nato’s priorities 2010

16
1 CHALLENGES CHALLENGES - - NATO’s NATO’s PRIORITIES 2010 PRIORITIES 2010 FOR A CHANGING ALLIANCE

Upload: pelham

Post on 03-Feb-2016

74 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

NATO’s PRIORITIES 2010. CHALLENGES -. FOR A CHAN GING A LL IA NC E. Outline. Operations: ISAF New Strategic Concept/Summit Russia NATO Reform Partners NATO-EU. Total: 107,656 incl. 2,727 from 17 Non-NATO countries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

1

CHALLENGES CHALLENGES --CHALLENGES CHALLENGES --

NATO’s NATO’s PRIORITIES 2010PRIORITIES 2010

FOR A CHANGING ALLIANCE

Page 2: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

2

Outline

• Operations: ISAF• New Strategic Concept/Summit

• Russia

• NATO Reform

• Partners

• NATO-EU

Page 3: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

3

ISAFISAFISAFISAFTotal:Total: 107,656 107,656 incl. 2,727 fromincl. 2,727 from 17 Non-NATO countries17 Non-NATO countries

28 NATO28 NATO:: ALB, BE,BiH, BUL, CA, CRO, CZ, ALB, BE,BiH, BUL, CA, CRO, CZ, DE, EST, FR, GE, GR, HU, ICE, IT, LAT, DE, EST, FR, GE, GR, HU, ICE, IT, LAT, LIT, LUX, NL, NO, PL, PO, RO, SK, SN, LIT, LUX, NL, NO, PL, PO, RO, SK, SN, SP, TU, UK, USSP, TU, UK, US

17 Non-NATO17 Non-NATO::, Armenia, Australia, AUS, , Armenia, Australia, AUS, AZE, BiH, FIN, FYROM*, GEO, IRL, AZE, BiH, FIN, FYROM*, GEO, IRL, Jordan, Mongolia, Montenegro, NZ, Jordan, Mongolia, Montenegro, NZ, Singapore, SWE, UAE, UKR Singapore, SWE, UAE, UKR

Key IssuesKey Issues

- Security/ReconstructionSecurity/Reconstruction- Governance/CorruptionGovernance/Corruption- Comprehensive StrategyComprehensive Strategy- Afghan capacityAfghan capacity- Insurgent activityInsurgent activity- Counter-NarcoticsCounter-Narcotics- PakistanPakistan

*Turkey recognizes the Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name

Page 4: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

4

ISAF Contributions by NationISAF Contributions by NationISAF Contributions by NationISAF Contributions by Nation

United States

10,605

Turkey

362

Netherlands88Finland

1,722

1,854

Luxemburg171Estonia

45,240

United Kingdom

9

Lithuania648Denmark

Sweden

173

Latvia455Czech Republic

411

Spain

132

Italy

292Croatia

71

Slovakia

3,524

Ireland

4,242Canada 1,362

Slovenia9

Iceland

616Bulgaria

236

Romania

3

Hungary

611Belgium

948

Portugal

357

Greece

90Azerbaijan

143

Poland

143

Germany

2Austria

1,950

Norway

4,592

FYROM*

1,339Australia

484

New Zealand

45 Countries45 Countries with 107,656 troops107,656 troops (as of April 2010 2010)

3,865France

372Albania

164

6

Non-NATO Troop Contributing Nation

Ukraine 8

Georgia 176

* Turkey recognises the Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name

United Arab Emirates 26

Singapore 35

Bosnia & Herzegovina 10

Jordan

Page 5: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

5

Strategic Concept

• Group of “Wisemen” tasked to collect views across wide spectrum

• Report provided to SecGen last week• Draft to be developed and agreed at Lisbon

Summit in November 2010• Issues: Russia, energy security, civil roles in

nation building, expeditionary opns vs. territorial defence, missile defence, new command structure.

Page 6: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

6

NATO – RUSSIA

• Divisive issue among Allies • Need to cooperate where interests are common

• Attempting to regenerate working together

• Allied support variable

Page 7: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

7

NATO Reform

• View that structures are bloated, too many committees, procedures cumbersome, inefficiency and waste prevalent.

• Need more bang for the buck!

• Sec Gen has mandate from nations to fix.

Page 8: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

8

PARTNERSHIPS

NATO-Ukraine & NATO-Georgia

• PFP- 18 nations in PARP • Mediterranean Dialogue and

Istanbul Cooperation Initiative

• Contact Group

Page 9: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

9

Partners in 2010

ARM KAZ

CHE UZB

MDA

UKR

AZE

BLR KGZ

RUS

TKMTJK

PFP - onlyPFP/Planning and Review Process

AUT FIN SWEIRL

EU

FYR

MAP

Mediterranean Dialogue (7 nations) & Istanbul Cooperation Initiative

BIH MON

SER

GEO

IPAP

MALANP

Page 10: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

10

NATO and the European Union

CA, IC, NO, TU, US

AL,BE, BU,CR,CZ, DE,ES,FR,GE, GR, HU, IT,LA, LI, LU,NL, PL, PORO, SK, SN,SP, UK

AUSFINIRLSWE

PARP

• NATO experts supported EU in Headline Task Force

• NATO/EU Capabilities Group discussing convergence issues

• More integrated planning/DPQ

Page 11: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

11

A FULL PLATE, BUT-A FULL PLATE, BUT-

Political will and ResourcesPolitical will and Resources are the key; all are the key; all linked to long term vision of NATO’s futurelinked to long term vision of NATO’s future

Page 12: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

12

FORCE GOALS 2012 – E 0356LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY FOR DEPLOYABLE FORCES

1. Improve the English language skills of all personnel planned for employment within Alliance staffs or on operations. In addition to special measures to increase the language proficiency of serving officers and NCOs, integrate adequate language training into the curricula of officer and NCO education establishments and in career development programmes.

2. Ensure that all personnel planned for participation in NATO staffs or other multinational headquarters, and MOD, General Staff and service staff personnel who are routinely involved with NATO issues, have English language skills at the minimum as follows (Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing in accordance with STANAG 6001: edition 3, February 2009):a. Officers: SLP 3-3-3-3.b. NCOs: SLP 2+2+2+2+.

3. Ensure that the following personnel subject to deployment on NATO operations, exercises or training are tested to ensure they meet the minimum English language skills as follows:a. Officers in command positions and all principal staff officers: SLP 2+2+2+2+.b. All other officers: SLP 2-2-2-2; andc. Appropriate NCOs, OR-5 and above likely to have frequent contact with personnel

from other nations: SLP 2-2-2-2.d. Enlisted personnel of all services planned to operate tactical communications, operate on NATO communications networks or who are members of tactical air control parties: SLP 2-2-1-1.

4. Nations should conduct general proficiency language testing IAW STANAG 6001, edition 3, using testing methodology as recommended by the Bureau of International Language Coordination and the ACT sponsored Language Testing Seminars.

5. Notwithstanding the above, nations are encouraged, where possible, to provide basic English language training to all NCOs participating in NATO operations and exercises.

Page 13: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

13

RC W

QRF

QRF

QRF

RC C

RC S

RC N

RC E

TTF

KANDAHAR

HELMANDNIMROZ

FARAH

GHOR

BADGHIS

HERATDAIKONDI

URUZGAN

ZABUL

PAKTIKA

PAKTYA

KHOST

WARDAKBAMYAN

GHAZNI

SARI PUL

FARYAB

JOWZJAN

SAMANGAN

BALKH

BAGHLAN

KUNDUZTAKHAR

BADAKHSHAN

PARWAN

NANGARHAR

KUNAR

KABUL

LEGEND

PRT

Planned

FSB

Manoeuvre Forces

RC North

RC West

RC South

RC East

RC Capital

LEGEND

PRT

Planned

FSB

Manoeuvre Forces

RC North

RC West

RC South

RC East

RC Capital

Small flags indicate lead nations. Big flags Regional Command lead nation and rotation

ISAF RCs & PRTsISAF RCs & PRTsISAF RCs & PRTsISAF RCs & PRTs

Page 14: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

14

NATO Training Mission - IraqNATO Training Mission - IraqNATO Training Mission - IraqNATO Training Mission - Iraq

In–country:In–country: mentoring and training at mentoring and training at Iraqi HQs + National Defence Iraqi HQs + National Defence University (National Defence University (National Defence College, Joint Staff College, Iraqi College, Joint Staff College, Iraqi Military Academy Ar Rustamiyah) + Military Academy Ar Rustamiyah) + NCO Courses and Gendarmerie-NCO Courses and Gendarmerie-type training. type training. Some 10,000 trained Some 10,000 trained since the beginning of the mission since the beginning of the mission in 2004in 2004

Out-of-country:Out-of-country: some some 900 trained900 trained in in NATO Training and Education NATO Training and Education Facilities and by Nations since Facilities and by Nations since 2004.2004.

Equipment donations through Equipment donations through NTECG:NTECG: over 130 M Euroover 130 M Euro

Page 15: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

15

Response to TerrorismOp ACTIVE ENDEAVOUR

TF STROG Suspended (Forces 30 days NTM)

ACTIVE ENDEAVOURACTIVE ENDEAVOURACTIVE ENDEAVOURACTIVE ENDEAVOUR

Key IssuesKey Issues-RUS and UKR participation-MD & ICI countries contributions

Page 16: NATO’s  PRIORITIES 2010

16

Operation OCEAN SHIELDOperation OCEAN SHIELD

IRTC

TF 410 (SNMG1) COMPOSITIONTF 410 (SNMG1) COMPOSITION

NRP CORTE REAL (Flag) NRP CORTE REAL (Flag)

HNLMS DE ZEVEN PROVINCIENHNLMS DE ZEVEN PROVINCIEN

SPS BLAS DE LEZOSPS BLAS DE LEZO

USS HALYBURTON 2 xUSS HALYBURTON 2 x

TF 410 (SNMG1) COMPOSITIONTF 410 (SNMG1) COMPOSITION

NRP CORTE REAL (Flag) NRP CORTE REAL (Flag)

HNLMS DE ZEVEN PROVINCIENHNLMS DE ZEVEN PROVINCIEN

SPS BLAS DE LEZOSPS BLAS DE LEZO

USS HALYBURTON 2 xUSS HALYBURTON 2 x

TF 508 (SNMG2) COMPOSITIONTF 508 (SNMG2) COMPOSITION

HMS CORNWALL (Flag) HMS CORNWALL (Flag)

ITS LIBECCIOITS LIBECCIO

HS NAVARINONHS NAVARINON

TCG GEDIZTCG GEDIZ

USS LABOON USS LABOON

TF 508 (SNMG2) COMPOSITIONTF 508 (SNMG2) COMPOSITION

HMS CORNWALL (Flag) HMS CORNWALL (Flag)

ITS LIBECCIOITS LIBECCIO

HS NAVARINONHS NAVARINON

TCG GEDIZTCG GEDIZ

USS LABOON USS LABOON

Units SNMG1

Units SNMG2

Handover/Red Sea 12 March 2010