meeting date: wednesday, october 15, 2014 subject: pet
TRANSCRIPT
City of Beverly HillsPlanning Division
455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210TEL (310) 458-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966
Architectural Commission Report
Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014
Subject: PET FOOD EXPRESS (P11426621)9153 Olympic BoulevardRequest for approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approvedbusiness identification signage. The Commission will also consider adoption of aCategorical Exemption, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.
Project agent: Jacob Webster — All American Permits
Recommendation: Conduct public hearing to discuss the project details and provide the applicant withan approval.
REPORT SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting review and approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previouslyapproved business identification signage for Pet Food Express located at 9153 Olympic Boulevard. Theproposed project includes the following components:
Facade Remodel• Paint (e) masonry wall in brown-taupe color;• Storefront system with clear glazing and dark bonze anodized aluminum framing;• Parapet cladding with wood siding, and;• Metal canopy with a dark bronzed anodized finish.
Signage RevisionThe revision to the previously approved business identification sign is limited to the sign locatedadjacent to the parking lot. Previously, this sign was approved by the Architectural Commission at theirmeeting on April 16, 2014 to be mounted on the existing mansard roof-type parapet. With theproposed façade changes now before the Commission, the connection and returns have been revised tofit more appropriately with the new design. The revised sign is now proposed to be consistent in itsentirety with the street-facing sign located adjacent to Olympic Boulevard.
Note: No changes in size or illumination of the business identification signs are proposed as a result ofthe requested revision.
URBAN DESIGN ANALYSISThe proposed façade remodel is generally a positive enhancement to the building as it provides a cleanand simple design. However, it is recommended that a greater variation in color between the masonrywalls and the wood siding be considered so as to provide more appropriate contrast to these elements.
Attachment(s):A. Detailed Design Description and Materials (Applicant Prepared)B. Project Design PlansC. DRAFT Approval Resolution _____________________
Report Author and Contact Information:Cindy Gordon, AICP, Associate Planner
(310) [email protected]
Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A
AC Meeting — October 15, 2014
ZONING CODE COMPLIANCEApplications for design review are preliminarily evaluated for compliance with the zoning code.Applicants are encouraged and have the option of requesting a comprehensive review separate andapart from this application. Formal compliance review will occur when a building permit application isfiled (plan check). The applicant has been advised that changes during plan check may require revisionsand subsequent approval from the Architectural Commission or staff, as appropriate.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTThe subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — Public ResourcesCode §~21000 — 21178), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that theproject includes the review of building design, colors and materials to the façade of the building, frontyard landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. It can be seen withcertainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on theenvironment. The project has also been reviewed and found not be a historic resource. The existingimprovements to be demolished or altered were not designed by an architect or builder identified onthe City’s Master Architect list and the site and improvements are not listed on the City’s historicresource inventory.
PUBLIC OUTREACH AND NOTIFICATIONPublic outreach and notification was not required for this project.
Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexforcl Drive, Room 280-A
AC Meeting — October 15, 2014
Attachment ADetailed Design Description
and Materials (applicant prepared)
)City of Beverly Hills — Architectural Review ApplicationPage3ofl3
A Indicate Requested Application
I~ Staff Review• Three (3) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements).
~ Architectural Commission Review• Eight (8) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements),• Public Notice materials required for Sign Accommodations (see Section 5 for public notice
requirements).
B Identify the scope of work (check all that apply):
LI New construction LI Remodel: mt. & Ext, no floor area addedI~I Façade Remodel ONLY LI Remodel: mt. & Ext, floor area addedLI Business Identification Sign(s) LI Awning(s): LI New LI Recovery
Number of signs proposed:LI Building Identification Sign(s) LI Open Air Dining: #Tables # chairs
Number of signs proposed:LI Sign Accommodation (explain reason for the accommodation request below):
Number of signs proposed:
LI Other:
C Describe the scope of work proposed including materials and finishes:
1. Remove existing mansard roof element on East and South elevations.2. Replace mansard roof with stained wood parapet on East and South elevations as indicated in submittaldrawings.3. Build new dark bronze finish metal canopy on East and South elevations as indicated in submittal drawings.3. Paint existing split face concrete block walls on on all sides of building as indicated in submittal drawings.
D Identify the Project Zoning (City Zoning Map: httD://gis,beverlyhills.org/)
LI R-4 LI R-4X LI R4 LI R-4-P LI R-4X2LI R-3 LI RMCP LI C-3 LI C-3A LI C-3BLI C-5 LI C-3T-1 ~] C-3T-2 LI C-3T-5 LI C-5LI Other:
E Lot is currently developed with (check all that apply):LI General Office Building LI Multi-family Building LI Other (specify below):~ Retail Building LI VacantLI Medical Office Building LI Restaurant
F Has the existing structure been designed by a notable architect or is it identified on any historicresource inventory, including the City of Beverly Historic Resources Survey (Verify with thePlanning Division if the property is listed on the City’s survey)?
Yes ~ No ~J If yes, please list Architect’s name:
SECTION 2 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION / ZONING INFORMATION
City of Beverly Hills — Architectural Review ApplicationPage 4 of 13
A Indicate in the chart below all applicable signage details:
Type of Sign - Quantity Dimensions Suuare Ft Maximum Area Permitted by Code
1
2
3
4
5
B List the s~eciflc materials and finishes for all of the architectural features proposed in the project(List N/A, not applicable, for features that do not apply.):
FACADE (List all material for all portions visible from the street)Material: Concrete Block (existing)Texture/Finish: Split FacedColor/Transparency: Painted Sherwin Williams 7040 Smokehouse
WINDOWS/DOORS (Include frame, trim, glass, metal, etc.)Material: Aluminum (approved under earlier permit)Texture /Rnish:Color/ Transparency:
ROOFMaterial:
Texture/Finish:NANA
Color/ Transparency: NA
COLUMNSMaterial:Texture/Finish:Color/ Transparency:
BALCONIES & RAILINGSMaterial:Texture /Finish:
Color! Transparency:
OUTDOOR DINING ELEMENTS (List all material for all outdoor dining elements.)Material:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency: NA
NANA
SECTION 3— PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continues on next page)
Anodized smoothDark Bronze Finish
NANANA
NANANA
City of Beverly Hills — Archite ural Review ApplicationPage Sofl3
AWNINGS, CANOPIESMaterial:Texture /FinIsh:
Color! Transparency:
DOWNSPOUTS I GUTTERSMaterial:Texture/Finish:Colon Transparency:
NANANA
BUSINESS ID SIGN(S)Material:Texture /Finish:Color! Transparency:
NA - approved under earlier reviewNANA
BUILDING ID SIGN(S)Material:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:
NA - approved under earlIer reviewNANA
EXTERIOR LIGHTINGMaterial:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:
Recessed Softit Lighting - Painted MetalSmoothDark Bronze Finish
PAVED SURFACESMaterial:
Texture/Finish:
Color! Transparency:
NANANA
FREESTANDING WALLS AND FENCESMaterial: NATexture/Finish:
Color! Transparency:
OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTSMaterial:
Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:
Parapet - 6~ Tongue and Groove Microbevel Wood SidingSmooth wood planks
C Describe the proposed landscape theme, if applicable. Explain how the proposed landscapingcomplements the proposed style of architecture:
SECTION 3 — PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continued from previous page)
Painted metalSmoothDark Bronze Finish
NANA
City of Beverly Hills — ArchitEr ural Review ApplicationPage 6of13
A Clearly identify how your project adheres to each of the required findings of the ArcnitecturalReview Commission:
1. Describe how the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste and gooddesign and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty,spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas and high quality.
The current mansard roof element is in poor condition. lVs metal panels are scratohed and dented and Its sizeand shape is over bearing. The new parapet and canopy with will lighten and freshen to look of the buildingand allow it to fit seam lessly with the surrounding buildings
2. Describe how the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the structure isreasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors whichmay tend to make the environment less desirable.
NA
3. Describe how the proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance,of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materiallydepreciate in appearance and value.
The intention of the proposed facade remodel is to upgrade the appearance of the building whioh is lookingold and worn. The color and materials proposed are contemporary yet timeless.
4. Describe how the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposeddevelopments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and with anyprecise plans adopted pursuant to the general plan.
See #1 and #3 above.
5. Describe how the proposed development is in conformity with the standards of the municipalcode and other applicable laws insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings andstructures are involved.
The scope of work is within the perimeter of the properly lines and conform with local codes. The new canopyoverhangs approximately 4~ beyond the properly line on W. Olympic Blvd. The new canopy hasapproximately 2 less overhang than the existing mansard roof.
SECTION 4— DESIGN ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS (for Commission level applications only)
Attachment BProject Design Plans
Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A
AC Meeting — October 15, 2014
BEVERLYLI S /
—
~y’I.
C C
/—~
“—
~~
~7~
~~~
z’~_
~
>
VPE
TFO
OD
EX
PR
ES
S91
53W
.O
LYM
PIC
BO
ULE
VA
RD
BE
VE
RLY
HIL
LSC
A90
212
FILE
NU
MB
ER
:5S
1403
048
•21
212$
F•.fo
odss
~Io
tDfl:
2l;2014.tllt,
PIW
db
itflh
en
im.:
bh*1
r fl C
/ ,a~__
~i~
S-~
nPE
TFO
OD
EX
PR
ES
S91
53W
.O
LYM
PIC
BO
ULE
VA
RD
BE
VE
RLY
HIL
LSC
A90
212
FILE
NU
MB
ER
:B
S14
0304
621
3113
ere
ssM
~i*
~
O.~
.5
.2I,2514-I
:t1.~
,P
IMW
dk.
~F
U.~
,,.:
5ft1
~/
—-
—zr
—~
;----<
-----
~
:.
PE
TFO
OD
EX
PR
ES
S~
9153
W.O
LYM
PIC
BO
ULE
VA
RD
•“~~
.B
EV
ER
LYH
ILLS
,C
A90
212
~9
•ex
ss~
FILE
NU
MB
ER
:B
S14
0304
8,
2151
25—
I I
I I I IL~ I I 1 I I
I I
~fl)C4~Ot?OO CC~O~MhIOfl&~
[ ~ [ ~:i ~I I I 9I I I I~
L~ ~i>HK~L~~_~—J-—~
‘I’::
ill!~I~i1_: I
———=~——=— — — —— —
-—=~=--
— WEST ELEVATION - PALM AVENUE 311r.1.*
~ ~
~~xpr S
a
— — x~_J ~— w~— U
oo~ ~2
— EAST ELEVATION - PARKING LOT ~ 2 ~ ~
~ ____
2I.Y4_ IOILL
__ ——-=-- —‘-- — -~!
— •- -~xpe —
-~ — P~OPO~fD— STORU~ONTE~VA1IOeG
~SNO1tD
S
wnovwøa,AMS,w1
SOUTh ELEVATION - OLYMPIC BOULEVARD
I I I
(E)LIF4E OF E&ENSARDROOF TO RE REMOVED
(N)OALVANIZEO SREETMETAL PARAPET CAP
(E)R METAL STEDPRAMINO WEE EXTERIORPLATTER PINISH TO RETvLRIN
(EJENEOFEtANTAROROOF TO RE REMOVED
(N(OALVANIZEO SHEETMETAL PARAPET CAP
—WEDGE ANCHORTYPICAL
...---—DTISTING CONCRETEBLOCK WALL
—31l4’ ACRYUC FACE
_—I/TCONDuIrroLOW VOLTAGEPOWER SUPPLY
—WAVE LAD DIODES
—.O63~ ALUMINUMRETURNS
‘“‘TTUIMCAP
-~
51)2’
—T LONG *14 HEXHEAD DBTAE SCREW.FOUR 4) PER LETTER
—WOOD SIDING
—3! 16 ACRYLIC FACE
—l/TCONDUTTTOLOWVOITAGEPOWER SUPPLY
—WHITE LED DIODES
—UHTALUMJNUMRETURNS
‘~‘—rTRIMCAp
NOSCALB BOTCHERSIGN AT CONCRETE BLOCK WALl. 8 SIGN AT CONCRETE WOOD SIDING
A/4
~/, ~, , /‘,/~
—CONTINUOUS24
~, GAUGE
/~~I ~ ::::::‘~~•TH” COPING CAP: PAINT
TO MATCH CANOPY
55— ONTTNUOUS2X
~, ~ WOOD BLOCKING
PLYWOODSHEATHING
FURRING GRIPS1A O.C.
SIDING AS
BARRIER
PARAPET’ CAP DETAIL
EXUDNOCONCH\~~~BLOCK WALL -—
BACKER ROD ANDSEALANT: COLOR TOMATCH WOOD
VAPOR BARRIER: -BTTTEND BEHIND -—CONCRETE BLOCK ,- — - — — -
3/4~ FURRING — —STRIPS I6’O.C. :— :~~\ ‘I~ I\ 1 i~’:, ‘:~\ ‘I~
MATCH WOOS
FULI,SCALR
B
4*:;
Ilihi
0
hWOK)
ILL
00> ~Dz
STOREFRONT DETAIlS
SAME ANNEXES
7B
PLYWOODSHEATHING
BARRIER
‘‘“FURRING STRIPS IV
WOOD TO CONCRETE BLOCK JOINT
“~~~“‘~—STAINLESS STEELSCREWS AT EACHFURRING STRIP
.,,_—W000 SIDED ASSPECIFIW
PTJl.LSCALE4 WALL SIDING PLAN SECTION
RJLLOCABE3 WOOD SIDING SECTION
FUU~SCALB
i;ji!i;i
I4
hwoo cn
UI
IJi>-~ Ill~_Jx ~oo~ ~
- 6” X 6’ STEEL PLATE WALLBRACKET WIll-I WELDED© © STEEL FIN: DARK BRONZE
~SUPPORT ROD AND CLEVIS:
FINISH
DARK BRONZE FINISH
WOOD SIDING AS~SPECIFIED
X 2” ALUMINUM SUPPORTTUBING: DARK BRONZE FINISH
6” X 6” STEEL PLATE WALLBRACKET WITH WELDEDSTEEL FIN: DARK BRONZEFINISH
SUPPORT ROD AND CLEVIS:~~DARKBRONZE FINISH
B
CANOPY SECTION
THIGH ALUMINUMFRAME: DARKBRONZE FINISH
3~142 CANOPY SECTION
CANOPY DEIAILS
~SC*t~ AS NOTED
7CI I I I
OO
O0
00
00
00
Cc0
c)0
))c)0
CcQ
00
00
O0
0o
O0
o0
oo
0c~
cC
cO
0o
00
0C
)~
Dc0
00
00
0o
oO
cco
c,
0o
-0000000000000000000000C
,Or,
Orjc
00000000000000000C
.Orc
000flO
rcO
Orc
c~
o00000000000C
cO
oc)0
000000C
c000000000000C
c00000000,o
rc0000000000rc
oC
Do
0000C
cfiC
c00000))
0C
cfl0C
c0000000,m
000
000C
)0000000000(0
00C
;00000000cc
‘0o
0000000000000000000C
OO
Cc0000C
000C
c0000000000C
,00C
)flO
C,0
00000r.
c00
CD
o000C
ccm
oc)o
ocrc
oocjc
ooc,0
0C
,000000c:c
c)r
occ000000000c,o
rc0000000C
cr,
0000c-c
oo
C,00)
C)
Cc0
0C)
)0
00
000000)0C
c)
cm0
o000000000C
,000C
crc
rc,c
000000000rc
r0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0C
cO
OC
c.(
c0
00
,c0
00
C)C)
OC
C)C
cC
C)O
OC
W0
00
Cc0
00
C)0
r)rc
Oo
c)0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
flc-,
00
00
r,0
00
00
0Q
c)
Cc0<
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0r,
,m0
00
o0
00
no
C0<
OO
Cc000000cm
OC
cO
Oc)0
00
CccO
cJrc
OO
cjO
a00000000000000000000rf
l-crf
l)W
n-u
)OC
00
)0
0O
CO
flO
)00
00
0C
0C
c00)0000
00
00)000
C0c
~00000000000000C
,0000000C
cQ
0C
cccc
C,0
00000000000000000rc
000000C
c0C
c0
)C)
0C000000000C
)00000c)J
fl<
)000000c0C
)0)
000c)0
00C
cC
c000cc0C
c0oc)o
c)0
000C
coC
crc
cm
C)
00
0C
0)C
0C
C)Q
))0
0000
000000C
C0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CC
)c)C
J0
00
00
0c0
00
0C
cO
c)00000000000000000000000000rj0
00.
o0oooooooooooocm
oC
coooooonooO
or)
oooo.?
oooooo)-
cc)o
,00~
c00oO
CO
OO
O).
cC
)Cc
0<
Cc00000ccO
crc
00
0000000C
C0
00
00
0[0
00
00
00
00
00
00
)JO
0fl0
00
Lrt
O))
O0
)’flfl
cc,
Ocro
co
occm
ccc)c
ccc000rc
0000
ocO
))o
cC
D0
oJ0
cW
00
00
0u
00
00
00
0rc
0o
c,0
c0fl)}
00),
Cc)
0C
c0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0cc0
c,c
I0o0o00ooO
0O
0c~
orc
nO
0ooo0c.,o00oono
cC)
Cc
CC
00000000000r0
00c.O
ocm
oO
ccO
ccooIo
orc
0000,c
0000000000),
cc000000W
,),
C)O
r000000000000000000000000000
)1000000000000c
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
cc00000fl0000000000C
c00rc
0m
oC
cOrc
OIO
Orc
OO
ccO
rc00000r
cc0
00
00
00
00
C,0
00
00
00
OW
000000C
c0)
cc”
00
00
0000rc
nO
Cc)c
nIc
c000000000000000rc
c)0
)30
00
00
0rc
Cccc0
0Jr
)<Q
r00000000C
0c000
‘00
00
00
00
0D
C!O
r000000000C
C0
00
0)0
00
00
00
c(W
OO
C)C
c0
00
0cm
00
00
C,0
00
cic
mc
00000000
m0
00
[0r
00
00
00
00
0W
00
00
00
)c000000000C
cC
)0
0000rc
oO
ccoC
c000)c
oc,0
000000
00
00
01
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0cc0
00
0rc
oc,0
o,
C)c.c
0000rc
000000c-,
ccr
000000C
C0cC
oIo
oo
000000000000C
c000000
0000000
cc,
C)0
0cc0
00
00
00
00
00
crc
00
00
00
c-c
Ccco
oclc
,00
00
00
0c-c
00
00
0n
00
0r
lOc)c
c0000(
~c)
0)
0)
cC
c0
00
0ccO
c)0
00
00
cr0
0C
c0
rc0
00
00
00
10
00
00
‘00
00
00
0)
00000000
~)c
0000000000000m
00000000000C
O0I0
0000000000000C
,0000000000000c
cC,
CcccC
cC
c0
00
0C
cC
cc)0
00
00
00
rc0
0c,
)000000100c.c
OO
c,0
000000000C
c000rc
oO
Ccrc
cccc000
c.c)
000rc
r,o
00
00
00
C)c
co
r,0
00
c)0
00
0C
00
01
00
0c,0
00
00
00
rc0
00
00
00
c,0
00
Cc0
00
0cccc
ccc
00
00
0C
c0
00
0m
00
00
00
c)0
00
00
00
00
00
10
00
03
00
00
00
)m0
00
0c-)
00
00
c,0
0c)O
O0
00
0ooC
cc)0
0000000cm
ccoorc
cc00000cm
r000;o
occoorc
cm
00000c0000C
co
00)0
0),
00
00
0cm
Cr0
00
00
00
00
00
)o
mcm
orc
00
00
00
00
0c,r
cc0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
rcO
nC
)Cc0
00
0cc0
00
c,o
00000C
coocc
cmC
cccO
cco
00cc000
Occ000000r0
00),
oC
cc~
00o00C
crc
o0C
Orc
Ccc
00
00
ccC<
‘ccc
)cc
c0
)ooo0oo0occo0no0C
cnooc~
Oooc.c
Occ0oC
[ooo00ooo0oo0cc00C
occO
ccuccc,o
oc-c
-c0ccc,
00
00
00
Cc0
0C
c0
00
CcO
ccc,0
0cc0
0c0
00
c0
00
cm
rcj,crc
oc,c
Jrc
oC
,00
0c)c
co
c,0
0cco
,oc,c
,c-)
00
0c-)
o0
0)
rcO
cm00000C
cCcO
Ocm
cO
cO
cc0
00
00
00
)0cc
cmjo
cc)c
m0
00
0C
c0
00
cT
hC
ccco
orc
oc)0
)oo
CcO
cc(c
ccc
c0
Cc
Cco
rccc
oocm
oocc
oc
Or)
,0
00
00
0c,0
0C
cC
co
0I0
C0
OL
c0
00
0c.c
00
00
0r0
00
rcccO
CcO
Occro
,00
,o0c
fl0
fl0
00
0rc
00
0ccC
cflccc,f
l0o
0o
oc-c
~co
rrco
IoC
cO
rc00000000c)0
000
rcrc
cc0
00
00
0cc0
00
crc
cc0
0cc0
00
00
0C
c0
ccC
cC
Ccrc
000000ccrc
c,O
czcc,I
r)0c)r
c000000rc
0c.c
C0
00
0cc
00
00
c.c
Occ
cccoo
cD00cm
)c~
000C
0m
cc0
Cc00000C
crc
oO
rcO
rcO
ICc00000000000C
cO
oc)0
c,o
,c000ccoc,c
-,oc,o
0Lccc000~
corc
0C
c0
cCcC
))c
0000000000cc01000cc0000cc0000C
cc
coo)
00000000
))O
ccO
flc
Cc
Or
0~
c0000O
00C
0000cccc00rc
Cccc0C
cO
rc0Ic
cccccC
c0rc
fl0rc
O0rc
n0cm
rcrc
rcC
cO
Ocm
rcc,
mc,
00
cc)
rc0
00
00
00
00
00
0rc
cc
)c.
00
00
00
0C
c0
00
rc0
1rc
00
00
00
00
00
0c
c0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
rccc
‘c-c
0<
(00(0
Cc
Orc
c)C
cc0000C
cO
Occ0000c)
0C
100(c
00cc
OC
cD
m000
cOO
0r,
Orc
cO
rcc,0
0cc0),
CD,
0<
cc000000000rc
000c
crcc
~0
00
00
Cc0
Lc0
0L
cIO
cJcm
0O
00
Cc0
OO
0cc
c)o
cccm
cJc,
0cc
0c)
cc(c
C)~
c0c
crc
co0
oO
oooooc,0
r,ooo00c~
c0O
ccooom
orc
-coc~
ooC
cooo00oooocco0oC
coooo,c
)Q~
c,Q
cc
0O
000cm
C)O
oc
0cm
)00
00
00
C0
00
00
C0
00
*0
00
00
0c’O
00
0fl0
00
00
00
00
Cc0
cco
0rc
occ
0O
W0
00
00
00
00
Cc,
rc0
00
00
0ccO
nC
crc
cC
00
00
00
00
00
0c
cO
Orc
0000000c.c
ocm
,cccc0
0o
c~
co
00
oo
o0
occo
cco
Cc0
rcrc
oo
oc~
co
cco
0o
eIo
rc0
0o
oo
o0
oo
ccrc
)0o
Cco
0co
oo
00
0cJ,
Oc)
crc
Ccc0cm
000000C
0000cm
00000000000001000000000000cccc00000000c,0
0c,n
CcccC
c0
cc)c
crc
cm
rcO
oc)c
,000000000000000000c,C
cC
ccc,C
ccm
oC
c000000000rc
r-
c0
crc
CO
OC
c0
00
0rc
00
0ccO
Orc
rcc0
00
cccm
orc
Cc0
00
cO
nc
r-
ccc
cc0
00
00
0rO
c,r
)c,0
cc,
Cc
)0000000)0
0C
00
00
00
00
-c,o
00000oO
rc0c,O
r,rc
orc
ccm
oo~
cccrc
0oc,
Cc0
)0
0))
0300C
)00
oc,0
0rc
CC
cccc
(0000000000000c,c
)rco,c
0000000C
crc
0cc
cC
c0000000C
c0C
cC
cctC
cc.c
00000000C
c0ccC
cC
crc
ccO
cc0000000000cccc)0
000000ccrc
c,r
cc,c
)O
00
00
00
00
rc0
0C
c0
c1
00
00
00
00
00
,,0
00
00
0ccc,0
Cc0
00
00
cccc0
00
00
Lccc0
00
Cfi
ccU
)’c0
00
00
00
crc
00
0rc
00
00
00
00
0c)
C)c
)0
)c000000C
c000c
Ccc)
000C
0C
0O
0C
cc~
00O
cT
hO
0O
0000c~
c)c
000000C
c000Q
c0,c
0c
ccC
00
00
0cc,c
occ0
Or
00cc00C
c0
0000cc000000000000C
c0000(0
c0000
0O
ccO
C0f
lCcc
mc~
ccc
’Oc,
OO
OO
ccO
c)O
cmC
cOO
cmO
OO
CC
),O
rO
00O
00cc0000c~
c00c
<<
000000L)
0’
0cc00C
c0000)0
00
z 0 8 z 0
-~
> -o -o 0 >< > p p
=z C
ID~ 0
4,4,
Attachment CDRAFT Approval Resolution
Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A
AC Meeting — October 15, 2014
RESOLUTION NO. AC-XX-14
RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OFBEVERLY HILLS CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURALREVIEW PERMIT FOR A FACADE REMODEL AND A REVISION TOPREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE FOR THEPROPERTY LOCATED AT 9153 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD (PL1426621 — PETFOOD EXPRESS).
The Architectural Commission of the City of Beverly Hills hereby finds, resolves and determines
as follows:
Section 1. Jacob Webster, All American Permits, on behalf of the property owner, Richard
J. Lauter & Co., LLP, and the tenant, Pet Food Express, (Collectively the “Applicant”), has applied for
architectural approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approved business identification
signage for the property located at 9153 Olympic Boulevard.
Section 2. Beverly Hills Municipal Code Article 30, Chapter 3 of Title 10, authorizes the
Architectural Commission the authority to approve, approve with conditions or deny design-related
aspects of projects located in the city’s commercial and multi-family districts, subject to findings set
forth in Beverly Municipal Code Section 10-3-3010.
Section 3. Consistent with Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10-3-3010, this resolution
documents the official action of the architectural commission with respect to the project.
Section 4. The subject project has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions set forth in
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — Public Resource Code Sections 21000, et seq.), the
State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 etseq.), and the city’s
Page 1 of 6 AC )QC—14
local CEQA Guidelines. The subject project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the project includes the review of building design,
colors and materials to the façade of the building, landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures,
such as fences or walls. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity
could result in a significant effect on the environment. The project has also been reviewed and found to
not be a historic resource. The existing improvements to be demolished or altered were not designed by
an architect or builder identified on the City’s Master Architect list and the site and improvements are
not listed on the City’s historic resource inventory.
Section 5. The Architectural Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on
October 15, 2014 at which time oral and documentary evidence was received concerning the
application.
Section 6. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff
report(s), oral and written testimony, the Architectural Commission hereby makes the following
findings:
A. The plan for the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste and
good design and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty, spaciousness,
balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality. Specifically the project incorporates an
appropriate balance of color, high quality materials and appropriate architectural design principles to
reinforce the city’s urban form and promote the image of Beverly Hills.
Page 2 of 6 AC XX—14
B. The plan for the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the
structure is reasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors which
may tend to make the environmental less desirable. The proposed project is proposed to be constructed
using contemporary building materials and practices, and, as conditioned, complaint with all applicable
building codes, including standards that protect against unwanted noise and vibrations.
C. Proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance, of inferior
quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and
value. Specifically, the commission has reviewed the design and construction materials proposed for the
project, which incorporates contemporary building material of known quality and durability. Moreover,
the project design is appropriate to the building and surrounding improvements and is well matched to
the selected materials.
D. As conditioned, the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed
developments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and with any precise
plans adopted pursuant to the general plan. The proposed project complies with the applicable goals
and policies set forth in the general plan, and, as conditioned, designed in a manner that complies with
local ordinances. The overall design is consistent with and appropriate to other improvements in the
general vicinity.
E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and other
applicable laws insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. As,
conditioned, the project will be designed in compliance with all applicable regulations.
Page 3 of 6 AC XX-14
F. The proposed development is designed in a manner that protects and preserves those
exterior elements of the building which the planning commission found contributed to the
determination of the project as a “character contributing building”: in accordance with section 10-2-707
of this title. The proposed project does not include a request and has not been determined by the
planning commission to be a project that qualifies as a “character contributing building” under section
10-2-707. Therefore, this finding is not applicable to the subject project.
Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the Architectural Commission hereby grants the request
defined in this resolution subject to the following conditions:
Project-Specific Conditions
No project-specific conditions are proposed
Standard Conditions
1. Revised Plan Submittal. For all projects that are approved with project-specific conditions, a revised
plan set that has fully incorporated all such conditions shall be submitted to the project planner,
both in hard copy format and in electronic format, prior to submitting for the building permit plan
check process.
2. Architectural Approval. Project approval is for the design-related aspects of the project only. No
approval is implied or granted with regard to applicable city zoning or technical codes, which may
require review and approval from other city commissions or officials.
3. Compliance with Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall
demonstrate compliance with all applicable provisions of the city’s municipal code and applicable
conditions imposed by any discretionary review approval.
Page 4 of 6 AC ~Q~—14
4. Compliance with Special Conditions. Any special conditions that require approval by the director of
community development, or designee, shall be submitted to the staff liaison to the commission
within fourteen (14) days of approval or prior to submittal of the plan check review application,
whichever is greater.
5. Project Rendering. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate into the
building permit set of plans, an updated color rendering of all building facades. The quality and
detail of the rendering shall be subject to approval from the director of community development, or
designee, and shall include sufficient design information to evaluate project compliance during
construction.
6. Approval Resolution. A copy of the signed resolution of approval shall be scanned onto the cover
sheet(s) of the building permit set of plans.
7. Substantial Compliance with Approved Plans. The director of community development, or
designee, shall determine if changes to the approved project are in substantial compliance with the
commission’s action. This determination shall be subject to applicable fees and charges. A
substantial modification to the approved project requires approval from the Architectural
Commission.
8. Validity of Permits. The rights granted by this approval shall remain valid for three (3) years from
the date of approval, unless extended pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10-3-207.
Page 5 of 6 AC XX14
Section 8. The Secretary of the Architectural Commission shall certify to the passage,
approval, and adoption of this resolution, and shall cause this resolution and its certification to be
entered in the administrative record maintained by the community development department.
Section 9. Decisions of the Architectural Commission may be appealed to the City Council
within fourteen (14) days of the final action by filling a written appeal and paying appropriate fees with
the City of Beverly Hills City Clerk.
Approved as to Form and Content: Adopted: October 15, 2014
William Crouch, Commission Secretary Barry Bernstein, ChairCommunity Development Department Architectural Commission
Page 6 of 6 AC XX14