measures

11
I T L P : : T h e I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y L e a d e r s P r o g r a m Workshop 3 @ The University of Texas, February 7-9, 2006 Measures

Upload: guinevere-james

Post on 02-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Measures. Measure. Measure n. 1. The dimensions, quantity, or capacity of something as ascertained by measuring: Length, area, volume, and mass are basic measures of material properties. Measures — What? and Why?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006 Measures

Page 2: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Measure

Measure n. 1. The dimensions, quantity, or capacity of something as ascertained by measuring: Length, area, volume, and mass are basic measures of material properties.

Page 3: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Measures — What? and Why?

What would be helpful to

measure in your university’s

IT environment and why?

Page 4: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Finance

¶ Historically, financial measures have been the first and foremost measure of interest to management.

¶ But, financial measures alone have never provided adequate information for operational support.

Page 5: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

The Balanced Scorecard¶ 1990 multicompany study:

Measuring Performance in the Organization of the Future.

¶ Existing performance measurement approaches were hindering organization’s abilities to create future economic value.

¶ New approach: four distinct sets of measures: finance, customer, internal process, and innovation and learning linked to vision and strategy.

Page 6: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

The Balanced Scorecard

Obj

ectiv

es

M

easu

res

Tar

gets

Initi

ativ

es

Obj

ectiv

es

M

easu

res

Tar

gets

Initi

ativ

es

Obj

ectiv

es

M

easu

res

Tar

gets

Initi

ativ

es

Internal Business Processes

“To satisfy our shareholders and customers, what business processes must we excel at?”

Customer

“To achieve our vision, how should we appear to our customers?”

Finance

“To succeed financially, how should we appear to our shareholders?”

Obj

ectiv

es

M

easu

res

Tar

gets

Initi

ativ

es

Learning and Growth

“To achieve our vision, how will we sustain our ability to change and improve?”

Vision and Strategy

Page 7: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Thinking about University IT

What do we need to know?¶ How our customers think we are

doing.¶ Information about the delivery

of outcomes.¶ Information about the internal

performance of our processes.¶ How our staff are doing?

Page 8: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Measurement Framework

Satisfaction – how well are we doing?

• Customer – how satisfied are our customers with our products and services

•C.f., http://web.mit.edu/ist/survey• Employee – how satisfied are our staff

with their work and working environment

•C.f., http://www.cit.cornell.edu/cit/qwl/•C.f.,

http://web.mit.edu/workfamily/qolsurvey.html

•C.f., http://www.insightlink.com/

Performance – numerical indicators of capacity and results

• System•E.g., email messages processed/day

• Process•E.g., avg. time to resolve call to help

desk•E.g., avg. number of purchase orders

processed by ERP system per business day

• Intraprocess task•E.g., avg. time to first response to web

posting of a request to the help deskCost – what are the financial costsassociated with the unit?

•Organization•What is the cost of central IT?

•System•What is the cost of operating the ERP system?

•Service•What is the cost of providing email? Per message processed?

•Process•What is the cost of processing a purchase order?

• Intraprocess task•What is the first-response cost in the help desk process?

Page 9: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Dashboards

What do I do if I want to use measures such as these for operational purposes?¶ Defining what is significant.¶ Collecting it.¶ Making it available.¶ Using it.

Page 10: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

Draft MIT Dashboard

Page 11: Measures

IT•LP

::

Th

e I

nfo

rmati

on

Tech

nolo

gy L

ead

ers

Pro

gra

m

Work

sh

op

3 @

Th

e U

niv

ers

ity o

f Texas,

Feb

ruary

7-9

, 2006

References1. The Balances Scorecard, Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton,

Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996. [Slide 6 reproduces Figure 1-1 on Page 9.]

2. “Aligning IT with Firm Business Strategies Using the Balanced Scorecard System,” Quing Hu and C. Derrick Huang, Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2005, http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2005/2268/08/22680230a.pdf

3. “Management by Fact: Benchmarking Uniersity IT Services,” Jennifer Dowling Dougherty, William Clebsch, and Greg Anderson, EDUCAUSE QUARTERLY, Number 1, 2004. [Available at: http://www.educause.edu/LibraryDetailPage/666?ID=EQM0413; see also, http://web.mit.edu/ist/about/benchmarking/.]

4. “Digital Dashboards: Driving Higher Education Decisions,” Elazar C. Harel and Toby D. Sitko, EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Research Bulletin, Volume 2003, Issue 19, September 16, 2003.

5. Information about MIT’s HelpDesk dashboard as well as current dashboards can be found at: http://web.mit.edu/ist/support/dashboard/.