marshalls & dent lawyers tax issues in family law the difference between hacking & carving...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
237 views
TRANSCRIPT
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Tax issues inFamily Law
The Difference between
Hacking & Carvingby
Peter SzaboMarshalls & Dent
Melbourne03 96705000
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Forced Estate Planning
• Assets must be apportioned between the parties, often with unwanted taxation consequences.
• Emotional issues a “wild card”
• By destroying an asset of one party, the total pool of available assets to be split between both parties is diminished.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
The Split - Hacking
HusbandWifeRevenue
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
The Split - Carving
HusbandWifeRevenueAdvisers
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Investment Potential over years
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year
HusbandWife
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
What are the Net Assets?
• The Form 17 Financial Statement
Take into account assets net of tax, contingent liabilities.
• Impact of tax changes - Ralph report, GST
• The Hidden Agenda - Tax evasion issues
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
What are the Net Assets?
• The relevance of CGT - In placing a value on an asset, is CGT taken into account?
Not necessarily!
• Income Tax -Any tax incurred by either party is a relevant debt to be taken into account. Similarly, any taxation refund is an asset also to be taken into account.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Superannuation
• Dividing up superannuation assets -A financial resource which will become available to one of the parties at some later stage. It must be taken into account in some way.
• Changing approach to Superannuation. The approach in many cases is to give one party more of the assets and let the other party keep the superannuation asset. But is that fair in the current economic climate?
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Superannuation
• A mathematical approach preferred. A trend has been to take into account the years of marriage against the total years in the fund, and adjust for that proportion.
• Proposed changes to Family Law Act
Presumption will be that the contributions relevant to the period of the marriage are to be apportioned equally - but
retained until retirement.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Other Financial Resources
• Interests in trusts and companies -These are often treated as the ultimate assets of the parties by the Family Court - but not always. The facts of each particular case is important.
• Valuing interests in trusts and companiesAs long as one party is a beneficiary, the Family Court can bring that entitlement into account. The key issue is who controls the resource.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Apportioning the Assets Real Estate
• Stamp DutyTransfers of otherwise dutiable assets are almost always exempt from duty when transferred between spouses as a
result of a separation.
• Rollover relief - Court orders or S87 Agreements only
Main residence exemption • Minimising CGT on a sale
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Example 1 - CGT on Investment Property
H usbandTax = $12,500a t m arg in a l ra te o f tax
say 5 0 %
W ifeTax = $12,500
a t m arg in a l ra tesay 5 0 %
C ap ita l g a in on jo in tly O w n ed In es tm en t p rop erty
$100,000A m ou n t su b jec t to C G T
$ 5 0 ,0 0 0 a fte r R a lp h = $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 each
Both parties on same tax rate so pay the same tax
Total tax payable is $25,000Net asset $75,000
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Example 2 - CGT - different tax rates
H usband = $25,000Tax = $12,500a t m arg in a l ra te o f tax
say 5 0 %
W ife = $25,000Tax = $7,000
a t m arg in a l ra tesaverag e say 2 5 %
P ro fit on sa le o f Jo in tly O w n ed In ves tm en t p rop erty
$100,000A m ou n t su b jec t to C G T
E ach to eq u a lly sh are g a in - $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 taxed a fte r R a lp h
Different Tax for one party - less tax payableTotal Tax Payable = $19,500
Net Asset = $80,500
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Example 3 - CGT transfer to spouse
H usband = N ilTax = N IL
Tran s fe rred to W ifeR o llover ap p licab le
W ife = $50,000Tax = $16,000
a t m arg in a l ra tes
S o le ly O w n ed In ves tm en t p rop erty
$100,000A m ou n t su b jec t to C G T
H u sb an d fu lly liab le a t top ra te w ou ld p ay $ 2 5 ,0 0 0
Asset transferred to Wife and THEN sold Rollover relief, duty free transfer to wife
Total Tax Payable = $16,000Net Asset = $84,000
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Example 4 - impact of Capital losses
H usband = $100,000Tax = N IL
C ap ita l losses u sed
W ife = $N ilTax = N il
at m arg in a l ra te
Jo in tly O w n ed In ves tm en t p rop erty
$100,000A m ou n t su b jec t to C G T
E ach to eq u a lly sh are g a in
Asset transferred to Husband with capital losses Duty free transfer
Total Tax Payable = NilNet Asset = $100,000
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Capitalising delayed payments
• Pay $100,000 in 12 months, with interest, at what rate - 11.3% current rate.
• Pay $111,300 in 12 months time - capitalised, no tax consequences to payee
• Haggle over the capitalised amount - eg - pay $107,000 in 12 months as a capital payment. Both parties better off
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Cost Base of acquired property may include family
law costs
• Property valuations - 100%• Accounting fees - possibly 100%• Proportion of total Family Law costs relevant to
property proceedings• These may be taken in proportion to the total
assets kept - eg if CGT asset is 50% of asset pool, 50% of above costs is included in costs base
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Partnership
• Apportioning the income stream. Is there any flexibility? One person controls that stream, the other gets “maintenance” . Who pays what tax?
• Capital assets and trading stock Watch rollover relief as elections are possible.
• Indemnities with partnerships - Need to
cover any contingencies, particularly tax.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Discretionary Trust
Specific Tax issues involve:
• Loss Trust Legislation• Election to become a Family Trust needed for
Franking credits, trust losses• Test individual important - where possible
choose one of the children to retain distribution potential to spouses
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Discretionary Trust
• The income stream - Distributions post separation may be tax effective even after divorce.
• Dealing with the assets of the trust Real Estate duty free, rollover relief for CGT
• Loan accounts - Watch debt forgiveness issues. Are they loans or beneficial entitlements?
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Discretionary Trust
Disengaging control involves :• Resignation as appointor/guardian• transferring shares in trustee company• resignation as director of trustee company• exclusion from being a beneficiaryWhere there are losses - watch continuity of control if no
family trust election
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Consequences of Poor Family Trust election
• No opportunity to effect spousal maintenance payments tax effectively out of the trust.
• No opportunity to pass control of the trust to spouse as part of a settlement
• Value of trust asset as tax planning vehicle diminished
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing Spouse from Company
• The income stream - make tax effective adjustments where possible.
• Transfers of assets from the company Real estate usually subject to stamp duty
• CGT rollover relief available sometimes - but is the transfer a deemed dividend?
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Company
• Companies with losses - Continuity of ownership test relevant to carry forward losses
• Debt forgiveness/deemed dividend issues
Dealing with loan accounts needs particular attention to avoid unwanted revenue issues. FBT issues can arise if the spouse is an empoyee.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Divorcing the Company
Disengaging a spouse may involve:• Resignation as director• Transferring shares• retiring as an employee
Retiring spouse needs tax indemnities
• remaining spouse should be aware of tax liabilities being covered
• GST - vendor pays but is this right?
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Other Aspects to Consider
• Impact on third parties - Change in shareholding may “freshen up” assets for CGT purposes. FBT, loss of cost base and inability to use deductions and other losses.
• Accounting issues - timing of disengagement may necessitate account keeping changes. Try to coordinate these to financial years.
• Tax issues with spousal maintenance. Consider trust distributions, but watch “Family trust” election. Termination packages for employee spouse.
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Retaining Carried forward Losses in a
CompanyThe problem is not to fail the continuity of
ownership test - otherwise harder tests to pass to satisfy ATAO
• Solution 1 - retain shareholding• Solution 2 - delay transfer of shareholding
until losses used• Solution 3 - Issue more shares and leave
exiting spouse with a share
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Advance Planning
Tax planning structures need flexibility
• Awareness of consequences of family breakdown will alert the financial adviser or
estate planner to some preventative measures. • eg - if company involves husband and wife,
issue more than 2 shares if you MUST have both spouses involved
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Advance Planning Other strategies
• Carefully consider the choice of controllers of the trading entity
• Consider alternatives to giving external parties equity and control
• Prepare shareholders’ and other business agreements in anticipation of disputes
• Consider pre-nuptial agreements
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Financial Agreements
• CGT Time bomb - no rollover relief for transfers of property
• Bankruptcy protection may be available
Marshalls & Dent Lawyers
Tax issues inFamily Law
The Difference between
Hacking & Carvingby
Peter SzaboMarshalls & Dent
Melbourne03 96705000