malthus revisited? science and resource limitsec.europa.eu/environment/archives/ecoinnovation... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Andrew Bloodworth Head of Science for Minerals and Waste,
British Geological Survey
Malthus revisited? Science and resource limits
Navachab mine, Namibia
Rev Thomas Malthus 1766-1834
‘The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race.’
Global population, 1950-2050, according to different projection variants
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
Billio
n
High fertility
Medium
fertility
Low fertility
Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2009): World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. New York
• Food – fertilisers, drinking water, food preparation and packaging
• Energy – vital for all industries, transport, power generation, heating
• Construction – houses, schools, hospitals, shops, offices
• Transportation – roads, railways, airports, cars, buses, trains, ships and aircraft
• Technology and communications – computers, telecommunications, electronic applications
• Globally we produce annually approximately:
– 16 million tonnes copper
– 1.6 billion tonnes iron ore
– 6 billion tonnes coal
Minerals are all around us
“Limits to growth”
•The Coal Question … and the Probable Exhaustion of our Coal Mines (Jevons, 1865)
• Presidents Material Policy Commission (1950-1952)
•The Limits to Growth (The Club of Rome, Meadows et al. 1972) “only 550 billion barrels of oil remained and that they would run out by 1990”
“On borrowed time?” Neo-Malthusian thinking
Perspectives on the ‘Environmental
Limits’ concept (Turner et al. 2007)
Metal stocks and sustainability
(Gordon et al. 2006)
Assessing the long-run availability of
copper (Tilton and Lagos, 2007)
Earth’s natural wealth: an audit
(Cohen, 2007)
Countdown – are the Earth’s mineral
resources running out? Mining Journal (2008)
Peak Minerals
(Bardi and Pagani, 2007)
Peak Minerals in Australia
Giurco et al. 2010
Rare metals getting rarer
(Ragnarsdottir, 2008) Nature
The disappearing nutrient
(Gilbert, 2009) Nature
Reserves
Number Years left =
Annual global consumption
Earth’s natural wealth: an audit (New Scientist)
• Conclusion - antimony “will run out in 15 years, silver
in 10 and indium in under five”
Dynamic reserves
• As the earth is finite, intuitively appealing to consider mineral resources as static
• However, fixed stock approach (years remaining = reserves/consumption) is flawed
• Reserves represent a very small
proportion of crustal resources
• Reserves are dynamic and depend on scientific knowledge and price of target mineral.
• Reserves poor indicator of long-term availability as definition depends on current science, technology and economics
Resources (discovered and undiscovered)
Resources
Undiscovered resources
Reserves
RESERVES - the quantity of a mineral
commodity found in subsurface resources,
which are both known and profitable to
exploit with existing technology, prices
and other conditions
18
20
4
8
12
16
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
20
40
60
80
1987: 39 years 2008: 36 years
2008: 14.4 Mio. t
1960: 4.2 Mio. t
Copper
Mio
. t
year
s
0,4
0,8
1,2
1,6
20
60
100
140
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Mio
. t
year
s
Nickel
1960: 0.34 Mio. t
2008: 1.5 Mio. t
1987: 63 years 2008: 46 years
0
10
20
30
0
200
400
600
t
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
year
s
Indium
1972: 66.4 t
2007: 563 t
1989: 15 years
2007: 19 years
10
30
50
70
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
100
300
500 ye
ars
1.0
00
t Cobalt
1960: 14.734 t
2008: 63,783 t
1988: 125 years 2008: 111 years
Mine production (for indium, refinery production) Data sources: USGS, BGR database, 2009 *Before 1988, the USGS only classified reserves
Static life time of reserve base*
Static life time of reserves
Reserves and long-term availability– the reality
Impact of science on primary resources: New models, new mines
Porphyry revolution: • Lowell, J D & Guilbert, J M (1970) Lateral and
vertical alteration-mineralization zoning in porphyry ore deposits. Economic Geology 65, pp 373-408
Epithermal precious and base metals
• Hedenquist, J W & Henley, RW (1985) Hydrothermal eruptions in the Waiotapu geothermal system, New Zealand - their origin, associated breccias, and relation to precious metal mineralization Economic Geology 80, pp1640-1668
• Hedenquist, JW & Lowenstern, JB (1994) The role of magmas in the formation of hydrothermal ore-deposits Nature 370
(6490):519-527 1994
• Mineral deposit models allow prediction of the location of new targets and are the foundation for exploration and development
Escondida, Chile: 60 % of global copper production now comes from porphyry style deposits
‘Bonanza’ Au, Round Mountain
Mine, Nevada
New frontiers: Where will primary resources come from in the future?
• ‘New’ terranes – Cu in Pakistan and Afghanistan
• Old targets in ‘old’ terranes – Reappraisal of Cu-Co in Zambia/ DRC, Hemerdon tungsten deposit, Devon
• Arctic – Fe ore, base metals, Au and coal
• Seabed - Cu-Zn-Au-Ag in massive sulphide deposits in SW Pacific
Hemerdon,
Devon
Can we keep pace with demand?
• GDP of the 'E7' (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Indonesia, Mexico, Turkey) will be 25% greater than the G7 by 2050 (PWC forecast).
As well as utilising primary resources we must also:
• Fully utilise resources in anthropogenic environment (recycle and re-use)
• Improve resource efficiency (do more with less)
Global Production of Iron Ore
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Years
Millio
n T
on
nes
Source: BGS Mineral Statistics database
Global Production of Platinum Group Metals
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
Year
Kilo
gra
ms
Source: BGS Mineral Statistics database
It’s not easy being green
• Information on metal stocks in society very sparse
• Long residence times restrict availability of ‘resource’
• Recycling rates for many metals (including those needed for environmental technologies) are extremely low
Recycled, 570t,
14%
Lost, 800t, 20%
Still on the road,
2700t, 66%
Fate of total stock of auto catalyst platinum
(Source: Umicore)
2008 Global mined output = 452t (Source: BGS)
End of life global recycling rates for 62
metals (Source: UNEP)
Environmental limits
• How much will our growing usage of earth resources accelerate climate change?
• Can we afford the carbon cost of recovering low grades from primary and secondary materials?
• Decarbonisation of resource use presents a major scientific, technical and economic challenge
South Crofty tin mine,
Cornwall 1904
Environmental change and limits to growth: Climate impact of resource use
• Global cement industry produces 5% of all anthropogenic CO2
• Solvent extraction refinery at Skorpion zinc mine uses 20% of Namibia’s electricity
Electrolitic zinc recovery, Skorpion
Energy efficiency
• Breaking rocks is hard work − significant energy is wasted (heat & noise) in grinding
− breaking rock in tension, microwave-assisted grinding
Sources: EIA 2001, 1998
Manufacturing Energy
Consumption Survey; U.S.
DOE 2002, Energy and
Environmental Profile of the
U.S. Mining Industry
Industrial energy intensity
vs. energy consumption
1000
En
erg
y In
ten
sity (
Th
ou
sa
nd
Btu
/$ G
DP
)
Energy Consumption (Trillion Btu)
Petroleum
Chemicals
Paper
Food processing Tobacco/beverages
Furniture
Leather Machinery and Computers
Wood
Transportation
Fabricated Metals
Textiles/apparel
Plastics
Rubber
Electrical Printing
1
10
100
10 100 1000 10000
Energy-
Intensive
Industries
Mining
Low Energy Extractive Metallurgy
2km2 bio-heap leach pads at
Talvivraara nickel mine, Finland – low
grade ore spends 5 years on the pads
to recover 90% of Ni
Economics drives science
• ‘When demand exceeds supply, the price goes up. When the supply exceeds demand, the price goes down’ The Wealth of Nations, published in 1776
• Burgeoning demand will increase commodity prices • High prices are a powerful driver for scientific
innovation and attitudinal change (new primary resources/ higher recycling rates/ substitution/ increased resource efficiency)
• Does the current price of raw materials reflect their environmental cost?
Adam Smith
1734-1790
Zinc price trend
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Jan-2
005
Jul-2005
Jan-2
006
Jul-2006
Jan-2
007
Jul-2007
Jan-2
008
Jul-2008
Jan-2
009
Jul-2009
Jan-2
010
Zinc cash LME daily off icial price
Source: Metal Bulletin, 2009a.
US
$ p
er
ton
ne
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Recycled aggregates as % total production
(Source: Mineral Products Association)
EU average
France
Germany
Ireland
Italy
Spain
Sweden
Great Britain
Impact of
environmental
taxation?
Malthus revisited • Malthus’ understanding of ‘production of
the earth’ did not take future science, innovation and their economic drivers into account – ‘babies are born with brains as well as mouths’
• Growth trajectory of human population and living standards mean that science is vital in extending resources (primary, secondary) and doing more with less
• Limits to growth exist, but not physical exhaustion Malthus envisaged, rather that the carrying capacity of our environment will restrict our ability to utilise resources
• Scientific endeavour also needed to break link between resource use and human-induced environmental change