maryland’s budget - c.ymcdn.com · operating budget lifecycle maryland’s fiscal year starts...
TRANSCRIPT
Maryland’s Budget:
A Moral Document
Benjamin Orr, for the
Democracy and the Social Sector Series,
Association of Baltimore Area Grantmakers
February 13, 2018
Development & Consequences
All MDers should be able
to achieve their full
potential in a healthy
economy that offers a
widely shared, rising
standard of living
Agencies develop recommendations
• Governor provides guidance to agencies
• Summer-Fall
DBM drafts budget
• Incorporates agency feedback, governor priorities
• Through early January
Spending Affordability Committee
Recommends
• Joint legislative committee
• Makes recommendation on how much budget, state workforce should grow
• November -December
Governor introduces
budget
• Mid-January
• Must be balanced
• DLS fiscal briefing Monday after budget introduced
Legislature holds
hearings, edits
budget
• January to April
• May cut, but cannot add
• Can decline to change mandates
• Chambers take turns originating
Legislature approves budget
Agencies implement
budget
• Deadline is one week before Sine Die (mid-April)
• Or go into extended session
• Does not require governor’s signature
• Must be balanced
• Start work on next budget
Operating Budget LifecycleMaryland’s fiscal year starts July 1st
BRE stands for Board of Revenue Estimates Sine Die is the name for the last day of sessionDBM stands for Department of Budget and ManagementDLS stands for Department of Legislative Services
September
BRE
estimates
March
BRE
estimates
After budget
passes, Governor
can cut up to 25%
of individual line
items through
Board of Public
Works
December
BRE
estimates
What will the status quo cost? $29.6B
1 Department of Legislative Services, Spending Affordability Briefing, October 17, 2017. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2017-spending-affordability-briefing-october-17.pdf.
2 DLS, Fiscal Briefing, January 2018. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2018rs-operating-budget-fiscal-briefing.pdf
$ in millions
$0.0
$1,000.0
$2,000.0
$3,000.0
$4,000.0
$5,000.0
$6,000.0
$7,000.0
$8,000.0
$9,000.0
FY 17 Actual FY 18 Working FY 19 Baseline FY 19 Proposed
State Funds (General Fund + Special Funds)
Status quo misses lots of needs
▪ $2.9 billion to fully fund education (more if we want to increase equity)
▪ 19,000 students on waitlist for state need-based financial aid
▪ Public benefits only bring family income to 61% of the Maryland Minimum Living Level
▪ DC Metro needs another $167 million annually -lots of transit needs in Baltimore too
$43.6 Billion Operating BudgetFY 2018
General
Funds
$17.2
Special
Funds
$9.0
Federal
Funds
$13.0
Higher
Education
Funds
$4.40
$ in billionsGeneral Fund
Revenue Sources
FY 18
Projection
Individual Income Tax $9,289 million
Sales & Use Tax $4,622 million
Corporate Income Tax $844 million
Other Business Taxes $560 million
State Lottery & Casinos $536 million
Tobacco & Alcohol Taxes $413 million
Estate & Inheritance
Taxes
$216 million
Court revenue $96 million
Other revenues $482 million
9.7% 9.5% 10.3% 9.7%8.5% 8.8%
6.7%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Lowest
20%
Second
20%
Middle
20%
Fourth
20%
Next 15% Next 4% Top 1%
Low income MDers pay greater share
of income in state/local taxesShares of family income for taxpayers under 65
Who Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax System in All 50 States. (2015). Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. See: http://www.itep.org/whopays/full_report.php
<$24,000>$481,000$44k-
$67k
$111k-
$211k
MDers of color more likely to pay a
greater share of their income in taxes
Maryland Center on Economic Policy. Maryland’s Poor Taxed More Than Rich; Communities of Color Feel Biggest Pinch. March 2015.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Poorest20% ≤$24,000
Second20%$24,000-$44,000
Middle 20%$44,000-$67,000
Fourth 20%$67,000-$111,000
Richest 20% ≥$111,000
White alone Non whites Excluding Asians
Female-headed HH more likely to pay
greater share of their income in taxes
Maryland Center on Economic Policy.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Poorest20% ≤$24,000
Second 20%$24,000-$44,000
Middle 20%$44,000-$67,000
Fourth 20%$67,000-$111,000
Richest 20% ≥$111,000
Total Male-Headed Households Total Female-Headed Households
Business taxes are a smaller share of
MD’s economy than in other states
Ernst & Young, FY14 COST report on state and local taxes
4.6%3.8%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
ND VT NM HI WV MT WA FL IL SC DC KY MN USA IA WI CA AK NB MA OH GA UT IN MO CT
MD business gets a $1 return for every 70
cents invested in state and local taxes
$0.0
$1,000.0
$2,000.0
$3,000.0
$4,000.0
$5,000.0
$6,000.0
$7,000.0
$8,000.0
$9,000.0
FY 17 Actual FY 18 Working FY 19 Baseline FY 19 Proposed base vs prop 18 vs 19
Governor Hogan’s Proposal? $29.5BState Funds (General Fund + Special Funds)
$ in millions
1 Department of Legislative Services, Spending Affordability Briefing, October 17, 2017. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2017-spending-affordability-briefing-october-17.pdf.
2 DLS, Fiscal Briefing, January 2018. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2018rs-operating-budget-fiscal-briefing.pdf
Up 2.3% (flat)
Up 2.7% (1.7% below
baseline)
Up 0.7% (1.5%
below baseline)
Up 2.5% (3% below
baseline)
Up 2.5% (1.2% above
baseline)
Up 2.7% (2.1%
below baseline)
Up 4.9% (1.3% above
baseline)
Up 3.9% (0.3% below
baseline)
$0.0
$1,000.0
$2,000.0
$3,000.0
$4,000.0
$5,000.0
$6,000.0
$7,000.0
$8,000.0
$9,000.0
FY 17 Actual FY 18 Working FY 19 Baseline
Governor Hogan’s Proposal? $29.5BState Funds (General Fund + Special Funds)
$ in millions
1 Department of Legislative Services, Spending Affordability Briefing, October 17, 2017. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2017-spending-affordability-briefing-october-17.pdf.
2 DLS, Fiscal Briefing, January 2018. http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/Pubs/BudgetFiscal/2018rs-operating-budget-fiscal-briefing.pdf
$44 Billion Operating BudgetProposed FY 2019
1 Footnote text can go here.
$ in billions
Health
$14.5
Pre-K-12
Education
$8.1
Higher Education
$6.6
Transportation
$5.3
Human Services
$2.8
Public Safety
$2.2
Natural
Resources
$1.1
Legislative,
Judicial, Legal
$0.8
Public Debt
$1.3Other
$1.8
$4 Billion Capital Budget
1 Footnote text can go here.
Proposed FY 2019$ in millions
Transportation
=
$2.9 billion
Pre-K-12
Education
374.8
Higher
Education
348.4
Housing and
Community
Development
126.4
Public Safety
25.3
Health
52.7
Economic
Development
18.9 Other
123.7
If current revenues
are not enough to
support status quo,
and status quo isn’t
sufficient to meet
needs, then what?
Maryland Needs More Revenue
▪ Still recovering from Great Recession, inequality continues to rise
▪ Lots of unmet needs across state
▪ “Blank check” for Amazon?
▪ Trying to support investments in 21st Century economy with a 20th Century tax system
▪ Expenses growing faster than revenues
▪ Unwillingness to ask everyone to pay their fair share
• Forces programs to compete for scarce $$$, some priority investments won’t be made
▪ Threats from Washington
Or we cut $$$ and let more people fall through the cracks
MD Has Room to Raise More Revenue
1 “State and Local Tax Revenue as a Share of Personal Income,” Tax Policy Center, 2016, http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/state-and-local-tax-revenue-percentage-personal-income.
U.S. Average
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%N
ew
Yo
rk
Wyo
min
g
Dis
tric
t o
f C
olu
mb
ia
Ma
ssa
ch
use
tts
New
Me
xic
o
Haw
aii
Mic
hig
an
Mo
nta
na
Wis
co
nsin
Min
nesota
Ore
gon
Ma
ine
Ve
rmo
nt
Rho
de
Isla
nd
Uta
h
Lou
isia
na
We
st
Virg
inia
Illin
ois
Iow
a
Dela
ware
Calif
orn
ia
Pe
nn
sylv
an
ia
New
Je
rsey
Nort
h D
akota
Ma
ryla
nd
Ari
zo
na
Okla
ho
ma
Neb
raska
Mis
sis
sip
pi
So
uth
Da
ko
ta
Ge
org
ia
Ka
nsa
s
Ke
ntu
cky
So
uth
Ca
rolin
a
Con
ne
cticut
No
rth C
aro
lina
Ala
ba
ma
Wa
sh
ing
ton
Idah
o
Te
xa
s
Colo
rad
o
Neva
da
Oh
io
India
na
Te
nn
essee
Vir
gin
ia
Ark
an
sa
s
Mis
so
uri
Flo
rid
a
New
Ha
mp
sh
ire
Sta
te a
nd
Lo
ca
l T
axe
s a
s a
Sh
are
of P
ers
on
al In
com
e, 2
01
4
Source: Tax Policy Center 2016. Note: Alaska is omitted because its tax system has limited comparability to other states. State and local taxes in Alaska are 36 percent of the state's personal income due to high severance tax revenues.
Potential Resources for Investment
▪ Eliminate corporate “nowhere income”, level the playing field for local business: $53 to $69 million
▪ Stop cutting the multi-millionaire estate tax, which only applies to the top one percent of estates: $82 million in fiscal year 2023
▪ Close the carried interest loophole benefiting hedge fund managers: $50 million
▪ Modernize the sales tax: $320 million
▪ Reinstate the millionaires tax: $170 million
▪ Tax marijuana like alcohol: $200 million
http://www.mdeconomy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Revenue-options-brief.pdf
Annual Revenue Estimates
Massive tax cuts for the wealthy
(who are?)…
https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-tax/jct-estimates-final-gop-tax-bill-skewed-to-top-hurts-many-low-and-middle-income
Individual
mandate repeal:
226,000 more
MDers uninsured
(who?), increased
premiums for
everyone
State response to federal tax bill
▪ Clarify the law to protect personal exemptions
▪ Expand the state EITC to include younger workers, workers without dependents
▪ Reinstate the millionaire’s tax ($50k federal tax break next year)
▪ Protect small businesses through corporate tax reform
▪ Tax larger pass-through entities as corporations
▪ Disconnect MD’s estate tax from federal
https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-tax/jct-estimates-final-gop-tax-bill-skewed-to-top-hurts-many-low-and-middle-income
… even less
funding for
human
needsPresident Trump’s latest budget cuts $3
trillion from Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps and other social programs over
the next 10 years
=
Perhaps a $2 billion+ hole in MD’s budget
”Indeed, by 2028, total NDD spending, measured as a share of
gross domestic product, would be at its lowest level since
Herbert Hoover was President.”
It all comes down to non-defense
discretionary spending (NDD)
▪ NDD spending already at historically low levels
▪ Short-term stopgaps increase NDD uncertainty
▪ Republicans have talked about undoing the sequester for defense spending but leaving it – or even deepening it – for NDD spending
▪ Huge consequences for states (receive 25% of NDD) and communities suffering from underinvestment
▪ Maryland is particularly vulnerable
Threats from Washington: Solutions?
▪ Protect structure of the safety net (vital)
▪ Increase the NDD funding caps (unlikely in future years)
▪ MD must get creative to make up the difference
Bottom line:
Will Maryland and the
federal government continue
to invest in the pillars of our
modern economy, or will we
make drastic cuts to
education, healthcare, and
public safety?