malcolm gladwellsttss.edu.hk/library/obj/topical_book7.pdfmalcolm gladwell has been a staff writer...
TRANSCRIPT
Malcolm Gladwell has been a staff writer at The
New Yorker since 1996. He is the author of The
Tipping Point, Blink, Outliers, and What the Dog
Saw. Prior to joining The New Yorker, he was a
reporter at the Washington Post. Gladwell was
born in England and grew up in rural Ontario. He
now lives in New York.
In 2001, Gladwell’s piece on Ron Popeil, “The
Pitchman,” was awarded the National Magazine
Award for Profiles. His 1996 article “The Tipping
Point” popularized the phrase and was expanded
into a book, “The Tipping Point: How Little Things
Can Make a Big Difference,” (2000). His second
book, “Blink,” was published in 2005, and his
third book, “Outliers,” was published in 2008. His
most recent book, “What the Dog Saw: And
Other
Malcolm Gladwell
Other Adventures,” is a collection of essays
from The New Yorker and is a New York Times
bestseller.
Gladwell came to The New Yorker from the
Washington Post, where he started as a staff
writer in 1987, first reporting for the business
section and then on the sciences. In 1993, he
became the newspaper’s New York City bureau
chief. He was a 1995 National Magazine Award
finalist for an article on mammography published
in The New Republic.
What the Dog Saw
What is the difference between choking and panicking? Why are there dozens of varieties of mustard-but only one variety of ketchup? What do football players teach us about how to hire teachers? What does hair dye tell us about the history of the 20th century?
Here is the bittersweet tale of the inventor of the birth control pill, and the dazzling inventions of the pasta sauce pioneer Howard Moscowitz. Gladwell sits with Ron Popeil, the king of the American kitchen, as he sells rotisserie ovens, and divines the secrets of Cesar Millan, the “dog whisperer” who can calm savage animals with the touch of his hand. He explores intelligence tests and ethnic profiling and “hindsight bias” and why it was that everyone in Silicon Valley once tripped over themselves to hire the same college graduate.
Outliers There is a story that is usually told about extremely successful people, a story that focuses on intelligence and ambition. Gladwell argues that the true story of success is very different, and that if we want to understand how some people thrive, we should spend more time looking around them-at such things as their family, their birthplace, or even their birth date. And in revealing that hidden logic, Gladwell presents a fascinating and provocative blueprint for making the most of human potential. In The Tipping Point Gladwell changed the way we understand the world. In Blink he changed the way we think about thinking. In OUTLIERS he transforms the way we understand success.
Blink
In his landmark bestseller The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell redefined how we understand the world around us. Now, in Blink, he revolutionizes the way we understand the world within. Blink is a book about how we think without thinking, about choices that seem to be made in an instant-in the blink of an eye-that actually aren’t as simple as they seem. Why are some people brilliant decision makers, while others are consistently inept? Why do some people follow their instincts and win, while others end up stumbling into error? How do our brains really work-in the office, in the classroom, in the kitchen, and in the bedroom? And why are the best decisions often those that are impossible to explain to others?
In Blink we meet the psychologist who has learned to predict whether a marriage will last, based on a few minutes of observing a couple; the tennis coach who knows when a player will double-fault before the racket even makes contact with the with the ball; the antiquities experts who recognize a fake at a glance. Here, too, are great failures of “blink”: the election of Warren Harding; “New Coke”; and the shooting of Amadou Diallo by police. Blink reveals that great decision makers aren’t those who process the most.
The Tipping Point The tipping point is that magic moment when an idea, trend, or social behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire. Just as a single sick person can start an epidemic of the flu, so too can a small but precisely targeted push cause a fashion trend, the popularity of a new product, or a drop in the crime rate. This widely acclaimed bestseller, in which Malcolm Gladwell explores and brilliantly illuminates the tipping point phenomenon, is already changing the way people throughout the world think about selling products and disseminating ideas.
David and Goliath We all know that underdogs can win–that’s what the David versus Goliath legend tells us, and we’ve seen it with our own eyes. Or have we? In David and Goliath, Malcolm Gladwell, with his unparalleled ability to grasp connections others miss, uncovers the hidden rules that shape the balance between the weak and the mighty, the powerful and the dispossessed. Gladwell examines the battlefields of Northern Ireland and Vietnam, takes us into the minds of cancer researchers and civil rights leaders, and digs into the dynamics of successful and unsuccessful classrooms–all in an attempt to demonstrate how fundamentally we misunderstand the true meaning of advantages and disadvantages. When is a traumatic childhood a good thing? When does a disability leave someone better off?
Do you really want your child to go to the best school he or she can get into? Why are the childhoods of people at the top of one profession after another marked by deprivation and struggle? Drawing upon psychology, history, science, business, and politics, David and Goliath is a beautifully written book about the mighty leverage of the unconventional. Millions of readers have been waiting for the next Malcolm Gladwell book. That wait is over.
According to Wikileaks he won the 1500
meter title at the 1978 Ontario High School
championships in Kingston, Ontario, in a duel
with eventual Canadian Open record holder
David Reid (the one on the left).
Malcolm Gladwell thinks a lot about running.
He has written about the topic for The New
Yorker, most recently analyzing the will that
drove marathon champion Alberto Salazar to
great heights. He attends marquee running
events to study the finest practitioners.
The effort it takes to run great distances
has always fascinated him.
Q. Why did he start running?
Malcolm Gladwell: My dad was a runner in
high school. Not a serious one, but a good
one. I started running for fun and did very
well in middle school—at a tiny school with
200 kids. It was basically the only sport I
could do. I grew up in rural Ontario, in this
little town outside of Waterloo—and
everyone else played hockey. I was born in
England, and we moved to Canada when I was
6, and believe it or not, when you’re 6 it’s
already too late to start playing hockey. So
I had to do something else.
The author got a vision of writing Outliners…
Malcolm Gladwell: The weird thing in running is how
people keep running faster and faster. Take the
great example of the four-minute mile. One guy
breaks it, then all of a sudden everyone breaks it.
And they break it in such a short period of time that
it can’t be because they were training harder. It’s
purely that it was a psychological barrier and
someone had to show them that they could do it. It’s
the same thing if you’re a runner and you’re around
older runners, you just get the sense of what’s
possible. You have no clue, if you’re by yourself, how
fast you can run. You have no sense of what your
limits are.
Q: How did the author get a vision of writing
Outliners?
MG: The weird thing in running is how people
keep running faster and faster. Take the
great example of the four-minute mile. One
guy breaks it, then all of a sudden everyone
breaks it. And they break it in such a short
period of time that it can’t be because they
were training harder. It’s purely that it was
a psychological barrier and someone had to
show them that they could do it. It’s the
same thing if you’re a runner and you’re
around older runners, you just get the sense
of what’s possible. You have no clue, if
you’re by yourself, how fast you can run.
You have no sense of what your limits are.
Q: In Outliers he talks about the “10,000-Hour
Rule”—that in order to excel in a given
discipline, you needed to practice it for at least
that long. Had he done that as a runner, where
would he be now?
MG: In high school I was a Canadian
champion, but I don’t think that was
sustainable. That was clear to me even then,
when I used to run against Dave Reid, who
was ultimately a 3:37 1500-meter runner,
13:36 5-K guy. I could’ve been a decent club
runner. If I’d killed myself, I could’ve
gotten to 3:50. And maybe run a 1:52 800.
Q:One concept he has written about is “slack”:
the gap between what is possible under
conditions of absolute effort and actual
performance. When we consider the possibility
of a two-hour marathon, is there still slack that
can be made up even at running’s extremes?
MG: In every activity there is a right side to
the curve, where you could’ve done better
but you didn’t know that you could’ve done
better. You thought you were at your limit
but you weren’t. So what we’re constantly
doing is narrowing the distance of what we
think we’re capable of and what we’re
actually capable of. You can’t do that
forever. There is a point where you can’t go
any faster. Over time the returns start to
get smaller and smaller. But I don’t know if
that’s true with world records—Usain Bolt
may be an exception when it comes to the
sprints.
With the two-hour marathon, I don’t know
what that last four-minute increment
represents. If you run a two-hour marathon,
that’s a 28-minute 10-K pace. I mean, it’s
just mind-boggling to think that any human
being could do that. I can’t even fathom what
that means. I wouldn’t be surprised if
someone did it one day. I wouldn’t be
surprised if someone didn’t.
“If my books appear oversimplified, then you shouldn’t
read them.” Malcolm Gladwell’s invitation to avoid reading his
books, made recently in an interview in The Guardian, has a
certain charm. He conveys the impression of a writer who,
aware of critics who accuse him of cherry-picking the results of
complex academic research to support simple-minded stories,
defiantly insists on his right to do something different—to write
in what he has described, in a riposte to one of his critics, as
“the genre of what might be called ‘intellectual adventure
stories.’ ” If his books do not display the intellectual rigor that is
supposed to attach to academic writings, Gladwell seems to be
suggesting, it is because they serve a different purpose.
Interweaving academic research with real-life stories, Gladwell
aims—as he puts in—“to get people to look at the world a little
differently.” Using the power of a storyteller, he is bringing “the
amazing worlds of psychology and sociology to a broader
audience,” an exercise that is capable of producing nothing less
than a shift in the worldview of his readers.
No one can doubt Gladwell’s ability to reach large
audiences. The Tipping Point, Blink, and Outliers were all
tremendous best-sellers, leading some to conclude that Gladwell
has invented a new genre of popular writing. In David and
Goliath, Gladwell again applies the formula that has been so
successful in the past. Deploying a mixture of affecting
narratives of struggle against the odds with carefully chosen
academic papers, he contends that the powerless are more
powerful than those who appear to wield much of the power in
the world. To many, this may appear counterintuitive, he
suggests; but by marshaling a variety of historical examples
ranging from the American struggle for civil rights to the
Troubles in Northern Ireland, leavened with homely tales of the
trials and triumphs of basketball teams and fortified with forays
into sociology and psychology, Gladwell thinks that he can
persuade the reader to accept the difficult truth that the weak are
not as weak as the reader imagines. If they play their cards right,
they can prevail against the strong. ……Read more
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115467/malcolm-gladwells-david-and-goliath-fairy-tales