magnetic core materials in hf applications dr. jonas ......core materials overview of different core...
TRANSCRIPT
APEC 2014
Magnetic Core Materials in HF Applications
Dr. Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
IntroductionWhat We Expect from Higher Switching Frequencies
Two Main Issues
Selection of materialModeling of material
Switching Frequency
Component Size
APEC 2014
19.02.14 3
Core MaterialsOverview of Different Core Materials (1)
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
19.02.14 4
Core MaterialsOverview of Different Core Materials (2)
[1] M. S. Rylko, K. J. Hartnett, J. G. Hayes, M.G. Egan, “Magnetic Material Selection for High Power High Frequency Inductors in DC-DC Converters”, in Proc. of the APEC 2009.
[1]
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
Core MaterialsExample
SiFe vs. Ferrite2 kHz vs. 20 kHz
Modeling with GeckoMAGNETICS
www.gecko-simulations.com
APEC 2014
Core MaterialsGeckoMAGNETICS Example
Ferrite (N87)
SiFe (M165-35S)
2 kHz / Tmax = 65 °C / L = 2.5 mH / Solid Round Wires
Sat. Limit
APEC 2014
Core MaterialsGeckoMAGNETICS Example
Ferrite (N87)
SiFe (M165-35S)
20 kHz / Tmax = 65°C / L = 1 mH / Litz Wires
Therm. Limit
APEC 2014
B sat
Core Loss
Increasing f
19.02.14 8
Core MaterialsMaterial Selection Criteria (2)
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
IntroductionMaterial Selection Criteria (1)
Laminated Steel Cores Ferrites / Amorphous / Iron Powder
Ferrites / Nanocrystalline Materials
Sat. Flux Density LossesSelection Criteria
MaterialsFrequency
Often superposition of HF and LF components...
Saturation Flux Density
vs. Core Losses
Major Loop
Minor Loop
Sat. Limit Therm. Limit
Ferrites
< 2 Mhz (approx.)Manganese-zinc ferrite
> 2 Mhz (approx.)Nickel-zinc ferrite
Lower permeability, Lower Bsat
APEC 2014
B sat
Core Loss
Increasing f
19.02.14 10
Core MaterialsMaterial Selection Criteria (2)
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
Best for components with LF and HF components?
(e.g. boost inductor?)
20.03.14 11
Losses in gapped tape wound cores higher than expected!
www.vacuumschmelze.de
Core MaterialsEffect in Tape Wound Cores
Thin ribbons (approx. 20 µm)
Wound as toroid or as double C core.
Amorphous or nanocrystalline materials.
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
19.02.14 12
Figure from [10]
In [10] a core loss increase with increasing air gap length has been observed.
Core MaterialsEffect in Tape Wound Cores - Orthogonal Flux Lines
[10] H. Fukunaga, T. Eguchi, K. Koga, Y. Ohta, and H. Kakehashi, “High Performance Cut Cores Prepared From Crystallized Fe-Based Amorphous Ribbon”, in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 26, no. 5, 1990.
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
Fringing
flux
Main flux
Eddy current
Eddy current
APEC 2014
19.02.14 13
Horizontal Displacement Vertical Displacement
An experiment that illustrates well the loss increase due to an orthogonal flux is given here.
Core MaterialsEffect in Tape Wound Cores - Orthogonal Flux Lines
Core Loss Results
Displacements
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
B sat
Core Loss
Increasing f
19.02.14 14
Core MaterialsCore Material Pareto Front
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
Transformers /
CM Chokes
inductors
APEC 2014
19.02.14 15
Core MaterialsConclusion
It is crucial to understand the core materials in detail.
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
Orthogonal FluxRelaxation Effect
+ other effects, e.g. dimensional resonance
Effects that become more important at HF:
Often material selection is not trivial (HF + LF).
APEC 2014
19.02.14 16
Waveform
iGSE
Understanding Core Lossesi2GSE – Motivation
Results
Conclusion
Losses in the phase of constant flux!
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
( )v
0
1 dd
d
T
i
BP k B t
T t
αβ α−= ∆∫
α βv
ˆP k f B=
APEC 2014
19.02.14 17
Relaxation Losses
Rate-dependent BH Loop.
Reestablishment of a thermal equilibrium is governed by relaxation processes.
Restricted domain wall motion.
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – B-H-Loop
Current Waveform
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
19.02.14 18
Model Part 1
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – Model Part 1
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
( ) ∑∫=
− +∆=n
ll
T
i PtBt
Bk
TP
1r
0
v dd
d1 αβα
( )
−∆=
−τβ
α1
r
r
e1)(d
d1rr
t
l BtBt
kT
P
ΔE
APEC 2014
19.02.14 19
Explanation
1) For values of D close to 0 or close to 1 a loss underestimation is expected when calculating losses with iGSE (no relaxation losses included).
2) For values of D close to 0.5 the iGSE is expected to be accurate.3) Adding the relaxation term leads to the upper loss limit, while the iGSE represents the lower loss limit. 4) Losses are expected to be in between the two limits, as has been confirmed with measurements.
Waveform Power Loss
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – Model Part 2 (1)
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
19.02.14 20
Waveform Power Loss
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – Model Results
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
APEC 2014
19.02.14 21
The improved-improved Generalized Steinmetz Equation (i2GSE) [9]
with
and
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – Summary
[9] J. Mühlethaler, J. Biela, J.W. Kolar, and A. Ecklebe, “Improved Core Loss Calculation for Magnetic Components Employed in Power Electronic Systems”, in Proc. of the APEC, Ft. Worth, TX, USA, 2011.
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
( ) ∑∫=
− +∆=n
lll
T
i PQtBt
Bk
TP
1rr
0
v dd
d1 αβα
ttB
ttBq
lQd/)(d
d/)(d
r
r
e −+−
=
( )
−∆=
−τβ
α1
r
r
e1)(d
d1rr
t
l BtBt
kT
P
APEC 2014
19.02.14 22
i2GSE
Understanding Core LossesDerivation of the i2GSE – Example
Evaluated for each piecewise-linear flux segment
Evaluated for each voltage step, i.e. for each corner point in a piecewise-linear flux waveform.
Example
Qr1 = Qr2 = 0with
Gecko-Simulations AG Jonas Mühlethaler
for 0 and 22
0 for 2 and 2d
dfor 2 and
2
0 for and
Bt t T t
T t
t T t t TB
Btt T t T t
T t
t T t t T
γγ
γ
γγ
γ
∆ ≥ < − − ≥ − <= ∆− ≥ < − −
≥ − <
( ) ∑∫=
− +∆=n
lll
T
i PQtBt
Bk
TP
1rr
0
v dd
d1 αβα
( )2
v r r1
2
2i l ll
T t BP k B Q P
T T t
αβ αγ
γ
−
=
− ∆= ∆ +− ∑
( )r
r
r1 r2 r
11 e
2
tB
P P k BT T t
γα
β τ
γ
− ∆= = ∆ − ÷ ÷−
APEC 2014THANK YOU !!!GeckoMAGNETICS
Save Time
Fast and accurate design of magnetic components
Easy-to-use for non-expert
Increase Flexibility
Tool shows more than one realization possibility
In-house design of magnetics crucial for optimal designs.
Most Loss Effects are Considered
Skin- and proximity losses in litz, round and foil windings, air gap stray field losses, DC bias core losses, thermal model, ...
www.gecko-simulations.com