meaningful involvement of people in ......(e.g. , bollard, lahiff & parkes, 2012; matka et al....
TRANSCRIPT
Learning Together North West Ltd
MEANINGFUL INVOLVEMENT OF PEOPLE IN RECRUITMENT AND D.CLIN.PSY INTERVIEWS
Ruth Dobson – Learning Together North West Ltd
Mark Howard – Learning Together North West Ltd
Bev Liver – Learning Together North West Ltd
Emma Munks, Lancaster University
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO GET INVOLVED?
• Inclusion is a key driver in all recent policy guidance
from the NHS (e.g. ‘Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A new
direction for community services (DoH, 2006)
• Competency based interviewing process is used by
many large organisations and advised by Occ Psychs
• Observe candidates in a real life interaction (in tray
task – validity in employment recruitment
processes)
• Inclusion of people with learning disabilities in LD
service development/interviews is hard to achieve
(e.g. , Bollard, Lahiff & Parkes, 2012; Matka et al. 2010)
“Moving on from
being the passive
recipients of
services, actively
involving
people in a true and
meaningful way, is a
reflection of a
positive culture.”
HQIP Service User
Network (SUN)
member
WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO BE INVOLVED?
• It will improve the quality of the process – everyone can be part of it in a
meaningful way
• People with learning disabilities can get their voice heard
• Everyone involved in the programme, trainees, staff and other clinical
psychologists getting to know us and what we can do
• Feedback ‘I didn’t know people with learning disabilities could do this’ –
breaking down barriers
• Helping the programme to choose the right people to make good clinical
psychologists of the future
MEANINGFUL INVOLVEMENT
• Salford LD Psychology Team
• Improve recruitment
• Avoid tokenism – meaningful involvement
• Inspired by Lancs D.Clin.Psy competency based approach
• Introduced a task (build a tower/bridge)
• Lancaster D.Clin.Psy
• Similar issues
• Meet and Greet
• Implemented Tower Task
LANCASTER D.CLIN.PSY -MEET AND GREET ROLE
• Welcome people arriving for the
interviews
• Shake their hand and ask them
to follow you to the candidate base
room
• Introduce candidates to the admin
team to check in
• While candidates are waiting chat
to the candidates to put them at
their ease
PHOTOGRAPHER ROLE
• Take photos of candidates to go onto their interview folders
• Ask them to sit in front of camera
• Make sure name badge is showing
• Make sure face is in middle of camera shot
• Take the photograph and ask candidate if happy with it – if not take another one
THE TASK
• At Lancaster we use a competency and value based interviewing process
• The task = to build something (e.g. a tower or a bridge) together (candidate and person with LD) & allows the following to be observed:
• Ability to engage/collaborate
• Adapt communication style as needed
• How ‘authority’ is being used
• Ability to manage process when under time pressure
• Which maps onto the competencies we consider in the selections process
• Cost effective and low tech
THE TOWER TASK
Tower Contract Brief - Information (Part 1)
From the material on the table you have to build a
tower that can support a £1 coin. The tower can be
of any design but it must be free-standing and you
can only use the material on the table.
TIME: You have 5 minutes to complete the building
of the tower
Tower Contract Brief - Information (Part 2)
Your team has entered a competition to generate
profit from a building exercise. Number of items
used and height of the structure will be counted/
measured.
TIME:You have 2 minutes to complete this part of
the task
Costs and Income calculations - Cost of
materials - £100 per item; £1,000 per cm of tower
(height)
TRAINING TO DO THE TOWER TASK
• Half day training for everyone who wants to take part
• What is a Clinical Psychologist?
• What makes a good/not so good psychologist – knowing what we are looking out for
• How to do the task (and having a go!)
• How to give feedback on the candidates
• Looking out for ourselves – what to do if you had a difficult time with a candidate – feeding back and support
• Visit to interview venue
THE PANEL BASE ROOM & FACILITATOR ROLE
• While people are waiting to take part in the
panels and do the Tower task – opportunities to
connect with each other – via games,
conversation, computer games to relax everyone
while waiting (& have fun!)
Facilitator role
• Preparation & recap what needed to do for the
Tower Task just before being called by panel
• Debrief and check in for Tower Task panel
members as they came back
• Check in with meet and greeters
DOING THE TASK
• Doing the training helped to know what ‘good’ looked like and what to look for –not always the best tower!
• Our experiences of doing the task
• Been fantastic- especially liked the different ways people do it (Mark what do you think?)
• Really enjoyed it – been a bit of a challenge - but thought would go with it and see where it goes and enjoyed it
• Liked how two of the candidates I was doing the tower task with shook my hand at the start – that made me feel like they would be good to talk to about my problems
GIVING FEEDBACK TO THE PANEL
• I felt a bit nervous giving feedback because I wanted to get it
right – meeting the panel before the interviews started
helped me to feel less nervous and put me at ease (Mark
what do you think?)
• Getting to know the panel members before the interviews
really helped to put me at ease, the panel gave me good eye
contact in a really nice way which helped me to say what I
wanted to say
• When I gave my feedback to Richard (the chair of the panel)
he wrote down what I said and read it back to me to make
sure it was right – I liked that it made me feel listened to
• I really enjoyed being part of the team – I liked people saying
they missed me not being in the meet and greet room when I
was doing the tower task
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT TAKING PART?
• I was very excited to be asked to take part
• I liked being in a position of supporting trainees and staff
• I get butterflies before doing it!
• I get a buzz from doing it!
• First I was unsure but watched my colleague doing meet and greet so
knew what to do and how to do it – learning from each other
• It built up my confidence in meeting people and starting conversations
• It is good to be valued as a person who has skills and things to contribute
• I felt listened to and my thoughts and what I said was taken seriously
• We need to get word out there that we have lots to offer
• It was a new challenge and a new experience – having the opportunity to
be pushed out of our comfort zones to try something new
• To boldly going where no one has gone before!!!
FEEDBACK ON PROCESS – LANCSINTERVIEWS
• Programme team – evidence gained from observing
candidates in the tower task – qualitatively different to that in
other parts of process – more ‘real’ as candidate had to react
to person in front of them – incr validity of task
• Amplified candidates abilities in both positive and negative
ways e.g. use of authority
• Trainee “I found that I was more at ease during the tower
task. Upon reflection, I feel that the tower task produced a
version of me that was closest to my ordinary self”
FEEDBACK ON PROCESS – LANCSINTERVIEWS
• Challenging assumptions
• People with LD / Autism can
take part and provide really
meaningful and helpful insights
within the recruitment process
• Breaking down barriers
• Working together and eating
together as colleagues
• People are more used to one
another
ANY QUESTIONS?
With thanks to all those who have taken part in the recruitment processes – people with IDs, carers, panel members and interviewees.
Learning Together North West Ltd
REFERENCES
• Matka, E. River, D. Littlechild, R. & Powell, P (2010). Involving Service Users and Carers in Admissions for Courses in Social Work and Clinical Psychology: Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of Practices at the University of Birmingham.The British Journal of Social Work, Volume 40, Issue 7, 1 October 2010, Pages 2137–2154, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp142
• Prescott, L. Westbrook, J & McGarry, J. (2017). An initial review and analysis of the recruitment process involving service users and carers for assistant psychologists. Clinical Psychology Forum 296, 16- 21.