lowline angus attle - springs cattle farm
TRANSCRIPT
Lowline Angus Cattle The Perfect Grass-Fed Cattle For Any Farmer!
Average final weight of
1200-1400lbs
Easier calving with lower birth weights
Less feed requirement
More cattle per acre
More ribeye area per hundred weight
Less carcass waste
Higher quality of meat
Moderate frames
Crossing a Lowline bull with a
traditional Angus will provide you
with a 50% Lowline
(Halfblood) that averages:
15% larger rib eye per 100lbs. of body
weight
25% less back fat
22 more retail pounds per acre
15% reduced cost and waste
National Lowline Angus Registry
www.usa-lowline.org/index.php
SPRINGS CATTLE FARM
721 Berry Rd
Boiling Springs, SC 29316
864-497-2407
Lowline Angus Advantages
Breed Avg # of
breeding
cows/100a
cres
Lbs of
avg.
carcass/
head
weight at
15 months
off grass
Lbs of
carcass
weight/
acre
Retail
carcass
yield %
saleable
weight
Lbs of
retail
product/
acre
Simmen-
tal 23 556 115.0 69% 79.4
Waygu 38 442 151.1 55% 83.1
Short-
horn 28 532 132.4 65% 86.1
Hereford 30 552 147.2 64% 94.2
Angus 33 543 161.7 68% 110.0
Lowlines 54 418 203.1 76% 154.3
Breed Comparison:
“We are a forage based business. The cost of doing business can triple
when cattle go into feedlots with the cost of grain. So, we really have to
look at the cows produced on grass.”
“We used Lowline bulls on conventional commercial cattle to produce F1,
first cross cattle and followed them through the feedlot. The F1 (half-
blood) offspring had a frame score of 4-5 and had finished weights from
1100-1300 lbs. If someone says “ they will never grow up” they are
wrong, don’t believe them. With final weights of 1100-1300 lbs they can
definitely fit in the industry. The cattle graded 69-100% choice so they
met the quality grade requirements of the industry very well in addition to
the market weight.”
“The easiest thing to do in cattle when trying to down size their frame is to
lose muscle. This is not the case when using lowline sires.” Using Low-
line Angus sires provided the best calving easy and a smaller frame with-
out the muscle loss.
“What about females? We bred the F1 (halfblood) females to calving ease
angus bulls and were quite pleased with the resulting calves. What really
impressed us was the average cow weight of the F1 relative to the weight
of the calf produced. The other thing that was impressive was the acres
per pair that were required to feed the half-bloods compared to the con-
ventional larger framed cow calf pairs.
“We have 80 head of half-blood lowline females. We know the lowline
influence will reduce cow size and reduce calving issues. We produce
more ribeye area/hundred weight.. We produce more gain per acre and the
lowline influence creates management options that we can implement. We
have an opportunity to breed Lowline bulls to conventional heifers. The
male offspring can be marketed through traditional channels. The half-
blood females become replacement females that are then able to be bred to
calving ease bulls. This beef cattle system results in reducing 300 lbs off
your cow size while maintain muscle and producing mainstream industry
carcasses.”
“How do you decrease cow size in anticipation of producing cattle for a
grass-based operation? The effort to decrease cow size had failed because
muscle mass was reduced. Once Lowline angus sires were used in the
experiment they had birthing weights that average 70lbs or less, a frame
score of 4.8, 83% graded choice or higher and had an average daily gain of
3.1 lbs/day. We therefore, had more cows per acre that produced more
beef per pound of grazing cow. Also, the rib eye per hundred weight of
live weight actually is greater on smaller framed heifers.”
How Can We Make The
Cattle Industry Better? Quotes & Data from Kris Ringwall
(Beef Specialist) North Dakota State
University, Dickinson Extension Research Center Conventional
size
herd
Half-blood
lowline
angus herd
Acres/
Pair
12.5 10.1
Gain/
Acre
23.6 32.4
% Cow
wt
weaned
46.2% 51.9%
C
ow
s less
tha
n 1
,300
lbs
1,3
01-1
,40
0
lbs
1,4
01-1
,50
0
lbs
1,5
01-1
,60
0
lbs
Co
ws
gre
ater
tha
n 1
,600
lbs
Mo
nth
ly
fora
ge d
ry-
ma
tter
inta
ke
93
3 lb
s
99
7 lb
s
1,0
51 lb
s
1,1
01 lb
s
1,1
88 lb
s
Req
uired
acr
es/cow
/
gra
zing
seaso
n
10
.75 ac
11
.49 ac
12
.11 ac
12
.68 ac
13
.68 ac
Pre
dicted
wea
nin
g
weig
ht
61
7 lb
s
61
1 lb
s
58
9 lb
s
59
8 lb
s
57
2 lb
s