nature's renewable energy blueprint: future fuel from
TRANSCRIPT
Bio-Inspired Abiotic Catalysts
Nature's Renewable Energy Blueprint: Future Fuel from Photosynthesis & Biomimics
Direct Bio-Solar H2 Production
2 H2O O2 + 2 H2 (H+/e+)
2 H2O +
WAVE WIND PV BIOMASS SOLAR TOWER HYDROELECTRIC TIDAL POWER
•ALMOST ALL CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES GENERATE ELECTRICITY•GLOBAL ENERGY USE: 33% ELECTRICITY: 67% FUELS (eg OIL, COAL, GAS)
FUTURE TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SOLAR H2 FROM H2O
RENEWABLE ENERGY ANNUAL ENERGY x GLOBAL ENERGYSOURCE SIZE (TW-YR) RESOURCE DEMAND @ 46 TW-YR
SOLAR 178,000 3869xGEOTHERMAL 92,063 2001xWIND 194 420xOCEAN THERMAL 10WAVE 2HYDROELECTRIC 1.6TIDAL 0.1TOTAL 270,271 5875x
13TW-YR
IEA source
Can we develop a practical H2-producing system to meet our energy needs?
Microalgae:Chlamydomonas reiinhardti
Cyanobacteria:Arthrospira (Spirulina) sp.
Sunlight
CO2 H20
Nutrients
Cell Factories
Chemical energy
Native & GMOs that produce more energy
Microbial cell factories directly produce chemical energy w/o sacrificing the microbe
H2 alcohols, acids,hydrocarbons
PENNSTATE HAWAIIPRINCETON
Renewable Bio-solar Hydrogen Production from Robust Oxygenic Phototrophs
-BioSolarH2 TeamG. Charles Dismukes PU photosynthesis/chemistryEdward I. Stiefel PU enzymology/inorganicDonald A. Bryant PSU genetics/mol biology cyanosMatthew Posewitz CSM genetics/mol biology algaeEric Hegg UU enzymology/inorganicRobert Bidigare UH microbial physiology/ecology>2006John Peters MSU crystallography & directed evolnRobert Austin PU microchemostats & cellular evoln
Objectives•Screening for the right organisms, photosystems & hydrogenases•Down-regulation of competing biochemical pathways•Random & specific mutagenesis for higher H2 production•Genetically combining host phototrophs with optimal hydrogenases
Renewable Bio-solar H2 Production from Robust Oxygenic Phototrophs
screeningfield
genomic sequence around hox genes in S. platensis7098 bp
HoxE HoxF HoxU HoxY HoxHORF?
diaphorase moiety Ni-Fe hydrogenase moiety
Bam HI (1484)Eco RI (4977)Cla I (2981) Cla I (7047)Nco I (1099)
Nco I (3375) Nco I (6934)
H2Oxygenic PhotosynthesisH2O
O2
genome
mutants
genes
GMOs
Achievements June 2005•Identified novel H2 photoproducers•Developed high throughput screen for H2•Built ultra-sensitive H2 detection instruments•Engineered mutants in a green alga
PayoffClean H2 from non-fossil source
Solar Bio-H2 Goals: Economic feasibility
• ~10% solar-to-H2 efficiency at ambient light levels• Requires temporal or spatial separation of H2 and O2
• Achieve current cost estimates for large scale bioreactors
Two independent feasibility studies: • NREL , Amos et al.• Thiess Engineering (Australia) + U. Queensland
(Hankamer)
Losses in solar energy conversion efficiency to H2
light energy capture e- & H+ competing pathways
SECE(H2) = Λi (1-ΛNPQ)(1-ΩII) Φ1Φ2 (1-ΧC)(1- ΧA)(1- ΧN)(1-XO)
H2O PSII PQ PSI Fd H2ase H2
H+
Kruse et al. (2005) Photochem. Photobiol. Science; 4, 957 – 970.Prince, R. & Kheshgi, H. (2005) Crit Rev Microbiol. 31, 19-31.
Incident Sun light(100%)
PigmentsAbsorbed
LightStored Energy
RC H2 energy
(42% visible)(24% max)
(12% max)0% Solar
flux100
e- & H+
alternatepathways
PV
PEC
HydrogenasesCyanobacteria• NiFe enzymes• H2 ↓ Uptake (N2ase)• H2 Bidirectional enzyme
(↑↓)• NADH or NADPH
cognate reductant (-320 mv)
• Slower• Less O2 sensitive
Microalgae• FeFe enzyme• H2↑ evolution only• Ferredoxin cognate
reductant (-420 mV)• Faster• Very O2 sensitive
H2ase-dependent Solar Biological Hydrogen from Water
Microalgae
Direct H2, 2 quanta/e-, 1 stage, no gas separation
H2O H2 + ½ O2
(NREL, ORNL, UCB) Indirect H2 via starch, 3 quanta/e-, 2 temporally resolved stages
2 H2O + CO2 light O2 + [CH2O] + H2O PS
2 H2O + [CH2O] anaeorbic PSII light 2 H2 + CO2 + H2O Resp + low % PSII
CyanobacteriaIndirect H2 via glycogen, 2 quanta/e-, 2 temporally resolved stages
2 H2O + CO2light [CH2O] + O2 + H2O PS
[CH2O] + H2O anaeorbic + dark 2 H2 + CO2 Fermentation
H2O PSII - PSI Ferredoxin “CH2O”Calvin Cycle
ATPe-
e-
Fe-Hydrogenase
CO2
Self-AnaerobisisSulfur Deprivation
Ghirardi, Zhang, Lee, Flynn, Seibert, Greenbaum, Melis, Tr. Biotechnology, 2000. 18(12): p. 506-511.
e-
3 Quanta / e-, 2 stage light + anaeorbic, temporal gas separation
Eukaryotic Microalgae: Chlamydomonas R.
reductase
GlycolysisTricarboxylic
Acid Cycle
½O2+2H+ NADPHe-
e-
e-e-
H2
+ Respiration
Indirect Biophotolysis
Instrumentation Development
PS charge separation ratesFast repetition rate fluorimeter
Metabolomics & Proteomics
Triple Quadrupole-TOF mass spectrometer & electrospray ion
ETA Summer 2006
Dissolved H2 or O2LED + Clark cells
Screening Colonies on plates/wells
NREL WO3 H2 gas sensorETA Spring 2006
LED illuminator400 – 730 nm100 mW opticalpower
Sample (5 µL)
Membrane
Platinum-IridiumElectrode (+0.4 V)
LED 0 2 4 6
0
50
100
rate
of g
as e
volu
tion
incubation time, hours
O2
H2
Light on
Light off
Chlamydomonas r. CC124
Ag/ AgCl electrode
Dissolved H2 & O2 rates measured with 1000x improved sensitivity
5 µL volumeSensitivity = 2 nanomolar0.1 sec response time
LEDS: blue, orange, red, infrared, white
Conclusions•Major Photo-H2 •Minimal dark-H2•Co-production of H2 and O2
-BioSolarH2
H2O PSII PQ PSI
Alternative e-
donore- acceptor
pool H2H2-ase
hνhν
0 10 20 30 40
0
50
100
0.2 hr
670 nmPSI + PSII0.2 hr
4 hr
730 nmPSI only
0.2 hr
H2
conc
entr
atio
n, re
l.u.
time, min
light on, 10 s pulses
670 nmPSI + PSII
4 hr
Anaerobic -O2pre-incubation
-∆hyd E/FConclusions: • Photo-H2 & dark-H2 requires H2ase
genes hyd E/F• Maximum photo-H2 production
requires illumination of both PSI and PSII
• The major source of reductantrequired for photo-H2 comes from water via PSII turnover
• The minor PSI only pathway involves PQ/other donor
G. Ananyev & M. Posewitz
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cc124
0 5 10 15 20
0
100
200
300
hydr
ogen
con
cent
ratio
n, re
l.u.
time, min
1 2 5 10 20 40 60 80
light pulseduration, s
Light produces two kinetic phases of photo-H2 in C. reinhardtii WT
0 20 40 60 80
0
100
200
300
light pulse duration, s
H2 e
volu
tion
(pea
k) Light H2
Light + Dark H2
0
50
100
integrated H2 evolution (area
)
Photo-H2post light H2
Peak Photo-H2
Total AreaPhoto-H2 +Post light H2
PSI
e- acceptorpool
secondarye- acceptor
pool
?
H2H2-ase
?
slow
hν
Conclusion: •Two pools of photo-electron acceptors in PSI capable of light-induced H2 production
•Integrated H2 yield is linear with pulse duration competing pathways for e-/H+ consumption
are either fixed or not present
on
off
NADP+?
Fd
G. Ananyev
CyanobacteriaArthrospira (spirulina) maxima
Habitat: volcanic soda lakesAlkalophile, pH = 9.5-11
0.2-1.2 M carbonateNo N2 fixation systemFastest PSII turnover e-/H+ flux-5x larger PQ pool vs algae
enes hox-EFUYH encodeNAD-dependent bidirectional H2ase No hup genes reported (uptake H2ase)
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.50
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
Fv/F
m
STF number
5 6 7 8 9 10
X5
Experiment
Fitting
1 10 100 10002
3
4
5
6
7
8
Q
ualit
y fa
ctor
, 1/(α
+β)
dark time between STF, ms
B
Chlorella
Spirulina
Water oxidation rate by Arthrospira maxima cells is highest by 5x
PSII quantum efficiency ~54%
Cyanos can split water 3-5x faster athigher photon flux vs. plants & algaeDue to 3-5x larger PQ pool size
* Ananyev & Dismukes, Photosyn Res. (2005)
Kok α & β
Cells with NiCl2 supplementation 3 days after inoculation in continuous illumination 130µE/m2sec light flux (above)12/05/05
0.01
0.1
1
10
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (Hours)
Chl A
bsor
ptio
n
0.0uM Ni0.25uM Ni1.0uM NiuM Ni 4.0
06/16/06
A. [Ni2+] causes chlorosis during photoautotrophic growth (130µE/m2sec).
C. Ni2+ stimulates H2 production rate by 20 x in reactor purged of H2.
6/19/06. 25mL samples + 0.200g sodium dithionite25 days old, 12hr light/dark growth18(+/-2) mg chla / L
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-5 5 15 25 35 45 55
time (hours)
0.0uM Ni (w/o glucose)0.0uM Ni (+ glucose)1.0uM Ni (w/o glucose)1.0uM Ni (+ glucose)3.0uM Ni (w/o glucose)3.0uM Ni (+ glucose)
Damian Carrieri
B. photoautotrophic growth rate is independent low levels of Ni2+,
at high Ni2+ growth lags but recovers.
D. and by 3 x in headspace of bulk cultures with H2 back pressure.
Dynamics of Dark Fermentative H2 Production RateArthrospira maxima
Logarithmic growth Stage 1
Stationary growth Stage 2
12 days
+ pyruvate
Phase-2
Phase-1
0 20 40 60 800
100
200
300
400
hy
drog
en, m
V
time, min
640 nm
735 nm
PSI illumination (735 nm)Suppresses fermentative H2Slow photo-H2
PSI+PSII illumination (640 nm)Adds to fermentative H2Fast photo-H2
A. maxima
Pathways for Dark and Light H2production by Arthrospira m.
PSII
H2O O2
PQH2
PQPSI
Fd FNR NADP+
NAD-dependentNiFe-H2ase
glycogen
glucose
pyruvate
NAD+
NDHComplex I
H2
ICM-thylakoid
Sustained H2 production from water by cyanobacteria
Synechocystis pcc 6803 mutant –ΔNDHB2
*Not sustainable
Arthrospiraplatensis1
Arthrospiramaxima
BatchpH 10. 5 & 35°C + Ni2+
[nitrate in media] Excess H2removed
In DarkIn light
photo-H2 in alga C. reinhardtiiunder Sulfur depletion
- nitrate
2. Cournac et al (2004)BioSolarH2 team (2006)
2006 NREL immobilized 0.35%
2004 NREL batch 0.15%
% E
ffici
ency
Sol
ar-to
-H2
1. Aoyama et al. (1997);
-BioSolarH2
Conclusions
•New tools for measuring H2, O2 and redox status provide reliable quantitative data on concentrations and fluxes
•greatly simplify and clarify the fundamental mechanisms of H2 production in microalgae and cyanobacteria
•Cyanobacteria & microalgae have different pathways to H2
•Ideal temporal separation of H2 and O2 production in cyanobacteria (fermentation) solves gas separation issue
•Strain selection and media optimization yield 20x improvement in cyanobacterial fermentative H2
Synthetic Biology Goals in Cyanobacteria
1. Replace native NiFe-H2ase with foreign FeFe-H2ase(s)• Couple to cognate Fd donor, eg. Eliminate loss to NAD(P)H
2. Over-express native NiFe-H2ase(s) (strong RUBISCO promotor)• Deliver e- potential: Knock-out competing ferm. pathways draining reductant
NADH (-lactate, -ethanol)• Deliver H+ potential: ATP hydrolysis or lower external pH (add CO2)
3. Directed evolution under forced fermentative growth, eg. cell division at suppressed photoautotrophic metabolism
4. Chimeric NiFe-H2ases (Ralstonia etc. gene shuffling)
5. Develop a genetic transformation system for Arthrospira species.
glycogen G6P
pyruvate
acetyl-CoA+ CO2
acetyl phosphate
CH3COOH
acetaldehyde
Manipulating Fermentative Pathways of Synechococcus 7002 & Synechocystis 6803
(whole genome predictions)
Fd(ox)
Fd(red)
NAD(P)H
NAD(P)
H+
H2
NAD(P)H
NAD(P)H
ATP
2 NAD(P)H + 3 ATP
CH3CH2OH
6803 only
NAD(P)
H+H+
NAD(P)+
2 NAD(P) + 3 ADP, Pi
ADP
7002 only
6803 & 7002
NAD(P)H
NAD(P)
lactate dehyd.
aldehyde dehyd.
alcohol dehyd.
pyruvate:Fdoxidoreductase
Fd: NAD(P) reductaseNiFe-H2ase
acetate kinase
phosphotransacetylase
glycolysis
acetyl-CoA
synthetase
OHOH
O
Kelsey McNeely
-BioSolarH2 Team 2005+PrincetonGennady AnanyevDerrick KollingDamian Carrieri GS2Kelsey McNeely GS1Nick Bennette GS1Tyler Brown ’06
Christine Louie 06, Adam Litterman 07Peter Curtin 08, Anita Ma 09
Edward I. Stiefel PUDonald A. Bryant PSUMatthew Posewitz CSMEric Hegg UURobert Bidigare UH
>2006John Peters MSURobert Austin PU
Future Challenges (DOE*)
•Synthesize durable catalysts for efficient water splitting and reversible O2 reduction without noble metals
•Functionally integrate these with solar photocells (semiconductors) for water oxidation, and with fuel cell cathodes for O2 reduction
*DOE/BES Publication:2003 http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/reports/files/NHE_rpt.pdf
Part 2"Biomimetic Catalysts for Splitting Water"
Ferreira, Iverson, Maghlaoui, Barber, Iwata (2004) Science
Photosystem II - Water Oxidizing ComplexThermosynechococcus el.
Ferreira et al (2004) Science
The Catalytic Site of Water Oxidation in Oxygenic PhotosynthesisXRD Model by Imperial College –Barber and Iwata
4 hν
Hypothesized Mechanism of Photosynthetic O2 Evolution*
* Dasgupta, van Willigen, Dismukes (2004) Physical Chem: Chem. Physics
4 e- + 2 H+
Mn4(2III, 2IV)
O
Mn
Mn
O
Mn
O
O
Mn
OO
R2P
O
O
PR2O
OR2PO
O
PR2
O
OR2P O
OR2P
R = phenyl p-tolyl
2.8 MnII + 1.2 MnO4-
B)
A)
[(bpy)2Mn Mn(bpy)2]3+
bpy =N N
R2PO2-
R2PO2-
DMF
MeCN
Mn2(III, IV)
70-90 % yield
O
O
O OP
XX
Rüttinger, W., C. Campana and G.C. Dismukes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997. 119(27): 6670-6671; Carrell, Cohen and Dismukes, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2002. 187: 3-15;
X = H, CH3, -CH2Br -OCH3
Synthesis of L6Mn4O4 cubane complex
Unusually long (weak) Mn-O bonds
• Mn-O distance: 1.88 ~ 1.98 Å• Mn-Mn distance: 2.90 ~ 2.95 Å
• O-O distance: 2.53 ~ 2.60 Å
Structure of (Ph2PO2)6Mn4O4 cubane complex
MnIII(µ-O)2MnIV complexesMn-O distance: 1.8 ÅMn-Mn distance: 2.6 ~ 2.7 Å
O-O distance in O2: 1.21 ÅO-O distance in H2O2: 1.50 Åvan der Waals radius
of O atom: 2.8 Å
Ruttinger, W., C. Campana, G.C. Dismukes, J.. Am. Chem. Soc. (1997) 119, 6670-71
Docking of phenol to XRD structure of cubane
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
2
2+
1+
1Mn4O2L
25
Mn4O4L26
Mn4O2L15
m/z
Mn4O4L16
[ “ ]+2+
Mn4O4L262
[ “ ]+1+
Mn4O4L161
m / z15 20 25 30 35 40
Inte
nsity
(a.u
.) H2O CO 16O218O2 L6Mn4(16O)4
L6Mn4(18O)4
Blank
O
P
O
O
O
CH3
CH3
Quadrupole MS
LDI-MS
Stronger electron-donating phosphinate ligands increase the QY of photodissociation In the gas phase
L2
Wu et al. (2005) Inorg Chem
Yagi et al (2001) Ang. Chem. Int.
Models: [Mn4O4]6+,7+ Chemistry to O2
O
Mn
Mn
O
Mn
O
O
Mn
OO
P
O
O
PR2O
OR2PO
O
PR2
O
OR2P O
OR2P
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
Ruettinger, Yagi, Wolf, Bernasek, Dismukes (2000) JACSWu, Selitto, Sheats, Yap, Dismukes (2004) Inorg. Chem.
2 H2O +
OO
P
NO2
NO2
ligands
OO
PO
O
P
MeO
OMe
O2 is released only if one phosphinate is dissociated
Dynamic- DFT Calculations of O2 release from L6Mn4O4 L- + L5Mn4O4
+
F. DeAngelis& R. Car
O2 release isexothermic ∆G = - 7.2 kcal/mol
Activation Barrier~ 27 kcal/mol
MnO
O
O
Mn
MnO
Mn or Ca
η2 −PeroxoE
nerg
y, k
cal/m
ol
[L5CaMn3O4]+
[L5Mn4O4]2+
[L5Mn4O4]+
DFT Calculations of the Transition State Energy on the path to O2 release
30
20
10
0
27,7
20.0
14.8
Reaction Coordinate
different Mn oxidation states
MnIII Ca2+ replacement
F. DeAngelis and R. Car
Conclusions:Lower kinetic barrier to O2 release
• The higher Mn oxidation state (III, 3IV) vs. (2III,2IV) gives a lower peroxo ∆E by 7.7 kcal/mol
• Replacing MnIII CaII lowers peroxo ∆E by 5.2 kcal/mol.
• Ca2+ serves as an “Electrostatic Ball Bearing” to lower the barrier to intramolecular O-O bond formation
Mn Mn
MnO
MnO
"tethered butterfly"
Ph2PO2- + O2
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
2 H2O
"oxidized butterfly"
O2
Electrodeor Solar Cell
e- + H+
Attach to Solar/ Fuel Cell Electrode
Electrode
The Holy Grail: Catalysts for Electro- and Photo- Sensitized Water Splitting*
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
X
Ying YuRuslan PryadunJohanna Scarino
Collaborators:
CSIRO + Monash U.Gerhard SwiegersLeone Spiccia
Spin Coating: 1µl of 10% Nafion solution is spotted on 3mm glassy carbon electrode and spun at 2000 rpm
ω
The Nafion coated electrode is soaked in 0.5mM solution of the oxidized cubane:
(bis(methoxyphenyl)phosphinic acid)6Mn4O4ClO4in acetonitrile.
Doping Nafion Coated Glassy Carbon Electrode with Cubane
F
F
F
FF
F
OO
S
F
CF3 F
FF
FF
F
O
O
OH
(CF2-CF2)x
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO Mn
O
OMn
MnO
MnO
Nafion
Ion exchange of L6Mn4O4+ with counter cations in
hydrophilic sulfonate lined channels. channel "diameter" ~10-100 nm. Chou, et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 3252.
ClO4-
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
=
+
Nafion
glassy carbon electrode
Johanna Scarino
4
3
2
1
0
curre
nt (u
A)
120100806040200time (min)
Oxidized Bismethoxy cubane doped nafion on GCE (solid), nafion GCE (dashed), in 0.1M NaSO4, held at 1V (just above cubane oxidation) vs Ag/AgCl, exposed to light at 5minutes
O
P
O
O
O
CH3
CH3
MnO
OMn
MnO
MnO
=
+
ClO4-
GCE Held at 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCljust above cubane oxidation couple 1 ↔ 1+
Xenon source illumination
Collaborators: R. Brimblecome, G. Swiegers, L. Spiccia, J. Sheats, unpublished.
Breaking News: June-July 2006Sustained Photo-assisted Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Water
with Manganese-oxo Cubanes
Nafion coated Glassy Carbon Anode + 1+
Nafion coated Glassy Carbon Anode
Light
2 H2O O2 + 4 H+ + 4 e-
“Predictions are hard to make, especially about the future.”
Can we predict which technologies will solve the energy crisis?
Steven Chu delivers the 31st Donald Ross Hamilton Lecture at Princeton University March 30, 2006:"The energy problem: our current choices and future hopes"
When asked at the end of his public lecture which single new energy technology he would bet on to help solve the energy crisis he responded:
".....synthetic biology (genetic engineering) applied to algae looks to be promising as a means to produce fuels. Synthetic biomimeticapproaches should then rise to prominence that need to have durability and use less land.“
Steven Chu touring the facilities of the BioSolarH2 team at Princeton.
Dr. Chu is the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California (3800 employees, $0.55B/yr budget) and the 1997 Nobel Prize winner in Physics.