network traffic paul german, jeffrey klow, and emily andrulis

16
NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

Upload: sarah-harrington

Post on 14-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

NETWORK TRAFFICPaul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

Page 2: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

THE IDEA

Ben’s proposal Examine Cornell’s Network Traffic How much do we use? When do we use it? What information can we glean?

Page 3: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

OUR MAIN QUESTIONS

What does an average day at Cornell look like in regards to network traffic?

Assuming the pattern holds, at what point

should we consider getting more bandwidth because we will be frequently coming close to our maximum allotted?

Page 4: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

GETTING THE DATA

The Tims in Network Services Log data files for primary and secondary

internet provider, and internal network traffic Log files include upload and download

averages and maximums Decreasing time resolution between lines

Solution: Collect data for 1 week around same time each day

Page 5: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

DATA CLEANING

Create scripts in R log file -> data frames in R Update already made data frames with new log data

Add different time variables UNIX -> CST, date, time, weekday, decimal time

Add % of bandwidth variables Helper functions

getSelectedIndices modifyDataResolution

Page 6: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

TELLING THE STORY

Use static, animated, and interactive graphs to display data

Go back to our focus questions: Average day at Cornell? Frequency of reaching 85% bandwidth? What does the future usage look like?

Page 7: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

EXPLAINING THREE TYPES

Log files from primary internet provider, secondary internet provider, and internal network traffic

Cap differences: 300 Mb/sec vs. 100 Mb/sec Internal weird

Page 8: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGE USAGE AT CORNELL Static -> Interactive

Page 9: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGE USAGE SECONDARY

Page 10: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGES THROUGH ANIMATION

Day of Week compared to Average Day

Page 11: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGE LAST WEEK

Average Day compared to Days Last Week

Page 12: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGES SINCE NOVEMBER

Average Day compared to all days back to November

Page 13: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

AVERAGE BLOCK USAGE

Showing Usage over Block 4

Page 14: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

BLOCK 4 SECONDARY

Block 4 Usage on Secondary Provider (Note: peaks)

Page 15: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

WHERE ARE WE HEADING?

Page 16: NETWORK TRAFFIC Paul German, Jeffrey Klow, and Emily Andrulis

FUTURE APPLICATIONS

Give code to the Tims Documented and split up by task

Interactive graphs with new data Easily replicable Raise awareness about usage in terms of

averages and when we’re nearing the cap