march 12th, 2001 cincinnati, oh fluid mechanics in headboxes m. shariati, e. bibeau, m.salcudean and...

44
March 12th, 2001 Cincinnati, OH FLUID MECHANICS IN FLUID MECHANICS IN HEADBOXES HEADBOXES M. Shariati, E. Bibeau, M. Shariati, E. Bibeau, M.Salcudean and I. Gartshore M.Salcudean and I. Gartshore CFD Modelling Group Department of Mechanical Engineering University of British Columbia Process Simulations Limited

Upload: nathaniel-york

Post on 15-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • FLUID MECHANICS IN HEADBOXES

    M. Shariati, E. Bibeau, M.Salcudean and I. GartshoreMarch 12th, 2001Cincinnati, OH

  • PRESENTATIONMathematical modelling in the pulp and paper industryWhy we model headboxesHow we model headboxesExamplesflow in the header, tubes and sliceConclusions and future

  • PROCESS MODELLING GROUP

    Dr. Martha Salcudean, Principal Investigator

    Dr. Ian Gartshore, Co-Investigator

    Bian Zhengbing

    Feng Xioasi

    Mohammad Shariati

    Dr. Eric Bibeau

    Dr. Pingfan He

    Dr. David Stropky

    Chris Chiu

    Lu Hua

    Zhu Zhi Xiao

    Suqin Dong

    Dr. Emil Statie

    Dr. Jerry Yuan

    Michael Georgallis

    Dr. Paul Nowak

    Kegang and Xun Zhang

    Note: UBC and PSL Personnel (Pulp & Paper Section)

  • UBC-PSL TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONOther InstitutionsGovernmentIndustry License agreementServiceagreementsConsultingagreementsCustomagreementsLicenseagreements

  • PROCESS MODELLING

    PROCESS

    IN PROGRESS

    INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION

    SIMULATOR & TRAINER

    WOOD KILNS

    (

    LIME KILNS

    (

    DIGESTERS

    (

    HEADBOXES

    (

    HYDROCYCLONES

    (

    PRECIPITATORS/HEATERS

    (

    BARK & UTILITY BOILERS

    (

    RECOVERY BOILERS

    (

  • STAGES OF ANALYSISIN PROGRESSINDUSTRIALAPPLICATIONPROCESSSIMULATORS

    Literature review

    Mill interaction

    Industrial innovators

    Process knowledge

    Commitment of industry

    Physical model

    Numerical model

    Model development

    Model validation

    Industrial testing

    Industrial application

    Parametric studies

    Solve problems

    Model proposed retrofits

    Improve operations

    Reduce costs

    Envelope calculations

    Interpolation

    Operational simulator

    Training& safety

    Interacts with control system

    Technology transferINITIALSTAGE

  • MODELLING EXAMPLESComputerJet enginesWeatherAutomotiveHarrier jet

  • HEADBOXESPaper quality depends on the flow and fluid/fiber interaction in the headboxFlow at the exit of the slice needs to be uniformgoal can be achieved only by knowing and controlling the flow upstreamDesirable paper properties impose certain requirements of fiber orientation which depends on the flow and turbulence characteristicsWHY MODEL HEADBOXES

  • HOW WE MODEL HEADBOXESDeveloped a model for the flow through the headbox including the header, individual tubes and sliceDeveloped a fiber motion model, which allows to compute the motion of the fiber in the fluidCouple the fiber motion model with the fluid dynamics modelCompute the fiber motion in the fluid for a large number of fibers and obtain information on fiber orientation through the sliceWater model experiments to validate the above

  • NUMERICAL CFD CODECode developed at the University of British ColumbiaGeneralized curvilinear systemFinite volume methodBlock structuredSecond order accurate for cross derivative termsSteady and transientPartial multigrid capability

  • HEADBOX WISH LISTSelect sheet properties Improve control of fiber distributionControl MD/CD ratiosPrevent non-uniformities (basis weight, fibre orientation)Control fiber distributionFlow Field (velocity, stresses, vorticity)Fluid-fibre interaction

  • HEADBOX REQUIREMENTSSupply to sheet forming sectionWell dispersed stockConstant percentage of fibersPrevent formation of flocsRemove flow non-uniformitiesCreate high-intensity turbulence

  • MODEL DELIVERABLESManufacturers and Pulp MillsEvaluate new headbox designsCompare headbox designsTrouble-shoot existing headboxesPredict influence of control devicesEvaluate proposed retrofits and design changesHelp correlate sheet properties to headbox behavior

  • GENERIC HEADBOX MODELLED

  • EFFECT OF FLOW RECIRCULATION

  • VELOCITY IN CD DIRECTION

  • TYPICAL TUBEVelocity VectorsPressure contours

  • TUBE FLOW ENTRANCE EFFECTGreenFlow turns before entering tubesRedFlow enters straightAffects Flow profile into sliceFibre distribution and orientation

  • CONVERGINGSECTIONVelocity vectors3 slices in CD direction

  • CONVERGING SECTIONVelocity vectorsContours in machine Direction (MD)

  • VELOCITY IN CD DIRECTION

  • VELOCITY IN MD DIRECTION

  • KINETIC ENERGY IN CONVERGING SECTION

  • LENGTH SCALE

  • EXPERIMENTAL METHOD

  • MD VELOCITY

  • CD VELOCITY

  • Velocity at the exit plane V, W/Uinlet and Uinlet= 1.22 m/s

  • CD VELOCITY (m/s)K-eRSM

  • Symmetry Plane Velocity Fluctuations (RMS/RMS at inlet)

  • TURBULENCE INTENSITY (RMS/MD VELOCITY) SYMMETRY PLANE

  • TURBULENCE KINETIC ENERGY

  • EFFECT OF SHAPE

  • KINETIC ENERGY

  • SIMULATION OF CONVERGING SECTION WITH TUBE BANKS

  • FIBER MOTIONFiber is modeled as chains of spheroids

    Model can deal with the wall automatically for different geometry23N-11NBall and Socket Joints

  • EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

  • FIBER MOTION RESULTSFiber orientation mid channel at x = 12.2 cmEdge viewSide view

  • FIBER MOTION RESULTSFiber orientation mid channel at x = 19.2 cm

    Edge viewSide view

  • FIBER MOTION RESULTSFiber orientation mid channel at x = 26.2 cm

    Edge viewSide view

  • RESULTS HIGHLIGHTSThere exists obvious difference between the results from the experiments and simulationsCause for this phenomenon maybe the fact that in our fiber simulation, only the effects of the mean flow properties are consideredAs a result, the turbulence effect on the fiber orientation should not be neglected

  • RESULTS OVERVIEWSimulation results from the mean flow field show fiber orientation has little relation withthe mean flow velocitythe channel lengththe fiber aspect ratio in the interested rangeFiber orientation increases with the increment of the contraction ratio of the channel

  • CONCLUSIONSDesigning of the header is critical to obtain flow uniformity in the sliceLevel of turbulence induced by the tubes is very important for the exit flow characteristicsSecondary flows induced by turbulence anisotropy are negligibleMain flow is well predicted by the standard K-e equationsTurbulence characteristics are not well predicted by the standard K-e modelThe fiber is significantly aligned by the contraction in the slice. However the turbulence induced fiber randomness is very essential

  • FUTURE WORKTurbulence modeling needs to be improved. Large eddy simulation is currently under developmentFiber/ fiber interaction will have to be introduced in the fiber model and will be introduced in the model in the futureTurbulence effect on the fiber has to be accounted for. The model is being currently developed.The fiber orientation in the slice has to be modelled again with the above mentioned improvementsCurrent model allows for assessing headboxes and can be used as a design assessment and optimization toolDevelopment currently under way will allow for realistic assessment of fiber orientation at the exit of the slice