[mpc comment] community forum letter to mpc re: 10-12-17,...
TRANSCRIPT
Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>
[MPC Comment] Community Forum letter to MPC re: 10-12-17, Meeting Agenda Item#7, 5-C-17-OA ( Short-Term Rentals Ordinance) 1 message
larrys55 via Commission <[email protected]> Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:57 PMReply-To: [email protected]: [email protected]
TO: MPC CommissionersFROM: Larry Silverstein, Secretary-Treasurer of Community ForumDATE: October 10, 2017RE: October 12, 2017, Meeting Agenda Item #7, 5-C-17-OA (STR Ordinance)
Community Forum is an organization with representatives from many neighborhoods in Knoxville and Knox County. The MPC staff has recommended that you approve the Proposed Ordinance as drafted on April 25, 2017, with one slightrevision proposed by the City. Except for that slight revision, this is the same ordinance you voted to send to City Councilwithout recommendation at your May 11, 2017, meeting. Community Forum, along with the following 9 neighborhood groups, has approved Resolutions asking that Short-termRentals be omitted from both R-1 and R-1E residential zoning districts. Alice Bell/Spring HillForest HeightsFountain City Town HallKingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills AssociationPond GapTazewell Pike-Beverly Station NeighborhoodWesley Neighbors Community AssociationWest Hills Community AssociationWestmoreland Hills Homeowners Association. We respectfully request you amend the proposed Ordinance to remove Short-term Rentals from R-1 and R-1E zoningdistricts. The professional MPC staff report states "...that the language permitting Type (1) (owner occupied) STRs in all residentialdistricts be maintained." The rationale offered for this recommendation compares R-1 and R-1E with R-1A and EN-1 andEN-2. The staff states that, "As proposed, this revision (removal of R-1 and R-1E districts) would make distinctionsamong the City's low density residential districts. The proposed distinctions, and different treatment, cannot be supportedby the zoning code language identifying the general description of these districts. All are described as areas for lowdensity residential uses, with the goals of preserving existing neighborhoods and providing opportunities for thedevelopment of new low density neighborhoods." In response, we find the MPC professional staff rationale to be inadequate and lacking in substance. Furthermore, the comparison of General Descriptions is incorrect. Unlike R-1 and R-1E, the R-1A General Descriptionstates that the district is designed for "low to medium population density". And, unlike R-1 and R-1E, the GeneralDescription of EN-1 and EN-2 states "The district is not intended for use on presently undeveloped land that is currentlyzoned as agriculture (A-1). It should be used in the context of the prevalent existing development pattern." Clearly, EN-1and EN-2, is not for the purpose of "providing opportunities for the development of new low density neighborhoods." The "General Description" is, however, but one section that defines each particular zoning district. It is the "PermittedUses" section, also included in each zoning district, which specifically defines each district and clearly distinguishesamong the residential districts. It is disappointing that the Staff report fails to address "Permitted Uses” in its rationale for its conclusion.
So let us look at "Permitted Uses.” Unlike R-1A and EN-1 and EN-2, R-1 and R-1E do not allow bed and breakfasts,accessory dwelling units and multi-dwelling structures--the very uses that are most similar to STRs. And, unlike thenewer zoning districts, EN-1 and EN-2 and Planned Residential, there are no protective mechanisms such as designstandards or design plan review, in R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.The only protection in R-1 and R-1E is the list of "Permitted Uses." Community Forum’s June 26, 2017, letter to City Council outlined thirteen reasons why Short-Term Rentals pose a realthreat to the character and integrity of our R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods and therefore, are not appropriate for thesezoning districts.
· R-1 and R-1E districts are made up of low density, single-family detached homes.
· R-1 and R-1E districts do not allow uses similar to Short-Term Rentals. Unlike other residential zoning districts, R-1and R-1E zoning districts do not allow apartments, bed and breakfasts, or rooming and boarding houses.
· R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods are primarily the older, traditional, single-family detached, suburban developmentareas of our city. Their location, narrow roads, and development design, have deemed them to be inappropriate zones foruses similar to Short-Term Rentals, such as bed and breakfasts, rooming and boarding houses and apartments. Likewise, R-1 and R-1E are not appropriate zoning districts for Short-Term Rentals.
· Short-Term Rentals are a commercial use. Why should this one commercial use be allowed in all residential zoningdistricts, including the residential districts that do not allow similar uses under the existing zoning Ordinance? ThisOrdinance would set a precedent for allowing other inappropriate uses in R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.
· Like all uses that are incompatible with the character of existing development, Short-Term Rentals will have asignificant negative impact on R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods, and more importantly, on the quality of life of thehomeowners living in these neighborhoods.
· Short-Term Rentals increase the general activity level in the area.
· Short-Term Rentals increase noise.
· Short-Term Rentals increase both on-street and off-street parking demands.
· The proposed ordinance states that the maximum occupancy, "...shall not exceed two (2) transients per bedroomplus two (2) additional transients;...the maximum occupancy of the STR shall not exceed 12 persons..." includingall persons. A typical 3-bedroom home could have eight (8) people staying in the home. Compare that number to the2.39 average number of persons per household, 2011 to 2015, in Knox County. (U.S. Census Quick Facts.)
· Short-Term Rentals increase safety issues in neighborhoods.
· The experience with Short-Term Rentals in many cities has been increased noise and nuisance complaints. Some ofthe complaints are due to large, loud parties, and some are due to increased automobile-related noise and activity.
· The proposed Ordinance does not contain an enforcement plan, and its provisions are generally not enforceable.
· The City has said that they fear the TN State Legislature will remove all meaningful local control of Short-TermRentals if local governments "prohibit" Short-Term Rentals.We are not requesting a prohibition. We are simply requesting that Short-term Rentals not be allowed in two residentialzoning districts, R-1 and R-1E, -- districts which do not allow similar uses. There are many residential zoning districts inKnoxville that allow uses similar to Short-Term Rentals, e.g., bed and breakfasts, rooming and boarding houses,apartments, etc. The Community Forum and other neighborhood associations across the State are prepared to contactthe State Legislature again next year to work to maintain local control of Short-Term Rentals.
None of these issues were addressed in the MPC Staff report on the issue of whether Short-Term Rentals should not beallowed in R-1 or R-1E districts. While the City has not chosen to amend the Zoning Ordinance, the inclusion of Short-Term Rentals in every residentialzoning district in Knoxville, is definitely a zoning issue. How can the inclusion of a use so unlike other uses allowed in R-1and R-1E--permitting a single-family home to be rented in its entirety by the day or week, when the owner does not evenhave to be present on the property, or in the city, or even in the country, not bring about a major and negative change inthe character of the R-1 and R-1E zoning districts? Such a conclusion defies logic and is strongly disputed by theresidents of R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods who would be impacted by this proposed Ordinance.
Our Zoning Ordinance clearly states what is and what is not permitted in each of our zoning districts. When an ownerasks to operate a use in a district that is not specifically listed as a "Permitted Use" or "Use Permitted on Review", theMPC determines whether or not the requested use is similar to the uses that are specifically listed in the district. So, the appropriate question to ask is: Which currently permitted use in R-1 or R-1E is similar to a Short-Term Rental? Therefore, we conclude that the extremely limited analysis performed by the MPC in just looking at General Descriptionsof zoning districts while ignoring other major issues is flawed. Any legislation to amend the City of Knoxville Code ofOrdinance which will result in undermining the long established principles of the existing Zoning Ordinance in such adirect and drastic way, should not be recommended for approval by MPC. We ask that you amend the proposed Ordinance to remove Short-Term Rentals from the R-1 and R-1E zoning districts.
Sincerely,
Larry SilversteinSecretary-TreasurerCommunity Forum7808 Sheffield Dr.Knoxville, TN [email protected]
-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]
Community Forum letter to MPC re STR 10-10-17.docx 18K
Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>
[MPC Comment] Proposed Short Term Rental Ordinance 1 message
sandy gillespie <[email protected]> Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:06 AMReply-To: [email protected]: MPC <[email protected]>
Commissioners,
The Kingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills Association voted unanimously to oppose including R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods in the proposed Short Term Rental Ordinance several months ago.
Currently the Zoning Code does not allow uses similar to Short Term Rentals in R-1 and R-1Eneighborhoods. I am concerned that the new proposed ordinance is in direct conflict with, anderodes the protection of "Permitted Uses" in R-1 and R-1E neighborhoods.
Thank you for considering our concern.
Sincerely,
Sandy Gillespie
President, Kingston Pike-Sequoyah Hills Association
-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]
Betty Jo Mahan <[email protected]>
[MPC Comment] Short-term rentals in R-1 districts 1 message
Jesse Mayshark <[email protected]> Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:45 AMReply-To: [email protected]: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Cc: William Lyons <[email protected]>, Gerald Green <[email protected]>, Charles Swanson<[email protected]>, Crista Cuccaro <[email protected]>, Peter Ahrens <[email protected]>
Commissioners,
As you prepare for your meeting on Thursday, I wanted to provide some context and perspective on the request you havereceived from some neighborhood groups to recommend a complete ban on short-term rentals for homeowners in R-1and R-1E districts. The administration has serious concerns about making that kind of blanket prohibition, which wouldaffect the majority of neighborhoods in all sectors of the city. It would effectively leave short-term rentals as a widespreadillegal use in most areas of Knoxville, creating both enforcement and public safety challenges.
I have attached a map prepared by MPC staff showing all of the R-1 and R-1E districts in Knoxville. As you can see, theycover the majority of our residential areas. I am also attaching the map that Crista Cuccaro presented in her slide showon Tuesday, showing areas of Airbnb activity in the past year. This activity is already happening citywide, including inmany R-1 and R-1E areas.
If you zoom in on the zoning map, you can see that in fact most of our neighborhoods have several different zoningdesignations, often varying from one street to the next. A prohibition on a use of property by homeowners in R-1 and R-1E would leave many people who may wish to operate a short-term rental in their own home unable to do so, while theirneighbors across the street or a few blocks over would be able to. To give one example, I have attached another mapshowing the location of a property in Sequoyah Hills (outlined in red) that the City sent a notice of violation to after ananonymous complaint that the owner was operating a short-term rental there. As you can see from this map, that propertyis literally across the street from a large apartment complex that is zoned R-2. It would be hard to make a case that thepresence of a guest in the home with the STR is imposing some burden on that block.
You can find these situations in most of our neighborhoods. We have, for another example, heard from a homeowner onDeane Hill Drive who wants to operate a short-term rental in a “mother-in-law apartment” in his house that has beenvacated by his mother-in-law. His R-1 property is just two doors down from an O-2 district. Again, it is hard to imaginewhat negative impact a guest in his 4,500-square-foot house is having. These are the real-world scenarios that we areattempting to give some regulatory coherence to with our ordinance. What’s more, these uses are happening literallyevery day in nearly every neighborhood in Knoxville, with an estimated 8,000 guest stays a year, and we have heard onlya handful of complaints – most of which have alleged only zoning violations, not any kind of disruptive behavior.
We understand that there are fears about the impact of short-term rentals, especially from people who are not familiarwith the STR model and marketplace. But those fears have not been in any way borne out by several years of actualexperience, with thousands of people staying in hundreds of homes across Knoxville. Moreover, the experience of othercities tells us clearly that the more restrictive a short-term rental ordinance is, the harder it is to enforce and the larger theunderground economy it fuels.
The nature of the technological platforms, their ease of use, and the growing demand for this form of lodging all ensurethat it will continue to happen in Knoxville, whether or not we provide a framework for it. With our proposed ordinance, wehave deliberately and carefully worked to balance the many competing interests we have heard from on the issue,
protecting the integrity of our neighborhoods and our housing supply while also respecting the rights of property ownersand recognizing the reality of the world in 2017. Like most compromises, the proposed ordinance does not make anyonecompletely happy, but it does give us a pragmatic and enforceable framework.
It is also a framework that will provide a great deal more information and protection to our neighborhoods than currentlyexists. By requiring permits, we will create a publicly available list of all STR properties, including contact information forowners and designated agents. That means people will no longer have to guess or wonder if their neighbors areoperating an STR, as is currently the case and will remain the case if they are broadly banned. By not allowing Type 2(non-owner-occupied) STRs in residential areas, we will protect against the kinds of problems we have seen in citieswhere that is a prevailing model, which can include both the “party house” phenomenon and a loss of properties from thelong-term rental market.
The staff report you have makes clear there is not a legal basis in the zoning code for discriminating between or againstresidential districts on this issue. The desire from some groups to maintain a total ban on STRs in most areas of the city istherefore really a matter of local policy and politics, not land use. The administration does not believe it is a wise course,from a policy standpoint – nor a practical one, from an enforcement standpoint. But in any case, it is the kind of politicalquestion that is best addressed by our local legislative body.
We would be happy to answer any questions you may have. As you can tell, this is a complex subject that we have spentmany months studying and wrestling with, and there are strong feelings on all sides of it.
Thank you for your time and dedication.
Jesse
Jesse Fox Mayshark
Sr. Director of Communications and Government Relations
City of Knoxville
Office: 865-215-3710
Cell: 865-226-9409
Email: [email protected]
-- ___________________________________________________ This message was directed to [email protected]
3 attachments
Sequoyah Hills zoning map.png 1223K
§̈¦40
§̈¦640
§̈¦140
§̈¦75
§̈¦275
§̈¦40
§̈¦640
§̈¦40
CHAPMAN HWY
S NORTHSHORE DR
RUTLEDGE PIKE
CLINTON HWY
ASHEVILLE HWY
OAK RIDGE HWY
W EMORY RD
E EMORY
RD
MIDDLEBROOK PIKE
MILLERTOWN PIKE
TAZEWELL
PIKE
WESTLAND
DR
HEISKELL RD
SCHAAD RD
STRA WBERRY PLAINS
PIKE
MARYVILLE
PIKE
CEDAR LN
WASHINGTON PIKE
THORNGROVE PIKE
WESTERN AVE
WM
AR
TINM
ILLPIK
E
W GOVERNOR JOHN SEVIER HWY
M
ARTINMILL PIKE
SUTHERLAND AVE
DUTCHTOWN RD
POWELL DR
PLEASANT RIDGE RD
N CENTRAL ST
MORRELL
RD
CALLAHAN DR
BRU
HIN
RD
DANTE RD
RIFLE RANGE DR
MINE RD
MERCHANT DR
PARK
SIDE
DR
KINGSTON PIKE
BROWN GAP RD
EBEN
EZER R
D
GLEASON DRN
EYLA
ND
DR
CONCO
RD RD
BROOKS AVE
DUTCH VALLEY DR
LOVE
LLRD
E HENDRON CHAPEL RD
S GAY ST
MA
YNARD
VILLEPI K
E
AMHERST RD
BALL CAMP PIKE
WRACCOON VALLEY DR
LYONS
VIEW
PIKE
HUCKLEBERRY
SPRIN
GS
RD
KIMBERLIN HEIGHTS RD
N PETERS RD
S PETERS RD
HARRIS RD
FRA
NC
IS RD
CARTER RD
NBR
OADW
AY
BU
RK
HA
RT
RD
RIDGEVIEW RD
WHITTLE
SPRINGSR
DHARDIN VALLEY RD
MURDOCK DR
CUMBERLAND AVE
CENTRAL AVENUE PIKE
SEVIER AVE
ROBERTS RD
E WOODLA
ND AVE
KARNS VALLEY DR
DANDRIDGE AVE
N CHERRY ST
S CENTRAL ST
E MOODY AVE
ED S
HO
USE
DR
HELMBOLTR
D
SOUTH MIDDLEBROOK PIKE
BOYDS BRIDGE PIKE
OLD
BR
OA
DW
AY
HENLEY ST
N CEDAR BLUFF RD
VAN
OSD
ALE
RD
E SUMMIT HILL DR
MO
NTVU
E RD
WES
TCO
TT B
LVD
N HALL OF FAM
E DR
E MAGNOLIA
AVE
S CONCORD ST
N N
OR
THSH
OR
E DR
E FIFTH AVE
CECIL AVE
S G
ALL
AH
ER V
IEW
RD
WSUMMIT
HILL DR
FOUNTAINCITY RD
N W
EISGA
RB
ER R
D
MAIN STASBURY RD
N SEVENTEENTH ST
WESTLAND DR
LOVELL RD
WESTLAND DR
HA
RR
ISRD RUTLEDGE PIKE
EBENEZER RD
MID DLEBR OOK PIKE
W EMORY RD
MIDDLEBR O OK PIKE
DANTE RD
CLINTON HWY
MIDDLEBROOK PIKE
SEVIERV
ILLE PIKE
TIPTON ST ATION RD
BALL R
D
FOX RD
BABELAY RD
LONAS DR
BUFFAT MILL RD
MASCOT RD
BADGETT RD
DRY
GAP
PIKE
MURRAY DR
BLUEGRASS RD
ADAIR DR
SHIPE
RD
FLINT GAP RD
NEUBERT SPRINGS RD
WAYLAN D
RD
KODAK RD
ELLISTOW
NRD
CUNNINGHAM RD
CATE R
D
ASBURYRD
HAMME R RD
HALLRD
RIVERSIDE DR
DUNCAN RD
NUBBIN
RID
GE RD
GREENWAY DR
TARKLIN
VALLEY
RD
MALON EY RD
BROWN RD
PEDIG
O
RD
PAPERMILL DR
HOPEWELL RD
DEADERICK RD
BRICKYARD RD
MCKAMEY RD
E
COPELAND DR
AMHERS T RD
BURNETT CREEK RD
CONNER
RD
P ICKENS GAP RD
WIL
SO
N R
D
TOPSIDE RD
BOB GRAY RD
N RUGGLESFER
RYPI
KE
MYNATT RD
BYINGT ON SOLWAY RD
KIMBERLINHEIGHTS RD
TED FORD LN
LYONS
BENDRD
W EMORY RD
SKYLINE DR
ISLAND HOM E AVE
CLINCH AVE
HIGHLAND DR
VALLEY VIEW DR
CRIPPEN RD
HOLSTON DR
KEITH AVE
WBEAVER
CREEK DR
WILSON AVE
FOX L
ON
AS
RD
MEREDITH RD
HA
RR
ISRD
DELROSE DR
GARDEN DR
YOU
NT
R
D
WCOPELAND DR
SULLIVAN
RD
THORN GROVE PIKE
FAIRMONT BLVD
WOODSON DR
E BEAVER CREEK DR
HOLS TON
HILLS RD
GEORGE WIL
LIAMS RD
DEANE HILL DR
SHERRILL BLVD
AULT RD
ESSARY DR
BAKERTO WN RD
MO
RRIS RD
SEVIER AVE
NICKL E RD
ANDES RD
BR
OOME RD
MILL RD
GARRISON DR
C HEROKEE TR L
ERED
BUD RD
MAG A ZINE RD
TEXAS A
VE
MCCAMMON RD
MARTINLUTH
ERKI
NGJR
AVE
WBRUSH
Y
VALLEY DR
HA
RTRD
MANIS RD
W BULLRUN
VALLE
YDR
JAC
KSB
OR
OPI
KE
MURPHY RD
GLEASONDR
BISHOP
RD
ELM ST
CHEROKEE BLVD
CRUZE RD
CANTON
HOLLOW
RD
E BRUSHYVAL LE
Y
DR
E INSKIP DR
HIGHLAND VIEW DR
HARRELLRD
LIB
ERTY
ST
WBLO
UNTA
VE
TWIN CREEK
RD
WOODY D R
HODGES FERRYRD
EBENEZERR
D
GREENWELL
DR
W FORDVALLEY RD
MCMILLAN RD
JENKINS RD
ISLAND HOMEPI
KE
MONTLAKE DR
RO
SEBERRY
RD
SIMS
RD
THOMPSONRD
LOVESC
REEKR
D
DAVENPORT RD
S HEFFIELD DR
NUBBIN RIDGE DR
CROSS PARK DR
SAN
DER
S R
D
CARPENTERRD
THIRD CREEK RD
SP
ATTY
RD
WES
LEYR
D
TOO
LES
B
END RD
E HILL AVE
OGLESBY
RD
DA LE AVE
HAWS
RD
WEAVER
RD
BA U
M DR
STO CKCREEK RD
GROVE DR
E B ULLRUN
VALLEY DR
SPRINGHILL
RDMCDONALD DR
MABRY
HOO
DR
D
HARVEY ST
OLD
CLINTON
PIKE
COLLEGE ST
WOODDALE CHURCH RD
NSIXTH
AVE
GREENWELL RD
CECIL AVE
VILLA RD
TILLERY RD
LINDY DR
BERKSHIREBLVD
BEVERLY RD
CO
TTRE
LLS
T
T AYLOR RD
WA
LLACE RD
NORTH NATIO
NAL DR
W
O ODS-SMITH RD
BALL CAMPPIKE
STONER
D
JOE
HIN
TON
RD
PINEY GROVE CHURC
HR
D
CHERT PIT RD
WAS HINGTO NAVE
CRENSHAW RD
COGDILLRD
MOURFIELD RD
HIC
KE
YRD
WALKER
BLVD
RUDDERRD
MCCALLA AVE
N ORTH MALL RD
COSTER RDSCHUBERTRD
PROSSER
RD
WILK
ERSONRD
BELL CAMPGR
OU
N
D RD
BOB KIRBY RD
SC
HILH
OW
EE
DR
BUD MCM
ILLANRD
WOO
DLA
WN
PIK
E
TAR WAT
ER
RD
S CASTLE ST
WRIGHTS FERRYR
DMIDPARK RD
FERN ST
NCHILHO
WEE
DR
BEAUMONT AVE
PELLEAUXRD
EDINGTONRD
BOYDS BRIDGE
PIKE
MO
SHIN
A R
D
BRO
WN
GAP
RD
FAIRW
AYR
D
JOHN MAY D R
ATLANTIC AVE
DEWINE
RD
S GALLAHER VIEW RD
OSBORNE RD
WALNUT ST
TENNESSEE AVE
EDGEWOOD AVE
W FIFTH AVE
OLD
CALLAHANDR
ARTELLA
DR
HO
LLYWO
OD
RD
RIFLE RANGE DR
BRIERCLIFF RD
W OLDHAM AVE
SAND
ERSON RD
TATE
TRO
TTER RD
EMORY CHURCHRD
CH ESHIR E DR
WALBROOK DR
SCEN
IC D
R
JACKSON RD
HAC
KWORTH
RD
MATLOC K
DR
ROWAN RD
KNOTT RD
REAGAN RD
AILOR AVE
SOU
THG
ATE
RD
GO
VERN
ME
NT
FAR
MR
D
LOOP RD
ROSEW
OO
D RD
INSK
IP R
D
BERNARD AVE
MALONEYVILLERD
DIVISION ST
OGLEW
OOD AVE
SOUTH NATIO
NAL DR
PARK WEST BLVD
WILDER PL
BID
DLE
ST
CO WARD MILL RD
UNIVER
SITY
AVE
PLUMM
ER RD
RENNO C RD
SISK
RD
BENNINGTON DR
LIPPENCOTT STV OLUNTE ER
BLVD
DANDRIDGE AVE
HENDERSON
RD
HA
ZELW
OO
D R
D
CORTE LAND DR
BRIDGEDALE DR
TILL
ERY
DR
WESTH
ILLSR
D
OGLE AVE
HAYNES-STERCHI RD
WALKER S PRINGS R D
ANITA DR
KINNAM
ON
RD
PRO
CTO
R S
T
CROSSLANE RD
BR
AD
SHAW
RD
BEAMAN LAKER
D
WILLOW
AVE
JIM STERCHI RD
ROBINSON RD
E FIFTH AVE
TOBLER
LN
WEST TOWN WAY
E MORELIA
AVE
SCHAEFFERRD
RAY MEARS BLVD
PLEASANT RIDGE RD
ORIOLE DR
CARTER MILL DR
BLACK STOCK
AV
E
GLENN AVE
KNOX RD
SCO
TTIS
H PI
KE
W BAXTER AVE
POR
TERFIELD
GA
P RD
KELLER BEND RD
OLD RUTLEDGE PIKE
E M
OO
DY
AVE
GAP RD
MCCONNELL ST
RED MILL LN
SHANNO
ND
ALER
D
HEISKELL AVE
NORTH HILLSBLVD
BEAVER RIDGE RD
CAIN RD
HOTEL RD
MCCLUNG AVE
COLEMAN RD
ARROWHEAD TRL
W MAGNOLIA AVE
HILLWOOD DR
NORTH PARK BLVD
BLACKS FERRY RD
TENW
OOD DR
PERSH
ING
ST
LOUDOUN RD
FAITH LN
HIGHLAND AVE
S CHESTNUT ST
STOCKCR
EEK
RD
DEANE HILL DR
ATLANTIC AVE
MCCAMMON RD
E H
ILL
AVE
WALKER BLVD
KIMBERLINHEIGHTS
RD
W BEAVER CREEK DR
MCCAMMON RD
MABRY HO
OD RD
ROBINSON RD
CECIL AVE
BAKERTOWN RD
SAN
DER
SON
RD
JENKINS RD
BALL CAMP PIKE
BALL CAMP PIKE
INSKIP
RD
OLD CLIN TON PIKE
TILLERY RD
CO
NN
ERRD
ALC
OA
HW
Y
PELLISSIPPI PKWY
ALC
OA
HW
Y
R - 1 A N D R - 1 E Z O N I N G I N T H E C I T Y O F K N O X V I L L E
Original Map Print Date: May 9, 2017
41 in = 0.5 miles
0 1 2 30.5Miles
Zoning DistrictsLow Density Residential (R-1, R-1E)