nuclear energy planning

Upload: juliocanales

Post on 10-Feb-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    1/60

    IAEA Tools forNuclear Energy System Modelling

    NESA Support Package

    IAEA/INPRO group

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    2/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    2

    Part II IAEA Tools for Nuclear Energy System Modelling

    Content

    Introduction

    Modelling of NES

    Specification of the NESof NES; Modelling of NES using

    IAEA codes

    NES modelling code toolbox

    DESAE NFCSS

    MESSAGE

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    3/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    3

    Development of energy demand scenarios

    National, regional, global

    National, regional, global

    Specification of the potential role of nuclear power

    to contribute to mix of energy supply

    Selection of components of NES

    Modelling of NES

    Assessment of NES against all INPRO methodology

    criteria of economics, infrastructure, waste management,

    proliferation resistance, physical protection, environment,

    and safety.

    All INPRO

    Criteria fulfilled?

    Sustainable NES

    NOTechnology

    Developer

    Define new RD&Dor redefine RD&D

    goals

    Energysystem

    planning

    NESAusin

    gtheINPRO

    method

    ologycvcc

    Evaluation of energy supply options

    National, regional, global

    Assembling information needed for assessment of NES

    NOTechnology

    User

    Modify NES

    YES

    Modelling of NES

    DESAE,NFCSS,

    MESSAGE

    MAED,MESSAGE,

    WASP,FINPLAN,SIMPACT,

    Tools

    Modelling of

    NES

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    4/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    4Specification of the NES ;

    1.

    Full scope

    2.

    Limitedscope

    3.Awareness

    a.

    Technology

    developers

    b.

    Experiencedtech. users

    c.Newcomers

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    5/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Modelling of NES using IAEA codes

    NES modelling activities help to select a

    NES. INPRO is offering support toselect/define a NES via providing analyticalIAEA tools that can help to define a NES (or

    several NESs), in particular MESSAGE,NFCSS and DESAE

    These activities make sense when the NESshows a certain level of complexity

    5

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    6/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    6

    DESAE(Dynamic of Energy System Atomic Energy created by unk groups KI)

    DESAE is the interactive NFC simulation code for quantitative assessment of nuclear energy

    system key indicators

    NFCSS (VISTA) is Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System which estimates nuclear fuel cycle

    service and material requirements as well as material arising for the each stage of the nuclearfuel cycle.

    NFCSS VISTA)

    MESSAGEModel for Energy Supply System Alternatives and their General Environmental impacts

    MESSAGE is IAEAs large-scale dynamic systems-engineering, economic optimization modelthat is used for development of medium- to long-term energy scenario and policy analysis.

    NES modelling code toolbox

    for MFA analysis

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    7/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    7

    Overview of DESAE code

    Based on INPRO Material

    Department of Nuclear Energy

    International Atomic Energy Agency

    Capabilities of DESAE code;

    Input/output data; DESAE material flow; DESAE reactor Data Base;

    Demo Cases

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    8/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    8

    The main capabilities of DESAE code

    Dynamic of Energy System Atomic Energy

    The main capabilities of DESAE code

    Modelling of the different fuel cycle

    Open fuel cycle Close fuel cycle U-Pu fuel cycle U-Th fuel cycle Pu-Th fuel cycle

    Calculations of material flow Tracing of isotopes Calculation of economic parameters

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    9/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    9

    DESAE code input/output DATA

    INPUT DATA

    Reactor Types

    ReactorThermal/ElectricityCapacities(as a function of time)

    Technical and economicdata of reactors and fuelcycles

    DESAEMAIN OUTPUT DATA

    Natural parameters:

    - Energy production;- Natural Uranium requirements;-Enrichment-Depleted Uranium

    -Fuel fabrication-Spent Fuel;

    - Isotopes tracing ;-Radio toxicity-Decay heat;

    Economics:-Required Investments-Fuel cycle costs;

    DESAE_2.2.lnk

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    10/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    10DESAE Flow sheet

    Natural U

    Natural The

    Reactors

    (7 types)

    ReactorStorage*.

    Long timeStorage.

    YM Storage

    Back End.

    Reprocessing

    Plant

    (4 types)

    Isotopes of fuel cycles

    Th-230, Th-232

    U-232, U-233,U-234,U-235,U-236,U-238

    Np-237

    Pu-238,Pu-239,Pu-240,Pu-241,Pu-242

    Am-241,Cm-244,

    I-129, Tc-99

    xx- users isotope

    Back End

    fission products

    Fabrication

    Enrichment U

    Depleted U

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    11/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    11DESAE Reactor Data Base

    DESAE_2.2.lnk

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    12/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    12Input data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    13/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    13Demo Cases

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    14/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    14

    Demo Cases

    Base variant

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    15/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    15Selected output data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    16/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    16

    Selected output data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    17/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    17

    Selected output data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    18/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    18

    Selected output data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    19/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    19

    Selected output data

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    20/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    20

    DESAE: short description

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    21/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    21DESAE materials: manual

    (working materials)

    DESAE_2.2.lnk

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    22/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    22DESAE application in IAEA Member states and in INPROglobal vision studies on nuclear capacity growth and

    material flowsNuclear Energy Development in the 21st Century: Global Scenarios and Regional Trends

    IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NP-T-1.8, STI/PUB/1476 (2010)

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    23/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    23Overview ofNuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System

    (NFCSS)

    Based on Material of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section

    Department of Nuclear Energy

    International Atomic Energy Agency

    NFCSS Background;

    NFCSS Material Flow; Reactor Module, CAIN;

    NFCSS Web Site;

    NFCSS TECDOC (TECDOC-1535).

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    24/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    24

    NFCSS, Background

    Developed in 1997 for the Int. Symp. On Nuclear

    Fuel Cycle and Reactor Strategies: Adjusting to New

    Realities. Previous tools were too simple or too complex.

    Purpose was to analyse the nuclear fuel cycle service

    and material requirements for once-through and

    recycling options.

    Optimum mixture of simplicity, accuracy and speed.

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    25/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    25

    NFCSS, Main Characteristics

    Scenario based simulation system

    Estimation of long-term fuel cycle material and service

    requirements Calculation of actinide accumulations

    Current state: suitable for commercially existing reactor and fuel

    types Two fuel cycle options: once-through and thermal recycle

    New reactor and fuel types can also be studied by providing

    necessary information and modelling appropriately Developed in MS Excel, currently available as web based

    application

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    26/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    26

    NFCSS, Information Flow

    Input Output

    NFCSS

    Strategy Parameters Nuclear power projections

    Reprocessing-recyclingstrategies

    Reactor mixtures

    Load factors

    Fuel Parameters Avg. discharge burnup

    Avg. initial enrichment Avg. tails assay

    Control Parameters Share of MOX fuel in core

    Lead and lag times for

    different processes

    # of reprocessing cycles

    Natural uranium requirements

    Conversion requirements

    Enrichment requirements

    Fresh fuel requirements

    Spent fuel arisings

    Plutonium accumulation

    Minor Actinide accumulation

    Reprocessing requirements

    MOX fuel fabrication

    requirementsCAINCalculation of

    Actinide

    Inventory

    27

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    27/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    27

    NFCSS Nuclear Material Flow Model

    28

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    28/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    28

    NFCSS Reactor Model (CAIN)

    Initial Composition of Fuel

    (initial fissile content)

    Average Discharge Burnup

    Cooling Time

    Fission, Capture and n2n

    Cross Sections (burnup

    average, one group)

    Half Lives

    Average Neutron Flux

    (burnup average, one group)

    Specific power

    CAIN Isotopic Composition

    User Input

    From Library

    Output

    29

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    29/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    29

    NFCSS, Calculation Process

    Nuclear Power

    Discharge Burnup

    Load Factor

    Thermal Efficiency

    Cooling and

    process times

    Init. Enrichment

    Tails Assay

    Fresh Fuel

    SF Discharged (*)

    SF to be

    reprocessed (*)

    SF to be stored (*)

    SF reprocessed (*)

    Enrichment

    Conversion

    Uranium Tails

    Natural

    Uranium

    (*) CAIN module calculates isotopic composition

    Fuel residence

    timesMOX

    30

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    30/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    30INFCIS (The Integrated Nuclear Fuel

    Cycle Information System) web site(http://wwwnfcis.iaea.org/).

    31

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    31/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    31

    NFCSS, Web Site, Background

    32

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    32/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    32

    NFCSS, Web Site, Description

    33

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    33/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    33

    NFCSS, Web Site, Modeling

    34

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    34/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    34

    NFCSS, Web Site, Example

    35

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    35/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    35

    NFCSS, Web Site, Calculation

    36

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    36/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    NFCSS, Web Site, Full Version

    37

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    37/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    NFCSS, Full Version, Program Operation

    Scenario Preparation

    1. Creating a New Scenario or Selecting Existing Scenario to work

    2. Selecting reactor and fuel types for the current scenario

    3. Editing scenario description

    4. Editing scenario data for each of the reactor and fuel types in the

    current scenario

    Calculations and Results

    5. Calculating isotopic compositions for each fuel type in each reactor

    type in the current scenario or providing isotopic composition table

    6. Calculating material flow for each reactor type in the current scenario

    7. Calculating overall material flow for all reactor types in the current

    scenario

    38

    O ll M i l Fl R l i T bl F

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    38/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011Material Flow Table

    Overall Material Flow Result in Table Form

    See result in

    chart

    39

    O ll M t i l Fl R lt i Di

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    39/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Material Flow Diagram

    Overall Material Flow Result in Diagram

    See result in chart

    Result year

    40

    NFCSS TECDOC

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    40/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    NFCSS, TECDOC

    41

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    41/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Code was successfully used for modelling of

    the NES selected for GAINS Code had to further elaborate its capacities

    and update its databases to perform the

    study

    NFCSS application in IAEA INPRO/GAINS study

    42

    IAEA D t b R l t d t th N l F l C l

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    42/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Member States

    (Contact Points)

    Consultants

    IAEA Meetings

    Reliable

    Publications

    Information

    Sources

    http://www-nfcis.iaea.org

    Navigation through

    facilities/deposits/records

    Search capabilities

    Summary reports for country specific

    or worldwide

    Country nuclear fuel cycle profiles

    Long term nuclear fuel cycle

    requirements for different scenarios

    Nuclear power

    projections

    Nuclear fuelcycle options

    Reactor physics

    calculations

    Inputs

    NFCIS : Nuclear Fuel Cycle Information System

    UDEPO : World Distribution of Uranium Deposits

    PIE : Post Irradiation Examination Facilities Database

    NFCSS : Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System

    MADB : Minor Actinide Property Database (in preparation)

    IAEA Databases Related to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

    43MESSAGE capabilities

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    43/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    MESSAGE capabilities

    for modelling of NE scenariosBased on Material of Planning and Economic Studies Section

    Department of Nuclear Energy

    International Atomic Energy Agency

    Once-through nuclear fuel cycle;

    Partly closed NFC based on thermal reactors withplutonium mono-recycling ;

    Closed NFC based on thermal and fast reactors with Pu

    multirecycling

    44Global Nuclear Energy System based on

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    44/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    LWR and HWR with once-through

    nuclear fuel cycle.

    The reactors and fuelsto be consideredare:

    HWR using naturaluranium fuel;

    LWR using UOXfuel,

    ALWR using UOX fuel.Fabrication

    HWR

    Dep U

    Enrichmentplant

    Conversion U

    FabricationLWR fuel

    LWR

    HWR SF

    LWR SF

    HWR

    Conversion U

    Enrichmentplant

    FabricationALWR fuel

    ALWR ALWR SFConversion U

    FabricationHWR

    Dep U

    Enrichmentplant

    Conversion U

    FabricationLWR fuel

    LWR

    HWR SF

    LWR SF

    HWR

    Conversion U

    Enrichmentplant

    FabricationALWR fuel

    ALWR ALWR SFConversion U

    MESSAGE energy chain of NES

    45Demand structure

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    45/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Demand structure

    46Mass flow MESSAGE outputs for open fuel cycle

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    46/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Mass flow MESSAGE outputs for open fuel cycle

    Natural uranium consumption (file cumNatU)Fresh fuel requirements (file FF)

    SWU consumption (file SWU)Spent nuclear fuel in storages (file SF)

    47Economic results of MESSAGE modelling for

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    47/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Economic results of MESSAGE modelling for

    once-through fuel cycle

    Annual Investments inNPP

    Annual expenditure onFuel Cycle and annualexpenditure on O&M ofNPP

    LUAC&LUOM (LevelizedUnit Amortization Cost andLevelized Unit Operationand Maintenance cost.)

    48Global Nuclear Energy System based on LWR

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    48/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    and HWR with partly closed nuclear fuel cycle

    Rep U

    Pu UMA

    FP

    LWR MOXSF

    LWR_MOX

    FabricationHWR fuel

    FabricationLWR MOXfuel

    Dep U

    Enrichmentplant

    Conversion U

    Fabrication

    LWR fuel LWR&

    HWR SF

    LWR SF

    HWR

    LWR MOXReprocessing

    plant

    Conversion U LWRReprocessing

    plant

    Pu

    HWR using natural uranium fuel;

    LWR using UOX fuel,LWR using UOX and MOX fuels.

    49Mass flow MESSAGE outputs for partly closed

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    49/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    fuel cycle

    Nuclearelectricity

    generationstructure

    Fresh fuel

    requirements Natural uranium

    consumption

    Reprocessingrequirements

    50Economic results of MESSAGE modelling for

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    50/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    g

    partly closed fuel cycle

    Annual Investments inNPP

    Annual expenditure onFuel Cycle and annualexpenditure on O&M of

    NPP LUAC&LUOM (LevelizedUnit Amortization Costand Levelized Unit

    Operation andMaintenance cost.)

    51

    Global Nuclear Energy System based on thermal and fast

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    51/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Global Nuclear Energy System based on thermal and fast

    reactors with recycling of Pu recovered from LWR andmultiple recycling of Pu recovered from FRs

    Rep U

    Pu

    U

    MAFP

    Pu loses

    FR_MOX&blSFFR_MOX

    FabricationHWR

    Fabrication bl.Fuel

    Dep U

    Enrichmentplant

    Conversion U

    FabricationLWR&ALWR

    fuel

    ALWR

    HWR SF

    LWR SF

    HWR

    FR&blReprocessing

    plant

    Conversion U LWRReprocessing

    plant

    Pu

    FabricationMOX Fuels

    LWR

    ALWR SF

    Rep U

    Pu

    U

    MAFP

    Pu loses

    FR_MOX&blSFFR_MOX

    FabricationHWR

    Fabrication bl.Fuel

    Dep U

    Enrichmentplant

    Conversion U

    FabricationLWR&ALWR

    fuel

    ALWR

    HWR SF

    LWR SF

    HWR

    FR&blReprocessing

    plant

    Conversion U LWRReprocessing

    plant

    Pu

    FabricationMOX Fuels

    LWR

    ALWR SF

    HWR using natural uranium fuel;LWR using UOX fuel,ALWR using UOX fuel.FR using MOX fuels for core and depleted uranium for blankets.

    52Selected MESSAGE outputs for closed fuel cycle

    i h l i l i li

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    52/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Fresh fuel requirements;Enrichment requirements;Nuclear electricity generation structure; Natural uranium consumption;

    with plutonium multi-recycling

    Reprocessing requirements;Spent fuel accumulation.Annual Investments in NPP and FC

    Annual expenditure on Fuel Cycle and annual expenditure on O&M of NPP

    53MESSAGE materials: Users Guide for ModellingN l E S t ith MESSAGE

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    53/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Nuclear Energy Systems with MESSAGE

    (Draft)

    Users Guide provides a step-by-step guidance tocreate mathematical models representing nuclear

    energy systems to the level of detail as necessary.

    The User Guide presents three demonstrationcases including modelling a nuclear energy systembased on thermal and fast reactors with fully closed

    fuel cycle.

    54GAINS Fuel Cycle Options modelled with

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    54/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    MESSAGE

    BAU, Business as usual : NES based on thermal reactors with once-through nuclear fuel cycle (OT-NFC) without spent fuel reprocessing;

    FR Introduction in BAU: NES based on thermal and fast reactors withinclusion of plutonium multi-recycling in fast reactors (BR ~1.0, ) withmixed oxide fuels;

    FR12 Introduction in BAU:NES based on thermal and fast reactorswith inclusion of plutonium multi-recycling in fast reactors (BR ~1.2, )with mixed oxide fuels

    FRMA Introduction in BAU:NES based on thermal and fast reactorswith inclusion of plutonium and MA multi-recycling in fast reactors (BR~1.2, ) with MOX&MA fuels

    Th Introduction in BAU:Thorium Fuel Cycle based on Thermal andFast Reactors with spent fuel reprocessing and Pu/U233 recycling

    MSR IntroductionFuel continuous feeding and discharge(reprocessed)One half of the fuel in the core, while the second one out of the coreFeeding fuel - Np, Am and Cm from LWR, ALWR and FR spent fuelv

    55Analysis of Other NES Issues with MESSAGE

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    55/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Non-geographicalgroup model

    Conversion

    SFEnrichm

    entplant

    De

    p

    U

    Fabrication

    plant

    TR

    U

    OX

    Separeted

    Pu

    MA,

    FP

    FR

    Fabrication

    plantM

    OX

    Conversion

    SF

    Reprocessin

    gplant

    Enrichmentpla

    nt

    De

    p

    U

    Fabrica

    tionplant

    TR

    UOX

    Convers

    ion

    SFEn

    richmentpl

    ant

    Dep

    U

    Fa

    bricationplant

    TR

    UOX

    SeparatedPu

    MA, FP

    FR

    Fabricationplant

    MOX

    Conversion

    SF

    Reprocessingplant

    Enrichment

    plant

    Dep U

    Fabricationplant TR UOX

    ConversionSF

    Enrichmentplant

    Dep U

    Fabricationplant

    TR UOX

    FR

    RD&D cost in

    transition to aNES CNFC-FR

    56

    Summary

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    56/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    y

    MESSAGE model has capability for simulation and optimization of : Nuclear Energy System based on LWR and HWR with once-

    through nuclear fuel cycle,

    Nuclear Energy System based on thermal and fast reactorswith Pu multi-recycling

    scenarios with the introduction of MSR systems, scenarios based on Thorium Nuclear Fuel Cycle,

    Global and Non-geographical group approach, RD&D cost for introduction of innovative reactor technology

    It allows to assess: Optimal Schedule for introduction various reactor technologies

    and fuel cycle options Infrastructure facilities Nuclear material flows and wastes Investments, RD&D and other costs

    57

    Application of IAEA modelling codes for INPRO

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    57/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Preliminary computer analysis of scenarios by usingDESAE , MESSAGE and NFCSS codes No single tool can be expected to respond well to all modelling requirements for NES

    assessment. Various models can be used as a package for assessment purposes. DESAE&NFCSS&MESSAGE can be linked and used in tandem to perform some relevant

    analysis required for NES assessment.

    The same NES can be modelled with DESAE&NFCSS&MESSAGE codes in order to usestrengths of each code and obtained necessary results for NES assessment.

    Evaluation of the tools

    DESAE, MESSAGE, NFCSS for modelling scenarios identified inJS, GAINS, FINITE, ThFC collaboration projects.

    Application of IAEA modelling codes for INPRO

    assessment studies

    58

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    58/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    Thank you for your attention

    www.IAEA.org/INPRO

    59Brief code information

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    59/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    NFCSS MESSAGE DESAE

    Software Availability To interested people fromIAEA MS upon a

    registration andauthorization at the sitehttp://www-nfcis.iaea.org.

    Via Responsible officer(below) Via Responsible officer(below)

    Responsible officer Tulsides Harikrishnan

    Nucl. Fuel Cycle &Materials Section/NEFWTel.: +43 1 2600-22758E-mail:

    [email protected]://www-nfcis.iaea.org

    Jalal Ahmed Irej

    Department of NuclearEnergyPlanning & EconomicStudies Section

    Telephone: (+431)2600-222780E-mail: [email protected]

    Peter Gowin

    INPRO group,Division of Nuclear Power,NETel.: +43 1 2600-22848

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Manual IAEA TECDOC 1535 Manual Within the modelsoftware

    Manual ( working material)

    Training Yes (regular) Yes (regular) Yes (on request)

    Tutorial/Demo cases Yes Distance Learning Packagetogether with Demo Cases

    Yes

    Familiarization/ Casecreation time

    One week Two weeks for training and3-4 months for a real casestudy

    One-Two weeks

    Flexibility for case creation Middle Very High Middle

    Optimisation capabilities No (variant simulation) Yes No (variant simulation)

    60

    DESAE code in INPRO methodology

  • 7/22/2019 Nuclear Energy Planning

    60/60

    WS NESA Kazakhstan, 2011

    gy

    Economics

    Environment

    Safety

    Proliferation

    Resistance

    Infrastructure

    Investments NPP&NFC,

    current prise,

    discounting cost

    Uranium consumption,

    Spent fuel, Isotopes quantity,

    Waste activity, Minor actinide

    quantity & activity

    Recycling fuel quantity, Pu&U3 in

    spent fuel,

    Pu&U3 after recycling, SWU

    quantity

    WasteManagement

    Expert place