modelling the syllogismimed/courses/seminar/modellingsyllogism.pdf · modelling the syllogism ......
TRANSCRIPT
Draft 14 February 2004 303
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
People do not understand how thatwhich is at variance with itself, agrees with itself.
Heraclitus
It is impossible for the same attribute at once to belong and not to belong to the same thing and in the same relation.
Aristotle
n this interlude, I show how relational logic can be used to model syllogisticreasoning, originally developed by Aristotle some
2
,
300
years ago. Aristotlewas concerned with various properties of things and with what conclusions
can be made about these properties from assumed premises. These propertiescan quite easily be represented in relational logic.
However, I am not here primarily concerned with the nature of the propertiesof the entities under discussion. I wish to model the underlying structure ofAristotle’s thought processes. This can best be done by studying the concepts ofthe syllogism and their relationships to each other.
Definitions
A syllogism consists of three propositions (also called statements orsentences), called the major premise, minor premise, and conclusion,respectively. Each proposition has two terms called the subject and predicate.
I
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
304 Draft 14 February 2004
The terms in a proposition are related to each other in four different ways,shown in Table
34
.
Each of these propositions has a number of dualistic attributes thatcharacterize the propositions. They are grouped together in pairs depending onwhether A is paired with E, I, or O. Table
35
, which is an extension of Table
34
,shows these attributes. Any two of these attributes uniquely defines theproposition. So we could call them defining attributes, with the third beingderived from the other two.
Aristotle called the symmetrical propositions convertible because they areequivalent when the terms are interchanged. A and E are also convertible intoweaker forms, I and O, respectively. Furthermore, if we assume Aristototle’s rulesof logic, A and O and E and I are contradictory; they exclude each other.
One other property of these propositions relates to the terms in theproposition, rather than the propositions themselves. A term is distributed if, in
Class
Syllogistic propositions
Attribute names
Name Form Diagram
Attribute values
A All S are P
E All S are not P
I Some S are P
or
O Some S are not P
or
Table 34.
Types of propositions in syllogisms
Class
Syllogistic propositions
Attribute names
Name Universality Positivity Symmetry
Attribute values
A universal positive asymmetrical
E universal negative symmetrical
I particular positive symmetrical
O particular negative asymmetrical
Table 35.
Attributes of propositions
S
P
PS
S P
S
P
S P
S
P
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
Draft 14 February 2004
305
some sense, it refers to all entities with the particular property (called a class),otherwise it is undistributed. The subject of universal propositions and thepredicate of negative propositions are distributed. How these definitions relateto syllogistic propositions is given in Table
36
, attributes that can be seen quiteclearly from the diagrams in Table
34
.
The terms of the three propositions of the syllogism are related to each otherin two ways:
1.
One term is common to the major and minor premises; it is called themiddle term (M).
2.
The predicate (P) of the conclusion is the major term of the syllogism andthe subject (S) is the minor term, because they are the nonmiddle terms inthe major and minor premises, respectively.
As each proposition has one of four types and as there are three propositionsin each syllogism, there are
4
3
=
64
different syllogistic forms, called moods.These are naturally called AAA, AAE, AAI, etc.
In addition, the syllogism can have one of four figures, depending on whetherthe middle term is the subject or predicate in the major and minor premises.
Class
Syllogistic propositions
Attribute names
Name Subject Predicate
Attribute values
A distributed undistributed
E distributed distributed
I undistributed undistributed
O undistributed distributed
Table 36.
Distribution of terms in syllogism
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
306 Draft 14 February 2004
(Curiously, for some reason, Aristotle only recognized three of these figures; thefourth was discovered only in the Middle Ages.)
There are thus
64
x
4
=
256
possible syllogisms in total.
Aristotle examined each mood and figure in turn to determine whether it wasvalid or not. He then derived a number of common properties of thesesyllogisms, which can be called rules of deductions. I reverse this process here.
These are the rules that Aristotle discovered:
1.
Relating to premises irrespective of conclusion or figure
(a)
No inference can be made from two particular premises.
(b)
No inference can be made from two negative premises.
2.
Relating to propositions irrespective of figure
(a)
If one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular.
(b)
If one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative.
3.
Relating to the distribution of terms
(a)
The middle term must be distributed at least once.
(b)
A predicate distributed in the conclusion must be distributed inthe major premise.
(c)
A subject distributed in the conclusion must be distributed in theminor premise.
Class
Syllogistic figures
Attribute names
Name Figure
Attribute values
I
II
III
IV
Table 37.
Syllogistic figures
M PS MS P
P MS MS P
M PM SS P
P MM SS P
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
Draft 14 February 2004
307
Application of rules
We can now apply these rules of inference to determine the validity of eachmood in each figure.
As the first rule applies irrespective of conclusion or figure, we need considerjust sixteen pairs of premises.
By rule
1
(a), these pairs of premises are invalid:II IO OI OO
By rule
1
(b), these pairs of premises are invalid:EE EO OE OO
I could now show the sixteen premises in the form of a relation, indicatingwhich has an attribute value invalid by one or both of the two rules. However, itis simpler to indicate invalidity by type style, bold and italics indicatinginvalidity by rules
1
(a) and
1
(b), respectively. The nine potentially valid premisesare marked in plain style:
Rule
2
applies to the moods of syllogisms. As there are four moods and ninepotentially valid pairs of premises from rule
1
, we need to consider
36
moods.By rule
2
(a), these moods are invalid:xIA IxA xOA OxAxIE IxE xOE OxE
By rule
2
(b), these pairs of premises are invalid:xEA ExA xOA OxAxEI ExI xOI OxI
Rule
2
therefore leaves
16
potentially valid moods of syllogism, the invalidones being marked in italics and bold, as for rule
1
:
The third rule is rather more complicated as it concerns the distribution ofeach of the three types of term in the syllogism for each mood and figure.
AA AE AI AO
EA
EE
EI
EO
IA IE
II IO
OA
OE
OI
OO
AAA AAE AAI AAO
AEA
AEE
AEI
AEO
AIA AIE
AII AIO
AOA
AOE
AOI
AOO
EAA
EAE
EAI
EAO
EIA
EIE
EII
EIO
IAA IAE
IAI IAO
IEA
IEE
IEI
IEO
OAA
OAE
OAI
OAO
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
308 Draft 14 February 2004
First considering rule
3
(a) about the distribution of the middle term. Theright-hand four columns in the following table show the distribution of themiddle term in the two premises. The ones that are invalid by this rule are theones that are undistibuted in both premises, indicated by italics in the table. Theother four columns show the sixteen potentially valid moods that we areconsidering after eliminating the others by applying rules
1
and
2
.
xxA xxE xxI xxO I II III IV
AAx AAA AAE AAI AAO D–U
U–U
D–D U–D
AEx AEE AEO D–D U–D D–D U–D
AIx AII AIO D–U
U–U
D–U
U–U
AOx AOO D–D U–D D–U
U–U
EAx EAE EAO D–U D–U D–D D–D
EEx
EIx EIO D–U D–U D–U D–U
EOx
IAx IAI IAO
U–U U–U
U–D U–D
IEx IEO U–D U–D U–D U–D
IIx
IOx
OAx OAO
U–U
D–U U–D D–D
OEx
OIx
OOx
Second Interlude
Modelling the Syllogism
Draft 14 February 2004
309
Rule
3
(b) concerns the distribution of the predicate. The ones that are invalidby this rule are the ones that are distributed in the conclusion, but notdistributed in the major premise, indicated by italics in the table.
Rule
3(c) is similar to 3(b) except that it applies to the subject in the minorpremise. The pairs of minor premise–conclusion that are invalid are againindicated by italics in the table.
xAx xEx xIx xOx I II III IV
AxA AAA U–U D–U U–U D–U
AxE AAE AEE U–D D–D U–D D–D
AxI AAI AII U–U D–U U–U D–U
AxO AAO AEO AIO AOO U–D D–D U–D D–D
ExA
ExE EAE D–D D–D D–D D–D
ExI
ExO EAO EIO D–D D–D D–D D–D
IxA
IxE
IxI IAI U–U U–U U–U U–U
IxO IAO IEO U–D U–D U–D U–D
OxA
OxE
OxI
OxO OAO D–D U–D D–D U–D
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
310 Draft 14 February 2004
Eliminating the syllogisms, both mood and figure, made invalid by rule 3leaves just 12 moods and 25 syllogisms. One of them, AAO in figure IV, is inrather a curious position. Aristotle’s rules allow it. However, it is onlyconditionally valid. As this is a syllogism of figure IV, and as Aristotle did notdiscover this figure, it is not surprising that he did not consider it.
AAO in figure IV is only valid if P is an actual subset of M and if M is anactual subset of S. However, if P, M, and S are equivalent, there are no S that arenot P. So we need to eliminate it from the list for this reason, not covered byAristotle’s rules. It is only conditionally valid.
There are five syllogisms that have a universal conclusion. So there are alsofive corresponding syllogisms with a particular conclusion, which we can alsoeliminate, as they are weak forms. These are:
This leaves us with 20 valid syllogisms, found by Aristotle and his successors:
Axx Exx Ixx Oxx I II III IV
xAA AAA D–D D–D U–D U–D
xAE AAE EAE D–D D–D U–D U–D
xAI AAI IAI D–U D–U U–U U–U
xAO AAO EAO IAO OAO D–U D–U U–U U–U
xEA
xEE AEE D–D D–D D–D D–D
xEI
xEO AEO IEO D–U D–U D–U D–U
xIA
xIE
xII AII U–U U–U U–U U–U
xIO AIO EIO U–U U–U U–U U–U
xOA
xOE
xOI
xOO AOO U–U U–U D–U D–U
Strong Weak
AAA I AAI I
EAE I EAO I
AEE II AEO II
EAE II EAO II
AEE IV AEO IV
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
Draft 14 February 2004 311
First figure AAA, EAE, AII, EIOSecond figure EAE, AEE, EIO, AOOThird figure AAI, IAI, AII, EAO, OAO, EIOFourth figure AAI, AEE, IAI, EAO, EIO
Students in the Middle Ages were expected to know all these by heart. Forinstance, the statutes of the University of Oxford in the fourteenth centuryincluded this rule: “Batchelors and Masters of Arts who do not follow Aristotle’sphilosophy are subject to a fine of 5s. for each point of divergence, as well as forinfractions of the rules of the Organum”.1
Not surprising therefore that they needed a mnemonic to remember thisrather arbitrary set of letters:
Barbara, Celarent, Darii, Ferioque, prioris:Cesare, Camestres, Festino, Baroko, secundae:Tertia, Darapti, Disamis, Datisi, Felpaton, Bokardo, Ferison, habet:Quarta insuper addit Bramantip, Camenes, Dimaris, Fesapo, Fresison.2
I don’t know what Tertia (EIA in the third figure) is doing here. She waseliminated by rule 2(a). Curiously, C. W. Kilmister, whose book Language, Logicand Mathematics this mnemonic is taken from, did not point out the error.
These syllogisms can be further reduced because propositions E and I aresymmetrical; the terms in these propositions can be interchanged. When one orboth premises is symmetrical, the mood stays unchanged, but the figure changes.When the conclusion is symmetrical, interchanging the subject and predicatemeans that the major and minor premises must change position, resulting in achange in both mood and figure.
This means that there are just eight core syllogisms out of the 256 candidatesthat we started with.
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
312 Draft 14 February 2004
To sum up, the table on the next page shows all 256 syllogisms, which arevalid, which are equivalent to a valid syllogism, and which rule first eliminatedthem from the list.
However, all this is rather abstract and mechanical. It tells us little about themeanings of this inferences. So tables 38 on page 314 and 39 on page 320provide a list of examples of each of the eight valid syllogisms, together with acorresponding Euler-Venn diagram. Note that because I and O can berepresented in two ways in Euler-Venn diagrams, as illustrated in Table 34 onpage 304, there are sometimes four or five corresponding diagrams for oneparticular mood and figure.
Syllogism: Mood (figure) Equivalent to
AAA (I) AAI (IV) ≡ AAI (I) [weak form]
AII (I) AII (III), IAI (III), IAI (IV)
EAE (I) EAE (II), AEE (II), AEE (IV)
EIO (I) EIO (II), EIO (IIII), EIO (IV)
AOO (II) —
AAI (III) Itself
EAO (III) EAO (IV)
OAO (III) —
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
Draft 14 February 2004 313
Class of syllogisms
Figure Figure
Mood I II III IV Mood I II III IV
AAA Valid
3(a)
3(c) 3(c) IAA 2(a)
AAE 3(b) 3(b,c) 3(c) IAE 2(a)
AAI Weak Valid Equiv IAI 3(a) 3(a) Equiv Equiv
AAO 3(b) 3(b) Cond IAO 3(a,b) 3(a,b) 3(b) 3(b)
AEA 2(b) IEA 2(a,b)
AEE 3(b) Equiv 3(b) Equiv IEE 2(a)
AEI 2(b) IEI 2(b)
AEO 3(b) Weak 3(b) Weak IEO 3(b) 3(b) 3(b) 3(b)
AIA 2(a) IIA
1(a)AIE 2(a) IIE
AII Valid3(a)
Equiv3(a)
III
AIO 3(b) 3(b) IIO
AOA 2(a,b) IOA
1(a)AOE 2(a) IOE
AOI 2(b) IOI
AOO 3(b) Valid 3(b) 3(a) IOO
EAA 2(b) OAA 2(a,b)
EAE Valid Equiv 3(c) 3(c) OAE 2(a)
EAI 2(b) OAI 2(b)
EAO Weak Weak Valid Equiv OAO 3(a) 3(b) Valid 3(b)
EEA
1(b)
OEA
1(b)EEE OEE
EEI OEI
EEO OEO
EIA 2(a,b) OIA
1(a)EIE 2(a) OIE
EII 2(b) OII
EIO Valid Equiv Equiv Equiv OIO
EOA
1(b)
OOA
1(a,b)EOE OOE
EOI OOI
EOO OOO
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
314 14 February 2004
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 1
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
AA
A (
I)A
ll M
are
PA
ll S
are
MA
ll S
are
P
All
prim
ates
are
mam
mal
sA
ll hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
esA
ll hu
man
s ar
e m
amm
als
EA
E (
I)A
ll M
are
not
PA
ll S
are
MA
ll S
are
not P
All
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rsA
ll hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
esA
ll hu
man
s ar
e no
t bea
rs
AII
(I)
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[Som
e S
are
not P
]
All
Cat
holic
s ar
e C
hris
tian
sSo
me
Ger
man
s ar
e C
atho
lics
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
Chr
isti
ans
[Som
e G
erm
ans a
re n
ot C
hrist
ians
]
AII
(I)
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
S ar
e P]
All
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
hum
anSo
me
med
itat
ors
are
mat
hem
atic
ians
Som
e m
edit
ator
s ar
e hu
man
[All
med
itato
rs a
re h
uman
]
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
P
M
S
P
M
S
SM
P
P
SM
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
14 February 2004 315
AII
(I)
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
P ar
e S]
All
hum
ans
are
mam
mal
sSo
me
mam
mal
s ar
e pr
imat
esSo
me
prim
ates
are
hum
ans
[All
hum
ans a
re p
rim
ates
]
AII
(I)
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
M a
re S
][A
ll P
are
S]
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
hum
ans
Som
e hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
es[A
ll hu
man
s are
mam
mal
s][A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
EIO
(I)
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
S ar
e P]
All
men
are
not
wom
enSo
me
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
men
Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re n
ot w
omen
[Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re w
omen
]
EIO
(I)
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll P
are
S]
All
mea
t eat
ers
are
not e
leph
ants
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not e
leph
ants
[All
elep
hant
s are
wild
ani
mal
s]
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 2
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
S
P
M
P
S
M
SM
P
SM
P
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
316 14 February 2004
EIO
(I)
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll S
are
not P
]
All
bear
s ar
e no
t med
itat
ors
Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re m
edit
ator
sSo
me
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
not
bea
rs[A
ll m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re n
ot b
ears
]
EIO
(I)
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll M
are
S]
All
elep
hant
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
elep
hant
sSo
me
wild
ani
mal
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
[All
elep
hant
s are
wild
ani
mal
s]
EIO
(I)
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll S
are
not P
]
All
hum
ans
are
not b
ears
Som
e pr
imat
es a
re h
uman
sSo
me
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rs[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re n
ot b
ears
]
AO
O (
II)
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[Som
e S
are
P]
All
Cat
holic
s ar
e C
hris
tian
sSo
me
Ger
man
s ar
e no
t Chr
isti
ans
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
not C
atho
lics
[Som
e G
erm
ans a
re C
atho
lics]
AO
O (
II)
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
P ar
e S]
All
tige
rs a
re m
eat e
ater
sSo
me
wild
ani
mal
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not t
iger
s[A
ll tig
ers a
re w
ild a
nim
als]
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 3
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
PS
M
S
MP
PM
S
SP
M
SM
P
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
14 February 2004 317
AO
O (
II)
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
S ar
e no
t P]
All
elep
hant
s ar
e w
ild a
nim
als
Som
e m
eat e
ater
s ar
e no
t wild
ani
mal
sSo
me
mea
t eat
ers
are
not e
leph
ants
[All
elep
hant
s are
not
mea
t eat
ers]
AO
O (
II)
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
M a
re S
][A
ll P
are
S]
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
hum
an[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
[All
hum
ans a
re m
amm
als]
AA
I (I
II)
All
M a
re P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t S]
[Som
e S
are
not P
]
All
tige
rs a
re w
ild a
nim
als
All
tige
rs a
re m
eat e
ater
sSo
me
mea
t eat
ers
are
wild
ani
mal
s[S
ome
wild
ani
mal
s are
not
mea
t eat
ers]
[Som
e m
eat e
ater
s are
not
wild
ani
mal
s]
AA
I (I
II)
All
M a
re P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
P[A
ll P
are
S]
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
All
hum
ans
are
mam
mal
sSo
me
mam
mal
s ar
e pr
imat
es[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 4
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
S
M
P S
M
P
SP
M
S
P
M
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
318 14 February 2004
EA
O (
III)
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[Som
e S
are
P]
All
elep
hant
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
All
elep
hant
s ar
e w
ild a
nim
als
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not m
eat e
ater
s[S
ome
wild
ani
mal
s are
mea
t eat
ers]
EA
O (
III)
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
P ar
e S]
All
men
are
not
wom
enA
ll m
en a
re h
uman
Som
e hu
man
s ar
e no
t wom
en[A
ll w
omen
are
hum
an]
EA
O (
III)
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
S ar
e no
t P]
All
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rsA
ll pr
imat
es a
re h
uman
sSo
me
hum
ans
are
not b
ears
[All
hum
ans a
re n
ot b
ears
]
OA
O (
III)
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t S]
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
not C
hris
tian
sA
ll C
atho
lics
are
Chr
isti
ans
Som
e C
hris
tian
s ar
e no
t Cat
holic
s[S
ome
Chr
istia
ns a
re C
atho
lics]
OA
O (
III)
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t M]
Som
e m
edit
ator
s ar
e no
t mat
hem
atic
ians
All
med
itat
ors
are
hum
anSo
me
hum
ans
are
not m
athe
mat
icia
ns[A
ll m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re h
uman
s]
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 5
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
S
MP
S
PM
M
S
P
SM
P
S
MP
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
14 February 2004 319
OA
O (
III)
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll P
are
M]
[All
P ar
e S]
Som
e pr
imat
es a
re n
ot h
uman
sA
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als
Som
e m
amm
als
are
not h
uman
s[A
ll hu
man
s are
pri
mat
es]
[All
hum
ans a
re m
amm
als]
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 6
of 6
)
Moo
d (F
igur
e)Fo
rmEx
ampl
eD
iagr
am
Tabl
e 38
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
moo
d an
d fig
ure
S
M
P
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
320 14 February 2004
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 1
of 5
)
Dia
gram
Exam
ple
Form
Moo
d (F
igur
e)
All
prim
ates
are
mam
mal
sA
ll hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
esA
ll hu
man
s ar
e m
amm
als
All
M a
re P
All
S ar
e M
All
S ar
e P
AA
A (
I)
All
hum
ans
are
mam
mal
sSo
me
mam
mal
s ar
e pr
imat
esSo
me
prim
ates
are
hum
ans
[All
hum
ans a
re p
rim
ates
]
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
P ar
e S]
AII
(I)
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
hum
ans
Som
e hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
es[A
ll hu
man
s are
mam
mal
s][A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
M a
re S
][A
ll P
are
S]
AII
(I)
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
prim
ates
Som
e m
amm
als
are
hum
an[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
[All
hum
ans a
re m
amm
als]
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
M a
re S
][A
ll P
are
S]
AO
O (
II)
Tabl
e 39
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
type
of E
uler
-Ven
n di
agra
m
P
M
S
S
P
M
P
S
M
S
M
P
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
14 February 2004 321
All
hum
ans
are
prim
ates
All
hum
ans
are
mam
mal
sSo
me
mam
mal
s ar
e pr
imat
es[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als]
All
M a
re P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
P[A
ll P
are
S]
AA
I (I
II)
Som
e pr
imat
es a
re n
ot h
uman
sA
ll pr
imat
es a
re m
amm
als
Som
e m
amm
als
are
not h
uman
s[A
ll hu
man
s are
pri
mat
es]
[All
hum
ans a
re m
amm
als]
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll P
are
M]
[All
P ar
e S]
OA
O (
III)
All
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rsA
ll hu
man
s ar
e pr
imat
esA
ll hu
man
s ar
e no
t bea
rs
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
S ar
e M
All
S ar
e no
t P
EA
E (
I)
All
hum
ans
are
not b
ears
Som
e pr
imat
es a
re h
uman
sSo
me
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rs[A
ll pr
imat
es a
re n
ot b
ears
]
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll S
are
not P
]
EIO
(I)
All
prim
ates
are
not
bea
rsA
ll pr
imat
es a
re h
uman
sSo
me
hum
ans
are
not b
ears
[All
hum
ans a
re n
ot b
ears
]
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
S ar
e no
t P]
EA
O (
III)
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 2
of 5
)
Dia
gram
Exam
ple
Form
Moo
d (F
igur
e)
Tabl
e 39
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
type
of E
uler
-Ven
n di
agra
m
S
P
M
S
M
P
P
M
S
PM
S
M
S
P
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
322 14 February 2004
All
Cat
holic
s ar
e C
hris
tian
sSo
me
Ger
man
s ar
e C
atho
lics
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
Chr
isti
ans
[Som
e G
erm
ans a
re n
ot C
hrist
ians
]
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[Som
e S
are
not P
]
AII
(I)
All
Cat
holic
s ar
e C
hris
tian
sSo
me
Ger
man
s ar
e no
t Chr
isti
ans
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
not C
atho
lics
[Som
e G
erm
ans a
re C
atho
lics]
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[Som
e S
are
P]
AO
O (
II)
Som
e G
erm
ans
are
not C
hris
tian
sA
ll C
atho
lics
are
Chr
isti
ans
Som
e C
hris
tian
s ar
e no
t Cat
holic
s[S
ome
Chr
istia
ns a
re C
atho
lics]
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t S]
OA
O (
III)
All
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
hum
anSo
me
med
itat
ors
are
mat
hem
atic
ians
Som
e m
edit
ator
s ar
e hu
man
[All
med
itato
rs a
re h
uman
]
All
M a
re P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e P
[All
S ar
e P]
AII
(I)
Som
e m
edit
ator
s ar
e no
t mat
hem
atic
ians
All
med
itat
ors
are
hum
anSo
me
hum
ans
are
not m
athe
mat
icia
ns[A
ll m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re h
uman
s]
Som
e M
are
not
PA
ll M
are
SSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t M]
OA
O (
III)
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 3
of 5
)
Dia
gram
Exam
ple
Form
Moo
d (F
igur
e)
Tabl
e 39
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
type
of E
uler
-Ven
n di
agra
m
SM
P
SP
M
SM
P
P
SM
S
MP
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
14 February 2004 323
All
men
are
not
wom
enSo
me
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
men
Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re n
ot w
omen
[Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re w
omen
]
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[S
ome
S ar
e P]
EIO
(I)
All
mea
t eat
ers
are
not e
leph
ants
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not e
leph
ants
[All
elep
hant
s are
wild
ani
mal
s]
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll P
are
S]
EIO
(I)
All
elep
hant
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
elep
hant
sSo
me
wild
ani
mal
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
[All
elep
hant
s are
wild
ani
mal
s]
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll M
are
S]
EIO
(I)
All
elep
hant
s ar
e w
ild a
nim
als
Som
e m
eat e
ater
s ar
e no
t wild
ani
mal
sSo
me
mea
t eat
ers
are
not e
leph
ants
[All
elep
hant
s are
not
mea
t eat
ers]
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
S ar
e no
t P]
AO
O (
II
All
elep
hant
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
All
elep
hant
s ar
e w
ild a
nim
als
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not m
eat e
ater
s[S
ome
wild
ani
mal
s are
mea
t eat
ers]
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[Som
e S
are
P]
EA
O (
III)
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 4
of 5
)
Dia
gram
Exam
ple
Form
Moo
d (F
igur
e)
Tabl
e 39
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
type
of E
uler
-Ven
n di
agra
m
SM
P
SM
P
S
MP
S
M
P
S
MP
Second InterludeModelling the Syllogism
324 14 February 2004
All
bear
s ar
e no
t med
itat
ors
Som
e m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re m
edit
ator
sSo
me
mat
hem
atic
ians
are
not
bea
rs[A
ll m
athe
mat
icia
ns a
re n
ot b
ears
]
All
M a
re n
ot P
Som
e S
are
MSo
me
S ar
e no
t P[A
ll S
are
not P
]
EIO
(I)
All
tige
rs a
re m
eat e
ater
sSo
me
wild
ani
mal
s ar
e no
t mea
t eat
ers
Som
e w
ild a
nim
als
are
not t
iger
s[A
ll tig
ers a
re w
ild a
nim
als]
All
P ar
e M
Som
e S
are
not M
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
P ar
e S]
AO
O (
II)
All
tige
rs a
re w
ild a
nim
als
All
tige
rs a
re m
eat e
ater
sSo
me
mea
t eat
ers
are
wild
ani
mal
s[S
ome
wild
ani
mal
s are
not
mea
t eat
ers]
[Som
e m
eat e
ater
s are
not
wild
ani
mal
s]
All
M a
re P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
P[S
ome
P ar
e no
t S]
[Som
e S
are
not P
]
AA
I (I
II)
All
men
are
not
wom
enA
ll m
en a
re h
uman
Som
e hu
man
s ar
e no
t wom
en[A
ll w
omen
are
hum
an]
All
M a
re n
ot P
All
M a
re S
Som
e S
are
not P
[All
P ar
e S]
EA
O (
III)
Cla
ss o
f va
lid s
yllo
gism
s (
Shee
t 5
of 5
)
Dia
gram
Exam
ple
Form
Moo
d (F
igur
e)
Tabl
e 39
. Val
id s
yllo
gism
s so
rted
by
type
of E
uler
-Ven
n di
agra
m
PS
M
SM
P
SP
M
S
PM