medical malpractice: rule of law and human and individual rights vs judicial corruption in new...

7/27/2019 Medical Malpractice: Rule of Law and Human and Individual Rights vs Judicial Corruption in New Zealand Courts

1/5

P J Harrison< [email protected]>

SC 23/2013 - Pauline Janice HARRISON & Anor v Auckland DistrictHealth Board & Ors (Leave Judgment)10 messages

Annie Chan < [email protected]>Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:55

PMTo: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],[email protected], [email protected]

Good afternoon,

Please find attached a copy of the judgment for the above application for leave to appeal.

Thank you.

Kind Regards,

Ani ChanCase OfficerSupreme Court |85 Lambton Quay | WellingtonDDI: (04) 914 3432FAX: (04) 914 [email protected]

========================================================

Confidentiality notice: This email may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged.If you have received it by mistake, please:(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply from your system;(2) do not act on this email in any other way.Thank you.

================================================

SC 23 2013 - Pauline Janice HARRISON & Anor v Auckland District Health Board &Ors (Leave Judgment).pdf51K

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:31 AMTo: Annie Chan

The judgment is utterly refuted on the Grounds of error of law and is scandalous against all theprinciples of the Rule of Law which are fundamental to justice and is a gross miscarriage of

justice. What does the Supreme Court by these judges think they are up to? The erroneousjudgment is delinquent against the Rule of Law and casts aside justice with a fob-off and assuch is scandalous and must be referred to the Chief Justice.

P. J. Harrison, A. J. HarrisonAppellants
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=fe7ccb7ef6&view=att&th=141ba0cba61a24cb&attid=0.1&disp=attd&safe=1&zwmailto:[email protected]


2/5

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:45 PMTo: Annie Chan , SupremeCourt

Email below dated 16/10/13 re-sent for acknowledgement and conveyance to Chief Justice.


[Quoted text hidden]

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:07 AMTo: [email protected]

The Appellants email dated 16/10/13 is resent (below) for immediate referral to the Chief Justice.

Acknowledgement from the Chief Justice is required in accordance with the seriousness andimportance of malpractice causing wrongful death. The Rule of Law, the Acts which bind theCrown, coupled with the weight of solid documented evidence in this prima facie medicalmalpractice case reproach the fob-off lawless decision by the three judges and those they areshielding. They have made anarchy.

It is disgraceful of the Chief Justice to ignore the seriousness and importance of ultra viresdecisions definitely made in excess of jurisdiction as was Abbott AJ as proven by the Judicature

Act 1908 and to not care about a labyrinth of proven serious malpractice and the anguish andwrongful death it caused, the victim illegally overdosed, poisoned with a lethal combination ofsynergistic controlled and potent drugs, infected, illegally restrained, and refused a properstandard of care. All documented evidence held.

How dare the Supreme Court practice hypocrisy and make a mockery and undermine theintention and purpose of the Law and what the Acts say and the Rule of Law and obstruct andoppress human and individual rights which it is doing in anarchy.

Reply immediately and get this to the Chief Justice at once which justice and moral high

ground demands.



3/5

SupremeCourt SupremeCourt

Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at10:28 AM

To: P J Harrison

Receipt of your emails are acknowledged.

The Courts decision stands. The Chief Justice is unable to assist you.

Gordon ThatcherRegistrar.

>>> P J Harrison 19/10/2013 1:08 a.m. >>>

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:51 PMTo: SupremeCourt SupremeCourt

Gordon Thatcher. Your perverse bullying email is unacceptable and is evidence of anarchy. Thedecision is not a Supreme Court decision - it is a decision of individual judicial officers who have put

their personal predilections and opinion above the purpose and intention of the Law and havedefinitely acted against fundamental human and individual Rights which are upheld in the Rule of Lawand the Acts which bind the Crown.

By the said judicial officers acting in excess against what the Law requires and refusing thefundamental affirmed Right to justice and discriminating against pro se legally representedlitigants (litigants in person) this cohort of judicial officers acts ultra vires of the purpose and intentionof the Acts made by Parliament and the decision from them is therefore invalid by reason of ultravires.

Get this serious and important matter to the Chief Justice and cease playing up with anarchy andtrickery to obstruct, prevent and pervert the course of justice. This matter will not rest. It is no answerto ignore prima facie lethal medical malpractice and wrongful death and trample on human and

individual Rights. The public who are victims are fed up with serious injustice from the corruptelement existing in the fraternity of judicial officers and lawyers in the courts of New Zealand. These

judges by obstructing, preventing and perverting the course of justice have gone the same pattern asthe cosseting that went out to (Dr) Harold Shipman until the public caught him out. Who's going to bethe next victim with your lawless tactics. It is clear to be seen that multiple judges in the courts ofNew Zealand do not want to address the epidemic of medical malpractice in the courts andfurthermore they want to barr self-represented litigants from the Right to justice in the courts whileextorting money from genuine self-represented litigants into the courts coffers. This is full blowncorruption and as stated above, shall not rest.

Chief Justice Elias knows about this case and is a hypocrite to her writings. She hasn't got thestamina to answer and is hiding behind you. Mr Malcolm Armstrong Harrison was poisoned off on topof a whole constellation of major malpractice (all evidence held) and because of inexcusable

malpractice, breaking internationally recognised safety standards, Mr Harrison was made to suffersevere anguish, screaming in pain before he died a terrible death and he had his hands strappeddown by the murderers who refused to give him the medical monitoring, medical treatment, andmedical management his body cried out for.

By these judges refusing to uphold justice, and obstructing, preventing and perverting the course ofjustice, and coming at ultra vires and trickery against the purpose and intention of Law, andby making a bare faced lie against the victim's family's standing and casting aside the Victims Rights

Act 2002 which gives standing to the Victim's Family, these judges are not worthy to sit on theSupreme Court judicial bench.

The perpetrators haven't even made a statement of defence and have cheated their way throughwhich violates fundamental Individual and Human Rights, Equity and the Rules and Laws in the Acts

made by Parliament. Chief Justice Elias says one thing and doesn't live up to it. She avoided thiscase that is clear for all to see. Lord Denning MR speaks against such judges.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


4/5

The anarchy of her judges face her now and under the inseparable Rule of Law and HumanRights we demand that this serious and important matter be referred to and addressed by her asChief Justice. Where is your mouth re. the lethal combination of drugs and other serious malpracticeto the opioid nave victim Mr Malcolm Armstrong Harrison: METHADONE on AMIODARONE, HIGH-DOSE CO-TRIMOXAZOLE, HALOPERIDOL, BENZODIAZEPINES MIDAZOLAM ANDLORAZEPAM, FENTANYL, MORPHINE dispensed by bad doctors against universal safetywarnings, and prior to that overdosing and crushing controlled release Metoprolol Succinate

causing Mr Harrison to go into cardiogenic shock with asystole with no pulse, no respiration, noheartbeat, then they belted him back only to kill him off a second time with a lethal drug cocktail whichevery doctor knows would kill him. On top of that a whole raft of other malpractice which shouldnever have happened. All of which is major public interest. The appellants documents provide thecomprehensive serious facts and merits of the case.

The irrefutable Medical Record and universal medical and pharmaceutical safety standards, the Ruleof Law and the Acts which Bind the Crown expose the involved judicial officers corruption where theyseek to obstruct, prevent and pervert the course of justice with lies against the purpose and intentionof the Acts made by Parliament. Their perverse opinion is irrelevant to the case and ultra viresagainst the Law.

The medical record exposes these defendants and their lawyers trickery and lying mouths. Theyhave no substance and no defence and the Chief Justice Elias has joined the cohort hiding behindmute of malice when the Facts and Law stand to accuse these perpetrators of malpractice andwrongful death.

The Chief Justice hasn't got the stamina to live up to and uphold the Rule of Law and HumanRights. Her reply to this scandalous outrage from her subordinates is demanded.

Ultra vires perverse decisions are INVALID and are justifiably not recognised. The Law and theMerits and Facts and Public Interest of the prima facie malpractice case stand by us.

It is clear that those judges never even read the Appellants documentation on Appeal.

Awaiting the Chief Justice's reply which is her responsibility as Chief Justice where sheshould be maintaining and upholding the Rule of Law and Individual and Human Rights.

P. J. Harrison, A. J. HarrisonAppellants with Standing pursuant to the Victims' Rights Act 2002 which recognises theFamily has Standing and in defence of Individual and Human Rights

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:11 PMTo: [email protected], [email protected]

To the Editor: What's become of real journalism? Where's your guts? Multiple judges are

obstructing access to the Right to Justice left, right and centre and the journalists sit on theirhands and do nothing.See Malpractice on Scribd for the Facts. The Public Interest Right to Safety and Right to Justiceis violated by partisan judges acting against the fundamental Principles of Rule of Law and the

Acts made by Parliament which bind the Crown. Any principled journalists wouldn't be sitting ontheir hands knowing the current state of affairs of the New Zealand courts obstructing, preventingand perverting the fundamental affirmed Right to justice.

P. J. Harrison, A. J. HarrisonAppellants with Standing pursuant to the Victims' Rights Act 2002 which recognises theFamily has Standing and in defence of Individual and Human Rights preserved in the Ruleof Law


5/5

P J Harrison < [email protected]> Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:15 PMTo: [email protected]

To the Editor to be read in conjunction with other email just sent re. anarchy by multiple judges inNew Zealand courts.

P. J. Harrison, A. J. HarrisonAppellants with Standing pursuant to the Victims' Rights Act 2002 which recognises theFamily has Standing and in defence of Individual and Human Rights preserved in the Ruleof Law

SC 23 2013 - Pauline Janice HARRISON & Anor v Auckland District Health Board &Ors (Leave Judgment).pdf

51K
https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=fe7ccb7ef6&view=att&th=141d90245388bd08&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=cff0084a3c8bf60d_0.1&safe=1&zw

medical malpractice: rule of law and human and individual rights vs judicial corruption in new...

Documents