network 11 quality update chris singer, man, rn, cnn december 4, 2008

47
Network 11 Quality Update Chris Singer, MAN, RN, CNN December 4, 2008

Upload: jefferson-woodard

Post on 14-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Network 11 Quality Update

Chris Singer, MAN, RN, CNNDecember 4, 2008

What’s Going on in Network 11?

• Fistula First• Lab data collection• MRC Recommended Treatment

Guidelines• Immunization• Involuntary discharge

Fistula First

We are Improving!

Almost there…Final State Approaching

50%

We Are Improving!

What Are We Doing to Improve?

• Facility goals• Surgeon workshops• Data feedback reports• QI action plans• Patient involvement

We Still Have a Ways to Go…

• September 2008 = 49.4%• New Network 11 goal from CMS =

51.3% by 6/30/2009 = 1% per calendar quarter

• CMS national goal = 66%

by 6/30/2009• KDOQI Guideline for prevalent AVFs 65%

Percent of Patients Dialyzing with an AVF12/31/2002

48.3

4238.9

35.7 34.9 34.5 34.4 33.3 32.4 32.1 31.3 31.1 30.3 29.5 29.226.6 26.3 25.7 25.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

16 1 2 18 17 7 3 10 US 4 11 12 9 15 6 5 8 14 13

The Starting PointWhere We Were

The Target Is Moving –Where We Are

Incredible Improvement in 2007

2008 AVF PrevalenceFacility Goals

• Formula used to calculate goals(66% [CMS program goal]) – (facility

baseline percent [AVF rate in Q4]) x 20%

• Project Design– Baseline: December 2007 – Goal to be achieved by December 2008

data– Progress reports sent out quarterly– Action plans requested after 6 months

Over Three-Fourths (88.8%) of Facilities on Target to Meet Goal!

Early Referral

CKD Management

ESRD

Upper Midwest Coalition Workgroups

• CKD Management– Strategy: Educate nephrologists and physician

extenders ways to use CKD care to improve likelihood of AVF placement prior to dialysis start.

• CKD Early Referral– Strategy: Use of automatic lab eGFR reporting to

alert physicians of early CKD identification.– Train primary care physicians to identify CKD and

refer to nephrologist earlier.

• ESRD– Strategy: State Survey Provider Tool– Develop facility and patient education strategies that

will facilitate AVF improvement

Coalition Successes All labs in 5-state region participated in GFR

survey with over 2/3 automatically reporting GFR

CKD WebEx conducted for primary care physicians

Vascular access coordinator questionnaire in all Network 11 facilities—WebEx's now being developed

Patient resistance focus groups conducted—new patient resources coming!

Acute dialysis education questionnaire conducted

Nephrologist Report Card• CMS Form 2728 Patient Data on

Vascular Access• Information collected included:

– Patient population: catheter as sole access for dialysis start

– Pre-dialysis nephrology care– Surgeon referral

• Implemented of model algorithm and education

• Follow-up data collected

Pre-ESRD Care Trends in Network 11Source: 2728 Medical Evidence Reports, 2007

3%

10%

5%4%

5% 6%

34%

21%

16%

27%

23% 24%

28%

41%

47%

34% 34%36%

35%

28%

32%

35%37%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

ND WI SD MN MI NW 11

Amount of Pre-ESRD Care in Months

Per

cen

t o

f P

atie

nts

< 6 6-12 > 12 None

Overall, more than 60% of patients in Network 11 are seen by a nephrologist at least 6 months before starting dialysis

Comparison of AVF Use on First DialysisSource: 2728 Medical Evidence Reports, 2007

16.2% 16.4%

7.3%

14.3%

12.3%13.6%

33.7%

31.5%

28.7%27.9%

23.2%

26.6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

ND WI SD MN MI NW 11

Pe

rce

nt

of

Pati

en

ts

AVF Used on First Dialysis AVF in Place on First Dialysis

N = 315 N = 1575 N = 247 N = 1346 N = 3639 N = 7122

Vascular Access Placed by Pre-ESRD Care in Network 11Source: 2728 Medical Evidence Report, 2007

20.2%

31.7%

42.0%

8.4%

4.7%

5.9%

6.2%

2.1%

68.9%

54.0%41.8%

87.5%

6.1% 8.5% 10.0%

2.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

< 6 6-12 > 12 None

Pre-ESRD Care

Per

cen

t o

f P

atie

nts

AVF Placed AVG Cath Other

Lab Data CollectionElab – 4th Quarter 2007

(nearly 100% patient sample)

Network 11 and the Lab Data Collection Project

• For Q4 2007 all 18 Networks participated in the project

• Lab Data Collection project was completely done in house by Network 11

• Network 11 has been awarded a contract from CMS to officially conduct this project for Q4 2008

National Overall Results

Hemodialysis AdequacyPercent of Patients with URR => 65

Network 11 Lab Data Collection Project - Q4 DataTrend Over Time

78.4

83.486 87.3

85.489.2

86.9 86 87.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Percent of Patients with URR => 65%Network Comparison

National Lab Data Collection Project - Q4 2007

92.1 90.4 90.4 90.0 89.9 89.6 89.3 89.1 89.1 88.8 88.7 88.7 88.3 87.5 87.1 87.1 86.9 86.884.5

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

14 1 15 4 3 8 16 2 9 7 6 US 10 12 5 11 13 18 17

Networks

Hemodialysis Adequacy

Anemia ManagementPercent of Patients with Hgb => 11

Network 11 Lab Data Collection Project - Q4 DataTrend Over Time

64.6

73.576.9 78

81.585.4 83.6 83.7 82.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Anemia ManagementPercent of Patients with Hemoglobin => 11 gm/dL

Network ComparisonNational Lab Data Collection - Q4 2007

83.0 82.8 82.6 82.5 82.3 82.2 82.1 82.0 81.8 81.6 81.4 81.2 81.1 81.0 80.8 80.2 80.2 80.175.9

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

7 18 14 6 15 17 11 4 5 1 US 3 8 13 10 12 16 9 2

Networks

Phosphorus ControlPercent of Patients with Phosphorus =< 5.5

Network 11 Lab Data Collection Project - Q4 DataTrend Over Time

54 53.1 53.156.9

61.1 61.7 62.7 63.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Unable to collect data for Q4

2004

Percent of Patients with Phosphorus =< 5.5 mg/dLNetwork Comparison

National Lab Data Collection - Q4 2007

63.6 63.3 63.1 62.7 61.1 60.9 60.7 60.4 59.8 59.8 59.7 59.5 59.4 59.2 57.6 57.0 56.8 55.5 54.5

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

3 11 4 2 12 1 18 10 9 15 17 US 5 16 7 6 14 13 8

Networks

Phosphorus Control

Medical Review Committee Recommended Treatment Guidelines and

Review Criteria

2008 Clinical Indicators with no changes

Recommended Best PracticeHD ADEQUACY: 80% of HD patients on three times per week dialysis will have a mean URR of at least 65% or delivered Kt/V of 1.2

> 85% of HD patients on three times per week dialysis will have a mean URR of at least 65% or delivered Kt/V of 1.2

PD ADEQUACY: 80% of PD patients will have a weekly Kt/V of 1.7

> 85% of PD patients will have a weekly Kt/V of 1.7

NUTRITION: 80% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have mean serum albumin the lower limit of normal (LLN), and no more than 10% of patients will have mean serum albumin < 0.9 LLN

> 85% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have serum albumin the lower limit of normal (LLN), and no more than 10% of patients will have mean serum albumin < 0.9 LLN

BONE/MINERAL: 70% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have a mean serum phosphorus of 5.5 mg/dL< 10% of patients will have mean serum phosphorus of > 8 mg/dL

> 80% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have a mean serum phosphorus of 5.5 mg/dL< 5% of patients will have mean serum phosphorus of > 8 mg/dL

BONE/MINERAL: 80% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have a mean corrected serum calcium concentration of 10.2 mg/dL.

> 85% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have a mean corrected serum calcium concentration of 10.2 mg/dL.> 75% of dialysis patients (HD and PD) will have a mean corrected serum calcium concentration of 9.5 mg/dL.

IMMUNIZATIONS: 90% of patients will receive immunization for influenza 80% of patients will receive immunization for pneumonia 80% of patients without natural immunity will receive immunization for hepatitis B

95% of patients will receive immunization for influenza 85% of patients will receive immunization for pneumonia 90% of patients without natural immunity will receive immunization for hepatitis B

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING: 80% of patients will have documentation that advance care planning discussions were conducted within 6 months of initiating dialysis

85% of patients will have documentation that advance care planning discussions were conducted within 3 months of initiating dialysis

TRANSPLANT REFERRAL 85% of patients will be assessed by the nephrologist for transplant candidacy or referral within 6 months of initiating dialysis as demonstrated by documentation in the medical record

95% of patients will be assessed by the nephrologist for transplant candidacy or referral within 3 months of initiating dialysis as evidenced by documentation in the medical record

Changes for 2008Recommended Best Practice

ANEMIA MANAGEMENTFacilities should target hemoglobin levels between 11-12 gm/dL. A normal distribution of Hgb levels centered around this target will include: 10% of patients with mean Hgb 10 gm/dL, AND 10% of patients with mean Hgb 13 gm/dL.

To be determined following analysis of the Q4 2007 hemoglobin data

VASCULAR ACCESSFacility AVF rate will achieve an annual increase that equals at least the specific goal set for that facility*.

65% of prevalent patients dialyze with an AV fistula

10% of prevalent patients are dialyzing with a catheter as sole access > 90 days

5% of prevalent patients are dialyzing with a catheter as sole access > 90 days

Elab 2007 Review Process

Review ResultsQ4, 2007

Option Number Percent

#1 – Best Practice 0 0%

#2 – Doing Well 42 12.1%

#3 – Needs some improvement

271 78.3%

#4 – QI plan required 32 9.2%

#5 – On site visit by NW

1 0.02%

Network 11 Involuntary Discharges

Involuntary DischargeInvoluntary Discharge

Network 11 Data - Discharges as a Percent of Prevalent Patient PopulationTrend Over Time

0.33

0.37

0.29

0.34

0.22

0.27 0.27

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Pe

rce

nt

of

Pre

va

len

t P

op

ula

tio

n

Decreasing Dialysis Patient-Provider Conflict toolboxes distributed in

2005

Involuntary DischargeReasons for Involuntary Discharge

Network 11 Data Trend Data 2006-2007

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Threat Abusive Non-compliant Disruptive Nonpayment Other Neph. D/ced

Pe

rce

nt

of

Dis

ch

arg

es

2006 N=54

2007 N=60

What’s Coming in 2009

• QI Projects– Fistula First– Catheter Reduction– Anemia Management– Unused AVF– QAPI

• CrownWEB

2008 – 09 Projects: Fistula First Goals

• December 2007 Baseline• All facilities with < 65% AVF Used

participating• Based on CMS formula for

Networks• Re-measurement using December

2008 data

2008 – 09 Projects: AVF Placed vs. Used

• Collaborative project with 10 facilities• Voluntary participation• Baseline data: Fistula First September

2008• Facility-specific goals to reduce unused AVF• Interventions include education, quality

improvement plans, and data feedback• Re-measurement March 2009

2008 – 09 Projects: Catheter Reduction

• Collaborative project with mentor regional chain of 9 mentor facilities and regional chain of 9 intervention facilities

• Baseline data: Fistula First September 2008• Facility-specific goals to reduce catheters >

90 days• Interventions include education, quality

improvement plans, and data feedback• Re-measurement March 2009

2008 – 09 Projects: Anemia Management

• Collaborative project with 8 facilities in MI• Baseline data collected September 2008• Facility-specific goals to reduce Hgb <10

and Hgb>13 (Target range 11 – 12)• Voluntary participation• Interventions include education, quality

improvement plans, and data feedback• Re-measurement March 2009

2008 – 09 Projects: Quality Assessment &

Performance Improvement

• Collaborative project with 11 facilities• Voluntary participation• Based on CFC 8 components of effective

QAPI program• Interventions include education, quality

improvement program assessment, and QI program feedback

• Baseline QI program assessment October 2008; re-measurement March 2009

CrownWEB

• Patient ESRD data

• Clinical data

• Fistula First

WNWebCRConsolidated Renal Operations in a Web Enabled Network

The mission of the Renal Network of the Upper Midwest is to assess and improve the

quality of care provided to patients with end stage renal

disease.

In Conclusion