meeting date: wednesday, october 15, 2014 subject: pet

24
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL (310) 458-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET FOOD EXPRESS (P11426621) 9153 Olympic Boulevard Request for approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approved business identification signage. The Commission will also consider adoption of a Categorical Exemption, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Project agent: Jacob Webster All American Permits Recommendation: Conduct public hearing to discuss the project details and provide the applicant with an approval. REPORT SUMMARY The applicant is requesting review and approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approved business identification signage for Pet Food Express located at 9153 Olympic Boulevard. The proposed project includes the following components: Facade Remodel Paint (e) masonry wall in brown-taupe color; Storefront system with clear glazing and dark bonze anodized aluminum framing; Parapet cladding with wood siding, and; Metal canopy with a dark bronzed anodized finish. Signage Revision The revision to the previously approved business identification sign is limited to the sign located adjacent to the parking lot. Previously, this sign was approved by the Architectural Commission at their meeting on April 16, 2014 to be mounted on the existing mansard roof-type parapet. With the proposed façade changes now before the Commission, the connection and returns have been revised to fit more appropriately with the new design. The revised sign is now proposed to be consistent in its entirety with the street-facing sign located adjacent to Olympic Boulevard. Note: No changes in size or illumination of the business identification signs are proposed as a result of the requested revision. URBAN DESIGN ANALYSIS The proposed façade remodel is generally a positive enhancement to the building as it provides a clean and simple design. However, it is recommended that a greater variation in color between the masonry walls and the wood siding be considered so as to provide more appropriate contrast to these elements. Attachment(s): A. Detailed Design Description and Materials (Applicant Prepared) B. Project Design Plans C. DRAFT Approval Resolution _____________________ Report Author and Contact Information: Cindy Gordon, AICP, Associate Planner (310) 285-1191 [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 04-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

City of Beverly HillsPlanning Division

455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210TEL (310) 458-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966

Architectural Commission Report

Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Subject: PET FOOD EXPRESS (P11426621)9153 Olympic BoulevardRequest for approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approvedbusiness identification signage. The Commission will also consider adoption of aCategorical Exemption, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

Project agent: Jacob Webster — All American Permits

Recommendation: Conduct public hearing to discuss the project details and provide the applicant withan approval.

REPORT SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting review and approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previouslyapproved business identification signage for Pet Food Express located at 9153 Olympic Boulevard. Theproposed project includes the following components:

Facade Remodel• Paint (e) masonry wall in brown-taupe color;• Storefront system with clear glazing and dark bonze anodized aluminum framing;• Parapet cladding with wood siding, and;• Metal canopy with a dark bronzed anodized finish.

Signage RevisionThe revision to the previously approved business identification sign is limited to the sign locatedadjacent to the parking lot. Previously, this sign was approved by the Architectural Commission at theirmeeting on April 16, 2014 to be mounted on the existing mansard roof-type parapet. With theproposed façade changes now before the Commission, the connection and returns have been revised tofit more appropriately with the new design. The revised sign is now proposed to be consistent in itsentirety with the street-facing sign located adjacent to Olympic Boulevard.

Note: No changes in size or illumination of the business identification signs are proposed as a result ofthe requested revision.

URBAN DESIGN ANALYSISThe proposed façade remodel is generally a positive enhancement to the building as it provides a cleanand simple design. However, it is recommended that a greater variation in color between the masonrywalls and the wood siding be considered so as to provide more appropriate contrast to these elements.

Attachment(s):A. Detailed Design Description and Materials (Applicant Prepared)B. Project Design PlansC. DRAFT Approval Resolution _____________________

Report Author and Contact Information:Cindy Gordon, AICP, Associate Planner

(310) [email protected]

Page 2: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A

AC Meeting — October 15, 2014

ZONING CODE COMPLIANCEApplications for design review are preliminarily evaluated for compliance with the zoning code.Applicants are encouraged and have the option of requesting a comprehensive review separate andapart from this application. Formal compliance review will occur when a building permit application isfiled (plan check). The applicant has been advised that changes during plan check may require revisionsand subsequent approval from the Architectural Commission or staff, as appropriate.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTThe subject project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — Public ResourcesCode §~21000 — 21178), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that theproject includes the review of building design, colors and materials to the façade of the building, frontyard landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures, such as fences or walls. It can be seen withcertainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity could result in a significant effect on theenvironment. The project has also been reviewed and found not be a historic resource. The existingimprovements to be demolished or altered were not designed by an architect or builder identified onthe City’s Master Architect list and the site and improvements are not listed on the City’s historicresource inventory.

PUBLIC OUTREACH AND NOTIFICATIONPublic outreach and notification was not required for this project.

Page 3: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexforcl Drive, Room 280-A

AC Meeting — October 15, 2014

Attachment ADetailed Design Description

and Materials (applicant prepared)

Page 4: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

)City of Beverly Hills — Architectural Review ApplicationPage3ofl3

A Indicate Requested Application

I~ Staff Review• Three (3) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements).

~ Architectural Commission Review• Eight (8) sets of plans required (see Section 6 for plan size requirements),• Public Notice materials required for Sign Accommodations (see Section 5 for public notice

requirements).

B Identify the scope of work (check all that apply):

LI New construction LI Remodel: mt. & Ext, no floor area addedI~I Façade Remodel ONLY LI Remodel: mt. & Ext, floor area addedLI Business Identification Sign(s) LI Awning(s): LI New LI Recovery

Number of signs proposed:LI Building Identification Sign(s) LI Open Air Dining: #Tables # chairs

Number of signs proposed:LI Sign Accommodation (explain reason for the accommodation request below):

Number of signs proposed:

LI Other:

C Describe the scope of work proposed including materials and finishes:

1. Remove existing mansard roof element on East and South elevations.2. Replace mansard roof with stained wood parapet on East and South elevations as indicated in submittaldrawings.3. Build new dark bronze finish metal canopy on East and South elevations as indicated in submittal drawings.3. Paint existing split face concrete block walls on on all sides of building as indicated in submittal drawings.

D Identify the Project Zoning (City Zoning Map: httD://gis,beverlyhills.org/)

LI R-4 LI R-4X LI R4 LI R-4-P LI R-4X2LI R-3 LI RMCP LI C-3 LI C-3A LI C-3BLI C-5 LI C-3T-1 ~] C-3T-2 LI C-3T-5 LI C-5LI Other:

E Lot is currently developed with (check all that apply):LI General Office Building LI Multi-family Building LI Other (specify below):~ Retail Building LI VacantLI Medical Office Building LI Restaurant

F Has the existing structure been designed by a notable architect or is it identified on any historicresource inventory, including the City of Beverly Historic Resources Survey (Verify with thePlanning Division if the property is listed on the City’s survey)?

Yes ~ No ~J If yes, please list Architect’s name:

SECTION 2 — PROJECT DESCRIPTION / ZONING INFORMATION

Page 5: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

City of Beverly Hills — Architectural Review ApplicationPage 4 of 13

A Indicate in the chart below all applicable signage details:

Type of Sign - Quantity Dimensions Suuare Ft Maximum Area Permitted by Code

1

2

3

4

5

B List the s~eciflc materials and finishes for all of the architectural features proposed in the project(List N/A, not applicable, for features that do not apply.):

FACADE (List all material for all portions visible from the street)Material: Concrete Block (existing)Texture/Finish: Split FacedColor/Transparency: Painted Sherwin Williams 7040 Smokehouse

WINDOWS/DOORS (Include frame, trim, glass, metal, etc.)Material: Aluminum (approved under earlier permit)Texture /Rnish:Color/ Transparency:

ROOFMaterial:

Texture/Finish:NANA

Color/ Transparency: NA

COLUMNSMaterial:Texture/Finish:Color/ Transparency:

BALCONIES & RAILINGSMaterial:Texture /Finish:

Color! Transparency:

OUTDOOR DINING ELEMENTS (List all material for all outdoor dining elements.)Material:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency: NA

NANA

SECTION 3— PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continues on next page)

Anodized smoothDark Bronze Finish

NANANA

NANANA

Page 6: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

City of Beverly Hills — Archite ural Review ApplicationPage Sofl3

AWNINGS, CANOPIESMaterial:Texture /FinIsh:

Color! Transparency:

DOWNSPOUTS I GUTTERSMaterial:Texture/Finish:Colon Transparency:

NANANA

BUSINESS ID SIGN(S)Material:Texture /Finish:Color! Transparency:

NA - approved under earlier reviewNANA

BUILDING ID SIGN(S)Material:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:

NA - approved under earlIer reviewNANA

EXTERIOR LIGHTINGMaterial:Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:

Recessed Softit Lighting - Painted MetalSmoothDark Bronze Finish

PAVED SURFACESMaterial:

Texture/Finish:

Color! Transparency:

NANANA

FREESTANDING WALLS AND FENCESMaterial: NATexture/Finish:

Color! Transparency:

OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTSMaterial:

Texture/Finish:Color! Transparency:

Parapet - 6~ Tongue and Groove Microbevel Wood SidingSmooth wood planks

C Describe the proposed landscape theme, if applicable. Explain how the proposed landscapingcomplements the proposed style of architecture:

SECTION 3 — PROJECT DETAILS AND MATERIALS (continued from previous page)

Painted metalSmoothDark Bronze Finish

NANA

Page 7: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

City of Beverly Hills — ArchitEr ural Review ApplicationPage 6of13

A Clearly identify how your project adheres to each of the required findings of the ArcnitecturalReview Commission:

1. Describe how the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste and gooddesign and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty,spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas and high quality.

The current mansard roof element is in poor condition. lVs metal panels are scratohed and dented and Its sizeand shape is over bearing. The new parapet and canopy with will lighten and freshen to look of the buildingand allow it to fit seam lessly with the surrounding buildings

2. Describe how the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the structure isreasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors whichmay tend to make the environment less desirable.

NA

3. Describe how the proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance,of inferior quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materiallydepreciate in appearance and value.

The intention of the proposed facade remodel is to upgrade the appearance of the building whioh is lookingold and worn. The color and materials proposed are contemporary yet timeless.

4. Describe how the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposeddevelopments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and with anyprecise plans adopted pursuant to the general plan.

See #1 and #3 above.

5. Describe how the proposed development is in conformity with the standards of the municipalcode and other applicable laws insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings andstructures are involved.

The scope of work is within the perimeter of the properly lines and conform with local codes. The new canopyoverhangs approximately 4~ beyond the properly line on W. Olympic Blvd. The new canopy hasapproximately 2 less overhang than the existing mansard roof.

SECTION 4— DESIGN ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS (for Commission level applications only)

Page 8: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

Attachment BProject Design Plans

Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A

AC Meeting — October 15, 2014

BEVERLYLI S /

Page 9: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

~y’I.

C C

/—~

“—

~~

~7~

~~~

z’~_

~

>

VPE

TFO

OD

EX

PR

ES

S91

53W

.O

LYM

PIC

BO

ULE

VA

RD

BE

VE

RLY

HIL

LSC

A90

212

FILE

NU

MB

ER

:5S

1403

048

•21

212$

F•.fo

odss

Page 10: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

~Io

tDfl:

2l;2014.tllt,

PIW

db

itflh

en

im.:

bh*1

r fl C

/ ,a~__

~i~

S-~

nPE

TFO

OD

EX

PR

ES

S91

53W

.O

LYM

PIC

BO

ULE

VA

RD

BE

VE

RLY

HIL

LSC

A90

212

FILE

NU

MB

ER

:B

S14

0304

621

3113

ere

ssM

~i*

~

Page 11: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

O.~

.5

.2I,2514-I

:t1.~

,P

IMW

dk.

~F

U.~

,,.:

5ft1

~/

—-

—zr

—~

;----<

-----

~

:.

PE

TFO

OD

EX

PR

ES

S~

9153

W.O

LYM

PIC

BO

ULE

VA

RD

•“~~

.B

EV

ER

LYH

ILLS

,C

A90

212

~9

•ex

ss~

FILE

NU

MB

ER

:B

S14

0304

8,

2151

25—

Page 12: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

I I

I I I IL~ I I 1 I I

I I

~fl)C4~Ot?OO CC~O~MhIOfl&~

[ ~ [ ~:i ~I I I 9I I I I~

L~ ~i>HK~L~~_~—J-—~

Page 13: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

‘I’::

ill!~I~i1_: I

———=~——=— — — —— —

-—=~=--

— WEST ELEVATION - PALM AVENUE 311r.1.*

~ ~

~~xpr S

a

— — x~_J ~— w~— U

oo~ ~2

— EAST ELEVATION - PARKING LOT ~ 2 ~ ~

~ ____

2I.Y4_ IOILL

__ ——-=-- —‘-- — -~!

— •- -~xpe —

-~ — P~OPO~fD— STORU~ONTE~VA1IOeG

~SNO1tD

S

wnovwøa,AMS,w1

SOUTh ELEVATION - OLYMPIC BOULEVARD

I I I

Page 14: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

(E)LIF4E OF E&ENSARDROOF TO RE REMOVED

(N)OALVANIZEO SREETMETAL PARAPET CAP

(E)R METAL STEDPRAMINO WEE EXTERIORPLATTER PINISH TO RETvLRIN

(EJENEOFEtANTAROROOF TO RE REMOVED

(N(OALVANIZEO SHEETMETAL PARAPET CAP

Page 15: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

—WEDGE ANCHORTYPICAL

...---—DTISTING CONCRETEBLOCK WALL

—31l4’ ACRYUC FACE

_—I/TCONDuIrroLOW VOLTAGEPOWER SUPPLY

—WAVE LAD DIODES

—.O63~ ALUMINUMRETURNS

‘“‘TTUIMCAP

-~

51)2’

—T LONG *14 HEXHEAD DBTAE SCREW.FOUR 4) PER LETTER

—WOOD SIDING

—3! 16 ACRYLIC FACE

—l/TCONDUTTTOLOWVOITAGEPOWER SUPPLY

—WHITE LED DIODES

—UHTALUMJNUMRETURNS

‘~‘—rTRIMCAp

NOSCALB BOTCHERSIGN AT CONCRETE BLOCK WALl. 8 SIGN AT CONCRETE WOOD SIDING

A/4

~/, ~, , /‘,/~

—CONTINUOUS24

~, GAUGE

/~~I ~ ::::::‘~~•TH” COPING CAP: PAINT

TO MATCH CANOPY

55— ONTTNUOUS2X

~, ~ WOOD BLOCKING

PLYWOODSHEATHING

FURRING GRIPS1A O.C.

SIDING AS

BARRIER

PARAPET’ CAP DETAIL

EXUDNOCONCH\~~~BLOCK WALL -—

BACKER ROD ANDSEALANT: COLOR TOMATCH WOOD

VAPOR BARRIER: -BTTTEND BEHIND -—CONCRETE BLOCK ,- — - — — -

3/4~ FURRING — —STRIPS I6’O.C. :— :~~\ ‘I~ I\ 1 i~’:, ‘:~\ ‘I~

MATCH WOOS

FULI,SCALR

B

4*:;

Ilihi

0

hWOK)

ILL

00> ~Dz

STOREFRONT DETAIlS

SAME ANNEXES

7B

PLYWOODSHEATHING

BARRIER

‘‘“FURRING STRIPS IV

WOOD TO CONCRETE BLOCK JOINT

“~~~“‘~—STAINLESS STEELSCREWS AT EACHFURRING STRIP

.,,_—W000 SIDED ASSPECIFIW

PTJl.LSCALE4 WALL SIDING PLAN SECTION

RJLLOCABE3 WOOD SIDING SECTION

FUU~SCALB

Page 16: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

i;ji!i;i

I4

hwoo cn

UI

IJi>-~ Ill~_Jx ~oo~ ~

- 6” X 6’ STEEL PLATE WALLBRACKET WIll-I WELDED© © STEEL FIN: DARK BRONZE

~SUPPORT ROD AND CLEVIS:

FINISH

DARK BRONZE FINISH

WOOD SIDING AS~SPECIFIED

X 2” ALUMINUM SUPPORTTUBING: DARK BRONZE FINISH

6” X 6” STEEL PLATE WALLBRACKET WITH WELDEDSTEEL FIN: DARK BRONZEFINISH

SUPPORT ROD AND CLEVIS:~~DARKBRONZE FINISH

B

CANOPY SECTION

THIGH ALUMINUMFRAME: DARKBRONZE FINISH

3~142 CANOPY SECTION

CANOPY DEIAILS

~SC*t~ AS NOTED

7CI I I I

Page 17: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

OO

O0

00

00

00

Cc0

c)0

))c)0

CcQ

00

00

O0

0o

O0

o0

oo

0c~

cC

cO

0o

00

0C

)~

Dc0

00

00

0o

oO

cco

c,

0o

-0000000000000000000000C

,Or,

Orjc

00000000000000000C

.Orc

000flO

rcO

Orc

c~

o00000000000C

cO

oc)0

000000C

c000000000000C

c00000000,o

rc0000000000rc

oC

Do

0000C

cfiC

c00000))

0C

cfl0C

c0000000,m

000

000C

)0000000000(0

00C

;00000000cc

‘0o

0000000000000000000C

OO

Cc0000C

000C

c0000000000C

,00C

)flO

C,0

00000r.

c00

CD

o000C

ccm

oc)o

ocrc

oocjc

ooc,0

0C

,000000c:c

c)r

occ000000000c,o

rc0000000C

cr,

0000c-c

oo

C,00)

C)

Cc0

0C)

)0

00

000000)0C

c)

cm0

o000000000C

,000C

crc

rc,c

000000000rc

r0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0C

cO

OC

c.(

c0

00

,c0

00

C)C)

OC

C)C

cC

C)O

OC

W0

00

Cc0

00

C)0

r)rc

Oo

c)0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

flc-,

00

00

r,0

00

00

0Q

c)

Cc0<

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0r,

,m0

00

o0

00

no

C0<

OO

Cc000000cm

OC

cO

Oc)0

00

CccO

cJrc

OO

cjO

a00000000000000000000rf

l-crf

l)W

n-u

)OC

00

)0

0O

CO

flO

)00

00

0C

0C

c00)0000

00

00)000

C0c

~00000000000000C

,0000000C

cQ

0C

cccc

C,0

00000000000000000rc

000000C

c0C

c0

)C)

0C000000000C

)00000c)J

fl<

)000000c0C

)0)

000c)0

00C

cC

c000cc0C

c0oc)o

c)0

000C

coC

crc

cm

C)

00

0C

0)C

0C

C)Q

))0

0000

000000C

C0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

CC

)c)C

J0

00

00

0c0

00

0C

cO

c)00000000000000000000000000rj0

00.

o0oooooooooooocm

oC

coooooonooO

or)

oooo.?

oooooo)-

cc)o

,00~

c00oO

CO

OO

O).

cC

)Cc

0<

Cc00000ccO

crc

00

0000000C

C0

00

00

0[0

00

00

00

00

00

00

)JO

0fl0

00

Lrt

O))

O0

)’flfl

cc,

Ocro

co

occm

ccc)c

ccc000rc

0000

ocO

))o

cC

D0

oJ0

cW

00

00

0u

00

00

00

0rc

0o

c,0

c0fl)}

00),

Cc)

0C

c0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0cc0

c,c

I0o0o00ooO

0O

0c~

orc

nO

0ooo0c.,o00oono

cC)

Cc

CC

00000000000r0

00c.O

ocm

oO

ccO

ccooIo

orc

0000,c

0000000000),

cc000000W

,),

C)O

r000000000000000000000000000

)1000000000000c

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

cc00000fl0000000000C

c00rc

0m

oC

cOrc

OIO

Orc

OO

ccO

rc00000r

cc0

00

00

00

00

C,0

00

00

00

OW

000000C

c0)

cc”

00

00

0000rc

nO

Cc)c

nIc

c000000000000000rc

c)0

)30

00

00

0rc

Cccc0

0Jr

)<Q

r00000000C

0c000

‘00

00

00

00

0D

C!O

r000000000C

C0

00

0)0

00

00

00

c(W

OO

C)C

c0

00

0cm

00

00

C,0

00

cic

mc

00000000

m0

00

[0r

00

00

00

00

0W

00

00

00

)c000000000C

cC

)0

0000rc

oO

ccoC

c000)c

oc,0

000000

00

00

01

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0cc0

00

0rc

oc,0

o,

C)c.c

0000rc

000000c-,

ccr

000000C

C0cC

oIo

oo

000000000000C

c000000

0000000

cc,

C)0

0cc0

00

00

00

00

00

crc

00

00

00

c-c

Ccco

oclc

,00

00

00

0c-c

00

00

0n

00

0r

lOc)c

c0000(

~c)

0)

0)

cC

c0

00

0ccO

c)0

00

00

cr0

0C

c0

rc0

00

00

00

10

00

00

‘00

00

00

0)

00000000

~)c

0000000000000m

00000000000C

O0I0

0000000000000C

,0000000000000c

cC,

CcccC

cC

c0

00

0C

cC

cc)0

00

00

00

rc0

0c,

)000000100c.c

OO

c,0

000000000C

c000rc

oO

Ccrc

cccc000

c.c)

000rc

r,o

00

00

00

C)c

co

r,0

00

c)0

00

0C

00

01

00

0c,0

00

00

00

rc0

00

00

00

c,0

00

Cc0

00

0cccc

ccc

00

00

0C

c0

00

0m

00

00

00

c)0

00

00

00

00

00

10

00

03

00

00

00

)m0

00

0c-)

00

00

c,0

0c)O

O0

00

0ooC

cc)0

0000000cm

ccoorc

cc00000cm

r000;o

occoorc

cm

00000c0000C

co

00)0

0),

00

00

0cm

Cr0

00

00

00

00

00

)o

mcm

orc

00

00

00

00

0c,r

cc0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

rcO

nC

)Cc0

00

0cc0

00

c,o

00000C

coocc

cmC

cccO

cco

00cc000

Occ000000r0

00),

oC

cc~

00o00C

crc

o0C

Orc

Ccc

00

00

ccC<

‘ccc

)cc

c0

)ooo0oo0occo0no0C

cnooc~

Oooc.c

Occ0oC

[ooo00ooo0oo0cc00C

occO

ccuccc,o

oc-c

-c0ccc,

00

00

00

Cc0

0C

c0

00

CcO

ccc,0

0cc0

0c0

00

c0

00

cm

rcj,crc

oc,c

Jrc

oC

,00

0c)c

co

c,0

0cco

,oc,c

,c-)

00

0c-)

o0

0)

rcO

cm00000C

cCcO

Ocm

cO

cO

cc0

00

00

00

)0cc

cmjo

cc)c

m0

00

0C

c0

00

cT

hC

ccco

orc

oc)0

)oo

CcO

cc(c

ccc

c0

Cc

Cco

rccc

oocm

oocc

oc

Or)

,0

00

00

0c,0

0C

cC

co

0I0

C0

OL

c0

00

0c.c

00

00

0r0

00

rcccO

CcO

Occro

,00

,o0c

fl0

fl0

00

0rc

00

0ccC

cflccc,f

l0o

0o

oc-c

~co

rrco

IoC

cO

rc00000000c)0

000

rcrc

cc0

00

00

0cc0

00

crc

cc0

0cc0

00

00

0C

c0

ccC

cC

Ccrc

000000ccrc

c,O

czcc,I

r)0c)r

c000000rc

0c.c

C0

00

0cc

00

00

c.c

Occ

cccoo

cD00cm

)c~

000C

0m

cc0

Cc00000C

crc

oO

rcO

rcO

ICc00000000000C

cO

oc)0

c,o

,c000ccoc,c

-,oc,o

0Lccc000~

corc

0C

c0

cCcC

))c

0000000000cc01000cc0000cc0000C

cc

coo)

00000000

))O

ccO

flc

Cc

Or

0~

c0000O

00C

0000cccc00rc

Cccc0C

cO

rc0Ic

cccccC

c0rc

fl0rc

O0rc

n0cm

rcrc

rcC

cO

Ocm

rcc,

mc,

00

cc)

rc0

00

00

00

00

00

0rc

cc

)c.

00

00

00

0C

c0

00

rc0

1rc

00

00

00

00

00

0c

c0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

rccc

‘c-c

0<

(00(0

Cc

Orc

c)C

cc0000C

cO

Occ0000c)

0C

100(c

00cc

OC

cD

m000

cOO

0r,

Orc

cO

rcc,0

0cc0),

CD,

0<

cc000000000rc

000c

crcc

~0

00

00

Cc0

Lc0

0L

cIO

cJcm

0O

00

Cc0

OO

0cc

c)o

cccm

cJc,

0cc

0c)

cc(c

C)~

c0c

crc

co0

oO

oooooc,0

r,ooo00c~

c0O

ccooom

orc

-coc~

ooC

cooo00oooocco0oC

coooo,c

QQ

)Q~

c,Q

cc

0O

000cm

C)O

oc

0cm

)00

00

00

C0

00

00

C0

00

*0

00

00

0c’O

00

0fl0

00

00

00

00

Cc0

cco

0rc

occ

0O

W0

00

00

00

00

Cc,

rc0

00

00

0ccO

nC

crc

cC

00

00

00

00

00

0c

cO

Orc

0000000c.c

ocm

,cccc0

0o

c~

co

00

oo

o0

occo

cco

Cc0

rcrc

oo

oc~

co

cco

0o

eIo

rc0

0o

oo

o0

oo

ccrc

)0o

Cco

0co

oo

00

0cJ,

Oc)

crc

Ccc0cm

000000C

0000cm

00000000000001000000000000cccc00000000c,0

0c,n

CcccC

c0

cc)c

crc

cm

rcO

oc)c

,000000000000000000c,C

cC

ccc,C

ccm

oC

c000000000rc

r-

c0

crc

CO

OC

c0

00

0rc

00

0ccO

Orc

rcc0

00

cccm

orc

Cc0

00

cO

nc

r-

ccc

cc0

00

00

0rO

c,r

)c,0

cc,

Cc

)0000000)0

0C

00

00

00

00

-c,o

00000oO

rc0c,O

r,rc

orc

ccm

oo~

cccrc

0oc,

Cc0

)0

0))

0300C

)00

oc,0

0rc

CC

cccc

(0000000000000c,c

)rco,c

0000000C

crc

0cc

cC

c0000000C

c0C

cC

cctC

cc.c

00000000C

c0ccC

cC

crc

ccO

cc0000000000cccc)0

000000ccrc

c,r

cc,c

)O

00

00

00

00

rc0

0C

c0

c1

00

00

00

00

00

,,0

00

00

0ccc,0

Cc0

00

00

cccc0

00

00

Lccc0

00

Cfi

ccU

)’c0

00

00

00

crc

00

0rc

00

00

00

00

0c)

C)c

)0

)c000000C

c000c

Ccc)

000C

0C

0O

0C

cc~

00O

cT

hO

0O

0000c~

c)c

000000C

c000Q

c0,c

0c

ccC

00

00

0cc,c

occ0

Or

00cc00C

c0

0000cc000000000000C

c0000(0

c0000

0O

ccO

C0f

lCcc

mc~

ccc

’Oc,

OO

OO

ccO

c)O

cmC

cOO

cmO

OO

CC

),O

rO

00O

00cc0000c~

c00c

<<

000000L)

0’

0cc00C

c0000)0

00

z 0 8 z 0

-~

> -o -o 0 >< > p p

=z C

ID~ 0

4,4,

Page 18: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

Attachment CDRAFT Approval Resolution

Architectural Commission Report455 North Rexford Drive, Room 280-A

AC Meeting — October 15, 2014

Page 19: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

RESOLUTION NO. AC-XX-14

RESOLUTION OF THE ARCHITECTURAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OFBEVERLY HILLS CONDITIONALLY APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURALREVIEW PERMIT FOR A FACADE REMODEL AND A REVISION TOPREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE FOR THEPROPERTY LOCATED AT 9153 OLYMPIC BOULEVARD (PL1426621 — PETFOOD EXPRESS).

The Architectural Commission of the City of Beverly Hills hereby finds, resolves and determines

as follows:

Section 1. Jacob Webster, All American Permits, on behalf of the property owner, Richard

J. Lauter & Co., LLP, and the tenant, Pet Food Express, (Collectively the “Applicant”), has applied for

architectural approval of a façade remodel and a revision to previously approved business identification

signage for the property located at 9153 Olympic Boulevard.

Section 2. Beverly Hills Municipal Code Article 30, Chapter 3 of Title 10, authorizes the

Architectural Commission the authority to approve, approve with conditions or deny design-related

aspects of projects located in the city’s commercial and multi-family districts, subject to findings set

forth in Beverly Municipal Code Section 10-3-3010.

Section 3. Consistent with Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10-3-3010, this resolution

documents the official action of the architectural commission with respect to the project.

Section 4. The subject project has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions set forth in

the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA — Public Resource Code Sections 21000, et seq.), the

State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 etseq.), and the city’s

Page 1 of 6 AC )QC—14

Page 20: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

local CEQA Guidelines. The subject project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section

15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that the project includes the review of building design,

colors and materials to the façade of the building, landscaping or minor low-scaled accessory structures,

such as fences or walls. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the subject activity

could result in a significant effect on the environment. The project has also been reviewed and found to

not be a historic resource. The existing improvements to be demolished or altered were not designed by

an architect or builder identified on the City’s Master Architect list and the site and improvements are

not listed on the City’s historic resource inventory.

Section 5. The Architectural Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on

October 15, 2014 at which time oral and documentary evidence was received concerning the

application.

Section 6. Based upon the evidence presented at the hearings, including the staff

report(s), oral and written testimony, the Architectural Commission hereby makes the following

findings:

A. The plan for the proposed building or structure is in conformity with good taste and

good design and, in general, contributes to the image of Beverly Hills as a place of beauty, spaciousness,

balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality. Specifically the project incorporates an

appropriate balance of color, high quality materials and appropriate architectural design principles to

reinforce the city’s urban form and promote the image of Beverly Hills.

Page 2 of 6 AC XX—14

Page 21: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

B. The plan for the proposed building or structure indicates the manner in which the

structure is reasonably protected against external and internal noise, vibrations, and other factors which

may tend to make the environmental less desirable. The proposed project is proposed to be constructed

using contemporary building materials and practices, and, as conditioned, complaint with all applicable

building codes, including standards that protect against unwanted noise and vibrations.

C. Proposed building or structure is not, in its exterior design and appearance, of inferior

quality such as to cause the nature of the local environment to materially depreciate in appearance and

value. Specifically, the commission has reviewed the design and construction materials proposed for the

project, which incorporates contemporary building material of known quality and durability. Moreover,

the project design is appropriate to the building and surrounding improvements and is well matched to

the selected materials.

D. As conditioned, the proposed building or structure is in harmony with the proposed

developments on land in the general area, with the general plan for Beverly Hills, and with any precise

plans adopted pursuant to the general plan. The proposed project complies with the applicable goals

and policies set forth in the general plan, and, as conditioned, designed in a manner that complies with

local ordinances. The overall design is consistent with and appropriate to other improvements in the

general vicinity.

E. The proposed development is in conformity with the standards of this code and other

applicable laws insofar as the location and appearance of the buildings and structures are involved. As,

conditioned, the project will be designed in compliance with all applicable regulations.

Page 3 of 6 AC XX-14

Page 22: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

F. The proposed development is designed in a manner that protects and preserves those

exterior elements of the building which the planning commission found contributed to the

determination of the project as a “character contributing building”: in accordance with section 10-2-707

of this title. The proposed project does not include a request and has not been determined by the

planning commission to be a project that qualifies as a “character contributing building” under section

10-2-707. Therefore, this finding is not applicable to the subject project.

Section 7. Based on the foregoing, the Architectural Commission hereby grants the request

defined in this resolution subject to the following conditions:

Project-Specific Conditions

No project-specific conditions are proposed

Standard Conditions

1. Revised Plan Submittal. For all projects that are approved with project-specific conditions, a revised

plan set that has fully incorporated all such conditions shall be submitted to the project planner,

both in hard copy format and in electronic format, prior to submitting for the building permit plan

check process.

2. Architectural Approval. Project approval is for the design-related aspects of the project only. No

approval is implied or granted with regard to applicable city zoning or technical codes, which may

require review and approval from other city commissions or officials.

3. Compliance with Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall

demonstrate compliance with all applicable provisions of the city’s municipal code and applicable

conditions imposed by any discretionary review approval.

Page 4 of 6 AC ~Q~—14

Page 23: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

4. Compliance with Special Conditions. Any special conditions that require approval by the director of

community development, or designee, shall be submitted to the staff liaison to the commission

within fourteen (14) days of approval or prior to submittal of the plan check review application,

whichever is greater.

5. Project Rendering. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate into the

building permit set of plans, an updated color rendering of all building facades. The quality and

detail of the rendering shall be subject to approval from the director of community development, or

designee, and shall include sufficient design information to evaluate project compliance during

construction.

6. Approval Resolution. A copy of the signed resolution of approval shall be scanned onto the cover

sheet(s) of the building permit set of plans.

7. Substantial Compliance with Approved Plans. The director of community development, or

designee, shall determine if changes to the approved project are in substantial compliance with the

commission’s action. This determination shall be subject to applicable fees and charges. A

substantial modification to the approved project requires approval from the Architectural

Commission.

8. Validity of Permits. The rights granted by this approval shall remain valid for three (3) years from

the date of approval, unless extended pursuant to Beverly Hills Municipal Code Section 10-3-207.

Page 5 of 6 AC XX14

Page 24: Meeting Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 Subject: PET

Section 8. The Secretary of the Architectural Commission shall certify to the passage,

approval, and adoption of this resolution, and shall cause this resolution and its certification to be

entered in the administrative record maintained by the community development department.

Section 9. Decisions of the Architectural Commission may be appealed to the City Council

within fourteen (14) days of the final action by filling a written appeal and paying appropriate fees with

the City of Beverly Hills City Clerk.

Approved as to Form and Content: Adopted: October 15, 2014

William Crouch, Commission Secretary Barry Bernstein, ChairCommunity Development Department Architectural Commission

Page 6 of 6 AC XX14