new intruder alarm standards an insurance view of the future a presentation for asc by

22
New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by Barry Faiers Principal Security Surveyor, Allianz Cornhill Insurance Plc

Upload: arwen

Post on 19-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by Barry Faiers Principal Security Surveyor, Allianz Cornhill Insurance Plc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

New Intruder Alarm Standards

An insurance view of the future

A presentation for ASC by

Barry Faiers

Principal Security Surveyor,

Allianz Cornhill Insurance Plc

Page 2: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

The introduction of the new

European Standards and

British Standard Codes of Practice

that will be replacing

BS 4737 during 2005.

Page 3: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

Then and Now

• British Standards were last updated in 1988

• Need to align with European Standards

• Conflicting British Standards Withdrawn 1st March 2004,

• but not all European Standards are published!

• PD 6662:2004 will be used to ‘plug the gaps’

Page 4: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

What Standards?

• Pr EN50131 : 2004

• BS EN 50131 - 6

• PD 6662 : 2004

• DD243 : 2002

• DD243 : 2004

Page 5: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

What’s Changing?

• There will be dual running of BS’s and EN’s from

1st October 2004 until 1st October 2005

• but not ‘mixed’ systems

• ENs will not be retrospective

• DD 243 will still apply

• to get a police response (England and Wales) new systems will still have to transmit a confirmed signal

Page 6: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

What’s different?• EN calls for graded systems using graded equipment

• Grades 1, 2, 2X, 3, 4

• System will be graded to its lowest component.

• Some equipment e.g. Grade 4 may not be available yet.

• Terminology:

Page 7: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

Terminology

• Signalling becomes Alarm transmission systems (ATS’s)

• Bells and sirens become Warning Devices (WD’s)

• Notification covers both ATSs and WDs.

• Specification becomes System Design Proposal

• New document introduced: As fitted Document

Page 8: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

The Grades

• Grade 1 - very low, equivalent to DIY

• Grade 2 - acceptable for low risks

• Grade 2X - as Grade 2 but bells only

• Grade 3 - Roughly equivalent to existing systems

• Grade 4 - high security old BS 7042 systems

Page 9: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

FEATURE GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4

Signalling andwarningdevices (WDs)

Choice of audibleonly or low graderemote signalling

Warning device andremote signalling(Option X permitsaudible only)

Warning device andenhanced remotesignalling

Warning device andhigh securitysignalling

MovementDetectors

Tamper detectionoptional

Tamper detectionmandatory

As Grade 2 + anti -masking detection

As Grade 3 + rangereduction detection

Level ofsupervision(guide to themethod ofintrusion to beconsidered)

Opening of externaldoors + trap

Opening of externaldoors and windowsetc. + trap

Opening of andpenetration throughexternal doors andwindows etc. + trapand specialconsideration to highrisk items

As Grade 3 +penetration of walls,ceilings, roof andfloor.

Tamper Control andindicating equipment+ signallingequipment + warningdevices+ power supplies.

As Grade 1 +detectors + junctionboxes.

As Grade 2 + anti-masking andadjustment of theorientation ofdetectors

As Grade 3 +penetration ofcontrols andsignalling equipment.+ penetration of WDs

EventRecording

Not required. 250 events 500 events + user i.d. 1000 events + useri.d.

Maintenancerequirementsper annum – asqualified by PD6662:2004

1 site visit 2 site visitsOR1 site visit + 1 remotediagnostic check(Option X – audibleonly- one site visit)

As Grade 2 2 site visits

Page 10: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

Who decides the Grade?• The installer must carry out a written risk

assessment to determine the Grade of system. • NSI / SSAIB to check that risk assessment has

been done but not how the Grade was decided on.

• Insurer can advise client of the Grade required. • Insurer will not see the installers risk

assessment. (warranty implications!)

Page 11: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

Summary – Gross Incurred Claims

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

£m

Theft Fire BI Weather Subsidence

Page 12: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

What grade shall I request?• Most systems will be Grade 3 • this equates roughly to existing systems.

• Low risk shops could be Grade 2

• Low risk shops ‘live on premises’ and multi-tenure offices with 24 hour guarding could be Grade 2X

• Domestic - Grade 2 or 2X but Grade 3 for very high risk

Page 13: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

What do I need to know?• Grade 1 not suitable for insurance purposes

• Difficult and costly to upgrade from 2 to 3

• Grade 4 will be rarely used and equipment may not be available in the short term.

• (Use Grade 3 equipment where grade 4 is not available)

• Remember the lowest graded item of equipment will determine the grade of the whole system.

Page 14: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

How to specify:

• ‘An intruder alarm system must be installed by a company recognised by a UKAS accredited inspection body (NSI or SSAIB).

• The system must conform to EN 50131-1 according to the scheme described in PD6662:2004 for a Grade {2/3/4} system, with dual path signalling by BT Redcare GSM or Dualcom Plus’

Page 15: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

How to check a specification • Correct grade of system?

• Method of verification? Sequential, audio, visual

• Coverage of equipment :

• enough detectors in an area for sequential activations?

• area of detection and coverage of microphones for audio?

• area of detection and view of cameras for visual?

• Method of unsetting as per DD243? - 6.4.4 is unacceptable

• Correct signalling - dual path? BT Redcare GSM or Dualcom Plus by name other systems are on the way, but untested!

Page 16: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

DD 243 Unsetting

• 6.4.1 - General details• 6.4.2 - Unlocking entry door unsets IAS• 6.4.3 - unlocking “ ” disables all conf.• 6.4.4 - opening entry door disables all conf.• 6.4.5 - completion of unsetting using a PACE• 6.4.6 - unsetting carried out in conjunction

with the Alarm Receiving Centre.

Page 17: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

DD243 : 2004

• Description of unsetting option inc. para no. e.g. 6.4.3.

• A warning if 6.4.4 unsetting is used

• A warning about single path signalling

• The specified parts of the premises that do, and do not, have effective confirmation facility

• Confirmation time to be stated

• Annexe F (informative): Information to be included in the System Design Proposal and As Fitted Documents.

Page 18: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

DD243 issues

• Nottinghamshire Police are requiring all existing systems be made confirmed systems from March 2006 if a police response is required.

Page 19: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

Other issues……SIA Approved Contractors Scheme

Proposed Standard Definition:• Seeks to describe the “perfect” organisation, rather

than setting a minimum standard• “Pass mark” to be decided after the scheme has been

piloted• “Reasonable” evidence of compliance required• No requirement for accreditation to ISO9001:2000• No requirement for compliance with British Standards

Page 20: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by
Page 21: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

The End

Page 22: New Intruder Alarm Standards An insurance view of the future A presentation for ASC by

QUESTIONS?(and maybe some answers)