media literacy research presentation

25
Measuring Media Literacy Among Collegiate Journalism Students An exercise in patience & perseverance By Jory Burson Image from pbs.org

Upload: jorydotcom

Post on 01-Dec-2014

1.456 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Media Literacy Research Presentation

Measuring Media LiteracyAmong Collegiate Journalism Students

An exercise in patience & perseveranceBy Jory Burson

Image from pbs.org

Page 2: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Inspiration:

Five semesters of grading papers for JB 1143 Media & Society

Page 3: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Definition:

“…the ability of a citizen to access, analyze, and produce information for specific outcomes.”

- The Aspen Institute National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy

“A media literate person – and everyone should have the opportunity to become one – can decode, evaluate, analyze, and produce both print and electronic media.”

- Aufderheide (2001, pg. 79)

Page 4: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Questions:

1) What is the media literacy knowledge level of collegiate journalism students?

2) How does the media literacy knowledge level of journalism students compare to that of non-journalism students?

Page 5: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Hypothesis:

Journalism majors will score higher than non-journalism majors on a media literacy survey.

Page 6: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Justification:

1) Journalism students should have a thorough understanding of the media industry upon graduation.

2) Effective media literacy education for journalists can impact our democracy.

3) This study could help guide future efforts to provide media literacy education for journalism students.

Page 7: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Theory:

•Potter’s Cognitive Theory of Media Literacy (2004)

•Defines the process of becoming media literate in three parts:

•Knowledge structures must be developed.•Continually develop knowledge structures and applying critical thinking toward media messages.•Media literacy must have a purpose.

•Social Construction Theory (Berger & Luckmann, 1966)

Page 8: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Methodology:

From the literature review, seven primary criterion of a media literate individual were identified:

1) Awareness of media’s impact on the individual and society

2) Understanding the media system & how it works

3) Information processing and critical thinking

Page 9: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Methodology, continued:

4) Awareness of media’s social constructionist

role5) Increased enjoyment or appreciation

of media content6) Knowledge of media’s role within

the First Amendment7) Continual development as mental

maturity increases

Page 10: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Methodology, continued:

To test those criterion, a media literacy survey was developed based on research by Potter (1998) and Thayer (2007).

The researcher surveyed for all the criterions except #7, continual development.

Page 11: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Methodology, continued:

The researcher used e-mail and direct classroom recruitment for the sampling method.

- e-mails sent via departmental listservs + visits to selected, consenting classrooms

Surveymonkey.com used to host the survey for e-mail responses.

Codebook developed by the researcher to input paper-survey responses into SPSS.

Page 12: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Survey:

•53 total test items•Combination of multiple choice, yes-no, scale, and open-ended questions.•Questions about prior knowledge of media literacy:

•“How many courses have you had which have discussed media literacy?”•“Define media literacy to the best of your ability.”

Page 13: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Survey, continued:

•Questions about media usage & engagement:

•“How many hours do you spend consuming media per day?”•“Have you ever written a letter to the editor of a newspaper?”

Page 14: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Survey, continued:

•Questions to test the criterion of a media literate individual included:

•“Which government agency monitors broadcasters?”•“I know more about the media than other students because of my major.”•“ I often find out about social trends through the media.”•“Which of the following camera shots conveys the most emotional drama?”

Page 15: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Demographics:

•291 respondents to the survey•125 majors in the Journalism & Broadcasting department, 166 majors from other departments.•45.4% male, 54% female, .6% no response•44.3% Freshmen, 22% Sophomore, 18.6% Juniors, 14.8% Seniors, .3% no response

Page 16: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Demographics, continued:

Of the 125 Journalism & Broadcasting dept. majors,

* 18.5% News/Editorial* 14.5% Broadcasting* 41.9% Public Relations* 8.9% Advertising* 16.1% Sports Media*.8% No Response

Page 17: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Statistical Tests:

•Independent Samples T-Tests to compare the Journalism majors with the non-journalism majors.•One-Way ANOVA to compare scores between Journalism majors based on their degree sequence. •Cronbach’s Alpha to establish the reliability of the scale.

Page 18: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Results:

Reliability Analysis removed the test items designed to test the criterion Media’s Impact, which left five criterion to analyze.

Journalism majors reported taking more courses (2-3 courses) that discussed media literacy than non-journalism majors (0-1 courses).

Page 19: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Results, continued:

Journalism majors reported spending more time per day and per week consuming media than non-journalism majors.

Journalism majors reported using multiple media sources at a time more often than non-journalism majors.

Journalism majors reported engaging more with media sources than non-journalism majors.

Page 20: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Results, continued:

On the knowledge portion of the survey,Journalism majors (M=6.25) had more

correct responses than non-journalism majors (M=3.33). This result was statistically significant.

- These results supported the Hypothesis

Page 21: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Results, continued:

{HOWEVER}The survey’s range was 0-14, meaning

that while journalism majors scored better than non-journalism majors, they still scored less than half the points available.

Page 22: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Results, continued:On the knowledge portion of the survey,

News/editorial majors scored the highest (M=7.74);

This was significantly different from one other major – Public Relations (M=5.54).

On the remaining criterion,

Journalism majors scored significantly higher than non- journalism students on all criterion except Information Processing

Page 23: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Limitations:•44.3% of the respondents were Freshmen, thus not as far along in their media education.•Advertising and Sports Media majors appeared to share more similarities with non-journalism majors.•The scale for this study suffered from reliability issues, which eliminated one criterion and some key questions designed to measure variables for others.

Page 24: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The Future?•Research to understand the relationship between media consumption and engagement levels?•Research to understand if journalism majors use media for a different social construction role than non-journalism majors?•Similar research to examine other media-related majors, such as film studies?

Page 25: Media Literacy Research Presentation

The END.