mock trial advocacy memorial (defence)

8/18/2019 MOCK TRIAL ADVOCACY MEMORIAL (DEFENCE)

1/26

2nd UILMS INTRA COLLEGE MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2014

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, DELHI

UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955

IN THE MATTER OF

DR. ASHMIT SINHA

(Pe!!"ne#$

Vs.

MRS. %ANSHI&A SINHA

(Re'"nden$

MEMORIAL SU)MITTED ON )EHALF OF RESPONDENT

COUNSELS FOR THE RESPONDENT

-Memorial submitted on behalf of Respondent-


2/26

TA)LE OF CONTENTS

Inde* "+ A-"#!!e'

o Cases

o Books and Websites

L!' "+ A#e/!!"n'

Seen "+ J#!'d!!"n

Seen "+ F'

I''e' +"# Ad3d!!"n

S# "+ A#en'

Arguments Advanced

P#e#



3/26

LIST OF AUTHORITIES

CASES

1. Bhagwan Dtt !s "a#$a De!i And An% on 1& O'tobe%( 1)&*

+. ,obinda Rani Dasi !s Radha Ba$$abh Das on - $/( 1)10

. An2a#a Mis%a !s Bhagaban Mis%a on 1 No!e#be%( 1)&1

*. Ms. o%dan Diengdeh !s 3.3. Cho2%a on 10 Ma/( 1)4-

-. A//a$aso#a/a5$a 3at/ananda# !. A//a$aso#a/a5$a 6shade!i( 1)4& 718 A9T - 7DB8

:. 6.N. 3at/ana%a/ana !s 6. 3ha%ada And An%. on +& De'e#be%( +00+

&. Madhsdan !s 3#t. Chand%ika on ++ Ma%'h( 1)&-



4/26

)OO&S

HIND6 9AW

HIND6 MARRIA,E ACT 1)--

CR;C

HIND6 ADO;TION AND MAINTANCE ACT 1)-:

6E)SITES

777 .d/"e8-"3."

777./8!n"1."

777.7e#'!nd!."

777.!nd!n8n""n."#

777.d!'!!!nd!.".!n


http://www.advocatekhoj.com/http://www.advocatekhoj.com/http://www.advocatekhoj.com/http://www.vakilno1.com/http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/http://www.indiankanoon.org/http://www.disabilityindia.co.in/http://www.advocatekhoj.com/http://www.vakilno1.com/http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/http://www.indiankanoon.org/http://www.disabilityindia.co.in/


5/26

LIST OF A))RI%ATION

1. CRPC ::::::::::::::: CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

2. ; ::::::::::::::: AND

. HMA ::::::::::::::..... HINDU MARRIAGE ACT

?. Cn@ :::::::::::::::. CAN NOT

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION



6/26

The ;etitione% has the hono% to #o!e this Co%t b/ wa/ o<


7/26

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. The 2etitione% and %es2ondent a%e hsband and wi


8/26

asking


9/26

ISSUES RAISED

I

6hethe% he #es2ondent o##its n/ + %ad 7ith he etitione% s $$egedB

II

6hethe% he etition + o% di!o%'e + i$ed / etitione% "ght o e dis#issedB

III

6hethe% he etitione% !s entit$ed o et de'%ee "


10/26

SUMMAR OF ARGUMENTS

I. 6-e-e# -e #e'"nden "!' n +#d 7!- -e e!!"ne# ' eedB

No( the %es2ondent has not 'o##itted an/


11/26

III. 6-e-e# -e e!!"ne# !' en!ed " e de#ee "+ 3d!! 'e#!"n "n -e #"nd "+

#e.

No( as the se'tion 1+ o< Hind #a%%iage a't states that i< in an/ #a%%iage the 2e%son is

t%eated with '%e$t/ hehad %ight to get 5di'ia$ se2a%ation bt in this 'ase the hsband is

not t%eated with an/ '%e$t/ b/ his wi


12/26

ARGUMENTS AD%ANCED

I. 6-e-e# -e #e'"nden "!' n +#d 7!- -e e!!"ne# ' eedB

The de


13/26

In the 'ase o< Md-'dn /' S. C-nd#!8 "n 22 M#-, 19?5( the hsband

72etitione%8 a$$eged that the wi o< ann$#ent o< #a%%iage #eans s'h the%e is no %ea$ 'onsent at a$$. In o%

o2inion( the wo%d


14/26

the #a%%iage 'an be ann$$ed si#2$/ on the g%ond that the %es2ondent was at the ti#e o


15/26

es( the 2etition


16/26

hi# o% to $i!e at his hose. The%e


17/26

3o it is '$ea%


18/26

Both the se'tion states that on$/ when the 2etitione% is t%eated with '%e$t/( di'ia$

se2a%ation is g%anted and in this 'ase no '%e$t/ was seen b/ the wi


19/26

'onditions s2e'i


20/26

The a22e$$ants $ette% to he% $aw/e% 3%i ;.C. Mis%a %eesting the $atte% not to 2%o'eed


21/26

The Hind ado2tion and #aintenan'e states that 718 A Hind wi

7b8 i< he has t%eated he% with s'h '%e$t/ as to 'ase a %easonab$e a22%ehension in he%

#ind that it wi$$ be ha%#

7'8 i< he is s


22/26

He%e( the 2etitione% is ab$e to 2a/ #aintenan'e to his wi


23/26

ag%ee#ent on the 2a%t o< the hsband is o22osed to 2b$i' 2o$i'/( and 'onseent$/( the


24/26

take o< the #atte%( the 2$ainti


25/26

2%e$i#ina%/ 'ondition atta'hed to a neg$e'ted 'hi$d wi$$ estab$ish on$/ his 'o#2eten'e to

To take the !iew that in g%anting #aintenan'e nde% 3e'tion *44 to a

wi


26/26

Whe%e

mock trial advocacy memorial (defence)

Documents