materials and methods 4. - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/4385/9/09_chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 162
4. 4.1 PROCUREMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF PLANTS
4.1.1 PROCUREMENT OF THE PLANT MATERIAL
The plant materials (leaves of Adhatoda vasica Nees., roots of Clerodendrum
serratum Linn., rhizomes of Curcuma longa Linn., fruits of Solanum
xanthocarpum Schrad & Wendl. and fruits of Piper longum Linn.) were obtained
from Government Ayurvedic Udhyan (Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India). They were
identified and authenticated by the Department of Pharmacognosy, K.B. Institute
of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Gandhinagar, India. Voucher
specimens as well as herbarium were deposited at the Department of
pharmacognosy, K.B. Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research,
Gandhinagar, India. Herbarium no. was given as per Table-4.1.1.
Table 4.1.1: Herbarium number of plants
Plants Herbarium Number
Adhatoda vasica Nees. PH/508/002
Clerodendrum serratum Linn. PH/508/003
Curcuma longa Linn. PH/508/004
Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad & Wendl. PH/508/005
Piper longum Linn. PH/508/006
4.1.2 MONOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF PLANT MATERIAL
The individual plants were evaluated with regard to their standard specifications
according to ‘The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India (2001)’. Determination of
various Extractive-values and Ash-values were carried out as per method
described in ‘The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India (2001)’.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 163
4.1.2.1 Determination of Extractive-values
(A) Determination of water-soluble extractive value
Five g of the air-dried powdered drug was macerated with 100 ml of distilled
water in a closed flask for 24 hrs. The flask was shaken intermittently during 6
hrs and allowed to stand for 18 hrs. The extract was filtered rapidly, taking
precautions against loss of solvent. 25 ml of the filtrate was evaporated to
dryness in a porcelain dish and dried at 105C, to a constant weight. The
percentage of water-soluble extractive value was calculated with reference to the
air dried drug.
(B) Determination of ethanol-soluble extractive value
Five g of the air-dried powdered drug was macerated with 100 ml of ethanol (95
%) in a closed flask for 24 hrs. The flask was shaken intermittently during 6 hrs
and allowed to stand for 18 hrs. The extract was filtered rapidly, taking
precautions against loss of solvent. 25 ml of the filtrate was evaporated to
dryness in a porcelain dish and dried at 105C, to a constant weight. The
percentage of ethanol-soluble extractive value was calculated with reference to
the air dried drug.
4.1.2.2 Determination of Ash-values
(A) Determination of total ash
Accurately weighed 2 g of the powdered drug was incinerated in a crucible at a
temperature not exceeding 450C until carbon free ash was obtained. It was
cooled, weighed and percentage of ash was calculated with reference to the air-
dried drug.
(B) Determination of acid-insoluble ash
The ash obtained in above was boiled for 5 minutes with 25 ml of 2 M
hydrochloric acid and filtered using an ash less filter paper to collect insoluble
matter. The ash obtained was washed with hot water and filter paper was burnt
to constant weight. The percentage of acid-insoluble ash was calculated with
reference to the air-dried drug.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 164
(C) Determination of water-soluble ash
Total ash obtained was boiled for 5 minutes with 25 ml of water and insoluble
matter was collected on an ash less filter paper, washed with hot water and
ignited for 15 minutes at a temperature not exceeding 450C. Difference in
weight of ash and weight of water insoluble matter gave the weight of water-
soluble ash. The percentage of ash was calculated with reference to the air-dried
drug.
4.1.3 PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING
The powder of all the plants were subjected to the following tests individually for
the presence of various phytoconstituents like alkaloids, steroids & terpenoids,
flavonoids, tannins, saponins, anthraquinones and carbohydrates.
Alkaloids (Sim, 1970)
One g of drug powder was extracted with 20 ml alcohol (95%) by refluxing for 15
minutes. The extract was filtered and filtrate was evaporated to dryness. The
residue was dissolved in 15 ml of H2SO4 (2 N) and filtered. After making alkaline,
the filtrate was extracted with chloroform. The residue left after evaporation was
tested with dragondroff’s reagent. Appearance of orange coloured precipitates
indicating the presence of alkaloids.
Sterols and Triterpenoids (Freudenberg & Weinger, 1962; Robinson, 1963)
Liberman Buchardt test
One g of powder drug moistened with 1 ml of acetic anhydride on a clean tile. To
the above mixture, 1 to 2 drops of concentrated H2SO4 was added. Presence of
dark green coloration of the solution indicated the presence of steroids and dark
pink or red coloration of the solution indicated the presence of terpenoids.
Salkowski reaction
To the 2 g of powder, 2 ml chloroform and 2 ml concentrated H2SO4 were added
and shake well. Chloroform layer was observed for appearance of red and acid
layer was observed for appearance of greenish yellow fluorescence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 165
Flavonoids (Kokate et al., 1999)
Shinoda test
One g of powder was extracted with 10 ml of ethanol (95%) for 15 minutes in a
boiling water-bath and filtered. To the filtrate, a piece of magnesium ribbon and 3
to 4 drops of concentrated H2SO4 was added. Appearance of pink red or red
coloration of the solution indicated the presence of flavonoids in the drug.
Fluorescence test
One g of power drug was extracted with 15 ml of methanol for 2 minutes on a
boiling water-bath, filtered while hot and evaporated to dryness. To the residue,
0.3 ml boric acid solution (3% w/v) and 1 ml oxalic acid solution (10% w/v) were
added. The mixture was evaporated to dryness and the residue was dissolved in
10 ml ether. The ethereal layer was observed for greenish fluorescence under
the UV indicating the presence of flavonoids.
Tannins (Kokate et al., 1999)
Aqueous extract of the drug was prepared by refluxing 10 g of drug powder with
50 ml of water for about 1 hr and used for the following test.
Gelatin test
To 2-3 ml of aqueous extract, 1% gelatin solution containing NaCl (10% w/v) was
added. Appearance of heavy white precipitates indicated presence of tannins.
Reaction with FeCl3
Two ml of aqueous extract was treated with 0.5 ml 5% FeCl3. Appearance of dark
blue or greenish grey coloration of the solution indicated the presence of tannins
in the drug.
Saponins (Kokate et al., 1999)
Froth test
0.1 g powder was vigrously shaken with 5 ml of distilled water in a test tube for
30 secs and was left undisturbed for 20 minutes. Presence of persistent froth
indicated presence of saponins in the drug.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 166
Carbohydrates (Kokate et al., 1999)
Molisch test
One g of powder was extracted with 10 ml ethanol for 15 minutes on a boiling
water bath and filter. On addition of α-naphthol and concentrated H2SO4 to the
filtrate, purple color was observed if carbohydrates were present in the drug.
Fehling test
One ml Fehling A and Fehling B solutions were mixed, boiled for 1 min. and
equal volume of test solution was added. Then, it was heated on boiling water
bath for 5-10 minutes. First yellow and then brick red precipitates were observed
indicating the presence of carbohydrates.
Anthraquinone glycoside (Kokate et al., 1999)
Borntrager’s test
The drug powder was taken and extracted with ether or any other water
immiscible organic solvent. To the filtered ethereal extract, dilute ammonia was
added. The aqeous layer was observed for the appearance of pink red or violet
color after shaking.
Modified borntrager’s test
To the aqeous solution of drug, FeCl3 and dilute HCl were added, heat it, cool it
and filtered. Filtrate was shaken with ether or any other organic solvent. The
ethereal extract was shaken with dilute ammonia. The aqeous layer was
observed for the appearance of rose pink or cherry red color after shaking.
4.1.4 ESTIMATION OF VASICINE, PIPERINE, CURCUMIN AND SOLASODINE
BY HPTLC METHOD
The powders of all the plants were subjected to HPTLC analysis to quantify some
known active constituents according to procedures described in the literature
(Gawas and Grampurohit, 1998; Singh et al., 2007b; Paramasivam et al., 2008;
Pawar et al., 2008).
Principle
The High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) – now also called
planar chromatography – is, like all chromatographic techniques, based on a
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 167
multistage distribution process. This process involves: a suitable adsorbent (the
stationary phase), solvents or solvent mixtures (the mobile phase or eluent), and
the sample molecules. For HPTLC, the adsorbent is coated as a thin layer onto a
suitable support (e.g. glass plate, polyester or aluminum sheet). On this layer the
substance mixture is separated by elution with a suitable solvent.
Instrument
Camag Linomat V (Automatic spotting device)
Hemilton 100 μl HPTLC syringe
Camag Twin trough chambers (20x10 cm)
Camag TLC scanner 3
Win CATS integration software
Chromatographic conditions
Separation technique: Ascending
Developing character: Twin trough chamber
Stationary phase: Precoated TLC plate of silica gel 60 F254 (methanol
washed, 20x10 cm with 250 μm thickness)
Chamber saturation time: 30 mins
Temperature: 25±2C
Relative humidity: 60±5 %
Migration distance: 7 cm
Spotting parameters
Start position: 10 mm from bottom edge
Band width: 8 mm
Space between two bands: 4 mm
HPTLC Analysis
(A) Standard solution and calibration curve of vasicine (Table-4.1.2):
Test solution
10 mg of crude powder was dissolved in methanol and volume was made up to
10 ml with methanol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 168
Standard solution
A stock solution of vasicine (1 mg/ml) was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of
vasicine in 10 ml of methanol in a volumetric flask. From this stock solution, 1 ml
solution was pipetted out and diluted to 10 ml (100 ng/μl). Graded concentrations
of standard solution (100 ng/μl) in 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16 μl volume were applied on a
precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate. The concentration of vasicine was 400,
600, 800, 1200 and 1600 ng/μl respectively.
Calibration curve
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Dioxane: ammonia (9:1)] in twin
trough chamber to a distance of 7 cm and was scanned densitometrically at 285
nm. The peak area was recorded and the calibration curve was prepared by
plotting peak area vs concentration of vasicine applied.
Estimation of vasicine in the drug
10 l of the test solution was applied on a precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate.
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Dioxane: ammonia (9:1)] and the
chromatogram was recorded as described above for the calibration curve. The
amount of vasicine present in the sample was calculated from the calibration
curve of vasicine.
(B) Standard solution and calibration curve of piperine (Table-4.1.2):
Test solution
10 mg of crude powder was dissolved in methanol and volume was made up to
the volume of 10 ml with methanol. Pipette out 1 ml from this and diluted to 10 ml
with methanol in a volumetric flask.
Standard solution
A stock solution of piperine (1 mg/ml) was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of
piperine in 10 ml of methanol in a volumetric flask. From this stock solution, 1 ml
solution was pipetted out and diluted to 10 ml (100 μg/ml). From this, 0.5 ml
solution was pipetted out and diluted to 10 ml (5 ng/μl). Graded concentrations of
standard solution (5 ng/μl) in 5, 8, 12, 15 and 18 μl volume were applied on a
precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate. The concentration of piperine was 25, 40,
60, 75 and 90 ng/μl respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 169
Calibration curve
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Benzene: ethyl acetate:
ammonia (9:0.5:0.5)] in twin trough chamber to a distance of 7 cm and scanned
densitometrically at 333 nm. The peak area was recorded and the calibration
curve was prepared by plotting peak area vs concentration of piperine applied.
Estimation of piperine in the drug
10 l of the test solution was applied on a precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate.
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Benzene: ethyl acetate:
ammonia (9:0.5:0.5)] and the chromatogram was recorded as described above
for the calibration curve. The amount of piperine present in the sample was
calculated from the calibration curve of piperine.
(C) Standard solution and calibration curve of curcumin (Table-4.1.2):
Test solution
10 mg of crude powder was dissolved in methanol and the volume was made up
to 10 ml with methanol.
Standard solution
A stock solution of curcumin (1 mg/ml) was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of
curcumin in 10 ml of methanol in a volumetric flask. From this stock solution, 1 ml
solution was pipetted out and diluted 10 ml (100 ng/μl). Graded concentrations of
standard solution (100 ng/μl) in 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 μl volume were applied on a
precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate. The concentration of curcumin was 200,
400, 600, 800 and 1000 ng/μl respectively.
Calibration curve
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Chloroform: ethanol: formic acid
(96:3.5:0.5)] in twin trough chamber to a distance of 7 cm and scanned
densitometrically at 365 nm. The peak area was recorded and the calibration
curve was prepared by plotting peak area vs concentration of curcumin applied.
Estimation of curcumin in the drug
10 l of the test solution was applied on a precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate.
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Chloroform: ethanol: formic acid
(96:3.5:0.5)] and the chromatogram was recorded as described above for the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 170
calibration curve. The amount of curcumin present in the sample was calculated
from the calibration curve of curcumin.
(D) Standard solution and calibration curve of solasodine (Table-4.1.2):
25 g of powdered drug was defatted with 150 ml of n-hexane. The marc was
hydrolyzed with 250 ml of 5N aqueous hydrochloric acid under reflux on a water
bath for 5 hrs. It was filtered through Whatman 1 filter paper and washed with
distilled water twice and made the marc alkaline with 10% sodium carbonate
solution. The marc was washed with distilled water till the pH reaches neutral.
The marc was dried at 50C in a hot air oven. The dried marc was transferred to
a reflux flask and was extracted with chloroform (4 x 200 ml) under reflux on a
water bath for 2 hrs. The chloroform extract was filtered, dried over sodium
sulphate and concentrated. 10 mg of chloroform extract was dissolved in
chloroform and the volume was made up to 10 ml with chloroform.
Standard solution
A stock solution of solasodine (0.5 mg/ml) was prepared by dissolving 5 mg of
solasodine in 10 ml of methanol in a volumetric flask. From this stock solution, 1
ml solution was pipetted out and diluted to 10 ml (50 ng/μl). Graded
concentrations of standard solution (50 ng/μl) in 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 μl volume were
applied on a precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate. The concentration of
solasodine was 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 ng/μl respectively.
Calibration curve
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Chloroform: methanol (9.5:1.2)]
in twin trough chamber to a distance of 7 cm. The plate was derivatized with
anisaldehyde-sulphuric acid reagent and was scanned densitometrically at 620
nm. The peak area was recorded and prepared the calibration curve by plotting
peak area vs concentration of solasodine applied.
Estimation of solasodine in the drug
10 l of the test solution was applied on a precoated silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate.
The plate was developed in the solvent system [Chloroform: methanol (9.5:1.2)]
and the chromatogram recorded as described above for the calibration curve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 171
The amount of solasodine present in the sample was calculated from the
calibration curve of solasodine.
Table 4.1.2: HPTLC chromatographic conditions
Compound Spotting volume Amount/band (For standard
curve)
Mobile phase Densitometric
scanning
For calibration curve
For test solution
Vasicine 4 – 16 μl 10 μl 400 – 1600 ng/μl
Dioxane: ammonia (9:1) 285 nm
Piperine 5 – 18 μl 10 μl 25 – 90 ng/μl Benzene:ethyl acetate: ammonia (9:0.5:0.5)
333 nm
Curcumin 2 – 10 μl 10 μl 200 –1000 ng/μl
Chloroform:ethanol:formic acid (96:3.5:0.5)
365 nm
Solasodine 2 – 10 μl 10 μl 100 – 500 ng/μl
Chloroform:methanol (9.5:1.2) 620 nm
4.1.5 THIN LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY (TLC) FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS OF
ETHANOLIC EXTRACT, PHE AND LM-02
The TLC analysis of ethanolic extract, PHE and LM-02 was performed as per
method described in section-4.1.4.
4.2 PREPARATION OF PLANT EXTRACTS
The plant materials were dried, comminuted and passed through a # 60 mesh
screen. The dried powder of each plant was defatted using petrol ether and then
each was exhaustively extracted with ethanol using soxhlet extractor at 60C.
The extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure and stored in air-tight
borosil glass containers in cool place until usage. The extractive values of plants
were as per Table-4.2.1.
Table 4.2.1: Extractive value of ethanol extracts of Plants
Plants Extractive value
Adhatoda vasica Nees 0.5%w/w
Clerodendrum serratum Linn. 1%w/w
Curcuma longa Linn. 0.7%w/w
Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad & Wendl. 0.8%w/w
Piper longum Linn. 0.4%w/w
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 172
4.3 PREPARATION OF POLYHERBAL FORMULATIONS
(A) PREPARATION OF MIXTURE OF POLYHERBAL EXTRACTS (PHE)
For preparation of mixture of polyherbal extracts, the plant extracts were mixed
as per Table-4.3.1 and was packed in small airtight container.
Table 4.3.1: Proportion of plant extract in Polyherbal mixture
Plants Proportion of ethanolic extract
Adhatoda vasica Nees. 40%
Clerodendrum serratum Linn. 30%
Curcuma longa Linn. 10%
Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad & Wechdle.
10%
Piper longum Linn. 10%
(B) PREPARATION OF CAPSULE (LM-01)
The PHE and 1% cabosil (as glidant) were filled in the capsule (GEM Capsule
filing machine, India). The amount of PHE in each capsule was 500 mg. The
capsules were polished, packed in small airtight containers and properly labeled.
(C) PREPARATION OF ORAL AEROSOL SPRAY (LM-02)
Each oral aerosol spray container was of 300 metered doses (10 mg/dose). The
PHE and 0.1 ml (1 % w/v) peppermint solution were dissolved in ethanol. The
ethanolic solution (40%) and Hydrocarbon as aerosol propellant (60%) were filled
in aerosol container with the help of Terco Inc, Germany.
PHE (dissolved in 1% Tween-80 solution) and LM-02 were subjected to pre-
clinical study. Further, LM-01 and LM-02 were used for clinical study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 173
4.4 PRE-CLINICAL STUDIES
4.4.1 SELECTION OF ANIMALS
All animals were housed at ambient temperature (22±1C), relative humidity
(55±5%) and 12h/12h light dark cycle. Animals had free access to standard pellet
diet and water given ad libitum. The protocol of the experiment was approved by
the institutional animal ethical committee as per the guidance of the Committee
for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals
(CPCSEA), Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India
(KBIPER/0891, KBIPER/08103 and KBIPER/08/116).
4.4.2 PHARMACOLOGICAL EVALUATION
4.4.2.1 Anti-Asthmatic Activity
(A) Effect of PHE (Polyherbal extracts) and LM-02 on Histamine and
Acetylcholine induced bronchospasm in guinea pigs
The method used in the present study was similar to that described by Sheth et
al., 1972.
Hartley strain guinea pigs of either sex weighing 350-500 g were selected and
randomly divided into seven groups, each containing six animals. The PHE and
LM-02 were administered as per following schedule:
Group I Ketotifen (1 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard)
Group II PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group III PHE (400 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group IV PHE (800 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group V LM-02 (3 mg/kg, per inhalation route)
Group VI LM-02 (6 mg/kg, per inhalation route)
Group VII LM-02 (12 mg/kg, per inhalation route)
The animals were kept in a closed chamber and exposed to an aerosol (Voyage
Mist, Shoney Medical Technology, USA) of 0.25% histamine hydrochloride (1
ml/min) and time for preconvulsion dyspnoea (PCD) (The time of aerosol
exposure to the onset of dyspnoea leading to the appearance of convulsions)
was noted. As soon as PCD commenced, animals were removed from the
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 174
chamber and placed in fresh air to recover. This time for PCD was taken as basal
value. The PHE, LM-02 and ketotifen were administered for 7 days. On the 7th
day, 2 hrs later of the drug administration, the animals were exposed to
histamine aerosol and time for PCD was noted. The effect of drug was calculated
by the following formula:
% increase in PCD time = [1-T1/T2] x 100
where, T1= time for PCD onset on day 0
T2= time for PCD onset on day 7
Similar procedure was repeated by exposure of aerosol of 0.5% acetylcholine (1
ml/min) in another seven groups of animals and PCD time was noted down. In
Group I, atropine (2 mg/kg, per oral route) was used as standard drug instead of
ketotifen.
(B) Effect of PHE on Trypsin and Egg albumin-induced bronchospasm in
conscious mice
Here, trypsin and egg albumin were used as sensitizers (antigens). Albino mice
of either sex weighing 25-30 g were selected and randomly divided into four
groups, each containing six animals.
Group I 1% Tween 80 solution orally (Control group)
Group II Asthmatic control (Positive Control group)
Group III Dexamethasone (5 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard group)
Group IV PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
On the first day before starting exposure of antigens, all animals were examined
for following parameters:
pO2
Serum bicarbonate level
Tidal volume
Respiratory rate
Air flow rate
The animals of Group I were exposed once daily to aerosol (Voyage Mist,
Shoney Medical Technology, USA) of saline for 5 min. Animals of Group II, III
and IV were exposed once daily to aerosol of trypsin (1 mg/ml, 1 ml/min) for 5
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 175
mins followed by a rest of 2 hours and then exposed to egg albumin (1%
solution, 1 ml/min) for 5 mins. This procedure was repeated for 10 days. Later
on, egg albumin aerosol was discontinued where as trypsin exposure was
continued till 21st day. On 22nd day, the animals were examined for the above
mentioned parameters. From day 22nd to 35th, dexamethasone and PHE were
administered (per oral route) once a day to animals of Group III and IV
respectively. On 35th day, 2 hrs after the drug treatment, animals of Group II, III,
and IV were exposed to egg albumin (1% solution, 1 ml/min) for 3 mins and were
examined for the above mentioned parameters.
Measurement of pO2
The method described by Apps, 1992 and Fabbri et al., 1997a was used.
The measurement of arterial O2 tension (pO2) was done with the help of Pulse
Oxymeter instrument (Nasan Medical Electronics Pvt Ltd, India). The animals
from each group were taken and pO2 of each animal was measured on 35th day.
Measurement of serum bicarbonate level
The method used in present study to measure serum bicarbonate level was
slightly modified, from that described by Godkar, 1994.
The serum bicarbonate level was measured in both sensitized and unsensitized
mice on 35th day of study.
Specimen collection
About 1-2 ml of blood was collected from each animal after 1 hr of the exposure
to egg albumin. The serum was separated from blood by minimum exposure to
air and it was stored in a sealed tube till bicarbonate level was estimated.
Procedure
Ten ml of 1 g/dl saline was pipetted out in 100 ml beaker. To this, 0.1 ml of the
specimen was added. Then 2 drops of phenol red indicator was added and
mixed well. In above mixture, drop by drop NaOH (0.01N) was added till the end
point was achieved (7.35 pH or color changed from yellow to pink). The volume
of NaOH required was noted down and considered as control reading (X ml). In
another set, 9.0 ml of 1 g/dl saline & 1 ml HCl (0.01N) was added. The above
experiment was repeated and volume of NaOH required was noted (Y ml).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 176
Now R = Y ml – X ml
Calculation
Serum bicarbonate level mEq/ltr = (1-R) x 100
Standard serum bicarbonate level = 21-28 mEq/ltr
Measurement of tidal volume
The method used in the present study was described by Khandpur, 1997.
Definition
It is volume of air inspired or expired per breathe during normal breathe.
Procedure
The measurement of tidal volume was done with the help of ‘Respiratory volume
transducer’ that was used with ‘Strain gage coupler’ and student physiograph.
The physiograph was calibrated with the help of standard 0.1cc volume air
supplier. The tidal volume was measured in terms of height of response
obtained. Then, the height was converted into volume.
Measurement of respiratory rate
The method used in present study was described by Apps, 1992 and Fabbri et
al., 1997a.
Definition
It is no. of breathes per unit time
Unit: Breathes per min (BPM)
Measurement of air flow rate
The method used in present study was described by Guyton and Hall, 2006a.
Definition
It is volume of air inspired or expired per unit time during normal breathing.
Unit: Volume per unit time (ml/min).
Calculation
Air flow rate = Respiratory rate x Tidal volume
BAL Fluid study: differential leukocyte count
The method described by Natiello et al., 2009 was used.
On 35th day, the tracheobronchial tree was lavaged with 1 ml of saline and the
fluid so collected was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 mins and then pellet was
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 177
resuspended in 0.5 ml saline. 0.2 ml Geimsa stain in buffered saline (pH 6.8) was
added to it. After 5 mins, the number of each type of leukocyte in 0.5 ml fluid was
determined under the microscope at 450x magnification.
Histopathology of lungs
The method for histological studies was as descried by Garg et al., 1991.
On 35th day, the mice were sacrificed and histological studies of lungs were
carried out. Briefly, the procedure used included fixation of the tissue with
formalin, embedding in paraffin blocks, sectioning with microtome (0.7 µm
thicknesses) and finally staining by Haematoxylin and Eosin stain technique.
Principle
Haematoxylin stains nucleus light blue which turns red in presence of acid. The
cell differentiation is achieved by treating the tissue with acid solution. The
counterstaining is performed by using eosin which imparts pink color to the
cytoplasm.
(C) Effect of PHE on Triple antigen-induced anaphylaxis in rats
The method described by Gupta et al., 1968 was used.
Twelve Wistar albino rats of either sex, weighing 200-250 g were used for the
study. All the rats were sensitized by single subcutaneous injection of 0.5 ml
horse serum along with 0.5 ml of triple antigen containing 20 million Bordetella
pertusis organisms. After sensitization, the rats were divided into two groups of 6
animals in each. Rats of Group-I received vehicle (1% Tween 80) and served as
control. Rats of Group-II received PHE (200 mg/kg, p.o.) once a day for 10 days.
On 10th day, 2 hrs after treatment, the rats were challenged with intravenous (i.v)
injection of 0.25 ml horse serum. The rats were observed for: onset of symptoms
such as dyspnoea and cyanosis (mins); duration of persistence of symptoms
(mins) and death.
With respect to symptoms, the severity score was graded as 2 – increased
respiratory rate, 4 – dyspnoea for 10 mins, 8 – dyspnoea and cyanosis for 10
mins, 12 – collapse and were recorded for both the groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 178
(D) Effect of PHE on Compound 48/80 induced rat mesentric mast cell
degranulation
The method used in present study was described by Nortan, 1954.
The Wistar albino rat was sacrificed and the pieces of mesentry were collected in
petri dish containing Ringer Locke solution and then subjected to the following
treatment schedules.
Petri dish no.1 - Ringer Locke solution (Vehicle control)
Petri dish no. 2 - Ringer Locke solution (Positive control)
Petri dish no. 3 - 0.1ml of Ketotifen (10 g/ml)
Petri dish no. 4 - 0.1ml of PHE in Tween-80 (500 g/ml)
Petri dish no. 5 - 0.1ml of PHE in Tween-80 (750 g/ml)
Petri dish no. 6 - 0.1ml of PHE in Tween-80 (1000 g/ml)
Each petri dish was incubated for 15 mins at 37C. Later Compound 48/80 (0.1
ml, 10 g/ml) was added to each petri dish except petri dish no.1 and again
incubated for 10 mins at 37C. After that, all pieces were transferred to 4%
formaldehyde solution containing 0.1% Toluidine blue and kept aside for 20 to 25
mins. After staining and fixation of mast cells, mesentry pieces were transferred
through acetone and xylene two times and mounted on slides. All the pieces
were examined under the high power of light microscope. Percent protection of
the mast cells in the control group and the treated groups were calculated by
counting the number of degranulated mast cells from total of at least 100 mast
cells counted. Percent inhibition of mast cell degranulation for each treatment
was calculated by following formula:
% inhibition of MCD = 1 – Number of degranulated mast cell X 100
Total number of mast cells
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 179
4.4.2.2 Anti Inflammatory Study
(A) Effect of PHE on Carrageenan-induced rat paw edema
The method used in present study was described by Winter et al., 1962.
Wistar albino rats of either sex, weighing 200-250 g were divided in five groups of
6 animals each. The single dose treatments were given for 7 days. The following
schedule of treatment was administered:
Group I 1% Tween 80 solution orally (Control)
Group II Indomethacin (10 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard)
Group III PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group IV PHE (400 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group V PHE (800 mg/kg, per oral route)
On 7th day, subsequently 1 hr after treatment; 0.1 ml of 1 % carrageenan was
injected subcutaneously into the planter region of right hind paw to induce
edema. The paw volume was measured initially and at 1, 3 and 5 hr after
carrageenan injection using plethysmographic method. Increase in paw volume
and per cent inhibition was calculated as follow:
Increase in paw thickness in control/treatment PC/PT = Pt – P0.
Per cent inhibition = (PC – PT ) x100
PC
Where Pt is paw thickness at time t, P0 is initial paw thickness, PC is increase in
paw thickness of the control group and PT is the increase in paw thickness of the
treatment groups.
(B) Effect of PHE on Acetic acid-induced increase in capillary permeability
Effect of the test samples on the increased vascular permeability induced by
acetic acid in mice was determined according to Whittle (1964) method with
some modifications.
Albino mice of either sex, weighing 25-30 g were divided in five groups of 6
animals each.
Group I 1% Tween 80 solution orally (Control)
Group II Indomethacin (10 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard)
Group III PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 180
Group IV PHE (400 mg/kg, per oral route)
Group V PHE (800 mg/kg, per oral route)
Each test sample was administered orally for seven day. On 7th day, 30 minutes
after the drug administration, each mouse was injected with 0.1 ml of 4% Evans
blue in saline solution (i.v.) at the tail. Then, 10 min after the i.v. injection of the
dye solution, 0.4 ml of 0.5% (v/v) acetic acid was injected intraperitonealy (i.p.).
After 20 mins, the mice were sacrificed, and the viscera were exposed and
irrigated with distilled water, which was then poured into 10 ml volumetric flasks
through glass wool. Each flask was made up to 10 ml with distilled water, 0.1 ml
of 0.1N NaOH solution was added to the flask and the absorption of the final
solution was measured at 590 nm using normal saline as blank with a Shimadzu
UV-160 spectrophotometer.
4.4.2.3 Immunomodulatory Activity
(A) Effect of PHE on Immunological responses to Sheep Red Blood Cells
(SRBC)
Sheep blood was collected aseptically from the city slaughter house in a
sterilized bottle containing Alsever’s solution (2% dextrose, 0.8% sodium citrate,
0.05% citric acid and 0.42% sodium chloride). SRBC was thoroughly washed
with sterile normal saline and stored in Alsever’s solution in refrigerator till
experimentation.
Wistar albino rats of either sex, weighing 200-250 g were selected for the study.
The animals were randomly divided into following groups of 6 animals each.
Group I 1% Tween 80 solution orally (Control)
Group II Dexamethasone (5 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard)
Group III PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
The animals of Group-II and Group-III received respective drug treatment orally
once daily, for 22 days. Besides above treatment, each group received SRBC
(0.5×109 cells/100 g, i.p.) on Day 7 and 13, as the antigenic material to sensitize
them for immunological studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 181
Humoral immune response
The humoral immunity was assayed as per the method of Joharapurkar et al.,
2003.
On the Day 13 and 20, blood was collected from all antigenically challenged rats
and serum was separated. Twenty-five µl of serum was serially diluted with 25 µl
of phosphate-buffered-saline. SRBC (0.025×109 cells) were added to each of
these dilutions and incubated at 37C for one hour. The rank of minimum dilution
that exhibited haemagglutination was considered as an antibody titre. The level
of antibody titre on Day 13 of the experiment was considered as the primary
humoral immune response and the antibody titre on Day 20 of the experiment
was considered as the secondary humoral immune response.
Cellular immune response
The cell mediated immunity was assayed as per the method of Joharapurkar et
al., 2003.
This was assayed by the footpad reaction method. The edema was induced in
the right paw of rats by injecting SRBC (0.025×109 cells) in the subplantar region
on Day 20. The increase in the paw volume in 48 hours i.e. on Day 22 was
assessed by plethysmographic method. The mean % increase in paw edema
was considered as delayed type hypersensitivity and index of cell mediated
immunity. The volume of left hind paw, injected similarly with phosphate buffered
saline, served as a control.
Histopathology of spleen
The method for histological studies was as descried by Garg et al., 1991.
After completion of 22 days drug treatment, rats were sacrificed; spleens were
dissected out and were transferred to 10% formalin solution. The
histopathological study was carried out as per method described in Section-
4.4.2.1B.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 182
(B) Effect of PHE on Neutrophil Adhesion Test
The method described by Wilkinson, 1978 was used.
Wistar albino rats of either sex, weighing 200-250 g were selected for the study.
The animals were randomly divided into following groups of 6 animals each.
Group I 1% Tween 80 solution orally (Control)
Group II Dexamethasone (5 mg/kg, per oral route) (Standard)
Group III PHE (200 mg/kg, per oral route)
The animals received respective drug treatment orally once daily, for 14 days. On
the 14th day after the drug treatment, blood samples were collected into EDTA
vials and analyzed for total leukocytes counts (TLC) and differential leukocytes
counts (DLC) by Sysmax 3000, Japan. After initial counts, blood samples were
incubated with 80 mg/ml of nylon fibers for 15 mins at 37C. The incubated blood
samples were again analyzed for TLC and DLC. The product of TLC and %
neutrophil gives neutrophil index (NI) of blood sample [NI= (TLC × % neutrophil)].
Percentage neutrophil adhesion was calculated as shown below:
Neutrophil adhesion (%) = (NIu- NIt) × 100.
NIu
Where,
NIu = NI of untreated blood sample.
NIt = NI of fiber-treated blood sample.
4.4.2.4 Acute Toxicity Study of PHE
Acute oral toxicity study was performed as per OECD – 423 guidelines (acute
toxic class method) (2002). Wistar albino rats (female) were selected. The
animals were kept fasting for overnight and provided only with water, after which
the PHE was administered orally at 300 mg/kg body weight in three rats and
observed for 14 days. The rats were observed individually for any sign of acute
toxicity, morbidity or mortality after dosing at least once during the first 30
minutes, periodically during the first 24 hrs and daily thereafter, for a total of 14
days. If mortality was observed in two out of three animals, then the dose
administered was assigned as toxic dose and the procedure was repeated with
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 183
lower dose i.e. 50 mg/kg body weight. If mortality was observed in one animal,
then the same dose was repeated again to confirm the toxic dose. If mortality
was not observed, the procedure was repeated for higher dose i.e. 2000 mg/kg
body weight.
4.4.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The values were expressed as Mean SEM. Statistical significance of difference
in parameters was determined by One way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple
range test and Unpaired student ‘t test’. P<0.05 was considered to be significant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 184
4.5 CLINICAL STUDIES
An open label, randomized, non-comparative, multicenter clinical study was
carried out of LM-01 on 36 patients and LM-02 on 27 patients of either sex,
having mild to moderate bronchial asthma at Government Referral Hospital,
Mansa, India as well as Ayukalp Clinic, Ahmedabad, India. The Independent
ethics committee has approved the protocol for carrying out the clinical study. All
patients were made fully aware of the investigative protocol and provided
informed consent before they were enrolled in the study (Annexure-I).
4.5.1 SUBJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
The patients were evaluated for eligibility to participate in the study based on
inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion Criteria
The following were the inclusion criteria.
Male and female patients between 20 to 80 years of age.
Patients having mild to moderate bronchial asthma and with duration ≥6
months (diagnosis was made based on complete clinical history, commonly
observed symptoms, physical and hematological examinations, and pulmonary
function test).
Exclusion Criteria
The following were the exclusion criteria.
Patients having very severe bronchial asthma (PEFR < 20%, FEV1 < 20% of
predicted value).
Patients with steroid-dependant asthma.
Asthma requiring hospitalization once or emergency treatment more than once
within the 6 months before or during the study.
Pregnant and breast feeding women.
Present smokers.
Patients with symptoms of respiratory tract infection.
Patients with diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, hepatic & renal diseases,
pulmonary tuberculosis etc.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 185
Those patients who fulfill all above mentioned criteria were enrolled in the study
(Annexure-II).
4.5.2 TREATMENTS
(1) LM-01(Capsule)
Patients were advised to take 2 capsules twice daily for 12 weeks.
(2) LM-02 (Oral aerosol spray)
Patients were advised to take 2 puffs of oral aerosol spray twice daily for 4
weeks.
Follow ups:
Patients were advised to visit the hospital daily during the 1st week. Subsequently
they visited every week for follow-up and collection of medications. At weekly
visit, patients were asked for any untoward effect and improvement in the
symptoms observed.
4.5.3 ASSESSMENT
Comprehensive assessment; comprising of baseline characteristics, clinical
assessment, laboratory investigations and pulmonary function tests was
recorded at the beginning of study and at the end of study (Annexure-II).
Clinical assessment
Patients were examined weekly for heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory
rate during the study period.
Hematological examinations
Blood samples were analyzed for hematological examinations include
Hemoglobin (Hb) estimation, Total leukocyte count (TLC), Differential leukocyte
count (DLC) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
Total serum IgE measurement (Bassion, 1989; Halpern, 1989)
Toatl IgE was measured in the serum of patient before and at the end of the
treatment. Total serum IgE was determined by ACS:180 total IgE assay. The
ACS:180 total IgE assay is two-site sandwich immunoassay using direct
chemiluminometric technology, which uses constant amounts of two antibodies
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 186
to IgE. The first antibody, in the Lite reagent, is a goat anti-human IgE antibody
labeled with acridinium ester. The second antibody, in the solid phase, is a
mouse anti-human IgE antibody which is covalently coupled to paramagnetic
particles. Briefly, 30 μl of standard and sample were dispensed into cuvettes.
Hundred (100) μl of Lite reagent and 450 μl of solid phase were dispensed and
incubated for 7.5 minutes at 37°C. Cuvettes were separated, aspirated and
washed with reagent water. Three hundred (300) μl each of chemiluminescence
substrate solutions were dispensed to initiate chemiluminescent reaction. Read
wells with a chemiluminescence microwell reader. Calculate the average read
Relative light units (RLU) for each set of reference standards and samples.
Construct a standard curve by plotting the mean RLU obtained for each
reference standard vs IgE concentration in IU/ml on linear graph paper, with RLU
on the vertical (y) axis and concentration on the horizontal (x) axis. Using the
mean absorbance value for each sample, determine the corresponding
concentration of IgE in IU/ml from the standard curve.
Sputum test
The test involves % Eosinophils count in the sputum of patient before and at the
end of the treatment. Sputum was induced through the method described by
Keatings et al., 1997. The patients were instructed to wash their mouths
thoroughly with water. They then inhaled nebulized 3.5% saline at room
temperature from an ultrasonic nebulizer (Voyage Mist, Shoney Medical
Technology, USA) at the maximum saline output (4 ml/min). The total period of
sputum induction was 15 mins. Subjects were encouraged to cough deeply.
Mouth washing before each cough was encouraged in order to minimize salivary
contamination. The initial sample from the first cough was discarded. Sputum
was collected into a 50-ml polypropylene tube, kept at 4°C, and processed within
2 hrs. For sputum processing, 1 ml Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS)
containing 1% dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to the sputum. The mixture was
vortexed and repeatedly aspirated at room temperature until the sputum was
homogenized. Samples were left at room temperature for 5 mins. Sputum
volume was then recorded, the sputum was further diluted with HBSS to a
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 187
volume of 5 ml, and the preparation was vortexed briefly and centrifuged at 400
rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The cell pellets from the sputum centrifugation were
resuspended. Slides were prepared and were stained with May–Grunwald–
Giemsa stain for differential cell counts.
Symptom Score
The symptom score was measured for all commonly observed symptoms of
bronchial asthma i.e. dyspnoea, wheezing, rhonchi, cough and accessory muscle
use (AMU)-sternocleidomastoid before start of the treatment and at the end of
the treatment. Score was graded as 3, 2, 1 and 0 for presence of severe,
moderate, mild and absence of any symptom respectively (Govindan et al.,
2004).
Pulmonary Score (PS)
The pulmonary score was measured before start of the treatment and at the end
of the treatment. The PS is the aggregate of three parameters: respiratory rate,
wheezing and accessory muscle use, each scored on a 0-3 scale (Table-4.5.1).
The PS ranges from 0 (no or very mild exacerbation) to 9 (severe exacerbation)
(Smith et al., 2002).
Table 4.5.1: Pulmonary score
Score Respiratory rate (breathes/min)
Wheezing Accessory muscle use
0 <20 None No apparent increase
1 21-35 Terminal expiration Mild increase
2 36-50 Entire expiration with stethoscope Increased
3 >50 Inspiration & expiration without stethoscope
Maximal activity
Pulmonary function Tests (Govindan et al., 1999)
Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were carried out with the help of Spirometer
(Spirobank, France) before treatment and at the end of the treatment. Patient
was asked to keep mouthpiece of spirometer in mouth and hold it in the mouth
firmly with the help of lips. Patient was asked to breathe normally a few times.
Then the patients were asked to take a deep inspiration followed by forcible
expiration in to the spirometer. The spirogram and the values of lung volumes
and lung flow rates obtained were recorded. The whole process was repeated
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Page 188
three times and the best results were recorded. Parameters assessed were
Forced vital capacity (FVC), Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Peak
expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and Forced expiratory flow rate (FEF25-75%).
Maximum ventilatory volume (MVV) was determined by asking the patient to
breathe as hard and fast as possible for 1 minute.
Frequency of asthmatic attacks/day
Frequency of asthmatic attacks were noted before and every week during their
visit to hospital.
4.5.4 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The values were expressed as Median (IQR) or Mean SD. Statistical
significance of difference in parameters before and after treatment was
determined by Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and Student’s paired t-test. P<0.05
was considered to be significant.