mobile communications topic 12 link budget interference

Upload: santosh-kumar

Post on 02-Jun-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    1/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Mobile Communications

    Jose Antonio Portilla Figueras

    September 29, 2009

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    2/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Agenda

    Topic 1: Fundamental of Cellular Radio Networks

    1 General Concepts of Telecommunication Networks2 Link Budget and Interference

    3 Experimental Propagation Models for Cellular Radio

    Networks

    4 Basic Traffic Concepts

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    3/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Environment is not perfect....

    There are several effects that could affect the qualityexperienced by the end user in a mobile communication system

    Noise

    From external sources.

    From the receiver.

    Interference experienced at the receiver

    Co-channel interferer: other MS transmit at same frequency (frequency reuse) as the receiver listens.

    Adjacent interferer: other MS uses adjacent frequencies for transmissio.

    Fading

    Due to mobile channel effects: houses .

    Multipath Shadowing.

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    4/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Link Budget

    Link budgets are used to calculate the coverage or cell range inthe UL and in the DL.

    BTS use higher power that mobile.

    TOTAL Coverage= Minimum (coverage in DL, coverage in UL)

    For this reason, the coverage in UL is always the limiting factor.

    The minimum performance requirements regarding the BTSreceiver and the MS receiver are fixed by the standardizationbodies.

    This minimum performance requirements determine the MS andBTS receiver sensitivity.

    Example from 3GPP for TU50iFH for EDGE in 900Mhz bandand Coding MCS5 BLER 10%

    BTS receiver sensitivity= -97dBm.

    MS receiver sensitivity= -94dBm

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    5/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Link Budget

    Receiver sensitivity (minimum accepted received signal level) for BTSand MS are specified in the standard 3GPP:

    For frequency bandFor different channels Typical urban, rural areaFor the queality levelSNR.

    Receiver Sensibility=SNR+Noise.Noise=Thermal Noise+Noise Bandwidth+Fr

    Thermal Noise = -174dBm / Hz.

    Noise Bandwidth (depends on the receiver filter) typical value forGSM 52.6 dB.

    Noise Figure, typicall value 5 dB.

    Typical noise value at the receiver filter output = -116.4 dBm

    The receiver sensitivity determine the maximum allowed pathloss and

    hence, the maximum cell range

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    6/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Link Budget

    General Link Budget Equation

    PTX+

    G L LPathloss=SRXWhere

    PTX: Transmitter Power.

    G: Gain of the diff

    erent equipment (dB).L: Losses of the different equipment (dB).

    SRX: Receiver Sensibility.

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    7/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Link Budget

    Free Space Pathloss

    LFreePathloss= 32 + 20Log(f) + 20Log(d)

    Where

    f: Frequency in MHz.

    d: Distance in Km.

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    8/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Propagation Models

    We have obtained previously the values for the total pathloss and our first estimation of the range using the freespace formulation.

    However it is straight forward to see that we are not in afree space environment so we have to study some other

    methods.Propagation methods may be classified into two maincategories:

    Theoretical Models: They come from theoreticalsimulations and mathematical studies.

    Simulation of Wave Propagation.Ray Theory.

    Experimental models: They come from measures in realworld

    COST 231 Hata ModelCOST 231 Walkfish Ikegami.PCS

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    9/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    COST 231 - Hata Model

    Path loss estimation is performed by empirical models ifland cover is known only roughly, and the parametersrequired for semi-deterministic models cannot bedetermined.

    One of the most extended model is the Okumura Hata.This model was developed by Y. Okumura using a set ofequation which required to go to a large set of curvesobtained from empirical measurements.

    M. Hata performs the first extension of this equations.

    The model is based in four parameters

    1 Frequency f (MHz).2 Distance d (Km).3 BTS antenna height hBTS (m).4 Mobile antenna height hMobile (m).

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    10/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    COST 231 - Hata Model

    The basic transmission loss Lbcan be calculated asfollows.

    Lb= 66.95 + 26.16Log(f)13.82Log(hBTS)a(hMobile)+(44.95

    6.55Log(hBTS))Log(d)

    Where:

    a(hMobile) = (1.1logf 0.7)hMobile (1.56log(f) 0.8)

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    11/35

    Mobile Com-

    munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    COST 231 - Hata Model

    The model is restricted to:

    f : 150...1000MHzhBTS : 30...200m.hMobile : 1...10m.d : 1...20Km

    COST 231 has extended Hatas model to the frequencyband 1500

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    12/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - Hata Model

    Lb= 46.3 + 33.9Log(f)

    13.82

    Log(hBTS)a(hMobile)+(44.95 6.55Log(hBTS))Log(d) +Cm

    Where a(hMobile) is defined as in the previous model and Cm:

    Cm =

    0dB for medium sized cities and suburban centres3dB for metropolitan centres

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    13/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - Hata Model

    The model is restricted to:

    f : 150...2000MHzhBTS : 30...200m.hMobile : 1...10m.d : 1...20Km

    The application of the COST-Hata-Model is restricted to

    large and small macro-cells,

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    14/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    COST 231 proposed a combination of the Walfisch andIkegami model that is called theCOST-Walfisch-Ikegami-Model (COST-WI).It calculates improved path-loss estimation byconsideration of more data to describe the character of the

    urban environment:Heights of buildings hRoof.Widths of roads wbuilding separation broad orientation with respect to the direct radio path .

    Note that although we use some special values this modelis still statistical because we only use characteristic values.

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    15/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    The model distinguishes between line-of-sight (LOS) andnon-line-of-sight (NLOS) situations.

    In the LOS case -between base and mobile antennas

    within a street canyon - a simple propagation loss formuladifferent from free space loss is applied.

    The loss is based on measurements performed in the cityof Stockholm

    COST 231 - WI for LOS

    Lb= 42.6 + 26Log(d) + 20Log(f) for d 20m

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    16/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    In the NLOS-case the basic transmission loss Lb iscomposed of the terms:

    Free space loss L0,

    Multiple screen diffraction loss LmsdRoof-top-to-street diffraction and scatter loss Lrts.

    COST 231 - WI for LOS

    Lb=

    L0+Lrts+Lmsd Lrts+Lmsd>0L0 Lrts+Lmsd 0

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    17/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    Lets study the diff

    erent terms that composes the model

    The term Lrtsdescribes the coupling of the wave along themultiple path into the street where the mobile terminal is

    located, that is, the roof-top-to-street diffraction andscatter loss.

    Lrts= 16.9 10Log(w)+10Log(f) + 20Log(hMobile) +LOri

    hMobile=hRoof hMobilehBase=hBase hRoof

    The values for LOriand its explanation are in the following

    slide

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    18/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    LOri=

    10 + 0.354 0 352.5 + 0.075( 35) 35 554.0 + 0.114

    ( 55) 55 90

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    19/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    Now we have to deal with the effect of the multi screendiffraction, that is, Lmsd.

    This part of the model is usually used when the antennaheight of the BTS is below the roof-top.

    Lmsd=Lbsh+ka+kdLog(d) +kf Log(f) 9Log(b)

    Where:

    Lbsh =

    18Log(1 + hBase) hBase>hRoof0 hBase hRoof

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    20/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    The term ka represents the increase of the path loss forbase station antennas below the roof tops of the adjacentbuildings.

    ka =

    54 hBase>hRoof

    54 0.8 hBase d 0.5 hBase hRoof54 0.8 hBase d0.5 d

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    21/35

    Mobile Com-

    municationsJose Antonio

    PortillaFigueras

    COST 231 - WI Model

    The terms kd and kfcontrol the dependence of themulti-screen diffraction loss versus distance and radiofrequency, respectively.

    kd =

    18 hBase>hRoof18 15 hBase

    hRoofhBase hRoof

    kf =

    0.7( f925 1) Medium sized cities and suburban

    1.5( f925 1) Metropolitan centers

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    22/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    COST 231 - WI Model: We are finishing

    An important problem in this method is to obtain values of thedifferent parameters.

    Note that is most cases these models are used to perform studies inseveral and quite different cities, and hence not all parameters areknow.

    If the data on the structure of buildings and roads are unknown thefollowing default values are recommended:

    Recommended Values

    hRoof = 3(Number of floors) + (roof height)

    (roof height) =

    3 pitched0 flat

    b= 20...50.w=b/2= 90

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    23/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    COST 231 - WI Model: The last slide

    Conditions

    The model is restricted to:f : 800...2000MHzhBTS : 4...50m.hMobile : 1...4m.d : 0.02...5Km

    C

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    24/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Interference Calculations

    When number of users start to increase (higher traffic) itis needed to calculate the interference in the system inorder to know if the quality criteria are fulfil.

    So we have to two factors to analyze.

    Receiver sensibility that comes from the SNR of the serviceand the Noise.Carrier to Interference ratio C/I.

    In urban environments the C/I will be often the limitingfactor

    I f C l l i

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    25/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Interference Calculations

    We would like to evaluate C/I en certain position.

    C= carrier power.

    I= Interference power.

    We may have two situations

    Interference downlink: Received by the MS and generatedby transmission of other BTS using same frequencies(cochannel).Interference uplink : Received by BTS listening to certainMS. Interference generated by other MS (located in othercells) using same frequencies (cochannel).

    It is straight forward to see that the most dominant one will be the

    downlink.There are two ways to evaluate that we fulfill the quality criteria:

    C/I> C/I threshold where C/I threshold is the designcriteria at the end of the cell that result in certain quality.Prob(C/I>C/I threshold),

    p example: 90 % (More

    Exact)

    I f C l l i

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    26/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Interference Calculations

    This illustration shows the C over I calculation scenario.

    I t f C l l ti

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    27/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Interference Calculations

    Interference Equations

    I = 6 PTD

    + 6 PT(

    3D)+ 6 PT(2D)

    C = PTR

    Where:

    I: Interference power.

    C: Carrier power

    D: Reuse distance.

    : Power depravement ratio.

    R: Cell Range.

    Only considered three circumferences over the target cell.

    I t f C l l ti

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    28/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Interference Calculations

    The minimum physical distance between two transmittersusing the same frequency required to achieve certain linkquality is denoted at Reuse Distance, D.

    Note the influence ofD

    with

    .Values of

    Free space propagation = 2.

    In mobile communications = 3 5

    = 3 correspond with rural areas.

    = 5 correspond with high-rise buildings areas.

    R s All ti

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    29/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation

    Our most scarce resource is the frequency.

    In figure above the coverage area is organized in 4 groupsof 7 cells marked in different colors Cluster.

    Each MS will connect with a BTS depending on thelocation

    In this case each BTS has been located in the middle ofthe cell, using Omni directional antenna.

    Resource Allocation

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    30/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation

    Each BTS is able to use n frequencies

    The total number of frequencies is 7n

    Frequencies are reused in neighboring clusters

    Example number of frequencies

    In the 900 MHz band the bandwidth for GSM is 25 MHz,divided by 3 operators it is about 8 MHz.

    This means 40 different frequencies (GSMBW= 200KHz)for each operator.

    Hence about 5 frequencies will be assigned for each cell.

    Resource Allocation

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    31/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation

    If we have Nfrequencies available, each cell can use N/Kwhere K is the size of the group

    We define frequency reuse factor as Reuse= K where

    K is number of cells that belong to same cluster.

    Reuse factor or cluster size is a compromise betweencapacity and quality

    Small reuse factors result in high interference & highcapacity (more channels)High reuse factors result in low interference & low capacity(less channels)

    Resource Allocation

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    32/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation

    If we have Cavailable channels, we divide them into Kgroups of approximately equal size.

    Each BTS will have assigned a group ofnf = CK.The number nf is orientation of the capacity of the system

    Channel could not be reused in a cell that is to closebecause is needed to maintain quality requirements and we

    saw that Reuse Distance=f(S.I.R required))

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    33/35

    Resource Allocation

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    34/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation

    Symmetric cell plans exist for K = 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 12, .

    Formulation for the Cluster definition

    K = (i+j)2 i

    j i,j= 0, 1, 2, 3...

    It is possible to demonstrate that the distance D betweentwo cells with the same channels is.

    6 Closest channels, distance D.Next circumference, other 6 cochannels

    3D

    Next circumference, 2D.

    Resource Allocation additional information

  • 8/10/2019 Mobile Communications Topic 12 Link Budget Interference

    35/35

    Mobile Com-munications

    Jose AntonioPortilla

    Figueras

    Resource Allocation, additional information

    In the previous examples the BTS was located in themiddle of the cell using an omni directional antenna.

    In urban environments and indoor coverage is more

    complicated and BTS usually use directive antennas.

    In this way the cell is divided typically in three Sectors

    Each antenna reaching 120.

    Each sector has its own frequency set and it is basically a

    cell.In highways typically cells with 2 sectors are used (180).