mobat – micom - hfindustry.com · mobat – micom the best radio for worst events ... density...
TRANSCRIPT
MOBAT – MICOMMOBAT – MICOMThe best radio for worst events
Increasing Data ThroughputIncreasing Data Throughput Over HF links
Hana Rafi - CEO
Eder Yehuda - VP R&D
1
Traditional HF RadioTraditional HF Radio
- Analog voice & 50,75…bpsg , p
New Trends on HF
- Digital voice, Noise reduction…
- High Data Rate …19200…bpsQAM
High linearity, SNR ,Efficiency
2
Requirements from the New HF RadioRequirements from the New HF RadioFor HDR performance
-Linearity - ISI
High dyn range
-High efficiency
Small size-High dyn. range
-Low ACI & IBN
-Small size.
-High MTBFLow ACI & IBN
-High Power TX.
High MTBF.
-feasible.
3
HPA andHPA andHigh Data Rate (HDR)
Traditional TX Inter-Mod : 31dBHDR RX SNR Requirements : >33 dBq
PSD
31dBSNR
~30dB
Frequency
4
q y
micom Radiomicom Radio &HPA Solution
Linearized Power Amplifier :N MICOM C
TX PWR 125/175W 125W Availability
New MICOM Spec.
Current Spec. Achivments
TX PWR 125/175W… 125W AvailabilityInter-Mod >42 dB 30-32dB Data RateEffi i 45% 30% EEfficiency >45% 30% EnergyPWR con. 280 /390W 416W Size
5
Efficiency V.S. PAR
(Peak to Average Ratio)
efficiencyPower density CPFSKyprobability
nPSK
F K
nQAM
Power level0dbm5dbm
6
0dbm-5dbm
New HF Generation & New HF Generation & iimicommicom
HDR Road-MapHDR Road Map• n*ISB Radio, 125/175W and HPA
• HDR Modems 9600,19200…64K bps
• Enhanced STD-5066 email gateway (IP)
• Enhanced digital voice• Enhanced digital voice
7
Technical session onLinearized techniques & Achievements on
micom – radiomicom radio
Mr Yehuda EderMr. Yehuda Eder
Thank you , have a productive day
8
Problem descriptionob e desc p o
LinearPout
Non Linearity caused by:
• PA/transmitter linearization
PinPSD
• RGC – Receiver Gain Control• TGC/ALC – Transmitter Gain Control• D/A-A/D – Resolutions
L l O ill h i
ACIBBN
• Local Oscillators phase noise • Receiver/Transmitter BW• Group Delay Variation
Freq
BBN
ISIIBN
9
Freq.
Available SolutionsAvailable Solutions
Linear Power Transceiver :Linear Power Transceiver :
Linear Power Amplifier, Class-A or A/B with large backoff :Low efficiency high costLow efficiency, high cost
AGC, TGC,ALC : HELD (Input regulation based on average signal level should be held) )HF channel receive signal variations may cause problems to the receiver performance and the linearity.
Linearized Power Amplifier High Efficiency and IMD
10
RGC – Receiver Gain ControlTGC/ALC Transmitter Gain ControlTGC/ALC–Transmitter Gain Control
Special techniques for attack-release of p qGAIN CONTROL must be used.
GAIN
T > delta between 2 peaks
Data AGC
GAIN
Typical AGC
TIME
11
A/D –D/A Quantizing NoiseA/D D/A Quantizing Noise
Distortion & Noise in CODECs•Integral non-linearity•Differential non-linearity.•Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)Total Harmonic Distortion (THD).•Total Harmonic Distortion Plus Noise (THD+N)•Signal to Noise and Distortion Ratio (SINAD, or S/N+D).•Effective Number Of Bits (ENOB).( )•Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR).•Analog Bandwidth (Full Power, Small Signal)•Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR).•Two Tone Inter-modulation Distortion.•Noise Power Ratio (NPR).
12
Local/Synthesizer Oscillators phase noisey p
The synthesizer is the source of:yIBNBBN
Hi h iHigh noise near the carrier =
SNR degradation
13
Receiver/Transmitter BW
In band ripple
Group delay variances
14
PA characteristics - linear scalePA characteristics linear scale
15
“Typical” class AB PA characteristicsTypical class AB PA characteristics (measurements)
Power Gain Phase Transfer FunctionPower Gain Phase Transfer Function
16
PA linearity vs SNRPA linearity vs. SNR
MIL-STD188-141B Requirement: Intermodulation distortion (IMD).Intermodulation distortion (IMD).The IMD products of HF transmitters produced by any two equal-level signals within the 3 dB bandwidth shall be at least 30 dB below either tone for fixed station application, and 24 dB below either tone for tactical application.
The 24/30dB limits the SNR performance.
Summary Performance tests results: SNR IMD (below tone)
3445
3339
3133
2830
2424 2424
1920
1819
17
the IMD should be improved for better SNR
PA Linearization TechniquesPA Linearization Techniques
Power Amplifier Linearization Techniques:p q• Feed Forward • Pre-Distortion • EER – Envelope Elimination RestorationEER Envelope Elimination Restoration • Cartesian Feedback
O hOur approach: High Efficiency Class-AB amplifier with Cartesian Feedback & EER to achieve high linearity and high efficiency.
18
Linearization TechniquesFeed-forward
Linearization Techniques
Vi VoP. A.G1 1 21 1 2
Error
1G2 2
Amplifier
- High complexity- Wide BW - Low freq Range
19
- Low freq. Range
pre-distortionLinearization Techniquespre-distortion
Vo
F(*)linear
Vi
VoP. A.Vi iV
Predistorter
iV
Vm
F(Vm)
- High complexityVi Vm
High complexity- Wide BW - Low freq. Range
20
Digital adaptive pre-distortionLinearization Technique
Digital adaptive pre distortion
V oF (V m )
P . A .
D / A D / A
I \ QM o d .
L . O .
P o la r to C a r te s ia n
D / A D / A
Var. A
t
P re -d is to r tio nc a lc u la tio n
P h i(k T s)
I(k T s ) Q (k T s )P re d is to r te dA d a p tiv e
P re d is to r t io n
tt.
Adress
D a t a
L o o k -u p ta b leC a r te s ianto P o la r
I /Q (k T s )
A m p (k T )
A d a p ta tio n a lg o rith m
(A i,P h ii) n e w(A i,P h i i) o ld
\T a b le s
A m p (k T s)
I \ QD e m o d .
A / D
D o w nC o n v e r te r
I/Q (k T s )D e m o d u ta te d
21
D ig ita l e le m e n tsR F / a n a lo g e le m e n ts
Linearization TechniqueDigital Pre-distortion - Preliminary Results
Linearization Technique
22
EER (Envelope Elimination and Restoration)
Envelopemodulator
VDD
)(cos)( tttVtV ci VoP. A.Signal
separation
)(1 tVtS
)(cos2 tttS c
-High Efficiency
- limited performance
23
PA without AM- –AM loopto PMIpol=[-95 0 87 0] ; Qpol=0
PA Ch t i ti T T I t d l ti AM l
10
15
20
Gai
n
PA Characteristics
20
40Two Tone Intermodulation. - AM loop
green - Sourceblue - PAred - PA with linearizer
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80
5
Vin [Volt]
200
-20
0
Am
p [d
B]
-100
0
100
200
Pha
se [o ]
-60
-40
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8-200
100
Vin [Volt]
200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300-80
IM3 = 25 dBcAM loop improvement > 20 dB
24
AM loop improvement > 20 dB
PA with AM-to-PM ( 0 ÷ 25° ) – AM loopIpol=[-95 0 87 0] ; Qpol=[-75 0 0 0]
10
15
20
Gai
n
PA Characteristics
20
40Two Tone Intermodulation. - AM loop
green - Sourceblue - PAred - PA with linearizer
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.80
5
Vin [Volt]
G
180-20
0
mp
[dB
]
160
170
180
Pha
se [o ]
-60
-40A
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8150
Vin [Volt] 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300-80
IM3 = 25 dBcAM loop improvement =0 dB
25
For QAM modulation Cartesian loop is required
Analog Cartesian Loop - Block Diagramg p g
RF Out
Snom= 43 dBm
Smax= 50 dBm ; Smin= 30 dBm
Nmax= - 104 dBm / Hz
Closed loop, Narrowband (< 200 kHz)
AMPAMP Directional
CouplerLPFP Adigitalatten.15 dB
digitalatten.15 dB
L.O I/QModulator
-20 dB(17 dBm mixer)
(Syn)AMP
- 2 dB
AMP
SLO= 10 +/- 2 dBm
coup.(10dB)
splitter-6 dB
IREF
loop filter
loop filter
err_I
err_Q
+
+
-
I_Tx Q_Tx
QREF
FPGAD / A
D / A
LPF
LPF
I_TsQ_Ts
fs
12
12 RF components
I_dem Q_dematten.4 B
-
Offset andI / Q balance
compensation circuits
s pAnalog componentsDigital components
I/Q DeMod.digitalatten.15 dB
atten.10 dB
atten.5 dB
(17 dBm mixer)AMP
26
Analog Cartesian Loop Performance
27
Micom Linearization solution EER & Cartesian loopEER & Cartesian loop
DCP.S.
LPF
Envelope
LPF28 / 48 VDC
110 VAC (option)
PIN =1 WattSignal Processing
Unit
P A
Harmonicfilter
PTX =500 Watt
Phase modulated RF
RF modulated-to-Polar
Cartesian Linearization(complex closed loop)
Unit
DC feedback
Att.
28
Micom – Radio implementation
DCP.S.
LPFReconst.
Envelope followerDigital
BB
DSP/
Var.Att. P A
14
12
Exc.D/A
S
IF1=1.05 MHzDigital
IF
BPFBPF
Bi-directionalIF amp.
1.6 - 30MHz
Harmonicfilter
IF2 = 45.1 MHz
Tx. ALC(fine + course)
BW= 12.1 KHz
FPGA
BW= 12.1 KHzIF2 = 1.05 MHz
Synt. Synt. Att.
Att.
Finj=46.15 MHz Finj=46.7 - 75.1 MHzstep=1.25 KHz step=8.75 KHz
fs= 20 MHz
R AGCPre-
LNA
BPF
Finj=430.77 kHz
BPFLPF
Digital
BW= 400 KHzanti-alias IF2= 45.1 MHz
IF1=5 MHz
Rec. AGC Sel.
Var.Att.
Var.Att.
BPF
anti-aliasBW= 3 KHzIF2 = 20 kHz
14
A/DIF Tx. ALC Tx. ALC(course)(fine + course)
29
fs=20 MHz
Micom – Digital part implementation DSP/FPGA
Envelopefollower
LPF
14 Digital BB
Envelopegenerator
Cartesian feedbackSSB
d
ALE
ITx(kT)Iref(kT)
BPF
fs= 4 - 5 MHz
14IF=4.5 - 5 MHz
Digital IF
fs= 15 - 20 MHz
14
codecAudioAmp.
I/Qmod.
NCO
Freq.compensation
Loopfilter
Errordetector
mod.vocoder
Tx
QTx(kT)Qref(kT)
Datamodem
Data sourcesanti-alias
codecAudioAmp.
Audiosources
BPF
BPF
TGC
TGC
Phasegen.
NCO(/PLL)
Ifbck(kT) Qfbck(kT)
Data
Data targets
LPFcodecAudio
circ.
REF clk
14
Digital IFLPF
reconstruction
codecAudiocirc. I/Q
demod.vocoder
ALE
SSBdemod.
BPF Noiseblanker
Audiotargets
Datamodem AGCreconstruction
IF1= 4.5 - 5 MHzf 4 0 5 MH
AudiopowerAmp. CPU
Multiport RS232USB port
Ethernet portMMI
AGCIF2= 20 kHz
fs1=4.0 - 5 MHz
fs2=100 - 200 kHz
30
USB port MMIH/W control
Micom simulation results
40Two Tone Intermodulation. - Complex loop
Micom simulation results
0
20
green - Sourceblue - PAred - PA with linearizer
-40
-20
Am
p [d
B]
200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300-80
-60
200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300
IM3 = 20 dBcComplex loop improvement ~ 25 dB
31
Two complex tones - baseband spectrumTwo complex tones baseband spectrumf1 = -30 Hz, f2 = 25 Hz
32
Two complex tones - I/Q plotp Q p)2sin()2sin()( 21 tfatfatI
)2/2sin()2/2sin()( 21 tfatfatQ
33
Single tone (modulating signal) I/Q plotSingle tone (modulating signal) I/Q plot
34
Non-Linear PA
35
Micom Simulation
36
Linearized PALinearized PA
37
Single tone time waveforms (RF or modulating signal)
38
I/Q plotQ p
39
Micom Short and Long term solutions
40
Thank you
41
micommicom HDR-ISB coco SSystem Solution
micom – 2*ISB Radio 125/175W
d f 500 4000 Wready for 500-4000 W
micom MD 9600/19200micom – MD-9600/19200
STD-5066 email gateway g yJITC @ Q1-Q2 2005
42