morphological algorithms for land mine detection · morphological algorithms for land mine...

1
Morphological Algorithms for Land Mine Detection Sinan Batman, Ulisses Braga-Neto and John Goutsias Center for Imaging Science The Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD 21218 The second method, referred to here as MM-MNF (Fig. 4), is based on a different linear prefilter: the Maximum Noise Fraction (MNF) transform. The MNF transform is an optimal linear filter that maximizes the signal to noise ratio (SNR) in each transform band subject to orthogonality. The results from this linear stage is again submitted to the morphological detection module shown in Fig. 5. Two hybrid algorithms, which combine the decorrelating qualities of a linear filter and the shape extracting properties of Mathematical Morphology, are investigated in the framework of land mine detection. The first algorithm, referred to here as PC-MM (Fig. 3), solely operates on the peaks in the image that are extracted by a morphological top-hat transform. These excerpted multi-spectral peaks are then compressed and decorrelated via the principal component (PC) transform. Due to the packing property of the PC transform, the target markers are typically found in the first or second bands in the PC transformed image. The targets are then detected using a morphological detection scheme (Fig. 5). For the target signatures to be mapped to the band with the highest (SNR), the MM-MNF algorithm requires an accurate estimation of the clutter covariance. This is achieved by using the more stable PC-MM algorithm in a first pass. The extracted targets from this first pass, are then used to improve the detection result in subsequent iterations using the MM-MNF algorithm, by updating covariance estimates of relevant filter variables (Fig. 6). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) GPS Satellite Field of View Land Mines Figure 1. Multi-spectral aerial imaging of land mines. Band 1 Band 6 Band 5 Band 4 Band 3 Band 2 Figure 2. Gray scale intensity profiles of multi-spectral image bands. Top-hat by Reconstruction Histogram Stretching Thresholding Opening by Reconstruction Majority Voting Morphological Reconstruction Bandwise Union Masks R Structuring element Threshold level Structuring element Cut-off parameter Morphological Detection (Direct MM Algorithm) Figure 5. Multispectral Signal Markers Binary Detection Result The MM-MNF Algorithm Opening by Reconstruction MNF Transform Structuring element Multispectral Signal Band Selection (Band 6) Direct MM Detection R Binary Detection Result Clutter Approximation Figure 4. PC-MM MM-MNF R 1 MM-MNF R 3 R 2 R 2 R 1 Detection Detection Image After Binarizarion Figure 6. Iterative implementation of Morphological Detection scheme Multispectral Signal Missed Target Correct Detection False Alarm Iteration 1 Iteration 3 Iteration 2 Top-hat by Reconstruction Principal Component Decomposition Structuring element Band Selection Band 1 or Band 2 Direct MM Detection R The PC-MM Algorithm Multispectral Signal Binary Detection Result Figure 3.

Upload: doankiet

Post on 19-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Morphological Algorithms for Land Mine Detection

Sinan Batman, Ulisses Braga-Neto and John Goutsias

Center for Imaging Science

The Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, MD 21218

The second method, referred to here as MM-MNF (Fig. 4), is based on a

different linear prefilter: the Maximum Noise Fraction (MNF) transform.

The MNF transform is an optimal linear filter that maximizes the signal to

noise ratio (SNR) in each transform band subject to orthogonality. The

results from this linear stage is again submitted to the morphological

detection module shown in Fig. 5.

Two hybrid algorithms,

which combine the

decorrelating qualities of

a linear filter and the

shape extracting

properties of

Mathematical

Morphology, are

investigated in the

framework of land mine

detection.

The first algorithm, referred to here as PC-MM (Fig. 3), solely operates on

the peaks in the image that are extracted by a morphological top-hat

transform. These excerpted multi-spectral peaks are then compressed

and decorrelated via the principal component (PC) transform. Due to the

packing property of the PC transform, the target markers are typically found

in the first or second bands in the PC transformed image. The targets are

then detected using a morphological detection scheme (Fig. 5).

For the target signatures to be mapped to the

band with the highest (SNR), the MM-MNF

algorithm requires an accurate estimation of the

clutter covariance. This is achieved by using

the more stable PC-MM algorithm in a first pass.

The extracted targets from this first pass, are

then used to improve the detection result in

subsequent iterations using the MM-MNF

algorithm, by updating covariance estimates of

relevant filter variables (Fig. 6).

Unmanned AerialVehicle (UAV)

GPS Satellite

Field of View

Land Mines

Figure 1. Multi-spectral aerial imaging of land mines.

Band 1

Band 6Band 5Band 4

Band 3Band 2

Figure 2. Gray scale intensity profiles of multi-spectral image bands.

Top-hat byReconstruction

HistogramStretching Thresholding

Openingby

Reconstruction

Majority

Voting

Morphological

Reconstruction

Bandwise

Union

Masks

R

Structuring element Threshold level Structuring elementCut-off parameter

Morphological Detection (Direct MM Algorithm)

Figure 5.

Multispectral

Signal Ma

rke

rs

Binary

Detection

Result

The MM-MNF Algorithm

Opening byReconstruction

MNFTransform

Structuring element

Multispectral

Signal

BandSelection(Band 6)

Direct MMDetection

R

Binary

Detection

ResultClutter

Approximation

Figure 4.

PC-MM

MM-MNF

R1

MM-MNF

R3

R2

R2

R1

Detection Detection Image

After Binarizarion

Figure 6. Iterative implementation of Morphological Detection scheme

Multispectral

SignalMissed Target

Correct Detection

False Alarm

Iteration 1

Iteration 3

Iteration 2

Top-hat byReconstruction

PrincipalComponent

Decomposition

Structuring element

BandSelectionBand 1 orBand 2

Direct MMDetection

R

The PC-MM Algorithm

Multispectral

Signal

Binary

Detection

Result

Figure 3.