ms and nmo update from ectrims_boston 2014.pdf

43
MS and NMO: An update ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS 2014 Surat Tanprawate, MD, MSc(Lond.), FRCPT The Northern Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University

Upload: surat-tanprawate

Post on 22-Nov-2015

97 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • MS and NMO: An update ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS

    2014Surat Tanprawate, MD, MSc(Lond.), FRCPT

    The Northern Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University

  • The slides and data were adapted from ECTRIMS/

    ACTRIMS 2014

  • Topic coverage1. The emerging of .CTRIMS, the MS

    conference

    2. Update from ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS, Boston 2014

    3. Around Boston, and MGH and the ether dome visit

  • Update from ECTRIMS & ACTRIMS, Boston 2014

  • Update topics1. Update on NMO

    1. The proposed new NMO criteria for diagnosis

    2. NMO and anti-MOG

    2. Update on MS

    1. cause of MS

    2. new measurement of disease progression

    3. Summarised of DMT for MS

  • 1. Update on NMO

  • Evolution of NMO: Historical context

  • Relevant differencesMS NMO

    Unknown cause, T cell, Th1>Th2, myelin target

    Caused by AQP4 Abs, Th2 >Th1, astrocyte target

    Relapse associated minor permanent disability

    Relapse associated with severe permanent disability

    Progression major cause of long-term disability

    No progression phase; relapse total cause disability

  • NMO Criteria (2006) Transverse myelitis and optic neuritis

    At least two of the following features:

    1) MRI brain negative/nondiagnostic for MS

    2) MRI spinal cord lesion extending over 3 vertebral segments (LETM)

    3) NMO-IgG seropositivity

    Wingerchuk et al. Neurology 2006

  • The New Face of NMO

  • International Panel for NMO Diagnosis (IPND)

    Convened October, 2011

    Co-chairs: Dean Wingerchuk, Brian Weinshenker

    Overall objective:

    To revise NMO diagnosis criteria to reflect advances in:

    Clinical and radiologic spectrum

    Serological testing

  • Results: Nomenclature NMOSD: Unified term

    Stratified by serostatus

    NMOSD with AQP4-IgG

    NMOSD without AQP4-IgG (or testing unavailable)

    Allow for future revision

    e.g. discovery and validation of other antibodies associated with NMOSD clinical phenotype

  • Revised Diagnostic Criteria:!NMOSD with AQP4-IgG

    Requirements!

    At least 1 core clinical characteristic

    Positive test for AQP4-IgG

    No better explanation

    clinical and MRI red flags

    Core Clinical Characteristics!

    Optic neuritis

    Acute myelitis

    Area postrema syndrome:

    nausea/vomiting/hiccups

    Other brain stem syndrome

    Symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic syndrome with MRI lesion (s)

    Symptomatic cerebral syndrome with MRI lesion (s)

  • Revised Diagnostic Criteria:!NMOSD without AQP4-IgG (or unavailable) At least 2 core clinical characteristics all satisfying:

    1 of ON, myelitis, or area postrema syndrome

    Dissemination in space

    Additional MRI requirements

    AP syndrome: dorsal medulla lesion

    Myelitis: LETM

    ON: normal brain MRI or >1/2 ON or chiasm lesion

    Negative test(s) for AQP4-IgG using best available assay, or testing unavailable

    No better explanation for the clinical syndrome

  • Area Postrema/Dorsal Medulla MRI Lesion

    Diencephalic MRI lesions

  • Cerebral MRI Lesion

  • Differential diagnosis of Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis

    1. Autoimmune

    NMO, SLE, Sjogren, APS

    2. Inflammatory

    MS, ADEM, Neurobechet, neurosarcoid

    3. Infectious:

    Parainfectious (EBV CMV, HSV, VZV, mycoplasma), syphilis, tuberculosis, HIV, HTLV-1)

    4. Neoplastic:

    Paraneoplastic, intramedullary tumor (ependymoma, lymphoma)

    5. Metabolic:

    Vitamin B 12 deficiency, copper deficiency

    6. Vascular

    Spinal cord infarct, Dural fistula

    7. Other

    radiotherapy

    Kitley et al, Mult Scler 2011

  • Red Flags:!Radiology

    Brain!

    MS-typical lesions

    Dawsons finger

    Adjacent to lateral ventricle temporal lobe

    Juxtacortical lesion(s)

    Cortical lesion (s)

    Lesion(s) with persistent (>3 months) gadolinium enhancement

    Spinal Cord!

    Short cord lesion(s)

    Predominantly(>70%)

    peripheral cord on axial T2

    Asymptomatic cord lesion(s)

    Persistent(>3months) gadolinium enhancement

    Tractopathy(e.g., paraneoplastic disorder)

    Diffuse,indistinctT2signal change (longstanding or progressive MS)

  • ???????????????

    Historically important

    Confusion terminology

    a form of MS versus NMO versus something unique?

    Similarly defined in Asia, patient have th esame disease

    ???????????????????????????

    NMO diagnosis allowable

    Concurrence with SLE, SS, MG increase likelihood of a diagnosis of NMO

    Association with systemic autoimmune disease more likely reflects concurrence than causation

  • 2. NMO and anti-MOG

  • Seronegative Definite NMO By use of the most sensitive cell-based assay for

    AQP4-Ab; sensitivity (74%) and specificity (100%)

    seronegative vas seropositive NMO

    No female preponderance (F/M 1.2 vs 9.8)

    Caucasian ethnicity (100% vs 73.6%)

    Opticomyelitis at the onset (27% vs 6%)

    Less frequent severe visual impairment (12% vs 54%)Jiao et al. Neurology 2013

  • A study of comparison between AQP4 Ab+. MOG Ab+ and Seronegative NMO ( 290 NMO pt.)

  • MOG-Ab+ Optic Neuritis

  • MOG-Ab+ Myelitis

  • Summary of Results AQP4-Ab+ patients=60.0% (156/260)

    MOG-Ab+ patients=10.4% (27/260)

    No NMOSD patients were double-positive

    Feature of MOG-Ab+ patients!

    (vs AQP4Ab+ and seronegative)

    - No female predominance

    - Optic neuritis (simutaneous bilateral) common

    - Caudal myelitis relatively common

    - Fewer attack & better recovery

  • 3. MS update

  • 3.1

  • Multiple sclerosis

    Phenotype1

    Phenotype 2

    Phenotype 3

    Phenotype 4 Phenotype 5

    Environment

    Genotype

  • MS Genetics Evidence of genetic risk

    population risk = 0.1%

    sibling risk = 2-4%

    dizygotic twin risk = 5%

    monozygotic twin risk = 30%

  • MS disease measurement Measure activity of disease by attacks frequency is not enough to

    measure disease progression

    Conventional MRI: limited

    baseline T1 and T2 lesion count and volume (focal damage) were moderately correlated with worsening EDSS scale over 10 year

    Whats new to measure in MS

    cortical lesions (focal damage)

    WM lesion

    brain volume; early brain atrophy rates may be associated with subsequent long term disability

    3.2

  • MS cause diffuse damage to grey matter

  • Advance technique for MS1. Double inversion recovery: for cortical

    2. Magnetization transfer imaging: a indicator of myelination in WM

    3. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy: determination of brain metabolite concentrations

    4. Volumetric MRI: changes in brain volume

    5. UHF-MRI97T): improved detection of MS lesions in WM and central vein sign, improved detection of cortical lesion

    6. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): quantification of biophysical tissue properties of the brain

  • Advanced imaging can detect functional, molecular or

    structural changes