national aeronautics and space administration … integrated propulsion research for the study of...
TRANSCRIPT
NASA Aviation Safety Program
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Vehicle Integrated Propulsion
Research for the study of
Health Management
Capabilities
John Lekki, Don Simon, Gary Hunter, Mark Woike, Roger Tokars
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20120016773 2018-06-25T13:11:14+00:00Z
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Vehicle Integrated Propulsion Research (VIPR)
Overview
EHM technology testing is challenging:
• Expensive
• Dedicated testing is necessary to demonstrate technology
against known system “ground truth” state.
Partnerships make it possible:
• Sharing of costs, results and benefits
• VIPR partners include NASA, Air Force, Pratt & Whitney and a
growing list of other government agencies and industry
partners.
VIPR test approach:
• A series of on-wing engine ground tests
• Includes “nominal” and “faulted” engine operating scenarios
• Technologies under evaluation include advanced EHM sensors
and algorithms
2
Vehicle testing
Test Rig
Component rig testing
Simulation test and evaluation
Testing is a necessary and challenging
component of Engine Health Management
(EHM) technology development.
Conceptual design
VIPR Test Schedule
VIPR I (Dec. 2011) VIPR II (2013) VIPR III (2014)
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I Test Overview
• VIPR I test was conducted in December 2011
at NASA Dryden / Edwards Air Force Base
• Test vehicle: – Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
– Equipped with Pratt & Whitney F117 turbofan
engines
• VIPR 1 EHM ground tests included: – A series of nominal and faulted engine test
cases
– Data collected over a range of power settings
including quasi-steady-state and transient
operating conditions
3
Pratt & Whitney F117 Turbofan Engine
Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I – EHM Technologies Under Test
4
Emissions Sensor System
(CO, Hydrocarbons, CO2,
O2, NOx)
Self-Diagnostic Accelerometer and
High Frequency Vibration Sensors
19:32:00 19:42:00 19:52:00 20:02:00
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
Fan
Sp
eed
, R
PM
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Probe #1 - 90 Deg, Average Clearance, mm
Probe #2 - 180 Deg, Average Clearance, mm
Fan Speed, RPM
Average Blade Tip Clearances (mm) and Fan Speed versus Time,
Probes #1 & #2, Run #7 9-23-2008
Av
era
ge C
leara
nce, m
m
Time
Microwave Blade Tip Clearance /
Blade Tip Timing Sensors
(EMI/EMC checkout only)
Legacy instrumentation
• Inlet debris monitoring system
• Station 2.5 pressure and temp
• High fidelity fuel flow measurement
Model-based performance
estimation and diagnostics
Multiple EHM sensors/algorithms tested during VIPR I
Valuable for identifying real-world implementation issues/concerns
Testing of multiple technologies also allows assessment of information fusion benefits
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Relevance to Aviation Safety Needs
• Engine malfunction coupled with Inappropriate Crew Response is the most statistically
significant issue
• Systems Analysis
– Sensor failure is one of the largest contributors to In Flight Shut Down
– Blade loss is one of the larger contributors to In flight Shut Down due to high vibration and power
loss
5
Steve Clark, Grace Balut Ostrom, and Sam Clark, Engine Damage-Related Propulsion System Malfunctions, DOT/FAA/AR-08/24, December 2008.
NASA Aviation Safety Program
6
Microwave Tip Clearance Sensor Technology • Microwave blade tip clearance sensor technology for use in turbine engines
– Structural health monitoring – tip clearance and tip timing – Active closed loop clearance control - tip clearance
• Targeted for use in hot sections of turbine engines (High Pressure Turbine section)
– Rated for use in high temperature environment, ~1200 ºC – Highly accurate, current goal of ~25um for this technology – Able to see through contaminants that exist in the engine
flow • Sensors have been used on several experiments at GRC
to evaluate & demonstrate their performance. Goal is to use sensors on an actual aero engine.
Microwave sensors installed on the NASA Turbofan Test Rig at the GRC’s 9x15 LSWT
Clearance data acquired on the NASA Turbofan Test Rig
NASA Aviation Safety Program 7
Self Diagnostic Accelerometer (SDA)
• Vehicle Health Management Systems may make
mission critical health assessments based upon sensor
information
• It is critical that sensor measurements be validated
before a health management system may take such
action
• Sensor validation is often accomplished through multiple
sensors voting - MAS 777-200 flight in 2005 is a case
where 2 failed sensors outvoted a third healthy sensor
This Self Diagnostic Accelerometer System was successfully demonstrated in providing electro-mechanical
data including the health of the sensor-part attachment under varying temperature, torque-attachment, and
electro-mechanical noise.
Manual Data from
Signal Analyzer
Self Diagnostic Accelerometer (SDA) System
Autonomous Data
from SDA System
SDA Controller
System
Base
Accel.
T-Box Connector
SDA System
NASA Aviation Safety Program
• Multispecies microsensor detection in single package to allow miniaturization of the detection
apparatus
• Quantify composition of critical constituents in turbine engine exhaust products, E.G., CO, CO2,
NOX, O2, HC (unburned Hydrocarbons) and H2
• Improve accuracy in measuring exhaust products
• Engine Test Objectives:
– Obtain correlated emissions data in conjunction with gas path diagnostics data so that the benefit for inclusion of emissions information in gas path diagnostics can be studied
CO2 Sensor CO
Sensor
SiC
Hydrocarbon
Sensor
Standard Multi-gas
Analyzer
MEMS Emissions Sensors
Engine Tests and Testing
High Temperature Electronic Nose
MEMS Based Emission Sensors
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Propulsion Gas Path Health Management
Technical Approach:
• Develop optimal sensor placement
methodology for gas path diagnostics
• Enhanced adaptive modeling techniques for
on-line engine performance deterioration
trending and fault diagnostics
• Gas Path Diagnostics also enable the model-
based estimation of unmeasured parameters
critical for IVHM
Engine Test Objectives:
• Obtain data containing simulated faults for
testing of current and future diagnostic
algorithms
• Obtain diagnostic data concurrently with tip
clearance and emission sensor data so that
initial studies for the inclusion of these
sensors in a diagnostic model can be made
On-Board
Adaptive Model Gas-Path
Diagnostics
Performance Trending and Fault
Diagnostics
Sensed Measurements
• Pressures, temperatures,
rotor speeds, etc.
Model-Based Diagnostics Architecture
Engine
FADEC
C-17 Aircraft
NASA Aviation Safety Program
10
Test Implementation
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I testing of the Self Diagnostic Accelerometer
Roger Tokars (GRC) John Lekki (GRC) December 2011
Test Locations C-17 Aircraft
The Self Diagnostic Accelerometer (SDA) was
mounted and tested on the C-17 engine in order to
demonstrate the SDA’s flight worthiness and
robustness.
Results
The Self Diagnostic Accelerometer System
was successfully demonstrated in providing
electro-mechanical data including the health
of the sensor attachment under the extremes
of an aircraft engine environment.
Conclusion
Ideal
Min.
Noise
Mod.
Noise
Max.
Noise
Pattern recognition software successfully discriminates all tight and loose conditions.
Accelerometer mount
Secured with safety wire
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Preservation Oil Burn-off
• Day 1 of VIPR testing was a
“green engine run” (first time the
test engine was run post-overhaul)
• Provided an opportunity to
evaluate the Emission Sensor
System (ESS) during preservation
oil burn-off
12
ESS Rig
Preservation oil burn-off!
NASA Aviation Safety Program 13
Preservation Oil Burn-off Test
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Engine 3 Preservation Oil Burn Off
Start up - ESS observed fast rise in concentrations
Exception – oxygen concentration dropped, as expected
~2 min from start up - noticeable change and recovery
The high levels eventually tapered down to somewhat lower
concentrations with the engine stable at idle
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
5
10
15
20
25
23
:44
:10
23
:45
:36
23
:47
:02
23
:48
:29
23
:49
:55
23
:51
:22
23
:52
:48
23
:54
:14
23
:55
:41
23
:57
:07
HC
-P
PM
NO
x -
PP
M
Time (GMT)
12/12/2011 - Engine 3 Preservation Oil Burn Off - 7205-31-100.002
NOx
HC
Engi
ne
star
t
Engi
ne
sto
p
Vis
ible
sm
oke
0
5
10
15
20
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
23
:44
:10
23
:45
:36
23
:47
:02
23
:48
:29
23
:49
:55
23
:51
:22
23
:52
:48
23
:54
:14
23
:55
:41
23
:57
:07
CO
2, O
2-
%
CO
-P
PM
Time (GMT)
12/12/2011 - Engine 3 Preservation Oil Burn Off - 7205-31-100.002
O2
CO
CO2
Engi
ne
star
t
Engi
ne
sto
p
Vis
ible
sm
oke
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I Highlights: Gas Path Diagnostic Testing
Gas Path Diagnostic Test Objectives:
• Collect engine performance data under nominal and
faulty operating conditions
• Evaluate ability of adaptive model to track engine
performance
• Evaluate ability of gas path diagnostic algorithms to
detect fault conditions
Engine Gas Path Fault Conditions Included:
• Station 2.5 bleed failed full-open
• Station 2.5 bleed schedule biased +10% open
• Stage 14 bleed failed full-open
Next Steps:
• Continue post-test data analysis
• Improve model transient and low power accuracy
Station 2.5 Stage 14
F117 engine – bleed fault locations
Power setting stair step 2 minute accel/decel
Jam accel/decel
Event Test Sequence
Station 2.5 and Stage 14 bleed fault signatures
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I Post-Test Data Analysis
(Preliminary Results)
• Model-based performance estimation and diagnostics
– Steady-state measurement residuals (faulty vs. nominal baseline) found to be in
good agreement with model predictions for each fault type.
– Model-based diagnostic architecture trained on a single baseline run and then
used to analyze remaining runs. With training:
• Model-engine residuals reduced on subsequent baseline runs.
• Model-engine residuals exhibit increases on fault runs.
– Future steps will be taken to:
• Improve model accuracy at specific power settings and during engine
transients.
• Evaluate the effectiveness of different machine learning techniques applied to
capture engine-model mismatch.
16
NASA Aviation Safety Program
VIPR I Post-Test Data Analysis
(Preliminary Results - continued)
• Emission Sensor System (ESS)
– Baseline emission levels established.
– Discernable change in emissions observed during preservation oil burn-off.
– Demonstrated system under nominal and seeded fault conditions. The ESS
system in general tracked a wide range of varying engine conditions.
• Microwave blade timing / tip clearance sensor
– Successfully passed electro-magnetic interference (EMI) / electro-magnetic
compatibility (EMC) checkout.
– Cleared for actual on-engine use for future VIPR tests at DFRC.
• Self-diagnostic accelerometer (SDA)
– Four SDAs, attached at engine B-flange and gearbox, successfully
completed first-ever demonstration in engine environment.
– SDA able to successfully detect un-torquing (loosening) of accelerometer
connection.
17
NASA Aviation Safety Program
Future Test Plans (VIPR 2 and VIPR 3 )
• VIPR 2 Test Objectives (2013)
– Advanced sensors
– Gas path diagnostic technologies
– Miss-scheduled turbine case cooling
– Fan response research
• VIPR 3 Test Objectives (~2014)
– Initial steps toward EHM sensor fusion with Advanced Sensors
– Volcanic ash ingestion testing
– Run engine to end of life
18