march 2018 denton code 2030 · new ddc or afterwards –pros/cons of both approaches • staff is...

36
DENTON CODE 2030 March 2018

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

DENTON CODE 2030 March 2018

Page 2: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

AGENDA

• Project Overview • Review Administration & Procedures• Next Steps• Discussion & Questions

Page 3: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

CLARION ASSOCIATES

• National consulting practice (25+ years)

• Planners, attorneys, designers, landscape architects

• Innovative, user-friendly zoning codes and plans

• Texas experience: Arlington, Austin, Cedar Hill, Irving, Rowlett, San Antonio

Page 4: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Page 5: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

WHAT IS THE DDC?

The Denton Development Code (DDC) answers important questions: • What can I build?• Where can I build it?• What activities are allowed?• How big and what level of quality is

required?• How do I get approved?

Page 6: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

GOALS – WRITE A CODE THAT IS…

• User-friendly • Clear and concise• Efficient • Streamlined• Consistent with

Denton Plan 2030• Aligned with state

statutes

Page 7: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

TASKS & TIMELINE

Draft New DDC

DDC Adoption

Project Initiation

In Progress Summer 2018

Page 8: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

DRAFTING THE NEW DDC

2

3

1Zoning Districts and Use Regulations• What can I do on my property?• Where can I do it?• How much / how big?

Development Standards • What level of quality is required?• What about redevelopment?

Administration and Procedures• How do I get a project approved?• Are there exceptions?

Page 9: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

DRAFTING THE NEW DDC

2

3

1

Adoption Draft

• Staff Review

• Public Meetings

• Adoption

• Final Code

Consolidated Draft

Spring 2018

• Staff Draft• Public Draft

• Staff Draft• Public Draft

• Staff Draft• Public Draft

Page 10: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

DRAFTING THE NEW DDCSubchapter 1 – General Standards

Subchapter 2 – Administration and Procedures

Subchapter 3 – Zoning Districts

Subchapter 4 – Overlay and Historic Districts

Subchapter 5 – Use Regulations

Subchapter 6 – Development Standards

Subchapter 7 – Subdivision Regulations

Subchapter 8 – Definitions

2

3

1

Page 11: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

YOUR ROLE?

• Help compress timeframe for council consideration of new Code

• Assist in analysis of existing code – Successes and challenges

• Attend meetings with staff/consultant team• Review and comment on incremental drafts• Attend and participate in public meetings • Provide continual outreach to and feedback

from colleagues

Page 12: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

ADMINISTRATION & PROCEDURESModule 2:

Page 13: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Administration & Procedures - Goals

• Align procedures with state law (TLGC)• Streamline process where possible• Relocate administrative and technical

information outside the DDC

Page 14: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Subchapter 1: General Standards

• Title and Effective Date• Purpose• Authority, Applicability,

and Jurisdiction• Nonconforming

Situations• Enforcement• Transition from Prior

Regulations

Page 15: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Subchapter 2: Administration & Procedures• Purpose & organization• Summary table• Review & decision-making

bodies• Common review

procedures• Development permits• Subdivisions • Plan & code amendments • Flexibility & relief • Historic preservation

Page 16: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:
Page 17: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:
Page 18: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.3 Review & Decision-Making Bodies

• City Council• Planning & Zoning Commission• Zoning Board of Adjustment• Historic Landmark Commission• City Administration• Development Advisory Committee

Page 19: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.4 Common Review Procedures• Apply to multiple application types.• Prevent repetition (and potential inconsistency).• Specific application procedures refer back to

common review procedures.

Page 20: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.5 Development Permits & Procedures

• Site Plan Review• Specific Use Permit• Temporary Use Permit• Change of Use Permit [new]• Gas Well Development Site Plan

Page 21: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.5.1 Site Plan Review• Codify (and simplify) site plan procedures• Clarify amendment process

Page 22: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.5.1 Site Plan Review Thresholds• New construction.• Reconstruction after

voluntary demolition.• Residential expansion by 10

dwelling units or 10%.• Mixed use expansion by more

than 2,000 square feet, 10 dwelling units, or 10%.

• Nonresidential expansion by 2,000 square feet or 20% of total square footage.

Page 23: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.5.4 Change of Use Permit [new]• Really, “certificate of use” (to distinguish

from building code)• Tool for staff to evaluate whether

changes of use comply with zoning standards.

• May also serve as a “certificate of zoning compliance.”

Page 24: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.6 Subdivision Procedures

• Administratively Approved Plat

• General Development Plan

• Preliminary Plat• Final Plat• Conveyance Plat• Development Plat• Replat• Vacating Plat

Page 25: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.7 Plan and DDC Amendments

• Comprehensive Plan Amendment

• Zoning Amendment:– Map– Rezone to PD– Text

• Annexation

Page 26: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.7.3 Planned Development Updates

• Replaces current Master Planned Community (MPC) and zoning overlays.

• Consolidate three-stage submittal into one.

• Require conceptual schematic at pre-application conference.

• Demonstrate public benefit to justify the increased flexibility.

Page 27: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.8 Flexibility & Relief Procedures

• Variance• Minor Modification [new]• Appeal of Administrative Decision• Alternative ESA Plan

Page 28: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

2.8.2 Minor Modifications• Replaces current Alternative Development Plan

(ADP) procedure.• Allows staff (or applicable decision-making body)

to approve minor modifications or deviations from dimensional and numeric standards based on set of qualifying criteria.

• Does NOT allow:– Increases in density– Change in uses– Deviation from use-specific standards, floodplain

regulations, or sensitive area protections– Modification of requirements for public

improvements

Page 29: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Minor Modifications

Page 30: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Module 2: Administration & Procedures

• March 27 - City Council Work Session• March 28 - Advisory Committee Meeting• March 28 - Stakeholder Meetings• March 28 - Special Called P&Z Work

Session• March 28 - Public Open House

Page 31: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Next Up - Module 3: Development Standards• April 17 - City Council

Work Session• April 18 - Advisory

Committee Meeting• April 18 - Stakeholder

Meetings• April 18 - Special Called

P&Z Work Session• April 18 - Public Open

House

Page 32: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Next Up – Zoning Map• Goal: Develop new zoning map

– Apply the updated lineup of zoning districts

– Implement Denton Plan 2030 future land use map

• Communities can adopt a new zoning map at same time as the new DDC or afterwards– Pros/cons of both approaches

• Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map

• The public review process:– Should allow for appeals to initial

designations– May result in updates to the draft

DDC (use tables, standards, etc.)

Page 33: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Next Up – Zoning Map Public Open Houses

• April 23 – Council District 1*• April 26 – Council District 2*• May 2 – Citywide (Development

Services)• May 3 – Citywide (Development

Services)• May 7 – Council District 3*• May 10 – Council District 4*• May 12 – Citywide (Civic Center)

*meeting location TBD

Page 34: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

P&Z and City Council Work Sessions/Public Hearings

• Late May to Early August• City Communication Channels• Multiple Work Sessions:

– Module 1– Module 2– Module 3

• Required Public Hearing Notification• Letters (mailed to all property owners)

Page 35: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

Where Can You Find More Information?

• www.dentoncode2030.com• Mailed postcards• Print & digital advertisements• Press releases• Email blasts• City’s social

media feeds• City newsletter

Page 36: March 2018 DENTON CODE 2030 · new DDC or afterwards –Pros/cons of both approaches • Staff is developing a consistent methodology for updating the map • The public review process:

SEND COMMENTS TO:

[email protected]

PROJECT WEBSITE:

www.dentoncode2030