manual on safety aspects of the design and equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/superseded safety...

116
( M } SAFETY \'W j SERIES No.30 Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of Hot Laboratories INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 1969 This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Upload: haquynh

Post on 21-May-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

( M }SAFETY \ 'W j SERIES

No.30

Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment

of Hot Laboratories

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

VIENNA, 1969

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 2: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 3: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

MANUAL ON SAFETY ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT

OF HOT LABORATORIES

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 4: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

T h e fo l lo w in g S tates are M em b ers o f the In tern a tion a l A t o m ic Energy A g e n c y :

AFGHANISTAN 'ALBANIAALGERIAARGENTINAAUSTRALIAAUSTRIABELGIUMBOLIVIABRAZILBULGARIABURMA .BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET

SOCIALIST REPUBLIC CAMBODIA CAMEROON CANADA CEYLON CHILE CHINA COLOMBIACONGO, DEMOCRATIC

REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA CUBA CYPRUSCZECHOSLOVAK SOCIALIST

REPUBLIC DENMARKDOMINICAN REPUBLICECUADOREL SALVADORETHIOPIAFINLANDFRANCEGABON

GERMANY. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF

GHANA GREECE GUATEMALA HAITI HOLY SEE HUNGARY ICELAND INDIA INDONESIA IRAN IRAQ ISRAEL ITALYIVORY COASTIAMAICAJAPANJORDANKENYAKOREA, REPUBLIC OFKUWAITLEBANONLIBERIALIBYALUXEMBOURGMADAGASCARMALIMEXICOMONACOMOROCCONETHERLANDSNEW ZEALANDNICARAGUANIGERIA

NORWAYPAKISTANPANAMAPARAGUAYPERUPHILIPPINESPOLANDPORTUGALROMANIASAUDI ARABIASENEGALSIERRA LEONESINGAPORESOUTH AFRICASPAINSUDANSWEDENSWITZERLANDSYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC-T H A ILA N D

TUNISIATURKEYUGANDAUKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST

REPUBLIC UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST

REPUBLICS UNITED ARAB REPUBLIC UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT

BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA URUGUAY VENEZUELA VIET-NAM YUGOSLAVIA

The A gen cy ’ s Statute was approved on 23 O ctober 1956 by the C onference on the Statute o f the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters. New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters o f the A gency are situated in V ienna. Its principal o b jec tiv e is " to acce lera te and enlarge the contribution o f atom ic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the w o rld " .

© IAEA, 1969

Permission to reproduce or translate the inform ation contained in this publication m ay be obtained by writing to the International A tom ic Energy Agency, KSrntner Ring 11, A -1010 Vienna I, Austria.

Printed by the IAEA in Austria March 1969

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 5: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

SAFETY SERIES No. 30

MANUAL ON SAFETY ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT

OF HOT LABORATORIES

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 1969

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 6: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

MANUAL ON SAFETY ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT OF HOT LABORATORIES (Safety Series, No. 30)

ABSTRACT. A manual prepared by the IAEA with the help of three consultants from three countries. The purpose o f this manual is to help those persons, particularly in the developing countries, who plan to design and construct a new hot laboratory or m odify an existing one.

Contents: Introduction; Purpose; Scope; 1. Arrangement of working areas inside the building;2. Enclosures; 3. Handling and viewing systems; 4. Transfer and transport systems; 5. Ventilation system; 6. Radioactive waste disposal systems; 7. Personnel protection; References.

Separately available in English and French.

(102 pp ., 1 4 .8 X 2 1 cm , paper-bound, 70 figures; 1969) Price; US $3.00; £1 .5 .0

THIS REPORT IS ALSO PUBLISHED IN FRENCH

MANUAL ON SAFETY ASPECTS OF THE DESIGN AND EQUIPMENT OF HOT LABORATORIES

IAEA, VIENNA, 1969 STI/PU B /l 69

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 7: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FOREWORD

With the development of atomic energy application and research, hot laboratories are now being constructed in a number of countries. The present publication describes and discusses experience in several countries in designing equipment for these laboratories.

The safe handling of highly radioactive substances is the main purpose of hot laboratory design and equipment. The manual aims at helping those persons, particularly in the developing countries, who plan to design and construct a new hot laboratory or modify an existing one. It does not deal in great detail with the engineering design of protective and handling equipment; these matters can be found in the comprehensive list of references. The manual itself covers only basic ideas and different approaches in the design of laboratory building, hot cells, shielded and glove boxes, fume cupboards, and handling and viewing equipment. Systems for trans­ferring materials and main services are also discussed.

The material has been prepared by three consultants appointed by the IAEA:

J.C. Campbell United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Risley, Warrington, Lancs,United Kingdom

V. N. Kosyakov Kurchatov Atomic Energy Institute,Moscow, USSR

J. Vertut Commissariat ~h. l'energie atomique,Centre d'etudes nucleaires de Saclay,France.

In the first stage of the compilation Mr. Kosyakov, then an IAEA staff member, co-ordinated the work. The task was com­pleted under Mr. G. A. Dorofeev, who succeeded him as Project Officer.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 8: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 9: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CONTENTS

PU R PO SE ............................................................................................. 2

SC O PE ........................................................................... ................. 2

1. Arrangement of working areas inside the building . . . . 31.1. Principles of classification of areas according

to varying radiation and contamination hazards . . 31.2. Architectural disposition of zones ......................... 5

2. Enclosures ................................................. ................................... 72 .1 . Fume cupboards ............................................................ 82 .2 . Glove boxes ................................................................... . 92 .3 . Shielded b o x e s ................................................................ 122 .4. Hot c e l l s ........ ................................................. ................. 13

3. Handling and viewing system s......................... ............ . . . . 183. 1. Viewing s y s te m s ............................................................ 183.2 . Lighting systems .......................................................... 213 .3 . Remote manipulation and handling equipment . . . . 223.4 . Relative dimensions of cells, manipulators

and windows ' .................................................................. 26

4. Transfer and transport system s............................................... 264 .1 . Shielded transfer system s.......................................... 274. 2. Contained transfer s y s te m s .................................... . 294. 3. Contained shielded transfer systems ..................... 304. 4. Transfer and transport of radioactive liquids . . . . 32

5. Ventilation system ........................................................................ 335. 1. Fume cupboards................... .......................................... 335.2 . Glove boxes ..................................................................... 345.3. Shielded b o x e s ................................................................ 345.4. Hot c e l l s ........................................................................... 34

INTRODUCTION ................ .................................................................... 1

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 10: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

6. Radioactive waste disposal systems ........................... .......... 356 .1 . Liquid radioactive wastes ............................................ 356 .2 . Solid w a ste s ..................................................................... 38

7. Personnel protection .................................................................. 397. 1. Changing ro o m s ...................... ............................ .......... 397.2 . M on itorin g ....................................................................... 407.3 . Protective c loth ing ........................................................ 43

References ....................................... ............................................. 44Figures ................................................................................................. 53

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 11: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

INTRODUCTION

With the advent of the atomic energy industry laboratories were called upon to handle ever increasing amounts of radioactive materials, so that it becam e a m atter o f prim e im portance that methods for the safe handling of these m aterials be devised [1 -28 ].

The main object of these methods is the safety of the operators, the provision of conditions under which work is carried out on radio­active materials to enable reproduceable and reliable results to be obtained, the maximum operating efficiency of the laboratories and the safe discharge of effluents and wastes from the labora tories.

Apart from the normal hazards in laboratories, e. g. chemical, equipment, fire, etc., radioactive laboratories have to be designed to safeguard the operators against external and internal radiation, and exposure to uncontrolled nuclear fiss ion that can occu r when fissile materials are brought together in excess of a particular c r i ­tical quantity.

Protection against external radiation is given by installing the appropriate b iological shield between the radiation source and the operator. The amount of shielding required for the operator's safe­ty depends on the type, quantity and energy of the radiation. In dealing with alpha- and beta-emitters relatively thin biological shield­ing is required whereas specia l b iological shielding is essential when protecting against gamma- and neutron-radiation. The p ro ­vision of these specia l shields for the op era tor 's protection must of necessity involve the usie of rem otely operated equipment for operations to be carried out behind these shields, so that elaborate viewing equipment and intricate manipulators have been evolved.

The internal radiation hazard is produced by radioactive material being taken into the human body; protection against this hazard can best be effected by isolating the material from the operator's envi­ronment. This isolation is achieved by containing the radioactive m aterials in an enclosure which can take the form of a fume cup­board, glove box, shielded box or hot cell. The integrity of the en­closure and standard of the ventilation required for the safety of the operator mainly depend on the following factors: toxicity of thematerial, quantity, specific activity, physical and chem ical form , type of operation.

The radioactive materials, however, must be passed into and out of the enclosure, therefore safe methods for the storage and trans­port of the radioactive materials must be investigated, and the opera­

1

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 12: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

ting environment must be m onitored to detect the presence of any contamination.

The hazard from uncontrolled nuclear fission can best be avoid­ed by exercising strict control over the storage, m ovem ent and quantity of fiss ile m aterials in the laboratories.

The provision of an isolating enclosure or containment enables processes to be carried out under the best possible controlled con­ditions to suit the individual p ro ce ss and rad ioactive m a teria l.

Because of the various degrees of radioactive hazard in the laboratories it has been found beneficial for the operating efficiency of the laboratory to gather together in distinct and separate areas those sections or operations that give rise to the same or sim ilar degree of radioactive hazard. Operators can move between these separate areas by passing through changing room s where a change of clothes or protective clothing is provided for the operator's safe­ty and to prevent the spread of contamination between areas. An integrated ventilation system for these areas must be carefully en­gineered to prevent the spread of airborne contamination between the areas.

PURPOSE

The prim ary purpose of this document is to serve as a guide for those persons or authorities (particularly in developing countries) who are responsible for the design and construction of new hot labo­ratories. It is intended to generalize concerning existing experien­ce in different countries in the design and operation of hot laborato­ries, pointing out basic ideas and different approaches in the design of laboratory buildings, equipment and main serv ices . P ractica l examples of the applications of these approaches have been discussed,, and this discussion could prove helpful in the training of the operators for hot laboratories.

SCOPE

Section I describes the general principles of the arrangement and architectural disposition of areas inside laboratories according to the varying potential radiation and contamination hazards. Section 2 d iscusses enclosures fo r radioactive m aterial containment. In

2

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 13: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Section 3 viewing and lighting system s and various types, of m ani­pulators are presented. Transfer and transport of radioactive m a­terials within the laboratories are discussed in Section 4. Ventila­tion of laboratories is discussed in Section 5, with particular referen­ce to IAEA Safety Series No. 17, Techniques for Controlling A ir Pollution from the Operation of Nuclear Facilities. Section 6 deals with various radioactive waste d isposal system s. Personnel m o­nitoring including changing room monitoring and protective clothing is described in Section 7.

1. ARRANGEMENT OF WORKING AREAS INSIDE THE BUILDING

1 .1 . P rin cip les o f classification o f a rea s according to va ryin g radiation and contamination hazards

A successfu lly designed laboratory must provide the facilities for the perform ance of the functions for which it was constructed, and must always be readily available for the perform ance of these functions whenever they arise [29-53].

In the case of radioactive laboratories the functions they are generally expected to undertake are the acceptance of radioactive material, the exposing and processing of this material, the dispatch of the product, and the safe d ischarge of any gaseous, liquid and solid wastes from this processing. Of these functions, those which give rise to the greatest hazard are the exposing and p rocess in g of the radioactive m aterial. In the early days the separation of the operator and the hazard was attempted by enclosing the operator in protective clothing; this procedure had many obvious disadvantages and was soon superseded by placing the radioactive m aterial in an enclosure.

To ca rry out the functions necessitates the breaching of the enclosure. The radioactive m aterial has to be passed into the enclosure, and the operation of exposing and processing the material can be accomplished either by direct or remote manipulation through the enclosure. The product, solid and liquid wastes have to be pas­sed out of the enclosure, and the gaseous effluent should not be a l­lowed to leak into the operator's environment.

It is therefore evident that the perform ance of these functions can be associated with varying degrees of hazard, and it is possible to divide the laboratory into areas in which functions with the same

3

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 14: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

degree of hazard are carried out. It is generally accepted that these areas fall into four ca tegories . Each category is given different names in different countries in accordance with local practice. It is intended in this manual to designate these-categories Zones I, II, III and IV .

Zone I. In this area no radiation or contamination hazard exists.Entry to this area is unrestricted.

Zone II. In this area no radiation and contamination hazard would norm ally be expected in excess of the loca l safety regu­lations for the operational staff. Entry to this area would require a minimum change of clothing. Minor surveys for the presence of radioactive materials are recommend­ed for this area.

Zone III. In this area the probability of contamination-and radiation hazard is greater than in Zone II because of the physical disposition of radioactive m aterials and the operations undertaken here. Radiation and contamination monitoring is required fo r this zone. Particu lar attention should be paid to air monitoring. Personnel movement between Zone III and Zone II usually requires a change of clothing and monitoring.

Zone IV. This area is designed as an enclosure, and in it radioactive materials are held, exposed and processed, and the p ro ­bability o f hazard from radiation and contamination is greatest. A ccess to this area is controlled, and is usually allowed only after the removal of radiation sources and any necessary decontamination. Special protective clothing and breathing equipment is worn, as specified by the health physicist in control.

Zone II is a general operating area in the laboratory. Zone III is usually an area where maintenance, decontamination, radioactive m aterial transfers and other operations which may lead to some radioactive contamination are carried out. In hot laboratories, Zone III and Zone IV are clearly defined areas. However, in some laboratories because of the quantity and nature of the radioactive materials and with some special precautions being undertaken Zone III can be merged with Zone II for normal operation. In the event of expected or actual release of activity a part of Zone II can tem po­rarily becom e Zone III.

4

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 15: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The chance of contamination of Zone II from Zone III and Zone III from Zone IV by transfer of particulate matter is m inim ized by clothing and footwear changes, and the possibility of airborne con­tamination is lessened by ensuring that air always flows from Zone II to Zone HI to Zone IV.

1 .2 . Architectural disposition of zones

Depending on the amount and type of radioactive m aterial to be handled in the laboratory, Zone IV may be one of the following types of containment: fume cupboard, glove box, shielded box and hot cell. It is convenient to examine the disposition of zones in relation to the type of containment required in the laboratory.

1 .2 .1 . Fume cupboards

Fume cupboards are chosen to provide containment in active laboratories whenever the probability and level of hazard from their use is low; as a consequence they are norm ally located within a Zone II area.

1 .2 .2 . Glove boxes

Numerous arrangements of the zones are available when glove boxes are used as the enclosure. Two layouts com m only used in active laboratories are the "in -lin e" (between zones) arrangement and the "free-standing" arrangement. The "in-line" arrangement as illustrated in Fig. la1shows the glove boxes positioned between Zones II and III. Operation of the boxes is carried out in Zone II, while maintenance and decontamination of the individual boxes can be carried out in Zone III. A ccess between Zones II and III is via a changing room .

Where large num bers of boxes are required in a laboratory it is usual in the interests of economy to provide a common Zone III for lines of glove boxes as shown in Fig. la .

The main advantages of the "in -lin e" arrangement are the r e ­latively easy and quick a ccess to a glove box to ca rry out m ain ­tenance or minor modification without disrupting operations at adja­cent boxes, and the straightforward arrangement of se rv ices and communication between boxes.

1 A l l the figures are at th e end o f th e M anual.

5

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 16: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The disadvantages of this system are its inflexibility with regard to m ajor m odifications concerning the boxes them selves, and the somewhat uneconom ic use of expensive building space.

In the "free-standing" arrangement glove boxes are positioned as required in a Zone II area where norm al operation is ca rr ied out together with a lim ited amount of maintenance and m inor m o­difications. Major maintenance and m odifications are carried out in a special area to which the glove box can be moved. This layout is shown in Fig. lb.

The advantages of this arrangement are its flexibility in the ease of replacing glove boxes, its economy of space and operational access to the four sides of the box. The main disadvantage is the greater down time needed for m ajor maintenance on a box. This disadvantage can be m inim ized by providing a tem porary Zone III at the box.

1 .2 .3 . Shielded boxes

The disposition of zones for shielded boxes are sim ilar to those described in Section 1 .2 .2 . It should be noted that with "free-standing" shielded boxes, it is usual for provision to be made to rem ove only the containment box to the decontamination and maintenance area, after making the radiation sources safe.

1 .2 .4 . Hot cells

Generally with very few exceptions hot cell laboratories conform to the in-line arrangement as described in Section 1 .2 .2 . The geo­graphical position of the maintenance area varies considerably, typi­cal arrangements being shown in F igs 2-4. Figures 2 and 3 show arrangements of single and double lines of hot cells with the main­tenance area (Zone III), the cells (Zone IV) and the operation area (Zone II) on the same level. The advantages of this type of arrange­ment are the containment of contamination by the rigid enforcement of controls between Zones II, III and IV, and the econom ic layout because of the arrangement of the building on one floor .

Figure 4 illustrates a single line of hot cells with separate maintenance areas on the roof and at the rear of the ce ll. The ad­vantage of this layout is that associated with vertical access to the hot cell, but this advantage is only gained by the additional building cost caused by the increase in building height.

Many versions of the in-line arrangement are described in the literature of hot cells, the variations being caused by a combination

6

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 17: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

of many factors, e .g . available space, existing facilities, andtrans- port problems.

1 .2 .5 . Special areas ^

Any laboratory consists of a com plex variety of the contain­ments mentioned above, and their arrangement either as units or as combined groups are mainly dictated by the nature of radioactive material being handled and the type of work being carried out in the laboratory.

Because Zones II, III and IV are controlled zones it is essential that special areas are established at the entrances to the zones. Here personnel can be given the appropriate change of clothing and be monitored as they pass from zone to zone.

2. ENCLOSURES

The principal purposes of enclosures are preventing the spread of radioactive contamination, protecting the operators from exter­nal radiation exposure and, if required, providing a controlled at­mosphere for processing and/or safety reasons.

Enclosures are therefore designed to meet the varying com bi­nation of these hazards. Fume cupboards are used when the conta­mination and external exposure hazard is low; when the external exposure hazard increases the fume cupboard is replaced by a simple shielded cell which can be constructed in various m aterials, the most com m on being cast iron, mild steel, lead and con crete .

When the contamination hazard is increased but the external exposure rem ains low glove boxes are introduced. The required leak tightness of the glove box depends on the degree of the conta­mination hazard. With an increase in both the contamination and external exposure hazard the glove box must be placed within a bio­logical shield and thus have been developed the shielded box, where the glove box is surrounded by a shield of cast iron, mild steel, lead or a com bination of these, and the m ore elaborate hot ce lls with concrete shields, the containment being provided by either special linings of the ce ll or special independent boxes placed in the ce ll.

The glove boxes, shielded boxes and elaborate hot ce lls may also provide a controlled atm osphere.

7

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 18: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

In practice there is no distinct lim it of hazards to separate these types of enclosures.

2. 1. Fum e cupboards

A fume cupboard is an enclosure in which m aterial is handled in isolation from the operator's environment. Handling the material is effected through an opening in the fume cupboard, and the iso la ­tion is achieved by d irectional air movem ent through the opening into the fume cupboard. These cupboards are used when the level of radioactivity of the m aterial being handled is in the m icrom illi- curie range.

Some factors that have a bearing on the design of the fume cup­board are toxicity of the chem icals used and the physical form of the m aterials being handled, wet or dry operations, corros ion problem s associated with the p rocesses and the requirem ent fo r structural strength of the cupboard if som e lead shielding is occasionally required for personnel protection.

Fume cupboards can be constructed in m ild steel, stain less steel, polyvinyl chloride and rein forced resin-bonded lam inates (e. g. fibreglass with polyester or epoxide). The front sliding panel can be manufactured from transparent plastic,or toughened or laminat­ed glass. When mild steel is used the interior of the cupboard must be painted to achieve a suitable finish, to provide resistance to co r ­rosion and ease of decontamination. Stainless steel, because of its cost, should be confined to those cases where its use is essential for corrosion and temperature conditions. The use of plastics for cupboards is becom ing m ore popular because of their cheapness, resistance to corrosion and ease of decontamination. Care how­ever should be used, when using plastics, to exclude the use of certain solvents and to limit the temperature of operations.

Services used in fume cupboards are usually water, gas, vacuum and electricity , and it is good practice to ensure that the controls for the services are situated outside the fume cupboard to minimize the number of movements through the front opening (Fig. 5).

Ventilation of the fume cupboards is of the once-through type, a detailed description of which will be found in Section 5 (see Figs 5 and 64).

Fume cupboards are usually situated within Zone II areas be­cause of their low potential hazard. The hazards of radioactive con­tamination can be reduced by ensuring that the openings of the fronts

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 19: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

of the fume cupboards are normally the minimum required, and if possible they should be closed. When closed, access to the cupboard can be gained by means of rubber gloves fixed to ports in the front panel. This improves the containment and so further reduces the chance of contamination.

2. 2. Glove boxes

A glove box is a leak-tight enclosure in which material may be manipulated in isolation from the operator's environment. This manipulation is effected through gauntlet gloves fixed to ports in the walls of the box [5 4 -7 0 ],

Glove boxes are used to provide containment for hazardous materials. The hazards may be toxic, radioactive and pyrophoric, or any combination of these. Usually glove boxes have no shielding protection against penetrating radiation so that they are used, in hot laboratories, to deal with alpha- and beta-activity. The levels of this activity may vary from minute to large amounts. One further use of the glove box is the maintenance of the purity level of the material being handled.

Some typical factors affecting the design of a glove box are its use for production or research, the processes to be carried out, the hazards associated with these processes, and whether it is to be an in-line or free-standing box.

If the box is to be used for research work then the main feature in its design should be its versatility; for production use a specialized design is required.

The installation of mechanical and electrical equipment in the boxes must be examined to ensure that the glove box maintains its integrity. For example, a piece of vibrating machinery should be installed so that no vibration is transmitted to the box or to other equipment in the box.

The hazards associated with the processes must be carefully analysed so that the necessary features can be incorporated to com­bat these hazards. For example, if a highly toxic pyrophoric powder is being exposed in the box then the design should ensure a high stan­dard of box integrity together with a minimum movement of a special inert atmosphere within the box.

If the box is to be installed in an in-line arrangement, then the operating and maintenance faces must be clearly defined. If it is to be free standing, then any face can be used for operating or maintenance.

9

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 20: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Materials that can be used in the construction of glove boxes are mild steel, stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride and reinforced resin-bonded laminates. Viewing panels are usually manufactured from transparent plastic, or toughened or laminated glass.

The choice of construction materials must be dependent on a number of factors such as chemical compatibility, fire resistance, structural strength to withstand heavy or shock loads, and ease of decontamination.

Gloves are manufactured from materials combining the following characteristics: flexibility, leak tightness, resistance to abrasion and aggressive media. Typical materials possessing these charac­teristics to varying degrees are natural latex rubber, neoprene rubber and butyl rubber.

Natural latex rubber is cheap, has good flexibility, reasonable resistance to acid conditions and adequate leak tightness but has low resistance to solvents. Neoprene latex rubber gives better re ­sistance to solvents and ultraviolet light, and has better leak tight­ness. Milled neoprene has increased mechanical strength and leak tightness. Butyl rubber has good leak tightness and is used with dry boxes and controlled atmospheres. Some special materials are used for particular conditions. In boxes where there is a handling hazard with beta-activity, lead rubber is often used for the gloves. Thickness of material used for gloves should be decided by the con­ditions and operations in each box. Figures 6 and 9 show different types of gloves, and Fig. 7 a typical arrangement of gloves.

Glove ports are generally located in the viewing panels, some of their methods of attachment being illustrated in Fig. 8. Figures 9 and 10 show two types of glove-changing procedures; the French system shown in Fig, 10 is used mainly with shielded boxes. A typical bag transfer system is shown in Fig. 11, and special transfer ports are illustrated in Fig. 12.

Various methods of fitting viewing panels are shown in Fig. 13, the choice being determined by the leak tightness required. Fig. 13a shows an economic seal with a reasonable standard of leak tightness, Fig. 13b a system that is decreasingly used although the standard of leak tightness is higher - the clamping angle should be installed in short sections to ensure uniform clamping pressure. Figure 13c indicates a French joint developed for joining two half boxes together, and Fig. 13d shows the French joint used where each side of the box is a removable panel. Systems (c) and (d) are more expensive than(a) and (b).

10

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 21: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Some typical gasket sections are illustrated in Fig. 14. If gas­kets are not manufactured in one piece then it is important that the joints in the gaskets themselves are not made at the corners. Soft rubber seals in one piece can ensure a high grade of leak tightness.

The construction of the glove box should ensure that the interior is smooth and free from any pockets where dust or gas can be trap­ped. Support of vibrating equipment and furnaces within the boxes should be carefully assessed to eliminate any problems with associated equipment.

The ideas concerning maintenance in the laboratory in which the box is to be used have an effect on the structure of the box. If the box is to be used in an in-line system then the maintenance will probably be carried but from one face, and the depth of the box should be governed by the ability of the maintenance staff to reach all sec­tions. If the box is to be used in a free-standing arrangement then it may be desirable to have secondary flanges on the box so that it can be attached to a decontamination or maintenance centre or have a PVC tent attached in situ for maintenance purposes.

Services for glove boxes generally comprise compressed air, vacuum, liquid feeds, electricity, instrumentation and effluent drai­nage. Segregation of electrical and mechanical supplies should be enforced, and the control of all services should be positioned out­side the box either on attached or separate panels. Controls for the processing equipment should also be established outside the box on separate panels.

Typical details of penetration of glove boxes for piped services and electrical cables are shown in Fig. 15. In certain cases where the leakage rate is to be minimized it is necessary to seal the leak path through the cables them selves, or to use sealed bulkheads.

Lighting of glove boxes is described in Section 3.The ventilation of glove boxes is dependent on the material being

handled and the processes being used. It is described in Section 5 (see Figs 7 and 65).

Glove boxes are suitable for in-line or free-standing arrange­ments. The layout determines the procedure for decontamination and maintenance. With the in-line arrangement direct access to the boxes is provided in Zone III, whereas with the free-standing arrangement the glove box can be taken to a special area or a tent can be erected at the box.

11

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 22: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

2. 3. Shielded b oxes

A shielded box is an enclosure whose containment is provided by an air-tight box and whose biological shield is constructed from a high density material, e. g. lead, steel. The containment can also be provided by the biological shield itself [36, 51, 52, 54, 58, 60,71-74], Figure 16 illustrates these two types of shielded boxes, (a) French type, (b) Russian type.

Shielded boxes are used in hot laboratories when the alpha-beta- gamma-activity of the material being handled is of m illicurie to thousand curies level, depending very much on the energy of gamma- rays. The alpha-beta-gamma-activity may also be associated with neutrons.

The factors that have a bearing on the design of shielded boxes are concerned with containment and shielding. Those affecting containment have been enumerated in Section 2 .2 ; in addition the effects of the higher level of radiation must be taken into account.

Determination of the shielding thickness can be carried out after estimating the quantity, nature, location and concentration of the radiation in the box together with an appreciation of the normal and exceptional positions and duties of the operators and maintenance staff on the various sides of the shielded box.

Materials used in constructing the containment box have already been described in Section 2 .2 . These materials must be closely examined for their resistance to the radiation produced by the radio­active material being handled; for example, transparent plastic win­dows may be used up to a certain level of radiation, above which glass, which may be stabilized, must be used. Materials for gas­kets must be carefully chosen and the use of plastics, which break down under high irradiation releasing corrosive products, should be avoided.

Common materials for the biological shield are lead, cast iron and steel; where neutrons are present special plastics can be used.

Panel-type construction is used with cast iron and mild steel. Lead can be used in the form of bricks, blocks or as a filling for a m ild-steel fabricated casing.

The joints in the biological shield should be carefully designed and positioned to minimize radiation leakage. Typical joints are presented in Fig. 17. Straight joints in the shield can be filled with lead in the form of wool, powder or shot.

12

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 23: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Lead walls are normally constructed with bricks having chevron or curved joints. A brick-built lead wall is illustrated in Fig. 18 and indicates the variety in the French standard type of bricks that are required. Figure 19 shows the British standard features in the design of lead brick penetrations for tongs, windows, services, etc., which are essential for the protection of the operators against ra ­diation leaks. If the walls are constructed with large cast lead pa­nels the same standard components for windows, e tc ., should be fitted.

Figures 20 and 21 show the use and method of changing flexible bootings at the various penetrations. It should be noted that if the containment box is to remain independent of the shield then the booting must be attached to the penetration on the box. Handling, viewing and lighting equipment is discussed in Section 3.

When shielded boxes are constructed with panels, one side of the shield should be installed as a moveable unit. This gives the added advantage of easy replacement of the containment box (if it has been installed as an independent unit) and easy access for main­tenance or modification to the equipment in the box after the removal of the radiation sources.

The services required for shielded boxes are similar to those already described for glove boxes. Their method of installation is different because of the radiation hazard; wherever they penetrate the biological shielding special plugs must be used which prevent a direct shine of radiation from inside the box.

When a variety of services are required at one point it is usual to design remotely operated connectors.

The ventilation of shielded boxes is similar to that of glove boxes, and is described in Section 5.

The layout of shielded boxes follows the in-line or free-standing arrangement.

2. 4. Hot cells

A hot cell is an enclosure in which highly radioactive material is handled in isolation from the operator's environment. This en­closure is a permanent feature of the laboratory [36, 50, 61, 74-100].

Hot cells are used in laboratories when the activity level of the material being handled is of the hundred to hundreds of thousands curie range, and when it is certain there will be a continuing demand for the use of such cells over a number of years.

13

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 24: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The main operations carried out in the cells are examination of irradiated fuel and canning materials, the experimental chemical reprocessing of spent fuel and irradiated targets, metallurgical research, radioisotope production and other high-level radiation research work.

Design of hot cells should only be attempted after a detailed specification has been drawn up. Typical questions that help to establish the specification are : What are the quantities, sizes and shapes of the radioactive materials to be examined and/or processed? What type and energy of activity is expected? Is the cell for produc­tion or research use? What types of operations are to be performed? Wet? Dry? What type of material-handling flasks are to be used? Are they top, bottom or side loading? What services are required? What type of viewing system is to be used? Are there any special lighting requirements? What type of manipulators are required? What philosophy of maintenance is to be adopted? What other hazards apart from radiation are present? Is there a requirement for an inert atmosphere? Are there special requirements for radioactive wastes disposal?

The main construction material for hot cells is concrete, which, is relatively cheap and its density can be varied to suit requirements of space, viewing system, availability of raw materials, etc.

Common types of concrete for use in hot cells are:

Hot cells that deal with quantities of isotopes with high alpha and neutron hazards are constructed in concrete having a high hydro­gen content, typical concretes being:

Type Mass density(gm/cm2)

Portland cement Barytes concrete Steel shot concrete

2 . 4 3. 5 5 . 6

TypeMass Water

density . contentgm /cm 2 (wt%)

Ferrophosphorus- serpentine

Magnetite -limonite 3 . 5

3 . 4 6

4 . 5

14

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 25: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Other mixtures of materials utilize the neutron-absorbing qualities of individual elements. An example of this is "Chemtree 13", which is a leaded concrete containing boron and with a specific gravi­ty of approximately 4. Another method of providing shielding against beta, gamma and neutron radiation is to build the cell wall in the form of a tank filled with water. v

When designing and constructing concrete shield walls for hot cells, -two important points should be noted. There should be suf­ficient steel reinforcement to cater for shrinkage, cracking and impact loads; and where there are any penetrations of the wall such as windows, service sleeves, manipulator or periscope tubes, etc., careful attention must be paid to the pouring of the concrete to eliminate any cavities in the wall around these penetrations.

With beta-gamma concrete cells it is usual to line the base with stainless-steel sheet or to have a complete stain less-steel bench just below window level. This gives a reasonable decontaminable surface on an area where abrasion can occur because of the move­ment of materials and equipment. The internal walls and roof of the cell should be given a good paint finish2*. A strippable plastic covering over the walls and roof can also be used to help the de­contamination problems.

Alpha-beta-gamma hot cells have two types of containment. One type with the containment integral with the shield is usually construct­ed in two ways. The containment can be built as a box by welding stainless-steel sheets to a steel frame. The welding of the box can be tested and a pressure or vacuum test applied to the complete unit. This box can then be used as the internal shuttering for the concrete shield, or concrete blocks can be placed around it as in the plutonium facility at Marcoule. The second method of construc­tion is to build the concrete shield and to have cast into the walls, roof and floor a steel framework to which stain less-steel sheets can be welded, and again the welds and complete structure can be tested.

The second type of containment has the box entirely separate from the concrete biological shield. The internal walls, roof and floor should be given the normal finish, and the containment box should be of the glove-box type suitable for operation with m aster- slave manipulators as shown in Fig. 22.

To leave the operating area free of equipment which is not re ­quired for operational control at the cell face it is good practice

2 Special paints with a base o f polym erizing resins are applied for the finishing.

15

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 26: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

to provide services and equipment either immediately above or be­low the operating face. Figure 23 shows how the operating area can be left free of equipment, which has been installed instead on the floor above, thus allowing the operator adequate space for easy manipulator removal, lighting replacement, insertion and withdrawal of periscope and installation of additional services. Controls for in-cell equipment should be arranged round the window so that where possible visual checks can be obtained that the equipment responds to the controls. Grouping of the controls should be carefully examined in conjunction with operational procedure to ensure that the operator needs a minimum of movement.

Transfers of radioactive materials into and out of hot cells can be made via transfer ports in the roof, wall or floor of the cells by means of shielded transfer flasks. The transfer ports must befitted with compensating shielding to ensure that the operational staff is shielded against penetrating radiation as the material is being passed through the biological shield. A shielded valve at each transfer port allows easy posting procedure. Transfer of material is described in Section 4.

Doors are provided for easy access to cells or for quick inter­communication between adjacent cells. Of the various types of doors the cheapest form is where a part of the biological shield is construct­ed in large removable blocks, which when removed from the wall give access to the cell. The next most economical form is the roll­out concrete door, and the most common of the other types are the metal sliding door and the metal hinged door. Figure 24 shows a plan view of an alpha-beta-gamma facility at Dounreay inScotland in which three of the above mentioned types are used. The ro ll­out concrete doors are used in the metallurgical and analytical cells, where space permits their economical use. In the case of the chemic­al reprocessing cells the metal sliding doors are used to divide the three cells in the most economical use*of building space, and the metal hinged door gives access to the cells.

Difficulties can be experienced when attempting to make a seal with these large doors. Typical solutions to this problem are the use of inflatable seals or the provision of a lightweight independent panel which gives a good seal. An example of the latter is shown in F ig .25.

In hot cell facilities, monitoring of the air in Zones II and III is carried out, and at the transfer ports provision is made both for installation of gamma alarm monitors and intercommunication with

16

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 27: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

the operating face. Particular attention should be paid to the build­ing finishes and floor coverings in the Zone III area so that in the event of an accidental spillage of radioactivity the problem of de­contamination is made easier.

Careful consideration should be given to the positioning of the extract filters for cell ventilation as the cost of floor or bench space in cells is extremely high and the filters should not occupy potential operational space in the cell. It should be remembered, however, that they must be accessible for remote replacement.

In some installations, special shielded areas are provided at the rear of hot cells for maintenance and decontamination purposes. One example of this is the Atomics International Hot Cell Facility at Santa Susana in the United States of America, a plan view of which is shown in Fig. 26. The decontamination areas in this facility are fitted with viewing windows and manipulator positions so that decontamination of equipment and its subsequent removal or maintenance can be carried out under controlled condi­tions in a space especially designed for this purpose.

Various services are required in hot cells. Viewing equipment must be provided, which may be either large viewing windows backed up by monocular and periscope, or a television viewing system.

Manipulation can be done with m aster-slave manipulators, a remotely controlled crane or remotely operated power manipulators. Special arrangements for the provision of water, steam, gas, vacuum, chemical reagents and electrical power inside the cell must be made. Typical arrangements of service sleeves for gas and liquor pipes are shown in Fig. 27a; electrical supplies can be provided as shown in Fig. 27b. Electrical plugs and sockets for use inside the cell should be chosen with great care, and they should be designed for easy aiid safe manipulation. Illumination of hot cells is usually pro­vided by lamps - tungsten, quartz iodine,. mercury vapour, sodium, etc. - placed inside the cell, replacement of the lamps being either direct or remote.

The ventilation of hot cells is discussed in Section 5.As previously stated, the layout of hot cells generally follows

the in-line arrangement with clear distinctions between Zones II, III and IV. Changing rooms are established at the entrance to Zones II and III, and provision is usually made for a temporary changing room to be established wherever the containment of Zone IV is breached for personnel access. Typical layouts of hot cell laboratories are shown in Figs 2-4 and in Figs 22-24, and Fig. 26.

17

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 28: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

3. HANDLING AND VIEWING

To ensure the successful performance of work in any enclosure viewing, lighting and handling equipment are necessary. These three types of equipment are interdependent, the light transmission factor of the window determining the required level of illumination within the enclosure, and the type and coverage of the manipulator deter­mining the position and size of the viewing window in the wall.

3 .1 . Viewing system s

Common viewing systems in use in hot laboratories are windows, periscopes and television [12-15, 35, 36., 41, 50, 101-130].

3 .1 .1 . Mirrors

M irrors were originally used to view over walls as shown in Fig. 28, However, with increasing thicknesses of the shielding wall this sytem of viewing is impracticable because of radiation leakage. Mirrors are still used inside enclosures to enable operators to view those areas not visible through the normal window.

3 .1 .2 . Windows

Various types of windows are used with each type of contain­ment. Fume cupboards and glove boxes generally have viewing panels made from either transparent plastic, or laminated or toughened glass, depending on the work being carried out. Shielded boxes are usually provided with lead glass windows. A typical arrange­ment of this type of window is shown in Fig. 29. The lead glass block is fitted in the steel cylindrical holder with lead powder and poly­ester resin cement. The most suitable type of lead glass for 50 mm of lead shielding is a 5 .2 g /cm 2 density type as a 110-mm thick block. Two blocks are assembled for 100 mm of lead. For more than 100 mm of lead cerium-stabilized glass at the hot side is required, and a special radiation-resistant window should be installed in the contain­ment box. Allymer CR39 is an example of high-radiation and chemi­cal-resistant plastic glass.

Hot cells are provided with large viewing windows of various types. A common type of window in hot cells is shown in Fig. 30a, consisting of a series of lead glass blocks fitted into a mild steel framework cast into the biological shielding. The space between

18

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 29: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

the glass and the framework is filled with lead-wool. The space between glass blocks is often filled with oil to avoid reflections and increase transmission. In many cases dry-type windows are used where the surfaces of each glass block are specially treated. Lead glass windows are used to advantage with dense biological shielding because in this case the window thickness is reduced and a better view is obtained. Care has to be taken with the spacing of the glass to prevent Newton's rings. Such windows are made with different types of glass with density between 2 .3 and 3 .6 . The thickness of the stabilized glass on the hot side should be sufficient to prevent the browning of the first block of unstabilized glass as a result of radiation. Figure 31 gives spectral transmission of several types of glass. Common 1% cerium-stabilized lead glass becomes brown by 105 R. For very high activity cells, more stabilized lead glasses have been made, but in these cases a lead cover is required to pro­tect the hot face of the window when not working.

For work with mixed neutrons and gamma-radiation a window as shown in Fig. 30b can be used. This consists of a stepped mild- steel case filled with Magnetite concrete fitted with alternate lead glass blocks and oil tanks. At the end sections of the window both on the hot side and operating side are oil tanks faced with 2. 5 -mm thick plate glass. Sectioning of the oil tanks between the lead glass blocks prevents the loss of all the oil at the same time.

The simplest kind of liquid-filled window uses water. This is applied for work with mixed neutron*and gamma-radiations. The disadvantage of such windows is the poor shielding efficiency to gamma-radiations which leads to disproportion between the thick­nesses of the window and the dense shielding materials used for the walls. To increase the density zinc bromide solution is commonly used. Figure 30c shows a typical zinc bromide window, consisting of an epoxy-lined opening in the concrete with twin plates of silicate glass fitted at the hot side and twin plates of lime glass fitted at the operating side. The interspace between the inner glasses is filled with zinc bromide solution. Alternatively, the window tank may be an epoxy-lined concrete or m ild-steel tank inserted in a hole left in the biological shielding. A further modification is when a lead glass block is fitted between the two silicate glasses on the hot side of the window. This type of window minimizes the gamma-dose re ­ceived by the zinc bromide when viewing highly active objects.

With a large window it is possible for more than one person to view at the same time, and stereoscopic vision is still retained.

19

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 30: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

This type of window is the most economical type to use when viewing objects in hot cells, particularly if the shielding is made of ordinary concrete. Another advantage of the zinc bromide windows is their high transmission and colourlessness. Care has to be taken to en­sure that the zinc bromide solution does not make contact with fer­rous m aterials, otherwise it will become clouded. Exposure to radiation may also liberate free bromine from the solution. This can be prevented by the addition of hydrazine hydrobromide or hy- droxylamine hydrochloride, which act as stabilizing agents.

The main disadvantages, for all windows are chromatic and spherical aberration and localized optical imperfections which re ­duce resolution. Loss of colour discrimination also occurs from the lighting and the intrinsic colour of the viewing media.

3 .1 .3 . Periscopes

Periscopes are used for viewing objects in hot cells, a typical arrangement being shown in Fig. 32. It consists of a tubular body inserted through the biological shielding as a lens system that per­mits the viewing eye-piece to be in such a position that protection from gamma-radiation is achieved. A turret lens may be incor­porated so that magnification can be varied, and a scanning device may also be fitted. The main advantage of this type of viewing is the close examination of detail, sharp image and true colour being obtained even through thick shielding. The periscope may also be used in conjunction with a microscope or camera. Use of an eye­piece for viewing tends to be tiring, and only one person at a time can use the instrument. Also if no scanning device is fitted the field of view is limited. The in-cell part of the periscope is usually protected against contamination by using a booting or a permanent gas-tight cover.

3 .1 .4 . Television

. Highly active objects may be viewed by means of television cam­eras. The main advantage over the other methods described is where the object being viewed is in a hazardous or inaccessible po­sition. It is possible for more than one operator to view objects at the same time, or view widely separated points simultaneously. The television cameras may be mounted to view from any vantage point, but it is convenient to have the camera set along the operator's

20

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 31: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

line of sight to the object being viewed, so that the operator does not have to re-orientate himself. Normal television systems do not provide stereoscopic viewing. To assist this, lighting may be ar­ranged to produce shadows to show depth perception. Alternatively two cameras may be used, connected to two receivers set at 90° fitted with polaroids and a half-silvered m irror. Impressions of depth are then obtained by viewing with polaroid glasses. The re ­liability of electronic systems when subjected to high radiation doses cannot be guaranteed and stand-by equipment is desirable. In any case the lenses must be stabilized, and for irradiation up to 104 R/h "nuvistor" irradiation-proof electronic tubes must be used. Plastic insulated wires should be avoided. The main applications of tele­vision systems are for back cell areas, transportation corridors and vehicle-mounted manipulators.

3. 2. Lighting system s

The types of lighting provided for fume cupboards and glove boxes are either tungsten or fluorescent lamps. The required level of illumination in the boxes is 150 to 300 lx, and the light fitting is usually suspended above or on the side of the box, where a suitable transparent panel is mounted. The type of lighting depends on the quantity of light required, size of the box and whether rotating ma­chinery is present (stroboscopic effect). Care must be taken to counteract the action of ultraviolet light on rubber and plastic by the use of filters. The heating effect of the lighting inside the boxes should be minimized.

Tungsten, fluorescent and sodium are the types of lighting used in shielded boxes where the level of illumination required is 1000-1500 lx. Higher illumination is necessary because of the lower optical transmission of the shielding windows. Figure 33a shows a typical installation of a light fitting, where the containment is an independent boi. The fitting can be removable for bulb replacement without risk of contamination.

The choice of the type of lighting depends on the nature of the operations being undertaken. Are sharply defined images required or is colour definition necessary?

Lighting in hot cells is usually provided by normal tungsten, quartz iodine, sodium or mercury vapour lamps. The level of i l ­lumination required is 1500-3000 lx. Figure 33b shows a typical arrangement of a removable lighting system for direct bulb replace­

21

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 32: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

ment; alternatively the fitting may be mounted directly in the cell and should be remotely changed and posted out of the cell. By cast­ing cooling tubes in the shield plugs gas cooling can-help to elimina­te the heating effect of the bulb. Reaspns for choice of lighting are similar to those stated in the previous paragraph.

Lead glass and zinc bromide solution are dispersive media, and when an object illuminated by light of different colours is viewed through these media the images produced by the different colours do not coincide because of the different refractive indices of the media produced by the various colours. This blurring of the image is not acceptable in certain cases, and it is essential that when a sharp image is required a monochromatic light is used. Sodium lamps can be used successfully for this purpose, and if colour de­finition is required a spot lamp of either tungsten or tungsten iodine can be used.

The danger of damaging the plastic bootings of manipulators by ultra-violet rays must be avoided: a few weeks' exposure in front of a mercury vapour lamp causes more damage than a radiation dose of 108 R.

3. 3. Remote manipulation and handling equipment

The development of handling equipment and manipulators has progressed with the increasing level of radioactive material being handled and with the evolution of the various types of enclosures. With low-level activity the simplest form of protection is to put dis­tance between.the source and the operator. Simple tongs were there­fore introduced, and as the level of radioactivity (radiation and con­tamination) increased the tongs and accessories were designed to permit operation through thin and thick shield walls. Manipulators were developed to operate over shield walls, and as the radiation hazard further increased through -- the -wall manipulators were evolv­ed. With a further increase in the contamination hazard, the need for a highly controlled atmosphere in hot cells was established and the sealed through-the-wall manipulators were produced.

The need to handle heavy material and equipment within hot cells led to the development of power manipulators and remotely operated cranes.

Simple tongs with special accessories are used in glove boxes and shielded boxes. Figure 34a shows a typical tongs arrangement in which the tongs can be replaced by withdrawing them through the ball leaving the grip inside the box. Articulated tongs are used to

2 2

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 33: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

give increased coverage. One French type is shown in Fig. 34b, and a Russian type in Fig. 34c. The wrist can be swung up to 90° by turning a muff at the handle. A very sophisticated American type of articulated tongs (the .Minimanip) is shown in Fig. 34d. The elbow and the wrist are articulated, and the ball and joint are located in the vertical wall and rotate about a horizontal axis thus giving a reversed up-and-down motion. When the shield wall is thin the ball is tight and friction is not a problem. However, with a thick lead wall the lead ball cam be mounted in a gas roller or ball bearing to eliminate friction.

The manipulator is a machine with six degrees of motion. Right to left (X motion), backwards and forwards (Y motion), and up and down (Z motion); the wrist has azimuth and elevation, and the tongs have rotation.

Figure 35 shows an articulated French master-slave manipulator, with a load capacity of 3 kg, which can be mounted either through the ceiling or the wall. The through-the-wall version has the ad­vantage of being safer when the radiation level is high.

Figure 36 shows two versions of articulated master-slave mani­pulators with an upper arm section; (a) French; (b) German type. These types of manipulators, because of the disposition of the upper arm, allow objects on the bench to be cleared with greater ease.

Two types of telescopic master-slave manipulators, with a load capacity of 5 kg, are shown in Fig. 37. These manipulators operate through the ceiling.

The French manipulator shown in Fig. 37b allows the slave arm to have a greater Y motion than the master arm; this is achieved by the replacement of the upper horizontal tube in Fig. 37a by the telescopic assembly (a) shown in Fig. 37b.

Figure 38 shows through-the-wall telescopic US manipulators. The manipulator shown in Fig. 38a has a load capacity of 5 kg and can be fitted with two additional features on the standard motions; these are displacement motions in the X and Y places giving the operator better visibility and covering a greater depth of cell.

Figure 38b shows a Soviet-type M-22 which has a load capacity up to 15 kg. It is a through-the-wall type and is designated for operating cells of up to 2. 5 -m width, 1. 8 -m depth and front wall thickness up to 1 .5 m. Operator's movements are accomplished by means of steel cables. Design of the slave wrist provides remote replacement of the tongs instruments. . The manipulator is able to carry out movements in seven degrees of freedom; motions in X, Y

23

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 34: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

and Z directions, wrist rotation around vertical and horizontal axis, instrument rotation (540°) and tongs claw. To enlarge the service area and for removal of the manipulators the slave arm can be ma­nually straightened to a horizontal position. Any intermediate po­sition of the slave arm may be fixed. Model M-33 is another master- slave manipulator of the same handling capacity and similar design, made of titanium alloys for work in large radiochemical cells with very aggressive media. For motion transmission steel bands in combination with chains are used. Straightening of the slave arm up to horizontal position is accomplished by means of an electrical motor and may be fixed in any position. The wrist design enables rotation of the tongs up to 2 .5 revolutions. For the operation of small cells with a front wall thickness less than 350 mm, a small m aster-slave manipulator of type M -31 with a handling capacity of 3 kg is used. Compared with M -22, apart from its size,, it also has some improvements: bands instead of cables are used for motion transmission; manual straightening of the slave arm is simplified; rotation of the tongs is extended up to 2 .5 revolutions. There are two modifications of M -31: of steel, for regular operations, and of titanium alloys, for operation of chemical cells.

Figure 39a shows the standard version of the telescopic master- slave manipulator. This type can have load capacities of 10, 15 and 25 kg. It is normally fitted with electrical indexing on the X and Y motions.

Figure 39b shows an adaptation of the standard manipulator for use in a hotcell with a low floor arrangement. This type of mani­pulator - the extended reach - has similar load capacity to the stand­ard model. Manipulators in Fig. 39 are US and UK designs.

An essential accessory to the tongs and manipulators previously described is the protective booting. The use of this booting has a fourfold purpose: to prevent contamination of the slave arm, to resist corrosive media, to maintain containment of the enclosure and to provide a safe system for the removal and repair of the tongs and manipulators. The booting for these tongs is shown in Fig. 20, and the technique for changing this booting is also indicated.

Figure 40 illustrates the different types of booting for through- the-wall manipulators. The methods of changing the booting follows the types of glove changing procedure (see Figs 9 and 10). Double bootings are used for strong containment, as for controlled atmos­phere. They may consist of a standard booting and an additional one placed outside the containment (see, e .g . Fig. 23).

24

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 35: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The different types of attachment of booting at the wrist are illustrated in Fig. 41. This feature is essential to allow for the safe removal of manipulators for maintenance. PVC is the material nor­mally used for booting, but special materials can be incorporated at the wrist ends because of the high irradiation level.

Where the need for a highly controlled atmosphere is predo­minant, sealed master-slave manipulators may be used. Figure 42 shows two such types.

The US manipulator shown in Fig. 42a has the seal at the "hot" end of the wall tube, and the slave arm is detachable in the cell by means of a crane. Figure 42b illustrates a German design with the seal at the "cold" end of the wall tube. Both models can be fitted with extended-reach slave arm s. A recent sealed manipulator de­veloped at Dounreay in Scotland is a power-assisted m aster-slave manipulator with hydraulic transmission which makes it possible to handle 2 5 kg without effort.

There are a number of designs of power manipulators for use in hot cells. The manipulator consists of a slave arm mounted on a carriage which gives the X -Y motions and a telescopic tube giving the Z motion. The arm can have from one to three articulated sections, and has tongs possessing swinging and rotating motions. The movements are produced by electric motors and the control is positioned outside the cell. The load capacity can vary from 25 to 100 kg, depending on the geometrical configuration of the arti­culated sections.

Maximum applied forces or torques are usually limited by friction or automatic cut-out; force of the grip is pre-set and adjust­able, and tools can be incorporated at the wrist.

In some case the manipulator can be mounted on a column that moves along the wall of a hot cell, and vertical motion up and down the column and horizontal telescopic motion can be included.

In designing hot cells careful attention should be paid to the provision of built-in facilities for maintenance and repair of power manipulators.

Provision of remotely operated cranes in hot cells is essential when dealing with heavy equipment, and a compact crane design will effect a considerable saving in cell space.

Water ponds are often associated with storage of radioactive materials before their acceptance in hot laboratories. Tongs are the usual handling equipment installed. The tongs tanks need not be sealed since the water provides the shielding. With hydraulic

25

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 36: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

tongs it is worth considering the use of water as the operating fluid since the pond cannot be fouled by any leakage from the cylinders.

The main advantage of a master-slave manipulator is its ability to reproduce faithfully at the slave end the motions and forces exert­ed at the master end, and to feed back any slight pressure differences from the slave to the master end; to achieve this it is essential that the design of the manipulators should ensure good balance, low friction, low inertia and minimum deflections, which require air­craft design techniques, and the materials of construction should be carefully chosen to achieve these ends.

Manipulators may be mounted on vehicles to permit remote re­covery in emergency conditions. Figure 43 shows two typical vehicles.

3. 4. Relative dimensions of cells, manipulators and windows

Carefull attention should be paid to the close connection between the dimensions of cells, manipulators and windows. The shielding thickness determines the type of manipulator to be selected, the depth of cell determines the length of the fully extended slave arm of the manipulator, and the length of slave arm determines the m i­nimum cell height. The centre distance between a pair of manipula­tors is usually 70 to 80 cm, which then determines the width of the cell. The shielding thickness and width and height of the cell de­termines the size of the window, and the clearance required to re ­move the manipulator can now be determined. Figure 44 shows the general limits for using different types of manipulators depending on cell dimensions and shielding thicknesses. Figure 45 shows typic­al coverage diagrams for a pair of manipulators and the limit of viewing in the cell.

4. TRANSFER AND TRANSPORT SYSTEMS

The safe operation of enclosures is dependent on the introduction and discharge of radioactive materials to and from the enclosures [131-143], The hazards involved in any transfer can be radiation, contamination or a combination of these, and the types of transfer can be direct or indirect. Direct transfer can be between an en­closure and its environment and between two enclosures with a per­manent connection.

26

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 37: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Indirect transfer is between two separate enclosures via an in­dependent portable enclosure, i . e . a transport container. The transfer system can be one way only or reversible.

4. 1. Shielded transfer system s

These systems are intended for use where there is only a radiation hazard.

4. 1. 1. Direct shielded transfer system

4. 1. 1. 1. Between an enclosure and its environment

Figure 46 indicates the different types of locks used to give ac­cess to enclosures. This system is used for transfer of inactive material and radioactive material held in its own shielded container.

4. 1. 1.2. Between two enclosures with a permanent connection

Three types of transfer between connecting enclosures are illustrated in Fig. 47. The radiation lock shown in Fig. 47c can be used to give access between enclosures of different shielding thick­nesses. When there is a line of shielded enclosures the most com­mon method of transfer is by a shielded tunnel. Figure 48 shows alternative positions for such a tunnel, the choice of position being dependent on the laboratory layout.

A pneumatic rabbit system can be used to transfer samples. Low active samples are commonly sent through unshielded pipes. This system is often used between a reactor and a laboratory en­closure. Hydraulic rabbits can be used with pool reactors.

A pool is often connected to an enclosure by means of a water channel, the water performing three very useful functions, as shielding, as a means of isolating the enclosure and as an easy mode of access.

4. 1.2. Indirect shielded transfer system

Transfers between widely separated enclosures are usually achieved by means of a shielded container, one exception being the rabbit system described above.

27

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 38: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The two common, methods of transfer are first to place the shielded container inside the enclosure for loading and unloading, and second to position the container outside the enclosure and to load or unload from the container through a hole in the biological shield.

4. 1. 2. 1. Transfer with container inside enclosure

Small containers can be passed into the enclosure through a ra­diation lock, as shown in Fig.46a. Heavy containers can be passed into the enclosure through a roof port or a door in the wall. This method should not be used when there is any possibility of a conta­mination risk. Transfers from pools can be made in a similar manner,

4. 1 . 2 . 2 . Transfer with the container outside the enclosure

The container is placed in position at the transfer port in the shield wall or ceiling.. The transfer of material can be made by means of a winch or a push-pull device on the container or a pick­up device within the enclosure. Figures 49a and 50a show typical arrangements. The main advantage of this system compared with that in Section 4. 1. 2. 1 is the saving of expensive enclosure space. Transfers from a pool can be carried out as shown in F ig . 50b.

4. 1 .3 . Shielded containers

Containers described in this section are for use in transfers between enclosures inside a particular factory or research centre. If the container is required for external transport then it should be designed to meet the very stringent regulations as laid down in the IAEA Safety Series No. 6, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials,

An important factor in the choice of material for containers is the density. The higher the density of the material used the greater is the saving in weight of the container.

4. 1. 3. 1, Containers with covers or plugs

Figure 51 shows types of containers with covers and plugs. With covers and plugs, straight joints should be avoided to prevent a ra­diation hazard. Figure 51(1) and (2) shows different types of covers.

28

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 39: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Figure 51(4) shows a container with a plug. The main advantage of this type is the large difference in weight of plugs and covers. With the smaller weight of the plug this type is much more flexible to operate.

4. 1 . 3 . 2 . Containers with sliding valve doors

Figure 49 shows containers with different types of sliding valves. This type of container is economical because of its simpli­city, but care must be taken to ensure the mechanical safety of the valve.

4. 1 . 3 . 3 . Containers with rotating valve ports

This type of container is safer mechianically than the sliding valve container during transport, but its weight is considerably grea­ter. Figure 50a shows a typical multichannel container with revolv­ing interior. Also shown is a rotating wall valve that can be used instead of the straight wall plug. Figure 50b illustrates a rotating valve door container in position for transfer of material from a pool.

4. 1.3 .4 . Special transfer system

A transfer system used at Windscale is shown in Fig. 52. Radio­active sources can be transferred between different enclosures that share a common maintenance area. A container with a sliding valve is mounted on a bogie that tracks over the length of the operating area. The bogie can be stopped at any enclosure, the container is then rotated and moved to make contact with the enclosure wall valve. The valves on the container and enclosure are opened remotely, and a tray from the container can be moved into the enclosure to deliver or remove sources.

4. 2. Contained transfer system s

These systems involve the transfer of material that involves problems of contamination only.

4 . 2 . 1 . Box system

This system allows passage of material into or out of a box and must achieve two objects: the atmosphere of the box should not be

29

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 40: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

disturbed, and contamination must not be passed out of the box. To achieve these objects various locks have been devised: air lock, va­cuum lock and washable lock.

Air locks can be used in conjunction with the ventilation system to prevent the outflow of airborne contamination. Vacuum locks can be used to prevent loss of the special atmosphere in the box, and the washable lock can be used to prevent any surface contamination of the transferred material.

4 . 2 . 2 . Bag posting system

In this system the containment of the enclosure is always main­tained. Figure 11 illustrates the bagging technique. It should be noted that this bagging procedure ensures two-way operation.

4 . 2 . 3 . Contained direct transfer system

Figure 53a and b shows a tunnel between two boxes. In Fig. 53a the tunnel is fixed and in Fig. 53b it is flexible to permit the removal of one or other of the boxes, as shown in Fig. 53c. The fixed tunnel arrangement is suitable for use when one box has a controlled atmosphere.

When there is a line of enclosures the tunnel system as described in Section 4. 1. 1. 2 can be adopted if the tunnel is made a containment. The rabbit system can also be used.

4. 2.4. Double door transfer systems

Figure 54 shows a US remotely operated transfer system de­veloped to minimize the spread of contamination where the risk is high. Figure 55 shows a French hand-operated transfer system de­veloped for conditions of high contamination risks.

4.3. Contained shielded transfer system s

These systems are used for transferring materials which com­bine the hazards of radiation and contamination and, as would be expected, are a combination of those systems described in Sections4. 1 and 4. 2.

30.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 41: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

4.3 . 1. Contained shielded direct transfer system

These systems are used for two or more enclosures joined to­gether.

Figure 56 shows the tunnel system for two adjacent enclosures and a line of enclosures. In Fig. 56b it is possible in many cases to omit the shielding door to the tunnel. The tunnel itself must be an enclosure to ensure containment.

4 . 3 . 2 . Contained shielded indirect transfer systems

When the contamination hazard is not too great the containment can sometimes be achieved by controlled air flow. Such a system is illustrated in Fig. 57 using a container shown in Fig. 51.

The container is opened under an auxiliary shield with a small top bulge into which the plug is lifted. An off-set rod is used to re­move the plug from the transfer port, and the container is then tilted on wheels so that its cavity is in position opposite the transfer port, which is lined with a flexible plastic tube fitted to a flange on the containment box. (Replacement of the plastic tube is as shown in Fig. 21.) The wall plug has a plastic cover (replaceable outside the shield) which can be used as a seal on the containment box whenever the box is to be removed. Whenever the containment is open air is drawn through the transfer port by the box ventilation system, the air velocity being maintained high enough to prevent contamina­tion leaking from the box. Tongs operating from the other side of the cell are used to load or unload the container when it is in po­sition. This system is used in France for containers with 5 to 15 cm of lead shielding.

Figure 58 illustrates the transfer of radioactive waste in French laboratories using the container shown in F ig .49b . This system is a simplified adaptation of the double-door system. A lightweight drum with sealed lid is placed in the container, and its shielding cover is removed close to the cell wall. The container is moved under the port and the drum is sealed to the containment flange, and the containment plug is raised into the box taking with it the drum lid, held by means of an electromagnet. When the drum has been filled the operations are reversed, and the filled sealed drum can eventually be discharged to the waste storage system via the bottom valve in the container.

When the contamination risk is high then the containment must be maintained during transfer operations.

. 31

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 42: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

In Fig. 59 a US remote bagging technique is shown. It is used on a containment box inside a concrete cell. Figure 54 shows the US double-door system which-can be operated remotely inside a con­crete shield.

Figures 60 and 61 show the UK system of direct bagging adapted for use with a shielded container. Figure 60 illustrates the horizon­tal posting of material. When used to introduce material the bag is replaced without welding. Figure 61 shows a vertical-type con­tainer in position.' This system has been used where controlled atmospheres are required. Figure 62 shows the application of the French double-door system to shielded containers. The main ad­vantage of this system is that it eliminates the risk associated with plastic bags.

4. 4. Transfer and transport of radioactive liquids

Radioactive liquids arise from the dissolution of radioactive materials and from the wet decontamination of plant and equipment in enclosures. The hazards of these liquids can be any combination of chemical, toxic, radiation and contamination.

4.4. 1. Direct transfer system

The safest method of transfer is by the direct system, i . e . via a pipe which goes from the point of arising to the point of disposal. This system is not always possible for hot laboratories.

Transfer of liquors can be carried out by the usual means, i . e. pump ejectors, air lift, etc. , the choice depending on the particular conditions.

The installation of pipework which carries active liquor outside the containment boxes should be remembered when the laboratory is being designed. If boxes are going to be made removable then the piping should be designed to permit modification and replacement with the minimum risk of contamination.

4 . 4 . 2 . Indirect transfer system

The transfer of active liquid from the point of arising to a con­tainer can be carried out by means of pumps, ejectors, air lifts, etc. It is essential that overfilling of the container does not take

32

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 43: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

place, and that the transfer pipes are designed to eliminate any risk of contamination when the container is uncoupled for transport.

The transfer pipes must be shielded to protect the operating staff from radiation, and any leaks from these pipes outside the con­tainment must be readily detectable.

4 . 4 . 3 . Container

Depending on the nature of the chemical, the type and level of activity of the liquid containers range from simple unshielded plastic bottles to heavily shielded vessels constructed in various materials.

Figure 63 shows an elaborate French system for highly active liquid transfer. The quantity of liquid is measured by using a dynamometer to weigh the inner tank and contents. Couplings are fitted with wash connections to eliminate contamination when d is­connected. Various methods of filling the container are possible depending upon the conditions. For example, if liquid is to be trans­ferred from a large holding tank then the container should be posi­tioned above the holding tank and, by evacuating the containers and then connecting them to the tank, liquid can be lifted into the con­tainer. By using a protective shell the container can be used for external transport under Type B container regulations.

5. VENTILATION SYSTEM

The principles involved in the design of safe ventilation systems for hot laboratories are fully described in IAEA Safety Series No. 17, Techniques for Controlling Air Pollution from the Operation of Nuclear Facilities.

The ventilation system, apart from providing suitable operating conditions, can be used as an aid to prevent the spread of contami­nation by directing the flow of air from Zone I through Zones II and III to Zone IV.

Some features of the ventilation of the various enclosures are worth noting [50, 51, 144-157],

5.1. Fume cupboards

The minimum velocity through the opening of the cupboard is 0. 5 m / s . It is common practice that the fume cupboards exhaust

33

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 44: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

all the air that is delivered to the room in which they are situated. It is therefore important that a suitable bypass system be installed so that the balance is maintained whenever the fume cupboards are closed. One bypass system is illustrated in Fig. 64.

5. 2. Glove boxes

The extract system should be designed so that the depression in the glove box will permit the necessary air flow into the box under certain accident conditions, e .g. loss of a glove. Figure 65 shows the installation of a French system to meet these conditions.

Two filters are usually placed on each circuit, and it is impor­tant that the sizes of the inside filters are suitable for posting out through the standard facility. The inlet outside filter is changed when dusty, but the inside one still operates during exchange. The outlet inside filter is changed when dusty, and the outside one is still in operation during exchange.

5. 3. Shielded boxes

It should be remembered when positioning extract filters that they have to be changed remotely. The ventilation system for the containment box should be similar to that for glove boxes; in ad­dition the space between the box and the shielding should be tied into an extract system so that the shielding becomes a secondary containment.

5.4. Hot cells

Filters must be remotely changed, and their position should be examined very closely because of the very high cost of the enclosure space.

Because of the large volumes of air used it is important to filter the air as it enters the cell to the same standard as the outlet filter to minimize the changing rate of the extract filter.

The use of special atmospheres in enclosures is increasing, and in general there are two system s. The first is a once-through system, which can be used where the purity level of the atmosphere is high and the volume of gas required is low. The second is a re ­circulating system to be used when the volumes are high. With glove boxes and shielded boxes the greatest leakages occur through gloves

34

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 45: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

and bootings, and the materials for these should be examined close­ly. Plastic windows should be avoided when a high purity level in the enclosure atmosphere is required.'

6. RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS

Radioactive wastes from hot laboratories, as wastes from any other nuclear facilities, are subdivided into three maim groups: liquid, solid and gaseous. Gaseous waste management is an integral part of the general ventilation system discussed in the previous section.

Wastes which are either known or suspected to be radioactive must first be collected and monitored so that the extent of the neces­sary treatment can be determined and performed. The level of acti­vity and the radiation characteristics of the radioisotope involved determine the nature of waste handling and the treatment. In hot laboratories separate collection system s are usually installed to handle wastes known to be non-radioactive or of such low activity that they may be released to the environment without further treat­ment or handling. Different systems may be provided to collect wastes of varying activity level and nature [32, 147, 158-173].

6. 1. Liquid radioactive wastes

According to the level of activity, liquid radioactive wastes are generally subdivided into three categories: low-level, intermediate and highly radioactive. The activity limits determining the segre­gation vary in different countries. Laboratory effluents are in the main segregated into the following categories:

(a) Non-radioactive liquid wastes (process wastes from laboratories in which no radioactive materials are used, all sanitary wastes, boiler blowdown, cooling water from non-radioactive processes, etc.).

(b) Low-level radioactive wastes which can be discharged into the regular sewage system after (or without) corresponding dilution or relatively short time storage for decay of the short-lived radionuclides. These may be wastes from tracer laboratories and low-level decontamination processes, some process wastes

35

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 46: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

of radioisotope laboratories containing short-lived radionuclides, etc. Such wastes should be collected in a separate holding tank.

(c) Radioactive wastes requiring special treatment. They are col­lected in a tank (or tanks), and after monitoring and conditioning transferred to a treatment or storage facility (see Fig. 66).

6 .1 . 1 . Collecting systems and segregation

There are two main types of systems for collecting liquid radio­active wastes:

(a) Active waste solutions are poured into specially provided con­tainers and transferred to the laboratory collecting tank or directly to a treatment facility.

(b) Radioactive effluents are discharged from'the place of arising through specially constructed sinks and drain lines leading to the collecting tank for monitoring and conditioning.

Sometimes a combination of the two systems is used. The choice of the system depends on many factors such as volume, re ­gularity, activity level and nature of wastes, and design of the laboratory.

One of the advantages of collecting wastes in special containers is that the volume of material handled at any one time is greatly reduced. However, because these containers must be accurately labelled as to content, this system requires the full co-operation of laboratory staffs. This type of system is especially applicable to limited laboratory operations involving tracer levels of radio­activity and small volumes of total solution. Special containers are useful in segregating long-lived or more hazardous radionuclides that require specialized handling, treatment (decontamination) or disposal.

The type of container used (size, material and shielding) will, of course, depend on the activity level, the chemical composition and the volume of the effluent. Containers for storage and trans­portation are shown in Fig. 63. The use of special sinks and separ­ate drainage systems leading to hold-up tanks is common in many big laboratories. Such systems permit segregation of low-volume high-activity wastes from large-volume low-activity wastes.

36

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 47: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

The materials used for drain systems should ensure the cons­truction of leak-tight joints and offer adequate corrosion resistance. In most cases the ease with which the construction material can be decontaminated is an important consideration. Stainless steel, poly­ethylene, PVC, glass tubing and ceramic pipes are examples of ma­terials commonly used. Obviously each material has advantages and limitations. If the nature of the wastes to be collected is known, it may be possible to select cheaper materials that will perform ade­quately under the particular conditions that prevail. An important requirement of a liquid-waste collecting system is that any leaks which may occur are rapidly detected and the leakage contained. The methods used will vary according to circumstances, but in general the systems should be easy to inspect, not buried in walls or floors. A particularly important factor is the level of radioactivity of the wastes being collected. In some cases double-walled piping and ef­ficient leak detectors are used. A more common method is to place the collecting pipes in waterproofed troughs which collect any leakage from the piping.

The number of separate drains provided for radioactive wastes varies with the nature of the operation. Sometimes the laboratory may be provided with two or three separate drains collecting radio­active wastes of different types.

The segregation of liquid wastes at source is usually well worth­while as it is normally more economical and satisfactory to treat small volumes of highly active effluent than to treat large volumes of effluent having a low-activity level. Therefore enclosures for radioactive operations (fume hoods, boxes, hot cells) must be de­signed so that they enable an easy segregation of the radioactive ef­fluents of different types. It is always important to avoid an acci­dental leak of costly material or highly radioactive wastes through a drain designed for low-level radioactive decontamination wastes. A special trap or small intermediate collection tank is often installed in cells or in boxes for such a purpose.

When the volume of wastes is small the wastes maybe solidified directly in the cell or box for convenience of transport. In some specific cases the pre-treatment of certain radioactive wastes can be performed directly in the laboratory.

6 . 1 . 2 . Collection tanks

Collection tanks are usually located on the underground floor of the laboratory building, as shown in Fig. 66, and are provided

37

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 48: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

with an adequate radiation shielding. Sometimes they can be situated outside the building and after being filled may serve as transport tanks.

Collection tanks are provided with monitoring, sampling and conditioning equipment. The instrument dials showing the volume and activity of the collected wastes are usually placed in a central panel to facilitate control.

The use of double-walled tanks (or a tank within a tank) may be advisable if leakage from a collection tank would not otherwise be contained.

6. 2. Solid wastes

Solid wastes consist of a wide variety of material encountered in laboratory operations. They may range from pieces of contami­nated paper and laboratory glassware to furniture, equipment and machinery. Solid wastes also include such items as contaminated filters, absorbers and spent ion-exchange columns. Radioactivity classification of solid wastes is difficult because of their non­homogeneity as regards contamination. They are segregated during collection with a view to subsequent treatment and handling processes. The segregation into two groups, combustible and non-combustible wastes, is common practice.

The collection of solid wastes does not usually present a diffi­cult problem. Frequently normal refuse containers, shielded if ne­cessary, can be used for small contaminated objects. It is prefer­able for such containers to have an inner lining, for example, plastic sheeting. These liners are usually sealed by a plastic clip, adhesive tape or welding when full, a procedure which facilitates removal from, and prevents contamination of, the outer container. Containers are collected in a specially equipped room or chamber, and trans­ported to a central treatment facility at appropriate intervals. In some laboratories solid wastes from cells and boxes are collected and conveyed to a holding room by special conveyor along the line of cells or boxes. Figure 58 illustrates the transfer of highly active solid wastes in sealed drums placed inside shielded containers to a central treatment facility.

38

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 49: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

7. PERSONNEL PROTECTION

7. 1. Changing rooms

All movements of personnel and equipment between zones must be through changing rooms. The purpose of these rooms is three­fold: (1) as an air lock to prevent any spread of contamination be­tween the zones; (2) to ensure personnel protection through addi­tional protective clothing before entering a zone with higher con­tamination hazard; (3) to check contamination on personnel before returning to a "colder" zone, personnel decontamination can be car­ried out if required.

Changing rooms are usually permanent but in certain circum ­stances temporary facilities or tents may be used.

The design of changing rooms depends on their relative position in the zones.

7 .1 . 1 . Initial changing rooms between Zone I and Zone II

The main purpose of this changing room is for putting on labo­ratory coats and overshoes. Figure 67 shows a typical arrangement. The workers remove such clothes as required in a cold section, put on overshoes, and cross over the bench to take their working cloth­ing from the "hot wardrobe". A special changing room is often pro­vided for visitors, clean laboratory coats being taken from the cold side.

On their return the workers take off their laboratory coats and cross the bench; they then wash their hands and monitor their nor­mal clothing.

7. 1.2. Changing rooms between Zone II and Zone III

These are sim ilar to initial changing room s, except that the contamination hazard is higher. The operators take off thfeir labo­ratory coats in a colder wardrobe, put on new overshoes, cross the bench and put on "hot" clothes from the hot wardrobe. When coming back into Zone II they are monitored before taking off the "hot" clothes, remove gloves and overshoes and drop them in a waste drum, then put on laboratory coats, etc.

39

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 50: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

7. 1.3. Changing rooms between Zone III and Zone IV

This zone requires pressurized suits which provide protection for the whole body and cover the normal’Zone III "hot" clothing. Such changing rooms, as shown in Fig. 68, are provided with the means, usually in the form of showers, of decontaminating the pressurized suit on return. For exceptional or short entries the suit is often used once and, instead of being decontaminated, it is dropped in a waste drum. It is useful to help the worker to undress with gloves through a containment panel from the cold side. Contaminated wastes can be transferred by bagging. There is always a risk of contaminating the "hot dress" when taking off the pressurized suit, so the worker often has a shower after removing it. Such changing rooms require space, several monitoring devices, lengthy deconta­mination operations, and involve long "dead" periods.

Two methods of entry to higher risk zones are illustrated in Figs 69 and 70, which show methods that eliminate the need for ela­borate decontamination facilities. The newt suit, shown in Fig. 69, can be compared with bagging. The other system is an application of the double-door system (Fig. 70). Both enable Zone IV to be entered quickly without a special fixed changing room. Such suits, even though expensive,, can effect considerable saving in the con­struction of the laboratory.

7,. 1.4. Temporary changing rooms — tents

If it is necessary to enter a free standard cell within Zone II a small temporary Zone III should be set up. This can be achieved by using plastic tents and/or mobile intervention boxes, as shown in F i g . 70.

7. 1.5. Emergency changing rooms

Most centres possess emergency changing rooms, usually of the trailer type with suitable waste storage for clothing and liquid. It is important that an ample supply of clean clothing should be available.

7. 2. Monitoring

To ensure the safety of laboratory personnel an adequate moni­toring system must be provided. This system includes personnel

40

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 51: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

monitoring and area monitoring. The monitoring is carried out by specially trained personnel with the help of special radiation measurement equipment such as dosimeters, radiation indicators and radiation monitors that are capable of determining individual exposures and radiation fields in working areas, as well as surface and air contamination [174-186]. It is intended, in this section, to give only the main principles of the monitoring system . Detailed information may be found in other IAEA publications.

7 . 2 . 1 . Personnel monitoring

The principal objects of a personnel monitoring system are to prevent over-exposure and avoid unnecessary exposure of personnel working with various sources of radiation. An adequate system of personnel monitoring in hot laboratories must provide for the measurement, evaluation and recording of significant doses accu­mulated by persons together with a recording of the conditions under which these doses were received. Personnel monitoring in hot la ­boratories usually includes monitoring of external exposure and of skin and clothing contamination.

The monitoring of external exposure is used to assess the whole-body doses and doses received by parts of the body if there is any likelihood of their being significantly in excess of the whole- body dose (for example, doses received by the fingers in case of working with soft gamma-radiation sources in a glove box). In case of accidental over-exposure, such information may be particularly useful in deciding on subsequent action. External exposure is usually monitored with physical indicators of small weight and size (film badges and rings, pocket chambers, activation detectors, etc.) which make it possible to estimate the dose equivalent for the region of the body where they are placed provided that the conversion fac­tors required to calculate the dose equivalent from measured quan­tities can be determined.

A proper assessment of the individual, area and job radiation situations make it possible to select adequate personnel monitoring devices and methods, and the proper frequency of exposure assess­ments. In simple cases it is sufficient if the individual wears a single dosimeter on the trunk of the bodj$ and the readings provided by this dosimeter are accepted as representing the whole-body ex­posure to the external radiation. In situations where the radiation distribution is not uniform it may be necessary to wear dosimeters

4 1

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 52: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

in several places on the body. In complex radiation situations, i . e. several types of radiation, it is necessary to wear a dosimeter sen­sitive to all types of radiation likely to be encountered. In labora­tory practice neutron monitoring is rare. However, it should be noted that provision of neutron monitoring may be necessary not only in work with neutron sources, but also in chemical work with in­tensive alpha-isotopes in the presence of light elements due to (a , n) reactions.

Monitoring of the clothing and skin is normally done to detect any potential risk of incorporating radioactive material. Such moni­toring is particularly necessary when a person crosses the border between two zones with different levels of contamination hazards. Therefore all changing rooms should be equipped with special moni­tors. It is sufficient.to employ a contamination detector that will indicate whether the contamination is below the acceptable limit. A contamination detector that gives a quantitative response is useful in indicating the level of contamination and the progress of decon­tamination. Special hand monitors or hand-foot monitors are con­venient if frequent monitoring of hands or feet is required. The monitor should give a sound or light signal when the contamination exceeds the acceptable level.

7 . 2 . 2 . Area monitoring

Some indications of the dose received by a person may be ob­tained by monitoring his environment. To apply the results of such monitoring to the person one must know how long he has been in the area, details of his movements therein, and changes in environ­mental conditions with time. Unless these additional factors are accurately known, complete reliance can be placed on area moni­toring only where the hazard is trivial and where the monitoring devices give adequate warning of any deterioration in exposure con­ditions .

The object of area monitoring is to provide an adequate assess­ment of external radiation, concentrations of radioactive aerosols and gases in the air, and surface contamination.

When the purpose is to provide an assessment of individual ex­posure, area monitoring is carried out in the specific working area of the person concerned. It is aimed at determining the type, energy, level and uniformity of the radiation. Radiation levels are determined by instruments (fixed, portable or semi-portable) de­signed to indicate directly the rate of external radiation exposure.

42

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 53: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

In most of the hot laboratories radiation levels in working areas are measured continuously with fixed monitors located in the vicinity of the operator. Reading parts of the monitors are usually located at a control panel. Duplicated reading instruments may be located directly in the monitored area. The monitors must give an audio or light signal when the radiation level exceeds the acceptable level. In some cases monitors are also installed in cells with reading ins­truments located in the cell control area or at the central panel. Portable or semi-portable measuring equipment is used for periodi­cal monitoring of working rooms, for assessment of contamination level of surfaces in the area, for indicating the progress of decon­tamination operations, as well as for evaluating the level of activity for determining the duration of working time in areas with higher radiation level (maintenance of cells, work in accident conditions, etc.) .

Selection of an air monitoring system depends on many factors including type of operation, toxicity of the material to be handled, and safety standards of the protective installation and devices. There are two systems in practice. The more complicated one is a fixed centralized system with continuous or periodical sampling of the air at the working places and centralized measuring and reading equip­ment. Another system is based on periodical air sampling in work­ing areas with portable or semi-portable samples.

Air sampling procedures should be based on the assumption that the activity of the sampled air is representative of the activity of the inhaled air. Since the radioactive contamination of the air inhaled by person may be substantially different from that in the working space as a whole, it is preferable to sample the air directly in his zone, using portable or semi-portable devices.

7. 3. Protective clothing

When passing between zones it is imperative to change clothing. There is a variety of protective clothing in use in hot laboratories. A full description of this clothing can be found in the IAEA Safety Series No. 22, Respirators and Protective Clothing.

It must be certain that the two types of gas-tight pressurized suits, shown in Figs 69 and 70, have no air escape into the c e ll 's atmosphere, so they canbe used in zones with controlled atmosphere. In the case of a tritium hazard, these suits give the best protection for operators. Other pressurized suits allow tritium, in spite of high air velocity, to enter through the escape valve.

43

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 54: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

R E F E R E N C E S

[1 ] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Safe Handling o f Radioisotopes, Safety Series No. 1, IAEA, Vienna (1958).

[2] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Basic Safety Standards for Radiation Protection, Safety Series No. 9, IAEA, Vienna (1962).

[3] Health and Safety Regulations Governing Work with Radioactive Materials and Sources o f Ionizing Radiation, Atom izdat, Moscow (1960) (in Russian).

[4] UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION, Standards for Radiation Protection, Chapter 0524 (1963).

[5] Code of Practice for the Protection o f Persons Exposed to Ionising Radiation in Research & Teaching, HMSO, London (1964).

[6] Classification o f Controlled Areas, Harwell N otice No. 36.[7] STANG, L .G ., Jr., Hot Laboratory Equipment, 2nd Ed., USAEC, Washington (1958).[8] BERANEK, J., HUBACEK, M . , PULKRAB, A . , WEBER, M ., Laboratore pro Praci s Radio-

izotopy, Statni Nakladatelstvi Technicke Liteiatuiy, Piaha (1961).[9] DIZDAR, Z . , Radioisotopna Laboratoriya, Export Press, Beograd (1960).

[10] NOWAK, W ., HAUSDORF, S ., Das Isotopenlaboratorium, VEB Deutscher V erlag fiir Grundstoff industrie, Leipzig (1961).

[11] Design and Construction o f the Hot Laboratory, JAERI - 5009, Japan (1963) (In Japanese).[12] REFORMATSKII, I. A ., Laboratorii dlja rabot s radioaktivnymi vescestvami (Laboratories

for work with radioactive substances), Atomizdat, Moscow (1963).[13] Handling radioactive materials, Nucl. Engng ]_ 75 (1962).[14] STEWART, D. C . , "Techniques o f handling highly active beta - and gam m a-em itting

m aterial", Techniques o f Inorganic Chemistry 3, (JONASSEN, H. B ., WEISSBERGER, A . , Eds), Interscience Publishers In c ., New York (1963) 167.

[15] FERGUSON, K .R . et a l . , "Remote handling o f radioactive m aterials", Ch. 14, Reactor Handbook, 2nd Ed., 4 Engineering (McLAIN, S ., MARTENS, J. H ., Eds), Interscience Publishers In c ., New York (1964).

[16] Proceedings o f the Fifth Hot Laboratories and Equipment C onference, Pergam on Press, London (1957).

[17] Proceedings o f the Sixth Hot Laboratories and Equipment Conference, Am erican Institute o f Chem ical Engineers (1958), Supplement, USAEC Rep. TID-7556 (1959).

[18] Proceedings o f the Seventh Hot Laboratories and Equipment Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, American Nuclear Society (1959).

[19] Proceedings o f the Eighth Conference on Hot Laboratories and Equipment, San Francisco, USAEC Rep. TID-7599 (2 vols) (1960).

[20] Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Hot Laboratories and Equipment, Chicago, American Nuclear Society (1961).

[21] Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Hot Laboratories and Equipment, Washington D .C ., American Nuclear Society (1962).

[22] Proceedings o f the Eleventh Conference on Hot Laboratories and Equipment, New York, Am erican Nuclear Society (1963).

[23] Proceedings o f the Twelfth Conference on Remote Systems T echnology , San Francisco, Am erican Nuclear Society (1964).

[24] Proceedings o f the Thirteenth Conference on Remote Systems Technology, Washington, D .C ., American Nuclear Society (1965).

44

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 55: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[25] Proceedings o f the Fourteenth Conference on Remote Systems Technology, Pittsburgh, Am erican Nuclear Society (1966).

[26] Proceedings o f the International Symposium on Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot La­boratories, Grenoble, ENEA (2 vols) (1965).

[27] International Conference on the Peaceful Uses o f Atom ic Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955).

[28] International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atom ic Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 17, UN, Geneva (1958).

[29] SPENCE, R ., "An atomic energy radiochemical laboratory design and operating experience",Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955)39.

[30] FIELDS, P .R ., YOUNGQUIST, C. H ., "Hot laboratory fa cilit ies for a w ide variety o fradiochem ical problem s", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom . Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva,1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955) 44.

[31] PRAVDYUK, N .F i, "H ot m etal research laboratory", Int. C onf. p ea ce fu l Uses atom . Energy (Proc. C onf. Geneva, 1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955) 49 .

[32] YAKOVLEV, G .N ., DERGUNOV, E .P ., REFORMATSKI, I. A ., DEDOV, V. B., "Hotanalytic­al laboratory", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1955) 7,UN, Geneva (1955) 57.

[33] GARDEN, N .B ., "Laboratory for handling radioactive m aterial", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955) 62.

[34] DISMUKE, S .E ., FELDMAN, M .J ., PARKER, G .W ., RING, F. ,Jr., "H ot laboratory fa ­cilities and techniques for handling radioactive materials", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1955) 7, UN, Geneva (1955) 67.

[35] GOERTZ, R. C . , "Recent developments in facilities for handling penetrating radiation", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 17_, UN, Geneva (1958) 585.

[36] BOWN, J.E., HYAM, E .D ., "The design, construction and equipment o f some high-activity handling cells in the United Kingdom", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 17, UN, Geneva (1958) 597.

[37] YAKOVLYEV, G. N ., DEDOV, V .B ., "The developm ent o f methods for rem ote controloperations in radiochem ical laboratories", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom . Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 1/7, UN, Geneva (1958) 652.

[38] HALL, G .R ., SHARM A.H .D ., "The design and construction of a radiochemistry laboratorysited in a tropical area", Int. Conf. peacefu l Uses atom . Energy (Proc. C onf. Geneva,1958) 17, U1SI, Geneva (1958) 691.

[39] MACHACEK, V ., HUBACEK, M ., KOS, E ., PANYR, M ., WEBER, M .t "Design o f highl­and m edium -level radiochemical laboratory", Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 1/7, UN, Geneva (1958) 696.

[40] Das Hot und Isotopenlaboratorium des EIR in Wiirenlingen, Neue Tech. 9 (1963).[41] Hot laboratories, Nucl. Engng, Lond. 11 123 (1966) 603.[42] BREBANT,. C .A . , MATHERN, F .L ., "Four years operating experience at the Saclay La­

boratory for Research on Irradiated Fuels (L .E .C .l)" , Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1962) 69.

[43] WHERRITT, C .R ., FIELD, R .E ., FRANKE, P .R ., LYLE, A .R ., "New hot laboratory fa c i­lities", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1962) 55.

45

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 56: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[44] CORBIN, L .T ., WINSBRO, W .R ., LAMB, C. E ., KELLEY, M .T ., "Design and construction o f ORNL High-Radiation-Level Analytical Laboratory", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 3.

[45] MOORE, P .F ., ALLEN, J .D ., "Los Alam os radiochemistry hot ce lls " , Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 11.

[46] BREBANT, C . , DICK, H ., JUNCA, A . , PORTAL, A ., WALLET, P ., "LEC A-irradiated fuel study laboratory", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 17.

[47] CLIMENT, V .H . , WATSON, J .M ,, "Design considerations for university-size hot c e l l fa cilit ies . A University o f C hicago radiochem istry laboratory", Proc. 11th C onf. Hot Laboratories and E quip., ANS (1963) 113.

[48] DAVIS, J .M ., JAVARY, B ., SCHLOSSER, L ., TARBE de St. HARDOUIN, A . , "Central laboratory for hot chemistry at KFA-Jiilich", Proc. 13th Conf. Remote Systems Technol. , ANS (1965) 69.

[49] MURAKAMI, M ., ISO, Y . , SASAKI, Y ., HAYASHI, K ., MATSUMOTO, T ., SAKAKURA, A ., TOMIMURA, K ., "Hot laboratory of Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute” , Proc.13th Conf. Remote Systems Technol., ANS (1965) 75.

[50] FERGUSON, K .R ., "United States practices in the control and containment o f radioactive contam ination", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 889.

[51] DOUIS, U ., "Equipementdu batimentde production des radioelements", Bulletin d'Inform a- tions Scientifiques et Techniques, CEA, n° 51 (1961).

[52] CORBIN, L. T . , WINSBRO, W.R. et a l . , "Design and construction of ORNL high-radiation- level analytical laboratory", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 3.

[53] FISHER, C. et a l . , "Radioisotope production building", Proc. 8th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., USAEC Rep. TID-7599 (1960).

[54] Glove Boxes and Shielded Cells for Handling Radioactive Materials, Proc. Symp. G love Box Design and Operation, AERE, Harwell (1957).

[55] BARTON, C. J ., A Review o f Glove Box Construction and Experimentation, USAEC Rep. ORNL-3070, u c -4 -Chemistry (1961).

[56] GARDEN, N.B. (E d.), G love Boxes and Containment Enclosures, Rep. TID-16020 (1962).[57] Looking into glove boxes, Nucl. Engng 8 (1963) 234.[58] GIMELSHTEIN, I .M ., MUZIS, A .N ., PARKIS, E .Y a . , Novye kamery dlja raboty s radio -

aktivnymi vescestvami (new cells for work with radioactive substances), A tom n. Energ. 12 (1962) 353.

[59] KELMAN, L .R ., et a l . , "G love boxes for plutonium metallurgy research at ANL", Proc. 9th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1961) 64.

[60] MORTON, J .E ., PARKER, H .A ., W YATT, E .I ., CORBIN, L .T . , "Shielded facility for use in the analysis o f radioisotopes", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and E quip., ANS(1963) 161.

[61] MARAMAN, W .J ., "Recent developments in facilities for handling intense alpha sources". Int. Conf. peaceful Uses atom. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 17, UN, Geneva (1958) 676.

[62] METZ, C .F ., "Analytical chem ical laboratory for the handling o f plutonium ", Int. Conf. peacefu l Uses atom . Energy (Proc. C onf. Geneva, 1958) 17, UN, Geneva (1958) 681.

[63] RHUDE, H .V ., KELMAN, L .R ., "A sim plified procedure for alteration and maintenance o f plutonium glove boxes", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 347.

[64] PECK, J .S ., Pressure Regulation in Activity Enclosures, Rep. UCRL-9147 (1960).

46

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 57: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[65] The Development o f a Dry Inert Atmosphere Dry Box System, Rep. LA-3109 (1964).[66] PHILLIPS, W .D .', A Com pact Inert-Atmosphere Enclosure for Alpha and Low-Level Beta-

Gamma Operations, Rep. UCRL-10369 (1962).[67] MINGESZ, D. P ., CZERNIK, D. E ., "Problems associated with the use o f inflatable seals

for enclosures containing high-purity atm ospheres", Proc. 11th C onf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 361.

[68] LANIER, S .F ., Fire and Explosion Protection o f Glove-Box Facilities. A Literature Search, Rep. TID-3578 (1964).

[69] RHUDE, H. V . , "Fire and explosion tests o f plutonium glove-boxes", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1962) 305.

[70] HUGHES, J .P ., SCHMITZ, F .J ., "Accessories developed for fiberglas reinforced plastic gloveboxes in the research hot laboratory", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems Technology, ANS (1964) 323.

[71] Lead for Radiation Shielding, Nos. 1 ,2 , 3 and 4 . Lead Developm ent Association, London(1962).

[72] MORTON, J. E., PARKER, H. A. et a l . , "Shielded facility for use in the analysis of radio­isotopes", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1963) 161.

[73] BURWELL, C .C ., SCHULTE, J .W ., WILSON, M .T . , "The Los Alam os ’ Wing 9 ‘ alpha - gamma box System", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech n o l., ANS (1964) 329.

[74] HERREN, M ., "Design and Procedures for Handling H igh-L evel A lpha-G am m a Boxes at the Laboratory for Radioactive Solids at KFA Jiilich", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 595.

[75] HARRISON, J ., Shielding materials, Nucl. Engng 7 (1962) 305.[76] ZAITSEV, L .N ., LAVDANSKII, P .A . , MALKOV, V .V . , SYCHEV, B .S ., Zascitnye

parametry betonov (Shielding parameters o f concretes), A tom n. Energ. 19 (1965) 303.[77] VESELIN, A .P . , EGOROV, Yu. A . , KUCHERYAEV, V . A . , ZaScitnye svoistva z le z o -

serpentinovogo betona (Shielding properties o f iron-serpentine concrete), Atom n. Energ. 20 (1966) 76.

[78] Shielding material, Nucleonics. 22 (1964) 82.[79] KUTATELADZE, K. S ., RISTAMBEKOV, A .V . , Spetsialny tia jelyi tsement s povyshennoi

pogloshchaiushcei sposobnostiu (Special heavy cem ent with high absorbing power), Atomn. Energ. VT_ (1964) 515.

[80] GLEN, H .M ., "A survey of structural materials for use in remote handling facilities", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 49.

[81] FERGUSON, K .R . , "T he estim ation o f gam m a-ray shielding for hot ce lls ” , Proc. l l t hConf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 469.

[82] Hot cells, N ucl. Engng 8 (1963) 242, 245, 280.[83] FAUST, L .G ., BRADLEY, J .G ., BOYD, C .L ., "Criteria for safe handling o f irradiated

plutonium in beta-gam m a shielded ce lls", Proc. l lth Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment,ANS (1963) 437.

[84] HOWE, P .W ., PARSONS, F .C ., MILES, L.E ., The Water-Shielded Cave Facility for Totally

Enclosed Master-Slave Operations at L.R. L .^ Rep. UCRL-9657 (1961).[85] FUDGE, A .J ., A Concrete C ell for Analytical Works with Multicuries Quantities o f A lpha-,

B eta-and Gamma-isotopes, Rep. AERE-R-3976 (Nucl. Engng, Lond. ]7 (1962) 415).[86] UNGER, W .E ., BOTTENFIELD, B .F ., HANNON, F. G . , "Transuranium processing facility

design", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 3.

47

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 58: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[87] NICHOLS, J. P ., ARNOLD, E .D ., TRUBEY, D .K ., "Evaluation o f shielding and hazards in the transuranium processing facility” , Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 11.

[88] CORRIGAN, J. E ., STEARNS, R. F ., "In -cell alpha-enclosure for disassembly and examination o f plutonium enriched fuel element capsules", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip­ment, ANS (1963) 245.

[89] MOORE, P .F ., ALLEN, J .D ., "Los Alamos radiochemistry hot cells, " Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 11.

[90] FAUGERAS, P ., BOUDRY, J ., LeFORT, G ,, HEUREUX, C . , STRATAKIS, J ., "CARMEN chemistry facility for reprocessing irradiated fuels in gas-tight shielded enclosures", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 89.

[91] MAS, R., TARBE; de SAINT HARDOUIN, A ., LECOUVREUR, P ., "A D A C -design of alpha- beta-gamma cells with alpha back cells and transfer facilities", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech nol., ANS (1964) 149.

[92] COOPS, M .S . , HANSON, C. L ., HAWK, L .R ., SCRIBNER, V .E ., "Rem otely operated trans-plutonium chem ical process cells", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech nol., ANS(1964) 337.

[93] GOERTZ, R .C ., FERGUSON, K .R ., LINDBERG, J .F ., MINGESZ, D. P .. BLESCH, R .A ., POTTS, C .W ., GRIMSON, J. H ., FORSTER, G .A . , BROWN, F .L ., ARMSTRONG, J. L ., "The ANL alpha-gam m a metallurgy hot c e l l - Its design philosophy and com ponents” , Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T e ch n o l., ANS (1964) 285.

[94] VALENTIN, A ., PORTAL, A. L ., "The new Fontenay-aux-Roses alpha-beta-gamm a radio­metallurgy laboratory - Design and construction", Proc. 13th Conf. Remote Systems Technol., ANS (1965).

[95] GANDOLFO, J .M ., "Methodes de travail - Materiel utilis£ auxcomplexestransplutoniens 100 curies - 1 MeV du L .M .A ." , Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 791.

[96] BRINKMANN, G ., SCHENK, W ., SCHULZ, W ., STOCKSCHLADER, F ., "Improving econo­my with the use o f standardised, movable, in -ce ll boxes, and the decontamination o f their equipment at the central decontamination fa cility ", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs, ENEA (1965).

[97] YOUNGQUIST, C. H ., MOHR, W. C . , VACHTA, S .J ., "Contamination control in Argonne chemistry cave", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 39.

[98] LEFORT, G ., VERTUT, J ., CAZALIS, J ., "New interchangeable seals for ports in alpha - beta-gam m a ce lls" , Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories.and Equipment, ANS (1963) 353.

[99] SCHRAIDT, J. H ., COLEMAN, L.F. et a l . , "Establishing and maintaining a high purity inert atmosphere in EBR II fuel cycle facility argon ce ll" , Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 181.

[100] KOPROWSKI, B .J., LIVERNASH, W .H ., BROWN, F .L ., "A system for a nitrogen atm os­phere in an alpha-gam m a hot c e ll" , Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T e ch n o l., ANS(1964) 315.

[101] Windows for direct view ing into hot cells, Nucl. Engng 8 (1963) 283.[102] Shielding windows, N ucl. Engng 9 (1964) 229.[103] LANE, W .B ., NUCKOLLS, M .J ., Argon improves ZnBr2 shielding windows, N ucleonics

22 2 (1964) 88.[104] YOUNGQUIST, C. H ., RENTSCHLER, L .M ., "Z inc bromide windows for neutron and gamma

shielding", Proc. 9th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1961) 363.

48

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 59: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[105] McGARY, T . E ., M A ZZA , J. S ., "A procedure for cleaning clouded o il filled radiation shielding w indow s",Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 149.

[106] HARDTKE, F. C . , FERGUSON, K .R ., "T he fracture by e lectrica l discharge o f gam m a - irradiated shielded window glass", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS(1963) 369.

[107] RIZZO, F .X ., MULLER, A .C . , ZUCKER, M .S ., "Electrical discharge in gamma irradiated lead shielding glass", Proc. 11th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 395.

[108] GOERTZ, R ., POTTS, C . , MINGESZ, D . , LINDBERG, J .F ., "A n experim ental head - controlled TV system to provide view ing for a manipulator operator", Proc. 13th C onf. Remote Systems T ech n o l., ANS (1965) 57.

[109] BAILEY, H .M ., Right-angle closed circu it TV system for hot c e l l operations, A tom ics Engng T echnol. 16^2 (1963) 54.

[110] O'NEILL, W .J ., Stereoscopic te lev ision system, N ucl. Instrum. M eth. 24 (1963) 45 .[111] GOERTZ, R. et a l . , "The ANL Mark-TV 2 —An experimental five-m otion head-controlled

TV system", Trans. Am. nucl. Soc. 9 (1966) 619.[112] Catalogue Protection Manipulation Detection, Chap. 2, CEA Saclay (1962).[113] Tongs, Nucl. Engng 7 (1962) 224.[114] LUKISHIN, G .I ., SMIRNOV, V .N ., RODIONOV, K .D ., Shpagovi manipuliator M ill-II -5

(Articulated Tong M ill-II -5), Atomn. Energ. 21 2 (1966) 149.[115] Manipulators, Nucl. Engng 1_ (1962) 228.[116] Recent manipulator developm ents/ Nucl. Engng £ (1963) 257.[117] GOERTZ, R. C ., "Manipulator systems developm ent at ANL” , Proc. 12th C onf. Remote

Systems T ech n o l., ANS (1964) 117,[118] VERTUT, J ., "Through-the-w all master-slave manipulator with indexing for forward and

backward m ovem ent", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech nol., ANS (1964) 67.[119] HAAKER, L .W ., OLSEN, R .A ., JELATIS, D .G ., "A gas-tight d irect-coupled m echanical

master-slave manipulator for alpha-gamma facilities” , Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 153.

[120] PARSONS, T . C . , DECKARD, L. E ., HOWE, P. W ., An im proved socking technique for master slaves, Rep. UCRL-9658 (1962).

[121] LEFORT, G ., CAZALIS, J .P ., ROUILLARD, J., "A new type o f air-tight tong for master- slave manipulators", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech n ol., ANS (1964) 167.

[122] JENNESS, R .G ., "T w o-p iece manipulator boot” , Proc. 13th Conf. Remote Systems Technol., ANS (1965) 187.

[123] AIKEN, S. C ., Gauntlet System for Master-Slave Manipulators, Rep. DP-881 (1964).[124] DICE, D. T . f WICKER, C .D . , Urethane Manipulator Gauntlets, Rep. ORN L-TM -1326

(1965).[125] Remote m anipulation for sealed cells, N ucl. Engng 7_ (1962) 335.[126] GALBIATI, L ., MANCINI, C ., RAIMONDI, T . , RONCAGLIA, F ., "A com pact and flexible

servosystem for m aster-slave e lectric manipulators", Proc. 12th C onf. Remote Systems T e ch n o l., ANS (1964) 73.

[127] JELATIS, D. G ., HAAKER, L. W ., OLSEN, R .A ., "A rugged-duty m an-capacity master- slave m anipulator", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 157.

[128] HUNT, C. L ., LINN, F. C . , "The Beetle, a m obile shielded cab with manipulators", Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 167.

[129] VERTUT, J ., "New types o f heavy manipulators” , Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 185.

49

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 60: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[130] GOERTZ, R. C .. et a l . , "ANL Mark-E4A electric master-slave manipulator", Proc. 14th Conf. Remote Systems T ech n o l., ANS (1965).

[131] RITCHIE, A .B ., WEBB, G. G ., "T he transfer o f radioactive sources", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 551.

[132] SCHULTE, J .W ., PETERSON, P .J ., WILSON, M .T . , DEILY, G .J ., FLEISCHER, E .S ., "Methods used in the United States for transferring materials through radiation barriers", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 523.

[133] LEFORT, G ., "Transferts dans une cellu le de chim ie de haute activite", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 571.

[134] BOEHME, G ., GOTTLOB, P ., NOWAK, A ., "Transfer procedures used in the alpha-gamma hot laboratory at Karlsruhe", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 583.

[135] GRAF, P ., STAUFFER, M ., "M ethodes de transfert des dispositifs d' irradiation et des Elements combustibles en vue de leur exam en apr£s irradiation dans les cellu les chaudes de 1' EIR, Wiirenlingen, " Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 485.

[136] DJURLE, S ., NANBERG, R ., "General design principles and experience o f the flow, transfer and storage o f radioactive m aterial in the Studsvik hot laboratory", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 501.

[137] LARSEN, F. B ., "Transfer o f materials, equipment and personnel through alpha-gamma barriers in the Riso hot cells", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA(1965) 511.

[138] PESENTI, P., CAZALIS, J .P ., "Proc6d£ special pour transferts alpha-bSta-gamma de pieces d' equipement de grandes tailles", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctiv ity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 611.

[139] EVANS, J.H ., "Transfer device for irradiated materials", Proc. 13th Conf. Remote Systems Technol., ANS (1965).

[140] Catalogue Protection Manipulation Detection, Chap.6, CEA Saclay (1962).[141] FLEISCHER, E .S ., PARSONS, T . C . , HOWE, P. W ., Remote Plastic Bag Passout Unit for

H igh -level Radiochem ical Operations, Rep. UCRL-9660 (1961).[142] CANTELOW, H .P ., MILES, L .E ., ABRAM, B .D ., A Simple Rapid Welder for Plastic Bags

and Sleeves, Rep. UCRL-9209 (1960).[143] VERTUT, J ., "Cendrillon containers for the transport and dispensing o f radioactive liquids",

Proc. l lth Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1963) 339.[144] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Techniques for Controlling Air Pollution

from the Operation o f Nuclear Facilities, Safety Series No. 17, IAEA, Vienna (1966).[145] KRUPCHATNIKOV, V .M ., Ventilyacia pri rabote s radioactivnimi veschestvami, (Ventila­

tion in work with radioactive substances), Atomizdat, Moscow (1964).[146] HALE, R .J ., "Laboratory ventilation", Proc. 6th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment,

A .I . Chem . E. (1958) 343.[147] STRAUB, C. P ., Low Level Radioactive Wastes, their Handling, Treatment and Disposal,

USAEC (1964) 74, 129.[148] FULLER, A .B ., "Design considerations for exhaust systems involving radioactive particu­

lates, Proc. 8th AEC Air Cleaning Conf. ORNL. (1963) 73.[149] BROWN, A .R ., What you should know when designing a plastic ventilation system, H eat.,

Pip. Air Condit. (Sept. 1962).[150] SMITH, S .E ., WHITE, P. A . S ., Design o f radioactive filtration systems, N ucl. Engng

7 (1962) 239.

50

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 61: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[151] HOWE, P. W ., PEARCE, W ., "Ventilation systems for use in transuranium processing, Proc. int. Conf. Radioactive Pollution of Gaseous Media, Saclay, France (1963).

[152] GARDEN, N. B ., Successful M ulticurie Operations in Equipment Designed with M obility C om plete Control, Rep. TID-5280 (1955) 338.

[153] YOUNG, J . . et a l . , Dry Scrubber Unit for Low-Leak Ventilation Systems, USAEC Rep. UCRL-10953 (1963).

[154] DUTEIL, J ., "U tilization o f specialized filter housings incorporating bag-out features for radioactive contam ination con trol", Proc. 12th C onf. Remote Systems T e ch n o l., ANS (1964) 377.

[155] HAHS, C. A ., "Contaminated filter removal equipment", Proc. 13th Conf. Remote Systems T echnol., ANS (1965) 61.

[156] McCORMACK, C. G . , "Im proved fission product gas co lle ction equipm ent", Proc, 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, ANS (1962) 233.

[157] SALLE, R ., "D eflector to prevent suction of smoke into chimney slipstreams at high wind speeds", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T ech n o l., ANS (1964) 39.

[158] GLUECKAUF, E .(E d .), A tom ic Energy Wastes, Interscience Publishers I n c . , New York (1961).

[159] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Technology o f Radioactive Waste Manage­ment avoiding Environmental Disposal, T echnical Reports Series, N o. 27, IAEA, Vienna (1964).

[160] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The M anagement o f R adioactive Wastes produced by Radioisotope Users, Safety Series No. 12, IAEA, Vienna (1965).

[161] INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The M anagem ent o f R adioactive Wastes produced by Radioisotope Users: Technical Addendum, Safety Series No. 19, IAEA, Vienna(1966).

[162] Report o f the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, Rep. UCRL-9657.[163] YOUNGQUIST, C .H ., "Packaging of fission product waste in a remote controlled chemistry

cave", Proc. 5th Conf. Hot Laboratory and Equip. 3, Pergamon Press, London (1957) 266.[164] ASBURN, A .G ., ELSON, A. W ., "A general purpose shielded area for work up to 1000 MeV

curies", Int. Conf. peacefu l Uses atom .. Energy (Proc. Conf. Geneva, 1958) 1/7, UN, Geneva (1958) 619.

[165] WATSON, H. E ., STEELE, L. E ., "The U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, high level radiation laboratory", Proc. 12th Conf. Remote Systems T echnol., ANS (1965) 45.

[166] STEARNS, R .F ., "New chem ical ce ll and radioactive waste disposal system at Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory", Proc. 6th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equipment, A . I.C h . E ., USAEC Rep. TID-7556 (1959).

[167] CONBOY, J .T . , HUNTER, K .R ., REYNOLDS, H. W ., TRURAU, W .H ., "O perational problems in hot laboratory safety", Proc. 5thConf. Hot Laboratories and Equip. 3 , Pergamon Press, London (1957) 67.

[168] FAUGERAS, P ., CONTURE, J ., GUILLET, H ., "Safety and m aintenance characteristics in a line o f ce lls " , Proc. 10th Conf. Hot Laboratories and Equip., ANS (1962) 83.

[169] TROTT, A .F ., "Contamination control and waste disposal in the high level isotope opera­tions at A tom ic Energy o f Canada Ltd Com m ercial Products Ottawa", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctiv ity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 667.

[170] WATSON, C .D . , BERRETH, E .A ., DUMMER, J .E ., FULLER, R .K ., STEARNS, R .F ., "Policy and procedures used in the United States for decontaminating hot ce lls", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 677.

51

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 62: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

[171]

[172]

[173]

[174]

[175]

[176]

[177][178]

[179]

[180]

[181]

[182]

[183]

[184]

[185]

[186]

[187]

[188]

[189]

[190]

[191][192]

[193]

5 2

CESARANO, C ., CHEZZI, E ., LAURO, M ., "Decontam ination experience at the hot laboratory o f C asaccia", - Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High A ctivity Hot Labs2, ENEA (1965) 705.WELLS, H ., "Decontam ination procedures for high activity cells at A . E. R. E. Harwell", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 719. VALENTIN, A . , HA YET, L ., "Techniques et cadences de decontamination dans des c e l ­lules de m etallurgie a lph a-beta -gam m a", Proc. Int. Symp. Working Methods in High Activity Hot Labs 2, ENEA (1965) 735 .INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Provision o f R adiological Protection Services, Safety Series No. 13, IAEA, Vienna (1965).INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Basic Requirements for Personnel M o ­nitoring, Safety Series No. 14, IAEA, Vienna (1965).INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Use o f Film Badges for Personnel M o ­nitoring, Safety Series No. 8, IAEA, Vienna (1962).Film Badge Dosimetry, Proc. Sym p., Harwell, Oct. 1961, UKAEA (1962).Personnel Dosimetry Techniques for External Radiation, Proc. S ym p ., M adrid, ENEA, Paris (1963).Radiation Contamination o f Workers, Proc. Symp. Munich, Oct. 1962, Euratom, Brussels(1964).AGLINTSEV, K. K ., Prakticheskaia dozimetria (Practical dosimetry), Atom izdat, Moscow(1963).TIUNOV, L .A ., VASILIEV, G .A ., PARUBOK, V .P ., Rukovodstvo po radiazionnoi zash- chite (Manual on radiation protection), AN USSR, Moscow-Leningrad (1961).Dozim etria i zashchita ot ioniziruiushchih izlueheni, (Dosimetry and ionizing radiation protection), M oscow, Gosenergoizdat. (1963).IVANOV, V. I . , Voprosy dozim etrii i zashchity ot izluchenii, (Problems o f dosimetry and radiation protection), Moscow, Gosatomizdat (1963).LISTER, B. A. J ., "Recent advances in monitoring for airborne radioactivity", Radiological Monitoring o f the Environment (GODBOLD, B .C ., JONES, J .K ., Eds), Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965).GUPTON, E. D . , Personnel monitoring - monitoring for alpha -^emitting aerosols, N ucl. Saf. 5 2 (1964) 194.

SHERWOOD, R. J ., STEVENS, D. C . , A Special Programme o f Air Sampling in Selected Areas o f AERE Harwell, Rep. AERE-R-4680.POWLANDS, R. P ., A Catalogue of Available Whole Body Protective Clothing, Rep. AHSB (RP) R-9, Harwell (1961).-CURTIS, W .K ., KINGSTON, D .W ., Decontamination Suit (The 'N ew t' Suit), Rep. AERE- ES/R-2674 (1960).ALHAZOV, V .A . , TKACHEV, A .P ., Individualnye sredstva protivoradiazionnoi n pro- tivopojarnoi zashchity, (Personal means o f radiation and fire-prevention), Moscow, Gosa­tomizdat (1963).Zashchitnaia Technika (Protective techniques), Catalogue, Vsesojuznoe Objedinenie Isotop, Moscow (1964).Protective Clothing and Other Apparel, Rep. SB-482 (Suppl. 1) (1965).MCDONALD, C. W ., A M odification to Self Contained Compressed Air Breathing Apparatus to Facilitate Personnel Decontamination, UKAEA, Rep. AEEW-M-376, (1963).DAVIES, C. N. (E d.), Design and Use o f Respirators, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1962),

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 63: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIGURES

FIG. 1.

( a )

Arrangement of glove boxes(a) In line(b) Free standing.

■ i || t U I I II H II□ L j . □ LZj l jZ ? ZONE II

□ □ □ □ □

(b)

FIG. 2. Single line arrangement o f hot cells1. Operating area2. Hot cells3. Decontamination room4. Changing rooms5. Offices and laboratory6. Workshop7. Cask storage.

53

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 64: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

cn

FIG. 3. Double line arrangement o f hot cells 1, 2. Operating area 3, 4. Concrete shielded cells5. Transfer rooms6. Changing room.

t— i------------10 1 2 0 5M ET R ES FEET

FIG.4. Elevation showing arrangement o f zones

1. Mechanical master-slave manipulator 6. Door2. Removable roof slab 7. Access ports3. Crane 8. Shielding window4. Rectilinear electric manipulator 9. Lights.5. Barrier

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 65: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG.5. Fume cupboard1. Front sliding panel2. Inlet flow3. Outlet ventilation4. Control o f services.

mO l

FIG.6. "T elescop ic" glove1. Glove port; the tight part 2 fits round the forearm and wrist; the wider part 3 enables easier movements than gloves in Figs 9 and 10.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 66: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 7. Typical arrangement o f gloves in boxes1. Gloves 4. Inlet filters2. Safety plug 5. Outlet filters3. Transfer tunnel 6. Regulating

valve.

FIG. 8. Glove ports(a) Plastic port welded or cemented;(b) and (c ) Detachable metal or plastic ports. The glove bead can be fitted 1. In grooves

2. By recesses.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 67: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 9. Glove-changing procedure1. Remove adhesive tape (a) or clamp (b)2. Move glove bead from second to first

groove3. Place new glove on second groove and

remove old glove4. Clamp new glove.

FIG. 10. Glove changing system by ejection1. Remove lock ring2. Fix ejection device to box flange and

rotate screw to release glove3. Replace lock ring.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 68: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

cnoo

FIG.

©

( b )

11. Bag transfer system(a) Posting out - place object in bag,

weld and cut o ff (see detail o f welding)

(b) Posting in - (1) p lace object in bag(2) weld outside the box(3) cut o ff inside the

box.

FIG. 12. Special transfer port (for posting in only)(a) Seal made by container(b) Seals fixed to port1. Hot side2. Container3. Lip seals.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 69: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 13. Panel fixing(a) Combined attachment and seal(b) Old system with holes in the panel(c) (d) (e) Clamping.

mCD

FIG.

(b)

'(c)

14. Types o f gaskets(a) (b) (c) Standard extended strip(d) Soft rubber one-p iece

seal.

(a)

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 70: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 15. Glove box penetrations 1. Cold sides(a) Welded pipe fitting(b) Removable pipe fitting(c) S ingle-cable penetration(d) M ulti-cable bulk-head seal.

60

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 71: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

8. (b)

FIG. 16. Typical shielded boxes(a) Shielded box with independent containment box(b) Shielded box with sealed shielding panels1. Lead bricks2. Lead glass window3. Tongs on ball and joint4. Containment box5. Transfer door6. Conveyor7. Lighting8. Services9. Remote control o f the door

10. Cast-iron shielding11. Higher activity enclosure12. Lower activity enclosure13. Glove with shielded door.

6 1

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 72: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 1 7 . Construction joints in shield walls

(a) P ie ce s o f th e sam e m a te ria l(1) A straight jo in t in front o f a source

can b e conpensated by a sm a ll b lo ck(2 ) A straight jo in t w hich is nev er in

front o f a source can b e a c c e p te d i f sca ttered rad iation is not too high

(3) T y p ic a l arran gem en t o f jo in ts o f w all with roof (a ) and b en ch (b)

(4 ) T y p ic a l step jo in t - th e rad iation

le a k a g e through sp ace (a) is co m p en ­sated by step (b) and reverse; o c c a s io n a lly com p en sation by part ( c ) is necessary, when sp aces (a)

and (b) are larg e(5) C h ev ro n -ty p e jo in t

(6 ) Curved jo in t, used for th ic k sh ield w alls

(7) Sh ield in g requirem ents a t door openings - th e sh ield in g provided in lin e (a ) must b e th e sam e as pro­vided in lin e (c ) .

( a )

©

©

/\

/\—-

/\

/\

Y ly

©

(b)

©(b) P ieces o f d ifferen t m a te ria l

(1 ) Step jo in t - shield ing presented by

path (a ) in s te e l and c o n c re te m ust b e the sam e as that presented by path (b) in c o n cre te - i f lead is s tee l - lin ed

path (a ) is sm a ller than path (b ) and it must b e com pensated (se e Fig. 1 7 a (4)).

(2) and (3 ) T y p ic a l lead glass window a rran gem en ts, sh ield ing presented by paths (a ), (b ), ( c ) , (d) m ust b e th e

sam e.<D

6 2

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 73: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 18

03GO

Typical chevron brick-built wall1. Standard top 8. Corner ordinary

brick brick2. Standard ordinary 9. Corner base

brick brick3. Standard base 10. Corner pillar brick

brick 11. T-junction pillar4. Half top brick 12. Reinforcement5. Half ordinary steel profile

brick 13. Simple bricks6. Half base brick on bench.7. Comer top brick

FIG. 19. Typical curved brick-built wall1, 2, 3. Bricks 12. Depleted urani-4, 8. Port bricks um sphere on gas5, 6. Inserts bearing7. Lead plugs 13, 14, 15, 16.9. Frame for Windows

sphere 17,, 18. Reductionbricks.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 74: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG.20. Booting change procedure (see also Fig.9)1. Remove grip tongs and sphere unit2. Put bead o f booting in first groove3. Fit new booting in second groove using special device (a)4. Release old booting.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 75: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 21. Ejectable ring system1. Lead frame 5. New clamping2. Box flange ring to be3. Ejection device placed4 . Elastic 6. Booting with

clamping lip seal inring in place place

7. New bootingto be placed.

FIG . 2 2 . A lp h a- B e ta - G am m a fa c i l i ty w ith co n ta in m en t

box sep a ra te from b io lo g ic a l sh ield1. C o n ta in m en t box2 . M a s te r -s l3 v e m an ip u lato r

3 . Window4. T ran sfer system5. B ench.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 76: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CD05

FIG. 23. Example o f operating area free o f equipment not required for operational control.

FIG. 24. Types o f doors for hot cells1. Roll-out door2. Hinged door3. Sliding door4. Operating area Zone II5. Maintenance area Zone III6. Transfer room Zone IV7. "Frogman" changing room8. Changing room.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 77: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

03-J

FIG.25. Containment panel.

FIG. 26. Special shielded areas for maintenance and decontamination1. Operating area ( Zone II)2, 3, 4, 5. Hot cells6, 7, 8, 9. Corresponding back cells for

maintenance or decontamination (Zone III or IV depending on the operations)

10. Storage o f hot equipment11. Air lock12. Service and transfer area (Zone III)13. Changing room.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 78: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG.27. H ot-cell penetrations(a) H ot-cell (b) Sleeve for

penetrations electric1. Steel-lined services

hole 1. Steel-lined2. Concrete. hole

2. Concrete3. Metal tube

with re­movable cable.

FIG. 28. Simple mirror viewing system.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 79: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 29. Lead glass windows for shielded boxes1. Lead frames o f different

widths for chevron brick2. Lead glass blocks.

6 9

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 80: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

3

FIG. 30. Windows for hot cells(a). Lead glass window(b) Lead glass and o il window for neutron and gamma(c) Zinc bromide window

1. Safety stabilized glass 4. Oil2. Lead glass block 5. Safety sealed glass3. Cold side safety glass 6. Zinc bromide

solution.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 81: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

Light transmission

violet blue green fellow orange red

FIG . 3 1 . Lead glass properties.

3 4

FIG . 3 2 . P eriscop e1. P erisco p e2. Lead plug for la m p ch a n g e3 . G a s -tig h t transp arent co v er

4 . R em o v a b le s e rv ic e plug w ith co o lin g

tubes.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 82: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 3 3 . Lighting system s(a ) Lighting system for sh ield ed box(b) Lighting system for hot c e l l

1. Bulb

2. Lead plug for lam p ch an g e3 . G a s -tig h t transparent co v er

4 . R em o v ab le serv ice plug with co o lin g

tubes.

7.2

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 83: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 3 4 . Tongs

(a) Tongs with b a ll and jo in t(b) A rticu la ted tongs(c) A rticu la ted tongs w ith a d ju sta b le a n g le(d) M in im a nip1. R em o v ab le grip

2. G a s -tig h t in te rm e d ia te p ie c e to w hich b ootin g is fitted

3. A rticu la tio n con tro l4 . B a ll and jo in t .

7 3

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 84: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG . 3 5 . A rticu lated m a ster -s la v e m an ip u la to r: (a ) T h ro u g h -th e -ro o f ty p e ; (b) T h ro u g h -th e -

w all ty p e. 1 . M an ip u lator; 2 . W indow; 3 . P en etration and sh ield in g ; 4 . Lead fra m e ; 5 . Booting;

6 . Tongs; 7 . Tongs ch an g in g fix tu re .

7 4

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 85: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .3 6 . Im proved a rtic u la te d m a ste r -s la v e m anip u lato rs: (a ) Upper arm s with sy m m e trica l m o v em en t and e le c t r ic Y m o tio n ; (b) S la v e arm with p a ra lle l and a m p lifie d m ov em en ts, a . Upper arm ; b. Shoulder, c . Forearm ; d. W rist; e . Through tube; f. A ctu ato r for Y dis­p la ce m en t m o tio n ; g . M aster sm a ller a rm ; h . S la v e a rticu la te d arm . 1 . M an ip u lato r; 2 . Window;

3 . Pen etration and sh ield in g ; 4 . Lead fra m e; 5 . B ooting; 6 . T on g s; 7 . Tongs changing fixtu re .

7 5

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 86: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

03

F IG .3 7 . T e le s c o p ic m a s te r -s la v e m an ip u lato r (th ro u g h -th e -ro o f ty p e ): (a ) Standard m o d e l; (b) M odified m od el with Y d isp la cem en t m o tio n . 1 . M an ip u lator: a . M ain tu b e ; b . Sh ould er; c . Upper tu b e ; d. E le c tr ic a c tu a to r for Y d isp la c e m e n t; 2 . W indow; 3 . P en etra tio n and sh ie ld in g ; 4 . B o o tin g ; 5 . Part to prevent bootin g stopping te le s c o p ic m o tio n ; 6 . Tongs; 7 . Tongs changing fix tu re ; 8 . B a ll and jo in t a ssem b ly ;9 , T e le s c o p ic upper tu b e .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 87: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

mmrnrnmm\0O-./oV{.„,il b«ton = 500

’Oo€)0>V>- (b)

F IG .3 8 . T e le sc o p ic m a ste r -s la v e m an ip u lato r (th ro u g h -th e -w a ll ty p e ): (a) C o m p act m o d el;(b) Sov iet type M -2 2 . 1 . M an ip u lator: a . F ixed tu b e ; b. M oving tu b e ; c . In te rm e d ia te tube; d. S la v e shoulder; e. M aster fixed tu b e; 2 . W indow; 3 . P en etration and sh ield in g ; 4 . Booting ;

5 . Ton g s; 6 . Tongs ch an gin g fixtu re .

7 7

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 88: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .3 9 . T e le sc o p ic m a ster -s la v e m an ip u lato r: (a) Standard ty p e; (b) E x ten d ed -reach ty p e;1 . M anip u lator: a . Fixed tu b e; b . M oving tu b e; c . In te rm e d ia te tu b e ; d. S la v e shoulder; e . M aster fixed tube; 2 . W indow; 3 . Pen etration and sh ield in g ; 4 . Booting; 5 . Tongs; 6 . Tongs changing fixtu re .

7 8

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 89: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 0 . Booting for m a ste r -s la v e m an ip u lato r(a ) O ld sy stem ; to f ix th e b ootin g in th e c e l l on th e g lo v e port (1 ) i t is necessary to

enter th e c e l l(b) British sy stem ; b ootin g is fixed on the g lo v e port (1 ) outside th e c e l l . T h e re is a risk o f d am agin g th e b ootin g when inserting th e m an ip u lato r

(c ) US and French system w ith e je c ta b le ring (2 ) . T h is system ca n a lso b e used w ith an in d e­pendent co n ta in m en t box

(d) US system o f independent box with f le x ib le c e ilin g (3 ) and b ootin g fixed on ring (4 ) hung on m an ip u lato r shoulder.

7 9

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 90: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 1 . B ootin g a tta c h m e n t a t wrist

(a ) O r ig in a l g a u n tle t b o o tin g system(b) G au n tle t w ith re m o v a b le fin g er

on in te rm e d ia te sea led p ieces

(c ) Tong s w ith in te rm e d ia te g a s- tig h t p ie c e - this d isposition ensures low est risk o f d am ag e to b o o tin g .

F IG .4 2 . S e a le d m a s te r -s la v e m an ip u lato r

(a ) S e a l on hot s id e(b) S e a l on co ld side1. S la v e a ssem b ly 3 . M aster assem b ly2 . S e a le d tu b e 4 . E xten d ed -reach

s la v e arm .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 91: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

( b )

F IG .4 3 . M an ip u lato r v e h ic les(a ) PaR (USA)(b) RIV ET v e h ic le (U K )1. A rm w ith th re e a r tic u la te d sectio n s2. T e le v is io n c a m e ra s and p latfo rm (not

equipped in (a ))3. T e le s c o p ic co lum n4 . C a te rp illa r v e h ic le5 . C o n tro l panel6. Pow er unit7. C a b le drum .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 92: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 4 . D iagram in d ica tin g ty p ic a l co rre la tio n o f c e l l p aram eters and m anipulators.

3

FIG . 4 5 . T y p ic a l co v e ra g e d iag ram for m an ip u lato rs shown in F ig . 361. Wrist co v e ra g e2. Tongs co v e ra g e3. A bsolute l im it o f v iew ing4 . L im it o f view ing when

handling .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 93: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 6 . R ad iatio n lo ck s(a ) T w o -d o o r transfer port

(b) R o tating transfer port (sm a ll

ite m a ccess)(c ) R o tatin g transfer port ( la rg e

ite m a ccess)(d) D ra w er-ty p e transfer port.

F IG .4 7 . I n t e r - c e l l tran sfer

(a ) S im p le sh ield in g door(b) R o tatin g v a lv e door(c ) S h ie ld ed tran sfer lo ck .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 94: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 8 . T u n n el tran sfer sy stem : (a ) Below bench sy stem ; (b) Behind c e l l sy stem ; 1 . Sh ie ld in g door;2 . Sh ie ld in g tu n n el; 3 . C on v eyor; 4 . Tongs.

A.

(b)

(L

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 95: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .4 9 . Big sh ield ed co n ta in ers w ith valved doors(a ) Sh ie ld ed co n ta in e r w ith slid in g v a lv e(b) S h ie ld ed c o n ta in e r w ith sp lit bottom

v a lv e(c ) Sh ie ld ed co n ta in e r w ith screw ed plug

v a lv e1. C o n ta in er v a lv e 4 . T ray op erating rod

qjj 2 . C e ll v a lv e 5 . A irtight cap su le .3 . T ray

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 96: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

0305

F IG . 50 Sh ield ed co n ta in ers with ro ta tin g v alves(a ) C o n ta in er w ith ro ta tin g v a lv e and

m a g a z in e a tta c h e d to c o n c re te c e l l(b) C o n ta in er w ith ro ta tin g v a lv e over pond

1. R o tatin g v a lv e2 . C e ll plug3 . O p eratin g rod4 . M a g a z in e

5 . R o tatin g door on th e c e l l

6 . Plug for top lo ad in g

7 . Lock rod8 . C o m p en satin g

sh ie ld in g .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 97: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

F IG .51

u

S m a ll sh ield ed co n ta in ers1. C o n ta in e r w ith h eav y co v er2. C o n ta in e r w ith heavy pivoting cover3 . H an d le w ith a u to m a tic lo ck to c lo se

c o n ta in e r b e fo re lif t in g4 . C o n ta in e r with sm a ll plug5 . C a b le fo r ra isin g bask et6 . Basket fix e d to sm a ll plug.

f t

u

co

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 98: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

B

FIG . 5 2 . S p e c ia l transfer system(A ) B o g ie tra v e llin g down c e n tre lin e o f m a in te n a n c e area(B) B o g ie rotated to present c o n ta in e r to s e le c te d c e l l1 . C e ll transfer port sh ield in g door2 . C o n ta in er sh ield in g door3. T ran sfer s t il la g e4 . T u rn ta b le and slider assem bly

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 99: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 53

ooCO

Tunnel transfer system (see also Fig. 7)(a) Rigid tunnel(b) Flexible tunnel assembly(c) Disconnection o f flexible tunnel1. Rigid tunnel 3. Flexible tube2. Cell port plug 4. Rigid tube to prevent

tunnel deflating.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 100: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CDO

FIG. 54. Double-door transfer system(a) General view showing all components(b) Before connection(c) Connected(d) Opened for transfer1. Cell flange 5. Cell door gasket2. Cell door 6. Container door3. Sealed container 7. Container gaskets.4. Cylinders to seal ce ll door

and container flanges to ce ll flange

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 101: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 55

CD

Double door with triple-effect joints(a) General view with container in position and double

door opened(b) Detail showing port flanges gaskets and doors before

connecting(c) Detail when connected(d) Detail when double door is open for transferWhen rotating the container into the ce ll flange, first the two flanges lock then the two doors interlock, and at the end o f the rotation the connected double door unlocks from the container

1. Cell flange with only one gasket to seal on the box2. Cell door with triple-effect joint3. Joint; first effect - between flange & door

second effect -in s id e its groove third effect - between the two doors when

connected4. Rotating lock ring to fix the ce ll door5. Bayonet connection to fix container to the cell flange6. Container door7. Container flange with triple-effect joint8. Bayonet connection to fix the door to the container9. Bayonet connection to fix the two doors together.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 102: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

( a )

FIG. 56. Sealed shielded transfer system (see also Figs 47 c and 48)(a) Tunnel between two shielded cells(b) Tunnel connecting a line o f cells1. Shielded enclosure 4. Containment box2. Shielded door 5. Gaslight door3. Shielded tunnel 6. Containment to

tunnel.

FIG. 57. Indirect transfer system with low contamination risk

1. Container plug2. Auxiliary shielding3. Cell plug4. Offset rod5. Plastic lining for transfer hole6. Cell plug plastic cover

(contaminated)

7. Intermediate piece for container(8) Both (7) and (8) can be replaced by a bigger container on the same tilting platform (9).

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 103: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CDGO

FIG.58. Solid waste transfer system(a) General view(b) The container is connected(c) Double door is opened1. Container2. Shielding cover 3; Lightweight drum4. Split bottom door5. Auxiliary shielding6. Containment box

7. Gastight door8. Transfer chamber9. Shielded gastight door

10. Electromagnet11. Drum cover.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 104: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CD

FIG. 59. Remote bagging transfer system1. Cell port with gasket2. Bag fitted on support ring3. Bag adapter ring4. Lifting fork5. Polythene bag6. Transfer chamber7. Jack for bag exchange8. Remote bag welder and cutter(a) Place material in bag from inside the box(b) Weld, cut and place the material by

manipulator from the outside(c) Place new bag on adapter ring(d) Lift and eject old bag.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 105: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

1

FIG. 60. Horizontal bag transfer system1. Tunnel in shielding with two

shielding doors working as. radiation lock

2. Shielded container with door and scoop

3. Bag fitted outside the ce llIntroduction (a) Open outer door,

place container in front o f transfer lock, open in -ce ll door,

(b) Open container door, >N operate scoop

'(c) Close in -ce ll door, remove container, put in new bag (see Fig. 9)

Extraction (d) as (a) and(b), then pick up object with scoop in bag

(e) Pull bag inside out, close container door when scoop is in container

(f) Close in -ce ll door, weld, cut, etc.

(a) (b)' (c)

FIG. 61. Vertical bag transfer system(a) Seal with bag and remove

welded bags (see Figs 9 and 53 c), drain with argon

(b) Connect container, open shielded doors and transfer object

(c) Close doors, valves, weld and cut.

1. Sealing bag 4. Weldedand2. Disposal cut bag

pouch 5. Shielded3. Gastightseal doors.

9 5

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 106: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

CD05

FIG. 62. Double-door transfer, system1. Shield wall with rotating valve2. Containment box3. Container with screwed valve (see

Fig. 49 c)4. Sealed capsule with door having triple­

effect joint5. Operating rod6. Box door with triple-effect joint7. Tray(a) Place container in position(b) Open rotating valve in wall and screw

plug in container, push operating rod forward until capsule door makes contact with box flange, rotate rod to connect capsule door with cell door

(c) Open ce ll door with capsule.door attached and remove tray with ce ll manipulator.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 107: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 63. System for transfer and transport o f active liquor1. Container and protective cover for laboratory storage2. Coupling and plastic pipe for transfer o f medium active liquor3. Shielded coupling platform4. Washout container5. Service plug with air pump6. Sampling unit7. Waste bag with extractor for washed coupling gaskets8. Unshielded coupling platform9. Shielded transfer unit for highly active liquor

10: Handling stand11. Vacuum pump12. Dynamometer measuring quantity o f liquor13. Air filters14. Protective cover used when transporting15. Additional protection for external transport

Containers o f the same size may have thin shielding and large capacity, or heavy shielding and small capacity.

9 7

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 108: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

( b )

FIG. 64. Bypass system for fume cupboard1. Inlet ventilation flow2. Room exhaust flow(a) When the front panel is opened inlet

ventilation flow serves as a curtain in front o f the opening - part o f the flow com es from the room exhaust flow

(b) When the front panel is closed the fume cupboard is still strongly venti­lated partly by direct ventilation flow and partly by the air exhausted from the room. The room exhaust flow is minimal.

FIG. 65. Glove box extract ventilation system (see also Fig. 7)

1. Diaphragm controls the regulating valve

2. Weight calibrating the depression in the box

3. Exhaust filters4. Inlet filters5. Valve control pipe6. Alarm switch

In normal conditions depression is controlled for any movement o f glove or small leakage. When by accident the largest port is opened, the valve opens automatically, provides 0. 5 m /s air velocity through the port, and the switch gives the alarm.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 109: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 66. Typical active waste liquor delay tank installation1. Low activity tanks 8. Laboratory2. Automatic pump sump 9. Cooling water3. Medium activity tanks 10. Active sink4. Sampling 11. Covered duct asphalt-lined5. Drain to low -level 12. Pump house

effluent treatment plant 13. By tanker to medium-level6. Hand basins effluent-treatment plant.7. Showers

9 9

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 110: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

100

© ® ® ©

© ©

F IG .6 7 . T y p ic a l ch an g in g room , Z o n e I to Zone II , or Z o n e II to Z o n e III1. Z o n e I or Z o n e II

2. Z o n e II or Z o n e III3. C old w ardrobe4 . C le a n overshoes c o n ta in e r5. B a rrie r b e n ch

6. C o n ta m in a te d overshoes c o n ta in e r

7. H ot w ardrobe8. H and and fo o t m on itor9 . Port m o n ito r

10. A c t iv e c o n ta in e r

11. Wash basin .

F IG .6 8 . T y p ic a l ch an g in g room . Z o n e III to Z on e IV1. C h an g in g room area2. Z o n e IV or a c c e s s to Z o n e IV3 . E n tran ce corridor4 . M a in te n a n c e area5. C le a n p ressu rized -su it w ardrobe6. C o n tro l window7. E xit a ir lo ck8. S u it d e co n ta m in a tio n shower

■9. Lock ch am b er1 0 . G lo v e b o x area for d isrobing w ith a id from m a in te n a n c e area1 1 . U nderw ear d isrobing a re a and p ersonnel show er1 2 . A ir lo c k13. B a rrie r b en ch .

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 111: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 69. Newt su it, seen from th e hot zon e1. C o n ta in m en t p an el

2 . Port for bagging w astes.

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 112: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

FIG. 7 0 . D o u b le -h e lm et suit

1. F ixed or m o b ile in terv en tio n box2 . D ou ble h e lm e t3 . Harness to hold h e lm e t4 . B reath in g and te lep h o n e lin es

(a ) In terv en tio n b o x is co n n ected to a c t iv e zo n e ;open double h e lm e t and th e o p erato r enters suit through th e

f la n g e(b) D ou ble h e lm e t is c lo sed , outside h e lm e t is lo c k e d . O p erator

unlocks insid e h e lm e t.

( c ) O p erator enters a c t iv e z o n e ;b reath in g lin e s and te lep h o n e c a b les en a b le op erator to m o v e about in a c t iv e z o n e and keep in touch with

co n tro l point. j

1 0 2

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 113: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

IAEA SALES AGENTS AND BOOKSELLERS

Orders for A gency p u b lica tio n s ca n be p la ced w ith your b o o kselle r or any o f th e addresses lis ted

b elow :

ARGENTINA

Com isifin N a cio n a l de Energfa A t6 m ica A venid a del L ibertador 8 2 5 0 Buenos A ires

A U S T R A L I AHunter P u blication s 23 M cK illo p S tre et M elbourne, C . 1

A U S T R I AIAEA

Pu blication s S a les U nit

P .O . Box 590 KSrntner Ring 11 A -1 0 1 1 V ienna

B E L G I U MO ffic e In tern atip n al

de L ib ra irie 3 0 , A venue M arnix Brussels 5

G E R M A N Y , F ed . Rep.R. O ldenbourg V erlag R o senheim er Strasse 145 D -8 M unich 80

H U N G A R YK ulturaH ungarian Trading C om pany for Books and Newspapers P .O . Box 149 Budapest 62

I S R A E LH eilig er & C o.3 , Nathan Strauss S tr.Jerusalem

I T A L YA gen zia E d ito ria le C om m ission aria

A . E. I .O .U .V ia M erav ig li 16 1 -2 0 1 2 3 M ilan

C A N A D AIn tern atio n al P u b lication s D ep t, o f Pu b lic Printing and Sta tio n ery Bldg. O ttaw a, O ntario

C .S .S .R .S .N .T .L .

Sp olen a 51 Nov6 M esto

Prague 1

D E N M A R K

Ejnar M unksgaard Ltd.

6 N orregade D K -1 1 6 5 Copenhagen K

F R A N C EO ffic e In tern atio n al de D o cu m en tatio n e t L ib ra irie 4 8 , Rue G ay-Lussac

Paris 5e

J A P A NM aruzen C om p an y , Ltd .P .O . Box 5 0 5 0 ,T ok yo In tern atio n al

M E X I C OLibrerfa In te rn a c io n a l, S . A. Av. Sonora 206 M e x ico 1 1 , D .F .

N E T H E R L A N D SM artinus N ijh o ff N. V.Lange Voorhout 9 P .O . Box 269 T h e Hague

P A K I S T A NM irza Book A gency 6 5 , Shahrah Q u a id -E -A z a m P .O . Box 729 Lahore - 3

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 114: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

P O L A N D Ars PolonaC en tra la Handlu Z ag ran iczn eg o K rakow skie P rz ed m iescie 7

Warsaw

R O M A N I A C a rtim ex Rue A . Briand

P .O . Box 1 3 4 -1 3 5 Bucarest

S P A I N

Librerfa Bosch Ronda U niversidad 11

Barcelo n a - 7

S WEDENC . E. F ritzes K ungl. H ovbokhandel

Fredsgatan 2 S to ck h o lm 16

S W I T Z E R L A N D Lib ra irie Payot Rue Grenus 6 C H -1 2 1 1 G eneva 11

U . S . S . R.M ezhdunarodnaya K niga S m o len sk a y a -S en n a y a 3 2 - 3 4 M oscow G -2 0 0

U . K .

Her M a jesty 's S ta tio n ery O ff ic e P .O . Box 569 London S . E. 1

U . S . A.

N ation al A gency for In tern atio n al P u b lica tio n s, In c .

■ 3 17 East 34 th S treetNew York, N. Y . 10016

Y U G O S L A V I AJugoslovenska K n jig a T e r a z i je 27 Belgrade

IAEA P u b licatio n s ca n also be purchased r e ta i l at th e U nited Nations Bookshop at U nited N ations H eadquarters, New Y ork , from th e n ew s-stan d at th e A gen cy ’s H eadquarters, V ien n a , and at most co n feren ce s , sym posia and sem inars o rg an ized by th e A g en cy .

In order to fa c i l i t a t e th e d istribution o f its p u b lica tio n s , th e A gency is prepared to a c c e p t p aym ent in UNESCO coupons or in lo c a l c u rre n c ies .

Orders and in quiries from coun tries not lis ted above m ay b e sent to i

P u b lica tio n s S a les U nit In tern a tio n a l A to m ic Energy A gency

P .O . Box 590

K Srntner Ring 11 A -1 0 1 1 V ien n a I , A ustria

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 115: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/

Page 116: Manual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment …gnssn.iaea.org/Superseded Safety Standards/Safety_Series_030_1969.pdfManual on Safety Aspects of the Design and Equipment of

IN TE R NA TI O NA LA T O M I C E N E R G Y A G E N C YV I E N N A , 1969

PRICE: US $3.00Aus t r i an Sc h i l l i n gs 78,- (£1.5.0; F.Fr. 14,70; D M 12,-]

This publication is no longer valid Please see http://www.ns-iaea.org/standards/