ncsbn research brief · jurisdiction july 1, 2006 to june 30, 2007. all data was obtained from...

60
NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF Volume 35 | January 2009 2007 Nurse Licensee Volume and NCLEX ® Examination Statistics

Upload: others

Post on 18-Nov-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF

Volume 35 | January 2009

2007 Nurse

Licensee Volume

and NCLEX®

Examination

Statistics

Page 2: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

2007 Nurse Licensee Volume

and NCLEX® Examination Statistics

Kevin Kenward, PhDAda Woo, PhDLindsey GrossWeiwei Liu, MS

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN®)

Page 3: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

Mission Statement

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing, composed of member boards, provides leadership to advance regula-tory excellence for public protection.

Copyright © 2008 National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN®)

All rights reserved. The NCSBN logo, NCLEX®, NCLEX-RN® and NCLEX-PN® are registered trademarks of NCSBN and this document may not be used, reproduced or disseminated to any third party without written permission from NCSBN.

Permission is granted to boards of nursing to use or reproduce all or parts of this document for licensure related purposes only. Nonprofit education programs have permission to use or reproduce all or parts of this document for educational purposes only. Use or reproduction of this document for commercial or for-profit use is strictly prohibited. Any authorized reproduction of this document shall display the notice: “Copyright by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. All rights reserved.” Or, if a portion of the document is reproduced or incorporated in other materials, such written materials shall include the following credit: “Portions copyrighted by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. All rights reserved.”

Address inquiries in writing to NCSBN Permissions, 111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2900, Chicago, IL 60601-4277. Suggested Citation: National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2009). 2007 Nurse Licensee Volume and NCLEX® Examination Statistics. (Research Brief Vol. 35). Chicago: Author.

Printed in the United States of America

978-0-9822456-0-6

Page 4: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

i

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLe of CoNTeNTS

List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Part I – 2007 Licensure Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Part II – 2007 NCLEX® Examination Statistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

NCLEX-RN® Examination, Jan. 1, 2007 - Dec. 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19

NCLEX-PN® Examination, Jan. 1, 2007 - Dec. 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42

Page 5: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

ii PART I

LIST of TABLeS

Part I – 2007 Licensure Statistics

Table 1. Boards of Nursing Empowered to License Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, or Other Categories of Nursing Personnel . . . . . . . 4

Table 2. Registered Nurses: New in State Functions, by Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Table 3. Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses: New in State Functions, by Jurisdiction . . . . . . 8

Table 4. Total Number of Active Licenses: Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, by Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Table 5. Number of Graduates of Foreign Nursing Programs Licenses, by Jurisdiction . . . . . . 12

Table 6. Summary of Licensing Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Table 7. Distribution of Active Advanced Practice/Authority to Practice Licenses Within Each Specialty Category, by Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

Table 8. Total Number of Active Advanced Practice/Authority to Practice Licenses Within the Member Board Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Part II – 2007 NCLeX® examination Statistics

Table 1. Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Type of Candidate (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Table 2. Summary Statistics for First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Table 3. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Degree Type (Jan. 1 - Mar. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Table 4. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Degree Type (Apr. 1 - June 30, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Table 5. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Degree Type (July 1 - Sept. 30, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

Table 6. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Degree Type (Oct. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Table 7. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN®

Examination, by Degree Type (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

Table 8. First-Time, Internationally-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-RN® Examination, by Country of Education (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Table 9. Candidates Taking the NCLEX-PN® Examination, by Type of Candidate ( Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Table 10. Summary Statistics for First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Table 11. First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-PN® Examination: Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Table 12. First-Time, Internationally Educated Candidates Taking the NCLEX-PN® Examination, by Country of Education (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Page 6: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

iii

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

PART I

LIST of fIGureS

Figure 1. Total Number of Active Licenses: Registered Nurses and Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses - 1997-2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Figure 1. NCLEX-RN® Pass Rates for First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

Figure 2. NCLEX-RN® Pass Rates for All Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

Figure 3. NCLEX-RN® Annual Pass Rates, April 1994 - December 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

Figure 4. NCLEX-RN® Volume for First-Time, U.S. - Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

Figure 5. NCLEX-RN® Volume for All Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

Figure 6. NCLEX-RN® Annual Volume, April 1994 - December 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

Figure 7. NCLEX-PN® Pass Rates for First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

Figure 8. NCLEX-PN® Pass Rates for All Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

Figure 9. NCLEX-PN® Annual Pass Rates, April 1994 - December 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Figure 10. NCLEX-PN® Volume for First-Time, U.S.-Educated Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

Figure 11. NCLEX-PN® Volume for All Candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

Figure 12. NCLEX-PN® Annual Volume, April 1994 - December 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

Page 7: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

1INTRODUCTION

INTroDuCTIoNThe mission of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®) is to lead in nursing regula-tion by assisting member boards, collectively and individually, to promote safe and effective nursing practice in the interest of protecting public health and welfare.

NCSBN serves as a consultant, liaison, advocate and researcher to its members, and as an education and information resource to policy makers and the gen-eral public. This publication provides statistics on the licensing activities of NCSBN’s member boards and its two licensure examinations, the National Council Licensure Examination for Practical Nurses (NCLEX-PN®) and the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN®).

Part I – Licensure Statistics

The data reported in Part I of this document include licensing statistics of the 59 state and territorial boards of nursing. The numbers of new licenses by endorsement and examination, as well as the total number of active licenses, are provided for each jurisdiction.

The data included in this publication provide licensing statistics for the period July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007.

Part II – NCLeX® examination Statistics

The NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN examinations are administered on behalf of NCSBN’s 59 member boards. The purpose of these examinations is to determine if a candidate possesses the minimum knowledge and abilities to provide entry-level nurs-ing care that is safe and effective.

Candidate performance on the NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN is summarized and reported by quar-ter and year. This publication provides a detailed breakdown of candidate performance for 2007, as well as historical data.

Page 8: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

2 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

The data reported in this section indicate licensure processing activity and data on the total num-ber of individuals licensed to practice within each jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing.

Estimates were provided where the exact figure requested for this collection of data was unknown.

Data are presented in a series of tables. Table 1 lists the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) member boards, the geographic locality within which a board has responsibility for regulat-ing nursing practice (JD), the types of licenses for which a board has licensing authority, and whether or not the board is empowered to issue licenses or certificates to practice in a specialty area of nurs-ing. Tables 2-5 provide data related to new licenses issued by endorsement or examination, total num-bers of active licenses (both RN and LPN/VN) by jurisdiction, and graduates of foreign nursing pro-grams licensed, by jurisdiction. Table 6 provides a summary of licensing activities by examination and endorsement for RNs, LPN/VNs and graduates of foreign nursing programs. Tables 7 and 8 provide the numbers of active specialty licenses, issued within each jurisdiction, by specialty license cat-egory. Figure 1 provides a review of the numbers of active licenses for the years 1997-2007. Unless noted otherwise, all percentages are calculated in terms of column totals.

Key Termsregistered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical or vocational nurses (LPN/VNs) obtain licensure by endorsement (if licensed in another jurisdiction) or by examination (if the applicant has never taken the appropriate NCLEX examination).

Active License figures are based on the reported actual or estimated total number of individuals holding an active license within a jurisdiction and represent the nurses available for employment. Due to an unknown number of individuals holding active licenses in more than one jurisdiction, the total

number of active licenses nationwide may be higher than the total number of nurses.

Advanced Practice Licenses/Authority To Prac-tice figures and tables contain data for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) groups: Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA), Certified Nurse Midwife (CNM), Certified Nurse Specialist (CNS), CNS-PSYCH/Mental Health and Nurse Prac-titioner (NP).

Abbreviations are followed by the category of advanced practice/authority to practice license:

CNM – Certified nurse midwife �

CRNA – Certified registered nurse anesthetist �

CNS-PSYCH – Clinical nurse specialist- �psychiatry and/or mental health (including all its subspecialties)

CNS – Clinical nurse specialist (all others) �

PArT I – 2007 LICeNSure STATISTICS

Page 9: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

3PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICSfi

gur

e 1.

To

tal N

umb

er o

f A

ctiv

e Li

cens

es:

reg

iste

red

Nur

ses

and

Lic

ense

d P

ract

ical

/Vo

cati

ona

l Nur

ses

- 19

97-2

007

2,99

2,34

23,

054,

215

3,09

7,90

23,

103,

981

3,10

3,44

43,

186,

880

3,21

0,45

6

3,06

1,64

3

3,31

7,79

1

3,41

6,94

63,

495,

906 948,

692

946,

260

901,

437

829,

619

885,

559

876,

487

902,

154

911,

332

919,

240

877,

748

883,

102

0

500,

000

1,00

0,00

0

1,50

0,00

0

2,00

0,00

0

2,50

0,00

0

3,00

0,00

0

3,50

0,00

0

4,00

0,00

0

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

RNLP

N/V

N

Number

Page 10: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

4 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 1. Boards of Nursing empowered to License registered Nurses, Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, or other Categories of Nursing Personnel

JD Board of Nursing rN LPN/LVN other Specialty Groups

AK Alaska Board of Nursing YES YES YES

AL Alabama Board of Nursing YES YES YES

AR Arkansas State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

AS American Samoa Health Service Regulatory Board YES YES YES

AZ Arizona State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

CA-RN California Board of Registered Nursing YES NO YES

CA-VN California Board of Vocational Nurse and Psychiatric Technician Examiners NO YES NO

CO Colorado Board of Nursing YES YES YES

CT Connecticut Board of Examiners for Nursing YES YES YES

DC District of Columbia Board of Nursing YES YES YES

DE Delaware Board of Nursing YES YES YES

FL Florida Board of Nursing YES YES YES

GA-PN Georgia State Board of Licensed Practical Nurses NO YES NO

GA-RN Georgia Board of Nursing YES NO YES

GU Guam Board of Nurse Examiners YES YES YES

HI Hawaii Board of Nursing Professional and Vocational Licensing Division YES YES YES

IA Iowa Board of Nursing YES YES YES

ID Idaho Board of Nursing YES YES YES

IL Illinois Department of Professional Regulation YES YES YES

IN Indiana State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

KS Kansas State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

KY Kentucky Board of Nursing YES YES YES

LA-PN Louisiana State Board of Practical Nurse Examiners NO YES NO

LA-RN Louisiana State Board of Nursing YES NO YES

MA Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing YES YES YES

MD Maryland Board of Nursing YES YES YES

ME Maine State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

MI Michigan CIS/Bureau of Health Services YES YES YES

MN Minnesota Board of Nursing YES YES YES

MO Missouri State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

MP Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Board of Nurse Examiners YES YES YES

MS Mississippi Board of Nursing YES YES YES

MT Montana State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NC North Carolina Board of Nursing YES YES YES

ND North Dakota Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NE Nebraska Health and Human Services System YES YES YES

NH New Hampshire Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NJ New Jersey Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NM New Mexico Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NV Nevada State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

NY New York State Board for Nursing YES YES YES

Page 11: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

5PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 1. Boards of Nursing empowered to License registered Nurses, Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, or other Categories of Nursing Personnel

JD Board of Nursing rN LPN/LVN other Specialty Groups

OH Ohio Board of Nursing YES YES YES

OK Oklahoma Board of Nursing YES YES YES

OR Oregon State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

PA Pennsylvania State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

RI Rhode Island Board of Nurse Registration and Nursing Education YES YES YES

SC South Carolina State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

SD South Dakota Board of Nursing YES YES YES

TN Tennessee State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

TX Texas Board of Nurse Examiners YES YES YES

UT Utah State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

VA Virginia Board of Nursing YES YES YES

VI Virgin Islands Board of Nurse Licensure YES YES YES

VT Vermont State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

WA Washington State Nursing Care Quality Assurance Commission YES YES YES

WI Wisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing YES YES YES

WV-PN West Virginia State Board of Examiners for Licensed Practical Nurses NO YES NO

WV-RN West Virginia Board of Examiners for Registered Professional Nurses YES NO YES

WY Wyoming State Board of Nursing YES YES YES

Page 12: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

6 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 2. registered Nurses: New in State functions, by Jurisdiction

JD examination endorsement Total New in State

N % N % N %

AK 1,561 0.70%

AL 2,570 2.77% 1,910 2.29% 4,480 2.01%

AR 1,417 1.52% 789 0.94% 2,206 0.99%

AZ 2,635 2.84% 3,222 3.86% 5,857 2.63%

CA-RN 12,884 13.87% 10,498 12.57% 23,382 10.50%

CO 1,707 1.84% 3,269 3.91% 4,976 2.24%

CT 1,374 1.48% 1,937 2.32% 3,311 1.49%

DC 369 0.40% 2,629 3.15% 2,998 1.35%

FL 15,700 7.05%

GU 23 0.02% 42 0.05% 65 0.03%

HI 478 0.51% 1,844 2.21% 2,322 1.04%

IA 1,508 1.62% 769 0.92% 2,277 1.02%

ID 642 0.69% 813 0.97% 1,455 0.65%

IN 4,980 2.24%

KS 70 0.08% 452 0.54% 522 0.23%

KY 1,874 2.02% 1,670 2.00% 3,544 1.59%

LA-RN 2,009 2.16% 1,437 1.72% 3,446 1.55%

MA 3,317 3.57% 3,417 4.09% 6,734 3.02%

MD 2,219 2.39% 1,679 2.01% 3,898 1.75%

ME 677 0.73% 682 0.82% 1,359 0.61%

MI 3,875 4.17% 2,323 2.78% 6,198 2.78%

MN 3,414 3.67% 1,830 2.19% 5,244 2.36%

MO 3,023 3.25% 3,022 3.62% 6,045 2.72%

MS 1,759 1.22% 866 1.22% 2,625 1.22%

MT 505 0.54% 1,333 1.60% 1,838 0.83%

NC 3,430 3.69% 3,861 4.62% 7,291 3.28%

ND 460 0.50% 249 0.30% 709 0.32%

NE 1,120 1.21% 454 0.54% 1,574 0.71%

NH 650 0.70% 1,250 1.50% 1,900 0.85%

NM 2,948 3.17% 928 1.11% 3,876 1.74%

NV 799 0.86% 3,190 3.82% 3,989 1.79%

NY 13,456 6.04%

OH 5,799 1.22% 2,273 1.22% 8,072 3.63%

OK 1,567 1.69% 1,931 2.31% 3,498 1.57%

OR 1,198 1.29% 2,293 2.75% 3,491 1.57%

PA 6,118 6.58% 4,249 5.09% 10,367 4.66%

RI 491 0.53% 1,051 1.26% 1,542 0.69%

SC 2,114 2.28% 1,612 1.93% 3,726 1.67%

SD 479 0.52% 290 0.35% 769 0.35%

TN 2,826 3.04% 1,869 2.24% 4,695 2.11%

TX 7,150 7.69% 5,257 6.29% 12,407 5.57%

No information available for American Samoa, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Northern Mariana Islands and Utah.

Page 13: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

7PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 2. registered Nurses: New in State functions, by Jurisdiction

JD examination endorsement Total New in State

N % N % N %

VA 3,091 3.33% 2,623 3.14% 5,714 2.57%

VI 13 0.01% 204 0.24% 217 0.10%

VT 2,935 3.16% 1,117 1.34% 4,052 1.82%

WA 6,361 2.86%

WI 4,122 1.85%

WV-RN 1,130 1.22% 1,251 1.50% 2,381 1.07%

WY 252 1.22% 1,128 1.22% 1,380 1.22%

Total 92,919 100.00% 83,513 100.00% 222,612 100.00%

No information available for American Samoa, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Northern Mariana Islands and Utah.

Page 14: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

8 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 3. Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses: New in State functions, by Jurisdiction

JD examination endorsement Total New in State

N % N % N %

AK 176 0.26%

AL 759 1.90% 373 3.29% 1,132 1.70%

AR 968 2.43% 219 1.93% 1,187 1.78%

AZ 778 1.95% 439 3.87% 1,217 1.83%

CA-VN 6,327 15.86% 534 4.71% 6,861 10.30%

CO 903 2.26% 330 2.91% 1,233 1.85%

CT 669 1.68% 201 1.77% 870 1.31%

DC 150 0.38% 269 2.37% 419 0.63%

FL 0.00% 0.00% 6,324 9.50%

GU 15 0.04% 4 0.04% 19 0.03%

HI 99 0.25% 181 1.59% 280 0.42%

IA 1,237 3.10% 126 1.11% 1,363 2.05%

ID 283 0.71% 125 1.10% 408 0.61%

IN 0.00% 0.00% 1,990 2.99%

KS 196 0.49% 20 0.18% 216 0.32%

KY 711 1.78% 319 2.81% 1,030 1.55%

LA-PN 1,327 3.33% 213 1.88% 1,540 2.31%

MA 834 2.09% 262 2.31% 1,096 1.65%

MD 863 2.16% 412 3.63% 1,275 1.91%

ME 10 0.03% 68 0.60% 78 0.12%

MI 1,488 3.73% 314 2.77% 1,802 2.71%

MN 1,452 3.64% 236 2.08% 1,688 2.54%

MO 1,264 3.17% 463 4.08% 1,727 2.59%

MS 703 1.76% 184 1.62% 887 1.33%

MT 203 0.51% 111 0.98% 314 0.47%

NC 950 2.38% 775 6.83% 1,725 2.59%

ND 289 0.72% 82 0.72% 371 0.56%

NE 533 1.34% 77 0.68% 610 0.92%

NH 330 0.83% 225 1.98% 555 0.83%

NM 319 0.80% 123 1.08% 442 0.66%

NV 39 0.10% 315 2.78% 354 0.53%

NY 4,330 6.50%

OH 3,350 8.40% 334 2.94% 3,684 5.53%

OK 1,210 3.03% 257 2.26% 1,467 2.20%

OR 266 0.67% 176 1.55% 442 0.66%

PA 1,976 4.95% 641 5.65% 2,617 3.93%

RI 67 0.17% 81 0.71% 148 0.22%

SC 642 1.61% 296 2.61% 938 1.41%

SD 95 0.24% 38 0.33% 133 0.20%

TN 1,390 3.48% 466 4.11% 1,856 2.79%

TX 4,557 11.42% 1,156 10.19% 5,713 8.58%

VA 1,984 4.97% 404 3.56% 2,388 3.59%

Page 15: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

9PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 3. Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses: New in State functions, by Jurisdiction

JD examination endorsement Total New in State

N % N % N %

VI 6 0.02% 7 0.06% 13 0.02%

VT 82 0.21% 195 1.72% 277 0.42%

WA 0.00% 0.00% 1,209 1.82%

WI 0.00% 0.00% 1,307 1.96%

WV-PN 434 1.09% 201 1.77% 635 0.95%

WY 138 0.35% 96 0.85% 234 0.35%

Total 39,896 100.00% 11,348 100.00% 66,580 100.00%

No information available for American Samoa, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, Northern Mariana Islands and Utah.

Page 16: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

10 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 4. Total Number of Active Licenses: registered Nurses and Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, by Jurisdiction

rNs LPN/VNs Total

JD N % N % N %

AK 9,859 0.28% 1,050 0.11% 10,909 0.25%

AL 57,638 1.65% 18,919 1.99% 76,557 1.72%

AR 30,935 0.88% 15,084 1.59% 46,019 1.04%

AZ 66,378 1.90% 11,721 1.24% 78,099 1.76%

CA-RN 338,522 9.68% 0 0.00% 338,522 7.62%

CA-VN 0 0.00% 75,406 7.95% 75,406 1.70%

CO 55,121 1.58% 10,135 1.07% 65,256 1.47%

CT 56,081 1.60% 12,125 1.28% 68,206 1.53%

DC 13,904 0.40% 2,547 0.27% 16,451 0.37%

DE 11,236 0.32% 2,207 0.23% 13,443 0.30%

FL 169,633 4.85% 59,215 6.24% 228,848 5.15%

GA-PN 0.00% 32,100 3.38% 32,100 0.72%

GA-RN 106,000 3.03% 0.00% 106,000 2.38%

GU 659 0.02% 136 0.01% 795 0.02%

HI 17,804 0.51% 2,813 0.30% 20,617 0.46%

IA 42,519 1.22% 11,571 1.22% 54,090 1.22%

ID 16,356 0.47% 3,840 0.40% 20,196 0.45%

IL 149,616 4.28% 28,150 2.97% 177,766 4.00%

IN 85,630 2.45% 29,053 3.06% 114,683 2.58%

KS 33,312 0.95% 8,325 0.88% 41,637 0.94%

KY 50,760 1.45% 14,172 1.49% 64,932 1.46%

LA-PN 0 0.00% 22,032 2.32% 22,032 0.50%

LA-RN 47,803 1.37% 0 0.00% 47,803 1.08%

MA 109,803 3.14% 20,480 2.16% 130,283 2.93%

MD 66,128 1.89% 12,338 1.30% 78,466 1.77%

ME 21,002 0.60% 2,768 0.29% 23,770 0.53%

MI 221,732 6.34% 82,651 8.71% 304,383 6.85%

MN 77,950 2.23% 23,642 2.49% 101,592 2.29%

MO 81,064 2.32% 23,230 2.45% 104,294 2.35%

MP 953 0.03% 65 0.01% 1,018 0.02%

MS 34,746 0.99% 13,096 1.38% 47,842 1.08%

MT 14,094 0.40% 3,561 0.38% 17,655 0.40%

NC 104,021 2.98% 21,293 2.24% 125,314 2.82%

ND 9,122 0.26% 3,594 0.38% 12,716 0.29%

NE 21,589 0.62% 7,246 0.76% 28,835 0.65%

NH 18,300 0.52% 3,500 0.37% 21,800 0.49%

NJ 102,433 2.93% 19,430 2.05% 121,863 2.74%

NM 23,965 0.69% 3,338 0.35% 27,303 0.61%

NV 24,904 0.71% 3,127 0.33% 28,031 0.63%

NY 257,724 7.37% 70,960 7.48% 328,684 7.40%

OH 165,998 4.75% 48,241 5.09% 214,239 4.82%

OK 38,825 1.11% 17,606 1.86% 56,431 1.27%

Page 17: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

11PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 4. Total Number of Active Licenses: registered Nurses and Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses, by Jurisdiction

rNs LPN/VNs Total

JD N % N % N %

OR 41,972 1.20% 3,891 0.41% 45,863 1.03%

PA 207,463 5.93% 51,930 5.47% 259,393 5.84%

RI 17,260 0.49% 2,238 0.24% 19,498 0.44%

SC 49,939 1.43% 11,458 1.21% 61,397 1.38%

SD 11,829 0.34% 2,281 0.24% 14,110 0.32%

TN 72,303 2.07% 27,051 2.85% 99,354 2.24%

TX 197,346 5.65% 81,185 8.56% 278,531 6.27%

UT 18,230 0.52% 2,607 0.27% 20,837 0.47%

VA 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

VI 640 0.02% 281 0.03% 921 0.02%

VT 15,944 0.46% 1,347 0.14% 17,291 0.39%

WA 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

WI 76,769 2.20% 15,238 1.61% 92,007 2.07%

WV-PN 0 0.00% 7,198 0.76% 7,198 0.16%

WV-RN 25,008 0.72% 0 0.00% 25,008 0.56%

WY 7,084 0.20% 1,220 0.13% 8,304 0.19%

Total 3,495,906 100.00% 948,692 100.00% 4,444,5981 100.00%

No information available for America Samoa.

1Includes 473,027 total number of active licenses reported in 2006 for Delaware, Georgia-PN, Georgia-RN, New Jersey, Northern Mariana Islands and Utah.

Page 18: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

12 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 5. Number of Graduates of foreign Nursing Programs Licenses, by Jurisdiction

JD rN Graduates of foreign Nursing Programs

LPN/VN Graduates of foreign Nursing Programs

AL 79 6

AZ 652 15

CA 5,093 0

CT 254 38

GU 18 4

IA 3 1

KY 121 0

LA 60 0

MA 356 0

MD 459 44

ME 37 0

MN 488 10

MO 113 2

NC 155 1

ND 8 0

NH 103 25

NM 2,201 99

OR 142 13

PA 486 19

RI 5 0

SC 10 2

TX 1,621 51

VI 5 1

WV 1 20

WY 5 0

Total 12,475 351

Information provided by 25 jurisdictions

Page 19: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

13PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 6. Summary of Licensing Activities

New In State

Registered Nurses 222,612

Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses 66,580

Total 289,192

Active Licenses1

Registered Nurses 3,495,906

Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses 948,692

Total 4,444,598

Graduates of foreign Nursing Program2

Registered Nurses 12,475

Licenses Practical/Vocational Nurses 351

Total 12,826

1Includes 473,027 total number of active licenses reported in 2006 for Delaware, Georgia-PN, Georgia-RN, Illinois, New Jersey, Northern Mariana Islands and Utah.

2Information provided by 25 jurisdictions

Page 20: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

14 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Tab

le 7

. Dis

trib

utio

n o

f A

ctiv

e A

dva

nced

Pra

ctic

e/A

utho

rity

to

Pra

ctic

e Li

cens

es W

ithi

n e

ach

Spec

ialt

y C

ateg

ory

, by

Juri

sdic

tio

n

JD

CN

STy

pes

of

Nur

se P

ract

itio

ners

CN

M n

Cr

NA

n

CN

S-P

SYC

H n

CN

S n

AC

n

AH

n

CH

P n

Co

L n

eM

r n

fAM

n

fPN

n

Ge

r n

Ne

o n

Wo

M n

PSY

n

SCH

n

NP

No

Sp

ecia

lty n

NP

No

C

ateg

ory

D

esig

nati

on n

Tota

l A

ctiv

e Li

cens

es n

AL

421,

718

6213

219

721

416

51,

084

3483

3222

3,78

5

AR

2765

912

01,

696

2,50

2

AZ

197

523

157

5150

525

51,

337

6417

234

218

47

3,79

4

CA

-RN

1,15

91,

934

02,

673

00

00

00

00

00

00

14,6

780

20,4

44

CO

340

795

224

794

147

552

381

1,39

580

225

146

121

414

35,

347

DC

7013

235

712

949

GU

72

00

31

121

41

132

HI

3619

477

853

5435

00

248

029

1351

130

284

0

IA75

464

4110

527

8418

00

063

60

4517

153

21

1,83

0

ID30

388

1316

510

957

IN65

65

KS

6378

118

446

560

160

135

00

1,06

22

2910

424

400

010

83,

217

KY

991,

055

108

340

231

129

00

1,16

90

2023

175

460

03,

089

LA-R

N36

1,18

467

238

7314

479

00

888

021

147

8533

00

02,

995

MA

439

958

978

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

5,52

77,

902

MD

187

442

149

014

978

236

20

073

40

126

119

176

310

00

3,25

7

ME

8838

926

021

720

979

10

596

526

1674

115

10

131,

900

MI

447

3,45

44,

260

8,16

1

MN

214

1,54

723

727

142

394

360

00

966

025

813

523

337

00

04,

694

MO

861,

445

161

265

6551

141

00

01,

455

087

163

252

360

00

4,93

6

MS

2551

40

047

3630

00

1,01

15

940

4343

00

01,

803

MT

4518

10

410

00

00

00

00

00

046

40

731

NC

196

2,13

311

895

582

457

249

21,

547

470

189

165

4211

6,22

0

ND

931

125

140

912

00

257

015

524

50

26

694

NE

2344

90

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

665

1,13

7

NH

1,50

01,

500

NM

198

711

146

1,05

5

Page 21: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

15PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICSTa

ble

7. D

istr

ibut

ion

of

Act

ive

Ad

vanc

ed P

ract

ice/

Aut

hori

ty t

o P

ract

ice

Lice

nses

Wit

hin

eac

h Sp

ecia

lty

Cat

ego

ry, b

y Ju

risd

icti

on

JD

CN

STy

pes

of

Nur

se P

ract

itio

ners

CN

M n

Cr

NA

n

CN

S-P

SYC

H n

CN

S n

AC

n

AH

n

CH

P n

Co

L n

eM

r n

fAM

n

fPN

n

Ge

r n

Ne

o n

Wo

M n

PSY

n

SCH

n

NP

No

Sp

ecia

lty n

NP

No

C

ateg

ory

D

esig

nati

on n

Tota

l A

ctiv

e Li

cens

es n

NV

2313

71

137

271

78

1974

2231

631

NY

00

332

4,08

11,

581

00

4,73

456

723

31,

090

1,03

621

00

13,6

75

OH

310

2,13

31,

647

3,65

67,

746

OK

4651

118

673

11,

474

OR

232

452

018

628

319

154

10

912

043

4212

833

90

00

2,83

6

PA6,

266

6,26

6

RI

6722

011

056

696

3

SC95

1,31

737

7721

146

391

13

2954

5840

123

73,

029

SD21

361

677

611

1224

09

4114

880

6

TN75

1,94

278

3,98

06,

075

TX36

93,

207

306

1,15

542

266

090

60

101

3,41

30

287

381

993

170

350

812

,413

VI

2519

34

55

61

VT

5262

421

374

290

116

50

107

115

00

462

WI

158

158

WV-

RN

6232

20

5611

3832

00

554

05

2030

40

00

1,13

4

WY

1313

914

30

95

00

165

02

126

80

00

385

Tota

l5,

553

32,6

723,

335

9,69

81,

834

9,60

05,

727

510

429

,747

261,

873

2,25

04,

361

2,42

170

25,5

8317

,091

151,

950

Page 22: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

16 PART I – 2007 LICENSURE STATISTICS

Table 8. Total Number of Active Advanced Practice/Authority to Practice Licenses Within the Member Board Jurisdictions

Abbreviation Category

Active Licenses

n %

CNM Certified Nurse Midwife 5,553 3.7%

CRNA Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist 32,672 21.5%

CNS-PSYCH Clinical Nurse Specialist - Psychiatry and/or Mental Health (including all its subspecialties)

3,335 2.2%

CNS Clinical Nurse Specialist (all others) 9,698 6.4%

Nurse Practitioners

AC Acute Care 1,834 1.2%

AHP Adult Health 9,600 6.3%

CHP Child Health/Pediatric 5,727 3.8%

COL College Health 5 0.0%

EMR Emergency 104 0.1%

FAM Family 29,747 19.6%

FPN Family Planning 26 0.0%

GER Geriatric 1,873 1.2%

NEO Neonatal 2,250 1.5%

WOM Obstetrical and/or Gynecological and/or Women’s Health 4,361 2.9%

PSY Psychiatric and/or Mental Health 2,421 1.6%

SCH School Health 70 0.0%

NP Nurse Practitioner - no specialty designation 25,583 16.8%

NP Nurse Practitioner - no category design 17,091 11.2%

Total 151,950 100.0%

Page 23: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

17PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICS

IntroductionIn 1982, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®) revised the State Board Test Pool Examination (SBTPE) substantially. NCSBN changed the examination from a norm-referenced test to a criterion-referenced test, implemented a new test plan and used Rasch’s (1960) one param-eter logistic model to calibrate items and measure candidates’ abilities. At this time, NCSBN renamed the examinations the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN®) and the National Council Licensure Examination for Practical Nurses (NCLEX-PN®). However, these NCLEX® examinations were very different than the NCLEX examinations taken by candidates today. These examinations were administered only twice a year in a pencil and paper format and each adminis-tration lasted two days.

In 1986, the NCSBN Board of Directors funded an initial investigation on the feasibility of using Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) procedures. CAT held the promise to make tests available year round, make tests shorter by only giving candidates items that were appropriate for their ability and pro-vide greater security for the content of the items. On April 1, 1994, NCSBN began administering the NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN examinations exclu-sively via CAT. This publication provides a detailed breakdown of candidate performance for 2007, as well as historical data.

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT)

Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a method of administering examinations that combines the power and speed of current computer technology with modern measurement theory. With CAT, each candidate’s test is unique; it is assembled interac-tively as the individual is tested. As the candidate answers each question, the computer calculates an ability estimate based on all earlier answers. The test administration software then identifies the con-tent area for the next item. Next, the software scans through the available items within the identified content area for an item that has a degree of diffi-culty sufficient to give the candidate approximately

a 50% chance of answering it correctly. This item is selected and presented to the candidate on the computer screen. This process is repeated for each item, creating an examination tailored to the individual’s ability level while fulfilling all NCLEX test plan requirements. The examination continues in this way until a pass-fail decision can be deter-mined. Because the test could end at any time after the minimum number of items has been answered, it is important that the test plan specifications are met throughout the entire test.

Setting the Passing Standard

To ensure a consistent standard of competence in nursing practice, NCSBN uses a criterion refer-enced standard, which means that passing or failing depends solely upon a candidate’s level of per-formance in relation to the established point that represents safe entry-level competence. There is no preassigned percentage of candidates that pass or fail each examination. Because the practice of nurs-ing changes over time, it is necessary to reevaluate the appropriateness of the passing standard from time to time. To ensure that the passing standards for the NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN examinations accurately reflect the amount of nursing ability cur-rently required to practice competently at the entry level, NCSBN’s Board of Directors reevaluates the passing standard every three years or when the test plan changes. In evaluating the passing standard, they consider information from a variety of sources. Although there is no limit on the information that they may consider, they are typically presented with the following information:

The results of a standard setting exercise 1. undertaken by the Panel of Judges. Currently, this exercise consists of a modified Angoff procedure, with additional statistical compro-mise procedures. Also, a list of the members on the Panel of Judges and their qualifications is included.

An historical record of the passing standard and 2. annual summaries of candidate performance on the NCLEX examination since the implementa-tion of the CAT methodology in 1994.

PArT II – 2007 NCLeX® eXAMINATIoN STATISTICS

Page 24: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

18 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICS

The results from the annual Standard Setting 3. Survey, which solicits the opinions of employers and educators regarding the competence of the current cohort of entry-level nurses.

Information detailing the educational readiness 4. of high school graduates who expressed an interest in nursing.

In April 1998, the passing standard for the NCLEX-RN® Examination was increased from –0.42 logits to –0.35 logits. In April 2001, this standard was retained for another three years. In April 2004, the standard was increased to –0.28 logits. In April 2007, the standard was again increased to -0.21 logits. The passing standard for the NCLEX-PN® Examination has experienced a similar increase over time. In April 1999, the passing standard for the NCLEX-PN® Examination was increased from –0.51 logits to –0.47 logits. In April 2002, this standard was retained for another three years. In April 2005, the NCLEX-PN passing standard was increased from –0.47 to –0.42 logits. And in April 2008, the standard was increased to -0.37 logits. It is important to note that the RN and PN standards are not directly com-parable because they are based on different item pools and different scopes of practice.

Pass-fail Decisions

Candidate performance on the NCLEX examina-tions is reported only as a pass-fail decision; scores are never reported. As a result, almost all the statis-tics presented here are pass rates or statistics based upon a pass-fail decision.

To make pass-fail decisions, the computer seeks to determine with 95% certainty whether the can-didate’s true ability is above or below the passing standard. To do this, three pieces of information must be known: the current person ability estimate; the precision of that estimate; and the passing stan-dard. After the minimum number of items has been answered, the computer compares the candidate’s ability level to the standard required for passing. Candidates clearly above the passing standard pass. Candidates clearly below the passing standard fail.

If the candidate’s ability level is close enough to the passing standard that it is not clear which side of the passing standard his or her ability falls, the

computer continues asking items. As more items are answered, the candidate’s ability estimate becomes more precise. After each item, the candidate’s abil-ity level is recomputed, using all of the information (answers to all the items asked) available at that point. When it becomes clear on which side of the passing standard the candidate’s ability falls, the examination ends.

Naturally, some candidates’ abilities are very close to the passing standard. For these candidates, all items in the item pool might not provide enough informa-tion to be certain their ability is truly above or below the passing standard. These are the candidates who take the maximum number of items. Once the maximum number of items has been administered, the computer waives the 95% certainty requirement and makes a pass or fail decision based upon the candidate’s final ability estimate. If the candidate’s ability estimate is above the passing standard, the candidate passes. If not, he or she fails.

If an NCLEX examination ends because time runs out, then the computer does not have enough infor-mation to make a clear pass-fail decision; if it did, it already would have stopped administering items. However, when the response patterns of people who ran out of time were investigated, it was found that some had been performing consistently above the passing standard and their “true” ability level appeared to be above passing, although close to it. A mechanism is therefore provided for these can-didates to pass. If a candidate’s ability estimate has been consistently above the passing standard over the last 60 items, then he or she will pass, despite having run out of time.

Page 25: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

19PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

1. C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Typ

e o

f C

and

idat

e (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

1

Ja

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal:

Jan.

1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Typ

e o

f C

and

idat

eC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Firs

t-T

ime,

U

.S.-

Ed

ucat

ed

Dip

lom

a1,

023

920

89.9

733

670

91.4

11,

467

1,26

586

.23

466

386

82.8

33,

689

3,24

187

.9

Ass

oci

ate

Deg

ree

15,7

0313

,942

88.8

18,9

2416

,365

86.4

829

,706

24,6

8183

.08

5,57

04,

283

76.8

969

,903

59,2

7184

.8

Bac

cala

urea

te

Deg

ree

10,1

299,

096

89.8

11,6

8310

,438

89.3

420

,203

16,9

7984

.04

3,75

73,

047

81.1

45,7

7239

,560

86.4

Spec

ial P

rog

ram

C

od

es

6440

62.5

3823

60.5

346

3678

.26

5328

52.8

320

112

763

.2

Tota

l Firs

t-T

ime,

U

.S.-

Ed

ucat

ed26

,919

23,9

9889

.131

,378

27,4

9687

.651

,422

42,9

6183

.59,

846

7,74

478

.711

9,56

510

2,19

985

.5

Rep

eat,

U.S

.-E

duc

ated

4,

442

2,34

952

.95,

079

2,12

941

.98,

273

4,59

155

.58,

608

4,77

755

.526

,402

13,8

4652

.4

Firs

t-T

ime,

In

tern

atio

nally

Ed

ucat

ed

8,26

54,

743

57.4

7,93

74,

120

51.9

8,19

44,

131

50.4

9,39

64,

581

48.8

33,7

9217

,575

52.0

Rep

eat,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly

Ed

ucat

ed

4,89

01,

401

28.7

4,94

31,

200

24.3

5,08

91,

240

24.4

5,59

21,

463

26.2

20,5

145,

304

25.9

All

Can

did

ates

44,5

1632

,491

73.0

49,3

3734

,945

70.8

72,9

7852

,923

72.5

33,4

4218

,565

55.5

200,

273

138,

924

69.4

1 Perf

orm

ance

of R

N E

duc

atio

nal P

rog

ram

s Th

e fo

llow

ing

is a

sum

mar

y o

f the

200

7 N

CLE

X p

ass

rate

s fo

r U

S R

N e

duc

atio

n p

rog

ram

s b

ased

up

on

first

-tim

e ca

ndid

ate

per

form

ance

:

In 2

007,

1,7

08 U

S R

N p

rog

ram

s ha

d a

t le

ast

one

firs

t-tim

e ca

ndid

ate.

The

mea

n p

ass

rate

for

tho

se p

rog

ram

s w

as 8

4.0%

(SD

13.

4%).

Whe

n in

clud

ing

onl

y th

ose

pro

gra

ms

with

at

leas

t te

n fir

st-t

ime

exam

inee

s (N

=1,

639)

the

mea

n p

ass

rate

was

84.

8% (S

D 1

0.3%

).

Page 26: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

20 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICS

Table 2. Summary Statistics for first-Time, u.S.-educated Candidates

NCLeX-rN® January-December 2007

Passing Standard1 -0.21 logits

Estimated Decision Consistency2 0.91

Average Test Length3 121 items

Percent of Candidates Taking the Minimum Number of Items 50.9%

Percent of Candidates Taking the Maximum Number of Items 14.5%

Average Testing Time4 2 hours, 16 minutes

Percent of Candidates Taking the Maximum Amount of Time 1.0%

1The NCLEX-RN passing standard scale uses logits as the unit of measurement. Logits is short for log-odds-units. These units have no inherent meaning with regard to nursing content and in fact have an arbitrary zero point, but logits are practical because the probability of a correct response can easily be computed when the candidate’s ability and the item’s difficulty are known. Typically, the logit range on the NCLEX-RN scale is from -2.00 (easy items or low ability candidates) to 2.00 (difficult items or high ability candidates). April 1, 2007, the NCLEX-RN passing standard increased from -0.28 to -0.21 logits.

2Estimated Decision Consistency is an indicator of reliability. Conceptually, it is the proportion of pass-fail decisions that would remain the same if the same population were retested immediately after their first test (assuming no learning or fatigue effects) using a different set of items.

3NCLEX-RN examinations consist of 75 to 265 items. 4The standard amount of allotted testing time for the NCLEX-RN examination is 6 hours.

Page 27: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

21PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

3. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (J

an. 1

- M

ar. 3

1, 2

007)

1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Jan

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Ala

bam

a0

185

166

89.7

330

303

91.8

515

469

91.1

Ala

ska

029

2896

.636

3597

.265

6396

.9

Am

eric

an S

amo

a0

20

0.0

02

00.

0

Ariz

ona

119

81.8

472

412

87.3

294

268

91.2

777

689

88.7

Ark

ansa

s25

223

593

.327

424

890

.567

5785

.159

354

091

.1

Cal

iforn

ia-R

N0

1,98

11,

772

89.5

753

688

91.4

2,73

42,

460

90.0

Co

lora

do

018

415

383

.226

124

694

.344

539

989

.7

Co

nnec

ticut

5044

88.0

3225

78.1

5149

96.1

133

118

88.7

Del

awar

e0

8676

88.4

55

100.

091

8189

.0

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

00

3330

90.9

3330

90.9

Flo

rida

01,

289

1,15

089

.220

317

083

.71,

492

1,32

088

.5

Geo

rgia

-RN

022

819

886

.831

528

189

.254

347

988

.2

Gua

m0

06

610

0.0

66

100.

0

Haw

aii

040

3792

.512

099

82.5

160

136

85.0

Idah

o0

7266

91.7

3129

93.6

103

9592

.2

Illin

ois

046

743

292

.552

147

290

.698

890

491

.5

Ind

iana

129

75.0

282

241

85.5

244

225

92.2

538

475

88.3

Iow

a0

250

219

87.6

151

126

83.4

401

345

86.0

Kan

sas

019

717

588

.815

713

988

.535

431

488

.7

Ken

tuck

y0

341

311

91.2

141

134

95.0

482

445

92.3

Loui

sian

a-R

N35

3510

0.0

355

316

89.0

437

386

88.3

827

737

89.1

Mai

ne0

2121

100.

080

7391

.310

194

93.1

Mar

ylan

d0

304

286

94.1

195

175

89.7

499

461

92.4

Mas

sach

uset

ts0

344

293

85.2

352

316

89.8

696

609

87.5

Mic

hig

an0

488

434

88.9

312

292

93.6

800

726

90.8

Min

neso

ta0

416

347

83.4

150

135

90.0

566

482

85.2

Mis

siss

ipp

i0

286

262

91.6

9588

92.6

381

350

91.9

Mis

sour

i14

1392

.956

249

888

.625

323

191

.382

974

289

.5

Mo

ntan

a0

85

62.5

7775

97.4

8580

94.1

Neb

rask

a33

2987

.95

510

0.0

244

225

92.2

282

259

91.8

Page 28: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

22 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

3. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (J

an. 1

- M

ar. 3

1, 2

007)

1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Jan

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Nev

ada

083

6578

.311

810

084

.820

116

582

.1

New

Ham

psh

ire0

32

66.7

64

66.7

96

66.7

New

Jer

sey

168

160

95.2

387

358

92.5

9573

76.8

650

591

90.9

New

Mex

ico

016

614

788

.670

6592

.923

621

289

.8

New

Yo

rk1

110

0.0

1,13

298

787

.234

428

482

.61,

477

1,27

286

.1

No

rth

Car

olin

a54

5296

.333

428

886

.216

414

990

.955

248

988

.6

No

rth

Dak

ota

00

6858

85.3

6858

85.3

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

94

44.4

09

444

.4

Ohi

o50

4590

.073

366

490

.624

422

391

.41,

027

932

90.7

Okl

aho

ma

027

323

586

.125

1664

.029

825

184

.2

Ore

go

n0

22

100.

056

5089

.358

5289

.7

Penn

sylv

ania

192

161

83.9

256

208

81.3

367

316

86.1

815

685

84.0

Rho

de

Isla

nd0

7265

90.3

7669

90.8

148

134

90.5

Sout

h C

aro

lina

021

319

692

.022

619

485

.843

939

088

.8

Sout

h D

ako

ta0

5145

88.2

6056

93.3

111

101

91.0

Tenn

esse

e0

295

271

91.9

402

376

93.5

697

647

92.8

Texa

s61

5386

.91,

175

1,07

191

.295

387

691

.92,

189

2,00

091

.4

Uta

h0

262

227

86.6

6454

84.4

326

281

86.2

Verm

ont

01

110

0.0

21

50.0

32

66.7

Virg

in Is

land

s0

00

0

Virg

inia

9074

82.2

200

171

85.5

266

234

88.0

556

479

86.2

Was

hing

ton

023

921

489

.519

017

994

.242

939

391

.6

Wes

t V

irgin

ia-R

N0

1414

100.

070

5578

.684

6982

.1

Wis

cons

in0

601

530

88.2

349

306

87.7

950

836

88.0

Wyo

min

g0

21

50.0

02

150

.0

Tota

l1,

023

920

89.9

15,7

0313

,942

88.8

10,1

299,

096

89.8

26,8

5523

,958

89.2

1 Dat

a d

oes

no

t in

clud

e Sp

ecia

l Pro

gra

m C

od

es.

Page 29: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

23PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

4. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7)1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Ap

r. 1

- Ju

ne 3

0, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Ala

bam

a0

712

630

88.5

348

314

90.2

1,06

094

489

.1

Ala

ska

020

1680

.017

1376

.537

2978

.4

Am

eric

an S

amo

a0

10

0.0

01

00.

0

Ariz

ona

1616

100.

046

942

490

.418

115

887

.366

659

889

.8

Ark

ansa

s15

1493

.316

415

292

.715

914

691

.833

831

292

.3

Cal

iforn

ia-R

N0

1,14

898

285

.548

444

491

.71,

632

1,42

687

.4

Co

lora

do

014

211

983

.813

812

993

.528

024

888

.6

Co

nnec

ticut

6256

90.3

6856

82.4

142

127

89.4

272

239

87.9

Del

awar

e10

1010

0.0

7058

82.9

2118

85.7

101

8685

.1

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

07

685

.734

3294

.141

3892

.7

Flo

rida

097

678

180

.031

327

587

.91,

289

1,05

681

.9

Geo

rgia

-RN

042

738

389

.725

422

789

.468

161

089

.6

Gua

m0

01

00.

01

00.

0

Haw

aii

016

1610

0.0

3729

78.4

5345

84.9

Idah

o0

169

158

93.5

4843

89.6

217

201

92.6

Illin

ois

128

66.7

474

419

88.4

489

432

88.3

975

859

88.1

Ind

iana

1917

89.5

632

545

86.2

367

319

86.9

1,01

888

186

.5

Iow

a0

372

309

83.1

255

221

86.7

627

530

84.5

Kan

sas

043

137

386

.532

328

287

.375

465

586

.9

Ken

tuck

y0

294

226

76.9

133

119

89.5

427

345

80.8

Loui

sian

a-R

N0

9681

84.4

7061

87.1

166

142

85.5

Mai

ne0

234

203

86.8

9382

88.2

327

285

87.2

Mar

ylan

d0

249

235

94.4

164

150

91.5

413

385

93.2

Mas

sach

uset

ts52

5198

.129

326

189

.123

220

588

.457

751

789

.6

Mic

hig

an0

572

504

88.1

262

231

88.2

834

735

88.1

Min

neso

ta0

857

751

87.6

493

458

92.9

1,35

01,

209

89.6

Mis

siss

ipp

i0

660

582

88.2

219

197

90.0

879

779

88.6

Mis

sour

i5

510

0.0

276

241

87.3

307

293

95.4

588

539

91.7

Mo

ntan

a0

5143

84.3

7368

93.2

124

111

89.5

Neb

rask

a2

210

0.0

190

166

87.4

305

272

89.2

497

440

88.5

Page 30: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

24 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

4. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7)1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Ap

r. 1

- Ju

ne 3

0, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Nev

ada

065

6092

.363

5587

.312

811

589

.8

New

Ham

psh

ire0

238

205

86.1

5952

88.1

297

257

86.5

New

Jer

sey

120

109

90.8

199

175

87.9

141

124

87.9

460

408

88.7

New

Mex

ico

011

385

75.2

4743

91.5

160

128

80.0

New

Yo

rk0

952

773

81.2

349

273

78.2

1,30

11,

046

80.4

No

rth

Car

olin

a24

2395

.81,

005

871

86.7

374

344

92.0

1,40

31,

238

88.2

No

rth

Dak

ota

043

3479

.121

720

594

.526

023

991

.9

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

10

0.0

01

00.

0

Ohi

o48

4695

.875

865

486

.355

148

087

.11,

357

1,18

087

.0

Okl

aho

ma

046

337

380

.630

926

686

.177

263

982

.8

Ore

go

n0

5447

87.0

175

160

91.4

229

207

90.4

Penn

sylv

ania

155

137

88.4

276

208

75.4

426

362

85.0

857

707

82.5

Rho

de

Isla

nd1

110

0.0

2421

87.5

2520

80.0

5042

84.0

Sout

h C

aro

lina

038

034

490

.531

927

285

.369

961

688

.1

Sout

h D

ako

ta0

136

111

81.6

122

110

90.2

258

221

85.7

Tenn

esse

e0

678

625

92.2

565

539

95.4

1,24

31,

164

93.6

Texa

s57

5393

.01,

784

1,62

891

.398

592

093

.42,

826

2,60

192

.0

Uta

h0

136

122

89.7

100

9292

.023

621

490

.7

Verm

ont

088

8596

.638

3386

.812

611

893

.7

Virg

in Is

land

s0

00

0.0

11

100.

01

110

0.0

Virg

inia

135

122

90.4

541

448

82.8

253

226

89.3

929

796

85.7

Was

hing

ton

024

521

487

.412

211

392

.636

732

789

.1

Wes

t V

irgin

ia -

RN

022

420

189

.720

616

379

.143

036

484

.7

Wis

cons

in0

362

287

79.3

253

221

87.4

615

508

82.6

Wyo

min

g0

8974

83.2

2119

90.5

110

9384

.5

Tota

l73

367

091

.418

,924

16,3

6586

.511

,683

10,4

3889

.331

,340

27,4

7387

.7

1 Dat

a d

oes

no

t in

clud

e Sp

ecia

l Pro

gra

m C

od

es

Page 31: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

25PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

5. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (J

uly

1 -

Sep

t. 3

0, 2

007)

1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Jul

y 1

- Se

pt.

30,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Ala

bam

a0

605

503

83.1

373

327

87.7

978

830

84.9

Ala

ska

025

1768

.023

1878

.348

3572

.9

Am

eric

an S

amo

a0

00

0

Ariz

ona

152

041

980

.616

814

284

.568

956

181

.4

Ark

ansa

s3

266

.729

223

680

.825

621

082

.055

144

881

.3

Cal

iforn

ia-R

N0

2,61

12,

205

84.5

962

797

82.9

3,57

33,

002

84.0

Co

lora

do

035

529

081

.743

037

086

.178

566

084

.1

Co

nnec

ticut

118

72.7

396

349

88.1

342

298

87.1

749

655

87.4

Del

awar

e12

866

.766

5177

.313

410

376

.921

216

276

.4

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

011

1090

.914

212

386

.615

313

386

.9

Flo

rida

01,

638

1,27

878

.01,

112

977

87.9

2,75

02,

255

82.0

Geo

rgia

-RN

041

735

885

.958

452

990

.61,

001

887

88.6

Gua

m0

012

866

.712

866

.7

Haw

aii

095

8488

.414

811

275

.724

319

680

.7

Idah

o0

9986

86.9

8367

80.7

182

153

84.1

Illin

ois

85

62.5

1,39

41,

203

86.3

910

753

82.8

2,31

21,

961

84.8

Ind

iana

2917

58.6

632

502

79.4

550

479

87.1

1,21

199

882

.4

Iow

a0

566

457

80.7

166

116

69.9

732

573

78.3

Kan

sas

018

514

176

.217

612

571

.036

126

673

.7

Ken

tuck

y0

835

699

83.7

322

280

87.0

1,15

797

984

.6

Loui

sian

a-R

N0

450

376

83.6

478

423

88.5

928

799

86.1

Mai

ne0

9065

72.2

121

9578

.521

116

075

.8

Mar

ylan

d0

533

457

85.7

522

448

85.8

1,05

590

585

.8

Mas

sach

uset

ts20

1890

.084

570

383

.278

668

887

.51,

651

1,40

985

.3

Mic

hig

an0

1,24

51,

071

86.0

880

751

85.3

2,12

51,

822

85.7

Min

neso

ta0

505

352

69.7

260

211

81.2

765

563

73.6

Mis

siss

ipp

i0

246

196

79.7

8370

84.3

329

266

80.9

Mis

sour

i23

2087

.067

157

285

.367

859

888

.21,

372

1,19

086

.7

Mo

ntan

a0

136

9872

.164

5382

.820

015

175

.5

Neb

rask

a31

3096

.878

6279

.513

911

079

.124

820

281

.5

Page 32: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

26 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

5. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (J

uly

1 -

Sep

t. 3

0, 2

007)

1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l Jul

y 1

- Se

pt.

30,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Nev

ada

013

311

485

.793

7176

.322

618

581

.9

New

Ham

psh

ire0

169

132

78.1

9874

75.5

267

206

77.2

New

Jer

sey

287

259

90.2

672

592

88.1

429

347

80.9

1,38

81,

198

86.3

New

Mex

ico

025

519

375

.780

7290

.033

526

579

.1

New

Yo

rk6

610

0.0

2,86

02,

439

85.3

1,36

31,

089

79.9

4,22

93,

534

83.6

No

rth

Car

olin

a45

4191

.11,

018

866

85.1

494

438

88.7

1,55

71,

345

86.4

No

rth

Dak

ota

045

2964

.485

7284

.713

010

177

.7

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

20

0.0

02

00.

0

Ohi

o19

216

787

.01,

573

1,32

584

.21,

088

930

85.5

2,85

32,

422

84.9

Okl

aho

ma

035

429

081

.934

627

479

.270

056

480

.6

Ore

go

n0

530

483

91.1

273

237

86.8

803

720

89.7

Penn

sylv

ania

597

511

85.6

1,71

21,

384

80.8

1,53

51,

254

81.7

3,84

43,

149

81.9

Rho

de

Isla

nd27

2488

.911

398

86.7

126

107

84.9

266

229

86.1

Sout

h C

aro

lina

030

526

085

.394

7478

.739

933

483

.7

Sout

h D

ako

ta0

160

109

68.1

138

108

78.3

298

217

72.8

Tenn

esse

e0

240

213

88.8

390

348

89.2

630

561

89.0

Texa

s42

3788

.194

280

084

.964

556

487

.41,

629

1,40

186

.0

Uta

h0

371

307

82.8

153

127

83.0

524

434

82.8

Verm

ont

053

4890

.662

5080

.711

598

85.2

Virg

in Is

land

s0

86

75.0

65

83.3

1411

78.6

Virg

inia

133

112

84.2

732

560

76.5

482

383

79.5

1,34

71,

055

78.3

Was

hing

ton

094

382

687

.638

833

586

.31,

331

1,16

187

.2

Wes

t V

irgin

ia-R

N0

290

229

79.0

268

197

73.5

558

426

76.3

Wis

cons

in0

569

442

77.7

622

513

82.5

1,19

195

580

.2

Wyo

min

g0

116

9682

.841

2970

.715

712

579

.6

Tota

l1,

467

1,26

586

.229

,706

24,6

8183

.120

,203

16,9

7984

.051

,376

42,9

2583

.6

1 Dat

a d

oes

no

t in

clud

e Sp

ecia

l Pro

gra

m C

od

es.

Page 33: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

27PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

6. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

1

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Ala

bam

a0

116

9178

.588

7888

.620

416

982

.8

Ala

ska

02

150

.032

2681

.334

2779

.4

Am

eric

an S

amo

a0

00

0

Ariz

ona

011

486

75.4

2923

79.3

143

109

76.2

Ark

ansa

s10

880

.026

2492

.311

763

.647

3983

.0

Cal

iforn

ia-R

N0

436

322

73.9

237

186

78.5

673

508

75.5

Co

lora

do

093

6974

.264

5789

.115

712

680

.3

Co

nnec

ticut

038

3284

.240

3792

.578

6988

.5

Del

awar

e0

77

100.

08

810

0.0

1515

100.

0

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

00

76

85.7

76

85.7

Flo

rida

074

158

979

.526

421

882

.61,

005

807

80.3

Geo

rgia

-RN

039

3179

.550

4080

.089

7179

.8

Gua

m0

016

1381

.316

1381

.3

Haw

aii

03

266

.721

1676

.224

1875

.0

Idah

o0

2421

87.5

43

75.0

2824

85.7

Illin

ois

010

768

63.6

3626

72.2

143

9465

.7

Ind

iana

62

33.3

4631

67.4

7966

83.5

131

9975

.6

Iow

a0

122

9174

.610

660

.013

297

73.5

Kan

sas

031

2683

.950

4080

.081

6681

.5

Ken

tuck

y0

202

148

73.3

6856

82.4

270

204

75.6

Loui

sian

a-R

N0

2721

77.8

5954

91.5

8675

87.2

Mai

ne0

85

62.5

4642

91.3

5447

87.0

Mar

ylan

d0

4440

90.9

4941

83.7

9381

87.1

Mas

sach

uset

ts0

8964

71.9

6855

80.9

157

119

75.8

Mic

hig

an0

252

194

77.0

204

171

83.8

456

365

80.0

Min

neso

ta0

3618

50.0

96

66.7

4524

53.3

Mis

siss

ipp

i0

2916

55.2

109

90.0

3925

64.1

Mis

sour

i10

1010

0.0

9166

72.5

165

147

89.1

266

223

83.8

Mo

ntan

a0

86

75.0

21

50.0

107

70.0

Neb

rask

a0

4942

85.7

1712

70.6

6654

81.8

Page 34: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

28 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

6. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Deg

ree

Typ

e (o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

rN

-Dip

lom

ar

N-A

sso

ciat

e D

egre

er

N-B

acca

laur

eate

Tota

l oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Juri

sdic

tio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%

Nev

ada

028

2485

.710

872

66.7

136

9670

.6

New

Ham

psh

ire0

85

62.5

43

75.0

128

66.7

New

Jer

sey

5036

72.0

4233

78.6

116

9884

.520

816

780

.3

New

Mex

ico

083

6072

.346

3984

.812

999

76.7

New

Yo

rk3

310

0.0

1,07

083

477

.942

429

970

.51,

497

1,13

675

.9

No

rth

Car

olin

a5

480

.033

2369

.734

2779

.472

5475

.0

No

rth

Dak

ota

01

00.

010

880

.011

872

.7

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

138

61.5

00

0.0

138

61.5

Ohi

o56

5191

.134

227

680

.719

615

880

.659

448

581

.6

Okl

aho

ma

060

4880

.037

3081

.197

7880

.4

Ore

go

n0

3735

94.6

3221

65.6

6956

81.2

Penn

sylv

ania

230

190

82.6

268

185

69.0

404

343

84.9

902

718

79.6

Rho

de

Isla

nd1

95

55.6

32

66.7

137

53.8

Sout

h C

aro

lina

011

098

89.1

2926

89.7

139

124

89.2

Sout

h D

ako

ta0

64

66.7

2623

88.5

3227

84.4

Tenn

esse

e0

3026

86.7

8269

84.2

112

9584

.8

Texa

s1

110

0.0

193

160

82.9

106

8277

.430

024

381

.0

Uta

h0

108

8376

.940

3485

.014

811

779

.1

Verm

ont

05

480

.012

1083

.317

1482

.4

Virg

in Is

land

s0

53

60.0

51

20.0

104

40.0

Virg

inia

9481

86.2

143

108

75.5

9682

85.4

333

271

81.4

Was

hing

ton

012

810

279

.744

3886

.417

214

081

.4

Wes

t V

irgin

ia -

RN

09

888

.955

4480

.064

5281

.3

Wis

cons

in0

5738

66.7

9982

82.8

156

120

76.9

Wyo

min

g0

22

100.

06

610

0.0

88

100.

0

Tota

l46

638

682

.85,

570

4,28

376

.93,

757

3,04

781

.19,

793

7,71

678

.8

1 Dat

a d

oes

no

t in

clud

e Sp

ecia

l Pro

gra

m C

od

es.

Page 35: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

29PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

7. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

exa

min

atio

n, b

y D

egre

e Ty

pe

(Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7)

RN

-Dip

lom

aR

N-A

ssoc

iate

Deg

ree

RN

-Bac

cala

urea

teR

N-S

pec

ial P

rog

ram

Cod

esTo

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tion

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Ala

bam

a0

1,61

81,

390

85.9

1,13

91,

022

89.7

2513

52.0

2,78

22,

425

87.2

Ala

ska

076

6281

.610

892

85.2

10

0.0

185

154

83.2

Am

eric

an S

amo

a0

30

0.0

01

110

0.0

41

25.0

Ariz

ona

2825

89.3

1,57

51,

341

85.1

672

591

87.9

10

0.0

2,27

61,

957

86.0

Ark

ansa

s28

025

992

.575

666

087

.349

342

085

.20

1,52

91,

339

87.6

Cal

iforn

ia-R

N0

6,17

65,

281

85.5

2,43

62,

115

86.8

3530

85.7

8,64

77,

426

85.9

Co

lora

do

077

463

181

.589

380

289

.84

250

.01,

671

1,43

585

.9

Co

nnec

ticut

123

108

87.8

534

462

86.5

575

511

88.9

11

100.

01,

233

1,08

287

.8

Del

awar

e22

1881

.822

919

283

.816

813

479

.80

419

344

82.1

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

018

1688

.921

619

188

.40

234

207

88.5

Flo

rida

04,

644

3,79

881

.81,

892

1,64

086

.76

610

0.0

6,54

25,

444

83.2

Geo

rgia

-RN

01,

111

970

87.3

1,20

31,

077

89.5

21

50.0

2,31

62,

048

88.4

Gua

m0

035

2777

.11

110

0.0

3628

77.8

Haw

aii

015

413

990

.332

625

678

.54

375

.048

439

882

.2

Idah

o0

364

331

90.9

166

142

85.5

053

047

389

.2

Illin

ois

2013

65.0

2,44

22,

122

86.9

1,95

61,

683

86.0

74

57.1

4,42

53,

822

86.4

Ind

iana

6645

68.2

1,59

21,

319

82.9

1,24

01,

089

87.8

02,

898

2,45

384

.6

Iow

a0

1,31

01,

076

82.1

582

469

80.6

11

100.

01,

893

1,54

681

.7

Kan

sas

084

471

584

.770

658

683

.00

1,55

01,

301

83.9

Ken

tuck

y0

1,67

21,

384

82.8

664

589

88.7

02,

336

1,97

384

.5

Loui

sian

a-R

N35

3510

0.0

928

794

85.6

1,04

492

488

.50

2,00

71,

753

87.3

Mai

ne0

353

294

83.3

340

292

85.9

069

358

684

.6

Mar

ylan

d0

1,13

01,

018

90.1

930

814

87.5

02,

060

1,83

288

.9

Mas

sach

uset

ts72

6995

.81,

571

1,32

184

.11,

438

1,26

487

.91

110

0.0

3,08

22,

655

86.1

Mic

hig

an0

2,55

72,

203

86.2

1,65

81,

445

87.2

32

66.7

4,21

83,

650

86.5

Min

neso

ta0

1,81

41,

468

80.9

912

810

88.8

02,

726

2,27

883

.6

Mis

siss

ipp

i0

1,22

11,

056

86.5

407

364

89.4

11

100.

01,

629

1,42

187

.2

Mis

sour

i52

4892

.31,

600

1,37

786

.11,

403

1,26

990

.40

3,05

52,

694

88.2

Mo

ntan

a0

203

152

74.9

216

197

91.2

041

934

983

.3

Neb

rask

a66

6192

.432

227

585

.470

561

987

.80

1,09

395

587

.4

Page 36: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

30 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

7. f

irst

-Tim

e, u

.S.-

ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

exa

min

atio

n, b

y D

egre

e Ty

pe

(Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7)

RN

-Dip

lom

aR

N-A

ssoc

iate

Deg

ree

RN

-Bac

cala

urea

teR

N-S

pec

ial P

rog

ram

Cod

esTo

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tion

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Can

dida

tes

Pass

ed%

Nev

ada

030

926

385

.138

229

878

.02

150

.069

356

281

.1

New

Ham

psh

ire0

418

344

82.3

167

133

79.6

1918

94.7

604

495

82.0

New

Jer

sey

625

564

90.2

1,30

01,

158

89.1

781

642

82.2

42

50.0

2,71

02,

366

87.3

New

Mex

ico

061

748

578

.624

321

990

.117

529

.487

770

980

.8

New

Yo

rk10

1010

0.0

6,01

45,

033

83.7

2,48

01,

945

78.4

227

31.8

8,52

66,

995

82.0

No

rth

Car

olin

a12

812

093

.82,

390

2,04

885

.71,

066

958

89.9

03,

584

3,12

687

.2

No

rth

Dak

ota

089

6370

.838

034

390

.30

469

406

86.6

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

2512

48.0

00

2512

48.0

Ohi

o34

630

989

.33,

406

2,91

985

.72,

079

1,79

186

.10

5,83

15,

019

86.1

Okl

aho

ma

01,

150

946

82.3

717

586

81.7

11

100.

01,

868

1,53

382

.1

Ore

go

n0

623

567

91.0

536

468

87.3

01,

159

1,03

589

.3

Penn

sylv

ania

1,17

499

985

.12,

512

1,98

579

.02,

732

2,27

583

.37

710

0.0

6,42

55,

266

82.0

Rho

de

Isla

nd29

2586

.221

818

986

.723

019

886

.10

477

412

86.4

Sout

h C

aro

lina

01,

008

898

89.1

668

566

84.7

21

50.0

1,67

81,

465

87.3

Sout

h D

ako

ta0

353

269

76.2

346

297

85.8

11

100.

070

056

781

.0

Tenn

esse

e0

1,24

31,

135

91.3

1,43

91,

332

92.6

02,

682

2,46

792

.0

Texa

s16

114

489

.44,

094

3,65

989

.42,

689

2,44

290

.83

266

.76,

947

6,24

789

.9

Uta

h0

877

739

84.3

357

307

86.0

22

100.

01,

236

1,04

884

.8

Verm

ont

014

713

893

.911

494

82.5

2512

48.0

286

244

85.3

Virg

in Is

land

s0

139

69.2

127

58.3

025

1664

.0

Virg

inia

452

389

86.1

1,61

61,

287

79.6

1,09

792

584

.31

00.

03,

166

2,60

182

.2

Was

hing

ton

01,

555

1,35

687

.274

466

589

.41

110

0.0

2,30

02,

022

87.9

Wes

t V

irgin

ia-R

N0

537

452

84.2

599

459

76.6

01,

136

911

80.2

Wis

cons

in0

1,58

91,

297

81.6

1,32

31,

122

84.8

02,

912

2,41

983

.1

Wyo

min

g0

209

173

82.8

6854

79.4

027

722

781

.9

Tota

l3,

689

3,24

187

.969

,903

59,2

7184

.845

,772

39,5

6086

.420

112

763

.211

9,56

510

2,19

985

.5

Page 37: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

31PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

8. f

irst

-Tim

e, In

tern

atio

nally

-ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

Jan.

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ept.

30,

200

7o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Tota

l Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Alb

ania

1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Arg

entin

a 2

00.

01

00.

02

210

0.0

05

240

.0

Arm

enia

2

150

.07

571

.46

116

.77

228

.622

940

.9

Aus

tral

ia

108

80.0

1915

79.0

62

33.3

1915

79.0

5440

74.1

Aus

tria

1

00.

00

01

00.

02

00.

0

Aze

rbai

jan

31

33.3

01

00.

01

00.

05

120

.0

Bah

amas

0

10

0.0

72

28.6

11

100.

09

333

.3

Ban

gla

des

h 2

00.

01

110

0.0

20

0.0

20

0.0

71

14.3

Bar

bad

os

03

133

.32

00.

02

210

0.0

73

42.9

Bel

arus

3

133

.35

240

.05

480

.01

110

0.0

148

57.1

Bel

giu

m

11

100.

01

00.

02

210

0.0

04

375

.0

Bel

ize

31

33.3

11

100.

01

00.

01

00.

06

233

.3

Bo

livia

0

10

0.0

01

110

0.0

21

50.0

Bo

snia

and

Her

zeg

ovi

na

10

0.0

02

150

.01

110

0.0

42

50.0

Bo

tsw

ana

10

0.0

10

0.0

00

20

0.0

Bra

zil

53

60.0

62

33.3

42

50.0

92

22.2

249

37.5

Bul

gar

ia

21

50.0

21

50.0

21

50.0

11

100.

07

457

.1

Bur

kina

Fas

o

10

0.0

10

0.0

00

20

0.0

Cam

bo

dia

0

01

00.

00

10

0.0

Cam

ero

on

122

16.7

143

21.4

91

11.1

132

15.4

488

16.7

Can

ada

187

135

72.2

199

141

70.9

246

143

58.1

197

122

61.9

829

541

65.3

Chi

le

00

21

50.0

02

150

.0

Chi

na

121

7259

.510

854

50.0

117

6353

.911

658

50.0

462

247

53.5

Co

lom

bia

6

583

.311

436

.46

233

.39

666

.732

1753

.1

Co

ngo

, Dem

ocr

atic

R

epub

lic o

f0

01

00.

00

10

0.0

Co

sta

Ric

a 2

150

.03

00.

00

11

100.

06

233

.3

Cro

atia

1

00.

00

10

0.0

02

00.

0

Cub

a 15

973

45.9

168

6035

.716

945

26.6

137

4432

.163

322

235

.1

Cze

ch R

epub

lic

11

100.

04

125

.07

228

.64

125

.016

531

.3

Page 38: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

32 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

8. f

irst

-Tim

e, In

tern

atio

nally

-ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

Jan.

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ept.

30,

200

7o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Tota

l Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Den

mar

k 0

22

100.

02

150

.00

43

75.0

Do

min

ica

32

66.7

02

150

.00

53

60.0

Ecu

ado

r 0

01

110

0.0

11

100.

02

210

0.0

Eg

ypt

31

33.3

30

0.0

32

66.7

09

333

.3

El S

alva

do

r 3

133

.34

00.

00

31

33.3

102

20.0

Erit

rea

41

25.0

21

50.0

61

16.7

30

0.0

153

20.0

Eth

iop

ia

3520

57.1

2813

46.4

156

40.0

133

23.1

9142

46.2

Fiji

20

0.0

30

0.0

10

0.0

10

0.0

70

0.0

Finl

and

4

375

.02

150

.02

150

.02

150

.010

660

.0

Fran

ce

32

66.7

43

75.0

41

25.0

32

66.7

148

57.1

Gam

bia

1

00.

04

00.

01

00.

01

00.

07

00.

0

Geo

rgia

4

250

.04

410

0.0

75

71.4

62

33.3

2113

61.9

Ger

man

y 10

770

.022

1045

.56

583

.313

753

.951

2956

.9

Gha

na

155

33.3

92

22.2

184

22.2

168

50.0

5819

32.8

Gre

nad

a 5

240

.00

11

100.

01

00.

07

342

.9

Gua

tem

ala

10

0.0

01

00.

00

20

0.0

Gui

nea

00

10

0.0

20

0.0

30

0.0

Guy

ana

83

37.5

71

14.3

41

25.0

53

60.0

248

33.3

Hai

ti 15

213

.318

527

.811

327

.318

316

.762

1321

.0

Ho

ndur

as

20

0.0

11

100.

00

03

133

.3

Ho

ng K

ong

4

410

0.0

22

100.

02

150

.02

00.

010

770

.0

Hun

gar

y 1

110

0.0

10

0.0

20

0.0

04

125

.0

Icel

and

1

110

0.0

22

100.

00

11

100.

04

410

0.0

Ind

ia

1,36

398

272

.11,

322

926

70.1

1,32

185

064

.41,

275

737

57.8

5,28

13,

495

66.2

Ind

one

sia

112

18.2

81

12.5

93

33.3

40

0.0

326

18.8

Iran

, Isl

amic

Rep

ublic

Of

148

57.1

156

40.0

206

30.0

1910

52.6

6830

44.1

Iraq

0

10

0.0

00

10

0.0

Irela

nd

64

66.7

11

100.

02

210

0.0

65

83.3

1512

80.0

Isra

el

2216

72.7

2417

70.8

2415

62.5

2822

78.6

9870

71.4

Ital

y 1

00.

01

00.

02

210

0.0

20

0.0

62

33.3

Page 39: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

33PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

8. f

irst

-Tim

e, In

tern

atio

nally

-ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

Jan.

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ept.

30,

200

7o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Tota

l Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Jam

aica

60

3965

.043

2046

.542

2252

.469

2840

.621

410

950

.9

Jap

an

4223

54.8

3012

40.0

4625

54.4

3017

56.7

148

7752

.0

Jord

an

84

50.0

125

41.7

63

50.0

105

50.0

3617

47.2

Kaz

akhs

tan

01

00.

00

01

00.

0

Ken

ya

2718

66.7

3012

40.0

3119

61.3

3323

69.7

121

7259

.5

Ko

rea,

No

rth

21

50.0

10

0.0

00

31

33.3

Ko

rea,

So

uth

600

366

61.0

429

253

59.0

420

262

62.4

466

305

65.5

1,91

51,

186

61.9

Kuw

ait

00

02

00.

02

00.

0

Kyr

gyz

stan

0

20

0.0

02

150

.04

125

.0

Latv

ia

11

100.

01

00.

00

31

33.3

52

40.0

Leb

ano

n 9

777

.87

457

.16

583

.38

450

.030

2066

.7

Leso

tho

1

00.

00

00

10

0.0

Lib

eria

4

00.

01

00.

06

00.

00

110

0.0

Lith

uani

a 0

63

50.0

32

66.7

63

50.0

158

53.3

Mac

ao1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Mac

edo

nia,

Fo

rmer

Yu

go

slav

Rep

ublic

of

01

00.

00

10

0.0

20

0.0

Mal

awi

00

01

00.

01

00.

0

Mal

aysi

a 1

110

0.0

02

210

0.0

03

310

0.0

Mal

ta

00

11

100.

00

11

100.

0

Mau

ritiu

s 17

635

.332

825

.035

514

.319

315

.810

322

21.4

Mex

ico

4

250

.05

360

.04

125

.03

133

.316

743

.8

Mo

ldo

va, R

epub

lic o

f 0

21

50.0

10

0.0

03

133

.3

Mo

ngo

lia0

11

100.

00

01

110

0.0

Mo

rocc

o2

210

0.0

10

0.0

21

50.0

05

360

.0

Mya

nmar

21

1047

.617

1376

.525

1664

.027

1555

.690

5460

.0

Nep

al

31

33.3

41

25.0

32

66.7

11

100.

011

545

.5

Net

herla

nds

10

0.0

00

01

00.

0

Net

herla

nds

Ant

illes

44

100.

04

250

.09

777

.86

583

.323

1878

.3

New

Zea

land

3

00.

03

133

.32

150

.00

82

25.0

Page 40: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

34 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

8. f

irst

-Tim

e, In

tern

atio

nally

-ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

Jan.

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ept.

30,

200

7o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Tota

l Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Nic

arag

ua

10

0.0

20

0.0

10

0.0

40

0.0

Nig

er

00

01

00.

01

00.

0

Nig

eria

79

2531

.782

1822

.077

1823

.476

1925

.031

480

25.5

No

rway

0

11

100.

01

00.

04

375

.06

466

.7

Om

an

00

01

110

0.0

11

100.

0

Paki

stan

22

1150

.018

1055

.613

323

.19

333

.362

2743

.5

Pale

stin

ian

Terr

itory

, O

ccup

ied

1

110

0.0

02

150

.00

32

66.7

Pana

ma

00

21

50.0

11

100.

03

266

.7

Peru

4

125

.013

538

.510

330

.010

110

.037

1027

.0

Phili

pp

ines

4,

888

2,66

954

.64,

693

2,27

448

.54,

958

2,37

547

.96,

216

2,89

946

.620

,755

10,2

1749

.2

Pitc

airn

00

01

00.

01

00.

0

Pola

nd

245

20.8

268

30.8

1910

52.6

217

33.3

9030

33.3

Port

ugal

0

11

100.

01

00.

03

266

.75

360

.0

Puer

to R

ico

24

520

.831

39.

731

412

.939

923

.112

521

16.8

Ro

man

ia

2112

57.1

158

53.3

135

38.5

137

53.9

6232

51.6

Rus

sian

Fed

erat

ion

4720

42.6

7433

44.6

4220

47.6

4922

44.9

212

9544

.8

Rw

and

a0

00

11

100.

01

110

0.0

Sain

t K

itts

and

Nev

is0

01

00.

01

00.

02

00.

0

Sain

t Lu

cia

10

0.0

20

0.0

10

0.0

32

66.7

72

28.6

Sain

t V

ince

nt a

nd T

he

Gre

nad

ines

4

125

.03

266

.72

150

.01

110

0.0

105

50.0

Sene

gal

0

11

100.

00

01

110

0.0

Serb

ia0

10

0.0

20

0.0

10

0.0

40

0.0

Serb

ia a

nd M

ont

eneg

ro

10

0.0

21

50.0

00

31

33.3

Sier

ra L

eone

9

00.

05

00.

02

00.

09

222

.225

28.

0

Sing

apo

re

76

85.7

106

60.0

54

80.0

31

33.3

2517

68.0

Slo

vaki

a 4

410

0.0

33

100.

03

133

.32

00.

012

866

.7

Som

alia

0

21

50.0

01

00.

03

133

.3

Sout

h A

fric

a 11

981

.813

969

.29

444

.45

360

.038

2565

.8

Spai

n 1

110

0.0

02

210

0.0

32

66.7

65

83.3

Page 41: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

35PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

8. f

irst

-Tim

e, In

tern

atio

nally

-ed

ucat

ed C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-r

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007)

Jan.

1 -

Mar

. 31,

200

7A

pr.

1 -

June

30,

200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ept.

30,

200

7o

ct. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Tota

l Jan

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nC

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

Pas

sed

%C

and

idat

esP

asse

d%

Sri L

anka

1

00.

00

01

110

0.0

21

50.0

Sud

an

01

00.

00

01

00.

0

Surin

ame

01

110

0.0

01

00.

02

150

.0

Swed

en

32

66.7

33

100.

03

266

.75

360

.014

1071

.4

Switz

erla

nd

22

100.

01

00.

04

410

0.0

07

685

.7

Syria

n A

rab

Rep

ublic

10

0.0

00

01

00.

0

Taiw

an

6630

45.5

8138

46.9

9142

46.2

8037

46.3

318

147

46.2

Tajik

ista

n 1

00.

00

00

10

0.0

Tanz

ania

, Uni

ted

Rep

ublic

of

20

0.0

10

0.0

60

0.0

11

100.

010

110

.0

Thai

land

30

1136

.735

1645

.742

1740

.555

1527

.316

259

36.4

Trin

idad

and

To

bag

o

125

41.7

62

33.3

30

0.0

52

40.0

269

34.6

Turk

ey

32

66.7

02

00.

02

00.

07

228

.6

Ug

and

a 3

133

.31

00.

01

00.

02

210

0.0

73

42.9

Ukr

aine

27

1451

.932

928

.134

2058

.845

2248

.913

865

47.1

Uni

ted

Ara

b E

mira

tes

11

100.

00

21

50.0

11

100.

04

375

.0

Uni

ted

Kin

gd

om

65

3452

.374

3040

.578

2937

.265

3046

.228

212

343

.6

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Min

or

O

utly

ing

Isla

nds

00

01

00.

01

00.

0

Uru

gua

y 1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Uzb

ekis

tan

91

11.1

152

13.3

131

7.7

173

17.7

547

13.0

Vene

zuel

a 0

10

0.0

11

100.

00

21

50.0

Vie

tnam

0

01

00.

00

10

0.0

Virg

in Is

land

, Brit

ish

01

110

0.0

01

00.

02

150

.0

Zam

bia

5

480

.02

210

0.0

32

66.7

40

0.0

148

57.1

Zim

bab

we

63

50.0

64

66.7

10

0.0

013

753

.8

Tota

l8,

265

4,74

357

.47,

937

4,12

051

.98,

194

4,13

150

.49,

396

4,58

148

.833

,792

17,5

7552

.0

Page 42: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

36 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 1.

NC

LeX

-rN

® P

ass

rat

es f

or

firs

t-Ti

me,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

9189

8788

8585

8587

8787

8788

89

9493

9191

8888

8688

8990

8991

9188

9090

8788

8385

8486

8787

8486

88

8482

7978

7374

7475

7978

7881

8279

77

020406080100

*199

4**

1995

1996

1997

***1

998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

****

2004

2005

2006

****

*200

7

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Percentage Passing

*APR

199

4 C

om

put

er A

dap

tive

Test

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng s

tand

ard

-0.

4766

log

its.

**O

CT

1995

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

4766

to

-0.

42 lo

gits

.

***A

PR 1

998

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

42 t

o -

0.35

log

its.

****

APR

200

4 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.35

to

-0.

28 lo

gits

.

****

*APR

200

7 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.28

to

-0.

21 lo

gits

.

Page 43: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

37PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 2.

NC

LeX

-rN

® P

ass

rat

es f

or

All

Can

did

ates

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

7573

74

6868

6669

6970

7274

73

89

85

81

7474

6969

69

7473

77

71

8483

8081

7574

78

73

64

5452

5254

55

6059

56

7979

7677

7776

7777

76

5958

5757

56

020406080100

*199

4**

1995

1996

1997

***1

998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

****

2004

2005

2006

****

*200

7

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Percent PassingPercentage Passing

*APR

199

4 C

om

put

er A

dap

tive

Test

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng s

tand

ard

-0.

4766

log

its.

**O

CT

1995

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

4766

to

-0.

42 lo

gits

.

***A

PR 1

998

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

42 t

o -

0.35

log

its.

****

APR

200

4 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.35

to

-0.

28 lo

gits

.

****

*APR

200

7 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.28

to

-0.

21 lo

gits

.

Page 44: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

38 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 3.

NC

LeX

-rN

® A

nnua

l Pas

s r

ates

, Ap

ril 1

994

- D

ecem

ber

200

7

8280

7169

6971

7170

7374

69

9090

8888

8585

8486

8787

8587

8885

7677

72

020406080100

*199

4**

1995

1996

1997

***1

998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

****

2004

2005

2006

****

*200

7

All

Can

did

ate

sFi

rst-

Tim

e, U

.S.-

Educ

ate

d

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Percent Passing

*APR

199

4 C

om

put

er A

dap

tive

Test

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng s

tand

ard

-0.

4766

log

its.

**O

CT

1995

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

4766

to

-0.

42 lo

gits

.

***A

PR 1

998

pas

sing

sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed fr

om

-0.

42 t

o -

0.35

log

its.

****

APR

200

4 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.35

to

-0.

28 lo

gits

.

****

*APR

200

7 p

assi

ng s

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -

0.28

to

-0.

21 lo

gits

.

Page 45: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

39PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 4.

NC

LeX

-rN

® V

olu

me

for

firs

t-Ti

me,

u.S

. - e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Number Examined

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 46: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

40 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 5.

NC

LeX

-rN

® V

olu

me

for

All

Can

did

ates

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Ye

ar A

dm

inis

tere

d

Number Examined

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 47: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

41PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 6.

NC

LeX

-rN

® A

nnua

l Vo

lum

e, A

pri

l 199

4 -

Dec

emb

er 2

007

0

20,0

00

40,0

00

60,0

00

80,0

00

100,

000

120,

000

140,

000

160,

000

180,

000

200,

000

220,

000

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Number Examined

All

Can

did

ate

sFi

rst-

Tim

e, U

.S.-

Educ

ate

d

Page 48: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

42 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

9. C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he N

CLe

X-P

N® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Typ

e o

f C

and

idat

e (J

anua

ry 1

- D

ecem

ber

31,

200

7)

Typ

e o

f C

and

idat

eJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Firs

t-T

ime,

U.S

.-E

duc

ated

13

,124

11,4

2287

.011

,741

10,1

0586

.122

,620

20,2

8589

.712

,752

10,7

4884

.360

,237

52,5

6087

.3

Rep

eat,

U.S

.-E

duc

ated

2,

548

1,11

043

.62,

932

1,26

043

.02,

690

1,18

344

.03,

000

1,33

744

.611

,170

4,89

043

.8

Firs

t-T

ime,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly

Ed

ucat

ed

377

193

51.2

410

181

44.2

413

213

51.6

441

210

47.6

1,64

179

748

.6

Rep

eat,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly

Ed

ucat

ed

451

125

27.7

484

108

22.3

461

126

27.3

490

114

23.3

1,88

647

325

.1

All

Can

did

ates

16,5

0012

,850

77.9

15,5

6711

,654

74.9

26,1

8421

,807

83.3

16,6

8312

,409

74.4

74,9

3458

,720

78.4

In 2

007,

1,4

54 U

S PN

pro

gra

ms

had

at

leas

t o

ne fi

rst-

time

cand

idat

e. T

he m

ean

pas

s ra

te fo

r th

ose

pro

gra

ms

was

88.

7% (S

D 1

4.8%

). W

hen

incl

udin

g o

nly

tho

se p

rog

ram

s w

ith a

t le

ast

ten

first

-tim

e ex

amin

ees

(N=

1,29

1), t

he m

ean

pas

s ra

te w

as 8

8.9%

(SD

12.

6%).

Tab

le 1

0. S

umm

ary

Stat

isti

cs f

or

firs

t-Ti

me,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

NC

LeX

-PN

®

Janu

ary

- D

ecem

ber

200

7

Pass

ing

Sta

ndar

d1

0.-

42 lo

gits

Est

imat

ed D

ecis

ion

Co

nsis

tenc

y20.

92

Ave

rag

e Te

st L

eng

th3

111

item

s

Perc

ent

of C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he M

inim

um N

umb

er o

f Ite

ms

59.9

%

Perc

ent

of C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he M

axim

um N

umb

er o

f Ite

ms

14.1

%

Ave

rag

e Te

stin

g T

ime4

two

ho

urs,

tw

o m

inut

es

Perc

ent

of C

and

idat

es T

akin

g t

he M

axim

um A

mo

unt

of T

ime

0.9%

1 The

NC

LEX

-PN

sca

le u

ses

log

its a

s th

e un

it o

f mea

sure

men

t. L

og

its is

sho

rt fo

r lo

g-o

dd

s-un

its. T

hese

uni

ts h

ave

no in

here

nt m

eani

ng w

ith re

gar

d t

o n

ursi

ng c

ont

ent

and

, in

fact

hav

e an

arb

itrar

y ze

ro p

oin

t, b

ut lo

gits

are

pra

ctic

al b

ecau

se t

he p

rob

abili

ty o

f a c

orr

ect

resp

ons

e ca

n ea

sily

be

com

put

ed w

hen

the

cand

idat

e’s

abili

ty a

nd t

he it

em’s

diffi

culty

are

kno

wn.

Typ

ical

ly, t

he lo

git

rang

e o

n th

e N

CLE

X-P

N s

cale

is fr

om

-2.

00 (e

asy

item

s o

r lo

w

abili

ty c

and

idat

es) t

o 2

.00

(diffi

cult

item

s o

r hi

gh

abili

ty c

and

idat

es).

2 Est

imat

ed D

ecis

ion

Co

nsis

tenc

y is

an

ind

icat

or

of r

elia

bili

ty. C

onc

eptu

ally

, it

is t

he p

rop

ort

ion

of p

ass-

fail

dec

isio

ns t

hat

wo

uld

rem

ain

the

sam

e if

the

sam

e p

op

ulat

ion

wer

e re

test

ed im

med

iate

ly a

fter

the

ir fir

st t

est

(ass

umin

g

no le

arni

ng o

r fa

tigue

effe

cts)

usi

ng a

diff

eren

t se

t o

f ite

ms.

3 NC

LEX

-PN

exa

min

atio

ns c

ons

ist

of 8

5 to

205

item

s.

4 The

stan

dar

d a

mo

unt

of a

llott

ed t

estin

g t

ime

for

the

NC

LEX

-PN

exa

min

atio

n is

5 h

our

s.

Page 49: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

43PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

11.

fir

st-T

ime,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

Tak

ing

the

NC

LeX

-PN

® e

xam

inat

ion:

Jan

uary

1 -

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tio

nJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Ala

bam

a22

420

390

.610

788

82.2

261

253

96.9

185

174

94.1

777

718

92.4

Ala

ska

1514

93.3

1212

100.

07

685

.74

250

.038

3489

.5

Am

eric

an S

amo

a1

00.

00

73

42.9

31

33.3

114

36.4

Ariz

ona

156

150

96.2

197

188

95.4

286

271

94.8

110

101

91.8

749

710

94.8

Ark

ansa

s32

729

991

.411

510

793

.049

545

291

.399

8080

.81,

036

938

90.5

Cal

iforn

ia-V

N1,

700

1,24

973

.51,

497

1,03

569

.11,

898

1,38

673

.01,

810

1,30

872

.36,

905

4,97

872

.1

Co

lora

do

151

147

97.4

181

162

89.5

365

335

91.8

149

127

85.2

846

771

91.1

Co

nnec

ticut

348

342

98.3

143

126

88.1

154

146

94.8

3328

84.9

678

642

94.7

Del

awar

e62

5690

.373

6893

.283

7388

.026

1765

.424

421

487

.7

Dis

tric

t o

f Co

lum

bia

187

137

73.3

212

140

66.0

184

141

76.6

131

109

83.2

714

527

73.8

Flo

rida

900

734

81.6

880

708

80.5

1,12

995

384

.487

469

879

.93,

783

3,09

381

.8

Geo

rgia

-PN

392

358

91.3

360

338

93.9

369

339

91.9

394

362

91.9

1,51

51,

397

92.2

Gua

m0

99

100.

012

325

.02

150

.023

1356

.5

Haw

aii

1211

91.7

1413

92.9

5752

91.2

2118

85.7

104

9490

.4

Idah

o71

6490

.145

4497

.812

711

993

.750

4488

.029

327

192

.5

Illin

ois

308

268

87.0

207

180

87.0

890

828

93.0

359

324

90.3

1,76

41,

600

90.7

Ind

iana

442

382

86.4

290

249

85.9

733

666

90.9

343

293

85.4

1,80

81,

590

87.9

Iow

a30

028

294

.030

628

593

.164

159

492

.717

215

087

.21,

419

1,31

192

.4

Kan

sas

185

175

94.6

235

207

88.1

410

383

93.4

105

9388

.693

585

891

.8

Ken

tuck

y24

523

696

.321

820

795

.027

226

196

.010

094

94.0

835

798

95.6

Loui

sian

a-PN

629

544

86.5

307

267

87.0

249

197

79.1

130

107

82.3

1,31

51,

115

84.8

Mai

ne1

110

0.0

1414

100.

05

510

0.0

11

100.

021

2110

0.0

Mar

ylan

d22

2210

0.0

1212

100.

011

311

310

0.0

7069

98.6

217

216

99.5

Mas

sach

uset

ts38

3694

.710

990

.077

972

693

.251

3772

.687

880

892

.0

Mic

hig

an28

727

595

.823

722

996

.657

255

296

.533

229

187

.71,

428

1,34

794

.3

Min

neso

ta47

043

392

.138

835

290

.769

761

788

.513

210

680

.31,

687

1,50

889

.4

Mis

siss

ipp

i19

416

283

.519

1157

.941

238

894

.260

5388

.368

561

489

.6

Mis

sour

i19

617

890

.811

511

095

.773

267

191

.725

423

592

.51,

297

1,19

492

.1

Mo

ntan

a51

5110

0.0

2322

95.7

3836

94.7

3129

93.6

143

138

96.5

Neb

rask

a86

7182

.614

412

184

.026

322

987

.194

8287

.258

750

385

.7

Page 50: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

44 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

11.

fir

st-T

ime,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

Tak

ing

the

NC

LeX

-PN

® e

xam

inat

ion:

Jan

uary

1 -

Dec

emb

er 3

1, 2

007

Juri

sdic

tio

nJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Nev

ada

05

480

.022

1881

.81

110

0.0

2823

82.1

New

Ham

psh

ire64

5789

.111

110

291

.911

596

83.5

6140

65.6

351

295

84.1

New

Jer

sey

243

195

80.3

394

307

77.9

631

518

82.1

464

354

76.3

1,73

21,

374

79.3

New

Mex

ico

3029

96.7

3534

97.1

132

128

97.0

5554

98.2

252

245

97.2

New

Yo

rk46

838

281

.669

958

483

.61,

326

1,19

189

.81,

356

1,10

381

.33,

849

3,26

084

.7

No

rth

Car

olin

a11

010

292

.778

7494

.950

648

896

.422

420

089

.391

886

494

.1

No

rth

Dak

ota

1716

94.1

4239

92.9

7874

94.9

1413

92.9

151

142

94.0

No

rthe

rn M

aria

na Is

land

s0

22

100.

00

21

50.0

43

75.0

Ohi

o58

152

790

.762

959

294

.11,

513

1,39

592

.297

489

792

.13,

697

3,41

192

.3

Okl

aho

ma

245

215

87.8

243

211

86.8

531

502

94.5

229

197

86.0

1,24

81,

125

90.1

Ore

go

n25

2080

.027

2696

.313

513

499

.397

9496

.928

427

496

.5

Penn

sylv

ania

429

402

93.7

405

358

88.4

515

475

92.2

774

690

89.2

2,12

31,

925

90.7

Rho

de

Isla

nd17

1694

.16

610

0.0

1111

100.

021

1885

.755

5192

.7

Sout

h C

aro

lina

119

116

97.5

116

110

94.8

254

246

96.9

105

101

96.2

594

573

96.5

Sout

h D

ako

ta28

2485

.79

777

.892

8996

.724

1979

.215

313

990

.9

Tenn

esse

e29

327

794

.542

639

793

.237

935

593

.730

127

691

.71,

399

1,30

593

.3

Texa

s1,

468

1,29

588

.286

178

290

.81,

734

1,57

791

.092

881

187

.44,

991

4,46

589

.5

Uta

h10

410

298

.120

019

095

.037

035

094

.682

7996

.375

672

195

.4

Verm

ont

11

100.

03

310

0.0

120

118

98.3

77

100.

013

112

998

.5

Virg

in Is

land

s0

016

956

.36

583

.322

1463

.6

Virg

inia

358

278

77.7

513

414

80.7

692

565

81.7

471

362

76.9

2,03

41,

619

79.6

Was

hing

ton

102

9694

.126

826

398

.137

836

897

.419

918

693

.594

791

396

.4

Wes

t V

irgin

ia-P

N81

7086

.429

2896

.626

524

492

.110

293

91.2

477

435

91.2

Wis

cons

in30

228

393

.721

019

994

.852

149

494

.812

310

686

.21,

156

1,08

293

.6

Wyo

min

g39

3910

0.0

6060

100.

044

4295

.57

710

0.0

150

148

98.7

Tota

l13

,124

11,4

2287

.011

,741

10,1

0586

.122

,620

20,2

8589

.712

,752

10,7

4884

.360

,237

52,5

6087

.3

Page 51: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

45PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

12.

fir

st-T

ime,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

Tak

ing

the

NC

LeX

-PN

® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

anua

ry 1

- D

ecem

ber

31,

200

7)

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Alb

ania

0

00

10

0.0

10

0.0

Arm

enia

3

133

.35

00.

05

360

.06

350

.019

736

.8

Aus

tral

ia

11

100.

00

00

11

100.

0

Aus

tria

01

110

0.0

00

11

100.

0

Ban

gla

des

h0

10

0.0

00

10

0.0

Bel

arus

0

11

100.

01

110

0.0

02

210

0.0

Bel

ize

03

133

.34

125

.01

00.

08

225

.0

Bo

snia

and

Her

zeg

ovi

na

01

110

0.0

02

00.

03

133

.3

Bra

zil

01

00.

02

210

0.0

11

100.

04

375

.0

Cam

bo

dia

0

00

10

0.0

10

0.0

Cam

ero

on

11

100.

04

250

.02

00.

01

00.

08

337

.5

Can

ada

1412

85.7

1412

85.7

2216

72.7

97

77.8

5947

79.7

Cay

man

Isla

nds

00

22

100.

01

110

0.0

33

100.

0

Chi

le0

00

11

100.

01

110

0.0

Chi

na

43

75.0

21

50.0

31

33.3

42

50.0

137

53.8

Co

lom

bia

1

00.

01

00.

00

02

00.

0

Co

sta

Ric

a1

00.

00

00

10

0.0

Cro

atia

01

110

0.0

10

0.0

02

150

.0

Cub

a 9

444

.44

250

.016

956

.311

218

.240

1742

.5

Cze

ch R

epub

lic

01

110

0.0

11

100.

01

110

0.0

33

100.

0

Do

min

ica

00

10

0.0

01

00.

0

Do

min

ican

Rep

ublic

0

01

00.

01

110

0.0

21

50.0

Ecu

ado

r 1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Eg

ypt

01

110

0.0

11

100.

00

22

100.

0

Erit

rea

01

00.

01

110

0.0

02

150

.0

Eth

iop

ia

10

0.0

10

0.0

10

0.0

03

00.

0

Gam

bia

0

10

0.0

11

100.

00

21

50.0

Geo

rgia

0

10

0.0

01

00.

02

00.

0

Ger

man

y 1

110

0.0

02

210

0.0

22

100.

05

510

0.0

Gha

na

33

100.

02

210

0.0

10

0.0

33

100.

09

888

.9

Page 52: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

46 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

12.

fir

st-T

ime,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

Tak

ing

the

NC

LeX

-PN

® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

anua

ry 1

- D

ecem

ber

31,

200

7)

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Gre

nad

a0

11

100.

00

01

110

0.0

Gua

tem

ala

01

110

0.0

00

11

100.

0

Guy

ana

43

75.0

32

66.7

21

50.0

21

50.0

117

63.6

Hai

ti 26

623

.145

1124

.441

819

.529

517

.214

130

21.3

Ho

ndur

as0

10

0.0

00

10

0.0

Ho

ng K

ong

0

01

00.

00

10

0.0

Hun

gar

y 0

22

100.

00

02

210

0.0

Ind

ia

229

40.9

269

34.6

207

35.0

2411

45.8

9236

39.1

Ind

one

sia

03

00.

00

10

0.0

40

0.0

Iran

, Isl

amic

Rep

ublic

of

21

50.0

01

110

0.0

11

100.

04

375

.0

Isra

el

10

0.0

01

110

0.0

02

150

.0

Ital

y1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Jam

aica

42

1331

.059

813

.642

1638

.176

2127

.621

958

26.5

Kaz

akhs

tan

10

0.0

00

21

50.0

31

33.3

Ken

ya

22

100.

05

480

.04

00.

05

240

.016

850

.0

Ko

rea,

So

uth

01

110

0.0

00

11

100.

0

Kyr

gyz

stan

0

11

100.

01

110

0.0

11

100.

03

310

0.0

Latv

ia0

20

0.0

00

20

0.0

Leb

ano

n1

00.

00

00

10

0.0

Lib

eria

3

133

.32

00.

00

11

100.

06

233

.3

Lith

uani

a 0

00

11

100.

01

110

0.0

Mac

edo

nia,

Fo

rmer

Yu

go

slav

Rep

ublic

of

11

100.

00

00

11

100.

0

Mex

ico

2

00.

02

00.

00

10

0.0

50

0.0

Mo

ldo

va, R

epub

lic o

f 0

01

110

0.0

11

100.

02

210

0.0

Mo

ngo

lia

10

0.0

00

01

00.

0

Mya

nmar

01

00.

00

01

00.

0

Nep

al

00

01

00.

01

00.

0

Nic

arag

ua

01

110

0.0

00

11

100.

0

Nig

eria

11

763

.68

450

.014

1071

.416

1381

.349

3469

.4

Page 53: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

47PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSTa

ble

12.

fir

st-T

ime,

Inte

rnat

iona

lly e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

Tak

ing

the

NC

LeX

-PN

® e

xam

inat

ion,

by

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

n (J

anua

ry 1

- D

ecem

ber

31,

200

7)

Co

untr

y o

f e

duc

atio

nJa

n. 1

- M

arch

31,

200

7A

pri

l 1 -

Jun

e 30

, 200

7Ju

ly 1

- S

ep. 3

0, 2

007

oct

. 1 -

Dec

. 31,

200

7To

tal J

an. 1

- D

ec. 3

1, 2

007

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

Can

did

ates

P

asse

d%

No

rway

0

00

11

100.

01

110

0.0

Paki

stan

0

31

33.3

10

0.0

04

125

.0

Pana

ma

00

11

100.

00

11

100.

0

Peru

1

00.

00

21

50.0

20

0.0

51

20.0

Phili

pp

ines

18

811

460

.617

598

56.0

184

110

59.8

202

115

56.9

749

437

58.3

Pola

nd

05

360

.03

266

.72

210

0.0

107

70.0

Puer

to R

ico

4

00.

01

00.

02

150

.05

360

.012

433

.3

Ro

man

ia

42

50.0

21

50.0

02

150

.08

450

.0

Rus

sian

Fed

erat

ion

40

0.0

22

100.

04

410

0.0

63

50.0

169

56.3

Sain

t Lu

cia

11

100.

00

00

11

100.

0

Serb

ia0

01

00.

00

10

0.0

Serb

ia a

nd M

ont

eneg

ro

10

0.0

00

01

00.

0

Seyc

helle

s0

10

0.0

00

10

0.0

Sier

ra L

eone

1

00.

01

00.

02

00.

04

00.

08

00.

0

Sing

apo

re1

00.

00

00

10

0.0

Som

alia

10

0.0

00

01

00.

0

Sout

h A

fric

a 1

00.

01

110

0.0

00

21

50.0

Sri L

anka

0

00

10

0.0

10

0.0

Taiw

an

32

66.7

21

50.0

10

0.0

10

0.0

73

42.9

Thai

land

1

110

0.0

00

01

110

0.0

Trin

idad

and

To

bag

o

02

150

.01

00.

00

31

33.3

Turk

ey0

11

100.

01

110

0.0

02

210

0.0

Turk

men

ista

n0

11

100.

00

01

110

0.0

Ug

and

a 0

01

110

0.0

01

110

0.0

Ukr

aine

1

00.

00

62

33.3

22

100.

09

444

.4

Uni

ted

Kin

gd

om

1

00.

00

22

100.

00

32

66.7

Uzb

ekis

tan

42

50.0

20

0.0

41

25.0

30

0.0

133

23.1

Virg

in Is

land

s, B

ritis

h 0

00

10

0.0

10

0.0

Zim

bab

we

00

10

0.0

01

00.

0

Tota

l37

719

351

.241

018

144

.141

321

351

.644

121

047

.61,

641

797

48.6

Page 54: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

48 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 7.

NC

LeX

-PN

® P

ass

rat

es f

or

firs

t-Ti

me,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

*Ap

r 19

94 C

omp

uter

Ad

apti

ve T

est

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

-0.5

6 lo

git

s.

**O

ct 1

996

Pass

ing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

6 to

-0.5

1 lo

git

s.

***A

pr

1999

Pas

sing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

1 to

-0.4

7 lo

git

s.

****

Ap

r 20

05 P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -0

.47

to -0

.42

log

its

8991

90

8687

8486

8487

8891

8887

9191

9088

8785

8385

8586

8888

8786

9192

9290

8988

8889

8891

9190

9090

8890

8886

8584

8384

8787

8986

8584

020406080100

*199

419

95**

1996

1997

1998

***1

999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

****

2005

2006

2007

Year

Adm

inis

tere

d

Percent Passing

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 55: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

49PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 8.

NC

LeX

-PN

® P

ass

rat

es f

or

All

Can

did

ates

*Ap

r 19

94 C

omp

uter

Ad

apti

ve T

est

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

-0.5

6 lo

git

s.

**O

ct 1

996

Pass

ing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

6 to

-0.5

1 lo

git

s.

***A

pr

1999

Pas

sing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

1 to

-0.4

7 lo

git

s.

****

Ap

r 20

05 P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -0

.47

to -0

.42

log

its

8280

7576

7273

7376

78

82

7878

8380

80

7572

6971

7274

7676

7675

8587

8784

8281

8080

80

8484

8484

83

7982

80

7673

7374

7679

7474

7777

7777

77

020406080100

*199

419

95**

1996

1997

1998

***1

999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

****

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Percent Passing

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 56: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

50 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 9.

NC

LeX

-PN

® A

nnua

l Pas

s r

ates

, Ap

ril 1

994

- D

ecem

ber

200

7

*Ap

r 19

94 C

omp

uter

Ad

apti

ve T

est

(CA

T) b

egin

s. P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

-0.5

6 lo

git

s.

**O

ct 1

996

Pass

ing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

6 to

-0.5

1 lo

git

s.

***A

pr

1999

Pas

sing

Sta

ndar

d c

hang

ed f

rom

-0.5

1 to

-0.4

7 lo

git

s.

****

Ap

r 20

05 P

assi

ng S

tand

ard

cha

nged

fro

m -0

.47

to -0

.42

log

its

8382

8380

7475

7980

8079

78

9091

9189

8786

8586

8788

8989

8887

7676

78

020406080100

*199

419

95**

1996

1997

1998

***1

999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

****

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Percent Passing

All

Can

did

ate

sFi

rst-

Tim

e, U

.S.-

Educ

ate

d

Page 57: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

51PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 10

. NC

LeX

-PN

® V

olu

me

for

firs

t-Ti

me,

u.S

.-e

duc

ated

Can

did

ates

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Number Examined

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 58: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

52 PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 11

. NC

LeX

-PN

® V

olu

me

for

All

Can

did

ates

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Number Examined

Jan

Ap

rJu

lO

ct

Page 59: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN) | 2009

53PART II – 2007 NCLEX® EXAMINATION STATISTICSfi

gur

e 12

. NC

LeX

-PN

® A

nnua

l Vo

lum

e, A

pri

l 199

4 -

Dec

emb

er 2

007

0

10,0

00

20,0

00

30,0

00

40,0

00

50,0

00

60,0

00

70,0

00

80,0

00

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Year

Ad

min

iste

red

Number Examined

All

Can

did

ate

sFi

rst-

Tim

e, U

.S.-

Educ

ate

d

Page 60: NCSBN RESEARCH BRIEF · jurisdiction July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. All data was obtained from state and territorial boards of nursing. Estimates were provided where the exact figure

111 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 2900Chicago, IL 60601-4277312.525.3600312.279.1032 faxwww.ncsbn.org 978-0-9822456-0-6