ml, ses, sis/sms, sub nssd k-8 building teams...mari-linn summer reading brain rules by john medina...

2015-16 Building GoalsNSSD K-8 Building TeamsML, SES, SIS/SMS, SUB

Immediate Goal: Powerful Teaching and LearningBy May 2016, ML, SIS/SMS, SES,SUB will increase Powerful Teaching and Learning in our classrooms: All teachers will increase their level of proficiency based on the BERC Group STAR Power Strategies as reported in an overall STAR score by 40% from the baseline data collected by the BERC Group fall and spring.· Concepts & Processes

· Questions & Discussions

· Purpose & Expectations

· Environment & Differentiation

Board Goals: #1District Goals: #1Outstanding Schools:#2, #3, #4, #6

Mari-Linn

● Summer Reading○ Brain Rules by John Medina○ Teaching with the Brain in Mind by Eric Jensen

● PLC times● Learning Walks● Pedagogical Lesson Planning-across grade

levels and content areas● Tools for Me

SES

● Get up to speed myself with training and materials

● Professional Development - 10 modules○ Model Power Teaching & Learning (PTL)

● Learning walks○ Teachers are reflective on their Instructional Habits

SIS/SMS● Professional Development Staff Meetings/PLC Time

○ BERC Group 10 Modules● Old vs New Instructional Habits● Understanding the STAR Framework● Learning Walks● Four Instructional Habits

Intermediate Goal #1: SBAC

By May 2016, ML,SES, SIS/SMS SUB will increase our average percent proficient on the Smarter ELA and Smarter Math based on cohort performance from the 2014-15 school year.

Buildings will individualize goals based on performance on the 2014-15 cohort results. Decision making on appropriate goals may be difficult at this time as we do not have historical data to support indicators of how cohorts will perform.

Board Goals: #1District Goals:#1Outstanding Schools:#2, #5, #6,#7

SES: ELA

● District Performance Tasks K-3● Writing PD - Lucy Calkins● Leveled Literacy Intervention● Assessment Data

ELA OregonPercent Proficient

NSSDPercent Proficient

SES 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47% 43% 36% 47%

SES: Math

● PLC Work○ Data collection and analysis - Determine areas of improvement○ Adjust scope and sequence to meet SBAC time frame○ Math interventions after each unit

● District Performance Tasks

Math OregonPercent Proficient


SES 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47% 37% 26% 37%

SIS/SMS: ELAELA Oregon

Percent Proficient


SIS/SMS 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 43 36% NA

4th Grade 51 48 41% 42%

5th Grade 55 54 50% 47%

6th Grade 55 50 50% 55%

7th Grade 57 56 50% 55%

8th Grade 58 55 54% 55%

SIS/SMS: MathMath Oregon

Percent ProficientNSSDPercent Proficient

SIS/SMS 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 37 26% NA

4th Grade 45 41 33% 31%

5th Grade 42 45 38% 40%

6th Grade 39 46 34% 42%

7th Grade 43 38 33% 40%

8th Grade 43 37 27% 40%

SUB: ELAELA Oregon

Percent Proficient


SUB 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 43 68% 70%

4th Grade 51 48 62% 73%

5th Grade 55 54 59% 67%

6th Grade 55 50 53% 65%

7th Grade 57 56 77% 60%

8th Grade 58 55 63% 80%

SUB: MathMath Oregon


SUB2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 37 73% 70%

4th Grade 45 41 56% 77%

5th Grade 42 45 61% 60%

6th Grade 39 46 63% 65%

7th Grade 43 38 57% 67%

8th Grade 43 37 66% 61%

Mari-Linn: ELAELA Oregon

Percent Proficient


ML 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 43 39% 45%

4th Grade 51 48 56% 43%

5th Grade 55 54 65% 62%

6th Grade 55 50 47% 70%

7th Grade 57 56 46% 53%

8th Grade 58 55 47% 53%

Mari-Linn: MathMath Oregon


ML 2014-15Percent Proficient

*Goal 2015-16

3rd Grade 47 37 33% 45%

4th Grade 45 41 56% 40%

5th Grade 42 45 42% 62%

6th Grade 39 46 62% 50%

7th Grade 43 38 24% 68%

8th Grade 43 37 42% 30%

SIS/SMS Intermediate Goal #2: PBISIntermediate Goal #2 (SIS/SMS): PBIS

● Stayton Intermediate School will see a 5-7% increase of positive feedback in the areas of 7-11 on the Positive Behavior Support Survey.

● Stayton Middle School will see a 2-4% increase of positive feedback in the areas of 2, 5-7 and a 4-6% increase of positive feedback in the areas of 8-11 of the Positive Behavior Support Survey given to our students at the end of the 2015-16 school year.

● The survey will be given at the 18 week mark. The PBIS teams in both buildings will look at data and create action plans for the remainder of the year that will focus on weakness areas and create plans designed to finish the year. The survey will then be given again at the end of the year to determine final results.

District/Board Goal Support:

District Goal: #1

Board Goal: #1

Outstanding School Characteristic: #1, #2, #6, #7

Stayton Intermediate

Stayton Middle

Intermediate Goal #2: Staff Collaboration

By May 2016, ML, SES, SUB will increase the collective efficacy within our individual buildings as measured with our PACT and Collective Efficacy survey tools focusing on specific need as indicated by staff surveys.

Buildings will individualize their specific goals in this area using data collected on the PACT , TELL, and Purposeful Community Surveys.

Board Goals:#3, #4District Goals:#4Outstanding Schools: #2, #3, #4, #5

SUBArea of collaboration Sub-indicators Current data from 2014-

15 SurveysGoal for 2015-16

Student Intervention & EnrichmentScale -2 to 2

1.43 1.65

StandardsScale -2 to 2

~

1.47 1.7

Purposeful CommunityScale of 1 to 4

3.5 3.7

Mari-LinnArea of collaboration Sub-indicators Current data from 2014-

15 SurveysGoal for 2015-16

Reporting & AccountabilityScale -2 to 2

-agendas are prepared for each collaborative meeting and minutes are taken-identified priority standards

1.292 1.6

Goal SettingScale -2 to 2

-actions are guided and focused by SMART goals and are routinely revised based on data

1.25 1.5


-regularly review asset allocation.-effectively use assets to increase the impact of classroom practices.-intangible resourcesdifficult to measure- Leader capitalizes on intangible assets

3.0 3.5

SESArea of collaboration

Sub-indicators Current data from 2014-15 Surveys

Goal for 2015-16

Collaborative CultureScale -2 to 2

- Team building activities- Effectively communicate improvement plans - Work together - identify and implement new ways to help students achieve at higher levels

0.739 1.3

Shared VisionScale -2 to 2

- Create a school mission from the vision created last year

1.48 1.85


Optimal Score: 4Optimal Score: 1

- Identify outcomes that matter to all.- Teachers will be given opportunities to visit other classrooms.- PD aimed at student engagement.- Establishing a shared vision and mission. 2.74

1.673.241.30

Long Range Goal: Outstanding Schools

By June 2017, ML, SES, SIS/SMS, SUB will be considered Outstanding Schools that create future citizens, parents and an educated workforce that contribute to the community by preparing students academically and socially for success at the high school level based on DuFour’s 8 characteristics of an outstanding school:

● Safe and Orderly Environment● Climate of High Expectations for Student Achievement in a College-Going Environment● Dynamic Instructional Leadership● Collaborative work behavior with a focus on specific products● Clear and Focused Mission● Opportunity for to Learn for All● Frequent monitoring of student progress● Strong Community-Home School Relationships

Board Goals:#1, #2, #3, #4District Goals: #1, #3, #4Outstanding Schools: ALL

All● PBIS● PLC’s● Collaboration Grant● DELTA Force● Building/District Leadership Teams● Board, District and Building Goals● SIT Team● RTI● SPED Programs● DIBELS● PTC● Site Council● After School Program● Family Involvement Activities● LLI

ml, ses, sis/sms, sub nssd k-8 building teams...mari-linn summer reading brain rules by john medina...

Documents