macroeconomic imbalances gavin cameron university of oxford oubep topical economics 2006

33
Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

Upload: alberta-jackson

Post on 04-Jan-2016

236 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

Macroeconomic Imbalances

Gavin Cameron University of Oxford

OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

Page 2: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

2

Source: Carlin & Soskice, p12

macroeconomic policy

Page 3: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

3

what drives aggregate demand?• Aggregate expenditure comprises five components:

‐ consumption‐ investment‐ primary government spending (i.e. net of transfers)‐ net exports (i.e. exports minus imports)‐ inventories (i.e. changes in stocks held by businesses)

• The level of income (both current and expected) is a major determinant of consumption, government spending and net exports.

• The real exchange rate is a major influence on net exports.• Monetary and fiscal policy are major influences on consumption and

investment (with the latter being also dependent upon output expectations and ‘animal spirits’).

Page 4: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

4

the inflation-output tradeoff• In 1958, A.W. Phillips of the LSE found relation an empirical

relationship between unemployment and inflation in the UK – the Phillips curve.

• Original interpretation:‐ There is a permanent trade-off between inflation and

unemployment/output.• Problem:

‐ After sustained inflation, the empirical relationship broke down.

• New interpretation:‐ There is a trade-off between output and unexpected

inflation:output=equilibrium output+ b(unexpected inflation)

• Therefore output deviates from its equilibrium level by the extent to which inflation deviates from its expected level.

• But in the long-run, there is no such trade-off.

Page 5: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

5

shocks to the economy• Why might the economy get ‘shocked’ away from

equilibrium?• Aggregate Demand shocks

‐ an investment boom;‐ a pre-election government spending spree;‐ a sudden rise in the real exchange rate;‐ a consumer boom abroad;‐ a boom in the housing market;‐ an unexpected cut in interest rates;‐ a slump in share prices;‐ a sudden rise in commodity prices.

• Inflation and supply shocks‐ a sudden rise in oil prices;‐ the invention and diffusion of a new technology;‐ labour market changes.

Page 6: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

6

fiscal policy• ‘If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with bank notes, bury them

at suitable depths in disused coal mines which are then filled up with town rubbish, and leave them to private enterprise… to dig them up again, there need be no more unemployment. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like, but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing’ J.M. Keynes, 1936.

• Changes in the government’s fiscal stance (that is, the difference between government spending and taxation) will change the level of aggregate demand.

• If economy is at equilibrium output, increases in spending (or tax cuts) will lead to an inflationary boom, which eventually will lead only to higher prices.

• If economy is below equilibrium output, increases in spending (or tax cuts) will tend to raise output (as well as prices) and shift the economy back to equilibrium.

Page 7: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

7

the limits to fiscal policy• But there are problems with the use of fiscal policy:

‐ Measurement of output: where are we? where are we going? how fast? will we know when we get there?

‐ Lags in the fiscal policy process: implementation (recognition & administrative lags) and operational;

‐ What kind of fiscal policy? Spending (on what?) or tax cuts (for whom?);

‐ Will spending ‘crowd-out’ other spending, either directly or indirectly (through interest rates, inflation, the exchange rate, or Ricardian Equivalence)?

Page 8: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

8

fiscal rules• Even now that most monetary policy is conducted by independent

monetary authorities, there is still the problem that politicians may pursue fiscal policies that are incompatible with stable inflation.

• Consequently, some countries have adopted fiscal rules. The two most famous are:‐ The Stability and Growth Pact (revised!): countries should aim to

run no more than a 1% deficit over the business cycle; cannot borrow more than 3% of GDP (cf. France and Germany!) in any one year; government debt should be kept below 60% of GDP.

‐ Gordon Brown’s Golden Rule: over the business cycle borrowing should equal net government investment; government debt should be kept below 40% of GDP.

• A fiscal rule that states that debt must be kept below a level of X% of GDP implies that the average deficit over the cycle must be approximately equal to the average growth rate of GDP times the target level of X%. For Britain, with an average growth rate of 2% and a target of 40%, the average deficit must be kept around 0.8%.

Page 9: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

9

monetary policy• ‘Having regard to human nature and our institutions, it can only be

a foolish person who would prefer a flexible wage policy to a flexible money policy, unless he can point to advantages from the former that are not obtainable from the latter’ J.M.Keynes, 1936.

• Monetary policy can be implemented through either changes in the money supply or interest rate, or through direct controls on lending.

• Changes in the interest rate will affect the interest-sensitive components of aggregate demand. The exact size and timing of these effects will differ from country to country.

• If economy is at equilibrium output, interest rate cuts will lead to an inflationary boom, which eventually will lead only to higher prices.

• If economy is below equilibrium output, interest rate cuts will tend to raise output (as well as prices) and shift the economy back towards equilibrium.

• Typical lag effect on output one year, inflation two years.

Page 10: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

10

transmission mechanisms

Official rate

Lending rates

Asset prices

Expectations& confidence

Exchange rate

Domestic demand

Net external demand

Total demand

Domestic inflationary pressure

Import prices

Inflation

Page 11: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

11

Euro area responses to a 1% rise in ECB repo rate for two years

Source: ECB Monthly Bulletin, October 2002, p45

Real GDP Consumer prices

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

ECB -0.34 -0.71 -0.71 -0.15 -0.30 -0.38NCB -0.22 -0.38 -0.31 -0.09 -0.21 -0.31NIGEM -0.34 -0.47 -0.37 -0.06 -0.10 -0.19

Note: The table shows responses of real GDP and consumer prices to a two-year increase of 100 basis points in the policy-controlled interest rates of the euro area. Figures are expressed in per cent from baseline. Simulations are performed using the ECB’s area-wide model, the national central banks’ macroeconometric models and the multi-country model of the NIESR

Page 12: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

12

the limits to monetary policy• But there are also problems with the use of monetary

policy:‐ Measurement of output: where are we? where are we

going? how fast? will we know when we get there?‐ Lags in the monetary policy process: implementation

(recognition & administrative lags) and operational;‐ What kind of monetary policy? Interest rates, open-

market operations, quantitative controls, credit controls.‐ The liquidity trap & credit channel – will policy actually

affect the interest rates and lending policies faced by agents?

Page 13: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

13

-0.3

0.0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004

Per cent

Revisions to level of UK market sector output between May and June 2005

Source: Inflation Report, August 2005

a policy problem – data revisions!

Page 14: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

14

higher interest rates do not always tighten financial conditions

Source: Goldman Sachs FCI index of 3 month LIBOR, corporate bond index, and trade-weighted dollar.

AMFJDNOSAJJMAMFJDNOSAJ200620052004

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

100.6

100.4

100.2

100.0

99.8

99.6

99.4

99.2

Percent Index, 10/20/03=100

Fed Funds Rate (left)FCI (right)

Page 15: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

15

Taylor rules and inflation targeting• After the inflationary difficulties of the 1970s and 1980s, many

countries moved towards having independent central banks and the use of inflation targets.

• This form of ‘constrained discretion’ seems to work because it takes control of monetary policy out of the hands of politicians!

• In practice, most monetary authorities operate something called a ‘Taylor rule’. That is, they raise the real interest rate (the nominal rate minus expected inflation) whenever inflation is above target or when capacity constraints appear in the economy (since these may predict future inflation).

• We can think of a monetary policy reaction function, wherer = inflation target + equilibrium real r

+ a(output – equilibrium output) + b (inflation – inflation target)

• The coefficient a measures how averse the monetary authority is to output deviations and b measures how averse it is to inflation deviations.

Page 16: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

16

UK inflation performance

Source: Carlin and Soskice (2006)

Page 17: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

17

recent developments• Euroland growth has been slow since 2000;• US recovery from recession in 2000-1 has been good,

although employment has not recovered as much as output;• The UK has grown steadily;• Japan may be picking up; China and India continue to grow

rapidly.• World monetary policy has been extraordinarily relaxed

since 2000, with interest rates of around 0% in Japan, 1% in the USA and 2% in Euroland. Commodity prices have boomed.

• But short-term interest rates are now rising around the world:‐ ECB lending rate raised on 9 August to 3%, BoE rate raised on

3 August to 4.75%, Fed last raised on 29 June to 5.25%, BoJ raised its basic loan rate on 14 July to 0.4%!

Page 18: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

18

recent performance

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 19: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

19

recent loose monetary policy

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 20: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

20

…even on a real basis

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 21: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

21

breaking the rules?

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 22: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

22

rising debt

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 23: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

23

bond yields low despite rule-breaking!

Source: CESifo (2006).

Page 24: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

24

inflationary pressure

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

Page 25: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

25

contango!

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

Page 26: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

26

rising yield expectations

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

Page 27: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

27

excess liquidity?

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

Page 28: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

28

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

focus on the USA

Page 29: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

29

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

focus on Japan

Page 30: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

30

focus on Euro Area: Junker vs Trichet

Source: BIS Annual Report (2006)

Page 31: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

31

global imbalances

Source: CESifo (2006)

Page 32: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

32

global prospects• While the US continues to run such large ‘twin deficits’, there is the

possibility of a disorderly correction to global imbalances. Not clear how different Bernanke will be to Greenspan yet.

• In the absence of such a correction, continued broad growth with some inflationary pressure is likely.

• Corporate profits have been very strong in the USA and wage growth has been weak – not much more scope for profits to outperform revenues, and risks to housing market.

• In Europe, on the other hand, corporate profits may rise faster than revenues as the economy picks up – assuming no more oil price rises.

• Very hard to predict changes in China. Likely to be modest upward movement of renminbi and modest decline in share of investment in GDP (46% in 2005!). Current policy hugely distorts price mechanism: credit too cheap, exchange rate too low, labour market distortions.

• The need for reform of Chinese banking and credit allocation, and to deal with inflation and excess capital investment, must be balanced against risk of sudden adjustment.

Page 33: Macroeconomic Imbalances Gavin Cameron University of Oxford OUBEP Topical Economics 2006

OXFORD UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ECONOMICS PROGRAMME

33

prospects for the world macroeconomy