mark schrimpf. background process economics health implications politics

26
High Fructose Corn Syrup Mark Schrimpf

Upload: justina-ramsey

Post on 21-Dec-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

High Fructose Corn Syrup

Mark Schrimpf

Page 2: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Background Process Economics Health Implications Politics

Outline

Page 3: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Enzymatic conversion of glucose to fructose◦ Produces desired sweetness

Invented in 1957 by Richard O. Marshall and Earl R. Kooi◦ Not economically feasible for mass production

Dr. Yoshiyuki Takasaki 1965–1970 industrialized process◦ Began appearing in soft drinks by 1975

High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)

Page 4: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Products

Page 5: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Can you taste the difference?

Page 6: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

C6H12O6

Liquid carbohydrates (advantage) Monosaccharide

Glucose and Fructose

glucose fructose

Page 7: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Solid Disaccharide of glucose and sucrose

monomers Found in Sugar Cane and Sugar Beets

Sucrose

Page 8: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

HFCS 42◦ Enzymatic Product◦ Cereal and baked goods◦ 42% fructose, 53% glucose, 5% other sugars◦ Less sweet than sucrose (table sugar)

HFCS 90◦ Purified – liquid chromatography◦ Specialty◦ 90% fructose, 10% glucose◦ More sweet than sucrose

HFCS 55◦ Mixture◦ Soft drinks◦ 55% fructose, 42% glucose, 3% other sugars◦ Similar sweetness to sucrose

HFCS Compounds

Page 9: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

What’s in corn?

Page 10: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Process Flow Diagram

Page 11: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Process Flow Diagram

Page 12: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

3 enzymes:◦Alpha-amylase slurry Corn Starch Oligosaccharides

◦Glucoamylase slurry Oligosaccharides Glucose

◦Xylose isomerase Packed bed column ($) Glucose HFCS 42

Enzymatic Conversion

Page 13: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Corn Pricing Corn=$0.09/lb HFCS=$0.20/lb

Page 14: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Government Subsidies

Page 15: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

USA leading consumerand producer

1,673 pounds per person in 2006

6x as much asEurope and China

58x as much asIndia

CornConsumption

Page 16: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Sugar Pricing

Page 17: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

10.18 million metric tons consumed -7.18 million metric tons produced = Government Quota

Import Tariffs $3.86 billion in 2011

Sugar Pricing

Michigan and Minnesota Central America, Africa, Caribbean

Page 18: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Sugar and Sweetener Consumption

Page 19: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

All Natural Product? Corn Syrup vs. Corn Sugar “Your body can’t tell the difference!” Lawsuits

Health Considerations

Page 20: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Are sugar and HFCS any different?

Page 21: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Rate at which body processes glucose High GI Food is rapidly absorbed

◦ Increased triglycerides◦ Spikes in insulin; drop in blood sugar◦ Stored as fat

Low GI Food is slowly absorbed◦ Used as fuel◦ Small insulin release

Table Sugar = 80 HFCS = 87

Glycemic Index

Page 22: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Rat Experiment

Page 23: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Rat experiments show HFCS to lead to higher body weight gain and a larger appetite.

However, similar experiments with human subjects has been inconclusive.

What does other data suggest?......

Is sucrose better for you?

Page 24: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics
Page 25: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Diabetes

Page 26: Mark Schrimpf.  Background  Process  Economics  Health Implications  Politics

Politics◦ Are large regulation and subsidies a good thing?◦ 2012 Farm Bill

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSRRA2DfNe4 http://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pCDc_vz-3U&feature=related Diet and Health

◦ Are the negative effects from HFCS or just bad overall diet and exercise?

Climate Change◦ 2012 drought◦ What is the effect on quality and pricing?◦ Will it be the new norm?

Other Questions?

Thoughts