multimodal education for inequality 2016

39
Multimodal education for inequality: exploring privilege in visual arts students’ e-portfolio personas by Noakes and Walton, 2016 “George” “Kyle” “Masibulele” “Melissa” “Nathan” 22-06-21 Presentation by @travisnoakes 1 Prepared for ICOM8 http://8icom.co.za Inequality in digital personas: how access to material and technological resources are mirrored in visual arts students’ e-portfolios by Noakes, Walton, and Cronje, 2009-16

Upload: travis-noakes

Post on 15-Apr-2017

236 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Multimodal education for inequality: exploring privilege in visual arts students’ e-portfolio personas

by Noakes and Walton, 2016

“George”

“Kyle”“Masibulele” “Melissa”

“Nathan”

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 1

Prepared for ICOM8 http://8icom.co.za

Inequality in digital personas: how access to material and technological resources are mirrored in visual arts students’ e-portfoliosby Noakes, Walton, and Cronje, 2009-16

Page 2: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Research Contributions

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 2

1 Action research intervention <appropriation of visual arts e-portfolios, digital curation>

2 Longitudinal research fieldwork <2 -3 years>

3 VERY different levels of resourcing <covers media ecologies in school, at home>

Default software values= disidentifiers

Absence of social information = misidentifiers

A digital hexis fordeveloping a templated self

Limitations young people face in expressing interests in e-portfolio styles

Differing opportunities for identities negotiating disciplinedpersonas Legitimated practicesDifferentiated practicesAffinity spaces

- Class- Race- Gender

REMEDIATION LIFESTYLES

Page 3: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 3Presentation by @travisnoakes

Illustration by Anja Venter

See Phone to Photoshop: Mobile workarounds in young people’s visual self-presentation strategies (Noakes, Walton, Venter & Cronje, 2014)

Participation in art, design or ICT as “formal privilege”Figure 1. ‘Inequalities in access to formal participation in ICT, visual arts or visual design education’. Illustration by Anja

Venter, 2014.

Page 4: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 4

Presentation by @travisnoakesIllustration by Anja Venter

Figure 2. ‘Inequalities in access to formal participation in ICT, visual arts or visual design education’. Illustration by Anja Venter, 2014.

School computer centres and art/design subjects as Capetonian “luxuries”

Page 5: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 5

Presentation by @travisnoakesIllustration by Anja Venter

Figure 3. ‘Silos in school subjects’. Illustration by Anja Venter, 2014.

Online content creation in syllabi bridging art, design and ICT is a “rare privilege”

Page 6: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

There are many online portfolio services to choose from (i.e. see Diigo social bookmarks ‘eportfolio’ tag)

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 6

Behance (an Adobe service)https://www.behance.net/about

DeviantArthttp://deviantartads.com/

Online portfolio genre affords an opportunity for visual creative producers to experiment with digital curation

Page 7: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 7

Digital portfolios serve as cultural and symbolic capitals that may help justifyTertiary academic opportunitiesFull-time jobsPart-time, freelance gigsVolunteer projects

Online portfolios can support growth in social capital via Understanding the breadth of visual creativity and who is involved in whatPlatform to first ‘seem’ and then ‘be’ an expert in your area(s) of specialityDevelop one’s persona as an expert by sharing ‘know-how’ in affinity groups and showcase examples of one’s work

Online portfolios may generate ongoing economic capitalLink to online shops and auctions selling one’s visual (re-)productionsEnter select works into online competitions

Digital portfolios =cultural, symbolic, social and economic capital$

Page 8: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

‘visual arts showcase e-portfolios’ meta-genre

• New syllabi primarily supported matric-exhibition preparation.

Presentation by @travisnoakes23-05-02 8

Figure 4. E-portfolio curriculum on travisnoakes.co.za, 2015.Figure 5. Screenshot of “Hui”’s Carbonmade ‘homepage’, November, 2010.Figure 6. Screenshot of Hui’s Carbonmade ‘homepage’, May, 2012

Page 9: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 9

Fields in the articulation of digital personas via showcase e-portfolios

Figure 7. Four key fields linked in visual arts education. Graphic by Travis Noakes, 2014.

Page 10: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Profiledescription

Profile image

Portfolio title

Contact details

Areas of expertise

SkillsFooterArtist. Date.

FolderName,Description

Artwork

Title withdescriptionTagsi.e. Client

1 ‘Home’ page template

3 ‘Artwork project folder’ page template

2 ‘About’ page template (artist’s profile)

Availabilityfor freelance graphic

Creative’s name

Portfolio title

Presentation by @travisnoakes23-05-02 10

4 ‘Search page results’ template

Folders of digitised artworks

Self-presentation and portfolio organization using Carbonmade

Page 11: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 11

Whereas in earlier times, apposite words to describe activities around publication may have been ‘written’, ‘edited’ and ‘produced’, it is quite clear that they are inadequate to capture all the self-representational activities or practices in networked, digital, culture. The word ‘curated’ does so by subsuming all of those practices and adding others that are possible in social media…

Curating is about knowing how the different forms you are working with work together to make meaning intertextually and for which purposes and audiences they are successful.’(Potter, 2015)

Support students with digital curation, a new media literacy

A. Collating artworks and inspirationsB. Production-Remediating-Editing-AssemblingC. Sharing-Moving media artefacts across different stages-Interacting with online audiences

Visual creatives’ online portfolio curation process

Page 12: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Action research fieldwork 2010 - 2013

Fieldwork (e-portfolio production) took place at an elite independent secondary school and at a less well-resourced ‘Arts and Culture focus’ government one.

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 12

12 government school volunteers

17 independent school students

Figure 8. ‘View of independent school from pool ’. Illustration by Travis Noakes, 2015.

Figure 9. ‘View of government school from parking lot’. Illustration by Travis Noakes, 2015.

Page 13: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 13

Source: Digital Sociology. ‘Inequalities in the Network Society’ by Jan van Dijk, page X, 2013.

Focus on material and technological inequalitiesTable 1. Types of (in)equality and (un)equally divided properties

Page 14: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Arts and Culture government focus school

•Incompatible ecologies with ten year old PCs.

•Few extra-mural and co-curricular activities offered at school (pupils’ safety on public travel )

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 14

Independent school

•“One laptop per learner” policy and conspicuous consumption of digital and consumer electronics (i.e. iPads, professional- and Go Pro cameras)

•Many co-curricular fine arts and other leisure activities supported by their school

Key technological and material inequalities that government and independent school students

experience

Volunteer students who are well-disposedto careers creating visual culture

Mandatory for all students, but few keen on ‘low-prestige’ careers involving visual culture

Differences in vocational interests and motivations

Page 15: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Prepared by @travisnoakes 15

Lots of data from four years of fieldwork…

1. E-portfolio lessons (30 independent school- and 12 government school lessons);

2. Screenshots of e-portfolios at the independent school (in 2010, 2011, 2012);

3. Screenshots of e-portfolios at the government school (in 2013);4. Screenshots of Carbonmade’s graphic user interface;5. E-portfolio and out-of-class questionnaire feedback (from all 29

learners);6. Individual interviews with 16 students and both educators;7. Research journal notes.

Page 16: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Research questions and theoretical lensesto research choices and contexts

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 16

A COMBINATION

OFTHEORETICAL

LENSES

RQ1. What digital self-presentation and organisation choices do visual arts students make in their e-portfolios?

RQ2. How do visual arts e-portfolios and visual culture repertoires relate to individual habitus and spaces of production?

Inequality approach

Infrastructure studies

Analysis1.Innovative multimodal content analysis of screenshots.2.Case studies referencing sources 1 to 7.

SOCIALINTERACTIONISM

SOCIAL SEMIOTICS

DIGITAL MATERIALISM

CULTURAL THEORY

Page 17: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 17

Content AnalysisRepresentational patterns in

government school students’ self-presentation

Representation of disciplinary personas1)Foregrounded observational drawer, painter and sculptor roles.2)Short self-descriptions, most add a few images.3)Averaged less than 14 images, few pushed the storage limit.4)Seldom thoroughly organised.5)No appropriation of inspiration.6)Private email addresses.7)Few added copyright statements.

Representation of extra mural visual creative personas1)Most added extra curricular visual creative productions.2)The surfaces and medias used were mostly similar to those used in class.

Representation of other personas1)A few feature personas as music fans and a tourist at the Waterfront.2)Two added being football players.

Page 18: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Government school students’informal self-representations

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 18

Mobile phone

Camera photographs

Figure 10. Self imagery uploaded by government school students, 2013.

Page 19: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 19

Content AnalysisRepresentational patterns in

Independent school’s self-presentation

Representation of disciplinary personas:1)Formal genres were used for self imagery. These were also common in lengthy self-descriptions.2)Classroom roles were foregrounded, which included graphic design.3)Artworks were well-organized, often-labelled.4)Most pupils attributed appropriations.5)Expensive surfaces and medias used (oil painting, charcoal drawing). 6)A few school email addresses.7)Most used incorrect copyright statements, but some used more thorough copyright statements than those prescribed.Representation of extra mural visual creative personas:8)Some add extra curricular visual creative productions involving more costly medias than those in class.9)A few added links to other digital portfolios.10)Some pushed imagery storage to the limit.

Other personas:10)Most featured other leisure personas. 11)Most foreground exclusive sporting personas (rugby, golf, watersports, shooting).12)Some also added distinctive leisure profiles as musicians or tourists.

Page 20: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Independent school students’self-representations

Presentation by @travisnoakes 2023-05-02

Drawn or painted

Mobile phone

Camera photographs

Video screengrab

Figure 11. Self imagery uploaded by independent school students, 2013.

Page 21: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 21

Checklist for the evidence of privilege in visual arts e-portfolio personas

Legitimated personas of a ’disciplined identity’ (visual art student)Detailed self-presentation as a visual arts studentWell-organised, curricular showcaseAppropriation and attribution of legitimated academic cultural capitalExtra-mural, co-curricular (“official”) productionsExclusive medias (oil versus standard acrylic) and surfaces

“Unofficial” personas’ differentiated practices (lifestyles)High production values (use of photographic editing software)“Unofficial” visual creative productions in exclusive mediasMaximum storageLinks to other portfoliosFeature other valued personas (academic, sport, music and tourism as cultural capital) Desire to connect for work; ‘Available for freelance’ and contact details providedDesire for a vocational trajectory in cultural industry

Page 22: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Importance of online access in curating digital personas

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 22

Is there infrastructure for me to curate my work?-In class-On my phone-At home

Will I use this infrastructure to develop a disciplinary showcase?-In class-On my phone-At home

Can I curate extra-muralvisual productions?-Only at school-On my phone-At home

What other personas andcultural capital can I publish?-In class-On my phone-At home

Visual creative personas Other leisure personas

Can I view online portfoliosas an educational resource?-In class-On my phone-At home

Can I use allied services, like social bookmarking?-In class-On my phone-At home

Do I link to other portfolios from my e-portfolio?-In class-On my phone-At home

Where can I participate in other online affinity spaces?-In class-On my phone-At home

Which should I hide or publish elsewhere?-In class-On my phone-At home

Which should I hide or publish elsewhere?-In class-On my phone-At home

At either site, well-connected students with “free” internet access did not face the constraints that their under-and non-connected peers did in developing a digital hexis (and habitus) for e-portfolio production.

Page 23: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

The young person’s digital hexis for e-portfolio curation

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 23

The process of digital self-presentation through preparing a user-identity is different from one’s embodied self-presentation. In the real world one’s body is an absolute clue of existence. However, in the ‘digital’ one, it is not because you are consulting a website that you do exist (Hogan, 2010). Here each user must first take existence to communicate or is hidden without a representation (web profile).

Such profiles require the use of a digital hexis (Georges, 2008) in which each user designates his or her scheme of self representation. These significations are transformed like a body, which is shaped by habit or by repetitive practice. Thus the notion of hexis bears analogy with the shaping of meaning and body. Students developed this digital hexis while producing e-portfolio self-presentations and curating their digital portfolios. Both were necessary for establish an e-portfolio presence that is traceable, but also required ongoing online activities to make it seem ‘alive’.

Page 24: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 24

Relationship of an individual’s habituses to affinity spaces in articulating e-portfolio personas

Figure 12. Habitus and affinity spaces. Graphic by Travis Noakes, 2016.

The habitus is, ‘a system of durable, transposable dispositions which functions as the generative basis of structured, objectively unified practices’ (Bourdieu, 1977). Habitus is socialised subjectivity; the way society becomes deposited in persons in the form of lasting dispositions, or trained capacities and structured propensities to think, feel and act in determinant ways, which then guide them (Wacquant 2005).

Affinity spaces are common for customers in high-technology, capitalist environments (Gee, 2000, 2001, Riffkind, 2000). Typically, the customers of businesses in these spaces share a common endeavor and support each other in developing and dispersing knowledge about their shared passion.

Page 25: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

George’s disciplinary touchstone e-portfolio- Five thumbnail page examples

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 25

Figure 13. Anonymised table of thumbnail webpages images from “George’s” 2012 e-portfolio, edited by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Page 26: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 26

Reproducing of a disciplined identity case #1 George (independent school student)

Secondary habitus Related roles

- Well connectedto the internet

- Owned a laptop,smartphone,entry-level camera

• Minimal description of other leisurepersonas

• Hid links to “unofficial” deviantArt,Flickr and Instagram portfolios

• Did not link from Carbonmade to his Twitter and Facebook accounts,but did share his imagery to these

• Local and international tourist • Gallery visitor• Music fan• Sports participant• Socializing

• An exemplary academic achiever

• Fine Arts fan of abstract, modern and conceptual art

• Observational drawer in charcoal,pencil, oil pastels, oil painter, printmaker, designer, photographer (nature), photo editor

• Extensive fine arts, design and photographic research online, i.e. FB fan pages, Twitter and artists’ blogs

E-portfolio curation

• Full showcase of syllabus-related images

• Organized according to gallery metaphor

• William Kentridge and van Gogh as inspiration in his e-portfolio

• Used other online portfolio services• Entered online arts competitions

White male with middle-class parentswho work in advertising

Digital information habitusVisual creative personas Other leisure personas

Primary habitus Vocational habitus

• Architect• Medicine

Exemplary academic cultural capital.

Page 27: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 27

Nathan’s e-portfolioFour thumbnail page examples

Figure 14. Anonymised table of thumbnail webpages images from “Nathan’s” 2013 e-portfolio, edited by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Page 28: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 28

- No connectionto the internet- No ownership of ICT

• Brief mentions of other leisurepersonas

• Music fan• Football player• Socializing

• Fan of visual art• Observational drawer in pencil• Painting in plakka paints• Sculptor in mixed media• Researched other Carbonmade

portfolios during lessons

• Four syllabus-related images

• Privacy concerns contributed to a brief self-description and no self image being added

Black male with working class parents•At home, he had no equipment to produceart, not enough space and seldom the time.

Secondary habitus Related rolesPrimary habitus Vocational habitusRemediation of academic cultural capital via heavily constrained habituses

• Graphic or interior design • Seeking internships

Digital information habitus Visual creative personas Other leisure personasE-portfolio curation

Reproducing a disciplined identity case #4 Nathan (government school student)

Page 29: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 29

Masibulele’s e-portfolioFour thumbnail page examples

Figure 14. Anonymised table of thumbnail webpages images from “Nathan’s” 2013 e-portfolio, edited by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Page 30: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 30

Under-connected:-Mobile internet-Computer use in computer lab and on home PC.

• Disciplinary: Traditional mixed-media• Fan of the ‘art industry’• Sought publicity: contact details• Facebook and Black Berry Messenger (BBM)

groups for his fashion label

Black Male with working-classparents

• Observational drawing in pencil, Illustrator, portrait drawer, oil and normal pastel work, painter, mixed-media sculptor, relief tiler and collages.

• Initially only disciplinary, but did add fashion label

• Did not share traditional mixed-media

Background

• Fashion entrepreneur• Music and movies fan• Socialiser• ‘Explorer’

• Fashion entrepreneur• Socialiser• Music fan• Explorer

Foregrounding other personas case #8 Masibulele (government school student)

Digital information habitus Other leisure personas

E-portfolio curation

Secondary habitus Related rolesPrimary habitus Vocational habitus

A fashion entrepreneur, who used a mobile digital information habitus in presenting his classroom and aspirant designer personas.

Visual creative personas

• Fashion entrepreneur• Surface designer• Architect

Page 31: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 31

Figure 15. Anonymised table of thumbnail webpages images from “Melissa’s” 2013 e-portfolio, edited by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Melissa’s e-portfolioFour thumbnail page examples and linked portfolio

Page 32: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 32

- Well connectedto the internet- Own PC, professional photo-, animation- and3D software

• Disciplinary: sketcher (pencil, ink, pen), observational drawer, pointillism

• Mixed-media (different mediums)

• Japanese calligraphy, typography art

• Animator’s workshop

Black female with middle-classparents

• Pseudonymous identity connected to her ‘Japanese freak’ interests

• Linked e-portfolio to her deviantArt profile • Created two other portfolios (MyFolio.com,

Behance.net)

• Japanese; Anime and Manga fan• Sci-Fi/Fantasy fan• Goth fan• Emo music fan

• Animation• Sci-Fi/Fantasy• Emo music fan• (Goth)

Background Secondary habitus Related rolesPrimary habitus Vocational habitusA fan of Japanese Animé and Manga visual culture and an aspirant animator.

Foregrounding other personas case #10 Melissa (government school student)

• Animator• Fine Art

Digital information habitus Other leisure personas

E-portfolio curationVisual creative personas

Page 33: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

33

Figure 16. Anonymised table of thumbnail webpages images from “Kyle’s” 2012 e-portfolio, edited by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Kyle’s e-portfolioFour thumbnail page examplesand linked portfolios

Page 34: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 34

- Well connectedto the internet- Own laptop,smartphone,professional camera equipment, Go Pro, professional photo- and video editing software

• Foregrounded watersports and included tourist personas

• Added links to Flickr and Vimeoportfolios, but not YouTube

• Watersports fan• Fan of technicity• Local and international tourist • Fan of several music genres• Socialiser• Computer gamer

• An fan of photography and “filmography”• Observational drawer in charcoal and

graphite, oil painter, designer,photographer (watersports, local and international travel), photo editor,videographer and video-editor

• Foregrounded photographic images• Well-designed using colour principles• Changes from Banksy to film inspiration*• Extensive extra-mural research online,

i.e. YouTube ‘giant wave break’ help• Entered online video competitions• Used other online portfolio services

White male from aprivileged home

* Similar to ”Dylan” in Online content creation: looking at students’ social media practices through a Connected Learning lens (Brown, Czerniewicz and Noakes, 2015)

Post-school•Google Plus, Tumblr and Instagram accounts•Linked to society6.com for online sales

Digital information habitus Other leisure personas

E-portfolio curationVisual creative personas

Foregrounding other personas case #11 Kyle (government school student)

Background Secondary habitus Related rolesPrimary habitus Vocational habitusA watersports man, videographer and photographer.

• Finance

Page 35: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Evidence of inequality and the symbolic reproduction of privilege

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 35

1. Prosumer personas of well-resourced students seemed to be amplified during my intervention.

2. Independent school students benefitted from leisure practices whose capitals correspond to their institutional schooling. By contrast, working class students perceived there to be obstacles to sharing repertoires from home.

3. Creation of easily searchable, nonymous identities a male student’s privilege?

4. E-portfolio production is now mandatory at the independent school for grade 10 and up students, but is not offered at the government school.

Page 36: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

Reproduction of a Capetonian “creative class” mostly from middle- and upper class origins

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 36

Figure 17. Social reproduction in trajectories linked to the visual arts or visual design. Graphic by Travis Noakes, 2016.

Page 37: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 37

In highly-constrained material and technological contexts, the concept of a signmaker expressing his or her interest is worthy of critique:1.Non-internet connected students described being unable to publish the social information or artwork showcases they wanted to.2.In the absence of information on digital infrastructure, it can be difficult for viewers to appreciate how differing contexts shaped the quantum and styles of visual and social information that users provided. For example, it is hard to spot that an under-resourced student has put a lot of effort in making workarounds to overcome slow and unreliable ICT infrastructures versus an affluent student achieving more with much less effort!3.Students may not deliberately choose multimodal ensembles: Default software values can create mis-identifiers that inexpert teenagers missed editing or forget to change. Their display may result in ongoing misrepresentation on webpages.

Major multimodal contributionfrom my visual arts e-portfolio research?

Page 38: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 38

Some recommendations for research related to visual arts e-portfolios

1. How can e-portfolio pedagogy better accommodate diverse material and

technological resourcing?

2. What do young visual creatives do with online portfolios after matric?

3. What visual arts e-portfolio styles might emerge in an isiXhosa-speaking government

school?

4. How are digital portfolios being assessed, particularly in justifying access to tertiary

education)?

5. Is a new form of distinction (“Distinction 2.0”?) emerging whereby the digital

sharing of differentiated practices and personas marks a distinctive social status?

Page 39: Multimodal education for inequality 2016

THANKS to supporters of e-portfolio research

National Research Foundation.

University of Cape Town,Department of Film and Media Studies.SAME research group.

Cape Peninsula University of Technology,Department of Informatics and Design.Technology in Education and Research, MA & PhD students.

23-05-02 Presentation by @travisnoakes 39

Illustration | Design | New Media Researchw: www.nannaventer.co.za c: [email protected]

IllustratIONS by