nlg(17)125€¦ · improvement programme entitled the ‘improving together programme’. this...
TRANSCRIPT
NLG(17)125
DATE OF MEETING 28 March 2017
REPORT FOR Trust Board of Directors – Public
REPORT FROM Wendy Booth, Director of Governance Assurance and T rust Secretary
CONTACT OFFICER Kathryn Helley, Deputy Director of Governance & Ass urance and Assistant Trust Secretary and Claire Pacey, Improve ment Director, NHSI
SUBJECT Improving Together Programme
BACKGROUND DOCUMENT (IF ANY) NLG(17)024
PURPOSE OF THE PAPER: For Assurance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (PLEASE INCLUDE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE PAPER, KEY POINTS & ANY RISK ISSUES AND MITIGATING ACTIONS WHERE APPROPRIATE)
The paper attached outlines the current progress wi th the development of the Improving Together Programme. It provides deta ils of the scope of work to be undertaken by each workstream along with the progress made within the A&E and maternity projects. The paper a lso provides a first draft of the mapping of the CQC actions to the work stream projects Note: discussion are currently underway regarding ‘ ownership’ of the Sustainability Workstream, not least to ensure alig nment with the leadership of and detail of the wider financial rec overy plan
HAVE STAFF SIDE BEEN CONSULTED ON THE PROPOSALS? NOT APPLICABLE
HAVE THE RELEVANT SERVICE USERS/CARERS BEEN CONSULTED ON THE PROPOSALS?
NOT APPLICABLE
ARE THERE ANY FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE RECOMMENDATIONS?
YES – it is anticipated that there will be financia l requirements in order to deliver the workstream outcomes. As each project d evelops, these will be identified and raised via the appropriate channels
IF YES, HAVE THESE BEEN AGREED WITH THE RELEVANT BUDGET HOLDER AND DIRECTOR OF FINANCE, AND HAVE ANY FUNDING ISSUES BEEN RESOLVED?
NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS STAGE
ARE THERE ANY LEGAL IMPLICATIONS ARISING FROM THIS PAPER THAT THE BOARD NEED TO BE MADE AWARE OF?
NOT APPLICABLE
WHERE RELEVANT, HAS PROPER CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN TO THE NHS CONSTITUTION IN ANY DECISIONS OR ACTIONS PROPOSED?
NOT APPLICABLE
WHERE RELEVANT, HAS PROPER CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN TO SUSTAINABILITY IMPLICATIONS (QUALITY & FINANCIAL) & CLIMATE CHANGE?
Quality Impact Assessment will be undertaken for ea ch project at the developmental stage
THE PROPOPSALS OR ARRANGEMNTS OUTLINED IN THIS PAPER SUPPORT THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE TRUST OBJECTIVE(S)
YES
THE PROPOSAL OR ARRANGEMENTS OUTLINED IN THIS PAPER ENSRE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATORY OR GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS LISTED
Ensures compliance with necessary regulatory requir ements
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THE PROPOSALS OR ARRAGEMENTS OUTLINED IN THIS PAPER TAKE ACCOUNT OF REQUIREMENTS IN RESPECT OF EQUALITY & DIVERSITY
YES
ACTION REQUIRED BY THE BOARD
The Board is asked to note the content of the repor t and identify any further actions required at this stage
1
Current Position
At the Trust Board meeting in January 2017, the Board approved the decision to develop a holistic
improvement programme entitled the ‘Improving Together Programme’. This paper also outlined
the governance and reporting process for the programme.
Since then, work has been taking place to develop the structures to support the overall programme.
Workstream scopes have been developed outlining the projects which will sit within each area.
These are attached as Appendix 1.
CQC Findings
Whilst the CQC visit findings are yet to be formally published and this is planned for the 6 April 2017,
the findings and actions which are already underway have been mapped to the workstreams and
projects within the Improving Together programme.
The full programme plan is in development and a detailed monthly report will be produced from
April 2017 to accompany it. The format of this will bring a hierarchy and therefore granularity to the
plan as outlined below.
This approach breaks the projects down into key milestones, milestones and actions so that delivery
and reporting can be effectively managed at all levels. Practically this also enables action lists to be
generated so that project activity can be delivered in a staged, methodical way rather than trying to
work through the plan as a whole.
The report will be for a full calendar month and therefore reporting to the trust board due to the
timing of the meeting will be for the previous month. e.g. The August Board and sub-committees
will receive the full report for July. This report will be used to provide information for all relevant
meetings/requests in order to reduce duplication and confusion about progress. The report will be
focused at milestone not action level and will include the agreed BRAG ratings for progress in the
month and confidence for the following period.
QDP Workstream ProjectKey
Milestone 1
Milestone 1
Action/task 1
Action/task 2
Action/task 3
Action/task 4
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
2
Workstreams will also be aligned to relevant Board sub-committees as art of their challenge and
assurance role. The reporting hierarchy is depicted below.
Action Required by the Trust Board
The Trust Board is asked to note the progress made to date and identify any further actions required
at this stage.
Trust Board
Executive Team (TWI Programme Board)
Sustainability
(Stocktake Meeting)
Organisational
Development
(Workforce Group)
Access and Flow
(Overarching Performance Group)
Quality & Safety
(group to be established)
Board Sub C
omm
ittees for assurance
1
DRAFT Together We Improve
Programme Brief
Programme Name Improving Quality
Senior Responsible Officer Tara Filby, Chief Nurse
Programme Manager Kathryn Helley, Deputy Director of Performance
Assurance
Board Sub-Committee Oversight Quality and Patient Experience Committee
Scope
To bring together under one programme the development of a safety culture, allowing quality improvement
activities being undertaken within the organisation to improve patient outcomes and experience.
Programme Objectives
• To deliver sustainable change in order to improve quality and safety, focussing on delivery of
outcomes
• To embed quality processes and systems so that they are consistently adhered to
• To streamline current processes, freeing up time to care
• To reduce variation and patient harm
• To develop robust reporting and assurance processes
Benefits
• Safe, high quality services for patients
• Lessons learned and shared across the Trust, reducing the risk of incidents and improving the quality
of care and experience for patients
• Improved systems and processes in place therefore reducing clinical/reputational risk
• Well trained and valued staff
• The Trust is compliance with CQC regulations
Projects
• Manchester Patient Safety Culture Tool (Tara Filby/TBC)
• Safe Nurse Staffing (Tara Filby/Di Hughes)
• Safe Medical Staffing (Lawrence Roberts/TBC)
• HCA/HSA Role Development (Recommending project sits outside of Improving Together)
• ‘Fit to Fly’ (Tara Filby/Sue Peckitt)
• Estates Helpdesk (Jug Johal/Malcolm Hoggart)
• Medicines Management (Lawrence Roberts/Paul Fieldhouse)
• DNACPR (Lawrence Roberts/Yousef Adcock)
• 5 Steps to Safer Surgery (Lawrence Roberts/Muzaffer Chaudhary)
• Mixed Sex Accommodation (Steve Vaughan/Claire Phillips)
• Learning Lessons (Wendy Booth/Kelly Burcham)
• Record Keeping (Lawrence Roberts/TBC following MES findings)
• Maternity (Lawrence Roberts/Mahadeva Manohar)
• Emergency Department (Tara Filby/Simon Buckley)
• Paediatrics (Tara Filby/Amanda Dexter)
• Infection Prevention and Control (Lawrence Roberts/Maurice Madeo)
• Risk Register and BAF (Wendy Booth/Jeremy Daws)
• Assurance Processes (Wendy Booth/Kathryn Helley)
• Data, Information and Dashboards (Recommending that this is an enabling project reporting direct to
Improving Together Programme Board)
• Patient Experience (Review being undertaken by Tara Filby with a view to this sitting outside of
Improving Together)
• Mental Capacity/Vulnerability (Tara Filby/Craig Ferris)
• Recognition and Escalation of the Deteriorating Patient (Tara Filby/Jenn Orton)
2
Interfaces/Dependencies
• There may be linkages and interdependences between some of the projects in this programme with
those in the other programmes.
• The cultural work being undertaken within the ‘Improving Culture and OD’ programme will support
the change management needed to deliver the projects.
Constraints
• The size of the programme and whether the staff have the capacity to deliver the necessary change
• Conflicting priorities between different workstreams
• Resources to lead the project teams and the ability to free up staff to undertake project work
• Whether staff have the necessary skills and experience to deliver the required projects
• Financial support for any changes required
Exclusions
• Business as usual activities which will be managed through existing management routes
Together We Improve
Programme Brief
Programme Name Patient Access and Flow
Senior Responsible Officer Steve Vaughan, Chief Operating Officer
Programme Manager Claire Phillips, Associate Chief Operating Officer/Jackie
France, Head of Patient Administration
Board Sub-Committee Oversight Quality and Patient Experience Committee
Scope
This programme will prioritise and focus on addressing the issues and concerns that have the widest and
greatest potential impact across our Trust and on the principles and processes that affect how we all work.
Programme Objectives
• To review and re-design the operating model and associated core/trust wide practices and processes to
enable the improvement of patient flow and enhance the patient experience.
• To review the role, functions and processes within the Operations Centre’s to ensure a whole site
approach.
• To review and co-develop best practice for the Patient Flow Policy on bed management and criteria for
declaring and managing purple alert/OPEL so clear for all concerned in temr sof actions expected.
• To ensure that the Trust is gathering, reporting and reviewing the right intelligence with the right people
in the right way at the right time - undertake a review of the existing structure and approach to evaluating
and addressing patient flow issues to enable optimal use of beds, nursing and other resources.
• To review and make recommendations for the improvement of weekend discharge.
• To review the process for discharge summaries and ensure it is sufficiently robust, and does not hinder
discharge process.
Benefits
Improved patient flow resulting in improved patient experience, less out of hour bed transfers, clear criteria
for each ward admissions, flow through ECC, and achievement of trust targets.
Projects
This programme will include 6 improvement work streams identified following an extensive and varied
engagement exercise with managerial and clinical colleagues across the Trust. These exercises focussed on
identifying the issues and concerns associated with patient flow through our hospitals and identified potential
solutions that could be explored, to ensure that we were operating as effectively as possible. A full analysis of
all the intelligence gathered during these exercises has been completed which identified a number of themes –
developed into these work streams.
Interfaces/Dependencies
Staff will continue to be engaged in the further development and implementation of the solutions identified in
earlier discussions. The nature of the changes that have been proposed through engagement exercises are
significant and as such we will need the contribution, co-operation and commitment of all our operational and
support staff to drive forward new ways of working that will help us to better understand and manage our
patient flow, as well as, most importantly, provide the patient with the best care in the best place for them.
• There may be linkages and interdependences between some of the projects in this programme with those
in the other programmes.
• The cultural work being undertaken within the ‘Improving Culture and OD’ programme will support the
change management needed to deliver the projects.
•
Constraints
• Resources to lead the project teams and the ability to free up staff to undertake project work
• Whether staff have the necessary skills and experience to deliver the required projects
• Financial support for any changes required
Exclusions
• Business as usual activities which will be managed through existing management routes
Together We Improve
Programme Brief
Programme Name We are improving OD and Culture Together
Senior Responsible Officer Jayne Adamson – Director of POE
Programme Manager Angie Davies – Deputy Director of POE.
Board Sub-Committee Oversight Workforce Sustainability and Transformation.
Scope
To bring together under one programme the Organisational Development and Culture activities planned for
and being undertaken within the organisation to improve:
• staff and patient outcomes and experience
• organisational performance
• transformational leadership and modernisation of the organisation .
Programme Objectives
• To understand the current organisational culture
• To plan for and implement sustainable improvement changes that support the aspirational
organisational development and culture.
• To embed new ways of working that are integral to the new culture of the organisation, supported by
robust workforce and learning strategies.
• To develop clear stakeholder strategies that are integrated and in partnership with the way we do
things
• To embed strategies that are about our people underpinned by our Trust vision and values at all levels
Benefits
• We improve the culture in the organisation so staff are satisfied and stay
• We improve our retention rates of staff
• We are able to attract staff as an employer of choice
• Staff experience is improved and this is reflected in good patient outcomes
• Staff are educated, are trained and the organisational knowledge and skill set improves.
• Positive stakeholder engagement contributes to organisational development and profile
• The organisation is visionary, and displays an authentic leadership style.
• Transformational activity becomes the norm
Projects
• Engagement (JA)
• Culture (including the Barratt survey for all staff) (JA)
• Medical Engagement Scale (LR)
• Accountability framework (JA)
• Internal Communications strategy (JA)
• Stakeholder management strategy and plan (JA/KD)
• CPD strategy (tbc)
• QSIR (JA)
• Management – definition and support (JA)
• Appraisals and training (tbc)
• Deanery (LR)
Interfaces/Dependencies
• All staffing projects
• Service development projects
• Estates and facilities project
• Terms and conditions project
• Learning lessons project
• All enabling recommendations
Constraints
• Currently have minimal OD resource – x1 person
• Financial position will constrain OD and development activities where funding is required.
• Current organisational culture may be a barrier to some of the improvement changes needed.
• Timescale to develop new strategies is a pressure
• Resources within the organisation to move on some of the work may be subject to change, reduction,
pressure, lack of knowledge and skill to undertake the work eg: new ways of working.
Exclusions
• All other activities that are out of the scope of this work stream and not identified within.
Together We Improve
Programme Brief
Programme Name Sustainability
Senior Responsible Officer Wendy Booth, Director of Performance and
Assurance
Programme Manager Kate Conway, Sustainability and Improvement
Manager
Board Sub-Committee Oversight Resources Committee
Scope
To bring together under one programme all of the financial sustainability (CIP) activities being undertaken
within the organisation along with the recommendations from Lord Carters ‘review of operational
productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals’
Programme Objectives
• To deliver sustainable change in order to achieve financial savings
• To ensure delivery of Lord Carter recommendations to reduce unwarranted variation
• To ensure ongoing robust reporting, escalation, challenge and assurance processes
Benefits
• Delivery of Trust sustainability (CIP) targets
• Improve processes to sustain achieved savings
Projects
Enabling recommendations
• People
• Governance
• Finance
• Clinical service reviews
• Digital systems
Efficiency & effectiveness workstreams
• Central and commercial
• Corporate and management
• Estates and facilities
• Medical staffing
• Non-pay and procurement
• Nurse staffing
• Operations
• Service development and income
• Terms and conditions
Interfaces/Dependencies
• There are linkages and interdependences between some of the projects in this programme with those
in the other programmes within ‘Improving Together’. These include patient access & flow and
workforce planning
Constraints
• Resources to lead the project teams and the ability to free up operational staff to support project
work
• Skills and experience to deliver the required projects
• Limited central improvement and sustainability governance support (this needs to be reviewed in
light of the overall ‘Improving Together’ Programme scope)
Exclusions
• Business as usual activities which will be managed through existing management routes