northern nevada teaching american history project september 2011 framing the constitution

27
NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Upload: devin-voshall

Post on 15-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT

SEPTEMBER 2011

Framing the Constitution

Page 2: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

How do you currently teach the Articles of Confederation and the making of the Constitution?

Articles of Confederation: failure? In whose view? Complexities?

Page 3: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

How do you currently teach the Articles of Confederation and the making of the Constitution?

Articles of Confederation: failure? In whose view? Complexities?

Making of the Constitution: triumph? In whose view? Complexities?

Page 4: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

How do you currently teach the Articles of Confederation and the making of the Constitution?

Articles of Confederation: failure? In whose view? Complexities?

Making of the Constitution: triumph? In whose view? Complexities?

Other aspects that you address with your students?

Page 5: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

What were the “Framers” drawing upon:intellectually, experientially, and politically?

Page 6: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

What were the “Framers” drawing upon:intellectually, experientially, and politically?

Intellectual frameworks: defining “constitution” What do WE mean by the term “constitution”?

Page 7: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

What were the “Framers” drawing upon:intellectually, experientially, and politically?

Intellectual frameworks: defining “constitution” What do WE mean by the term “constitution”? What did Americans in 1787 mean by that word?

(recent experience = constitutions of new states; but also “small-c” vs. “big-C” constitutions)

Page 8: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

What were the “Framers” drawing upon:intellectually, experientially, and politically?

Intellectual frameworks: defining “constitution” What do WE mean by the term “constitution”? What did Americans in 1787 mean by that word?

(recent experience = constitutions of new states; but also “small-c” vs. “big-C” constitutions)

How had the definition of “constitution” developed from the 1600s to 1787? (this takes us to the English/British system)

Page 9: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

English “constitutionalism” in the 17th-18th centuries

The common-law tradition What is “common law”? Where does it come from? What about a written, national constitution? (England

did not have one—still doesn’t) What did the common law mean to people in England,

and in England’s North American colonies? (protected “the rights of Englishmen”—linchpin = the jury system)

Page 10: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

English “constitutionalism” in the 17th-18th centuries

The structure of the English “constitution” King (monarchy): ideas about “divine right of kings”

and absolute rule in the early to mid-1600s; changes in late 1600s

Parliament: House of Lords (aristocracy), House of Commons (the broader populace)

“King-in-Parliament”: the system as operated in the 1700s

Who voted for members of Parliament? Whom did Parliament “represent,” and how? (virtual representation)

Page 11: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

English “constitutionalism” in the 17th-18th centuries

Sources of ideas about sovereignty and rights Emerging “natural rights” philosophy (John Locke):

“natural” and “civil” liberty

Page 12: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

English “constitutionalism” in the 17th-18th centuries

Sources of ideas about sovereignty and rights Emerging “natural rights” philosophy (John Locke):

“natural” and “civil” liberty Earlier “classical” philosophy re-emerges in the 18th

century, in the thinking of “radical Whigs”: power vs. liberty, the need for “citizen/civic virtue” to counter the encroachments of power

Page 13: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

English “constitutionalism” in the 17th-18th centuries

Sources of ideas about sovereignty and rights Emerging “natural rights” philosophy (John Locke):

“natural” and “civil” liberty Earlier “classical” philosophy re-emerges in the 18th

century, in the thinking of “radical Whigs”: power vs. liberty, the need for “citizen/civic virtue” to counter the encroachments of power

Another key thinker: Montesquieu Big-C “Constitutions” (whether written or not) must

reflect the small-c “constitutions” of the societies they are to govern—or else the Big-C Constitution won’t work

Page 14: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The experience of government(s) in American colonies (pre-1776) and early states (1776-1780s)

The structure of colonial governments

British Crown (through Privy Council & Board of Trade)

Royal GovernorAppointed by the crown Has final approval on lawsOversees colonial trade Can dismiss colonial

assembly

Council Colonial AssemblyAppointed by governor Elected by eligible colonistsAdvisory board to governor Makes lawsActs as highest court in colony Has authority to tax

Pays governor’s salary

Page 15: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The experience of government(s) in American colonies (pre-1776) and early states (1776-1780s)

How did colonial governance differ from governance in Great Britain (King-in-Parliament, etc.)? Broader suffrage among free white males Assembly members elected from specific districts,

answerable to constituents in those districts (not “virtual representation”)

Page 16: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The experience of government(s) in American colonies (pre-1776) and early states (1776-1780s)

The creation of new state constitutions, 1776-1780 Constitutions as WRITTEN documents, expressing

“supreme” law (above the common law, ordinary legislation, etc.)

Legislative supremacy in most states: weak executives, strong legislatures

Widened representation: more members in legislatures, closer to the people represented (more, smaller districts)

Underlying concept: popular sovereignty, based on “civic virtue” in the people

Page 17: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The experience of government(s) in American colonies (pre-1776) and early states (1776-1780s)

The Articles of Confederation (1777) Let’s read some of these together (Major Problems pp.

37-40)

Page 18: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The experience of government(s) in American colonies (pre-1776) and early states (1776-1780s)

The Articles of Confederation (1777) Let’s read some of these together (Major Problems pp.

37-40) Where does “sovereignty” lie? What is the nature of “the United States” as an entity?

(“firm league of friendship”) What are the powers of “the United States in

Congress assembled” (and what does THAT phrase mean, anyway?)

In what ways does the document limit the powers of states?

How can the Articles of Confederation be amended?

Page 19: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Movement for a stronger central government, 1780s

Experience: Fighting the American Revolution—constraints on the

“national” war effort (Washington, Hamilton) Inter-state disputes after the war—disagreements

over boundaries, trade, etc. (Madison) “Conflagrations” within states that threatened to

spread across the states (Shays’s Rebellion)

Page 20: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Movement for a stronger central government, 1780s

Experience: Fighting the American Revolution—constraints on the

“national” war effort (Washington, Hamilton) Inter-state disputes after the war—disagreements

over boundaries, trade, etc. (Madison) “Conflagrations” within states that threatened to

spread across the states (Shays’s Rebellion)Which Americans would have been most

likely to want a stronger national government? And which would NOT have wanted such a government?

Page 21: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Toward May 1787

September 1786: Annapolis Convention 12 delegates from 5 states (NJ, NY, PA, DE, VA) Attempts to deal with trade barriers between states Calls for a broader convention to be held in

Philadelphia in May 1787

Page 22: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Toward May 1787

September 1786: Annapolis Convention 12 delegates from 5 states (NJ, NY, PA, DE, VA) Attempts to deal with trade barriers between states Calls for a broader convention to be held in

Philadelphia in May 1787Late 1786 to April 1787:

Madison studies the history and government of ancient and modern nations

States select delegates to the convention (all except RI)

Page 23: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The “Federal Convention”

What was it authorized to do? (recommend changes to the Articles of Confederation)

Page 24: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The “Federal Convention”

What was it authorized to do? (recommend changes to the Articles of Confederation)

What did the delegates decide to do? (propose an entirely new constitution)

Page 25: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The “Federal Convention”

What was it authorized to do? (recommend changes to the Articles of Confederation)

What did the delegates decide to do? (propose an entirely new constitution)

Basic rules of the convention Nothing is decided until everything is decided (why?) Confidentiality: don’t leak the proceedings (why?) Rule of debate: nobody speaks a second time on an

issue until everyone who wants to speak on that issue has spoken

Page 26: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

The “Three Plans”: An Exercise in Historical Thinking and Understanding

Virginia Plan (written by Madison, proposed by Edmund Randolph, May 29)

New Jersey Plan (proposed by John Dickinson, June 15; defeated June 19, 7-3-1)

Alexander Hamilton’s Plan (June 18)

Page 27: NORTHERN NEVADA TEACHING AMERICAN HISTORY PROJECT SEPTEMBER 2011 Framing the Constitution

Resource Exploration:Teaching Websites on the American Founding

www.teachingamericanhistory.org/founding.html Created by Gordon Lloyd, Pepperdine University The Constitutional Convention The Federalist-Antifederalist Debate The Ratification of the United States Constitution