meditations on first philosophy - david barnettmeditations on first philosophy rene descartes. rene...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHYRene Descartes
![Page 2: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
RENE DESCARTES
(1596-1650)mathematician, scientist, philosopher
![Page 3: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Skeptical scenarios: inconsistent with most of our beliefs, consistent with everything we know for sure
![Page 4: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Archimedean point: an infallible, indubitable foundation for all knowledge
![Page 5: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
I THINK, THEREFORE I AM
➤ Descartes: I exist, I am thinking must be true whenever I affirm them.
➤ Survives evil demon doubt:
➤ demon cannot deceive me of anything unless I exist and am thinking
➤ What am I? A thinking thing (res cogitans).
➤ Can be known even when material world unknown.
![Page 6: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
“WHAT ELSE AM I? I WILL USE MY IMAGINATION. I AM NOT THAT
STRUCTURE OF LIMBS THAT IS CALLED A HUMAN BODY. I AM
NOT EVEN SOME THIN VAPOUR WHICH PERMEATES THE LIMBS—A WIND, FIRE, AIR, BREATH, OR WHATEVER I DEPICT IN MY IMAGINATION; FOR THESE ARE
THINGS WHICH I HAVE SUPPOSED TO BE NOTHING. LET THIS
SUPPOSITION STAND; FOR ALL THAT I AM STILL SOMETHING.”
Second Meditation (pg. 11, right column)
![Page 7: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
DESCARTES’ MODAL ARGUMENT FOR DUALISM
➤Re (4): “I am not…a human body…or whatever I depict in my imagination.”
➤Re (1): “…for these [material objects] are things which I have supposed to be nothing. Let this supposition stand; for all that I am still something.”
➤“And yet may it not perhaps be the case that these very things which I am supposing to be nothing, because they are unknown to me, are in reality identical with the ‘I’ of which I am aware? I don not know…”
1. I can suppose that I exist without material objects existing.
2. ???
3. ???
4. I am not a material object.
![Page 8: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“I KNOW THAT EVERYTHING WHICH I CLEARLY AND DISTINCTLY
UNDERSTAND IS CAPABLE OF BEING CREATED BY GOD SO AS TO CORRESPOND EXACTLY WITH MY
UNDERSTANDING OF IT. HENCE THE FACT THAT I CAN CLEARLY AND DISTINCTLY UNDERSTAND ONE
THING APART FROM ANOTHER IS ENOUGH TO MAKE ME CERTAIN
THAT THEY ARE TWO THINGS, SINCE THEY ARE CAPABLE OF BEING
SEPARATED, AT LEAST BY GOD.”Sixth Meditation (pg. 16, right column)
![Page 9: MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY - David BarnettMEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY Rene Descartes. RENE DESCARTES (1596-1650) mathematician, scientist, philosopher . Skeptical scenarios:](https://reader030.vdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040205/5f0e8e247e708231d43fce9c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DESCARTES’ MODAL ARGUMENT FOR DUALISM
➤Re (2): God is omnipotent, so… ➤“everything which I…
understand is capable of being created by God”
➤Re (3): Descartes says that “two things are distinct” if “they are capable of being separated.” ➤separated = one existing
without the other existing ➤Follows from “It is impossible
for a single thing to both exist and not exist.”
1. I can understand a scenario where I exist but no material objects exist.
2. Every understandable scenario is possible.
3. If it is possible for X to exist without Y existing, then X is not Y.
4. I am not a material object.