michael pacholok, purchasing and materials ... - toronto · 6. add to section 4, available...
TRANSCRIPT
Michael Pacholok, Director
Purchasing and Materials Management Division City Hall, 18th Floor, West Tower 100 Queen Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2
Joanne Kehoe Manager Construction Services
April 26, 2016 Reply to: Michael Porcarelli Via Website Posting: 50 Pages Tel: (416) 338-5585
Addendum No. 1
Tender No. 162-2016
Re: St. Lawrence Market North Redevelopment, 92 Front Street East, Toronto, Demolition, Enabling and Archaeological Work.
Closing Date: 12:00 P.M. Noon (Local Time), April 28, 2016
Please refer to the above Tender Call document in your possession and be advised of the following information: 1. Revisions
1. All references to "Temporary chiller" shall be removed and replaced with "Permanent chiller" for the purposes of this tender 162-2016. 2. Reference to Structure Demolition, Section 02 41 16.1, Appendix 1, page 02 41 16.1-2
Delete: North Exterior
Granite Paving Sets
See Dwg L‐100 To be stored for reinstallation following construction
Coordinate with Owner
Replace with: North Exterior
Granite Paving Sets
See Dwg L‐100 Contractor to crate and skid for offsite storage
Deliver to Owner facilities at 150 Ellesmere Ave. (provide 48 hours notice prior to delivery)
3. Reference to Spec Section Demolition and Salvage 02 41 13 items 3.3.7.8 to 3.3.7.12 inclusive to be removed.
1 of 50
4. Refer to Drawing AD1.502 Issue B, Hoarding Plan, Notes under Heading: CONSTRUCTION HOARDING , item 3 Delete part of sentence: “…. HOARDING AND GRAPHICS TO BE PAINTED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT,” Replace part of sentence with: “… HOARDING TO BE PAINTED WITH EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT,” 5. Page 38 of 141, Section 3, Pricing Form, #4. Itemized Prices, Bidders are instructed to remove the words "preparation" and "assembly" from itemized price line item #3.
Item No. Item Description Price $
3. Cost for the Final Archaeological Report preparation, assembly, submission and approval of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the City of Toronto Heritage Preservation Services.
$ 25,000.00
6. Add to Section 4, Available Information item #13.1.24, Report Title: Arborist Report on Potential Effects of Crown Pruning Work on City-Owned and Private Trees in Conjunction with Proposed Re-Development of the St. Lawrence Market North Building Site at 92 Front Street East, Toronto authored by Redbud Forestry Consultants dated April 21, 2016. In addition to the pruning identified drawing LD-100, include this report for additional clarifications of scope of work. (Refer to enclosed report, 10 pages)
2. General Clarifications To Questions From Bidders
Q1. Reference to Tender Call Document, Section 4 -Scope of Work:
Please clarify the set milestones for the project completion (page 44 of 141), for demolition by August 4, 2016 and Archeological by December 20, 2016 , in relation to the following constraints:
a) What is the anticipated approval time for pre-installation submissions of 100 Ton Chiller package, stamped demolition and monitoring plan (a condition of demolition permit), engineered hoarding drawing?
Please note that building demolition may not commence until asbestos abatement procedures and commissioning of mechanical services are completed.
A1. a.) This is for the General Contractor to schedule accordingly. The Contractor shall provide Shop Drawings for Consultant review to suit meet the Contractor schedule and identify reasonable time for provisions, review, and return of shop drawings. Allow a minimum of 10 Working days. Contractor schedule to reflect all activities immediately after award to achieve milestone dates. Please note that the statement about commissioning of mechanical services in Q1 is not correct. The general contractor has other means and methods to address this item.
2 of 50
Q2. The time frame required to obtain street occupation permit, traffic control, utilities and
other permits from authorities having jurisdiction specified in various sections of the documents.
What is required by right of way permits, air encroachment agreement, hydro permits, overhead insulation of power lines, lifting permits related to this project (43 of 141)? Where is the use of adjacent land required by this project (Section 011000-1.16)?
A2. The General Contractor is to contact Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) and Utilities and schedule accordingly. General Requirements, Section 01 10 00-1.16 As specified any required access to adjacent lands Municipal or private are the responsibility of the Contractor to seek and get approval directly from those respective land Owners.
Q3. What is the time required for preparation of construction staging plan, contractor mobilization and award of subcontracts?
A3. It is the General Contractors responsibility to meet the Project Deliverable date confirmed by
the bidder at time of Tender submission. Q4. Will the Hall Facility continue to be occupied' (42 of 141)? Please revise loading dock delivery schedule from 2015.
A4. The loading dock is to be available to the Hall at all times unless scheduled in advance by the
General Contractor and approved by the City. The GC does not have exclusive access to this area. It is only on a temporary as needed basis for the shortest duration possible. An updated schedule will not be provided.
Q5. What are the Contract security/bonding requirements for the pre-qualified subcontractors, including for the extended 24 month warranty period?
A5. Section 5 – Supplementary Conditions: Refer to page 79 of 141 and Section 5A – Specific
Conditions page 94 of 141 for insurance provisions as identified.
Q6. Please specify 'Other Contracts' that may take place within the construction limits during the project duration (91 of 141) and impacts on project milestones?
A6. The text defines this.
3 of 50
Q7. Clarification is required on Archeological monitoring services for the removal of existing Service Tunnel, temporary chiller services, test pits and the time frame required for MTCS, HPS approvals (Section 01 4000-1.15.1.1.2). A7. The Pre – Approved Archaeological Sub Trade is responsible to carry out the monitoring
services as required by the Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) as specified for the duration of the test holes, and any excavation required to complete the enabling Works to install the permanent chiller and any excavation. There is no reference to approvals in the section referenced by the bidder question.
Q8. What is the intent of a reference to Winter Archeology Document in Section 01 4501?
Is this for the scope of work if the project duration is anticipated to extend through the winter. If so, please define the work for 'keeping site properly drained (Section 01 5000- 1.2.5), discharges of pollutants/contaminants (93 of 141) defined under the pre-qualified Archeological subcontractor's operations.
A8. All cost related to the requirements of Winter Archeology are to be included in the Total cost
of Work submitted by the General Contractor should the Contractor schedule dates confirmed with the Tender submission extend into the period as per the referenced MTCS 2013 Document. The General Contractor and Sub Contractors are responsible to meet all of the requirements for discharging any water pumped or otherwise to meet the requirements of all municipal and AHJ requirements.
Q9. Please clarify 'The Owner shall be reimbursed by the Contractor .... as the result of such delay, including all services required from the Consultant' in relation to the above- mentioned project restraints.
A9. We are not clear on your question. Require reference page in order to clarify this question.
Q10. What is required by 'utilities found by locates' and who is responsible for locates (46 of 141 and Section 01 10 00-1.19)?
A10. The General Contractor is responsible for all locates.
4 of 50
Q11. Reference to Section 3 - Pricing Form:
Given the nature of pre-qualified subcontracts, please provide us with' Trade or Specific Work Items' expanded to cover excavation for service tunnel removal, test pits, site remediation, temporary shoring, locates and protection of utility services, site access and mud mat, Asbestos abatement, Heritage removals, salvage and transportation etc ..
Itemized Price Item No.1 indicates' Excavate, remove and dispose of contaminated soils by Archeology sub-trade.'
A11. The scope of work is reflected in the completed set of Contract Documents in its entirety. Specifications are only divided by division for convenience. Assignment of work items is a contractual arrangement by the General Contractor and his Sub-Contractors.
Q12. Please provide information for Division 21 - Fire Suppression, on mechanical drawings?
A12. No fire suppression scope is anticipated.
Q13. List of Manufactures Equipment: Does the Roof mounted Air Cooled chillers refer to Temporary 100 Ton chiller on concrete pad? Is any of these equipment pre-selected or readily available for the project?
A13. Yes, “roof mounted air cooled chiller” is the permanent exterior air cooled chiller. Refer to the
project technical specifications 23 64 29.00 and the bid form. The permanent chiller has not been pre-ordered.
The bidder shall indicate which manufacture is carried in the bid form, if this is not indicated, the described base equipment (top name listed) shall be furnished under this contract. Section 23 64 29.00 – ROOF MOUNTED AIR COOLED CHILLERS
( ) Daiken ( ) Carrier ( ) York
Q14. Please clarify where the Total specified Cash allowances of $150,000 is to be expended.
A14. The cash allowance is discretionary and will be expended at the discretion of the Contract Administrator/Owner for any work within this contract.
5 of 50
Q15. Reference to Tender Documents:
Section 4 -3.0: Special Notes 9. - 'Please clarify 'The site shall be cleaned on a daily basis without exception (43 of 141) and 'The Owner shall have the right to back charge cleaning to the Contractor .. .' pertinent to this project.
A15. If cleaning activities by the General Contractor are unsatisfactory to the City, the City reserves
its right to conduct cleaning and back charge the General Contractor for all costs of this service.
Q16. Section 01 1000-1.5: Please clarify the requirement of a Land Surveyor, Property Survey and Pest Control (01 5000-1.7.3) in pertinent to this project.
A16. The General Contractor is responsible to maintain iron pins, survey bars, monuments,
geodectic datum's, and similar reference markers which maybe disturbed moved or lost during Demolition Work.
Pest Control (01 5000-1.7.3) The General Contractor is responsible at time of the Work to conform as specified.
Q17. Section 01 5000 -1.7.1.3:- Is any structural shoring work required? Please confirm 'Available
Information 1.2.9: Memorandum from Alstom Associates regarding shoring is not relevant to this project.
A17. Temporary Facilities and Controls - Section 01 50 00 refers to the Contractor work plan
(means & methods) to under take the Work. Any Structural shoring or other means and methods the contractor requires are to be designed and under the supervision of the General Contractors Structural Engineer. With regards to 1.2.9 Alstom Report, any shoring is to be designed by the Shoring Contractor if required.
Q18. d) Section 00 50 00- 1 .3: Please clarify that the site office to accommodate 20 persons and sanitary facility with closets, urinals, basins are not relevant to this project.
A18. d.) Revise the contract documents to read "The General Contractor shall provide the required
trailer(s) and sanitary facilities to meet their needs and conformance with any OHSA requirements or other Authorities". The 20 person trailer facility is not required however the trailer must be large enough to accommodate site meetings.
Q19. The concrete precast roofing is covered with some texture material. Please verify if it is
asbestos or not. 6 of 50
A19. Please refer to the Pre-Demolition Survey Reports #13.1.6 by ECOH Management dated
December 19, 2011 and #13.1.10 ECHO Inc. dated May 8, 2014 for 92 Front Street East in the available information section of the documents page 51 of 141 for all designated substances. (Items # 1.2.6. and 1.2.10 on the disk).
Please also refer to the Pre-renovation survey reports for 157 King Street #13.1.12 by ECHO dated December 18, 2015 and #13.1.11 Annual Survey dated June 30, 2015 in the available information section of the documents page 51 of 141 for all designated substances. . (Items 1.2.11 and 1.2.12 on the disk).
Q20. Reference to Drawing. LD-100 Note at top left of the drawing indicates “Existing Granite paving to be removed and stored. Storage location TBD by owner”. Please indicate total plan area of Granite paving to be removed.
A20. For further clarity, granite paver sets to be crated and shipped for storage are located within
the hoarding area to the north of the existing building and the entire loading area of the Hall. Q21. Item No. 3 on the Pricing Form – Itemized Prices, found on page 38 of 141 in the Tender
document indicates $25,000 as the ‘Cost for the Final Archaeological Report preparation, assembly, submission and approval of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the City of Toronto Heritage Preservation Services’. It is not clear how this dollar amount was derived. Based on the Archaeological Sub-Contractor’s experience with the completion of large, complex urban Stage 4 Archaeological Assessment Final Reports, this dollar amount is entirely inadequate. Please remove this amount from the itemized pricing list.
A21. Refer to Revision 5 above. The amount will not be removed from the bid form.
Q22. Please define what liquidated damages are part of this Tender Contract A22. Refer to Section 5 Supplementary Conditions: Zero (0) dollars is specified for Liquidated
damages. Refer to page 71 of 141. Q23. Please add the following sentence, indicated in bold to Section 02 21 13.23, Sub-Section
3.5.5, ‘Assist with developing a strategy for conveying the history of the St. Lawrence Market and the Old Town including the archaeological evidence to the public with the new development, in accordance with the Heritage Interpretation Plan for Old Town Toronto 2013.’ Assume 80 hours will be required for this task.
A23. This scope of work is a deliverable of the contract and the bidder(s) are to price accordingly for
the required hours the meet the deliverable. 7 of 50
3. Clarifications
1. Section 4, Scope of Work, Page 52 of 141 item #13.1.23. Environmental Sampling – Archaeological Stage 2 and 3 Investigation dated October 26, 2016 authored by MMM is reissued in its entirety due to corruption of Figure 3 diagram on some disks. (Item # 1.2.23. on available information disk) Enclosed 32 pages.
2. Refer to drawing AD1.51 Rev B, at interior partition removals and slab removal, the intent is
for the contractor to remove the greatest extent of slab as close as possible to existing footing location. The graphics on plan / section details are only to illustrate that the below grade structure is not to be disturbed with the building demolition scope.
3. Time is of the essence and the General Contractor shall approach this contract in such a way
addressing appropriate means and methods to meet the schedule as defined in Section 4, Scope of Work, on page 44 of 141. The General Contractor must consider the possibility of acquiring a rental chiller unit while waiting for delivery of the permanent chiller unit. Delay to the schedule will not be accepted by the City due to lead times for the permanent chiller.
4. Addendum Response Information
Please note, the City is continuing to work on providing responses to all questions received to date. A response to each question received will be provided in a subsequent addendum to be issued shortly.
Please note that the Deadline for Questions has passed. All other information regarding the call document is unchanged. All other terms and conditions remain the same. Should you have any questions regarding this addendum contact Michael Porcarelli, Corporate Buyer, at email [email protected]. Please attach this addendum to your Request for Tender document and be governed accordingly. Bidders must acknowledge receipt of all addenda on the space provided on the Tender Call Cover Page as per the Process Terms and Conditions, Section 1, Item 8 - Addenda, of the Tender Call document. All other aspects of the Tender remain the same.
Yours truly, Joanne Kehoe, Manager, Construction Services, Purchasing & Materials Management
8 of 50
QUINN
QUINN DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architecture and Urban Design 132 Cumberland Street, 3rd Floor Toronto, ON Canada M5R 1A6 T 416 962 8700 F 416 962 2750
April 22, 2016 Adamson Associates Architects 401 Wellington Street, Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5V 1E7 Attention: Claudina Sula Re: St. Lawrence Market North Arborist Report on Crown Pruning and Root Damage Dear Claudina: As requested and in response to comments from Jason Kostopoulos of the City Urban Forestry Division, attached is a copy of the Arborist Report on crown pruning and potential root damage of existing trees to the south, west and north of the development site.
This report has been prepared for us by Philip Rogic of Redbud Forestry Consultants, who has also included a detailed assessment of each of the noted trees affected by the demolition and/or construction.
Please review the attached information and let us know if there are any further comments or requirements in this matter.
Sincerely,
Quinn Design Associates Inc.
Gregory F. Hill, OALA Senior Associate
9 of 50
1
April 21, 2016 Quinn Design Associates Inc. 132 Cumberland Street, 3rd Floor, Toronto, ON M5R 1A6 Attn: Mr. Greg Hill Dear Greg: Re: Arborist Report on Potential Effects of Crown Pruning Work on City-Owned
and Private Trees in Conjunction with Proposed Re-development of the St. Lawrence Market North Building Site at 92 Front Street East, Toronto
1.0 Introduction This report has been prepared to provide details on the extent of crown pruning work and other injury-mitigating measures that are to be undertaken for a number of by-law protected trees to facilitate demolition of an existing building and to construct a new building structure, known as St. Lawrence Market North, at 92 Front Street East, Toronto. Our services have been retained to undertake an assessment of fourteen trees and to determine the extent of crown pruning work and any root pruning that may be necessary to provide sufficient space to install City-approved site hoarding and to both demolish the existing building and construct the replacement building structure. Each of these fourteen trees, along with other trees surrounding the subject lands, were previously assessed for this project. Tree assessment findings on species, size, health condition, location and other factors were presented for all trees on a Tree Inventory & Landscape Removals Plan, drawing no. L-100, prepared by Quinn Design Associates Inc. Our tree assessment work was completed on Wednesday, April 20, 2016 using the drawing for reference. Thirteen of the fourteen trees are located on City-owned lands, either on lands south of the existing St. Lawrence Market North building, or on the abutting City-owned Market Square lands. These thirteen City-owned trees are identified as trees #8, 9, 10 and 17 – 26 on the provided plan. In addition to these trees, one private tree (tree #13 in this report) was assessed on private property in conjunction with this assignment. The private specimen, a 42.5cm dbh littleleaf linden (Tilia cordata), is located north of the northwest corner of the proposed building. All trees were inspected from the ground only with botanical health of deciduous tree cover assessed based upon bud development. It may be prudent to re-inspect each deciduous specimen during the upcoming growing season to better evaluate its vigour. Trees were tallied by tree number, common name, botanical name, dbh, health condition, by-law applicability and tree dripline (m)/required Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Photographs are presented in this report of the fourteen trees, crown sections to be pruned back and prescribed areas for tree protection hoarding installation. Detailed information on all trees is provided in Appendix A – Tree Inventory Data. Management recommendations were made on removal, protection and maintenance work based on the trees health and/or anticipated adverse construction effects upon the tree.
10 of 50
2
2.0 Assessment of Potential Impacts and Tree Management Requirements Crown pruning work necessary to facilitate site hoarding installation and to construct the proposed building structure will require crown pruning work on a number of the fourteen assessed trees. With one of the tallied trees (tree #26) to be removed in conjunction with building demolition works the remaining thirteen trees are scheduled for retention. All of the retained trees are expected to endure any ill effects of crown pruning work and subsequent building demolition and construction activities due to the species’ intrinsic tendency to endure ill effects of crown pruning work and due to the manageable extent of crown pruning work that appears required. Ten of the thirteen retained trees will require at least some crown pruning work to facilitate construction. One of these trees (tree #19) is expected to incur significant adverse effects from crown pruning work, with up to 1/3 of its crown to be pruned back, whereas two trees (trees #20 and 22) are anticipated to incur notable effects from pruning work, seven trees (trees #9, 13, 18, 21, 23, 24 and 25) minor crown injury and three trees (trees #8, 10 and 17) no crown injury to undertake scheduled works. In addition to crown pruning work necessary to clear branching back from the building structure, all of the retained trees should also be subject to general crown pruning to remove crown deadwood and interfering cross-branching, balance their respective crowns, etc. All crown pruning and root pruning (tree #13) work is to be completed in accordance with good arboricultural standards, as set out by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). Details on the extent of crown pruning work for each tree is provided in Appendix A. In addition to the thirteen City-owned trees, there is a private littleleaf linden (tree #13) that is expected to incur minor crown and root injury in conjunction with construction of the northern extent of the proposed building structure. Injury-mitigating measures to be initiated for protection of this tree include crown pruning work, hoarding installation, hydro-vacuum operations or hand-dug excavation, and subsequent root pruning activities. It will be necessary to conduct a site meeting between the tree care contractor retained to carry out crown pruning works and designated building officials who are familiar with the extent of space requirements needed for demolition of the existing building as well as construction of the proposed taller structure. The Toronto and East York District Office of Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review (416-392-7391) should be contacted at least one day prior to any crown pruning or other tree work that may have any impact upon a tree(s). The retained tree care company should be certified with the ISA or other qualified arboricultural industry association, be familiar with ISA pruning standards and the pruning standards of the City of Toronto’s Urban Forestry Services and preferably have at least 10 years of experience providing professional arboricultural services within the City of Toronto. We trust this information is sufficient to meet your current needs. Please feel free to contact us if you require any further clarification on this matter. Redbud Forestry Consultants
Philip Rogic, B.Sc.F., R.P.F. #1824 Principal/Forester
11 of 50
3
Image looking east from the SW corner of the subject site shows the subject building (left) to be re-constructed, three City-owned honey locust trees (trees #8 (rear), #9 (left) and #10
(right)) to be protected and the surrounding area to be hoarded for the duration of site construction. The north crown on tree #9 is to be pruned back to facilitate construction.
Image looking west from near the SW corner of the existing building shows a City-owned honey locust tree (tree #26) to be removed under permit to facilitate demolition works
12 of 50
4
Image looking north shows the SW corner of the building to be demolished (right) and a row of honey locust trees (trees #25 (l) - #17 (rear)) that are to be retained and protected for the duration of all site construction activity. Trees #25 and #24 (foreground) will both
require less than 15% of their respective crowns to be pruned by arborist to provide adequate clearance for both demolition and construction of the proposed building.
Image looking south shows the SW corner of the building to be demolished (left) and a pair of honey locust trees (trees #24 (right) & #25 (left of tree #24)) that are to be retained
and protected for the duration of all site construction activity. Trees #24 and #25 (foreground) will both require less than 15% of their respective crowns (shown
encroaching on the building wall) to be pruned by arborist to provide adequate clearance for both demolition and construction of the proposed building.
13 of 50
5
Image looking south shows the west wall of the building to be demolished (left) and a City-owned honey locust (tree #23 (far right)) that is to be retained and protected for the
duration of all site construction. Tree #23 (far right) will require less than 10% of its crown (shown encroaching on the building wall) to be pruned by arborist to provide adequate
clearance for both demolition and construction of the proposed building. Hoarding is to be installed 2.4m to the east of tree #23, extending north-south, prior to site construction.
Image looking south shows the west wall of the building to be demolished (left) and a row of City-owned honey locusts (trees #18 - #22 (right to the left)) that are to be retained and
protected for the duration of all site construction. Crowns sections shown overhanging the existing building roofline will have to be pruned back by an arborist, in consultation with
building officials, in accordance with ISA industry standards, prior to hoarding installation.
14 of 50
6
Image looking east from Market Square shows a littleleaf linden tree (tree #13 (centre)), that is to be protected with the initiation of a number of injury-mitigating measures,
including crown pruning, hand-digging or hydro-vacuum operations, and root pruning work, in conjunction with construction of the north wall of the proposed building
Image looking east from Market Square shows tree #13 (left of centre) that is to be protected with the initiation of a number of injury-mitigating measures, including crown
pruning, hand-digging or hydro-vacuum operations and root pruning work, in conjunction with construction of the north wall of the new building (right)
15 of 50
Pre
par
ed f
or:
Qu
inn
Des
ign
Ass
oci
ates
Pre
par
ed b
y: R
edb
ud
Fo
rest
ry C
on
sult
ants
Ap
pen
dix
A -
Tre
e In
ven
tory
Dat
a -
St.
Law
ren
ce M
arke
t N
ort
h, T
oro
nto
Dat
e: A
pri
l 21,
201
6
Tag
N
o.
Tre
e N
o.
Co
mm
on
Nam
eS
cien
tifi
c N
ame
DB
H*
(cm
)C
on
d.*
*T
ree
Cat
.***
Dri
plin
e /T
PZ
T
ree
Co
nd
itio
n a
nd
Man
agem
ent
Rec
om
men
dat
ion
s
N/A
8H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
15.5
F5
2.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
on
the
sout
h si
de o
f the
exi
stin
g S
t. La
wre
nce
Mar
ket N
orth
bui
ldin
g. It
app
ears
to b
e st
ruct
ural
lyan
d bo
tani
cally
in fa
ir co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e no
adv
erse
con
stru
ctio
n ef
fect
s up
on
this
tree
due
to it
s su
ffici
ent d
ista
nce
from
are
as o
f site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
and
pro
vide
d co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e in
stal
latio
n o
fC
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
, to
be in
stal
led
in a
dvan
ce o
f and
for
the
dura
tion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity, a
s sh
own
on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan.
No
crow
n pr
unin
g w
ork
will
be
requ
ired
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
efo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. Rec
omm
end
a ge
nera
l cro
wn
prun
ing
to r
emov
e de
adw
ood.
N/A
9H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
24.5
F5
3.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
on
the
sout
h si
de o
f the
exi
stin
g S
t. La
wre
nce
Mar
ket N
orth
bui
ldin
g, to
the
nort
hwes
t of t
ree
#8.
It ap
pear
s to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
poo
r co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d an
d de
velo
pmen
tof
wat
ersp
rout
gro
wth
. Ant
icip
ate
at m
ost m
inor
adv
erse
con
stru
ctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s no
rth
crow
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cr
own
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. T
he tr
ee is
exp
ecte
d to
end
ure
any
ill e
ffect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
n of
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
dead
equa
te c
lear
ance
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
to fa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity, i
n co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith q
ualif
ied
on-s
itepe
rson
nel,
com
pris
ing
less
than
10%
of i
ts o
vera
ll cr
own;
2)
Inst
all C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
at 1
.8m
nor
th a
nd e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
e of
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3) R
emov
e th
e ho
ardi
ng o
nly
upon
com
plet
ion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity.
N/A
10H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
24.5
F5
3.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
on
the
sout
h si
de o
f the
exi
stin
g S
t. La
wre
nce
Mar
ket N
orth
bui
ldin
g. It
app
ears
to b
e st
ruct
ural
lyan
d bo
tani
cally
in fa
ir co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e no
adv
erse
con
stru
ctio
n ef
fect
s up
on
this
tree
due
to it
s su
ffici
ent d
ista
nce
from
are
as o
f site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
and
pro
vide
d co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e in
stal
latio
n o
fC
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
, to
be in
stal
led
in a
dvan
ce o
f and
for
the
dura
tion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity, a
s sh
own
on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan.
No
crow
n pr
unin
g w
ork
will
be
requ
ired
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
efo
r sc
affo
ld in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. Rec
omm
end
a ge
nera
l cro
wn
prun
ing
to r
emov
e de
adw
ood.
N/A
26H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
20.5
F5
3.0/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
nea
r th
e so
uthw
est c
orne
r of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
min
or c
row
n de
adw
ood
and
a m
oder
ate
amou
nt o
f wat
ersp
rout
gro
wth
.T
his
tree
is to
be
rem
oved
in c
onju
nctio
n w
ith p
ropo
sed
dem
oliti
on a
ctiv
ity. A
per
mit
to r
emov
e th
is tr
ee w
ill b
e re
quire
d.
N/A
25H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
24.5
F5
3.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
sou
thw
est c
orne
r of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs
to b
e st
ruct
ural
ly a
nd b
otan
ical
ly in
fair
to g
ood
cond
ition
exh
ibiti
ng o
nly
min
or c
row
n de
adw
ood.
Ant
icip
ate
at m
ost m
inor
adve
rse
cons
truc
tion
effe
cts
upon
its
east
cro
wn
from
the
effe
cts
of c
row
n pr
unin
g w
ork
nece
ssar
y to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
to fa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity. T
he tr
ee is
exp
ecte
d to
end
ure
any
ill e
ffect
s of
crow
n pr
unin
g w
ork
and
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity a
nd is
to b
e pr
otec
ted
by th
e in
itiat
ion
of th
e fo
llow
ing
inju
ry-m
itiga
ting
mea
sure
s:
1) A
n ar
boris
t is
to p
rune
bac
k on
ly th
ose
limbs
nec
essa
ry to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
tofa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity, i
n co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith q
ualif
ied
on-s
ite p
erso
nnel
, com
pris
ing
less
than
15%
of i
ts o
vera
ll cr
ow
n;2)
Inst
all C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
at 2
.4m
eas
t of t
he tr
ees
base
, in
adva
nce
of a
ny s
ite c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity, a
s sh
own
on th
eT
ree
Inve
ntor
y &
Lan
dsca
pe R
emov
als
Pla
n; a
nd 3
) R
emov
e th
e ho
ardi
ng o
nly
upon
com
plet
ion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity.
N/A
24H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
26.5
F5
4.0/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e at
mos
t min
orad
vers
e co
nstr
uctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s ea
st c
row
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. The
tree
is e
xpec
ted
to e
ndur
e an
y ill
effe
cts
ofcr
own
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
n of
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
, in
cons
ulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el, c
ompr
isin
g le
ss th
an 1
5% o
f its
ove
rall
cro
wn;
2) In
stal
l City
-app
rove
d ho
ardi
ng a
t 2.4
m e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
e of
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
onl
y up
on c
ompl
etio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
.
Cit
y-o
wn
ed T
rees
reg
ula
ted
by
the
Cit
y's
Str
eet
Tre
e B
y-L
aw
16 of 50
Pre
par
ed f
or:
Qu
inn
Des
ign
Ass
oci
ates
Pre
par
ed b
y: R
edb
ud
Fo
rest
ry C
on
sult
ants
Ap
pen
dix
A -
Tre
e In
ven
tory
Dat
a -
St.
Law
ren
ce M
arke
t N
ort
h, T
oro
nto
Dat
e: A
pri
l 21,
201
6
Tag
N
o.
Tre
e N
o.
Co
mm
on
Nam
eS
cien
tifi
c N
ame
DB
H*
(cm
)C
on
d.*
*T
ree
Cat
.***
Dri
plin
e /T
PZ
T
ree
Co
nd
itio
n a
nd
Man
agem
ent
Rec
om
men
dat
ion
s
N/A
23H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
27.5
F5
5.0/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e at
mos
t min
orad
vers
e co
nstr
uctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s ea
st c
row
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. The
tree
is e
xpec
ted
to e
ndur
e an
y ill
effe
cts
ofcr
own
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
n of
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
, in
cons
ulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el, c
ompr
isin
g le
ss th
an 1
0% o
f its
ove
rall
cro
wn;
2) In
stal
l City
-app
rove
d ho
ardi
ng a
t 2.4
m e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
e of
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
onl
y up
on c
ompl
etio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
.
N/A
22H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
25.5
F5
4.0/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
a n
otab
le e
ast l
ean
to it
s st
em a
nd c
row
n. A
ntic
ipat
e no
tabl
e
adve
rse
cons
truc
tion
effe
cts
upon
its
east
cro
wn
from
the
effe
cts
of c
row
n pr
unin
g w
ork
nece
ssar
y to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
to fa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity. T
he tr
ee is
stil
l exp
ecte
d to
end
ure
any
ill e
ffect
s of
crow
n pr
unin
g w
ork
and
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity a
nd is
to b
e pr
otec
ted
by th
e in
itiat
ion
of th
e fo
llow
ing
inju
ry-m
itiga
ting
mea
sure
s:
1) A
n ar
boris
t is
to p
rune
bac
k on
ly th
ose
limbs
nec
essa
ry to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
tofa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity, i
n co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith q
ualif
ied
on-s
ite p
erso
nnel
, com
pris
ing
15-2
0% o
f its
ove
rall
crow
n;2)
Inst
all C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
at 2
.4m
eas
t of t
he tr
ees
base
, in
adva
nce
of a
nd fo
r th
e du
ratio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
nac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
onl
y up
on c
ompl
etio
nof
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
.
N/A
21H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
21.5
F5
3.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e at
mos
t min
orad
vers
e co
nstr
uctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s ea
st c
row
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. The
tree
is e
xpec
ted
to e
ndur
e an
y ill
effe
cts
ofcr
own
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
n of
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
, in
cons
ulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el, c
ompr
isin
g le
ss th
an 1
0% o
f its
ove
rall
cro
wn;
2) In
stal
l City
-app
rove
d ho
ardi
ng a
t 2.4
m e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
e of
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
onl
y up
on c
ompl
etio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n.
N/A
20H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
27.5
F5
4.5/
1.8
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e no
tabl
e ad
vers
eco
nstr
uctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s ea
st c
row
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
efo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. The
tree
is s
till e
xpec
ted
to e
ndur
e an
y ill
effe
cts
of c
row
npr
unin
g w
ork
and
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity a
nd is
to b
e pr
otec
ted
by th
e in
itiat
ion
of th
e fo
llow
ing
inju
ry-m
itiga
ting
mea
sure
s:
1) A
n ar
boris
t is
to p
rune
bac
k on
ly th
ose
limbs
nec
essa
ry to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
tofa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity, i
n co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith q
ualif
ied
on-s
ite p
erso
nnel
, com
pris
ing
15-2
0% o
f its
ove
rall
crow
n;2)
Inst
all C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
at 2
.4m
eas
t of t
he tr
ees
base
, in
adva
nce
of a
ny s
ite c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity, a
s sh
own
onth
e T
ree
Inve
ntor
y &
Lan
dsca
pe R
emov
als
Pla
n; a
nd 3
) R
emov
e th
e ho
ardi
ng o
nly
upon
com
plet
ion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion.
N/A
19H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
30.5
F5
4.0/
2.4
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
to th
e w
est o
f the
wes
t sid
e of
the
exis
ting
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
It a
ppea
rs to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on w
ith m
uch
of it
s cr
own
exte
ndin
g ov
er th
e ro
oflin
e of
the
exis
ting
build
ing.
Ant
icip
ate
sign
ifica
nt a
dver
se c
onst
ruct
ion
effe
cts
upon
its
east
cro
wn
from
the
effe
cts
of c
row
n pr
unin
g w
ork
nece
ssar
y to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
to fa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity. T
he tr
ee is
stil
lex
pect
ed to
end
ure
any
ill e
ffect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
nof
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
, in
cons
ulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el,
com
pris
ing
appr
ox. 3
3% o
f its
ove
rall
crow
n; 2
) In
stal
l City
-app
rove
d ho
ardi
ng a
t 2.4
m e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
eof
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
only
upo
n co
mpl
etio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
.
17 of 50
Pre
par
ed f
or:
Qu
inn
Des
ign
Ass
oci
ates
Pre
par
ed b
y: R
edb
ud
Fo
rest
ry C
on
sult
ants
Ap
pen
dix
A -
Tre
e In
ven
tory
Dat
a -
St.
Law
ren
ce M
arke
t N
ort
h, T
oro
nto
Dat
e: A
pri
l 21,
201
6
Tag
N
o.
Tre
e N
o.
Co
mm
on
Nam
eS
cien
tifi
c N
ame
DB
H*
(cm
)C
on
d.*
*T
ree
Cat
.***
Dri
plin
e /T
PZ
T
ree
Co
nd
itio
n a
nd
Man
agem
ent
Rec
om
men
dat
ion
s
N/A
18H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
31F
54.
0/2.
4O
rnam
enta
l tre
e si
tuat
ed to
the
wes
t of t
he n
orth
wes
t cor
ner
of th
e ex
istin
g S
t. La
wre
nce
Mar
ket N
orth
bui
ldin
g. It
app
ears
to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d. A
ntic
ipat
e at
mos
t min
orad
vers
e co
nstr
uctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s ea
st c
row
n fr
om th
e ef
fect
s of
cro
wn
prun
ing
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
. The
tree
is e
xpec
ted
to e
ndur
e an
y ill
effe
cts
ofcr
own
prun
ing
wor
k an
d co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
and
is to
be
prot
ecte
d by
the
initi
atio
n of
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d to
faci
litat
e co
nstr
uctio
n ac
tivity
, in
cons
ulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el, c
ompr
isin
g le
ss th
an 1
0% o
f its
ove
rall
cro
wn;
2) In
stal
l City
-app
rove
d ho
ardi
ng a
t 2.4
m e
ast o
f the
tree
s ba
se, i
n ad
vanc
e of
any
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
, as
show
n on
the
Tre
e In
vent
ory
& L
ands
cape
Rem
oval
s P
lan;
and
3)
Rem
ove
the
hoar
ding
onl
y up
on c
ompl
etio
n of
all
site
con
stru
ctio
n ac
tivity
.
N/A
17H
oney
locu
stG
ledi
tsia
tria
cant
hos
22F
53.
0/1.
8O
rnam
enta
l tre
e si
tuat
ed to
the
wes
t of t
he n
orth
wes
t cor
ner
of th
e ex
istin
g S
t. La
wre
nce
Mar
ket N
orth
bui
ldin
g. It
app
ears
to b
est
ruct
ural
ly a
nd b
otan
ical
ly in
fair
cond
ition
exh
ibiti
ng a
wes
t lea
n to
its
crow
n as
a p
hoto
trop
ic r
espo
nse
to c
row
n co
mpe
titio
nw
ith n
earb
y tr
ees.
Ant
icip
ate
no a
dver
se c
onst
ruct
ion
effe
cts
upon
this
tree
due
to it
s su
ffici
ent d
ista
nce
from
are
as o
f site
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity a
nd p
rovi
ded
com
plia
nce
with
the
inst
alla
tion
of C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
, to
be in
stal
led
in a
dvan
ceof
and
for
the
dura
tion
of a
ll si
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity, a
s sh
own
on th
e T
ree
Inve
ntor
y &
Lan
dsca
pe R
emov
als
Pla
n. N
o cr
own
prun
ing
wor
k w
ill b
e re
quire
d to
pro
vide
ade
quat
e cl
eara
nce
for
hoar
ding
inst
alla
tion
and
to fa
cilit
ate
cons
truc
tion
activ
ity.
N/A
13Li
ttlel
eaf l
inde
nT
ilia
cord
ata
42.5
F2
3.0/
3.0
Orn
amen
tal t
ree
situ
ated
in a
cou
rtya
rd a
rea
to th
e no
rth
of th
e no
rthw
est c
orne
r of
the
St.
Law
renc
e M
arke
t Nor
th b
uild
ing.
Itap
pear
s to
be
stru
ctur
ally
and
bot
anic
ally
in fa
ir to
goo
d co
nditi
on e
xhib
iting
onl
y m
inor
cro
wn
dead
woo
d an
d a
com
pact
cro
wn
due
to c
row
n co
mpe
titio
n w
ith n
earb
y tr
ees
#11,
12,
14
and
16. A
ntic
ipat
e m
inor
adv
erse
con
stru
ctio
n ef
fect
s up
on it
s so
uthe
rntr
ansp
ort a
nd fe
eder
roo
ts in
con
junc
tion
with
exc
avat
ion
wor
k ne
cess
ary
to c
onst
ruct
the
nort
h fo
unda
tion
wal
l of t
he n
ew b
uild
ing
and
at m
ost m
inor
inju
ry to
its
sout
hern
cro
wn
in a
ssoc
iatio
n w
ith li
mite
d pr
unin
g w
ork
nece
ssar
y to
con
stru
ct th
e no
rth
wal
l of t
hest
ruct
ure.
Muc
h of
the
area
that
is to
be
exca
vate
d to
the
sout
h of
the
hoar
ding
is e
xpec
ted
to c
onta
in th
e ro
ot p
late
of t
ree
#14
and
not t
he r
oot p
late
of t
his
tree
. As
such
, thi
s tr
ee is
exp
ecte
d to
end
ure
any
root
and
cro
wn
inju
ry th
at m
ay b
e re
quire
d to
un
dert
ake
both
dem
oliti
on o
f the
exi
stin
g st
ruct
ure
and
cons
truc
tion
of th
e ne
w b
uild
ing
faci
lity.
It is
to b
e pr
otec
ted
thro
ugh
initi
atio
nof
the
follo
win
g in
jury
-miti
gatin
g m
easu
res:
1)
An
arbo
rist i
s to
pru
ne b
ack
only
thos
e lim
bs n
eces
sary
to p
rovi
de a
dequ
ate
clea
ranc
e fo
r ho
ardi
ng in
stal
latio
n an
d cl
eara
nce
from
the
build
ing
stru
ctur
e, in
con
sulta
tion
with
qua
lifie
d on
-site
per
sonn
el,
com
pris
ing
less
than
10%
of i
ts o
vera
ll cr
own;
2)
Inst
all C
ity-a
ppro
ved
hoar
ding
at l
ocat
ions
sho
wn
on th
e T
ree
Inve
ntor
y &
Land
scap
e R
emov
als
Pla
n, in
adv
ance
of a
ny s
ite c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity; a
nd 3
) R
emov
e th
e ho
ardi
ng o
nly
upon
com
plet
ion
of a
llsi
te c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity. A
per
mit
to in
jure
this
tree
will
be
requ
ired
due
to c
onst
ruct
ion
activ
ity e
ncro
achm
ent w
ithin
its
TP
Z.
* D
BH
: Dia
met
er a
t bre
ast h
eigh
t 1.4
M a
bove
gro
und
leve
l; c-
cop
pice
gro
wth
: the
tree
fork
s in
to tw
o or
mor
e st
ems
belo
w 1
.4m
and
the
stem
of t
he la
rges
t dia
met
er w
as m
easu
red.
4. T
rees
of a
ll di
amet
ers
situ
ated
with
in la
nds
desi
gnat
ed u
nder
City
of T
oron
to M
unic
ipal
Cod
e, C
hapt
er 6
58, R
avin
e P
rote
ctio
n
Pri
vate
ly-o
wn
ed T
rees
reg
ula
ted
by
the
Cit
y's
Pri
vate
Tre
e P
rote
ctio
n B
y-L
aw
** C
ondi
tion:
G-
Goo
d, F
- F
air,
P-
Poo
r
5. T
rees
of a
ll di
amet
ers
situ
ated
with
in th
e C
ity r
oad
allo
wan
ce a
djac
ent t
o th
e su
bjec
t site
.
3. T
rees
of a
ll di
amet
ers
situ
ated
on
City
ow
ned
park
land
with
in 6
m o
f the
sub
ject
site
.
2. T
rees
with
dia
met
ers
of 3
0 cm
or
mor
e, s
ituat
ed o
n pr
ivat
e pr
oper
ty, w
ithin
6 m
of t
he s
ubje
ct s
ite.
1. T
rees
with
dia
met
ers
of 3
0 cm
or
mor
e, s
ituat
ed o
n pr
ivat
e pr
oper
ty o
n th
e su
bjec
t site
.
***
Tre
e C
ateg
orie
s:
18 of 50
1 of 5
October 6, 2015 33-14337-002-ARC
via email
Ms. Sara Reid, CET Environmental Project Manager City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate Metro Hall, 2nd Floor 55 John Street Toronto, ON M5V 3C6
Dear Ms. Reid,
Subject: Environmental Sampling - Phase 2/3 Archeological Investigation 92 Front Street East, Toronto, ON
MMM Group Limited (MMM) was retained by the City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate Department (the “City”) to complete supplemental soil sampling and site observations during the Phase 2/3 Archeological Investigation at 92 Front Street East, Toronto, Ontario, (the “Subject Property”). The investigation was conducted by Golder Associates (Golder) under contract with the City. The location of the Subject Property is illustrated in Figure 1.
The purpose of the supplemental sampling is to assist in the further characterization of soil for offsite soil management during planned construction activities. This letter presents the findings of the environmental sampling prior to and during the Phase 2/3 Archeological Investigation.
Background
A 2006 environmental investigation [CRA 2006] identified concentrations of lead and several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exceeding the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE – now Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC)) Table 3 standards [MOE 2011] for industrial, commercial and community (ICC) land uses, which are applicable to the Subject Property. The contaminants were identified in soil at the northern (lead) and southern (PAH) portions of the Subject Property. A 2012 supplemental Environmental Subsurface Investigation [MMM 2012] included environmental sampling in association with a geotechnical investigation. The Environmental Subsurface Investigation didn’t identify further soil impacts or groundwater impacts. No methane was measured in the two subsurface vapour samples collected at the Subject Property.
19 of 50
City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate 33-14337-002-ARC October 6, 2015
2 of 5
In conclusion, the identified impacts from past investigations consisted of:
Concentrations of several PAHs at two boreholes (BH02-06 (0.61 to 1.22 m) and MW01-06 (0.61 to 1.22m), exceed the applicable MOECC Table 3 standards; and
Lead was detected at one borehole (BH05-06 (0.09 to 0.61 m)), at a concentration that marginally exceeded the applicable MOECC Table 3 standards.
The previous investigations included eight samples submitted for analysis of petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). These samples were recovered from various depths across the site and results indicated only very low concentrations of these contaminants in soil with no concentrations exceeding the most stringent MOECC Table 1 background standards. Therefore, PHCs and VOCs are not considered contaminants of concern at the Subject Property.
Phase 2/3 Trench Investigation
The Phase 2/3 Archaeological Investigation was completed at three pre-determined trench locations from August 31 to September 18, 2015. MMM field staff provided part-time site supervision during the soil excavation portions of the archaeological investigation and collected soil samples from the trenches to supplement the data collected during previous environmental investigations. The soil sampling was based on a judgemental sampling approach as identified in the then Ministry of the Environment document [MOE 1996].
Each trench was excavated by Petrie Contracting Ltd, measuring 1.0 m wide by 15.0 m long at the locations shown on Figure 2. The concrete floor was cut in the trench areas on August 31, 2015 and the slabs were removed from each area using a rubber tire backhoe fitted with a smooth edged/toothless bucket. The excavations of the three trenches were completed between September 1 and September 4, 2015. A MMM field person was onsite at times during the excavation works to observe site conditions and collect soil samples from each trench.
Seven soil samples were recovered and submitted for chemical analysis. Two soil samples were recovered from each of Trench 1 and Trench 2 with one sample representing fill material and one sample representing native soil from the deepest location of each trench. Three soil samples were selected from Trench 3; each sample represented fill material distributed to assist in the delineation of the previously identified contaminated fill.
Soil samples were placed into laboratory supplied sample jars, labelled with unique identifiers, and stored in a cooler for transport to Maxxam Analytics Inc. in Mississauga, Ontario for chemical analysis of metals, inorganics, and PAHs. Maxxam has been accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA). Certificates of Analysis are provided in Appendix A.
The three trenches were backfilled with the excavated soil on September 18, 2015 after the archeological investigation had been documented and was observed by MMM to be generally in reverse order of removal.
20 of 50
City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate 33-14337-002-ARC October 6, 2015
3 of 5
Discussion of Results
In general, soil composition at the three trench locations was similar. The overburden soils were classified as sand to silty sand fill material including rubble consisting of red brick, ceramics, rock and gravel. The fill layer was observed to extend from 0.13 to 1.17 m below grade. The fill rests on a stratum of native silty clay soil which includes trace to some sand and a trace of gravel. The trenches were advanced to a maximum depth of 1.6 m below grade. No groundwater was encountered during the excavation works.
The results of analysis from past and current investigations were compared to the MOECC Table 3 standards for ICC land uses. A summary of the soil impacts for the Subject Property is provided in Table 1. The results for metals, inorganics and PAH analysis are presented for all sampling locations in Table 2 (2006 results) and Table 3 (2012 and 2015 results). The spatial distribution of contaminants is shown on Figure 3.
Table 1: Summary of Soil Impacts
Sample Location
(Depth mbgs)
Parameter MOECC Table 3 ICC (ug/g)
Measured concentration
(ug/g)
BH02-06
(0.61 to1.22)
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b/j]fluoranthene
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
Fluoranthene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
Phenanthrene
0.15
0.67
0.96
0.3
0.96
9.6
0.96
9.6
0.1
9.6
0.76
12
4.8
7
23
23
28
14
10
17
4
55
15
31
MW01-06
(0.61 to1.22)
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b/j]fluoranthene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
0.15
0.67
0.96
0.3
0.96
0.96
0.1
0.76
0.34
0.84
2.5
2.2
2.7
1
0.4
1.4
21 of 50
City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate 33-14337-002-ARC October 6, 2015
4 of 5
Table 1: Summary of Soil Impacts
Sample Location
(Depth mbgs)
Parameter MOECC Table 3 ICC (ug/g)
Measured concentration
(ug/g)
BH05-06
(0.09 to 0.6)
Lead 120 140
Trench 1-A
(0.51-0.64)
Acenaphthylene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b/j]fluoranthene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
0.15
0.96
0.3
0.96
0.1
0.19
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.13
Trench 2-A
(0.51-0.64)
Conductivity (mS/cm) 1.4 2.6
Trench 2-B
(1.62)
Conductivity (mS/cm) 1.4 2.0
Trench 3-A
(0.71)
Acenaphthylene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b/j]fluoranthene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
0.15
0.96
0.3
0.96
0.1
0.76
0.27
2.0
1.8
1.9
0.18
0.99
Trench 3-C
(0.64)
Acenaphthylene
Benzo[a]anthracene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b/j]fluoranthene
Dibenzo[ah]anthracene
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
0.15
0.96
0.3
0.96
0.1
0.76
0.22
1.5
1.3
1.5
0.15
0.81
Samples of native soil were recovered at five locations and the concentrations of sampled parameters met MOECC Table 3 ICC standards. A comparison to more stringent standards indicates that not all native soil is suitable for use as inert fill (MOECC Table 1 background standards) or at a site accepting backfill (MOECC Table 2 residential, parkland or institutional standards) due to elevated values of electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio. Additional sampling would be required to segregate impacted native soil from soil that could be managed as inert fill.
22 of 50
City of Toronto, Facilities and Real Estate 33-14337-002-ARC October 6, 2015
5 of 5
Fill samples from 15 locations were submitted for analysis of metals, inorganics and/or PAHs. Results show that 45% of the fill samples are contaminated with concentrations of parameters that exceed the MOECC Table 3 ICC standard. Based on spatial distribution of these samples, they represent soil under approximately 60% of the building. Because the characteristics of the fill material appear to be similar at each sampling location, segregation of material would require extensive sampling at the time of remediation. Previous analysis indicated that the soil would be classified as solid, non-hazardous waste.
Previous estimates of soil quantities were based on two discrete contaminated areas. However, observations of the fill removed from the trenches suggest that segregation of impacted and non-impacted fill will not be feasible. An average thickness of fill of 1 m (observed to range from 0.6 m at the north end to 1.4 m at the south end of the building) under the entire building footprint would result in an estimated volume of 2,000 m3. If subsequent investigations (either archaeological or environmental) identify areas with different physical properties, additional sampling may be conducted to help refine the estimates of soil volumes requiring management as waste.
Conclusions
A review of the current and previous soil quality sampling programs at the Subject Property, indicated that fill material has been impacted by metals, inorganics and PAHs. The soil impacts appear to be present within silty sand fill material containing concrete and brick fragments that is present under most of the building. It is recommended that a quantity of 2,000 m3 of fill to be managed as waste be included in construction planning for the site.
Standard Limitations of this report are included in Appendix B. If you have any questions related to these soil quality results, please contact the undersigned.
Yours truly, MMM GROUP LIMITED
Carolyn Adams, P.Eng. Manager Environmental Management REFERENCES Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA), 2006. Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, 92 Front Street, Toronto, Ontario. Prepared for City of Toronto.
Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 1996. Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario.
Ministry of the Environment (MOE), 2011. Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.
MMM Group Limited (MMM), 2012. Environmental Subsurface Investigation, 92 Front Street East, Toronto, Ontario. Prepared for City of Toronto.
23 of 50
FIG
UR
ES
24 of 50
.
0 200 400 600100MetersJ:\
1442
Proje
cts by
Job N
umbe
r\201
4\33-1
4337
92 Fr
ont S
t\Map
ping\M
XD\Fi
gure
1 Site
Loca
tion.m
xd
Site Location
Client:
Title:
Prepared By:
Review: CIAScale as ShownDate: October 2015© Queen's Printer for Ontario Figure: 133-14337-002
City of TorontoLegend_̂ Site Location
© 2015 Microsoft Corporationand its data suppliershttp://www.bing.com/maps
25 of 50
.
0 10 20 305MetersJ:\
1442
Proje
cts by
Job N
umbe
r\201
4\33-1
4337
92 Fr
ont S
t\Map
ping\M
XD\Fi
gure
2 Site
Plan
.mxd
Site Plan
Client:
Title:
Prepared By:
Review: CIAScale as ShownDate: October 2015© Queen's Printer for Ontario Figure: 233-14337-002
City of TorontoLegend!( Sampling Locations (MMM, 2015)! Borehole (Alston, 2011)# Borehole (CRA, 2006)X Geotechnical Borehole (CRA, 2010)!A Monitoring Well (CRA, 2006)< Monitoring Well (Unknown Consultant & Date)? Vapour Well (MMM, 2011)
TrenchesProperty Boundary
© 2015 Microsoft Corporationand its data suppliershttp://www.bing.com/maps
26 of 50
.
0 10 20 305
Metres
J:\
14
42
Pro
jects
by J
ob
Nu
mb
er\
20
14\3
3-1
433
7 9
2 F
ron
t S
t\M
app
ing
\MX
D\F
igure
3 S
oil
Excee
dan
ce
s 1
1x1
7.m
xd
Soil Exceedances
Client:
Title:
Prepared By:
Review: CIAScale as Shown
Date: October 2015
© Queen's Printer for OntarioFigure: 3
33-14337-002
City of TorontoLegend
!( Sampling Locations (MMM, 2015)
! Borehole (Alston, 2011)
# Borehole (CRA, 2006)
X Geotechnical Borehole (CRA, 2010)
!A Monitoring Well (CRA, 2006)
< Monitoring Well (Unknown Consultant & Date)
? Vapour Well (MMM, 2011)
Trenches
Property Boundary
© 2015 Microsoft Corporationand its data suppliershttp://www.bing.com/maps
Jarv
is S
treet
Low
er J
arvis S
treet
Front Stre
et East
EC NA 0-0.61
Pb 38 0-0.61
ANTL 4.8 0.61-1.22
ATR 7 0.61-1.22
BaA 23 0.61-1.22
BaP 23 0.61-1.22
BbF 28 0.61-1.22
BP 14 0.61-1.22
BkF 10 0.61-1.22
CRY 17 0.61-1.22
DahA 4 0.61-1.22
FLA 55 0.61-1.22
IPYR 15 0.61-1.22
PHN 31 0.61-1.22
EC NA 0.61-1.22
Pb 95 0.61-1.22
ANTL 0.34 0.61-1.22
ATR 0.84 0.61-1.22
BaA 2.5 0.61-1.22
BaP 2.2 0.61-1.22
BbF 2.7 0.61-1.22
BP 1.3 0.61-1.22
BkF 1 0.61-1.22
CRY 2 0.61-1.22
DahA 0.4 0.61-1.22
FLA 5.6 0.61-1.22
IPYR 1.4 0.61-1.22
PHN 3.5 0.61-1.22
EC 1.2 0.64
Pb 42 0.64
ANTL 0.22 0.64
ATR 0.45 0.64
BaA 1.5 0.64
BaP 1.3 0.64
BbF 1.5 0.64
BP 0.62 0.64
BkF 0.47 0.64
CRY 1.1 0.64
DahA 0.15 0.64
FLA 3.4 0.64
IPYR 0.81 0.64
PHN 1.6 0.64
EC 1.2 0.71
Pb 48 0.71
ANTL 0.27 0.71
ATR 0.5 0.71
BaA 2 0.71
BaP 1.8 0.71
BbF 1.9 0.71
BP 0.8 0.71
BkF 0.66 0.71
CRY 1.5 0.71
DahA 0.18 0.71
FLA 4.5 0.71
IPYR 0.99 0.71
PHN 1.6 0.71
EC 0.67 0.64
Pb 17 0.64
ANTL 0.019 0.64
ATR 0.024 0.64
BaA 0.086 0.64
BaP 0.065 0.64
BbF 0.093 0.64
BP 0.039 0.64
BkF 0.039 0.64
CRY 0.073 0.64
DahA 0.0097 0.64
FLA 0.16 0.64
IPYR 0.047 0.64
PHN 0.068 0.64
EC 0.57 0-0.61
Pb 11 0-0.61
ANTL 0.012 0-0.61
ATR 0.011 0-0.61
BaA 0.053 0-0.61
BaP 0.045 0-0.61
BbF 0.06 0-0.61
BP 0.033 0-0.61
BkF 0.022 0-0.61
CRY 0.054 0-0.61
DahA 0.0087 0-0.61
FLA 0.092 0-0.61
IPYR 0.038 0-0.61
PHN 0.025 0-0.61
EC 1 1.22-2.13
Pb 14 1.22-2.13
ANTL <0.0050 2.13-2.74
ATR <0.0050 2.13-2.74
BaA <0.0050 2.13-2.74
BaP <0.0050 2.13-2.74
BbF <0.0050 2.13-2.74
BP <0.0050 2.13-2.74
BkF <0.0050 2.13-2.74
CRY <0.0050 2.13-2.74
DahA <0.0050 2.13-2.74
FLA <0.0050 2.13-2.74
IPYR <0.0050 2.13-2.74
PHN <0.0050 2.13-2.74
EC 1.2 1.6
Pb 9 1.6
ANTL <0.0050 1.6
ATR <0.0050 1.6
BaA <0.0050 1.6
BaP <0.0050 1.6
BbF <0.0050 1.6
BP <0.0050 1.6
BkF <0.0050 1.6
CRY <0.0050 1.6
DahA <0.0050 1.6
FLA <0.0050 1.6
IPYR <0.0050 1.6
PHN <0.0050 1.6
EC NA 0-0.61
Pb 140 0-0.61
ANTL 0.038 0-0.61
ATR 0.12 0-0.61
BaA 0.32 0-0.61
BaP 0.28 0-0.61
BbF 0.35 0-0.61
BP 0.19 0-0.61
BkF 0.13 0-0.61
CRY 0.26 0-0.61
DahA 0.05 0-0.61
FLA 0.62 0-0.61
IPYR 0.18 0-0.61
PHN 0.41 0-0.61
EC 1.2 0.61-1.22
Pb 84 0.61-1.22
ANTL <0.0050 1.22-1.83
ATR <0.0050 1.22-1.83
BaA 0.0095 1.22-1.83
BaP 0.008 1.22-1.83
BbF 0.01 1.22-1.83
BP 0.0065 1.22-1.83
BkF <0.0050 1.22-1.83
CRY 0.0095 1.22-1.83
DahA <0.0050 1.22-1.83
FLA 0.016 1.22-1.83
IPYR 0.0069 1.22-1.83
PHN 0.0068 1.22-1.83
EC 0.65 2.44-3.05
Pb 12 2.44-3.05
ANTL <0.0050 3.05-3.66
ATR <0.0050 3.05-3.66
BaA <0.0050 3.05-3.66
BaP <0.0050 3.05-3.66
BbF <0.0050 3.05-3.66
BP <0.0050 3.05-3.66
BkF <0.0050 3.05-3.66
CRY <0.0050 3.05-3.66
DahA <0.0050 3.05-3.66
FLA <0.0050 3.05-3.66
IPYR <0.0050 3.05-3.66
PHN <0.0050 3.05-3.66
EC 0.65 0.51-0.64
Pb 28 0.51-0.64
ANTL 0.19 0.51-0.64
ATR 0.28 0.51-0.64
BaA 1.2 0.51-0.64
BaP 1.1 0.51-0.64
BbF 1.3 0.51-0.64
BP 0.64 0.51-0.64
BkF 0.43 0.51-0.64
CRY 0.96 0.51-0.64
DahA 0.13 0.51-0.64
FLA 2.2 0.51-0.64
IPYR 0.74 0.51-0.64
PHN 0.69 0.51-0.64
EC 2.6 0.51-0.64
Pb 36 0.51-0.64
ANTL 0.016 0.51-0.64
ATR 0.02 0.51-0.64
BaA 0.081 0.51-0.64
BaP 0.068 0.51-0.64
BbF 0.094 0.51-0.64
BP 0.042 0.51-0.64
BkF 0.036 0.51-0.64
CRY 0.069 0.51-0.64
DahA 0.0094 0.51-0.64
FLA 0.16 0.51-0.64
IPYR 0.048 0.51-0.64
PHN 0.051 0.51-0.64
EC 2 1.63
Pb 9.4 1.63
ANTL <0.0050 1.63
ATR <0.0050 1.63
BaA <0.0050 1.63
BaP <0.0050 1.63
BbF <0.0050 1.63
BP <0.0050 1.63
BkF <0.0050 1.63
CRY <0.0050 1.63
DahA <0.0050 1.63
FLA <0.0050 1.63
IPYR <0.0050 1.63
PHN <0.0050 1.63
Parameter
Concentration (ug/g)
Depth (m)
EC 0.65 0.51-0.64
Parameter Acronym Standard (ug/g)
Conductivity (mS/cm) EC 1.4
Lead Pb 120
Acenaphthylene ANTL 0.15
Anthracene ATR 0.67
Benzo(a)anthracene BaA 0.96
Benzo(a)pyrene BaP 0.3
Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene BbF 0.96
Benzo(ghi)perylene BP 9.6
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BkF 0.96
Chrysene CRY 9.6
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene DahA 0.1
Fluoranthene FLA 9.6
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene IPYR 0.76
Phenanthrene PHN 12
Metals and Inorganics
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Standard: MOECC Table 3 Ful l Depth Generic Site Condi tion
Standards in a Non-potable condi tion for
Industria l/Commercia l /Communi ty (ICC) use with coa rse textured
soi ls .
<#: Not detected, parameter analyzed was below reporting l imit.
NA: Parameter not analyzed.
Notes : Red text indicates exceeda nces.
EC NA 0-0.61
Pb 17 0-0.61
ANTL <0.0050 0.61-1.22
ATR 0.007 0.61-1.22
BaA 0.03 0.61-1.22
BaP 0.029 0.61-1.22
BbF 0.037 0.61-1.22
BP 0.02 0.61-1.22
BkF 0.02 0.61-1.22
CRY 0.02 0.61-1.22
DahA <0.0050 0.61-1.22
FLA 0.056 0.61-1.22
IPYR 0.02 0.61-1.22
PHN 0.023 0.61-1.22
EC NA 0-0.61
Pb 34 0-0.61
ANTL <0.0050 0.61-1.22
ATR <0.0050 0.61-1.22
BaA <0.0050 0.61-1.22
BaP <0.0050 0.61-1.22
BbF <0.0050 0.61-1.22
BP <0.0050 0.61-1.22
BkF <0.0050 0.61-1.22
CRY <0.0050 0.61-1.22
DahA <0.0050 0.61-1.22
FLA <0.0050 0.61-1.22
IPYR <0.0050 0.61-1.22
PHN <0.0050 0.61-1.22
EC NA 0.61-1.22
Pb 40 0.61-1.22
ANTL 0.011 0.61-1.22
ATR 0.006 0.61-1.22
BaA 0.04 0.61-1.22
BaP 0.045 0.61-1.22
BbF 0.061 0.61-1.22
BP 0.04 0.61-1.22
BkF 0.02 0.61-1.22
CRY 0.03 0.61-1.22
DahA <0.0050 0.61-1.22
FLA 0.061 0.61-1.22
IPYR 0.04 0.61-1.22
PHN 0.013 0.61-1.22
EC NA 0.61-1.22
Pb 11 0.61-1.22
ANTL <0.0050 0-0.61
ATR <0.0050 0-0.61
BaA <0.0050 0-0.61
BaP <0.0050 0-0.61
BbF 0.005 0-0.61
BP <0.0050 0-0.61
BkF <0.0050 0-0.61
CRY <0.0050 0-0.61
DahA <0.0050 0-0.61
FLA <0.0050 0-0.61
IPYR <0.0050 0-0.61
PHN <0.0050 0-0.61
EC NA 0-0.61
Pb 7 0-0.61
ANTL <0.0050 1.2-1.8
ATR <0.0050 1.2-1.8
BaA <0.0050 1.2-1.8
BaP <0.0050 1.2-1.8
BbF <0.0050 1.2-1.8
BP <0.0050 1.2-1.8
BkF <0.0050 1.2-1.8
CRY <0.0050 1.2-1.8
DahA <0.0050 1.2-1.8
FLA <0.0050 1.2-1.8
IPYR <0.0050 1.2-1.8
PHN <0.0050 1.2-1.8
27 of 50
TAB
LE
S
28 of 50
Table 2: Summary of Analytical Results in Soil - 2006Metals, Inorganics and PAHs92 Front Street, Toronto, ON
BH04-06 BH05-06Sample ID BH1-0-2' BH1-2-4' BH2-0-2' BH2-2-4' BH3-0-2' BH3-2-4' BH4-2-4' BH5-0-2' MW1-2-4' MW2-0-2' MW2-2-4' MW3-0-2' MW3-0-2' (DUP) MW3-4-6'
0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 2-4 ft 0-2 ft 0-2 ft 4-6 ftDepth (m) 0-0.61 m 0.61-1.22 m 0-0.61 m 0.61-1.22 m 0-0.61 m 0.61-1.22 m 0.61-1.22 m 0-0.61 m 0.61-1.22 m 0-0.61 m 0.61-1.22 m 0-0.61 m 0-0.61 m 1.2-1.8 m
Sampling Date 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06 06/19/06
Antimony 40 40 0.2 ug/g ND NA ND NA 1 NA 2 2 2 NA 3 ND ND NAArsenic 40 18 1 ug/g 1 NA 1 NA 2 NA 2 1 3 NA 1 1 1 NABarium 1500 670 0.5 ug/g 23 NA 45 NA 60 NA 85 27 73 NA 56 14 16 NABeryllium 1.2 8 0.2 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NABoron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 2 0.05 ug/g 0.45 NA 0.65 NA 0.43 NA 0.58 0.73 0.99 NA 0.43 0.14 0.14 NACadmium 12 1.9 0.1 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NAChromium 750 160 1 ug/g 5.9 NA 13 NA 15 NA 17 5.5 12 NA 14 11 11 NAChromium VI 8 8 0.2 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NACobalt 80 80 0.1 ug/g 2.4 NA 4.4 NA 6.1 NA 6.6 1.7 3.7 NA 5.4 2.1 2.1 NACopper 225 230 0.5 ug/g 6.4 NA 12 NA 14 NA 16 4 20 NA 10 6.1 4.9 NALead 1000 120 1 ug/g 17 NA 38 NA 34 NA 40 140 95 NA 11 7 7 NAMercury 10 3.9 0.05 ug/g ND NA 0.08 NA 0.09 NA 0.12 0.08 0.26 NA 0.05 ND ND NAMolybdenum 40 40 0.5 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NANickel 150 270 0.5 ug/g 5.3 NA 8.6 NA 12 NA 13 3 7.6 NA 9.3 4 3.9 NASelenium 10 5.5 0.5 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NASilver 40 40 0.2 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NAThallium 32 3.3 0.05 ug/g ND NA ND NA ND NA ND ND ND NA ND ND ND NAVanadium 200 86 5 ug/g 9.7 NA 17 NA 25 NA 27 14 22 NA 25 10 9.2 NAZinc 600 340 5 ug/g 37 NA 61 NA 56 NA 54 95 79 NA 32 21 25 NApH (pH Units) NV NV - pH NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAConductivity (ms/cm) 1.4 1.4 0.002 mS/cm NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASodium Absorption Ratio 12 12 N/A N/A NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NACyanide, Free 100 0.051 0.01 ug/g NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAChloride NV NV - - NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NABoron (Total) NV 120 5 ug/g NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAUranium NV 33 0.05 ug/g NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Acenaphthene 1300 96 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA 1.1 NA ND ND 0.03 0.3 ND NA NA NA NDAcenaphthylene 840 0.15 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA 4.8 NA ND 0.011 0.038 0.34 ND NA NA NA NDAnthracene 28 0.67 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.007 NA 7 NA ND 0.006 0.12 0.84 ND NA NA NA NDBenzo(a)anthracene 40 0.96 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.03 NA 23 NA ND 0.04 0.32 2.5 ND NA NA NA NDBenzo(a)pyrene 1.9 0.3 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.029 NA 23 NA ND 0.045 0.28 2.2 ND NA NA NA NDBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene 19 0.96 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.037 NA 28 NA ND 0.061 0.35 2.7 0.005 NA NA NA NDBenzo(e)pyrene - - NV ug/g NA 0.02 NA 14 NA ND 0.04 0.18 1.4 ND NA NA NA NDBenzo(ghi)perylene 40 9.6 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.02 NA 14 NA ND 0.04 0.19 1.3 ND NA NA NA NDBenzo(k)fluoranthene 19 0.96 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.02 NA 10 NA ND 0.02 0.13 1 ND NA NA NA NDChrysene 19 9.6 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.02 NA 17 NA ND 0.03 0.26 2 ND NA NA NA NDDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1.9 0.1 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA 4 NA ND ND 0.05 0.4 ND NA NA NA NDFluoranthene 40 9.6 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.056 NA 55 NA ND 0.061 0.62 5.6 ND NA NA NA NDFluorene 350 62 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA 1.7 NA ND ND 0.034 0.28 ND NA NA NA NDIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 19 0.76 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.02 NA 15 NA ND 0.04 0.18 1.4 ND NA NA NA ND1-Methylnaphthalene 280 76 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA ND NA ND ND 0.014 0.11 ND NA NA NA ND2-Methylnaphthalene 280 76 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA ND NA ND ND 0.015 0.09 ND NA NA NA NDNaphthalene 40 9.6 0.0050 ug/g NA ND NA 0.6 NA ND ND 0.016 0.16 ND NA NA NA NDPhenanthrene 40 12 0.0050 ug/g NA 0.023 NA 31 NA ND 0.013 0.41 3.5 ND NA NA NA NDPyrene 250 96 0.005 ug/g NA 0.054 NA 47 NA ND 0.065 0.55 4.8 0.006 NA NA NA ND
Notes: 'NV ' : No Standard established NA: Parameter not analyzed
ND: Not detected, below reporting limit
100 Exceeds 2011 MOE Standard Value
100 Method Detection Limit Exceeds MOE Standard
MOE Table 3: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, " April 2011. Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition for lndustrial, Commercial, Community (ICC) Property Use with coarse textured soils.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
MOE 2011 Table 3 ICC Land Uses
REPORTING LIMIT Units
Metals and Inorganics
BH02-06BH01-06MOE 2004
Table 3 ICC Land Uses
MW03-06MW02-06MW01-06BH03-06
MMM Group Limited3314337
Page 1 of 106/10/2015
29 of 50
Table 3: Summary of Analytical Results in Soil - 2012 and 2015Metals, Inorganics and PAHs92 Front Street, Toronto, ON
BH101 BH101 BH101 BH101 BH102 BH102 BH102 Trench 1-A Trench 1-B Trench 2-A Trench 2-B Trench 3-A Trench 3-B Trench 3-C2-4 ft 4-6 ft 8-10 ft 10-12 ft 0-2 ft 4-7 ft 7-9 ft
Depth (m) 0.61-1.22 m 1.22-1.83 m 2.44-3.05 m 3.05-3.66 m 0-0.61 m 1.22-2.13 m 2.13-2.74 m 0.51-0.64 m 1.60 m 0.51-0.64 m 1.63 m 0.71 m 0.64 m 0.64 mMaxxam Job # B203093 B203093 B203093 B203093 B203093 B203093 B203093 AYA083 AYA084 AYA085 AYA086 AYA087 AYA088 AYA089Sampling Date 27-Dec-11 27-Dec-11 27-Dec-11 27-Dec-11 4-Jan-12 4-Jan-12 4-Jan-12 3-Sep-15 3-Sep-15 2-Sep-15 2-Sep-15 4-Sep-15 4-Sep-15 4-Sep-15
Antimony 40 0.2 ug/g 0.22 NA <0.20 NA <0.20 0.29 NA <0.20 <0.20 <0.2 <0.2 0.34 0.31 <0.2Arsenic 18 1 ug/g 1 NA 3.2 NA 1.2 4.3 NA 1.6 3.6 1.8 2.9 2.2 1.9 1.9Barium 670 0.5 ug/g 20 NA 97 NA 15 100 NA 31 140 67 260 63 21 55Beryllium 8 0.2 ug/g <0.20 NA 0.43 NA <0.20 0.5 NA <0.20 0.83 0.41 0.89 0.37 <0.2 0.3Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 0.05 ug/g 0.76 NA 0.19 NA 0.32 0.24 NA 0.54 0.3 0.47 0.47 0.51 0.21 0.55Cadmium 1.9 0.1 ug/g <0.10 NA <0.10 NA <0.10 <0.10 NA 0.28 <0.10 0.13 0.18 <0.1 0.21 0.12Chromium 160 1 ug/g 3.8 NA 21 NA 6.2 25 NA 18 32 20 32 18 16 16Chromium VI 8 0.2 ug/g <0.2 NA <0.2 NA <0.2 <0.2 NA <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cobalt 80 0.1 ug/g 1.3 NA 9.8 NA 2.4 13 NA 2.8 10 6.1 11 5.9 2.6 5.1Copper 230 0.5 ug/g 9.6 NA 31 NA 15 31 NA 8.9 28 17 26 20 7.4 16Lead 120 1 ug/g 84 NA 12 NA 11 14 NA 28 9 36 9.4 48 17 42Mercury 3.9 0.05 ug/g 0.16 NA <0.050 NA <0.050 <0.050 NA 0.19 <0.05 0.34 0.06 0.14 0.25 0.12Molybdenum 40 0.5 ug/g <0.50 NA <0.50 NA <0.50 <0.50 NA <0.50 <0.5 <0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50 <0.5Nickel 270 0.5 ug/g 2.1 NA 20 NA 4.1 30 NA 5.8 24 12 26 12 5.4 10Selenium 5.5 0.5 ug/g <0.50 NA <0.50 NA <0.50 <0.50 NA <0.50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50 <0.5Silver 40 0.2 ug/g <0.20 NA <0.20 NA <0.20 <0.20 NA <0.20 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20 <0.2Thallium 3.3 0.05 ug/g <0.050 NA 0.14 NA <0.050 0.2 NA <0.050 0.17 0.079 0.15 0.086 0.2 0.07Vanadium 86 5 ug/g 10 NA 27 NA 10 31 NA 12 44 25 41 24 <0.05 22Zinc 340 5 ug/g 34 NA 49 NA 25 58 NA 76 54 55 57 69 81 73pH (pH Units) NV pH 8.26 NA 7.76 NA 7.97 7.68 NA 8.02 7.74 7.73 7.46 7.94 7.95 8.01Conductivity (ms/cm) 1.4 0.002 mS/cm 1.2 NA 0.65 NA 0.57 1 NA 0.65 1.2 2.6 2 1.2 0.67 1.2Sodium Absorption Ratio 12 N/A 3.1 NA 3.2 NA 5.8 4.6 NA 2.2 7.7 5.8 11 3.4 1.9 5.5Cyanide, Free 0.051 0.01 ug/g <0.01 NA <0.01 NA <0.01 <0.01 NA <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Chloride NV - - NA - NA - - NABoron (Total) 120 5 ug/g <5.0 NA <5.0 NA <5.0 <5.0 NA 5.4 8.8 <5.0 7.9 6.8 <5.0 6.2Uranium 33 0.05 ug/g 0.18 NA 0.56 NA 0.24 0.53 NA 0.28 0.53 0.56 1 0.38 0.22 0.39
Acenaphthene 96 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.046 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.085 <0.0050 0.086Acenaphthylene 0.15 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.012 NA <0.0050 0.19 <0.0050 0.016 <0.0050 0.27 0.019 0.22Anthracene 0.67 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.011 NA <0.0050 0.28 <0.0050 0.02 <0.0050 0.5 0.024 0.45Benzo(a)anthracene 0.96 0.005 ug/g NA 0.0095 NA <0.0050 0.053 NA <0.0050 1.2 <0.0050 0.081 <0.0050 2 0.086 1.5Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.005 ug/g NA 0.008 NA <0.0050 0.045 NA <0.0050 1.1 <0.0050 0.068 <0.0050 1.8 0.065 1.3Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 0.96 0.005 ug/g NA 0.01 NA <0.0050 0.06 NA <0.0050 1.3 <0.0050 0.094 <0.0050 1.9 0.093 1.5Benzo(ghi)perylene 9.6 0.005 ug/g NA 0.0065 NA <0.0050 0.033 NA <0.0050 0.64 <0.0050 0.042 <0.0050 0.8 0.039 0.62Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.96 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.022 NA <0.0050 0.43 <0.0050 0.036 <0.0050 0.66 0.039 0.47Chrysene 9.6 0.005 ug/g NA 0.0095 NA <0.0050 0.054 NA <0.0050 0.96 <0.0050 0.069 <0.0050 1.5 0.073 1.1Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.0087 NA <0.0050 0.13 <0.0050 0.0094 <0.0050 0.18 0.0097 0.15Fluoranthene 9.6 0.005 ug/g NA 0.016 NA <0.0050 0.092 NA <0.0050 2.2 <0.0050 0.16 <0.0050 4.5 0.16 3.4Fluorene 62 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.044 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.083 0.0059 0.099Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.76 0.005 ug/g NA 0.0069 NA <0.0050 0.038 NA <0.0050 0.74 <0.0050 0.048 <0.0050 0.99 0.047 0.811-Methylnaphthalene 76 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.013 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.019 0.0057 0.022-Methylnaphthalene 76 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.012 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.018 0.0068 0.015Naphthalene 9.6 0.005 ug/g NA <0.0050 NA <0.0050 <0.0050 NA <0.0050 0.018 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 0.029 0.0079 0.027Phenanthrene 12 0.005 ug/g NA 0.0068 NA 0.0082 0.025 NA <0.0050 0.69 <0.0050 0.051 <0.0050 1.6 0.068 1.6Pyrene 96 0.005 ug/g NA 0.016 NA <0.0050 0.093 NA <0.0050 2.1 <0.0050 0.14 <0.0050 3.7 0.13 2.9
Notes: 'NV ' : No Standard established NA: Parameter not analyzed
100 Exceeds MOE Standard Value100 Method Detection Limit Exceeds MOE Standard
MOE Table 3: Ontario Ministry of the Environment, "Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, " April 15, 2011. Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition with coarse textured soils.
Sample IDMOE Table 3
ICC Land UsesREPORTING
LIMITUnits
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Metals and Inorganics
MMM Group Limited3314337
Page 1 of 106/10/2015
30 of 50
AP
PE
ND
IX A
– CE
RT
IFIC
AT
ES
OF
AN
ALY
SE
S
31 of 50
MAXXAM JOB #: B5H9978Received: 2015/09/04, 15:27
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Your Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
Report Date: 2015/09/15Report #: R3662049
Version: 1 - Final
Attention:Dan Neerhof
MMM Group Limited100 Commerce Valley Dr WestThornhill, ONCANADA L3T 0A1
Your C.O.C. #: 485210-09-01
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
Sample Matrix: Soil# Samples Received: 7
ReferenceLaboratory MethodDateAnalyzed
DateExtractedQuantityAnalyses
EPA 8270D mCAM SOP-003012015/09/14N/A7Methylnaphthalene Sum
R153 Ana. Prot. 2011CAM SOP-004082015/09/112015/09/117Hot Water Extractable Boron
OMOE E3015 mCAM SOP-004572015/09/142015/09/107Free (WAD) Cyanide
OMOE E3138 v2 mCAM SOP-004142015/09/14N/A7Conductivity
EPA 3060/7199 mCAM SOP-004362015/09/142015/09/117Hexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC (1)
EPA 6020A mCAM SOP-004472015/09/142015/09/117Strong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Carter 2nd ed 51.2 mCAM SOP-004452015/09/10N/A7Moisture
EPA 8270D mCAM SOP-003182015/09/092015/09/097PAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
EPA 9045 D mCAM SOP-004132015/09/142015/09/147pH CaCl2 EXTRACT
EPA 6010CAM SOP-001022015/09/14N/A7Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Maxxam Analytics has performed all analytical testing herein in accordance with ISO 17025 and the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in theAssessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. All methodologies comply with this document and are validated for use inthe laboratory. The methods and techniques employed in this analysis conform to the performance criteria (detection limits, accuracy and precision) asoutlined in the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.
Maxxam Analytics is accredited for all specific parameters as required by Ontario Regulation 153/04. Maxxam Analytics is limited in liability to the actualcost of analysis unless otherwise agreed in writing. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Samples will be retained at Maxxam Analytics for threeweeks from receipt of data or as per contract.
Remarks:
Reference Method suffix “m” indicates test methods incorporate validated modifications from specific reference methods to improve performance.
* RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.
(1) Soils are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise specified.
Page 1 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca32 of 50
MAXXAM JOB #: B5H9978Received: 2015/09/04, 15:27
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Your Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
Report Date: 2015/09/15Report #: R3662049
Version: 1 - Final
Attention:Dan Neerhof
MMM Group Limited100 Commerce Valley Dr WestThornhill, ONCANADA L3T 0A1
Your C.O.C. #: 485210-09-01
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager.Jolanta Goralczyk, Project ManagerEmail: [email protected]# (905)817-5751==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.
Total Cover Pages : 2Page 2 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca33 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF SOIL
N/A = Not Applicable
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
4186407N/A8.017.95-pHAvailable (CaCl2) pH
41852501.07.73.8-%Moisture
41853230.01<0.01<0.010.051ug/gFree Cyanide
41863700.0021.20.671.4mS/cmConductivity
41861240.2<0.2<0.28ug/gChromium (VI)
Inorganics
41799355.51.912N/ASodium Adsorption Ratio
Calculated Parameters
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-CTRENCH 3-BCriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/04 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA089AYA088Maxxam ID
N/A = Not Applicable
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
4186407N/A7.947.467.737.748.02-pHAvailable (CaCl2) pH
41852501.09.1175.8215.3-%Moisture
41853230.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.051ug/gFree Cyanide
41863700.0021.22.02.61.20.651.4mS/cmConductivity
41861240.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2<0.28ug/gChromium (VI)
Inorganics
41799353.4115.87.72.212N/ASodium Adsorption Ratio
Calculated Parameters
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-ATRENCH 2-BTRENCH 2-ATRENCH 1-BTRENCH 1-ACriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA087AYA086AYA085AYA084AYA083Maxxam ID
Page 3 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca34 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL)
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
41861190.0500.140.0600.34<0.0500.193.9ug/gAcid Extractable Mercury (Hg)
41861195.06957555476340ug/gAcid Extractable Zinc (Zn)
41861195.0244125441286ug/gAcid Extractable Vanadium (V)
41861190.0500.381.00.500.530.2833ug/gAcid Extractable Uranium (U)
41861190.0500.0860.150.0790.17<0.0503.3ug/gAcid Extractable Thallium (Tl)
41861190.20<0.20<0.20<0.20<0.20<0.2040ug/gAcid Extractable Silver (Ag)
41861190.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.505.5ug/gAcid Extractable Selenium (Se)
41861190.50122612245.8270ug/gAcid Extractable Nickel (Ni)
41861190.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.50<0.5040ug/gAcid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)
41861191.0489.4369.028120ug/gAcid Extractable Lead (Pb)
41861190.50202617288.9230ug/gAcid Extractable Copper (Cu)
41861190.105.9116.1102.880ug/gAcid Extractable Cobalt (Co)
41861191.01832203218160ug/gAcid Extractable Chromium (Cr)
41861190.10<0.100.180.13<0.100.281.9ug/gAcid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)
41861195.06.87.95.68.85.4120ug/gAcid Extractable Boron (B)
41861190.200.370.890.410.83<0.208ug/gAcid Extractable Beryllium (Be)
41861190.50632606714031670ug/gAcid Extractable Barium (Ba)
41861191.02.22.91.83.61.618ug/gAcid Extractable Arsenic (As)
41861190.200.34<0.20<0.20<0.20<0.2040ug/gAcid Extractable Antimony (Sb)
41862120.0500.510.470.470.300.542ug/gHot Water Ext. Boron (B)
Metals
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-ATRENCH 2-BTRENCH 2-ATRENCH 1-BTRENCH 1-ACriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA087AYA086AYA085AYA084AYA083Maxxam ID
Page 4 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca35 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (SOIL)
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
41861190.0500.120.253.9ug/gAcid Extractable Mercury (Hg)
41861195.07381340ug/gAcid Extractable Zinc (Zn)
41861195.0227.986ug/gAcid Extractable Vanadium (V)
41861190.0500.390.2233ug/gAcid Extractable Uranium (U)
41861190.0500.070<0.0503.3ug/gAcid Extractable Thallium (Tl)
41861190.20<0.20<0.2040ug/gAcid Extractable Silver (Ag)
41861190.50<0.50<0.505.5ug/gAcid Extractable Selenium (Se)
41861190.50105.4270ug/gAcid Extractable Nickel (Ni)
41861190.50<0.50<0.5040ug/gAcid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)
41861191.04217120ug/gAcid Extractable Lead (Pb)
41861190.50167.4230ug/gAcid Extractable Copper (Cu)
41861190.105.12.680ug/gAcid Extractable Cobalt (Co)
41861191.01616160ug/gAcid Extractable Chromium (Cr)
41861190.100.120.211.9ug/gAcid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)
41861195.06.2<5.0120ug/gAcid Extractable Boron (B)
41861190.200.30<0.208ug/gAcid Extractable Beryllium (Be)
41861190.505521670ug/gAcid Extractable Barium (Ba)
41861191.01.91.918ug/gAcid Extractable Arsenic (As)
41861190.20<0.200.3140ug/gAcid Extractable Antimony (Sb)
41862120.0500.550.212ug/gHot Water Ext. Boron (B)
Metals
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-CTRENCH 3-BCriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/04 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA089AYA088Maxxam ID
Page 5 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca36 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (SOIL)
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
418313510395979596-%D8-Acenaphthylene
41831359887919393-%D14-Terphenyl (FS)
41831359995969693-%D10-Anthracene
Surrogate Recovery (%)
41831350.00503.7<0.00500.14<0.00502.196ug/gPyrene
41831350.00501.6<0.00500.051<0.00500.6912ug/gPhenanthrene
41831350.00500.029<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.0189.6ug/gNaphthalene
41831350.00500.018<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.01276ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene
41831350.00500.019<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.01376ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene
41831350.00500.99<0.00500.048<0.00500.740.76ug/gIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
41831350.00500.083<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.04462ug/gFluorene
41831350.00504.5<0.00500.16<0.00502.29.6ug/gFluoranthene
41831350.00500.18<0.00500.0094<0.00500.130.1ug/gDibenz(a,h)anthracene
41831350.00501.5<0.00500.069<0.00500.969.6ug/gChrysene
41831350.00500.66<0.00500.036<0.00500.430.96ug/gBenzo(k)fluoranthene
41831350.00500.80<0.00500.042<0.00500.649.6ug/gBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
41831350.00501.9<0.00500.094<0.00501.30.96ug/gBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene
41831350.00501.8<0.00500.068<0.00501.10.3ug/gBenzo(a)pyrene
41831350.00502.0<0.00500.081<0.00501.20.96ug/gBenzo(a)anthracene
41831350.00500.50<0.00500.020<0.00500.280.67ug/gAnthracene
41831350.00500.27<0.00500.016<0.00500.190.15ug/gAcenaphthylene
41831350.00500.085<0.0050<0.0050<0.00500.04696ug/gAcenaphthene
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons
41799880.00710.037<0.0071<0.0071<0.00710.02576ug/gMethylnaphthalene, 2-(1-)
Calculated Parameters
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-ATRENCH 2-BTRENCH 2-ATRENCH 1-BTRENCH 1-ACriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/02 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
2015/09/03 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA087AYA086AYA085AYA084AYA083Maxxam ID
Page 6 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca37 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (SOIL)
Criteria: Ontario Reg. 153/04 (Amended April 15, 2011)Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground WaterConditionSoil - Industrial/Commercial/Community- Coarse Texture
QC Batch = Quality Control Batch
RDL = Reportable Detection Limit
41831359997-%D8-Acenaphthylene
41831359592-%D14-Terphenyl (FS)
41831359697-%D10-Anthracene
Surrogate Recovery (%)
41831350.00502.90.1396ug/gPyrene
41831350.00501.60.06812ug/gPhenanthrene
41831350.00500.0270.00799.6ug/gNaphthalene
41831350.00500.0150.006876ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene
41831350.00500.0200.005776ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene
41831350.00500.810.0470.76ug/gIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
41831350.00500.0990.005962ug/gFluorene
41831350.00503.40.169.6ug/gFluoranthene
41831350.00500.150.00970.1ug/gDibenz(a,h)anthracene
41831350.00501.10.0739.6ug/gChrysene
41831350.00500.470.0390.96ug/gBenzo(k)fluoranthene
41831350.00500.620.0399.6ug/gBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
41831350.00501.50.0930.96ug/gBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene
41831350.00501.30.0650.3ug/gBenzo(a)pyrene
41831350.00501.50.0860.96ug/gBenzo(a)anthracene
41831350.00500.450.0240.67ug/gAnthracene
41831350.00500.220.0190.15ug/gAcenaphthylene
41831350.00500.086<0.005096ug/gAcenaphthene
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons
41799880.00710.0350.01276ug/gMethylnaphthalene, 2-(1-)
Calculated Parameters
QC BatchRDLTRENCH 3-CTRENCH 3-BCriteriaUNITS
485210-09-01485210-09-01COC Number
2015/09/04 13:00
2015/09/04 13:00
Sampling Date
AYA089AYA088Maxxam ID
Page 7 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca38 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
TEST SUMMARY
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA083 Collected: 2015/09/03Sample ID: TRENCH 1-A
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA084 Collected: 2015/09/03Sample ID: TRENCH 1-B
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA085 Collected: 2015/09/02Sample ID: TRENCH 2-A
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Page 8 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca39 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
TEST SUMMARY
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA086 Collected: 2015/09/02Sample ID: TRENCH 2-B
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA087 Collected: 2015/09/04Sample ID: TRENCH 3-A
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA088 Collected: 2015/09/04Sample ID: TRENCH 3-B
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Page 9 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca40 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
TEST SUMMARY
AnalystDate AnalyzedExtractedBatchInstrumentationTest Description
Maxxam ID: AYA089 Collected: 2015/09/04Sample ID: TRENCH 3-C
Matrix: SoilShipped:
Received: 2015/09/04
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179988CALCMethylnaphthalene Sum
Suban Kanapathippllai2015/09/112015/09/114186212ICPHot Water Extractable Boron
Xuanhong Qiu2015/09/142015/09/104185323TECHFree (WAD) Cyanide
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/14N/A4186370ATConductivity
Sally Coughlin2015/09/142015/09/114186124IC/SPECHexavalent Chromium in Soil by IC
Grace Bu2015/09/142015/09/114186119ICP/MSStrong Acid Leachable Metals by ICPMS
Valentina Kaftani2015/09/10N/A4185250BALMoisture
Peggy Mclaren2015/09/092015/09/094183135GC/MSPAH Compounds in Soil by GC/MS (SIM)
Neil Dassanayake2015/09/142015/09/144186407ATpH CaCl2 EXTRACT
Automated Statchk2015/09/14N/A4179935CALC/METSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Page 10 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca41 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
GENERAL COMMENTS
Each temperature is the average of up to three cooler temperatures taken at receipt
6.7°CPackage 1
Results relate only to the items tested.
Page 11 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca
42 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
QC LimitsUNITS RecoveryValueDate
AnalyzedParameterQC TypeInitQA/QCBatch
50 - 130%912015/09/09D10-AnthraceneMatrix SpikePMC418313550 - 130%902015/09/09D14-Terphenyl (FS)50 - 130%912015/09/09D8-Acenaphthylene50 - 130%832015/09/09Acenaphthene50 - 130%882015/09/09Acenaphthylene50 - 130%832015/09/09Anthracene50 - 130%832015/09/09Benzo(a)anthracene50 - 130%822015/09/09Benzo(a)pyrene50 - 130%832015/09/09Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene50 - 130%772015/09/09Benzo(g,h,i)perylene50 - 130%812015/09/09Benzo(k)fluoranthene50 - 130%882015/09/09Chrysene50 - 130%852015/09/09Dibenz(a,h)anthracene50 - 130%902015/09/09Fluoranthene50 - 130%862015/09/09Fluorene50 - 130%832015/09/09Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene50 - 130%882015/09/091-Methylnaphthalene50 - 130%842015/09/092-Methylnaphthalene50 - 130%762015/09/09Naphthalene50 - 130%812015/09/09Phenanthrene50 - 130%892015/09/09Pyrene50 - 130%892015/09/09D10-AnthraceneSpiked BlankPMC418313550 - 130%872015/09/09D14-Terphenyl (FS)50 - 130%932015/09/09D8-Acenaphthylene50 - 130%822015/09/09Acenaphthene50 - 130%842015/09/09Acenaphthylene50 - 130%792015/09/09Anthracene50 - 130%812015/09/09Benzo(a)anthracene50 - 130%702015/09/09Benzo(a)pyrene50 - 130%852015/09/09Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene50 - 130%762015/09/09Benzo(g,h,i)perylene50 - 130%692015/09/09Benzo(k)fluoranthene50 - 130%822015/09/09Chrysene50 - 130%662015/09/09Dibenz(a,h)anthracene50 - 130%872015/09/09Fluoranthene50 - 130%852015/09/09Fluorene50 - 130%832015/09/09Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene50 - 130%842015/09/091-Methylnaphthalene50 - 130%822015/09/092-Methylnaphthalene50 - 130%752015/09/09Naphthalene50 - 130%792015/09/09Phenanthrene50 - 130%862015/09/09Pyrene50 - 130%932015/09/09D10-AnthraceneMethod BlankPMC418313550 - 130%872015/09/09D14-Terphenyl (FS)50 - 130%932015/09/09D8-Acenaphthylene
ug/g<0.00502015/09/09Acenaphtheneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Acenaphthyleneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Anthraceneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Benzo(a)anthraceneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Benzo(a)pyreneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Benzo(b/j)fluorantheneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Benzo(g,h,i)peryleneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Page 12 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca43 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT(CONT'D)
QC LimitsUNITS RecoveryValueDate
AnalyzedParameterQC TypeInitQA/QCBatch
ug/g<0.00502015/09/09Chryseneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Dibenz(a,h)anthraceneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Fluorantheneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Fluoreneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneug/g<0.00502015/09/091-Methylnaphthaleneug/g<0.00502015/09/092-Methylnaphthaleneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Naphthaleneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Phenanthreneug/g<0.00502015/09/09Pyrene
40%NC2015/09/09AcenaphtheneRPDPMC418313540%NC2015/09/09Acenaphthylene40%NC2015/09/09Anthracene40%NC2015/09/09Benzo(a)anthracene40%NC2015/09/09Benzo(a)pyrene40%NC2015/09/09Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene40%NC2015/09/09Benzo(g,h,i)perylene40%NC2015/09/09Benzo(k)fluoranthene40%NC2015/09/09Chrysene40%NC2015/09/09Dibenz(a,h)anthracene40%NC2015/09/09Fluoranthene40%NC2015/09/09Fluorene40%NC2015/09/09Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene40%NC2015/09/091-Methylnaphthalene40%NC2015/09/092-Methylnaphthalene40%NC2015/09/09Naphthalene40%NC2015/09/09Phenanthrene40%NC2015/09/09Pyrene20%02015/09/10MoistureRPDNS34185250
75 - 125%972015/09/14Free CyanideMatrix SpikeXQI418532380 - 120%982015/09/14Free CyanideSpiked BlankXQI4185323
ug/g<0.012015/09/14Free CyanideMethod BlankXQI418532335%NC2015/09/14Free CyanideRPDXQI4185323
75 - 125%902015/09/14Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)Matrix SpikeGBU418611975 - 125%1012015/09/14Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)75 - 125%1042015/09/14Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Boron (B)75 - 125%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)75 - 125%982015/09/14Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)75 - 125%1012015/09/14Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)75 - 125%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)75 - 125%1022015/09/14Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)75 - 125%972015/09/14Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)75 - 125%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Uranium (U)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)75 - 125%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)75 - 125%1092015/09/14Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)80 - 120%1062015/09/14Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)Spiked BlankGBU4186119
Page 13 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca44 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT(CONT'D)
QC LimitsUNITS RecoveryValueDate
AnalyzedParameterQC TypeInitQA/QCBatch
80 - 120%1032015/09/14Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)80 - 120%1032015/09/14Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)80 - 120%1032015/09/14Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)80 - 120%1172015/09/14Acid Extractable Boron (B)80 - 120%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)80 - 120%1032015/09/14Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)80 - 120%1042015/09/14Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)80 - 120%1032015/09/14Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)80 - 120%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)80 - 120%1022015/09/14Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)80 - 120%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)80 - 120%1012015/09/14Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)80 - 120%1022015/09/14Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)80 - 120%1002015/09/14Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)80 - 120%1012015/09/14Acid Extractable Uranium (U)80 - 120%1012015/09/14Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)80 - 120%1062015/09/14Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)80 - 120%1122015/09/14Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)
ug/g<0.202015/09/14Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)Method BlankGBU4186119ug/g<1.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)ug/g<0.502015/09/14Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)ug/g<0.202015/09/14Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)ug/g<5.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Boron (B)ug/g<0.102015/09/14Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)ug/g<1.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)ug/g<0.102015/09/14Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)ug/g<0.502015/09/14Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)ug/g<1.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)ug/g<0.502015/09/14Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)ug/g<0.502015/09/14Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)ug/g<0.502015/09/14Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)ug/g<0.202015/09/14Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)ug/g<0.0502015/09/14Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)ug/g<0.0502015/09/14Acid Extractable Uranium (U)ug/g<5.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)ug/g<5.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)ug/g<0.0502015/09/14Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)
30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Antimony (Sb)RPDGBU418611930%1.82015/09/14Acid Extractable Arsenic (As)30%2.42015/09/14Acid Extractable Barium (Ba)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Beryllium (Be)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Boron (B)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Cadmium (Cd)30%2.42015/09/14Acid Extractable Chromium (Cr)30%0.422015/09/14Acid Extractable Cobalt (Co)30%1.02015/09/14Acid Extractable Copper (Cu)30%1.72015/09/14Acid Extractable Lead (Pb)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Molybdenum (Mo)30%0.122015/09/14Acid Extractable Nickel (Ni)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Selenium (Se)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Silver (Ag)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Thallium (Tl)30%0.122015/09/14Acid Extractable Uranium (U)
Page 14 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca45 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT(CONT'D)
QC LimitsUNITS RecoveryValueDate
AnalyzedParameterQC TypeInitQA/QCBatch
30%2.12015/09/14Acid Extractable Vanadium (V)30%3.32015/09/14Acid Extractable Zinc (Zn)30%NC2015/09/14Acid Extractable Mercury (Hg)
75 - 125%902015/09/14Chromium (VI)Matrix SpikeSAC418612480 - 120%962015/09/14Chromium (VI)QC StandardSAC418612480 - 120%932015/09/14Chromium (VI)Spiked BlankSAC4186124
ug/g<0.22015/09/14Chromium (VI)Method BlankSAC418612435%NC2015/09/14Chromium (VI)RPDSAC4186124
75 - 125%1002015/09/11Hot Water Ext. Boron (B)Matrix SpikeSUK418621275 - 125%932015/09/11Hot Water Ext. Boron (B)Spiked BlankSUK4186212
ug/g<0.0502015/09/11Hot Water Ext. Boron (B)Method BlankSUK418621240%NC2015/09/11Hot Water Ext. Boron (B)RPDSUK4186212
90 - 110%1002015/09/14ConductivitySpiked BlankNYS4186370mS/cm<0.0022015/09/14ConductivityMethod BlankNYS4186370
10%0.412015/09/14ConductivityRPDNYS418637097 - 103%992015/09/14Available (CaCl2) pHSpiked BlankNYS4186407
N/A%0.872015/09/14Available (CaCl2) pHRPDNYS4186407
NC (Duplicate RPD): The duplicate RPD was not calculated. The concentration in the sample and/or duplicate was too low to permit a reliable RPDcalculation (one or both samples < 5x RDL).
NC (Matrix Spike): The recovery in the matrix spike was not calculated. The relative difference between the concentration in the parent sample and thespiked amount was too small to permit a reliable recovery calculation (matrix spike concentration was less than 2x that of the native sampleconcentration).
Surrogate: A pure or isotopically labeled compound whose behavior mirrors the analytes of interest. Used to evaluate extraction efficiency.
Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.
Spiked Blank: A blank matrix sample to which a known amount of the analyte, usually from a second source, has been added. Used to evaluate methodaccuracy.
QC Standard: A sample of known concentration prepared by an external agency under stringent conditions. Used as an independent check of methodaccuracy.
Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference.
Duplicate: Paired analysis of a separate portion of the same sample. Used to evaluate the variance in the measurement.
N/A = Not Applicable
Page 15 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca46 of 50
Maxxam Job #: B5H9978Report Date: 2015/09/15
MMM Group LimitedClient Project #: 33-14337-002-ARC
SLMN ARCHOLOGYSite Location:
VALIDATION SIGNATURE PAGE
The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).
Brad Newman, Scientific Specialist
Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.
Page 16 of 16
Maxxam Analytics International Corporation o/a Maxxam Analytics 6740 Campobello Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 2L8 Tel: (905) 817-5700 Toll-Free: 800-563-6266 Fax: (905) 817-5777 www.maxxam.ca47 of 50
Page 1 of 148 of 50
AP
PE
ND
IX B
– STA
ND
AR
D L
IMITA
TIO
NS
49 of 50
STANDARD LIMITATIONS
PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (PHASE II ESA)
These Standard Limitations form part of the Report to which they are appended and any use of the Report is subject to them.
Page 1 of 1 Revision 5, October 2013
1. EXCLUSIVE USE BY CLIENT
This Report was prepared for the exclusive use of the client identified as the intended recipient. Any use of the report by any other party without the written consent of MMM Group Limited is the sole responsibility of such party. MMM Group Limited accepts no responsibility for damages that may be suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this Report.
2. SCOPE, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
CONTRACT
The observations and investigations (hereinafter referred to as the “Work”) upon which this Report is based were carried out in accordance with the scope, terms and conditions of the contract or the proposal pursuant to which the Work was commissioned. The conclusions presented in the Report are based solely upon the scope of services described in the contract or the proposal and governed by the time and budgetary constraints imposed by them.
3. STANDARD OF CARE
The Phase II ESA was carried out in accordance with generally accepted environmental study and/or professional practices, industry standards and applicable environmental regulations. No other warranties are either expressed or implied with respect to the professional services provided under the terms of the contract or proposal and represented in this Report.
4. SCOPE OF THE PHASE II ESA
A Phase II ESA is conducted to obtain information about environmental conditions in the land or water on, in or under the subject property. This Report has been prepared based on information obtained at discrete borehole, test pit, monitoring well, or other (e.g., surface water) sampling locations. The conditions reported herein were those encountered at the subject property at the time the Work was performed and as present at the discrete sampling locations. Conditions
between sampling locations may be different than those encountered at the sampling locations and MMM Group Limited is not responsible for such differences.
5. REASONABLE CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions of the Phase II ESA regarding the environmental conditions at the subject property are based on the investigations conducted during the Work and information from other sources as may be indicated in the Report. The accuracy of information from other sources was not verified unless specifically noted in the Report, nor was it determined if the reviewed information constituted all information that exists and pertains to the subject property.
The conclusions made are based on reasonable and professional interpretation of the information considered. If additional information concerning environmental conditions of relevance to this Report is obtained during future work at the subject property, MMM Group Limited should be notified in order that we may determine if modifications to the conclusions presented in this Report are necessary.
6. REPORT AS A COMPLETE DOCUMENT
This Report must be read as a whole and sections taken out of context may be misleading. If discrepancies exist between the preliminary (draft) and final versions of the Report, the final version of the Report shall take precedence.
7. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
MMM Group Limited’s liability with respect to the Phase II ESA is limited to re-performing, without cost, any part of the Work that is unacceptable solely as a result of failure to comply with industry standards. MMM Group Limited’s maximum liability is limited in accordance with terms in the original contract, provided that notice of claim is made within regulated timelines as of the date of delivery of the Report.
50 of 50