new issue-book-entry only ratings: standard & poor’s: “aa+ aa1
TRANSCRIPT
NEW ISSUE-Book-Entry Only Ratings: Standard & Poor’s: “AA+”
Moody’s: “Aa1”
(See “RATINGS” herein)
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the Bonds is excluded
from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative
minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, except that interest on the Bonds must be included in the “adjusted current
earnings” of certain corporations for purposes of calculating alternative minimum taxable income. Bond Counsel also is of the
opinion that, under existing laws of the State of Nebraska, interest on the Bonds is exempt from Nebraska state income taxation as
long as it is exempt for purposes of the federal income tax. See “TAX EXEMPTION” herein.
$24,970,000
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds
Series 2013A
Dated: Date of Delivery Due: November 15, as shown on inside cover page
The above captioned bonds (the “Bonds”) are issuable in fully registered form in the denominations of $5,000 and integral multiples thereof. Interest on the Bonds is payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing May 15, 2014, by check or draft mailed to the registered owner as of the applicable record date at the address shown on the books of registry maintained by First National Bank of Omaha, as Registrar. Principal of the Bonds is payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds at the principal corporate office of First National Bank of Omaha, as Paying Agent, in Omaha, Nebraska. The Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior to maturity at the principal amount thereof plus interest to the redemption date all as described in this Official Statement.
The Bonds initially will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”), which will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Purchases of the Bonds may be made only in book-entry form in authorized denominations by credit to participating broker-dealers and other institutions on the books of DTC as described herein. Purchasers will not receive certificates evidencing the Bonds. Principal of and interest on the Bonds will be payable by the paying agent directly to DTC as the registered owner thereof. Disbursement of such payments to the DTC Participants is the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the beneficial owners is the responsibility of the DTC Participants and the Indirect Participants, as more fully described herein. Any purchaser of a beneficial interest in the Bonds must maintain an account with a broker or dealer who is, or acts through, a DTC Participant to receive payment of the principal of and interest on such Bonds. See “THE BONDS—Book-Entry Only System” herein.
The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to pay the costs of acquiring equipment and constructing improvements relating to the streets and highways, sewers, public safety and other public facilities and parks and recreation facilities of the City of Omaha (the “City”) and to currently refund certain outstanding indebtedness assumed by the City as a result of its annexations of one Douglas County, Nebraska sanitary and improvement district and certain outstanding general obligation debt previously issued by the City.
THE BONDS ARE PAYABLE FROM AD VALOREM TAXES, UNLIMITED AS TO RATE AND AMOUNT, LEVIED BY THE CITY AGAINST ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY IN THE CITY. THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY ARE PLEDGED TO THE PROMPT PAYMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THE BONDS.
MATURITY SCHEDULE
(on inside cover page)
This cover page contains information for convenient reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors must
read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential and material to the making of an informed investment decision.
The Bonds are being offered when, as and if issued by the City and accepted by the Underwriter, subject to the approval
of legality of the Bonds by Kutak Rock LLP, Bond Counsel, and to certain other conditions. It is expected that delivery of the
Bonds will be made on or about September 26, 2013, at DTC in New York, New York against payment therefor.
Dated: September 17, 2013
MATURITIES, AMOUNTS AND INTEREST RATES
Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds
Series 2013A
Maturity
(November 15) Amount Interest Rate Price
CUSIP
(681712)
2014 $2,720,000 3.000% 103.082% F34 2015 3,460,000 3.000 105.173 F42 2016 2,780,000 3.000 106.478 F59 2017 1,550,000 2.750 106.027 F67 2018 1,245,000 2.000 101.369 F75 2018 250,000 3.000 106.265 F83 2019 1,525,000 3.000 105.568 F91 2020 1,415,000 4.000 110.988 G25 2021 1,445,000 4.000 109.896 G33 2022 715,000 4.000 108.854 G41 2023 715,000 4.000 108.226 G58 2024 715,000 4.000 105.985* G66 2025 715,000 4.000 103.885* G74 2026 715,000 3.500 97.422 G82 2027 715,000 5.000 111.258* G90 2028 715,000 4.500 104.128* H24 2029 715,000 4.500 103.118* H32 2030 715,000 4.625 103.474* H40 2031 715,000 4.750 104.245* H57 2032 715,000 4.750 103.411* H65 2033 715,000 4.250 97.223 H73
The City of Omaha shall not be responsible for the use of the CUSIP numbers selected, nor is any representation made as
to their correctness indicated herein. They are included solely for the convenience of the holders.
* Priced to first call date of November 15, 2023.
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
JEAN STOTHERT, MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
Pete Festersen, President
Chris Jerram Aimee Melton Rich Pahls Franklin Thompson Ben Gray Garry Gernandt
DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS
Allen Herink............................................................................................................. Acting Finance Director Paul D. Kratz ............................................................................................................................. City Attorney James R. Thele ........................................................................................................ Acting Planning Director Todd Schmaderer ....................................................................................................................... Police Chief Bernard Kanger .................................................................................................................. Interim Fire Chief Brook Bench ........................................................................ Parks, Recreation and Public Property Director Robert Stubbe.............................................................................................................. Public Works Director Mikki Frost........................................................................................................... Human Resources Director Gary Wasdin ........................................................................................................................ Library Director Dana Markel.............................................................................................. Convention and Tourism Director Mikki Frost ......................................................................................... Human Rights and Relations Director
Allen Herink, City Comptroller Buster Brown, City Clerk
AUDITOR KPMG LLP
BOND COUNSEL Kutak Rock LLP
UNDERWRITER
[This page left blank intentionally.]
No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the City or the Underwriter to
give any information or to make any representations in connection with the Bonds or the matters described
herein, other than those contained in this Official Statement, and, if given or made, such other information or
representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the City or the Underwriter. This Official
Statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of
the Bonds by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer,
solicitation or sale. The information and expressions of opinion contained herein are subject to change, without
notice, and neither the delivery of this Official Statement, nor any sale made hereunder, shall, under any
circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the matters described herein since the
date hereof. This Official Statement is submitted in connection with the sale of the Bonds referred to herein and
may not be reproduced or used, in whole or in part, for any other purpose. The Underwriter may offer and sell
Bonds to certain dealers and others at prices lower than the offering prices stated on the inside cover page
hereof. The offering prices may be changed from time to time by the Underwriter.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Page
INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1
CITY OF OMAHA GENERAL
INFORMATION .................................. 1 Form of Government ...................................1
City Administration .....................................1
City Financial Management and
Controls .......................................................2
Financial Reporting Systems and
Control Systems ..........................................2
Location and General Background ..............3
Area and Population ....................................3
Transportation .............................................3
Utility Services ............................................4
Education .....................................................4
Health Services ............................................4
Military ........................................................4
Economy .....................................................4
SOURCES OF CITY REVENUES ................... 5 Authority to Levy Property Taxes ...............5
Property Taxes.............................................6
City Sales and Use Taxes ............................6
City Business Taxes ....................................7
Other Revenues ...........................................7
2013 General Fund Forecast ........................7
2014 Budget ................................................7
DISPOSITION OF BOND PROCEEDS ........... 8
SOURCES AND USES ..................................... 8
THE BONDS ..................................................... 8 Description of the Bonds .............................8
Place of Payment .........................................9
Book-Entry Only System ............................9
Optional Redemption ................................ 11
Authority for Issuance ............................... 12
Security ..................................................... 12
Revisions of State Property Tax
System ....................................................... 12
RATINGS ........................................................ 13
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ....................... 13
UNDERWRITING .......................................... 13
LEGAL OPINION ........................................... 14
TAX EXEMPTION ......................................... 14 Federal and State Tax Exemption .............. 14
Original Issue Discount ............................. 15
Original Issue Premium ............................. 15
Future Legislation ..................................... 16
LITIGATION .................................................. 16 Fire Union Lawsuits .................................. 16
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ......................... 17
CERTIFICATION AS TO OFFICIAL
STATEMENT .................................... 17
APPENDIX A—CITY OF OMAHA— SELECTED
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
APPENDIX B—CITY OF OMAHA—FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Part One—Selected City of Omaha Financial
Information
Part Two—Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
APPENDIX C—FORM OF CONTINUING
DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING
APPENDIX D—FORM OF OPINION OF BOND
COUNSEL
APPENDIX E—SCHEDULE OF REFUNDED
BONDS
[This page left blank intentionally.]
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
$24,970,000
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds
Series 2013A
INTRODUCTION
This Official Statement, including the cover page, is furnished in connection with the offering of
$24,970,000 Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds Series 2013A (the “Bonds”) of the City of Omaha,
Nebraska (the “City”).
The Bonds will be issued in strict compliance with the Constitution and laws of the State of
Nebraska, the Home Rule Charter of the City of Omaha, 1956, as amended (the “Charter”) and the
proceedings of the City Council (the “Council”) of the City, including Ordinance No. 39766 (the
“Ordinance”). See “THE BONDS—Authority for Issuance.”
The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to pay the costs of acquiring equipment and constructing
improvements relating to the streets and highways, sewers, public safety and other public facilities and
parks and recreation facilities of the City and to currently refund certain outstanding indebtedness
assumed by the City as a result of its annexations of one Douglas County, Nebraska sanitary and
improvement district and certain outstanding general obligation debt previously issued by the City . See
“DISPOSITION OF BOND PROCEEDS” herein.
This Official Statement contains brief descriptions or summaries of, among other matters, the
Bonds, the City and the Ordinance. Such descriptions and information do not purport to be
comprehensive or definitive. All references herein to the Ordinance are qualified in their entirety by
reference to such document, and references herein to the Bonds are qualified in their entirety by reference
to the form thereof included in the Ordinance. Copies of such documents may be obtained from the City
by writing to the attention of the Finance Director, Tenth Floor, 1819 Farnam Street, Omaha,
Nebraska 68183; telephone: (402) 444-5417.
CITY OF OMAHA GENERAL INFORMATION
Form of Government
Omaha operates with a strong mayor form of government. The Mayor is the City’s full-time
Chief Executive Officer. The City has a seven-member City Council. As a home-rule city, Omaha has
all of the powers available to a home-rule city under the Nebraska Constitution. The Mayor and Council
are elected for four-year terms. The Mayor is elected in a citywide election while the City Council
members are elected by district.
City Administration
The executive and administrative powers of the City are vested in the Mayor, who is popularly
elected for four years on a nonpartisan basis. The Honorable Jean Stothert was elected on May 14, 2013
to a four-year term of office ending in June 2017. A graduate of Seattle Pacific University, Stothert began
her career in nursing. Her 12 years of experience as a critical care nurse and nursing manager included
serving as head nurse and department head of Cardiovascular Surgery at St. Louis University.
2
Stothert was appointed to the Millard School Board in 1997, elected and re-elected for three
terms, including three years as president of the board. In 2009, Stothert was elected to the Omaha City
Council.
The Mayor’s cabinet consists of the chief officers of eleven City Departments. The Mayor
appoints each Department head, except that the Library Board appoints the Public Library Director.
City Financial Management and Controls
City financial management is the responsibility of the Finance Department. In total, the Finance
Department consists of 40 employees and is organized by division. The head of the Finance Department
is the Acting Finance Director of the City, Allen Herink, who also serves as the City Comptroller. Mr.
Herink has 38 years of experience as an accountant with the City of Omaha. He began his career with the
City working in the Grants Accounting Division of the Finance Department. In 1990, he was transferred
to the Budget and Accounting Division. In 1997, Mr. Herink was promoted to Division Manager. He
became Acting City Comptroller in July 2001 and City Comptroller in August 2003. Mr. Herink holds a
Bachelor of Science degree with a major in Accounting from the University of Nebraska at Omaha.
Ms Donna Waller is the City Treasurer. Ms. Waller has eighteen years of experience with the
City. She has spent her career with the City in the Revenue Division of the Finance Department. She was
promoted to Accountant I in 2008 and Accountant II in 2010. She is currently the City Treasurer and
Revenue Manager. The Revenue Division’s activity includes investing, budget implementation, and the
continuous monitoring and internal control of revenue against budget appropriations. It is responsible for
the City’s centralized billing procedures, the collection and deposit of moneys by the Central Cashier and
the Violation Bureau and administration of the Keno game. Ms. Waller holds an Associate Degree in
Professional Studies from Metropolitan Community College and a Bachelor of Science degree with a
major in Business Management from Bellevue University.
Andrew W. Brott, Budget Manager, has eight years of experience with the City of Omaha. He
started as an Accountant in Public Works with his primary responsibility being the maintenance and
calibration of the Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Financial Plan Model for the City. Later he
transferred to City Finance, where he continued working with Public Works on budgeting, fund closings,
and the CSO Financial Plan. In January 2010, Mr. Brott became the Budget Manager for the City of
Omaha. Prior to working for the City, Mr. Brott was a Senior Auditor with the State of Nebraska Motor
Fuels Division. He performed tax compliance audits for the State of Nebraska for ten years. Mr. Brott
holds a Bachelor of Science degree with a Major in Accounting and a double Minor in Information
Management and Business Administration from Bellevue University.
Scott Winkler, Accounting Manager, has nine years of experience with the City of Omaha and
nearly 26 years combined experience in accounting, auditing and financial management. Mr. Winkler
began his career with the City as an Accountant I with the Budget and Accounting Division of the
Finance Department. He was promoted to an Accountant II and then in February of 2010, to an
Accountant III and the position of Accounting Manager. Mr. Winkler holds a Bachelor of Science degree
with a major in Accounting and a Master of Arts degree in Information Systems, both from the University
of Nebraska at Lincoln. He is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) in the State of Nebraska.
Financial Reporting Systems and Control Systems
The Budget and Accounting Division of the Finance Department performs significant and
ongoing monitoring of the financial performance of the operating departments/divisions after budget
adoption. All equipment spending is prioritized, scheduled into semiannual acquisition periods and
submitted by department heads to staff accountants for analysis and review prior to any purchasing
3
activity by the City Purchasing Agent. All purchases and contracts in excess of $20,000 must be
approved by formal City Council action. Department Directors and Division Managers run status reports
detailing actual to budget performance as needed. The City Charter requires quarterly budget status
reporting. These reports forecast year-end revenue and expenditure balances for all operating
departments/divisions. Material variances are investigated promptly as they occur. Remedial actions to
return a division/department to budget might include, but are not limited to, such actions as (i) staff
accountant review and approval of all requisitions prior to receipt by the Purchasing Division,
(ii) postponement or reductions in quantity of materials and equipment purchased, or (iii) deferral of
major budgeted expenditures.
Location and General Background
Omaha, founded in 1854, is the largest city in the State of Nebraska. Omaha is the hub of a vast
transportation network leading to all parts of the nation and thus offers significant advantages to business
and industry competing in regional and national markets. This fact is substantiated by the growth of
population, employment and income during recent years.
Area and Population
The U.S. Census Bureau in the 2010 Census reported the population of the eight–county Omaha
Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”), comprising five Nebraska counties and three Iowa counties,
numbered 865,350 with over 1.1 million within a 60-minute drive. The 2012 population estimate from
the U.S. Census Bureau of the City of Omaha is approximately 419,042 and their estimate for the MSA is
885,624.
Transportation
Over 4.1 million passengers, more than 90 million pounds of cargo and over 48 million pounds of
mail passed through Eppley Airfield, Omaha’s principal airport, in 2012. In the last decade, Eppley
Airfield has made over $110 million in investments in terminal, apron, cargo area and runway expansions.
Eppley Airfield offers between 150 and 170 flights per day and is serviced by six national air carriers
(recent mergers within the industry may change the number), 18 regional airlines, seven air freight
carriers and two full–service general aviation facilities. A total of 63 general aviation aircraft, including
43 executive jets, are based at Eppley Airfield. There are 75-80 departures out of Eppley Airfield daily.
Omaha is general headquarters for the Union Pacific Railroad. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe
and the Canadian National railroads also provide service and combine to make Omaha an important rail
center.
Two interstate highways (Interstate 80 and Interstate 29), five federal highways and seven state
highways provide fast all-weather routes within Nebraska and to and from the rest of the nation. In
addition, Interstate 480 (downtown spur) and Interstate 680 (circumferential route) provide quick access
to all parts of the metropolitan area.
More than 100 motor common carriers haul freight to and from Omaha and all parts of the nation,
making Omaha a major Midwestern trucking center. Several bus lines operate between Omaha and points
in Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska.
4
Utility Services
Residential, commercial and industrial electric service rates in Omaha historically have been
below the national averages, according to reports of the Edison Electric Institute in its Statistical
Yearbook of the Electrical Utility Industry. In addition to low rates, the Omaha Public Power District, a
Nebraska political subdivision, assures its customers ample power with a net generating capability of
3,222.7 megawatts.
The Metropolitan Utilities District (“MUD”), a Nebraska political subdivision, distributes natural
gas and water in the Omaha area. Rates compare favorably with those prevailing in other metropolitan
areas in the nation. Omaha has a plentiful water supply (Missouri River and Platte River wells) and a
water system designed to the standards of the National Board of Fire Underwriters, with a current
capacity of 334 million gallons a day. MUD’s supply of natural gas is purchased wholesale from up to
twenty different suppliers. This supply is supplemented with peak–shaving storage facilities which can
provide up to approximately 30% of peak demand. There have been no interruptions of natural gas
service to firm commercial and residential customers and no interruptions are expected in the foreseeable
future.
Education
Omaha is an important educational center and is the location of Creighton University, the
University of Nebraska at Omaha and the University of Nebraska Medical Center. These institutions,
together with three additional colleges located in Omaha, offer educational programs at the graduate and
undergraduate levels, in law and in the health professions: medicine, dentistry, nursing and pharmacy.
Health Services
There are 13 hospitals within the City of Omaha, six of them classified as acute–care community
hospitals. Of the remaining seven hospitals, two are acute-care hospitals operated by governmental
entities (one by the State of Nebraska and one by Douglas County), four are specialized hospitals
(pediatrics, maternity care, geriatrics and psychiatry) and one is a major hospital of the Veterans
Administration. There are more than 1,200 physicians and more than 300 dentists in Omaha; their
services are utilized both by Omaha residents and by persons within the surrounding region.
Military
The United States Strategic Command (“USSTRATCOM”) is headquartered at Offutt Air Force
Base, just south of Omaha. The missions of U.S. Strategic Command are: to deter attacks on U.S. vital
interests, to ensure U.S. freedom of action in space and cyberspace, to deliver integrated kinetic and non–
kinetic effects to include nuclear and information operations in support of U.S. Joint Force Commander
operations, to synchronize global missile defense plans and operations, to synchronize regional combating
of weapons of mass destruction plans, to provide integrated surveillance and reconnaissance allocation
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense, and to advocate for capabilities as assigned. The estimated
economic impact of Offutt Air Force Base on the Greater Omaha community is more than $1.8 billion.
Economy
From an economy founded on the livestock industry in the late nineteenth century, Omaha is a
major grain exchange market in the United States. Food processing is also an important part of the
economy and is represented by such companies as ConAgra Foods, Inc., Kellogg Company and Omaha
Steaks International.
5
The geographic centrality of Omaha in the United States has encouraged commercial
development, and the City is home to five Fortune 500 companies, which represent a diverse array of
industries: Berkshire Hathaway, ConAgra Foods, Inc., Mutual of Omaha, Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. and
Union Pacific Corp. The City’s economy continues to diversify, although it still remains agriculturally
oriented. The Omaha MSA contains more than 650 manufacturing plants, including plants operated by
Lozier Corporation and Valmont Industries Inc. In the early 1980s, Omaha began developing as a major
participant in the reservation, customer service and direct–response center industry. Currently, there are
50 such firms located within the City. In total they employ a labor force in excess of 40,000. Major
employers in this group include First Data Corporation, Oriental Trading Co., Inc., West Corporation,
PayPal, Marriott Worldwide Reservation Center and Omaha Steaks. Omaha is the home of Peter Kiewit
Sons’, Inc., one of the largest construction and mining organizations in North America, TD Ameritrade, a
major discount stock brokerage firm, and 21 insurance companies (with over 50 employees each),
including Mutual of Omaha, the world’s largest mutual health and accident company, and Woodmen of
the World Life Insurance Society, the largest fraternal life insurance company. In December of 2012,
meatpacking employment in the Omaha MSA numbered 6,500. The district offices of the Farm Credit
System for Nebraska, Iowa, South Dakota and Wyoming are headquartered in Omaha.
The City is economically attractive to potential residents. The cost of living in the City in the
first quarter of 2013 across all categories was 87.7% of the national average. Omaha MSA residents
enjoy a median household income of $57,181 — 7% higher than the national average. The
December 2012 seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the Omaha MSA was 4.2%, compared with
8.2% for the United States.
SOURCES OF CITY REVENUES
Authority to Levy Property Taxes
Under the City Charter, the tax levy of the City in any year for all purposes shall not exceed the
total of (i) $0.6125 per $100 of actual taxable value plus (ii) whatever tax levy is necessary to provide for
principal and interest payments on the indebtedness of the City, for the administrative expenses incurred
in issuing and maintaining bonds, and for the satisfaction of judgments and litigation expenses in
connection therewith, plus (iii) whatever amount is required to finance certain overtime and holiday pay
for members of the police force. In addition, the Omaha Douglas Public Building Commission Act,
pursuant to which the Commission issues bonds, empowers the City to levy a tax on all the taxable
property in the City, except intangible property, of $0.0175 per $100 of actual valuation in excess of the
Charter limitation if and to the extent necessary to make the City’s payments to the Commission.
Effective July 1, 1998, the tax levy of the City (exclusive of levies for preexisting lease purchase
contracts and bonded indebtedness approved according to law and secured by a levy on property) is
limited by state law to 45¢/$100 of taxable valuation. See “THE BONDS—Revision of State Property
Tax System” herein.
The City’s tax levy during its current fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 is 28.447 cents per
$100, plus 19.281 cents per $100 for payment of the City’s general obligation indebtedness, plus 0.600
cents per $100 for satisfaction of judgments and 1.594 cents per $100 for payment on the City’s Special
Redevelopment Levy, for a total levy of 49.922 cents per $100. A detailed summary of the property tax
levied on real and personal property in the City appears in the table entitled “Total Property Tax Levies in
the City of Omaha” in Appendix B.
The City’s tax levy for fiscal year 2014 will remain unchanged at 49.922 cents per $100 of
taxable valuation.
6
Property Taxes
Property taxes on tangible property, real and personal, are levied by the City of Omaha, collected
by the Douglas County Treasurer and remitted to the City. Real property taxes are levied September 1 of
each year and become due December 31. The first half of tax payable becomes delinquent the following
April 1 and the second half August 1. Personal property taxes also are levied September 1 of each year,
become due the following December 31 and become delinquent in halves on the succeeding April 1 and
August 1.
Taxes for Year Shown
Year Ended
December 31 Certified
Amount
Collected
%
Collected
Prior Years’
Taxes
Collected
Total
Collections
% of Total
Collections
to Current
Year Taxes
2001 $ 76,293,126 $ 74,827,346 98.1% $1,529,927 $76,357,273 100.08%
2002 80,926,571 78,176,656 97.1 1,061,170 79,237,826 97.91
2003 82,464,501 80,538,622 97.7 1,479,940 82,018,562 99.46
2004 85,165,599 83,107,249 98.7 1,623,450 84,730,699 99.49
2005 87,170,521 85,897,631 98.5 2,762,734 88,660,364 101.70
2006 93,260,893 91,592,309 98.2 1,572,719 93,165,028 99.90
2007 96,605,427 96,518,640 99.9 1,623,515 98,142,155 101.59
2008 106,888,144 107,891,216 100.9 2,021,689 109,912,905 102.83
2009 115,018,659 113,644,205 98.8 1,708,782 115,586,354 100.49
2010 128,854,709 126,385,602 98.1 1,873,134 128,258,736 99.50
2011 134,239,776 131,111,754 97.7 1,644,917 132,756,671 98.90
2012 137,202,938 136,285,263 99.8 1,456,009 138,341,272 100.80
Source: Records of Finance Department, City of Omaha.
Property Valuations and Property Tax Levies
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Actual Valuation $27,077,712,200 $26,889,903,480 $27,483,461,735 $27,913,680,440 $27,803,448,875
Levy (per $100
actual valuation)
47.587¢
49.922¢
49.922¢
49.922¢
49.922¢
Source: Records and Projections of Finance Department, City of Omaha.
City of Omaha taxable property valuations have increased 2.68% from 2009 to 2013, including a 0.4%
decrease in 2013 from 2012. The property tax base has been enhanced through orderly annexation of
developed sanitary and improvement districts contiguous to the City.
City Sales and Use Taxes
The City’s sales tax rate of 1.5%, authorized under the provisions of the Nebraska Revenue Act
of 1967, has remained unchanged since July 1, 1978. Net sales tax collections declined by 1.90% in 2011
and increased by 5.4% in 2012. Through July 2013, actual City sales tax receipts were down 0.4%
compared to the same period in 2012.
7
City Business Taxes
Receipts for telephone occupation tax are projected at $15,375,000 for 2013. The Omaha Public
Power District Occupation Tax rate is 5% of revenues resulting from the sale of electricity within the
corporate limits of the City of Omaha. The 2013 projection of occupation tax of $5,800,000 is based
upon the assumption that weather conditions will be normal. The Cable Television Franchise Fee rate is
5% of gross receipts generated from the operation of cable television within the City of Omaha. The
2013 revenue estimates are $6,153,036. Vehicle Occupation Tax for 2013 is $8 per rental. The 2013
revenues are projected at $2,100,000. Based on the 5.5% per night occupation tax for hotels/motels, the
City estimates that the Hotel/Motel Tax will generate $3,998,590 for the General Fund in 2013.
The new restaurant fee equal to 2.5% of food and beverage sales became effective October 1,
2010 and produced $24.9 million of revenues in 2012. In 2013, the City anticipates the restaurant fee will
generate $25.3 million in revenues.
Other Revenues
The City receives intergovernmental revenues from a number of sources. Federal and state
grants-in-aid and matching funds are received by the City to help fund specific programs and projects.
State tax distributions are appropriated by the Nebraska Legislature according to a formula comparing its
population to the total population of all incorporated municipalities within the State. The Metropolitan
Utilities District pays a payment in lieu of taxes equal to 2% of the annual gross revenue derived from all
retail sales of water and gas sold within the City. The Omaha Public Power District makes payments in
lieu of taxes at the 1957 in-lieu-of-tax levels as dictated by Section 70-651.01, Reissue Revised Statutes
of Nebraska, as amended.
2013 General Fund Forecast
The City formally prepares and makes available a quarterly financial report. For the period
ending June 30, 2013, the City’s quarterly report projects a year-end budget deficit in the City’s General
Fund of $5,211,667. This deficit is primarily due to 2013 unbudgeted costs associated with the labor
dispute between the City and the Omaha Association of Firefighters No. 385 (the “Fire Union”). In
December 2012, the City and the Fire Union reached a labor contract settlement. Prior to reaching the
settlement, the City, in 2011, had set aside $5,297,891 in the Contingent Liability Fund for the expected
costs associated with the labor dispute. Monies in the Contingent Liability Fund will be available and
used to offset the projected deficit in the General Fund in 2013. See the table in APPENDIX B labeled
“SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES”.
The City continues to monitor purchases and approve only “mission critical” or “public safety”
related items. Hiring is managed through the Job Bank Committee and only essential positions are filled.
2014 Budget
Highlights in connection with the City’s adoption of its 2014 budget, passed on August 28, 2013,
include (2014 budget numbers set forth below are compared to 2013 budgeted numbers):
General Fund appropriations increased to $340.5 million, a 5.8% increase over 2013.
Total health care costs included in the 2014 budget are $59.5 million, of which
approximately $47.7 million is attributable to the General Fund. This is a 7.3% increase
over 2013.
8
Overall spending decreased slightly from $793.12 million in 2013 to $792.9 million.
Capital spending for the Public Works Combined Sewer Overflow Program will decrease
by $24 million. This reduction is offset by an increased appropriation for the Fire
Department in the amount of $7.6 million.
Property valuation decreased from $27.9 billion in August 2012 to $27.8 billion in
August 2013, or 0.4%. Property tax levies remain unchanged from 2013.
Several extraordinary items in 2014 are projected to cause overall General Fund revenues
and expenditures to increase by 5.8% over the 2013 amounts. The Elkhorn Fire service
contract was accounted for properly therefore increasing both expenses and revenues by
$4.3 million. The Tobacco Tax Agreement with the University of Nebraska Medical
Center also will increase both expenses and revenues in the amount of $3.7 million. Net
of these extraordinary items, General Fund spending in 2014 is budgeted to increase only
3.3%.
The Restaurant Tax continues to perform well with a budget of $28.0 million in revenues
for 2014, an increase of 9.375% over 2013.
DISPOSITION OF BOND PROCEEDS
The principal and premium of the Bonds will be applied as follows: the amount of approximately
$9,100,000 of the proceeds of such Bonds will be applied to pay the cost of constructing streets and
highways; the amount of approximately $1,200,000 of the proceeds of such Bonds will be applied to pay
the cost of constructing sewers and sewer related infrastructure; approximately $1,100,000 of the
proceeds of such Bonds will be applied to pay for certain public facilities; approximately $1,600,000 of
the proceeds of such Bonds will be used to pay for certain public safety facilities and equipment;
approximately $1,900,000 of the proceeds of such Bonds will be applied to pay for parks and recreation
facilities; and $10,645,000 of the proceeds of such Bonds will be used to currently refund (i) outstanding
debt for which the City became legally liable upon its annexations of Douglas County Sanitary and
Improvement District No. 330 and (ii) certain outstanding general obligation indebtedness previously
issued by the City (collectively, the “Refunded Bonds”). Appendix E identifies the Refunded Bonds.
SOURCES AND USES
Sources:
Bond Proceeds ............................................................................ $24,970,000.00
Net Original Issue Premium ....................................................... 1,318,706.40
Total .............................................................................. $26,288,706.40
Uses:
Redemption of Refunded Bonds ................................................. $11,143,833.63
Deposit into Project Fund ........................................................... 14,905,712.77
Cost of Issuance .......................................................................... 239,160.00
Total .............................................................................. $26,288,706.40
THE BONDS
Description of the Bonds
The Bonds in aggregate principal amount of $24,970,000 will be dated their date of delivery,
which is anticipated to be September 26, 2013, will be issued in fully registered form and will mature as
set forth on the reverse of the cover page of this Official Statement. Interest on the Bonds is payable
semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, commencing May 15, 2014.
9
Place of Payment
The principal of the Bonds will be payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the
corporate trust office of First National Bank of Omaha, as paying agent and registrar (the “Paying Agent”
and “Registrar”), in Omaha, Nebraska. Interest on the Bonds will be paid by wire transfer, check or draft
mailed to the person in whose name a Bond is registered as of the May 1 or November 1, as the case may
be, immediately preceding each interest payment date.
Book-Entry Only System
The Bonds initially are being issued solely in book-entry form to be held in the book-entry only
system maintained by The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York. So long as such
book-entry system is used, only DTC will receive or have the right to receive physical delivery of Bonds
and Beneficial Owners (as hereinafter defined) will not be or be considered to be, and will not have any
rights as, owners or holders of the Bonds under the Ordinance. The following information about the
book-entry only system applicable to the Bonds has been supplied by DTC. Neither the City nor the
Paying Agent makes any representations, warranties or guarantees with respect to its accuracy or
completeness.
DTC will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issued as fully-registered
securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC’s partnership nominee) or such other name as may
be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered Bond certificate will be issued
for each maturity of the Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity and will be
deposited with DTC.
DTC, the world’s largest depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the
New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a
member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York
Uniform Commercial Code, and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million
issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments
(from over 100 countries) that DTC’s participants (“Direct Participants”) deposit with DTC. DTC also
facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in
deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct
Participants’ accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct
Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies,
clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (“DTCC”). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National
Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation all of which are registered
clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system
is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust
companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct
Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”). DTC has a Standard & Poor’s rating of
“AA+.” The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com.
Purchases of Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants,
which will receive a credit for the Bonds on DTC’s records. The ownership interest of each actual
purchaser of each Bond (“Beneficial Owner”) is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect
Participants’ records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their
purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of
10
the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant
through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the
Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on
behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership
interests in Bonds, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Bonds is discontinued.
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are
registered in the name of DTC’s partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be
requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Bonds with DTC and their registration
in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership.
DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Bonds; DTC’s records reflect only the
identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Bonds are credited, which may or may not be
the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account
of their holdings on behalf of their customers.
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct
Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial
Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory
requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to take certain
steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Bonds, such
as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Bond documents. For example,
Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Bonds for their benefit
has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may
wish to provide their names and addresses to the Paying Agent and request that copies of notices be
provided directly to them.
Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Bonds within an issue are being
redeemed, DTC’s practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in
such issue to be redeemed.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to
the Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC’s MMI Procedures. Under
its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the City, as issuer of the Bonds, as soon as possible
after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.’s consenting or voting rights to those
Direct Participants to whose accounts Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing
attached to the Omnibus Proxy).
Principal and interest payments, redemption proceeds and distributions on the Bonds will be
made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC.
DTC’s practice is to credit Direct Participants’ accounts upon DTC’s receipt of funds and corresponding
detail information from the City or the Paying Agent, on payable date in accordance with their respective
holdings shown on DTC’s records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by
standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with Bonds held for the accounts of
customers in bearer form or registered in “street name” and will be the responsibility of such Participant
and not of DTC, the Paying Agent or the City, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may
be in effect from time to time. Payment of redemption proceeds, distributions, and interest payments to
Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the
responsibility of the City or the Paying Agent, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will
be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the
responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants.
11
DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Bonds at any time
by giving reasonable notice to the City or the Paying Agent. Under such circumstances, in the event that
a successor depository is not obtained, Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered.
The City may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry transfers through DTC (or a
successor securities depository). In that event, Bond certificates will be printed and delivered.
NEITHER THE CITY NOR THE PAYING AGENT WILL HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY
OR OBLIGATION TO ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT, INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OR ANY
BENEFICIAL OWNER OR ANY OTHER PERSON NOT SHOWN ON THE REGISTRATION
BOOKS OF THE PAYING AGENT AS BEING A HOLDER WITH RESPECT TO: (1) THE BONDS;
(2) THE ACCURACY OF ANY RECORDS MAINTAINED BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT
PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT; (3) THE PAYMENT BY DTC OR ANY DIRECT
PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF ANY AMOUNT DUE TO ANY BENEFICIAL
OWNER IN RESPECT OF THE PRINCIPAL OR REDEMPTION PRICE OF OR INTEREST ON THE
BONDS; (4) THE DELIVERY BY ANY DIRECT PARTICIPANT OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANT OF
ANY NOTICE TO ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER WHICH IS REQUIRED OR PERMITTED UNDER
THE TERMS OF THE ORDINANCE TO BE GIVEN TO HOLDERS; (5) THE SELECTION OF THE
BENEFICIAL OWNERS TO RECEIVE PAYMENT IN THE EVENT OF ANY PARTIAL
REDEMPTION OF THE BONDS; OR (6) ANY CONSENT GIVEN OR OTHER ACTION TAKEN BY
DTC AS HOLDER.
Each Beneficial Owner for whom a Direct Participant or Indirect Participant acquires an interest
in the Bonds, as nominee, may desire to make arrangements with such Direct Participant or Indirect
Participant to receive a credit balance in the records of such Direct Participant or Indirect Participant, to
have all notices of redemption, elections to tender Bonds or other communications to or by DTC which
may affect such Beneficial Owner forwarded in writing by such Direct Participant or Indirect Participant,
and to have notification made of all debt service payments.
Beneficial Owners may be charged a sum sufficient to cover any tax, fee, or other governmental
charge that may be imposed in relation to any transfer or exchange of their interests in the Bonds.
THE CITY AND PAYING AGENT CANNOT AND DO NOT GIVE ANY ASSURANCES
THAT THE DIRECT PARTICIPANTS OR THE INDIRECT PARTICIPANTS WILL DISTRIBUTE TO
THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE BONDS (i) PAYMENTS OF PRINCIPAL OF AND
INTEREST ON THE BONDS, (ii) BONDS REPRESENTING AN OWNERSHIP INTEREST OR
OTHER CONFIRMATION OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN THE BONDS OR
(iii) REDEMPTION OR OTHER NOTICES SENT TO DTC OR CEDE & CO., ITS NOMINEE, AS
THE REGISTERED OWNERS OF THE BONDS, OR THAT THEY WILL DO SO ON A TIMELY
BASIS OR THAT DTC, DIRECT PARTICIPANTS OR INDIRECT PARTICIPANTS WILL SERVE
AND ACT IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT. THE CURRENT
“RULES” APPLICABLE TO DTC ARE ON FILE WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION, AND THE CURRENT “PROCEDURES” OF DTC TO BE FOLLOWED IN DEALING
WITH DIRECT PARTICIPANTS ARE ON FILE WITH DTC.
Optional Redemption
The Bonds maturing November 15, 2024 and thereafter are subject to redemption at the option of
the City at prior to their stated maturities at any time on or after November 15, 2023, in whole or in part
($5,000 or any multiple thereof) in such order of maturities as determined by the City, and in such manner
12
as the Paying Agent deems fair within a maturity, at a price of par, without premium, plus accrued interest
to the date of redemption.
At least 30 days’ notice of redemption will be mailed to the person whose name appears in the
bond registration books as the registered owner of a Bond as of the close of business on the forty-fifth day
immediately preceding the date fixed for redemption.
Authority for Issuance
The Bonds have been authorized in accordance with the Constitution and statutes of the State of
Nebraska, the Charter and proceedings of the Council providing for the issuance thereof, including the
Ordinance. The issuance of the Bonds, except for the portion used to refund the Refunded Bonds, was
approved by the voters of the City at the May 11, 2010 election relating to each such purpose. The
issuance of the portion of the Bonds used for the refunding purposes described under “DISPOSITION OF
BOND PROCEEDS” was approved by the City Council by authority of Sections 10-142, 10-615 and 10-
616, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, as amended, and applicable provisions of the Charter.
Security
The Bonds are general obligations of the City, and the City is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes
for the payment of said Bonds and the interest thereon upon all property within the City subject to
taxation by the City without limitation as to rate or amount. The full faith and credit of the City shall be
pledged to the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. See “SOURCES OF CITY
REVENUES – Authority to Levy Property Taxes” herein.
Revisions of State Property Tax System
The State of Nebraska’s system of assessing and taxing real and personal property for purposes of
local ad valorem taxation for support of local political subdivisions, including the City, was the subject in
the late 1990’s of constitutional amendment, legislation and litigation the result of which was to
substantially resolve certain challenges to the validity of the tax system.
Governmental units in Nebraska may not adopt budgets for fiscal years in excess of 102.5% of
the prior fiscal year’s budget plus allowable growth (which includes increases in taxable valuation for
such things as new construction and annexations). However, such budgetary limitations do not apply to,
among other things, revenue pledged to retire bonded indebtedness or budgeted for capital improvements.
Governmental units may exceed the budget limit for a given fiscal year by up to an additional 1% upon
the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the governing body or in such amount as is approved by a majority
vote of the electorate. The property tax levies of incorporated cities and villages, such as the City, are
limited to a maximum of 45¢/$100 of taxable valuation (plus an additional 5¢/$100 to pay the
municipality’s share of revenue required under interlocal agreements). The levy limit does not apply to
levies for preexisting lease-purchase contracts approved prior to July 1, 1998, to bonded indebtedness,
such as the Bonds, approved according to law and secured by a levy on property and to pay judgments.
The City’s 2013 General Fund levy, exclusive of such unlimited levies, is 28.447¢/$100 of taxable
valuation. A political subdivision may exceed its levy limitation for a period of up to five years by
majority vote of the electorate.
There can be no assurance that Nebraska’s system of assessing and taxing real and personal
property will remain substantially unchanged, given the possibility of further legislation and litigation.
Such changes could materially and adversely affect the amount of property tax revenues the City and
other local governments could collect in future years. The City does not believe, however, that the
13
Nebraska Legislature would leave the City without adequate taxing resources to pay for its programs and
meet its financial obligations, including the repayment of its bonds, lease-purchase obligations and other
obligations. The opinion of Bond Counsel will be rendered based on the law existing as of the date of
issuance of the Bonds and in reliance upon general legal presumptions in favor of the constitutionality of
statutes and upon the holdings of existing case law.
RATINGS
Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”),
has given the Bonds a rating of “AA+” and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) has given the Bonds
a rating of “Aa1.” Any desired explanation of the significance of such ratings should be obtained from
S&P and from Moody’s. The City furnished the rating agencies with certain information and materials
relating to the Bonds and the City which have not been included in this Official Statement. Generally, a
rating agency bases its rating on the information and materials so furnished and on investigations, studies
and assumptions made by such rating agency. There is no assurance that a particular rating will be
maintained for any given period of time or that it will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely if, in the
judgment of the agency originally establishing the rating, circumstances so warrant. Neither the City nor
the Underwriter has undertaken any responsibility either to bring to the attention of the owners of the
Bonds any proposed revision or withdrawal of the rating of the Bonds or to oppose any such proposed
revision or withdrawal. Any such change in or withdrawal of such rating could have an adverse effect on
the market price of the Bonds. Any explanation of the significance of such ratings should be obtained
from the rating agency furnishing such rating.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
The Ordinance includes the City’s undertaking (the “Undertaking”) for the benefit of the holders
and beneficial owners of the Bonds to send certain financial information and operating data to the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) annually and to provide notice to the MSRB of
certain events, pursuant to the requirements of Section (b)(5)(i) of Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 15c2-12 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12) (the “Rule”). See “APPENDIX C—FORM OF CONTINUING
DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING.”
A failure by the City to comply with the Undertaking will not constitute an Event of Default
under the Ordinance, although any bondholder will have any available remedy at law or in equity,
including seeking specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its obligations
under the Undertaking. Any such failure must be reported in accordance with the Rule and must be
considered by any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer before recommending the purchase or sale
of the Bonds in the secondary market. Consequently, such a failure may adversely affect the
transferability and liquidity of the Bonds and their market price. Except for the failure promptly to
provide notice of bond insurance related downgrades by the rating agencies of the ratings on the City’s
Series 2006 Sewerage System Revenue Bonds in 2009 and the failure timely to provide notice of a
downgrade in 2012 by Moody’s of the rating on the City’s general obligation bonds, the City has been in
compliance with its continuing disclosure obligations under its existing undertakings entered into
pursuant to the Rule. The City now is in compliance with its continuing disclosure undertakings.
UNDERWRITING
Under a Bond Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into by and between the City and
D.A. Davidson & Co. (the “Underwriter”), the Bonds are being purchased at a price of par plus a net
original issue premium of $1,318,706.40 (from which will be paid $174,790.00 of Underwriter’s
discount) by the Underwriter for public reoffering by the Underwriter at the initial public offering prices
14
or yields set forth on the inside of the cover page of this Official Statement. The Agreement provides that
the Underwriter will purchase all of the Bonds if any are purchased. The obligation of the Underwriter to
accept delivery of the Bonds is subject to various conditions contained in the Agreement, including the
absence of pending or threatened litigation questioning the validity of the Bonds or any proceedings in
connection with the issuance thereof and the absence of material adverse changes in the financial or
business condition of the City.
The Underwriter intends to offer the Bonds to the public initially at the offering prices set forth
on the inside of the cover page of this Official Statement, which prices may subsequently change without
any requirement of prior notice. The Underwriter reserves the right to join with dealers and other
underwriters in offering the Bonds to the public. The Underwriter may offer and sell Bonds to certain
dealers (including dealers depositing Bonds into investment trusts) at prices lower than the public offering
price.
LEGAL OPINION
The approving opinion of Kutak Rock LLP (“Bond Counsel”) will affirm, among other things,
that the Bonds have been authorized and issued in accordance with the Constitution and statutes of the
State of Nebraska and the Charter of the City of Omaha, and constitute valid and legally binding
obligations of the City, and that the City has the power and is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes for the
payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon upon all the property within the City subject to taxation by
the City without limitation as to rate or amount. The rights of the holders of the Bonds and the
enforceability thereof may be subject to valid bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and
other laws for the relief of debtors.
TAX EXEMPTION
Federal and State Tax Exemption
In the opinion of Bond Counsel, to be delivered at the time of original issuance of the Bonds,
under existing laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions, interest on the Bonds (including any
original issue discount treated as interest) (a) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax
purposes and (b) is not a specific item of tax preference for purposes of calculating the federal alternative
minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. Interest on the Bonds, however, must be included
in the “adjusted current earnings” of certain corporations (i.e., alternative minimum taxable income as
adjusted for certain items, including those items that would be included in the calculation of a
corporation’s earnings and profits under Subchapter C of the Code) and such corporations are required to
include in the calculation of alternative minimum taxable income 75% of the excess of each such
corporation’s adjusted current earnings (which includes tax-exempt interest) over its alternative minimum
taxable income (determined without regard to this adjustment and prior to reduction for certain net
operating losses).
The opinions set forth above are subject to continuing compliance by the City with its covenants
regarding federal tax laws in the Ordinance. Failure to comply with such covenants could cause interest
on the Bonds to be included in gross income retroactive to the date of issue of the Bonds.
The accrual or receipt of interest on the Bonds may otherwise affect the federal income tax
liability of certain recipients, such as banks, thrift institutions, property and casualty insurance companies,
corporations (including S corporations and foreign corporations operating branches in the United States),
Social Security or Railroad Retirement benefit recipients, taxpayers otherwise entitled to claim the earned
income credit or taxpayers who may be deemed to have incurred (or continued) indebtedness to purchase
15
or carry tax-exempt obligations. The nature and extent of these other tax consequences will depend upon
the recipients’ particular tax status or other items of income or deduction. Bond Counsel expresses no
opinion regarding any such consequences, and investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding
the tax consequences of purchasing or holding the Bonds.
In Bond Counsel’s further opinion, under the existing laws of the State of Nebraska, the interest
on the Bonds is exempt from Nebraska state income taxation so long as it is exempt for purposes of the
federal income tax.
Original Issue Discount
The Bonds maturing in the years 2026 and 2033 (collectively, the “Discount Bonds”), are being
sold at an original issue discount. The difference between the initial public offering prices, as set forth on
the inside cover page, of such Discount Bonds and their stated amounts to be paid at maturity constitutes
original issue discount treated as interest which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax
purposes, as described above.
The amount of original issue discount which is treated as having accrued with respect to such
Discount Bonds is added to the cost basis of the owner in determining, for federal income tax purposes,
gain or loss upon disposition of such Discount Bonds (including its sale, redemption or payment at
maturity). Amounts received upon disposition of such Discount Bonds which are attributable to accrued
original issue discount will be treated as tax-exempt interest, rather than as taxable gain, for federal
income tax purposes.
Original issue discount is treated as compounding semiannually, at a rate determined by reference
to the yield to maturity of each individual Discount Bond, on days which are determined by reference to
the maturity date of such Discount Bond. The amount treated as original issue discount on such Discount
Bond for a particular semiannual accrual period is equal to the product of (i) the yield to maturity for such
Discount Bond (determined by compounding at the close of each accrual period) and (ii) the amount
which would have been the tax basis of such Discount Bond at the beginning of the particular accrual
period if held by the original purchaser, less the amount of any interest payable for such Discount Bond
during the accrual period. The tax basis is determined by adding to the initial public offering price on
such Discount Bond the sum of the amounts which have been treated as original issue discount for such
purposes during all prior periods. If such Discount Bond is sold between semiannual compounding dates,
original issue discount which would have been accrued for the semiannual compounding period for
federal income tax purposes is to be apportioned in equal amounts among the days in such compounding
period.
Owners of Discount Bonds should consult their tax advisors with respect to the determination and
treatment of original issue discount accrued as of any date and with respect to the state and local tax
consequences of owning a Discount Bond.
Original Issue Premium
The Bonds maturing in the years 2014 through 2025, inclusive, and in the years 2027 through
2032, inclusive (collectively, the “Premium Bonds”), are being sold at a premium. An amount equal to
the excess of the issue price of a Premium Bond over its stated redemption price at maturity constitutes
premium on such Premium Bond. An initial purchaser of a Premium Bond must amortize any premium
over such Premium Bond’s term using constant yield principles, based on the purchaser’s yield to
maturity (or, in the case of Premium Bonds callable prior to their maturity, by amortizing the premium to
the call date, based on the purchaser’s yield to the call date and giving effect to the call premium, if any).
16
As premium is amortized, the purchaser’s basis in such Premium Bond is reduced by a corresponding
amount resulting in an increase in the gain (or decrease in the loss) to be recognized for federal income
tax purposes upon a sale or disposition of such Premium Bond prior to its maturity. Even though the
purchaser’s basis may be reduced, no federal income tax deduction is allowed. Purchasers of Premium
Bonds should consult with their tax advisors with respect to the determination and treatment of
amortizable premium for federal income tax purposes and with respect to the state and local tax
consequences of owning a Premium Bond.
Future Legislation
From time to time, there are legislative proposals in the Congress and in the states that, if enacted,
could alter or amend the federal and state tax matters referred to above or adversely affect the market
value of the Bonds. It cannot be predicted whether or in what form any such proposal might be enacted
or whether if enacted it would apply to bonds issued prior to enactment. In addition, regulatory actions
are from time to time announced or proposed and litigation is threatened or commenced which, if
implemented or concluded in a particular manner, could adversely affect the market value of the Bonds.
It cannot be predicted whether any such regulatory action will be implemented, how any particular
litigation or judicial action will be resolved, or whether the Bonds or their market value would be affected
thereby. Purchasers of the Bonds should consult their tax advisors regarding any pending or proposed
legislation, regulatory initiatives or litigation. The opinions expressed by Bond Counsel are based upon
existing legislation and regulations as interpreted by relevant judicial and regulatory authorities as of the
date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, and Bond Counsel has expressed no opinion as of any date
subsequent thereto or with respect to any pending legislation, regulatory initiatives or litigation.
LITIGATION
The City is party to legal proceedings which occur in government operations and include claims
for property damage and personal injury, contract disputes, discrimination claims and property
condemnation proceedings. The legal proceedings, in the opinion of the City management, based on the
advice of the City Attorney, are not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the City’s financial
position at June 30, 2013, after giving effect to available funds provided for such contingencies in the
Judgment, Cash Reserve and Contingent Liability Reserve Funds and alternative methods of satisfying
judgments, these being identified as:
—City’s authority to levy under Judgment Fund set by Home Rule Charter.
—State Statute, Section 77-1620 R.R.S. 1943, which authorizes a special levy for
payment of judgments.
—State Statute, Section 13-918 R.R.S. 1943, which authorizes the City to borrow money
from the State to satisfy certain judgments.
In addition to amounts recorded by the City as other accrued liabilities, the City Attorney is of the
opinion that there is a reasonable possibility that the City will incur additional losses on these lawsuits of
approximately $6,526,000.
Fire Union Lawsuits
For a discussion of certain litigation and other developments involving the City and the Fire
Union, see “POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM–Current Developments” in Appendix B.
17
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The comprehensive annual financial report of the City as of and for the year ended December 31,
2012 included as Part Two of Appendix B has been audited by KPMG LLP, independent certified public
accountants, as stated in their report appearing therein.
CERTIFICATION AS TO OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City of Omaha, Nebraska, will furnish a certificate signed on its behalf by Allen Herink,
Acting Finance Director of the City of Omaha, and delivered concurrently with the delivery of the Bonds,
to the effect that at the date of this Official Statement and at the date of delivery of the Bonds, (i) the
information and statements, including financial statements, of or pertaining to the City, contained in this
Official Statement were and are correct in all material respects; and (ii) insofar as the City and its affairs,
including its financial affairs, are concerned, this Official Statement did not and does not contain an
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made,
not misleading. The City, by such certificate, will further confirm to the effect that insofar as the
descriptions and statements, including financial data, contained in the Official Statement of or pertaining
to nongovernmental bodies or governmental bodies other than the City are concerned, such descriptions,
statements and data have been obtained from sources believed by the City to be reliable, and that the City
has no reason to believe that they are untrue or incomplete in any material respect.
The execution and delivery of this Official Statement have been duly authorized by the City as of
the date shown on the cover hereof.
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
By: /s/ Jean Stothert
Mayor
[This page left blank intentionally.]
APPENDIX A
CITY OF OMAHA— SELECTED ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Omaha MSA Population and Employment
Population1
Non-Farm
Employment2
2000 767,140 441,600
2001 775,251 444,500
2002 782,158 439,400
2003 790,252 440,700
2004 800,155 441,900
2005 810,155 448,800
2006 819,073 456,800
2007 827,666 463,600
2008 837,925 469,800
2009 828,855 459,500
2010 865,350 457,300
2011 877,171 461,300
2012 885,624 467,400
______________________ 1 Source: U.S. Census Bureau
2 Source: Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics..
Omaha MSA (Eight Counties) Non-Farm Employment
Industry Average for 2012 Average for 2013*
Number % of Total Number % of Total
Mining, Logging and Construction 21,100 4.5% 21,800 4.7%
Manufacturing 31,300 6.7 31,500 6.7
Trade, Transportation and Utilities 93,800 20.1 92,700 19.8
Information 11,400 2.4 11,300 2.4
Financial Activities 41,600 8.9 41,700 8.9
Professional and Business Services 66,700 14.3 66,400 14.2
Education and Healthcare Services 73,100 15.6 74,000 15.8
Leisure and Hospitality 45,600 9.8 45,800 9.8
Other Services 17,400 3.7 17,400 3.7
Government 65,500 14.0 65,400 14.0
Total Non-Farm Employment 467,400 100.0% 467,900 100.0%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: State and Area Employment, Hours and Earnings
* For seventh month period ending July 31, 2013
A-2
Omaha MSA Personal Income (per capita)
Year Personal Income
Per Capita
Personal Income
U.S. Per Capita
Personal Income
2000 $24,935,879 $32,414 $26,206
2001 25,905,005 33,376 27,179
2002 26,879,221 34,304 28,127
2003 27,922,390 35,252 29,201
2004 29,683,944 36,956 30,700
2005 31,076,985 38,164 31,763
2006 33,391,162 40,476 33,591
2007 35,244,303 42,231 34,829
2008 37,175,293 43,988 36,104
2009 35,538,239 41,505 35,598
2010 36,986,509 42,606 36,296
2011 39,005,295 44,470 37,776
2012 N/A N/A 38,965
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, SA1-3, CA1-3.
Omaha MSA1 Net Taxable Sales
Year
Total Net
Taxable Sales (000)
Net Taxable Sales
of Motor Vehicles (000)
2000 $7,006,016 $970,867
2001 7,241,327 1,133,659
2002 7,331,540 1,164,841
2003 7,667,430 1,171,888
2004 8,365,580 1,124,848
2005 8,669,035 1,055,036
2006 8,796,364 1,013,663
20072 9,116,077 1,092,087
2008 9,235,201 1,093,682
2009 8,974,240 1,093,115
2010 9,242,676 1,152,824
2011 9,639,416 1,224,889
2012 9,813,262 1,317,213
Source: Nebraska Department of Revenue. 1 Includes the five Nebraska Counties in the eight County MSA.
2 Nebraska Counties of MSA (Cass, Douglas, Sarpy, Washington, Saunders (1997-present)) through October 2007.
A-3
Value of Building Permits—City of Omaha
Year Amount Year Amount
2000 $473,849,942 2007 $663,007,432
2001 1,558,867,305 2008 795,783,313
2002 701,502,687 2009 511,966,409
2003 633,542,187 2010 530,331,594
2004 623,481,197 2011 477,008,844
2005 673,153,699 2012 560,651,422
2006 605,536,231 2013 460,016,875*
Source: Division of Permits and Inspections, City of Omaha.
* Through June 30, 2013
Largest Employers—City of Omaha Metro Area
April 2013
Company Product/Service Number of Employees
Offutt Air Force Base* National Security 8,879
Alegent Health Healthcare 8,600
Omaha Public Schools Education 7,239
The Nebraska Medical Center Healthcare 5,600
Methodist Health System Healthcare 5,500
University of Nebraska Medical Center Healthcare 4,974
First Data Corp. Transaction Processing 4,900
Union Pacific Corp. Railroad 4,500
Hy-Vee Inc. Supermarkets 3,963
First National Bank of Omaha Banking 3,707
West Corp. Telemarketing 3,600
Walmart Stores Store 3,500
ConAgra Foods Food products 3,300
Mutual of Omaha Insurance 3,235
Creighton University Education 3,010
University of Nebraska at Omaha Education 3,000
Millard Public Schools Education 2,719
City of Omaha Administration 2,562
PayPal Transaction Processing 2,500
Omaha Public Power District Energy 2,300
Located in Sarpy County (immediately south of Omaha).
Source: Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce Top 25 Employer List, (Ranked by Number of Employees).
[This page left blank intentionally.]
APPENDIX B
CITY OF OMAHA—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Part One
Selected City of Omaha Financial Information
Part Two
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(December 31, 2012)
[This page left blank intentionally.]
APPENDIX B
CITY OF OMAHA—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART ONE
Selected City of Omaha Financial Information
B-2
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
GENERAL FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUE,
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Five Years ended December 31, 2012
Revenue: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
General Property Tax $61,795,651 $64,773,742 $70,912,516 $75,955,957 $79,123,615
Motor Vehicle Taxes 9,374,405 9,299,184 9,309,995 9,068,784 9,163,518
City sales & use tax 121,532,796 121,309,926 126,138,188 124,935,836 131,859,046
Business taxes 33,830,794 33,664,179 38,143,460 60,024,570 62,170,182
Taxes in lieu 5,817,788 6,779,901 4,474,712 4,649,772 3,956,031
Licenses & permits 8,155,504 7,125,362 7,935,989 7,532,462 8,417,387
Intergovernmental revenue 3,619,494 3,541,861 3,421,652 1,903,495 (480)
Charges for services 19,842,674 19,946,262 21,961,139 19,862,579 20,613,005
Investment income 3,847,009 1,195,845 646,181 1,149,584 682,977
Rents & royalties 104,961 130,130 1,118,960 1,017,478 965,061
Miscellaneous 1,685,643 1,331,891 469,175 1,198,139 107,663
Total Revenue $269,606,719 $269,098,283 $284,531,967 $307,298,656 $317,058,005
Expenditures
Legislative & Executive $2,540,850 $2,597,111 $2,621,519 $2,729,891 $2,942,295
Law, Personnel & Human Relations 5,824,839 5,661,845 5,892,037 5,988,295 6,118,347
Finance 2,276,814 2,480,074 2,417,849 2,814,410 3,282,205
Planning 6,612,669 6,603,010 6,633,359 7,021,676 7,095,017
Parks, Recreation & Public Property 17,887,259 16,977,290 18,134,827 17,749,191 18,538,311
Fire 74,905,411 74,257,000 71,977,607 80,849,513 78,719,244
Police 93,597,942 93,603,374 100,729,317 110,185,046 115,622,102
Public Works 14,988,397 15,588,063 16,731,652 15,318,718 17,780,113
Public Library 8,173,587 8,098,422 9,874,149 10,420,102 10,660,030
Employee Benefits 19,359,233 22,005,057 20,289,850 19,248,137 19,449,521
Agency &Other Accounts 24,771,326 27,598,496 29,172,082 34,720,357 31,916,831
Total Expenditures $270,938,327 $275,469,742 $284,474,248 $307,045,336 $312,124,016
Excess (deficit) of revenues
over expenditures: (1,331,608) (6,371,459) 57,719 253,320 4,933,989
Other sources:
Operating transfers and
encumbrance adjustments (net) 545,751 2,475,349 1,084,595 2,460,993 1,410,550
Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over expenditures & other sources
(uses) of financial resources* (785,857) (3,896,110) 1,142,314 2,714,313 6,344,539
Fund balance, beginning of year 6,555,432 5,769,575 1,873,465 3,015,779 5,730,092
Fund balance, end of year $5,769,575 $1,873,465 $3,015,779 $5,730,092 $12,074,631
Source: Records of the Finance Department, City of Omaha
*City of Omaha's procedure in General Fund budgeting is as follows: at the end of each fiscal year the excess, if any, of revenues and adjustments over
expenditures and encumbrances is determined. Any such excess, less extraordinary transfers out, if any, is used as the initial credit to the General Fund Budget
for the second year following the year in which the excess has arisen. The year-end fund balance of $12,074,631 is the sum of the 2010 to 2012 carryover of $2,714,313 and the 2012 to 2014 carryover of $9,360,318.
B-3
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
DEBT SERVICE FUND* STATEMENT OF REVENUE,
EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
Five Years Ended December 31, 2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
REVENUE:
Taxes $44,536,697 $46,832,517 $52,067,867 $51,383,865 $53,660,317
In-lieu-of taxes 74,594 74,607 56,027 197,923 196,169
Interest income 252,097 214,294 437,998 356,304 966,136
Parking fees 1,328,971 945,928 1,398,895 1,312,672 1,099,677
Seat tax 544,927 360,975 457,758 401,049 416,817
State turn back revenue 2,404,735 2,380,069 3,544,079 2,693,907 3,292,609
Contributions from annexed areas 10,568,138 491,410 163,248 3,259,230 2,161,516
Build America Bond Credits - - 227,781 309,704 253,440
Total revenue and contributions $59,710,159 $51,299,800 $58,353,653 $59,914,654 $62,046,680
EXPENDITURES:
Outside services:
Professional fees & liabilities $2,071,744 $1,151,204 $550,778.00 $338,170 $664,677
Collection fees 446,385 342,458 579,338.00 506,057 554,322
Total outside services 2,518,129 1,493,662 1,130,116 844,227 1,218,999
General obligation bonds:
Interest expense 28,463,687 27,786,112 25,072,592 24,262,597 23,226,637
Bonds retired 109,871,890 76,393,269 67,332,307 43,297,591 77,149,260
Total general obligation bonds 138,335,577 104,179,381 92,404,899 67,560,189 100,375,897
Total expenditures $140,853,706 $105,673,043 $93,535,015 $68,404,416 $101,594,896
Deficit of revenues and contributions
under expenditures
(81,143,547) (54,373,243) (35,181,362) (8,489,762) (39,548,216)
Other Financing sources :
Refunding bonds 83,628,251 48,886,711 38,385,126 10,391,684 39,641,871
Excess (deficit) of revenues and
contributions over (under) expenditures
and other financing sources 2,484,704 (5,486,532) 3,203,764 1,901,922 93,655
Fund balance at beginning of year: 16,491,540 18,976,244 13,489,712 16,693,476 18,595,398
Fund balance at end of year: $18,976,244 $13,489,712 $16,693,476 $18,595,398 $18,689,053
*This fund was created by the City Charter and is sustained by a separate debt service fund property tax levy. Its purpose is to accumulate resources for
servicing the general obligation bonded debt of the City. The actual property tax revenues are derived from a levy of 17.581 cents per one hundred dollars of taxable valuation in 2008, 2009 and 19.281 in 2010, 2011 and 2012.
B-4
CITY OF OMAHA SPECIAL TAX REVENUE REDEVELOPMENT AND
SPECIAL OBLIGATION DEBT SERVICE FUND
Five Years Ended December 31, 2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Revenues:
Property tax revenue (redevelopment levy) $2,266,497 $2,386,049 $4,175,584 $4,258,621 $4,428,183
Tax allocation revenue 2,270,964 1,975,044 1,841,934 1,775,251 1,839,814
State cigarette tax 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Douglas County Miller Park contribution 141,177 141,177 141,177 141,177 141,177
Naming rights convention center 825,000 825,000 825,000 825,000 825,000
Land sales 77,500 850,000 - - -
Refunding Bonds\Other Income 40,596,567 75,119 87,548 90,279 126,735
Investment Earnings - - - 192,704 35,135
Sewer Revenue Fees* 1,518,584 1,517,163 1,515,164 1,515,196 1,513,723
Total revenues $49,196,289 $9,269,552 $10,086,406 $10,298,228 $10,409,766
Expenditures:
Agency and other accounts $ 56,122 $ 163,898 $ 52,923 $ 40,918 $ 42,940
Principal payment 35,949,182 3,172,837 3,566,492 3,690,878 51,862,452
Interest 5,454,753 5,733,379 5,892,020 5,763,433 5,744,790
Sewer Special Obligation debt service* 1,518,584 1,517,163 1,515,164 1,515,196 1,513,723
Professional fees 6,330,887 95,027 6,785 24,121 11,488
Total expenditures $49,309,528 $10,682,304 $11,033,384 $11,034,546 $59,175,393
Deficit of revenues under expenditures (113,239) (1,412,752) (946,978) (736,318) (48,765,627)
Other Financing Sources-Refunding Bonds - - - - 48,667,076
Deficit of revenues and contributions under
expenditures and other financing sources (113,239) (1,412,752) (946,978) (736,318) (98,551)
Fund balance, beginning of year: 7,107,528 6,994,289 5,581,537 4,634,559 3,898,242
Fund balance, end of year $6,994,289 $5,581,537 $4,634,559 $3,898,242 $3,799,690
This redevelopment levy is used to pay bond and interest payments on Redevelopment Bonds. The levy for 2008 and 2009 was 0.894 cents per $100 of
taxable valuation. The levy for 2010, 2011 and 2012 is 1.594 cents. The State Development Law authorizes a taxing authority of 2.6 cents on each $100
upon actual value of all taxable property in the City. The Omaha Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment and Special Obligation Debt Service Fund services
the following issuances:
Name Maturity Date
Performing Arts Redevelopment 2004** 2014
Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2007 2027
Special Tax & Tax Allocation Revenue Redevelopment 2007 A 2016
2008 Redevelopment Refunding (Stockyards & Downtown) 2013
2008 Special Obligation Refunding ( Riverfront ) 2026
Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2008* 2028
Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2009 A 2029
2012 Special Obligation Refunding (Riverfront)* 2032
Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment Refunding Series 2012A 2032
Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment Refunding Series 2012B 2018
Performing Arts Refunding Redevelopment 2012 2024
The 2012 Special Obligation Refunding Bonds and the 2008 Special Obligation Refunding Bonds are serviced by a variety of revenue sources including Property Tax Revenue,
Tax Allocation Revenue, State Cigarette Tax, NRD Miller Park Contribution, Douglas County Miller Park Contribution, Sewer Fees and Land Sales.
*The debt service for the sewer-related portion of the 2008 and 2012 Special Obligation Bonds is paid directly from the Sewer Revenue Enterprise Fund.
**The City recently refunded the principal amount of this issue with the Performing Arts Refunding Redevelopment Bonds 2012 listed above. The bonds of this issue maturing
in 2013 and 2014 will be paid at maturity.
B-5
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
THROUGH JUNE 30, 2013
2013 Actual Projected Projected Over
Budgeted 6/30/2013 12/31/2013 (Under) Budget
Revenues:
General Property Tax $79,089,535 $45,565,135 $79,089,535 $ -
Motor Vehicle Taxes 9,408,238 4,328,996 10,189,122 780,884
City Sales and Use Tax 135,461,322 63,891,525 128,144,631 (7,316,691)
Business Taxes 35,893,995 14,964,215 33,997,039 (1,896,956)
Restaurant Tax 25,645,594 9,377,816 25,260,910 (384,684)
Tobacco Tax - 1,164,459 2,498,596 2,498,596
Licenses and Permits 8,393,549 4,955,808 8,674,559 281,010
Intergovernmental Revenues 4,551,742 1,665,675 5,366,412 814,670
Charges for Services 17,004,178 7,632,573 16,990,050 (14,128)
Investment Income 1,175,000 330,789 700,000 (475,000)
Miscellaneous Other Revenue 2,396,075 630,025 2,823,675 427,600
Prior Year General Fund Balance 2,714,312 2,714,312 2,714,312 -
Total General Fund Revenue $321,733,540 $157,221,328 $316,448,841 $(5,284,699)
Expenditures:
Legislative & Executive $2,947,195 $1,400,230 $2,876,048 $(71,147)
Law, Personnel & Human Relations 6,542,841 3,022,528 6,278,902 (263,939)
Finance 3,310,805 1,486,355 3,181,197 (129,608)
Planning 7,277,275 3,309,133 6,916,671 (360,604)
Parks, Recreation & Public Property 18,708,414 8,395,014 18,355,424 (352,990)
Fire 82,392,215 43,233,832 88,900,358 6,508,143
Police 121,272,730 55,531,576 118,836,991 (2,435,739)
Public Works 19,215,341 8,958,605 17,917,210 (1,298,131)
Public Library & Convention & Tourism 9,790,614 5,041,652 9,302,279 (488,335)
Benefits 22,394,480 8,346,060 20,526,764 (1,867,716)
Outside Agency Accounts 20,422,870 5,385,423 21,443,759 1,020,889
Contingency and Other Accounts 7,458,760 1,840,139 7,218,710 (240,050)
Total General Fund Expenditures $321,733,540 $145,950,547 $321,754,313 $20,773
Excess Revenues over Expenditures
(5,305,472)
Projected 2013 General Fund Budget Carryover Reserve $(5,305,472)
Source: Unaudited records and projections of the Finance Department, City of Omaha as of June 30, 2013. These records and projections have not been
reviewed by the City's outside auditors: projections are projections only. Actual results based on the 2013 year-end audit may differ significantly.
B-6
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET AND 2014 BUDGET
2013 2014
Budget Budget
Revenues:
Property Tax $ 79,089,535 $ 78,934,554
Motor Vehicle Tax 9,408,238 9,750,000
City Sales Tax (netted against LB 775) 135,461,322 135,404,522
Business Tax 35,893,995 39,757,243
Licenses and Permits 8,393,549 8,365,000
Intergovernmental Revenues 4,676,742 4,690,000
Charges for Service 17,129,778 24,778,609
Investment Income 1,175,000 800,000
Rents & Royalties 631,600 166,000
Restaurant Tax 25,645,594 27,677,874
Miscellaneous 1,513,875 833,000
Initial Credit 2,714,312 9,360,317
Total Revenue $ 321,733,540 $ 340,517,119
Expenditures:
Legislative & Executive $ 2,947,195 $ 2,855,491
Law, Human Resources & Human Relations 6,544,474 6,419,514
Finance 3,310,805 3,472,178
Planning 7,277,275 7,431,055
Police 121,272,730 124,148,422
Fire 70,575,115 90,615,765
Parks, Recreation and Public Property 18,708,414 18,625,727
Public Works 19,215,341 18,792,599
Library 9,290,614 10,464,250
Convention and Tourism 500,000 400,000
Other Budgetary Accounts - Benefits 22,394,480 21,843,823
Other Budgetary Accounts - Other 34,289,736 29,225,400
Other Budgetary Accounts - Debt Service 5,407,361 6,222,895
Total Expenditures $ 321,733,540 $ 340,517,119
The major portion of the City's day-to-day operations, some annual Capital Improvements, and various
lease-purchase agreements are financed by the General Fund. Appropriations are also made from the
fund for operating the Public Library System. Further appropriations are provided for the City's
contribution to employee benefit plans including pension systems, hospitalization and life insurance,
and social security taxes.
2014 Budget projections anticipate an increase of $18,783,579 over the 2013 budget, or an increase of
5.84%.
B-7
DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
The annual debt service requirements on all outstanding City of Omaha general obligation bonds,
as of January 1, 2013, net of the debt service requirements on the Refunded Bonds, are shown below,
together with the annual debt service requirements on the City of Omaha Various Purpose and Refunding
Bonds, Series 2013A.
Debt Service
on
Outstanding
Bonds after
Refunding Plus Debt Service on Various Purpose and
Refunding Bonds, Series 2013A
For Year
Ending
December
31
Total
Principal
and Interest
Principal Interest
Total
Principal
and Interest
Total Debt
Service
2013 $63,336,630 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 63,336,630
2014 58,384,025 2,720,000 993,962 3,713,962 62,097,987
2015 55,816,391 3,460,000 793,281 4,253,281 60,069,673
2016 54,410,688 2,780,000 689,481 3,469,481 57,880,169
2017 52,514,984 1,550,000 606,081 2,156,081 54,671,065
2018 48,409,979 1,495,000 563,456 2,058,456 50,468,435
2019 45,993,544 1,525,000 531,056 2,056,056 48,049,600
2020 44,252,218 1,415,000 485,306 1,900,306 46,152,524
2021 42,295,188 1,445,000 428,706 1,873,706 44,168,894
2022 40,631,372 715,000 370,906 1,085,906 41,717,279
2023 37,561,085 715,000 342,306 1,057,306 38,618,392
2024 35,713,615 715,000 313,706 1,028,706 36,742,321
2025 33,189,812 715,000 285,106 1,000,106 34,189,918
2026 28,981,380 715,000 256,506 971,506 29,952,886
2027 27,367,698 715,000 231,481 946,481 28,314,180
2028 5,511,436 715,000 195,731 910,731 6,422,167
2029 4,459,937 715,000 163,556 878,556 5,338,493
2030 3,083,825 715,000 131,381 846,381 3,930,206
2031 1,979,119 715,000 98,313 813,313 2,792,431
2032 1,239,088 715,000 64,350 779,350 2,018,438
2033 0.00 715,000 30,388 745,388 745,388
TOTALS $685,132,013 $24,970,000 $7,575,062 $32,545,062 $717,677,075
B-8
PROPERTY VALUATIONS AND DEBT RATIOS
As of December 31, 2012
2009 2010 2011 2012
Actual Valuation $27,077,712,200 $26,889,903,480 $27,483,461,735 $27,913,680,440
Net Direct General
Obligation Bonded
Debt $532,339,481 $509,486,524 $500,154,602 $498,105,711
% of Net Direct General
Obligation Bonded Debt
to Actual Valuation 1.97% 1.89% 1.82% 1.78%
Source: Records of Accounting Department, Office of the Douglas County Clerk.
Population, Net General Bonded Debt and Per Capita Debt
Year Population1
Net Direct
General Obligation
Bonded Debt2,3
Per Capita
Net Direct
General Obligation
Bonded Debt
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
251,117
301,598
346,929
313,911
335,795
390,007
404,516
408,202
412,679
417,702
423,255
428,263
432,791
438,791
454,731
409,850
416,855
419,041
$ 11,100,500
30,697,871
71,586,248
73,939,298
115,435,013
408,103,671
423,338,935
417,421,740
421,869,470
439,551,010
465,864,465
464,368,152
520,334,932
539,312,795
532,339,481
509,486,524
500,154,602
498,105,711
$ 44.00
102.00
206.00
236.00
344.00
1,046.00
1,047.00
1,023.00
1,022.00
1,052.00
1,101.00
1,084.00
1,202.00
1,229.00
1,171.00
1,246.00
1,200.00
1,189.00 1Source: United States Census and Metropolitan Area Planning Agency, City of Omaha. 2Records of the Finance Department, City of Omaha. 3In 1982, the City of Omaha inaugurated a new annexation policy. The current annexation policy is designed to create annual,
balanced annexation packages and establish consistency from year to year. Such annexation packages combine areas with
relatively high outstanding indebtedness in relation to assessed valuation with other areas that have a more positive financial
picture. These balanced packages can then be added to the City without tax increase to cover retirement of the additional debt
assumed by the City. Under this approach, Omaha has grown by approximately 105,130 people and 41 square miles as a result
of annexations since 1980.
B-9
OVERLAPPING DEBT
Listed below are the political subdivisions which have the power to levy taxes and the amount of
net bonded indebtedness of each, as reported to the State of Nebraska Auditor of Public Accounts on
December 17, 2012, applicable to the taxable property within the City of Omaha:
Bonds Outstanding % Applicable to
City of Omaha
Amount
Applicable
Douglas County1 $ 70,185,000 76.25% $ 53,516,062
Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission2 34,770,000 76.25 26,512,125
School District of Omaha3 264,281,949 85.91 227,044,622
School District of Ralston3 27,449,600 72.78 19,977,818
School District of Millard3 127,665,000 62.65 79,982,122
School District of Elkhorn3 141,895,000 49.24 69,869,098
Westside Community Schools 23,745,000 100.00 23,745,000
Total $689,991,549 $500,646,847
1 Douglas County, under various lease purchase agreements, is obligated to provide for annual rental payments. The annual
payments on those lease purchase agreements, mostly short-term, are in each case $500,000 or less. 2 Payable from certain property tax revenues and payments to be made to it by the City of Omaha and Douglas County under
certain contractual agreements. Actual rental payments by the City for 2012 were $1,583,353. The Act authorizing issuance of
bonds by the Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission (the “Commission”) permits the Commission to levy a tax of $0.017
per $100 of actual valuation on all the taxable property in Douglas County; the levy for 2012-13 is $0.013 per $100 of actual
valuation. However, although the same Act authorizes the City to levy a tax on all the taxable property in the City, except
intangible property, of $0.017 per $100 of actual valuation in excess of the Charter limitation described under “AUTHORITY TO
LEVY TAXES,” if and to the extent necessary to make the City’s payments to the Commission, no such levy has ever been made
by the City for such purpose. 3 Tax levies for general obligation bond sinking fund purposes are unlimited as to amount. Residents of the City reside in one of
the five school districts and pay taxes only to that school district and the Learning Community. These numbers represent bonds
outstanding as of August 31, 2012.
The City’s ratio of direct and overlapping debt ($1,056,211,230) to its 2012 property valuation
($27,913,680,440) is 3.78%.
LONG-TERM CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS
The City of Omaha, under certain existing contractual agreements (including lease purchase
agreements), is obligated to provide for annual payments which are a charge on the General Fund and the
Parking Revenue Fund. From 2013 to 2036, the highest annual payment is $16,640,589 (in 2014), the
lowest is $7,435,015 (in 2036), and the average annual payment is $10,846,645. Such annual payments
are included as General Fund budgetary items for which annual appropriations are required. Under the
Charter of the City of Omaha, the outstanding amount of any lease purchase agreements executed by the
City as vendee or as lessee is not chargeable against the City debt limit.
B-10
City of Omaha and Local Authorities and Districts
Revenue and Special Obligation Bonds Outstanding1
as of December 31, 2012
City of Omaha:
Tax Increment Bonds and Notes $ 305,094,734
Special Tax Revenue Bonds 40,580,000
Highway Allocation Revenue Bonds 1,675,000
Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds 145,325,000
Special Obligation Bonds* 76,685,000
Omaha Public Power District 2,052,783,000
Airport Authority of the City of Omaha 23,940,375
Sanitary Sewerage System Revenue Bonds 212,040,000
Nebraska Department of Environmental Control Sewer Revenue Notes 13,071,421
Metropolitan Utilities District 180,601,259 _______________________ 1Revenue bond indebtedness is not general obligation debt of the City. Principal and interest are paid solely from revenues
arising from operations of the respective City facilities or of the Authority or District issuing such revenue bonds. No taxes are
levied for payment of either principal or interest. Nor are the Tax Increment Bonds and Notes and Special Tax Revenue Bonds
referred to above general obligations of the City. Principal and interest are paid (1) either from that portion of the ad valorem tax
on real property in a redevelopment project which is in excess of that portion of the ad valorem tax upon real property in such
redevelopment project produced by the levy at the rate fixed each year by or for each public body levying a tax in such
redevelopment project on the valuation for assessment of the taxable real property as last certified for the year prior to the
providing for division of such taxes pursuant to the redevelopment plan or (2) from special tax revenues collected pursuant to
redevelopment laws. *Including $17,252,935 principal amount payable from sewer revenues.
B-11
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX LEVIES IN THE CITY OF OMAHA
(Levied on Real and Tangible Personal Property)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
City of Omaha
Amount per $100 of actual Valuation
(Rounded to four decimals)
General Fund $.2431 $.2431 $.2611 $.2845 $.2845 $.2845
Debt Service Fund .1759 .1759 .1759 .1928 .1928 .1928
Judgment Fund .0060 .0060 .0060 .0060 .0060 .0060
Redevelopment Fund .0089 .0089 .0089 .0159 .0159 .0159
Total for City of Omaha $.4339 $.4339 $.4759 $.4992 $.4992 $.4992
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
(Amount per $100 of actual Valuation)
Other Taxing Units
Douglas County $ 0.24519 $ 0.26459 $ 0.26459 $ 0.26459 $ 0.26459
Library-(Unincorporated Areas Only) 0.01807 0.01553 0.01927 0.04791 0.00000
School District of Omaha1 1.20064 0.25572 0.25863 0.25909 0.25465
School District No. 66 of Douglas County1 1.25302 0.29106 0.32890 0.32890 0.35063
School District of Ralston1 1.29738 0.30785 0.32470 0.31280 0.32409
School District of Millard1 1.20997 0.25000 0.26000 0.26000 0.26000
School District of Elkhorn1 1.30499 0.34499 0.36500 0.36499 0.36499
State Educational Service Units2 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500
Omaha-Douglas Public Building
Commission 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300
Papio Missouri River Natural Resources
District 0.03375 0.03375 0.03275 0.03275 0.03275
Metropolitan Technical Community College 0.06740 0.08500 0.08500 0.08500 0.08500
Omaha Transit Authority 0.04613 0.04674 0.04872 0.04933 0.05027
Learning Community General3 - 0.96500 0.95125 0.96000 0.95000
Elementary Learning Center - 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.10000
1Residents in Omaha reside in one of the above five school districts and pay taxes only to that school district. 2Residents residing in school districts other than the School District of Omaha pay $0.01606 for years 2012-2013, $0.01609 for years 2011-2012,
$0.01618 for years 2009-10, $0.01642 for years 2008-09 and $0.01629 for years 2007-08. 3Comprised of all 11 school districts within Douglas and Sarpy Counties, the Learning Community implemented a common property tax levy among the 11 school districts with the purpose of helping distribute property tax revenue more evenly throughout the school districts in the area.
B-12
MAJOR TAXPAYERS
The following are firms located within the City of Omaha with real estate valuations in excess of
$25,000,000 as of June 27, 2013.
Taxpayer Value of Real Property
FIRST DATA RESOURCES INC $108,122,000
OAK VIEW MALL LLC 103,206,100
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INS 95,101,200
WESTROADS MALL LLC 92,602,800
168TH AND DODGE LP 90,337,700
NEBRASKA FURNITURE MART 66,198,500
IRET-MR9 LLC 54,360,600
COMMERCIAL FED SAV & LOAN 48,357,800
CLF LANDMARK OMAHA LLC 46,177,800
SFI LTD PARTNERSHIP 45,325,000
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUS TR 45,146,800
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OMAHA 44,258,000
TARGET CORPORATION 41,888,600
EM OMAHA OWNER LLC 40,368,700
ALEGENT HEALTH 40,098,100
WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INS 40,000,000
OMAHA PLAZA INVESTMENTS LLC 36,287,300
WACHOVIA DEVELOPMENT CO 35,524,000
CAGR LLC 34,761,700
BISHOP CLARKSON MEMORIAL HOSP 33,396,300
GUARANTEE MUTUAL LIFE 31,132,000
WELLS FARGO BANK NEBRASKA 31,074,300
WEST TELESERVICES CORP 30,500,000
OMAHA MARKETPLACE HOLDINGS LLC 30,451,200
WESTPLEX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 30,060,300
CONNECTICUT NATL BANK TR 30,000,000
AIRLITE PLASTICS CO 29,921,600
CONAGRA FOODS INC 29,245,000
LOZIER CORP 29,151,000
REGENCY LAKESIDE ASSOC LLC 28,750,800
IRET PROPERTIES 28,652,300
WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS 28,398,300
FIRST NATL OF NEBR INC 28,216,300
BUCKS INC 26,690,800
VK BLONDO PROPERTIES LP 25,890,300
WIESMAN DEVELOPMENT LLC 25,508,900
Source: Records of the Tax Control Supervisor, Office of the Douglas County Clerk
B-13
DEBT MANAGEMENT
General Obligation Debt Margin
Article V, Section 5.27, Home Rule Charter of the City of Omaha, 1956, as amended, provides:
The total amount of general obligation indebtedness outstanding at any time, which shall
include bonds issued but shall not include bonds authorized until they are issued, shall
not exceed 3.5 per cent of the actual value of taxable real and personal property in the
city.
Computation of the general obligation debt margin as defined in the Home Rule Charter, based
upon valuations, reflects the following:
Maximum debt limit (3.5% of total assessed valuation) $976,978,815
General obligation bonds outstanding 516,794,764
Less balance in General Obligation Debt
Service Fund December 31, 2012
(18,689,053) (498,105,711)
General obligation debt margin $478,873,104
Revenue bond indebtedness, special obligation bonds, general obligation notes and
lease-purchase agreements are not chargeable against the general obligation debt margin. The City of
Omaha has no general obligation notes outstanding. Revenue and special obligation bond indebtedness
and lease purchase agreement obligations are set forth herein under the captions “OVERLAPPING
DEBT” and “LONG-TERM CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS—City of Omaha and Local Authorities
and Districts Revenue and Special Obligation Bonds Outstanding.”
Debt Payment Record
The City of Omaha has never defaulted on its obligations to pay principal of or interest on its
indebtedness.
General Obligation Bonds Authorized But Unissued
Not including the applicable portion of the Bonds, the City has $68,371,000 of general obligation
bonds authorized but unissued which were approved by the City electorate on May 11, 2010. The City
anticipates that these bonds will be issued in varying amounts annually through 2016.
CASH RESERVE FUND
At a special City election held on November 6, 1984, voters of the City approved an amendment
to Section 5.03 of the City Charter to provide in subsection (10) for the establishment of a cash reserve
fund (“Cash Reserve Fund”) for the purpose of meeting emergencies arising from:
(a) the loss or partial loss of a revenue source;
(b) an unanticipated expenditure demand due to a natural disaster, casualty loss or
act of God;
B-14
(c) expenditure demand for the satisfaction of judgments and litigation expenses
when the Judgment Levy Fund balance is inadequate; or
(d) conditions wherein serious loss of life, health or property is threatened or has
occurred.
The 1984 amendment to the City Charter authorized the appropriation at the close of any fiscal
year for credit to the Cash Reserve Fund of any amount, or portion thereof, held as General Fund surplus.
Income earned on amounts credited to the Cash Reserve Fund is retained in the fund. The maximum size
of the Cash Reserve Fund was established at an amount equal to 4% of General Fund appropriations.
The ordinance adopted by the City Council to close Fiscal 1984 Accounts provided that the sum
of $1,600,000 be transferred from 1984 available budgetary balances as the initial credit to the Cash
Reserve Fund to be held as provided in Section 5.03(10) of the City Charter. In 2012, $750,000 was
appropriated from the General Fund, leaving the balance as of December 31, 2012 of $4,044,945.
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS: RETIREMENT SYSTEMS
General
The City of Omaha negotiates with four major unions: The Civilian Management Professional
and Technical Employees Council; The Omaha City Employees, Local No. 251; The Omaha Association
of Firefighters, Local No. 385 (the “Fire Union”); and The Omaha Police Union, Local No. 1 (the “Police
Union”). Current agreements with the four unions expire or expired as follows: The Civilian
Management Professional and Technical Employees Council—December 22, 2012; Fire Union—
December 20, 2014; Omaha City Employees, Local No. 251—December 22, 2012; and Police Union,—
December 21, 2013. See “CITY OF OMAHA EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM—Current
Developments” regarding the status of contract negotiations between the City and the civilian bargaining
groups.
The negotiating procedure involves meeting with the designated union representatives and
discussing economic and noneconomic items regarding contractual agreements. At any time, should an
impasse be reached, Nebraska law provides that either party may appeal to the Nebraska Commission of
Industrial Relations. Either party may appeal the decision of such Commission to the Nebraska Supreme
Court, whose decision is final.
Investors should note that (i) the information included in herein relating to the City’s Uniform
Plan and Civilian Plan (each as hereinafter defined) relies on information produced by Cavanaugh
Macdonald Consulting, LLC (the “Actuary”), (ii) actuarial assessments are “forward-looking”
information that reflect the judgment of the fiduciaries of the plans, and (iii) actuarial assessments are
based upon a variety of assumptions, one or more of which may prove to be inaccurate or be changed in
the future, and will change with the future experience of plans. The City engaged Cavanaugh Macdonald
Consulting, LLC in 2011 pursuant to a request for proposal process. Cavanaugh replaced Milliman
Consultants and Actuaries as the City’s actuary as of that date.
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Valuations of the plans use the “entry age-normal” cost method. Under this actuarial method, the
value of future costs attributable to future employment of participants is determined. The value of future
costs attributable to past employment of participants, which is called the actuarial liability, is equal to the
present value of benefits less the present value of future normal costs. The unfunded actuarial liability is
B-15
equal to the excess of the actuarial liability over assets. The unfunded actuarial liability is funded as a
level percent of payroll over a 30-year closed period that began—in regards to the Civilian Plan on
January 1, 2002 and in regards to the Uniform Plan on January 1, 2003. The City’s annual Civilian Plan
and Uniform Plan expenses are calculated based on the annual required contribution of the employer
(“ARC”), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB 45. The ARC
represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year
and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years.
As experience develops with the plans, actuarial gains and actuarial losses result. These actuarial
gains and losses indicate the extent to which actual experience is deviating from that expected on the
basis of the actuarial assumptions. In each year, as they occur, actuarial gains and losses are recognized
in the unfunded actuarial liability as of the actuarial valuation date.
The plans use an asset-smoothing method in the actuarial valuation process. As a result, each
plan’s funded status and the targeted contribution are based on the actuarial (smoothed) value of assets –
not the actual market value. See the two tables below for a comparison of each plan’s Market Value of
Assets to its Actuarial Value of Assets.
CIVILIAN PLAN
Date Market Value of
Assets (MVA)
Actuarial Value of
Assets (AVA)
AVA /
MVA
1/1/2008 $294,658,022 $283,243,750 96.13%
1/1/2009 204,452,506 245,343,007 120.00%
1/1/2010 213,219,632 240,109,413 112.61%
1/1/2011 232,346,583 240,291,310 103.42%
1/1/2012 215,434,784 236,741,347 109.89%
1/1/2013 223,233,088 235,591,941 105.54%
UNIFORM PLAN
Date Market Value of
Assets (MVA)
Actuarial Value of
Assets (AVA)
AVA /
MVA 1/1/2008 $529,923,390 $530,493,413 100.1%
1/1/2009 365,923,877 439,108,652 120.0%
1/1/2010 405,390,038 440,478,409 108.7%
1/1/2011 452,640,303 456,158,774 100.8%
1/1/2012 440,429,392 467,375,458 106.1%
CITY OF OMAHA EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
The City of Omaha Employees’ Retirement System (the “Civilian Plan”) became effective on
January 1, 1949. Certain of its provisions, which are governed by Chapter 22.21 of the Omaha Municipal
Code, are summarized herein. The Civilian Plan is a single-employer defined benefit plan with a fiscal
year that ends December 31. Under the Civilian Plan, there are 1,152 active members, 1,002 retirees,
272 beneficiaries, 84 disabled members and 75 deferred vested members for a total of 2,585.
B-16
All city employees except the following are covered by the Civilian Plan: police; firefighters;
persons paid on a contractual or fee basis; seasonal, temporary and part-time employees; and elected
officials who do not make written application to the Civilian Plan. Prior service credit is granted for
employment with the City before January 1, 1949, and membership service credit is granted for
employment thereafter. Compulsory military duty and voluntary military duty in time of war count as
service.
Early retirement is permitted at age 50 with five years of service, with the accrued benefit
reduced 8% per year for retirement prior to age 60. For employees whose age plus service equals or
exceeds 80, the 8% per year reduction is eliminated. An employee’s monthly pension is equal to
2.25% of average final monthly compensation for each year of service.
The historical City contributions are as follows:
Fiscal Year
Ending
Annual Required
Contribution
(ARC)
(a)
Total Employer
Contribution
(b)
% of ARC
Contributed
(b/a)
12/31/2005 $6,877,913 $4,500,192 65.43%
12/31/2006 6,213,801 4,145,033 66.71%
12/31/2007 8,883,617 4,975,039 56.00%
12/31/2008 9,212,669 5,374,082 58.33%
12/31/2009 12,893,331 5,310,754 41.19%
12/31/2010 14,149,386 5,717,610 40.41%
12/31/2011 14,564,847 6,618,110 45.44%
12/31/2012 15,658,045 7,216,050 46.09%
Notes Regarding the above table: (1) The actuarial value of assets is determined based on a method that smoothes the effects of
short term volatility in the market value of investments. The actuarial value is equal to the expected value, based on the assumed
rate of return, plus 25% of the difference between market and expected values. A corridor of 80% to 120% of market value is
also applied; (2) Economic assumptions are as follows: (a) Investment return rate: 8.00%, (b) Salary increase rates: from 10% at
1 year of service to 4% at 20 years of service, (c) Inflation rate: 3.5%, (d) Payroll growth: 4.00%, (e) Post-retirement benefit
increases: Applicable after 5 years equal to the lesser of 3% or $50 per month for members (and their beneficiaries) who retired
on or before January 28, 1998; and (3) The amortization method is a closed 30-year period, level percentage of payroll (the
unfunded actuarial liability is amortized over 19 years as of January 1, 2013).
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
B-17
Following is a cash flow analysis of the Civilian Plan for the last five fiscal years:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Receipts
Employee Contributions $ 4,695,162 $ 4,638,593 $ 4,858,097 $5,628,888 $6,201,924
Employer Contributions 5,374,082 5,310,754 5,717,610 6,618,110 7,216,050
Investment Income (74,148,690) 25,385,457 36,420,500 (401,034) 24,485,826
Security Lending Income 131,023 151,792 29,994 16,808 44,131
Total Receipts $(63,948,423) $35,489,596 $47,026,201 $11,862,772 $37,947,931
Disbursements
Retirement Pensions $23,359,337 $24,583,957 $25,956,829 $26,789,295 $28,024,628
Death Benefits 256,610 149,633 175,000 148,333 201,667
Refunds 327,075 514,398 205,017 387,696 557,950
Other Disbursements 1,750,227 1,474,483 1,562,403 1,448,974 1,365,382
Total Disbursements 25,693,249 26,722,470 27,899,249 28,774,572 30,149,626
Excess of Receipts
Over Disbursements $(89,641,672) $ 8,767,126 $ 19,126,952 $(16,911,800) $7,798,304
Source: Records of Finance Department, City of Omaha.
Funding Status
Strong investment performance in 2009 and 2010 has helped reduce the deferred investment loss
from the 2008 fiscal year. However, despite returns in both 2009 and 2010 that were higher than the
expected return of 8%, the actuarial value of assets on January 1, 2012 was $21 million greater than the
market value of assets on the same date. The funded ratio of the Civilian Plan, on a market value basis,
has decreased from 52% in the January 1, 2009 actuarial valuation to 51.0% in the January 1, 2013
valuation. The Civilian Plan faces a significant challenge, as more fully discussed in the second
succeeding paragraph and under “Current Developments”, based on the contribution shortfall between the
actuarial contribution rate and the current fixed member and employer contribution rates.
The actuarial contribution rate of the Civilian Plan is composed of two parts:
(1) The normal cost (which is the allocation of costs attributed to the current year’s
membership service); and
(2) The amortization payment on the Unfunded Actuarial Liability.
The normal cost rate is independent of the Civilian Plan’s funded status and represents the cost,
as a percent of payroll, of the benefits provided by the Civilian Plan which is allocated to the current year
of service. The total normal cost for the Civilian Plan is 13.716% of pay, or about $8.0 million in the
2012 fiscal year. When offset by the expected employee contributions, the City portion of the normal
cost is 3.655% of pay, or about $2.2million. The normal cost represents the long-term cost of the benefit
structure of the Civilian Plan.
B-18
The Civilian Plan’s total actuarially determined contribution rate (payable as a percentage of
member payroll) increased by 2.563% of pay, to 37.561% on January 1, 2013, from 34.998% on
January 1, 2012. The Civilian Plan has an unfunded actuarial liability (“UAL”) of $201 million (actuarial
liability is greater than actuarial assets). The UAL is being funded over a closed 30-year period beginning
January 1, 2002 of which 19 years remain as of the valuation date. The resulting UAL payment is
23.831% of pay. As a result, the total contribution for 2013 is 37.561% of pay (13.730% + 23.831% The
City’s required contribution rate in the city ordinance for 2013 is 11.775% and the employees
contribution rate is 10.075%, which results in a contribution shortfall for 2013 of 15.711% of pay. Based
on the projections in the actuarial study and in light of the City’s and employees’ contribution shortfalls,
the Civilian Plan will not achieve full funding in the absence of negotiated changes to the Civilian Plan’s
funding rates or benefits package. See “CITY OF OMAHA EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM –
Current Developments.”
The latest Civilian Plan actuarial study by the Actuary was for the period ended January 1, 2013
and included an 8.0% investment rate of return assumption. The City expects the Actuary to prepare an
annual actuarial study updating the information herein. Summarized below is financial information
concerning the Civilian Plan for the last six fiscal years.
Actuarial
Valuation Date1
Market Value of
Assets2
(a)
Actuarial
Liability (AAL)
(b)
Unfunded AAL
(UAAL)
(b-a)
Funded Ratio
(a / b)
Covered Payroll
(P / R)
(c)
UAAL as a
Percentage of
Covered P / R
[(b-a) / c] 12/31/2008 $204,500,000 $387,700,000 $183,200,000 52.7% $56,400,000 324.8%
12/31/2009 213,200,000 402,800,000 189,600,000 52.9% 55,700,000 340.4%
12/31/2010 232,400,000 414,500,000 182,100,000 56.1% 56,700,000 321.2%
1/1/2011 240,291,310 409,442,601 169,151,291 58.7% 59,235,591 285.6%
1/1/2012 236,741,347 420,810,359 184,069,012 56.3% 62,825,685 293.0%
1/1/2013 235,591,941 436,270,409 200,678,468 54.0% 63,327,394 316.9%
(1) Results prior to 2011 were provided by the City’s prior actuary and were reported at the end of the year rather than the valuation date.
(2) The prior actuary reported the market value of assets in column (a). The Actuary applied the valuation date methodology for GASB calculations to the
extent the methodology complies with GASB 25 parameters. Information reported as of 1/1/2011 and later accordingly reflects the valuation methodology including the actuarial value of assets.
The City’s annual pension cost and net pension obligation to the Civilian Plan for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2012 are as follows:
City of Omaha Employees’ Retirement System
Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation
December 31, 2012
Annual required contribution (ARC) $ 15,658,045
Interest on net pension asset 3,322,571
Adjustment to annual required contribution (3,016,754)
Annual pension cost 15,963,862
Contributions made (7,216,050)
Increase in net pension obligation 8,747,812
Net pension obligation, beginning of year 41,532,143
Net pension obligation, end of year $50,279,955
B-19
Three-year trend information is as follows:
Fiscal
Year
Ending
Annual
Required
Contribution
(ARC)
Percentage
of ARC
Contributed
Net
Pension
Obligation
12/31/2012 $15,658,045 46% $50,279,955
12/31/2011 $14,564,847 45% $41,532,143
12/31/2010 $14,149,386 41% $32,263,609
Asset Allocation
The Pension Board of the Civilian Plan with the recommendation from its investment committee
approves fund manager agreements. Such management agreements provide specific investment
requirements. Updated investment guidelines were adopted by the Civilian Plan in February 2011.
Under the Civilian Plan’s investment guidelines the target range for fixed income assets is between 12%
and 28% of the portfolio value; equity investments shall be 25.5 – 54.0% of the portfolio with large cap
domestics (6.5 – 13.5%), small cap domestics (9.6 – 20.0%), and international equities (9.5 – 20.5%).
Domestic real estate securities shall be 9.5 – 20.5% of the portfolio. The investments may be held
individually or commingled in mutual funds and investment pools. There are no individual investments
greater than 5% with a single issuer. See the table below for a breakdown of investment type and
accompanying asset value:
Investment Type
Market Value
12/31/2012 Percent Allocated
Government Securities $20,278,557 8.60%
Municipal Issues 1,409,593 0.63%
Corporate Bonds 21,076,921 9.40%
Domestic Equities 67,886,568 30.27%
International Equities 36,006,318 16.06%
Domestic Real Estate Securities 36,980,630 16.49%
Commodities 22,342,786 9.96%
Private Equity 12,059,269 5.38%
Cash and Cash Equivalents 6,200,110 2.76%
Total $224,240,753 100.0%
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
B-20
Fixed income investments are held in two accounts managed by two different managers:
$34.8 million in managed accounts and $10.7 million in one bond mutual fund. Maturities of the
securities in these commingled funds as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Managed Accounts
Maturity Range (Years)
Investment Type Less than 1
year
1-5 6-10 10+
U.S. Treasuries 0.0% 10.0% 7.2% 7.2%
U.S. Agencies 0.4% 14.4% 2.3% 0.3%
Municipal Bonds 0.0% 0.00% 2.2% 1.8%
Corporate Bonds 1.6% 19.2% 22.0% 11.4%
Bond Mutual Funds
Maturity Percent of Total
0-1 years 27.8%
1-5 years 72.2%
6-10 years --
10+ years --
The credit quality ratings of the securities in these two fixed income asset funds as of
December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Managed Accounts
Investment Type Ratings Percent of Total
U.S. Treasuries AAA 9.5%
U.S. Agencies AAA/AA+ 10.0%
Municipal Bonds AAA/A3 2.8%
Corporate Bonds AAA/A3 21.4%
U.S. Agencies BAA1/BBB 1.4%
Corporate Bonds BAA1/BBB 47.9%
Corporate Bonds N/R 7.0%
Bond Mutual Funds
Rating Percent of Total
TSY/AGY 41.5%
AAA/Aaa 39.3%
AA+/A3 15.0%
BBB/Ba2 4.0%
N/R 0.2%
Current Developments
In regard to the Civilian Plan, contribution rates for both the employees and the City were
increased through December 22, 2012. The City and the civilian bargaining groups are continuing to
negotiate solutions to address the Civilian Plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability. It is expected that
new contract provisions beginning in 2013 will provide additional funding to the Civilian Plan. The 2014
Budget of the City includes an additional 5% City contribution to the Civilian Plan in 2014.
B-21
POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
The City of Omaha Police and Fire Retirement System (the “Uniform Plan”) became effective on
July 1, 1961. Certain of its provisions, which are governed by Chapter 22.61 of the Omaha Municipal
Code, are summarized herein. The Uniform Plan is a single-employer defined benefit plan with a fiscal
year that ends December 31. Under the Uniform Plan, there are 1,411 active members, 947 retirees,
393 beneficiaries, 237 disabled members and 11 deferred vested members for a total of 2,844.
Membership in the Uniform Plan is limited to and shall include only probationary and regular
uniformed personnel of the Police and Fire Departments. Under the new December 2012 contract
between the City and the Fire Union, the minimum years of service required to qualify for a maximum
pension benefit of 75% of average monthly compensation increased by five years for existing sworn fire
personnel with less than 15 years of service. Additionally, the minimum years of service required for new
hires to qualify for the maximum pension benefit without penalty increased by 10 years from the old
contract and the maximum benefit for such new hires is now capped at 65% of average monthly
compensation. Further, new hires under the contract that retire prior to the age of 55 face a penalty on
their pension benefits. In regards to sworn fire personnel with more than 15 years of services at the time
of the new contract, the retirement qualifications remain as they were—with 25 years of service or more,
an employee can retire at the minimum age of 45 with a lifetime monthly retirement benefit equal to
75% of average final monthly compensation and with a minimum of 20 years of service, an employee can
retire at the age of 50 with a lifetime monthly service retirement benefit equal to 55% of average monthly
compensation. For sworn police personnel, under the September 2010 contract the minimum years of
service for a maximum pension benefit of 75% of average monthly compensation increased from 25 years
to 30 years. Additionally, under the new police contract sworn personnel hired after January 1, 2010, the
minimum age for a normal service retirement is 50. For current sworn police personnel, retirement is
optional at 45 with 20 years of service with a lifetime monthly service retirement benefit equal to 50% of
average monthly compensation. With 30 years of service or more, an employee can retire at the
minimum age of 45 with a lifetime monthly retirement benefit equal to 75% of average final monthly
compensation.
The historical City contributions are as follows:
Fiscal Year
Ending
Annual Required
Contribution
(ARC)
(a)
Total Employer
Contribution
(b)
% of ARC
Contributed
( b/a )
12/31/2005 $26,255,804 $17,762,209 67.65%
12/31/2006 31,102,053 20,171,610 64.86%
12/31/2007 34,842,280 20,699,211 59.41%
12/31/2008 38,073,021 21,700,806 57.00%
12/31/2009 50,507,561 22,701,608 44.95%
12/31/2010 55,488,062 24,183,493 43.58%
12/31/2011 49,945,979 30,775,568 61.62%
12/31/2012 54,310,693 35,302,037 65.00%
Notes Regarding this Schedule: (1) The actuarial value of assets is determined based on a method that smoothes the effects of short term volatility in the market value investments. The actuarial value is equal to the expected value, based on the assumed rate of return, plus 1/3 of the difference
between market and expected values. A corridor of 80% to 120% of market value is also applied; (2) Economic assumptions are as follows:
(a) Investment return rate: 8.00%, (b) Salary increase rates: from 6.5% at 1 year of service to 4% at 30 years of service, (c) Inflation rate: 3.5%, (d) Payroll growth: 4.00%, (e) Post-retirement benefit increases: the lesser of 3% or $50 ($65 for Fire retirements after June 30, 2007. The
increase will be made annually, beginning in the 13th month of retirement); and (3) The amortization method is a closed 30-year period, level
percentage of payroll (the unfunded actuarial liability is amortized over 21 years as of January 1, 2012).
B-22
Following is a cash flow analysis of the system for the last five fiscal years:
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Receipts
Employee Contributions $14,858,953 $15,630,476 $ 16,271,773 $16,916,367 $19,641,660
Employer Contributions 20,373,206 21,374,008 22,855,893 29,447,968 33,974,437
Prior Service Contributions 1,327,000 1,327,600 1,327,600 1,327,600 1,327,600
Investment Income (148,242,515) 57,038,628 66,701,848 1,473,016 57,435,625
Security Lending Income 448,804 174,265 187,065 108,677 96,605
($111,234,552) $95,544,975 $107,314,179 $49,273,627 $112,475,927
Disbursements
Retirement Pensions $49,426,367 $52,783,686 $55,911,664 $58,101,622 $59,622,531
Death Benefits 13,000 77,360 156,507 25,500 148,885
Refunds 221,824 296,230 520,997 295,730 585,861
Other Disbursements 3,103,770 2,921,538 3,474,746 3,061,687 2,747,902
52,764,961 56,078,815 60,063,914 61,484,538 63,105,179
Excess of Receipts
Over Disbursements
$(163,999,513) $39,466,161 $47,250,265 $(12,210,911) $49,370,748
Source: Records of Finance Department, City of Omaha.
Funding Status
Significant changes to the benefit structure for police members are reflected in the 2011
valuation. The police contract signed with the Police Union in September 2010 provided for significant
increases to the future contributions of both police members and the City to the Uniform Plan as well as
significant reductions to the benefit provisions for current and future police members which lowered the
cost of the Uniform Plan. The changes in the Uniform Plan provisions for police members resulted in a
decrease in the unfunded actuarial liability of $52 million and a decrease in the normal cost rate of 5.23%
(for police members). The contribution shortfall for 2011 fell to 18.71% from 28.16% in 2010. The
changes in the police contract are expected to produce a significant improvement in the sustainability of
the Uniform Plan over the long term. The full impact of the provisions of the new police contract are not
reflected in the 2011 valuation because some of the benefit changes are effective only for new hires and,
thus, will unfold over time as new hires replace current active members. As discussed above, the Fire
Union signed a new contract with the City in December 2012, which includes a commitment by the City
and the Fire Union to increase their contributions to the Uniform Plan to address the growing unfunded
liability of the Uniform Plan. While the City expects the new Fire Union contract to have similar impacts
as the renegotiated police contract, it is too early to measure the impact of these changes on the unfunded
liability of the Uniform Plan. The City will continue its underfunding of its ARC for the Uniform Plan,
which is funded as a level percent of payroll over a 30-year closed period that began in January 1, 2002.
Based on projections in the actuarial study and in light of the City’s and the police and fire members’
contribution rates, the Uniform Plan is expected to achieve full funding in about 45 years.
During 1977, on the basis of an actuarial balance sheet prepared as of January 1, 1977, the
District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska made a determination relative to the unfunded liability for
past service credits and the method of funding such amount. The City had adopted a policy whereby the
employer contributions each year exceeded the matching requirements and served to amortize in part the
B-23
past service costs. Commencing in 1979, the City contributes to the Uniform Plan the sum of
$1,327,600 per year for 50 years to provide for the amortization of the prior service cost.
The latest actuarial study by the Actuary was for the period ended January 1, 2012 and included
an 8.0% rate of return investment assumption. The City anticipates receiving the updated actuarial study
for the period ended January 1, 2013 at the end of September 2013. Going forward, the City expects the
Actuary to annually prepare an actuarial report updating the information included herein. Summarized
below is financial information concerning the Uniform Plan for the last six fiscal years.
Actuarial
Valuation
Date1
Market Value
of Assets2
(a)
Actuarial
Liability
(AAL)
(b)
Unfunded
AAL (UAAL)3
(b-a)
Funded Ratio
(a / b)
Covered
Payroll (P / R)
(c)
UAAL as a
Percentage of
Covered P / R
[(b-a) / c ] 12/31/2007 $530,800,000 $882,700,000 $351,900,000 60.1% $99,600,000 353.3%
12/31/2008 365,900,000 947,600,000 581,700,000 38.6% 99,500,000 584.6%
12/31/2009 405,400,000 1,026,200,000 620,800,000 39.5% 103,900,000 597.5%
12/31/2010 452,600,000 1,093,300,000 640,700,000 41.4% 111,200,000 576.2%
1/1/2011 456,158,774 1,028,866,353 572,707,579 44.3% 105,025,610 545.3%
1/1/2012 467,375,458 1,07,607,299 610,231,841 43.4% 110,027,537 554.6%
(1) Results prior to 2011 were provided by the City’s prior actuary and were reported at the end of the year rather than the valuation date.
(2) The prior actuary reported the market value of assets in column (a). The Actuary applied the valuation date methodology for GASB
calculations to the extent the methodology complies with GASB 25 parameters. Information reported as of 1/1/2011 and later accordingly
reflects the valuation methodology including the actuarial value of assets.
(3) As of 1/1/2011 the Present Value of Prior Service Payments is not reflected in the Unfunded AAL.
The City’s annual pension cost and net pension obligation to the Uniform Plan for the year ended
December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Police and Firemen’s Retirement System
Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation
December 31, 2012
Annual required contribution (ARC) $54,310,693
Interest on net pension obligation 11,185,815
Adjustment to annual required contribution (9,833,151)
Annual pension cost 55,663,357
Contributions made (35,302,037)
Increase in net pension obligation 20,361,320
Net pension obligation, beginning of year 139,822,693
Net pension obligation, end of year $160,184,013
Three-year trend information is as follows:
Fiscal
Year
Ending
Annual
Required Contribution
(ARC)
Percentage
of ARC
Contributed
Net
Pension
Obligation
12/31/2012 $54,310,693 65% $160,184,013
12/31/2011 $49,945,979 61% $139,822,693
12/31/2010 $55,488,062 44% $119,249,376
B-24
Asset Allocation
The Pension Board of the Uniform Plan with the recommendation from its investment committee
approves fund manager agreements. Such management agreements outline specific investment policies.
Updated investment guidelines were adopted by the Uniform Plan in February 2011. Under the Uniform
Plan’s investment guidelines the target range for fixed income assets is between 13% and 31% of the
portfolio value; equity investments shall be 33.0 – 71.0% of the portfolio with large cap domestics (13.0 –
27.0%), small cap domestics (6.0 – 14.0%), and international equities (14.0 – 30.0%). Domestic real
estate securities shall be 9.0 – 21.0% of the portfolio. The investments may be held individually or
commingled in mutual funds and investment pools. There are no individual investments greater than 5%
with a single issuer. See the table below for a breakdown of investment type and accompanying asset
value:
Investment Type
Market Value
12/31/2012 Percent Allocated
Government Securities $17,033,908 3.50%
Municipal Issues 2,469,565 0.51%
Corporate Bonds 96,448,882 19.83%
Domestic Equities 159,295,250 32.74%
International Equities 89,163,872 18.33%
Domestic Real Estate Securities 96,127,044 19.76%
International Real Estate 1,503,535 0.31%
Commodities 11,150,579 2.29%
Cash and Cash Equivalents 13,308,611 2.74%
Total $486,501,247 100.0%
Fixed income investments are held in three accounts managed by three separate managers:
$115.9 million in managed accounts. Maturities of the securities in these commingled funds as of
December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Managed Accounts
Maturity Range (Years)
Investment Type Less than 1
year
1-5 6-10 10+
U.S. Treasuries 0.0% 2.6% 1.1% 1.4%
U.S. Agencies 0.3% 3.5% 3.5% 2.3%
Municipal Bonds 0.2% 0.0% 1.0% 0.9%
Corporate Bonds 1.6% 32.0% 43.5% 6.1%
B-25
The credit quality ratings of the aforementioned three fixed income accounts as of December 31, 2012 are
as follows:
Managed Accounts
Investment Type Ratings Percent of Total
U.S. Treasuries AAA 5.1%
U.S. Agencies AAA/AA+ 8.1%
Municipal Bonds AAA/A3 1.9%
Corporate Bonds AAA/A3 16.5%
U.S. Agencies BAA1/BBB 1.5%
Corporate Bonds BAA1/BBB 57.8%
Corporate Bonds N/R 9.1%
Current Developments
The City and the Fire Union executed in 2012 a new contract for payroll years 2011 through
2014. In addition to the changes in benefits and increased contributions to the Uniform Plan, the new
contract increases the Fire Union’s share of health care and sets wages through 2014, with an average
wage increase of 1.6% annually for the term of the contract.
The Fire Union had been negotiating with the City from when its last contract expired at the end
of 2007 until December 2012. The new contract addressed payroll years 2011 and 2012, but did not
address 2008, 2009, and 2010. The Fire Union had filed several lawsuits against the City with the
Nebraska Commission of Industrial Relations (“CIR”) and the District Court of Douglas County,
Nebraska (the “District Court”) since the expiration of the prior contract. The wage cases for 2008, 2009,
and 2010 are complete and have been implemented; however, there is still pending litigation in regards to
implementation of the 2008 case with the same questions also affecting 2009 and 2010 and those are
addressed in the next paragraph.
The District Court issued Orders on two cases before it on January 12, 2012. In the first case,
Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha v. City of Omaha (No. 1095-998), the Fire Union
prevailed on its motion for summary judgment that the City must pay wages in accordance with City
Code 23-148 (relating to levels of wages by rank), a decision that the City estimates will cost between $2
million and $4 million when applied to wages for 2008 to 2011. However, the District Court in the same
Order granted the City’s motion for summary judgment against a Fire Union claim for back pay for
alleged understaffing of fire units. In the second case, Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha v.
City of Omaha (No. 1095-999), the Fire Union requested that the City be held in contempt for an alleged
failure to comply with various CIR orders. The District Court granted the City’s motion for summary
judgment against that request, but allowed the Fire Union to amend its original complaint to request an
accounting of appropriate back pay under CIR's 2008 Wage Order. The Fire Union has amended its
original complaint alleging the City failed to properly comply with the 2008 Wage Order of the CIR. On
March 20, 2013, an order was entered in Professional Firefighters Association of Omaha v. City of
Omaha (No. 1095-999) in which the District Court found in the City’s favor on five of seven counts and
found for the Fire Union on two of seven counts. It is estimated that the decision will result in the City
having to pay between $300,000 and $400,000 when applied to wages for 2008 to 2010. The Fire Union
has filed a third District Court lawsuit alleging the City has failed to make timely payments for 2009 back
pay. The City anticipates that the Fire Union will continue to pursue other remedies with respect to wage
claim matters for years 2008, 2009, and 2010.
B-26
OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
Implementation of GASB Statements
The Government Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) has issued Statements No. 43
(“GASB 43”), Financial Reporting for Post Employment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans
(“OPEBs”), and No. 45 (“GASB 45”), Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post
Employment Benefits Other Than Pensions. GASB 43 was implemented by the City for fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006 and GASB 45 was implemented by the City for fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007.
GASB 45 requires the accounting for the annual cost of OPEB and the related outstanding
liability using an actuarial approach similar to pensions. The City implemented prospectively (zero net
obligation at transition).
Plan Description
The City provides certain postemployment health care benefits to eligible retirees and their
dependents in accordance with provisions established in Chapter 23 of the Omaha Municipal Code. The
plan is a single-employer defined benefit health care plan administered by the City. The plan does not
issue separate financial statements.
Funding Policy
The contribution requirements of plan members and the City are established through labor
negotiations, with the Police Union, the Fire Union, the Omaha City Employees Local No. 251, and other
classified civilian and sworn employees. All agreements are approved and can be amended by the Omaha
City Council. Contributions are made to the plan based on a pay-as-you-go basis and the City self-insures
this benefit. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the City paid $15,642,584 for 916 retirees. Retiree
contribution rates vary from 0% to 10% of an annual estimated premium depending on the bargaining
group date of retirement. Retiree contributions for 2012 were $ 439,174.
Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The City’s annual OPEB expense is calculated based on the ARC, an amount actuarially
determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that,
if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded
actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The City’s annual
OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation
for 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended
(December 31) Annual OPEB Cost
% of Annual
OPEB Contribution Net OPEB
2012 $44,454,512 35% $144,918,982
2011 $47,322,593 38% $116,107,053
The following tables show (1) the components of the City’s annual OPEB cost for the year, the
amount actually contributed to the plan, and changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation and (2) the funded
status of the plan:
B-27
(1) Annual required contribution (ARC) $45,752,280
Contributions made (15,642,584)
Increase in OPEB obligation 28,811,928
Net OPEB obligation — beginning of year 116,107,053
Net OPEB obligation — end of year $144,918,981
(2) The funded status of the plan as of January 1, 2012 is as follows:
Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $449,381,032
Actuarial value of plan assets 0
Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) 449,381,032
Funded ratio 0.00%
Covered payroll 164,200,000
UAAL as a percentage of covered payroll 274%
Source: Finance Department, City of Omaha.
Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Actuarial valuations on an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value-reported amounts and
assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include
assumptions about future employment, mortality and the health care cost trend. Amounts determined
regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer are subject
to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are
made about the future.
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan
as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include benefits provided at the time of each
valuation and the historical pattern of sharing benefit costs between the employer and plan member to that
point. The actuarial methods used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-term
volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term
perspective of the calculations. In the January 1, 2012 actuarial valuation, the unprojected unit
credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 3% projected
investment rate of return and an annual health care cost trend of 8.10% initially, reduced by decrements
to an ultimate rate of 4.70% after 71 years. Both rates include a 2.50% inflation assumption. The
amortization of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability is calculated assuming 25 annual payments
increasing at 2.75% per year. The amortization method used is the level percentage of projected payroll
method and the amortization period is closed 30-year period beginning in 2007.
[This page left blank intentionally.]
APPENDIX B—CITY OF OMAHA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART TWO
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(December 31, 2012)
[This page left blank intentionally.]
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUALFINANCIAL REPORT
FOR
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
•
MAYOR JEAN STOTHERT
DECEMBER 31, 2012
Office of the Mayor— 1819 Farnam Street, Suite 300
Omaha, Nebraska 68183-0300(402) 444-5000
*eo FAX: (402) 444-6059
City of Omaha
Jean Stothert, Mayor
Dear Omaha Citizens and Public Officials:
I am pleased to submit the City of Omaha’s Comprehensive Annuai Financial Report forthe fiscal year that ended December 31, 2012.
A public report from governmental entities of their financial transactions and fundbalances represents the work of those entrusted with public funds on behalf of theirfellow citizens. In Omaha, the work of thousands of dedicated public employees towardtheir department and our community goals are reflected in the pages that follow.Complete and accurate disclosure and explanations of public expenses not only satisf’governmental accounting standards; they provide the transparency citizens expect anddeserve.
Our finance professionals take great pride in their work in developing this report. Iwould like to thank them for their efforts and for working every day to enhance the fiscalstability of our great City.
Sincerely,
Jean StothertMayorCity of Omaha
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
December 31, 2012
Mayor
Jean Stothert
City Council
Pete Festersen District #1
Ben Gray District #2
Chris Jerram District #3
Garrv Gernandt District #4
Rich Pahls District #5
Franklin Thompson District #6
Aimee Melton District #7
City Officials
Buster Brown City Clerk
Allen Herink Acting Finance Director
Michael McDonnell Fire Chief
Steve Kerrigan Acting Human Resources Director
Steve Kerrigan Acting Human Rights and Relation Director
Paul Kratz City Attorney
Gary Wasdin Library Director
Brook Bench Acting Parks, Recreation & Public Property Director
James Thele Acting Planning Director
Todd Schmaderer Police Chief
Robert Stubbe Public Works Director
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Table of Contents
Page(s)
Introductory Section
Organizational Chart 1Letter of Transmittal 2 — 5Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting 6
Financial Section
Independent Auditors’ Report 7 _9Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 10—22
Basic Financial Statements:Governmentwide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position 23Statement of Activities 24
Fund Financial Statements:Governmental Funds:
Balance Sheet 25Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances 26Reconciliation of the Change in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the
Statement of Activities 27
Proprietary Funds:Statement of Net Position 28Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position 29Statement of Cash Flows 30
Fiduciary Funds:Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 31Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 32
Discretely Presented Component Units:Combining Statement of Net Position 33Combining Statement of Activities 34
Notes to Basic Financial Statements 35 — 89
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited):Budgetary Comparison Schedule — General Fund 90Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule — General Fund 91 —92Schedules of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions 93 — 94
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Table of Contents
Page(s)
Supplemental Information:
Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds 95Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor
Governmental Funds 96Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Special Revenue Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 100— 103Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances —
Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 104— 107Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Judgment Fund (unaudited) 108Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Library Fine and Fees Fund (Unaudited) 109Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Douglas County Library Supplement Fund (Unaudited) 110Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Keno/Lottery Proceeds Fund (Unaudited) 111Budgetary Comparison Schedule — SID Administrative Fees Revenue Fund (Unaudited) 112Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Storm Water Fee Revenue Fund (Unaudited) 113Budgetary Comparison Schedule — City Street Maintenance Fund (Unaudited) 114Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Street and Highway Allocation Fund (Unaudited) 115Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Interceptor Sewer Construction Fund (Unaudited) 116Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Community Park Development Fund (Unaudited) 117Budgetary Comparison Schedule — State Turn Back Revenue Fund (Unaudited) 118Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Keno/Lottery Reserve Fund (Unaudited) 119Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Greater Omaha Convention and Visitors
Bureau Fund (Unaudited) 120Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Household Chemical Disposal Fund (Unaudited) 121
Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Debt Service Funds:Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Debt Service Fund 123Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Debt
Service Fund 124Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Debt Service Fund (Unaudited) 125Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Riverfront Redevelopment Special Tax Fund (Unaudited) 126
Nonmajor Governmental Funds — Capital Project Funds:Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Capital Project Funds 130 — 132Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances —
Nonmajor Capital Project Funds 133 — 135Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Advanced Acquisition Fund (Unaudited) 136Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Environmental Bond Fund (Unaudited) 137Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2006 Transportation Bond Fund (Unaudited) 138Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Transportation Bond Fund (Unaudited) 139Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2006 Public Facilities Bond Fund (Unaudited) 140Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Public Facilities Bond Fund (Unaudited) 141Budgetary Comparison Schedule — 2006 Public Safety Bond Fund (Unaudited) 142
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Table of Contents
Page(s)
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Public Safety Bond Fund (Unaudited) 143Budgetary Comparison Schedule — 2006 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund (Unaudited) 144Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund (Unaudited) 145Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Downtown Stadium and Companion
Projects Fund (Unaudited) 146Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Pedestrian Trail Bridge-Joint Use (Unaudited) 147Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Assessment Funds (Unaudited) 148
Nonmajor Govemmental Funds — Permanent Funds:Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Permanent Funds 150Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances—
Nonmajor Permanent Funds 151Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Western Heritage Permanent Fund (Unaudited) 152
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds:Combining Statement of Net Position — Nonmajor Enterprise Funds 154Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position — Nonmajor
Enterprise Funds 155Combining Statement of Cash Flows — Nonmajor Enterprise Funds 156
Pension Trust Funds:Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position — Pension Trust Funds 158Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position — Pension Trust Funds 159
Agency Funds:Combining Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities — Agency Funds 162 — 164Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities — Agency Funds 165 — 167
Statistical Section (Unaudited)
Net Position by Component 169Changes in Net Position 170 — 171Fund Balances of Govemmental Funds 172Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 173Tax Revenues by Source 174Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 175Direct and Overlapping Govemments 176Principal Property Taxpayers 177Property Tax Levies and Collections 178Total City Taxable Sales 179Direct and Overlapping Governments 180Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 181Ratios of General Obligation Debt Outstanding 182Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 183
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Table of Contents
Page(s)
Legal Debt Margin Information 184Pledged Revenue Coverage 185 — 186Demographic and Economic Statistics 187Principal Employers 188Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by FunctionlProgram 189Operating Indicators by Function/Program 190Capital Asset Statistics by FunctionlProgram 191
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
This page intentionally left blank
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Org
aniz
atio
nal
Cha
rt
Exec
uti
ve
and
Leg
isla
tiv
e
This page intentionally left blank
Finance Department
Omaha/Douglas Civic Center1819 Farnam Street, Suite 1004Omaha Nebraska 68 183-1004
(402) 444-5416Telefax (402) 546-1150
Allen R. Herink
City of Omaha Acting Director
Jean Stothert, Mayor Comptroller
July 31, 2013
To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council,and Citizens of the City of Omaha:
State law requires that all general-purpose local govemments publish within six months of the close ofeach fiscal year a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with generally acceptedaccounting principles (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards by afirm of licensed certified public accountants. Pursuant to that requirement, we hereby issue thecomprehensive annual financial report of the City of Omaha (the City) for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2012.
This report consists of management’s representations conceming the finances of the City of Omaha.Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of theinformation presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations,management of the City of Omaha has established a comprehensive internal control framework that isdesigned both to protect the government’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficientreliable information for the preparation of the City of Omaha’s financial statements in conformity withGAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the City of Omaha’scomprehensive framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable rather than absoluteassurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assertthat, to the best of our knowledge and belief this financial report is complete and reliable in all materialrespects.
The City of Omaha’s financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, a firm of licensed andcertified public accountants. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that thefinancial statements of the City of Omaha for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, are free of materialmisstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amountsand disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significantestimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Theindependent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for renderingunqualified opinions that the City of Omaha’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,2012, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The independent auditor’s report is presented as thefirst component of the financial section of this report.
The independent audit of the financial statements of the City of Omaha was part of a broader, federallymandated “Single Audit” designed to meet the special needs of federal grantor agencies. The standardsgoverning Single Audit engagements require the independent auditor to report not only on the fairpresentation of the financial statements, but also on the audited government’s internal controls andcompliance with legal requirements, with special emphasis on internal controls and legal requirements
The Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council,and Citizens of the City of Omaha
July 31, 2013
involving the administration of federal awards. These reports are available in the City of Omaha’sseparately issued Single Audit Report.
GAAP requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompanythe basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letterof transmittal is designed to complement MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City ofOmaha’s MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors.
Profile of the Government
The City of Omaha, incorporated in 1857, is located in the eastern part of the state of Nebraska, and is the42nd largest city in the nation. The City of Omaha currently occupies a land area of 127 square miles andserves a population of 419,041. The City of Omaha has seen steady upward growth over the past fivedecades and growth of 4.9% between 2000 and 2010. The City of Omaha is empowered to levy a propertytax on both real and personal properties located within its boundaries. It also is empowered by state statuteto extend its corporate limits by annexation, which occurs periodically when deemed appropriate by thegoverning council.
The City of Omaha is operated under the Mayor-Council form of government. The Mayor andseven-member City Council are both elected to four-year terms. The executive and administrative powersof the City of Omaha are vested in the Mayor, who is popularly elected on a non-partisan basis.Agreements with Douglas County provide for the sharing of library, information technology, parks,purchasing, printing, mail, and 911 services between city and county residents.
The City of Omaha provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection, the constructionand maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure, recreational activities and cultural events.The City of Omaha is financially accountable for the Metropolitan Entertainment and ConventionAuthority (MECA) and Heartland Workforce Solutions, Inc. (HWS). MECA is a separate nonprofitcorporation that is responsible for the operation of the Omaha Convention Center/Arena, the CivicAuditorium, and TD Ameritrade Stadium. HWS is a separate 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization thatadministers the Workforce Investment Act activities for adults, youth, and dislocated workers in Douglas,Sarpy and Washington Counties in Nebraska. Additional information regarding both MECA and HWS canbe found in Note 1 (a) in the notes to basic financial statements.
The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City of Omaha’s financial planning and control. Allagencies of the City of Omaha are required to submit requests for appropriation to the Finance Directorduring April of each year. The Finance Director uses these requests as the starting point for developing aproposed budget. The Finance Director then provides the Mayor with a proposed budget. The Mayorreviews all estimates, expenditures, and capital improvements, and makes revisions where necessary. Notlater than 30 days before the tax levy certification date, the Mayor then submits the proposed budget to theCity Council for consideration, at which time the budget becomes a public record and open to inspection.The City Council is required to hold public hearings on the proposed budget and to adopt a final budget nolater than the day prior to the tax levy certification date. The appropriated budget is prepared by fund anddepartment (e.g., police). The Mayor may at any time transfer an unencumbered appropriation balance orportion thereof between appropriations of the same division. Transfers of appropriations between divisionswithin the same department, however, require the special approval of the City Council. Budget-to-actualcomparisons are provided in this report for each individual governmental fund for which an appropriated
The Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council,and Citizens of the City of Omaha
July 31, 2013
annual budget has been adopted. For the general fund, this comparison is presented on page 90 as part ofthe required supplemental information. For governmental funds, other than the general fund, withappropriated annual budgets, this comparison is presented in the governmental fund subsection of thisreport. which starts on page 95. Also included in the governmental fund subsection are project-lengthbudget-to-actual comparisons for each governmental fund for which a project-length budget has beenadopted (e.g., the CDBG revitalization project special revenue fund and the capital projects funds).
Factors Affecting Financial Condition
The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is consideredfrom the broader perspective of the specific environment within which the City of Omaha operates.
Local Economy. The City of Omaha currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and localindicators point to continued stability. Unemployment in the City of Omaha in 2012 was 4.3%, well belowthe national average. The City of Omaha has a high concentration of its employment in trade,transportation and utilities, professional and business services, education, and healthcare services. The Cityhas a relatively small amount of total employment in manufacturing and government. Over the past decade,Omaha has experienced solid growth, despite two recessions at the national level. The City is the corporateheadquarters for such Fortune 500 companies as: Berkshire Hathaway, Union Pacific, ConAgra Foods,Peter Kiewit, and Mutual of Omaha.
The Greater Omaha Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) (which includes the eight-county region ofDouglas, Sarpy, Cass, Saunders and Washington counties in Nebraska and Harrison, Mills andPottawattamie counties in Iowa) has a population of approximately 888,959. The MSA grew by 14.9percent between 2000 and 2011 and is projected to grow another 7.3 percent by 2016. The government’scentral business district is expected to maintain its current occupancy rate with a variety of stores, specialtyshops, commercial businesses, and a rising number of residential living spaces.
Long-Term Financial Planning. The City has a steady capital improvement plan that provides forreinvesting in City streets, public facilities, public safety, libraries, parks, and infrastructure over the nextfive years.
Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO)
Like many communities across the nation, the City of Omaha is addressing its CSO problem byimplementing a CSO Long Term Control Plan. Combined sewer overflow occurs when untreatedwastewater and storm water commingle in a single pipe and spill into Omaha’s rivers and creeks. The totalcost of the program, which the City anticipates will extend over approximately 15 years, is estimated at$1.66 billion in 2009 dollars. Annual borrowing needs for the foreseeable future will be in the range of $75million to $150 million. The City has increased and is increasing its rates and charges for the system on anannual basis for each of the fiscal years 2011 through 2018, primarily for the purpose of paying for the costof the program.
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded aCertificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Omaha for itscomprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. In order to be awardeda Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized
The Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council,and Citizens of the City of Omaha
July 31, 2013
comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accountingprinciples and applicable legal requirements.
A certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of only one year. We believe that our currentcomprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’srequirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
In addition, the City also received the GFOA’s Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its annualbudget document dated December 31, 2011. In order to qualify for the Distinguished Budget PresentationAward, the government’s budget document must be judged as proficient in several categories, including asa policy document, a financial plan, an operations guide, and a communications device.
The preparation of this request would not have been possible without the efficient and dedicated services ofthe entire staff of the Finance and Administration Department. We would like to express our appreciationto all members of the department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit alsomust be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the higheststandards of professionalism in the management of the City of Omaha’s finances.
Respectfully submitted,
Allen R. HerinkActing Finance Director
Certificate ofAchievementfor Excellence
in Financialaeporting
Presened te
City of OmahaNcbraska
for its Comprchonsi’.o Ain&
Piinnchil Rcrnrn.
tot’ bt Pired “cw EnJtd
Lftccmbor3l;201 I
A ciE:iIv uiAub,ev;rriI rut NxreIIi:r& ii FiirudaJ‘Pcirtiu,eJs xeuented by lie Ccn’ernnIeHtFInalre cirnecr
Msiiiti*n olbe LLbPI S1zte- nd Csiire cc
ctini—ie’’ - ii id jciihl Ic ei’pIoyee irireinentyLcinc w]cvcce rc”r’r” chile Ivc aici’nial finaLe hi
r4lore (C4F14s) crbfrvc the hihcataiwcda-cIt in vonicccncnt aceecufiug
ciiil thnaiieial netlertflL!.
dS44a*e )
4,ir ‘fl ExxiiuT)iruewr
6
This page intentionally left blank
FINANCIAL SECTION
This page intentionally left blank
KPMG LLPSuite 1501222 South 15th StreetOmaha, NE 68102-1610
Suite 1600233 South 13th StreetLincoln, NE 68508-2041
Independent Auditors’ Report
The Honorable Mayor and Membersof the City Council
City of Omaha, Nebraska:
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-typeactivities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregateremaining fund information of the City of Omaha, Nebraska (the City), as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2012, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise theCity’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
Management’s Responsibilityfor the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements inaccordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes the design, implementation,and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statementsthat are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not auditthe financial statements of Metropolitan Entertainment and Convention Authority (MECA) and HeartlandWorkforce Solutions, which statements are included as discretely presented component units and represent100% of the discretely presented component units as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012. Thosestatements were audited by other auditors, whose reports have been fumished to us, and our opinion,insofar as it relates to the amounts included for MECA and Heartland Workforce Solutions, is based solelyon the reports of the other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standardsgenerally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial auditscontained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whetherthe basic financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessmentof the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In makingthose risk assessments, the auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fairpresentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in thecircumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internalcontrol. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness ofaccounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management,as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
KPMG LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership,the U.S. member firm of KPMG letereahonal Cooperative(KPMG leternatioeal”), a Swiss entity.
W4
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for ouraudit opinions.
Opinions
In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of the other auditors, the financial statements referred toabove present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmentalactivities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each majorfund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Omaha, Nebraska, as of December 31,2012, and the respective changes in its financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for theyear then ended in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that the management’s discussion and analysis onpages 10 to 22, the budgetary comparison schedule — general fund on page 90, the notes to budgetarycomparison schedule — general fund on pages 91 to 92, and schedules of funding progress and employercontributions on pages 93 to 94, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Suchinformation, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the GovernmentalAccounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing thebasic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have appliedcertain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standardsgenerally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about themethods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’sresponses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during ouraudit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on theinformation because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express anopinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary and Other Injörmation
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectivelycomprise the City’s basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financialstatements and budgetary comparison schedules, and the introductory and statistical sections, are presentedfor purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements.
The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements are the responsibility of managementand were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to preparethe basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied inthe audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing andreconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare thebasic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional proceduresin accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion,the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements are fairly stated in all material respects inrelation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory section and statistical section and budgetary comparison schedules have not beensubjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly,we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them.
8
/
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated July 31, 2013 onour consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliancewith certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. Thepurpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting andcompliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financialreporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance withGovernment Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting andcompliance.
LCP
Omaha, NebraskaJuly 31, 2013
9
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 3 1, 2012
(Unaudited)
The discussion and analysis of the City of Omaha’s (the City) financial performance provides an overall reviewof the City’s financial activities for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The intent of this discussion andanalysis is to look at the City’s financial performance as a whole. Readers should also review the basic financialstatements to enhance their understanding of the City’s financial performance.
Financial Highlights for Fiscal Year 2012
o The assets of the City, on a governmentwide basis excluding component units, exceeded its liabilities at theclose of fiscal year 2012 by $447.3 million (net position). Of this amount, $110.1 million is an unrestricteddeficit, while $496.6 million is the City’s net investment in capital assets, and $60.8 million is restrictedfor specific purposes.
o The City’s total net position decreased by $23.9 million from the prior year. Of this amount, $32.5 millionwas a decrease in governmental activities and $8.6 million was an increase in business-type activities. Thedecrease in net position related to governmental activities is primarily attributable to current year increasesfor net pension obligations by $27.7 million and postretirement benefits obligations by $27.6 million. Theincrease in business-type activities is primarily attributable to an increase in the Sewer Revenue Fund of$13.5 million. This increase was offset by a decrease in net position of the Convention Center Hotel Fundin the amount of $5.5 million.
• As of December 31, 2012, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of$115.6 million, an increase of $52.4 million in comparison with the prior year. This increase is largely dueto the receipt of $21 million from 2011 flood insurance proceeds; pledged Stadium receipts of $7.0million; City Capital Improvement bonds, $5.4 million; Parks and Recreation bonds, $4.6 million; andincreased Street & Highway revenues of $3.2 million. Of the combined governmental funds ending fundbalances, approximately 48.7%, or $56.2 million, is available for spending at the City’s discretion(unassigned and assigned fund balance).
• The general fund, on a current fiscal resources basis, reported a surplus of revenues over expenditures,lapsed encumbrances, and transfers of $9.4 million. Revenues were above budget in the amount of $5.1million and expenditures under budget, lapsed encumbrances and year-end transfers in the amount of $4.3million account for a 2012 year-end carryover reserve of $9.4 million.
• At the end of the current fiscal year, the unassigned/assigned fund balance for the general fund was$44.8 million, or 14.6% of general fund expenditures.
o As of December 31, 2012, the City’s general obligation bond rating from Standard & Poor’s was AAA andMoody’s Investor Service rated the City’s bonds Aal.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements. TheCity’s basic financial statements comprise three components: (1) govemmentwide financial statements, (2) fundfinancial statements, and (3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementaryinformation in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
10 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
The basic financial statements include two kinds of statements that present different views of the City:
• The first two statements are govemmentwide statements that provide both long-tenn and short-terminformation about the City’s overall financial status.
The remaining statements are fund financial statements that focus on individual parts of the City’sgovernment, reporting the City’s operations in more detail than the governmentwide statements.
— Governmental fund statements tell how general government services such as public safety werefinanced in the short term, as well as what amounts remain for future spending.
— Proprietary fund statements offer short-term and long-term financial information about the activitiesthe government operates similar to a business, such as the City’s sewage treatment plants orConvention Center Hotel.
— Fiduciary fund statements provide information about financial relationships in which the City actssolely as a trustee or agent for the benefit of others, to whom the pertaining resources belong, forexample, parking fine receipts which are remitted to the school district.
The financial statements also include notes that explain some of the information in the financial statements andprovide more detailed data. The statements are followed by a section of required supplementary information thatfurther explains and supports the information in the financial statements.
Government-wide Financial Statements
The govemmentwide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’sfinances, using accounting methods similar to those used by private sector companies. The statement of netposition and the statement of activities, which are the governmentwide statements, include the City’s assets andliabilities using the accrual basis of accounting, which is similar to the accounting used by most private sectorcompanies. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the changeoccurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statementfor some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned butunused vacation leave).
These two governrnentwide statements report the City’s net position and how it has changed. Net position — thedifference between the City’s assets and liabilities — is one way of measuring the City’s financial health orfinancial position. Over time, increases or decreases in the City’s net position is an indicator of whether itsfinancial health is improving or deteriorating. Other nonfinancial factors, such as changes in the City’s propertytax base and the condition of the City’s roads and other infrastructure, may need to be considered to assess theoverall health of the City.
In the statement of net position and the statement of activities, the City is divided into three categories:
Governmental Activities — Most of the City’s basic services are included here, such as the police, fire, publicworks, parks and recreation, and general administration departments. Taxes and intergovernmental revenuesprincipally support these functions.
11 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Business-Type Activities — The City charges fees to customers in order to cover the costs of certain services itprovides. The City’s sewer system, air quality control enforcement, compost operation, marinas, golf courses,tennis operation, parking facilities, printing services, river plaza facility, citywide sports, and hotel are includedhere.
Component Units — The City includes two separate legal entities in its report, the Metropolitan Entertainmentand Convention Authority (MECA), and Heartland Workforce Solutions Inc. Although legally separate, these“component units” are important because the City is financially accountable for them and the City provides debtservice funding for the arena and convention center (see note 1).
The governmentwide financial statements can be found on pages 23 and 24 of this report.
Fund Financial Statements
The fund financial statements provide more detailed information about the City’s most significant funds — not theCity as a whole. Funds are accounting mechanisms that the City uses to keep track of specific sources of fundingand spending for particular purposes. The City Charter, state law, and bond covenants require certain funds. TheCity Council or Administration establishes other funds to control and manage money for particular purposes or toshow that the City is properly using certain taxes and grants.
The City has three kinds of funds:
Governmental Funds — Most of the City’s basic services are included in governmental funds, which focus on(1) the flow in and out of cash and other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash and (2) thebalances remaining at year-end that are available for spending. These funds are reported using the modifiedaccrual accounting basis and a current financial resources measurement focus. Consequently, the governmentalfund statements provide a detailed short-term view that helps the reader determine whether there are more orfewer financial resources that can be spent in the near future to finance the City’s programs. The relationshipbetween governmental activities (reported in the statement of net position and the statement of activities) andgovernmental funds is described in a reconciliation that follows the governmental fund financial statements.
The City maintains 93 governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balancesheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for thegeneral fund and debt service fund, which are considered to be major funds. Data from the other governmentalfunds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
The City adopts an annual budget for the general fund, as required by the City Charter. A budgetary comparisonstatement is presented for the general fund using the City’s budgetary basis of accounting. This statement reflectsthe following: (a) the original budget, (b) the final budget as amended, (c) actual results, and (d) the variancebetween the final budget and actual results. Because the budgetary basis of accounting differs from the modifiedaccrual basis used in the funds statements, a reconciliation is provided at the end of the statement.
The governmental fund financial statements can be found on pages 25 through 27 of this report.
Proprietary Funds — Services for which the City charges customers a fee are generally reported in proprietaryfunds. Proprietary funds, like the governmentwide statements, provide both short- and long-term financial
12 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
information. The City maintains 15 enterprise funds, which are a type of proprietary fund. Enterprise funds areused to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the governmentwide financialstatements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its sewer system, air quality control enforcement,compost operation, marina dredge operations, golf course operations, tennis operation, river plaza facility,parking facilities, printing services, citywide sports, and hotel.
The proprietary fund financial statements can be found on pages 28 through 30 of this report.
Fiduciary Funds — The City is the trustee, or fiduciary, for certain donated funds. The City maintains 24fiduciary funds. It is also responsible for other assets that, because of a trust arrangement, can be used only forthe trust beneficiaries. The City is responsible for ensuring that the assets reported in these funds are used fortheir intended purpose. These activities are reported in a separate statement of fiduciary net position. The Cityexcludes this activity from its govemmentwide financial statements because the City cannot use these assets tofinance its operations. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds.
The fiduciary fund financial statements can be found on pages 31 and 32 of this report.
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in thegovemmentwide and fund financial statements. The notes to the basic financial statements can be found on pages35 through 89 of this report.
Other Information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents certain requiredsupplementary information concerning the City’s 2012 budget information and the City’s progress in funding itsobligation in both pension and other postemployment benefits. Required supplementary information can be foundon pages 90 through 94 of this report.
City Governmentwide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, net position (assets over liabilities) may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government’sfinancial position. In the case of the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $447.3 million at the close of fiscal year2012. The City’s net investment in capital assets reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, building,equipment, and infrastructure), less accumulated depreciation, and less any related outstanding debt used toacquire those assets. The City uses these assets to provide services to its citizens, and consequently, these assetsare not available for future spending. The resources needed to repay the debt related to these capital assets mustbe provided from other sources.
13 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
The following table reflects the condensed summary of net position (in millions):
CITY OF OMAHA
Summary of Net Position
Governmental Business-type Total primaryactivities activities government
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
Current and other assets $ 339 308 190 138 529 446Capital assets 1,104 1,104 662 595 1,766 1,699
Total assets $ 1,443 1,412 852 733 2,295 2,145
Current and other liabilities $ 128 53 42 15 170 68Long-term liabilities 1,147 1,159 531 447 1,678 1,606
Total liabilities 1,275 1,212 573 462 1,848 1,674
Net position:Net Investment in capital
assets 360 352 137 166 497 518Restricted position 17 7 43 40 60 47Unrestricted position (deficit) (209) (159) 99 65 (110) (94)
Total net position 168 200 279 271 447 471
Total liabilities andnet position $ 1,443 1,412 852 733 2,295 2,145
Governmental Activities
Net position of the City’s governmental activities decreased $32.6 million (16.3%) to $167.6 million. However, asignificant portion of that net position is either restricted as to the purpose it can be used for or the City’s netinvestment in capital assets (building, roads, bridges, etc.). Consequently, unrestricted net position showed a$209 million deficit at the end of this year. This deficit does not mean that the City does not have the resourcesavailable to pay its current liabilities. Rather, it is the result of having long-term commitments that are greaterthan current available resources. Specifically, the City did not included in past annual budgets the full amountsneeded to finance future liabilities arising from worker’s compensation and healthcare claims ($38.7 million),Civilian employees, Policemen’s and Firemen’s net pension obligation ($201.7 million) and postemploymentbenefits ($137.2 million). The City will include these amounts in future years’ budgets as they become due.
Business-Type Activities
The net position of the City’s business-type activities increased approximately $8.7 million to $279.7 million.The City generally can only use this net position to finance the continuing operation of its enterprise operations.A key element of this increase is the $13.5 million increase in net position incurred by the Sewer Fund.
14 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
The following table shows the revenue and expense of the governmental and business-type activities:
City of Omaha’s Change in Net Position(In millions)
Governmental Business-type Total primaryactivities activities government
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011Revenues:
Program revenues:Charges for services $ 84.2 78.3 94.8 77.0 179.0 155.3Operating grants and
contributions 70.6 81.3 0.9 0.7 71.5 82.0Capital grants and
contributions 2.1 2.0 1.3 3.4 2.0General revenues:
Sales and use tax 128.4 126.6 128.4 126.6Propertytax 141.8 139.6 141.8 139.6Othertaxes 75.7 74.1 75.7 74.1Unrestricted investment
earnings 2.4 2.0 0.4 0.6 2.8 2.6
Total revenues 505.2 503.9 97.4 78.3 602.6 582.2
Expen ses:General government 108.8 102.7 — — 108.8 102.7Public safety 221.1 216.0 — — 221.1 216.0Transportation services 63.8 61.4 — — 63.8 61.4Other public services 30.0 34.2 — — 30.0 34.2Community development 27.3 31.6 — — 27.3 31.6Culture and parks 49.5 60.7 — — 49.5 60.7Interest on long-term debt 34.0 35.2 — — 34.0 35.2Convention Center Hotel — — 16.8 10.1 16.8 10.1Sewage treatment — 62.0 56.7 62.0 56.7Other — — 13.2 13.5 13.2 13.5
Total expenses 534.5 541.8 92.0 80.3 626.5 622.1
Increase (decrease) innet positionbefore transfers (29.3) (37.9) 5.4 (2.0) (23.9) (39.9)
Transfers (3.2) (8.3) 3.2 8.3
Increase (decrease) inin net position (32.5) (46.2) 8.6 6.3 (23.9) (39.9)
Net position at beginning ofyear 200.1 246.3 271.1 264.8 471.2 511.1
Net position at end ofyear $ 167.6 200.1 279.7 271.1 447.3 471.2
15 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Governmental Activities
The City’s total revenues from governmental activities were $505.2 million for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2012. The largest source of revenue ($141.8 million in 2012) for the City is property tax. Propertytax increased $2.2 million (1.6 %) during 2012. The city property tax rate is 49.922 cents per $100 of assessedvalue. Property tax valuations for 2012 increased by 1.57% when compared with 2011 valuations.
The City’s expenses for governmental activities cover a wide range of services, with 41.4%, or $221.1 million,for fiscal year 2012 related to public safety and 11.9%, or $63.8 million, for fiscal year 2012 for transportationservices. Overall, the expenses for governmental activities decreased by 1.4% or $7.3 million in 2012. This canlargely be attributed to an $11.2 million decrease in expenditures for culture and parks.
Business-Type Activities
The net position of the City’s business-type activities increased by $8.7 million. The change of net position bythe major enterprise funds and the other nonmajor enterprise funds is presented as follows:
Fund Amount(In millions)
Convention Center Hotel $ (5.5)Parking facilities 0.5Sewer revenue 13.5Other nonmajor enterprise funds 0.2
The Convention Center Hotel Fund began operations in April 2004. The City believes that future operations ofthe Hotel will eliminate this deficit. Annual appropriations from the City will subsidize any debt service shortfall.In October 2011, construction was completed on a 150-room expansion project bringing the hotel’s totalinventory to 600 guestrooms. The expansion project also included an additional ballroom.
The Parking Facilities Fund was established as a tool to manage the City’s eight parking structures and varioussurface lots throughout the City. Lease purchase debt has been issued to finance the construction of the parkingstructures. All operating activities of the Parking Facility Fund have been consolidated within Public Works.The completion of a comprehensive parking-fee study may lead to changes in rates based upon location andhours of enforcement.
In May 2009, the City Council enacted an ordinance increasing sewer use fees by twenty to thirty percentannually beginning in 2012 through 2014. The action provides funding for the sewer system’s capitalimprovements.
The City’s enterprise operations are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revenues and expenses are adjusted asnecessary to maintain an adequate amount of working capital. Annual appropriations may also be used tosubsidize these funds. The City has decided to account for these activities by the use of enterprise accounting tobetter identify the cost of the services and for better management control.
16 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Financial Analysis of the Government’s Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legalrequirements.
Governmental Funds
The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, andbalances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. Inparticular, unassigned fund balances may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available forspending at the end of the fiscal year.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, the governmental funds reported combined ending fund balancesof $115.6 million, an increase of $52.4 million in comparison with the prior year. An increase in fund balance inthe amount of $7.3 million for the Downtown Stadium Fund; an increase in the amount of $5.4 million for theStreet and Highway Allocation Fund; an increase in the Capital City improvement Fund of $4.9 million; anincrease of $3.1 million for the 2010 Parks and Recreation Fund and an increase in fund balance in the amountof $19.1 million for the Grant Funds accounted for the majority of the $48.3 million increase in the nonmajorGovernmental Funds fund balance. The fund balance in the General Fund and Debt Service Fund increased$4.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Approximately 48.7% or $56.2 million of the combined fund balance constitutes committed/assigned/unassignedfund balance, which generally is available for spending at the City’s discretion. The remainder of the fundbalance is restricted to indicate that it is not available for new spending, because it has already been committedto:
o pay debt service ($22.5 million)
o public safety purposes ($1.1 million)
o community development ($2.2 million)
• culture and parks purposes ($6.0 million)
o general government purposes ($6.5 million)
o transportation and street system purposes ($13.7 million)
The General Fund is the City’s chief operating fund. The general fund’s assigned/unassigned fund balance atDecember 31, 2012 is $44.8 million, while the total fund balance is $47.9 million. As a measure of the generalfund’s liquidity, it may be useful to compare both the assigned/unassigned fund balance and the total fundbalance to total fund expenditures. The assigned/unassigned fund balance represents 14.6% of the total fundbalance to total fund expenditures, whereas the total fund balance represents 15.6% of that same amount. Thefund balance of the general fund increased by $4.0 million for fiscal year 2012. For budgeting purposes only, the2012 budget surplus of $9.4 million is available for governmental use.
17 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Another major governmental fund is the Debt Service Fund. The Debt Service Fund has a total fund balance ofS 18.7 million, all of which will be used either for payment of debt service on the City’s general obligation debt orfor payment of debt issuance costs. The Debt Service Fund increased by £0.1 million for fiscal year 2012.
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
December 31, 2012
(In millions)
Original Finalbudget budget Actual
Revenues:Taxes $ 272.3 272.3 278.0Intergovernmental 4.9 4.9 4.0Other 34.7 34.7 35.1
Total 311.9 311.9 317.1
Expenditures, lapsed encumbrances,and transfers 314.0 314.2 312.1
Changes in fund balance $ (2.1) (2.3) 5.0
Proprietary Funds
The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the governmentwide financialstatements, but in more detail.
Net position of the Convention Center Hotel Fund, Parking Facilities Fund, Sewer Revenue Fund, and otherenterprise funds amounted to S(37.6) million, S(4.8) million, S320.5 million, and S1.5 million, respectively, atDecember 31, 2012. Additional discussion concerning the finances of these funds has already been addressed inthe discussion of the City’s business-type activities.
There are three types of budget transfers, each requiring a successive level of authority. First, the Mayor may, atany time, transfer an unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof between appropriations of the samedivision. Second, transfers between divisions in the same department may be authorized by resolution of the CityCouncil. Third, transfers between departments/agencies may be authorized by ordinance of the City Council. Atthe end of the year, the City Council passed a budget amendment to transfer $1.2 million from the General Fundto the Contingent Liability Fund.
Significant variances between the general fund’s actual revenues and expenditures and the final amended budgetare summarized as follows:
• Sales tax revenue was £0.4 million above budget
• In Lieu taxes and Licenses and Permits were $1.1 million below budget
18 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
• Property tax revenue was $0.6 million above budget
o Business Taxes were $0.9 million above budget
• Restaurant Tax revenues were $5.8 million above budget
o Interest earnings were $0.7 million below budget
o Rents and Royalties and Misc. Revenues were 0.8 million below budget
o Charges for services were $1.4 million above budget
o The Mayor’s Office, City Council, Human Resources, Planning, Parks, Public Works and theLibrary collectively were $1.7 million above budget.
o The City Clerk, Law, Human Rights and Relations, Finance, and Police ended the year $0.6 millionunder budget.
o The Fire Department was $7.2 million over budget.
o Retiree Benefits and Other Agencies were under budget $6.8 million and $4.4 million respectively.
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital Assets
The City’s investment in capital assets for its govemmental and business-type activities as of December 31,2012, is $1.8 billion (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, buildings,improvements, machinery and equipment, streets, bridges, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, event facilities, andwastewater treatment plants. The total change in the City’s investment in capital assets for the current year was anet increase of 3.9% (a decrease of 0.1% for governmental activities and an increase of 11.3% for business-typeactivities).
Governmental Business-type
activities activities Total2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
Land $ 140.1 139.2 5.2 5.2 145.3 144.4Cultural assets 5.8 5.8 0.7 0.7 6.5 6.5Construction in progress 38.4 24.6 107.2 51.7 145.6 76.3Buildings 335.4 345.0 121.9 127.5 457.3 472.5Machinery and equipment 24.1 24.4 13.7 16.0 37.8 40.4Infrastructure 559.8 565.3 413.8 393.9 973.6 959.2
Total $ 1,103.6 1,104.3 662.5 595.0 1,766.1 1,699.3
Major capital asset events during 2012 included the following:
• DOT.Comm Projects for Success infrastructure improvements; current year expenditures were$1.9 million.
19 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
o Construction continued on the City’s sewer system including the Combined Sewer OverflowProgram with capital outlays of $93.6 million.
o Purchases of fire fighting vehicles, aerial ladder truck; current year expenditures were $0.7 million.
o Construction continued on the 144th and Eagle Run Road Project; current year costs were$1.5 million.
• City wide park renovations and construction of City parks; current year expenses were $5.4 million.
o ADA street ramp compliance construction; current year expenditures were $1.7 million.
Construction and repair on lO street bridge over Leahy Mall; current year expenditures were $0.8million.
o Final construction on the Downtown Ballpark Project; current year expenditures were $1.8 million.
o Construction of street improvements on 48th Street from L to Q; current year expenditures were $1.1million.
• Construction in progress citywide totaled $145.6 million.
o Annual citywide depreciation expense for governmental activities totaled $37.9 million.
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in note 11 to the financial statements on pages76 through 80 of this report.
Long-Term Debt
At December 31, 2012, the City had total bonded debt outstanding of $1 .268 billion (including notes payable).Of this amount, $516.8 million is general obligation debt backed by the full faith and credit of the City;$449.8 million of revenue bonds secured solely by specified revenue sources; $57.9 million of special obligationbonds backed by a variety of revenue sources, including sales tax and property tax; $59.4 million of special taxrevenue bonds backed by a redevelopment property tax levy; $167.9 million of lease purchase bonds backed byannual General Fund appropriations; and $16.4 million of notes payable backed by a variety of revenue sources.
Cit) of Omaha’s Outstanding Debt
(In millions)
Governmental Business-typeactivities activities Total
2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011
General obligation bonds S 516.8 518.7 — — 51 6.8 518.7Revenuebonds 1.7 1.9 448.1 358.0 449.8 359.9Special obligation bonds 40.6 43.1 17.3 17.6 57.9 60.7Special tax revenue bonds 59.4 60.5 — 59.4 60.5Leasepurchasebonds 131.1 130.6 36.8 39.4 167.9 170.0Notespayable 2.9 2.2 13.5 13.1 16.4 15.3
Total $ 752.5 757.0 515.7 428.1 1,268.2 1,185.1
20 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s biscussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
During 2012, the City’s total debt increased by $83.1 million (7.0%). In 2012, the City issued $97.7 million forconstruction of the combined sewer separation project. This issue accounts for the increase in outstanding debt.
At December 31, 2012, the City maintained an AAA rating from Standard & Poor’s Corporation and an Aairating from Moody’s Investors Service on general obligation bonds.
Under the City’s Home Rule Charter, the total amount of general obligation indebtedness outstanding at any timeshall not exceed 3.5% of the actual value of taxable real and personal property in the City. The debt margin as ofDecember 31, 2012, is $478.9 million.
Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements onpages 55 through 65 of this report.
Economic Factors and Next Year’s Budgets and Rates
The City’s property tax base for 2013 is $27.9 billion. This is an increase over 2012 of $430.2 million or 1.6%,primarily due to annexations in 2012. This increase also includes revaluations of existing properties and newgrowth within the City. The property tax rate for 2013 remained the same as 2012 at 49.922 cents per $100 ofvaluation.
o Sales tax collections for 2011 and 2012 have changed, respectively, by (0.2) % and 1.4% over eachof the past two years. For 2012, increased sales tax collections were enough to offset an increase inbusiness incentive tax refunds of $0.9 million. Current net collections through June 2013 show anincrease over the same period in 2012 by 3.9%.
• In the fall of 2011, the City enacted a 2.5% restaurant occupation tax charge on food and beverages.in 2013, the City budgeted restaurant tax revenues at $25.6 million. Collections for 2013 are nowprojected at $25.3 million or $0.4 million under budget.
o Effective January 1, 2013, the state legislature prohibits the City from collecting the wheel tax in thethree mile jurisdiction of Douglas County. This results in a loss of revenue of approximately $3.2million.
• The Sewer Use Fee rate for 2013 increases about 26% over 2012. Anticipated future rate increasesare intended to fund the Combine Sewer Overflow Compliance Project.
• Overall general fund revenue collections for 2013 are projected to be $5.3 million under budget(1.7%) due primarily to LB775 and LB312 sales tax refunds to businesses.
All of these factors were considered in preparing the City’s budget for the 2014 fiscal year.
During 2012, the assigned/unassigned fund balance in the general fund was $44.8 million. The City appropriated$9.4 million of this amount for spending in the 2014 fiscal year. This 2014 appropriation represents the 2012budget balance carried forward. The 2012 budget balance carried forward in the amount of $9.4 million will beappropriated for spending in 2014. The City Charter requires that the general fund budget balance, as of the closeof any particular fiscal year, shall be applied as general fund revenue in the budget for the fiscal year two yearssubsequent to that fiscal year.
21 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Requests for Information
This financial report is designed to provide citizens, taxpayers, customers, investors, and creditors with a generaloverview of the City’s finances and to demonstrate the City’s accountability for the funds it receives. Questionsconcerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information shouldbe addressed to the City of Omaha, Finance Department, Suite 1004, 1819 Famam Street, Omaha, Nebraska68183.
22
This page intentionally left blank
BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Net Position
December31, 2012
Liabilities and Net Position
Liabilities:Accounts payable and otherAccrued interest payableDue to other governmentsUnearned revenueLong-term liabilities:
Net pension obligation due in more than one yearPostrctirement benefit obligation due in more than one yearOther liabilitiesCompensated absences:
Due within one yearDue in more than one year
Grants payable:Due within one yearDue in more than one year
Claims and judgments:Due within one year
Workers’ compensation and healthcare claims:Due within one yearDue in more than one year
Bonds, notes, and leases payable:Due within one yearDue in more than one year
Total liabilities
Net position:Net investment in capital assetsRestricted for:
Debt serviceCommunity improvementPerpetual care:
ExpendableNonexpendable
Unrestricted
Total net position
Total liabilities and net position
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
— 2,250,000— 13,513,750
— 1,950,000
14,555,22026,596,386
66,780,0491,215,724,325
1,847,594,984
Primary government
Assets
Cash and pooled investmentsI rlvestmentsReceivables (net of allowance for uncollectibles)Due from other governmentsInternal balancesAccrued interestInventoriesOther assetsRestricted assets:
InvestmentsDeposits with trustee
Capital assets:NondepreciableDepreciable
Total assets
Governmentalactivities
$ 43,045,58978,718,896
176,493,00839,955,181
(20,000,000)190,925
2,320,1447,413,234
Business-typeactivities
2,334,350110,938,296
1,762,2415,226,409
20,000,00044,466
787,7385,164,184
Total
45,379,939189,657,192178,255,24945,181,590
235,3913,107,882
12,577,418
Aggregatediscretelypresentedcomponent
unitsTotal
15,552,52221,167,800
3,740,879352,491
2,470,246
653,66916,757,407
60,695,014
21,219,508 21,219,50810,879,942 22,219,931 33,099,873
297,458,6611,468,724,236
2,294,896,939
113,117,750549,435,357
852,250,230
20,788,5524,944,903
317,097
63,093,961 24,860,22411,934,935 —
1,013,345 —
4,973,520
184,340,911919,288,879
S 1,442,646,709
$ 42,305,4096,990,0321,013,3454,656,423
201,734,657137,193,594
3,392,99364,466,877
2,250,00013,513,750
1,950,000
13,703,65425,040,342
52,142,184704,731,238
1,275,084,498
8,729,311 210,463,9687,725,388 144,918,982
98,3331,868,340
3,491,32666,335,217
414,716
1,002,2412,805,837
29,083,018
851,5661,556,044
14,637,865510,993,087
572,510,486
359,649,050 136,922,155 496,571,205 13,602,998
10,879,942 43,439,439 54,319,381 133,2503,331,576 — 3,331,576 —
403,938 — 403,938 —
2,775,389 — 2,775,389 —
(209,477,684) 99,378,150 (110,099,534) 17,875,748
167,562,21 1 279,739,744 447,301,955 31,611,996
$ 1,442,646,709 852,250,230 2,294,896,939 60,695,014
23
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
NE
BR
AS
KA
Sta
tem
ent
of
Act
iviti
es
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r31
.20
12
Pro
gra
mre
ven
ues
Net
reve
nLie
(esp
ense
)an
dch
anges
inne
tpo
siti
onA
gg
regat
edis
cret
ely
tres
ente
dO
per
atin
gC
apit
alP
rim
ary
go
ver
nm
ent
__
__
__
__
__
com
pone
nt
Char
ges
for
gra
nts
and
gra
nts
and
Go
ver
nm
enta
lB
nsin
ess-
type
unit
s
Exp
ense
sse
rvic
esco
ntr
ibu
tio
ns
con
trib
uti
on
sac
tiv
itie
sac
tivit
ies
‘Fot
alT
otal
Ftt
ttcl
iono
prog
ratt
ts:
Prito
an’
gos’
ernt
nent
:G
over
nttte
ntal
activ
ities
:G
ener
algo
vern
men
tS
108,
841.
189
3,63
9,38
42.
607,
543
(102
.594
.262
)—
—(1
02.5
94,2
62)
—
Publ
icsa
lbty
221.
061.
828
16,2
69.7
926.
195,
710
216.
587
(198
.399
.739
)—
(196
.399
.739
)T
rans
port
atio
nse
rvic
es63
.844
.036
34.9
46,9
8532
.509
.9(7
(92.
602)
3,52
0,26
4—
3.52
0.26
4—
Oth
erpu
blic
serv
ices
30.0
52.9
634.
106,
470
16,2
71.3
00(9
.675
.193
1(9
,675
.193
1—
Com
mun
ityde
velo
pmen
t27
.254
.620
11,6
36.1
3113
.191
.715
2.36
4.84
238
.060
——
130.
060
—
Cul
ture
anti
park
s49
.472
.973
13.4
12.0
15(1
60.2
04)
(377
.414
)(3
6.59
8.57
6)—
(36.
598.
576)
Inte
rest
Ott
lottg
-ter
utde
bt33
.96
1.78
2—
—(3
3.90
1.78
2)—
(33.
961,
782)
____
___
_____
___
Tot
algo
vert
tttse
tttal
activ
ities
534.
509.
391
84.2
10,7
777(
1,6(
5,98
12,
111,
413
(377
.571
.220
)
____
_____
___
___
(377
.571
,220
)—
Bus
ines
s-ty
peac
tiviti
es:
Con
vettt
intt
Cet
tter
Hot
el16
,760
,156
11,1
47.6
00—
(5.6
12.5
56)
(5.6
12.5
56)
—
Park
ing
6.03
3,42
94.
064.
700
——
—(1
.968
.729
)(1
,968
.729
)Se
wer
62,0
37,6
6372
,391
,970
929,
479
1.23
6.27
412
,520
,060
(2,5
20.0
60C
ityw
ide
Spor
ts32
3.80
629
2,76
9—
(31.
117)
(31.
1171
—
Mar
ittax
577.
404
603,
435
-—
100,
000
—12
6,03
112
6.03
1T
entti
sop
erat
iots
s43
7,16
725
6,92
4—
.(1
80.2
43)
((80
,243
)G
olfn
pera
tiotts
attd
cottc
essi
otts
3,92
1,55
93,
713.
606
——
—(2
07,9
53)
(207
.953
)—
Air
qtta
lity
667.
210
759.
500
—-.
92.2
9092
,290
—
Cnt
upos
t76
3,10
31,
072,
270
—-.—
309,
167
309,
167
—
Prin
ting
attd
grap
hics
462.
201
499,
711
-—
.37
,510
37,5
)0—
Riv
erFr
ont
Plaz
aan
dM
aritt
a40
.842
46,7
25—
5,88
35.
883
Tot
albu
sine
ss-t
ype
activ
ities
92,0
24,6
2094
,849
,210
929,
479
1.33
6,27
4
______
_____
___
_
5,09
0.34
35,
090,
343
—
Tot
alpr
iman
vgos
ernt
nett
t5
626.
534.
011
179,
059,
987
71,5
45,4
603,
447.
687
1377
,571
,220
)5,
090,
343
(372
.480
,877
)—
Cot
ttpot
tent
uttit
s:M
EC
A5
41,4
14,4
3042
.527
,484
——
—1,
113.
054
Wor
irfo
rce
Solu
tions
3,48
4,42
142
,546
3,81
3,68
5—
—.—
‘—
371,
810
Tot
alcn
tttpo
nent
uttit
s$
44,0
98.8
5142
,570
,030
3,81
3,68
5—
——
1,48
4,86
4
Gen
eral
rex’
emte
s:P
rnpe
rtyt
axes
S14
1,76
5,31
9—
141,
765,
319
—
Mot
nrve
lticl
eta
xes
9,16
3,51
89,
163,
510
Sale
san
dus
eta
xes
128,
379,
322
—12
8,37
9.32
2B
usin
ess
laxe
s62
,341
,910
62,3
41,9
10Po
ytite
ttts
inlie
uof
taxe
s4,
174,
522
—4,
174,
522
—
Unr
estr
icte
din
vest
men
tea
rnitt
gs2,
365,
086
406,
562
2,77
1,64
880
,648
Tra
ttsfe
cs(3
,163
,477
)3,
163.
477
——
Tot
alge
ttert
tlre
vettu
esat
tdtr
ansf
ers
345,
026,
200
3,57
0,03
934
8,59
6,23
980
,648
Clta
nge
inteL
posi
ttott
(32,
545,
020)
8,66
0,38
2(2
3,88
4,63
8)1,
565,
512
Net
posi
tion
begi
nnin
gof
year
200,
107,
231
271,
079,
362
471,
186,
593
30,0
46,4
84
Net
posi
tiott
—en
dof
year
$16
7,56
2,21
127
9,73
9,74
444
7,30
1,95
531
,611
,996
See
acco
tnpa
nyin
gno
tes
Inba
sic
)iua
ttcia
lsl
atet
uettt
s.
24
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Balance Sheet — Governmental Funds
December31. 2012
Debt Nonmajor Totalservice governmental governmental
Assels General fund funds funds
Cash and pooled investments S 560,317 8,251,165 34,234,107 43,045,589Investments 74,153,277 — 4,565,619 78,718,896Receivables (net ofallosvanee for uncollectibles) 92,676,187 55,699.750 28,117,071 176,493.008Dne front nthergovernments 22,994.025 223.942 16,737,214 39,955,181Due from other funds — 10,371,000 — 10,371,000Accnted interest 130,260 — 60.665 190,925Inventories 2.320,144 — — 2,320,144Other assets 10.722 — 498,899 509,621Restricted assets:
Deposits with tmstee — — 10,879,942 10,879.942
Total assets S 192,844,932 74,545,857 95,093,517 362,484,306
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other S 32,592,307 169,601 9,543,501 42,305,409Due to other governnsents 988,345 — 25,000 1.013,345Due to other funds 30,371,000 — — 30,371.000Unearned revenue 25.360 17,189 4,613,874 4.656,423Advanced revenue 80.959,039 55.670,014 31.903,083 168,532,136
Total liabilities 144,936,051 55,856,804 46.085.458 246,878,313
Fund balances:Nonspendable 2,320,144 — 2,775.389 5,095,533Restricted 747.561 18,689.053 34,824,332 54,260,946Committed — — 18,704,036 18,704,036Assigned 7,233,035 — 6.691,614 13,924,649Unassigned 37.608.141 — (13,987,312) 23,620,829
47,908,881 18.689,053 49,008.059 115,605,993
Total liabilities atid fund balances S 192,844,932 74,545,857 95,093,517
Amounts reported for governmental activilies in the slatementof net position are different because:
Capital assets used in governmental activities arenot linancial resources and, therefore, are notreported in the funds 1,103,629,790
Revenues earned during the current period are notavailable as resources and, therefore, are recognizedas advanced revenue in the funds 168,532,136
Bond costs of issuance are capitalized at the governmentsvide level and amortized over the life of Ilte relatedbonds 6,903,613
Long-term liabilities. including bonds payable and pensionobligations, are not due and payable in the current periodand. therefore, are not reported in the funds (see note 5) (1,227,109,321)
Net position of governmental activities S 167,562,211
See acconspanying notes to basic financial statements.
25
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund BalancesGovernmental Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
PropertyMotor vehicleCity sales and uscBusinessIn lieu
Licenses and permitsIntergovernmentalInvestment incomeRevenue from KenoCharges for servicesRents, royalties, and otherContributions and grants
Total revenues
Expenditures:Current:
General governmentPublic safetyTransportation servicesOther public servicesCommunity developmentCulture and parks
Debt service:PrincipalInterestBond issuance costs
Capital outlay
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover expenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers inTransfers outSale of capital assetsProceeds from issuance of bondsProceeds from refunding bondsProceeds from bond premiumDiscount on sale of bondsPayment to refunded bond escrow agent
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balances
Fund balances beginning of year
Fund balances - end of year
$ 79,123,6159,163,518
128,379,32261,614,154
3,956,0318,417,387
(480)722,382554,533
20,613,005965,061107,663
313,616,191
38,505,619206,990,090
1,113,00916,415,1097,233,401
28,841,517
3,984,8733,045,351
257,258
306,386,227
7,229,964
150,000(3,413,203)
53,660,317 7,931,448
717,49222,322
1,536,24939,720,823
444,9886,665,750
31,462,60221,663,716
_______________
49,882,028
_______________
160,047,418
738,724 9,145,101— 6,758,284
47,853,48713,098,52019,010,163
— 4,966,316
4,896,6537,531,931
492,973
_______________
32,562,258
_______________
146,315,686
(579,570) 13,731,732
— 2,176,735— (2,077,007)
658,00042,555,86235,067,0654,073,894
(3,922)
______________
(47,877,188)
______________
34,573,439
48,305,171
140,715,3809,163,518
128,379,32262,331,6464,174,5229,953,636
41,896,0212,133,5067,220,283
54,709,03122,628,77752,404,647
535,710,289
48,389,444213,748,374
48,966,49629,513,62926,243,56433,807,833
47,062,14033,803,919
973,24832,819,516
515,328,163
20,382,126
2,326,735(5,490,210)
658,00077,890,86235,067,065
8,380,765(3,922)
(86,845,834)
31,983,461
52,365,587
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
Revenues:Taxes:
General
Debt Nonmajor Totalservice governmental governmentalfund funds funds
196,169
2,175,678966,136
2,633,424
2,414,956
62,046,680
38,180,61423,226,637
480,275
62,626,250
35,335,000
4,306,871
(38,968,646)
673,225
93,655
(3,263,203)
3,966,761
43,942,120 1 8,595,398 702,888 63,240,406
$ 47,908,881 18,689,053 49,008,059 115,605,993
26
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA j5Reconciliation of the Change in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
to the Statement of Activities — Governmental Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
Amounts reported for governmental activities iii the statement of activitiesare different because:
Net change in fund balances — total governmental funds $ 52,365,587Governmental finds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the
statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimateduseful lives and reported as depreciation expense. This is the amount by whichcapital outlays exceeded depreciation expense in the current period (see note 5). (5,081,487)
The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital contributionsand sale of capital assets. 901,969
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financialresources are not reported as revenues in the funds. (19,604,284)
The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds, leases, etc.) and long-term liabilitiesprovides current financial resources to governmental funds, whereas therepayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financialresources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effecton net position. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs,premiums, discounts, and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas theseamounts are advanced and amortized in the statement of activities. This amountis the net effect of these differences in the treatment of long-term debt andrelated items (see note 5). 1,651,233
Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use ofcurrent financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures inthe governmental funds (see note 5). (62,778,038)
Change in net position of governmental activities S (32,545,020)
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
27
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Net Position —
Proprietary Funds
December 3!, 2012
Sewer Nonmajor TotalConvention Parking revenue enterprise proprietary
Assets Center Hotel facilities fund funds funds
Current assets:Cash and casts equivalents S 159 1,088,532 353,076 892,583 2,334,350Investments
— 110,938,296 — 110,938,296Prepaids
— 6,742 — 10,000 16,742Receivables met of allowance for uncottectibles) — 171,726 1,420,249 170,266 1,762,241Due from other governments — — 5,226.409 — 5,226,409Accrued interest receivable 173 — 44,293 — 44,466Inventories —
— 759,374 28,364 787,738Due from other funds — — 20,000000 27,000 20,027,000Restricted assets:
Investments —— 11,960,039 — 11,960,039
Deposits svith trustee 4,324,014
________________
— — 4,324,014
Total current assets 4,324,346 1,267,000 150,701,736 1,128,213 157,421,295
Noncurrent assets:Restricted assets:
Investments —— 9,259,469 — 9,259,469
Deposits svith trustee 17,895,917 — — 17,895,917Advanced charges 2.232,618 275,936 2,636,459 2,429 5,147,442
Capital assets:Land 2,473,344 2,721,046 — 5,194,390Buildings and systems 90,781.991 61,363,255 755,721,784 9,228,130 917,095,160Furniture and fixtures 14,343,347 — — 14,343,347Machinery and cqnipmcnt 3,974,072 — 10,089.056 2,852,482 16,915,610Cullurat assets 718,020 — — 718,020Construction in progress -
— 107,205,340 — 107,205,340
109,817.430 63,836,599 875,737,226 12,080,612 1,061,471.867
Less accumulated depreciation 24,544,708 33.148,427 334,024,784 7,200,841 398,918,760
Capital assets, net 85,272,722 30,688,172 541,712,442 4.879,771 662,553,107
Total noncurrent assets 105,401,257 30,964,108 553,608,370 4,882,200 694,855,935
Total assets S 109,725.603 32,231.108 704,310,106 6,010,413 852,277,230
Liabilities and Net Position
Current liabilities:Acconnts payable and other current liabililies 5 70,032 206,991 20,263,166 248,363 20,788,552Accrned interest payable 3,164,014 540,073 1,237,174 3,642 4,944,903Unearned revenue
— 270,460 46,637 317,097Current installments of long-term debt 1,160,000 2,730,000 10,722,865 25,000 14,637,865Workers’ compensation and healtbcare claims — 5,822 646.317 199,427 851,566Due to other funds 27.000 — — — 27,000Compensated absences — 17 80.963 17,353 98.333
Total current liabilities 4,421,046 3,482,903 33,220,945 540,422 41,665,316
Noncurrent liabililies:Long-term debt, excluding current installments 42,894,053 33,400,162 334,377,171 321,701 510,993,087Pension obligation
— 46,740 7,131,722 1,550,849 8,729,311Postretirement benefit obligation — 41,366 6,311,529 1,372,493 7,725,388Workers’ compensation and henllhcare claims —- 10,640 1,180,998 364,406 1,556,044Compensated absences
— 329 1,538,291 329,720 1,868,340
Total noncurrent liabilities 142,894.053 33,499.237 350.539,711 3,939.169 530,872,170
Total liabilities 147,315,099 36.982,140 383,760,656 4,479,591 572,537,486
Net positionNet investnsent in capital assets (58,781,331) (5,441,990) 196,612,406 4,533,070 136,922,155Restricted for debt service 22,219,931 — 21,219,508 43,439,439Unrestricted (1,028.096) 690,958 102,717.536 (3,002,248) 99,378,150
Total net posilion 137,589,496) (4.751,032) 320.549,450 1,530,822 279,739,744
Total liabilities and net position S 109.725,603 32,231,108 704.310,106 6,010,4t3 852,277,230
See acconspanying notes to basic financial slatements.
28
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net PositionProprietary Funds
Year ended December31, 2012
Convention Sewer Nonmajor TotalCenter Parking revenue enterprise proprietaryHotel facilities fund funds funds
Operating revenues:Charges for services S 11,147,600 4,064,700 73,321,440 7,244,940 95,778,689
Total operating revenues 11,147,600 4,064,700 73,321,449 7,244.940 95,778,689
Operating expenses:Personal services — 103.121 17,086,095 3,621,586 20,810,802Outside services 146,498 1,552,660 9,461.741 1,217,276 12,378,175Operation and maintenance 1,360,197 65,411 8,478,241 1,619,674 11,523,523Cost of sales and services — — 276,785 276,785Depreciation and amortization 5,442,663 2,410,197 19,039,886 442,464 27,335,210
Total operating expenses 6,949.358 4,131,389 54,065,963 7.177,785 72,324.495
Operating income (lossl 4,198.242 (66,689) 19,255,486 67,155 23,454,194
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):Investment income 100,405 — 306,156 — 406,561Interest expense (9.810.798) (1,902,040) (7,980,699) (15,587) 119,709,124)Oain on disposal of assets — — 9,000 — 9.000
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses), net (9,710.393) (1.902,040) (7,665,543) (15,587) (19,293,563)
Inconse (loss) before contributions and transfers (5,512,151) (1,968.729) 11,589,943 51,568 4,160,631
Transfers in — 2,446.3 19 913,870 — 3,360,189Transfers out — — (196,712) — (196,712)Cotitrihnted capital — — 1,236,274 100,000 1,336.274
Chaitge ut net position (5,512.151) 477,590 13,543,375 151,568 8,660,382
Net positiott at beginnittg of year (32,077,345) (5,228,622) 307,006,075 1,379.254 271,079.362
Net position at end of year S (37.589,496) (4,751.032) 320,549,450 1,530,822 279,739,744
See accompanying notes to basic titiancial statements.
29
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Cash Flows — Proprietary Funds
Year ended December 31, 20 2
Cash flows front operating activities:Receipts from customersPayments to suppliersPayments to employees
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flosvs from noitcapital financing activities:Transfers in/osttAdvances front (to) otlter fttnds
Net cash provided by (itsed in) ttoncapitalfinancing activities
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:Capital expenditttresCapital contributedDebt issoance costsPayments Ott long-term debtlsstiance of long-term debtPrentiutti received on issuance
of long-term debtInterest paid
Net cash used in capital and relatedfinancing activities
Cash flows front ittvesting activities:Net sale/pttrcltases of investment securities, netInterest received
Net cash provided by (itsed in) ittvestittg activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash eqttivalents, beginning of year
Caslt and cash eqttivalettts, end of year
Recottciliation of operating incoitse (loss) to itet cash provided byoperating activities:
Operating ittcottle (loss)Adjttstmeitts to reconcile operating income (loss) to set cash provided
by (ttsed in) operatittg activities:Depreciation and amortizationCaslt tlosvs intpacted by chattges in:
ReceivablesInventoriesPrepaidsAcconitts payable attd otherClainis payableCompensated absencesPension obligationPostretiremeitt benefit obligatiott
Net cash provided by operating activities
See accottipattying notes to basic flnattcial statetrtents.
2,446,319 717,158(2,296,829) 1,003 (990,657)
(2,296,829) 2.447,322 (273,499)
(1.156,833) — (93,594,034)—
— 1,236,27456,886 58,813 (554,174)
(640.000) (2,635,000) (25,064.847)—
— 115,777,635
S 4,198.242 (66,689) 19,255,486
5,442,663 2,410,197 19,039,886
20,78069,536
(496,254)10,248,192
243,864(64,220)
1,288,035
______________ ______________
1,060.960
________________ ________________
50,666,265
ConventionCenterHotel
S 11,147,600(2,977,781)
8,169.819
Sewer Nonmajor TotalParking revenue enterprise proprietaryfacilities fund funds funds
4,117,336(1,517,900)
(95,955)
2,503,481
73,612,689(8,388,968)
(14,557,456)
50,666,265
7,253.333(2,991,726)(3.393,968)
867,639
96,130,958(15.876,375)(18,047,379)
62,207.204
3,163,477(1,421,050) (4,707,533)
(1,421,050)
(63,585)100,000
(25,000)
(1,544,056)
(94.814.452)1.336.274(438,475)
(28,364,847)115,777,635
—— 9,617,815 — 9.617,815
(7,663,319) (1,927,163) (7,940.477) (15,694) (17,546.653)
(9,403,266) (4,503,350) (521,808) (4.279) (14,432,703)
3.379.467150,968
3.530.435
159
S 159
447,453
641,079
1,088,532
(81,717,492)310,149
(81,407.343)
(31,536,385)
31.889,461
353.076
(557.690)
1.450,273
892,583
(78,338,025)461,117
(77,876,908)
(31.646,463)
33.980,813
2.334.350
67,155 23,454,194
98.709(1,569.795)
S 8.169.819
52,636
27,09173,080
2603.9702,936
2,503,481
442,464
(28.244)(18,505)
(9,934)87.085(8,827)
135,578100,867
867.639
27,335,210
45,17251,031
(380,388)8,938,562
235,297(60,250)
1,426,5491,161.827
62.207,204
30
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position —
Fiduciary Funds
December 31, 2012
TotalPension Trust Fiduciary
Funds Agency Funds
Assets:Cash and cash equivalents $ 813,226 8,318,297 9,131,523Receivables:
Accounts receivable 1,813,415 33,565 1,846,980Accrued interest 2,067,995 1,325 2,069,320
Due from other governments 1,089 1,089Due from other funds 1,221,300 1,221,300investments, at fair value:
Government securities 37,312,465 1,196,423 38,508,888Municipal issues 3,879,158 — 3,879,158Corporate bonds 117,525,803 117,525,803Domestic equities 227,181,818 — 227,181,818International equities 125,170,190 125,170,190Domestic real estate securities 133,107,674 133,107,674International real estate 1,503,535 1,503,535Commodities 33,493,365 33,493,365Private equity 12,059,269 — 12,059,269Cash and cash equivalents 19,508,721
_______________
19,508,721
Total assets 715,437,723 10,770,910 726,208,633
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities 2,404,496 10,770,910 13,175,406
Total liabilities 2,404,496 10,770,910 13,175,406
Net position held in trust for pension benefits $ 713,033,227 713,033,227
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
31
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position —
Pension Trust Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
Additions:Contributions:
Employer $ 42,518,087Employee 25,843,583
Total contributions 68,361,670
Investment earnings:Dividends and interest 21,004,508Net increase in the fair value of investments 61,057,680
Total investment earnings 82,062,188
Less investment expenses (3,853,291)
Net investment income 78,208,897
Total additions 146,570,567
Deductions:Benefit payments 89,401,515
Change in net position 57,169,052
Net position, beginning of year 655,864,175
Net position, end of year $ 713,033,227
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
32
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Discretely Presented Component UnitsCombining Statement of Net Position
December 31, 2012
WorkforceAssets MECA Solutions Total
Cash and pooled investments $ 15,243,146 309,376 15,552,522Investments 21,167,800 21,167,800Receivables (net of allowance for uncollectibles) 3,731,277 9,602 3,740,879Due from other governments 352,491 352,491Other assets 2,470,246 2,470,246Capital assets:
Nondepreciable 653,669 653,669Depreciable 16,648,226 109,181 16,757,407
Total assets $ 59,914,364 780,650 60,695,014
Liabilities and Net Position
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other $ 24,566,810 293,414 24,860,224Long-term liabilities:
Other liabilities 396,105 18,611 414,716Bonds, notes, and leases payable:
Due within one year 1,002,241 1,002,241Due in more than one year 2,805,837 2,805,837
Total liabilities 28,770,993 312,025 29,083,018
Net position:Net investment in capital assets 13,493,817 109,181 13,602,998Restricted 133,250 133,250Unrestricted 17,649,554 226,194 17,875,748
Total net position 31,143,371 468,625 31,611,996
Total liabilities and net position $ 59,914,364 780,650 60,695,014
See accompanying notes to basic financial statements.
33
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SI<
A
Dis
cret
ely
Pre
sent
edC
ontp
onen
tU
nits
Cn,
nbi,
tint
tS
tate
roen
tci
Act
isit
ics
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r31
,2(
112
Pro
gra
mre
ven
ues
Net
reven
ue
(exp
ense
)an
dch
anges
inne
tpo
siti
on
Oper
atin
gC
apit
alH
eart
land
Char
ges
for
gra
nts
and
gra
nts
and
Wo
rkfo
rce
Ex
pen
ses
sers
ices
con
trib
uti
on
sco
ntr
ibu
tio
ns
ME
CA
Sutr
rtiu
ns
Tot
al
Func
tions
/pro
grar
os:
Cor
opon
ent
Uni
tsM
EC
A5
41.4
14.4
3042
,527
,404
—1.
113.
054
—1.
113.
054
Vor
kfor
ceSo
ltttio
ns3.
404.
421
42.5
463.
013.
605
——
371.
010
371.
810
Tot
aldI
rer
com
pone
nttn
tits
44.8
98.0
5142
.570
.030
3.01
3.60
5-—
1.11
3.05
437
1,81
0.4
04,8
64
Gen
eral
rer
entte
s:In
vest
men
tea
rnin
gs00
.640
—80
.648
Tot
alge
nera
lre
senn
es00
.648
80.6
48
Clta
nge
ittne
tpo
siti
on1,
193,
702
371.
810
1,56
5,51
2
Net
posi
tion
—be
ginn
ing
oiy
ear
29.9
49.6
6996
.815
30.0
46.4
84
Net
posi
tion
—en
dot
yert
rS
31.1
43.3
7146
8,62
531
.611
.996
See
aeeo
ntpa
nyin
gno
tes
toba
sic
linan
eial
stat
ettte
ots.
34
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Reporting Entity
The City of Omaha, Nebraska (the City) was incorporated on February 2, 1857. The City operatesunder a Home Rule Charter and has a mayor-council form of government with an elected full-timechief executive, the Mayor, and an elected legislative body, the council, composed of sevenmembers. The seven council members each represent one of the City’s seven districts. The Mayorand members of the council are elected through popular vote to four-year terms. The City is apolitical subdivision of the state of Nebraska and is exempt from state and federal income taxes.
The governmental reporting entity consists of the City (the primary government) and its componentunits. Component units are legally separate organizations for which the City is financiallyaccountable or other organizations whose nature and significant relationship with the City are suchthat exclusion would cause the City’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. Financialaccountability is defined as the appointment of a voting majority of the component unit’s board and(i) either the City’s ability to impose its will on the organization or (ii) there is potential for theorganization to provide financial benefit to or impose a financial burden on the City.
The basic financial statements include both blended component units and the City’s discretelypresented component units. The blended component units, although legally separate entities, are, insubstance, part of the City’s operations, and data from these units are basic with data of the primarygovernment. The City’s basic financial statements blend the activity of the City of Omaha ParkingFacilities Corporation, the City of Omaha Impound Facilities Corporation, the City of OmahaStadium Facilities Corporation, City of Omaha Northwest Library Facilities Corporation, the City ofOmaha Facilities Corporation, and City of Omaha Convention Hotel Coiporation. The City isfinancially accountable for these organizations and they provide services entirely to the City ofOmaha.
The City reports its respective ownership percentage of the assets, liabilities, net position, andoperating activity of the Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission (the Commission). Separatefinancial statements are available at 1819 Famam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68183.
The City has engaged in related-party transactions as defined under Governmental AccountingStandards Board (GASB) Statement No. 56, Codification of Accounting and Financial ReportingGuidance Contained in the AICPA Statements on Auditing Standards, with the Omaha HousingAuthority, Omaha Airport Authority, and Metro Transit Authority where the Mayor or City Councilappoints board members to these organizations. The City’s accountability for these organizationsdoes not extend beyond making the appointments.
The discretely presented component units, on the other hand, are reported in separate columns in thegovernmentwide financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the primarygovernment. The City’s basic financial statements discretely present the financial position andactivities of the Metropolitan Entertainment and Convention Authority (MECA) and HeartlandWorkforce Solutions (HWS).
35 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Metropolitan Entertainment and Convention Authority
Metropolitan Entertainment and Convention Authority (MECA) is a separate nonprofitcorporation that is responsible for the operation of the Omaha Convention Center/Arena, CivicAuditorium, and Downtown Stadium. Title to the facilities and all related infrastructure assetsare vested with the City. Construction activities were principally funded by private donations andgeneral obligation bonds of the City. Board members of MECA are appointed by the City. Thefinancial statements for MECA included herein are for the year ended June 30, 2012. MECA’sseparate financial statements are available at 1819 Famam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68183.
Heartland Workforce Solutions
Heartland Workforce Solutions (HWS) is a separate 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation that wasfonned in October 2010. HWS administers the Workforce Investment Act to expandemployment opportunities for youth, adults, and dislocated workers in Douglas, Sarpy, andWashington Counties in Nebraska. The organization receives the majority of its funding from theCity of Omaha as pass-through federal funds. The Mayor of the City of Omaha is the chiefelected official of the Tn-County workforce area. The Mayor appoints all board members andapproves HWS’s budget. The financial statements for HWS included herein include the periodfor fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Separate financial statements for HWS are available at 1819Farnarn Street, Omaha, NE 68183.
Related Organizations
The City’s officials are responsible for appointing members of the boards of other organizations, butthe City’s accountability for these organizations does not extend beyond making the appointments.The Mayor or City Council appoints board members of the Omaha Housing Authority, the OmahaAirport Authority, and the Metro Area Transit Authority. The City is not financially accountable forthese organizations.
The Douglas Omaha Technology Commission (DOT.Comm) is a governmental entity formed by aninterlocal agreement between the City and Douglas County (the County). The purpose of this entityis to increase the cooperative efforts of the County and the City in connection with electronicinformation, voice, and data communication services for governmental operations, and publicservices. The Mayor appoints two members of the DOT.Comm Oversight Committee, which has atotal of seven members. The City Finance Director is a permanent member of the OversightCommittee. DOT.Comm has control over its operations and fiscal matters and holds title to its assets.DOT.Comm’s revenues are primarily derived from maintenance fees from the City and County.Separate financial statements can be obtained from its office at 408 South 18th Street, Omaha,Nebraska 68102.
(b) Basis ofPresentation
Governmentwide Financial Statements
The statement of net position and statement of activities display information about the primarygovernment and its component units. These statements include the financial activities of the overallgovernment, except for fiduciary activities. Eliminations have been made to minimize interfund
36 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
activities. These statements distinguish between the governmental and business-type activities of theCity and between the City and its discretely presented component units. Governmental activities,which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately frombusiness-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees charged to external parties.
The statement of activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues forthe business-type activities of the City and for each function of the City’s governmental activities.Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a program or function and, therefore,are clearly identifiable to a particular function. Program revenues include (1) charges paid by therecipients of goods or services offered by the programs and (2) grants and contributions that arerestricted to meeting the operation or capital requirements of a particular program. Revenues that arenot classified as program revenues, including all taxes, are presented as general revenues.
Fund Financial Statements
The fund financial statements provide information about the City’s funds, including fiduciary funds.Separate statements for each fund category — governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary — arepresented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major governmental and enterprise funds,each displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental and enterprise funds are separatelyaggregated and reported as nonmajor funds.
Proprietary fund operating revenues, such as charges for services, result from exchange transactionsassociated with the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those in which eachparty receives and gives up essentially equal values. Nonoperating revenues, such as investmentearnings, result from nonexchange transactions, or ancillary activities.
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
o The general find is used to account for all revenues and expenditures necessary to carry outbasic governmental activities of the City that are not accounted for through other funds.
• The debt service fund is used to account for the resources for, and the payment of, generallong-term debt principal, interest, and related costs.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
o The convention center hotel fund is used to account for costs associated with the constructionand operation of the Convention Center Hotel.
e The parking facilities fund accounts for activity from parking revenue and related expendituresfor operation, maintenance, and construction of parking garages.
• The sewer revenue fund accounts for activity from sewer service charges, construction grants,and related expenditures for operation, maintenance, and capital improvements of the sanitarysewerage system and wastewater treatment plants.
37 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
The City reports the following additional fund types:
o The pension trust funds accumulate contributions from the City and its employees andearnings from the funds’ investments. Disbursements are made from the funds for pensionpayments to City retirees.
o The agency funds account for assets held by the City as an agent for various localgovernments.
o The permanent funds are used to report resources that are legally restricted to the extent thatearnings, and not principal, may be used for purposes that support the City’s programs for thebenefit of the City or its citizenry.
The special revenue funds account for the proceeds from specific revenue sources that arerestricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
• The capital projects funds account for all resources received and used for the acquisition ordevelopment of major capital improvements (other than those financed by proprietary fundsand trust funds).
o The enterprisefinds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similarto private business enterprises: (a) where the intent of the governing body is that the costs ofproviding goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis are financed orrecovered primarily through user charges or (b) where the governing body has decided thatperiodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, andlor net income is appropriatefor capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purposes.
(c) Basis ofAccounting
The governmentwide, proprietary, and fiduciary fund financial statements are reported using theeconomic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recordedwhen earned and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when therelated cash flows take place. Nonexchange transactions, in which the City gives (or receives) valuewithout directly receiving (or giving) equal value in exchange, include property and sales taxes,grants, entitlements, and donations. On an accrual basis, revenue from property taxes is recognizedin the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied. Revenues from grants, entitlements, and donationsare recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligible requirements have been met.
Governmental funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and themodified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when measurableand available. Property and sales taxes, interest, certain state and federal grants, and charges forservices are accrued when their receipt occurs within 60 days after the end of the accounting periodso as to be both measurable and available. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability isincurred, except for debt service expenditures and other long-term liabilities, which are recordedonly when due. General capital assets acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmentalfunds. Proceeds and issuances of long-term debt are reported as other financing sources and uses.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operatingrevenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods
38 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operatingrevenues of the enterprise funds are charges to customers for goods and services. Operating expensesinclude the cost of sales and service, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. Allrevenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues andexpenses.
(d) Pooled Cash and Investments
The City maintains a pooled cash and investment account for all funds. These funds are placed in thecustody of the City Treasurer. Each fund reports its undistributed interest in the principal balance ofthe pooi. Interest earned on the City’s pooled cash and investments is credited to the general fund ofthe City, except for the Don Hayes Memorial Fund, Ralph Anderson Memorial Fund, Cash ReserveFund, Western Heritage/Byron Reed Fund, Asarco Remediation Fund, Sewer Revenue Fund, andSewer Construction Fund, which are credited directly to the respective funds. Interest is imputed andtransferred to the Keno funds, Police Seized Assets funds, Law Enforcement Block Grant funds, andWestern Heritage fund.
(e) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the accompanying statement of cash flows, the City’s enterprise funds consider allhighly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to becash equivalents.
Q9 Investments
Investments are stated at fair value. Securities traded on a national or international exchange arevalued at the last reported sales prices at current exchange rates and where marketable securities arenot listed on an exchange, quotations are obtained from brokerage firms or national pricing services.Income from investments not included in pooled cash and investments that are held by individualfunds is recorded in the respective funds as it is received. Accrued interest is recorded at year-end.
(g) Inventories
Inventories of materials and supplies are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in,first-out method. The costs of govemmental fund inventories are recorded as assets when purchasedand expended as used.
(h) Revenue
• Property tax: Nebraska Legislative Bill (LB) 1114 imposes a tax ceiling for general revenuepurposes. The tax levy certified in any year shall not exceed $0.45 per $100 of actual valuation.The 2012 general tax levy ($0.28447 per $100 of assessed valuation) was below the legal limitby $0.16553, or $45,493,374.
The Home Rule Charter of the City imposes a tax ceiling for general revenue purposes. The taxlevy certified in any year shall not exceed $0.6l25 per $100 of actual valuation plus whatevertax levy is necessary to provide for principal and interest payments on the indebtedness of theCity for administrative expenses incurred in issuing and maintaining bonds and for satisfactionof judgments and litigation expenses in connection therewith. The 2012 general tax levy
39 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
($0.28447 per $100 of assessed valuation) was below the legal limit by $032803, or$90,154,000. The assessed value upon which the 2012 levy was based was $27,483,461,755.
The tax levies for all political subdivisions in Douglas County are certified by the county boardon or before October 15. Real estate taxes are due and become an enforceable lien on propertyon December 31. The first half of real estate taxes becomes delinquent on April 1 and thesecond half becomes delinquent on August 1 following the levy date. Personal property taxesare due on December 31 and become delinquent on April 1 and August 1 following the levydate. Delinquent taxes bear 14% interest.
• Motor vehicle tax: Motor vehicle tax is imposed upon all motor vehicles registered for operationupon the highways of the State of Nebraska. The tax is imposed at the rates authorized by theState and in the manner and for the puose specified. The Motor Vehicle Tax is assessed on avehicle at the time of initial registration and annually thereafter until the vehicle reaches 14years of age or more. It is based upon the Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price of the vehicle.
o City sales and use tax: A tax imposed upon the sale transactions within the corporate limits ofthe City on which the State is authorized to impose a tax according to the provisions of theNebraska Revenue Act of 1967. Sales tax collected by the State is remitted to the City twomonths after the month of sale. The tax is 1.5% that is added to the 5.5% State Sales Tax set bythe Nebraska Legislature. (The State Department of Revenue retains a 3% collection charge onall of the City’s sales tax receipts.) This revenue pays the City’s day-to-day operations.
• Business tax: Includes the cable television franchise fee, hotel/motel occupancy tax, kenoadministrative fee, occupation tax—Omaha Public Power District, occupation tax—Metropolitan Utilities District, stadium concessions, vehicle rental occupation tax, and vendingmachines concessions. These fees/taxes were implemented to raise money for the City and tofund special projects.
• License and permits: Includes various licensing fees, permit fees, and other fees related toprofessional/business activities (beer and liquor permits, firearm permits, pawnbroker’s permits,theater permits). A majority of these fees were implemented to raise money for the City;however, some items were implemented to regulate businesses and professionals that require alicense or permit to practice.
o Charges for services: Includes various fees and surcharges related to professional and businessactivities (asbestos removal, parking meters, swimming fees, tree removal). A majority of thesefees were implemented to raise money for the City in order to recover costs of maintenance,upkeep of public property, administration costs, and costs related to the service provided by theCity.
(i) Capital Assets
Within the governmentwide and proprietary fund financial statements, capital assets, includinginfrastructure, are recorded at historical cost or at estimated historical cost if actual historical cost isnot available. Contributed fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair market value on the date ofdonation. Capital assets include public domain infrastructure, including roads and bridges. The City
40 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
defines capital assets as assets with individual costs of more than $10,000 and estimated useful livesin excess of one year. Capital assets used in operations are depreciated or amortized using thestraight-line method over the lesser of the capital lease period or their estimated useful lives in thegovemmentwide and proprietary fund financial statements. Assets are depreciated using thehalf-year convention in the first and last years of the asset’s useful life.
The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Infrastructure 15 — 50 yearsBuildings and systems 15 — 50 yearsImprovements 5 — 30 yearsMachinery and equipment 5 —20 yearsVehicles 5 — 15 yearsFurniture and Fixtures 5 — 7 years
Net interest costs on funds borrowed to finance the construction are capitalized and depreciated overthe life of the related asset.
(1) Compensated Absences
Employees earn annual vacation and sick leave at various specific rates during their period ofemployment. In the event of termination, an employee is reimbursed for accumulated vacation time.This balance is the total of a yearly carryover, up to a maximum of 280 hours for civilian bargainingand civilian management employees, plus the current year’s leave balance. Civilian management andbargaining employees are reimbursed for a percentage of accumulated sick leave up to a maximumof 2,000 hours (612.5 maximum paid hours). Civilian and nonexempt management employees havethe option of accruing compensatory leave time at a rate of one and one half times the actual hoursworked in lieu of the payment of overtime. Employees may accrue a maximum of 120 hours ofcompensatory time. The compensatory time must be taken within three months after the end of thecalendar year in which it is earned and any remaining amounts are paid out in cash. However, theemployee retains the right to cash out the compensatory leave balance at any time.
In the event of termination, police employees are reimbursed for accumulated vacation time up to amaximum of 320 hours, plus the current year leave balance. Upon retirement, death, or resignationafter 20 years, police employees receive I for 1 for the first 1,200 hours of accumulated sick leaveand 1 for 4 hours thereafter up to a maximum of 3,200 hours (1,700 hours). Police employees mayaccrue a maximum of 360 hours of compensatory time. In the event of termination, Fire Department24-hour shift employees are reimbursed for accumulated vacation time up to a maximum of 432hours, plus current year accumulation. Upon retirement or resignation, Fire Bargaining 24-hour shiftemployees are reimbursed for accumulated sick leave at 65% of actual hours. In the event oftermination, Fire Management employees are reimbursed for accumulated vacation time up to amaximum of 280 hours, plus current year accumulation. Upon retirement, Fire Managementemployees are reimbursed for accumulated sick leave 1 for 1 for the first 1,200 hours and 1 for 4 forall hours greater than 1,201 to 3,200 for a maximum 1,700. In the event of termination, FireDepartment 40-hour shift employees are reimbursed for accumulated vacation time up to a maximumof 291.48 hours, plus current year accumulation. Upon retirement or resignation, 40-hour shift
41 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
employees are converted to 24-hour shift employees reimbursed for accumulated sick leave asabove.
For the governmentwide, proprietary, and fiduciary fund financial statements, vacation leave andother compensated absences with similar characteristics are accrued as the benefits are earned if theleave is attributable to past service and it is probable that the City will compensate the employees forsuch benefits. Such accruals are based on current salary rates and include salary-related payments,such as the employer’s matching Social Security and Medicare costs, associated with payments madefor compensated absences on termination. In the governmental funds, a liability for these amounts isreported only if they are due as a payable.
(k) Risk Management
The City is exposed to various risk of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to, and destruction ofassets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City is self-insuredwith respect to its obligation to provide workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage,unemployment benefits, and health and dental coverage.
The City purchases commercial insurance for property damage of City buildings and contents. TheCity purchases commercial insurance for aviation liability for the police aviation unit.
(1) Long- Term Obligations
In the governmentwide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financialstatements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicablegovernmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position.Bond premiums and discounts, as well as issuance costs, are advanced and amortized over the life ofthe bonds using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bondpremium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as advanced charges and other assets andamortized over the term of the related debt on a straight-line basis.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts,as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reportedas other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financingsources, whereas discounts on debt issuances are reported as financing uses. Issuance costs, whetheror not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as current expenditures.
(in) Interfund Transactions
Interfund transactions are reflected as either loans, services provided, reimbursements, or transfers.Loans, which are reported as receivables and payables, are subject to elimination upon consolidationand are referred to as either “due to/from other funds” or “advances to/from other funds.”
Services provided, deemed to be at market or near market rates, are treated as revenues andexpenditures/expenses. Reimbursements are when one fund incurs a cost, charges the appropriatebenefiting fund, and reduces its related cost as a reimbursement. All other interfund transactions aretreated as transfers. Transfers between governmental or proprietary funds are netted as part of thereconciliation to the govemmentwide presentation.
42 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(n) Restricted Assets
Restricted assets include deposits with trustees of various enterprise funds and capital projects.
(o) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2010, GASB issued Statement No. 60, Accounting and Financial Reportingfor ServiceConcession Arrangements. The objective of this statement is to improve financial reporting byaddressing issues related to service concession arrangements (SCA5), which are a type ofpublic-private or public-public partnership. This guidance was effective for the City for the yearended December 31, 2012. The City does not have SCAs that fall under this guidance.
In December 2010, GASB issued Statement No. 62, Codification of Accounting and FinancialReporting Guidance Contained in Pre-November 30, 1989 Financial Accounting Standards Board(FASB) and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICP4) Pronouncements. Theobjective of this statement is to incorporate into the GASB’s authoritative literature certainaccounting and financial reporting guidance that is included in the following pronouncements issuedon or before November 30, 1989, which does not conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements:FASB Statements and Interpretations; Accounting Principles Board Opinions; or AccountingResearch Bulletins of the AICPA Committee on Accounting Procedure (collectively referred to asthe FASB and AICPA pronouncements). The guidance was effective and was adopted by the Cityfor the year ended December 31, 2012.
In June 2011, GASB issued Statement No. 63, Financial Reporting of Deferred Ou(fiows ofResources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position. This statement provides financialreporting guidance for presentation of certain deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows ofresources and was effective and was adopted by the City for the year ended December 31, 2012.
In June 2011, GASB issued Statement No. 64, Derivative Instruments: Application of HedgeAccounting Termination Provisions, an amendment of GASB Statement No. 53. The objective of thisstatement is to clarify whether an effective hedging relationship continues after the replacement of aswap counterparty or a swap counterparty’s credit support provider. This statement sets forth criteriathat establish when the effective hedging relationship continues and hedge accounting shouldcontinue to be applied. The requirements of this statement were effective for the City for the yearended December 31, 2012.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Adopted
In November 2010, GASB issued Statement No. 61, The Financial Reporting Entity: Omnibus, anamendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 34. The objective of this statement is to improvefinancial reporting for a governmental financial reporting entity. The requirements ofGASB Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, and the related financial reportingrequirements of GASB Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements — and Management’sDiscussion and Analysis —for State and Local Governments, were amended to better meet user needsand to address reporting entity issues that have arisen since the issuance of those statements. Theguidance is effective for the City for the year ending December 31, 2013.
43 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements3;.
December 31, 2012
In March 2012, GASB issued Statement No. 65, items Previously Reported as Assets andLiabilities,which reclassifies certain items that were previously reported as assets and liabilities as deferredoutflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources, or current period outflows and inflows. Therequirements of this statement are effective for the City for the year ending December 31, 2013.
In March 2012, GASB issued Statement No. 66, Technical Corrections. The objective of thisstatement is to improve accounting and financial reporting for a governmental financial reportingentity by resolving conflicting guidance that resulted from the issuance of previous pronouncements.The provisions of this statement are effective for the City for the year ending December 31, 2013.
In June 2012, GASB issued Statement No. 67, Financial Reportingfor Pension Plans. The objectiveof this statement is to improve financial reporting by state and local governmental pension plans.This Statement results from a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of existing standards ofaccounting and financial reporting for pensions with regard to providing decision-useful information,supporting assessments of accountability and interperiod equity, and creating additionaltransparency. The provisions of this statement are effective for the City for the year endingDecember 31, 2014.
In June 2012, GASB issued Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reportingfor Pension. Theprimary objective of this statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state andlocal governments for pensions. The provisions of this statement are effective for the City for theyear ending December 31, 2015.
In January 2013, GASB issued Statement No. 69, Government Combinations and Disposals ofGovernment Operations. This statement establishes accounting and financial reporting standardsrelated to government combinations and disposals of government operations. The provisions of thisstatement are effective for the City for the year ending December 31, 2014.
In April 2013, GASB issued Statement No. 70, Accounting and Financial Reporting forNonexchange Financial Guarantees. The objective of this statement is to improve accounting andfinancial reporting by state and local governments that extend and receive nonexchange financialguarantees. The provisions of this statement are effective for the City for the year endingDecember 31, 2014.
The City has not completed its assessment of the impact of the adoption of these statements.
(p) Use ofEstimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted AccountingPrinciples (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reportedamounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of thefinancial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures/expenses during thereporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
44 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(2) Interfund Receivables, Payables, and Transfers
Individual interfund receivables and payables at December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Receivable fund Amount Payable fund
Agency Fund $ 1,221,300 Civilian Retirement Fund - Pension TrustFund
Sewer Revenue Fund - Enterprise Fund 20,000,000 General FundNonmajor Enterprise Funds 27,000 Convention Center Hotel Fund -
Enterprise FundDebt Service Fund 10,371,000 General Fund
All remaining balances result from the time lag between the dates that (1) interfund goods and services areprovided or reimbursable expenditures occur, (2) transactions are recorded in the accounting system, and(3) payments between funds are made. All amounts are expected to be paid within one year.
Transfers are related to funding for capital projects, lease payments, debt service, or reallocations ofspecial revenues. The following schedule briefly summarizes the City’s transfer activity:
Transfer inGeneral Nonmajor Sewer Parking
Transfers out fund governmental revenue facilities Total
Major governmental funds:General ifind $ — 966,884 2,446,319 3,413,203
Major enterpdse funds:Sewer revenue 50,000 146,712 — 196,712
Nonmajor governmental 100,000 1,063,139 913,870 — 2,077,007
Total $ 150,000 2,176,735 913,870 2,446,319 5,686,922
(3) Deposits and Investments
The City has generally pooled the cash resources of the various funds, except the pension trust fund, forinvestment purposes. Interest earned on pooled funds is credited to the City’s general fund in accordancewith Nebraska State Statute Section 77-23 15, R.R.S. 1943.
(a) Deposits
Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City will not be able to recoverits deposits. As of December 31, 2012, all of the City’s deposits were collateralized with securitiesheld by the City’s agent in the City’s name.
(b) City Investments
Investments are stated at fair value. City funds are invested in conformity with the public fundsSecurity Act, Chapter 77, Article 23, specifically 77-2387, of the Nebraska Revised Statutes.
45 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Allowable investments include U.S. government bonds, U.S. Treasury bills and notes, U.S. agencybonds and notes, certain state and political subdivision bonds, repurchase agreements, warrants ofthe State of Nebraska and Nebraska political subdivisions, and certain instruments of the FHLM,federal farm credit system, FHLB, FNMA, and the Small Business Administration. The governmentmoney market mutual fund consists of only those securities that are allowed by N.R.S. 77-2387.
Custodial Credit Risk — Custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of thecounterparty, the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateralsecurities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City’s policy requires that all funds ondeposit with any financial institution be secured with securities equal or greater than the deposit lessany amount insured by the FDIC. The City’s investment policy also requires that all investmentsecurities be held in the City’s name in the City’s safekeeping account.
Interest Rate Risk — Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of the City’s investments willdecrease as a result of an increase in interest rates. The City’s investment policy related to maturity isas follows: U.S. Treasury securities cannot exceed five years; zero-coupon or stripped couponU.S. Treasury notes or bonds cannot exceed two years; certificates of deposit issued by commercialbanks cannot exceed 30 months; and all other investments not mentioned above cannot exceed afive-year maturity from the date of purchase.
The City had the following maturities for pooled investments:
Investment termLess than
Investment type Fair value 1 year 1 — 5 years
U.S. agencies $ 120,792,279 17,894,398 102,897,881U.S. Treasuries 84,157,982 67,289,348 16,868,634
8 204,950,261
The City had the following maturities for investments held by trustees:
Investment termLess than
Investment type Fair value 1 year 1 —5 years
U.S. agencies 8 4,744,808 2,756,927 1,987,881U.S. Treasuries 132,500 — 132,500
$ 4,877,308
Credit Risk — Credit risk is the risk that the City will not recover its investments due to the inabilityof the counterparty to fulfill their obligation. State statute limits investment options to certainspecific investment vehicles. There is no statutory requirement for investments to meet a certainquality rating.
46 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December3l,2012
The pooled investment’s quality rating is as follows:
QualityInvestment type Fair value rating AAA
U.S. agencies $ 120,792,279 AAAU.S. Treasuries 84,157,982 AAA
$ 204,950,261
The deposits with trustees’ quality rating are as follows:
QualityInvestment type Fair value rating AAA
U.S. agencies $ 4,744,808 AAAU.S. Treasuries 132,500 AAA
$ 4,877,308
Concentration of Credit Risk — Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss attributed to themagnitude of the City’s investment in a single issuer. State statute does not restrict the concentrationof investment in any issuer. The City’s policy states that no more than 25% of the total portfolio willbe invested in the issuance of any single institution other than securities of the U.S. government andits agencies.
Concentrations of investment by issuer for pooled investments are displayed in the following table:
Investment type Fair value Percentage
U.S. agencies S 120,792,279 60%U.S. Treasuries 84,157,982 40
$ 204,950,261
Concentrations of investment by issuer for deposits held by trustees are displayed in the followingtable:
Investment type Fair value Percentage
U.S. agencies $ 4,744,808 98%U.S. Treasuries 132,500 2
4,877,308
47 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Foreign Currency Risk — Foreign currency risk is the risk that changes in exchange rates willadversely impact the fair value of an investment. The City does not have a policy related to foreigncurrency risk.
Summary — The following is a complete listing of deposits and investments of the City:
Investment type Fair value
Deposits $ 60,767,021Pooled investments 204,950,261Trustee accounts
Cash and cash equivalents 28,222,565Investments 4,877,308
Imprest funds 54,077
$ 298,871,232
The deposits and investments of the City, excluding the pension trust funds, at December 31, 2012,are reflected in the financial statements as follows:
FiduciaryGovernmentwide funds
statement of statement ofInvestment type net position net position Total
Cash and pooled investments $ 45,379,939 8,318,297 53,698,236Investments 189,657,192 1,196,423 190,853,615Restricted deposits with trustee 33,099,873 33,099,873Restricted investments 21,219,508
________________
21,219,508
$ 289,356,512 9,514,720 298,871,232
(c) Pension Trust Funds
The pension trust funds consist of two funds: the Civilian Plan and the Uniformed Plan. Thesepension programs operate in compliance with Omaha Municipal Code Chapter 22 and NebraskaState Statute 30-3209. City pension funds are invested according to a plan developed and reviewedquarterly by each plan’s Investment Committee. The plans define the purposes of the assets, identifythe parties responsible for managing the investment process, establish both broad and specificguidelines for the investment of the fund’s assets, and establish criteria to monitor and evaluate theperformance of the investment managers. The plan authorizes investments in common and preferredstocks, corporate bonds, cash equivalent securities, certificates of deposits of insured institutions,money market funds, bank short-term investment funds, GICs, BICs, and government bonds. Theycan be in mutual funds or privately managed accounts.
48 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Interest Rate Risk — The Pension Board of each plan with the recommendation from the respectiveInvestment Committee approves fund manager agreements. These management agreements outlinespecific investment policies each manager must adhere to. The Retirement Committees do restrictthe general asset allocation to fixed income. The uniformed plan fund’s target range for fixed incomeassets is between 13% and 31% of the portfolio value and the civilian plan fund’s range is between12% and 28%. Updated Investment Guidelines were adopted by each Pension Board inFebruary 2011. Fixed income investments are held in five accounts managed by four managers:$150.7 million in managed accounts and $10.7 million in one bond mutual fund. Maturities of thesecurities in these commingled funds are as follows:
Managed accountsMaturity range (years)
Less thanInvestment type 1 year 1 —5 6 — 10 10+
U.S. Treasuries —% 4.3% 2.5% 2.7%U.S. agencies 0.3 6.0 3.3 1.8Municipal bonds 0.2 — 1.3 1.1Corporate bonds 1.6 29.1 38.6 7.3
Bond mutual fundsPercentage
Maturity of total
0 — 1 years1 — 5 years
6 — 10 years10+ years
27.8%72.2
49 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Credit Risk — Credit risk involves the potential of loss of fair value due to the quality of the fixedincome investments. The Investment Committees of each plan monitor and select fixed fundmanagers based on an investment policy that diversifies the plan’s risks. Each manager employs avarying type of investment style. Fixed income investments are held in five accounts and aremanaged by four managers: $150.7 million in managed accounts and $10.7 million in one bondmutual fund. The quality ratings of the securities in these commingled funds are as follows:
Managed accountsPercentage
Investment type Ratings of total
U.S. Treasuries AAA 9.5%U.S. agencies AAA!AA+ 10.0Municipal bonds AAAIA3 2.8Corporate bonds AAA!A3 21.4U.S. agencies BAA1/BBB 1.4Corporate bonds BAA1/BBB 47.9Corporate bonds N/R 7.0
Bond mutual fundsPercentage
Rating of total
TSY/AGY 41.5%AAAIAaa 39.3AA+/A3 15.0BBB/Ba2 4.0N/R 0.2
Concentration of Credit Risk — Fixed income securities guidelines are governed by each manager’sindividual management contract. This allows a wide variety of management styles, thus diversifyingeach portfolio. Combined target allocation for fixed income securities shall be 12% to 31% of theportfolio. Equity investments shall be 22% to 77% of the portfolio with large cap domestics (6.5% to27%), small cap domestics (6% to 20%), and international equities (9.5% to 30%). Domestic realestate securities shall be 9.5% to 28% of the portfolio. They may be held individually or commingledin mutual funds and investment poois. There are no individual investments greater than 5% with asingle issuer.
50 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
PercentageInvestment type Fair value allocated
Government securities $ 37,312,465 5.3%Municipal issues 3,879,158 0.6Corporate bonds 117,525,803 16.5Domestic equities 227,181,818 32.0International equities 125,170,190 17.6Domestic real estate securities 133,107,674 18.7International real estate 1,503,535 0.2Commodities 33,493,365 4.7Private equity 12,059,269 1.7Cash and cash equivalents 19,508,721 2.7
Total $ 710,741,998 100.0%
Foreign Currency Risk — The City is exposed to foreign currency risk related to internationalequities. Foreign currency risk is the risk that changes in exchange rates will adversely impact thefair value of an investment. The City does not have policy related to foreign currency risk. Allinternational equities are denominated in U.S. dollars.
(4) Net Position/Fund Balances
The governmentwide and proprietary fund financial statements utilize a net position presentation. Netposition are categorized as net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted.
• Net Investment in Capital Assets — This category groups all capital assets, including infrastructure,into one component of net position. Accumulated depreciation and outstanding balances of debt that areattributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of these assets reduce the balance in thiscategory.
• Restricted Net Position — This category presents external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors,contributors, or laws or regulations of other govemments and restrictions imposed by law throughconstitutional provisions or enabling legislation.
• Debt Service— This fund is restricted for resources for, and the payment of general long-term debtprincipal, interest, and related costs.
• Community Improvement — These funds are restricted to comply with City ordinances requiring athree million dollar bond reserve for the Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds and a reserve offund interest earnings from Keno revenues.
• Perpetual care — These funds are used to report resources that are legally restricted to the extent thatearnings, and not principal, may be used for purposes that support the City’s programs for the benefitof the City or its citizenry.
• Unrestricted Net position — This category represents net position of the City not restricted for anyproject or other purpose.
51 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Under GASB Statement No. 54, the governmental funds report up to five categories of fund balance.Ranging from the most restrictive to the least restrictive, they are: nonspendable, restricted, committed,assigned, and unassigned.
• Nonspendable Fund Balances — Nonspendable fund balances are amounts that cannot be spentbecause they are either not in spendable form or legally or contractually required to be maintainedintact.
o Restricted Fund Balances — Restricted fund balances represent amounts constrained by creditors,grantors, contributors or laws, and regulations of other governments, or limitations are imposed bylaw through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.
o Committed Fund Balances — Committed funds can only be used for specific purposes pursuant toconstraints imposed by the highest level of decision making, which is the City Council. Only theCity Council, through an ordinance or resolution, can change any fund balance commitment.
o Assigned Fund Balances — Assigned fund balances are intended for specific purposes. Allassignments of contracts and purchase orders over $20,000 are approved by the City Council. Aresolution passed by the City Council would explicitly state the specific purpose for the use of funds.Management can assign funds through the purchasing process in conjunction with the FinanceDepartment.
• Unassigned Fund Balance — Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the generalfund. In nonmajor governmental funds, if expenditures incurred for specific purposes exceeded theamounts restricted, committed, or assigned to those purposes, it may be necessary to report anegative unassigned fund balance.
52 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Fund balances are classified as nonspendable, restricted, committed, assigned, or unassigned. The Citygenerally follows the same order in spending resources unless special circumstances apply. The followingprovides details of the aggregate amounts displayed on the face of the governmental funds balance sheet:
Nonmajor Totalgovernmental governmental
General Debt Service funds funds
Fund balances:Nonspendable:
Inventory $ 2,320,144 2,320,144Permanent principal 2,775,389 2,775,389
Total nonspendable 2,320,144 2,775,389 5,095,533
Restricted:General
— 6,493,068 6,493,068Public safety
— 1,063,844 1,063,844Transportation 13,655,232 13,655,232Other public services 2,339,669 2,339,669Community development — — 2,196,606 2,196,606Culture and parks 747,561 5,276,223 6,023,784Debt service
— 18,689,053 3,799,690 22,488,743
Totalrestricted 747,561 18,689,053 34,824,332 54,260,946
Committed:General 6,257,059 6,257,059Transportation
— 3,303,762 3,303,762Other public services 5,227,274 5,227,274Community development
— 422,867 422,867Culture and parks
— 3,493,074 3,493,074Debt service — —
Total committed 18,704,036 18,704,036
Assigned:General 1,153,124 5,655,987 6,809,111Public safety 5,587,995 — 5,587,995Transportation 114,107 114,107Community development 190,714 — 190,714Culture and parks 187,095 — 1,035,627 1,222,722Other public services — —
Total assigned 7,233,035 — 6,691,614 13,924,649
Unassigned 37,608,141 — (13,987,312) 23,620,829
Total unassigned 37,608,141 — (13,987,312) 23,620,829
Total all funds $ 47,908,881 18,689,053 49,008,059 115,605,993
53 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(5) Reconciliation of government-wide and fund financial statements
(a) Explanation of Certain Differences between the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet and theGovernment-Wide Statement of Net Position
The governmental funds balance sheet includes reconciliation between find balance — totalgovernmental funds and net position of governmental activities as reported in the government-widestatement of net position. One element of that reconciliation explains, “Long-term liabilities,including bonds payable and pension obligations, are not due and payable in the current period and,therefore, are not reported in the funds.” The details of the $1,227,109,321 difference are as follows:
Bonds payable $ 618,481,829Less deferred amount for loss on
refunding (34,692,920)Less issuance discounts (398,176)Plus issuance premiums 39,441,231Capital leases payable 120,663,183Notes payable 2,947,275Contracts payable 10,431,000Grant payable 15,763,750Accrued interest payable 6,990,032Workers’ compensation and
healthcare claims 38,743,996Net pension obligation 201,734,657Net OPEB obligation 137,193,594Claims and judgments payable 1,950,000Compensated absences 67,859,870
Net difference $ 1,227,109,321
(b) Explanation of Certain Differences between the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues,Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances and the Government-Wide Statement ofActivities
The governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances includesreconciliation between net change in fund balances — total governmental funds and change in netposition of governmental activities as reported in the government-wide statement of activities. Oneelement of that reconciliation explains, “Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures.However, in the statement of activities, the cost of those assets, which exceeds the capitalizationthreshold, is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense.” Thedetails of this ($5,081,487) differences are as follows:
Capital outlay $ 32,819,516Depreciation expense (37,901,003)
Net difference $ (5,081,487)
54 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Another element of that reconciliation states, “The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds, leases,etc.) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, where as the repayment of theprincipal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neithertransaction, however, has any effect on net position. Also, governmental funds report the effect ofissuance costs, premiums, discounts, and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas theseamounts are advanced and amortized in the statement of activities.” The details of this $1,651,233difference are as follows:
Debt issued or incurred:Issuance of long-term debt $ (112,957,928)Annexed debt (12,285,378)Deferred charge for issuance costs (2,440,965)
Amortization of deferred items (398,360)Principal repayments 47,062,140Current refunding 39,261,724Defeased debt 43,410,000
Net difference $ 1,651,233
Another element of that reconciliation states, “Some expenses reported in the statement of activitiesdo not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expendituresin governmental funds.” The details of this ($62,778,038) difference are as follows:
Grants payable $ 2,300,000Workers’ compensation and
health claims (4,953,358)Claims and judgments payable 1,445,000Net pension obligation (27,681,550)Postretirement benefits obligation (27,647,165)Accrued interest 221,498Compensated absences (6,462,463)
Net difference $ (62,778,038)
(6) Special Assessment Note Payable
The City did not obtain a note for 2012, as there were sufficient funds available to fund the currentrequirements in the special assessment fund for the purpose of meeting obligations to contractors for workin place that will ultimately be assessed to the benefited property owners.
55 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(7) Bonds Payable and Other Long-Term Obligations
The following is a summary of long-term liability transactions for the year ended December 31, 2012:
Balances at lssuances Retirements Balances at Amount dueJanuary 1, or other or other December 31, within one
2012 additions reductions 2012 year
Governmental activities:Bonds payable:
General obligation bonds S 516,090,000 59,210,000 65,560,000 509,740,000 38,835,000Annexed general obligation
bonds 2,660,000 12,285,378 7,890,614 7,054,764 2,004,764Special tax revenue bonds 43,120,000 23,700,000 26,240,000 40,580,000 3,130,000Special obligation bonds 60,495,488 23,152,065 24,215,488 59,432,065 1,809,870Revenue bonds 1,855,000 180,000 1,675,000 185,000Deferred amounts:
Unamortized premiums 34,843,923 8,380,766 3,783,458 39,441,231 —
Unamortized discounts (413,390) (3,922) (19,136) (398,176) —
Loss on refunding (32,362,159) (4,963,632) (2,632,871) (34,692,920) —
Total bonds payable 626,288,862 121,760,655 125,217,553 622,831,964 45,964,634
Special assessment note 536,000 536,000
Lease-purchase contractspayable 119,240,045 5,265,000 3,841,862 120,663,183 4,870,928
Notes payable 2,190,812 1,094,863 338,400 2,947,275 351,622Contracts payable 11,362,500 — 931,500 10,431,000 955,000Grants payable 18,063,750 — 2,300,000 15,763,750 2,250,000Compensated absences 61,397,407 6,462,463 — 67,859,870 3,392,993Workers’ compensation and
healthcare claims 33,790,638 4,953,358 — 38,743,996 13,703,654Claims and judgments payable 3,395,000 — 1,445,000 1,950,000 1,950,000Net pension obligation 174,053,107 27,681,550 — 201,734,657 —
Postretirement benefit obligation 109,546,429 27,647,165 — 137,193,594 —
Total governmentallong-term
liabilities 1,159,328,550 195,401,054 134,610,315 1,220,119,289 73,438,831
Business—type activities:Convention Center Hotel:
Revenue bonds 145,965,000 640,000 145,325,000 1,160,000Deferred amounts:
Unamortized premium 2,649,573 118,417 2,531,156Unamortized discount (241,956) (8,355) (233,601)Loss on refunding (3,735,450) (166,948) (3,568,502)
144,637,167 583,114 144,054,053 1,160,000
56 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Balances at Issuances Retirements Balances at Amount dueJanuary 1, or other or other December 31, within one
2012 additions reductions 2012 year
Parking Facilities Fund:Lease-purchase contracts
payable S 39,055,000 — 2,635,000 36,420,000 2,730,000Deferred amounts:
Unamortized premium 38,950 — 7,028 31,922 —
Unamortized discount (6,121) — (954) (5,167) —
Loss on refunding (381,481) — (64,888) (316,593) —
Accrued compensated absences 346 346 17Workers’ compensation and
healthcare claims 16,550 88 16,462 5,822Net pension obligation 42,770 3,970 46,740 —
Postretirement benefitobligation 38,429 2,937 — 41,366 —
38,804,097 7,253 2,576,274 36,235,076 2,735,839
Sewer Revenue Fund:Revenue bonds 212.040,000 97,650,000 6.935,000 302,755,000 9,195,000Plus unamortized
premium 2,426,386 9,559,176 408,483 11,577,079 —
Loss on refunding — (178,651) (8,507) (170,144) —
Notes payable 13,071,421 874.700 490,335 13,455,786 592,735Special obligation bonds 17,639,512 17,252,935 17,639,512 17.252,935 935,130Plus unamortized
premium 146,288 237,290 154,198 229,380 —
Compensated absences 1,683,474 — 64,220 1,619,254 80,963Workers’ compensation and
healthcare claims 1,583,451 243,864 — 1,827,315 646,317Net pension obligation 5,843,687 1,288,035 — 7,131,722 —
Postretirement benefitobligation 5,250,569 1,060,960 6,311,529
259,684,788 127,988,309 25,683,241 361,989,856 11,450,145
Nonmajor business-type activities:Lease-purchase contracts
payable 370,000 25,000 345,000 25,000Deferred amounts:
Unamortized premium 1,857 — 156 1,701 —
Compensated absences 396,473 7,246 56,646 347,073 17,353Workers’ compensation and
healthcare claims 523,261 47,292 6,720 563,833 199,427Netpension obligation 1,415.271 149,130 13,552 1,550,849 —
Postretirement benefitobligation 1,271.626 115,867 15,000 1,372,493
3,978,488 319,535 117,074 4,180,949 241,780
Total business-typeactivities 447,104,540 128,315,097 28,959,703 546,459,934 15,587,764
Total all funds S 1,606,433,090 323,716,151 163,570,018 1,766,579,223 89,026,595
57 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(a) Governmental Activities
Bonds payable at December 31, 2012 comprises the following individual issues:
General Obligation Bonds
Effectiveinterest rate First
Original payable Series date December31,Amount issued Issue semiannually due callable 2012
$ 16,000,000 03/01/03 Various purpose 2.75% — 5.00% 2003—2022 2013 $ 840,00030,175,000 03/01/03 GO. — defeasance bonds 1.50% — 4.30% 2003 —2021 2013 12,820,000
205,875,000 04/01/04 GO. — defeasance bonds 5.25% — 5.25% 2004—2027 2014 197,445,00031,660,000 04/01/04 Various purpose — refund
series 2.00% — 4.50% 2004—2024 2014 8,720,00042,800,000 11/15/05 Various purpose— refund
series 4.00%—4.75% 2006—2025 2015 6,420,00026,625,000 10/15/06 Various purpose — refund
series 4.00% — 4.25% 2007—2026 2016 13,595,00046,785,000 10/15/07 Various purpose— refund
series 4.00%—4.75% 2008 —2027 2017 34,490,00075,540,000 7/24/08 Various purpose.- refund
series 3.75% — 5.00% 2009—2025 2018 61,995,00017,880,000 10/30/08 G.O. — defeasance bonds 5.00% — 5.75% 2009—2028 2018 14,305,00037,050,000 04/16/09 GO. — defeasance bonds 3.625% — 5.00% 2010—2025 2019 18,985,000
7,440,000 10/15/09 Various purpose 2.00% — 3.00% 2010—2017 none 4,650,00011,160,000 10/15/09 Various purpose 4.229% — 5.721% 2018— 2029 2019 11,160,0008,510,000 10/15/09 G.O. — defeasance bonds 2.00% — 5.00% 2010—2026 2019 6,180,000
35,950,000 11/10/10 GO. — defeasance bonds 2.00% — 4.50% 2011 —2030 2020 30,200,0008,500,000 11/18/10 Various purpose 0.70% — 5.00% 2011 —2030 2020 7,650,000
13,310,000 10/13/11 Various purpose 1.25% —4.125% 2012— 2031 2020 12,645,0009,525,000 10/13/11 G.O. — defeasance bonds 2.00% — 3.30% 2021 —2025 2020 8,430,000
27,170,000 10/12/12 Various purpose - refundseries 3.00% —4.125% 2013 -2032 2022 27,170,000
32,040,000 10/12/12 GO. — defeasance bonds 3.00% — 4.00% 2013 - 2028 2022 32,040,000
Total general obligation bonds 509,740,000
Annexed General Obligation Bonds
1,245,000 05/01/08 S.l.D. #353 3.10% — 4.20% 2009—2018 2013 50,0001,420,000 01/01/11 S.l.D. #354 1.15% — 4.00% 2012—2022 2016 1,320,0001,200,000 03/15/11 S.l.D. #244 1.50% — 4.10% 2013— 2021 2016 1,200,0001,125,000 10/15/09 S.l.D.#300 2.40%— 4.10% 2012— 2019 2013 425,000
350,000 05/01/11 S.l.D. #300 1.55% — 3.85% 2013— 2021 2016 350,0001,290,000 01/15/03 S.l.D.#330 1.80%— 4.80% 2003— 2017 2007 405,0002,100,000 07/01/09 S.l.D.#330 2.20%— 2.25% 2010— 2017 2013 255,0001,740,000 01/15/11 S.l.D.#370 1.30%— 3.40% 2012— 2019 2016 1,540,000
885,000 10/11/11 S.l.D.#416 1.10%— 3.50% 2012— 2021 2016 815,000500,000 10/15/08 S.l.D. #440 3.15%— 5.30% 2010— 2028 2013 10,000
Various S.l.D. #553 Warrants 7.00% 684,764
Total annexed general obligation bonds 7,054,764
Total general obligation and annexed area bonds $ 516,794,764
58 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Governmental Activities Special Tax Revenue Bonds
Effectiveinterest rate First
Original payable Series date December 31,Amount issued Issue semiannually due callable 2012
$ 20,325,000 09/01/04 Performing Arts complexRedevelopment Bonds 2.50% —5.00% 2005 —2024 2014 $ 2,985,000
1,095,000 12/20/07 1-lorneland RedevelopmentProjectSeries2007A 4.00%—4.25% 2007—2016 None 735,000
4,075,000 12/20/07 Various ProjectsRedevelopment Series 2007 3.60% — 5.13% 2007—2027 2017 4,060,000
2,000,000 03/25/08 Special Tax RevenueRefunding Series 2008 3.03% — 4.32% 2009—2013 None 430,000
4,865,000 11/13/08 Special Tax RevenueRedevelopment Series 2008 4.00% — 5.25% 2009—2028 2018 4,185,000
5,170,000 10/29/09 Special Tax RevenueRedevelopment TaxableSeries 2009A (BAB) 1.159% — 6.022% 2010— 2029 2019 4,970,000
3,225,000 03/01/12 Special Tax RevenueRefunding Series 2012 2.00% — 4.00% 2012—2018 None 2,740,000
8,690,000 03/01/12 Special Tax RevenueRefunding Series 2012A 2.00% — 5.00% 2013—2032 None 8,690,000
11,785,000 10/25/12 Special Tax RevenueRefunding Series 2012 2.00% — 4.00% 2015—2024 None 11,785,000
8 40,580,000
Special Obligation Bonds — Governmental Activities
Effectiveinterest rate First
Original payable Series date December 31,Amount issued Issue semiannually due callable 2012
$ 38,535,000 03/25/08 Riverfront RedevelopmentRefund Series 2008 4.00% — 6.40% 2009—2026 None $ 36,280,000
23,152,065 03/01/13 Riverfront RedevelopmentRefund Series 2012 2.00% — 5.00% 2013 —2032 2022 23,152,065
$ 59,432,065
Governmental Activities Revenue Bonds
Effectiveinterest rate First
Original payable Series date December 31,Amount issued Issue semiannually due callable 2012
$ 760,000 03/01/04 HighwayAllocation 1,20%—3.65% 2004—2014 2009 $ 310,0001,420,000 09/30/06 Highway Allocation 3.85% — 4.45% 2007—2026 2011 1,365,000
$ 1,675,000
59 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(b) Business-Type Activities
Bonds payable at December 31, 2012 comprises the following individual issues:
Business-Type Activities Revenue Bonds
Effectiveinterest rate
payableIssue semiannually
_____________ _____________ _____________
Elkhom Sewer Revenue 1.25% — 3.70%Sanitary Sewer System
Revenue Bonds Series 2006 4.00% — 4.50%Convention Center Hotel
Revenue, Series 2007A 4.00% — 5.00%Convention Center Hotel
Revenue, Series 201 0B (BAB) 3.905% —7.125%Sanitary Sewer System
Revenue Series 2009B (BAB) 1.04% —6.153%Sanitary Sewer System Refunding
Revenue, Series 2010A 2.00% —3.625%Sanitary Sewer System
Revenue, Series 20 lOB (RZDB)3.993% — 5.076%Sanitary Sewer System
Revenue Series 2011 2.00% — 5.00%Sanitary Sewer System
Revenue Series 2012 2.00% - 5.00%
Amount
S 2,010,00053,170,000
109,750,000
37.000,000
29,975,000
33,800,000
34,079,570
69,560,000
97,650,000
Originalissued
05/20/0311/15/06
05/15/07
12/15/10
12/10/09
11/18/10
11/18/10
12/01/Il
12/31/12
Seriesdue
2003 —2013
2006—2036
2010—2035
2016—2040
2010—2039
2011—2026
2011 —2040
2012—2041
2013-2042
Firstdate December 31,
callable 2012
2008 $ 220,000
2016 48,105,000
2017 108,325,000
2010 37,000,000
2019 27,970,000
2010 27,975,000
2010 32,455,000
2021 68,380,000
2022 97,650.000
$ 448,080,000
Firstdate December 31,
callable 2012
Special Obligation Bonds - Business-Type Activities (Sewer Revenue Fund)
Effectiveinterest rate
payable SeriesIssue semiannually due
OriginalAmount issued
$ 17,252,935 03/01/12 Riverfront RedevelopmentProject Series 2012 2.00% - 5.00% 2013 -2032 2022 $ 17,252,935
17,252,935
60 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
As of December 31, 2012, the bonds payable debt service requirements of the City for principal andinterest in future years are as follows:
Governmental activitiesPrincipal Interest Total
Year ending December 31:2013 $ 45,964,634 27,579,433 73,544,0672014 44,337,790 25,657,156 69,994,9462015 42,424,020 23,922,927 66,346,9472016 43,157,615 22,167,172 65,324,7872017 41,757,670 20,328,708 62,086,3782018 —2022 195,090,000 73,769,943 268,859,9432023 —2027 168,300,085 28,803,324 197,103,4092028—2032 37,450,015 3,541,566 40,991,581
$ 618,481,829 225,770,229 844,252,058
Business-type activitiesPrincipal Interest Total
Year ending December 31:2013 $ 11,290,130 20,723,955 32,014,0852014 9,992,210 20,714,130 30,706,3402015 9,730,980 20,429,016 30,159,9962016 10,857,385 20,089,957 30,947,3422017 11,327,330 19,703,616 31,030,9462018 —2022 63,575,000 91,360,364 154,935,3642023—2027 82,294,915 75,335,520 157,630,4352028—2032 103,744,985 53,356,322 157,101,3072033 —2037 106,415,000 26,918,906 133,333,9062038 —2042 56,105,000 6,790,558 62,895,558
$ 465,332,935 355,422,344 820,755,279
General obligation bonds have been approved by the voters and issued by the City for variousmunicipal improvements. These bonds represent indebtedness supported by the full faith and creditof the City.
61 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(c) Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of a loan contract between the City and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers andthree loan contracts between the City and the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality(NDEQ) with interest rates ranging from 0% to 3%. Maturities of the notes payable are as follows:
Governmental activitiesPrincipal Interest Total
Year ending December 31:2013 $ 351,622 113,597 465,2192014 367,222 97,997 465,2192015 383,537 81,682 465,2192016 400,600 64,619 465,2192017 292,607 48,077 340,6842018—2022 741,081 123,516 864,5972023—2027 410,606 21,693 432,299
8 2,947,275 551,181 3,498,456
Business-type activitiesPrincipal Interest Total
Year ending December 31:2013 $ 592,735 233,998 826,7332014 603,105 223,628 826,7332015 613,671 213,062 826,7332016 624,430 202,303 826,7332017 635,385 191,348 826,7332018—2022 2,655,142 651,790 3,306,9322023—2027 3,590,532 543,133 4,133,6652028—2032 4,140,786 216,855 4,357,641
$ 13,455,786 2,476,117 15,931,903
(d) Grants Payable
The City has entered into various agreements with not-for-profit organizations to provide grant fundsas follows:
2013 $ 2,250,0002014 1,635,2502015 1,725,2002016 1,820,1002017 1,920,2002018—2020 6,413,000
$ 15,763,750
62 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December3l,2012
(e) Tax Increment Financing Notes and Bonds
At December 31, 2012, $305,156,947 of tax increment financing notes and bonds were outstanding.Tax increment financing allows cities to create special districts and to make public/privateimprovements within those districts that will generate public/private-sector development. For aperiod of 15 years, the tax base is frozen at the predevelopment level, and taxes generated from theincremental increases in assessed value are remitted as payment on the notes and bonds. The loanagreements between the City and developer expressly limit the City’s commitment for debtrepayment to the incremental tax collected during the 15-year period. At the end of the 15-yearperiod, the tax jurisdiction collects on the increased property values. The related tax incrementdistricts are not component units of the City; therefore, the City is not liable for the outstanding debt.The City’s responsibility for this liability is limited only to remittance of paid taxes.
(j9 Debt Margin/Covenants
According to the City Charter, the total amount of general obligation indebtedness (includingannexed area bonds) outstanding at any time, which shall include bonds issued, but shall not includebonds authorized until they are issued, shall not exceed 3.5% of the actual value of taxable real andpersonal property in the City. Debt margin as of December 31, 2012 is calculated as follows:
Debt limit $ 976,978,815
General obligation debt 516,794,764Debt service fund balance 18,689,053
498,105,711
Debt margin S 478,873,104
Revenue bonds and certain other long-term obligations are the obligation of specific enterprise fundsand are payable solely from the revenues of the respective funds. Provisions in the revenue bondordinances contain limitations and restrictions on annual debt service requirements, maintenance ofand flow of moneys through various restricted accounts, and minimum amounts to be maintained invarious accounts. It is management’s opinion the City is in compliance with all such significantprovisions.
(g) In Substance Deftasance
On October 25, 2012, the City issued $11,785,000 of special tax revenue development bonds toprovide resources to purchase investment securities that were placed in an irrevocable trust for thepurpose of generating resources to all future debt service payments of $11,685,000 of special taxrevenue bonds. As a result, the funded bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability has beenremoved from the govemmental activities column of the statement of net position. The reacquisitionprice exceeded the net carrying amount of the old debt by $770,644. This amount is being nettedagainst the new debt and amortized over the shorter life of the refunded debt or original debt. Thisrefunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments over the next 12 years by $1,248,180and resulted in an economic gain of$1,207,572.
63 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December3l,2012
On October 12, 2012, the City issued $32,040,000 of general obligation refunding bonds to provideresources to purchase investment securities that were placed in an irrevocable trust for the purpose ofgenerating resources for all future debt service payments of $31,725,000 of general obligation bonds.As a result, the refunded bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability has been removedfrom the governmental activities column of the statement of net position. The reacquisition priceexceeded the net carrying amount of the old debt by $3,082,814. This amount is being netted againstthe new debt and amortized over the shorter life of the refunded debt or original debt. This refundingwas undertaken to reduce total debt service payments over the next 16 years by $2,666,154 andresulted in an economic gain of $2,533,692.
In prior years, the City defeased certain general obligation and other bonds by placing the proceedsof new bonds in an irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service payments on the old bonds.Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased bonds are not included in theCity’s financial statements. The amount of in substance defeased debt outstanding at December 31,2012 is shown as follows:
64 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
General Obligation Bonds
2000 Convention Center Series A $ 92,175,0002003 Various Purpose 7,560,0002004 Various Purpose & Refunding 2004B 7,430,0002005 Various Purpose & Refunding 2005A 21,400,000
128,565,000
General Obligation Bonds
S.I.D. #250 700,000S.LD. #288 119,567S.I.D. #322 1,315,000S.I.D. #388 850,000S.I.D. #353 A 925,000S.I.D. #353 A 460,000S.I.D. #330 H 1,210,000S.I.D. #300 R 300,000
5,879,567
Total general obligation andannexed area bonds 134,444,567
Special Tax Revenue Bonds
2001 Performing Arts Redevelopment 11,685,000
Lease Purchase Bonds
2006 Rosenblatt Stadium 1,320,0002007 Rosenblatt Stadium 400,000
Total lease purchase bonds 1 ,720,000
Total $ 147,849,567
(8) Leases
The City is leasing libraries and other facilities under noncancelable lease-purchase agreements expiring atvarious times through 2036, at which time title will be conveyed to the City. The net book value of leasedassets is approximately $182.9 million. The rental payments are designed to equal the debt servicerequirements of certain nonprofit organizations that financed the construction of the facilities. The City hasan option to purchase the facilities at any time by paying an amount equal to the total of all remainingunpaid lease obligations to the lessor at that time.
65 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
The following schedule reflects future minimum lease payments under the lease-purchase agreementstogether with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2012:
Governmental Business-typeactivities activities
Fiscal year ending:2013 $ 11,299,687 4,548,2172014 12,259,554 4,381,0352015 12,230,234 4,397,1782016 9,941,709 3,701,2192017 9,004,215 3,694,8522018—2022 44,439,438 13,534,7542023 — 2027 40,602,573 9,933,8672028—2032 36,069,588 9,116,3602033 —2036 29,335,408 1,829,585
Total minimum lease payments 205,182,406 55,137,067
Less amount representing interest 74,088,223 18,372,067
Total principal obligation under capital leaseswith rates of interest from 1.10% to 6.51% $ 131,094,183 36,765,000
The City leases space in the Omaha Douglas Civic Center and the adjoining Hall of Justice under a leasethat expires only upon payment of all outstanding bonds of the Commission. The annual rental paymentsare determined based upon actual space occupied by the City for operation and maintenance. Actual rentalpayments for 2012 were approximately $1,600,000.
66 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(9) Receivables
Receivables at December 31, 2012 of the City’s major funds and nonmajor funds in the aggregate,including the applicable allowances for uncollectible accounts, are as follows:
Total
Total Parking business
Dabs gos’erooceolal facilities Soaver l5pr
General senior Nonmajor activities fund fund Nonmajor activities Total
Receivables:
Properlylasas S 79,669.535 53.605.859 6.090.852 136,795.226 .— 30,795,226
Tolopisooc occopasios las 2,377,1)22 — — 2,377,022 — — 2,377,022
I ole) cole) 0000pal:oo vs 426.964 — 426.964 — — 426,964
Vol tIe rectal occopaloo las 652,264 — — 652,264 — — 652,264
Roslaerael Tos 3.025,709 — 3.025.709 — —. — — 3,025,789
CoblcTV 000 (101 600011:00 fee 1.367,164 — — 1,367,164 — — — 1,367,103
MU)) is boo alIas 069,511 — — 665,5)) — — 669.511
OPPD is l:eo oflas 43,672 29.736 3,363 76.99) — — — 76,991
Moles vohbU las 745.432 — 745,432 — -‘- — — 745,432
Special aslesoesool -— 2.1164.175 2,464,456 4,526,63) — — — — 4.025,63)
Decor’s Trosl — — I 1,111)0,001) 11,000,000 — — — 11,000,1164
MECA — - 2.066.363 2.008.363 — — — — 2,880,363
Charges for seroices 000 016cr 4.078,634 — 5.661,1117 9.739,65) 171,726 1,420,249 170,266 1,762.241 11.501,092
S 92.676.167 55,699,751) 26,117,071 126,493,000 171,726 1.420.249 170,266 1.762,241 178,255.249
Governmental funds report advanced revenues in connection with receivables for revenues not consideredavailable to liquidate liabilities of the current period. At December 31, 2012, the various components ofadvanced revenue and unearned revenue are as follows:
Advanced Unearned
Property tax receivable (general fund) $ 79,089,535 25,360Property tax receivable (debt service fund) 53,605,839 17,189Special assessments (debt service fund) 2,064,175 —
Property tax receivable (nonmajor governmental funds) 6,099,852 1,957Special assessments (nonmajor governmental funds) 3,585,914Grants (general fund) 1,869,501 —
Grants (nonmajor governmental funds) 19,328,957 4,611,917MECA (nonmajor governmental funds) 2,888,363 —
Charges for services and other (sewer revenue fund) 270,460Charges for services and other (nonmajor enterprise funds)
_______________
46,637
$ 168,532,136 4,973,520
(10) Employees’ Retirement Plans
Substantially all City employees are covered by one of two single-employer contributory defined benefitretirement plans. The City of Omaha Employees’ Retirement System (the Civilian Plan) and the City ofOmaha Police and Firefighters Retirement System (the Uniformed Plan), as described as follows, areaccounted for by the City as pension trust funds.
67 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(a) Civilian Plan
Plan Description — The Civilian Plan is a single-employer contributory defined benefit pension plan.The Civilian Plan provides retirement benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. All eligible Cityemployees, except the following, are covered by the plan: police; firefighters; persons paid on acontractual or fee basis; seasonal, temporary, and part-time employees; and elected officials who donot make written application. Cost-of-living adjustments are provided to members and beneficiariesat the discretion of the City in accordance with plan provisions. A cost-of-living adjustment currentlyis provided for members who retired prior to January 28, 1998 after a five-year waiting period. ThePension Board of the City administers the Civilian Plan. The Pension Board is responsible forestablishing or amending plan provisions. The Civilian Plan does not issue separate financialstatements.
Funding Policy — Effective January 1, 2012, Civilian Plan members are required to contribute, bypayroll deduction, 10.08% of their annual covered salary and the City is required to contribute at arate of 11.78% of annual covered salary. Administrative costs for management of the investmentfunds are financed through investment earnings. Other administrative costs of the Civilian Plan arepaid by the City’s general fund. Contributions to the Civilian Plan totaled $6,201,923 for theemployees and $7,216,050 for the employer for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Participant Data
Membership of the Civilian Plan consists of the following at December 31, 2012:
Number of:Active members 1,152Service retirements 1,002Surviving spouses and children 272Disabled 84Deferred vested 75
Total participants 2,585
The Civilian Plan is not subject to either the minimum funding standards of the EmployeeRetirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the maximum funding standards of the EmployeeRetirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the maximum funding limitations. Funding standards areactuarially determined using the entry age normal cost method.
68 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
The information presented in the notes to financial statements and required supplementaryinformation was determined as part of the actuarial valuation at the date indicated. Additionalinformation as of the latest actuarial valuation follows:
Valuation date January 1, 2012Actuarial cost method Entry age normal methodAmortization method Level percent cost of payRemaining amortization period 20 yearsAsset valuation method Expected + 25%
75% of expected value, plus 25% of market valueActuarial assumptions:
Investment rate of return 8% per yearProjected salary increases Varying 4% to 10% per yearCost-of-living adjustments Lesser of 3% or $50 per monthAmortization period Closed
Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation — The City’s annual pension cost and net pensionobligation to the Civilian Plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Annual required contribution $ 15,658,045Interest on net pension obligation 3,322,571Adjustment to annual required contribution (3,016,754)
Annual pension cost 15,963,862
Contributions made (7,216,050)
Increase in net pension obligation 8,747,812
Net pension obligation, beginning of year (41,532,143)
Net pension obligation, end of year $ (50,279,955)
The annual pension costs, the percentage of annual pension cost contributed, and the net pensionobligation for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are as follows:
Schedule of employer contributionsAnnualrequired Percentage Net
contribution of ARC pension(ARC) contributed obligation
Fiscal year ended:2012 $ 15,658,045 46% $ (50,279,955)2011 14,564,847 45 (41,532,143)2010 14,149,386 41 (33,263,609)
69 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Basis ofAccounting — The Civilian Plan’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis ofaccounting and are presented as a pension trust fund in the accompanying basic financial statementsof the City. Plan member and employer contributions are recognized in the period in which thecontributions are due. Benefits are provided based on a percentage of the member’s final averagecompensation and are recognized when due and payable.
Method Used to Value Investments — Civilian Plan assets are carried at fair value. Investments insecurities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at the latest quoted market prices.Unlisted investments are valued at net asset value.
Funding Status and Funding Progress — The funding status and funding progress is as follows(dollars in millions):
Actuarial UAAL as aActuarial accrued Unfunded percentagevalue of liability (AAL) AAL Funded Covered of covered
Actuarial assets entry age (UAAL) ratio payroll payrollvaluation date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) ((b-a)/c)
2012 $ 236.7 420.8 184.1 56.3% $ 62.8 293.2%
The schedules of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information (RSI) following the notes to the financial statements,present multiyesr trend information about whether the actuarial values of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relativeto the AALs for benefits.
Summary financial information for the Civilian Plan is as follows:
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 984Due from other funds 1,089Receivables:
Accounts receivable 312,293Accrued interest 318,835
Investments 224,240,752
Total assets $ 224,873,953Liabilities
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $ 1,640,865
Total liabilities 1,640,865Net Position
Net position:Held in trust for pension benefits 223,233,088
Total liabilities and net position $ 224,873,953
70 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Additions:Contributions:
Employer $ 7,216,050Employee 6,201,923
Total contributions 13,417,973
Investment income (loss):Dividends and interest 6,075,554Net appreciation in fair value of investments 18,454,403Investment expenses (1,364,199)
Net investment income 23,165,758
Total additions 36,583,73 1
Deductions:Benefit payments 28,785,427
Change in net position 7,798,304
Net position held in trust for pension benefits, beginning of year 215,434,784
Net position held in trust for pension benefits, end of year $ 223,233,088
(b) Uniformed Plan
Plan Description — The Uniformed Plan is a single-employer contributory defined benefit pensionplan. The Uniformed Plan covers all eligible probationary and regular sworn personnel of the Policeand Fire Departments of the City. The Uniformed Plan provides retirement, disability, and deathbenefits to plan members and beneficiaries. Cost-of-living adjustments are provided to members andbeneficiaries at the discretion of the City in accordance with plan provisions. The City Council hasthe authority to negotiate, set, and amend contribution rates for the employer and employees. ThePension Board of the City administers the Uniformed Plan. The Pension Board is responsible forestablishing or amending plan provisions. The Uniformed Plan does not issue separate financialstatements.
The valuation date of January 1, 2012 does not include the renegotiated fire union contract. The fireunion signed a new contract with the City in December 2012, which includes a commitment by theCity and the fire union to increase their contributions to the uniform plan to address the growingunfunded liability of the Plan. Management has yet to quantify the impact of the new contract, butexpects the changes to impact the updated valuation to be prepared on January 1, 2013.
71 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Funding Policy — Uniformed Plan members are required to contribute, by payroll deduction, apercentage of their annual covered salary and the City is also required to contribute as follows:
Bargaining group Employee rate City rate
Fire Sworn 15.40 21.02Fire Management 15.45 21.07Police Sworn 16.35 33.67Police Management 16.35 33.17
In addition, the City will make contributions of $1,327,600 annually through 2028. Administrativecosts for management of the investment funds are financed through investment earnings. Otheradministrative costs of the Uniformed Plan are paid by the City’s general fund. Contributions to theUniformed Plan totaled $19,641,660 for the employees and $35,302,037 for the employer for theyear ended December 31, 2012.
Participant Data
Membership of the Uniformed Plan consists of the following at December 31, 2012:
Number of:Active members 1,411Service retirements 947Surviving spouses and children 282Disabled 237Deferred vested 11
Total participants 2,888
The Uniformed Plan is not subject to either the minimum funding standards of the EmployeeRetirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the maximum funding standards of the EmployeeRetirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the maximum funding limitations. Funding standards areactuarially determined using the entry age normal cost method.
72 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
The information presented in the notes to the basic financial statements and required supplementaryinformation was determined as part of the actuarial valuation at the date indicated. Additionalinformation as of the latest actuarial valuation follows:
Valuation date January 1, 2012Actuarial cost method Entry age normal methodAmortization method Level percent of payRemaining amortization period 21 yearsAsset valuation method Expected Value + 33%
One-third of market value, plustwo-thirds of expected asset value
Actuarial assumptions:Investment rate of return 8% per yearProjected annual salary increases varying 4% through 6.5%Final year wage adjustment 10.0%Cost-of-living adjustments Lesser of 3% or $50 per month ($65 for fire
retirements after June 30, 2007)Amortization period Closed
Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation — The City’s annual pension cost and net pensionobligation to the Uniformed Plan for the year ended December 31, 2012 are as follows:
Annual required contribution $ 54,310,693Interest on net pension obligation 11,185,815Adjustment to annual required contribution (9,833,151)
Annual pension cost 55,663,357
Contributions made (35,302,037)
Increase in net pension obligation 20,361,320
Net pension obligation, beginning of year (139,822,693)
Net pension obligation, end of year $ (160,184,013)
73 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December3l,2012
The annual pension costs, the percentage of annual pension cost contributed, and the net pensionobligation for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are as follows:
Schedule of employer contributionsAnnualrequired Percentage Net
contribution of ARC pensionARC contributed obligation
Fiscal year ended:2012 $ 54,310,693 65% $ (160,184,013)2011 49,945,979 61 (139,822,693)2010 55,488,062 44 (119,249,376)
Basis of Accounting — The Uniformed Plan’s financial statements are prepared using the accrualbasis of accounting and are presented as a pension trust fund in the accompanying financialstatements of the City. Plan member and employer contributions are recognized in the period inwhich the contributions are due. Benefits are provided based on a percentage of the member’s finalaverage compensation and are recognized when due and payable.
Method Used to Value Investments — Uniformed Plan assets are carried at fair value. Investments insecurities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at the latest quoted market prices.Unlisted investments are valued at net asset value.
Funding Status and Progress — The funding status and funding progress is as follows:(dollars in millions).
Actuarial UAAL as aActuarial accrued Unfunded percentagevalue of liability (AAL) AAL Funded Covered of covered
Actuarial assets entry age (UAAL) ratio payroll payrollvaluation date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) ((b-a)/c)
2012 $ 467.4 1,077.6 610.2 43.4% $ 110 554.7%
The schedules of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information (RSI) following the notes to the financial statements,present multiyear trend information about whether the actuarial values of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relativeto the AALs for benefits.
74 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Summary financial information for the Uniformed Plan is as follows:
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents S 812,242Receivables:
Accounts receivable 1,501,122Accrued interest 1,749,160
Investments 486,501,246
Total assets S 490,563,770
Liabilities
Accounts payable and other current liabilities 5 763,631
Total liabilities 763,631
Net Position
Net position:Held in trust for pension benefits 489,800,139
Total liabilities and net position $ 490,563,770
Additions:Contributions:
Employer $ 35,302,037Employee 19,641,660
Total contributions 54,943,697
Investment income (loss):Dividends and interest 14,928,954Net appreciation in fair value of investments 42,603,277Investment expenses (2,489,092)
Net investment income 55,043,139
Total additions 109,986,836
Deductions:Benefit payments 60,616,088
Change in net position 49,370,748
Net position held in trust for pension benefits, beginning of year 440,429,391
Net position held in trust for pension benefits, end of year $ 489,800,139
75 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(11) Capital Assets
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:
Beginning Endingbalances Increases Decreases balances
Governmental activities:Capital assets, not being
depreciated:Land $ 139,164,334 916,804 140,081,138Cultural assets 5,833,600 — 5,833,600Construction in progress 24,565,872 22,846,149 8,985,848 38,426,173
Total capital assets,not beingdepreciated 169,563,806 23,762,953 8,985,848 184,340,911
Capital assets, being depreciated:Buildings 557,114,585 6,454,378 411,259 563,157,704Machinery and equipment 73,624,161 4,855,168 2,989,349 75,489,980Infrastructure 754,972,918 23,525,200 778,498,118
Total capital assets,being depreciated 1,385,711,664 34,834,746 3,400,608 1,417,145,802
Less accumulated depreciation for:Buildings 212,097,268 15,901,466 280,695 227,718,039Machinery and equipment 49,188,790 4,942,843 2,710,616 51,421,017Infrastructure 189,661,883 29,055,984 218,717,867
Total accumulateddepreciation 450,947,941 49,900,293 2,991,311 497,856,923
Total capital assets,being depreciated,net 934,763,723 (15,065,547) 409,297 919,288,879
Governmentalactivitiescapital assets, net $ 1,104,327,529 8,697,406 9,395,145 1,103,629,790
In 2012, the City annexed SID #244; 300; 330; 370; 414; 416; 440; 447; and 553. As a result, capital assetsrelated to government wide of $16,543,347, net of accumulated depreciation of$1 1,999,290 were acquiredand capital assets related to sewer of $3,256,842, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,806,057, and debtof $12,285,378 was assumed in a noncash transaction. Current year additions to accumulated depreciationwere increased by the amount of existing depreciation on the acquired assets.
76 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs as follows:
Governmental activities:General governmentPublic safetyCommunity developmentOther public servicesCulture and parksTransportation services
Total depreciation expense — governmental
Capital asset activity of each major enterprise fund is as follows:
ii$ 1,123,340
3,720,857853,696
1,060,74116,238,69814,903,671
$ 37,901,003
Convention Center Flotel Fund:Capital assets, not being
depreciated:Cultural assets
Beginningbalances
$ 718,020
Increases DecreasesEnding
balances
718,020
Capital assets, being depreciated:BuildingsMachinery and equipmentFurniture and fixtures
Total capital assets,being depreciated
Less accumulated depreciation for:BuildingsMachinery and equipmentFurniture and fixtures
Total accumulateddepreciation
Total capital assets,being depreciated, net
Convention Center HotelFund capitalassets, net
90,072,145 709,846 — 90,781,9913.587,790 386,282 3,974,072
14,282,642 60,705 14,343,347
107,942,577 1,156,833 109,099,410
13,976,221 2,493,012 16,469,2333,202,746 143,565 3,346,3111,923,078 2,806,086 4,729,164
19,102,045 5,442,663 24,544,708
88,840,532 (4,285,830) 84,554,702
$ 89,558,552 (4,285,830)
______________
85,272,722
77 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Beginning Endingbalances Increases Decreases balances
Parking Facilities Fund:Capital assets, not being
depreciated:Land $ 2,473,344
_____________
— 2,473,344
Total capital assets,not being depreciated 2,473,344 — — 2,473,344
Capital assets, being depreciated:Leased buildings and buildings 61,363,255
_______________ _______________
61,363,255
Total capital assets,being depreciated 61,363,255 — — 61,363,255
Less accumulated depreciation for:Leased buildings and buildings 30,738,230 2,410,197
______________
33,148,427
Total accumulateddepreciation 30,738,230 2,410,197 — 33,148,427
Total capital assets,being depreciated, net 30,625,025 (2,410,197) — 28,214,828
Parking Facilities Fundcapital assets, net $ 33,098,369 (2,410,197) — 30,688,172
78 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December3l,2012
Beginning Endingbalances Increases Decreases balances
Sewer Revenue Fund:Capital assets, not being
depreciated:Land $ 2,705,920 15,126 2,721,046Construction in progress 51,651,576 91,626,603 36,072,839 107,205,340
Total capital assets,not being depreciated 54,357,496 91,641,729 36,072,839 109,926,386
Capital assets, being depreciated:Buildings and systems 715,624,945 40,096,839 — 755,721,784Machinery and equipment 9,575,077 743,362 229,383 10,089,056
Total capital assets,being depreciated 725,200,022 40,840,201 229,383 765,810,840
Less accumulated depreciation for:Infrastructure 268,637,701 20,215,148 288,852,849Buildings and systems 36,902,199 1,098,378 — 38,000,577Machinery and equipment 6,868,324 532,417 229,383 7,171,358
Total accumulateddepreciation 312,408,224 21,845,943 229,383 334,024,784
Total capital assets,being depreciated, net 412,791,798 18,994,258
_____________
431,786,056
Sewer Revenue Fundcapital assets, net $ 467,149,294 110,635,987 36,072,839 541,712,442
79 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
Beginning Endingbalances Increases Decreases balances
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds:Capital assets, not being
depreciated:Construction in progress $
Capital assets, being depreciated:Buildings and systems 9,228,130 — 9,228,130Machinery and equipment 2,813,437 63,585 24,540 2,852,482
Total capital assets,being depreciated 12,041,567 63,585 24,540 12,080,612
Less accumulated depreciation for:Building and systems 4,575,250 311,676 — 4,886,926Machinery and equipment 2,207,667 130,788 24,540 2,313,915
Total accumulateddepreciation 6,782,917 442,464 24,540 7,200,841
Nonmajor Enterprisecapital assets, net $ 5,258,650 (378,879)
______________
4,879,771
(12) Fund Deficits
Fund deficits exist in the following funds as of December 31, 2012:
Major Enterprise Funds:Convention Center Hotel-Enterprise Fund $ (37,589,496)Parking Facilities-Enterprise Fund (4,751,032)
Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds:Keno/Lottery Proceeds (338,192)Community Park Development (2,422,707)Grants (918,431)Household Chemical Disposal (77,060)
Nonmajor Capital Projects Funds:Downtown Stadium and Companion Project (10,130,922)Missouri River Pedestrian Bridge (100,000)
Nonmajor Enterprise Funds:Golf Operations (1,772,000)Air Quality (405,351)Compost (522,971)Printing Services and Graphics (2,248)
80 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(a) Major Enterprise Funds
The Convention Center Hotel began operations in April 2004. The City projects that futureoperations of the hotel will eliminate this deficit. An addition of 150 rooms, a junior ballroom, andadditional meeting space were completed in 2012 and are expected to generate additional revenue toreduce the deficit. Several national-profile events have been secured for the adjoining Century-LinkCenter providing increased revenue stability. Annual appropriations from the City will subsidize anydebt service shortfall.
The Parking Facilities Fund was established as a tool to manage the City’s eight parking structuresand various surface lots throughout the City. Lease-purchase debt has been issued to finance theconstruction of the parking structures. The City recently completed a comprehensive parking study.Among the recommendations implemented to date are: the consolidation of all parking functionsunder one department — Public Works; and, the installation of new parking meters that accept bothcredit cards and coins. Under consideration are changes to parking fees, increased hours ofenforcement, and review of vendor and leasing contracts. The City has also hired a full-time parkingfacilities manager to oversee all parking operations. Annual appropriations from the City’s GeneralFund to subsidize the payment of this debt will eliminate this deficit.
(b) Voninajor Special Revenue Funds
The Community Park Development Fund’s deficit is a result of the acquisition of two large landpurchases. These sites are outside of the City and have been selected as future regional parks. A parkdevelopment fee has been established, which will be collected from neighboring SanitaryImprovement Districts to fund these acquisitions. Both Douglas and Sarpy Counties are contributingpartners to the Household Chemical Disposal Fund, along with the City; they have both agreed tomake one-time contributions to help eliminate this fund deficit. The other Nonmajor SpecialRevenue Fund deficits will be eliminated upon collection of advanced revenues from the sponsoringgrantor agency and reduction of expenses.
(c) Nonmajor Capital Funds
The Downtown Stadium fund deficit is the result of expenditures to complete the City’s newballpark. Pledged gifts will eliminate the deficit. The elimination of the fund deficit in the remainingNonmajor Capital Projects Fund will be accomplished by the receipt of advanced revenues.
(d) Nonmajor Enterprise Funds
The deficit in the Golf Operations, Air Quality Fund, Compost, and Printing Services and Graphicswill be eliminated by fee increases and reduction of expenses.
(13) Postretirement Healthcare Benefits
(a) Plan Description
The City sponsors a single-employer, defined benefit healthcare plan that provides certainpostemployment healthcare benefits to eligible retirees and their dependents up to age 65 when theywould be Medicare eligible in accordance with provisions established in Chapter 23 of the OmahaMunicipal Code. The benefits include medical and prescription coverage. The rates paid by retirees
81 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
Decernber3l,20l2
are substantially lower than they would be under individual health insurance policies. This differenceis an implicit rate subsidy and considered other post employment benefits (OPEB). The plan isadministered by the City. The plan does not issue separate financial statements.
(b) Funding Policy
The contribution requirements of plan members and the City are established through labornegotiations, with the Omaha Police Union Local No. 101, the Professional Firefighters Associationof Omaha Local No. 385, the Omaha City Employees Local No. 251, and other classified civilianand sworn employees. All agreements are approved and can be amended by the City Council.Contributions are made to the plan based on a pay-as-you-go basis and the City self-insures thisbenefit. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the City paid $15,642,584 for 916 retirees. Retireecontribution rates vary from 0% to 10% of an annual estimated premium depending on thebargaining group. Retiree contributions for 2012 were $439,174.
(c) Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation
The City’s annual other OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the annual required contributionof the employer (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters ofGASB Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for PostemploymentBenefits Other Than Pensions. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoingbasis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (orfunding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The amortization method used is the levelpercentage of projected payroll and the periods used on closed. The remaining amortization period is25 years. The unprojected-unit-credit-actuarial-cost method is used. The following table shows thecomponents of the City’s annual OPEB costs for the year, the amount actually contributed to theplan, and the changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation:
Normal cost $ 26,692,833Amortization of unfunded actuarial accrued liability 19,059,447Interest on net OPEB obligation 3,483,212Adjustments to annual required obligation (4,780,980)
Annual OPEB 44,454,512
Contributions made by employer (15,642,583)
Increase in net OPEB obligation 28,811,929
Net OPEB obligation, beginning of year (116,107,053)
Net OPEB obligation, end of year $ (144.918,982)
The net OPEB cost is allocated to governmental activities, sewer enterprise fund, and other nonmajorenterprise funds based on 2012 compensation expense.
82 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
The annual OPEB costs, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed, and the net OPEBobligation for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are as follows:
Percentage ofAnnual OPEB annual OPEB
cost contributed Net OPEB
Fiscal year ended:2012 $ 44,454,512 35% $ (144,918,982)2011 47,322,593 38 (116,107,053)2010 47,359,459 39 (86,604,366)
(d) Funded Status and Funding Progress
The funded status of the plan as of January 1, 2012 is as follows:
Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $ 449,381,032
Actuarial value of plan assetsUnfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $ 449,381,032
Funded ratio
Covered payroll $ 164,200,000
UAAL as a percentage of covered payroll 274%
(e) Actuarial Methods and Assumptions
Actuarial valuations on an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts andassumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples includeassumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determinedregarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer aresubject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimatesare made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementaryinformation following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information,which shows the actuarial liability as a percentage of covered payroll.
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan asunderstood by the employer and the plan members) and include benefits provided at the time of eachvaluation and the historical pattern of sharing benefit costs between the employer and plan memberto that point. In the January 1. 2012 actuarial valuation, the unprojected unit-credit-actuarial-costmethod was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 3% projected investment rate of return andan annual healthcare cost trend of 8.10% during 2012, reduced to an ultimate rate of 4.70% after71 years. Both rates include a 2.50% inflation assumption. The amortization of the unfundedactuarial accrued liability is calculated assuming 25 annual payments increasing at 2.75% per year.The amortization method used is the level percentage of projected payroll method and theamortization period is a closed 30-year period beginning in 2007.
83 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(14) Risk Management
The City is exposed to various risk of loss related to torts, theft of damage to, and destruction of assets;errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City is self-insured with respect toits obligation to provide workers’ compensation, general liability, property damage, unemploymentbenefits, health and dental coverage, environmental, and antitrust.
The City sets aside assets for claim settlements in the general and individual proprietary funds. These fundsservice all claims for risk of loss to which the City is exposed including general liability, property, andcasualty up to $100,000 per occurrence. The City also services claims including workers’ compensation,employee health and dental, environmental, and antitrust, which are subject to unlimited liability by theCity.
The City maintains a Judgment Fund for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy judgments, damageclaims, and related litigation expenses against the City. It is sustained by an unlimited tax levy upontangible property within the City.
The City obtains an annual funding valuation from a claims servicing company managing the appropriatelevel of estimated claims liability for workers’ compensation claims. Liabilities are reported when it isprobable that a loss can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities are based on historical losses paid.
The City maintains a blanket surety bond covering all City employees, including those of the city clerk’soffice and the public libraries, in the amount of $250,000.
The City purchases commercial insurance for property damage of City buildings and contents in excess of$100,000. Settled claims have never exceeded this commercial coverage.
The City purchases commercial insurance for aviation liability for the police aviation unit, in the amount of$1,000,000 per person and $5,000,000 per occurrence for personal injury, and $200,000 for propertydamage. Settled claims have never exceeded this commercial coverage.
Changes in the balance of claims liabilities during the fiscal years 2012 and 2011 for workers’compensation and employee health and dental are as follows:
Beginning Current Endof year year Claim of yearliability claims payments liability
2012 $ 35,913,900 59,868,355 54,630,649 41,151,6062011 31,893,436 59,361,421 55,340,957 35,913,900
(15) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Judgment Claims
The City is a defendant in a number of lawsuits in its normal course of operations. In addition to the$1,950,000 recorded by the City as claims and judgments payable, the City Attorney is of the
84 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
opinion that there is a possibility that the City will incur additional losses on various lawsuits ofapproximately $6,540,000.
(b) Grants
The City participates in a number of federally assisted grant programs, principally Federal HighwayConstruction Grants, HUD Grants, Office of Justice Prevention Grants, Homeland Security,Department of Energy and Department of Transportation Grants, and other local improvementprograms. The programs are subject to financial and compliance audits. The amount of expenditures,if any that may be disallowed by granting agencies is not determinable at this time; however, Citymanagement does not believe that such amounts, if any, would be significant.
(c) Encumbrances
An encumbrance is the commitment of appropriated funds to purchase goods or services to bedelivered or performed at a future date. On a budget basis, an encumbrance is a reserve of fundbalance. The encumbrances are generally in a requisition form before the end of the budget year. Thepurchasing process must be initiated before year-end. The encumbrances do not lapse at year-end.Department heads are authorized to make or approve encumbrances in their respective departments.Contracts or purchase orders over $20,000 are approved by the City Council. Encumbrances areincluded in restricted, committed, assigned, or unassigned fund balances as appropriate.Encumbrances are detailed in the following table:
Govemmental funds:General $ 7,980,543Special revenue 4,518,062Capital projects 9,423,151
Total encumbrances $ 21,921,756
(d) Construction Commitments
The City has various construction projects; specifically, the sewer fund is used to account for incomefrom sewer service charges, construction grants and related expenditures for operation, maintenanceand capital improvements of the sanitary sewer system and wastewater treatment plants. The City’sobligation under these construction commitments is $96,274,780 as of December 31, 2012.
85 (Continued)
(16)
Ple
dged
Rev
enue
s
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Not
esto
Bas
icFi
nanc
ial
Stat
emen
ts
Dec
embe
r31
,20
12
The
City
has
pled
ged
spec
ific
reve
nues
stre
ams
tose
cure
the
repa
ymen
tof
cert
ain
outs
tand
ing
debt
issu
es.
The
follo
win
gta
ble
lists
thos
ere
venu
esan
dth
eco
rres
pond
ing
debt
issu
eal
ong
with
the
purp
ose
ofth
ede
bt,
the
amou
ntan
dte
rmof
the
pled
gere
mai
ning
,th
ecu
rren
tfi
scal
year
prin
cipa
lan
din
tere
ston
the
debt
,th
eam
ount
ofpl
edge
dre
venu
ere
cogn
ized
duri
ngth
ecu
rren
tfi
scal
year,
and
the
appr
oxim
ate
perc
enta
geof
the
reve
nue
stre
amth
atha
sbe
enco
mm
itted
ifes
timab
le:
Issu
e
Spe
cial
lax
reve
nue
rede
velo
pmen
t(s
erie
s20
04,
2007
A,
2007
C,
2008
,20
08re
fund
ing,
2009
A,
2000
Ata
xabl
e.20
12.
2012
A,
2012
B)
Spe
cial
obli
gati
on
(ser
ies
Riv
crfr
ont
2008
refu
ndin
g,
2012
refu
ndin
g)
Hig
hway
allo
cati
on
(seri
es
2004
,20
06)
Con
vent
ion
Cen
ter
Hot
el(s
erie
s20
07A
,20100
taxa
ble)
San
itar
yse
wer
syst
em
(ser
ies
2003
,20
06,
20090
taxa
ble,
2OtO
AR
efun
ding
,2O
lOB
taxa
ble,
2011
,201
2)N
ED
epar
tine
ttl
of
Env
tron
inen
tal
Qua
lity
(ser
ies
C3t7
432,
C31
7476
)
Typ
ere
venu
epl
edge
d
Cot
nmun
ity
rede
velo
pmen
t
prop
erty
tax
Cig
aret
teta
x.T
IPre
venu
es.
Sew
erre
venu
e,la
ndsa
tes.
and
sale
sta
x
Stre
etan
dhi
ghw
ayga
solin
eta
xes
Net
oper
atin
gre
venu
eof
the
hote
t
Ope
ratin
gre
venu
eof
the
sani
tary
sew
erSy
stem
Am
ount
ofre
venu
e
nle(
l2ed
2,23
2,18
5T
ofi
nanc
eSt
reet
impr
ovem
ents
275,
238,
061
To
fina
nce
the
cons
truc
tion
of
the
Con
vent
ion
Cen
ter
Hot
el
536,
339,
343
To
fina
nce
the
cons
truc
tion
Thr
ough
2041
and
reha
bilit
atio
tiof
the
sani
tary
sew
ersy
slet
u
Pri
nci
pal
and
inte
rest
Per
centa
ge
for
the
yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r31
,
___
___
_____
___
__
2012
Rec
ogni
zed
for
the
yea
r
ende
d
Dec
embe
r31
,
2012
Gen
eral
purp
ose
for
deb
t
of
Term
ofre
venu
e
coni
mit
men
tpl
edge
d
55,6
90.5
33To
fina
nce
infr
astr
uctu
reT
hrou
gh20
32
and
capi
tal
impr
ovem
enls
inre
deve
lopm
ent
area
sth
roug
hout
the
Cit
y
16.5
25,9
72To
fina
nce
infr
astr
uctu
reT
hrou
gh20
32an
dca
pita
lim
prov
etue
tlts
inth
eR
iver
fron
tB
usin
ess
Par
k
100%
$4,
076,
834
4,42
8,18
3
Var
ious
5,31
4.86
113
2,79
0,28
2
253,
578
32,4
52,0
13
8,24
6,43
511
,345
,928
100%
16,9
23,4
5071
,728
,412
Thr
ough
2026
100%
Thr
ough
2040
100%
86(C
ontin
ued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(17) Subsequent Events
The City has evaluated subsequent events from the financial statement date through July 31, 2013, the dateat which the financial statements were issued, and determined there were no items to disclose.
(18) Discretely Presented Component Units
(a) Cash and Investments
As of June 30, 2012, the investment balances of the discretely presented components are as follows:
MECA
Investment Maturities Credit rating Fair value
Certificates of deposit 7/27/12-5/24/13 100% FDIC Insured $ 5,880,000Commercial paper 8/1/12 - 11/13/12 S&P-Al and Moody’s P1 6,892,881U.S. Treasury securities 10/31/12 - 5/15/13 N/A 5,495,905Government agency
discount notes 8/3/12 - 1/3/13 N/A 2,899,014
Totalinvestments $ 21,167,800
HWS had no investments.
(b) Capital Assets
Activity for the year ended June 30, 2012 for both of the component units’ property, equipment, andintangible assets and accumulated depreciation and amortization is as follows:
Additions &July 1, 2011 Reclassifications Dispositions June 30, 2012
Leasehold improvements $ 6,075,157 1,587,763 (3,070) 7,659,850Fumiture, fixtures, and
equipment 10,359,078 1,866,440 (387,351) 11,838,167Building rights 10,079,196
— 10,079,196Construction in progress 386,422 267,247
_____________
653,669
26,899,853 3,721,450 (390,421) 30,230,882
Accumulated depreciationand amortization (11,370,228) (1,839,460) 389,882 (12,819,806)
Total $ 15,529,625 1,881,990 (539) 17,411,076
87 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(c) Long- Term Debt
MECA’s long-term debt activity for the year ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:
Balance Balance,June 30, 2011 Additions Reductions June 30, 2012
City of Omaha $ 4,157,729 — (675,946) 3,481,783Food service contract 652,575 (326,280) 326,295
Total $ 4,810,304 (1,002,226) 3,808,078
Through the amended agreement and lease with the City, MECA agreed to exercise good faith andbest efforts to raise and pay over to the City the sum of $14,000,000 to offset additional fundsprovided by the City for the construction of the facility. Proceeds from the sale of Naming Rightswere specifically identified as a source of repayment. The Naming Rights have been sold to anoutside party under a Convention Center/Arena Naming Rights Agreement, which terminates onSeptember 1, 2018. As a result, the obligation for the repayment of this portion of the constructionfunds has been recorded as long-term debt payable to the City offset by recording intangibleBuilding Rights.
Under a long-term contract for food service operations, MECA received a $4,000,000 interest-freeloan from the contractor for the purchase of food service equipment and leasehold improvements.The loan is to be repaid over the 10-year period of the contract, which began in July 2003.
MECA’s Debt service payments for the City and food service contract debt are as follows:
Principal Interest
Year:2013 $ 1,002,241 149,0542014 675,946 149,0542015 575,946 149,0542016 575,946 149,0542017 575,946 149,054Thereafter 402,053 173,895
$ 3,808,078 919,165
HWS has no long-term debt.
88 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Basic Financial Statements
December 31, 2012
(d) Commitments and Contingencies
MECA — Food Service Contract
MECA entered into a long-term contract for food service operations in November 2001. The termsof the contract commit MECA to a 10-year CPI indexed annual payment to the contractor of$727,226 and $715,493 for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. There are incentive provisionsin the contract that may result in additional payments to the contractor. Such incentives totaled$181,807 for the year ended June 30, 2012. The remaining cost of such commitments as of June 30,2012 is as follows:
Year ending June 30:2013 $ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
89
This page intentionally left blank
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION(Unaudited)
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — General Fund
(Unaudited)
Year ended December 31, 2013
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Property tax S 78,519,348 78,519,348 79,123,615 604,267Motor vehicle taxes 9,408,238 9,408,238 9,163,518 (244,720)City sales and use tax 131,466,507 131,466,507 131.859,046 392,539Business taxes 20,789,410 20,789,410 21.694,969 905,559Taxes in lieu 4,877,090 4,877,090 3.956,031 (921,059)Licenses and pennits 8,620.323 8,620,323 8.4 17.387 (202,936)Intergovernmental revenues — — (480) (480)Charges for services 19,252,164 19,252,164 20,613,005 1,360.841Revenue for KENO 545,865 545,865 554,533 8,668interest income 1,375,000 1,375,000 682,977 (692,023)Rent and royalties 204,000 204,000 965,061 761,061Miscellaneous 1,639,475 1,639,475 107,663 (1,531,812)Restaurant Tax 19,084,888 19,084,888 24,851,426 5,766,538Business Usage 12,440,078 12,440,078 11,348,853 (1,091,225)Revenue from Stadium 3,631,921 3,631,921 3,720,401 88,480
Total revenues 311,854,307 311,854,307 317,058,005 5,203,698
Expenditures:General government:
Mayor’s office 1.148.254 1,148,254 1,229,177 (80,923)Cityclerks 636,413 643,124 614,917 28,207City council 1,092,322 1,093,598 1.098,201 (4,603)Law 3,708,511 3,721,157 3,586,217 134,940Human Resources 2,098,769 2.100,091 2.191,542 (91,451)Human Rights and Relations 405,874 466,375 340,588 125,787Finance 3,300,346 3,303,506 3,282,205 21,301Planning 6,972,304 6,972,304 7,095,017 (122.713)Employee benefits 26,199,899 26,199,899 19,449,521 6,750.378Other agencies 37,286,409 31,907,651 27.557,329 4,350,322Stadium Expenses 3,552,267 3,552,267 4,359,502 (807,235)
Total general government 86,401,368 81,108,226 70,804,216 10,304,010
Public safety:Fire 66,914,984 71,566,530 78,719,244 (7,152,714)Police 115,920,343 115,931,325 115,622,102 309,223
Total public safety 182,835,327 187,497,855 194,341,346 (6,843,491)
Public works:Environmental 15,864,230 15,717,434 15,151,693 565,741Street and highway 673,927 1,583,997 2,628,420 (1,044,423)
Total public works 16,538,157 17,301,431 17,780,113 (478,682)
Culture and recreation:Parks and recreation 17,688,172 17,688,172 18,538,311 (850,139)Libraries 10.564,133 10,564,133 10,660,030 (95,897)
Total culture and recreation 28,252,305 28,252,305 29,198,341 (946,036)
Total expenditures 314,027,157 314,159,817 312,124,016 (2,035,801)
(Deficiency) exeessofrevenues overexpenditures (2,172,850) (2,305,510) 4,933,989 7,239,499
Net changes in fund balances (2,172,850) (2,305,510) 4,933,989 7,239,499
Fund balances — beginning of year — — 5,730,091 5,730,091Lapsed encumbrances — — 1,480,750 1,480,750Transfers out
— — (70,200) (70,200)Transfers in — — — —
Fund balances — end of year S (2,172,850) (2,305,510) 12,074,630 14,380,140
See accompanying notes to schedule of revenues. expenditures. and changes in fund balances — budget and actual — general fund.
90
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Budgetary ComparisonSchedule — General Fund
Unaudited
Year ended December 31, 2012
(1) Budget and Budgetary Accounting
The Mayor is required by the City Charter to prepare and submit an annual budget to the City Council. Abudget is prepared for the general fund and all special revenue funds, exclusive of all grant funds and theservice-type special assessments fund. These budgets are prepared primarily on a cash basis for revenuesand modified accrual basis for expenditures. The budget presented reflects the original budget and therevised budget prior to the closing ordinance. In addition, encumbrances are reported as expenditures forbudgetary purposes. Under this system, purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for theexpenditure of funds are recorded as encumbrances in order to reserve a portion of the applicableappropriation.
Budgetary control is maintained by department/division and by the following category of expenditures:personnel services, nonpersonnel services, capital outlay, and debt service. All budget amendments mustbe approved by the Mayor and/or City Council. Unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscalyear. Encumbered funds are carried over to the ensuing fiscal year until utilized or canceled.
The City Charter also requires the City Council each year to make an ad valorem tax levy for a sinkingfund (debt service fund) that shall provide for principal and interest payments on the general obligationbonded indebtedness of the City.
Appropriations for certain special revenue funds and capital projects funds are controlled on a project basisand are carried forward each year until the project is completed or grant funds are expended.
Budgets are also prepared for the proprietary funds as a management control device. The budgets for thesefunds are prepared on a revenue and expenditure basis similar to the budgets for the governmental fundtypes.
(2) Reconciliation of Budget-Basis Revenues and Expenditures to GAAP
Revenue and expenditures presented on a non-GAAP budget basis of accounting differ from the revenuesand expenditures presented in accordance with GAAP because of the different treatment of encumbrancesand accruals (revenue recognition).
In addition, Section 5.14 of the City of Omaha’s Home Rule Charter requires, in relevant part, that theyear-end general fund balance “. . . be applied as general fund revenue in the budget for the fiscal year twoyears subsequent to that fiscal year.” Therefore, the amount of the general fund carryover coming into aparticular fiscal year has already been determined. Any general fund encumbrances at the end of a fiscalyear are not included in the year-end general fund balance because those encumbrances will normally needto be paid in the following fiscal year and cannot be held until the fiscal year two years subsequent to thefiscal year when the encumbrance was incurred.
91 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Notes to Budgetary ComparisonSchedule — General Fund
Unaudited
Year ended December 31, 2012
All general fund encumbrances are charged to the appropriate accounts at the end of the fiscal year. Thisallows those funds to be kept separate from the year-end general fund balance. Therefore, when the actualpayments to the vendors are required in the following fiscal year, there are general fund moneys available.A reconciliation of the differences between the budgetary versus GAAP is presented as follows:
General fund
Budget basis:2ol2carryoverto2ol4 $ 2,714,3132011 carryover to 2013 9,360,317
Total budget basis fundbalance 12,074,630
Basis differences:Cash reserve 4,044,945Contingent liability reserve 7,254,018Taxes accrued 21,031,332Accrued interest 126,301Encumbrances 2,682,705Inventories 694,950
GAAP basis fund balance $ 47,908,881
(3) Expenditures in Excess of Budget
Budgeted expenditures were exceeded in the following departments/divisions:
Department/division Amount
General fund:Mayor’s Office $ (80,923)City Council (4,603)Human Resources (91,451)Planning (122,713)Public safety:
Fire (7,152,714)Public works:
Street and highway (1,044,423)Culture and parks:
Parks and recreation (850,139)Libraries (95,897)
Stadium (807,235)
92
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Schedules of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions
Year ended December 31, 2012
Unaudited
Civilian Plan Schedule of Funding Progress(Dollars in millions)
Actuarial UAAL as aActuarial accrued Unfunded percentagevalue of liability (AAL) AAL Covered of coveredassets entry age (UAAL) Funded ratio payroll payroll
Actuarial valuation date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) ((b-a)/c)
2012 $ 236.7 420.8 184.1 56.3% $ 62.8 293.2%2011 240.3 409.4 169.1 58.7 59.2 285.62010 232.4 414.5 182.1 56.1 56.7 321.22009 213.2 402.8 189.6 52.9 55.7 340.42008 204.5 387.7 183.2 52.7 56.4 324.82007 294.7 369.0 74.3 79.9 54.0 137.6
Civilian Plan Schedule of Employer Contributions
Annual required Percentage Netcontribution of ARC pension
Fiscal year ended (ARC) contributed obligation
2012 $ 15,658,045 46% $ (50,279,955)2011 14,564,847 45 (41,532,413)2010 14,149,386 41 (33,263,609)2009 12,893,331 42 (25,052,987)2008 9,212,669 59 (17,626,003)2007 8,883,617 56 (13,910,207)
Uniformed Plan Schedule of Funding Progress(Dollars in millions)
Actuarial UAAL as aActuarial accrued Unfunded percentagevalue of liability (A.AL) AAL Covered of coveredassets entry age (UA.AL) Funded ratio payroll payroll
Actuarial valuation date (a) (b) (b-a) (a/b) (c) ((b-a)/c)
2012 $ 467.4 1,077.6 610.2 43.4% $ 110.0 554.7%2011 456.2 1,028.9 572.7 44.3 105.0 545.42010 452.6 1,093.3 640.7 41.4 111.2 576.22009 405.4 1,026.0 620.6 39.5 104.0 596.72008 365.9 947.6 581.7 38.6 99.5 584.62007 530.8 882.7 351.9 60.1 99.6 353.3
93 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Schedules of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions
Year ended December31, 2012
Unaudited
Uniformed Plan Schedule of Employer Contributions
Annual required Percentage Netcontribution of ARC pension
Fiscal year ended (ARC) contributed obligation
2012 S 54,310,693 65% $ (160,184,013)2011 49,945,979 61 (139,822,693)2010 55,488,062 44 (119,249,376)2009 50,507,561 45 (88,728,048)2008 38,073,021 57 (61,464,670)2007 34,842,280 60 (45,494,051)
Postretirement Obligation Schedule ofFunding Progress
(Dollars in millions)
Schedule of Funding ProgressUAAL as a
Actuarial Actuarial Unfunded percentagevalue of accrued AAL Covered of covered
assets liability (AAL) (UAAL) Funded ratio payroll payrollActuarial valuation date (a) (b) (b-a) (a-b) (c) ((b-a)fc)
January 1,2012 S — 449.4 449.4— $ 164.2 274%
March 1,2010 — 478.1 478.1 167.9 285March 1,2008 — 388.5 388.5 153.6 253
94
This page intentionally left blank
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
December31, 2012
TotalNonmajor
Special Debt Capital Permanent GovernmentalAssets revenue service projects funds Funds
Cash and pooled investments $ 22,500,899 3,387,083 8,248,766 97,359 34,234,107Investments — — 1,500,544 3,065,075 4,565,619Receivables (net of allowance for uncolleetibles) 4,319,092 7,385,023 16,412,956 — 28,117,071Due from other governments 16,004,607 387,060 345,547 — 16,737,214Accrued interest 40,455 — 3,317 16,893 60,665Other assets 498,899 498,899Restricted assets:
Deposits with trustee 2,889,427
_____________
7,990,515
_____________
10,879,942
Total assets S 45,754,480 11,159,166 35,000,544 3,179,327 95,093,517
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other current liabilities $ 5,738,748 11,946 3,792,807 — 9,543,501Due to other governments — — 25,000 — 25,000Uneamed revenue 4,612,453 1,421 — 4,613,874Advances 8,788,693 7,346,109 15,768,281 — 31,903,083
Total liabilities 19,139,894 7,359,476 19,586,088
______________
46,085,458
Fund balances (deficit):Nonspendable — — — 2,775,389 2,775,389Restricted 17,341,217 3,799,690 13,683,425 — 34,824,332Committed 12,774,962 — 5,525,136 403,938 18,704,036Assigned 254,797 — 6,436,817 — 6,691,614Unassigned (3,756,390) — (10,230,922) — (13,987,312)
Total fund balance 26,614,586 3,799,690 15,414,456 3,179,327 49,008,059
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 45,754,480 11,159,166 35,000,544 3,179,327 95,093,517
Sec accompanying independent auditors’ report.
95
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Year ended December31, 2012
TotalNonmajor
Special Debt Capital Permanent Governmentalrevenue service projects funds Funds
Revenues:Taxes:
Property S 1,671,346 6,260,102 — 7,931,448Business 717,492 — — 717,492In lieu 6,104 16,218 — — 22,322
Licenses and grants 1,536,249 — — — 1,536,249Intergovernmental 38,220,823 1,500,000 — — 39,720,823Investment income 37,013 26,813 298,046 83,116 444,988Revenue from Keno 6,665,750 — 6,665,750Charges forservices 30,153,260 — 1,309,342 — 31,462,602Rents, royalties, and other 20,838,523 825,000 193 — 21,663,716Contributions and grants 33,121,915 267,911 16,492,202 — 49,882,028
Total revenues 132,968,475 8,896,044 18,099,783 83,116 160,047,418
Expenditures:Governmental activities:
General government 8,976,031 54,428 114,642 — 9,145,101Public safety 6,472,324 — 285,960 — 6,758,284Transportation services 47,783,487 70,000 — 47,853,487Other public services 13,098,520 — — — 13,098,520Community development 18,868,854 — 141,309 — 19,010,163Culture and parks 4,689,069 203,497 73,750 4,966,316
Debt service:Principal 282,335 3,985,264 629,054 — 4,896,653Interest 2,162,727 5,323,955 45,249 — 7,531,931Bond issuance costs — 420,835 72,138 — 492,973
Capital outlay:Other public services 542,602 866,101 — 1,408,703Public safety — — 3,130,138 — 3,130,138Culture and parks 109,890 — 7,904,145 — 8,014,035General government — — 1,564,289 — 1,564,289Transportation 2,144,733 — 12,438,523 — 14,583,256Community development — — 3,861,837 — 3,861,837
Total expenditures 105,130,572 9,784,482 31,326,882 73,750 146,315,686
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers in 690,088 - 1,486,647 — 2,176,735Transfers Out (1,489,870) — (587,137) — (2,077,007)Sale of capital assets — — 658,000 — 658,000Proceeds from the issuance of bonds —- 11,785,000 30,770,862 — 42,555,862Proceeds of refunding bonds — 35,067,065 — — 35,067,065Proceeds from bond premium — 1,815,011 2,258,883 — 4,073,894Discount on sale of bonds — (3,922) — (3,922)Payment to refunded bond escrow agent — (47,877,188) — — (47,877,188)
Total other financing sources (uses) (799,782) 789,888 34,583,333 — 34,573,439
Net change in fund balance 27,038,121 (98,550) 21,356,234 9,366 48,305,171
Beginning fund balance (423,535) 3,898,240 (5,941,778) 3,169,961 702,888
Ending fund balance $ 26,614,586 3,799,690 15,414,456 3,179,327 49,008,059
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
96
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
juqqoiLilnuopuow!ohdsp
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Special Revenue Funds account for the proceeds from specific revenue sources that are restricted to expendituresfor specified purposes.
Judgment Fund — To accumulate resources for the purpose of providing a means to satisfy judgments, damageclaims, and related litigation expenses against the City. It is sustained by a Judgment Fund tax levy upon tangibleproperty. The actual and projected revenues are derived from a levy of 0.6 cents per $100 in 2007 —2012.
Public Library Contribution Fund — To accumulate and hold special contributions for the library from outsidesources. Funds are generally restricted for specific purposes to enhance library operations. The trust fundincludes grants, gifts, State Aid, and contributions from Friends of the Library and the Library Foundation.
Library Fines and Fees Fund — To account for the revenues generated through fees and fines collected by theLibrary.
Douglas County Library Supplement Fund — To account for the revenue generated by a property tax levyassessed on Douglas County residents living in unincorporated areas. The Douglas County Board passed thislevy in 1995 for the purpose of providing countywide funding for the Omaha Public Library System.
Miscellaneous Contribution Fund — To account for money collected and encumbered into this ExpendableTrust Fund. These short-term “small funds” are not large enough for the creation of a fund and are established forthe sole purpose of private entity or individual contributions for specific usage of funds. Organizations withcurrent year activity or previous year balances are shown individually on the Organization Sheet.
Keno/Lottery Proceeds Fund — To accumulate resources from the City’s percentage of Keno revenue in theCity and account for activities financed with Keno revenues.
SIB Administrative Fee Revenue Fund — To collect a 1% fee on Sanitary and Improvement District finalconstruction costs. The City ordinance #36247 passed April 29, 2003 authorized the City to collect a 1% fee (1%of final construction costs) from subdivision applications using Sanitary and Improvement District (SID)financing.
Storm Water Fee Revenue Fund — To account for revenues collected from a fee charged to all retailMetropolitan Utilities District customers. The funds are used to implement administrative requirements of theNPDE5 Storm Water Permit issued by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality in 2003. Thisfunction is mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency of the Federal Government.
City Street Maintenance Fund — To account for the usage of City motor vehicle registration fees and street cutfees. The City Motor Vehicle Registration Fee was increased to $50.00 per passenger vehicle, with a graduatedschedule for larger vehicles. The street cut fee, derived from local utilities and contractors, is based upon the sizeof the street cut. Use of funds is restricted to street maintenance and repair purposes and their related costs.
Street and Highway Allocation Fund — To account for usage of State shared vehicle user taxes allocated to theCity. Usage of fund proceeds is restricted to street maintenance, improvements, and related purposes. In additionto the state gasoline tax portion, cities and counties divide an additional 2 cents per gallon as authorized by the1985 State Legislature.
97 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Interceptor Sewer Construction Fund — To accumulate resources from the Special Sewer Connection Feescharged to new plats outside the City limits within the Papillion Creek Watershed and existing platted lots asthey are developed. These fees are used to finance the extension and/or relief of existing interceptor sanitarysewers in the Papillion Creek Watershed Basin.
Community Park Development Fund — To account for the costs of community park acquisition, and parkimprovements in suburban Omaha. In addition, subdivision agreements include provisions for revenues to becollected from Sanitary Improvement Districts at appropriate debt to value intervals.
Storm Water Management Plan Program — To account for storm water planning grants received. These fundsare used primarily for implementation.
State Turn Back Revenue Fund — To account for money collected upon adoption of LB 551 by the StateLegislature and amended in 2008 by LB 754 and LB 912. The City receives 70% of the state sales tax collectedthrough the Qwest Center Omaha and the Hiltbn hotel. The majority of these funds are used to repay the QwestCenter debt. The remaining 10% of the City’s revenue from this source is to be distributed for tourism-relatedpurposes in the areas of the City with high concentrations of poverty.
Ballpark Revenue Fund — With the passage of City Ordinance #68123 dated June 1, 2008, the City Councilestablished the Ballpark Revenue Fund. The purpose of this special revenue fund is to accumulate excess CollegeWorld Series revenues for any purpose related to the New Stadium or its operations. The annual excess of PublicFunds that exceed the stadium debt service or the Variable Funds that exceed planned projections are to bedeposited into this fund. The City’s portion of College World Series revenue shall also be deposited into thisfund. The City may retain all Public Surplus Funds in the event the fund balance of this fund exceeds$10,000,000.
Keno Lottery Reserve Fund — To account for the reserve perpetual fund in accordance with OrdinanceNo. 34688 passed in 1998. Twenty-five (25%) of all Keno revenue must be credited to this fund until the fundbalance reaches $2,370,000. After this reserve fund reaches $3,000,000, 25% of the interest earned stays in thefund; 75% is appropriated as permitted.
Grants Fund — To account for costs associated with activities related to various grants received by the City,which are designated for a specific purpose or period of time.
Greater Omaha Convention and Visitors Bureau Fund — To account for the operations of the Greater OmahaConvention and Visitors Bureau, which is a City department established to improve the City’s economy byattracting conventions and visitors.
Household Chemical Disposal Fund — To account for funds related to the collection of household hazardouswaste. In August 2001, an Interlocal Agreement between Omaha, Douglas, and Sarpy counties was executed toestablish a regional collection center for household hazardous waste (HHW).
Development Revenue Fund — To record fees collected on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) projects inaccordance with the City of Omaha Municipal Code, Section 24-150, Fees: Tax Increment FinancingApplications, Processing and Administration. Funds received will be used to fund additional staff required toadminister the processing of TIF applications.
98 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Special Revenue Funds
Technology and Training — To account for technology and training fees from any permit, inspection, zoningapproval, subdivision approval, board application, or other item sought from or performed by the PlanningDepartment. Fees collected will be used to defray the costs of enhancing the technological resources and trainingof the Planning Department. This is City Council ordinance number 39121.
99
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
Non
maj
orSp
ecia
lR
even
ueFu
nds
Dec
embe
r31
,20
12
Ass
ets
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
low
ance
for
unco
llect
ible
s)D
uefr
omot
her
gove
rnm
ents
Due
from
othe
rfu
nds
Acc
rued
inte
rest
Res
tric
ted
asse
ts:
Dep
osits
with
trus
tee
Tot
alas
sets
Pub
lic
Lib
rary
Judgm
ent
Contr
ibuti
on
$2,
636,
499
1,66
9,09
94,
540
$4,
310,
138
242,
059
Dou
glas
Cou
nty
Lib
rary
______________
Su
pp
lem
ent
_____
___
_____
_
1,17
8,24
0
2,66
11,
178,
240
2,24
2,18
2
Lia
bili
ties
and
Fund
Bal
ance
s
Lia
bilit
ies:
Acc
ount
spa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
sD
ueto
othe
rfu
nds
Une
arne
dre
venu
eA
dvan
cere
venu
e
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
Fund
bala
nces
(def
icit)
:R
estr
icte
dC
omm
itted
Ass
igne
dU
nass
igne
d Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
and
fund
bala
nce
21,2
7029
9,23
733
7,20
3
36,7
95—
58,0
6563
6,44
0
__________
(338
,192
)
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinue
d)
Lib
rary
Fin
esan
dF
ees
2,66
124
1,54
351
6
Mis
cell
aneo
usK
eno
/Lott
ery
Co
ntr
ibuti
on
Pro
ceed
s
1,78
0,67
446
1,50
829
8,24
8
$1,
171
14,2
46
535
1,66
8,14
6
1,66
9,85
214
,246
298,
248
2,64
0,28
6
2,64
0,28
6
$4,
310,
138
227,
813
227,
813
242,
059
2,66
1
2,66
1
2,66
1
1,17
8,24
0
1,17
8,24
0
1,17
8,24
0
2,18
4,11
7
2,18
4,11
7
2,24
2,18
2
(338
,192
)
298,
248
100
Lia
bili
ties
and
Fund
Bal
ance
s
Lia
bilit
ies:
Acc
ount
spa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
sD
ueto
othe
rfu
nds
Une
arne
dre
venu
eA
dvan
cere
venu
e
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
Fund
bala
nces
(def
icit)
:R
estr
icte
dC
omm
itted
Ass
igne
dU
nass
igne
d Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
and
fund
bala
nce
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
Non
maj
orSp
ecia
lR
even
ueFu
nds
Dec
embe
r31,
2012
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinue
d)
Ass
ets
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
low
ance
for
unco
llect
ible
s)D
uefr
omot
her
gove
rnm
ents
Due
from
othe
rfu
nds
Acc
rued
inte
rest
Res
tric
ted
asse
ts:
Dep
osits
with
trus
tee
Tot
alas
sets
2,00
6,08
1
SID
Str
eet
and
Inte
rcep
tor
Com
mun
ity
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Sto
rmW
ater
Cit
yS
tree
tH
ighw
ayS
ewer
Par
kF
eeR
even
ueF
eeR
even
ueM
ainte
nan
ceA
lloc
atio
nC
onst
ruct
ion
Dev
elop
men
t
2,53
0,53
33,
346,
497
374
255,
870
68,3
953,
220,
159
6,10
9,00
0
1,12
7,63
91,
518,
486
1,67
1,33
6
$ $ $ $
2,00
6,08
14,
317,
461
12,1
15,5
623,
346,
497
68,7
69
123,
785
343,
012
2,32
8,35
11,
100
81—
2,42
3,00
0
670,
687
45,8
9468
,395
123,785
1,013,699
____
____
____
____
____
____
__
__
___
___
___
__
1,88
2,29
63,
303,
762
1,88
2,29
6
2,00
6,08
1
2,37
4,24
5
9,74
1,31
7
9,74
1,31
7
12,1
15,5
62
3,30
3,76
2
4,31
7,46
1
1,10
0
3,34
5,39
7
3,34
5,39
7
3,34
6,49
7
2,49
1,47
6
(2,4
22,7
07)
(2,4
22,7
07)
68,7
69
101
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
Non
maj
orSp
ecia
lR
even
ueFu
nds
Dec
embe
r31
,20
12
Lia
bilit
ies:
Lia
bili
ties
and
Fund
Bal
ance
s
Acc
ount
spa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
sD
ueto
othe
rfu
nds
Une
arne
dre
venu
eA
dvan
cere
venu
e
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
1,67
4,17
4
Fund
bala
nces
(def
icits
):R
estr
icte
dC
omm
itted
Ass
igne
dU
nass
igne
d Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
and
fund
bala
nce
$1,
674,
174
2,42
1,21
13,
594,
000
2,99
7,85
1—
6,28
2,33
3
15,2
95,3
95
(918
,431
)
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinue
d)
Ass
ets
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
low
ance
for
unco
llect
ible
s)D
uefr
omot
her
gove
rnm
ents
Due
from
othe
rfu
nds
Acc
rued
inte
rest
Res
tric
ted
asse
ts:
Dep
osits
with
trus
tee
Tot
alas
sets
Ken
oL
ott
ery
Res
erve
64,4
91
Sto
rmW
ater
Man
agem
ent
Pla
nP
rogra
m
$1,
674,
174
$1,
674,
174
$60
,107
1,61
4,06
7
Gra
nts
3,99
0,06
5
—10
,386
,899
337,
203
40,4
55
2,88
9,42
7
3,33
1,57
6
Sta
teT
urn
Bac
kR
even
ue
40,3
42
40,3
42
40,3
42
40,3
42
40,3
42
14,3
76,9
64
Bal
lpar
kR
even
ue
130,
844
130,
844
130,
844
130,
844
130,
844
Gre
ater
Om
aha
Con
vent
ion
and
Vis
itor
sB
ure
au
1,07
2,01
61,
467
721,
673
1,79
5,15
6
109,
948
109,
948
1,68
5,20
8
1,68
5,20
8
1,79
5,15
6
3,33
1,57
6
3,33
1,57
6
3,33
1,57
6
(918
,431
)
14,3
76,9
64
102
Lia
bili
ties
and
Fun
dB
alan
ces
Lia
bili
ties
:A
ccou
nts
paya
ble
and
othe
rcu
iren
tli
abil
itie
sD
ueto
othe
rfu
nds
Une
arne
dre
venu
eA
dvan
cere
venu
e
Res
tric
ted
Com
mit
ted
Ass
igne
dU
nass
igne
d
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceS
heet
Non
maj
orS
peci
alR
even
ueFu
nds
Dec
embe
r31,
2012
5,73
8,74
86,
446,
203
4,61
2,45
38,
788,
693
25,5
86,0
97
17,3
41,2
1712
,774
,962
254,
797
(3,7
56,3
90)
26,6
14,5
86
52,2
00,6
83
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
Ass
ets
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
low
ance
for
unco
llec
tibl
es)
Due
from
othe
rgo
vern
men
tsD
uefr
omot
her
fund
sA
ccru
edin
tere
stR
estr
icte
das
sets
:D
epos
its
with
trus
tee
Tot
alas
sets
Tota
lS
peci
alT
echn
olog
yR
even
uean
dT
rain
ing
Fun
ds
255,
424
22,5
00,8
994,
319,
092
16,0
04,6
07—
6,44
6,20
3—
40,4
55
________________
2,88
9,42
7
52,2
00,6
83
Hou
seho
ldC
hem
ical
Dev
elop
men
tD
ispo
sal
Rev
enue
S45
542
2,34
745
,503
—
S45
,958
422,
347
S14
,575
2792
,000
16,4
43
Tot
alli
abil
itie
s
Fun
dba
lanc
es(d
efic
its)
:
255,
424
627
627
Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
Tot
alli
abil
itie
san
dfu
ndba
lanc
e
123,
018
27
—42
2,32
0
(77,
060)
——
(77,
060)
422,
320
254,
797
$45
,958
422,
347
255,
424
254,
797
103
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Rev
enue
s.E
xpen
ditu
res,
and
Cha
nges
inFu
ndB
alan
ces
Non
maj
orSp
ecia
lR
even
ueFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
202
Dou
glas
Pu
bli
cC
oun
tyL
ibra
ryL
ibra
ryF
ines
Lib
rary
Mis
cell
aneo
us
Ken
o/L
ott
ery
Jud
gm
ent
Contr
ibuti
on
and
Fee
sS
up
ple
men
tC
ontr
ibuti
on
Pro
ceed
sR
even
ues:
Tax
es:
Pro
pert
yS
1.67
1.34
0.
——
—
Bus
ines
s—
——
——
Inlie
u6,
104
——
——
l.ice
nses
and
perm
its
——
——
Inte
rgov
ernm
enta
l—
—
—1.
976,
85I
Inve
stm
ent
inco
me
——
—13
330
Rev
enue
from
Ken
o—
—66
65,7
50C
harg
esfo
rse
rvic
es—
454.
880
—39
2.94
9—
Ren
ts,
roya
ltie
s,an
dot
her
——
-—
216.
905
Con
trib
utio
nsan
dgr
ants
—45
5.1
56—
.—
—80
6.82
6—
Tot
alre
venu
es1.
677,
450
455.
156
454.
880
1,97
6.85
11,
416.
693
6,66
6,08
0
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
ritn
tent
3,23
7,76
6—
——
278,
489
1,35
6,93
6Pu
blic
safe
ty—
—
—76
772
0,99
4T
rans
port
atio
nse
rvic
es—
——
——
Otl
ter
publ
icse
rvic
es—
——
—12
0,00
0C
olru
uuni
lyde
velo
pmen
t—
——
109,
577
683,
405
Cul
ture
and
park
s2,
534
401.
561
564.
925
1.30
0.00
044
8.67
01,
375,
000
Deb
tse
rvic
e:P
nnci
pal
——
Inte
rest
2.11
6,04
1C
apit
alou
tlay
:O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
es—
——
—
Cul
ture
atid
park
s.—
.67
,489
—42
.401
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
——
——
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es3,
240,
300
469,
050
564,
925
1.30
0,00
087
9,90
46,
372,
378
Oth
erfi
nanc
ing
sour
ces
(use
s):
Tra
nsfe
rsin
——
—..
——
—
Tra
nsfe
rsou
t—
——
——
(476
,000
)
Tot
alot
her
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
——
——
—(4
76.0
00)
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
over
expe
ndit
ures
(1,5
62.8
50)
(13.
894)
(110
.045
)67
6,85
153
6.78
9(1
82,2
98)
Beg
inni
ttgfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
4.20
3.13
624
1.70
711
2,70
650
1,38
91.
647.
328
(155
,894
)E
nditt
gft
tnd
bala
nce
(def
icit
)S
2.64
0,28
622
7,81
32.
661
1.17
8,24
02,
184.
117
(338
.192
)
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
tide
ntau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinu
ed)
104
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
to
fR
even
ues,
Exp
endi
ture
s.an
dC
hang
esin
Fund
Bal
ance
s
Non
maj
orSp
ecia
lR
even
ueFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
I20
12
S1D
Str
eet
and
Inte
rcep
tor
Com
mun
ity
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Sto
rmV
ate
rC
ityS
tree
tH
ighx
say
Sew
erP
ark
Fee
Rev
enue
Fee
Rev
enue
Mai
nte
nan
ceA
lloc
atio
nC
onst
ruct
ion
Dev
elop
men
tR
even
ues:
Tax
es:
Pro
per
lyS
——
Bus
ines
s—
Inlie
u_
——
Lic
ense
san
dpe
mti
ts-—
I.11
4.17
5In
terg
over
nmen
tal
-—
——
32.4
69.8
53—
——
Inve
stm
ent
inco
me
——
Rev
enue
from
Ken
o—
——
——
Cha
rges
fors
ervi
ces
27.4
931.
767.
151
25,1
41.8
641,
342.
169
248.
694
Ren
ts,
roya
ltie
s,an
dot
her
26.0
0667
1.47
8—
—
Con
trib
utio
nsan
dg
ran
ts
_______________
_______________
357,
143
30,3
39—
Tot
alre
venu
es27
.493
1,76
7,15
125
.525
.013
34,5
13,8
391.
114.
175
248,
694
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
rnm
ent
459,
649
3.20
8.55
8Pu
blic
safe
ty—
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
—24
,369
.845
23.4
13.6
42O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
es1.
126,
807
Com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent
27,4
93—
—
Cul
ture
and
park
s—
—20
1,78
414
.595
Deb
tse
rvic
e:P
rinc
ipal
—18
0.00
010
2,33
5In
tere
st43
.609
3,07
7C
apit
alou
tlay:
Oth
erpu
blic
serv
ices
—45
,732
——
——
Cul
ture
and
park
s—
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
——
2.14
4.73
3—
—
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es27
.493
1,17
2,53
925
,031
,278
29,0
05,1
37—
105,
412
Oth
erfi
nanc
tng
sour
ces
(use
s):
Trt
tnsf
ers
in—
——
Tra
nsfe
rsou
t—
——
(100
,000
)(7
67.1
58)
—
Tot
alot
her
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
——
—(1
00,0
00)
(767
,158
)—
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
over
expe
ndit
ures
—59
4,61
249
3,73
55,
408,
702
347.
017
143,
282
Beg
inni
ngfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
—1,
287,
684
2,81
0,02
74,
332,
615
2,99
8,38
0(2
.565
,989
)
End
ing
fltn
dba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
$—
1,88
2,29
63,
303,
762
9,74
1,31
73,
345,
397
(2,4
22,7
07)
See
acco
ttsp
anyt
ngtt
tdep
ende
ntau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinu
ed)
05
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
RB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Rev
enue
s,E
xpen
ditu
res,
and
Cha
nges
inFu
ndB
alan
ces
Non
maj
orS
peci
alR
even
ueFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
,20
2
Gre
ater
Oni
aha
Sto
rmW
ater
Sta
teC
onve
ntio
nM
anag
emen
tT
urn
Bac
kB
allp
ark
Ken
oL
otte
ryan
dV
isit
ors
Pla
nP
rogra
mR
even
ueR
even
ueR
eser
veG
rants
Bur
eau
Rev
enue
s:T
axes
:P
rope
rty
S—
—-
—-
—
Bus
ines
s28
,670
—68
8.82
2In
lieu
——
——
—
Lic
ense
san
dpe
nnil
s—
Inte
rgov
ernm
enta
l24
1,74
2—
—3,
4791
64In
vest
men
tin
com
e..-
—
——
35,7
7889
2R
even
uefr
omK
eno
——
—-—
Cha
rges
for
serv
ices
—28
0,00
0—
—15
3,61
4R
ents
,ro
yalt
ies,
and
othe
r—
——
—9,
889,
228
34,6
50C
ontr
ibut
ions
and
gran
ts85
0,24
9
______________
——
30,2
37.1
73—
Tot
alre
venu
es85
0.24
924
1,74
230
8,67
035
,778
50.1
27,2
934,
356,
250
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
rnit
tent
—37
2,76
961
.862
Publ
icsa
fety
——
—5.
750,
563
—
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
—-.-.-
——
—
Oth
erpu
blic
serv
ices
710.
799
——
0,76
4.3
I7C
otnm
unit
yde
velo
pmen
t—
228,
665
——
14.1
84,1
153.
274,
760
Cul
ture
and
park
s—
280.
000
100,
000
—
Deb
tse
rvic
e:P
rinc
ipal
Inte
rest
Cap
ital
outla
y:O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
es13
9,45
0—
357,
420
Cul
ture
and
park
s—
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
——
—.—
——
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es85
0,24
922
8,66
528
0,00
010
0,00
031
,429
,184
3,33
6,64
2
Oth
erfi
nanc
ing
sour
ces
(use
s):
Tra
nsfe
rsin
—70
,200
619,
888
Tra
nsfe
rsou
t—
——
(t46
,712
)—
Tot
alot
lter
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
_______________
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
70.2
00—
473,
176
—
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
over
expe
ndit
ures
13.0
7798
,870
(64,
222)
19.1
71,2
851,
019,
608
Beg
inni
ngfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
—27
.265
31.9
743,
395,
798
(20,
089,
716)
665,
600
Ettd
ing
find
bala
nce
(def
icit
)S
—40
.342
30,8
443,
331.
576
(918
,431
)1,
685,
208
See
acco
tnpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinu
ed)
106
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Cot
tibi
ning
Sta
tem
ent
ofR
even
ues.
Exp
endi
ture
s,an
dC
hang
esin
Fund
Bal
ance
s
Non
usaj
orS
peci
alR
even
ueFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
2012
To
lal
Hou
seho
ldS
pec
ial
Ch
emic
alD
evel
opm
ent
Tec
hnol
ogy
Rev
enue
Dis
posa
lR
even
ue
and
Tra
inin
gF
und
s
Rev
enue
s:T
axes
:P
rope
rty
S—
—I.
671
.346
Bus
ines
s—
7t7,
492
Inlie
u—
—
—6,
104
Lic
ense
san
dpe
nuit
s—
422074
.536
,249
Inte
rgov
ernm
enta
l53
.213
38.2
20,8
23In
vest
men
tin
com
e—
37,0
13R
even
uefr
omK
eno
——
6,66
5.75
0C
harg
esfo
rse
rvic
es34
4.44
6—
30.1
53,2
60R
ents
,ro
yalt
ies,
and
othe
r25
6—
—20
.838
,523
Con
trib
utio
nsan
dgr
ants
385,
029
—33,t
2l,
9t5
Tot
alre
venu
es43
8,49
834
4.44
642
2.07
413
2.96
8,47
5
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
rnm
ent
—•
—8.
976,
03!
Publ
icsa
fety
——
—6,
472.
324
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
—47
.783
,487
Oth
erpu
blic
serv
ices
376.
597
—13
.098
.520
Com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent
118,
811
242.
008
8,86
8.85
4C
ultu
rean
dpa
rks
-4.
689.
069
Deb
tse
rvic
e:P
rinc
ipal
—28
2,33
5In
tere
st2,
162,
727
Cap
ital
outla
y:O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
es—
.—
542,
602
Cul
ture
mid
park
s---
—09
,890
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
—2,
144.
733
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es37
6,59
711
8.81
124
2,00
810
5,13
0,57
2
Oth
erfi
nanc
ing
sour
ces
(use
s):
Tra
nsfe
rsin
——
690,
088
Tra
nsfe
rsou
t—
—
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
(1,4
89,8
70)
Tot
alot
her
fina
ncin
gso
tirc
es(u
ses)
——
(799
,782
)
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
over
expe
ndit
ures
61,9
0122
5,63
518
0.06
627
,038
,121
Beg
inni
ngfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
(138
,961
)19
6,68
574
.73l
(423
,535
)
End
ing
fund
bala
nce
(def
icit
)8
(77,
060)
422,
320
254,
797
26,6
14,5
86
See
acco
mpa
nyil
tgin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rl.
107
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Judgment Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Taxes property S 1,656,119 1,656,119 1,671,346 15,227Taxes in lieu 2,531 2,531 6,104 3,573
Total revenues 1,658,650 1,658,650 1,677,450 18,800
Expenditures:General government 2,007,402 2,007,402 3,237,766 (1,230,364)Culture and parks
_______________
— 2,534 (2,534)
Total expenditures 2,007,402 2,007,402 3,240,300 (1,232,898)
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover expenditures (348,752) (348,752) (1,562,850) (1,214,098)
Net change in fund balances (348,752) (348,752) (1,562,850) (1,214,098)
Fund balances—beginning 2,645,377 2,645,377 4,203,136 1,557,759
Fund balances—ending $ 2,296,625 2,296,625 2,640,286 343,661
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
108
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Library Fine and Fees Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Charges for services $ 440,755 440,755 454,880 14,125
Total revenues 440,755 440,755 454,880 14,125
Expenditures:Culture and parks 564,925 564,925 564,925 —
Total expenditures 564,925 564,925 564,925 —
Excess of revenues overexpenditures (124,170) (124,170) (110,045) 14,125
Net change in fund balance (124,170) (124,170) (110,045) 14,125
Fund balances — beginning 125,822 125,822 112,706 (13,116)
Fundbalances—ending $ 1,652 1,652 2,661 1,009
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
109
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Douglas County Library Supplement Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
____________________________________
positive
________________ ________________ ________________
(negative)
Revenues:Intergovernmental
_________________ _________________ __________________ _________________
Total revenues
Expenditures:Culture and parks
______________ _______________ _______________ _______________
Total expenditures
______________ _______________ _______________ _______________
Excess of revenues overexpenditures
________________ ________________ _________________ ________________
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances— beginning
_______________ _______________ ________________ _______________
Fund balances — ending
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final Actual
5 1,175,000 1,175,000 1,976,851 801,851
1,175,000 1,175,000 1,976,851 801,851
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 —
(125,000) (125,000) 676,851 801,851
(125,000) (125,000) 676,851 801,851
257,897 257,897 501,389 243,492
$ 132,897 132,897 1,178,240 1,045,343
110
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule Keno/Lottery Proceeds Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Investment income 330 330Revenue from keno $ 5,518,930 5,518,930 6,665,750 1,146,820
Total revenues 5,518,930 5,518,930 6,666,080 1,147,150
Expenditures:General government 120,000 120,000 1,356,938 (1,236,938)Public safety 1,196,000 1,196,000 720,994 475,006Other public services — — 120,000 (120,000)Community development 685,000 685,000 683,405 1,595Culture and parks 1,375,000 1,375,000 1,375,000Debt service:
Interest 2,172,714 2,172,714 2,116,041 56,673
Total expenditures 5,548,714 5,548,714 6,372,378 (823,664)
Excess of revenues overexpenditures (29,784) (29,784) 293,702 323,486
Other financing uses:Transfers out (476,000) (476,000)
Total other financing —— (476,000) (476,000)
Net change in fund balance (29,784) (29,784) (182,298) (152,514)
Fund balances — beginning 23,910 23,910 (155,894) (179,804)
Fund balances — ending $ (5,874) (5,874) (338,192) (332,318)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
Ill
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetaiy Comparison Schedule — SID Administrative Fees Revenue Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(lJnaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Charges for services $ 70,000 70,000 27,493 (42,507)
Total revenues 70,000 70,000 27,493 (42,507)
Expenditures:Community development 62,000 62,000 27,493 34,507Transportation services 38,000 38,000
_______________
38,000
Total expenditures 100,000 100,000 27,493 72,507
Excess of revenues overexpenditures (30,000) (30,000)
_______________
30,000
Net change in fund balance (30,000) (30,000) 30,000
Fund balances — beginning 30,000 30,000
_______________
(30,000)
Fund balances — ending $ —
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
112
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Storm Water Fee Revenue Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Revenues:Charges for services
Total revenues
Expenditures:Other public servicesCapital outlay
Total expenditures
Excess of revenues overexpenditures
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances — beginning
Fund balances — ending
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final
$ 1,200,000 1,200,000
1,200,000 1,200,000
1,212,244 1,212,24451,910 51,910
1,264,154 1,264,154
(64,154) (64,154)
(64,154) (64,154)
872,974 872,974
$ 808,820 808,820
Actual
1,767,151
1,767,151
1,126,80745,732
1,172,539
594,612
594,612
1,287,684
1,882,296
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
567,151
567,151
85,4376,178
91,615
658,766
658,766
414,710
1,073,476
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
113
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — City Street Maintenance Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Charges for services $ 25,458,376 25,458,376 25,141,864 (316,512)Rents and royalties 26,006 26,006Contributions and grants 300,000 300,000 357,143 57,143
Total revenues 25,758,376 25,758,376 25,525,013 (233,363)
Expenditures:General government 400,000 400,000 459,649 (59,649)Transportation services 23,947,525 23,947,525 24,369,845 (422,320)Culture and parks 286,991 286,991 201,784 85,207
Total expenditures 24,634,516 24,634,516 25,031,278 (396,762)
Deficiency of revenuesover expenditures 1,123,860 1,123,860 493,735 (630,125)
Other financing uses:Transfers out
Total other financing uses — — — —
Net change in fund balances 1,123,860 1,123,860 493,735 (630,125)
Fund balances — beginning (1,123,860) (1,123,860) 2,810,027 3,933,887
Fund balances — ending $ — 3,303,762 3,303,762
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
114
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Street and Highway Allocation Fund
Year ended December 31 • 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Intergovernmental $ 29,593,405 29,593,405 32,469,853 2,876,448Charges for services 40,000 40,000 1,342,169 1,302,169Rents and royalties
— 671,478 671,478Contributions and grants 619,017 619,017 30,339 (588,678)
Total revenues 30,252,422 30,252,422 34,513,839 4,261,417
Expenditures:General government 1,434,582 1,434,582 3,208,558 (1,773,976)Transportation services 29,996,134 29,996,134 23,413,642 6,582,492Culture and parks 14,595 14,595 14,595Debt service:
Principal 180,000 180,000 180,000Interest 73,578 73,578 43,609 29,969
Capital outlay 2,488,000 2,488,000 2,144,733 343,267
Total expenditures 34,186,889 34,186,889 29,005,137 5,181,752
Excess of revenues overexpenditures (3,934,467) (3,934,467) 5,508,702 9,443,169
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers out (100,000) 100,000
Total other financing sources (uses) — — (100,000) 100,000
Net change in fund balance (3,934,467) (3,934,467) 5,408,702 (9,343,169)
Fund balances — beginning 5,750,651 5,750,651 4,332,615 (1,418,036)
Fundbalances—ending $ 1,816,184 1,816,184 9,741,317 7,925,133
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
115
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Interceptor Sewer Construction Fund -
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Licenses and permits $ 550,000 550,000 1,114,175 564,175
Total revenues 550,000 550,000 1,114,175 564,175
Expenditures:Other public services 1,700,000 1,700,000 — 1,700,000
Total expenditures 1,700,000 1,700,000 — 1,700,000
Deficiency of revenuesover expenditures (1,150,000) (1,150,000) 1,114,175 2,264,175
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers inTransfers out
— (767,158) 767,158
Total other financing uses —— (767,158) 767,158
Net change in fund balance (1,150,000) (1,150,000) 347,017 1,497,017
Fund balances — beginning 1,714,136 1,714,136 2,998,380 1,284,244
Fundbalances—ending $ 564,136 564,136 3,345,397 2,781,261See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
116
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Community Park Development Fund
Year ended December31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Charges for services $ 160,000 160,000 248,694 88,694
Total revenues 160,000 160,000 248,694 88,694
Expenditures:Debt service:
Principal 98,401 98,401 102,335 (3,934)Interest 7,012 7,012 3,077 3,935
Total expenditures 105,413 105,413 105,412 1
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover expenditures 54,587 54,587 143,282 88,695
Net change in fund balance 54,587 54,587 143,282 88,695
Fund balances — beginning (2,554,972) (2,554,972) (2,565,989) (11,017)
Fund balances — ending $ (2,500,385) (2,500,385) (2,422,707) 77,678
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
117
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — State Turn Back Revenue Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Intergovernmental $ 312,000 312,000 241,742 (70,258)
Total revenues 312,000 312,000 241,742 (70,258)
Expenditures:Community development 275,500 275,500 228,665 46,835
Total expenditures 275,500 275,500 228,665 46,835
Excess of revenues overexpenditures 36,500 36,500 13,077 (23,423)
Net change in fund balance 36,500 36,500 13,077 (23,423)
Fund balances — beginning 8,536 8,536 27,265 18,729
Fund balances — ending $ 45,036 45,036 40,342 (4,694)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
118
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Keno/Lottery Reserve Fund .
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Investment income S 95,000 95,000 35,778 (59,222)
Total revenues 95,000 95,000 35,778 (59,222)
Expenditures:Culture and parks 100,000 100,000 100,000
______________
Total expenditures 100,000 100,000 100,000 —
Excess of revenues overexpenditures (5,000) (5,000) (64,222) (59,222)
Net change in fund balance (5,000) (5,000) (64,222) (59,222)
Fund balances — beginning 3,366,741 3,366,741 3,395,798 (29,057)
Fundbalances—ending $ 3,361,741 3,361,741 3,331,576 (30,165)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
119
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Greater Omaha Convention and Visitors Bureau Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Taxes business $ 650,500 650,500 688,822 38,322Intergovernmental 2,300,000 2,300,000 3,479,164 1,179,164Charges for services 40,000 40,000 153,614 113,614Rents and royalties 20,000 20,000 34,650 14,650
Total revenues 3,010,500 3,010,500 4,356,250 1,345,750
Expenditures:General government 61,862 61,862 61,862Community development 3,113,445 3,113,445 3,274,780 (161,335)
Total expenditures 3,175,307 3,175,307 3,336,642 (161,335)
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover expenditures (164,807) (164,807) 1,019,608 1,184,415
Net change in fund balance (164,807) (164,807) 1,019,608 1,184,415
Fundbalances—beginning 956,839 956,839 665,600 (291,239)
Fund balances—ending $ 792,032 792,032 1,685,208 893,176
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
120
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Household Chemical Disposal Fund —
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Intergovernmental $ 277,000 277,000 53,213 (223,787)Rents and royalties — — 256 256Contributions and grants 50,000 50,000 385,029 335,029
Total revenues 327,000 327,000 438,498 111,498
Expenditures:Other public services 448,393 448,393 376,597 71,796
Total expenditures 448,393 448,393 376,597 71,796
DeOciency of revenuesover expenditures (121,393) (121,393) 61,901 183,294
Net change in fund balance (121,393) (121,393) 61,901 183,294
Fund balances — beginning (17,675) (17,675) (138,961) 121,286
Fundbalances—ending $ (139,068) (139,068) (77,060) 62,008
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
121
This page intentionally left blank
NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Debt Service Fund
The Debt Service Funds are used to account for the resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debtprincipal, interest, and related costs.
Riverfront Redevelopment Special Tax Fund — To accumulate revenues and pay bond and interest obligationson Redevelopment Bonds. The property tax levy for 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 is 0.894 cents per $100 oftaxable valuation. It was increased to 1.594 cents per $100 of taxable valuation in 2010 and is the same through2012.
This Redevelopment Debt Service Fund services the following issuances:
Name Date of issue Date retired
Downtown Redevelopment 1999 20192002 Redevelopment (Stockyards & Downtown) 2002 20322002 Special Obligation (Riverfront) 2002 20322004 Performing Arts Redevelopment 2004 2024Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2007 2027Special Tax & Tax Allocation Revenue Redevelopment A 2007 20162008 Special Obligation (Riverfront) 2008 2013Riverfront Redevelopment Refunds Series 2008A 2008 2026Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2008 2028Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2009 2012Special Tax Revenue Redevelopment 2009 2029
These bonds are serviced by a variety of revenues sources including Property Tax Revenue, Tax AllocationRevenue, State Cigarette Tax, NRD Miller Park Contribution, Douglas County Miller Park Contribution, CenturyLink naming rights, and land sales.
122
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Balance Sheet
Nonmajor Debt Service Fund — Riverfront Redevelopment Special Tax Fund
December 31, 2012
Riverfrontredevelopment
specialAssets tax
Cash and pooled investments $ 3,387,083Receivables (net of allowance for uncollectibles) 7,385,023Due from other governments 387,060
Totalassets $ 11,159,166
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other current liabilities $ 11,946Unearned revenue 1,421Advance revenue 7,346,109
Total liabilities 7,359,476
Fund balances:Restricted 3,799,690
Total fund balance 3,799,690
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 11,159,166
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
123
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Nonmaj or Debt Service Fund — Riverfront Redevelopment Special Tax Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
Riverfrontredevelopment
specialtax
Revenues:Taxes:
Property $ 6,260,102In lieu 16,218
Intergovernmental 1,500,000Investment income 26,813Rents, royalties, and other 825,000Contributions and grants 267,9 1 1
Total revenues 8,896,044
Expenditures:Current:
General government 54,428Debt service:
Principal 3,985,264Interest 5,323,955Bond issuance costs 420,835
Total expenditures 9,784,482
Other financing sources:Proceeds from the issuance of bonds 11,785,000Proceeds of refunding bonds 35,067,065Proceeds from bond premium 1,815,011Payment to refunded bond escrow agent (47,877,188)
Total other financing sources 789,888
Net change in fund balances (98,550)
Beginning fund balance 3,898,240
Ending fund balance $ 3,799,690
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
124
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Debt Service Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Revenues:Taxes propertyTaxes in lieuIntergovernmentalInvestment incomeCharges for servicesContributions and grants
Total revenues
Expenditures:General governmentDebt service:PrincipalinterestBond issuance costs
Total expenditures
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover expenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bondsProceeds from bond premiumPayment to refunded bond escrow agent
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances — beginning
Fund balances — ending
S 53,219,37481,334
200,0002,157,5843,019,349
58,677,641
694,766
37,532,33323,850,886
62,077,985
(3,400,344)
Final Actual
53,660,317196,169
2,175,678966,136
2,633,4242,414,956
62,046,680
694,766 738,724
38,180,61423,226,637
480,275
62,626,250
(3,400,344) (579,570)
35,335,0004,306,871
(38,968,646)
_______________
673,225
(3,400,344) 93,655
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
440,943114,835
2,175,678766,136475,840
(604,393)
3,369,039
(43,958)
(648,281)624,249
(480,275)
(548,265)
2,820,774
35,335,0004,306,871
(38,968,646)
673,225
3,493,999
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
Budgeted amountsOriginal
53,219,37481,334
200,0002,157,5843,019,349
58,677,641
37,532,33323,850,886
62,077,985
(3,400,344)
16,746,784 16,746,784 18,595,398 1,848,614
$ 13,346,440 13,346,440 18,689,053 5,342,613
125
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Riverfront Redevelopment Special Tax Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Revenues:Taxes propertyTaxes in lieuIntergovernmentalInvestment incomeRents, royalties, and otherContributions and grants
Total revenues
Expenditures:General governmentDebt service principalDebt service interestDebt service bond issuance costs
Total expenditures
Deficiency of revenues overexpenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bondsProceeds of refunding bondsProceeds from bond premiumPayment to refunded bond escrow agent
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances — beginning
Fund balances — ending
S 6,420,7196,724
1,500,000
825,000287,230
9,039,673
58,9503,835,2645,610,594
9,504,808
(465,135)
Final Actual
6,260,10216,218
1,500,00026,813
825,000
_____________
267,911
9,039,673 8,896,044
54,4283,985,2645,323,955
______________
420,835
_______________
9,784,482
(465,135) (888,438)
11,785,00035,067,065
1,815,011(47,877,188)
_______________
789,888
(465,135) (98,550)
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
(160,617)9,494
26,813
(19,319)
(143,629)
4,522(150,000)286,639
(420,835)
(279,674)
(423,303)
11,785,00035,067,065
1,815,011(47,877,188)
789,888
366,585
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
Budgeted amountsOriginal
6,420,7196,724
1,500,000
825,000287,230
58,9503,835,2645,610,594
9,504,808
(465,135)
3,119,507 3,119,507 3,898,240 (778,733)
S 2,654,372 2,654,372 3,799,690 1,145,318
126
This page intentionally left blank
NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Capital Project Funds
The Capital Projects Funds are used to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed,or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities andother capital facilities and other capital assets. Capital projects funds exclude those types of capital relatedoutflows financed by proprietary funds or for assets that will be held in trust for individuals, privateorganizations, or other governments.
ASARCO/Lewis and Clark Remediation Fund — To develop initial public improvements associated with theconversion of the ASARCO property to a public recreational area, along with other improvements along theriverfront. Improvements will include trails, benches, landscaping, roads, parking lots, and similar publicdevelopments. In addition, the agreement requires ASARCO to deposit $1.5 million to be invested by the City tofund long-term remediation costs.
Advanced Acquisition Fund — To account for net proceeds from the sale or exchange of real property. The netproceeds from the sale or exchange of real property not needed for public purposes are to be credited to this find.Section 5.03 of the Municipal Code permits usage of available funds to facilitate the orderly and timelyacquisition of real estate for public purposes as proposed in the master plan.
City Capital Improvement Fund — To account for money supplemented by General Fund appropriations andgrants used to fund various city projects.
2006 Environmental Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of a general obligationbond voted on in the May 2006 primary election. Proceeds from the sale of the bond are used toward the cost ofconstmction and improvement of storm, sanitary, and interceptor sewers throughout the City.
2010 Environmental Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of a general obligationbond voted on in the May 2010 primary election. Proceeds from the sale of the bond are used toward the cost ofconstmction and improvement of storm, sanitary, and interceptor sewers throughout the City.
Airport Business Park Development Fund — To account for contributions received from developers whorequest Tax Increment Financing throughout the Downtown Northeast area. This requirement is incorporated inthe Redevelopment Agreement between the City of Omaha and the developer when sewer connections arerequired within the Airport Industrial Park and/or East Omaha Detention Cells. All sewer connection fees withinthis area are paid by this fund. Other funding is provided by TIF proceeds and the sale of land.
2006 Transportation Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of general obligationbonds in the May 2006 primary elections. Proceeds from the sale of these bonds are used toward the cost ofconstruction and improvement of streets, expressways, freeways, and various bridge improvements throughoutthe City.
2010 Transportation Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of general obligationbonds in the May 2010 primary elections. Proceeds from the sale of these bonds are used toward the cost ofconstruction and improvement of streets, expressways, freeways, and various bridge improvements throughoutthe City.
127 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds3”.
Capital Project Funds
2006 Public Facilities Bond Fund — To account for the construction of projects funded with proceeds from the2006 Public Facility Bond Authorization. The Bond Authorization amount is $16,410,000.
2010 Public Facilities Bond Fund — To account for the construction of projects funded with proceeds from the2010 Public Facility Bond Authorization. The Bond Authorization amount is $8,025,000.
2006 Public Safety Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of general obligationbonds in the May 2006 primary election. Proceeds from the sale of these bonds will be used for various publicsafety capital expenditures, including the purchase of aerials, pumpers, and emergency vehicle preemptionsystem equipment.
2010 Public Safety Bond Fund — To account for money received through the issuance of general obligationbonds in the May 2010 primary election. Proceeds from the sale of these bonds will be used for various publicsafety capital expenditures, including the purchase of aerials, pumpers, and emergency vehicle preemptionsystem equipment.
2000 Park and Recreation Bond 2002 #1 Fund — To account for this Capital Project fund, which was createddue to the November, 2000 Primary Election, the voters authorized the issuance of $10,500,000 of GeneralObligation Bonds. Various smaller projects remain and should complete in 2009 to expend this fund fully.
2006 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund — To account for the City of Omaha 2006 Bond issue. The City ofOmaha citizens voted and approved, in the spring of 2006, to issue $16,930,000 in General Obligation bonds.This money will be used for development and rehabilitation of City of Omaha Parks, and Recreations Centers.
2010 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund — To account for the City of Omaha 2010 Bond issue. The City ofOmaha citizens voted and approved on May 11, 2010 to issuance of $14,410,000 in General Obligation bonds.This money will be used for development and rehabilitation of City of Omaha Parks and Recreations Centers.
Downtown Stadium & Companion Project — To account for the construction of a new City baseball stadium tobe built between 10th and 13th Streets between Cuming and Webster Streets. The City of Omaha FacilitiesCorporation will issue lease purchase bonds to provide funding. On June 10, 2008, the Omaha City Counciladopted Ordinance 38124 approving the Sixth Amendment to the Agreement and Lease regarding the OmahaConvention Center/Arena between the City and MECA (Metropolitan Entertainment & Convention Authority) toprovide for the construction and operation.
Pedestrian Trail Bridge — Joint Use Omaha/Council Bluffs Fund — To account for moneys spent toward theoperation and maintenance of the Missouri River Pedestrian Bridge. Funds received in this fund may be usedtoward inspection, operation and maintenance costs of the crossing bridge.
Missouri River Pedestrian Bridge Fund — To account for the costs associated with the construction of theMissouri River Pedestrian Bridge.
Back to the River Project Fund — To track expenditures associated with the Riverfront Trail — North/NorthOmaha Connector Grant. The City of Omaha received this grant from the Nebraska Department of Roads toconstruct two major trails, the riverfront trail from ASARCO north to NP Dodge Park and the North OmahaConnector, which will connect this to the Keystone Trail.
128 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds
Capital Project Funds
UNMC Infrastructure Improvements Fund — To account for the redevelopment of 42nd Street within theUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center campus. The fund will provide for fully reimbursable expenditures forstreet and other infrastructure development to the site. The project entails a reduction from 4 to 2 lanes of throughtraffic creating a pedestrian friendly streetscape. The project has been expanded to include the study of therelocation of Saddle Creek Road to the west permitting development of the previous roadbed into an urbancampus.
Downtown Development Fund — To account for the redevelopment of the site known as Pinnacle Foods locatedacross 10th Street from the Qwest Center. The fund represents the City’s exercise of its “right of first refusal” toacquire this prime development property.
Library Facilities Capital Fund — To pay off yearly bond obligations for capital projects to improve facilities ofthe Omaha Public Library. Phase II of this project would include purchase of land in west central, southwest, andnorthwest Omaha areas. Other projects include the renovation of W. Dale Clark Library, Swanson Branch, andAbrahams Branch.
Capital Special Assessment Fund — To account for Public Works assessments for sidewalks and sewer repairsdone by the City. This is assessed annually for the homeowner with outstanding bills. S.I.D.’s are also billed forstreet and sewer repairs.
Service Special Assessment Fund — To account for a Parks and Recreation fund to enforce the city codes forweeds, litter, and demolition of buildings. This is assessed annually for the homeowner with outstanding bills.
129
CiT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
Non
maj
orC
apit
alP
roje
cts
Fund
s
Dec
embe
r31
2012
AS
AR
CO
!A
irport
Lew
is&
2006
2010
Bus
ines
s20
0620
10
Cla
rkA
dvan
ced
Cit
yC
apit
alE
iis’
iron
nsen
tal
En
vir
on
men
tal
Par
kT
ran
spo
rtat
ion
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n20
06P
ubli
c
Ass
ets
Rem
edia
tio
nA
cqu
isit
ion
Impro
vem
ent
Bon
dB
ond
t)ev
elop
men
tB
ond
Bon
dF
acil
itie
sB
ond
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
S40
4,82
826
5,59
444
247
2,32
894
,705
609,
582
1,92
225
8,68
61.
209.
530
Inve
stm
ents
(.50
0.54
4—
—-
——
—
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
of
allo
wan
cefo
run
coll
ecti
hles
)—
—66
.742
——
.061
)732
2,7(
6
Due
fron
tot
her
gove
rnm
ents
—24
4.84
0—
—55
,110
Due
from
othe
rSt
uds
2.59
2.11
00—
1.9(
10.0
004.
000.
000
—
Acc
rtte
din
tere
st2,
550
—
Oth
eras
sets
—49
8,S
99D
epos
its
with
trus
tee
——
7.12
1,43
7—
—.
——
——
Tot
alas
sets
51,
907,
922
2.85
7.59
47,
932.
360
472.
328
1.99
4.70
560
9,58
25.
117.
764
261,
402
1.20
9.53
0
Lia
bil
itie
san
dF
und
Bal
ance
s
Litt
bilit
ies:
Acc
ount
spa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
sS
6.90
01.
496.
538
123.
234
4.12
0-
264.
662
159.
718
76.8
23
Dtte
toot
her
fund
s—
592,
00(1
——
Due
togo
vern
men
ts—
..
—
Adv
ance
reve
nue
——
—16
,587
——
1,04
0,98
9—
——
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
—6.
900
2.10
5,12
512
3.24
44,
120
—1.
305,
651
159,
718
76,8
23
Fund
bala
nce
(def
icit
):R
estr
icte
d—
349.
084
1,99
0,58
5—
3,81
2,11
310
1,68
41.
132,
707
Cot
nmit
ted
1,90
7,92
22,
850,
694
—-
——
—
Ass
igtt
ed—
—5,
827,
235
——
609,
582
—
Unt
tssi
gned
——
——
——
——
—
Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
1,90
7,92
22,
850,
694
5,82
7,23
534
9,08
41.
990.
585
609,
582
3,81
2,11
310
1,68
4l.
l32,7
07
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
and
fund
bala
ttee
(def
icit
)S
1,90
7,92
22.
857,
594
7,93
2,36
047
2,32
81.
994.
705
609,
582
5,11
7,76
426
1,40
21.
209,
530
See
acco
mpa
nytn
gin
depe
ndet
ttau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Cou
tinst
ed)
130
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
No
maj
orC
apit
alP
roje
cts
Fund
s
Dec
embe
r3
2012
Ped
estr
ian
Dow
ntow
nT
rail
Bri
dge
Mis
sour
i
2006
2010
2000
Par
kan
d20
06P
arks
2010
Par
ks
Sta
dium
&Jo
int
Use
Riv
er
2010
Pub
lic
Pub
lic
Saf
ety
Pub
lic
Saf
ety
Rec
reat
ion
and
Rec
reat
ion
and
Rec
reat
ion
Com
pani
onO
mah
a/C
ounc
ilP
edes
tria
n
Ass
ets
Fac
ilit
ies
Bon
dB
ond
Bon
d20
02#1
Bon
dB
ond
Pro
ject
Blu
ffs
Bri
dge
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
S.5
4403
01.
010,
764
271.
676
6147
6,18
696
,341
96,9
32—
Inve
stm
ents
——
——
——
—
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
low
ance
for
unco
llec
tibl
es)
——
43.6
9355
1,70
711
.000
,000
“-
100,
000
Due
from
othe
rgo
vern
men
ts—
——
——
-—
Due
from
othe
rfu
nds
——
—81
1.40
02.
300.
000
100.
000
Acc
rued
inte
rest
——
,-—
Oth
eras
sets
——
.—
——
Dep
osit
sw
ithtr
uste
e—
——
869.
078
—
Tot
alas
sets
S1,
544,
030
1,01
0,76
427
1,67
661
1,33
1,27
92,
948.
048
11.8
69.0
7896
,932
100,
000
Lia
bil
itie
san
dF
ond
Bal
ance
s
Lia
bilit
ies:
Acc
ount
spa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
sS
150.
450
676,
207
—(1
1,33
9)20
2,36
154
8,50
6—
.-
9,50
3
Due
toot
her
fund
s—
—11
.400
—‘
11,0
00,0
00—
100.
000
Due
togo
vern
men
ts—
——
——
——
——
Adv
ance
reve
nue
——
12,7
64
__
___
____
____
___
11,0
00.0
00—
100.
000
Tol
allia
bilit
ies
159,
450
676,
207
—61
215,
125
548,
506
22,0
00,0
009,
503
200.
000
Ftin
dba
lanc
e(d
efic
it):
Res
tric
ted
1,38
4,58
033
4,55
727
1,67
6—
1,11
6,15
42,
399,
542
—18
7,42
9—
Com
mit
ted
—,
——
——
——
——
Ass
igne
d—
——
——
——
——
Una
ssig
ned
—‘
——
——
—(1
0,13
0,92
2)—
(100
.000
)
Tot
alth
udba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
1,38
4,58
033
4,55
727
1,67
6—
1,116
,154
2,39
9,54
2(1
0,13
0,92
2)18
7,42
9(1
00,0
00)
Tot
allia
bilil
ies
and
thud
bala
nce
(def
icit
)S
1,54
4,03
01,
010,
764
271.
676
611,
331,
279
2.94
8,04
811
,869
,078
196,
932
100,
000
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinu
ed)
131
CIT
YO
FO
.IA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngB
alan
ceSh
eet
Non
maj
orC
apit
alP
roje
cts
Fund
s
Dec
embe
r31
2012
UN
MC
Lib
rary
Cap
ital
Tot
alB
ack
toth
eIn
fras
truct
ure
Dos
vnto
ssn
Fac
ilit
ies
Spe
cial
Ser
vice
Spe
cial
Cap
ital
Ass
ets
Riv
erP
roje
ctIm
pro
vem
ent
Dev
elop
men
tC
apit
alA
sses
smen
tA
sses
snie
nlP
roje
cts
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
$60
3.57
9—
7,10
720
714
8,80
167
5,46
58,
248,
766
Inve
slnt
ents
——
—
—15
00,5
44
Rec
eiva
bles
(net
ofal
losv
ance
for
unco
llec
tibl
es)
—1,
452
—1.
560,
042
2,02
5.87
216
,41
2,95
6
Due
lions
othe
rgo
vern
tnte
nls
12,0
2625
,000
——
4,20
84,
363
345.
547
Dtte
frot
tsot
her
fund
s—
——
——
-—
11,7
03,4
00
Acc
rued
ittle
rest
-—
——
249
518
3,31
7
Otl
ter
asse
ts—
——
—
—49
8,89
9D
ep
osits
with
tru
stee
______________
—
—
______________
___
___
_____
___
7,99
0,51
5
Tot
alas
sets
$61
5,60
525
,000
8,55
920
71,
713,
300
2,70
6,21
846
,703
,944
Lia
bili
ties
and
Fun
dB
alan
ces
Lia
bilit
ies:
Acc
ottit
lspa
yabl
ean
dot
her
curr
ent
liabi
litie
s$
264
—8.
325
-67
,525
3.79
2,80
7D
ue10
oUte
rfu
nds
——
——
11,7
03,4
00D
ueto
gove
rnit
tent
s—
—25
.000
—---.
—25
,000
Adv
ance
rcve
tttte
12.0
27—
—
______________
1,56
0,04
22,
025,
872
15,7
68,2
81
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
12,2
9125
,000
8.32
5—
1,62
7,56
72.
025.
872
31.2
89,4
88
Fund
bala
nce
(del
ictI
):R
estr
icte
d60
3.31
4—
——
13,6
83.4
25C
otts
ntilt
ed—
234
207
85.7
3368
0.34
65,
525,
136
Ass
igne
d—
——
——
6.43
6.81
7U
nass
igne
d—
——
——
—(1
0.23
0,92
2)
Tot
alfu
ndba
lanc
e(d
efic
it)
603,
314
—23
420
785
.733
680,
346
15.4
14.4
56
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
aitd
fund
bala
nce
(def
icit
)S
615,
605
25,0
008.
559
207
1,71
3,30
02,
706.
218
46.7
03,9
44
See
acco
ttip
anyi
ngin
depe
nden
tau
dtto
rs’
repo
rt.
132
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
nrz
Stat
emen
tof
Rev
enue
s.E
xpen
ditu
res,
and
Cha
nges
inFu
ndB
alan
ces
Non
rna(
orC
apita
lPr
ojec
tFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
2012
AS
AR
CO
/A
irpo
rtL
ewis
&20
0620
10B
usin
ess
2006
2010
Cla
rkA
dvan
ced
Cit
3C
apit
alE
nvir
onm
enta
lE
nvir
onm
enta
lP
ark
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
nT
ran
sport
atio
n20
06P
ubli
cR
emed
iati
onA
cqui
siti
onIm
pro
vem
ent
Bon
dB
ond
Dev
elop
men
tB
ond
Bon
dF
acil
itie
sB
ond
Rev
enue
s:In
vest
men
tio
cottt
e(l
oss)
(14,
714)
—1,
600
——
—
Clta
rges
for
serv
ices
——
-_
——
—
Ren
ts,
roya
lties
,an
dot
her
——
‘‘
——
Con
trib
utio
nsat
tdgr
ants
—2,
564,
842
426,
578
49,1
63—
1,46
4,85
924
8,19
5—
Tot
alre
venu
es(1
4,71
4)
_____________
2.56
6.44
242
6,57
849
.163
—.4
64.8
5924
8.19
5
__
___
__
___
___
Exp
endi
tore
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
rotti
ent
86.6
66—
Publ
icsa
fety
—28
5.96
0—
.
Tra
nspo
rtat
ioo
serv
ices
—‘—
-—
Cot
ttnsu
oity
deve
lopn
scot
92.2
42—
38.1
10—
Cut
tore
and
park
s(4
.635
)—
.—
25.7
2D
ebt
serv
ice:
Prin
cipa
lIn
tere
st—
.
Deb
tis
suan
ceco
sts
—72
,138
Cap
ital
outla
y:O
tlter
publ
icse
rvic
es—
—65
7,52
320
8,57
8—
——
Publ
icsa
fety
——
—1,
293,
256
——
—37
6,60
8C
ultu
rean
dpa
rks
_91
,228
——
——
—46
,275
Gen
eral
gove
mm
ent
——
——
—
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
——
——
9,84
2,76
92,
595,
754
—
Com
mun
ityd
evel
opnt
ent
—85
7,10
32,
693,
258
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
___
__
__
___
__
___
__
__
__
___
__
___
310,
976
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es—
949,
345
4,5t
7,87
t65
7,52
320
8.57
838
,110
9.84
2.76
92,
595,
754
759,
584
Oth
erfi
rtan
eing
sour
ces
(use
s):
i’ra
osfe
rsin
—1,
385,
169
——
903
—
Tra
nsfe
rsou
t—
(902
)—
—-
(585
.660
)—
Sate
ofca
pita
las
sets
—65
8,00
0—
——
‘—
—
Pro
ceed
sfr
omth
eis
suan
ceof
bond
s—
4.81
0.00
035
0,00
02.
040.
000
—8.
966,
000
2.49
4.00
01,
340.
000
Pro
ceed
sfr
ombo
ndpr
emiu
nt—
633.
883
—tl
O.0
0054
0.00
0—
Dis
coun
ton
sate
ofbo
nds
——
(3,9
22)
——
—
Tot
alot
ltcr
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
—65
8,00
06,
824.
228
350.
000
2.15
0.00
0—
8.96
6,00
02,
449,
243
1,34
0,00
0
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
res’
eouc
sov
erex
pend
itur
es(1
4,71
4)(2
91.3
45)
4,87
2,79
911
9,05
51.
990.
585
(38.
110)
588,
090
101.
684
580,
416
Futtd
bala
nces
(def
icit)
—be
ginn
ing
1,92
2,63
63,
142.
039
954.
436
230,
029
—64
7.69
23,
224,
023
—55
2,29
1
Fund
bala
nce
(def
icil
)—
endi
ngS
1.90
7,92
22.
850.
694
5,82
7,23
534
9,08
41.
990.
585
609,
582
3.81
2,11
310
1.68
41,
132,
707
Sec
acco
mpa
oyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinu
ed)
133
Cll
’YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Rev
enue
s,E
xpen
ditu
res,
and
Cha
nges
inFu
ndB
alan
ces
Non
maj
orC
apit
alP
roje
ctFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3.2
012
Rev
enue
s:Ii
tves
tntc
ntin
com
e(l
oss)
Cha
rges
for
serv
ices
Ren
ts,
roya
ltie
s,an
dot
her
Co
ntrib
utio
ns
and
grants
__
__
__
__
__
__
_________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
__
____
____
____
____
___
____
____
____
____
____
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
___
___
___
__
___
__
_
Tot
alre
venu
es
___
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
___
__
___
___
___
__
_
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
Cos
ernm
ent
Publ
icsa
fety
lraf
lspO
rlat
ion
seru
tces
Com
mun
ity
dcvc
lopn
sent
Cul
ture
and
park
sD
ebt
serv
ice:
Pri
ncip
alIn
tere
stD
ebt
issu
ance
cost
sC
apit
alou
tlay
:O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
esPu
blic
safe
lyC
ultu
rean
dpa
rks
Gen
eral
gove
rnnt
cnt
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Co
mn
tu
nity
dcvclopttaent
__
__
__
__
__
_______
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
___
____
____
____
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
___
___
___
__
Tot
alex
pend
itur
es
__
__
__
__
__
__
_________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
_____________________
___
____
____
____
____
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
___
___
___
__
___
_
OIl
ier
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
:T
rans
fers
inT
rans
fers
out
Sale
of
capi
tal
asse
tsP
roce
eds
fron
tth
eis
suan
ceof
bond
sP
roce
eds
frot
ttbo
ndpr
ensi
unt
Dis
coun
ton
sale
of
bond
s
Tot
alot
ltcr
fina
nctn
gso
urce
s(t
tses
)
__
__
__
__
__
_______
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
05cr
expe
ndit
ures
Fund
balan
ces
(d
eficit)
—he
gitt
ning
__
__
__
__
__
_______
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
__
____
____
____
___
____
____
____
____
__
____
____
____
____
___
__
___
___
___
__
_
Fund
bala
nce
(def
icit
)—
endi
ng
________________
Sec
acco
mpa
nytn
git
idep
ende
ntau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
)Cot
ttin
ued)
2006
2010
2010
Pub
lic
Pub
lic
Saf
ety
Pnb
lic
Saf
ety
Fac
ilit
ies
Bon
dB
oitd
2000
Par
kan
d20
06P
ark
s20
10P
ark
sR
ecre
atio
nan
dR
ecre
atio
itan
dR
ecre
atio
nB
ond
2002
#1B
ond
Bon
d
75,0
00
75,0
00
3.04
44.
718
Dow
ntow
nS
tad
iunt
&C
on
tpan
ion
Pro
ject
1.12
7,44
1
7.00
0,00
0
8.12
7.44
1
1,39
2,23
6
1.39
2,23
6
Ped
estr
ian
Tra
ilB
ridg
eJo
int
Use
Om
aha/
Coun
cil
Blt
iffs
100,
000
100.
000
Mis
sou
riR
iver
l’ed
estr
ian
Bri
dge
80,0
00
80,0
00
575
575
(575
)
1575
)
—93
.054
—34
.366
1,78
3,76
8
1,78
3,76
8
2,50
6,03
4
2,50
6,03
4
575
1,13
0,00
0
1.13
0,57
5
408.
309
707,
845
1,11
6,15
4
—22
8,14
8
140.
084
368.232
__
___
__
__
__
__
_
522,
016
769.
934
168.
324
322.
655
——
500
——
852,
933
769.
934
168,
324
2.00
0,00
01,
160,
000
35.0
0026
0,00
0—
405.
000
2.26
0.00
01,
160.
000
440.
000
1,48
2,06
739
0.06
627
1.67
6
(97.
487)
(55.
509)
S.3
84,5
8033
4,55
727
1,67
6
2.91
5.27
1
2.91
5.27
1
4,36
0,00
03
10.0
00
4.67
0.00
0
3,14
6.96
5
(747
,423
)
2.39
9,54
2
.768
,688
1,89
6.10
8
1,09
4,86
2
1.09
4.86
2
7,32
6.19
5
(17,
457,
117)
(10,
130,
922)
100,
000
00,0
00
(168
.232
)
355,
661
187.
429
80.0
00
(180
,000
)
(100
,000
)
134
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Rev
enue
s.E
xpen
ditu
res,
and
Cha
nges
inFu
ndB
alan
ces
No
nm
ajo
rcapit
al
Pro
ject
Fu
nd
s
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r31
,20
2
UN
MC
Lib
rary
Cap
ital
Tot
alB
ack
toth
eIn
fras
tru
ctu
reD
nwnt
own
Fac
ilit
ies
Spe
cial
Ser
vice
Spe
cial
Cap
ital
Riv
erP
roje
ctIm
pro
vem
ent
Dev
elnpnie
nt
Cap
ital
Ass
essm
ent
Ass
essm
ent
Pro
ject
s
Rev
enue
s:In
vest
men
tin
com
e(l
oss)
——
379,
373
(68,
213)
298,
046
Cha
rges
for
serv
ices
——
18,8
76—
—29
,6l3
133,
412
1,30
9,34
2R
ents
,ro
yalti
es,
and
othe
r—
——
—93
193
Con
trib
utio
nsan
dgr
ants
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
——
.306
.986
__
___
__
___
___
_
6,49
2,20
2
Tot
alre
venu
es—
18,8
76—
1,71
5.97
265
.392
18,0
99.7
83
Exp
endi
ture
s:C
urre
nt:
Gen
eral
gove
rnm
ent
27,0
8289
411
4,64
2Pu
blic
safe
ty—
•28
5.96
0T
rans
port
atio
nse
rvic
es—
-
—-
70,0
0070
.000
Com
ntun
ily
deve
lopm
ent
7.91
3—
—14
1,30
9C
aita
rean
dpa
rks
—(7
5.55
9)25
,100
—20
3.49
7D
ebt
serv
ice:
Prin
cipa
l—
.53
6.00
062
9,05
4In
tere
st—
10,8
83—
45,2
49D
ebt
issu
ance
cost
s—
—72
,138
Cap
ital
outla
y:O
ilier
publ
icse
rvic
es—
——
—86
6,10
1Pu
blic
safe
ty—
——
—
.—
3,13
0,13
8C
ultu
rean
dpa
rks
—11
3,91
0—
—7,
904,
145
Gen
eral
gove
rnm
ent
——
—1,
564,
289
1,56
4,28
9T
rans
port
atio
n—
.-—
——
—12
,438
,523
Com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent
——
——
3,86
1,83
7
‘l’ot
alex
pend
itur
es—
—7,
913
38,3
512,
233.
354
894
31,3
26,8
82
Oili
erfi
nanc
ing
sour
ces
(use
s):
Tra
nsfe
rsin
——
——
1,48
6,64
7T
rans
fers
out
—.
(587
.137
)Sa
leof
capi
tal
asse
ts—
——
——
658.
000
Pro
ceed
sfr
omtir
eis
suan
ceof
bond
s—
455,
000
536,
000
—30
,770
.862
Pro
ceed
sfr
ombo
ndpr
emiu
nt—
2,25
8,88
3D
isco
unt
onsa
leof
bond
s—
——
——
—(3
,922
)
Tot
alot
her
fina
ncin
gso
urce
s(u
ses)
——
—45
5.00
053
6,00
0—
34.5
83.3
33
Exc
ess
(def
icie
ncy)
reve
nues
over
expe
ndit
ures
——
0.96
341
6.64
918
.618
64,4
9821
,356
.234
Fund
bala
nces
(def
icit
)be
ginn
ing
603,
314
—(1
0.72
9)(4
t6.4
42)
67.1
1561
5,84
8(5
,941
,778
)
Fnnd
bala
nce
(def
icit
)—
endi
ngS
603.
314
—23
420
785
,733
680.
346
15,4
14,4
56
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
oden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
35
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Advanced Acquisition Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:$
______ ______
Total revenues
Expenditures:Community development 92,242 (92,242)Capital outlay 1,900,000 1,900,000 857,103 1,042,897
Total expenditures 1,900,000 1,900,000 949,345 950,655
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (1,900,000) (1,900,000) (949,345) 950,655
Other financing sources:Sale of capital assets 658,000 658,000
Total other financing sources — — 658,000 658,000
Net change in fund balance (1,900,000) (1,900,000) (291,345) 1,608,655
Fund balances — beginning 2,693,657 2,693,657 3,142,039 448,382
Fund balances — ending $ 793,657 793,657 2,850,694 2,057,037
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
136
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Enviromnental Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Contributions and grants $ — — 49,163 49,163
Total revenues — — 49,163 49,163
Expenditures:Capital outlay 3,480,000 3,480,000 208,578 3,271,422
Total expenditures 3,480,000 3,480,000 208,578 3,271,422
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (3,480,000) (3,480,000) (159,415) 3,320,585
Other financing sources:Proceeds from issuance of bonds 3,480,000 3,480,000 2,040,000 (1,440,000)Proceeds from bond premium — — 110,000 110,000
Total other financing sources 3,480,000 3,480,000 2,150,000 (1,330,000)
Net change in fund balance — — 1,990,585 1,990,585
Fund balances — beginning
_______________ _______________ _______________
Fund balances — ending $ — 1,990,585 1,990,585
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
137
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2006 Transportation Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final
SRevenues:
Contributions and grants
Total revenues
Expenditures:Capital outlay
Total expenditures
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bonds
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances — beginning
Fund balances — ending
4,714,000
4,714,000
(4,714,000)
4,714,000
4,714,000
4,714,000
4,714,000
(4,714,000)
4,714,000
4,714,000
Actual
1,464,859
1,464,859
9,842,769
9,842,769
(8,377,910)
8,966,000
8,966,000
588,090
3,224,023
3,812,113
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
1,464,859
1,464,859
(5,128,769)
(5,128,769)
(3,663,910)
4,252,000
4,252,000
588,090
3,224,023
3,812,113$ —
138
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Transportation Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
139
S
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final Actual
248,195
248,195
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
248,195
248,195
Revenues:Contributions and grants
Total revenues
Expenditures:Capital outlay
Total expenditures
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bondsProceeds from bond premiumTransfers inTransfers out
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balance
Fund balances — beginning
Fund balances — ending
7,326,000 7,326,000 2,595,754 4,730,246
7,326,000 7,326,000 2,595,754 4,730,246
(7,326,000) (7,326,000) (2,347,559) 4,978,441
7,326,000 7,326,000 2,494,000 (4,832,000)—
— 540,000 540,000— 903 903
—
— (585,660) (585,660)
7,326,000 7,326,000 2,449,243 (4,876,757)
—
— 101,684 101,684
$ — 101,684 101,684
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2006 Public Facilities Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:$
______ ______ ______ ______
Total revenues — — —
Expenditures:Capital outlay 183,000 183,000 733,859 (550,859)Culture and parks — — 25,725 (25,725)
Total expenditures 183,000 183,000 759,584 (576,584)
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (183,000) (183,000) (759,584) (576,584)
Other financing sources:Proceeds from issuance of bonds 183,000 183,000 1,340,000 1,157,000
Total other financing sources 183,000 183,000 1,340,000 1,157,000
Net change in fund balance — — 580,416 580,416
Fund balances — beginning —.— 552,291 552,291
Fund balances— ending $ — — 1,132,707 1,132,707
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
140
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Public Facilities Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Contributions and grants S
_______________ _______________
75,000 75,000
Total revenues — — 75,000 75,000
Expenditures:Capital outlay 3,492,000 3,492,000 845,171 2,646,829Community development 3,044 (3,044)Culture and parks — — 4,718 (4,718)
Total expenditures 3,492,000 3,492,000 852,933 2,639,067
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (3,492,000) (3,492,000) (777,933) 2,714,067
Other financing sources:Proceeds from issuance of bonds 3,492,000 3,492,000 2,000,000 (1,492,000)Proceeds from bond premium
_______________
— 260,000 260,000
Total other financing sources 3,492,000 3,492,000 2,260,000 (1,232,000)
Net change in fund balance — — 1,482,067 1,482,067
Fund balances — beginning — — (97,487) (97,487)
Fund balances—ending $ — — 1,384,580 1,384,580
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
141
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — 2006 Public Safety Bond Fund
Year ended December 3 1, 20 12
(Unaudited)
Revenues:
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final Actual
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
Expenditures:Capital outlay
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
142
298,066
298,066
298,066
92,000
92,000
390,066
(55,509)
334,557
Total revenues
$
1,068,000 1,068,000 769,934
Total expenditures 1,068,000 1,068,000 769,934
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (1,068,000) (1,068,000) (769,934)
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bonds 1,068,000 1,068,000 1,160,000
Total other financing sources (uses) 1,068,000 1,068,000 1,160,000
Net change in fund balance — 390,066
Fund balances — beginning (55,509)
Fund balances — ending $ —- 334,557
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — 2010 Public Safety Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
143
Variance withfinal budget
positive(negative)
8,676
8,676
8,676
(142,000)405,000
263,000
271,676
271,676
Budgeted amountsOriginal Final Actual
Revenues:S —
Total revenues — —
Expenditures:Capital outlay 177,000 177,000 168,324
Total expenditures 177,000 177,000 168,324
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (177,000) (177,000) (168,324)
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bonds 177,000 177,000 35,000Proceeds from bond premium — — 405,000
Total other financing sources (uses) 177,000 177,000 440,000
Net change in fund balance — — 271,676
Fund balances — beginning — —
Fund balances — ending S — — 271,676
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — 2006 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Contributions and grants $ — — 1,783,768 1,783,768
Total revenues — — 1,783,768 1,783,768
Expenditures:Capital outlay 670,000 670,000 2,506,034 (1,836,034)
Total expenditures 670,000 670,000 2,506,034 (1,836,034)
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (670,000) (670,000) (722,266) (52,266)
Other financing sources:Proceeds from issuance of bonds 670,000 670,000 1,130,000 460,000Transfers in — 575 575
Total other financing sources 670,000 670,000 1,130,575 460,575
Net change in fund balance — — 408,309 408,309
Fund balances — beginning — — 707,845 707,845
Fund balances— ending $ —— 1,116,154 1,116,154
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
144
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule —2010 Parks and Recreation Bond Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Contributions and grants $ —
_______________
1,392,236 1,392,236
Total revenues — 1,392,236 1,392,236
Expenditures:Capital outlay 3,077,000 3,077,000 2,915,271 161,729
Total expenditures 3,077,000 3,077,000 2,915,271 161,729
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (3,077,000) (3,077,000) (1,523,035) 1,553,965
Other financing sources:Proceeds from issuance of bonds 3,077,000 3,077,000 4,360,000 1,283,000Proceeds from bond premium — — 310,000 310,000
Total other financing sources 3,077,000 3,077,000 4,670,000 1,593,000
Net change in fund balance — — 3,146,965 3,146,965
Fund balances — beginning — — (747,423) (747,423)
Fund balances — ending $ — — 2,399,542 2,399,542
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
145
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Downtown Stadium and Companion Projects Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues;Charges for services $ 1,127,441 1,127,441Contributions and grants 7,000,000 7,000,000 7,000,000 —
Total revenues 7,000,000 7,000,000 8,127,441 1,127,441
Expenditures:Debt Service:
Principal 34,366 (34,366)Interest 93,054 (93,054)
Capital outlay 1,768,688 (1,768,688)
Total expenditures 1,896,108 (1,896,108)
Excess (deficiency) of revenuesover (under) expenditures 7,000,000 7,000,000 6,231,333 (768,667)
Other financing sources (uses):Proceeds from issuance of bonds 1,094,862 1,094,862
Total other financing sources (uses) — — 1,094,862 1,094,862
Net change in fund balance 7,000,000 7,000,000 7,326,195 326,195
Fund balances—beginning (18,000,000) (18,000,000) (17,457,117) 542,883
Fund balances — ending $ (11,000,000) (11,000,000) (10,130,922) 869,078
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
146
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Pedestrian Trail Bridge-Joint Use
Year ended December., 1, 2012 -
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Contributions and grants $ 200,000 200,000 100,000 (100,000)
Total revenues 200,000 200,000 100,000 (100,000)
Expenditures:Culture and parks 86,873 86,873 228,148 (141,275)Capital outlay —
______________
140,084 (140,084)
Total expenditures 86,873 86,873 368,232 (281,359)
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures 113,127 113,127 (268,232) (381,359)
Other financing sources:Transfers in 100,000 100,000
Total other financing sources — — 100,000 100,000
Net change in fund balance 113,127 113,127 (168,232) (281,359)
Fund balances—beginning 309,548 309,548 355,661 46,113
Fund balances — ending S 422,675 422,675 187,429 (235,246)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
147
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Assessment Fuids
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Investment income $ 144,000 144,000 311,160 167,160Charges for services 770,000 770,000 163,025 (606,975)Rents and royalties — — 193 193Contributions and grants — — 1,306,986 1,306,986
Total revenues 914,000 914,000 1,781,364 867,364
Expenditures:General government 30,000 30,000 27,976 2,024Transportation services 885.000 885,000 70,000 815,000Culture and parks 25,100 25,100 25,100Debt service:
Principal 536,000 (536,000)Interest 10,883 (10,883)
Capital outlay 1,564,289 (1,564,289)
Total expenditures 940,100 940,100 2,234,248 (1,294,148)
Deficiency of revenues underexpenditures (26,100) (26,100) (452,884) (426,784)
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers in 228,000 228,000 (228,000)Transfers Out (228,000) (228,000) 228,000Proceeds from issuance of bonds — — 536,000 536,000
Total other financing sources — — 536,000 536,000
Net change in fund balance (26,100) (26,100) 83,116 109,216
Fund balances—beginning 98,618 98,618 682,963 584,345
Fund balances — ending S 72,518 72,518 766,079 693,561
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
148
NONMAJOR PERMANENT FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Nonmajor Governmental Funds :Permanent Funds
Permanent funds are used to report resources that are legally restricted to the extent that only earnings, notprincipal, may be used for purposes that support the reporting government’s programs.
Western Heritage Special Revenue Fund — To account for a Permanent Endowment fund established inaccordance with City Ordinance #33472 passed January 31, 1995, whereby the City will contribute moneystoward the renovation and construction at the Western Heritage Museum. These funds were realized from thesale of a portion of the Byron Reed coin and manuscript collection held in October 1996.
Endowment for Library Fund — To account for funds that are donated to the Public Library from outsidesources. This is a permanent fund for endowment gifts. Tn 1974, Don L. Hayes bequeathed to the Public Librarya permanent memorial endowment with interest to be used to purchase books in honor of his parents. In 1979,Ralph Anderson bequeathed an endowment to the library with interest to be used to benefit the library. Annualinterest from these accounts is used to enhance the library’s collections and operations.
149
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Balance Sheet
Nonmaj or Permanent Funds
December 31, 2012
TotalWestern Endowment Permanent
Assets Heritage for Library Funds
Cash and pooled investments $ 93,467 3,892 97,359Investments 3,005,904 59,171 3,065,075Accrued interest 16,700 193 16,893
Total assets $ 3,116,071 63,256 3,179,327
Liabilities and Fund Balances
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other current liabilities $
________________
Total liabilities
Fund balances:Nonspendable 2,717,918 57,471 2,775,389Committed 398,153 5,785 403,938
Total fund balance 3,1 16,071 63,256 3,179,327
Total liabilities and fund balance $ 3,116,071 63,256 3,179,327
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
150
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances
Nonmaj or Permanent Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
Revenues:Investment income
Total revenues
Expenditures:Current:
Culture and parks
Total expenditures
Other financing sources (uses):Transfers inTransfers out
Total other financing sources
Net change in fund balance
Beginning fund balance
Ending fund balance
WesternHeritage
S 82,509
82,509
73,750
73,750
8,759
3,107,312
S 3,116,071
Endowmentfor Library
607
607
607
62,649
63,256
TotalPermanent
Funds
83,116
83,116
73,750
73,750
9,366
3,169,961
3,179,327
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
151
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Western Heritage Permanent Fund
Year ended December 31, 2012
(Unaudited)
Variance withfinal budget
Budgeted amounts positiveOriginal Final Actual (negative)
Revenues:Investment income $ 87,000 87,000 82,509 (4,491)
Total revenues 87,000 87,000 82,509 (4,491)
Expenditures:Culture and parks 87,000 87,000 73,750 13,250
Total expenditures 87,000 87,000 73,750 13,250
Deficiency of revenuesunder expenditures — — 8,759 8,759
Net change in fund balance — — 8,759 8,759
Fund balances — beginning 31,141,918 31,141,918 3,107,312 (28,034,606)
Fund balances—ending $ 31,141,918 31,141,918 3,116,071 (28,025,847)
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
152
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Enterprise Funds
The Enterprise Funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to privatebusiness enterprises: (a) where the intent of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods or services tothe general public on a continuing basis is financed or recovered primarily through user charges or (b) where thegoverning body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, andJor netincome is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or otherpurposes.
City Wide Sports Revenue Fund — To account for the moneys received from adult leagues operated by theParks, Recreation, and Public Property Department. Currently, leagues are formed for football, volleyball, andbasketball competition. The fund is self-supported through registration fees charged to participants.
Marinas Fund — To account for activities at the N.P. Dodge Park Marina, the Riverfront Marina, andCunningham Lake Marina. This Enterprise Fund accounts for receipts generated through the leasing of boat stallsat the N.P. Dodge Park Marina.
Dodge Park Marina Dredge Fund — To account for the accumulated reserves for the replacement of the RiverDredge. The Dodge Park Marina Dredge Fund is a special revenue fund created to take care of any contingencies(repairs, etc.) that occur with the dredge. Each year, $4,000 is transferred from the Dodge Park Marina fund tothis fund.
Tennis Operations Fund — To account for the Tennis operations at the City of Omaha Tennis courts. Thisenterprise fund provides for the operation of one 8-court indoor tennis center, one 15-court tennis center, andnumerous neighborhood tennis courts located throughout the City.
Golf Operations Fund — To account for the Golf operations and concessions at the City of Omaha Golf Courses.This enterprise fund was created in 1993 to form a self-supporting enterprise fund for the operations at allMunicipal Golf Courses, which includes maintenance of the City’s four 18-hole golf courses and five 9-hole golfcourses and to fund necessary capital improvements.
Air Quality Fund — To account for the Title V federal funding and the applicable City ordinance authorizedfees. These funds provide the City the necessary resources to monitor the air quality and enforce the health andenvironmental laws relating to clean air.
Compost Fund — To account for the contract between the City of Omaha and the Quality Control Division of theCity of Omaha to operate the compost facility located adjacent to the Papillion Creek Wastewater TreatmentPlant.
Printing Services and Graphics Fund — To account for the charges for printing services for the various Cityand Douglas County departments, agencies, and grant fund projects.
Riverfront Plaza and Marina Fund — To account for the activity at Lewis and Clark landing on the City ofOmaha’s Missouri Riverfront. The plaza is available for private groups to rent.
153
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Net
Pos
itio
n
Not
tnta
jor
Ent
erpr
ise
Fttn
ds
Dec
ettt
ber
3120
12
Cit
yW
ide
Pri
nti
ng
Riv
erfr
ont
Tot
alS
port
sD
odge
Par
kTe
nnis
Gol
fS
ervi
ces
Pla
za&
Non
nia
jor
Ass
ets
Rev
enue
Mar
inas
Mar
ina
Dre
dge
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Air
Qua
lity
Com
post
and
Gra
phic
sM
arin
aE
nte
rpri
se
Ctt
rren
tas
sets
:C
asit
and
casi
teq
aiva
lett
tsS
49,0
0619
1,53
I4(
1,58
631
,578
337
207.
013
391)
165,
137
125,
405
092.
503
Dtte
from
otit
erfa
nds
—07
2.00
0—
——
——
—07
2,1)
1)1)
Pre
paid
s—
——
10,0
01)
——
——
0,1)
01)
Rec
eiva
ble
(net
ofal
lnsv
attc
efo
rm
teol
leet
ible
s)—
100(
10))
5,03
547
.507
—14
,702
3,02
217
0,26
6ltt
s’en
tori
es-
——
—20
.364
——
——
28,3
64
Tot
alca
rret
ttas
sets
49,0
061,
163,
531
4(1,
586
31,5
7843
,736
335.
320
390
179,
039
120,
427
1,97
3,21
3
Non
cnne
ntas
sets
:A
dvan
cetl
char
ges
2,42
92,
429
Cap
ital
asse
ts:
Bui
ldin
gan
dsy
stem
s—
2.67
(1.8
47—
3,64
8.92
92,
908,
354
——
9,22
8,13
1)M
aclt
iner
yan
deq
aipt
nett
t(0
9,95
11,
696,
651
—96
9.40
976
,471
—2,
852,
482
Les
sac
enat
alat
edde
prec
iati
tttt
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
(1,4
51,1
)7))
)—
11,6
5)1.
775)
(3,4
90,8
27)
—(5
31,6
98)
176.
471)
—(7
.20)
1,84
))
Tot
alca
pita
las
sets
(net
ofac
rntn
ttla
tecl
depr
ecia
tion
)—
(.32
9,72
8—
1,99
8,15
41.
1(4
,178
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
437,
7)1
——
4,87
9,77
)
Tot
alno
ncur
rent
asse
ts—
(.32
9.72
8—
1,99
8,15
41,
114,
178
—44
)1,1
40—
—4,
882.
20))
Tot
alas
sets
S49
.8)1
62,
493,
259
4)1,
586
2.02
9,73
2(.
157,
914
335,
32))
44)1
,530
(79,
839
(28,
427
6,85
5,4(
3
Lia
lsit
itie
san
dN
etP
osit
ion
Ctt
rren
lli
ahih
lics
:A
ccot
ttsts
paya
ble
and
othe
rS
1,51
274
,020
—((
.9)1
283
,21(
1((
(.68
77,
678
59.3
63—
248.
363
Acc
rued
inte
rest
paya
ble
——
——
—3.
642
——
3.64
2U
near
ned
reve
ttac
46.6
37—
——
——
—46
,637
Cnr
rett
tin
stal
lttt
ents
ofio
ttp.
tets
nde
bt—
——
——
—25
,000
—25
,800
Wor
kers
’co
tnpe
tssa
tion
and
Itea
ltlt
care
clai
ms
—8.
734
—1(
1.19
012
3.73
229
,1(3
(8,9
248,
734
199.
427
Dtte
toot
lter
ftnt
ds—
——
—74
6,0)
8)99
,110
0—
845.
1(01
)C
otnp
etts
ated
abse
itce
s—
76._.
(.59
29.
1(42
3,29
))2.
949
404
—(7
,353
Tot
alcu
rren
t(i
abih
ties
48,1
4982
,830
-23
.684
961,
975
43,0
9015
7,19
368
,501
____
____
____
__
1,38
5,42
2
Non
curr
ent
liab
ilit
ies:
Lnn
g-te
rtn
debt
excl
udin
gcn
rret
ttin
stal
lnte
nts
——
——
321,
701
—32
1.7(
11P
ensi
onob
ligat
iots
—87
,143
—65
.371
832,
9)19
308,
680
209,
0(6
47,7
30(.
550,
849
Pon
tret
iren
sent
bene
fit
obli
gati
on—
77.1
2157
,853
737,
12))
273,
180
(84,
978
42.2
41(.
372.
493
Wor
kers
’co
mpe
nsat
ints
and
(tea
ltlt
care
clai
nts
—(5
,959
—(8
,6(9
226,
092
53,1
9834
,579
15,9
5936
4,4)
16C
otnp
cnsa
ted
abse
ttce
s—
1,42
7—
30.2
62(7
1.8(
862
,523
56,0
347,
656
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
329,
720
Tot
alIt
onca
rren
tli
abil
itie
s
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
181,
650
—(7
2(0
5(.
967.
939
697,
581
806.
308
((3
.58
6—
3,93
9,16
9
Tot
alli
abil
itie
s48
.149
264,
480
—(9
5,78
92,
929,
9(4
740.
671
963,
5(11
(82,
087
____
____
____
__
5,32
4.59
1
Net
posi
tion
:
Net
inve
stm
ent
inca
pita
las
sets
—1,
329,
728
—1,
998,
154
1,11
4.17
8—
91,
1(10
——
4,53
3,1(
70U
nres
tric
ted
(.65
789
9,85
140
,586
((64
,211
)(2
,886
,178
)(4
05,3
51)
(6(3
,981
)(2
,248
)12
8,42
7(3
.082
,248
)
Tot
alte
lpo
siti
on(.
657
2.22
8.77
94)
1,58
6(.
833,
943
(1,7
72,1
8(0)
(4(1
5,35
1)(5
22,9
71)
12,2
48)
128.
427
(.53
0,82
2
Tot
alli
abil
itie
san
dtte
tpo
siti
onS
49,8
062.
493,
259
40,5
862.
029,
732
1.15
7.91
433
5,32
))44
0,53
0(7
9.83
9(2
8,42
76,
855,
4(3
See
acco
tstp
anyi
ngin
depe
ndet
stau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
154
CIT
YO
FO
MA
hA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Cot
nhin
ing
Sta
tem
ent
ofR
even
ues.
Exp
ense
s.an
dC
hang
esin
Net
Pos
itio
n
Non
maj
orE
nter
pris
eFu
nds
Yea
rca
det!
Dec
embe
r31
.20
12
Cit
yW
ide
Pri
nti
ng
Riv
erfr
on
tT
otal
Spo
rts
Dod
geP
ark
Ten
nis
Gol
fS
ervi
ces
Pla
za&
Non
ntaj
orR
even
ueM
arin
asM
arin
aD
redg
eO
per
atio
ns
Op
erat
ion
sA
irQ
uali
tyC
otop
ost
and
Gra
phic
sM
ario
aE
nte
rpri
se
Ope
rati
ngre
venu
es:
Cha
rges
for
serr
ices
S29
2.76
960
3,43
5—
256.
924
3,7(
3.60
675
9,50
(11,
072.
270
499,
711
46.7
257.
244,
940
Tot
alttp
etst
ting
reve
nues
292.
769
683.
435
—25
6.92
43.
7(3,
606
759.
50))
.072
.27)
)49
9.71
146
.725
7,24
4.94
0
Ope
rati
ngex
pens
es:
Pers
otta
lse
rvic
es12
0.96
617
5.74
2—
(94,
31(7
2,16
1.39
940
0,11
5430
)1,7
628)
1,35
6—
3,62
1.50
6O
tttsi
dese
rvic
es20
1.15
330
,155
—94
,603
7(0,
993
25,0
00(0
3.50
031
,379
2(1,
405
(.21
7.27
6O
pera
tion
attd
nsai
tttet
tattc
e(.
743
1911
,115
—31
.933
7115
.731
(54,
060
265,
101
250,
466
2)1,
437
1,61
9,67
4C
ost
ofsa
les
and
serv
ice
2475
,731
——
201.
030
——
—27
6,70
5D
epre
ciat
iott
attd
atrs
ortiz
tttio
ts—
1(15
,661
—(6
.324
142.
406
—70
,073
__
__
__
___
__
___
—44
2,46
4
Tot
alop
erat
ing
expe
nses
323.
086
577,
404
—43
7,16
73,
921.
559
667.
2I))
747.
516
462,
20)
40,8
427,
177,
705
Ope
rati
ngin
cotn
e(l
oss)
(31.
117)
26.0
3)—
(10(
1.24
3)(2
07,9
53)
92.2
9!)
324,
754
37.5
105.
883
67,1
55
Not
tope
rati
ttg
res’
etnt
es)e
xpet
tses
):In
tere
stex
pens
e—
——
——
—((
5,50
7)—
—((
5.58
7)
Tot
alno
nope
rali
ngre
veut
tes
(exp
euse
s)—
—-—
—((
5,50
7)—
-—
((5,
507)
Incc
snse
(los
s)be
fore
ccst
ttrih
ntio
ttsai
tdtr
ansf
ers
(31.
117)
26,0
3)—
(101
1.24
3)(2
07,9
53(
92.2
903)
19,1
6737
,5(0
5,80
351
,568
Cap
ital
co,tt
ribt
ttio
ns—
(1)1
1,1)
00—
——
——
——
(00.
000
Cha
ttge
itsre
tpo
siti
ott
(31,
117)
(26,
031
—(1
80.2
43)
(207
.953
)92
,291
)30
9.16
737
,510
5,88
315
1,56
8
Tot
alne
tpo
siti
on(d
e0ci
t(be
gint
ting
32,7
742,
102,
748
411,
586
2.01
4.18
6((
.564
,047
)(4
97.6
4!)
(832
,130
)(3
9,75
8)12
2,54
41,
379,
254
Tot
alne
tpo
siti
on(d
eOci
t)—
endi
ngS
(.65
72,
228,
779
40,5
86(.
833,
943
((.7
72.0
00)
(405
,351
)(5
22,9
71)
(2.2
48)
128,
427
1,53
0,82
2
See
acco
mpa
ttyi
ngin
depe
nden
tat
tdit
ors’
repo
rt.
(55
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Cas
ltFl
osvs
Non
otaj
orE
nter
pris
eFu
nds
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
2012
Cit
yW
ide
Pri
nti
ng
Riv
erfr
ont
Tota
l
Spo
rts
Dod
geP
ark
Ten
nis
Gol
fS
ervi
ces
Pla
za&
Non
nta
jor
Rev
enue
Mari
nas
Mar
ina
Dre
dge
Op
erat
ion
sO
per
atio
ns
Air
Qna
lity
Com
post
and
Gra
phic
sM
arin
aE
nte
rpri
se
Cas
hfl
osvs
into
oper
attn
gac
tivi
ties
:R
ecei
pts
from
cost
o,st
ers
S33
9.40
65t
t3.4
3525
6,92
43,
797.
1171
174
2.1,
1(0
t,07a
,4tt
S40
5.1)
1)9
49.6
767.
253.
333
Pas
s,en
isto
supp
lter
s(2
03.2
43)
(224
,779
11
23
.27
0)
I.5
86.4
59)
1211
,622
)(3
64.9
37)
(237
,574
)(l
t),a
42)
(2,9
9t,7
26)
Pay
men
tsto
empl
oyee
s((
20,9
66)
16
9,9
57
)(1
61,3
58)
(1,9
37,3
75)
(511
2.12
3)(3
30(6
7)
(164
,022
1—
(3,3
93,9
60)
Net
casim
prov
ided
by(t
tsed
in)
oper
atin
gac
tivi
ties
I5.1
97((
(0,6
99(2
7,70
4)27
4,1(
3629
,063
375,
30t
03,4
(30,
034
067,
63’t
Cas
htlo
svs
frot
nno
ttca
pita
lfi
ttan
eitt
gac
tivi
ties
:A
dvan
ces
frot
tt(t
o)ot
her
land
s—
(072
.101
)—
(023
)(2
10,1
141
(3.2
25)
(334
,2t7
)(4
90)
—(1
,421
,050
)
Net
casl
tpr
ovid
edby
)tts
editt
)no
neap
ital
oitta
oeitt
gac
tivi
ties
—(0
72,1
St)
—10
23)
(21(
1,11
4)(3
,225
)(3
34.2
17)
(490
)—
(1,4
21,0
50)
Cas
hfl
osvs
from
capi
tal
and
rela
ted
titta
mtc
ittg
acti
viti
es:
Cap
ital
expe
udit
ttre
s(6
3,50
5)—
—.—
163.
585)
Cap
ital
cont
ribu
ted
—(0
0,00
0—
——
((01
,000
Pay
men
tson
long
.tenm
tde
bt—
...
——
—(2
5,00
0)—
_—
(25.
01(0
)
Inte
rest
paid
——
—..—
——
(15,
694)
——
(15,
694)
Net
cash
prov
ided
by(t
tset
lin
)ca
pita
lan
dre
late
d(i
aane
ittg
acti
viti
es—
00,0
00.—
-—
(63.
505)
—(4
0,69
4)—
_—
(4.2
79)
Caslm
floss
’sfro
m,,
inve
stin
gac
tivity
:In
tere
stre
ceiv
ed—
——
—
Net
cash
prov
ided
byin
vest
ittg
acti
vity
——
——
—
Net
nter
ease
(dec
reas
e)itt
cash
and
cash
eqai
s’al
ents
(5,1
97(6
67.4
02)
(20,
527)
337
26.6
3039
002
,923
0,03
4(5
57,6
90)
Caslm
and
east
teq
aiva
lent
s,be
ginn
ina
of
year
34,6
1)9
855.0
030
.506
60.1
05—
261.
175
02.2
(41)
6.57
11,
450,
273
Caslm
attd
casl
teq
ttis’
alen
ts.
end
ofye
arS
49006
191,
531
4)1,
506
31.5
7833
720
7,01
339
(116
5.13
712
5,40
589
2.50
3
Rec
onci
liat
iott
ofop
erat
ittg
itteo
me
(los
s)to
net
etts
hpr
ttvi
ded
by(u
sed
itt)
op
crat
ing
acti
viti
es:
Ope
rati
ngin
cotn
e(l
oss)
S(3
1.11
7)26
,031
——
(10(
1,24
3)(2
07,9
53)
92,2
911
324,
754
37.5
11)
5,00
367
,155
Adj
ustm
ents
tore
conc
ile
oper
atir
tgin
com
e(l
oss)
tomte
mea
sls
prov
ided
byop
erat
ittg
acti
viti
es:
Dep
reci
atio
nan
dam
orti
zati
on—
1(15
.661
I(6,
324
142,
406
—70
.073
—44
2,46
4C
ash
floss
’sin
tpac
tett
bycl
,ang
esin
:R
ecei
vabl
es—
(11(
0,00
0)—
-—
94,2
64(1
6.89
2)6,
135
(14,
702)
2.95
1(2
8,24
4)In
sen
tori
es—
(8,
505)
.—
——
(18,
505)
Acc
oum
tts
paya
ble
and
otl
ter
46,3
1471
,222
3.26
649
,800
(31.
466)
3.67
844
,271
—‘-
107,
005
Pre
paid
s—
—.
——
(10,
000)
—66
—(9
,934
)C
laim
spa
yabl
e—
I1,6
72)
7,30
82.
154
(29,
336)
10,8
53)
11,1
94(0
,827
)P
ensi
nit
obli
gati
on4,
540
—(3
,930
I7,
367
111,
230
(13.
552)
3,11
47—
—35
,570
Pos
lrel
iret
nenl
bene
fit
obli
gali
on2.
9119
—11
,633
94,2
035,
029
(15,
000)
2,09
310
11,0
67
Net
cash
prov
ided
by)tm
sed
in)
oper
atit
tnac
tivi
ties
515
,197
100,
699
—(2
7,70
4)27
43(3
629
.863
375.
30)
83,4
)38,
834
067,
639
156
PENSION TRUST FUNDS
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Pension Trust Funds IiI1IThe Pension Trust Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity.
Civilian Retirement Fund — To account for resources that are held in trust for the members and beneficiaries ofthe full-time Civilian employees of the City of Omaha.
Police/Fire Retirement Reserve Fund — To account for resources that are held in trust for the members andbeneficiaries of the Police and Fire Sworn full-time employees of the City of Omaha.
157
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position
Pension Trust Funds
December 31, 2012
Civilian Police/Fire TotalRetirement Retirement Pension
Assets Fund Reserve Fund Trust
Cash and cash equivalents $ 984 812,242 813,226Receivables:
Accounts receivable 312,293 1,501,122 1,813,415Accrued interest 318,835 1,749,160 2,067,995
Due from other governments 1,089 1,089Investments, at fair value:
Government securities 20,278,557 17,033,908 37,312,465Municipal issues 1,409,593 2,469,565 3,879,158Corporate bonds 21,076,921 96,448,882 117,525,803Domestic equities 67,886,568 159,295,250 227,181,818International equities 36,006,318 89,163,872 125,170,190Domestic real estate securities 36,980,630 96,127,044 133,107,674International real estate 1,503,535 1,503,535Commodities 22,342,786 11,150,579 33,493,365Private equity 12,059,269 — 12,059,269Cash and cash equivalents 6,200,110 13,308,611 19,508,721
Total assets $ 224,873,953 490,563,770 715,437,723
Liabilities and Net Position
Accounts payable and other current liabilities $ 1,640,865 763,631 2,404,496
Total liabilities 1,640,865 763,631 2,404,496
Held in trust for pension benefits 223,233,088 489,800,139 713,033,227
Total liabilities and net position $ 224,873,953 490,563,770 715,437,723
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
158
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position
Pension Trust Funds
Year ended December 3 1, 2012
Civilian Police/Fire TotalRetirement Retirement Pension
Fund Reserve Fund Trust
Additions:Contributions:
Employer $ 7,216,050 35,302,037 42,518,087Employee 6,201,923 19,641,660 25,843,583
Total contributions 13,417,973 54,943,697 68,361,670
Investment income:Dividends and interest 6,075,554 14,928,954 21,004,508Net appreciation in fair value of investments 18,454,403 42,603,277 61,057,680
Total investment earnings 24,529,957 57,532,231 82,062,188
Investment expenses (1,364,199) (2,489,092) (3,853,291)
Net investment income 23,165,758 55,043,139 78,208,897
Total additions 36,583,731 109,986,836 146,570,567
Deductions:Benefit payments 28,785,427 60,616,088 89,401,515
Change in net position 7,798,304 49,370,748 57,169,052
Net position held in trust for pension benefits,beginning of year 215,434,784 440,429,391 655,864,175
Net position held in trust for pension benefits,end of year $ 223,233,088 489,800,139 713,033,227
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
159
This page intentionally left blank
AGENCY FUNDS
This page intentionally lefi blank
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Agency Funds
The Agency Funds account for assets held by the City as an agent for various local governments.
RID #126 First National Bank Tower Fund — To account for the tax increment financing revenues collected inregard to the First National Bank Tower TIE project.
RID #132 ConAgra Campus and Parking Fund — To account for the tax increment financing revenuescollected with regard to the ConAgra Campus/Parking TIF project. Property taxes from the increased propertyvalue are collected and used to pay off the TIE debt service requirements.
TIF Bond Debt Service Fund — To account for the tax increment financing revenues collected in regards to theConvention Center Hotel TIF project and account for the debt service reserve required by the issuance of bonds.
TIF Redevelopment Projects Fund — To comply with the Community Development Law of the State ofNebraska (Chapter 18, Article 21, Sections 18-2101) as supplemented and including Sections 18-2147 to18-2153, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, 1943, as amended. This fiduciary fund is required in accordancewith Section 18-2147 to establish separate funds into which Excess Tax Revenues (provided from special taxprovisions) from the Redevelopment site shall be paid and from which the principal and interest of theRedevelopment Note shall be paid.
RiD #122 First National Child Care Facility - To account for the tax increment financing revenues collected inregards to the First National Bank Day Care TIF project. These funds will be remitted to First National uponrequest.
RID #77 Hammons/Embassy Suites Fund — To account for the tax increment financing revenues collected inregards to the ConAgra Embassy Suites Hotel TIP project.
R/D #87 Aksarben Business and Education Campus Fund — To account for the tax increment financingrevenues collected in regards to the Aksarben Business Park TIP project phase I.
Appeal Bond Deposit Fund — To account for appeal application fees received from citizens whose applicationto build upon or rezone an area of land within the City limits has been denied. Fees are charged for appealapplications to defray the administrative costs incurred by the City Planning Board of Appeals.
Automobile Impounding Deposit Fund — To account for vehicles sold at auction at the police tow lot for morethan the accumulated charges against the vehicle. The amount in excess of the accumulated charges is held inescrow for two years, during which the former owner can claim the money held.
Bid Deposit Fund — To account for moneys collected from vendors based on the required amounts to place a bidwithin the City. Once the bid process is completed and bid is awarded, the bid deposits for those who did notreceive the bid are returned.
Board of Education Liquor Deposit Fund — To account for the collection of fees derived from a wholesalebeer and liquor occupation tax imposed on any person who engages in the manufacture or distribution of beer orliquors, or selling at retail of alcoholic beverages within the City limit. The tax rates are controlled by the State ofNebraska. These license fees are remitted to the Omaha Public Schools Board of Education, through the DouglasCounty Treasurer via wire transfer, on a quarterly basis.
160 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Agency Funds
EL)
Board of Education Tobacco Deposit Fund — To account for license fees from retailers for all tobacco sales,including a separate permit fee for the operation of any machine, which upon insertion of a coin or substituteobject operates or may be operated to dispense tobacco products. These license fees are remitted to the OmahaPublic Schools Board of Education, through the Douglas County Treasurer via wire transfer, on a quarterly basis.
Humane Society Kennel Permits Fund — To account for collection of kennel permits and licenses fromcitizens. Receipts are remitted to the Humane Society on a quarterly basis.
Sales Tax Deposit Fund — To account for all sales tax receipts collected by the City, which are imposed uponsales transactions within the corporate limits of the City in accordance with the Nebraska Tax Revenue Act of1967. The State portion of the sales tax is remitted to the Nebraska Department of Revenue on a monthly basis.
After Hours Dance Deposit Fund — To account for money collected through Section 5-64 of the OmahaMunicipal Code, in which the City requires a $5,000 bond to be posted when a business is granted an after-hoursdance permit.
Board of Education Parking Fines Fund — To account for moneys collected by the City Cashier for parkingviolation fines, which are remitted to the Omaha Public Schools Board of Education through the Douglas CountyTreasurer, via wire transfer, on a quarterly basis.
Park Development Deposits Fund — To account for the receipts received for neighborhood parks to be builtwithin suburban Omaha in the future. In addition, subdivision agreements include provision for deposits to bemade to the fund at appropriate debt to value intervals.
Arterial Street Improvement Program Fund — To collect and distribute funds for the design and constructionof arterial street improvements in the unincorporated portions of Douglas County. These funds are collected onbehalf of Douglas County and are remitted on an as-requested basis to the County.
R/D #102 First National Processing Center — To account for the tax increment financing revenues collected inregards to the First National Bank Data Center TIF project.
Demolition Performance Bond Fund — To hold moneys where citizens post a deposit for the demolition ofdilapidated structures. Before the demolition fee is refunded, a visual inspection is done to insure proper cleanupof the demolition site.
Performance Bond Fund — To hold deposits received in the form of a bond or cashier’s check from vendorswhose bid was accepted to provide services, i.e., professional or construction, to the City of Omaha. Uponsatisfactory completion of the contracted services, the bond deposit is returned to the vendor. If the vendor failsto satisfactorily complete the contracted services, the bonding company is then responsible for finding anothervendor to complete the contracted services.
TJF Projects Contribution Fund — To account for the contributions received from redevelopment projects oncertain locations for the purpose of defraying costs of improvements to those locations. This special revenue fundwas created to record contributions collected on TIE projects in accordance with the existing redevelopmentagreements.
161
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Fid
ocia
tyA
sset
san
dL
iabi
liti
es
Age
ncy
Fnnd
s
Dec
emhe
r3l.
2012
RID
#126
RID
#132
RID
#122
RID
#77
RID
#87
Fir
stC
on
Ag
raT
IFF
irst
Ham
mon
s/A
ksa
rben
Bus
Aut
omob
ile
Nat
iona
lB
ank
Cam
pu
san
dT
IFB
ond
Red
evel
opm
ent
Nat
iona
lC
tsitd
Em
bass
yan
dE
duca
tion
App
eal
Bon
dIm
po
un
din
gA
sset
sT
ow
erP
ark
ing
Deb
tS
ervi
ceP
roje
cts
Car
eF
acil
ity
Sui
tes
Cam
pu
sD
epos
itD
epos
itB
idD
epos
it
Cas
han
dpo
oled
ittv
estn
tent
s$
484.
676
424,
437
938,
946
237,
803
.000
—1,
925
92,4
7197
,940
Acc
aont
sre
ceiv
able
(tte
tof
allo
svat
tce
for
nnco
llec
lihl
es)
——
——
—
Dne
fron
tot
her
fnttd
s—
1,21
6,00
0—
——
——
——
Acc
rued
iltte
rest
—1,
325
——
——
—
Inve
slm
enls
—1,
196,
423
——
——
Tot
alas
sets
484,
876
1,64
0,43
72,
136,
694
237.
003
1,11
00—
—1,
925
92,4
7197
.940
Lia
bili
ties
Lia
bili
ties
:A
ccou
nts
paya
ble
and
otlt
erli
abil
itie
sS
484,
876
1,64
0,43
72,
136,
694
237,
003
1.00
0—
—1,
925
92,4
7197
,940
Tot
alli
abil
ilie
s48
4,87
61,
640,
437
2,13
6,69
423
7,80
31,
000
——
1,92
592
.471
97,9
40
Tot
alli
ahil
ilie
s$
404,
876
1,64
0,43
72,
136,
694
237,
803
1,00
0—
—1,
925
92,4
7197
,940
See
acco
tttp
atty
iog
ittd
epet
tden
tau
dito
rs’
reporl
.(C
nnti
nned
)
162
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Fid
ncia
nA
sset
san
dL
iabi
liti
es
Age
ncy
Foo
ds
Dec
embe
r31
.20
12
Boa
rdof
Boa
rdof
RID
#162
Educa
tion
Educa
tion
Hu
man
eB
oard
ofl’
ark
Art
eria
lS
tree
tF
irst
Nat
iott
al
Liq
uo
rT
ob
acco
Soc
iety
Sal
esT
anA
fter
Hou
rsE
du
cati
on
Des
elop
nten
tli
opro
vem
eitt
Pro
cess
ing
Ass
ets
Dep
osit
Dep
osit
Kct
tnel
Per
mit
sD
epos
itD
ance
Dep
osit
Par
ldti
gF
ines
Dep
osit
sP
rog
ratt
tC
ettt
er
Cas
han
dpo
oled
,nve
stm
ents
S46
.607
2.34
643
5.00
071
.914
04.4
711
5,47
7.63
’)—
Acc
onnt
sre
ceiv
able
(net
ofal
losn
ance
forn
neol
lect
ih(e
s)—
5,76
62.
10))
25,6
97—
..
..
-
Doe
from
ttot
her
fnnd
s5,
300
-—
——
——
.
Ace
rned
inte
rest
,—
——
——
Inve
stm
ents
—.
——
——
——
—
Tot
alas
sets
$14
6,60
713
,414
2,11
1025
,740
5.00
071
,914
104.
470
5,47
7,63
9
Lia
bili
ties
Lin
hili
ties
:A
ccon
ots
paya
ble
mind
othe
rli
abil
itie
sS
146.
607
13,4
142,
100
25,7
405.
000
71.9
1410
4,47
05,
477,
639
—
Tot
alli
abil
itie
s14
6,60
713
,414
2,10
025
,740
5,00
071
,914
104,
470
5,47
7,63
9—
Tot
alli
abil
itie
sS
146,
607
13.4
142,
100
25,7
405,
000
71,9
1410
4,47
05,
477,
639
—
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tan
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
(Con
tinne
d)
163
CiT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Com
bini
ngS
tate
men
tof
Fido
ciat
yA
sset
san
dL
iabi
liti
es
Age
ncy
Foo
ds
Dec
embe
r31
,20
12
Dem
olit
ion
TIF
Per
form
aoec
Per
form
ance
Pro
ject
sl’
otaI
Ass
ets
Bon
dB
onds
Co
ntr
ibn
tio
nA
genc
y
Cas
han
dpo
oled
inve
stm
ents
29.0
005
79,0
0012
2,00
00,
310,
297
Acc
ount
sre
ceiv
able
(net
of
allo
wan
cefa
rto
tcol
lect
ible
s)—
——
33.5
65
Due
from
olit
erfo
nds
—1,
221,
300
Acc
rued
inte
rest
—.3
25ln
vest
tnen
ts—
——
1,19
6,42
3
Tot
alas
sets
$29
,000
S79
,800
122,
000
10,7
70.9
10
Lia
bili
ties
Lia
bili
ties
:A
ccou
nts
paya
ble
and
otlt
erli
abil
itie
s$
29.0
00S
79,0
0012
2,00
010
,770
.910
Tot
alli
abil
itie
s29
,000
79,0
0012
2,00
010
,770
.910
Tot
allia
bilit
ies
$29
,000
S79
,801
112
2,00
010
,770
.910
See
acco
tupa
ttyi
ngin
depe
ttde
nlau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
64
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities
Agency Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
Balance, Balance,January 1, December31,
RID #126 First National Bank Tower 2012 Additions Deductions 2012
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 342,324 2,722,967 2,580,415 484,876
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 342,324 2,580,415 2,722,967 484,876
RID #132 ConAgra Campus and Parking
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 1,124,200 790,737 1,490,500 424,437Due from other funds — 1,216,000 — 1,216,000
$ 1,124,200 2,006,737 1,490,500 1,640,437
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 1,124,200 1,000 517,237 1,640,437
TIF Bond Debt Service
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 660,194 2,869,620 2,590,868 938,946Investments 1,196,735 1,199,688 1,200,000 1,196,423Accrued interest — 1,325 — 1,325
$ 1,856,929 4,070,633 3,790,868 2,136,694
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 1,856,929 1,500 281,265 2,136,694
TIF Redevelopment Projects
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 709,804 37,085,274 37,557,275 237,803
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 709,804 18,561,113 18,089,112 237,803
First National Child Care Facility
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 146,801 145,801 1,000
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ — 77,901 78,901 1,000
RID #77 Hammons/Enibassy Suites
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ — 638,671 638,671
______________
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ — — — —
R/D #87 Aksarben Bus & Education Campus
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S — 677 677
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S — 338 338 —
Appeal Bond Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 1,125 850 50 1,925
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 1,125 50 850 1,925
165 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities
Agency Funds
Year ended December 31, 2012
Balance, Balance,January 1, December 31,
Automobile Impounding Deposit 2012 Additions Deductions 2012
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 108,522 37,408 53,459 92,471
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 108,522 53,459 37,408 92,471
Bid Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 86,088 1,395,111 1,383,259 97,940
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S 86,088 1,368,480 1,380,332 97,940
Board of Education Liquor Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 145,575 548,712 547,600 146,687Accounts receivable 1,200 287,863 289,063 —
$ 146,775 836,575 836,663 146,687
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities 5 146,775 564,963 564,875 146,687
Board of Education Tobacco Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 9,863 46,712 54,229 2,346Accounts receivable 3,315 17,824 15,371 5,768Due from other funds
_______________
5,300 — 5,300
$ 13,178 69,836 69,600 13,414
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities 5 13,178 18,294 18,530 13,414
Humane Society Kennel Permits
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 72 6,073 6,145Accounts receivable 2,100 2,502 2,502 2,100
S 2,172 8,575 8,647 2,100
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities 5 2,172 4,272 4,200 2,100
Sales Tax Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 54,736 562,993 617,686 43Accounts receivable 29,355 85,252 88,910 25,697
$ 84,091 648,245 706,596 25,740
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 84,091 606,207 547,856 25,740
After Hours Dance Deposit
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 5,000 — 5,000
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 5,000 — — 5,000
166 (Continued)
CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets snd Liabilities
Agency Funds
Year ended December 3 2012
Balance, Balance,January 1, December31,
Board of Education Parking Fines 2012 Additions Deductions 2012
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 67.572 587,617 583.275 71,914
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S 67,572 587.833 592,175 71,914
Park Development Deposits
Assets:Cash and pooled investments 5 302,95l 961,091 l,l59,572 104,470
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S 302,951 536,690 338,209 104,470
Arterial Street Improvement Program
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 3,406,185 2,296.535 225,081 5,477,639
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S 3.406.185 228.120 2,299,574 5,477,639
RID #102 First National Processing CenterAssets:
Cash and pooled investments S — 902,378 902,378 —
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S — 451,189 451,189 —
Demolition Performance Bond
Assets:Cash and pooled investments $ 25,950 132,930 129,880 29,000
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S 25.950 29.880 132,930 29,000
Performance Bond
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 26.000 186.216 132.416 79,800
Liabilities:Accounts payable and oilier liabilities S 26,000 132,416 186,216 79,800
TIF Projects Contribution
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S — 122,000 — 122,000
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities S — — 122,000 122,000
Total Agency Funds
Assets:Cash and pooled investments S 7.076,161 52.041,373 50.799,237 8.318,297Accounts receivable 35.970 390,939 393.344 33,565Due from other hinds 1.221.300 — 1,221.300Accrued interest
— 1 .325 — I ,325Investments 1,196,735 1,199,688 1,200.000 1,196,423
Total assets S 8,308,866 54.854,625 52,392,581 10.770,9 10
Liabilities:Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 8,308,866 25,904,120 28,366,164 10,770,910
Total liabilities $ 8,308,866 25.904,120 28,366,164 10,770,910
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
167
STATISTICAL SECTION
This page intentionally left blank
CITY OF OMAHA
Statistical Section (Unaudited) ::December 31, 2012
This part of the City’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context forunderstanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementaryinformation says about the City’s overall financial health.
Contents Page
Financial Trends
These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how theCity’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. 169
Revenue Capacity
These schedules control information to help the reader assess the City’s mostsignificant local revenue source, the property tax. 174
Debt Capacity
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability ofthe City’s current levels of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issueadditional debt in the future. 181
Demographic and Economic Information
These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the readerunderstand how the environment within which the City’s financial activities takeplace. 187
Operating Information
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the readersunderstand how the information in the City’s financial report relates to theservices the City provides and the activities it performs. 190
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these pages is derived from the comprehensive financialreports for the relevant year.
168
Snltedralo ICliv OFO7tIAlIA, 76BI9RASKA
Nat I’ositiott by Component
Last Ten seal Years(AcCrual Basin oiAesottnttnti)
2003 to 2012
2003 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
(iosemrnental aetisttnesNeltnsentnnontnnenpttal astern 0 255.7 1.91 201,522.074 213,958,527 237.357.059 261,308.456 295,937,697 309,036,583 327,786.022 352,248.316 359.649,050
Osstttetad 32,067,872 11,696.950 13,163.72 14,612,499 16,814,445 15,109,807 0,238,405 6,380.609 6,565,759 7.390,845
Uotestnictasl 17,1 1,405 (nS,t66.250 80,623.315 60.396,154 49,343,457 (540,888) 24.680,926) (87,779,242) (158,706,840) (209,477,684)
Total getemtttetttalaetisities trot posittott $ 2)4.691.166 278.588.074 307.745.563 3(2,365.692 327,466,355 310,586,616 292,594,062 246.357.389 200.107.230 167.562,211
Bestoens.tyw tettctttet.Net tns.atttttettt tn e.tpttel assets $ 267,653,1 $t( 271.157.076 261,232,464 244,078,865 222,436,144 235,667,494 228,900,267 195,594,307 (66,025,886 136,922,155
llesttteted — — (0.155,739 (2,362,000 6,698,070 4,249,375 8,253,046 31,292,774 40,374,573 43,439,439Untestatetesl 11.656.667) 3.999,636 (2.064,272) 10,157.757 40,306,568 23,937,327 25.401.260 37,903,634 64,670,906 99,378,100
Total bsstnesn’typesettnitten set pastttett 0 285,976,522 275,156,7(4 266,383,951 266,598,622 269,662,802 263.053,196 262,564,575 263,790.7(5 271,079,365 279,739,734
N I I I I 5 4 (00 47 (7895 47 111011 49(4 9 4 183 7(4 (00 31(05191 5 79 60 6 9 803 9 518 74 0 496 571 05llesttteteel 52,067,672 ((.890,950 23.299.46)1 26,974,499 23,7(2,5(5 19,430,182 (6,491.451 37,643,385 46,940,332 60,850,204Ontesttiets’4 (5,454,736 69,165,666 77,659.043 70.553,891 69,652,045 23,396,439 720,334 549.075,606) (94,027,939) (I 10,099.5348
Total ptitltsrnnet positiott 8 570,867.71)) 553,744.765 576.129.514 576.961.3(4 597,129,160 574,439,8(2 555.140,635 511.140.104 471.106.595 447,301.955
((ASO 34 teas aeleptesl itt 20)12.
Sostrse: Ctt5 olOonalts ltnatnstal Ststettnetnts
Sue seeotttpsnstna tttte’ttt(ettt ttttIttttnt’ repson
169
Soh04ols 2CITY OF 0045,11,6. NEBR5,SKA
Chsogos is 7)05 00080s
Los,, Ton F 00) Yosro(Aooroul B,sin olA0005rning)
20035,, 2012
21(03 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2082
Expossos
(IonorI go 5,0’O),, 6 51.899.189 82.023.849 43.617.209 40,179.313 93,334.595 95.914,3011 00,443.248 118.7211.1)38 102.6911.207 1118,841.109blsafoo 15’9157’9 1614500184 172.241.11,2 93,31)3.487 82,054.883 205,824,1)14 80.694,998 193,001.551 2)6,023.998 221,081.828
Tnsssponorios,ono,oos, 44.401.009 47.492,991 44,550.196 47.021,969 53.248,665 60,883,765 61)24,356 60,5)84,233 61.355.661 83,844,0360(60, psOl,nor,ioos 4.754.426 14.147.6,24 14.185,023 4.797.970 15,650,815 7,366,093 17.355,052 21,001,115 34.196.504 30.1152,963Cos,o)ydosolog,oos, 32,536,567 29,345,008 27,550,302 9,774,789 19,460,381 25.723,952 27,370.011 3.987,295 31,619,209 27,254,620Co)6,,o 551 noOn 30,376.92)) 1,2.71 3,346 53,992,416 57,818,310 44,894,282 40,9811.158 47,480,680 64.931,722 6(1,697.876 49,472.973
Io,,g.ono lob, 30.5111.243 24.2(13.001 52.326.602 32.457.752 34.691,594 36.519,508 37,443,850 30.360,978 35.225,037 33.961,752
Tool 40004m,0555( uos,,iooo 057055505 385.294,863 401.306.053 368.463.840 380.333.090 444.14(1.715 483,0) (.85(1 479,9(0,807 526,302.932 541,808.45(2 534.509,391
(o,00400ooon,or 60,0) 200.103 11.352.991 12,006,197 11,591,4(4 11.290.566 11,114,095 10.172,470 8.900,205 ((.064,689 16,760.1569400, 32.505.709 35,01,325 58,084.36) 39.502,641, 45,508.2(7 49.553,194 47.080.704 51.029,107 06.781.507 62.037,665
10,49(445 (0,51(2,170 1.807,06 ((.60(1.36’) 11.577.633 12,155.4(13 (2,122,555 (0.744.969 15.505,3(8 (3,226,0(11
To,o( hsns,,oss’,ypo oo6,i,, onponsos 43,252.307 57.446.486 61.900.477 1,2.854.429 68,176.4(8, 72,003,190 69.875.707 71,179.331 50,351,592 92,024.620
To),,) pros,or (5’0fl555505 6 4(18.577.150 450.833.339 430,564,3(7 448,188.019 512,316.631 555.815,040 049,794,594 597.562.263 622,160,054 826,534,011
ML(’is &lioanls,,d (Vo,kl64oo S,,Ioooos S 2.466,77) 2(1,025.073 20,032,090 22,047.661 25,035,904 27,211,194 27,425,186 26.300.147 40.351.582 44,898,851
Chorgon(10006,10,0055555005 S 27,286,77’) 7.606,19’) 8,430,849 8.090,356 5,054,592 5,729,600 8,560.90), 11.432,115 9,452,548 3,639.354l’,,06o s,(On 5.21.3,466 13.696.230 8,869,544 8.011,612 15.205,420 15,812,344 14.756,190 18,373,482 16,902.557 16,269.752Tro,,,p,,r,a,,o,,,or,iooo l0.’122.388 15.746,006 14,022.227 15.1,04.717 15,153.477 (8,045,115 19,0’(2,487 22,167.554 20,495,842 34,946.905l660r p,,060 5055005 5.921.059 5.996.074 5,367.207 3,756.052 9.620.112 1,205.471 3,877.405 2,502.65) 2.968.513 4.106.470l’ooo,,o,,irydo,olop,,,o,,, 6.2)0.800 13.247.956 11,1(5.776 10,757,997 0.540,329 6,397,642 7,465.072 5,748.813 10,555,050 11,036.131(‘,,)6,ros,,d p5,0, 206.580 4,10,7,573 6,595,5(50 I l.55l,l)52 4,789.667 3.545,045 10,177.203 0,772,589 9.094.553 13.412,015
(lO,05,4 0,5,5,55,01 oo,or,),,,60,,, 61.720,15), 50,647.742 58.1545,805 52,095.766 76,4111.775 02,6(5.753 70,638.578 65,624.631 81.334,162 70,615.981Copi,u) 6,0,06,05,1 o,,,,010,,,iooo 29.900.919 20.425.532 32.117.704 17.134,301 29.645(64 30.129,275 27,255.802 51.671,2(7 1,991,113 2,111,413
70,016’0505,,,,01500v,,,05
prog,o,,,,ooo,,,,os 147,525,144 139.45(l.176 44,724.262 128,599.5110 167,955,542 69,784345 161.503,643 66,372,952 161,623,738 158.938,171
B55555055’SflpOOOOSiOOs
(‘horgos 6,rsor0oos(‘on,oosjo,,oo,,,or 15,5,01 2.250.535 4,623,04) 6,447,1(7 7,732.472 0,910.030 8,6)01,37) 7,024,146 6,765,385 I (.147.601)P.oki,,g 5,021,967 3.250.347 3,749,533 3,7911,0(11 4,151,923 4.110,011 4.144.920 4,170,4116 4,23(1,560 4.1(1,4,700So,oo,,o,orn,o 0,,,ol 54.260.55)) 32,15(1.114 33,528,73% 34,692,56) 35,474,534 41,154.63)) 43.633,767 49,944,627 65.461.497 72.191,970(‘i,yoi,(o opors, 174.15(3 150,135 145,11,8 (53.660 117,543 148,42(1 13)1.94)) 193,202 151,768 292,769Ms,ioos 415,69)) 466,1s43 395 .825 786.525 737.166 500,23), 486.578 446.039 397.457 603.435To,,nin,,poro,,,,,,, 186.565 165.97) 237,0)7 270.760 248,238 267.685 265,028 263.691 259.072 256,924(i,sll’,,poro,,,,,,s 0551 0s550oss0ss 5.18)1.770 3,539.390 3,31),07’l 3,406.750 3,537,287 3,441,617 3444,417 3.421.7(9 3.347.221 5,713,606A,r 45555(50 337.4356 591,923 5(2.451, 536.470 532.192 509,107 037.111 802,199 689,868 759,500Cs,,,,75,5, 599(39 542,702 701,279 798,111 756,9)0) 561,151 789.1170 835.696 322,717 1.072,270Fri,,,i,,g sod gosph,o, 418,1)1) 400.540 478.632 515,262 528.3)0 543.339 551.847 474.093 348,359 499,711Roor8,,,,, plaso o,,,l ,sassss,, 31.665 251.661 31,0(1 85,482 38,350 40.179 45,532 34,612 46.725
lIpo,a,,,,s, 455’os o,,d o,,,,,nho,,,,,,s 711,166 ‘129.479Cop,,o( 0,s’,,s md oos,rih,,,j,,,,, (.609.9)2 3.0)9.15% 5,795.21,6 9,56) .366 4.486.724 4.565.282 5.491,917
_______________ _______________
1.336.274
To,o18,,n,,,oso.l,poao,,,,Oo,pr,,or,o,o,o,o,,oos. 45,21)1,1125 46.426.423 53.353,955 611.639,673 1,1.388,77)) 64,853,594 66,518,445 68.424,329 77.720.758 97,1(4,963
TI prsoosy o’onssos S (92,735,169 105.871,.593 (98,101,257 l0’1,239.7%3 229.344,3)2 234,137.639 228.322.088 234,797.28) 239,344.496 254,053,134
C,,,,,po,,o,,,os,0,OlE/a & Ho,sla,,d (Vorkfomo 9,4,0,0,,,
500,005 S 1.666.667 19.142.608 21(754,59’) 23,467,351 24.863.872 29.865,01% 30.629,846 28,717,594 39.797,00)) 42,570,050((P06,15,54 srs,,,o 0,1 00,0,10,00,,,,
___________________
2.61,6.667 (.50)1,0)10 1,5)61.00)1 1.50036(0 1.815,000 - 1.023,808 5,5(3,605
5 1.666.61,7 22.7)19.275 22,254.59’) 24,967.355 26.363.072 31.68)15(18 50,629,846 25,717,594 40.820,608 46,383,715
No,o,6pomo:O 1217.769,73’)) )261,936,%83) (223,739,57%) (256.733,684% 1276,104,673) (313,727.805) (518,115,1(841 (380,059,905) (580,154.754) (377,571,220)
5,,si,,os,.mpo 00(15)64, 1.937.718 1)1.02)1.063) 10.546.402) (2.2)4.556) (6,787,14%) (7.949,596) (3,357,3421 (2.755.60) (2.630.034) 0.050.343
Toss,) 9 1215,532,1(2)1 777,956,741,1 (232.286.060) (298.948,236) (282,972,319) (321,1,77,49) (321,472,51(8) (362,714,982) (302.813,0881 (372.400,877)
MEL/a & I lo.,slond IV,,,06,,oo 601,,s,o,,, S (8)6).)04) 2,283.402 I ,7_’2,509 2,3(9,1,92 1,327,880 4.468,024 3,2)9,68)1 2.362.447 551,3(81 (.565,5 12
170 (Continued)
(tteralreverroea asrl other oh soot pOstliOs
Pr potty tooMotortehot,tsSolos arId 5 0,5
Paystrests jO 110110! 0505
Usroarrietad isvossoeitt
Sale ofoapira) assetsTtaasSsa
_____________ _____________ _____________ ______________
Total SilSerOs)e oral oollattres
BOsirseas-tpe aarivitros,CsresoioledhrsaeosaessearssosSale sIC capital CiCeroTrosafets
__________ __________ __________ __________
Total bossresstypo oottt riles
Tool
(‘rtrsrprrsersssttrrta
9)60th & I laoalatsrl Wsok600e SrrllrsrossOrss&tosa sot teatrreted to apoerSe prssesarsss
(‘lsosoe irs trot posrsiort’
llasrsoas’r9pe aorisrsjes
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
Total
Cssstporsertrartsrrs’MOOT & I leattlasrl Wetkftrtoe Solorrosrs
Notposttron laegisstaorrfoear
Brraisoss-tspooetja riles.
Tsaal
(‘otsposesrorttrs7alEO’A&lleoolorsdlVrrsktirsoo SillrrrrOiis.
Netprtsrsrts ertd rtfssas
Brratrtess-lype aolteitles
l,otoprtsetrt exits:Tll(’A aS Ilecolosrl SVrrt6tiireo Solrrlrstss
Sooroe. OIly 000rsoha ISsossetal Sirirrieiiia
(he cod halasee lit 21101 ft tire Otto does aol oratolt tIre 201(7 Ioegrsttrsg hslasee )oeeorrso it tsos tostoted it rselrrale Ito attseratrrmoflilkhors.
lsogissrsg 012(1)1. the (its hegas seprlottto I leortlasd Worklirtee Srtlottoss ass as arlrlttirtrso) Ortttl[lrtllellt trait
SalsadIsla 2CITY OF 07113 lIT. NEIIRASK5S 4iaftr3t5
Clta500s io Nor I°ositioo
Last Tort Prsool Yaots(Aeooal Basis ofthoeoarstiso(
2(103 lot 21112
201(3 2004 2)105 2006 2007 2000 2009 201)1 2(11 2012
S 79.254,6(1 l11I.370,(101 94,292,79r1 99,432.280 14,935.2211 110,979.730 l30,016,943 130,320,939 139.574.329 l4l.765,3l99,637,101 9,9)4,977 9,03t),957 0,019,1111 8,829,ftTS 9.374.405 9,299(84 9,3t(ly995 9,(168,784 9.l63,5l8
11l2.4l3,934 II I.01t7,9 II I (4)94,544 I I3.It25.998 I16,05l.364 124,470,354 120.730,362 126.9111.238 126.636,793 I28.379.32227,421,096 27.01111,112 2ft,84S,99? 28,78l,008 30.894.535 33.963.066 34,291,049 38,228,765 ltl.l2l.4T9 62,341,910
4.3)5,478 4.132.903 5.975.592 5.259,34I 5.943.008 5,098.222 4,595.289 4,938,1lI4 4.870,2(6 4)74,5221,619.924 2,725.710 2.298.1I3I1 3,446,775 6,222,915 4,720,079 .663.49) 1,440,959 2,008.l43 2.SftS,086l,I90,261 l.IOS.ft9S l.78l.2l5 163,5341 1143.254) 1,2911.879 (252,223)
471.81)5 Il23.ttSSl (L1I2.967) 54.1010 (l.385.I23) (558.6011 11,729.5871 Id.723.4001 18.345.1471 )3.163.477(
225.325.l75 255,633.5 69 252,Srt7,I(ST 7(4,553,909 201.434,294 296.048.053 3101,)72,6I0 313,773,3117 333.934.593 345.026.2I)0
)tt6.1L2( 74,475 tt57.991 403,227 2,8I0,341) l,58l,389 328,132 267,736 574.337 406.061(.280 5_,(75 7,7ttl 1)3.447) 1345.700) -
(471.816 I (21,699 I,) I2.9t’7 (54,001(1 I,385,l25 550.60) (.720.587 4,773,499 8.345.147 3)63.477
(536,3471 200.205 1.773.719 429.227 4.182.106 2)39.990 2.057.7)9 4.991.144 0,573,784 3,579,038
5 224.708.628 235.833,824 2S4,tt7O.705 76),7%3,036 285,616.310 298.988.1(53 302,180.329 3I8.764,45 I 342,508.377 348.596,238
S 90I.55t. l,)174.565 l.849,1113 2)29,239 2.562,799(9.71(0 616361 229.544 615.691 821.148 984.5)10 506.345
_______________ _______________ _______________
S 9(7,754 l,I34.726 7,l)77,357 2744 rtSO 3.383.437 984.500 506.343 -
S 7,555,43ts (6,3r(3,I 13) 29,157,489 4,52(l,129 5,249.621 I 16,0T9,742( I I7.992,554) (46,230r,673) (46,250,16)1 (32,545.02 0)1.4111.171 I l0,8l9.808) (6.772.TttT) I l,785.32l( (2.609,6301 IS.909.SOtt) 11.798,623) 2,236,142 6.288,ltSO 85t61).382
5 9,956,607 (IT, 22,977) 77,304,771r 2.834,9)10 2,ft4S.991 (77,6%9,349( (19.291.177) (44.0)111.53)) (39.961.5111 (23,884,638)
((7.16)1 3.410,128 3.6101,Ohtt S.lOt$,627 4.7(1,325 9,455,332 3.7(1.1)23 2.367,447 55630) 1,565.512
S 277.335.757 284,801l.I80 276.508,1(74 31(7.745,563 322,2I6.737 327.466.358 3 0658tt,6 (6 292.594,062 246.357.397 200,107.23)261.575.351 205,904,522 275,156.714 268.383.951 772.266.432 269,662,802 26S.OSS.I9tt 262.554,5732fa4.790,71527I,OTS.362
S 561.11)1.11)3 5711,967.7 01 593.744.788 576. (29.5(4 594.485.16S 597.129.160 574.439.0)7 555,48.635 5)1.140.107 47 ),l86.593
S 557(60 874,74)) 4,397,369 5.192.454 3,750406 17.968.381 23.421,7)5 27, lS2.7Stt 29,495383 30,l(46,484
S 794,89), (50 278.588.074 S((T,?4S,SttS 3)2.565,697 327.466.358 3 I0.356.616 297,594,I((t7 246.357,389 20().l()7,231 I67.562.2I295976527 °75,IStsTI4 26838395 I 766.599.622 269.692,042 263.853.196 262 .554.573 2fa4,790,7 IS’ 27I,t(79,3h5 279.739.744
S 57(l,86T,7I11 555,744,769 576)25,5)4 575,9)4.3(4 597.129.)61( 574.435.9)2 559,I48.635 5)1.140,1(4 47I.106.596 447.310.955
S 974.24)1 4.392.56% 8.1112.431 13,257,1156 I7.96S,3%I 23.42).? 3 27,132,739 79,495)91 30.1)46.484 31.6)1.996
See aoortrtrposVrrtoirldopetldorrt oodrtrto.’ teprttr
IT)
Sch
edul
e3
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Fund
Bal
ance
sof
Gov
ernm
enta
lFu
nds
Las
tT
enFi
scal
Yea
rs(M
odil
)ed
Acc
rual
Bas
isof
Acc
ount
ing)
2003
to20
12
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Gen
eral
fund
:R
eser
ved
$4,
142,
557
2,51
7,52
53,
550,
983
4,49
2,35
01,
8967
882,
810,
463
3,92
1,97
63,
637,
299
Unr
eser
ved
21.7
53,7
7327
,380
,450
29,2
22,0
4928
.41
5.72
827
,071
866
28,8
55,9
5)24
.167
,995
25,9
40,2
12—
—
Non
spen
dabl
e2,
246,
558
2,32
0,14
4R
estr
icte
d70
9,30
174
7,56
1C
omm
itte
d—
Ass
igite
d8,
391,
106
7,23
3,03
5U
itas
sign
ed32
,595
,155
37,6
08,1
41
Tot
alge
nera
lfu
nd$
25,8
96,3
3029
,897
,975
32,7
73,0
3232
,908
,078
28,9
68,6
5431
,666
,414
28,0
89,9
7129
,577
,511
43,9
42,1
2047
,908
,881
All
othe
rgo
vern
men
tal
fund
s:R
eser
ved
$59
,826
,935
53,6
14,2
5648
,781
,150
65,5
70,6
3455
,180
,529
42,1
78,0
2344
,190
,404
40,6
59,0
61U
ttre
serv
ed,
repo
rted
in:
Spe
cial
reve
nue
fund
s10
,618
,697
26,3
93,9
4521
,200
,398
24,5
58,7
4527
,285
,911
19,1
90,7
034,
876,
004
5,27
3,30
1—
—
Cttp
ital
proj
ects
fund
s(2
5,1
67,4
28)
(10,
854,
927)
16,3
07,5
10(2
3.1
63,3
86)
(2,0
97,9
06)
(15,
493,
032)
35,4
31,6
7917
,252
,775
——
Per
man
ent
fund
s1,
678,
506
1,15
31,
848
360
4,05
84,
525
539,
208
428,
925
Non
spen
dabl
e2,
775,
389
2,77
5,38
9R
estr
icte
d38
,509
,089
53,5
13,3
85C
omm
itte
d18
,252
,217
18,7
04,0
36A
ssig
ned
1,67
6,85
96,
691,
614
Una
ssig
ited
(41,
915,
268)
(13,
987,
312)
Tot
alal
lot
lter
gove
rnm
enta
lfu
nds
$46
,956
,710
69,1
54,4
2786
,290
,906
66,9
66,3
5380
,372
,592
45,8
80,2
1985
,037
,295
63,6
14,0
6219
,298
,286
67,6
97,1
12
nBeg
initi
itgtn
2011
,th
eC
ity
ttdop
ted
GA
SB54
and
was
requ
ired
tore
pom
im
ore
spec
ific
cate
gori
esfo
rth
efu
ndba
lanc
es.
Sou
rce:
City
of
Orn
alta
Fina
ncia
lS
tate
men
ts.
See
stec
ompa
nyin
git
tdep
ende
ntau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
172
806,3,1,3Cu’S OF OMAHA, (EBRASKA
Chum,,, I, Foud Ruluooo, o(’Govon moulul F,md, 7’’
(ModulAR ol’Aooo,mOuo)
2803(02012
2003 2004 2008 2006 2007 2008 2009 20(0 2011 20(2
Proporly $ 92,696.954 96.380,823 89,341.424 94,917.441 102.681,475 12.354.610 17,561,400 30,625.280 133.175,220 140,715,380Molorool,io)o 8,3,37,101 8,5(4,977 9.030.957 8,516,011 8.825.629 9.374.405 9.299.184 9.309.995 9.068,784 9.163,518Cily ,aIor oud 00 102,413.934 (.007,9 14,184,544 I (3.025,998 I (6.051.364 I 24,470.354 (20,735,362 126,910.238 126,636.793 128.379,322Soujooso 27,423,096 27.000, 2 26,045,997 20,781.000 30,884.535 34,249.57 34,25 .051 38.225.765 60.121.475 82.331,646
4,315,438 4.132,805 5.575,592 5,259.341 5,543.008 5.595.722 4,590,983 4.538,013 4.870,216 4.174.522l,,00u,o, md porl1i1 7,899,272 9.699.324 8.248.962 5.216,566 8,044,824 8,022,731 7.125.382 5.447,524 5.627.653 0.953.636IululOO,Oflu000lu) 69,705,612 49.655,652 47,399,603 43.152.752 49,850.176 41,275.519 37,433,627 39.943,475 39,259.990 41.596.021luoou600uli,00mo 1.610,924 2,004,225 2.298.930 5,446,225 6.722.9(5 4.720,079 (.669.490 (.291,935 1.834,089 2.133.508Rovoooo ho,, K000 6.113.009 6.016,221 1,209.779 6.811,565 7,693.010 7.455,212 6.195,196 6.959.045 7.222,115 7.220.283Charm,, ir ,or100u 41,365,731 41,872,226 38.007,379 39.246.354 45,727.075 45,777,345 61.279,665 49.441,858 53,453,047 54.706.031Soul,’ oml royulliou 5(8,077 3.788.825 2.487.922 2,521,666 5,353.045 2.726,418 1.459.459 2,388,690 2,066,022 22.628.777Couu,hulo,moud groorl (7.066.045 32,664,861 31,790,177 (9,733,628 48.985,045 56.8(5,186 41,657.358 44,964,597 44.972,195 52.404.647
Told ro,00uoo 31,9763690 392,037,962 382.221,266 376.530.355 435.362,104 453,170.451 443.252.060 462,049,415 493,337.632 535.7(0.289
hupoodi hrOO
(,‘ouorul golommOol 47,971,879 35,042,752 30.437,115 35,503.736 40,699.673 52,797.201 44.237.2(7 45,400.158 45,478.299 48,389.444Pohliouu(Sly 142.681.534 154,177,140 164.989,313 174,588,175 (83.747.075 197.108.649 195.927.042 192,681.092 209.5(3.357 2(3,740,374Tr.m,po,Lu,o, uorvi001 37,621.204 39.907.448 37.51 2,546 39,232,879 43,421,768 40,623,732 48.208.708 47,095.967 48,800.535 48.966,496OliorI,oh(io ,or,iooo 14,613,596 (3,957.726 13.920,71,3 4,364,9(6 (4,750.946 (6,929.963 16.403.382 20,0(2.730 33,340.836 29,5(3.629Cornuu,ohy dooIopmool 32,424,252 45.157,257 27,680,503 19,346.165 (8,744,993 25,039.148 26.735.726 27,990.076 26,008.123 26,243,564C,dlorouud pork, 79.399,038 33,900,044 31,431,397 28.751,405 31,551.223 30,321.658 29.906.063 31,916,664 99.392.941 39,807,813
0061 ,Oroioo.
Prioop.,) 54999209 24,261.1,67 25,925,284 28,511,694 42,032,712 72,787.519 36,895,854 35.934,250 40.000,182 47,062,1401110,00 30.044,01,4 21.744.997 31,096,744 31,506,002 33,532,480 34,954,674 76,899.394 38.360.979 35,225,036 3 .9.503.9(9So,,d 6r,u,uo 0040 2,090,2(7 702,799 161.026 303.209 1,346.4611 1.271.689 740,549 303,220 973.240
(‘apilol 001(19 136,739.116 39,033,370 47,748.502 42.654,793 55,734,797 76,697,970 64,595,974 79,279,779 55,701.862 32,019,516
lola) oupoodlor0u 5,32,462,901 409.372,110 41(1,041,566 414.221,413 460.369.676 556.597.920 500,791.049 519.491.902 533,564,991 5(5.928,163
Dolioo,,oyol’rouo,oouo,,doroupood,lorou ((62,719,103) ((7,334,1561 (21,620.3001 (37.691.0301 (32.947,572) (103,422,4691 (57.520.989) (57.442,487) (40.226,759) 20.3 12.I’_h
Olhorloooo,og soor000
Trom6r, (0 8,705,765 4,791(222 750.000 654.000 1.434.525 679.238 5.970,605 6.442,775 (.045,890 2,326.795Tr,mu(broool (7.731,961) (4,92 1,077) ((.062,967) (600.000) (2,619,1,48) (1,237,839) (7.300.192) 311.169.286) (10.191.027) (5,490,210)0,1(01 ol’oupilu( lomb (.243.595 (.759.449 1,577,271 421.700 1,334,919 647,494 12.044,740 658.000Pr000od, (ion, hood, iom,od 47,210.633 36,964,036 47.369,296 (0.521.516 57,565.000 146.483.605 91.392.000 77,485.000 27,995.000 77,890,862(1,0000,1, Son,opooi,,I,o,osuu,ooldohl 1.215,000Prooood, ol’ro6mdog hood, 256,730.785 6,990.000 ((.425,000 45.560.000 - 35.067.065(1r0000)o So,, in,,0,,00 00,0o 2,962,858Prooood,)p,,9m,ool 6,, hood
prouuonu’dioooo,b, 00, 543,236 169.931, 671.695 4.350.806 4,649,445 2,435,125 1,349.912 8.350,765Poymbool hroflbud hood oso,om 00010 (294.759.954) (63(59.000) (11,667.90(1 (17.900.194) (79.064.654) (48.297.153) (17.985.111) (22.768.906) (86,043.834)0000ool 0,150(0 oihood,
_______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________
(346.191)
_______________
(3.9221
Tobol othorliouocop10111001 (‘1101) 50.141,033 43.533.5(1 49,631,836 15.501.551 98.951,381 71,632.856 93.109,624 37.506.794 (0,275,599 31.983,461
No, oh0000 6, lOud hdu,,00o 8 (((2.571.770) 26(99,362 20.0(1.556 (19.109.5071 1,003.809 (3(794.6(31 35,580.635 ((9,935.893) (29.931.160) 52.365.587
SohI Soru,oo 0(01COb01b000)
o000m,iSl oupoodiboro, 27.37% 4.93% 5.74% 9.33% 23,05% 29,42% 20,80% 20,55% (8.77% 20,43%
Sooroo (‘ibyol’Omdro F,00ooio( Sl.do,,,o,01
SOC 0CC0Ill0li 0 iiolopo,,do,,Iotidibors’ roporb.
173
Sch
edul
e5
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Tax
Rev
enue
sby
Sour
ce
2003
to20
12
Str
eet
Gen
eral
high
way
Tel
epho
neM
otor
vehi
cle
Hot
el/v
ehic
leM
UD
Cab
leR
esta
uran
tY
ear
Sale
sta
xpr
oper
tyta
xal
loca
tion
occu
pati
onta
xW
heel
tax
taxe
soc
cupa
tion
tax
inlie
uof
tax
fran
chis
eta
xta
x
2003
S11
0,91
0.10
282
.018
,063
25,2
03,9
294,
034,
329
9,16
7.64
48,
637,
101
4.65
3.68
04.
131,
352
3.35
2,61
7—
-
2004
117,
526,
998
84,7
30,7
0025
,889
,143
14,1
36,5
7711
,766
.177
8,81
4,97
75,
104,
462
3,94
6,63
03,
523,
756
2005
120,
873,
521
88,6
60,3
6425
,503
,946
13,7
25,2
1511
,896
,323
8,80
8,67
75,
435,
528
6.36
0,67
23,
589,
703
—
2006
122,
721,
806
93,1
65,0
2824
,790
,938
14,3
52,2
1711
,751
,030
8,81
8,01
15,
989,
404
5,05
6,17
44,
048,
296
2007
128,
625,
275
98,1
42,1
5628
,638
,167
14.9
65,6
9514
,934
,190
8,82
5,62
96,
990,
559
5,22
9,23
34.
312,
349
2008
131,
801,
803
109,
912,
905
29,4
59,9
7515
,932
,992
15,5
25,8
389,
374,
405
8,31
0,62
05,
714,
591
4,72
7,39
120
0912
7,30
1,96
511
5,58
6,35
427
,572
,563
15,7
46,0
2615
,638
,431
9,29
9,18
48,
087,
878
4,41
1,08
74,
952,
987
—
2010
131,
455,
524
128,
501,
803
27,6
74,5
3614
,815
,170
18,3
48,7
729,
309,
995
8,16
2,03
14,
356,
585
5,19
8,24
34,
419,
993
2011
133,
278,
455
133,
399,
969
30,3
71,2
6814
,963
,767
23,2
47,3
229,
068,
784
9,31
4,65
34,
362,
256
5,61
7,73
423
,796
,387
2012
128,
379,
322
138,
875,
565
32,4
52,0
1316
,254
,082
22,8
70,9
809,
163,
518
7,54
3,40
13,
666,
563
5,44
9,20
324
,851
,426
Sour
ce:
City
ofO
rnal
taFi
nanc
ial
Stat
emen
ts.
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
174
Schedule 6CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Real property Other propertyPersonal!
Residential! centrally Total taxable Totalcommercial assessed assessed direct
property property value tax rate
Year ended December 31:2003 $ 17,209,603,450 2,193,041,999 19,402,645,449 43.3872004 18,140,043,695 1,951,348,065 20,091,391,760 43.3872005 19,561,022,580 1,934,101,080 21,495,123,660 43.3872006 20,407,325,900 1,858,658,545 22,265,984,445 43.3872007 23,466,618,660 1,835,621,110 25,302,239,770 43.3872008 24,851,524,870 1,658,411,000 26,509,935,870 43.3872009 25,148,357,122 1,929,355,078 27,077,712,200 47.5872010 24,966,532,305 1,923,371,175 26,889,903,480 49.9222011 25,675,576,785 1,807,884,970 27,483,461,755 49.9222012 26,035,695,300 1,877,985,140 27,913,680,440 49.922
Note: Property is assessed at actual value; therefore, the assessed values are equal to actual value.
Taxes assessed by the County during 2012 are not due and payable until 2013.
Source: Douglas County Assessor’s Office.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
175
Schedule 7CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Property Tax Rates
Direct and Overlapping Governments
2007 —2012
2012—2013 2011—2012 2010—2011 2009—2010 2008—2009 2007—2008
City of Omaha:General fund 0.28447 0.28447 0.28447 0.26112 0.24312 0.24312Judgment 0.00600 0.00600 0.00600 0.00600 0.00600 0.00600Debtservicc 0.19281 0.19281 0.19281 0.19281 0.17581 0.17581Rcdeveloptnentdcbtservice 0.01594 0.01594 0.01594 0.01594 0.00894 0.00894
Total City of Omaha 0.49922 0.49922 0.49922 0.47587 0.43387 0.43387
Overlapping rates:Douglas County 0.26459 0.26459 0.26459 0.24519 0.24519 0.24519Omaha Douglas Building Commission 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300 0.01300 0.01096Papio NRI) 0.03275 0.03275 0.03275 0.03275 0.03375 0.03485Omaha Ptiblie Schools 0.25465 0.25909 0.25863 0.25572 1.20064 1.20059Metro Community College 0.08500 0.08500 0.08500 0.08500 0.06740 0.06740Edtication service units 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500 0.01500OmahaTransitAuthority 0.05027 0.04872 0.04872 0.04674 0.04613 0.04617Learning community 0.96000 0.96000 0.96000 0.96000 — —
Learning community— capital projects — 0.00125 0.00125 0.00500 — —
Total overlapping rates 1.67526 1.67940 1.67894 1.65840 1.62111 1.62016
Total tax rate 2.17448 2.17862 2.17816 2.13427 2.05498 2.05403
Note: Overlapping rates arc those of local and county governmetsts that apply to property ownerswithin the City of Omaha.
Sources: Douglas County Clerk’s Office and City of Omaha Finance Department.
See utccompanying independent auditors’ report.
176
Sour
ce:
Dou
glas
Cou
nty
Ass
esso
r.
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
Sch
edul
e8
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Prin
cipa
lPr
oper
tyT
axpa
yers
2011
—20
12
Tax
paye
r
2011
Typ
eof
busi
ness
2012
Oak
Vie
wM
all
LL
CU
nite
dof
Om
aha
Lif
eIn
sura
nce
Eas
tC
ampu
sR
ealty
LL
CM
utua
lof
Om
aha
Wes
troa
dsM
all
LLC
168t
han
dD
odge
LPC
reig
hton
St.
Jose
phR
egio
nal
Com
mer
cial
Fede
ral
Ban
kFi
rst
Dat
aC
orp
IRE
TPr
oper
ties
Firs
tN
atio
nal
Ban
kof
Om
aha
Wac
hovi
aD
evel
opm
ent
Co
Qua
dtec
hL
LC
Riv
erfr
ont
Cam
pus
Dev
elop
ers
SF1
Ltd
Part
ners
hip
Tot
al
Per
cent
age
ofto
tal
Cit
yta
xabl
eas
sess
edR
ank
valu
e
40.
37%
Ret
ail
man
agem
ent
Insu
ranc
eIn
sura
nce
Ret
ail
man
agem
ent
Rea
les
tate
man
agem
ent
I-Iea
lthca
reB
anki
ngPa
ymen
tpr
oces
sing
Rea
les
tate
inve
stm
ent
Ban
king
Dev
elop
erIn
sura
nce
Dev
elop
erR
eal
esta
tem
anag
emen
t
Tax
able
asse
ssed
valu
e
$
92,6
02,8
00
62,9
78,5
0047
,464
,900
117,
786,
400
91,8
29,0
0021
9,25
3,80
057
,575
,500
72,4
67,9
0077
,109
,800
128,
995,
900
$96
8,06
4,50
0
Tax
able
asse
ssed
valu
e
$10
3,20
6,10
095
,101
,200
85,9
56,3
0092
,602
,800
90,3
37,7
008 10 3 5 9 7 6 2
Ran
k
4 5 9 6 7 2 8 10 3
I’er
cent
age
ofto
tal
Cit
yta
xabl
eas
sess
edva
lue
0.40
%0.
370.
330.
360.
35
0.50
0,35
0.83
0.30
0.48
4.27
%
0.25
0.19
0.47
129,
402,
400
0.37
90,2
06,1
000.
8821
2,76
9,20
00.
230.
290.
3177
,109
,800
0.52
123,
498,
400
3.88
%$
1,10
0,19
0,00
0
177
Sch
edul
e9
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Prop
erLy
Tax
Lev
ies
and
Col
lect
ions
çL
ast
Ten
Fisc
alY
ears
Col
lect
edw
ithi
nth
eC
olle
ctio
nsof
subs
eque
ntye
arof
the
levy
year
s’ta
xT
otal
coll
ecti
ons
byye
arT
axes
levi
edfo
rth
eP
erce
ntag
eP
erce
ntag
eT
axan
dfi
scal
year
Am
ount
Inte
rest
ofle
vyA
mou
ntIn
tere
stA
mou
ntof
levy
inte
rest
Yea
ren
ded
Dec
embe
r3
1:20
03$
82,4
64,5
0180
,538
,622
—97
.66%
$1,
479,
440
82,0
18,0
6299
.46%
$82
,018
,062
2004
84,1
82,2
5883
,107
,249
98.7
21.
623,
451
—84
,730
,700
100.
6584
,730
,700
2005
87,1
70,5
2185
,897
,631
98.5
42,
762,
734
—88
,660
,365
101.
7188
,660
,365
2006
93,2
60,8
9391
,592
,309
—98
.21
1,57
2,71
993
,165
,028
99.9
093
,165
,028
2007
96,6
05,4
2796
,518
,641
—99
.91
1.62
3,51
5—
98,1
42,1
5610
1.59
98,1
42,1
5620
0810
9,77
8,82
810
7,89
1,21
5—
98.2
82,
021,
690
—10
9,91
2,90
510
0.12
109,
912,
905
2009
115,
018,
659
113,
644,
205
-98
.81
1,70
8,78
2—
115,
586,
354
100.
4911
5,35
2,98
720
1012
8,85
4,70
912
6,19
5,72
418
9,87
897
.94
1,87
3,13
424
3,06
712
8,06
8,85
899
.73
128,
501,
803
2011
134,
239,
776
131,
111,
754
218,
348
97.6
71,
644,
917
424,
950
132,
756,
671
99.3
713
3,39
9,96
920
1213
7,20
2,93
813
6,88
5,26
326
0,64
299
.77
1,45
6,00
927
3,65
013
8,61
4,92
310
1.22
138,
875,
564
Not
e:Pr
oper
tyta
xes
are
cert
ifie
din
Aug
ust
ofea
chye
arby
the
Dou
glas
Cou
nty
Ass
esso
r.T
heta
xes
are
base
don
cent
spe
r$1
00of
taxa
ble
valu
e.T
axes
beco
me
due
on.ta
nuai
yI
ofth
efo
llow
ing
year
and
may
bepa
idin
two
equa
lin
stal
lmen
ts.
Tax
esbe
com
ede
linqu
ent
ifno
tpa
idby
Apr
il1
and
Aug
ust
1.D
elin
quen
tta
xes
bear
14%
inte
rest
.Pr
ior
to20
10,
the
figu
res
abov
ein
clud
edin
tere
st.
The
City
incl
udes
tota
lin
tere
stfo
rla
tepa
ymen
tsw
ithta
xes
onth
efi
nanc
ial
stat
emen
ts.
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
178
Schedule 10CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Total City Taxable Sales
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Total City Totaltaxable direct
sales tax rate
Year ended December 3 1:2003 $ 7,605,363,133 0.01502004 8,058,991,867 0.01502005 8,292,560,467 0.01502006 8,413,842,533 0.01502007 8,819,720,867 0.01502008 9,037,369,933 0.01502009 8,736,921,267 0.01502010 9,023,580,333 0.01502011 9,143,290,667 0.01502012 9,630,891,267 0.0150
Source: City of Omaha Revenue Division.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
179
Schedule 11CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Sales Tax Rates
Direct and Overlapping Governments
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Direct Overlapping’City of State of TotalOmaha Nebraska tax rate
Fiscal year:2003 0.015 0.055 0.0702004 0.0 15 0.055 0.0702005 0.015 0.055 0.0702006 0.015 0.055 0.0702007 0.015 0.055 0.0702008 0.015 0.055 0.0702009 0.015 0.055 0.0702010 0.015 0.055 0.0702011 0.015 0.055 0.0702012 0.015 0.055 0.070
Note: Overlapping rates are those of other governments that apply to consumers within the City of Omaha.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
180
CI
ISO
FO
SI
OIl
S,
6EL
SH
AS
I(A
Sel
ted
ole
l2
2003
S45
2.92
702
.4_’
720
(14
463.0
601
.271
201)
546
4.75
697
.524
201(
647
6.25
697
.520
2007
536.
027
99.1
1411
20(1
055
0,1)
6210
0,49
120
151
545.
529
I((
.673
20)1
)526)1
))(7
7,3
06
21(1
15(
0.75
(1(0
3.6
(521
112
516.
795
10(1
.1(1
2
7)5
52.4
6074
5.1(
3457
551
.255
714.
61(7
445
49.1
2107
1.11
1230
54
9.7
(507
9.1,
17(5
54
7.0
(594
7.00
7—
—46
.211
067
7.12
1—
44.3
05
(.05
6.50
3—
42.1
90(4
1.33
03)
1,42
51.
101.
154
36.7
65(.
200.
075
4(2
’,.
S(.5
1(5
4.13
1.70
24.
115
I‘(
404
II2.
1)54
46
2.19
04.
172.
226
40
44
OIl
2.64
2N
’A3.
026
aOli
Vil
ien
0000,
010
61
(1,0
170h
1by
Typo
Lol
lla
olO
cal
Yea
r,
lAm
Oofl
O0
ll1
00
,O((
)l,,
06
00
Pl
P01
00)1
001
Sp
ecia
lG
enera
lia
,rs
ues,
ment
Hil
lel
Lay
Sco
reSe
wer
lola
ll’
erer
nlo
ge
661
Obl
igat
ion
sltP
llO
l’te
dlI
lacs
lirv
ell
Uc
50)6
1C
apit
alre
ven
ue
support
ed
reoccur
colo
nlO
r000ue
Capil
ol
pri
mary
of
pers
on
al
deb
tper
buil
ds
bo
nd
sp
ayab
lebond,
para
llle
leas
esbo
nds
l,rr
ndn
h,tn
dup
ay
ab
leb(
,,)iI
sbay
es
___
___
__
___
___
__
__
__
___
___
___
__
___
_
50)6
,D
etai
lsro
g,,r
diog
bcC
i),’
,o
lasl
oad
oig
dobl
coo
ho(S
hod
011000660110
linoacia
l
See
labl
OI?
.D
ern
ogra
ple
can
dL
conorn
wS
la6
60
0,.
(hr
00
00
0an
dpo
polo
lioo
daM
See
aceo
inp
.nfl
yif
lgin
dopoil
dool
audil
Ol,
’ro
porl
.
(2)5
.52
))3
40
Ir
100.
977
21.’
43
—11
,717
1.35
1,—
3.7(
123
l,’5
6(0
6,97
32(2
55
11.2
54
74)
“—
3.50
754
.1(1
211
1115
52(
1,53
6—
-17
.1lb
(.1)2
53.
505
94.7
31)
110.
155
711.
555
53.1
711
53.0
31
2(5
2,35
113.
0)16
37,4
(5(0
9.75
1)19
.155
94,4
711
57,1
15
‘06
7.7
(02.
511
41.3
12(0
9.7
50
111.
335
532’
(S54
,579
257
2,1(
652.
656
11(7
.131
(06.
75))
16.7
9212
)195
32.6
26
—1.
920
2.42
514
1.1(
90(4
6.45
516
.229
146.
074
—1.
055
2.11
113
11.1
10(4
5.06
517
.639
217)0
0(5
.1)7
)
—(.1
,73
2.93
715
1.99
4(4
5.32
517
.252
51(2
.755
(3.4
5’
(Xl
Schedule 13CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Ratios of General Obligation Debt Outstanding
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Ratio ofnet debt
Less amounts Net to estimatedGeneral available in bonded valuation
obligation debt debt per of taxablebonds service fund Total capital’ real property2
Fiscal year:2003 $ 432,926,472 11,057,002 421,869,470 1,022 2.172004 463,106,472 23,555,462 439,551,010 1,052 2.192005 484,756,472 18,892,007 465,864,465 1,101 2.172006 476,256,472 11,888,320 464,368,152 1,084 2.092007 536,826,472 16,491,540 520,334,932 1,202 2.062008 558,062,463 18,976,244 539,086,219 1,229 2.032009 545,829,194 13,489,712 532,339,482 1,171 1.972010 526,180,000 16,693,476 509,486,524 1,246 1.892011 518,750,000 18,595,398 500,154,602 1,200 1.822012 516,794,764 18,689,053 498,105,711 1,189 1.78
Note: Details regarding the City’s outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements.
Population data can be found in table 17, Demographic and Economic Statistics.2 Property value information can be found in table 6, Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
182
Schedule 14CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt
December31, 2012
Estimated Direct andDebt percentage overlapping
Governmental units outstanding applicable’ debt to the City
Direct:City4 $ 498,105,711 100.00% $ 498,105,711
Overlapping:Douglas County 70,185,000 76.25 53,516,063Omaha-Douglas Public Bldg. Commission2 34,770,000 76.25 26,512,125School District of Omaha2 264,281,949 85.91 227,044,622School District of Ralston3 27,449,600 72.78 19,977,819School District of Millard3 127,665,000 62.65 79,982,123School District of Elkhorn3 141,895,000 49.24 69,869,098School District No. 66 of Douglas County3 23,745,000 100.00 23,745,000
689,991,549 500,646,850
Total $ 1,188,097,260 $ 998,752,561
Note: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries ofthe City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governmentsthat is borne by the residents and business of the City. This process recognizes that,when considering the government’s ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burdenborne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not implythat every taxpayer is a resident and, therefore, is responsible for repaying the debt, of each overlappinggovernment.
The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values.Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the City’s taxable assessed valueand dividing it by the corresponding overlapping government unit’s taxable assessed value.
2 Payable from certain property tax revenues and payments to be made to it by the City of Omahaand Douglas County under certain contractual agreements. Actual rental payments by the City for2012 were $1,583,353. The Act authorizing issuance of bonds by the Omaha-Douglas Public BuildingCommission permits them to levy a tax of $0.17 per $100 of actual valuation on all the taxable propertyin Douglas County. However, although the same Act authorizes the City to levy a tax on all the taxableproperty in the City, except intangible property, of $0.17 per $100 of actual valuation in excess of theCharter limitation described under “AUTHORiTY TO LEVY TAXES,” if and to the extent necessaryto make the City’s payments to the Commission, no such levy has ever been made by the City forsuch purpose.
Residents of the City reside in one of the five school districts and pay taxes only to thatschool district. These numbers represent bonds outstanding as of December 30, 2012.
The debt for the City of Omaha is based on the general obligation debt.
Source: The information regarding the bonds outstanding comes from the State of Nebraska Auditor ofPublic Accounts Web site, reported as of December 30, 2012.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
183
2003
2004
2110
5
S66
5.23
567
9.09
375
2.32
942
1.86
943
9.55
146
5.S
64
S24
3.36
623
9,54
228
6,46
5
$26
,567
,520
.800
1,34
6,15
9,64
0
27,9
13,6
80,4
40
976.
978,
8)5
CIT
YO
FO
s1A
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Leg
alD
ebt
Mar
intn
fons
iatio
n
Las
tT
enFi
scal
Yea
rs
(Am
ount
inth
ousa
nds)
2006
2007
2008
2009
779.
309
885.
578
927.
848
947.
720
464.
398
520.
335
539.
086
532.
339
314.
941
365,
243
388.
762
4t5,
381
Deb
tlii
ttit
Tot
alne
tde
btap
plic
able
tolim
it
Leg
alde
btitt
argi
n
Tot
alne
tde
btap
plic
able
toth
elim
itas
ape
reel
ttane
ofde
btlim
it
Leg
alde
btm
argi
nca
lcul
atio
nfo
rfi
scal
year
2012
Sch
edul
e15
2011
2012
961.
921
976.
979
500.
154
498.
106
461,
767
478,
873
2010
941.
147
51)9
.487
431.
660
6342
%,
64.7
3%6)9
2%
59.5
9%58
.76%
58.1
0%56
.17%
54.1
3%52
.00%
50.9
8%
Tax
able
prop
erty
valu
es:
Rea
les
tate
Pers
onal
prop
erty
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
Tot
alas
sess
edva
lue
Deb
tlim
it(3
.5%
ofto
tal
asse
ssed
valu
e)
Deb
tap
plic
able
tolim
it:G
ener
alob
liga
tion
bottd
s51
6,79
4.76
4L
ess
amou
ntse
tas
ide
for
repa
ymen
tof
gene
ral
oblig
atio
ttde
bt(1
8,68
9.05
3)
Tot
alite
tde
btap
plic
able
tolim
it49
8.10
5,71
1
Leg
alde
btm
argi
n$
478.
873.
1)14
Not
e:U
nder
Art
icle
V.
Sect
ion
5.27
,Il
onte
Rol
eC
hart
erof
the
City
ofO
mah
a.19
56as
amen
ded,
the
City
ofO
tttal
ta’s
onts
tand
ing
gene
ral
obli
gati
onde
btsh
ould
not
exce
ed3.
5%of
tlte
actu
alva
lue
ofta
xabl
ere
alat
tdpe
rson
alpr
oper
ty’
inth
eC
ity.
By
law
,tIr
ege
nera
lob
liga
tion
debt
subj
ect
totIr
elin
titat
ion
tray
heof
fset
byai
ttonn
tsse
tas
ide
for
repa
ying
gene
ral
obli
gati
onbo
nds.
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
184
Schedule 16CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Pledged Revenue Coverage —.
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Direct NetGross operating available Debt service requirements
revenue1 expenses2 revenue Principal Interest Total3 CoverageUtility service
chargesSewer System
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012
S 34,232,617 20,084,158 14,148,45932,182,282 22,072,931 10,109,35133,279,697 23,515,095 9,764,60234,759,942 24,434,713 10,325,22940,573,046 26,148,634 14,424,41241,969,126 29,381,293 12,587,83343,704,193 29,341,757 14,362,43649,783,043 32,629,953 17,153,09059,414,374 35,082,144 24,332,23073,636,605 35,026,078 38,610,527
1,614,5061,487,5111,439,0302,475,8542,436,6793,832,6823,968,0394,790,9456,183,6929,819,735
888,373 2,502,8791,745,792 3,233,3031,512,034 2,951,0642,558,781 5,034,6355,078,921 7,515,6005,080,556 8,913,2384,867,190 8,835,2296,246,860 11,037,8057,670,908 13,854,6007,797,934 17,617,669
Generally, gross revenues include sewer use fees and interest on investments.Generally, direct operating expenses iuclttde sewage treatment and pumping, sewer maintenance, administrative and general, and industrial Ivaste control.Excluded from direct operating expense are depreciation and amortization.The numbers reflect tlte total annual fiscal year’s debt service requirements on all the outstanding senior and junior revenue bonds and notes.
Net revenuesConvention Center Hotel from Manager
2004 S 5,197,148 1,111,614 4,085,5342005 5,197,148 l,lll,6l4 4,085,5342006 7,046,759 1,766,738 5,280,0212007 8,414,989 1,835,394 6,579,5952008 9,715,892 1,956,436 7,759,4562009 7,065,949 1,863,396 5,202,5532010 8,274,289 1,569,043 6,705,2462011 6,969,693 1,971,401 4,998,2922012 11,248,005 1,506,695 9,741,310Generally, gross revenues include net revenues from manager and interest on investments.
(2) Generally, direct operating expenses include administrative costs, taxes, and insurance.Excluded from direct operating expense are depreciation and anlortization.Hotel opened April I, 2004.
Dock rentalDodge Park Marina Fund fees
2002 $ 467,548 233,494 234,0542003 407,690 240,315 167,3752004 406,644 219,965 186,6792005 424,648 277,860 146,7882006 444,992 261,985 183,0072007 517,829 300,929 216,9002008 504,623 325,086 179,5372009 498,450 450,812 47,6382010 446,039 283,542 162,4972011 397,344 272,036 125,3082012 603,435 471,743 131,692Generally, gross revenues include net slip rental fees, concessions, and interest on investments.
(2) Generally, direct operating expenses include operating and maintenance costs.Excluded from direct operating expense are depreciation and amortization.
Special tax revenue Redevelopmentredevelopment bonds levy
5.653.133.312.051.921.411.631.551.762.19
0.950.950.991.241.261.001.220.891.18
1.451.011.160.891.161.341.12
N/AN/AN/A
0.660.870.570.580.690.680.620.900.920.94
315,000470,000640,000
120,000130,000130,000140,000140,000150,000155,000
855,000885,000
1,125,0001,360,0001,095,0001,420,0001,730,0002,315,0002,390,0002,625,000
4,280,5274,280,5275,318,6655,299,3076,158,5465,192,2175,185,9175,170,2177,606,435
41,35536,30930,52424,62818,39812,0385,288
1,721,3441,125,0712,082,7621,929,6021,768,3611,889,6802,105,9452,302,7142,228,5702,113,708
4,280,5274,280,5275,318,6655,299,3076,158,5465,192,2175,500,9175,640,2178,246,435
161,355166,309160,524164,628158,398162,038160,288
2,576,3442,010,0713,207,7623,289,6022,863,3613,309,6803,835,9454,617,7144,618,5704,738,708
2003 S 1,698,219 — 1,698,2192004 1,757,854 — 1,757,8542005 1,815,671 — 1,815,6712006 1,924,414 — 1,924,4142007 1,987,825 — 1,987,8252008 2,266,497 — 2,266,4972009 2,386,049 — 2,386,0492010 4,175,584 — 4,175,5842011 4,258,621 — 4,258,6212012 4,436.505 — 4,436,505
Gross revenue include the Special Tax Redevelopment Property Tax Levy.
185 (Continued)
Schedule 16CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Pledged Revenue Coverage
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Direct NetGross operating available Debt service requirements
revenue’ expenses2 revenue Principal interest Total3 Coverage
Special Obligation Bonds
2003 S 105,555,834 — 105,555,834 613,217 3,425,480 4,038,697 26.142004 114,508,723 — 114,508,723 596,024 3,401,295 3,997,319 28.652005 119,192,495 .— 119.192,495 621,813 3,376,938 3,998,751 29.812006 116,878,412 — 116,878,4l2 643,542 3,352,007 3,995,549 29.252007 121,702,023 — 121,702,023 670,527 3,325,702 3.996,229 30.452008 128,318,818 — 128,318,818 699,182 2,455,815 3,154,997 40.672009 125,060,406 — 125,060,406 1,442,837 3,645,523 5,088,360 24.582010 130,252,172 — 130,252,172 1,251,492 3,589,306 4,840,798 26.912011 129,912,045 — 129,912,045 1,300,878 3,534,862 4,835,740 26.862012 131,719,136 — 131,719,136 1,360,264 3,210,247 4,570,511 28.82
Gross revenues include state cigarette tax, TIF revenues, land sales, and sales tax.Generally, direct operating expenses include ad,ninistrativc costs, taxes, and insurance.
“ Sewer Revenue portio,, of debt service requ,rernent reported under the Sewer Revenue Fund.
Street & Highway TaxAllocation Bonds
2009 5 27,572,563 — 27,572,563 145,000 91,084 236,084 116.792010 27,674,538 .--- 27,674,538 145,000 84,503 229,503 120.582011 30,371,268 — 30,371,268 65,000 77,645 142,645 212.922012 32,469,853 — 32,469,853 180,000 73,578 253,578 128.05
Gross revenues include state Street and highway allocation taxes.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
186
Schedule 17CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Demographic and Economic Statistics
Last Ten Fiscal Years .
Per capitaPersonal personal School Unemployment
Population1 income2 income2 enrollment3 rate4
Fiscal year:2003 412,679 $ 18,084,044 38,008 71,325 4.32004 417,702 19,221,889 39,970 72,407 4.32005 423,255 20,283,646 41,693 73,182 4.32006 428,263 21,424,933 43,599 74,288 3.42007 432,791 22,786,541 45,946 75,318 3.32008 438,646 23,941,124 47,588 75,764 3.72009 454,731 23,428,776 45,921 77,096 5.02010 409,850 23,584,222 45,473 77,560 4.72011 416,855 24,672,885 47,008 78,708 5.02012 419,041 N/A N/A 78,796 4.4
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau.2 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal Income and Per Capita Income
are based on Douglas County figures. The figures for the year 2000 Personal Income and Per CapitaPersonal Income are based on estimates.
Omaha Public Schools, Millard Public Schools, District 66.United States Department of Labor — Bureau of Labor Statistics
The unemployment rates are for the Omaha — Council Bluffs Metropolitan Statistical Area.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
187
Schedule 18CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Pimcipal Employers
2012Percentageof total City
Employer Employees Rank employment
Offutt Air Force Base 7,500+ 1 1.93%Alegent Health 7,500+ 2 1.93Omaha Public Schools 5,000+ 3 1.93Methodist Health System 5,000+ 4 1.29The Nebraska Medical Center 5,000+ 5 1.29University of Nebraska Medical Center 2,500+ 6 1.29First Data Corp. 2,500+ 7 0.64Union Pacific 2,500+ 8 0.64HyVee Inc. 2,500+ 9 0.64First National Bank of Nebraska 2,500+ 10 0.64West Corp. 2,500+ 11 0.64Walmart Stores 2,500+ 12 0.64ConAgra Foods 2,500+ 13 0.64Mutual of Omaha 2,500+ 14 0.64Creighton University 2,500+ 15 0.64
Total 15.42%
2011Percentageof total City
Employer Employees Rank employment
Alegent Health 7,500± 1 1.99%Offutt Air Force Base 7,500+ 2 1.99Omaha Public Schools 7,500+ 3 1.99The Nebraska Medical Center 5,000± 4 1.33Methodist Health System 5,000+ 5 1.33First Data 5,000+ 6 1.33Union Pacific Corporation 2,500+ 7 0.66University of Nebraska Medical Center 2,500+ 8 0.66West Corp. 2,500+ 9 0.66First National Bank of Omaha 2,500+ 10 0.66Mutual of Omaha 2,500+ 11 0.66Wal-Mart Stores 2,500± 12 0.66City of Omaha 2,500+ 13 0.66ConAgra Foods 2,500+ 14 0.66Creighton University 2,500+ 15 0.66
Total 60,000+ 15.90%
Note: Data not available for employers eight years prior.
Sources: Greater Omaha Economic Development Partnership — Omaha Chamber of Commerce Web site.
See accompanying independent auditors’ report.
188
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Ful
l-T
ime
Equ
ival
eliL
Cit
yG
over
nmen
tE
mpl
oyee
sby
Funct
ionP
rogra
in
Last
Ten
Fisc
alY
ears
2007
2008
Sch
edul
e19
2009
2010
2011
2012
2003
2004
2005
2006
Func
tion:
Gen
eral
gove
rnm
ent
9417
818
216
5Pu
blic
safe
ty:
Polic
e:Sw
orn
708
745
768
772
Civ
ilian
s82
t73
t80
170
Fire
: Swor
n63
663
763
465
IC
ivili
ans
109
88
Pros
ecut
ors
1717
t 717
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
251
229
229
244
Com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent
101
103
103
102
Cul
ture
and
park
s25
122
821
020
8O
ther
publ
icse
rvic
es88
9387
96G
olf
3129
2525
Ten
nis
II
ID
odge
Par
kM
arin
a1
11
Pri
ntin
gan
dgr
aphi
cs4
4—
7S
ewer
4545
4542
Air
qual
ityco
ntro
l6
67
7C
ompo
st6
66
7Pa
rkin
gCm
iliti
esI
II
Env
iron
men
tal
engi
neer
ing
1615
——
Tot
al2,
549
2.52
02,
504
2,52
4
Sou
rce:
City
of
Om
aha
Ann
ual
Bud
gets
.
170
170
176
180
169
751
796
765
787
780
790
161
147
143
149
142
142
630
662
667
640
624
633
99
5-—
-3
13II
1212
1212
249
255
262
262
275
284
106
118
117
120
121
119
211
221
208
221
221
220
9896
9510
510
410
223
2122
1716
161
II
II
II
I1
II
55
33
32
5757
5757
6363
77
76
66
77
75
55
2.49
12,
584
2.54
22,
562
2,55
42,
569
189
Sch
edul
e20
CiT
YO
FO
MA
HA
,N
EB
RA
SK
A
Ope
rati
ngIn
dica
tors
byF
unct
ion/
Pro
gram
Las
tT
enFi
scal
Yea
rs
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fun
ctio
n:G
ener
algo
vern
men
t:L
aw—
civi
c:C
ivil
acti
veca
ses
452
416
416
350
389
161
241
245
26]
280
Publ
icsa
fety
:Po
lice:
Cal
lsfo
rser
vice
236.
038
231,
104
234,
149
235,
065
232,
586
226,
616
236,
670
229,
933
218.
446
217.
149
Inci
dent
sof
arre
sls
28,1
9426
,572
28,0
1932
,266
32,7
3232
,178
25,0
0939
,973
24,0
7822
,732
Tra
ffic
cita
tion
s:8,
875
29,2
5730
,611
33.2
3828
,834
20,1
21)
24,4
0943
,186
47.2
3043
,219
Mov
ing
Fire
: Fire
call
san
swer
ed1,
91]
1,78
41,
825
1,83
41.
905
1,62
01,
549
1,58
51,
420
1,87
8A
vera
gere
spon
setim
e4
mm34
sec
4mm
21se
c4
mm3
4se
c4
mm36
sec
4mm
34se
c4
loin
31se
c4
mm25
sec
4m
iii28
sec
4mm
23se
c4
mil
l24
sec
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
:S
tree
tm
aint
enan
ce:
Asp
halt
repa
ir(l
ane
mile
s)1,
570
1,57
01.
600
1,61
)01.
682
1.68
21,
682
1.68
21.
682
1,68
2C
ultu
rean
dre
crea
tion
:L
ibra
iy:
Num
ber
ofite
ms
chec
ked
out
bypu
blic
2,42
5,39
92,
375,
781
2,50
0,00
02.
889.
557
2.85
5.39
33,
002,
144
3,13
1,58
53.
205,
734
3,14
8,96
93,
038,
060
Rec
reat
ion:
Att
enda
nce:
com
mun
ity
cent
ers
659,
182
630,
964
629,
618
638,
835
720.
778
611,
081
615,
000
893,
737
959,
984
Com
mun
ity
deve
lopm
ent:
Plan
ning
:P
lann
ing
boar
dca
sere
view
s41
842
256
139
045
223
327
721
818
816
7G
olf: Gol
fro
unds
play
ed20
7,85
021
4,00
))20
6,00
019
5,91
118
9.34
618
2,15
718
1,00
015
7,50
015
2,50
316
2,47
9
Not
e:T
hefi
gure
ssh
own
abov
ear
eba
sed
onac
tual
s,
Sou
rce:
Cil
yof
Om
aha
Ann
ual
Bud
get.
See
itcc
ompa
nyln
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt,
190
Sch
edul
e21
CIT
YO
FO
MA
HA
.N
EB
RA
SK
A
Cap
ital
,\ss
etS
tati
stic
sby
Fun
ctio
nPro
urar
n
Las
tT
enFi
scal
Yea
rs
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Fun
ctio
n:P
ubli
csa
fety
:P
olic
epr
ecin
cts
(inc
lude
she
adqu
arte
rs)
55
55
55
55
5
Pol
ice
hors
epa
trol
faci
lity
II
II
Ern
erec
ucy
resp
onse
and
Iraf
Oc
faci
lity
II
1I
Pol
ice
air
supp
ort
tbci
ltty
II
II
II
II
IFi
tcst
atio
ns(i
nclu
des
Itea
dqua
rter
s)23
2323
2323
2424
2424
24
Pol
ice/
tire
trai
niug
faci
lity
—I
II
II
IM
edie
uuit
s13
1313
1315
1515
15IS
IS
Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
serv
ices
:L
attc
mile
sof
stre
ets,
stri
ped
825
825
830
840
870
870
940
1.20
093
093
0S
tree
tlig
hts
50.6
7251
.100
51,5
2852
,834
53,6
9654
.852
56,2
7757
,074
58,2
0758
,725
Cul
ture
and
recr
eati
on:
l’ar
ksac
reag
e8.
284
8,28
48,
284
8,53
78,
537
8,68
09,
455
9,47
59,
475
9,62
0P
arks
**
**
**
192
225
225
231
Swim
min
gpo
ols
(out
door
)17
1616
1616
1614
165
15
Sw
itti
min
gpools
(ind
oor)
22
22
33
33
33
Gol
fcot
trse
s(p
ttbl
ic)
88
88
88
88
88
Com
mut
tilv
cett
tcrs
IS15
1515
1515
1615
1414
Lib
rari
es10
1010
10II
II12
1212
12
Sew
er:
Sew
erlin
ecl
eane
d(l
inea
rfe
et)
2,52
7,69
12,
182,
938
31
71
,49
63.
405,
072
3,38
3,99
43.
150,
344
3,38
3,99
43,
711,
211
3,45
9,31
73,
539,
909
Not
e:T
hese
figu
res
are
base
don
aetu
als
from
the
City
budg
etan
dliv
edas
set
info
rmat
ion.
Sou
rces
:V
ari
ous
City
depa
rtm
ettt
s.
See
acco
mpa
nyin
gin
depe
nden
tau
dito
rs’
repo
rt.
191
[This page left blank intentionally.]
APPENDIX C
FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE UNDERTAKING
Following is the text of Section 11 of the Ordinance. Such Ordinance provisions comprise the
City’s continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 15c2-12(b)(5)(i) with respect to the Bonds.
(a) That the City does hereby covenant and agree and enter into a written
undertaking for the benefit of the holders and beneficial owners of the Bonds in accordance with
Section (b)(5)(i) of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12) (the “Rule”). Capitalized terms
used in this Section 11 and not otherwise defined in this Ordinance shall have the meanings
assigned such terms in subsection (d) hereof. It being the intention of the City that there be full
and complete compliance with the Rule, this Section shall be construed in accordance with the
written interpretative guidance and no-action letters published from time to time by the Securities
and Exchange Commission and its staff with respect to the Rule.
(b) The City undertakes to provide the following information as provided in this
Section 11:
(i) Annual Financial Information;
(ii) Audited Financial Statements, if any; and
(iii) Material Event Notices.
(c) (i) The City shall while any Bonds are outstanding provide the Annual
Financial Information on or before the date which is 270 days after the end of each fiscal year of
the City (the “Report Date”) to the MSRB in an electronic format accompanied by identifying
information as prescribed by the MSRB. The City shall include with each submission of Annual
Financial Information a written representation to the effect that the Annual Financial Information
is the Annual Financial Information required by this Section 11 and that it complies with the
applicable requirements of this Section 11 and that it has been provided to the MSRB. If the City
changes its fiscal year, it shall provide written notice of the change of fiscal year to the MSRB. It
shall be sufficient if the City provides to the MSRB any or all of the Annual Financial
Information by specific reference to documents previously provided to the MSRB or filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and, if such a document is a final official statement
within the meaning of the Rule, available from the MSRB.
(ii) If not provided as part of the Annual Financial Information, the City
shall provide the Audited Financial Statements when and if available while any Bonds
are outstanding to the MSRB.
(iii) If a Material Event occurs while any Bonds are Outstanding, the City
shall provide a Material Event Notice in a timely manner, not in excess of 10 business
days after the occurrence of the event, to the MSRB. Each Material Event Notice shall be
so captioned and shall prominently state the date, title and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds.
C-2
(iv) The City shall provide in a timely manner to the MSRB notice of any
failure by the City while any Bonds are outstanding to provide to the MSRB Annual
Financial Information on or before the Report Date.
(v) Any filing or report under this Section 11 may be made solely by
transmitting such filing or report to the MSRB in an electronic format accompanied by
identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB.
(d) The following are the definitions of the capitalized terms used in this Section 11
and not otherwise defined in this Ordinance:
(i) “Annual Financial Information” means the financial information or
operating data with respect to the City, provided at least annually, of the type included in
Appendix B of the final official statement with respect to the Bonds. The financial
statements included in the Annual Financial Information shall be prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for governmental units as
prescribed by the Government Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”). Such financial
statements may, but are not required to be, Audited Financial Statements.
(ii) “Audited Financial Statements” means the City’s annual financial
statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP for governmental units as prescribed by
GASB, which financial statements shall have been audited by such auditor as shall be
then required or permitted by the laws of the State of Nebraska.
(iii) “Material Event” means any of the following events, with respect to the
Bonds:
(A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies;
(B) Non-payment related defaults, if material;
(C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial
difficulties;
(D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial
difficulties;
(E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to
perform;
(F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue
Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed
Issue (IRS Form 5701–TEB) or other material notices or determinations with
respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax
status of the Bonds;
(G) Modifications to rights of Bondholders, if material;
(H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers;
C-3
(I) Defeasances;
(J) Release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of
the Bonds, if material;
(K) Rating changes;
(L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the
City;
(M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation or acquisition
involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City
other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive
agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive
agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if
material; and
(N) Appointment of a successor or additional paying agent or the
change of name of a paying agent, if material.
(iv) “Material Event Notice” means electronic notice of a Material Event.
(v) “MSRB” means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. On July 1,
2009 the MSRB became the sole repository to which the City must electronically submit
Annual Financial Information, Audited Financial Statements, if any, and Material Event
Notices pursuant to this Section 11. Reference is made to Commission Release No.
34-59062, December 8, 2008 (the “Release”) relating to the MSRB’s Electronic
Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) system for municipal securities disclosure which
became effective on July 1, 2009. To the extent applicable to this Section 11, the City
shall comply with the Release and with EMMA.
(e) (i) The continuing obligation hereunder of the City to provide Annual
Financial Information, Audited Financial Statements, if any, and Material Event Notices shall
terminate immediately once the Bonds no longer are outstanding. This Section 11, or any
provision hereof, shall be null and void in the event that the City obtains an opinion of nationally
recognized bond counsel to the effect that those portions of the Rule which require this
Section 11, or any such provision, are invalid, have been repealed retroactively or otherwise do
not apply to the Bonds, provided that the City shall have provided notice of such delivery and the
cancellation of this Section 11 to the MSRB.
(ii) This Section 11 may be amended, without the consent of the
Bondholders, but only upon the City obtaining an opinion of nationally recognized bond
counsel to the effect that such amendment, and giving effect thereto, will not adversely
affect the compliance of this Section 11 by the City with the Rule, provided that the City
shall have provided notice of such delivery and of the amendment to the MSRB. Any
such amendment shall satisfy, unless otherwise permitted by the Rule, the following
conditions:
(A) The amendment may only be made in connection with a change
in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law
C-4
or change in the identity, nature or status of the issuer or type of business
conducted;
(B) This Section 11, as amended, would have complied with the
requirements of the Rule at the time of the primary offering, after taking into
account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in
circumstances; and
(C) The amendment does not materially impair the interests of
Bondholders, as determined either by parties unaffiliated with the City (such as
nationally recognized bond counsel), or by approving vote of Bondholders
pursuant to the terms of this Ordinance at the time of the amendment.
The initial Annual Financial Information after the amendment shall explain, in narrative
form, the reasons for the amendment and the effect of the change, if any, in the type of operating
data or financial information being provided.
(f) Any failure by the City to perform in accordance with this Section 11 shall not
constitute an Event of Default with respect to the Bonds. If the City fails to comply herewith, any
Bondholder or Beneficial Owner may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate,
including seeking specific performance by court order, to cause the City to comply with its
obligations hereunder.
APPENDIX D
FORM OF OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL
[Letterhead of Kutak Rock LLP]
September __, 2013
City Council of the City
of Omaha, Nebraska
Omaha/Douglas Civic Center
1819 Farnam Street
Omaha, NE 68183
$24,970,000 CITY OF OMAHA, NEBRASKA
Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds Series 2013A
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have acted as Bond Counsel in connection with the issuance and sale by the City of Omaha
(the “City”), a municipal corporation in the State of Nebraska, of $24,970,000 aggregate principal amount
of Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds, Series 2013A (the “Bonds”). The Bonds are issuable as fully
registered Bonds without coupons dated as of their date of delivery in the denomination of $5,000 or any
integral multiple thereof, bearing interest payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each
year, commencing May 15, 2014, at the rates per annum set forth in the schedule below.
The Bonds mature serially in numerical order on November 15, in each of the years and in the
principal amounts as follows:
Various Purpose and Refunding Bonds, Series 2013A
Maturity
Date
(November
15)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate
Maturity Date
(November 15)
Principal
Amount
Interest
Rate
2014 $2,720,000 3.000% 2024 $715,000 4.000% 2015 3,460,000 3.000 2025 715,000 4.000 2016 2,780,000 3.000 2026 715,000 3.500 2017 1,550,000 2.750 2027 715,000 5.000 2018 1,245,000 2.000 2028 715,000 4.500 2018 250,000 3.000 2029 715,000 4.500 2019 1,525,000 3.000 2030 715,000 4.625 2020 1,415,000 4.000 2031 715,000 4.750 2021 1,445,000 4.000 2032 715,000 4.750 2022 715,000 4.000 2033 715,000 4.250 2023 715,000 4.000
The Bonds maturing November 15, 2024 and thereafter are subject to redemption at the option of
the City at any time on or after November 15, 2023, upon the terms and at the prices set forth therein.
The Bonds recite that they are issued by the City to provide for payment of the cost of certain streets and
highways, sewers, public facilities, public safety equipment, parks and recreation facilities and to
currently refund certain indebtedness of the City under and pursuant to and in full conformity with the
D-2
Constitution and Statutes of the State of Nebraska and the Charter of the City, and pursuant to and in full
compliance with the proceedings of the City Council of the City duly enacted and adopted.
The City has covenanted in the ordinance pursuant to which the Bonds have been issued to
comply with all necessary provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to
preserve the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes.
Noncompliance by the City with such restrictions may cause the interest on the Bonds to be subject to
federal income taxation retroactive to their date of issue.
We have examined the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Nebraska, the Charter of the City,
certified copies of proceedings of the City Council of the City authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, and
an executed bond of said issue.
In our opinion the Bonds have been authorized and issued in accordance with the Constitution
and Statutes of the State of Nebraska and the Charter of the City, and constitute valid and legally binding
obligations of the City, and the City has the power and is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes for the
payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon upon all the property within the City subject to taxation by
the City without limitation as to rate or amount.
The rights of the owners of the Bonds and the enforceability thereof may be subject to valid
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other laws for the relief of debtors.
It is also our opinion that, assuming compliance by the City with the covenant referred to in the
fourth paragraph of this letter, the interest on the Bonds (including any original issue discount treated as
interest) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not a special preference
item for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations.
Interest on the Bonds, however, must be included in the “adjusted current earnings” of certain
corporations (i.e., alternative minimum taxable income as adjusted for certain items, including those items
that would be included in the calculation of a corporation’s earnings and profits under Subchapter C of
the Code) and such corporations are required to include in the calculation of alternative minimum taxable
income 75% of the excess of each such corporation’s adjusted current earnings (which includes
tax-exempt interest) over its alternative minimum taxable income (determined without regard to this
adjustment and prior to reduction for certain net operating losses).
The accrual or receipt of interest on the Bonds may otherwise affect the federal income tax
liability of the recipient. The extent of these other tax consequences will depend upon the recipient’s
particular tax status or other items of income or deduction. We express no opinion regarding any such
consequences. Purchasers of the Bonds, particularly purchasers that are corporations (including
S corporations and foreign corporations operating branches in the United States), property or casualty
insurance companies, banks, thrifts or other financial institutions, certain recipients of Social Security or
Railroad Retirement benefits, taxpayers otherwise entitled to claim the earned income credit or taxpayers
who may be deemed to have incurred (or continued) indebtedness to purchase or carry tax-exempt
obligations are advised to consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of purchasing or holding
the Bonds.
It is further our opinion that, under the existing laws of the State of Nebraska, interest income on
the Bonds is exempt from Nebraska state income taxation as long as it is exempt for purposes of the
federal income tax.
Very truly yours,
[To be signed and delivered at closing by
Kutak Rock LLP]
APPENDIX E
SCHEDULE OF REFUNDED BONDS
Douglas County Sanitary and Improvement District No. 330 (Summergreen Estates)
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2003
Dated January 15, 2003
Maturity
(January 15) Amount Interest Rate
CUSIP
(259283)
2014 $75,000 4.45% FK0
2015 80,000 4.60 FL8
2016 85,000 4.70 FM6
2017 90,000 4.80 FN4
City of Omaha, Nebraska
General Obligation Refunding Bonds
Series of 2003
Dated March 1, 2003
Maturity
(November 1) Amount Interest Rate
CUSIP
(681712)
2014 $1,880,000 5.00% NV3
2015 2,610,000 5.00 NW1
2016 1,975,000 5.00 NX9
2017 790,000 4.00 NY7
2021 3,310,000 4.30 NZ4