monorail part 3 design operation
TRANSCRIPT
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 1/39
ON
MONORAIL ~YSTEM DESIGN
EST!Y~TES OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS
AND OF OPERATING EXPENSES
D e c emb ~ .3 . 7[ 5
GIBBS & H!LL~ 7.NCo
ENG!~ERS-~ CONSTRUCTORS
NEW YO~tK -o LOS ANGE~S
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 2/39
GIBBS ~ HILL, i~c.
CONSULTING ]~NGINEERS
DESIGNERS o CONSTRUCTORS
510 WEST SIXTH STREET
LOS ANGELES 14, CAL.
PENNSYLVANIA STATION
NEW YORK I, N. Y.
December 31, 1953
Coverdale & Colpitts
120 Wall Street
New York 5, New York
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is our report on prelimin-~y design as requiredfor estimating purposes, estimates of construction cost and of maintenance and
operating expenses of a monorail rapid-transit installation over both the longer
and shorter routes in Los Angeles specified by you.
Attention is called to the fact that unit costs of operation and maln-
tenance are favorable due to the high intensity of use resulting from the sched-
ules proposed. High scheduled speed comblnedwith dense train service over a
long main llne run results in low costs per train mile and per track mile. The
figures given in the report have been derived from the records of similar and
successful rapid transit operation adjusted for inherent differences in the two
services.
While some structural modifications should be considered in case finaldesign is undertaken the first cost figures based upon the preliminary design
are adequate for the present economic study.
A few of the preliminary drawings have been included in the report for
illustrative purposes and to indicate the care with which the estimates were
prepared. The entire file of drawings is available to you at any time you wlsh.
We wish to express our appreciation of the wholehearted cooperation
received from all members of your staff and the officials of the Metropolitan
Transit Authority.
Very truly yours,
GIBBS & HILL, Inc.
~J.B. Saxe
Vice President and
Chief Engineer
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 3/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 4/39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Page No-
8
I0
l!
12
13
15
17
18
19
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 5/39
-1 -
SCOPE
Under a contract consummated pril 15, 1953 Gibbs & Hill, Inco has
prepared the following stimates f ~ Monorail installation o provide mass
rapid tr~usit in Los Angeles~ California:
Th2 estimated ost of construction f a Monorail line along
route location furnished y Coverdale Colpitts;
~Ae estimated ost of equipment nd appurtenances, tations,
shops and inspection facilities~ ~ds, power supply, power
tre~usmission ~ distribution ystem~ signals and cars;
The estimated ost of maintaining nd operating the system
based on desired overall speeds~ frequency f service and
passenger loads from information urnished y Coverdale &Colpitt~.
~K~e study required has developed he following irst Cost and Annual
M~’~in~en~m.cend Operating ost figomes:
1. For full length of line, Panorama to
Long Beach:
Estimated First Cost of Lineb. Estima~i~:d irst Cost of Equipment~ tc.
c. Contingency
do Estimated Arm.~l Cost of Maintenance~nd Operation nvolving 3,750~000
cs~r miles/ye~
$82,904,17544~262~29.0
lO~O00,O00
8~021,000
For the shorter line, North Hollywood to
Compton:
ao Estimated First Cost of Line
b. Estimated First Cost of Equipment, etco
c. Contingency
d. Estimated Annual Cost of M~intenanceand Operation involving 7,540,000
car miles/year
65~146,855
36,170;677
lO,O00,O00
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 6/39
-2.-
IERODUCTION
Monorail rapid transit ~as devised as a promising answer to the need~
evident in many co~nunities, f providing ~ss rapid transit in face of exi~t~
ing s~face~.traffic ongestion nd of~the high costs of alternate orms of rapid
transit, notably the sub~ay~ In most instances, high speed movement of true
mass~trausportation ehicles on the surface is impossible ecause of interfer-
ence from other traffic using the same arteries. The cost usually involved for
suitable private rights-of-way n the surface ~ould be prohibitive. A sub,y,
of co°~rse, rovides he private right-of-way nd eliminates he hind~/ance f
movement from competing traffic. It is, therefore, an admirable solution in
all respects, except that of cost. Very fe~, if any communities ~n support
this burden even when the population served is very dense and riding r~latively
~Auiform hroughout large part of the day°
~Vnen both surface and sub-surface olutions re t~aavailable, he only
resort is to go above the surface. In the past this ha~ involved the ~’elevated
an air~less~ ight-less~ ear-tunnel ver a street cluttered y two or more rov~
of ~pporting structures and. surrounded by a din of noise. The elevated did
~rovide the desired private right-of-way nd as a form of transport~:~ion o~od
be satisfactory~ ts cost was, relative to the subway, a step in the right
direction.
Starting from the elevated, the ~roBlem is to strip a~y it~ ob~ection
able features and improve its better ones with the aid of modern t~chni~sA ro-
greSSo Monorail is the resulting auswer.
The more or less conventional oadbed of the elevated, t~ ties, and
rails~ are reduced to a single longitudinal upporting member of strength and
stiffness adequate to support the equipment, and within this limitation, f
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 7/39
the smalles~ dimensions possible° ~is member, being placed above the
the normal clearance above the ground surface is increased ten or t~elve feet°
Thi~ rela~tion~hip in comblna~ion w~.th the small a~ount of light cut off~ even
by ~ "tvo track~ line~ restores the space belo~ it to the out-of~doors
incre~eing appreciably the usual street noise° Both the ~ingle a~d double
tra~k arrangements of members require only a single ro~ of col~amns presenting
~ limited ~urface obstruction° In fact, ~hatever obstruction is ~_uvoZ~ved
becomes almost negligible when columns ~re placed in the center divi~±on pro-
~ded In ~ost import~%ut r~e~ highways o
GENERAL DES~IFITON OF LOS ANGELES PROJECT
The route for which cost studies have been prepared extende approx~
imately 45 miles from a terminal station at the north end of Vsz Nt%F~ Boulevard
r~r Roscoe Boulev~rd to a ~imilar station at the southern end on Ameri.~:ar~
Boulevard at Broadway in Long Beach° Short turn~aro~.hnd~ loop facilities extend
beyond bcth te~ina~ st~tior~so ~%e entire operation is above ground except
for ~% short tu~uel, slightly over two miles in length, under Hill Street in
do~to~n Los Angeles. T~arn~around facilities are also provided a~ either end
of the t~&~uel ~ection~ and adjacer~t to North Holl~ood and Compton.
Along V~n N’~ys Bouievard~ the structures occupy the center of the
~Ide thoroug~hfare~ from "~hich a turn is made onto private right-of-%r~y in the
center of Chandler Bo~f£evardo Leaving the latter bouleva~d, the line run~ 6iong
Vineland Aven2 to a second section of private right-of-~y in the center of
C~huenga Pass Fr_ee~ayo It leaves this right-of-way at a point ~ere freely
construction interferes and passes via Highland Avenue to Sunset Boulevard°
Locs, ted along th~ previous two track street car route, the line follows Sunset
Boule-~srd to the vicinity of the old Hill Street intersection° At thi~ point
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 8/39
the route swings across the Hollywood Freeway and into a tunnel extending under
Hill Street to Washington Boulevard° Thence it cuts across to Broadway, run-
ning eventua&ly into Main Street which is followed until the route turns onto
Florence Avenue, across which it runs east to Pacific Boulevard~ Running south
on this thoroughfare, the line moves over to Long Beach Boulevard, which togethe
with American Avenue provides the route into Long Beach.
STRUC~JRES
The structure is~ in general, supported by a single row of columus
located in the center of private right-of-way where available or alternately in
the middle of streets° Each column, resting on a concrete foundation adequate
to ~thstand the overturning moments imposed upon it, terminates at the upper
end in a transverse double bracket member, supporting two longitudinal girders.
Each longitudinal girder, provided with expansion joints at suitable intervals~
forms a continuous rail support from one end of the line to the other.
A single running rail, for the form of monorail used as the basis for
cost estimates, is fastened on top of the longitudinal girder~ resting upon a
resilient~ sound-deadeningmaterial~ At expansion joints in the-supporting
girder~ mitre-joints in the rail are provided to preserve a smooth-rur~uing
s~rface~ free of usual rail-joint clicking. When actual design is undertaken
certain alternate forms of construction should be examined. One of these,
constituting a change in physical form~ is to arrange the trucks and. supporting
girders so that the truck runs inside the girder, possibly on pneumatic tires.
While this arrangement would probably increase the cost of supporting struc-
tures and girders approximately 15 per cent, it presents offsetting advantages
in cost of subway installation and more convenient switching. Further investi-
gation of the feasibility and economy of pre-stressed concrete structures is
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 9/39
also ~arranted o
Each of the two trucks supporting each car is provided with two
double-flanged wheels. All propulsion motors and equipment are mounted in the
trucks, ~ich ride above the running rail surface ~ The car body runs below the
supporting girder and is supported by a hanger-arm from each truck in such a
way that the center of gravity of the unit of rolling stock is directly below
the rail.
Side clearances are provided to permit sway of the car body in pass~,ng
around curves or due to transverse wind-loading. In the former c~se~ the car
assumes a position of equilibrium between centrifugal and gravitational forces
leading to the easiest passage around curves and to greater passenger comfort.
The maximum sway provided for, results from the extreme condition of a steady
transverse wind loading on the side of the car equivalent to a sustained wind
velocity of 70 miles per hour. Under this condition, the displacement of the
car is 12° 40’ from the vertical. Speed restrictions on curves are established,
and enforced by automatic speed control~ to keep the sway on cu_~ves within this
same limit of displacement.
All parts of the structure are designed to withstand earthquake shock
of an acceleration equal to 0o2g, or 20 per cent of the rate of acceleration due
to gravity.
Due to the presence of the hanger arms between trucks and car bodies,
track switches necessarily differ from conventional rail-line switches. For
straight-t~hrough movement space between the tangent girder and that for the
turn-off, must be provided for passage of the hanger arms. This is very simply
accomplished by arranging a length of the girder support as a 180 degree rotat-
ing block turning around a longitudinal axis° In one position it places a
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 10/39
tangent rail in alignment ~ith adjacent stralght~through rail~o When rotated
over~ a curved rall on the opposite surface matches vith one adjacent tangent
rail and ~ith the curved tarnout rail, so bridging the gap between stationary
~upporting m~mberso Movement is provided by dual motor driving mechanisms~ so
a~owing for remote control analogou~ to conventional s~itch machines.
The vertical dimensions of the supporting structure provide 16 feet
clear between the bottom of cars stud the surface of ~treets or ground below°
The under ~urface of the supporting girders ~re approximately ten and a half
feet above the 16 foot clearance line or slightly over ~6 feet ~bove a road
~urf~ceo Be~,ng at such height and of relatively ~mall dimens±ons~ the girders
car~ot approach the effect of a nearly solid roadbed at a ~ixteen foot clear
height in obstructing air and light above the ~treet and in reflecting traffic
noi~es~ nor do they come nearly as alose to structures on ~utting propert~o
A number of varying station arrangement~ are possible~ some of them
making use of property adjacent to the street~ Such solutions are~ ho~ever~
speci~l c~ses~ generally applicable in only a few locations~ Since the line
runs in general down the center of a street or private right~of~ay~ the lea~t
complication is involved by placing the stations in the same locat±on~
Each station must provide space for a change booth~ turn~tiles a~ud
other general facilities, with convenient access to and from the street level
and the train platform. In the case of ten stations~ the latter i~ placed
between the iobound and outbound routes by somewhat spreading ’the space between
~upporting girder~. The fare collecting facilities are placed below the plat-
fo~ level as this arrangement avoids restricting space for free passenger
movement on the platform and permits access to the platfor~ by ~tair~ays lead-
Ing outward toward the ends of the platform so resulting in convenient
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 11/39
-7
passenger distribution° Tais mezzanine level can be s~pported on the same row
of columns as the main structure~ by increasing the usual girder heighz suf-
ficiently to preserve the standard 16 foot clearance from the mezzanine tc the
street°
It appears undesirable to provide access to the mezzanine level from
the center of the street due to the traffic hazard of concentrating pedestrian
travel to and fro~ sidewalks in the vicinity of stations° Instead~ foot-bridge
across the street at both ends of the mezzanine level and fo~ st~ir~,ys to
sidewalk level are provided. T~o of these stairways are equipped ~dth ~oving
stairs°
It is considered that both the profile ~ud downto~ traffic conditions
under which even a single row of supporting columns would be undesir~ole~ indi~
care a ttu~uei under approximately two miles of Hill Street o This t~une! sectio
includes two stations, one serving the Civic Center and one at Seventh Street.
In these stations passenger platforms are provided outside the two-track area
in order to facilitate convenient stairways to the surface without forcing the
construction deeper into the ~o’aud as would be required by a mezzo.nine lev~lo
Adjacent to all except downtown stations, parking lot facilities are
provided for the convenience of patrons using their o~m cars~ rather than feede
buses or walking to re~ch the station°
Storage yards and shops for inspection and mainter.ance are provided
at t~o locations~ on the northern end just off Chandler Bo~~l.evard near Woodman
Avenue and on the southern end just off Long Beach Boulevard between Compton
Boulevard and San Antonio Drive~ For the 45 mile installation each storage yar
has ten tracks each capable of storing lO cars° Three additional track~ of
thirteen car capacity are provided for car cleaning and light inspection~ All
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 12/39
of the~e tracks are at a lower height than on the main line so providing
acce~ to car interiors from gro~md level° Each yard is provided vith an
~atic c~z° ~na~her through which cars will pass between cleaning and light inspec
t±on tracks a~.~d the storage area° F~~i~~the shorter insta/~lation~ etween North
Hollywood and Compton the n°~nber of storage tracks and yard capacity ~re reduced
in proportion to the number of cars required°
Both ~i.n~peotion and maintenance shops are provided with covered track
long enough for three car trains° The southern shop~ designated to handle per~
iodlc and heavy repairs ha~ two tracks for such york and two more for he~j
in~ectlon ~nd iubr~cationo These two tracks can ~Iso be ~ed for heavy repairs
if required° The northern shop is designed with two tracks for hea~J ir~.spectio
and one for lig~t repairs° Both shops have office and repair shop areas for
brake~ drive~ and control equipment repairs and for motor overhatL[ if this latt
work is no~ handled on a contract basi~ by an outside service shop°
Entrance Zo and departure from the yards is provided to or from both
in~,o-~nd and outbound directions on the lineo Track facilities required for this
fe~.ture may ai~o be used for turning ~rains short of the te~-nni~l stations when
riding does not justify the full run°
CAR EQL~PMKNTS
T~e cars are to be lightweight, double truck units, approximately
50 feet long and seating approximatel~ 6~ persons depending on the arrangement
of seats finally adopted° The body, of semi-monocoque construction will have
t~o l~rge sliding doors on each side, near the quarterpoints of the car~ to
facilitate rapid loading and uuloadingo Inter-communicating doors for emer~
gency use are provided in the ends of the Caro~. All cars are identical except
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 13/39
~;hat a propcrzion f the %oral n’c~her; o be used as lead car~ will have
~tre~i~d no~e and be equlp~d with a control po~itlon for train o~ration
eqalpped ~t~h a m~Ifled control sta~<l,ou for ~ndli~ lu y~rd~ aud
to ~ke up tralus~
~alns ¢onslsti~ of cue lead c~ and one to se~n traili~ units
can he operated ~ If consistent with estates of ridi~ semi-~r~neu~
¢oupli~ of car~ in pairs Is advantageous
Each of the two t~ per car ~ have two 30-1nch double-fla~ed
Waeel~ mediated ~i~ly cu each of the two a~e~ ~ ~e a~es will al~o c~r~ a
right a~le ge~ box and a disc t~e brake and ~i! nn in ro~r beari~
sup~or%~ the llghZwelght ~lded t~ck fr~e~
~[ach t~ick fr~e will carr~ two propulsion motor a~embl~es~
threug~ ~ubl~ uni%~r~al joln~ propeller ~hafts~ brake and control eqaip~nt
an~ c’~rrent co~ectlon devices ~ No proval~iou po~r circuits or appara~ are
located in the car body lu the Interest of ~i~%alui~ s~plIc!ty ~ud to avoid
an~[ i~czea~e In vertical d~neions which w~ld In t~n require prcpor~io~tel~
hlgh~r supporti~ ~t~tc~es t~oughout the insta~tlon~
Each of the fo~ propulsion motor a~emblies per c~ cou~i~t~ of a
100 horsepo~r tk~ee phas~ ~%er~ting current squirrel-cage induction t~e
motor~ ~o which Is rigi~ bol~d a h~aullc torque-conver~r. Tai~ combi~-
tlou pe~It~ the inductlou motor to come up to spee~ ~ rapidly because
the converter d~s not exert its ~~ ~ag on the motor until the ~t~r
reachee a ~p~ed within It~ desirable o~rati~ ra~e, approx~ly 87.5 per
cent of ~c~onous epeed and ~iI abo~ the ~olnt of breakdo~ torqae. ~e
net result of the c~blned c~ac~rlstlcs Is to provide an e~remel~ smooth~
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 14/39
- l0 -
h~h rate of acceleration in vehicle spe~d practicallyup to -¢ehicle balancing
speed° It p~rmits use of the very rugged squirrel-cage type of motor and
complete elimination of alternating~to direct-current roadside conversion
equipment and its corresponding investment.
The motor winding is arranged for full and half speed connections by
means of a cam type group switch, ~hich together with amain switch constitutes
all th~ control equipment required. The h~lf speed connection is used only for
r~&uced speed running. Normal accelerations are made in the single high spe~d
connection~ thus eliminating "transitions" during acceleration. Because the
lo~er~ half-speed~ shaft inpu~ speed to the converter also reduces the latter’s
torqu~ ~altiplication f~ctor, the resulting acceleration is also suitable for
yard and s~tchingmoveme.ntSo
Reverse movement~ also at a reduced rate of acceleration~ is obtained
~ithout g~r~ by reversal of the driving motor direction of rotation°
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
Three-phase, 60-cycle~ alternating currez~t at 2300 volts is delivered
to th~ ca:~os by using a dual -~ire contact system and the running rail as th~
three pF~se conductors. Energy is supplied this distribution system from
siml~, s’~tio~Bry transformer unit-substations located in parking lots ~djac~nt
to pa.ssCz~ger stations. To insure continuity of supply, each substation is fed
over t~o independent supply lines by the utility in whose area the substation
is locatsdo The substation itself is provided with t~o step-down transformers.
in c~se of outage of a supply l~ue or a transformer, the remaining ~ult, ~ith
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 15/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 16/39
- 12 -
application is involved; on curves of moderate radius.~ power is cut off and
br~king initiated° In the case of sharp curves, such as exist on terminal loops,
the motor control will be prevented from operating the motors in any but the
lo~ger speed connection, supplementary to braking action if required°
It is considered that the signal and speed control system provides
ma~xim°~n safety of operation, especially as it requires only features already
proven in act~! service°
SC~.~fl~Di~ ERFORMANCE
T~e car equipments ~ii have a scheduled speed~ that is overall averag
speed including stop time at sixteen intermediate stations and reduced speed
operation on severe curves, of 41 miles per hour. The running time frGm terminal
to terminal over the 45 mile route is 66 minutes. The sched~ied speed depends
pri~.cipa!ly on the rates of acceleration and braking, which are the maximo~ con~
sistent ~’ith available adhesion at the rail, and passenger comfort; ~ud on the
bal~ucing~ or free-running speed, in this case, 60 miles per hour° With sts~tion
stops averaging 2.8 miles apart, a substantially higher balancing speed wo~ll.d be
.less economica& as it would barely be attained before braking for the nex#~ stati
stop -~ould coumenceo ~ lower balancing speed would probably be an adverse
psy~d~olcglcal factor in view of prevalent speeds on free~gaySo
TIME OF CONSTRUCTION
The construction schedule for the entire system is a function of sever
factors~ the most important of which would be the time required for determination
of concept~ design, supply and fabrication of the steel shapes and plate and the
construction of the subway section. It is felt that a period of six months will
be required after a~ard of contract to study the final routing, and crystallize
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 17/39
the design precepts. The actual design development would be accomplished in
the ensuing year but mill orders for both Monorail and subway steel could be
placed in the interim so that construction might be started at the end of this
period° Because higher speeds are contemplated for Los Angeles than experienced
in ~ny previous similar installation it is recommended an initial section one or
one and a half miles long be installed for advamce testing purposes before all
details for the entire project are released for construction.
It is estimated that the construction of the subway section~ill require
thirty months and that all work involved in the construction of the remainder of
the Monorail system can be completed ~ithin this time. Construction would be
performed simultaneously in the several sections in order to reduce the overall
time requirements. It is anticipated that the entire system could be completed
within four years after award of contract. ~
NAINTEN~NCEAND OPERATING COSTS
The unit costs of maintenance, operating and power costs tabulated
below, ’were estimated after careful comparison of the proposed service with an
efficient~ comparable operation. They are based upon an annual car mileage for
the full length of the system of 23,750,000, indicated by others, as required
for the expected riding. It should be noted that the intensity of use of the
proposed service is high, that is the miles per car per year, the anz~l car~
miles per track mile and the cars per hour per track mile all are high. Such
figures are inherent in a fast and frequent service over a straight-away main
line of considerable length.
Respectfully submitted,
GIBBS & HILL, Inc.
E. H. Anson
Vice President
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 18/39
EXHIBITS
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 19/39
MAINTEN~hNCE AND OPERATING UNIT COSTS
Ma__~/~9~nce Way & Structures - Annual Cost
Per Car Mile
Malnter~nce Equipment - Annual Cost
Per Car Mile
Operatiug Expense - Annual Cost
Per Car Mile
~neral Administrative Cost - Annual
Per Car Mile
Power
Per Car Male
Total Maintenance, Operatlng~ Power &
Administrative Costs - Annual
Per Car Mile
$ 1,220,000.
$ 1,750,000o
7.37¢
$ 2,426~ 000o
lO.~¢
$ 875, oo.
3 °68~
$ l, 750,000.
7.36¢
$ 8~021,000o
33.8~
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 20/39
and rell
- Z5 -
$g0,988,710o
Zg,078,653.
61~000.
262,500.
1,423,569.
736,405.
864,478.
1,837,410.
512,600.
Z2-~,850.
21~,000.
¯ 21~800~000.
$82,904,175o
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 21/39
FULL LENGTH OF LINE
Panorama to Long Beach
Estimated ost of Equipment nd Appurtenances, tations,
Shops and Xnspection acilitles~ ards, Power Supply,
Power Transmission nd Distribution ystems, Signalsand Cars
a. Passenger tations (except subway)
b~ Subway Statious (tuunel s~ructure uot iucluded)
Co Scheduled Repair Shop
~o Running Repair Shop
eo Parking Lots at Stations
fo Land Acquisition or Parking Lots, Storage Yards(no provision or R/W property)
go Southeru Storage Yard
ho Northern Storage Yard
io Power Supply
Jo Electric System
ko Signals aud Iutercommuuicatiou ystems
lo Cars 131 @ $80,000. each
Maintenance E~Ipment
no Model Testing aud Development
Engineering
po Supervision uring construction )
Field Engiueers ud Inspectors )
Field Survey Crews )Procurement f material and equipment)
~o Insuramce during construction
r. E~pemses for procuring property
so Furulshings ud equipment for Authorlty’s eueral
and admimlstration ffices
to Placing eqnipmeut in operation and traiuing personnel
Total
~5(0~000o
~,833~780.
2,49%666.
i, 772,730°
5~ 174~0~9.
1% 480, OO’.
3 ~ 5@S~ OO
l~0~ 000 o
400~ 00
lOO~ 00.
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 22/39
o 17 -
FUlL LENGTH OF LI~E
Panorama to Long Beach
Contingencies, (NOT includiD~ Escalation pro-tection, Value of R/W property, Property Taxes
during construction, Legal expenses, Expense
of Authority’s personnel during construction)
$I0,000,000.
Basis of Estimate: Labor and material est~m-tes
are base&upon prices as of December 1953 and the
former on the basis of a ~0 hour week at straight-
time° As far as can be determined no royalties
are payable on any part of the basic concept of
the monorail
Total Estimated First Cost $137,166,~65.
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 23/39
SHORTER LENGTH OF LINE
North Eollywood to Compton
Estimated ost of Construction
a o Supporting tructures ncluding irders an~ Rail forMain Route, Turn Arounds and Terminal Loops (exclusive
of Line Switches, auuel Section, Storage Yard Access
Trackage and Storage Yards)
b o Foundations nd Anchor Bolts
c. Special Foundations or Freeway and River Channel
Crossings
d. Retaining alls, Drainage, Fencing, etc. for Turn-around at Washington lvd.
e. Subway Section~ Supporting Structures, irders and
Addition for Foundations ~’Monorail acilities NLY"
f. Line Switahes with Supporting tructures nd Founda-
tions
g. Painting
h. Traffic Islands in Streets for Protection of Columns
i. Elimination of Overhead Interferences
j. Elimimatlon of Unlerground Interferences
k. Sub-soil iuve~tigatious
1. Subway Structure
Total
$28,782,66
49,000
262,500.
044.
371,694.
595,627.
1,269,470.
415,050.
85,950139,000.
... 00, oo
$65,146,855
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 24/39
SEOR_~R ~GE OF LINE
North ~ollywood to Compton
Estimated ost of Equipment an~ Appurtenances, tations~ Shops and
luspectlou acilities, ard~, Power Supply, Power Transmission nd
Distribution ystems~ .i.~a!s nd Cars
a~ Passenger tations (except subway)
b o Subway Statlou~ (tunnel st~c’~e not i~luded)
c ~ Scheduled epair Shop
d. ~nni~ Repair Shop
e~ Parki~ Lot~ at Stations
f~ I~nd Acquisition for P~ki~ Lots~ Storage Yar~ andSWD St~tlons (no provision or R/W property)
Southern Storage Yard
Northern Storage
Po~r Supply
Electric System
Si~l~ and Xnterco~nlcatlon S~
C~ ll7 @ $80~0. each
~lu~nce Equ!~ent
M~el Testi~ and ~lo~nt
E~!ne~ri~
Supe~-vlslon ~,ri~ const~ctlon )Field Engineers and Ins~ctors )Field Survey Cre~ )Procurement of ~rial and equi~ent)
Insuramce duri~ co~t~ctlon
Em@e~es for pr~uri~ property
~nlsh!~s and e~u!~ent for Authorlty’s general and
a~inistration offices
Pla~Ing ~qui~nt in o~ration a~ traini~ person~l
Total
P.
to
$ 2,243,20
450,000
802,000
450,000
262,000
2,046,90
2,457,66
2,009,34
I, 818,90
!, 327,56
4,183,10
9, 360,00
iI0~ 00
250, 00
3,000,00
4,000, 00
750,000
300, 00
!00,000
250, 00
$36,170,67
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 25/39
SHORTER LENGTH OF LINE
North Hollywood to Compton
Contin6encies (Not including Escalation protection~
Value of R/W property~ Property ta~.<es during construc-
tion# Legal expenses, Expense of Authority~s personnel
during construction°)
$.10,000,000.
Basis of Estimate: Labor and material estimates
are based upon prices as of December 1953 and the
former on the basis of a 40-hour week at straight
time. As far as can be determined no royalties are
payable on the basic concept of the Monorail.
Total Estimated First Cost $111,3~7,53
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 26/39
CONDENSED PROFILE
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 27/39
SCHEMATIC ARRANGEMENT OF LIE
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 28/39
CROSS-SECTION F MINII~JM IDTH STREET
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 29/39
C~OS S S
c~O’ ST~2_~E:T
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 30/39
TYPICAL STRUCTURAL UPPORT
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 31/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 32/39
GENERAL ARRANGEMKNT OF MONORAIL CAR
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 33/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 34/39
STATION ELEVATION ND SECTIONS
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 35/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 36/39
STATION PLANS AND ARRANGEMENT
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 37/39
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 38/39
P L A T E S
7/27/2019 Monorail Part 3 Design Operation
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/monorail-part-3-design-operation 39/39
Printed by