[mpc comment] community forum letter to mpc re: 10-12-17,...

9
Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]> [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, Meeting Agenda Item #7, 5-C-17-OA ( Short-Term Rentals Ordinance) 1 message larrys55 via Commission <[email protected]> Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:57 PM Reply-To: [email protected] To: [email protected] TO: MPC Commissioners FROM: Larry Silverstein, Secretary-Treasurer of Community Forum DATE: October 10, 2017 RE: October 12, 2017, Meeting Agenda Item #7, 5-C-17-OA (STR Ordinance) Community Forum is an organization with representatives from many neighborhoods in Knoxville and Knox County. The MPC staff has recommended that you approve the Proposed Ordinance as drafted on April 25, 2017, with one slight revision proposed by the City. Except for that slight revision, this is the same ordinance you voted to send to City Council without recommendation at your May 11, 2017, meeting. Community Forum, along with the following 9 neighborhood groups, has approved Resolutions asking that Short-term Rentals be omitted from both R-1 and R-1E residential zoning districts. Alice Bell/Spring Hill Forest Heights Fountain City Town Hall Kingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills Association Pond Gap Tazewell Pike-Beverly Station Neighborhood Wesley Neighbors Community Association West Hills Community Association Westmoreland Hills Homeowners Association. We respectfully request you amend the proposed Ordinance to remove Short-term Rentals from R-1 and R-1E zoning districts. The professional MPC staff report states "...that the language permitting Type (1) (owner occupied) STRs in all residential districts be maintained." The rationale offered for this recommendation compares R-1 and R-1E with R-1A and EN-1 and EN-2. The staff states that, "As proposed, this revision (removal of R-1 and R-1E districts) would make distinctions among the City's low density residential districts. The proposed distinctions, and different treatment, cannot be supported by the zoning code language identifying the general description of these districts. All are described as areas for low density residential uses, with the goals of preserving existing neighborhoods and providing opportunities for the development of new low density neighborhoods." In response, we find the MPC professional staff rationale to be inadequate and lacking in substance. Furthermore, the comparison of General Descriptions is incorrect. Unlike R-1 and R-1E, the R-1A General Description states that the district is designed for "low to medium population density". And, unlike R-1 and R-1E, the General Description of EN-1 and EN-2 states "The district is not intended for use on presently undeveloped land that is currently zoned as agriculture (A-1). It should be used in the context of the prevalent existing development pattern." Clearly, EN-1 and EN-2, is not for the purpose of "providing opportunities for the development of new low density neighborhoods." The "General Description" is, however, but one section that defines each particular zoning district. It is the "Permitted Uses" section, also included in each zoning district, which specifically defines each district and clearly distinguishes among the residential districts. It is disappointing that the Staff report fails to address "Permitted Uses” in its rationale for its conclusion.

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>

[MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, Meeting Agenda Item#7, 5-C-17-OA ( Short-Term Rentals Ordinance) 1 message

larrys55 via Commission <[email protected]> Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:57 PMReply-To: [email protected]: [email protected]

TO: MPC CommissionersFROM: Larry Silverstein, Secretary-Treasurer of Community ForumDATE: October 10, 2017RE: October 12, 2017, Meeting Agenda Item #7, 5-C-17-OA (STR Ordinance)

Community Forum is an organization with representatives from many neighborhoods in Knoxville and Knox County. The MPC staff has recommended that you approve the Proposed Ordinance as drafted on April 25, 2017, with one slightrevision proposed by the City. Except for that slight revision, this is the same ordinance you voted to send to City Councilwithout recommendation at your May 11, 2017, meeting. Community Forum, along with the following 9 neighborhood groups, has approved Resolutions asking that Short-termRentals be omitted from both R-1 and R-1E residential zoning districts. Alice Bell/Spring HillForest HeightsFountain City Town HallKingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills AssociationPond GapTazewell Pike-Beverly Station NeighborhoodWesley Neighbors Community AssociationWest Hills Community AssociationWestmoreland Hills Homeowners Association. We respectfully request you amend the proposed Ordinance to remove Short-term Rentals from R-1 and R-1E zoningdistricts. The professional MPC staff report states "...that the language permitting Type (1) (owner occupied) STRs in all residentialdistricts be maintained." The rationale offered for this recommendation compares R-1 and R-1E with R-1A and EN-1 andEN-2. The staff states that, "As proposed, this revision (removal of R-1 and R-1E districts) would make distinctionsamong the City's low density residential districts. The proposed distinctions, and different treatment, cannot be supportedby the zoning code language identifying the general description of these districts. All are described as areas for lowdensity residential uses, with the goals of preserving existing neighborhoods and providing opportunities for thedevelopment of new low density neighborhoods." In response, we find the MPC professional staff rationale to be inadequate and lacking in substance. Furthermore, the comparison of General Descriptions is incorrect. Unlike R-1 and R-1E, the R-1A General Descriptionstates that the district is designed for "low to medium population density". And, unlike R-1 and R-1E, the GeneralDescription of EN-1 and EN-2 states "The district is not intended for use on presently undeveloped land that is currentlyzoned as agriculture (A-1). It should be used in the context of the prevalent existing development pattern." Clearly, EN-1and EN-2, is not for the purpose of "providing opportunities for the development of new low density neighborhoods." The "General Description" is, however, but one section that defines each particular zoning district. It is the "PermittedUses" section, also included in each zoning district, which specifically defines each district and clearly distinguishesamong the residential districts. It is disappointing that the Staff report fails to address "Permitted Uses” in its rationale for its conclusion.

Page 2: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

So let us look at "Permitted Uses.” Unlike R-1A and EN-1 and EN-2, R-1 and R-1E do not allow bed and breakfasts,accessory dwelling units and multi-dwelling structures--the very uses that are most similar to STRs. And, unlike thenewer zoning districts, EN-1 and EN-2 and Planned Residential, there are no protective mechanisms such as designstandards or design plan review, in R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.The only protection in R-1 and R-1E is the list of "Permitted Uses." Community Forum’s June 26, 2017, letter to City Council outlined thirteen reasons why Short-Term Rentals pose a realthreat to the character and integrity of our R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods and therefore, are not appropriate for thesezoning districts.

· R-1 and R-1E districts are made up of low density, single-family detached homes.

· R-1 and R-1E districts do not allow uses similar to Short-Term Rentals. Unlike other residential zoning districts, R-1and R-1E zoning districts do not allow apartments, bed and breakfasts, or rooming and boarding houses.

· R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods are primarily the older, traditional, single-family detached, suburban developmentareas of our city. Their location, narrow roads, and development design, have deemed them to be inappropriate zones foruses similar to Short-Term Rentals, such as bed and breakfasts, rooming and boarding houses and apartments. Likewise, R-1 and R-1E are not appropriate zoning districts for Short-Term Rentals.

· Short-Term Rentals are a commercial use. Why should this one commercial use be allowed in all residential zoningdistricts, including the residential districts that do not allow similar uses under the existing zoning Ordinance? ThisOrdinance would set a precedent for allowing other inappropriate uses in R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.

· Like all uses that are incompatible with the character of existing development, Short-Term Rentals will have asignificant negative impact on R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods, and more importantly, on the quality of life of thehomeowners living in these neighborhoods.

· Short-Term Rentals increase the general activity level in the area.

· Short-Term Rentals increase noise.

· Short-Term Rentals increase both on-street and off-street parking demands.

· The proposed ordinance states that the maximum occupancy, "...shall not exceed two (2) transients per bedroomplus two (2) additional transients;...the maximum occupancy of the STR shall not exceed 12 persons..." includingall persons. A typical 3-bedroom home could have eight (8) people staying in the home. Compare that number to the2.39 average number of persons per household, 2011 to 2015, in Knox County. (U.S. Census Quick Facts.)

· Short-Term Rentals increase safety issues in neighborhoods.

· The experience with Short-Term Rentals in many cities has been increased noise and nuisance complaints. Some ofthe complaints are due to large, loud parties, and some are due to increased automobile-related noise and activity.

· The proposed Ordinance does not contain an enforcement plan, and its provisions are generally not enforceable.

· The City has said that they fear the TN State Legislature will remove all meaningful local control of Short-TermRentals if local governments "prohibit" Short-Term Rentals.We are not requesting a prohibition. We are simply requesting that Short-term Rentals not be allowed in two residentialzoning districts, R-1 and R-1E, -- districts which do not allow similar uses. There are many residential zoning districts inKnoxville that allow uses similar to Short-Term Rentals, e.g., bed and breakfasts, rooming and boarding houses,apartments, etc. The Community Forum and other neighborhood associations across the State are prepared to contactthe State Legislature again next year to work to maintain local control of Short-Term Rentals.

None of these issues were addressed in the MPC Staff report on the issue of whether Short-Term Rentals should not beallowed in R-1 or R-1E districts. While the City has not chosen to amend the Zoning Ordinance, the inclusion of Short-Term Rentals in every residentialzoning district in Knoxville, is definitely a zoning issue. How can the inclusion of a use so unlike other uses allowed in R-1and R-1E--permitting a single-family home to be rented in its entirety by the day or week, when the owner does not evenhave to be present on the property, or in the city, or even in the country, not bring about a major and negative change inthe character of the R-1 and R-1E zoning districts? Such a conclusion defies logic and is strongly disputed by theresidents of R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods who would be impacted by this proposed Ordinance.

Page 3: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

Our Zoning Ordinance clearly states what is and what is not permitted in each of our zoning districts. When an ownerasks to operate a use in a district that is not specifically listed as a "Permitted Use" or "Use Permitted on Review", theMPC determines whether or not the requested use is similar to the uses that are specifically listed in the district. So, the appropriate question to ask is: Which currently permitted use in R-1 or R-1E is similar to a Short-Term Rental? Therefore, we conclude that the extremely limited analysis performed by the MPC in just looking at General Descriptionsof zoning districts while ignoring other major issues is flawed. Any legislation to amend the City of Knoxville Code ofOrdinance which will result in undermining the long established principles of the existing Zoning Ordinance in such adirect and drastic way, should not be recommended for approval by MPC. We ask that you amend the proposed Ordinance to remove Short-Term Rentals from the R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.

Sincerely,

Larry SilversteinSecretary-TreasurerCommunity Forum7808 Sheffield Dr.Knoxville, TN [email protected]

-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]

Community Forum letter to MPC re STR 10-10-17.docx 18K

Page 4: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>

[MPC Comment] Proposed Short Term Rental Ordinance 1 message

sandy gillespie <[email protected]> Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:06 AMReply-To: [email protected]: MPC <[email protected]>

Commissioners,

The Kingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills Association voted unanimously to oppose including R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods in the proposed Short Term Rental Ordinance several months ago.

Currently the Zoning Code does not allow uses similar to Short Term Rentals in R-1 and R-1Eneighborhoods. I am concerned that the new proposed ordinance is in direct conflict with, anderodes the protection of "Permitted Uses" in R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods.

Thank you for considering our concern.

Sincerely,

Sandy Gillespie

President, Kingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills Association

-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]

Page 5: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>

[MPC Comment] Short-term rentals in R-1 districts 1 message

Jesse Mayshark <[email protected]> Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:45 AMReply-To: [email protected]: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Cc: William Lyons <[email protected]>, Gerald Green <[email protected]>, Charles Swanson<[email protected]>, Crista Cuccaro <[email protected]>, Peter Ahrens <[email protected]>

Commissioners,

As you prepare for your meeting on Thursday, I wanted to provide some context and perspective on the request you havereceived from some neighborhood groups to recommend a complete ban on short-term rentals for homeowners in R-1and R-1E districts. The administration has serious concerns about making that kind of blanket prohibition, which wouldaffect the majority of neighborhoods in all sectors of the city. It would effectively leave short-term rentals as a widespreadillegal use in most areas of Knoxville, creating both enforcement and public safety challenges.

I have attached a map prepared by MPC staff showing all of the R-1 and R-1E districts in Knoxville. As you can see, theycover the majority of our residential areas. I am also attaching the map that Crista Cuccaro presented in her slide showon Tuesday, showing areas of Airbnb activity in the past year. This activity is already happening citywide, including inmany R-1 and R-1E areas.

If you zoom in on the zoning map, you can see that in fact most of our neighborhoods have several different zoningdesignations, often varying from one street to the next. A prohibition on a use of property by homeowners in R-1 and R-1E would leave many people who may wish to operate a short-term rental in their own home unable to do so, while theirneighbors across the street or a few blocks over would be able to. To give one example, I have attached another mapshowing the location of a property in Sequoyah Hills (outlined in red) that the City sent a notice of violation to after ananonymous complaint that the owner was operating a short-term rental there. As you can see from this map, that propertyis literally across the street from a large apartment complex that is zoned R-2. It would be hard to make a case that thepresence of a guest in the home with the STR is imposing some burden on that block.

You can find these situations in most of our neighborhoods. We have, for another example, heard from a homeowner onDeane Hill Drive who wants to operate a short-term rental in a “mother-in-law apartment” in his house that has beenvacated by his mother-in-law. His R-1 property is just two doors down from an O-2 district. Again, it is hard to imaginewhat negative impact a guest in his 4,500-square-foot house is having. These are the real-world scenarios that we areattempting to give some regulatory coherence to with our ordinance. What’s more, these uses are happening literallyevery day in nearly every neighborhood in Knoxville, with an estimated 8,000 guest stays a year, and we have heard onlya handful of complaints – most of which have alleged only zoning violations, not any kind of disruptive behavior.

We understand that there are fears about the impact of short-term rentals, especially from people who are not familiarwith the STR model and marketplace. But those fears have not been in any way borne out by several years of actualexperience, with thousands of people staying in hundreds of homes across Knoxville. Moreover, the experience of othercities tells us clearly that the more restrictive a short-term rental ordinance is, the harder it is to enforce and the larger theunderground economy it fuels.

The nature of the technological platforms, their ease of use, and the growing demand for this form of lodging all ensurethat it will continue to happen in Knoxville, whether or not we provide a framework for it. With our proposed ordinance, wehave deliberately and carefully worked to balance the many competing interests we have heard from on the issue,

Page 6: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

protecting the integrity of our neighborhoods and our housing supply while also respecting the rights of property ownersand recognizing the reality of the world in 2017. Like most compromises, the proposed ordinance does not make anyonecompletely happy, but it does give us a pragmatic and enforceable framework.

It is also a framework that will provide a great deal more information and protection to our neighborhoods than currentlyexists. By requiring permits, we will create a publicly available list of all STR properties, including contact information forowners and designated agents. That means people will no longer have to guess or wonder if their neighbors areoperating an STR, as is currently the case and will remain the case if they are broadly banned. By not allowing Type 2(non-owner-occupied) STRs in residential areas, we will protect against the kinds of problems we have seen in citieswhere that is a prevailing model, which can include both the “party house” phenomenon and a loss of properties from thelong-term rental market.

The staff report you have makes clear there is not a legal basis in the zoning code for discriminating between or againstresidential districts on this issue. The desire from some groups to maintain a total ban on STRs in most areas of the city istherefore really a matter of local policy and politics, not land use. The administration does not believe it is a wise course,from a policy standpoint – nor a practical one, from an enforcement standpoint. But in any case, it is the kind of politicalquestion that is best addressed by our local legislative body.

We would be happy to answer any questions you may have. As you can tell, this is a complex subject that we have spentmany months studying and wrestling with, and there are strong feelings on all sides of it.

Thank you for your time and dedication.

Jesse

Jesse Fox Mayshark

Sr. Director of Communications and Government Relations

City of Knoxville

Office: 865-215-3710

Cell: 865-226-9409

Email: [email protected]

-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]

3 attachments

Sequoyah Hills zoning map.png 1223K

Page 7: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve
Page 8: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve
Page 9: [MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, …agenda.knoxmpc.org/2017/oct2017/blues/5-C-17-OA_cor2.pdf · 2017-10-11 · The MPC staff has recommended that you approve

§̈¦40

§̈¦640

§̈¦140

§̈¦75

§̈¦275

§̈¦40

§̈¦640

§̈¦40

CHAPMAN HWY

S NORTHSHORE DR

RUTLEDGE PIKE

CLINTON HWY

ASHEVILLE HWY

OAK RIDGE HWY

W EMORY RD

E EMORY

RD

MIDDLEBROOK PIKE

MILLERTOWN PIKE

TAZEWELL

PIKE

WESTLAND

DR

HEISKELL RD

SCHAAD RD

STRA WBERRY PLAINS

PIKE

MARYVILLE

PIKE

CEDAR LN

WASHINGTON PIKE

THORNGROVE PIKE

WESTERN AVE

WM

AR

TINM

ILLPIK

E

W GOVERNOR JOHN SEVIER HWY

M

ARTINMILL PIKE

SUTHERLAND AVE

DUTCHTOWN RD

POWELL DR

PLEASANT RIDGE RD

N CENTRAL ST

MORRELL

RD

CALLAHAN DR

BRU

HIN

RD

DANTE RD

RIFLE RANGE DR

MINE RD

MERCHANT DR

PARK

SIDE

DR

KINGSTON PIKE

BROWN GAP RD

EBEN

EZER R

D

GLEASON DRN

EYLA

ND

DR

CONCO

RD RD

BROOKS AVE

DUTCH VALLEY DR

LOVE

LLRD

E HENDRON CHAPEL RD

S GAY ST

MA

YNARD

VILLEPI K

E

AMHERST RD

BALL CAMP PIKE

WRACCOON VALLEY DR

LYONS

VIEW

PIKE

HUCKLEBERRY

SPRIN

GS

RD

KIMBERLIN HEIGHTS RD

N PETERS RD

S PETERS RD

HARRIS RD

FRA

NC

IS RD

CARTER RD

NBR

OADW

AY

BU

RK

HA

RT

RD

RIDGEVIEW RD

WHITTLE

SPRINGSR

DHARDIN VALLEY RD

MURDOCK DR

CUMBERLAND AVE

CENTRAL AVENUE PIKE

SEVIER AVE

ROBERTS RD

E WOODLA

ND AVE

KARNS VALLEY DR

DANDRIDGE AVE

N CHERRY ST

S CENTRAL ST

E MOODY AVE

ED S

HO

USE

DR

HELMBOLTR

D

SOUTH MIDDLEBROOK PIKE

BOYDS BRIDGE PIKE

OLD

BR

OA

DW

AY

HENLEY ST

N CEDAR BLUFF RD

VAN

OSD

ALE

RD

E SUMMIT HILL DR

MO

NTVU

E RD

WES

TCO

TT B

LVD

N HALL OF FAM

E DR

E MAGNOLIA

AVE

S CONCORD ST

N N

OR

THSH

OR

E DR

E FIFTH AVE

CECIL AVE

S G

ALL

AH

ER V

IEW

RD

WSUMMIT

HILL DR

FOUNTAINCITY RD

N W

EISGA

RB

ER R

D

MAIN STASBURY RD

N SEVENTEENTH ST

WESTLAND DR

LOVELL RD

WESTLAND DR

HA

RR

ISRD RUTLEDGE PIKE

EBENEZER RD

MID DLEBR OOK PIKE

W EMORY RD

MIDDLEBR O OK PIKE

DANTE RD

CLINTON HWY

MIDDLEBROOK PIKE

SEVIERV

ILLE PIKE

TIPTON ST ATION RD

BALL R

D

FOX RD

BABELAY RD

LONAS DR

BUFFAT MILL RD

MASCOT RD

BADGETT RD

DRY

GAP

PIKE

MURRAY DR

BLUEGRASS RD

ADAIR DR

SHIPE

RD

FLINT GAP RD

NEUBERT SPRINGS RD

WAYLAN D

RD

KODAK RD

ELLISTOW

NRD

CUNNINGHAM RD

CATE R

D

ASBURYRD

HAMME R RD

HALLRD

RIVERSIDE DR

DUNCAN RD

NUBBIN

RID

GE RD

GREENWAY DR

TARKLIN

VALLEY

RD

MALON EY RD

BROWN RD

PEDIG

O

RD

PAPERMILL DR

HOPEWELL RD

DEADERICK RD

BRICKYARD RD

MCKAMEY RD

E

COPELAND DR

AMHERS T RD

BURNETT CREEK RD

CONNER

RD

P ICKENS GAP RD

WIL

SO

N R

D

TOPSIDE RD

BOB GRAY RD

N RUGGLESFER

RYPI

KE

MYNATT RD

BYINGT ON SOLWAY RD

KIMBERLINHEIGHTS RD

TED FORD LN

LYONS

BENDRD

W EMORY RD

SKYLINE DR

ISLAND HOM E AVE

CLINCH AVE

HIGHLAND DR

VALLEY VIEW DR

CRIPPEN RD

HOLSTON DR

KEITH AVE

WBEAVER

CREEK DR

WILSON AVE

FOX L

ON

AS

RD

MEREDITH RD

HA

RR

ISRD

DELROSE DR

GARDEN DR

YOU

NT

R

D

WCOPELAND DR

SULLIVAN

RD

THORN GROVE PIKE

FAIRMONT BLVD

WOODSON DR

E BEAVER CREEK DR

HOLS TON

HILLS RD

GEORGE WIL

LIAMS RD

DEANE HILL DR

SHERRILL BLVD

AULT RD

ESSARY DR

BAKERTO WN RD

MO

RRIS RD

SEVIER AVE

NICKL E RD

ANDES RD

BR

OOME RD

MILL RD

GARRISON DR

C HEROKEE TR L

ERED

BUD RD

MAG A ZINE RD

TEXAS A

VE

MCCAMMON RD

MARTINLUTH

ERKI

NGJR

AVE

WBRUSH

Y

VALLEY DR

HA

RTRD

MANIS RD

W BULLRUN

VALLE

YDR

JAC

KSB

OR

OPI

KE

MURPHY RD

GLEASONDR

BISHOP

RD

ELM ST

CHEROKEE BLVD

CRUZE RD

CANTON

HOLLOW

RD

E BRUSHYVAL LE

Y

DR

E INSKIP DR

HIGHLAND VIEW DR

HARRELLRD

LIB

ERTY

ST

WBLO

UNTA

VE

TWIN CREEK

RD

WOODY D R

HODGES FERRYRD

EBENEZERR

D

GREENWELL

DR

W FORDVALLEY RD

MCMILLAN RD

JENKINS RD

ISLAND HOMEPI

KE

MONTLAKE DR

RO

SEBERRY

RD

SIMS

RD

THOMPSONRD

LOVESC

REEKR

D

DAVENPORT RD

S HEFFIELD DR

NUBBIN RIDGE DR

CROSS PARK DR

SAN

DER

S R

D

CARPENTERRD

THIRD CREEK RD

SP

ATTY

RD

WES

LEYR

D

TOO

LES

B

END RD

E HILL AVE

OGLESBY

RD

DA LE AVE

HAWS

RD

WEAVER

RD

BA U

M DR

STO CKCREEK RD

GROVE DR

E B ULLRUN

VALLEY DR

SPRINGHILL

RDMCDONALD DR

MABRY

HOO

DR

D

HARVEY ST

OLD

CLINTON

PIKE

COLLEGE ST

WOODDALE CHURCH RD

NSIXTH

AVE

GREENWELL RD

CECIL AVE

VILLA RD

TILLERY RD

LINDY DR

BERKSHIREBLVD

BEVERLY RD

CO

TTRE

LLS

T

T AYLOR RD

WA

LLACE RD

NORTH NATIO

NAL DR

W

O ODS-SMITH RD

BALL CAMPPIKE

STONER

D

JOE

HIN

TON

RD

PINEY GROVE CHURC

HR

D

CHERT PIT RD

WAS HINGTO NAVE

CRENSHAW RD

COGDILLRD

MOURFIELD RD

HIC

KE

YRD

WALKER

BLVD

RUDDERRD

MCCALLA AVE

N ORTH MALL RD

COSTER RDSCHUBERTRD

PROSSER

RD

WILK

ERSONRD

BELL CAMPGR

OU

N

D RD

BOB KIRBY RD

SC

HILH

OW

EE

DR

BUD MCM

ILLANRD

WOO

DLA

WN

PIK

E

TAR WAT

ER

RD

S CASTLE ST

WRIGHTS FERRYR

DMIDPARK RD

FERN ST

NCHILHO

WEE

DR

BEAUMONT AVE

PELLEAUXRD

EDINGTONRD

BOYDS BRIDGE

PIKE

MO

SHIN

A R

D

BRO

WN

GAP

RD

FAIRW

AYR

D

JOHN MAY D R

ATLANTIC AVE

DEWINE

RD

S GALLAHER VIEW RD

OSBORNE RD

WALNUT ST

TENNESSEE AVE

EDGEWOOD AVE

W FIFTH AVE

OLD

CALLAHANDR

ARTELLA

DR

HO

LLYWO

OD

RD

RIFLE RANGE DR

BRIERCLIFF RD

W OLDHAM AVE

SAND

ERSON RD

TATE

TRO

TTER RD

EMORY CHURCHRD

CH ESHIR E DR

WALBROOK DR

SCEN

IC D

R

JACKSON RD

HAC

KWORTH

RD

MATLOC K

DR

ROWAN RD

KNOTT RD

REAGAN RD

AILOR AVE

SOU

THG

ATE

RD

GO

VERN

ME

NT

FAR

MR

D

LOOP RD

ROSEW

OO

D RD

INSK

IP R

D

BERNARD AVE

MALONEYVILLERD

DIVISION ST

OGLEW

OOD AVE

SOUTH NATIO

NAL DR

PARK WEST BLVD

WILDER PL

BID

DLE

ST

CO WARD MILL RD

UNIVER

SITY

AVE

PLUMM

ER RD

RENNO C RD

SISK

RD

BENNINGTON DR

LIPPENCOTT STV OLUNTE ER

BLVD

DANDRIDGE AVE

HENDERSON

RD

HA

ZELW

OO

D R

D

CORTE LAND DR

BRIDGEDALE DR

TILL

ERY

DR

WESTH

ILLSR

D

OGLE AVE

HAYNES-STERCHI RD

WALKER S PRINGS R D

ANITA DR

KINNAM

ON

RD

PRO

CTO

R S

T

CROSSLANE RD

BR

AD

SHAW

RD

BEAMAN LAKER

D

WILLOW

AVE

JIM STERCHI RD

ROBINSON RD

E FIFTH AVE

TOBLER

LN

WEST TOWN WAY

E MORELIA

AVE

SCHAEFFERRD

RAY MEARS BLVD

PLEASANT RIDGE RD

ORIOLE DR

CARTER MILL DR

BLACK STOCK

AV

E

GLENN AVE

KNOX RD

SCO

TTIS

H PI

KE

W BAXTER AVE

POR

TERFIELD

GA

P RD

KELLER BEND RD

OLD RUTLEDGE PIKE

E M

OO

DY

AVE

GAP RD

MCCONNELL ST

RED MILL LN

SHANNO

ND

ALER

D

HEISKELL AVE

NORTH HILLSBLVD

BEAVER RIDGE RD

CAIN RD

HOTEL RD

MCCLUNG AVE

COLEMAN RD

ARROWHEAD TRL

W MAGNOLIA AVE

HILLWOOD DR

NORTH PARK BLVD

BLACKS FERRY RD

TENW

OOD DR

PERSH

ING

ST

LOUDOUN RD

FAITH LN

HIGHLAND AVE

S CHESTNUT ST

STOCKCR

EEK

RD

DEANE HILL DR

ATLANTIC AVE

MCCAMMON RD

E H

ILL

AVE

WALKER BLVD

KIMBERLINHEIGHTS

RD

W BEAVER CREEK DR

MCCAMMON RD

MABRY HO

OD RD

ROBINSON RD

CECIL AVE

BAKERTOWN RD

SAN

DER

SON

RD

JENKINS RD

BALL CAMP PIKE

BALL CAMP PIKE

INSKIP

RD

OLD CLIN TON PIKE

TILLERY RD

CO

NN

ERRD

ALC

OA

HW

Y

PELLISSIPPI PKWY

ALC

OA

HW

Y

R - 1 A N D R - 1 E Z O N I N G I N T H E C I T Y O F K N O X V I L L E

Original Map Print Date: May 9, 2017

41 in = 0.5 miles

0 1 2 30.5Miles

Zoning DistrictsLow Density Residential (R-1, R-1E)