nursing chronotherapeutics: a conceptual framework

6
Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework Una E. Westfall Nurses frequently make decisions about when treatments and actions are performed. The nursing concern driving this review is the timing of nursing activities to optimize desired and minimize untoward effects. A nursing conceptual framework is proposed that highlights individual and environmental factors, as they relate to rhythmic responses, as well as places within the framework for nursing actions based on customary and usual temporal patterns. [Keywords: clinical decision making; conceptslconstructsrelated to health] t herapeutics are assisting measures taken with, or on behalf of, patients and significant others to manage and reduce effects of illness and to improve and promote health and health-relatedbehaviors (Clinical Therapeu- T tics Task Force, 1988). Nursing therapeutics are assist- ing measures for which nurses have decision and action respon- sibilities. Determining the time for an activity often is a nursing responsibility because nurses frequently sequence, implement or ensure that actions are carried out. Thus, temporal placement or timing- of measures can be viewed as a nursing therapeutic. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for timing as a nursing clinical therapeutic by: 1) clarifying characteristics of rhythms; 2) exploring timing as a clinical therapeutic; and 3) proposing a nursing chronotherapeutic conceptual framework. Rhythms Predictable temporal patterns are ubiquitous, as exemplified by the passage of days, the ebb and flow of tides, and the changing seasons of the year. A rhythm is "a sequence of events ... that repeats (itself) through time in the same order and at the same interval" (Minors & Waterhouse, 1981, p. 321). When a rhythm originateswithin an organism, it is said to be endogenous or self- initiated. * * Peak Time Peak ~- Figure 1 : Schematic of rhythmic characteristics. Rhythms have common characteristics depicted in Figure 1. They can span different periods or time intervals. A common period is close to but not exactly 24 hours. Such rhythms of -24 Una E. Westfall, RN, PhD, Beta Psi, is Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University. The author thanks Linda Felver, RN, PhD and Susan Woods, RN, PhD for their contributions to the early development of ideas expressed here. Correspondence to Department of Adult Health and Illness Nursing, L-456, School of Nursing, Oregon Health SciencesUniversity, 3181 SWSamJackson ParkRoad, Portland,OR97201- 3098. Accepted for publication January 15, 1992. IMAGE: lournal of Nursing Scholarship. Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992 307

Upload: una-e-westfall

Post on 26-Sep-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework Una E. Westfall

Nurses frequently make decisions about when treatments and actions are performed. The nursing concern driving this review is the timing of nursing activities to optimize desired and minimize untoward effects. A nursing conceptual framework is proposed that highlights individual and environmental factors, as they relate to rhythmic responses, as well as places within the framework for nursing actions based on customary and usual temporal patterns.

[Keywords: clinical decision making; conceptslconstructs related to health]

t

herapeutics are assisting measures taken with, or on behalf of, patients and significant others to manage and reduce effects of illness and to improve and promote health and health-related behaviors (Clinical Therapeu- T tics Task Force, 1988). Nursing therapeutics are assist-

ing measures for which nurses have decision and action respon- sibilities. Determining the time for an activity often is a nursing responsibility because nurses frequently sequence, implement or ensure that actions are carried out. Thus, temporal placement or timing- of measures can be viewed as a nursing therapeutic.

This paper proposes a conceptual framework for timing as a nursing clinical therapeutic by: 1) clarifying characteristics of rhythms; 2) exploring timing as a clinical therapeutic; and 3) proposing a nursing chronotherapeutic conceptual framework.

Rhythms

Predictable temporal patterns are ubiquitous, as exemplified by the passage of days, the ebb and flow of tides, and the changing seasons of the year. A rhythm is "a sequence of events ... that repeats (itself) through time in the same order and at the same interval" (Minors & Waterhouse, 1981, p. 321). When a rhythm originates within an organism, it is said to be endogenous or self- initiated.

* *

Peak Time Peak

~-

Figure 1 : Schematic of rhythmic characteristics.

Rhythms have common characteristics depicted in Figure 1. They can span different periods or time intervals. A common period is close to but not exactly 24 hours. Such rhythms of -24

Una E. Westfall, RN, PhD, Beta Psi, i s Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University. The author thanks Linda Felver, RN, PhD and Susan Woods, RN, PhD for their contributions to the early development of ideas expressed here. Correspondence to Department of Adult Health and Illness Nursing, L-456, School of Nursing, Oregon Health SciencesUniversity, 3181 SWSamJackson ParkRoad, Portland,OR97201- 3098.

Accepted for publication January 15, 1992.

IMAGE: lournal of Nursing Scholarship. Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992 307

Page 2: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

hours (24+4) are called circadian (circa-about, &is-day); when less than 20 hours, ultradian; when longer than28 hours, infradian. Infradian rhythms may include such time frames as multiple days (e.g., a week), a month or a year.

In addition to period length, single rhythms display features of amplitude (magnitude of peak to trough [nadir] difference), peak time (when the crest or maximum value occurs, usually given in clock hours or a reference point such as midsleep, or hours after light on); level or mean (average or midpoint value of the period) and waveform (graphic composite of peak time, period, slope of ascending and descending curves, and amplitude that depicts progression from any given point to the next point characterized by the same phase).

The rhythmic quality of “phase” can be used to describe temporal relationships among two or more rhythms (Minor & Waterhouse, 198 1). There may be reference to rhythms being “in phase” with one another. Internal synchronization of rhythms by the body’s timekeeping system is the usual condition. An ex- ample of such a relationship is that of circadian rhythms of rest (sleep)-activity and growth hormone in adults. Normally, growth hormone plasma levels rise sharply and peak early in the sleep portion of the sleep-activity cycle. When there is time displace- ment of one rhythm, there can be transient desynchronization among other rhythms. Some rhythms are able to adjust to environmental cues more quickly than others. For example, when rest-activity, temperature and urinary excretion of sodiumrhythms were compared in humans following a time shift, rest-activity adjusted more quickly then temperature, and temperature more quickly than urinary sodium excretion (Wever, 1979). When subjects experienced a six hour phase-advance (comparable to traveling west to east across six time zones), partial entrainment with environmental cues took -3 days for rest-activity rhythm; -4 days, temperature; and -7 days, urinary sodium excretion. More detailed presentations of rhythmic phenomena are avail- able (Arendt, Minors & Waterhouse, 1989; Minors & Waterhouse, 1981; Moore-Ede, Sulzman & Fuller, 1982).

Clinical Therapeutic: Timing

Timing focuses on the question of when an action will provide its optimal benefit or cause the least harmful impact. Living organisms are not homostatic, i.e., the same or constant. If physiology varies predictably over a time period, then the individual can be said to be biologically different at different times within the period (Folk, 1974; Halberg, et al, 1973; Moore- Ede et al., 1982). Reactions may be anticipated to be different when the same stimuli are introduced at different times of the day. Much temporal pattern research has been conducted with animals (especially rodents), in part to control for environmental stimuli and to gain access to tissues. Halberg and co-workers (as reported in Reinberg, 1967) exposed rodents to various noxious agents, including E. coli and ouabain. When the same amount of each agent was given at different times during a 24-hour period, mortality rates differed dramatically. These rates ranged from <10 percent to >70 percent with E. coli exposure (<lo percent when given during late activity hours) and 15 percent to 75 percent for ouabain (15 percent when given during early activity

phase). The only difference was in the clock hour, or time, of exposure.

In a study with five healthy males, Moore-Ede, Meguid, Fitzpatrick, Boyden & Ball (1978) infused the same dose of intravenous potassium at noon and at midnight. The plasma potassium concentration was found to be 40 percent higher following the midnight dose than after the noon dose. More recently, in patients with constant heparin infusion rates, acti- vated partial thromboplastin and thrombin time values differed by as much as -50 percent and 60 percent respectively between specimens drawn at night and in the morning (Decousus et al., 1985). The role that rhythms play in health and disease has yet to be clearly determined; however, there is evidence to support the view that there are times within biological rhythmic cycles when an individual’s vulnerability and resistance fluctuate (Hrushesky, 1983; Reinberg, 1967).

Conceptual Framework: Nursing Chronotherapeutic Model

To examine timing as a nursing therapeutic, a proposed nursing chronotherapeutic model has been adapted from work by Heitkemper and Shaver (1989) and presented in Figure 2.

Nur,infi.2rlt(inito: 0 * Alter c ti<%

EndogenousRhydrms fxiemalhv. Intemalbv. Sensory Receptorb) lnternd Pacernaker(s) Light: Dark Neural Pathways Food Availability Periodic:Predidive Age Time (Eating: Fasting) Other Biologic Rhythms aronotvpe K q i n g Social Ecology *Rangeoffrequencies

SVStem Temperature 4mmdary 1 Aperiodic: Readbe

Atmospheric Responses tostimuli Pressure Geomagnetic Field

Individual Responses: I Overt Rhythm(s)

phvsioloai RhVthmK Behavioral Experiential dh hms Y

a *Resistance * Susceptibilty

Figure 2: Proposed Nursing Chronotherapeutic Model

308 IMAGE:lournalofNursingScholarship* Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992

Page 3: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

In this model, individual factors and environmental cues lead to individual responses, some of which are overt rhythms. It is these rhythmic responses that are phenomena of nursing concern (ANA, 1980), and are categorized as physiologic, pathologic, behavioral, and experiential. Within the framework proposed, places are highlighted for the nursing therapeutic of timing. Nursing actions can be linked to selected environmental cues and to overt rhythmic responses, and less directly to individual factors.

Individual Factors Individual factors are endogenous to the organism and in this

model include rhythms, sensory receptors, internal pacemakers (time clocks), neural pathways, age and chronotype.

Endogenous Rhythms: An endogenous rhythm, or the endog- enous component of an overt rhythm (sometimes referred to as periodicity), exists independent of environmental factors, but can be synchronized by an internal time-keeping system. The endogenous component ensures that under constant environmen- tal conditions, period-predictable fluctuations continue. When a self-generated and self-maintained rhythmic period is not iden- tical to that of environmental cues (e.g., 24 hours), the rhythm is said to be free-running. These rhythms, however, can be influ- enced by the environment.

Sensory Receptor: Sensory receptor integrity and intact affer- ent pathways are necessary for environmental input. Some receptors with their accessory structures can be adjusted to enhance or decrease input. Ways in which this can be done include adding or removing eye glasses and patches, removing or replacing hearing aids and cleansing the mouth of any coating interfering with taste buds.

Internal Pacemakerfs): Considerable research have been di- rected toward identifying and tracing the body’s internal time- keeping system. The best documented location of one (not the only) time-keeping center is the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), paired clusters of cell bodies located in the anterior hypothala- mus, just distal to the optic chiasm. Disruption of locomotion, rest-activity, sleep (particularly slow wave type), drinking and feeding rhythms have been reported following bilateral SCN destruction (Czeisler, Richardson, Zimmerman, Moore-Ede & Weitzman, 1981; Hobson & Steriade, 1986; Krieger, 1980; Moore-Ede et al., 1982; Nishio, Shiosaka, Nagakawa, Sukumoto & Satch, 1979; Rodieck, 1979).

It is posited that projections or neurotransmitter substances from the SCN, or both, act as timing messengers to distant receptor sites active in various endogenous rhythms. Such cen- ters and communication links are proposed as part of the timekeeping system. Researchers are now exploring components of this system.

Age: A review of changes in aging noted differences in some rhythms (Casale & deNicola, 1984). In an older population, rhythms amplitudes often were decreased, and period length, shorter or more labile.

Chronotype: This word refers to the characteristic of morningness-eveningness-type (Kerkhof, 1985). Other terms used include “early birds” and “night owls.” Horne and Ostberg (1976, 1977) generated a tool to measure an individual’s

IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship- Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992

propensity toward being a “morning-” or “evening-” type. Temporal pattern differences have been reported for measured rhythms such as temperature, activity, and salivary cortisol values, with “morning-type’’ individuals manifesting earlier peak levels than persons rating themselves as “evening-type.’’ Such findings support chronotype as a factor in periodicity.

Environmental Cues Multiple environmental fluctuations exist external to the indi-

vidual. In this proposed model, environmental cues also may be external to the body’s time-keeping system but part of the individual’s internal environment.

Recall that endogenous rhythms can be influenced, but are not generated, by the environment. When an environmental cue “captures” the endogenous rhythm period length ( e g , from -24 to exactly 24 hours), the cue is called a zeitgeber (zeit-time, geber-giver), a synchronizer, or an entraining agent (Aschoff, Fatranska Giedke, Coerr, Stamm & Wisser, 1971; Halberg & Lee, 1974; Reinberg & Smolensky, 1983). These roughly equiva- lent terms refer both to initiating and maintaining a coalescing between environmental cues and corresponding endogenous rhythms. Because of environmental richness, few experimental human studies have successfully tested for a single environmen- tal cue; however, exploration of environmental links with endo- genous rhythms have been pursued with animals.

External Environmental Fluctuations Studied environmental aspects include such recurring events

as light-dark (light-dusk-dark-dawn) (Czeisler et al., 198 1 ; Czeisler et al., 1989; Moore-Ede et al., 1982; Reinberg & Smolensky, 1983; Wilkinson, Shinsako & Dallman, 1979), noise-quiet (Moore- Ede et al., 1982; Reinberg & Smolensky, 1983; Wever, 1979), food availability-nonavailability (Moore-Ede et al., 1982; Moore- Ede, 1986; Stevenson, Day & Sitren, 1979; Stevenson, Sitren & Furuya, 1980) as well as temperature (Moore-Ede et al., 1982; Reinberg & Smolensky, 1983) atmospheric pressure (Moore- Ede et al., 1982), electromagnetic field differences (Wever, 1970) and social interactions (Aschoff et al., 1971; Halberg, Halberg, Barnum & Bittner, 1959; Wever, 1979), including activity and rest (sleep) phases.

Lighting cycles have been acknowledged as strong zeitgebers for animals and more recently, humans (Czeisler et al., 1989). In a thoughtful critique, Czeisler and colleagues (1981) raised issues about lighting cycles as a zeitgeber for humans. Subse- quently, in research with humans using a set lighting cycle and otherwise constant conditions (Czeisler et al., 1981), or bright light exposure (Czeisler et al., 1989) multiple rhythms including body temperature, bedrest-activity, and urine output were syn- chronized with lighting changes.

Both food and fluid (water) availability have been proposed as zeitgebers. Findings from animal studies do not support the simple presence of fluid as a zeitgeber for rhythms tested (Moore- Ede et al., 1982). There is, however, general agreement that restricted food availability can be a powerful zeitgeber (Scheving, 1976) for multiple rhythms in animals (Nelson, Scheving & Halberg, 1975; Phillippens, Von Mayersbach & Scheving, 1977; Sulzman, Fuller & Moore-Ede, 1977). Corresponding results

309

Page 4: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

with humans have yet to be determined, although with more accessibility to food, one may posit considerably less influence of this cue on human rhythms.

“Daily routine” or schedule (social ecology) is often cited as a powerful synchronizer for humans derived from early work by Halberg et al. (1959). The reported daily routine encompassed multiple sensory stimuli, including light, sound and temperature fluctuations, as well as social interactions. Wever (1979) also reported social cues as strong human zeitgebers. In his study, however, light fluctuations were coupled with the presence (or absence ) of a gong sound. Subjects were observed responding to the sound but not to the lighting change. The gong was interpreted as a link to the researcher, and thus a “social” cue. An alternative explanation for the response is that it was the sound itseg with or without a link to a person.

Stronger support for social ecology as a human zeitgeber may be found in rhythmic studies where groups were isolated. One such study was with seven women isolated in a cave “living as a group” for 14 days (Reinberg, 1971). Inside the cave, there were two tents; three women in one, and four in the other. Two separate temperature rhythms were found among the seven subjects. Women in one tent had a significantly different tem- perature peak time than the women in the second tent.

Other environmental fluctuations that have been explored, at least to a limited degree, include temperature (Moore-Ede et al., 1982), sound (Wever, 1979), atmospheric pressure and geomag- netic fields (Wever, 1970, 1979). Results to date support the position that if these elements do exert a synchronizing effect, it is modest at best. Species-specific responses may also enter the picture.

Methodological problems have plagued several studies seek- ing to characterize temporal patterns, necessitating cautious interpretation of reported findings. Such problems include statis- tical analysis methods used, sample sizes, species differences and a “constant environment.” To determine which particular zeitgebers, alone or in combinations, can entrain specific human rhythms, precise separation and testing would be needed. To date environmental cues have been isolated, adjusted, and main- tained mainly in laboratories and with multiple animal species. Separate human testing of many of these cues, including geo- magnetic fields and atmospheric pressure-pose unique chal- lenges. Coalescing of rhythms with selected environmental cues has been reported, although the evidence with humans is vari- able.

Internal Environmental Conditions In the model, additional environmental cues are posited to

exist within the individual, but outside the time-keeping system. Gender has been included as an internal environmental condi-

tion because of hormonal differences. Wever (1984) measured sleep-wake and temperature rhythms in 33 subjects (12 female and 21 male) and found measurable differences in the sleep- wake rhythm by gender, with women demonstrating shorter intrinsic sleep-wake rhythms than men. However no differences were found in intrinsic temperature rhythms.

Folk (1974) and later Moore-Ede (1986) proposed that bio- logical rhythms serve an adaptive purpose. Such rhythms act as

corrective responses to cyclic environmental changes. This anticipatory response has been called predictive, or periodic, homeostasis. Such homeostasis contrasts with responses to aperiodic environmental input, termed reactive homeostasis (Moore-Ede, 1986).

Predictive responses: Multiple rhythms with temporal rela- tionships exist within an individual. Wilkinson (1989) proposed that several physiological oscillatory factors influence biologi- cal rhythms. Rhythmic fluctuations in properties such as levels of substances, responsiveness, or receptor concentration could contribute to enhancing or minimizing the ability to react. One of many examples can be found in the adrenal cortex. The adrenal gland has been found to vary in its responsiveness to plasma ACTH levels during the course of a day (Dallman, Akana, Cascio, Darlington, Jacobson & Levin, 1987; Dallman, Engeland, Rose, Wilkinson, Shinsako & Siedenburg, 1978).

Reactive responses: Reactive responses occur following envi- ronmental changes and encompass a wide range of mechanisms activated to attain or maintain viable equilibrium (Moore-Ede, 1986). It is possible that reactive responses may “mask” a smaller, basal endogenous rhythm. Whether or not the endog- enous rhythm continues to oscillate during the time of reactive response is only now being explored.

Environmental Influences

Individual factors and environmental cues have been pre- sented separately; however, the two merge through a time- keeping system, leading to individual responses manifested by measurable overt rhythms. Within their range of entrainment, rhythms can be modified by environmental cues. Findings from animal studies support the position that different rhythms have different ranges of entrainment and points beyond which rhythms do not remain coupled to environmental cues (Moore-Ede et al., 1982). In one set of experiments, activity rhythms remained synchronized with light-dark phases until the period length dropped to 20 hours. Then, activity rhythms began to free-run.

In contrast to endogenous rhythms, environmental cyclic fluctuations may produce responses that are predictable, but not self-initiated. An example of such responses is the postprandial increases in plasma glucose and insulin levels following food intake. If food is ingested on a regular schedule, the marked plasma glucose and insulin values rise on a regular basis; however, when food is withheld, there is loss of this regularity and amplitude in plasma glucose and insulin levels. Interest- ingly, plasma insulin levels have been found to have an endog- enous rhythmic component (Bellinger, Mendel, & Moberg, 1975; Goodner et al., 1977). The greater influence from an exogenous caloric load, however, can obscure or overshadow this endogenous rhythm.

Individual Responses of Overt Rhythms Measured rhythmic responses may be categorized as physi-

ological, such as those found for blood glucocorticoids and insulin levels, heart rate, liver glycogen content and core body temperature; pathologic, such as jet lag, seasonal affective disorder, and phase shifting as well as tumor cell metabolism;

310 IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship- Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992

Page 5: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

behavioral, such as performance speed, error occurrence and oral behavior (smoking, eating, drinking actions); or experien- tial, such as hunger, mood, pain intensity and perception of time passage. Although endogenous rhythms in each of these catego- ries exist, such rhythms can be modified by exogenous environ- mental influences.

Nursing Actions

A person’s customary and current rhythms supply a base for nursing actions. Such actions are directed toward environmen- tal stimuli and overt rhythmic responses. Additionally, nurses assess individual factors.

Nurses can manipulate the environment, such as lighting cycles, to provide or strengthen zeitgebers consistent with an individual’s customary environment. Actions can also be taken to decrease extraneous environmental stimuli, espe- cially input likely to interfere with usual zeitgebers. In addi- tion, the nurse can act to decrease and prepare for aperiodic environmental stimuli. These measures can include such ac- tivities as closing or opening doors, reducing interruptions, controlling delays in scheduled care, and providing anticipa- tory sensory teaching about procedures and tests (Johnson, 1972; Johnson, Kirchhoff, & Endress, 1978). With this frame- work, there is the added perspective of when during a day such information and events would have maximal benefit.

Nursing therapeutic measures also direct planning actions based on knowledge of the individual’s customary and present rhythms. Though data gathering may not be a clinical thera- peutic per se, it provides information that can be used in modifying interventions to coincide with known customary and present rhythms. Assessment of rhythms may offer useful direction about individual periods of susceptibility or resis- tance in relation to prescribed treatments and activities. It is the adjustment of activities to match more closely the person’s rhythms that is the clinical therapeutic of interest here. From a nursing perspective, such adjustments would be directed toward establishing baseline fluctuations, maximizing times of resistance, and protecting the individual during times of susceptibility.

Nurses are responsible for assessing individual factors iden- tified in the framework. Such data gathering can enhance the nursing therapeutic of timing. For example, not knowing about the integrity of sensory systems, or if persons consider them- selves to be “morning-”or “evening-” type people, can inter- fere with individualizing nursing actions. Likewise, assessing customary environmental routines provides the basis for tak- ing action based on specialized knowledge of the individual.

In summary, this nursing chronotherapeutic model gives direction for nursing actions based on customary and current rhythms of the individual. Through such nursing activities, the concept of predictive homeostasis can be operationalized by selecting the time of actions to match or coincide with an already prepared response pattern. While much remains to be learned, it is clear that nurses are in a unique position to observe and enhance temporal patterns when caring for pa- tients. @&

References

American Nurses’ Association. (1980). Nursing: A social policy statement. Kansas City, MO: The Association.

Arendt, J.,Minors, D. & Waterhouse, J. (Eds.). (1989). Biological rhythmsin clinical practice, London, UK: Wright.

Aschoff, J., Fatranska, M., Giedke, H., Coerr, P., Stamm, D. & Wisser, H. (1971). Human circadian rhythms in continuous darkness: Entrainment by social cues. Science, 171,213-215.

Bellinger, L., Mendel, V. & Moberg, G. (1975). Circadian insulin, G.H., prolac- tin, corticosterone and glucose rhythms in fed and fasted rats. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 7, 132-135.

Casale, G. & deNicola, P. (1984). Circadian rhythms in the aged: A review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 3,267-284.

Clinical Therapeutics Task Force (1988). Report of the past year’s work on the clinical therapeutics field of study in the PhD program. Seattle: University of Washington, School of Nursing (unpublished)

Czeister, C.,Kronauer,R., AUan, J.,Duffy, J., Jewett,M.,Brown,E. &Ronda, J. (1989). Bright light induction of strong (Type 0) resetting of the human circadian pacemaker. Science, 244, 1328-1333.

Czeisler, C., Richardson, G., Zmmerman, J. Moore-Ede, M. & Weitzman,E. (1981). Entrainment of human circadian rhythms by light-dark cycles: A reassessment. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 34,239-247.

Dallman, M., Akana, S., Cascio, C., Darlington, D., Jacobson, L. & Levin, N. (1987). Regulation of ACTH secretion: Variations on a theme of B. Recent Progress in Hormone Research, 43, 113-173.

Dallman,M.,Engeland, W., Rose, J., Wilkinson, C., Shinsako, J. & Siedenburg, F. (1978). Nycthemeral rhythm in adrenal responsiveness to ACTH. American Journal of Physiology, 235, R210-R218.

Decousus, H., Croze, M., Levi, F., Jaubert, J., Perpoint, B., Bonadona, J., Reinberg, A. & Queneau, P. (1985). Circadian Changes in Anticoagulant Effect of Heparin Infused at a Constant Rate. British Medical Journal, 290,

Folk, G. (1974). Textbook of environmental physiology, 39-86, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

Goodner, C., Walike, B., Koerker, D., Ensenik, J., Brown, A., Chideckel, E., Palmer, J. & Kalnasy, L. (1977). Insulin, glucagon and glucose exhibit synchronous sustained oscillations in fasting monkeys. Science, 195, 177-179.

Halherg, F., Haus, E., Cardoso, S., Scheving, L., Kuhl, J., Shiotsuka, R., Rosene, G., Pauly, J., Runge, W., Spalding, J., Lee, J. & Good, R. (1973). Toward a chronotherapy of neoplasia: Tolerance of treatment depends upon host rhythms. Experientia, 29,909-934.

Halberg,F.,Halberg, E.,Bamum, C. & Bittner, J. (1959). Physiologic 24-hour periodicity in human beings and mice, the lighting regimen and daily routine. In R. Withrow (Ed.), Photoperiodism and related phenomena in plants and animals, 55,803-878, Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Ad- vancement of Science.

Halberg, F. & Lee, J. (1974). Glossary of selected chronobiologic terms. In L. Scheving, R. Halberg & J. Pauly (Eds.), Chronobiology, xxxvii-L, Tokyo: Igaku Shoin.

Heitkemper, M. & Shaver, J. (1989). Nursing research opportunities in enteral nutrition. Nursing Clinics of North America, 24,415-426.

Hobson, J. & Steriade, M. (1986). Neuronal basis of behavioral state control. In V. Mountcastle, R. Bloom, & S. Geiger (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: Section 1: The nervous system, Volume IV: Intrinsic regulatory systems of the brain, 705-710, Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.

Home, J. & Ostberg, 0. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine momingness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Jour- nal of Chronobiology, 4,97-I 10.

Home, J. & Ostberg, 0. (1977). Individual differences in human circadian rhythms. Biological Psychology, 5, 179-190.

Hrushesky, W. (1983). The clinical application of chronobiology to oncology. The American Journal of Anatomy, 168,5 19-542.

Johnson, J. (1972). Effects of structuring patient’s expectations on their reaction to threatening events. Nursing Research, 21, 499-503.

Johnson, J., Kirchhoff, K. & Endress, M. (1978). Altering children’s distress behavior during orthopedic cast removal. Nursing Research, 24,404-410.

Kerkhof, G. (1985). Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: A review. Biological Psychology, 20, 83-1 12.

341-344.

IMAGE: journal of Nursing Scholarship Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992 311

Page 6: Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Nursing Chronotherapeutics: A Conceptual Framework

Krieger, D. (1980). Ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus lesions abolish food- shifted circadian adrenal and temperature rhythmicity. Endocrinology, 106, 649-654.

Minors, D. & Waterhouse, J. (1981). Circadian rhythms and the human. Bristol, UK: Wright.PSG.

Moore-Ede, M. (1986). Physiology of the circadian timing system: Predictive versus reactive homeostasis. The American Journal of Physiology, 250, R737-R752.

Moore-Ede, M., Meguid, M., Fitzpatrick, G., Boyden, C. & Ball, M. (1978). Circadian variation in response to potassium infusion. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 23,218-227.

Moore-Ede, M., Sulzman, R. & Fuller, C. (1982). The clocks that time us. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Nelson, W., Scheving, L. & Halberg, F. (1975). Circadian rhythms in mice fed a single daily meal at different stages of lighting regimen. Journal of Nutrition, 105, 171-184.

Nishio, T. Shiosaka, S., Nagakawa, H., Sukumoto, T. & Satch, K. (1979). Circadian feeding rhythms after hypothalamic knife-cut isolating suprachiasmatic nucleus. Physiology and Behavior, 23,763-769.

Phillippens, K., Von Mayersbach, H., & Scheving, L. (1977). Effects of the scheduling of meal-feeding at different phases of the circadian system in rats. Journal of Nutrition, 107, 176-193.

Reinberg, A. (1967). The hours of changing responsiveness or susceptibility. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Autumn 11 , 11 1-128.

Reinberg, A. (197 1). Methodologic consideration for human chronobiology.

INTERCOLLEGIATE CENTER FOR NURSING EDUCATION

Spokw, Wuhingtom

Tenure Tmck Nursing Faculty PmiriortS available for August, 1993 at collsortim of Washington State University, Eastem Washington University, and whitworth college.The hedth-care hub of the lnland Northwest wilh 5 private gened hwpitals, a VA Medical Cm- ter, nearby Air Force hospital, regional state psychiatric hdlity, a ehildrm’s hospital, many long-term and community-bad health care agencies. Masters in Nursing and doctorate in ap- propriate field required.

Nursing Semce Admioktration Community H c d h Nursing

PsychistridMenW Hulth Nursing

The scenic community offers a wide variety of outQor activitis with lakes, woods, and ski ar- eas nearby. Additionally, Spokane’s m y cultural and public affairs program will appeal to nurses concerned with high quality of life. Housing is affordable. Send resume or mminatim postmarked by February I , 1993 to:

Search Commiaee Interwllegrate Center for Nursmg Education

W. 2917 Ft. Gmrge Wright Drive Spokane, WA 99204

(509) 326-7270

Woshrnglon Srole Un,verstfy IS on EO/AA employer and educator. Pmfrctedgmup members M en- couraged to apply.

Journal of Interdisciplinary Cycle Research, 2, 1-15.

York Springer-Verlag. Reinberg, A. & Smolensky, M. (1983). Biological rhythms and medicine. New

Rodiedq R (1979). Visual pathways. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2,193-225. Scheving, L. (1976). The dimension of time in biology and medicine-

chronobiology. Endeavour, 25,66-72. Stevenson,N.,Day,S. & Sitren, H. (1979). Circadian rhythmicity in rat intestinal

villus lengd~ and cell number. International Journal of Cluonobidogy, 6,l-12. Stevenson, N., Sitren, H. & Furuya, S. (1980). Circadian rhythmicity in several

small intestinal functions is independent of use of the intestine. American Journal of Physiology, 238, G203-G207.

Sufunan, R., Fuller, C. & Moore-Ede, M. (1977). Feeding time synchronizes primate circadian rhythms. Physiology and Behavior, 18,775-779.

Wever, R. (1970). The effects of electric fields on circadian rhythmicity in men. Life Sciences and Space Research, 8,177-187.

Wever, R. (1 979). The circadian system of man: Results of experiments under temporal isolation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wever, R. (1984). Sex differences in human circadian rhythms: Intrinsic periods and sleep fractions. Experientia, 40, 1226-1234.

Wilkinson, C., Shinsako, J. & Dallman, M. (1979). Daily rhythms in adrenal responsiveness to adrenocorticotropin are determined primarily by the time of feeding in the rat. Endocrinology, 104,350-359.

Wilkinson, C. (1989). Endocrine rhythms and the pineal gland. In H. Patton, A. Fuchs., B. HiIle., A. Scher, & R. Steiner (Eds.), Textbook of physiology (21st ed.), 1239-1261, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.

1 Rehabilitation

Nursing Foundation (RNF) is pleased to announce the availability of its annual grant that funds nursing research. Research proposals must address the clini- cal practice, educational, or administrative dimensions of rehabilitation nursing. Funding of up to $5,000 is available. The deadline for submission of proposals each year is April 1. Funding begins the follow- ing year for the proposal(s) selected.

For a grant application or further informa- tion, please contact RNF at the address below.

Rehabilitation Nursing Foundation 5700 Old Orchard Road, First Floor

Skokie, IL 60077-1057 708/966-3433

312 IMAGE: Journal ofNursing Scholarship. Volume 24, Number 4, Winter 1992