mountain equipment co-operative: the private lable strategy case analysis
DESCRIPTION
This case study is an excellent piece of material by Richard Ivey Business school. The case is analyzed on the basis of : Case Synopsis Case Facts Situation Analysis Problem Definition Recommendations/ Conclusion. Please go through this case and gain excellent piece of Knowledge.TRANSCRIPT
Mountain Equipment Co-opThe Private- Label Strategy
Presented By: Bhavesh Bhansali
Case SynopsisThe case talks about how MEC as a brand is fighting for it’s own Private Label brandMountain Equipment Co-op
MEC was founded in 1971 in
Vancouver, Canada
Retail Co-operative
15 stores
1387 Employees
$248 millions in 2008
Serves Sports products• Mountaineering• Rock climbing• Ski touring• Hiking, etc…
Market Share-1.2%
Some more facts Top players
FORZANI- 20%
CANADIAN TIRE- 12%
WALMART- 10%
China36%
Canada32%
Veitnam24%
India 4%
Thailand4%
Percentage
Suppliers for MEC branded products
13,000+ separate products are available for purchase at MEC.
50% of In-House branded products in the stores
Anyone can become a member of MEC. lifetime fees- $5
Problem Definition
How to launch and develop innovative Private Label products
People’s perception of MEC as a Second Wal-Mart
More of Asian Supplier
Objective ofmonopolizing the market
It takes more than 18 months for a Product to be placed in stored shelf
Change the Perception of Copy Paste
+
Case Inferences
MEC’s works on this Philosophy
Quality
Integrity
Co-operation
CreativityLeadership
Sustainability
Adventure
Market share UP-DOWN of Key players
• Forzani• Canadian Tire• Wal-Mart• MEC• Independent Stores
Players 2007 2008
19.6129.51.240.4
20.211.49.91.240.8
Recommendations
Heavy promotions for Private- Label brands
Sponsorship to sporting events at local levels
Engage a technology for faster product development
Low- pricing and high penetration
Merchandise the Private
label products with
independent stores for better
penetration
Associate the company with a
event
Thank You!!!