me31dchapter2

Upload: hundeejireenya

Post on 14-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    1/80

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    2/80

    Considerations in Planning

    Irrigation Systems i) Location: The main point to consider in locating an

    irrigation project is the need to investigate available resources in

    the area e.g.

    Climate, Adequate water in quality and quantity,

    Land with good agricultural potential and

    Good topography,

    Availability of labour (sophisticated or not), Land tenure,

    Marketing,

    Transport facilities etc.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    3/80

    Considerations in Planning

    Irrigation Systems Contd. ii) Crops to be grown: Should be determined by available

    resources as well as marketability of the crops especially interms of what people like to eat.

    iii) Water Supply: Consider

    (a)Sources of water

    (b) Quantity and quality of water

    c) Engineering works necessary to obtain water e.g. ifunderground, pumping is needed

    d) Conveyance System: can be by gravity e.g. open channelsor canals or by closed conduits e.g. pipes.

    (e) Water measuring devices e.g. weirs, orifice, flumes, currentmeters

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    4/80

    Other Considerations iv) Systems of Applying Water:

    e.g. Surface (90% worldwide),

    Sprinkler(5%),

    Trickle and Sub-irrigation(5%).

    v) Water Demand: The water requirement for thegiven crop has to be determined. This is by

    calculating the evapotranspiration (to be treated later)

    vi) Project Management: Consider how to managethe irrigation system

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    5/80

    2.2 CROP WATER AND NET

    IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS

    In irrigation, it is essential to know the amount of water neededby crops.

    This determines the quantity of water to be added by irrigationand rainfall and helps in day to day management of irrigationsystems.

    Total water demand of crops is made up of:

    i) Crop water use: includes evaporation and transpiration(evapotranspiration described in section 2.3 below)

    ii) Leaching requirement:

    iii) Losses of waterdue to deep seepage in canals and losses

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    6/80

    EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 2.3.1 DEFINITIONS

    a) Evaporation: The process by which water is changed from

    the liquid or solid state into the gaseous state through thetransfer of heat energy.

    b) Transpiration: The evaporation of water absorbed by thecrop which is used directly in the building of plant tissue in aspecified time. It does not include soil evaporation.

    c) Evapotranspiration, ET: It is the sum of the amount ofwater transpired by plants during the growth process and thatamount that is evaporated from soil and vegetation in thedomain occupied by the growing crop. ET is normally

    expressed in mm/day.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    7/80

    FACTORS THAT AFFECT

    EVAPOTRANSPIRATIONWeather parameters, Crop Characteristics,Management and Environmental aspects arefactors affecting ET

    (a) Weather Parameters: The principal weather conditions affecting

    evapotranspiration are: Radiation,

    Air temperature,

    Humidity and

    Wind speed.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    8/80

    CROP FACTORS THAT

    AFFECT ET Crop Type

    Variety of Crop

    Development Stage

    Crop Height

    Crop Roughness

    Ground Cover

    Crop Rooting Depth

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    9/80

    Management and Environmental

    Factors (a) Factors such as soil salinity,

    Poor land fertility,

    Limited application of fertilizers,

    Absence of control of diseases and Pests and poor soil management

    May limit the crop development and reduce soilevapotranspiration.

    Other factors that affect ET are ground cover, plant density andsoil water content. The effect of soil water content on ET isconditioned primarily by the magnitude of the water deficit andthe type of soil. Too much water will result in waterloggingwhich might damage the root and limit root water uptake byinhibiting respiration.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    10/80

    EVAPOTRANSPIRATION

    CONCEPTS (a) Reference Crop Evapotranspiration (ETo):

    Used by FAO.

    This is ET rate from a reference plant e.g. grass or alfalfa, not

    short of water and is denoted as ETo. The ET of other cropscan be related to the Et of the reference plant.

    ETo is a climatic parameter as it is only affected by climatic

    factors.

    The FAO Penman-Monteith method is recommended as the

    sole method for determining ETo. The method has beenselected because it closely approximates grass ETo at the

    location evaluated, is physically based, and explicitly

    incorporates both physiological and aerodynamic parameters.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    11/80

    CROP ET UNDER STANDARD

    CONDITIONS (ETc) This refers to crop ET under standard conditions, i.e.

    ET from disease-free, well-fertilized crops, grown inlarge fields, under optimum soil water conditions.

    ETc can be derived from ETo using the equation:

    ETc = Kc . ETo where Kc is crop coefficient

    Crop Evapotranspiration under non- standardconditions as mentioned above is called ETc(adjusted). This refers to growth of crops under non-optimal conditions.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    12/80

    DETERMINATION OF

    EVAPOTRANSPIRATION Evapotranspiration is not easy to measure.

    Specific devices and accurate measurements

    of various physical parameters or the soilwater balance in lysimeters are required to

    determine ET. The methods are expensive,

    demanding and used for research purposes.

    They remain important for evaluating ETestimates obtained by more indirect methods.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    13/80

    ENERGY BUDGET METHOD This method like the water budget

    approach involves solving an equation

    which lists all the sources and sinks ofthermal energy and leaves evaporation

    as the only unknown. It involves a great

    deal of instrumentation and is still underactive development. It is data intensive

    and is really a specialist approach.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    14/80

    Energy Budget Method Contd.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    15/80

    Water Balance Method The Water Balance or Budget Method is a

    measurement of continuity of flow of water.

    This method consists of drawing up a balance sheet

    of all the water entering and leaving a particularcatchment or drainage basin.

    The water balance equation can be written as:

    ET = I + P RO DP + CR + SF + SW

    Where: I is Irrigation, P is rainfall, RO is surfacerunoff, DP is deep percolation, CR is capillary rise,SF and SW are change in sub-surface flow andchange in soil water content respectively

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    16/80

    Lysimeters For Water Balance

    Method Lysimeters are normally adopted in water balance studies.

    By isolating the crop root zone from its environment and

    controlling the processes that are difficult to measure, the

    different terms in the soil balance equation can be determinedwith greater accuracy.

    Using Lysimeters, crop grows in isolated tanks filled with either

    disturbed or undisturbed soil.

    In weighing lysimeters, water loss is directly measured by

    change in mass while In non-weighing ones, the ET for a given time is determined by

    deducting the drainage water collected at the bottom of the

    lysimeters, from the total water input.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    17/80

    Non-Weighing Lysimeter

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    18/80

    ET Computed from

    Meteorological Data: ET is commonly computed from weather data. A large number

    of empirical equations have been developed for assessing crop

    or reference crop evapotranspiration from weather data. Some

    of these methods include the Blaney-Criddle, Penman,

    Thornthwaite, Radiation, Hargreaves, Turc and many others.

    Most of these methods have been found to only work in specific

    locations.

    Following an Expert Consultation by Food and Agriculture

    Organization in May 1990, the FAO Penman-Monteith method

    is now recommended as the standard method for the definition

    and computation of the reference evapotranspiration. The FAO

    Penman-Monteith equation is described in the Notes.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    19/80

    ET Estimated from

    Evaporation Pans: Evaporation from an open water surface provides an

    index of integrated effect of radiation, airtemperature, air humidity and wind on

    evapotranspiration. However, differences in thewater and cropped surface produce significantdifferences in the water loss from an open surfaceand the crop. The pan is used to estimate referenceETo by observing the evaporation loss from a water

    surface (Epan) and applying empirical coefficients(Kpan)to relate pan evaporation to Eto thus:

    ETo = Kp x Epan

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    20/80

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    21/80

    Standard Pan: United States Class A

    Pan The most common Evaporation Pan used is the United States

    Class A pan. This is made up of unpainted galvanized iron, 1.2

    m in diameter and 25.4 cm deep. The bottom supported on a

    wooded frame, is raised 15.24 cm above the ground surface.

    The water surface is maintained between 5.0 and 7.6 cm below

    the rim of the pan and is measured daily with a gauge. The

    daily evaporation is computed as the difference between

    observed levels corrected for any precipitation measured in an

    adjacent or nearby standard rain gauge. A pan coefficient of 0.7

    (0.6 - 0.8) is normally used to convert the observed value to anestimated value for lake or reservoirs. This is because the rate

    of evaporation in small areas is greater than that from large

    areas.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    22/80

    US Class A Evaporation PanIncoming Radiation

    q Absorbed By

    Water

    Evaporation

    Air Flow

    Conduction

    Through Walls

    of pan

    q conv

    absorbed by

    the water

    Incoming

    Radiation Heats

    Pan Wall q rad

    Convection

    qconv heats up

    pan walls

    Heat Transfer Mechanisms Involved In Heating Of Water In The Standard Pans (diameter D) And Their Walls (After Jagroop,2000).

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    23/80

    Types of Evaporation Pans

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    24/80

    A Comparison of Standard Open

    PansPan Dimensions Pan Coefficient

    US Class A 1.2 m Diameter; 250mm Deep

    0.7 (0.6 to 0.8)

    Australian Pan 900 mm Diameter; 900

    mm Deep. Large Pan:

    1200 mm Diameter and850 mm Deep

    0.9 ( 0.6 to 1.2)

    British Tank 1.83 m Square 0.9 (Very Variable)

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    25/80

    2.4. LEACHING REQUIREMENT

    Most irrigation water contain dissolved salts.

    Evaporation removes pure water leaving aconcentration of salt in soil.

    Salt concentration may reach a level that isdetrimental to the growth of the crop and should becontrolled. The only practical way of achieving this isby leaching.

    Leaching requirement is an extra water needed topass through the root zone in addition to the normalrequirement to ensure that salts are placed below theroot zone.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    26/80

    LEACHING REQUIREMENT

    CONTD.

    acceptableEC

    RainETirrig

    Ec

    ZoneRoottheinContentSaltAcceptableRainETWaterIrrigationinionConcentratSaltLR

    )(

    )(

    Ec acceptable = 4 mmhos/cm. For water quality, Ec of 0.8

    Mmhos/cm is medium, quality while Ec of 4 mmhos/cm is saline.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    27/80

    2.5. EFFECTIVE PRECIPITATION This is the component of rainfall that is

    available to crops ie. does not runoff.

    It can be estimated as 65% of total rainfall.

    It can also be estimated as the rainfall value,which has 80% probability of being exceeded

    (D80).

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    28/80

    .REQUIREMENT (Nir)

    This is the moisture that must be supplied by irrigation to satisfyevapotranspiration plus that needed for leaching and notsupplied by off-season storage, and the effects of precipitationand groundwater storage.

    Nir = ET + Wl - Ws - Re

    Where: Nir is the net irrigation;

    ET is evapotranspiration,

    Wl is leaching requirement;

    Ws is off-season soil moisture carry-over.

    All parameters are in mm of water.

    2 7 GROSS IRRIGATION

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    29/80

    2.7 GROSS IRRIGATIONREQUIREMENT (Gir)

    Gross Irrigation Requirement is equal to:

    Net Irrigation Requirement Divided byIrrigation Efficiency

    Irrigation efficiency accounts for losses in storage

    and distribution systems, losses in applicationsystems as well as operation and managementlosses.

    Irrigation Efficiency depends on the Method of

    Applying Irrigation Water

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    30/80

    2.8 IRRIGATION TERMS 2.8.1. Depth of Irrigation: This is the

    depth of the readily available moisture.

    This is the net depth of water normallyneeded to be applied to the crops

    during each irrigation

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    31/80

    Example 1 The Moisture Content at Field Capacity of a Clay Loam Soil is

    28% by Weight While that at Permanent Wilting Point is 14% byWeight. Root Zone Depth Is 1 m and the Bulk Density Is 1.2g/cm3 . Calculate the Net and Gross Depth of Irrigation

    Required If the Irrigation Efficiency Is 0.7.

    Solution: Field Capacity = 28%; Permanent wilting point =14%

    i.e. Available moisture = 28 - 14 = 14% by weight i.e. Pm

    Bulk density (Db) = 1.2 g/cm3 Root Zone depth (D) = 1 m = 1000 mm

    Equivalent depth of available water (d) = Pm . Db . D

    = 0.14 x 1.20 x 1000 mm = 168 mm

    This is the net depth of irrigation.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    32/80

    Solution to Example 1 contd.

    Gross Water Application is equal to:

    Net Irrigation/Efficiency = 84/0.7 = 120 mm

    Note: This is the actual water needed to bepumped for irrigation.

    It is equivalent to:120 /1000 mm x 10,000 m2 =

    1200 m 3 per hectare.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    33/80

    2.8.2 Irrigation Interval (II):

    This is the time between successive

    irrigations.

    Irrigation interval is equal to: Readily Available Moisture or Net Irrigation divided by

    Evapotranspiration, ET

    The shortest irrigation interval is normally use in

    design. The irrigation interval varies with ET. It is equivalent to Readily Available Water divided by the

    Peak ET

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    34/80

    Example 2 For the Last Example. the Peak ET is

    7.5 mm/day, Determine the Shortest

    Irrigation Interval.

    Solution: From Example 1, ReadilyAvailable Moisture (RAM) = 84 mm

    i.e. Shortest irrigation interval = RAM/Peak ET = 84/7.5 = 11 days.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    35/80

    Irrigation Period (IP) This is the number of days allowed to

    complete one irrigation cycle in a given

    area.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    36/80

    Irrigation Period Contd.

    Assuming water is applied in a border in a day,

    the total period of irrigation is then 11 days.

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    37/80

    Irrigation Interval and Period

    In irrigation scheduling, the irrigation period

    should be less that the irrigation interval.

    This is because if the period is not smaller,before the latter parts of the area are to be

    irrigated, the earlier irrigated areas will need

    fresh irrigation.

    At peak evapotranspiration (used in design),irrigation interval should be equal to irrigation

    period. i.e. Generally IP < II

    2 8 4 Desired Irrigation Design

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    38/80

    2.8.4 Desired Irrigation DesignCapacity (Qc)

    This is the flow rate determined by the

    water requirement, irrigation time,

    irrigation period and the irrigationapplication efficiency.

    It is the flow rate of flow of the water

    supply source e.g. pumps from areservoir, or a borehole required to

    irrigate a given area.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    39/80

    Desired Irrigation Design Capacity

    (Qc) Contd.

    aEHFdAcQ .. .

    Where:

    Qc is the Desired Design Capacity;

    d is the Net Irrigation Depth = Readily Available Moisture;

    F is the number of Days to complete the Irrigation (Irrigation Period);

    H is the number of Hours the System is perated (hrs/day) and

    Ea is the Irrigation Efficiency

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    40/80

    Example 3 A 12-hectare field is to be irrigated with a sprinkler

    system. The root zone depth is 0.9 m and the fieldcapacity of the soil is 28% while the permanent

    wilting point is 17% by weight. The soil bulk densityis 1.36 g/cm and the water application efficiency is70%. The soil is to be irrigated when 50% of theavailable water has depleted. The peakevapotranspiration is 5.0 mm/day and the system is

    to be run for 10 hours in a day. Determine: (i) The net irrigation depth

    (ii) Gross irrigation ie. the depth of water to be pumped

    (iii) Irrigation period

    (iv) Area to be irrigated per day and (v)

    the system capacity.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    41/80

    Solution to Example 3 Solution: Field Capacity = 28%; Permanent

    Wilting Point = 17%

    ie. Available Moisture = 28 - 17 = 11% , which is

    Pm Root zone depth = 0.9 m;

    Bulk density = 1.36 g/cm3

    Depth of Available Moisture, = Pm . Db. D

    = 0.11 x 1.36 x 900 = 135 mm Allowing for 50 % depletion of Available Moisture

    before Irrigation, Depth of Readily Available Moisture= 0.5 x 135 mm = 67.5 mm

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    42/80

    Solution of Example 3 Contd.

    i) Net irrigation depth = Depth of the Readily AvailableMoisture = 67.5 mm

    ii) Gross Irrigation = Net irrigation

    Application efficiency

    = 67.5/0.7 = 96.4 mm

    iii) Irrigation interval = Net irrigation or RAM

    Peak ET = 67.5/5 = 13.5 days

    = 13.5 days = 13 days (more critical)

    In design, irrigation interval = irrigation period

    ie. irrigation period is 13 days

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    43/80

    Solution of Example 3 Contd. iv) Total area to be irrigated = 12 hectares

    Area to be irrigated per day = Total area /irrigation period = 12 ha/ 13 days

    = 1 ha/day

    v) System Capacity, Qc = A. d m3 /s

    F. H. Ea

    Area, A = 12 ha = 12 x 10000 m2 = 120,000 m2 Net irrigation depth, d = 67.5 mm = 0.0675 m

    Irrigation period , F = 13 days

    Number of hours of operation, H = 10 hrs/day

    Irrigation efficiency, Ea = 0.78

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    44/80

    Solution of Example 3 Concluded System capacity, Qc = 120,000 m2 x 0.0675 m

    13 days x 10 hrs/day x 0.7

    = 89.01 m3/h r

    Recall: 1 m 3 = 1000 L and 1 hr = 3600 s

    ie. 89.01 m3 /hr = {89.01 x 10 3 L}/3600 secs

    = 24.73 = 25 L/s

    The pump to be purchased for sprinkler irrigationmust have capacity equal to or greater than 25 L/s.

    Alternatively, more than one pump can bepurchased.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    45/80

    2.9. IRRIGATION EFFICIENCIES

    These irrigation efficiencies are brought aboutby the desire not to waste irrigation water, nomatter how cheap or abundant it is.

    The objective of irrigation efficiency conceptis to determine whether improvements can bemade in both the irrigation system and themanagement of the operation programmes,which will lead to an efficient irrigation wateruse.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    46/80

    2.9.1 Application EfficiencyE

    Water in root zone after irrigation

    Total volume of water applieda

    Total vol of water applied Vol of Tailwater Vol of deep percolation

    Total water applied

    . ( . . )

    Ea is inadequate in describing the overall quantity of water

    since it does not indicate the actual uniformity of irrigation,the amount of deep percolation or the magnitude of

    under-irrigation. See diagrams in text.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    47/80

    Example 4 Delivery of 10 m3/s to a 32 ha farm is continued for 4

    hours. The tail water is 0.27 m3/s. Soil probing afterirrigation indicates that 30 cm of water has been

    stored in the root zone. Compute the ApplicationEfficiency.

    Solution: Total volume of water applied

    = 10 m3/s x 4 hrs x 3600s/hr = 144,000 m3

    Total tail water = 0.27 x 4 x 3600 = 3888 m3

    Total water in root zone = 30 cm = 0.3 m x 32 hax 10,000 m2/ha = 96,000 m3

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    48/80

    Solution to Example 4 Contd.

    = 96,000/144,000 = 66.7%.

    EWater in root zone after irrigation

    Total volume of water applieda

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    49/80

    2.9.2 Water Conveyance Efficiency

    EWater delivered to the Farm W

    Water of water diverted from a stream reservoir or well Wc

    d

    s

    ( )

    , ( )

    Farm

    Water lost by evapAnd seepage Ws

    Wd

    Stream

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    50/80

    Example 5 45 m3 of water was pumped into a farm distribution

    system. 38 m3 of water is delivered to a turn out (athead ditch) which is 2 km from the well. Compute the

    Conveyance Efficiency.

    Solution:

    EWater delivered to the Farm W

    Water of water diverted from a stream reservoir or well Wcd

    s

    ( )

    , ( )

    = 38/45 = 84%

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    51/80

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    52/80

    2.9.3. Christiansen Uniformity

    Coefficient (Cu)

    C

    X

    m nu

    100 10( .

    / /

    )

    This measures the uniformity of irrigation

    W here: is the summation of deviations from the mean depth

    infiltered

    m is the mean depth unfiltered and

    n is the number of observations.

    // X

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    53/80

    Example 6A Uniformity Check is taken by probing many

    stations down the border. The depths ofpenetration (cm) recorded were: 6.4, 6.5,

    6.5, 6.3, 6.2, 6.0, 6.4, 6.0, 5.8, 5.7, 5.5, 4.5,4.9. Compute the Uniformity Coefficient.

    Solution: Total depth of water infiltered =76.7 cm

    Mean depth = 76.7/13 = 5.9 cm

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    54/80

    Locations Depths (cm) Deviations from Mean

    1 6.4 0.5

    2 6.5 0.6

    3 6.5 0.6

    4 6.3 0.4

    5 6.2 0.3

    6 6.0 0.1

    7 6.4 0.5

    8 6.0 0.1

    9 5.8 0.1

    10 5.7 0.2

    11 5.5 0.4

    12 4.5 1.4

    13 4.9 1.0

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    55/80

    Example 6 Concluded

    This is a good Efficiency. 80% Efficiency isacceptable.

    / /X

    C

    X

    m nu

    100 10( .

    / /

    )

    Cu 100 106 2

    5 9 13( ..

    . )

    = 6.2

    m = 5.9 cm; n = 13

    = 92%

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    56/80

    2.9.4 Water Storage Efficiency (Es)

    2.9.5 Irrigation Efficiency

    EVolume of water in the root zone after irrigation

    Volume of water needed in root zone to avoid total water moisture depletions

    E Steady stateET W R W

    W

    Net Irrigation

    Water divertedi

    l e s

    i

    ( )

    ET is Evapotranspiration;

    Wl is Leaching Requirement;

    Re is Effective Precipitation;

    is change in storage;

    Wi is water diverted, stored or pumped for irrigation.s

    W

    2.10 IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    57/80

    2.10 IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

    This means Predicting when to Irrigate andhow much to Irrigate

    For efficient water use on the farm, the farmerneeds to be able to predict when his cropsneed irrigation. This can be done by:

    Observing the plants;

    Keeping a Water Balance Sheet By Measuring the Soil Moisture Content or

    Computer Software

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    58/80

    2.10.1 Observing the Plants:

    This is a direct way of knowing when the

    crops need water.

    The farmer observes the plants for any signsof wilting or change in leaf colour or growth

    rate.

    The method is simple but its major

    disadvantage is that the signs of shortageappear after the optimum allowable depletion

    has already been exceeded.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    59/80

    2.10.2. Keeping a Water Balance

    Sheet This approach works on the principle that the

    change in water content of the soil isrepresented by the difference between water

    added by irrigation(or rainfall) and the amountlost by evapotranspiration.

    The records are kept for each farm and cropsas shown in Table 2.4 below.

    The method requires no equipment and iseasy to operate.

    It can be operated on a daily or weekly or 10day basis.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    60/80

    . Sheet

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    61/80

    Sheet

    Date Estimated

    ET (mm)

    Rainfall

    (mm)

    Accumulated

    Deficit (mm)

    Irrigation

    Period

    5.1.05 4.2 - 4.2

    6.1.05 3.5 - 7.77.1.05 3.8 - 11.5

    8.1.05 4.5 - 16.0

    9.1.05 5.2 - 21.2

    10.1.05 5.1 2.0 24.311.1.05 5.5 - 29.8

    12.1.05 5.1 - 4.9 (34.9) 30.0

    13.1.05 4.9 - 9.8

    etc.

    Irrigation Plan: Apply 30 mm of water at 30 mm deficit.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    62/80

    2.10.3 Measuring Soil Moisture

    This is the best scheduling and the most widely used.Soil moisture can be indirectly measured usingdevices and instruments eg. tensiometers, resistance

    blocks or neutron probes. Direct measurement of soil moisture can be by

    weighing or the gravimetric method.

    These methods are either too expensive orcomplicated.

    The simplest and most practical method is toestimate the moisture content by the 'feel andappearance' of the soil.

    Soil is collected at the root zone and checked to

    guess the right time to irrigate.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    63/80

    2.11 IRRIGATION WATER: SOURCES, QUALITY &

    MEASUREMENT

    2.11.1 Sources of Irrigation Water Supply

    i) Rainfall or Precipitation: This is apractical and dominant factor.

    The supply varies with time and place e.g.while Grenada receives 2,100 mm annualrainfall, Antigua receives only 1,100 mm.Trinidad receives 1, 950 mm (Data suppliedby Gumbs, 1987).

    To be of greatest benefit for crop production,the rainfall amount should be enough toreplace water in the root zone on a regularbasis.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    64/80

    Mean Annual Rainfall of Caribbean

    Countries

    1127

    1500 1524

    1983

    4500

    2263 2253

    20571980

    1372

    1971 1990

    2500

    2054

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    4500

    5000

    Antig

    ua&Barbu

    da

    TheBa

    hamas

    Barbad

    os

    Beliz

    e

    Domini

    ca

    Grena

    da

    Guy

    ana

    Haiti

    Jamaica

    St.Kitts

    &Nevis

    St.Lucia

    St.Vinc

    ent&

    theGrena

    dines

    Surin

    ame

    Trinida

    d&To

    bago

    MeanAnnualR

    ainfall(mm)

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    65/80

    Sources of Irrigation Water

    Contd. ii) Underground water sources: This can be

    shallow or bore holes.

    iii) Surface Sources: Streams, rivers, lakes, farmponds etc.

    Streams should be gauged to ensure that there isenough water for irrigation.

    Rivers or streams can also be dammed to raise theheight of flow and make more water available forirrigation.

    Farm ponds can also be dug to store water fromrivers or channels (e.g. field station) or to collect

    water from rainfall

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    66/80

    Sources of Irrigation Water

    Contd. iv) Springs and waste water e.g.

    industrial water and sewage: Determine

    quality before use. (For details of harnessing water for

    irrigation in the Caribbean, see Gumb's

    Soil & Water Conservation Methods,Chapter 7).

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    67/80

    2.11.2 Irrigation Water

    Quality: Irrigation water quality depends on

    i) Amount of suspended sediment eg.

    silt content ii) The chemical constituents of water

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    68/80

    i) Amount of Suspended

    Sediment: The effect of sediment may depend upon the

    nature of the sediment and the characteristicsand soil conditions of the irrigated area.

    Silt content in irrigation may be beneficial if itimproves the texture and fertility of say sandysoil.

    It can also be detrimental if it is derived froma sterile sub-soil, and applied to a fertile soil.

    Silt accumulation can cause aggradation incanals or distribution systems. In sprinklersystems, silt can cause abrasion.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    69/80

    ii) The Chemical Constituents

    of Water: There are three main elements or

    compounds that can cause hazards in

    irrigation water. They include: Sodium,

    Boron and

    Salts.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    70/80

    a) Salinity Hazards:

    The units of salt concentration in irrigation water canbe parts per million (p.p.m), milliequivalents/litre(ME/litre) or electrical conductivity.

    On the basis of salinity, irrigation water can beclassified as C1 to C4(see chart).

    They refer to low, medium, high and very high salinitylevels respectively.

    While C1 water can easily be used for irrigation

    without need for leaching requirement,

    C4 water is not useable, except in permeable soilswhere adequate leaching and drainage is possibleand for highly tolerant crops.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    71/80

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    72/80

    b) Sodium Hazard:

    It is Measured in Sodium Absorption Ratio(S.A.R).

    SAR is defined as the proportion of sodium

    relative to other cations.

    SARNa

    Ca Mg

    2

    Parameters are measured in ME/litre.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    73/80

    Sodium Hazard Contd.

    Irrigation Water is also divided into S1 to S4in terms of Sodium (SAR) Content.

    S1 Water can be used readily

    S2 and S3 can be used with adequateLeaching and Drainage and addition ofOrganic and Chemical amendment.

    S4 Water has very high Sodium Content andis unsuitable for irrigation except wherecalcium, gypsum or other chemicalamendments are possible.

    (See water quality chart).

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    74/80

    Boron

    See Table 2.4 in Note Book for

    Permissible limit of Boron for several

    classes of irrigation water

    2 11 3 Measurement of Irrigation

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    75/80

    2.11.3 Measurement of Irrigation

    Water

    Water is the most valuable asset of irrigated

    agriculture and can be detrimental if used

    improperly.

    An accurate measurement permits an

    intelligent use.

    The methods to use for measurement should

    depend on the flow, environmental conditionsand the degree of accuracy required.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    76/80

    Methods of Measuring Irrigation

    Water a) Direct method: Collect water in a contained of known

    volume e.g. bucket. Measure the time required for water froman irrigation source e.g. siphon to fill the bucket.

    Flow rate = Volume/time m3/hr or L/s etc.

    b) Weirs: Weirs are regular notches over which water flows.

    They are used to regulate floods through rivers, overflow damsand open channels.

    Weirs can be sharp or broad crested; made from concrete

    timber, or metal and can be of cross-section rectangular,trapezoidal or triangular.

    Sharp crested rectangular or triangular sections are commonlyused on the farm.

    W i C td

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    77/80

    Weirs Contd. The discharge through a weir is usually expressed as:

    Q = C L Hm

    where Q is the discharge;

    C is the coefficient dependent on the nature of weir crest andapproach conditions;

    L is the length of crest;

    H is the head on the crest and m is an exponent depending on weir opening.

    Weirs should be calibrated to determine these parametersbefore use eg. for trapezoidal weirs(Cipoletti weir),

    Q = 0.0186 L H1.5

    Q is discharge in L/s;

    L, H are in cm.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    78/80

    Methods of Measuring Irrigation

    Water Contd. c) Orifices: An orifice is an opening in the

    wall of a tank containing water.

    The orifice can be circular, rectangular,

    triangular or any other shape. The discharge through an orifice is given by:

    Q = C A 2 g h

    Where Q is the discharge rate;

    C is the coefficient of discharge (0.6 - 0.8);

    A is the area of the orifice;

    g is the acceleration due to gravity and

    h is the head of water over an orifice.

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    79/80

    Methods of Measuring Irrigation

    Water Contd.

    d) Flumes: Hydraulic flumes are artificial open channels or

    sections of natural channels.

    Two major types of hydraulic flumes are Parshall or Trapezoidal

    ones.

    Flumes need to be calibrated after construction before use.

    See Chapter 6 for further information.

    e) For streams, use gauging. A current meter is used to

    measure velocity at 0.2 and 0.8 Depth or at only 0.6 depth. Measure areas of all sections using trapezoidal areas.

    Q = ai vi

    M th d f M i I i ti

  • 7/27/2019 me31dchapter2

    80/80

    Methods of Measuring Irrigation

    Water Contd. Using Floats: A floating object is put in water and

    observe the time it takes the float e.g. a cork to go

    from one marked area to another.

    Assuming the float travels D meters in t secs

    Velocity of water at surface = ( D/t ) m/s

    Average velocity of flow = 0.8 (D/t)

    Flow rate, Q = Cross sectional area of flow x velocity.

    Object