marcus andersson sandvik heating technology, … next generation of electrical ladle heaters: a case...
TRANSCRIPT
1
NEXT GENERATION OF ELECTRICAL LADLE HEATERS: A CASE STORY
Marcus Andersson
Sandvik Heating Technology, Hallstahammar, Sweden
ABSTRACT
Sandvik is now introducing its next generation of Kanthal® electrical ladle heaters. By heating ladles with electricity instead of gas, aluminum producers and steel foundries can benefit from lower energy costs, increased process control, reduced CO2 emissions, and a cleaner working environment. The in situ testing of a Kanthal electrical ladle heater system compared to a conventional gas heated ladle heater shows that energy savings of 50% can be achieved in conjunction with better temperature uniformity in the ladle.
2
Figure 1 Kanthal electrical ladle heater
1. INTRODUCTION
Sandvik is now introducing its next generation of Kanthal® electrical ladle heaters. By heating ladles with electricity instead of gas, aluminum producers and steel foundries can benefit from lower energy costs, increased process control, reduced CO2 emissions, and a cleaner working environment. The following report will introduce the reader to the benefits of electrical ladle heating through an in situ test at a customer site where the customer’s existing gas heated ladle heater’s performance is compared to a new electrical ladle heater supplied by Sandvik heating technology.
1.1 High net efficiency:
Kanthal electrical ladle heaters offer significantly higher net energy efficiencies compared with traditional gas heating. Their design enables the same heater tube to be used for both heating and holding. The heating elements are arranged in a reflector, allowing the radiation to be more accurately directed towards the target area. The uniform temperature profile achieved when using electrical elements to heat the ladle, and the fact that there is no flame or streaming hot exhausts, will prolong the lifetime of the refractory, typically by 10–15%.
1.2 Innovative monitoring and control:
An advanced heater monitoring and control system optimizes performance and prolongs the lifetime of the heater by eliminating overheating. The system ensures maximum and consistent power, which reduces process times.
Kanthal electrical ladle heaters are supplied as complete installations, comprising heating elements in a reflector casing, and control and regulation equipment. Commissioning and technical support are provided on site by Sandvik heating experts.
3
1.3. Complete range:
Sandvik offers a broad portfolio of Kanthal electrical heating systems, for a range of applications in the primary aluminum industry, typically rodding shops, in secondary aluminum in foundries, and in steel foundries. We also provide systems for glass production and R&D purposes. See table 1 for a description of the full range of standard Kanthal electrical ladle heaters.
Product portfolio
Ladle heaters
Table 1 Standard range of Kanthal ladle heaters
2
The car mresu
2
Gas
The flamfor a
Elec
The 3D ewith Specphot
. IN SITUELECT
comparatimanufactu
ults are pre
2.1 Prereq
burner sys
customer’e”-burner a
a descriptiv
Heatinghour. HoGas typ
Gas con
ctrical ladle
new systeelement sithydraulic
cifications tographs o
Heatingwith 3D
Heater uhydrauli
Heater s Attachm
the spou
U COMPATRICALLY
ve test desrer´s alum
esented in t
quisites:
stem
s previousand with s
ve photogra
g cycle: Roold for 3 ho
pe 13A, Ennsumption
e heater sy
em suppliedtuated in a hoist systeas per bel
of the ladle
g elements configurat
unit is autoically specificatio
ments on bouts
ARISON Y HEATE
scribed in tinum foundthe followin
s system wpecificationaph of old
om tempeours. 4 houergy conte: 6 Nm3/hr
stem
d by Sandvsteel fram
em and conow, see figheater sys
made of Ktion omatically
on 54kW/6oth sides t
4
BETWEED LADL
this paper dry in Japang text.
was of the tyns as beloladle heat
rature to 8urs total cyent: 41,7 M
(24 Nm3 p
vik comprismed reflectontrol equipgure 3 for dstem.
Kanthal® S
raised and
600A to minimize
EN GAS LE HEAT
was conduan. The pre
ype “open w, see figuer
850ºC in onycle.
MJ/m3
per cycle)
ses of a paor in comb
pment. descriptive
uper RA (1
d lowered
e heat loss
Figure 2: C
AND TER
ucted at a erequisites
ure 2
ne
atented Kaination
e
12/24)
s from
Customers prev
Figure 3: Ka
well-knows, method a
anthal Supe
vious ladle he
anthal ladle he
wn and
er
eater system
eater system
3The sdiffertestswoulvisuacycleis los
The tseco
Therthe teimagconvtherm
To acelectseco
. METHOsame ladle rent measu
s, see figured be used i
alization mee for both ofst through th
thermocouponds.
rmal imaginemperature
ging would bvection and mal imaging
ccount for ttrical ladle h
ondary side
OD AND was used iring points t
e 4 for placen the forma
ethod for thef the tests.The exhaust
ple signals w
g was usede changes obe used to ealso used t
g from the te
the thermal heater curreof the trans
EVALUAn both teststo reflect th
ement of theation of the ee temperatuTnd thus wil
gases.
were measu
d to measureover the testestimate theto calculate ests.
losses throent measurisformer.
5
ATED PAs and was ee temperat
ermocoupleenergy bala
ure uniformil be used to
ured every
re the tempet cycle of boermal lossethe energy
ough cablesng devices
Figure
ARAMETEequipped wure change
es. The dataance for eacity within theo calculate t
30
erature on toth tests, th
es through thy balance, s
s, controllerwas placed
2
6
e 4: Thermoco
ERS ith thermoco over time d
a from the thch test casee ladle durinthe amount
he outside e data fromhe ladle waee figure 5
etc. during d both on th
uple placeme
couples at 7during both hermocoupe and also ang each het of energy t
of the ladlem thermal all due to
for example
the test withe primary a
ent on test ladl
les as a ating that
e as
es of
th the and
e
4
4Thertimeare p
After
As thprehusingheatis we
After
Afterstartthe tsyste
F
. RESUL
4.1 Thermrmal imagi for a compresented
r 1 hour
he images heating theg the gas bting the topell insulate
r 2 hours
r two hoursting to raisetemperaturem.
Figure 5: Com
Figure 6: Com
LTS
mal imaginng was peparison of below.
show, seeere is a raisburner sysp of the laded against t
s of heatine, the effecre of the to
Gas burne
Gas b
mparison of la
mparison of lad
ng: erformed du
the ladle o
e figure 5, ose in tempestem, this isdle when exthe top of t
g, see figuct of the ex
op of the la
er system
burner syste
adle outer she
dle outer shell
6
uring both outer shell
one can deerature at ts due to thxiting the sthe ladle p
ure 6, the texhaust gas
adle outside
em
ll temperature
temperature a
tests aftertemperatu
etect that athe top of tat the exhsame. The
preventing
emperaturses can bee is higher
Electrical heati
Electrica
e after 1 hour o
after 2 hours o
r the same ure uniform
after one hthe outsideausts fromelectrical
heat losse
e of the ouseen in thusing the
ing system
al heating sy
of heating
of heating
duration omity, the res
hour of e of the lad
m the burneheater sys
es.
uter shell ishe images gas burne
ystem
of sults
dle er is stem
s as
er
After
As sunifosyste
Fi
r 4 hours
seen in figuormity usinem.
Gas
gure 7: Comp
ure 7, afterng the elect
s burner system
parison of ladl
r four hourstrical ladle
e outer shell t
7
s of heatingheating sy
Elec
temperature a
g one can ystem is be
trical heating sys
fter 4 hours of
see that thetter that th
stem
f heating
he temperahe gas hea
ature ating
4.2
See the h
A nu
°C
2 Thermo
figure 8 anheating cyc
umber of co
CH ② (exhaust
CH ① (tempera
Both tesCH ④ a
The elein the ou
Gas bu
Figure 9:
Elapsed time
couple re
nd 9 for a rcle for the
onclusions
(gas) is unt gas. For t
(electrical) ature) due sts reachedafter 4 houctrical heauter shell a
urner system
Logged tempe
e
eadings:
representatwo differe
s can be dr
stable duethe referen
shows higto the proxd same tem
urs preheatating systemand inner w
m
erature data fr
8
ation of tement system
rawn from
e to the posnce, CH ④gher tempeximity effecmperature ting (gas 2m showed wall
rom ladle TC's
mperature ws.
the results
sition whic④ and ⑥ a
erature thact from theat
253°C / elebetter tem
Elect
Figure
s over the hea
within the l
s:
h means thre preferab
n TC (settie heater
ctrical 239mperature u
2
6
trical heatin
e 8: Thermoco
ating cycle of e
ladle durin
he TC pickble
ing
9°C) uniformity
ng system
ouple placeme
each test.
ng
ks up
ents
4.3
An ecommeth
Gas
Enercom
ENE
ENE
The estim
Figur
Table
3 Energy
energy balaparison behod all loss
burner sys
rgy going ibustion ga
ERGY IN:
ERGY OUT
different cmations an
re 11: Energy
2: Energy go
balance:
ance for eaetween theses where
stem
n to the gaas as below
T: See tabl
contributionnd basis for
losses in the g
ing out from th
ach heatinge two differe
estimated
as burner sw, (A)
e 2
ns to energr calculatio
gas burner sys
he gas burner
9
g method went heating and calcu
system com
gy losses aons are des
ystem
r system
Figurefor the
was perforg systems.
ulated as p
mes from t
are describscribed in f
e 10: Basis foenergy balan
rmed to ge. For each er the follo
he energy
ed in figurefigure 10.
r estimations ace of the gas
et an accurheating
owing:
y content in
re 11 below
and calculatioheater system
ate
n the
w. All
ons m.
10
Electrical ladle heater system
Energy going in to the electrical heating system is the energy supplied by the power supply on the primary side of the control cabinet.
ENERGY IN (A): Power on the primary side (measured by amp meter): 131 kW (total energy consumption during heating cycle, measured)
ENERGY OUT: see Table 3
The different contributions to energy losses in the electrical heating system are described in Figure 12. Basis for estimations and calculations are described in figure 10.
Table 3: Energy losses of the electrical heating system
Figure 12: Energy losses in the electrical heating system
11
4.4 Comparison energy efficiency between gas and electrically heated ladle:
Putting the two energy loss estimations next to each other the conclusion can easily be made that the electrical heating system is significantly more energy efficient than the gas heated system, the biggest difference being that with the electrical heating system there is no exhausts that transports heat energy away from the ladle and not contributing to the heating process. When comparing the energy need of heating the ladle to the desired temperature one can see that in the case of the gas heated system the customer previously needed to supply gas with an energy content of almost 278 kW to complete the heating cycle whereas the electrical heating system supplied from Sandvik will only require an electrical power of 134 kW to perform the same task.
From a pure energy perspective one can see from the data that an energy saving of 50% is achieved with the electrical heating system, see figure 14.
• In the same preheating conditions, the heat balance is as shown in the graph
• Pure efficiency improvement 50% (278 kWh / 134 kWh)
Figure 13: Energy balance comparison between the customer’s previous gas fired ladle heater compared to the electrical ladle heater supplied by Sandvik.
12
5. Summary
Sandvik has launched their new generation of high efficient ladle heater systems to the market with a wide range of standard heaters. The high net efficiency of Kanthal electric ladle heater systems offers significant advantages, aluminum producers and steel foundries can benefit from lower energy costs, increased process control, reduced CO2 emissions, and a cleaner working environment.
This report describes a test at a customer site where their previous gas heated ladle heaters performance was compared to a new electrical system supplied by Sandvik Heating Technology.
Sandvik replaced the existing ladle heater which had a gas consumption of 6 Nm3/hr (278 kW per heating cycle) with an 54 kW electrical heating system comprising of , heating elements made of Kanthal® Super RA (12/24) with 3D configuration, an automatic hydraulic hoist configuration and a state of the art control system.
The tests confirmed that the electric ladle heater system reached the customer target temperature of 850ºC while at the same time offering better temperature uniformity both inside and outside of the ladle, this was confirmed by thermal imaging together with thermocouple readings, and a significant energy efficiency improvement.
A detailed energy balance for both systems was set up to take into account all losses for both system.
The test results show that an energy efficiency improvement of 50% was achieved.