oakland city planning commission · 2011-10-27 · page -1- findings final . project findings,...

Page -1- Findings

FINAL

Project Findings, Conditions of Approval, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Case File No. ER 08-0005/PUD 08-186/TTM 8038/CMD 08-185 (Fruitvale Transit Village Project - Phase 2)

Note: At the public hearing on May 19, 2010, the Planning Commission approved minor

amendments to the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Residential Project Design Guidelines (prepared by HKIT Architects) dated April 23, 2010 (Attachment B to the Planning Commission

Staff Report dated May 19, 2010).

The amendments are shown in the Design Guidelines document in strikethrough and double underline text. The amended Design Guidelines are in the project file.

Modifications to these Conditions of Approval to reflect the amendments to the Design Guidelines

are also shown in double underline text.

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: The proposed project meets the required findings under CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, Oakland Planning Code Sections 17.140.080 (Planned Unit Development Criteria); Section 17.134.050 (Conditional Use Permit); and Section 16.08.030 (Tentative Tract Map findings). Required findings are shown in bold type below and are also contained within other sections of this report and the administrative record; explanations as to why these findings can be made are in normal type. CEQA Findings for Certification of EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15090) 1. That the Draft EIR was prepared by the City of Oakland as the Lead Agency, was properly circulated

for public review and comment for 45 days, was independently reviewed and analyzed by the City Planning Commission, and reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission.

2. That the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA. The Final EIR was presented and properly circulated, independently reviewed and analyzed by the City Planning Commission and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. That such independent judgment is based on review and consideration of the information contained in the Final EIR and on substantial evidence in the record (even though there may be differences between or among the different sources of information and opinions offered in the documents, testimony, public comments and such responses that make up the Final EIR and the administrative record as a whole). That the Planning Commission recognizes that the Final EIR contains certain additions, clarifications, modifications or other revisions (as the result of the public review and comments on the Draft EIR, public agency responses to those comments, and refinements to the project description), but that such work does not present significant new information requiring re-circulation of the Draft EIR. That such information, revisions and additional data do not include any new significant environmental impacts that would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure and that they do not reflect any substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impact, nor do they propose any additional feasible project alternative or mitigation measure that is materially different from others previously analyzed that would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project that has not been adopted. Thus, no recirculation of the Draft EIR is required. No information indicates that the Draft EIR was inadequate or conclusory or that the public was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to review and comment on the Draft EIR.

3. The Final EIR and its findings and conclusions are adopted by the City Planning Commission as its source of environmental information, except where otherwise expressly stated; and that the Final EIR is legally adequate and was completed in compliance with CEQA and the City’s Environmental Review

Page -2- Findings

Regulations.

CEQA Findings for Project Approval (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091-15093) Environmental Impacts 5. That the Final EIR identifies all potential significant adverse environmental impacts and feasible

mitigation measures and/or standard conditions of approval that would reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. All of the mitigation measures and/or standard conditions of approval identified in the Draft and Final EIR, as they may have been modified, and again in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, will be adopted and implemented as conditions of approval for the Project. That three significant and unavoidable impacts remain as follows:

a. Construction of the proposed project would cause an increase in the overall intersection average delay by more than two seconds during the AM and PM peak hours at the San Leandro Street / High Street intersection, which would operate at LOS F under 2035 Baseline conditions. The addition of project traffic also would cause an increase in the average delay during the PM peak hour by more than four seconds for the critical northbound (High Street) through movement (Impact TRANS-18)

b. Construction of the proposed project would contribute to 2015 and 2035 changes to traffic conditions on the regional and local roadways (Impacts TRANS-21 and TRANS-22)

For these impacts, a statement of overriding considerations will be adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093.

6. That the approval of project complies with CEQA; and that the Final EIR was presented to the City Planning Commission, which reviewed and considered the information contained therein prior to acting on any of the development approvals for the project.

7. That the Initial Study included as Appendix A in the Draft EIR evaluated the proposed project and found, after an initial review, the following impacts to the following topic areas be less than significant:

a. Aesthetics

b. Agricultural Resources

c. Biological Resources

d. Cultural Resources

e. Geology/Soils

f. Hazards/Hazardous Materials

g. Hydrology/Water Quality

h. Land Use/Planning

i. Mineral Resources

j. Population/Housing

k. Public Services/Recreation

l. Utilities/Service Systems

All the reasons stated in the DEIR, as well as the responses to comments in the FEIR, as to why the foregoing impacts are less than significant are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

8. The EIR evaluated the proposed project and identified significant potential adverse impacts in the following environmental categories: Air Quality, Noise, and Transportation/Traffic. The EIR found

Page -3- Findings

that there would be less than significant environmental impacts associated with many of these categories. All the reasons stated in the DEIR, as well as the responses to comments in the FEIR, as to why many of the foregoing impacts are less than significant are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

As detailed below, the EIR also recommends mitigation measures and/or standard conditions of approval that, if implemented, would avoid or reduce some of the identified significant effects to less-than-significant levels. These measures/conditions are included within the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and these measures are incorporated into the Conditions of Approval.

a. Significant but Mitigable Impacts

i. Air Quality. The proposed project could result in exposure of persons to substantial levels of Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) which may result in adverse health effects (Impact AIR-4). This impact is significant during construction under proposed BAAQMD Thresholds only. Mitigation Measure AIR-4 requires the project applicant and its contractors to develop a plan demonstrating that the equipment to be used during construction of the project would achieve reductions in Toxic Air Contaminants, which will reduce the impact to Less-Than-Significant Levels.

ii. Noise. Noise impacts from construction activities, the impacts to future residents of placing residential uses in close proximity to a noisy environment, and exposing sensitive residential uses to ground-borne vibration from trains were all identified as Significant Impacts (Impacts NOI-1, NOI-2, and NOI-4). However, compliance with the City’s Standard Conditions of Approval will reduce the impacts to Less-Than-Significant Levels.

iii. Transportation, Circulation, and Parking. The project will impact several adjacent and nearby intersections and turning movements that currently operate at unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) or that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) in the future (Impacts TRANS-1 to TRANS-17, TRANS-19). Modifying signal timing, installing signal modifications, restriping lanes, and other physical improvements have been identified in Mitigations Measures TRANS-1 to TRANS-17, TRANS-19) that will reduce the impacts to Less-Than-Significant Levels.

The identified mitigation measures contained in the DEIR and FEIR, as they may be revised, would, for the reasons stated in the DEIR and/or FEIR, reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. The detailed reasons and analysis contained in the DEIR and FEIR are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

b. Significant Unavoidable Impacts

iv. Construction of the proposed project would cause an increase in the overall intersection average delay by more than two seconds during the AM and PM peak hours at the San Leandro Street / High Street intersection, which would operate at LOS F under 2035 Baseline conditions. The addition of project traffic also would cause an increase in the average delay during the PM peak hour by more than four seconds for the critical northbound (High Street) through movement (Impact TRANS-18). No feasible mitigation measure was identified to reduce the project impact to a Less-Than-Significant Level.

v. Construction of the proposed project would contribute to 2015 and 2035 changes to traffic conditions on the regional and local roadways (Impacts TRANS-21 and TRANS-22). Mitigation of the project’s significant impact on eastbound San Leandro Street west of 35th Avenue or west of High Street is not feasible. An additional lane on eastbound San Leandro Street would require removal of the parking lane or widening of San Leandro Street. However, such measures are

Page -4- Findings

considered infeasible due to physical constraints caused by on-street parking demand and existing right-of-way. No feasible mitigation measures were identified to reduce these impacts to a Less-Than-Significant Level.

Rejection of Alternatives as Infeasible 9. That the FEIR identified a reasonable range of project alternatives. The DEIR identified six

alternatives to the proposed project, two of which were initially rejected as infeasible for the reasons stated on pages 5-22 to 5-25 of the DEIR. Such detailed reasons and analysis contained in the DEIR and FEIR are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Those infeasible alternatives are the Higher Density Alternative and the Mixed Use with Commercial Alternative. The potentially feasible alternatives analyzed in detail in the DEIR represent a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that reduce one or more significant impacts of the project, as follows:

a. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative

b. Alternative 2.1: Lower Density Alternatives (25% and 50% lower density)

c. Alternative 2.2: Lower Density Alternative (80% lower density)

d. Alternative 3: Open Space/Passive Recreation Alternative

10. As presented in Chapter 5 of the DEIR, the Alternatives were described and compared with each other and with the proposed project. The Open Space/Passive Recreation Alternative (Alternative 3) was the environmentally superior alternative. Each of the alternatives is rejected as infeasible for the reasons outlined below. Each individual reason presented constitutes a separate and independent basis to reject the project alternative as being infeasible, and, when the reasons are viewed collectively, provide an overall basis for rejecting the alternative as being infeasible.

a. Under the No Project Alternative 1, the project would not be undertaken and none of the impacts of the project would occur. The No Project Alternative would not result in any significant impacts; however, it would not meet the Project Objectives as stated in Chapter 3 of the DEIR and would not achieve any of the Project benefits described elsewhere in the record.

b. Under the Lower Density Alternative 2.1 (25% or 50% reduction in density), the project size would be reduced to either 206 units or 138 units, respectively. Lower Density Alternative 2.1 would partially achieve the Project Objectives. These alternatives would reduce, but would not avoid, the significant unavoidable impacts of the project. Both the 25% and 50% reduced densities would also result in similar significant and unavoidable traffic intersection impacts as identified for the proposed project. Additionally, this alternative would not meet the Project Objectives as stated in Chapter 3 of the DEIR.

c. Under the Lower Density Alternative 2.2 (80% reduction in density), the project size would be reduced to 55 units. Lower Density Alternative 2.2 would achieve only a few of the Project Objectives. This Alternative would reduce the impacts to traffic intersections both now and in future conditions. This alternative would reduce the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the project to Less-Than-Significant Levels (with mitigation and/or standard conditions). However, this alternative would not meet the Project Objectives as stated in Chapter 3 of the DEIR, nor would it achieve the goals and policies of the Land Use and Transportation Element of the General Plan including the policy to provide affordable housing and the policy to intensify uses in transit-oriented locations by constructing multi-story development on properties near or adjacent to BART stations.

d. Under the Open Space/Passive Recreation Alternative, the entire 3.4-acre site would consist of open space with limited amenities, such as a tot lot, playground area, and benches. The site would have contoured terrain and landscaping throughout to discourage

Page -5- Findings

use of the site for field games. This alternative would avoid or substantially reduce significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the project to Less-Than-Significant Levels (with mitigation and/or standard conditions). Although the Fruitvale area in general lacks sufficient open space and recreation facilities, this Alternative would conflict with nearly all of the Project Objectives.

Statement of Overriding Considerations 11. That the significant, unavoidable impacts of the project are determined to be acceptable in light of

the important benefits of the project as described below. Each of the benefits set forth herein would separately and independently outweigh each and every significant and unavoidable impact of the project. The following reasons explain why approval of the project is warranted despite the previously described significant, adverse, unavoidable impacts:

a. The proposed project advances critical goals of the Oakland General Plan, including:

i. Objective N3: Encourage the construction, conservation, and enhancement of housing resources in order to meet the current and future needs of the Oakland community;

ii. Policy N3.2: Encouraging Infill Development. In order to facilitate the construction of needed housing units, infill construction that is consistent with the General Plan should take place throughout the City of Oakland;

iii. Policy N8.1: Developing Transit Villages. “Transit Village” areas should consist of attached multi-story development on properties near or adjacent to BART stations or other well-used or high volume transit facilities;

iv. Policy T2.1 Encouraging Transit-Oriented Development. The project is located adjacent to the Fruitvale BART station. This project would meet the goal of providing housing near transit.

b. The proposed project advances several critical goals of the Coliseum Area Redevelopment Plan, including:

i. Goal 1: The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including among others, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities;

ii. Goal 2: The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area; and

iii. Goal 3: The re-planning, redesign, and development of undeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized.

c. The proposed project will implement several policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan, will aid in the provision of quality housing units, and will help advance State and Regional policies to providing in-fill housing. Housing Element policies implemented by the project include:

i. Policy 1.7: Regional Housing Needs. The City will strive to meet its fair share of housing needed in the region.

ii. Policy 2.4: Inclusion of Affordable Units in Market Rate Projects. Seek voluntary agreements with private developers of market rate housing to include units affordable to lower-income households, especially those projects involving Redevelopment Agency support or requiring major planning approvals.

iii. Policy 3.2: Flexible Zoning Standards. Allow flexibility in the application of

Page -6- Findings

zoning, building, and other regulations.

iv. Policy 7.2: Energy Conservation. Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation design features in existing and future residential development.

v. Policy 7.3: Infill development. Continue to direct development toward existing communities and encourage infill development at densities consistent with surrounding communities.

vi. Policy 7.4: Compact Building Design. Work with developers to construct new housing that reduces the footprint of new construction, preserves green spaces, and supports the use of public transit.

d. The proposed project will aid in the revitalization and redevelopment of an underutilized parcel and will promote development near transit stations. The project develops an underutilized site in a transit-oriented area and will bring additional vitality to the Fruitvale district. The project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village. The project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements, and the project will be well-integrated with the first phase of the Transit Village as well as improve access to the Fruitvale BART station.

e. The proposed project will create temporary jobs in construction during the multi-phased development of the site.

f. The proposed project will create new revenue for the City, County, and State through the transfer and reassessment of property and through the improvement of the property and the corresponding increase in value.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 12. That the monitoring and reporting of project conditions of approval and CEQA mitigation

measures in connection with the project will be conducted in accordance with the attached SCAMMRP/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program incorporated into the conditions of Project approval. Adoption of this Program will constitute fulfillment of the CEQA monitoring and/or reporting requirement set forth in Section 21081.6 of CEQA. All proposed mitigation measures are capable of being fully implemented by the efforts of the City of Oakland, the applicant or other identified public agencies of responsibility.

Findings for Preliminary Planned Unit Development Permit (Section 17.140.080) A. That the location, design, size, and uses are consistent with the Oakland Comprehensive Plan

and with any other applicable plan, development control map, or ordinance adopted by the City Council.

The General Plan land use designation is for the site is Neighborhood Center Mixed Use, which permits and encourages development “characterized by smaller scale pedestrian-oriented, continuous street frontage with a mix of retail, housing, office, active open space, eating and drinking places, personal and business services, and smaller scale educational, cultural, or entertainment uses,” as stated in the Land Use and Transportation Element (LUTE). The maximum residential density provided in the Neighborhood Center Mixed Use category is 125 dwelling units per gross acre. The 3.4-acre project site could support a maximum of 425 units. The 275-unit project is well under the maximum allowable density. The project is meeting several policies and goals of the General Plan including: Objective N3: Encourage the construction, conservation, and enhancement of housing resources in order

to meet the current and future needs of the Oakland community.

Page -7- Findings

Policy N3.2: Encouraging Infill Development. In order to facilitate the construction of needed housing units, infill construction that is consistent with the General Plan should take place throughout the City of Oakland.

Policy N8.1: Developing Transit Villages. “Transit Village” areas should consist of attached multi-story development on properties near or adjacent to BART stations or other well-used or high volume transit facilities.

Policy T2.1 Encouraging Transit-Oriented Development. The project is located adjacent to the Fruitvale BART station. This project would meet the goal of providing housing near transit.

The project is located in the Coliseum Area Redevelopment Project Area, an applicable plan under this finding. The proposed project is consistent with the following goals of the Coliseum Area Redevelopment Plan: Goal 1: The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the

Project Area, including among others, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities.

Goal 2: The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area.

Goal 3: The re-planning, redesign, and development of undeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized.

The project as proposed is also consistent with the S-15 Zoning District, with approval of the Conditional Use Permit for parking, and the project will conform to the Planning Code in all other respects. B. That the location, design, and size are such that the development can be well integrated with its

surroundings, and, in the case of a departure in character from surrounding uses, that the location and design will adequately reduce the impact of the development.

The project site is designated Neighborhood Center Mixed Use in the General Plan, which permits and encourages development “characterized by smaller scale pedestrian-oriented, continuous street frontage with a mix of retail, housing, office, active open space, eating and drinking places, personal and business services, and smaller scale educational, cultural, or entertainment uses.” The proposed project has been designed to create a residential project in a transit-oriented area and that can bring added additional vitality and residential activity to the Fruitvale district. The project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements, and the project will be well-integrated with the first phase of the Transit Village as well as improve access to the Fruitvale BART station.

C. That the location, design, size, and uses are such that traffic generated by the development can

be accommodated safely and without congestion on major streets and will avoid traversing other local streets.

The project will be required as a condition of approval and through the Mitigation Measures of the EIR to make transportation-related improvements to the local street network. Vehicular access to the project has been designed to occur along 35th and 37th Avenues in order to minimize traffic impacts to East 12th Street and to ensure safe ingress and egress to the project site. A traffic impact study was completed for the project and is included as Appendix E to the Draft EIR.

D. That the location, design, size, and uses are such that the residents or establishments to be

accommodated will be adequately served by existing or proposed facilities and services.

Page -8- Findings

The proposed project site is located in a developed area surrounded by residential and industrial uses that are adequately served by existing utilities and service systems including water supply, wastewater treatment, storm water drainage, and solid waste disposal. The proposed project will also provide additional services for the area and improvements to the existing infrastructure such as new sidewalk, curb, and gutter where needed.

E. That the location, design, size, and uses will result in an attractive, healthful, efficient, and

stable environment for living, shopping, or working, the beneficial effects of which environment could not otherwise be achieved under the zoning regulations.

The proposed project will benefit the surrounding area by developing an underutilized parcel. The Design Guidelines that have been developed will ensure that the eventual building architecture, landscape plan, and overall project design is an attractive, high quality residential development. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning regulations. The project’s structures, as shown in their preliminary design drawings, are varied yet integrated into a single comprehensive development that is related to the surrounding context. The project is located immediately adjacent to the Fruitvale BART station, providing for excellent transit access. The project conforms to the S-15 zoning regulations with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to provide additional parking. The project’s interior private courtyards and planting plan creates an intimate neighborhood setting. Compliance with the conditions of approval will result in an attractive, healthful, efficient, and stable living environment.

F. That the development will be well integrated into its setting, will not require excessive earth

moving or destroy desirable natural features, will not be visually obtrusive and will harmonize with surrounding areas and facilities, will not substantially harm major views for surrounding residents, and will provide sufficient buffering in the form of spatial separation, vegetation, topographic features, or other devices.

The site is flat so no sizable amount of grading will occur. The natural features on the site consist of trees, most all of which will need to be removed to accommodate the proposed development. However, the project Applicant will be required to comply with the City’s tree replanting requirements as outlined in the conditions of approval. The project will not be visually intrusive as it responds to the context of the neighborhood and the backside borders the BART right of way and a surface parking lot owned by BART. There is no need to buffer the project from the existing setting because the intent is to integrate into the setting.

Page -9- Findings

Findings for Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.134.050) A. That the proposal will be of a quality and character which harmonizes with and serves to

protect the value of private and public investment in the area;

As noted previously in the Findings, the proposed project has been designed to create a residential project in a transit-oriented area and that can bring added additional vitality and residential activity to the Fruitvale district. The project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements, and will serve to increase the value of public and private investment in the area.

B. That the proposal will encourage an appropriate mixture of Residential and Commercial

Activities in a manner which promotes and enhances use of multiple modes of transportation; As noted previously in the Findings, the project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project will add residential units in an area that has a good source of commercial uses, thereby increasing the likelihood that residents will be able to shop, dine, and recreate nearby without needing to drive.

C. That the proposal is designed to provide a safe and pleasant pedestrian environment;

As noted previously in the Findings, the project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements and has been designed to have a safe and comfortable interface between the public realm and private spaces of the ground-floor residential units.

D. That the amount of off-street parking, if any, provided in excess of this code will not contribute

significantly to an increased orientation of the area to automobile or truck movement. The proposed project will provide one parking space per dwelling unit instead of the maximum ½ space per unit as required in the S-15 Zoning District. The project includes a mixture of studio (10%), 1-bedroom (42%), 2-bedroom (38%), and 3-bedroom units (10%), so there is a distinct possibility that there will be one car per household. In an effort to ensure that spill-over parking from the residential project to the surrounding neighborhood is minimized, the Applicant has proposed to provide one space per unit on-site. The project site remains adjacent to a BART station and in the vicinity of bus lines that serve Oakland and Alameda County, so it is not anticipated that providing one space per unit will have a detrimental impact or increase the automobile movement in the area above what it would be with only ½ space per unit.

E. That the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed development will

be compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood, with consideration to be given to harmony in scale, bulk, coverage, and density; to the availability of civic facilities and utilities; to harmful effect, if any, upon desirable neighborhood character; to the generation of traffic and the capacity of surrounding streets; and to any other relevant impact of the development; As noted previously in the Findings, the proposed project has been designed to create a residential project in a transit-oriented area and that can bring added additional vitality and residential activity to the Fruitvale district. The project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements, and will serve to increase the value of public and private investment in the area.

F. That the location, design, and site planning of the proposed development will provide a

convenient and functional living, working, shopping, or civic environment, and will be as attractive as the nature of the use and its location and setting warrant;

Page -10- Findings

As noted previously in the Findings, the proposed project has been designed to create a residential project in a transit-oriented area and that can bring added additional vitality and residential activity to the Fruitvale district. The project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project includes improvements to pedestrian circulation and vehicular safety improvements, and will serve to increase the value of public and private investment in the area.

G. That the proposed development will enhance the successful operation of the surrounding area

in its basic community functions, or will provide an essential service to the community or region; As noted previously in the Findings, the project will add 275 residential units to the core Fruitvale area and will complete the original vision of the two-phased Fruitvale Transit Village developed by the Unity Council. The project will add residential units in an area that has a good source of commercial uses, thereby increasing the likelihood that residents will be able to shop, dine, and recreate nearby without needing to drive.

H. That the proposal conforms to all applicable regular design review criteria set forth in the

regular design review procedure at Section 17.136.050; The project is not yet subject to the Design Review criteria.

I. That the proposal conforms in all significant respects with the Oakland General Plan and with

any other applicable plan or development control map which has been adopted by the City Council. The General Plan land use designation is for the site is Neighborhood Center Mixed Use, which permits and encourages development “characterized by smaller scale pedestrian-oriented, continuous street frontage with a mix of retail, housing, office, active open space, eating and drinking places, personal and business services, and smaller scale educational, cultural, or entertainment uses,” as stated in the Land Use and Transportation Element (LUTE). The maximum residential density provided in the Neighborhood Center Mixed Use category is 125 dwelling units per gross acre. The 3.4-acre project site could support a maximum of 425 units. The 275-unit project is well under the maximum allowable density. Additionally, the project will implement several of the goals and policies of the General Plan, as noted previously in the Findings.

Page -11- Findings

Findings for Tentative Tract Map (Section 16.08.030) (Pursuant also to California Government Code §66474 (Chapter 4, Subdivision Map Act)

The Advisory Agency shall deny approval of a tentative map if it makes any of the following findings:

A. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in the State Government Code Section 65451.

The project meets the density requirements of the S-15 Zoning District and the Neighborhood Center Mixed Use land use designation of the General Plan. The project meets the zoning and is consistent with the General Plan with approval of the PUD and Conditional Use Permit.

B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

As noted above, the project meets the density requirements of the S-15 Zoning District and the Neighborhood Center Mixed Use land use designation of the General Plan. The project meets the zoning and is consistent with the General Plan with approval of the PUD and Conditional Use Permit.

C. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development.

The site is flat, in an urban area, and future development can be easily accommodated.

D. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

As noted above, the maximum residential density provided in the Neighborhood Center Mixed Use category is 125 dwelling units per gross acre. The 3.4-acre project site could support a maximum of 425 units. The 275-unit project is well under the maximum allowable density.

E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The subject property is located in an urban area surrounded by developed residential, commercial, and industrial properties. The site is currently used as a surface parking lot. No environmental damage would occur with the proposed project.

F. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems.

The merger of the parcels and the subsequent subdivision are not expected to cause serious public health problems. The proposed development would be served by public water and sewer service, and would therefore not require the use of on-site sewage disposal or domestic water well. The project site is not located on the state’s Cortese List for hazardous waste. There are no buildings on the site. Therefore asbestos, lead in paint, lead in water, and contaminated equipment are not expected.

G. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. (This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.)

The Tentative Tract Map approval contains a condition of approval requiring that any utilities or easements that are in conflict with the proposed development be .removed or abandon prior to filing the Final Map(s).

H. That the design of the subdivision does not provide to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision.

Page -12- Findings

The subdivision of the lot for condominium purposes does not exclude the possibility of for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities.

Page -13- Conditions of Approval

STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. Approved Use Ongoing a) The project shall generally conform to the application materials submitted as follows unless

modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein: 1. Project Plan Set (prepared by HKIT Architects) dated April 23, 2010. 2. Tentative Tract Map 8038 (prepared by BKF Engineers) dated February 5, 2010. 3. Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Residential Project Design Guidelines (prepared by

HKIT Architects) dated April 23, 2010 and as amended May 19, 2010. Any additional uses or facilities other than those approved with this permit, as described in the project description and the approved plans will require a separate application and approval. Any deviation from the approved drawings, Conditions of Approval or use shall require prior written approval from the Director of City Planning or designee.

b) This action by the City Planning Commission (“this Approval”) includes the approvals set forth

below. This Approval includes: 1. Approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Development Plan, under

OMC Chapters 17.140 and 17.142. 2. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), under OMC Chapter 17.134 3. Approval of a Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes under OMC Chapter 16.08. 4. Approval of a Tree Removal Permit under OMC Chapter 12.36.

2. Effective Date, Expiration, Extensions and Extinguishment

Ongoing a) Unless a different termination date is prescribed, this Approval shall expire two years from the

approval date, unless within such period an application for Design Review and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development Plan approval has been submitted to the City of Oakland. Review and approval of Design Review and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development Plan is required before any buildings may be constructed or any of the uses commence. Upon written request, and payment of appropriate fees submitted no later than the expiration date of this permit, the Director of City Planning or designee may grant two one-year extensions of this date, with additional extensions subject to approval by the approving body.

b) A Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Development Plan (FDP) submittal may be for all four phases of the project at once, or the FDP submittals may be for one or more phase at a time. If the FDP applications are submitted separately, the applications will need to be received no more than one year apart and all FDP/Final Design Review applications will need to be received within five years from the approval date of this application. Upon written request, and payment of appropriate fees submitted no later than the expiration date of this permit, the Director of City Planning or designee may grant two one-year extensions of this date, with additional extensions subject to approval by the approving body.

c) The approval of Tentative Tract Map 8038 shall expire two years from the approval date, the effective date of its granting, unless the applicant files a Final Map with the City Engineer. Failure to file a Final Map within this time limit shall nullify the previous approval or conditional approval of the Tentative Tract Map. The Applicant may file one or more Final Maps for the project. Upon written request and payment of appropriate fees submitted no later than the expiration date of this permit, the Director of City Planning or designee may grant an extension of this permit, and up to two subsequent extensions upon receipt of a subsequent written request and payment of appropriate fees received no later than the expiration date of the previous extension.

3. Scope of This Approval; Major and Minor Changes


Ongoing The project is approved pursuant to the Planning Code and Subdivision Regulations only. Minor changes to approved use and/or plans may be approved administratively by the Director of City Planning or designee. Major changes to the approved use and/or plans shall be reviewed by the Director of City Planning or designee to determine whether such changes require submittal and approval of a revision to the approved project by the approving body or a new, completely independent permit.

4. Conformance with other Requirements (Also listed as SCA PUB-1 in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, P-job, or other construction related permit a) The project applicant shall comply with all other applicable federal, state, regional and/or local

laws/codes, requirements, regulations, and guidelines, including but not limited to those imposed by the City’s Building Services Division, the City’s Fire Marshal, and the City’s Public Works Agency. Compliance with other applicable requirements may require changes to the approved use and/or plans. These changes shall be processed in accordance with the procedures contained in Condition of Approval 3.

b) The applicant shall submit approved building plans for project-specific needs related to fire protection to the Fire Services Division for review and approval, including, but not limited to automatic extinguishing systems, water supply improvements and hydrants, fire department access, and vegetation management for preventing fires and soil erosion.

5. Conformance to Approved Plans; Modification of Conditions or Revocation

Ongoing a) Site shall be kept in a blight/nuisance-free condition. Any existing blight or nuisance shall be

abated within 60-90 days of approval, unless an earlier date is specified elsewhere. b) The City of Oakland reserves the right at any time during construction to require certification by a

licensed professional that the as-built project conforms to all applicable zoning requirements, including but not limited to approved maximum heights and minimum setbacks. Failure to construct the project in accordance with approved plans may result in remedial reconstruction, permit revocation, permit modification, stop work, permit suspension or other corrective action.

c) Violation of any term, Conditions/ Mitigation Measures or project description relating to the Approvals is unlawful, prohibited, and a violation of the Oakland Municipal Code. The City of Oakland reserves the right to initiate civil and/or criminal enforcement and/or abatement proceedings, or after notice and public hearing, to revoke the Approvals or alter these Conditions/ Mitigation Measures if it is found that there is violation of any of the Conditions/ Mitigation Measures or the provisions of the Planning Code or Municipal Code, or the project operates as or causes a public nuisance. This provision is not intended to, nor does it limit in any manner whatsoever the ability of the City to take appropriate enforcement actions.

6. Signed Copy of the Conditions/Mitigation Measures

Ongoing A copy of the approval letter and Conditions/ Mitigation Measures shall be signed by the property owner, notarized, and submitted with each set of permit plans to the appropriate City agency for this project.

7. Indemnification Ongoing a) The project applicant shall defend (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City), indemnify,

and hold harmless the City of Oakland, the Oakland City Council, the City of Oakland Redevelopment Agency, the Oakland City Planning Commission and their respective agents, officers, and employees (hereafter collectively called the City) from any claim, action, or proceeding (including legal costs and attorney’s fees) against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul this Approval, or any related approval by the City. The City shall promptly notify the project applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and the City shall cooperate fully in such


defense. The City may elect, in its sole discretion, to participate in the defense of said claim, action, or proceeding. The project applicant shall reimburse the City for its reasonable legal costs and attorney’s fees.

b) Within ten (10) calendar days of the filing of a claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul this Approval, or any related approval by the City, the project applicant shall execute a Letter Agreement with the City, acceptable to the Office of the City Attorney, which memorializes the above obligations and this condition of approval. This condition/obligation shall survive termination, extinguishment, or invalidation of this, or any related approval. Failure to timely execute the Letter Agreement does not relieve the project applicant of any of the obligations contained in 7(a) above, or other conditions of approval.

8. Compliance with Conditions of Approval

Ongoing a) The project applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the recommendations in any

submitted and approved technical report and all the Conditions of Approval and adopted mitigation measures set forth below at its sole cost and expense, and subject to the review and approval of the City of Oakland.

b) For purposes of these conditions of approval, “feasible” means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors.

c) The project Applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the recommendations in any submitted and approved technical report and all the Conditions of Approval set forth below at its sole cost and expense, and subject to review and approval of the City of Oakland.

9. Severability

Ongoing Approval of the project would not have been granted but for the applicability and validity of each and every one of the specified conditions and/or mitigations, and if one or more of such conditions and/or mitigations is found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction this Approval would not have been granted without requiring other valid conditions and/or mitigations consistent with achieving the same purpose and intent of such Approval.

10. Job Site Plans Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction At least one (1) copy of the stamped approved plans, along with the Approval Letter and Conditions of Approval and mitigations, shall be available for review at the job site at all times.

11. Special Inspector/Inspections, Independent Technical Review, Project Coordination and Management

Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, and/or construction permit The project applicant may be required to pay for on-call third-party special inspector(s)/inspections as needed during the times of extensive or specialized plancheck review or construction. The project applicant may also be required to cover the full costs of independent technical review and other types of peer review, monitoring and inspection, including without limitation, third party plan check fees, including inspections of violations of Conditions of Approval. The project applicant shall establish a deposit with the Building Services Division, as directed by the Building Official, Director of City Planning or designee.


12. Required Landscape Plan for New Construction At the time of Design Review/Final Development Plan application Submittal and approval of a landscape plan for each stage of the project will be required. The landscape plan and the plant materials installed pursuant to the approved plan shall conform with all provisions of Chapter 17.124 of the Oakland Planning Code, including the following: a) Landscape plans shall include a detailed planting schedule showing the proposed location, sizes,

quantities, and specific common botanical names of plant species. b) Landscape plans for each FDP/Design Review application shall show how the remainder of the

site is being landscaped until that phase is developed. For instance, if the Applicant submits an FDP/Design Review application for Phase 1 of the PDP only, the Landscape plans for Phase 1 shall show the landscaping of the Phase 1 portion of the site as well as demonstrate how the remainder of the site will be landscaped until the future phases of the project are built out.

c) Landscape plans shall incorporate pest-resistant and drought-tolerant landscaping practices. The City Planning and Zoning Division shall maintain lists of plant materials and landscaping practices considered pest-resistant, fire-resistant, and drought-tolerant.

d) All landscape plans shall show proposed methods of irrigation. The methods shall ensure adequate irrigation of all plant materials for at least one growing season.

13. Landscape Requirements for Street Frontages.

Prior to issuance of a final inspection of the building permit a) All areas between a primary Residential Facility and abutting street lines shall be fully

landscaped, plus any unpaved areas of abutting rights-of-way of improved streets or alleys, provided, however, on streets without sidewalks, an unplanted strip of land five (5) feet in width shall be provided within the right-of-way along the edge of the pavement or face of curb, whichever is applicable. Existing plant materials may be incorporated into the proposed landscaping if approved by the Director of City Planning.

b) In addition to the general landscaping requirements set forth in Chapter 17.124, a minimum of one (1) fifteen-gallon tree, or substantially equivalent landscaping consistent with city policy and as approved by the Director of City Planning, shall be provided for every twenty-five (25) feet of street frontage. On streets with sidewalks where the distance from the face of the curb to the outer edge of the sidewalk is at least six and one-half (6 ½) feet, the trees to be provided shall include street trees to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks and Recreation.

14. Assurance of Landscaping Completion.

Prior to issuance of a final inspection of the building permit The trees, shrubs and landscape materials required by the conditions of approval attached to this project shall be planted before the certificate of occupancy will be issued; or a bond, cash, deposit, or letter of credit, acceptable to the City, shall be provided for the planting of the required landscaping. The amount of such or a bond, cash, deposit, or letter of credit shall equal the greater of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) or the estimated cost of the required landscaping, based on a licensed contractor’s bid.

15. Landscape Maintenance.

Ongoing All required planting shall be permanently maintained in good growing condition and, whenever necessary, replaced with new plant materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping requirements. All required fences, walls and irrigation systems shall be permanently maintained in good condition and, whenever necessary, repaired or replaced.


16. Underground Utilities Prior to issuance of a building permit The project applicant shall submit plans for review and approval by the Building Services Division and the Public Works Agency, and other relevant agencies as appropriate, that show all new electric and telephone facilities; fire alarm conduits; street light wiring; and other wiring, conduits, and similar facilities placed underground. The new facilities shall be placed underground along the project applicant’s street frontage and from the project applicant’s structures to the point of service. The plans shall show all electric, telephone, water service, fire water service, cable, and fire alarm facilities installed in accordance with standard specifications of the serving utilities.

17. Improvements in the Public Right-of-Way (General)

Approved prior to the issuance of a P-job or building permit a) The project applicant shall submit Public Improvement Plans to Building Services Division for

adjacent public rights-of-way (ROW) showing all proposed improvements and compliance with the conditions and/or mitigations and City requirements including but not limited to curbs, gutters, sewer laterals, storm drains, street trees, paving details, locations of transformers and other above ground utility structures, the design specifications and locations of facilities required by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), street lighting, on-street parking and accessibility improvements compliant with applicable standards and any other improvements or requirements for the project as provided for in this Approval. Encroachment permits shall be obtained as necessary for any applicable improvements- located within the public ROW.

b) Review and confirmation of the street trees by the City’s Tree Services Division is required as part of this condition and/or mitigations.

c) The Planning and Zoning Division and the Public Works Agency will review and approve designs and specifications for the improvements. Improvements shall be completed prior to the issuance of the final building permit.

d) The Fire Services Division will review and approve fire crew and apparatus access, water supply availability and distribution to current codes and standards.

18. Improvements in the Public Right-of Way (Specific)

Approved prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit Final building and public improvement plans submitted to the Building Services Division shall include the following: a) Remove and replace any existing driveway that will not be used for access to the property with new

concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter. b) Reconstruct drainage facility to current City standard as needed. c) Provide separation between sanitary sewer and water lines to comply with current City of Oakland

and Alameda Health Department standards. d) Construct wheelchair ramps that comply with Americans with Disability Act requirements and

current City Standards at all pedestrian access points along the project frontage on E. 12th Street, 35th Avenue, and 37th Avenue.

e) Remove and replace deficient concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter within property frontage along all project street frontages.

f) Provide adequate fire department access and water supply, including, but not limited to currently adopted fire codes and standards.

g) Install a new pedestrian crosswalk across 35th Avenue at the northwest corner of the project site, connecting the project site to the BART station across 35th. The details of the crosswalk design shall be shown in the Final Development Plan submittal.

h) Install improvements along East 12th Street between 35th and 37th Avenues on both sides of the street. Improvements shall include the installation of street trees and tree grates, repairs to the existing sidewalk, and landscape enhancements.

i) Install rail crossing improvements as specified in Condition no. 58.


j) Install additional improvements as specified in Condition no. 59. 19. Payment for Public Improvements

Prior to issuance of a final inspection of the building permit. The project applicant shall pay for and install public improvements made necessary by the project including damage caused by construction activity.

20. Compliance Matrix

Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit The project applicant shall submit to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division a Conditions/ Mitigation Measures compliance matrix that lists each condition of approval and/or mitigation measure, the City agency or division responsible for review, and how/when the project applicant has met or intends to meet the conditions and/or mitigations. The applicant will sign the Conditions of Approval attached to the approval letter and submit that with the compliance matrix for review and approval. The compliance matrix shall be organized per step in the plancheck/construction process unless another format is acceptable to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division. The project applicant shall update the compliance matrix and provide it with each item submittal.

21. Construction Management Plan Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit The project applicant shall submit to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division for review and approval a construction management plan that identifies the conditions of approval and mitigation measures related to construction impacts of the project and explains how the project applicant will comply with these construction-related conditions of approval and mitigation measures.

22. Parking and Transportation Demand Management (also listed in the SCAMMRP) Prior to issuance of a final inspection of the building permit. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Division a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan containing strategies to reduce on-site parking demand and single occupancy vehicle travel. The applicant shall implement the approved TDM plan. The TDM shall include strategies to increase bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and carpools/vanpool use. All four modes of travel shall be considered. Strategies to consider include the following: a) Inclusion of additional bicycle parking, shower, and locker facilities that exceed the requirement b) Construction of bike lanes per the Bicycle Master Plan; Priority Bikeway Projects c) Signage and striping onsite to encourage bike safety d) Installation of safety elements per the Pedestrian Master Plan (such as cross walk striping, curb

ramps, count down signals, bulb outs, etc.) to encourage convenient crossing at arterials e) Installation of amenities such as lighting, street trees, trash receptacles per the Pedestrian Master

Plan and any applicable streetscape plan. f) Direct transit sales or subsidized transit passes g) Guaranteed ride home program h) Pre-tax commuter benefits (checks) i) On-site car-sharing program (such as City Car Share, Zip Car, etc.) j) On-site carpooling program k) Distribution of information concerning alternative transportation options l) Parking spaces sold/leased separately m) Parking management strategies; including attendant/valet parking and shared parking spaces

23. Dust Control (also listed as “SCA AIR-1” in the SCAMMRP)


Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading or building permit During construction, the project applicant shall require the construction contractor to implement the following measures required as part of Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) basic and enhanced dust control procedures required for construction sites. These include: a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. Watering should be sufficient to prevent

airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.

b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).

c) Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.

d) Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites.

e) Sweep streets (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads.

f) Limit the amount of the disturbed area at any one time, where feasible. g) Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 mph. h) Pave all roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. as soon as feasible. In addition, building pads

should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. i) Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as feasible. j) Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to exposed stockpiles (dirt,

sand, etc.). k) Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. l) Clean off the tires or tracks of all trucks and equipment leaving any unpaved construction areas.

24. Construction Emissions (Also listed as “SCA AIR-2” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading or building permit To minimize construction equipment emissions during construction, the project applicant shall require the construction contractor to: a) Demonstrate compliance with Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)

Regulation 2, Rule 1 (General Requirements) for all portable construction equipment subject to that rule. BAAQMD Regulation 2, Rule 1 provides the issuance of authorities to construct and permits to operate certain types of portable equipment used for construction purposes (e.g., gasoline or diesel-powered engines used in conjunction with power generation, pumps, compressors, and cranes) unless such equipment complies with all applicable requirements of the “CAPCOA” Portable Equipment Registration Rule” or with all applicable requirements of the Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program. This exemption is provided in BAAQMD Rule 2-1-105.

b) Perform low-NOx tune-ups on all diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower (no more than 30 days prior to the start of use of that equipment). Periodic tune-ups (every 90 days) shall be performed for such equipment used continuously during the construction period.

25. Days/Hours of Construction Operation (Also listed as “SCA NOI-1” in the SCAMMRP)

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction The project applicant shall require construction contractors to limit standard construction activities as follows:

a) Construction activities are limited to between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, except that pile driving and/or other extreme noise generating activities greater than 90 dBA shall be limited to between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.


b) Any construction activity proposed to occur outside of the standard hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm Monday through Friday for special activities (such as concrete pouring which may require more continuous amounts of time) shall be evaluated on a case by case basis, with criteria including the proximity of residential uses and a consideration of resident’s preferences for whether the activity is acceptable if the overall duration of construction is shortened and such construction activities shall only be allowed with the prior written authorization of the Building Services Division.

c) Construction activity shall not occur on Saturdays, with the following possible exceptions: i. Prior to the building being enclosed, requests for Saturday construction for special activities

(such as concrete pouring which may require more continuous amounts of time), shall be evaluated on a case by case basis, with criteria including the proximity of residential uses and a consideration of resident’s preferences for whether the activity is acceptable if the overall duration of construction is shortened. Such construction activities shall only be allowed on Saturdays with the prior written authorization of the Building Services Division.

ii. After the building is enclosed, requests for Saturday construction activities shall only be allowed on Saturdays with the prior written authorization of the Building Services Division, and only then within the interior of the building with the doors and windows closed.

d) No extreme noise generating activities (greater than 90 dBA) shall be allowed on Saturdays, with no exceptions.

e) No construction activity shall take place on Sundays or Federal holidays. f) Construction activities include but are not limited to: truck idling, moving equipment

(including trucks, elevators, etc) or materials, deliveries, and construction meetings held on-site in a non-enclosed area.

g) Applicant shall use temporary power poles instead of generators where feasible. 26. Noise Control

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction To reduce noise impacts due to construction, the project applicant shall require construction contractors to implement a site-specific noise reduction program, subject to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division review and approval, which includes the following measures:

a) Equipment and trucks used for project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures and acoustically-attenuating shields or shrouds, wherever feasible).

b) Except as provided herein, Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for project construction shall be hydraulically or electrically powered to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. However, where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used, if such jackets are commercially available and this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures shall be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever such procedures are available and consistent with construction procedures.

c) Stationary noise sources shall be located as far from adjacent receptors as possible, and they shall be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, incorporate insulation barriers, or use other measures as determined by the City to provide equivalent noise reduction.

d) The noisiest phases of construction shall be limited to less than 10 days at a time. Exceptions may be allowed if the City determines an extension is necessary and all available noise reduction controls are implemented.

27. Noise Complaint Procedures (Also listed as “SCA NOI-3” in the SCAMMRP)

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction


Prior to the issuance of each building permit, along with the submission of construction documents, the project applicant shall submit to the Building Services Division a list of measures to respond to and track complaints pertaining to construction noise. These measures shall include:

a) A procedure and phone numbers for notifying the Building Services Division staff and Oakland Police Department; (during regular construction hours and off-hours);

b) A sign posted on-site pertaining with permitted construction days and hours and complaint procedures and who to notify in the event of a problem. The sign shall also include a listing of both the City and construction contractor’s telephone numbers (during regular construction hours and off-hours);

c) The designation of an on-site construction complaint and enforcement manager for the project;

d) Notification of neighbors and occupants within 300 feet of the project construction area at least 30 days in advance of extreme noise generating activities about the estimated duration of the activity; and

e) A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the job inspectors and the general contractor/on-site project manager to confirm that noise measures and practices (including construction hours, neighborhood notification, posted signs, etc.) are completed.

28. Interior Noise (Also listed as “SCA NOI-4” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a building permit and Certificate of Occupancy If necessary to comply with the interior noise requirements of the City of Oakland’s General Plan Noise Element and achieve an acceptable interior noise level, noise reduction in the form of sound-rated assemblies (i.e., windows, exterior doors, and walls), and/or other appropriate features/measures, shall be incorporated into project building design, based upon recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer and submitted to the Building Services Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. Final recommendations for sound-rated assemblies, and/or other appropriate features/measures, will depend on the specific building designs and layout of buildings on the site and shall be determined during the design phases. Written confirmation by the acoustical consultant, HVAC or HERS specialist, shall be submitted for City review and approval, prior to Certificate of Occupancy (or equivalent) that:

a) Quality control was exercised during construction to ensure all air-gaps and penetrations of the building shell are controlled and sealed; and

b) Demonstrates compliance with interior noise standards based upon performance testing of a sample unit.

c) Inclusion of a Statement of Disclosure Notice in the CC&R’s on the lease or title to all new tenants or owners of the units acknowledging the noise generating activity. Potential features/measures to reduce interior noise could include, but are not limited to, the following:

a. Installation of an alternative form of ventilation in all units identified in the acoustical analysis as not being able to meet the interior noise requirements due to adjacency to a noise generating activity, filtration of ambient make-up air in each unit and analysis of ventilation noise if ventilation is included in the recommendations by the acoustical analysis.

b. Prohibition of Z-duct construction. 29. Operational Noise-General

Ongoing. Noise levels from the activity, property, or any mechanical equipment on site shall comply with the performance standards of Section 17.120 of the Oakland Planning Code and Section 8.18 of the Oakland Municipal Code. If noise levels exceed these standards, the activity causing the noise shall be abated until appropriate noise reduction measures have been installed and compliance verified by the Planning and Zoning Division and Building Services.


30. Construction Traffic and Parking (also listed in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading or building permit The project applicant and construction contractor shall meet with appropriate City of Oakland agencies to determine traffic management strategies to reduce, to the maximum extent feasible, traffic congestion and the effects of parking demand by construction workers during construction of this project and other nearby projects that could be simultaneously under construction. The project applicant shall develop a construction management plan for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Division, the Building Services Division, and the Transportation Services Division. The plan shall include at least the following items and requirements: a) A set of comprehensive traffic control measures, including scheduling of major truck trips and

deliveries to avoid peak traffic hours, detour signs if required, lane closure procedures, signs, cones for drivers, and designated construction access routes.

b) Notification procedures for adjacent property owners and public safety personnel regarding when major deliveries, detours, and lane closures will occur.

c) Location of construction staging areas for materials, equipment, and vehicles at an approved location.

d) A process for responding to, and tracking, complaints pertaining to construction activity, including identification of an onsite complaint manager. The manager shall determine the cause of the complaints and shall take prompt action to correct the problem. Planning and Zoning shall be informed who the Manager is prior to the issuance of the first permit issued by Building Services.

e) Provision for accommodation of pedestrian flow. f) Provision for parking management and spaces for all construction workers to ensure that

construction workers do not park in on-street spaces on East 12th Street. g) Any damage to the street caused by heavy equipment, or as a result of this construction, shall be

repaired, at the applicant's expense, within one week of the occurrence of the damage (or excessive wear), unless further damage/excessive wear may continue; in such case, repair shall occur prior to issuance of a final inspection of the building permit. All damage that is a threat to public health or safety shall be repaired immediately. The street shall be restored to its condition prior to the new construction as established by the City Building Inspector and/or photo documentation, at the applicant's expense, before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

h) Any heavy equipment brought to the construction site shall be transported by truck, where feasible.

i) No materials or equipment shall be stored on the traveled roadway at any time. j) Prior to construction, a portable toilet facility and a debris box shall be installed on the site, and

properly maintained through project completion. k) All equipment shall be equipped with mufflers. l) Prior to the end of each work day during construction, the contractor or contractors shall pick up

and properly dispose of all litter resulting from or related to the project, whether located on the property, within the public rights-of-way, or properties of adjacent or nearby neighbors.


31. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ongoing throughout demolition grading, and/or construction activities The project applicant shall implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce erosion, sedimentation, and water quality impacts during construction to the maximum extent practicable. Plans demonstrating the Best Management Practices shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division. At a minimum, the project applicant shall provide filter materials deemed acceptable to the City at nearby catch basins to prevent any debris and dirt from flowing into the City’s storm drain system and creeks.

32. Phase I and/or Phase II Reports Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit If the project site is listed in City records as containing hazardous materials or if the site has been identified on the State Cortese List, prior to issuance of demolition, grading, or building permits the project applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau, Hazardous Materials Unit, a Phase I environmental site assessment report. A Phase II report shall also be prepared if warranted by the Phase I report for the project site. The reports shall make recommendations for remedial action, if appropriate, and should be signed by a Registered Environmental Assessor, Professional Geologist, or Professional Engineer.

33. Environmental Site Assessment Reports Remediation (also listed as SCA HAZ-2 in the

SCAMMRP) Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit If the environmental site assessment reports recommend remedial action, the project applicant shall: a) Consult with the appropriate local, State, and federal environmental regulatory agencies to ensure

sufficient minimization of risk to human health and environmental resources, both during and after construction, posed by soil contamination, groundwater contamination, or other surface hazards including, but not limited to, underground storage tanks, fuel distribution lines, waste pits and sumps.

b) Obtain and submit written evidence of approval for any remedial action if required by a local, State, or federal environmental regulatory agency.

c) Submit a copy of all applicable documentation required by local, State, and federal environmental regulatory agencies, including but not limited to: permit applications, Phase I and II environmental site assessments, human health and ecological risk assessments, remedial action plans, risk management plans, soil management plans, and groundwater management plans.

34. Hazards Best Management Practices (also listed as SCA HAZ-1 in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to commencement of demolition, grading, or construction The project applicant and construction contractor shall ensure that construction of Best Management Practices (BMPs) are implemented as part of construction to minimize the potential negative effects to groundwater and soils. These shall include the following: a) Follow manufacture’s recommendations on use, storage, and disposal of chemical products used

in construction; b) Avoid overtopping construction equipment fuel gas tanks; c) During routine maintenance of construction equipment, properly contain and remove grease and

oils; d) Properly dispose of discarded containers of fuels and other chemicals. e) Ensure that construction would not have a significant impact on the environment or pose a

substantial health risk to construction workers and the occupants of the proposed development. Soil sampling and chemical analyses of samples shall be performed to determine the extent of potential contamination beneath all UST’s, elevator shafts, clarifiers, and subsurface hydraulic lifts when on-site demolition, or construction activities would potentially affect a particular development or building.


f) If soil, groundwater or other environmental medium with suspected contamination is encountered unexpectedly during construction activities (e.g., identified by odor or visual staining, or if any underground storage tanks, abandoned drums or other hazardous materials or wastes are encountered), the applicant shall cease work in the vicinity of the suspect material, the area shall be secured as necessary, and the applicant shall take all appropriate measures to protect human health and the environment. Appropriate measures shall include notification of regulatory agency(ies) and implementation of the actions described in the City’s Standard Conditions of Approval, as necessary, to identify the nature and extent of contamination. Work shall not resume in the area(s) affected until the measures have been implemented under the oversight of the City or regulatory agency, as appropriate.

35. Waste Reduction and Recycling (also listed as SCA UTIL-2 in the SCAMMRP)

At the time of submittal of a Final Development Plan and/or Design Review for the whole project or a portion thereof The Applicant shall demonstrate how the project will provide recycling facilities sufficient to meet the requirements of the Oakland Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of demolition, grading, or building permit The Applicant will submit a Construction & Demolition Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan (WRRP). Chapter 15.34 of the Oakland Municipal Code outlines requirements for reducing waste and optimizing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling. Affected projects include all new construction, renovations/alterations/modifications with construction values of $50,000 or more (except R-3), and all demolition (including soft demo).The WRRP must specify the methods by which the development will divert C&D debris waste generated by the proposed project from landfill disposal in accordance with current City requirements. Current standards, FAQs, and forms are available at www.oaklandpw.com/Page39.aspx or in the Green Building Resource Center. After approval of the plan, the project applicant shall implement the plan. Ongoing The Applicant will submit an Operational Diversion Plan (ODP) for review and approval by the Public Works Agency. The ODP will identify how the project complies with the Recycling Space Allocation Ordinance, (Chapter 17.118 of the Oakland Municipal Code), including capacity calculations, and specify the methods by which the development will meet the current diversion of solid waste generated by operation of the proposed project from landfill disposal in accordance with current City requirements. The proposed program shall be in implemented and maintained for the duration of the proposed activity or facility. Changes to the plan may be re-submitted to the Environmental Services Division of the Public Works Agency for review and approval. Any incentive programs shall remain fully operational as long as residents and businesses exist at the project site.

36. Standard Conditions of Approval/Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

(SCAMMRP) Ongoing All mitigation measures identified in the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) EIR are included in the Standard Condition of Approval and Mitigation Monitoring Program (SCAMMRP) which is included in these conditions of approval and incorporated herein by reference. The Standard Conditions of Approval identified in the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) EIR are also included in the SCAMMRP. To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the SCAMMRP and these conditions, the more restrictive conditions shall govern. The project sponsor (also referred to as the Developer or Applicant) shall be responsible for compliance with the recommendation in any submitted and approved technical reports, all applicable mitigation measures adopted and with all conditions of approval set forth herein at its sole cost and expense, unless otherwise expressly provided in a specific mitigation measure or condition of approval, and subject to the review and approval of the City of Oakland. The SCAMMRP identifies the time frame and responsible party for implementation and monitoring for each mitigation measure. Overall monitoring and compliance with the mitigation measures will be the responsibility of the Planning and Zoning Division. Adoption of the SCAMMRP will constitute fulfillment of the CEQA monitoring and/or reporting

http://www.oaklandpw.com/Page39.aspx


requirement set forth in Section 21081.6 of CEQA. Prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading, and/or construction permit, the project sponsor shall pay the applicable mitigation and monitoring fee to the City in accordance with the City’s Master Fee Schedule.

37. Vibration (Also listed as “SCA NOI-6” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a building permit A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained by the project applicant during the design phase of the project to comment on structural design as it relates to reducing groundborne vibration at the project site. If required in order to reduce groundborne vibration to acceptable levels, the project applicant shall incorporate special building methods to reduce groundborne vibration being transmitted into project structures. The City shall review and approve the recommendations of the acoustical consultant and the plans implementing such recommendations. Applicant shall implement the approved plans. Potential methods include the following: a) Isolation of foundation and footings using resilient elements such as rubber bearing pads or

springs, such as a “spring isolation” system that consists of resilient spring supports that can support the podium or residential foundations. The specific system shall be selected so that it can properly support the structural loads, and provide adequate filtering of ground-borne vibration to the residences above.

b) Trenching, which involves excavating soil between the railway/freeway and the project so that the vibration path is interrupted, thereby reducing the vibration levels before they enter the project’s structures. Since the reduction in vibration level is based on a ratio between trench depth and vibration wavelength, additional measurements shall be conducted to determine the vibration wavelengths affecting the project. Based on the resulting measurement findings, an adequate trench depth and, if required, suitable fill shall be identified (such as foamed styrene packing pellets (i.e., Styrofoam) or low-density polyethylene).

38. Pile Driving and Other Extreme Noise Generators

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction To further reduce potential pier drilling, pile driving and/or other extreme noise generating construction impacts greater than 90dBA, a set of site-specific noise attenuation measures shall be completed under the supervision of a qualified acoustical consultant. Prior to commencing construction, a plan for such measures shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Division and the Building Services Division to ensure that maximum feasible noise attenuation will be achieved. This plan shall be based on the final design of the project. A third-party peer review, paid for by the project applicant, may be required to assist the City in evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of the noise reduction plan submitted by the project applicant. The criterion for approving the plan shall be a determination that maximum feasible noise attenuation will be achieved. A special inspection deposit is required to ensure compliance with the noise reduction plan. The amount of the deposit shall be determined by the Building Official, and the deposit shall be submitted by the project Applicant concurrent with submittal of the noise reduction plan. The noise reduction plan shall include, but not be limited to, an evaluation of implementing the following measures. These attenuation measures shall include as many of the following control strategies as applicable to the site and construction activity:

a) Erect temporary plywood noise barriers around the construction site, particularly along on sites adjacent to residential buildings;

b) Implement “quiet” pile driving technology (such as pre-drilling of piles, the use of more than one pile driver to shorten the total pile driving duration), where feasible, in consideration of geotechnical and structural requirements and conditions;

c) Utilize noise control blankets on the building structure as the building is erected to reduce noise emission from the site;

d) Evaluate the feasibility of noise control at the receivers by temporarily improving the noise reduction capability of adjacent buildings by the use of sound blankets for example and


implement such measure if such measures are feasible and would noticeably reduce noise impacts; and

e) Monitor the effectiveness of noise attenuation measures by taking noise measurements. 39. Lighting Plan (Also listed as “SCA AES-1” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to the issuance of an electrical or building permit The proposed lighting fixtures shall be adequately shielded to a point below the light bulb and reflector and that prevent unnecessary glare onto adjacent properties. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Electrical Services Division of the Public Works Agency for review and approval. All lighting shall be architecturally integrated into the site.

40. Asbestos Removal in Structures (Also listed as “SCA AIR-4” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a demolition permit If asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are found to be present in building materials to be removed, demolition and disposal, the project applicant shall submit specifications signed by a certified asbestos consultant for the removal, encapsulation, or enclosure of the identified ACM in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, including but not necessarily limited to: California Code of Regulations, Title 8; Business and Professions Code; Division 3; California Health & Safety Code 25915-25919.7; and Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Regulation 11, Rule 2, as may be amended.

41. Tree Removal Permit (Also listed as “SCA BIO-2” in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit Prior to removal of any protected trees, per the Protected Tree Ordinance, located on the project site or in the public right-of-way adjacent to the project, the project applicant must secure a tree removal permit from the Tree Division of the Public Works Agency, and abide by the conditions of that permit.

42. Tree Removal During Breeding Season (Also listed as “SCA BIO-1” in the SCAMMRP) Prior to issuance of a tree removal permit To the extent feasible, removal of any tree and/or other vegetation suitable for nesting of raptors shall not occur during the breeding season of March 15 and August 15. If tree removal must occur during the breeding season, all sites shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist to verify the presence or absence of nesting raptors or other birds. Pre-removal surveys shall be conducted within 15 days prior to start of work from March 15 through May 31, and within 30 days prior to the start of work from June 1 through August 15. The pre-removal surveys shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division and the Tree Services Division of the Public Works Agency. If the survey indicates the potential presences of nesting raptors or other birds, the biologist shall determine an appropriately sized buffer around the nest in which no work will be allowed until the young have successfully fledged. The size of the nest buffer will be determined by the biologist in consultation with the CDFG, and will be based to a large extent on the nesting species and its sensitivity to disturbance. In general, buffer sizes of 200 feet for raptors and 50 feet for other birds should suffice to prevent disturbance to birds nesting in the urban environment, but these buffers may be increased or decreased, as appropriate, depending on the bird species and the level of disturbance anticipated near the nest.

43. Tree Replacement Plantings (Also listed as “SCA BIO-3” in the SCAMMRP) The Landscape Plan(s) submitted at the Design Review/Final Development Plan stage shall reflect the requirements below. Project landscaping that reflects the required tree replanting standards shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any given phase of the project. Replacement plantings shall be required for erosion control, groundwater replenishment, visual screening and wildlife habitat, and in order to prevent excessive loss of shade, in accordance with the following criteria:


a) No tree replacement shall be required for the removal of nonnative species, for the removal of trees which is required for the benefit of remaining trees, or where insufficient planting area exists for a mature tree of the species being considered.

b) Replacement tree species shall consist of Sequoia sempervirens (Coast Redwood), Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak), Arbutus menziesii (Madrone), Aesculus californica (California Buckeye) or Umbellularia californica (California Bay Laurel) or other tree species acceptable to the Tree Services Division.

c) Replacement trees shall be at least of twenty-four (24) inch box size, unless a smaller size is recommended by the arborist, except that three fifteen (15) gallon size trees may be substituted for each twenty-four (24) inch box size tree where appropriate.

d) Minimum planting areas must be available on site as follows: i. For Sequoia sempervirens, three hundred fifteen square feet per tree; ii. For all other species listed in #2 above, seven hundred (700) square feet per tree.

e) In the event that replacement trees are required but cannot be planted due to site constraints, an in lieu fee as determined by the master fee schedule of the city may be substituted for required replacement plantings, with all such revenues applied toward tree planting in city parks, streets and medians.

f) Plantings shall be installed prior to the issuance of a final inspection of the building permit, subject to seasonal constraints, and shall be maintained by the project applicant until established. The Tree Reviewer of the Tree Division of the Public Works Agency may require a landscape plan showing the replacement planting and the method of irrigation. Any replacement planting which fails to become established within one year of planting shall be replanted at the project Applicant’s expense.

44. Archaeological Resources (Also listed as “SCA CUL-1” in the SCAMMRP)

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction a) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5 (f), “provisions for historical or unique

archaeological resources accidentally discovered during construction” should be instituted. Therefore, in the event that any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are discovered during ground disturbing activities, all work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted and the project applicant and/or lead agency shall consult with a qualified archaeologist or paleontologist to assess the significance of the find. If any find is determined to be significant, representatives of the project proponent and/or lead agency and the qualified archaeologist would meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate measure, with the ultimate determination to be made by the City of Oakland. All significant cultural materials recovered shall be subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and a report prepared by the qualified archaeologist according to current professional standards.

b) In considering any suggested measure proposed by the consulting archaeologist in order to mitigate impacts to historical resources or unique archaeological resources, the project applicant shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while measure for historical resources or unique archaeological resources is carried out.

c) Should an archaeological artifact or feature be discovered on-site during project construction, all activities within a 50-foot radius of the find would be halted until the findings can be fully investigated by a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the find and assess the significance of the find according to the CEQA definition of a historical or unique archaeological resource. If the deposit is determined to be significant, the project applicant and the qualified archaeologist shall meet to determine the appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate measure, subject to approval by the City of Oakland, which shall assure implementation of appropriate measure measures recommended by the archaeologist. Should archaeologically-significant materials be


recovered, the qualified archaeologist shall recommend appropriate analysis and treatment, and shall prepare a report on the findings for submittal to the Northwest Information Center.

45. Human Remains (Also listed as “SCA CUL-3” in the SCAMMRP)

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction In the event that human skeletal remains are uncovered at the project site during construction or ground-breaking activities, all work shall immediately halt and the Alameda County Coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains, and following the procedures and protocols pursuant to Section 15064.5 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the City shall contact the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and all excavation and site preparation activities shall cease within a 50-foot radius of the find until appropriate arrangements are made. If the agencies determine that avoidance is not feasible, then an alternative plan shall be prepared with specific steps and timeframe required to resume construction activities. Monitoring, data recovery, determination of significance and avoidance measures (if applicable) shall be completed expeditiously.

46. Paleontological Resources (Also listed as “SCA CUL-2” in the SCAMMRP)

Ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction In the event of an unanticipated discovery of a paleontological resource during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (per Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (SVP 1995,1996)). The qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find. The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important, and such plan shall be implemented. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

47. Fire Safety Phasing Plan

At the time of submittal of a Final Development Plan and/or Design Review for the whole project or a portion thereof The project applicant shall submit a separate fire safety phasing plan to the Planning and Zoning Division and Fire Services Division for their review and approval. The fire safety plan shall include all of the fire safety features incorporated into the project and the schedule for implementation of the features. Fire Services Division may require changes to the plan or may reject the plan if it does not adequately address fire hazards associated with the project as a whole or the individual phase.

48. Hazardous Materials Business Plan Prior to issuance of a business license The project applicant shall submit a Hazardous Materials Business Plan for review and approval by

Fire Prevention Bureau, Hazardous Materials Unit. Once approved this plan shall be kept on file with the City and will be updated as applicable. The purpose of the Hazardous Materials Business Plan is to ensure that employees are adequately trained to handle the materials and provides information to the Fire Services Division should emergency response be required. The Hazardous Materials Business Plan shall include the following: a) The types of hazardous materials or chemicals stored and/or used on site, such as petroleum fuel

products, lubricants, solvents, and cleaning fluids. b) The location of such hazardous materials. c) An emergency response plan including employee training information d) A plan that describes the manner in which these materials are handled, transported and disposed.


49. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (also listed as SCA HYD-3 in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to any grading activities a) The project applicant shall obtain a grading permit if required by the Oakland Grading

Regulations pursuant to Section 15.04.780 of the Oakland Municipal Code. The grading permit application shall include an erosion and sedimentation control plan for review and approval by the Building Services Division. The erosion and sedimentation control plan shall include all necessary measures to be taken to prevent excessive stormwater runoff or carrying by stormwater runoff of solid materials on to lands of adjacent property owners, public streets, or to creeks as a result of conditions created by grading operations. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, such measures as short-term erosion control planting, waterproof slope covering, check dams, interceptor ditches, benches, storm drains, dissipation structures, diversion dikes, retarding berms and barriers, devices to trap, store and filter out sediment, and stormwater retention basins. Off-site work by the project applicant may be necessary. The project applicant shall obtain permission or easements necessary for off-site work. There shall be a clear notation that the plan is subject to changes as changing conditions occur. Calculations of anticipated stormwater runoff and sediment volumes shall be included, if required by the Director of Development or designee. The plan shall specify that, after construction is complete, the project applicant shall ensure that the storm drain system shall be inspected and that the project applicant shall clear the system of any debris or sediment.

Ongoing throughout grading and construction activities b) The project applicant shall implement the approved erosion and sedimentation plan. No grading

shall occur during the wet weather season (October 15 through April 15) unless specifically authorized in writing by the Building Services Division.

50. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Prior to and ongoing throughout demolition, grading, and/or construction activities The project applicant must obtain coverage under the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit (General Construction Permit) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The project applicant must file a notice of intent (NOI) with the SWRCB. The project applicant will be required to prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and submit the plan for review and approval by the Building Services Division. At a minimum, the SWPPP shall include a description of construction materials, practices, and equipment storage and maintenance; a list of pollutants likely to contact stormwater; site-specific erosion and sedimentation control practices; a list of provisions to eliminate or reduce discharge of materials to stormwater; Best Management Practices (BMPs), and an inspection and monitoring program. Prior to the issuance of any construction-related permits, the project applicant shall submit to the Building Services Division a copy of the SWPPP and evidence of submittal of the NOI to the SWRCB. Implementation of the SWPPP shall start with the commencement of construction and continue though the completion of the project. After construction is completed, the project applicant shall submit a notice of termination to the SWRCB.

51. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan (also listed as SCA HYD-1 in the SCAMMRP) Prior to issuance of building permit (or other construction-related permit) The applicant shall comply with the requirements of Provision C.3 of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued to the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program. The applicant shall submit with the application for a building permit (or other construction-related permit) a completed Construction-Permit-Phase Stormwater Supplemental Form to the Building Services Division. The project drawings submitted for the building permit (or other construction-related permit) shall contain a stormwater management plan, for review and approval by the City, to manage stormwater run-off and to limit the discharge of pollutants in stormwater after construction of the project to the maximum extent practicable. a. The post-construction stormwater management plan shall include and identify the following:

i. All proposed impervious surface on the site; ii. Anticipated directional flows of on-site stormwater runoff; and


iii. Site design measures to reduce the amount of impervious surface area and directly connected impervious surfaces; and

iv. Source control measures to limit the potential for stormwater pollution; v. Stormwater treatment measures to remove pollutants from stormwater runoff; and

vi. Hydromodification management measures so that post-project stormwater runoff does not exceed the flow and duration of pre-project runoff, if required under the NPDES permit.

b. The following additional information shall be submitted with the post-construction stormwater management plan:

i. Detailed hydraulic sizing calculations for each stormwater treatment measure proposed; and

ii. Pollutant removal information demonstrating that any proposed manufactured/mechanical (i.e. non-landscape-based) stormwater treatment measure, when not used in combination with a landscape-based treatment measure, is capable or removing the range of pollutants typically removed by landscape-based treatment measures and/or the range of pollutants expected to be generated by the project.

All proposed stormwater treatment measures shall incorporate appropriate planting materials for stormwater treatment (for landscape-based treatment measures) and shall be designed with considerations for vector/mosquito control. Proposed planting materials for all proposed landscape-based treatment measures shall be included on the landscape and irrigation plan for the project. The applicant is not required to include on-site stormwater treatment measures in the post-construction stormwater management plan if he or she secures approval from Planning and Zoning of a proposal that demonstrates compliance with the requirements of the City’s Alternative Compliance Program. Prior to final permit inspection The applicant shall implement the approved stormwater management plan.

52. Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Treatment Measures (also listed as SCA HYD-2 in the

SCAMMRP) Prior to final zoning inspection For projects incorporating stormwater treatment measures, the applicant shall enter into the “Standard City of Oakland Stormwater Treatment Measures Maintenance Agreement,” in accordance with Provision C.3.e of the NPDES permit, which provides, in part, for the following: i. The applicant accepting responsibility for the adequate installation/construction, operation,

maintenance, inspection, and reporting of any on-site stormwater treatment measures being incorporated into the project until the responsibility is legally transferred to another entity; and

ii. Legal access to the on-site stormwater treatment measures for representatives of the City, the local vector control district, and staff of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Region, for the purpose of verifying the implementation, operation, and maintenance of the on-site stormwater treatment measures and to take corrective action if necessary. The agreement shall be recorded at the County Recorder’s Office at the applicant’s expense.

53. Stormwater and Sewer (also listed as SCA HYD-4 in the SCAMMRP)

Prior to completing the final design for the project’s sewer service a) Confirmation of the capacity of the City’s surrounding stormwater and sanitary sewer system

and state of repair shall be completed by a qualified civil engineer with funding from the project applicant. The project applicant shall be responsible for the necessary stormwater and sanitary sewer infrastructure improvements to accommodate the proposed project. In addition, the applicant shall be required to pay additional fees to improve sanitary sewer infrastructure if required by the Sewer and Stormwater Division. Improvements to the existing sanitary sewer collection system shall specifically include, but are not limited to, mechanisms to control or minimize increases in infiltration/inflow to offset sanitary sewer increases associated with the proposed project. To the maximum extent practicable, the applicant will be required to


implement Best Management Practices to reduce the peak stormwater runoff from the project site. Additionally, the project applicant shall be responsible for payment of the required installation or hook-up fees to the affected service providers.

b) Construction over the common sewer and within the sewer easement is not permitted. c) The Fire Services Division will review and approve fire crew and apparatus access, water

supply availability and distribution to current codes and standards.

54. Regulatory Permits and Authorizations Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit Prior to construction within the floodway or floodplain, the project applicant shall obtain all necessary regulatory permits and authorizations from the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and shall comply with all conditions issued by that agency.

55. Structures within a Floodplain Prior to issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit a) The project applicant shall retain the civil engineer of record to ensure that the project’s

development plans and design contain finished site grades and floor elevations that are elevated above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) if established within a 100-year flood event.

b) The project applicant shall submit final hydrological calculations that ensure that the structure will not interfere with the flow of water or increase flooding.

PROJECT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 56. Components of Final Development Plan(s).

Prior to the approval of any Final Development Plan application In accordance with the Planning Code Chapter 17.140, each FDP shall: a) Conform to all major respects with the approved Preliminary Development Plan prepared by

HKIT Architects, dated April 23, 2010, and included as Exhibit xx to these Conditions of Approval Attachment A to the Project Staff Report dated May 19, 2010;

b) Comply with development standards of the S-15 Zone, except as modified to allow one parking space per dwelling unit as permitted by the Conditional Use Permit approved herein;

c) Be consistent with the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) Design Guidelines, dated April 23, 2010 and as amended May 19, 2010 and included as Exhibit xx to these Conditions of Approval Attachment B to the Project Staff Report dated May 19, 2010 ;

d) Include all information included in the Preliminary Development Plan plus the following: a. The location of water, sewerage, and drainage facilities; b. Detailed building floor plans, elevations and landscaping plans; c. The character and location of signs; d. Plans for street improvements; and e. Grading or earth-moving plans.

e) Be sufficiently detailed to indicate fully the ultimate operation and appearance of the buildings; and

f) Include copies of legal documents required for dedication or reservation of group or common spaces, for the creation of CC&Rs, for the establishment of a homeowners association, or for performance bonds, and they shall be submitted with each Final Development Plan.

57. Final Development Plan and Design Review

The final site design and building elevations shall: a) Provide adequate screening of all rooftop utilities.


b) Show interim building and site conditions. Building elevations for each FDP/Design Review application shall show how the building and site will look if the other building(s) are not constructed at the same time. For instance, if the Applicant submits an FDP/Design Review application for Phase 2 only of the PDP, the building elevations and site plan for Phase 2 shall show what the building and site will look like in its interim condition until the adjacent building (Phase 3) is constructed.

c) Be subject to review and recommendation by the Planning Commission’s Design Review Committee and review and approval by the Planning Commission.

58. Bicycle Parking

At the time of Design Review/Final Development Plan application The applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Division, plans that

show bicycle storage and parking facilities, the design and location of bicycle racks, and secure bicycle storage areas to serve the project.

59. Provision of Parking Spaces for Fruitvale Village (Phase 1)

At the time of first Design Review/Final Development Plan application A parking study conducted by Dowling Associates in November 2009 concluded that with the loss of the public parking lot on the project site, the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 1) development to the west would have a deficiency of 61 parking spaces. At the time of the first FDP application for the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 2) project, the Applicant shall accomplish one of the following:

a) Identify a new location for the 61 parking spaces for the dedicated use of the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 1) development, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director;

b) Conduct a new parking survey to illustrate that a lesser amount of parking spaces are needed to serve the needs of the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 1). Identify a new location for the number of parking spaces needed for the dedicated use of the Fruitvale Transit Village (Phase 1) development, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director; or

c) Apply to have the requirement to provide replacement parking waived, subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission.

60. Rail Crossing Improvements in the Project Vicinity

Prior to approval of first Design Review/Final Development Plan(s) The Applicant shall submit Public Improvement Plans to the Transportation Services Division (TSD) committing to the installation of the following rail crossing safety improvements in the project vicinity. On behalf of the Applicant, TSD will coordinate with the Public Utilities Commission, rail authority, and others as needed to facilitate the installation of the improvements. a) Median channelization/separation treatment on Fruitvale Avenue approaching the rail

crossing. Bollard/plastic curbing discourages vehicles from driving around the automated crossing arm gate. Install the bollard along the centerline on Fruitvale Avenue approaching the rail crossing in both directions.

b) Cross hatch pavement marking at Fruitvale and 37th Avenue rail crossings. Similar to hatch pavement marking at intersections to indicate a “keep clear” zone. Install cross hatch pavement marking between two and six feet outside the rail at both identified crossings.

The Applicant shall install above improvements prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.

61. Tentative Tract Map 8038 and Recordation of Final Map(s) a) Prior to a certificate of occupancy for any of the 275 residential units, a Final Map shall be

recorded pursuant to Case File PUD 08-186. The Applicant shall review the recordation with Engineering Services, as this department may have a different timeframe for final map submittal.

b) The Final Map(s) shall show a 10 foot wide sidewalk (with 8 feet wide clear passageway) on 35th Avenue adjacent to the project site, not 8 feet as is currently shown, pursuant to the City’s Pedestrian Master Plan and as warranted by the project’s transit-oriented location.


c) The Final Map(s) shall show a 26 foot wide Emergency Vehicle Access Easement along the southern portion of the site, parallel to the BART tracks and connecting 35th and 37th Avenues, pursuant to the 2008 Fire Code provisions for increased right-of-way access.

d) All elevations shown on the Final Map(s) and any elevations established by this or future vertical subdivisions shall be based upon City of Oakland Datum.

e) Prior to recordation of a Final Map, a site-specific, design level, Landslide or Liquefaction geotechnical investigation for each construction site within the project area shall be required as part if this project and submitted for review and approval by the Building Services Division.

f) Prior to recordation of a Final Map, City of Oakland Monuments shall be established or confirmed to accurately exist at each of the bounding intersections:

a. San Leandro/ 35th Ave b. San Leandro /37th Ave c. East 12th Street / 37th Ave d. East 12th Street / 36th Ave e. East 12th Street / 35th Ave.

These monuments will be shown upon the Final Map(s) with ties to adjacent monuments and to the adjacent (new/existing) boundary lines. Monuments shall be constructed to City Standards and shall become City Monuments upon acceptance by the City Engineer or City Surveyor All monuments shall be installed and completed prior to the occupancy of ANY lot in this subdivision, regardless of sequencing or staged development. At least two of these monuments shall have an elevation established (based upon City of Oakland Datum) upon the surface of the monument disk. All relevant information shall be shown upon the Final Map(s) and provided to the City Surveyor upon recordation of the Final Map(s).

62. Tentative Tract Map 8038 – Engineering

The following items will be required at the time of Final Map(s) submittal: a) An application for a Final Map shall be made and all fees paid prior to any other application

with City of Oakland Building Services. b) Show location of existing and proposed drainage, sanitary sewer, water supply, and other utility

facilities for each lot. c) Existing utilities and their associated easements lie within the project site. It appears that these

utilities will have to be relocated from the project site and the easements vacated. Note that building structures cannot be located within any City utility easement. The City believes that the underground 12kv line has similar restrictions.

d) The proposed storm drain system shown on the map shall be designed and constructed to City standards. The proposed project may increase storm drain sewer flows beyond the capacity of the existing storm drain sewer system. Sanitary sewer impact fees may be owed. Obtain approval from the City Public Works Agency concerning the extent of the sanitary sewer replacement and/or rehabilitation prior to the City issuing the Grading, Demolition or P-job Permit

e) If buildings along the southern boundary of the project will be greater than 30-feet in height, the applicant shall provide a 26-foot wide emergency access easement along the entire southern boundary. If the Applicant is proposing to utilize a portion of BART property for this easement, BART shall sign the Final Map and other applicable documents.

f) Emergency vehicles utilizing the emergency access easement along the southern boundary may encroach on the clearance zone for the BART trains. The applicant shall obtain BART approval for any facilities built on BART property and for any uses of the air space within BART property.

g) Show location, purpose, and width of all existing and proposed easements. h) There are existing bus stops within the vicinity of the project. If bus stops are proposed for

relocation or otherwise to be affected by the project, please provide documentation that the


project has been coordinated with AC Transit. Documentation shall include discussion and approval of bus stop locations and the need for improvements for bus stops.

i) Note that the property lies within a seismic hazard zone with earthquake-induced liquefaction potential. A soils report may be required. If required, submit geotechnical reports meeting the guidelines of Special Publication 117 prepared by a licensed civil engineer or a registered engineering geologist to the City for review when applying for permits. A statement acknowledging the above shall be placed on the parcel map. Add a statement to the Map that says “This real property lies within the following hazardous area: A SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE - Liquefaction Zone pursuant to Section 2696 of the Public Resources Code. These hazards may limit your ability to develop the real property, to obtain insurance, or to receive assistance after a disaster. The maps on which these disclosures are based estimate where natural hazards exist. They are not definitive indicators of whether or not a property will be affected by a natural disaster. Transferee(s) and transferor(s) may wish to obtain professional advice regarding hazards and other hazards that may affect the property.”

j) The proposed project may increase sanitary sewer flows beyond the capacity of the existing sanitary sewer system. Sanitary sewer impact fees may be owed. Obtain approval from the City Public Works Agency concerning the extent of the sanitary sewer replacement and/or rehabilitation prior to the City issuing the Grading, Demolition or P-job Permit.

k) Coordinate the project with the City of Oakland Fire Department. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Fire Department prior to approval of the Final Map(s).

l) The existing traffic signals and stop signs in the vicinity of the project may require improvements to support the proposed traffic. Coordinate with the Traffic Engineering Department of PWA. Obtain approval for traffic signal modification/replacement from the City.

m) Obtain approval for driveway locations and proposed traffic movements from PWA prior to obtaining Grading, Demolition, or P-job permits.

n) Street, curb, gutter, sidewalk, sewer, undergrounding of overhead utilities and other improvements are required along the frontage of the project to the centerline of the public right-of-way.

o) Major and Minor Encroachment Permits shall be obtained prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) or the issuance of Grading, Demolition, or P-job permits.

p) Obstruction permits for parking meter removal shall be obtained prior to obtaining Grading, Demolition, or P-job permits. New parking meter locations and/or relocation of existing meters shall approved by the City prior to removal of any existing meters.

q) Copies of utility agreements regarding relocation shall be provided to the City prior to approval of the Final Map(s) or issuance of any permits.

r) Obtain approval from the City for the location of any joint trench and utility box locations. s) Shoring and/or tie-backs if used in construction may require Major Encroachment Permits. t) Utility vaults may require Major Encroachment permits. u) Show any proposed dedications or vacations on the Final Map(s). v) Obtain approval from the City for any installation, removal and/or relocation of street lights

from the City. w) New sidewalks and wheelchair ramps shall conform to City of Oakland standards. x) Driveways openings and vehicular access shall conform to City of Oakland Standard Plans. y) Improvements within the public right-of-way may be a part of this project. A P-job permit and a

signed Subdivision Improvement Agreement shall be completed prior to the City signing the Final Map(s). Improvements shall be designed to City standards.

z) The project lies within a FEMA designated Flood Zone. Please state the Flood Zone designation on the Final Map.

Page

-35-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

4.1

Air

Quali

ty

Impa

ct A

IR-1

: Act

iviti

es a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

dem

oliti

on, s

ite p

repa

ratio

n, a

nd

cons

truct

ion

thro

ugho

ut d

evel

opm

ent o

f th

e pr

ojec

t wou

ld g

ener

ate

crite

ria a

ir po

lluta

nts.

(Les

s th

an S

igni

fican

t und

er

exis

ting

and

prop

osed

BA

AQ

MD

Th

resh

olds

)

AIR

-1: D

ust C

ontr

ol

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng o

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit.

D

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n, th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll re

quire

the

cons

truct

ion

cont

ract

or to

impl

emen

t the

follo

win

g m

easu

res

requ

ired

as p

art o

f Bay

Are

a A

ir Q

ualit

y M

anag

emen

t Dis

trict

’s (B

AA

QM

D) b

asic

and

enh

ance

d du

st c

ontro

l pro

cedu

res

requ

ired

for c

onst

ruct

ion

site

s.

Thes

e in

clud

e:

Wat

er a

ll ac

tive

cons

truct

ion

area

s at

leas

t tw

ice

daily

. W

ater

ing

shou

ld b

e su

ffici

ent t

o pr

even

t airb

orne

dus

t fro

m

leav

ing

the

site

. Inc

reas

ed w

ater

ing

frequ

ency

may

be

nece

ssar

y w

hene

ver w

ind

spee

ds e

xcee

d 15

mile

s pe

r ho

ur. R

ecla

imed

wat

er s

houl

d be

use

d w

hene

ver p

ossi

ble.

C

over

all

truck

s ha

ulin

g so

il, s

and,

and

oth

er lo

ose

mat

eria

ls o

r req

uire

all

truck

s to

mai

ntai

n at

leas

t tw

o fe

et o

f fre

eboa

rd (i

.e.,

the

min

imum

requ

ired

spac

e be

twee

n th

e to

p of

the

load

and

the

top

of th

e tra

iler)

. a)

P

ave,

app

ly w

ater

thre

e tim

es d

aily

, or a

pply

(non

-toxi

c)

soil

stab

ilize

rs o

n al

l unp

aved

acc

ess

road

s, p

arki

ng

area

s an

d st

agin

g ar

eas

at c

onst

ruct

ion

site

s.

b)

Sw

eep

daily

(with

wat

er s

wee

pers

usi

ng re

clai

med

w

ater

if p

ossi

ble)

all

pave

d ac

cess

road

s, p

arki

ng a

reas

an

d st

agin

g ar

eas

at c

onst

ruct

ion

site

s.

c)

Sw

eep

stre

ets

(with

wat

er s

wee

pers

usi

ng re

clai

med

w

ater

if p

ossi

ble)

at t

he e

nd o

f eac

h da

y if

visi

ble

soil

mat

eria

l is

carr

ied

onto

adj

acen

t pav

ed ro

ads.

d)

Li

mit

the

amou

nt o

f the

dis

turb

ed a

rea

at a

ny o

ne ti

me,

w

here

feas

ible

. e)

S

uspe

nd e

xcav

atio

n an

d gr

adin

g ac

tivity

whe

n w

inds

(in

stan

tane

ous

gust

s) e

xcee

d 25

mph

. f)

Pav

e al

l roa

dway

s, d

rivew

ays,

sid

ewal

ks, e

tc. a

s so

on

as fe

asib

le. I

n ad

ditio

n, b

uild

ing

pads

sho

uld

be la

id a

s so

on a

s po

ssib

le a

fter g

radi

ng u

nles

s se

edin

g or

soi

l bi

nder

s ar

e us

ed.

g)

Rep

lant

veg

etat

ion

in d

istu

rbed

are

as a

s qu

ickl

y as

fe

asib

le.

h)

Enc

lose

, cov

er, w

ater

twic

e da

ily o

r app

ly (n

on-to

xic)

so

il st

abili

zers

to e

xpos

ed s

tock

pile

s (d

irt, s

and,

etc

.).

i) Li

mit

traffi

c sp

eeds

on

unpa

ved

road

s to

15

mile

s pe

r hou

r.

AIR

-1 a

nd A

IR-2

sha

ll be

impl

emen

ted

prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it.

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-36-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

j)

Cle

an o

ff th

e tir

es o

r tra

cks

of a

ll tru

cks

and

equi

pmen

t le

avin

g an

y un

pave

d co

nstru

ctio

n ar

eas.

AI

R-2

: Con

stru

ctio

n Em

issi

ons

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng o

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit.

To

min

imiz

e co

nstru

ctio

n eq

uipm

ent e

mis

sion

s du

ring

cons

truct

ion,

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

requ

ire th

e co

nstru

ctio

n co

ntra

ctor

to:

k)

Dem

onst

rate

com

plia

nce

with

Bay

Are

a A

ir Q

ualit

y M

anag

emen

t Dis

trict

(BA

AQ

MD

) Reg

ulat

ion

2, R

ule

1 (G

ener

al R

equi

rem

ents

) for

all

porta

ble

cons

truct

ion

equi

pmen

t sub

ject

to th

at ru

le. B

AA

QM

D R

egul

atio

n 2,

R

ule

1 pr

ovid

es th

e is

suan

ce o

f aut

horit

ies

to c

onst

ruct

an

d pe

rmits

to o

pera

te c

erta

in ty

pes

of p

orta

ble

equi

pmen

t us

ed fo

r con

stru

ctio

n pu

rpos

es (e

.g.,

gaso

line

or d

iese

l-po

wer

ed e

ngin

es u

sed

in c

onju

nctio

n w

ith p

ower

ge

nera

tion,

pum

ps, c

ompr

esso

rs, a

nd c

rane

s) u

nles

s su

ch e

quip

men

t com

plie

s w

ith a

ll ap

plic

able

requ

irem

ents

of

the

“CAP

CO

A” P

orta

ble

Equi

pmen

t Reg

istra

tion

Rul

e”

or w

ith a

ll ap

plic

able

requ

irem

ents

of t

he S

tate

wid

e P

orta

ble

Equ

ipm

ent R

egis

tratio

n P

rogr

am. T

his

exem

ptio

n is

pro

vide

d in

BA

AQ

MD

Rul

e 2-

1-10

5.

l) Pe

rform

low

-NO

x tu

ne-u

ps o

n al

l die

sel-p

ower

ed

cons

truct

ion

equi

pmen

t gre

ater

than

50

hors

epow

er (n

o m

ore

than

30

days

prio

r to

the

star

t of u

se o

f tha

t eq

uipm

ent).

Per

iodi

c tu

ne-u

ps (e

very

90

days

) sha

ll be

pe

rform

ed fo

r suc

h eq

uipm

ent u

sed

cont

inuo

usly

dur

ing

the

cons

truct

ion

perio

d.

Impa

ct A

IR-4

: The

pro

pose

d pr

ojec

t co

uld

resu

lt in

exp

osur

e of

per

sons

to

subs

tant

ial l

evel

s of

PM

2.5

conc

entra

tions

and

Tox

ic A

ir C

onta

min

ants

(TA

Cs)

whi

ch m

ay re

sult

in a

dver

se h

ealth

effe

cts.

(Sig

nific

ant

durin

g co

nstru

ctio

n un

der p

ropo

sed

BA

AQ

MD

Thr

esho

lds

only

)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re A

IR-4

: The

pro

ject

app

lican

t and

its

cont

ract

ors

shal

l dev

elop

a p

lan

dem

onst

ratin

g th

at th

e of

f-ro

ad e

quip

men

t (m

ore

than

50

hors

epow

er) t

o be

use

d du

ring

cons

truct

ion

of th

e pr

ojec

t wou

ld a

chie

ve a

pro

ject

wid

e fle

et-

aver

age

of 2

0 pe

rcen

t NO

x re

duct

ion

and

a 45

per

cent

PM

re

duct

ion

com

pare

d to

the

mos

t rec

ent C

ARB

fleet

ave

rage

. A

ccep

tabl

e op

tions

from

redu

cing

em

issi

ons

incl

ude

the

use

of la

te m

odel

eng

ines

, low

-em

issi

on d

iese

l pro

duct

s,

alte

rnat

ive

fuel

s, e

ngin

e re

trofit

tech

nolo

gy, a

fter-

treat

men

t pr

oduc

ts, a

nd/o

r oth

er o

ptio

ns a

s su

ch b

ecom

e av

aila

ble.

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n;

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

4.2 N

oise

Im

pact

NO

I-1: C

onst

ruct

ion

activ

ities

w

ould

inte

rmitt

ently

and

tem

pora

rily

gene

rate

noi

se le

vels

abo

ve e

xist

ing

ambi

ent l

evel

s in

the

proj

ect v

icin

ity.

(Pot

entia

lly S

igni

fican

t)

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

ns o

f App

rova

l: N

OI-1

: Day

s/H

ours

of C

onst

ruct

ion

Ope

ratio

n N

OI-3

: Noi

se C

ompl

aint

Pro

cedu

res

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng

and/

or c

onst

ruct

ion

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n;

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g

Page

-37-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

an

d Zo

ning

Im

pact

NO

I-3: T

he p

roje

ct w

ould

pla

ce

nois

e-se

nsiti

ve m

ultif

amily

resi

dent

ial

uses

in a

noi

se e

nviro

nmen

t ch

arac

teriz

ed a

s “n

orm

ally

un

acce

ptab

le” f

or s

uch

uses

by

the

City

of

Oak

land

. (P

oten

tially

Sig

nific

ant)

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n of

App

rova

l: N

OI-4

: Int

erio

r Noi

se

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

bu

ildin

g pe

rmit

and

Cer

tific

ate

of

Occ

upan

cy

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n;

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Impa

ct N

OI-4

: The

pro

ject

wou

ld e

xpos

e se

nsiti

ve re

side

ntia

l use

s to

gro

undb

orne

vi

brat

ion

from

trai

ns p

assi

ng b

y on

the

UP

RR

trac

ks. (

Pot

entia

lly S

igni

fican

t)

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n of

App

rova

l: N

OI-6

: Vib

ratio

n P

rior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a

build

ing

perm

it an

d C

ertif

icat

e of

O

ccup

ancy

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n;

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

4.3 T

rans

porta

tion,

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Park

ing

Bef

ore

Proj

ect A

ppro

val

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n of

App

rova

l, P

arki

ng a

nd

Tran

spor

tatio

n D

eman

d M

anag

emen

t P

rior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a fi

nal i

nspe

ctio

n of

the

build

ing

perm

it:

The

appl

ican

t sha

ll su

bmit

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val b

y th

e P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng D

ivis

ion

a Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Dem

and

Man

agem

ent (

TDM

) pla

n co

ntai

ning

stra

tegi

es to

redu

ce

on-s

ite p

arki

ng d

eman

d an

d si

ngle

occ

upan

cy v

ehic

le

trave

l. Th

e ap

plic

ant s

hall

impl

emen

t the

app

rove

d TD

M

plan

. The

TD

M s

hall

incl

ude

stra

tegi

es to

incr

ease

bic

ycle

, pe

dest

rian,

tran

sit,

and

carp

ools

/van

pool

use

. All

four

m

odes

of t

rave

l sha

ll be

con

side

red.

Stra

tegi

es to

con

side

r in

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

a)

Inc

lusi

on o

f add

ition

al b

icyc

le p

arki

ng, s

how

er, a

nd

lock

er fa

cilit

ies

that

exc

eed

the

requ

irem

ent

b) C

onst

ruct

ion

of b

ike

lane

s pe

r the

Bic

ycle

Mas

ter P

lan;

P

riorit

y B

ikew

ay P

roje

cts

c) S

igna

ge a

nd s

tripi

ng o

nsite

to e

ncou

rage

bik

e sa

fety

d)

Ins

talla

tion

of s

afet

y el

emen

ts p

er th

e P

edes

trian

Mas

ter

Pla

n (s

uch

as c

ross

wal

k st

ripin

g, c

urb

ram

ps, c

ount

do

wn

sign

als,

bul

b ou

ts, e

tc.)

to e

ncou

rage

con

veni

ent

cros

sing

at a

rteria

ls

e) I

nsta

llatio

n of

am

eniti

es s

uch

as li

ghtin

g, s

treet

tree

s,

trash

rece

ptac

les

per t

he P

edes

trian

Mas

ter P

lan

and

any

appl

icab

le s

treet

scap

e pl

an.

f) D

irect

tran

sit s

ales

or s

ubsi

dize

d tra

nsit

pass

es

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

fin

al in

spec

tion

of th

e fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-38-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

da

rd C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tan

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

g)

Gua

rant

eed

ride

hom

e pr

ogra

m

h) P

re-ta

x co

mm

uter

ben

efits

(che

cks)

i)

On-

site

car

-sha

ring

prog

ram

(suc

h as

City

Car

Sha

re,

Zip

Car

, etc

.) j)

On-

site

car

pool

ing

prog

ram

k)

Dis

tribu

tion

of in

form

atio

n co

ncer

ning

alte

rnat

ive

trans

porta

tion

optio

ns

l) P

arki

ng s

pace

s so

ld/le

ased

sep

arat

ely

m) P

arki

ng m

anag

emen

t stra

tegi

es; i

nclu

ding

at

tend

ant/v

alet

par

king

and

sha

red

park

ing

spac

es

Proj

ect C

onst

ruct

ion

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n of

App

rova

l, C

onst

ruct

ion

Traf

fic a

nd

Par

king

: P

rior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f a d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

or b

uild

ing

perm

it:

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant a

nd c

onst

ruct

ion

cont

ract

or s

hall

mee

t w

ith a

ppro

pria

te C

ity o

f Oak

land

age

ncie

s to

det

erm

ine

traffi

c m

anag

emen

t stra

tegi

es to

redu

ce, t

o th

e m

axim

um

exte

nt fe

asib

le, t

raffi

c co

nges

tion

and

the

effe

cts

of p

arki

ng

dem

and

by c

onst

ruct

ion

wor

kers

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

of th

is

proj

ect a

nd o

ther

nea

rby

proj

ects

that

cou

ld b

e si

mul

tane

ousl

y un

der c

onst

ruct

ion.

The

pro

ject

app

lican

t sh

all d

evel

op a

con

stru

ctio

n m

anag

emen

t pla

n fo

r rev

iew

an

d ap

prov

al b

y th

e P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng D

ivis

ion,

the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n, a

nd th

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion.

The

pla

n sh

all i

nclu

de a

t lea

st th

e fo

llow

ing

item

s an

d re

quire

men

ts:

a) A

set

of c

ompr

ehen

sive

traf

fic c

ontro

l mea

sure

s,

incl

udin

g sc

hedu

ling

of m

ajor

truc

k tri

ps a

nd d

eliv

erie

s to

avo

id p

eak

traffi

c ho

urs,

det

our s

igns

if re

quire

d, la

ne

clos

ure

proc

edur

es, s

igns

, con

es fo

r driv

ers,

and

de

sign

ated

con

stru

ctio

n ac

cess

rout

es.

b) N

otifi

catio

n pr

oced

ures

for a

djac

ent p

rope

rty o

wne

rs

and

publ

ic s

afet

y pe

rson

nel r

egar

ding

whe

n m

ajor

de

liver

ies,

det

ours

, and

lane

clo

sure

s w

ill o

ccur

. c)

Lo

catio

n of

con

stru

ctio

n st

agin

g ar

eas

for m

ater

ials

, eq

uipm

ent,

and

vehi

cles

at a

n ap

prov

ed lo

catio

n.

d) A

pro

cess

for r

espo

ndin

g to

, and

trac

king

, com

plai

nts

perta

inin

g to

con

stru

ctio

n ac

tivity

, inc

ludi

ng id

entif

icat

ion

of

an o

nsite

com

plai

nt m

anag

er. T

he m

anag

er s

hall

dete

rmin

e th

e ca

use

of th

e co

mpl

aint

s an

d sh

all t

ake

prom

pt a

ctio

n to

cor

rect

the

prob

lem

. Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Prio

r to

the

issu

ance

of

a de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

, or

bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n;

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Page

-39-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

sh

all b

e in

form

ed w

ho th

e M

anag

er is

prio

r to

the

issu

ance

of

the

first

per

mit

issu

ed b

y Bu

ildin

g Se

rvic

es.

e) P

rovi

sion

for a

ccom

mod

atio

n of

ped

estri

an fl

ow.

Maj

or P

roje

ct C

ases

: f)

Pro

visi

on fo

r par

king

man

agem

ent a

nd s

pace

s fo

r all

cons

truct

ion

wor

kers

to e

nsur

e th

at c

onst

ruct

ion

wor

kers

do

not

par

k in

on-

stre

et s

pace

s.

g) A

ny d

amag

e to

the

stre

et c

ause

d by

hea

vy e

quip

men

t, or

as

a re

sult

of th

is c

onst

ruct

ion,

sha

ll be

repa

ired,

at

the

appl

ican

t's e

xpen

se, w

ithin

one

wee

k of

the

occu

rren

ce o

f the

dam

age

(or e

xces

sive

wea

r), u

nles

s fu

rther

dam

age/

exce

ssiv

e w

ear m

ay c

ontin

ue; i

n su

ch

case

, rep

air s

hall

occu

r prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

fina

l in

spec

tion

of th

e bu

ildin

g pe

rmit.

All

dam

age

that

is a

th

reat

to p

ublic

hea

lth o

r saf

ety

shal

l be

repa

ired

imm

edia

tely

. The

stre

et s

hall

be re

stor

ed to

its

cond

ition

pr

ior t

o th

e ne

w c

onst

ruct

ion

as e

stab

lishe

d by

the

City

B

uild

ing

Insp

ecto

r and

/or p

hoto

doc

umen

tatio

n, a

t the

ap

plic

ant's

exp

ense

, bef

ore

the

issu

ance

of a

Cer

tific

ate

of O

ccup

ancy

. h)

Any

hea

vy e

quip

men

t bro

ught

to th

e co

nstru

ctio

n si

te

shal

l be

trans

porte

d by

truc

k, w

here

feas

ible

. i)

No

mat

eria

ls o

r equ

ipm

ent s

hall

be s

tore

d on

the

trave

led

road

way

at a

ny ti

me.

j)

Prio

r to

cons

truct

ion,

a p

orta

ble

toile

t fac

ility

and

a

debr

is b

ox s

hall

be in

stal

led

on th

e si

te, a

nd p

rope

rly

mai

ntai

ned

thro

ugh

proj

ect c

ompl

etio

n.

k)

All

equi

pmen

t sha

ll be

equ

ippe

d w

ith m

uffle

rs.

l) P

rior t

o th

e en

d of

eac

h w

ork

day

durin

g co

nstru

ctio

n,

the

cont

ract

or o

r con

tract

ors

shal

l pic

k up

and

pro

perly

di

spos

e of

all

litte

r res

ultin

g fro

m o

r rel

ated

to th

e pr

ojec

t, w

heth

er lo

cate

d on

the

prop

erty

, with

in th

e pu

blic

righ

ts-o

f-way

, or p

rope

rties

of a

djac

ent o

r nea

rby

neig

hbor

s.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-1:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

six

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

eas

tbou

nd (E

ast 9

th

Stre

et) t

hrou

gh m

ovem

ent a

t Int

erse

ctio

n #4

Fru

itval

e A

venu

e / E

ast 9

th S

treet

, w

hich

cur

rent

ly o

pera

tes

at a

n

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-1:

Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak

hour

si

gnal

tim

ing

at th

e in

ters

ectio

n of

Fru

itval

e A

venu

e / E

ast

9th

Stre

et to

incr

ease

the

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

eas

tbou

nd a

nd

wes

tbou

nd (E

ast 9

th S

treet

) app

roac

hes

and

decr

ease

the

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

nor

thbo

und

and

sout

hbou

nd (F

ruitv

ale

Ave

nue)

thro

ugh

mov

emen

ts.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-40-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

un

acce

ptab

le L

OS

E. (

Sig

nific

ant)

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns. T

he

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

sta

ndar

ds a

nd A

DA

st

anda

rds

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gu

idel

ines

) at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

S

tand

ards

cal

l for

, am

ong

othe

r ite

ms,

the

elem

ents

list

ed

belo

w:

• 20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r; •

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s IT

S

Mas

ter P

lan)

; •

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

alre

ady

inst

alle

d);

• Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n, b

icyc

le

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

); •

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls; a

nd

• S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

. S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pr

epar

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

. Im

plem

enta

tion

of M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

TR

AN

S-1

wou

ld n

ot

resu

lt in

an

acce

ptab

le L

OS

dur

ing

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur a

t thi

s in

ters

ectio

n. T

he a

vera

ge d

elay

for t

he c

ritic

al e

astb

ound

(E

ast 9

th S

treet

) thr

ough

mov

emen

t wou

ld in

crea

se b

y le

ss

than

the

six-

seco

nd th

resh

old

of s

igni

fican

ce fo

r in

ters

ectio

ns o

pera

ting

at L

OS

E.

mod

ifica

tion

mea

sure

s ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-2:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e P

M p

eak

hour

at I

nter

sect

ion

#4 -

Frui

tval

e A

venu

e an

d E

ast 9

th

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t an

unac

cept

able

LO

S F

und

er 2

015

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-2:

Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

si

gnal

pha

sing

at t

he in

ters

ectio

n of

Fru

itval

e A

venu

e / E

ast

9th

Stre

et to

allo

w p

rote

cted

-per

mitt

ed le

ft-tu

rn m

ovem

ents

on

the

north

boun

d an

d so

uthb

ound

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e)

thro

ugh

mov

emen

ts, a

nd re

fine

the

sign

al p

hase

tim

e.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. The

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

Page

-41-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in e

ffect

at t

he

time

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity s

tand

ards

and

AD

A

stan

dard

s (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd

guid

elin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or, a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s, th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

be

low

: •

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller;

• G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

ITS

M

aste

r Pla

n);

• A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

stal

led)

; •

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bic

ycle

de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns);

• C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

; and

•

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Impa

ct T

RANS

-3: B

uild

out o

f the

pro

pose

d pr

ojec

t wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

du

ring

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

ea

stbo

und

(Eas

t 12t

h S

treet

) thr

ough

m

ovem

ent a

t Int

erse

ctio

n #6

- 35

th A

venu

e an

d Ea

st 1

2th

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te

at a

n un

acce

ptab

le L

OS

F u

nder

201

5 B

asel

ine

cond

ition

s. (S

igni

fican

t)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-3:

Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of 3

5th

Ave

nue

/ Eas

t 12

th S

treet

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

eas

t-w

est (

Eas

t 12t

h S

treet

) app

roac

h an

d de

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

nor

th-s

outh

(35t

h A

venu

e) a

ppro

ach.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or, a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s, th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller;

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-42-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n);

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

; o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

); o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

; and

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-4:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

the

PM

pe

ak-h

our L

OS

to d

egra

de fr

om a

n ac

cept

able

LO

S D

und

er 2

015

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons

to a

n un

acce

ptab

le L

OS

E a

t In

ters

ectio

n #8

- S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

and

35

th A

venu

e. (S

igni

fican

t)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-4:

At t

he in

ters

ectio

n of

S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

/ 35

th A

venu

e, e

limin

ate

the

prot

ecte

d le

ft-tu

rn s

igna

l pha

se fo

r wes

tbou

nd S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

, an

d op

timiz

e th

e si

gnal

spl

it du

ring

the

PM

pea

k-ho

ur.

• To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

Pla

ns,

Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

, am

ong

othe

r ite

ms,

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r; o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n);

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

; o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

); o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

; and

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-43-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll fu

nd th

e co

st o

f pre

parin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-5:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e P

M p

eak

hour

at I

nter

sect

ion

#14

- San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et a

nd H

igh

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t an

unac

cept

able

LO

S F

und

er 2

015

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-5:

Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al p

hasi

ng a

t the

inte

rsec

tion

of S

an L

eand

ro

Stre

et /

Hig

h S

treet

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

ea

st-w

est (

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et) a

ppro

ach

and

decr

ease

d gr

een

time

for t

he n

orth

-sou

th (H

igh

Stre

et) a

ppro

ach.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or, a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s, th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller;

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

; o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d);

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns);

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls; a

nd

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

. •

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pr

epar

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-6:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

sou

thbo

und

(Hig

h S

treet

) thr

ough

mov

emen

t at I

nter

sect

ion

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-6:

Mod

ify th

e AM

pea

k-ho

ur

traffi

c si

gnal

tim

ing

at th

e in

ters

ectio

n of

Hig

h St

reet

/ C

olis

eum

Way

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

so

uthb

ound

(Hig

h St

reet

) thr

ough

mov

emen

t and

dec

reas

ed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

nor

thbo

und

(Hig

h St

reet

) lef

t-tur

n

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Page

-44-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

#1

5 - H

igh

Stre

et a

nd C

olis

eum

Way

, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t an

unac

cept

able

LO

S F

und

er 2

015

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(S

igni

fican

t)

mov

emen

t.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

, am

ong

othe

r ite

ms,

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r; o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n);

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

; o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

); o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

; and

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

sign

al

mod

ifica

tion

mea

sure

s ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-7:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

sou

thbo

und

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) th

roug

h m

ovem

ent a

t In

ters

ectio

n #1

- Fr

uitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ In

tern

atio

nal B

oule

vard

, whi

ch w

ould

op

erat

e at

LO

S F

und

er 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-7:

Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of F

ruitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ In

tern

atio

nal B

oule

vard

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r th

e no

rth-s

outh

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) a

ppro

ache

s an

d de

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

eas

t-wes

t (In

tern

atio

nal

Bou

leva

rd) a

ppro

ache

s.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-45-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

am

ong

othe

r ite

ms

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n)

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

) o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RANS

-8: B

uild

out o

f the

pro

pose

d pr

ojec

t wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

du

ring

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

so

uthb

ound

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) th

roug

h m

ovem

ent a

t Int

erse

ctio

n #2

- Fr

uitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ Eas

t 12t

h S

treet

, whi

ch w

ould

op

erat

e at

LO

S F

und

er 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-8:

Mod

ify th

e PM

pea

k-ho

ur

sign

al p

hasi

ng a

t the

inte

rsec

tion

of F

ruitv

ale

Aven

ue /

East

12

th S

treet

to p

rovi

de p

rote

cted

-per

mis

sive

left-

turn

pha

sing

fo

r eas

tbou

nd a

nd w

estb

ound

(Eas

t 12t

h St

reet

) and

to

prov

ide

incr

ease

d gr

een

time

for s

outh

boun

d (F

ruitv

ale

Aven

ue) a

nd d

ecre

ased

gre

en ti

me

for e

astb

ound

(Eas

t 12

th S

treet

).

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n Se

rvic

es

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

, am

ong

othe

r ite

ms,

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r;

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-46-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n);

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

; o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

); o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

; and

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-9:

Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

nor

thbo

und

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) th

roug

h m

ovem

ent a

t In

ters

ectio

n #3

- Fr

uitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ San

Le

andr

o S

treet

, whi

ch w

ould

ope

rate

at

LOS

F u

nder

203

5 B

asel

ine

cond

ition

s.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-9:

Mod

ify th

e A

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of F

ruitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

no

rth-s

outh

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) a

ppro

ache

s an

d de

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

eas

t-wes

t (S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

) ap

proa

ches

. To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or, a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s, th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller;

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

; o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d);

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns);

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls; a

nd

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-47-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et.

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

prep

arin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-10

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e P

M p

eak

hour

at I

nter

sect

ion

#4 -

Frui

tval

e A

venu

e an

d E

ast 9

th

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S F

un

der 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

The

ad

ditio

n of

pro

ject

traf

fic a

lso

wou

ld

caus

e an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

eas

tbou

nd

(Eas

t 9th

Stre

et) t

hrou

gh m

ovem

ent.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-10

: Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

si

gnal

pha

sing

at t

he in

ters

ectio

n of

Fru

itval

e A

venu

e / E

ast

9th

Stre

et to

pro

vide

pro

tect

ed-p

erm

issi

ve le

ft-tu

rn p

hasi

ng

for n

orth

boun

d an

d so

uthb

ound

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) a

nd to

pr

ovid

e in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

eas

t-wes

t (E

ast 9

th

Stre

et) a

ppro

ache

s an

d de

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

no

rth-s

outh

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e) a

ppro

ache

s.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

, am

ong

othe

r ite

ms,

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r;

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

; o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d);

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns);

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls; a

nd

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

. •

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pr

epar

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-48-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

Im

pact

TR

ANS-

11: B

uild

out o

f the

pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct w

ould

cau

se th

e P

M

peak

-hou

r LO

S to

deg

rade

from

an

acce

ptab

le L

OS

D u

nder

203

5 B

asel

ine

cond

ition

s to

an

unac

cept

able

LO

S E

at

Inte

rsec

tion

#5 -

Frui

tval

e A

venu

e / E

ast

8th

Stre

et. (

Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-11

: Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of F

ruitv

ale

Ave

nue

/ E

ast 8

th S

treet

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

ea

st-w

est (

Eas

t 8th

Stre

et) a

ppro

ache

s an

d de

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

nor

th-s

outh

(Fru

itval

e A

venu

e)

appr

oach

es.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l: •

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d)

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns)

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

•

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

fund

the

cost

of p

repa

ring

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-49-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

Im

pact

TR

ANS-

12: B

uild

out o

f the

pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct w

ould

cau

se a

n in

crea

se in

the

over

all i

nter

sect

ion

aver

age

dela

y by

mor

e th

an tw

o se

cond

s du

ring

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur a

t Int

erse

ctio

n #6

- 35

th A

venu

e an

d E

ast 1

2th

Stre

et,

whi

ch w

ould

ope

rate

at L

OS

F u

nder

20

35 B

asel

ine

cond

ition

s. T

he a

dditi

on

of p

roje

ct tr

affic

als

o w

ould

cau

se a

n in

crea

se in

the

aver

age

dela

y by

mor

e th

an fo

ur s

econ

ds d

urin

g th

e A

M a

nd P

M

peak

hou

rs fo

r the

crit

ical

nor

thbo

und

(35t

h A

venu

e) th

roug

h m

ovem

ent.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-12

: Res

tripe

the

north

boun

d (3

5th

Ave

nue)

app

roac

h at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of 3

5th

Ave

nue

/ E

ast 1

2th

Stre

et to

pro

vide

one

sha

red

left-

thro

ugh

lane

an

d on

e sh

ared

thro

ugh-

right

lane

, whi

ch w

ould

requ

ire

rem

oval

of t

wo

park

ing

or lo

adin

g sp

aces

on

the

wes

t sid

e of

35t

h A

venu

e.

To im

plem

ent t

his

mea

sure

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll su

bmit

the

follo

win

g to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tra

nspo

rtatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• A

stri

ping

pla

n, a

nd a

traf

fic s

igna

l tim

ing

plan

. Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll be

resp

onsi

ble

for a

ll w

ork

asso

ciat

ed w

ith re

mov

al o

f par

king

spa

ces

and

shal

l co

ntrib

ute

its fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of p

repa

ring

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t re-

strip

ing

and

sign

al ti

min

g ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-13

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e P

M p

eak

hour

at I

nter

sect

ion

#8 -

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et a

nd 3

5th

Ave

nue,

whi

ch w

ould

ope

rate

at L

OS

F

unde

r 203

5 B

asel

ine

cond

ition

s.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-13

:Res

tripe

the

sout

hbou

nd

(35t

h A

venu

e) a

ppro

ach

at th

e in

ters

ectio

n of

San

Lea

ndro

S

treet

/ 35

th A

venu

e to

pro

vide

one

sha

red

left-

thro

ugh

lane

and

one

exc

lusi

ve ri

ght-t

urn

lane

, whi

ch w

ould

requ

ire

rem

oval

of u

p to

thre

e pa

rkin

g sp

aces

on

the

wes

t sid

e of

35

th A

venu

e. A

lso,

mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

traf

fic s

igna

l tim

ing

to p

rovi

de in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

wes

tbou

nd

(San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et) t

hrou

gh m

ovem

ent a

nd d

ecre

ased

gr

een

time

for t

he n

orth

-sou

th (3

5th

Ave

nue)

app

roac

hes.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d)

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t re-

strip

ing

and

sign

al ti

min

g ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-50-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns)

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

•

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

be re

spon

sibl

e fo

r all

wor

k as

soci

ated

with

rem

oval

of p

arki

ng s

pace

s an

d sh

all

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pre

parin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-14

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld a

dd m

ore

than

10

trip

s du

ring

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur to

In

ters

ectio

n #9

- 37

th A

venu

e / E

ast 1

2th

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld m

eet s

igna

l w

arra

nts,

and

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S F

un

der 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

(S

igni

fican

t)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-14

: Sig

naliz

e th

e in

ters

ectio

n of

37t

h A

venu

e / E

ast 1

2th

Stre

et w

hen

the

Cal

trans

M

anua

l on

Uni

form

Tra

ffic

Con

trol D

evic

es s

igna

l war

rant

s ar

e m

et.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

pay

for f

utur

e si

gnal

war

rant

an

alys

is (e

stim

ated

to b

e $2

1,00

0 in

200

9 do

llars

) to

be

done

in th

ree-

year

inte

rval

s, a

nd it

s fa

ir-sh

are

cost

of

sign

aliz

atio

n of

this

inte

rsec

tion.

Cos

t of s

igna

l war

rant

an

alys

is to

be

colle

cted

pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f firs

t bu

ildin

g pe

rmit.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-15

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

at d

urin

g th

e A

M a

nd P

M p

eak

hour

s In

ters

ectio

n #1

0 - S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

/ 37

th A

venu

e, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S F

und

er 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

Th

e ad

ditio

n of

pro

ject

traf

fic a

lso

wou

ld

caus

e an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

wes

tbou

nd

(San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et) t

hrou

gh m

ovem

ent.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-15

: Res

tripe

the

sout

hbou

nd

(37t

h A

venu

e) a

ppro

ach

at th

e in

ters

ectio

n of

San

Lea

ndro

S

treet

/ 37

th A

venu

e to

pro

vide

one

exc

lusi

ve le

ft-tu

rn la

ne

and

one

shar

ed th

roug

h-rig

ht la

ne; a

nd re

strip

e th

e w

estb

ound

(San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et) a

ppro

ach

to p

rovi

de o

ne

shar

ed le

ft-th

roug

h la

ne, o

ne th

roug

h la

ne a

nd o

ne

excl

usiv

e rig

ht-tu

rn la

ne. T

he la

tter r

estri

ping

wou

ld re

quire

re

mov

al o

f up

to tw

o pa

rkin

g sp

aces

on

the

north

sid

e of

S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

. To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

A s

tripi

ng p

lan,

and

a tr

affic

sig

nal t

imin

g pl

an.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

be re

spon

sibl

e fo

r all

wor

k as

soci

ated

with

rem

oval

of p

arki

ng s

pace

s an

d sh

all

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pre

parin

g an

d im

plem

entin

g th

is m

easu

re.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t re-

strip

ing

and

sign

al ti

min

g ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-16

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

the

PM

pe

ak-h

our L

OS

to d

egra

de fr

om a

n ac

cept

able

LO

S D

und

er 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons

to a

n un

acce

ptab

le L

OS

E a

t In

ters

ectio

n #1

1 - I

nter

natio

nal

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-16

:Mod

ify th

e P

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of In

tern

atio

nal

Bou

leva

rd /

38th

Ave

nue

to in

crea

se th

e cy

cle

leng

th fr

om

65 s

econ

ds to

67

seco

nds.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Page

-51-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

B

oule

vard

/ 38

th A

venu

e. (S

igni

fican

t) S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l:

• P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al a

nd

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

am

ong

othe

r ite

ms

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n)

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

bicy

cle

dete

ctio

n, p

edes

trian

pus

h bu

ttons

) o

C

ount

dow

n P

edes

trian

Sig

nals

o

S

igna

l int

erco

nnec

t for

cor

ridor

s id

entif

ied

in th

e C

ity's

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan

for a

max

imum

of 6

00 fe

et

• S

igna

l tim

ing

plan

s fo

r the

sig

nals

in th

e co

ordi

natio

n gr

oup.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it si

gnal

tim

ing

plan

s to

City

of O

akla

nd’s

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val.

As

a co

nditi

on o

f pro

ject

app

rova

l, th

e tra

ffic

sign

al w

ould

be

upg

rade

d to

incl

ude

a G

PS

clo

ck a

nd p

edes

trian

sig

nal

head

s.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

fund

the

cost

of p

repa

ring

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

sign

al

mod

ifica

tion

mea

sure

s ac

cord

ing

to

timin

g ou

tline

d in

ap

prov

ed

plan

.

Tran

spor

tatio

n S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-52-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

Im

pact

TR

ANS-

17: B

uild

out o

f the

pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct w

ould

cau

se a

n in

crea

se in

the

over

all i

nter

sect

ion

aver

age

dela

y by

mor

e th

an tw

o se

cond

s du

ring

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur a

t Int

erse

ctio

n #1

3 - I

nter

natio

nal B

oule

vard

/ H

igh

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S F

un

der 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

The

ad

ditio

n of

pro

ject

traf

fic a

lso

wou

ld

caus

e an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

sou

thbo

und

(Hig

h S

treet

) thr

ough

mov

emen

t. (S

igni

fican

t)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-17

: Mod

ify th

e A

M p

eak-

hour

si

gnal

pha

sing

at t

he in

ters

ectio

n of

Inte

rnat

iona

l B

oule

vard

/ H

igh

Stre

et to

pro

vide

pro

tect

ed-p

erm

issi

ve

left-

turn

pha

sing

for w

estb

ound

(Int

erna

tiona

l Bou

leva

rd)

and

optim

ize

the

sign

al s

plit

durin

g th

e A

M p

eak

hour

. To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

•

Pla

ns, S

peci

ficat

ions

, and

Est

imat

es (P

S&

E) t

o m

odify

in

ters

ectio

n to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e si

gnal

mod

ifica

tions

. Th

e si

gnal

sho

uld

be d

esig

ned

to C

ity s

tand

ards

in

effe

ct a

t the

tim

e of

con

stru

ctio

n. A

ll ot

her f

acili

ties

supp

ortin

g ve

hicl

e tra

vel a

nd a

ltern

ativ

e m

odes

thro

ugh

the

inte

rsec

tion

shou

ld b

e br

ough

t up

to b

oth

City

st

anda

rds

and

AD

A s

tand

ards

(acc

ordi

ng to

Fed

eral

and

S

tate

Acc

ess

Boa

rd g

uide

lines

) at t

he ti

me

of

cons

truct

ion.

Cur

rent

City

Sta

ndar

ds c

all f

or a

mon

g ot

her i

tem

s th

e el

emen

ts li

sted

bel

ow:

o

2070

L Ty

pe C

ontro

ller

o

GP

S c

lock

inst

alla

tion

(if n

ot a

lread

y in

the

City

’s

ITS

Mas

ter P

lan)

o

A

DA

-com

plia

nt c

urb

ram

ps o

n al

l cor

ners

(if n

ot

alre

ady

inst

alle

d)

o

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(incl

udes

vid

eo d

etec

tion,

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns)

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

•

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pr

epar

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

.

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-18

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e A

M a

nd P

M p

eak

hour

s at

In

ters

ectio

n #1

4 - S

an L

eand

ro S

treet

/ H

igh

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S

F un

der 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

The

ad

ditio

n of

pro

ject

traf

fic a

lso

wou

ld

caus

e an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-18

:No

feas

ible

miti

gatio

n m

easu

re w

as id

entif

ied

to re

duce

the

proj

ect i

mpa

ct to

less

th

an s

igni

fican

t lev

el. O

ptim

izin

g th

e si

gnal

spl

it tim

es w

ould

im

prov

e th

e av

erag

e de

lay

for t

he o

vera

ll in

ters

ectio

n to

be

tter t

han

2035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons

durin

g th

e A

M a

nd P

M

peak

hou

rs, b

ut w

ould

resu

lt in

sec

onda

ry im

pact

s on

cr

itica

l mov

emen

t del

ays.

Wid

enin

g ei

ther

Hig

h S

treet

or

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et to

pro

vide

add

ition

al c

apac

ity w

ould

al

so le

ssen

the

proj

ect i

mpa

ct, b

ut is

not

feas

ible

due

to

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-53-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

du

ring

the

PM

pea

k ho

ur b

y m

ore

than

fo

ur s

econ

ds fo

r the

crit

ical

nor

thbo

und

(Hig

h S

treet

) thr

ough

mov

emen

t. (S

igni

fican

t)

right

-of-w

ay c

onst

rain

ts.

As

a co

nditi

on o

f pro

ject

app

rova

l, th

e tra

ffic

sign

al w

ould

be

upg

rade

d to

cur

rent

City

of O

akla

nd s

tand

ards

and

in

clud

e:

• 20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r •

Full

sign

al a

ctua

tion

(vid

eo d

etec

tions

& a

udib

le

pede

stria

n pu

shbu

ttons

) •

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls

• G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n •

Sig

nal I

nter

conn

ect a

nd o

ptim

izin

g si

gnal

tim

ing.

S

ince

this

inte

rsec

tion

wou

ld b

e re

timed

und

er M

M T

RA

NS

-5,

the

AM

pea

k pe

riod

wou

ld b

e ad

ded

to th

e re

timin

g pr

oces

s.

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-19

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ause

an

incr

ease

in th

e ov

eral

l int

erse

ctio

n av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

two

seco

nds

durin

g th

e A

M a

nd P

M p

eak

hour

s at

In

ters

ectio

n #1

5 - C

olis

eum

Way

/ H

igh

Stre

et, w

hich

wou

ld o

pera

te a

t LO

S F

un

der 2

035

Bas

elin

e co

nditi

ons.

The

ad

ditio

n of

pro

ject

traf

fic a

lso

wou

ld

caus

e an

incr

ease

in th

e av

erag

e de

lay

by m

ore

than

four

sec

onds

dur

ing

the

AM

pea

k ho

ur fo

r the

crit

ical

sou

thbo

und

(Hig

h S

treet

) lef

t-tur

n m

ovem

ent.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-19

:Mod

ify th

e A

M p

eak-

hour

tra

ffic

sign

al ti

min

g at

the

inte

rsec

tion

of C

olis

eum

Way

/ H

igh

Stre

et to

pro

vide

incr

ease

d gr

een

time

for t

he

sout

hbou

nd (H

igh

Stre

et) a

ppro

ach

and

decr

ease

d gr

een

time

for t

he n

orth

boun

d (H

igh

Stre

et) l

eft-t

urn

mov

emen

t. M

odify

the

PM

pea

k-ho

ur tr

affic

sig

nal t

imin

g to

pro

vide

in

crea

sed

gree

n tim

e fo

r the

nor

th-s

outh

(Hig

h S

treet

) ap

proa

ches

and

dec

reas

ed g

reen

tim

e fo

r the

wes

tbou

nd

(Col

iseu

m W

ay) a

ppro

ach.

To

impl

emen

t thi

s m

easu

re, t

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it th

e fo

llow

ing

to C

ity o

f Oak

land

’s T

rans

porta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

for r

evie

w a

nd a

ppro

val:

P

lans

, Spe

cific

atio

ns, a

nd E

stim

ates

(PS

&E

) to

mod

ify

inte

rsec

tion

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

sign

al m

odifi

catio

ns.

The

sign

al s

houl

d be

des

igne

d to

City

sta

ndar

ds in

ef

fect

at t

he ti

me

of c

onst

ruct

ion.

All

othe

r fac

ilitie

s su

ppor

ting

vehi

cle

trave

l and

alte

rnat

ive

mod

es th

roug

h th

e in

ters

ectio

n sh

ould

be

brou

ght u

p to

bot

h C

ity

stan

dard

s an

d A

DA

sta

ndar

ds (a

ccor

ding

to F

eder

al

and

Sta

te A

cces

s B

oard

gui

delin

es) a

t the

tim

e of

co

nstru

ctio

n. C

urre

nt C

ity S

tand

ards

cal

l for

am

ong

othe

r ite

ms

the

elem

ents

list

ed b

elow

: o

20

70L

Type

Con

trolle

r o

G

PS

clo

ck in

stal

latio

n (if

not

alre

ady

in th

e C

ity’s

IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n)

o

AD

A-c

ompl

iant

cur

b ra

mps

on

all c

orne

rs (i

f not

al

read

y in

stal

led)

o

Fu

ll si

gnal

act

uatio

n (in

clud

es v

ideo

det

ectio

n,

Sub

mit

plan

pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f fir

st b

uild

ing

perm

it;

Impl

emen

t si

gnal

m

odifi

catio

n m

easu

res

acco

rdin

g to

tim

ing

outli

ned

in

appr

oved

pl

an.

Pro

ject

Spo

nsor

; C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A,

Dep

artm

ent o

f E

ngin

eerin

g an

d C

onst

ruct

ion,

Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-54-

STA

ND

AR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

S O

F A

PPR

OVA

L/M

ITIG

ATI

ON

MO

NIT

OR

ING

AN

D R

EPO

RTI

NG

PR

OG

RAM

(SC

AMM

RP)

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Draf

t EIR

Top

ics (I

n Or

der o

f Pre

sent

atio

n in

the D

raft

EIR)

bi

cycl

e de

tect

ion,

ped

estri

an p

ush

butto

ns)

o

Cou

ntdo

wn

Ped

estri

an S

igna

ls

o

Sig

nal i

nter

conn

ect f

or c

orrid

ors

iden

tifie

d in

the

City

's IT

S M

aste

r Pla

n fo

r a m

axim

um o

f 600

feet

•

Sig

nal t

imin

g pl

ans

for t

he s

igna

ls in

the

coor

dina

tion

grou

p.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

cont

ribut

e its

fair-

shar

e co

st o

f pr

epar

ing

and

impl

emen

ting

this

mea

sure

. Im

pact

TR

ANS-

21: B

uild

out o

f the

pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct w

ould

con

tribu

te to

20

15 c

hang

es to

traf

fic c

ondi

tions

on

the

regi

onal

and

loca

l roa

dway

s. (S

igni

fican

t)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-21

: Miti

gatio

n of

the

proj

ect’s

si

gnifi

cant

impa

ct o

n ea

stbo

und

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et w

est o

f 35

th A

venu

e is

not

feas

ible

. An

addi

tiona

l lan

e on

ea

stbo

und

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et w

ould

requ

ire re

mov

al o

f the

pa

rkin

g la

ne o

r wid

enin

g of

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et. H

owev

er,

such

mea

sure

s ar

e co

nsid

ered

infe

asib

le d

ue to

phy

sica

l co

nstra

ints

cau

sed

by o

n-st

reet

par

king

dem

and

and

exis

ting

right

-of-w

ay.

Non

e N

one

Impa

ct T

RAN

S-22

: Bui

ldou

t of t

he

prop

osed

pro

ject

wou

ld c

ontri

bute

to

2015

cha

nges

to tr

affic

con

ditio

ns o

n th

e re

gion

al a

nd lo

cal r

oadw

ays.

(Sig

nific

ant)

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

re T

RAN

S-22

: Miti

gatio

n of

the

proj

ect’s

si

gnifi

cant

impa

ct o

n ea

stbo

und

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et w

est o

f H

igh

Stre

et is

not

feas

ible

. An

addi

tiona

l lan

e on

eas

tbou

nd

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et w

ould

requ

ire re

mov

al o

f the

par

king

la

ne o

r wid

enin

g of

San

Lea

ndro

Stre

et. H

owev

er, s

uch

mea

sure

s ar

e co

nsid

ered

infe

asib

le d

ue to

phy

sica

l co

nstra

ints

cau

sed

by o

n-st

reet

par

king

dem

and

and

exis

ting

right

-of-w

ay.

Non

e N

one

Page

-55-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) I. A

esth

etics

C

reat

e a

new

sou

rce

of s

ubst

antia

l lig

ht

or g

lare

whi

ch w

ould

sub

stan

tially

and

ad

vers

ely

affe

ct d

ay o

r nig

httim

e vi

ews

in

the

area

?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

AES

-1: (

Ligh

ting

Plan

) Pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f an

elec

tric

al o

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

The

prop

osed

ligh

ting

fixtu

res

shal

l be

adeq

uate

ly s

hiel

ded

to a

poi

nt b

elow

the

ligh

t bu

lb a

nd r

efle

ctor

and

tha

t w

ould

pr

even

t un

nece

ssar

y gl

are

onto

adj

acen

t pr

oper

ties.

All

light

ing

shal

l be

arch

itect

ural

ly in

tegr

ated

into

the

site

.

Prio

r to

the

issu

ance

of

an e

lect

rical

or b

uild

ing

perm

it

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

; City

of

Oak

land

, P

ublic

Wor

ks

Age

ncy,

Ele

ctric

al

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

IV. B

iolo

gica

l Res

ourc

es

d)

Inte

rfere

sub

stan

tially

with

the

mov

emen

t of a

ny n

ativ

e re

side

nt o

r m

igra

tory

fish

or w

ildlif

e sp

ecie

s or

w

ith e

stab

lishe

d na

tive

resi

dent

or

mig

rato

ry w

ildlif

e co

rrid

ors,

or

impe

de th

e us

e of

nat

ive

wild

life

nurs

ery

site

s?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

BIO

-1: (

Tree

Rem

oval

Dur

ing

Bre

edin

g Se

ason

) Pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f a tr

ee re

mov

al p

erm

it To

the

exte

nt fe

asib

le, r

emov

al o

f any

tree

and

/or

vege

tatio

n su

itabl

e fo

r nes

ting

of ra

ptor

s sh

all n

ot o

ccur

du

ring

the

bree

ding

sea

son

of M

arch

15

and

Aug

ust 1

5. If

tre

e re

mov

al m

ust o

ccur

dur

ing

the

bree

ding

sea

son,

all

site

s sh

all b

e su

rvey

ed b

y a

qual

ified

bio

logi

st to

ver

ify th

e pr

esen

ce o

r abs

ence

of n

estin

g ra

ptor

s or

oth

er b

irds.

Pre

-re

mov

al s

urve

ys s

hall

be c

ondu

cted

with

in 1

5 da

ys p

rior t

o st

art o

f wor

k fro

m M

arch

15

thro

ugh

May

31,

and

with

in 3

0 da

ys p

rior t

o th

e st

art o

f wor

k fro

m J

une

1 th

roug

h A

ugus

t 15.

The

pre

-rem

oval

sur

veys

sha

ll be

sub

mitt

ed to

th

e P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng D

ivis

ion

and

the

Tree

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

of th

e P

ublic

Wor

ks A

genc

y. If

the

surv

ey in

dica

tes

the

pote

ntia

l pre

senc

e of

nes

ting

rapt

ors

or o

ther

bird

s, th

e bi

olog

ist s

hall

dete

rmin

e an

app

ropr

iate

ly s

ized

buf

fer

arou

nd th

e ne

st in

whi

ch n

o w

ork

will

be

allo

wed

unt

il th

e yo

ung

have

suc

cess

fully

fled

ged.

The

siz

e of

the

nest

bu

ffer w

ill b

e de

term

ined

by

the

biol

ogis

t in

cons

ulta

tion

with

the

CD

FG, a

nd w

ill b

e ba

sed

to a

larg

e ex

tent

on

the

nest

ing

spec

ies

and

its s

ensi

tivity

to d

istu

rban

ce. I

n ge

nera

l, bu

ffer s

izes

of 2

00 fe

et fo

r rap

tors

and

50

feet

for

othe

r bird

s sh

ould

suf

fice

to p

reve

nt d

istu

rban

ce to

bird

s ne

stin

g in

the

urba

n en

viro

nmen

t, bu

t the

se b

uffe

rs m

ay b

e in

crea

sed

or d

ecre

ased

, as

appr

opria

te, d

epen

ding

on

the

bird

spe

cies

and

the

leve

l of d

istu

rban

ce a

ntic

ipat

ed n

ear

the

nest

.

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

tre

e re

mov

al p

erm

it C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A, P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng; C

ity

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y, T

ree

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-56-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) f)

Fu

ndam

enta

lly c

onfli

ct w

ith th

e C

ity

of O

akla

nd T

ree

Pre

serv

atio

n O

rdin

ance

(Oak

land

Mun

icip

al C

ode

(OM

C) C

hapt

er 1

2.36

) by

rem

oval

of

prot

ecte

d tre

es u

nder

cer

tain

ci

rcum

stan

ces?

Fac

tors

to b

e co

nsid

ered

in d

eter

min

ing

sign

ifica

nce

incl

ude:

The

num

ber,

type

, siz

e, lo

catio

n an

d co

nditi

on o

f (a

) the

pro

tect

ed tr

ees

to b

e re

mov

ed a

nd/o

r im

pact

ed b

y co

nstru

ctio

n an

d (b

) the

pro

tect

ed

trees

to re

mai

n, w

ith s

peci

al

cons

ider

atio

n gi

ven

to n

ativ

e tre

es.

P

rote

cted

tree

s in

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing:

Q

uerc

us a

grifo

lia (C

alifo

rnia

or c

oast

liv

e oa

k) m

easu

ring

four

inch

es

diam

eter

at b

reas

t hei

ght (

dbh)

or

larg

er, a

nd a

ny o

ther

tree

mea

surin

g ni

ne in

ches

dbh

or l

arge

r exc

ept

euca

lypt

us a

nd p

inus

radi

ata

(Mon

tere

y pi

ne);

prov

ided

, how

ever

, th

at M

onte

rey

pine

tree

s on

City

pr

oper

ty a

nd in

dev

elop

men

t-rel

ated

si

tuat

ions

whe

re m

ore

than

five

M

onte

rey

pine

tree

s pe

r acr

e ar

e pr

opos

ed to

be

rem

oved

are

co

nsid

ered

to b

e P

rote

cted

tree

s.

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

BIO

-1: (

Tree

Rem

oval

Dur

ing

Bre

edin

g Se

ason

) S

ee a

bove

. ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N B

IO-2

: (Tr

ee R

emov

al P

erm

it)

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

Prio

r to

rem

oval

of a

ny p

rote

cted

tree

s, p

er th

e P

rote

cted

Tr

ee O

rdin

ance

, loc

ated

on

the

proj

ect s

ite o

r in

the

publ

ic

right

-of-w

ay a

djac

ent t

o th

e pr

ojec

t, th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t m

ust s

ecur

e a

tree

rem

oval

per

mit

from

Tre

e D

ivis

ion

of th

e P

ublic

Wor

ks A

genc

y, a

nd a

bide

by

the

cond

ition

s of

that

pe

rmit.

ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N B

IO-3

: (Tr

ee R

epla

cem

ent

Plan

tings

) P

rior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a fi

nal i

nspe

ctio

n of

the

build

ing

perm

it R

epla

cem

ent p

lant

ings

sha

ll be

requ

ired

for e

rosi

on

cont

rol,

grou

ndw

ater

repl

enis

hmen

t, vi

sual

scr

eeni

ng a

nd

wild

life

habi

tat,

and

in o

rder

to p

reve

nt e

xces

sive

loss

of

shad

e, in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

follo

win

g cr

iteria

: 1)

N

o tre

e re

plac

emen

t sha

ll be

requ

ired

for t

he re

mov

al

of n

onna

tive

spec

ies,

for t

he re

mov

al o

f tre

es w

hich

is

requ

ired

for t

he b

enef

it of

rem

aini

ng tr

ees,

or w

here

in

suffi

cien

t pla

ntin

g ar

ea e

xist

s fo

r a m

atur

e tre

e of

the

spec

ies

bein

g co

nsid

ered

. 2)

R

epla

cem

ent t

ree

spec

ies

shal

l con

sist

of S

equo

ia

sem

perv

irens

(Coa

st R

edw

ood)

, Que

rcus

agr

ifolia

(C

oast

Liv

e O

ak),

Arb

utus

men

zies

ii (M

adro

ne),

Aes

culu

s ca

lifor

nica

(Cal

iforn

ia B

ucke

ye) o

r U

mbe

llula

ria c

alifo

rnic

a (C

alifo

rnia

Bay

Lau

rel)

or

othe

r tre

e sp

ecie

s ac

cept

able

to th

e Tr

ee S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n.

3)

Rep

lace

men

t tre

es s

hall

be a

t lea

st o

f tw

enty

-four

(24)

in

ch b

ox s

ize,

unl

ess

a sm

alle

r siz

e is

reco

mm

ende

d by

the

arbo

rist,

exce

pt th

at th

ree

fifte

en (1

5) g

allo

n si

ze tr

ees

may

be

subs

titut

ed fo

r eac

h tw

enty

-four

(24)

in

ch b

ox s

ize

tree

whe

re a

ppro

pria

te.

4)

Min

imum

pla

ntin

g ar

eas

mus

t be

avai

labl

e on

site

as

follo

ws:

i.

For S

equo

ia s

empe

rvire

ns, t

hree

hun

dred

fifte

en

(315

) squ

are

feet

per

tree

; ii.

Fo

r all

othe

r spe

cies

list

ed in

#2

abov

e, s

even

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

, or

build

ing

perm

it;

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

fin

al in

spec

tion

of th

e bu

ildin

g pe

rmit

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y; T

ree

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-57-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) hu

ndre

d sq

uare

feet

per

tree

. 5)

In

the

even

t tha

t rep

lace

men

t tre

es a

re re

quire

d bu

t ca

nnot

be

plan

ted

due

to s

ite c

onst

rain

ts, a

n in

-lieu

fe

e as

det

erm

ined

by

the

mas

ter f

ee s

ched

ule

of th

e ci

ty m

ay b

e su

bstit

uted

for r

equi

red

repl

acem

ent

plan

tings

, with

all

such

reve

nues

app

lied

tow

ard

tree

plan

ting

in c

ity p

arks

, stre

ets

and

med

ians

. 6)

P

lant

ings

sha

ll be

inst

alle

d pr

ior t

o th

e is

suan

ce o

f a

final

insp

ectio

n of

the

build

ing

perm

it, s

ubje

ct to

se

ason

al c

onst

rain

ts, a

nd s

hall

be m

aint

aine

d by

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant u

ntil

esta

blis

hed.

The

Tre

e R

evie

wer

of

the

Tree

Div

isio

n of

the

Pub

lic W

orks

Age

ncy

may

re

quire

a la

ndsc

ape

plan

sho

win

g th

e re

plac

emen

t pl

antin

g an

d th

e m

etho

d of

irrig

atio

n. A

ny re

plac

emen

t pl

antin

g w

hich

fails

to b

ecom

e es

tabl

ishe

d w

ithin

one

ye

ar o

f pla

ntin

g sh

all b

e re

plan

ted

at th

e pr

ojec

t ap

plic

ant’s

exp

ense

. ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N B

IO-4

: (Tr

ee P

rote

ctio

n D

urin

g C

onst

ruct

ion)

Pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

, or b

uild

ing

perm

it A

dequ

ate

prot

ectio

n sh

all b

e pr

ovid

ed d

urin

g th

e co

nstru

ctio

n pe

riod

for a

ny tr

ees

whi

ch a

re to

rem

ain

stan

ding

, inc

ludi

ng th

e fo

llow

ing,

plu

s an

y re

com

men

datio

ns o

f an

arbo

rist:

1)

Bef

ore

the

star

t of a

ny c

lear

ing,

exc

avat

ion,

co

nstru

ctio

n or

oth

er w

ork

on th

e si

te, e

very

pro

tect

ed

tree

deem

ed to

be

pote

ntia

lly e

ndan

gere

d by

sai

d si

te

wor

k sh

all b

e se

cure

ly fe

nced

off

at a

dis

tanc

e fro

m

the

base

of t

he tr

ee to

be

dete

rmin

ed b

y th

e C

ity T

ree

Rev

iew

er. S

uch

fenc

es s

hall

rem

ain

in p

lace

for

dura

tion

of a

ll su

ch w

ork.

All

trees

to b

e re

mov

ed s

hall

be c

lear

ly m

arke

d. A

sch

eme

shal

l be

esta

blis

hed

for

the

rem

oval

and

dis

posa

l of l

ogs,

bru

sh, e

arth

and

ot

her d

ebris

whi

ch w

ill a

void

inju

ry to

any

pro

tect

ed

tree.

2)

W

here

pro

pose

d de

velo

pmen

t or o

ther

site

wor

k is

to

encr

oach

upo

n th

e pr

otec

ted

perim

eter

of a

ny

prot

ecte

d tre

e, s

peci

al m

easu

res

shal

l be

inco

rpor

ated

to

allo

w th

e ro

ots

to b

reat

he a

nd o

btai

n w

ater

and

nu

trien

ts. A

ny e

xcav

atio

n, c

uttin

g, fi

ling,

or c

ompa

ctio

n of

the

exis

ting

grou

nd s

urfa

ce w

ithin

the

prot

ecte

d pe

rimet

er s

hall

be m

inim

ized

. No

chan

ge in

exi

stin

g

Page

-58-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) gr

ound

leve

l sha

ll oc

cur w

ithin

a d

ista

nce

to b

e de

term

ined

by

the

City

Tre

e R

evie

wer

from

the

base

of

any

pro

tect

ed tr

ee a

t any

tim

e. N

o bu

rnin

g or

use

of

equi

pmen

t with

an

open

flam

e sh

all o

ccur

nea

r or

with

in th

e pr

otec

ted

perim

eter

of a

ny p

rote

cted

tree

. 3)

N

o st

orag

e or

dum

ping

of o

il, g

as, c

hem

ical

s, o

r oth

er

subs

tanc

es th

at m

ay b

e ha

rmfu

l to

trees

sha

ll oc

cur

with

in th

e di

stan

ce to

be

dete

rmin

ed b

y th

e Tr

ee

Rev

iew

er fr

om th

e ba

se o

f any

pro

tect

ed tr

ees,

or a

ny

othe

r loc

atio

n on

the

site

from

whi

ch s

uch

subs

tanc

es

mig

ht e

nter

the

prot

ecte

d pe

rimet

er. N

o he

avy

cons

truct

ion

equi

pmen

t or c

onst

ruct

ion

mat

eria

ls s

hall

be o

pera

ted

or s

tore

d w

ithin

a d

ista

nce

from

the

base

of

any

pro

tect

ed tr

ees

to b

e de

term

ined

by

the

tree

revi

ewer

. Wire

s, ro

pes,

or o

ther

dev

ices

sha

ll no

t be

atta

ched

to a

ny p

rote

cted

tree

, exc

ept a

s ne

eded

for

supp

ort o

f the

tree

. No

sign

, oth

er th

an a

tag

show

ing

the

bota

nica

l cla

ssifi

catio

n, s

hall

be a

ttach

ed to

any

pr

otec

ted

tree.

4)

P

erio

dica

lly d

urin

g co

nstru

ctio

n, th

e le

aves

of

prot

ecte

d tre

es s

hall

be th

orou

ghly

spr

ayed

with

wat

er

to p

reve

nt b

uild

up o

f dus

t and

oth

er p

ollu

tion

that

w

ould

inhi

bit l

eaf t

rans

pira

tion.

5)

If

any

dam

age

to a

pro

tect

ed tr

ee s

houl

d oc

cur d

urin

g,

or a

s a

resu

lt of

wor

k on

the

site

, the

pro

ject

app

lican

t sh

all i

mm

edia

tely

not

ify th

e P

ublic

Wor

ks A

genc

y of

su

ch d

amag

e. If

, in

the

prof

essi

onal

opi

nion

of t

he

Tree

Rev

iew

er, s

uch

tree

cann

ot b

e pr

eser

ved

in a

he

alth

y st

ate,

the

Tree

Rev

iew

er s

hall

requ

ire

repl

acem

ent o

f any

tree

rem

oved

with

ano

ther

tree

or

trees

on

the

sam

e si

te d

eem

ed a

dequ

ate

by th

e Tr

ee

Rev

iew

er to

com

pens

ate

for t

he lo

ss o

f the

tree

that

is

rem

oved

. 6)

A

ll de

bris

cre

ated

as

a re

sult

of a

ny tr

ee re

mov

al w

ork

shal

l be

rem

oved

by

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant f

rom

the

prop

erty

with

in tw

o w

eeks

of d

ebris

cre

atio

n, a

nd s

uch

debr

is s

hall

be p

rope

rly d

ispo

sed

of b

y th

e pr

ojec

t ap

plic

ant i

n ac

cord

ance

with

all

appl

icab

le la

ws,

or

dina

nces

, and

regu

latio

ns.

V. C

ultu

ral R

esou

rces

b)

C

ause

a s

ubst

antia

l adv

erse

cha

nge

in th

e si

gnifi

canc

e of

an

arch

aeol

ogic

al re

sour

ce p

ursu

ant t

o

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

CU

L-1:

(Arc

haeo

logi

cal

Res

ourc

es)

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng,

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g

Page

-59-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) δ1

5064

.5?

Prio

r to

cons

truct

ion

Follo

win

g re

view

of t

he p

roje

ct b

y a

qual

ified

arc

haeo

logi

st,

if it

is d

eter

min

ed th

at th

e pr

ojec

t site

is in

a c

ultu

rally

-se

nsiti

ve a

rea

and

that

con

stru

ctio

n m

ay im

pact

pot

entia

lly-

sign

ifica

nt a

rcha

eolo

gica

l res

ourc

es, a

n A

rcha

eolo

gica

l R

esea

rch

Des

ign

and

Trea

tmen

t Pla

n (A

RD

TP) s

hall

be

deve

lope

d pr

ior t

o co

nstru

ctio

n. T

he A

RD

TP s

houl

d co

ntai

n an

arc

haeo

logi

cal r

esea

rch

cont

ext t

o ev

alua

te p

oten

tially

-si

gnifi

cant

reso

urce

s; a

sen

sitiv

ity s

tudy

and

test

ing

plan

to

iden

tify

expe

cted

pro

perty

type

s, h

isto

rical

dev

elop

men

t, re

leva

nt re

sear

ch is

sues

and

them

es, a

nd p

roje

ct im

pact

s;

and

an a

rcha

eolo

gica

l tes

ting

plan

to id

entif

y po

tent

ially

si

gnifi

cant

arc

haeo

logi

cal f

eatu

res

and

depo

sits

, and

a

treat

men

t pla

n th

at in

clud

es m

etho

ds, a

naly

sis,

repo

rt pr

oduc

tion,

labo

rato

ry a

naly

sis,

and

cur

atio

n of

mat

eria

ls.

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

, and

/or

cons

truct

ion

In c

onsi

derin

g an

y su

gges

ted

mea

sure

pro

pose

d by

the

cons

ultin

g ar

chae

olog

ist i

n or

der t

o m

itiga

te im

pact

s to

hi

stor

ical

reso

urce

s or

uni

que

arch

aeol

ogic

al re

sour

ces,

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

dete

rmin

e w

heth

er a

void

ance

is

nece

ssar

y an

d fe

asib

le in

ligh

t of f

acto

rs s

uch

as th

e na

ture

of

the

find,

pro

ject

des

ign,

cos

ts, a

nd o

ther

con

side

ratio

ns.

If av

oida

nce

is u

nnec

essa

ry o

r inf

easi

ble,

oth

er a

ppro

pria

te

mea

sure

s (e

.g.,

data

reco

very

) sha

ll be

inst

itute

d. W

ork

may

pro

ceed

on

othe

r par

ts o

f the

pro

ject

site

whi

le

mea

sure

s fo

r his

toric

al re

sour

ces

or u

niqu

e ar

chae

olog

ical

re

sour

ces

are

carr

ied

out.

Pur

suan

t to

CE

QA

Gui

delin

es s

ectio

n 15

064.

5 (f)

, “p

rovi

sion

s fo

r his

toric

al o

r uni

que

arch

aeol

ogic

al re

sour

ces

acci

dent

ally

dis

cove

red

durin

g co

nstru

ctio

n” s

houl

d be

in

stitu

ted.

In th

e ev

ent t

hat a

ny p

rehi

stor

ic o

r his

toric

su

bsur

face

cul

tura

l res

ourc

es a

re d

isco

vere

d du

ring

grou

nd

dist

urbi

ng a

ctiv

ities

, all

wor

k w

ithin

50

feet

of t

he re

sour

ces

shal

l be

halte

d an

d th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t and

/or l

ead

agen

cy

shal

l con

sult

with

a q

ualif

ied

arch

aeol

ogis

t or p

aleo

ntol

ogis

t to

ass

ess

the

sign

ifica

nce

of th

e fin

d ac

cord

ing

to th

e C

EQ

A d

efin

ition

of a

his

toric

al o

r uni

que

arch

aeol

ogic

al

reso

urce

. If t

he d

epos

it is

det

erm

ined

to b

e si

gnifi

cant

, the

pr

ojec

t app

lican

t and

the

qual

ified

arc

haeo

logi

st s

hall

mee

t to

det

erm

ine

the

appr

opria

te a

void

ance

mea

sure

s or

oth

er

appr

opria

te m

easu

re, s

ubje

ct to

app

rova

l by

the

City

of

Oak

land

, whi

ch s

hall

assu

re im

plem

enta

tion

of a

ppro

pria

te

and/

or c

onst

ruct

ion

and

Zoni

ng

Page

-60-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) m

easu

res

reco

mm

ende

d by

the

arch

aeol

ogis

t. S

houl

d ar

chae

olog

ical

ly-s

igni

fican

t mat

eria

ls b

e re

cove

red,

the

qual

ified

arc

haeo

logi

st w

ould

reco

mm

end

appr

opria

te

anal

ysis

and

trea

tmen

t, an

d w

ould

pre

pare

a re

port

on th

e fin

ding

s fo

r sub

mitt

al to

the

Nor

thw

est I

nfor

mat

ion

Cen

ter.

c)

D

irect

ly o

r ind

irect

ly d

estro

y a

uniq

ue

pale

onto

logi

cal r

esou

rce

or s

ite o

r un

ique

geo

logi

c fe

atur

e?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

CU

L-2:

(Pal

eont

olog

ical

R

esou

rces

) O

ngoi

ng th

roug

hout

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, a

nd/o

r co

nstru

ctio

n In

the

even

t of a

n un

antic

ipat

ed d

isco

very

of a

pa

leon

tolo

gica

l res

ourc

e du

ring

cons

truct

ion,

exc

avat

ions

w

ithin

50

feet

of t

he fi

nd s

hall

be te

mpo

raril

y ha

lted

or

dive

rted

until

the

disc

over

y is

exa

min

ed b

y a

qual

ified

pa

leon

tolo

gist

(per

Soc

iety

of V

erte

brat

e P

aleo

ntol

ogy

stan

dard

s, 1

995)

. The

qua

lifie

d pa

leon

tolo

gist

sha

ll do

cum

ent t

he d

isco

very

as

need

ed, e

valu

ate

the

pote

ntia

l re

sour

ce, a

nd a

sses

s th

e si

gnifi

canc

e of

the

find

unde

r the

cr

iteria

set

forth

in S

ectio

n 15

064.

5 of

the

CE

QA

G

uide

lines

. The

pal

eont

olog

ist s

hall

notif

y th

e ap

prop

riate

ag

enci

es to

det

erm

ine

proc

edur

es th

at w

ill b

e fo

llow

ed

befo

re c

onst

ruct

ion

is a

llow

ed to

resu

me

at th

e lo

catio

n of

th

e fin

d. If

the

City

det

erm

ines

that

avo

idan

ce is

not

fe

asib

le, t

he p

aleo

ntol

ogis

t sha

ll pr

epar

e an

exc

avat

ion

plan

for m

itiga

ting

the

effe

ct o

f the

pro

ject

on

the

qual

ities

th

at m

ake

the

reso

urce

impo

rtant

, and

suc

h pl

an s

hall

be

impl

emen

ted.

The

pla

n sh

all b

e su

bmitt

ed to

the

City

for

revi

ew a

nd a

ppro

val.

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng,

and/

or c

onst

ruct

ion;

up

on d

isco

very

of

pale

onto

logi

cal

reso

urce

s

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

d)

Dis

turb

any

hum

an re

mai

ns,

incl

udin

g th

ose

inte

rred

out

side

of

form

al c

emet

erie

s?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

CU

L-3:

(Hum

an R

emai

ns)

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

and

/or

cons

truct

ion

If po

tent

ial h

uman

rem

ains

are

enc

ount

ered

, all

wor

k sh

all

halt

in th

e vi

cini

ty o

f the

find

and

the

Ala

med

a C

ount

y C

oron

er s

hall

be c

onta

cted

to e

valu

ate

the

rem

ains

, fo

llow

ing

the

proc

edur

es a

nd p

roto

cols

pur

suan

t to

Sec

tion

1506

4.5

(e) (

1) o

f the

CE

QA

Gui

delin

es. I

f the

cor

oner

de

term

ines

the

rem

ains

are

Nat

ive

Am

eric

an, t

he c

oron

er

shal

l con

tact

the

NA

HC

, pur

suan

t to

subd

ivis

ion

(c) o

f S

ectio

n 70

50.5

of t

he H

ealth

and

Saf

ety

Cod

e, a

nd a

ll ex

cava

tion

and

site

pre

para

tion

activ

ities

sha

ll ce

ase

with

in

a 50

-foot

radi

us o

f the

find

unt

il ap

prop

riate

arr

ange

men

ts

are

mad

e. If

the

agen

cies

det

erm

ine

that

avo

idan

ce is

not

fe

asib

le, t

hen

an a

ltern

ativ

e pl

an s

hall

be p

repa

red

with

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng,

and/

or c

onst

ruct

ion;

up

on d

isco

very

of

hum

an re

mai

ns

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Pla

nnin

g an

d Zo

ning

Page

-61-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) sp

ecifi

c st

eps

and

timef

ram

e re

quire

d to

resu

me

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

. Mon

itorin

g, d

ata

reco

very

, de

term

inat

ion

of s

igni

fican

ce a

nd a

void

ance

mea

sure

s (if

ap

plic

able

) sha

ll be

com

plet

ed e

xped

itiou

sly.

VI

. Geo

logy

and

Soils

a)

E

xpos

e pe

ople

or s

truct

ures

to

subs

tant

ial r

isk

of lo

ss, i

njur

y, o

r de

ath

invo

lvin

g:

ii)

Stro

ng s

eism

ic g

roun

d sh

akin

g?

iii

) Sei

smic

-rel

ated

gro

und

failu

re,

incl

udin

g liq

uefa

ctio

n, la

tera

l sp

read

ing,

sub

side

nce,

col

laps

e?

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n G

EO-1

: (G

eote

chni

cal R

epor

t) R

equi

red

at th

e tim

e of

sub

mitt

al o

f Fin

al M

ap(s

) 1)

A s

ite-s

peci

fic, d

esig

n le

vel,

Land

slid

e or

Liq

uefa

ctio

n ge

otec

hnic

al in

vest

igat

ion

for e

ach

cons

truct

ion

site

with

in

the

proj

ect a

rea

shal

l be

requ

ired

as p

art o

f thi

s pr

ojec

t and

su

bmitt

ed fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l by

the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n. S

peci

fical

ly:

i. E

ach

inve

stig

atio

n sh

all i

nclu

de a

n an

alys

is o

f exp

ecte

d gr

ound

mot

ions

at t

he s

ite fr

om id

entif

ied

faul

ts. T

he

anal

yses

sha

ll be

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith a

pplic

able

City

or

dina

nces

and

pol

icie

s, a

nd c

onsi

sten

t with

the

mos

t re

cent

ver

sion

of t

he C

alifo

rnia

Bui

ldin

g C

ode,

whi

ch

requ

ires

stru

ctur

al d

esig

n th

at c

an a

ccom

mod

ate

grou

nd

acce

lera

tions

exp

ecte

d fro

m id

entif

ied

faul

ts.

ii. T

he in

vest

igat

ions

sha

ll de

term

ine

final

des

ign

para

met

ers

for t

he w

alls

, fou

ndat

ions

, fou

ndat

ion

slab

s,

surr

ound

ing

rela

ted

impr

ovem

ents

, and

infra

stru

ctur

e (u

tiliti

es, r

oadw

ays,

par

king

lots

, and

sid

ewal

ks).

iii. T

he in

vest

igat

ions

sha

ll be

revi

ewed

and

app

rove

d by

a

regi

ster

ed g

eote

chni

cal e

ngin

eer.

All

reco

mm

enda

tions

by

the

proj

ect e

ngin

eer,

geot

echn

ical

eng

inee

r, w

ill b

e in

clud

ed in

the

final

des

ign,

as

appr

oved

by

the

City

of

Oak

land

. iv

. The

geo

tech

nica

l rep

ort s

hall

incl

ude

a m

ap p

repa

red

by

a la

nd s

urve

yor o

r civ

il en

gine

er th

at s

how

s al

l fie

ld w

ork

and

loca

tion

of th

e “N

o B

uild

” zon

e. T

he m

ap s

hall

incl

ude

a st

atem

ent t

hat t

he lo

catio

ns a

nd li

mita

tions

of

the

geol

ogic

feat

ures

are

acc

urat

e re

pres

enta

tions

of

said

feat

ures

as

they

exi

st o

n th

e gr

ound

, wer

e pl

aced

on

this

map

by

the

surv

eyor

, the

civ

il en

gine

er o

r und

er

thei

r sup

ervi

sion

, and

are

acc

urat

e to

the

best

of t

heir

know

ledg

e.

v. R

ecom

men

datio

ns th

at a

re a

pplic

able

to fo

unda

tion

desi

gn, e

arth

wor

k, a

nd s

ite p

repa

ratio

n th

at w

ere

prep

ared

prio

r to

or d

urin

g th

e pr

ojec

ts d

esig

n ph

ase,

sh

all b

e in

corp

orat

ed in

the

proj

ect.

Req

uire

d as

par

t of t

he

subm

ittal

of a

tent

ativ

e Tr

act M

ap o

r ten

tativ

e P

arce

l Map

; req

uire

d pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r bu

ildin

g pe

rmit.

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-62-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) vi

. Fin

al s

eism

ic c

onsi

dera

tions

for t

he s

ite s

hall

be

subm

itted

to a

nd a

ppro

ved

by th

e C

ity o

f Oak

land

B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

prio

r to

com

men

cem

ent o

f the

pr

ojec

t. vi

i. A

pee

r rev

iew

is re

quire

d fo

r the

Geo

tech

nica

l Rep

ort.

Per

sonn

el re

view

ing

the

geol

ogic

repo

rt sh

all a

ppro

ve

the

repo

rt, re

ject

it, o

r with

hold

app

rova

l pen

ding

the

subm

issi

on b

y th

e ap

plic

ant o

r sub

divi

der o

f fur

ther

ge

olog

ic a

nd e

ngin

eerin

g st

udie

s to

mor

e ad

equa

tely

de

fine

activ

e fa

ult t

race

s.

2) T

enta

tive

Trac

t or P

arce

l Map

app

rova

ls s

hall

requ

ire,

but n

ot b

e lim

ited

to a

ppro

val o

f the

Geo

tech

nica

l R

epor

t. b)

R

esul

t in

subs

tant

ial s

oil e

rosi

on o

r th

e lo

ss o

f top

soil,

cre

atin

g su

bsta

ntia

l ris

ks to

life

, pro

perty

, or

cree

k/w

ater

way

s?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

GEO

-2: (

Gra

ding

Per

mit)

Pr

ior t

o an

y gr

adin

g ac

tiviti

es

1) T

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

obta

in a

gra

ding

per

mit

if re

quire

d by

the

Oak

land

Gra

ding

Reg

ulat

ions

pur

suan

t to

Sec

tion

15.0

4.78

0 of

the

Oak

land

Mun

icip

al C

ode.

Th

e gr

adin

g pe

rmit

appl

icat

ion

shal

l inc

lude

an

eros

ion

and

sedi

men

tatio

n co

ntro

l pla

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l by

the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n. T

he e

rosi

on a

nd

sedi

men

tatio

n co

ntro

l pla

n sh

all i

nclu

de a

ll ne

cess

ary

mea

sure

s to

be

take

n to

pre

vent

exc

essi

ve s

torm

wat

er

runo

ff or

car

ryin

g by

sto

rmw

ater

runo

ff of

sol

id m

ater

ials

on

to la

nds

of a

djac

ent p

rope

rty o

wne

rs, p

ublic

stre

ets,

or

to c

reek

s as

a re

sult

of c

ondi

tions

cre

ated

by

grad

ing

oper

atio

ns. T

he p

lan

shal

l inc

lude

, but

not

be

limite

d to

, su

ch m

easu

res

as s

hort-

term

ero

sion

con

trol p

lant

ing,

w

ater

proo

f slo

pe c

over

ing,

che

ck d

ams,

inte

rcep

tor

ditc

hes,

ben

ches

, sto

rm d

rain

s, d

issi

patio

n st

ruct

ures

, di

vers

ion

dike

s, re

tard

ing

berm

s an

d ba

rrie

rs, d

evic

es to

tra

p, s

tore

and

filte

r out

sed

imen

t, an

d st

orm

wat

er

rete

ntio

n ba

sins

. Off-

site

wor

k by

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant

may

be

nece

ssar

y. T

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

obta

in

perm

issi

on o

r eas

emen

ts n

eces

sary

for o

ff-si

te w

ork.

Th

ere

shal

l be

a cl

ear n

otat

ion

that

the

plan

is s

ubje

ct to

ch

ange

s as

cha

ngin

g co

nditi

ons

occu

r. C

alcu

latio

ns o

f an

ticip

ated

sto

rmw

ater

runo

ff an

d se

dim

ent v

olum

es

shal

l be

incl

uded

, if r

equi

red

by th

e D

irect

or o

f D

evel

opm

ent o

r des

igne

e. T

he p

lan

shal

l spe

cify

that

, af

ter c

onst

ruct

ion

is c

ompl

ete,

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

ensu

re th

at th

e st

orm

dra

in s

yste

m s

hall

be in

spec

ted

and

that

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

clea

r the

sys

tem

of

Req

uire

d pr

ior t

o an

y gr

adin

g ac

tiviti

es;

requ

ired

prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

, or

build

ing

perm

it.

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-63-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) an

y de

bris

or s

edim

ent.

Ong

oing

thro

ugho

ut g

radi

ng a

nd c

onst

ruct

ion

activ

ities

2)

The

pro

ject

app

lican

t sha

ll im

plem

ent t

he a

ppro

ved

eros

ion

and

sedi

men

tatio

n pl

an. N

o gr

adin

g sh

all o

ccur

du

ring

the

wet

wea

ther

sea

son

(Oct

ober

15

thro

ugh

Apr

il 15

) unl

ess

spec

ifica

lly a

utho

rized

in w

ritin

g by

the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n.

c)

Be

loca

ted

on e

xpan

sive

soi

l, as

de

fined

in T

able

18-

1-B

of t

he

Uni

form

Bui

ldin

g C

ode

(199

4, a

s it

may

be

revi

sed)

, cre

atin

g su

bsta

ntia

l ris

ks to

life

or p

rope

rty?

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n G

EO-1

: (G

eote

chni

cal R

epor

t) S

ee a

bove

. R

equi

red

as p

art o

f the

su

bmitt

al o

f a te

ntat

ive

Trac

t Map

or t

enta

tive

Par

cel M

ap; r

equi

red

prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

, or

build

ing

perm

it.

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

VII. H

azar

ds an

d Ha

zard

ous M

ater

ials

b)

Cre

ate

a si

gnifi

cant

haz

ard

to th

e pu

blic

or t

he e

nviro

nmen

t thr

ough

re

ason

ably

fore

seea

ble

upse

t and

ac

cide

nt c

ondi

tions

invo

lvin

g th

e re

leas

e of

haz

ardo

us m

ater

ials

into

th

e en

viro

nmen

t?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HAZ

-1: (

Haz

ards

Bes

t M

anag

emen

t Pra

ctic

es)

Prio

r to

com

men

cem

ent o

f dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r co

nstru

ctio

n Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t and

con

stru

ctio

n co

ntra

ctor

sha

ll en

sure

that

con

stru

ctio

n be

st m

anag

emen

t pra

ctic

es a

re

impl

emen

ted

as p

art o

f con

stru

ctio

n to

min

imiz

e th

e po

tent

ial n

egat

ive

effe

cts

to g

roun

dwat

er a

nd s

oils

. The

se

shal

l inc

lude

the

follo

win

g:

1)

Follo

w m

anuf

actu

re’s

reco

mm

enda

tions

on

use,

st

orag

e, a

nd d

ispo

sal o

f che

mic

al p

rodu

cts

used

in

cons

truct

ion;

2)

A

void

ove

rtopp

ing

cons

truct

ion

equi

pmen

t fue

l gas

ta

nks;

3)

D

urin

g ro

utin

e m

aint

enan

ce o

f con

stru

ctio

n eq

uipm

ent,

prop

erly

con

tain

and

rem

ove

grea

se a

nd

oils

; 4)

P

rope

rly d

ispo

se o

f dis

card

ed c

onta

iner

s of

fuel

s an

d ot

her c

hem

ical

s.

5)

Ens

ure

that

con

stru

ctio

n w

ill n

ot h

ave

a si

gnifi

cant

im

pact

on

the

envi

ronm

ent o

r pos

e a

subs

tant

ial

heal

th ri

sk to

con

stru

ctio

n w

orke

rs a

nd th

e oc

cupa

nts

of th

e pr

opos

ed d

evel

opm

ent.

Soi

l sam

plin

g an

d ch

emic

al a

naly

ses

of s

ampl

es s

hall

be p

erfo

rmed

to

dete

rmin

e th

e ex

tent

of p

oten

tial c

onta

min

atio

n be

neat

h al

l US

T’s,

ele

vato

r sha

fts, c

larif

iers

, and

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it;

ongo

ing

thro

ugho

ut

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng,

and/

or c

onst

ruct

ion.

City

of O

akla

nd,

Fire

Dep

artm

ent,

Offi

ce o

f E

mer

genc

y S

ervi

ces;

City

of

Oak

land

, CE

DA

, B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

Page

-64-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) su

bsur

face

hyd

raul

ic li

fts w

hen

on-s

ite d

emol

ition

, or

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

will

pot

entia

lly a

ffect

a p

artic

ular

de

velo

pmen

t or b

uild

ing.

6)

If

soil,

gro

undw

ater

or o

ther

env

ironm

enta

l med

ium

w

ith s

uspe

cted

con

tam

inat

ion

is e

ncou

nter

ed

unex

pect

edly

dur

ing

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

(e.g

., id

entif

ied

by o

dor o

r vis

ual s

tain

ing,

or i

f any

un

derg

roun

d st

orag

e ta

nks,

aba

ndon

ed d

rum

s or

ot

her h

azar

dous

mat

eria

ls o

r was

tes

are

enco

unte

red)

, the

app

lican

t sha

ll ce

ase

wor

k in

the

vici

nity

of t

he s

uspe

ct m

ater

ial,

the

area

sha

ll be

se

cure

d as

nec

essa

ry, a

nd th

e ap

plic

ant s

hall

take

all

appr

opria

te m

easu

res

to p

rote

ct h

uman

hea

lth a

nd th

e en

viro

nmen

t. A

ppro

pria

te m

easu

res

shal

l inc

lude

no

tific

atio

n of

regu

lato

ry a

genc

y(ie

s) a

nd

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

actio

ns d

escr

ibed

in th

e C

ity’s

S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns o

f App

rova

l as

nece

ssar

y, to

id

entif

y th

e na

ture

and

ext

ent o

f con

tam

inat

ion.

Wor

k sh

all n

ot re

sum

e in

the

area

(s) a

ffect

ed u

ntil

the

mea

sure

s ha

ve b

een

impl

emen

ted

unde

r the

ov

ersi

ght o

f the

City

or r

egul

ator

y ag

ency

, as

appr

opria

te.

d)

Be

loca

ted

on a

site

whi

ch is

in

clud

ed o

n a

list o

f haz

ardo

us

mat

eria

ls s

ites

com

pile

d pu

rsua

nt to

G

over

nmen

t Cod

e S

ectio

n 65

962.

5 an

d, a

s a

resu

lt, w

ould

cre

ate

a si

gnifi

cant

haz

ard

to th

e pu

blic

or t

he

envi

ronm

ent?

1

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HAZ

-2: (

Envi

ronm

enta

l Site

As

sess

men

t Rep

orts

Rem

edia

tion)

Pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

, or b

uild

ing

perm

it If

the

envi

ronm

enta

l site

ass

essm

ent r

epor

ts re

com

men

d re

med

ial a

ctio

n, th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll:

1)

Con

sult

with

the

appr

opria

te lo

cal,

Sta

te, a

nd fe

dera

l en

viro

nmen

tal r

egul

ator

y ag

enci

es to

ens

ure

suffi

cien

t m

inim

izat

ion

of ri

sk to

hum

an h

ealth

and

en

viro

nmen

tal r

esou

rces

, bot

h du

ring

and

afte

r co

nstru

ctio

n, p

osed

by

soil

cont

amin

atio

n,

grou

ndw

ater

con

tam

inat

ion,

or o

ther

sur

face

haz

ards

in

clud

ing,

but

not

lim

ited

to, u

nder

grou

nd s

tora

ge

tank

s, fu

el d

istri

butio

n lin

es, w

aste

pits

and

sum

ps.

2)

Obt

ain

and

subm

it w

ritte

n ev

iden

ce o

f app

rova

l for

an

y re

med

ial a

ctio

n if

requ

ired

by a

loca

l, S

tate

, or

fede

ral e

nviro

nmen

tal r

egul

ator

y ag

ency

.

Req

uire

d pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r bu

ildin

g pe

rmit

City

of O

akla

nd,

Fire

Pre

vent

ion

Bur

eau,

H

azar

dous

M

ater

ials

Uni

t, C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A, B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion;

C

ity o

f Oak

land

, C

ED

A P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng

1 Th

e C

orte

se L

ist i

s th

e co

mpi

led

list o

f haz

ardo

us m

ater

ials

site

s, p

ursu

ant t

o G

over

nmen

t Cod

e S

ectio

n 65

962.

5. A

ppen

dix

B o

f the

CE

QA

Thr

esho

lds

/ Crit

eria

of S

igni

fican

ce G

uide

lines

con

tain

s gu

idan

ce o

n th

e C

orte

se L

ist.

Page

-65-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) 3)

S

ubm

it a

copy

of a

ll ap

plic

able

doc

umen

tatio

n re

quire

d by

loca

l, S

tate

, and

fede

ral e

nviro

nmen

tal

regu

lato

ry a

genc

ies,

incl

udin

g bu

t not

lim

ited

to:

perm

it ap

plic

atio

ns, P

hase

I an

d II

envi

ronm

enta

l site

as

sess

men

ts, h

uman

hea

lth a

nd e

colo

gica

l ris

k as

sess

men

ts, r

emed

ial a

ctio

n pl

ans,

risk

man

agem

ent

plan

s, s

oil m

anag

emen

t pla

ns, a

nd g

roun

dwat

er

man

agem

ent p

lans

. VI

II. Hy

drol

ogy a

nd W

ater

Qua

lity

a)

Vio

late

any

wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rds

or w

aste

dis

char

ge re

quire

men

ts?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HYD

-1: (

Post

-Con

stru

ctio

n St

orm

wat

er P

ollu

tion

Man

agem

ent P

lan,

ht

tp://

ww

w.c

lean

wat

erpr

ogra

m.c

om)

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

(or o

ther

co

nstru

ctio

n-re

late

d pe

rmit)

Th

e ap

plic

ant s

hall

com

ply

with

the

requ

irem

ents

of

Pro

visi

on C

.3 o

f the

Nat

iona

l Pol

luta

nt D

isch

arge

E

limin

atio

n S

yste

m (N

PD

ES

) per

mit

issu

ed to

the

Ala

med

a C

ount

ywid

e C

lean

Wat

er P

rogr

am. T

he a

pplic

ant s

hall

subm

it w

ith th

e ap

plic

atio

n fo

r a b

uild

ing

perm

it (o

r oth

er

cons

truct

ion-

rela

ted

perm

it) a

com

plet

ed S

torm

wat

er

Sup

plem

enta

l For

m fo

r the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n. T

he

proj

ect d

raw

ings

sub

mitt

ed fo

r the

bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

(or o

ther

co

nstru

ctio

n-re

late

d pe

rmit)

sha

ll co

ntai

n a

stor

mw

ater

po

llutio

n m

anag

emen

t pla

n, fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l by

the

City

, to

limit

the

disc

harg

e of

pol

luta

nts

in s

torm

wat

er a

fter

cons

truct

ion

of th

e pr

ojec

t to

the

max

imum

ext

ent

prac

ticab

le.

1)

The

post

-con

stru

ctio

n st

orm

wat

er p

ollu

tion

man

agem

ent p

lan

shal

l inc

lude

and

iden

tify

the

follo

win

g:

i. A

ll pr

opos

ed im

perv

ious

sur

face

on

the

site

; ii.

A

ntic

ipat

ed d

irect

iona

l flo

ws

of o

n-si

te

stor

mw

ater

runo

ff; a

nd

iii.

Site

des

ign

mea

sure

s to

redu

ce th

e am

ount

of

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ce a

rea

and

dire

ctly

con

nect

ed

impe

rvio

us s

urfa

ces;

and

iv

. S

ourc

e co

ntro

l mea

sure

s to

lim

it th

e po

tent

ial f

or

stor

mw

ater

pol

lutio

n; a

nd

v.

Sto

rmw

ater

trea

tmen

t mea

sure

s to

rem

ove

pollu

tant

s fro

m s

torm

wat

er ru

noff.

2)

Th

e fo

llow

ing

addi

tiona

l inf

orm

atio

n sh

all b

e su

bmitt

ed

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it; p

rior t

o an

d on

goin

g th

roug

hout

dem

oliti

on,

grad

ing

and/

or

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

http://www.cleanwaterprogram.com/

Page

-66-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) w

ith th

e po

st-c

onst

ruct

ion

stor

mw

ater

pol

lutio

n m

anag

emen

t pla

n:

i. D

etai

led

hydr

aulic

siz

ing

calc

ulat

ions

for e

ach

stor

mw

ater

trea

tmen

t mea

sure

pro

pose

d; a

nd

ii.

Pol

luta

nt re

mov

al in

form

atio

n de

mon

stra

ting

that

an

y pr

opos

ed m

anuf

actu

red/

mec

hani

cal (

i.e.,

non-

land

scap

e-ba

sed)

sto

rmw

ater

trea

tmen

t m

easu

re, w

hen

not u

sed

in c

ombi

natio

n w

ith a

la

ndsc

ape-

base

d tre

atm

ent m

easu

re, i

s ca

pabl

e or

rem

ovin

g th

e ra

nge

of p

ollu

tant

s ty

pica

lly

rem

oved

by

land

scap

e-ba

sed

treat

men

t m

easu

res.

3)

A

ll pr

opos

ed s

torm

wat

er tr

eatm

ent m

easu

res

shal

l in

corp

orat

e ap

prop

riate

pla

ntin

g m

ater

ials

for

stor

mw

ater

trea

tmen

t (fo

r lan

dsca

pe-b

ased

trea

tmen

t m

easu

res)

and

sha

ll be

des

igne

d w

ith c

onsi

dera

tions

fo

r vec

tor/m

osqu

ito c

ontro

l. P

ropo

sed

plan

ting

mat

eria

ls fo

r all

prop

osed

land

scap

e-ba

sed

stor

mw

ater

trea

tmen

t mea

sure

s sh

all b

e in

clud

ed o

n th

e la

ndsc

ape

and

irrig

atio

n pl

an fo

r the

pro

ject

. The

ap

plic

ant i

s no

t req

uire

d to

incl

ude

on-s

ite s

torm

wat

er

treat

men

t mea

sure

s in

the

post

-con

stru

ctio

n st

orm

wat

er p

ollu

tion

man

agem

ent p

lan

if ap

prov

al is

se

cure

d fro

m P

lann

ing

and

Zoni

ng o

f a p

ropo

sal t

hat

dem

onst

rate

s co

mpl

ianc

e w

ith th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f the

C

ity’s

Alte

rnat

ive

Com

plia

nce

Pro

gram

. 4)

P

rior t

o fin

al p

erm

it in

spec

tion,

the

appl

ican

t sha

ll im

plem

ent t

he a

ppro

ved

stor

mw

ater

pol

lutio

n m

anag

emen

t pla

n.

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HYD

-2: (

Mai

nten

ance

Ag

reem

ent f

or S

torm

wat

er T

reat

men

t Mea

sure

s)

Prio

r to

final

zon

ing

insp

ectio

n Fo

r pro

ject

s in

corp

orat

ing

stor

mw

ater

trea

tmen

t mea

sure

s,

the

appl

ican

t sha

ll en

ter i

nto

the

“Sta

ndar

d C

ity o

f Oak

land

S

torm

wat

er T

reat

men

t Mea

sure

s M

aint

enan

ce A

gree

men

t,”

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith P

rovi

sion

C.3

.e o

f the

NP

DE

S p

erm

it,

whi

ch p

rovi

des,

in p

art,

for t

he fo

llow

ing:

1)

Th

e ap

plic

ant a

ccep

ting

resp

onsi

bilit

y fo

r the

ad

equa

te in

stal

latio

n/co

nstru

ctio

n, o

pera

tion,

m

aint

enan

ce, i

nspe

ctio

n, a

nd re

porti

ng o

f any

on-

site

st

orm

wat

er tr

eatm

ent m

easu

res

bein

g in

corp

orat

ed

into

the

proj

ect u

ntil

the

resp

onsi

bilit

y is

lega

lly

Page

-67-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) tra

nsfe

rred

to a

noth

er e

ntity

; and

2)

Le

gal a

cces

s to

the

on-s

ite s

torm

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

mea

sure

s fo

r rep

rese

ntat

ives

of t

he C

ity, t

he lo

cal

vect

or c

ontro

l dis

trict

, and

sta

ff of

the

Reg

iona

l Wat

er

Qua

lity

Con

trol B

oard

, San

Fra

ncis

co R

egio

n, fo

r the

pu

rpos

e of

ver

ifyin

g th

e im

plem

enta

tion,

ope

ratio

n,

and

mai

nten

ance

of t

he o

n-si

te s

torm

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

mea

sure

s an

d to

take

cor

rect

ive

actio

n if

nece

ssar

y.

The

agre

emen

t sha

ll be

reco

rded

at t

he C

ount

y R

ecor

der’s

Offi

ce a

t the

app

lican

t’s e

xpen

se.

c)

Res

ult i

n su

bsta

ntia

l ero

sion

or

silta

tion

on- o

r off-

site

that

wou

ld

affe

ct th

e qu

ality

of r

ecei

ving

wat

ers?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HYD

-3: (

Eros

ion

and

Sedi

men

tatio

n C

ontr

ol P

lan)

Pr

ior t

o an

y gr

adin

g ac

tiviti

es

1)

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

obta

in a

gra

ding

per

mit

if re

quire

d by

the

Oak

land

Gra

ding

Reg

ulat

ions

pu

rsua

nt to

Sec

tion

15.0

4.78

0 of

the

Oak

land

M

unic

ipal

Cod

e. T

he g

radi

ng p

erm

it ap

plic

atio

n sh

all

incl

ude

an e

rosi

on a

nd s

edim

enta

tion

cont

rol p

lan

for

revi

ew a

nd a

ppro

val b

y th

e B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion.

Th

e er

osio

n an

d se

dim

enta

tion

cont

rol p

lan

shal

l in

clud

e al

l nec

essa

ry m

easu

res

to b

e ta

ken

to p

reve

nt

exce

ssiv

e st

orm

wat

er ru

noff

or c

arry

ing

by s

torm

wat

er

runo

ff of

sol

id m

ater

ials

on

to la

nds

of a

djac

ent

prop

erty

ow

ners

, pub

lic s

treet

s, o

r to

cree

ks a

s a

resu

lt of

con

ditio

ns c

reat

ed b

y gr

adin

g op

erat

ions

. The

pl

an s

hall

incl

ude,

but

not

be

limite

d to

, suc

h m

easu

res

as s

hort-

term

ero

sion

con

trol p

lant

ing,

w

ater

proo

f slo

pe c

over

ing,

che

ck d

ams,

inte

rcep

tor

ditc

hes,

ben

ches

, sto

rm d

rain

s, d

issi

patio

n st

ruct

ures

, di

vers

ion

dike

s, re

tard

ing

berm

s an

d ba

rrie

rs, d

evic

es

to tr

ap, s

tore

and

filte

r out

sed

imen

t, an

d st

orm

wat

er

rete

ntio

n ba

sins

. Off-

site

wor

k by

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant

may

be

nece

ssar

y. T

he p

roje

ct a

pplic

ant s

hall

obta

in

perm

issi

on o

r eas

emen

ts n

eces

sary

for o

ff-si

te w

ork.

Th

ere

shal

l be

a cl

ear n

otat

ion

that

the

plan

is s

ubje

ct

to c

hang

es a

s ch

angi

ng c

ondi

tions

occ

ur. C

alcu

latio

ns

of a

ntic

ipat

ed s

torm

wat

er ru

noff

and

sedi

men

t vo

lum

es s

hall

be in

clud

ed, i

f req

uire

d by

the

Dire

ctor

of

Dev

elop

men

t or d

esig

nee.

The

pla

n sh

all s

peci

fy

that

, afte

r con

stru

ctio

n is

com

plet

e, th

e pr

ojec

t ap

plic

ant s

hall

ensu

re th

at th

e st

orm

dra

in s

yste

m

shal

l be

insp

ecte

d an

d th

at th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll cl

ear t

he s

yste

m o

f any

deb

ris o

r sed

imen

t.

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it; p

rior t

o an

d on

goin

g th

roug

hout

dem

oliti

on,

grad

ing

and/

or

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-68-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Miti

gatio

n M

easu

res

or S

tand

ard

Con

ditio

ns

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) 2)

Th

roug

hout

gra

ding

and

con

stru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es, t

he

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

impl

emen

t the

app

rove

d er

osio

n an

d se

dim

enta

tion

plan

. No

grad

ing

shal

l oc

cur d

urin

g th

e w

et w

eath

er s

easo

n (O

ctob

er 1

5 th

roug

h A

pril

15) u

nles

s sp

ecifi

cally

aut

horiz

ed in

w

ritin

g by

the

Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n.

d) R

esul

t in

subs

tant

ial f

lood

ing

on- o

r of

f-site

? ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N H

YD-4

: (St

orm

wat

er a

nd

Sew

er)

Prio

r to

com

plet

ing

the

final

des

ign

for t

he p

roje

ct’s

se

wer

ser

vice

C

onfir

mat

ion

of th

e ca

paci

ty o

f the

City

’s s

urro

undi

ng

stor

mw

ater

and

san

itary

sew

er s

yste

m a

nd s

tate

of r

epai

r sh

all b

e co

mpl

eted

by

a qu

alifi

ed c

ivil

engi

neer

with

fund

ing

from

the

proj

ect a

pplic

ant.

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

be

resp

onsi

ble

for t

he n

eces

sary

sto

rmw

ater

and

san

itary

se

wer

infra

stru

ctur

e im

prov

emen

ts to

acc

omm

odat

e th

e pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct. I

n ad

ditio

n, th

e ap

plic

ant s

hall

be

requ

ired

to p

ay a

dditi

onal

fees

to im

prov

e sa

nita

ry s

ewer

in

frast

ruct

ure

if re

quire

d by

the

Sew

er a

nd S

torm

wat

er

Div

isio

n. Im

prov

emen

ts to

the

exis

ting

sani

tary

sew

er

colle

ctio

n sy

stem

sha

ll sp

ecifi

cally

incl

ude,

but

are

not

lim

ited

to, m

echa

nism

s to

con

trol o

r min

imiz

e in

crea

ses

in

infil

tratio

n/in

flow

to o

ffset

san

itary

sew

er in

crea

ses

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

e pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct. T

o th

e m

axim

um

exte

nt p

ract

icab

le, t

he a

pplic

ant w

ill b

e re

quire

d to

im

plem

ent B

est M

anag

emen

t Pra

ctic

es to

redu

ce th

e pe

ak

stor

mw

ater

runo

ff fro

m th

e pr

ojec

t site

. Add

ition

ally

, the

pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll be

resp

onsi

ble

for p

aym

ent o

f the

re

quire

d in

stal

latio

n or

hoo

k-up

fees

to th

e af

fect

ed s

ervi

ce

prov

ider

s.

Prio

r to

com

plet

ing

the

final

des

ign

for t

he

proj

ect’s

sto

rm

drai

nage

and

sew

er

serv

ice

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y, S

ewer

an

d S

torm

wat

er

Div

isio

n

f) C

reat

e or

con

tribu

te s

ubst

antia

l ru

noff

whi

ch w

ould

be

an a

dditi

onal

so

urce

of p

ollu

ted

runo

ff?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HYD

-1: (

Post

-Con

stru

ctio

n St

orm

wat

er P

ollu

tion

Man

agem

ent P

lan

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

HYD

-2: (

Mai

nten

ance

Ag

reem

ent f

or S

torm

wat

er T

reat

men

t Mea

sure

s)

See

abo

ve.

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it; p

rior t

o an

d on

goin

g th

roug

hout

dem

oliti

on,

grad

ing

and/

or

cons

truct

ion

activ

ities

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

g)

Oth

erw

ise

subs

tant

ially

deg

rade

w

ater

qua

lity?

ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N H

YD-1

: (Po

st-C

onst

ruct

ion

Stor

mw

ater

Pol

lutio

n M

anag

emen

t Pla

n ST

AND

ARD

CO

ND

ITIO

N H

YD-2

: (M

aint

enan

ce

Agre

emen

t for

Sto

rmw

ater

Tre

atm

ent M

easu

res)

S

ee a

bove

.

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

or

build

ing

perm

it; p

rior t

o an

d on

goin

g th

roug

hout

dem

oliti

on,

grad

ing

and/

or

City

of O

akla

nd,

CE

DA

, Bui

ldin

g S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-69-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

In

nitia

l Stu

dy T

opics

(Ien

tatio

n in

the I

nitia

l Stu

dy)

Ord

er o

f Pre

sco

nstru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es

XIII.

Publ

ic Se

rvice

s a)

R

esul

t in

subs

tant

ial a

dver

se

phys

ical

impa

cts

asso

ciat

ed w

ith th

e pr

ovis

ion

of n

ew o

r phy

sica

lly a

ltere

d go

vern

men

tal f

acili

ties,

nee

d fo

r new

or

phy

sica

lly a

ltere

d go

vern

men

tal

faci

litie

s, th

e co

nstru

ctio

n of

whi

ch

coul

d ca

use

sign

ifica

nt

envi

ronm

enta

l im

pact

s, in

ord

er to

m

aint

ain

acce

ptab

le s

ervi

ce ra

tios,

re

spon

se ti

mes

or o

ther

per

form

ance

ob

ject

ives

for a

ny o

f the

follo

win

g pu

blic

ser

vice

s:

i. Fi

re p

rote

ctio

n?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

PU

B-1

: (C

onfo

rman

ce w

ith

Oth

er R

equi

rem

ents

) Pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a d

emol

ition

, gra

ding

, P-jo

b, o

r ot

her c

onst

ruct

ion

rela

ted

perm

it:

1)

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

com

ply

with

all

othe

r ap

plic

able

fede

ral,

stat

e, re

gion

al a

nd/o

r loc

al c

odes

, re

quire

men

ts, r

egul

atio

ns, a

nd g

uide

lines

, inc

ludi

ng

but n

ot li

mite

d to

thos

e im

pose

d by

the

City

’s B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion,

the

City

’s F

ire M

arsh

al, a

nd th

e C

ity’s

Pub

lic W

orks

Age

ncy.

2)

Th

e ap

plic

ant s

hall

subm

it ap

prov

ed b

uild

ing

plan

s fo

r pr

ojec

t-spe

cific

nee

ds re

late

d to

fire

pro

tect

ion

to th

e Fi

re S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n fo

r rev

iew

and

app

rova

l, in

clud

ing,

but

not

lim

ited

to a

utom

atic

ext

ingu

ishi

ng

syst

ems,

wat

er s

uppl

y im

prov

emen

ts a

nd h

ydra

nts,

fir

e de

partm

ent a

cces

s, a

nd v

eget

atio

n m

anag

emen

t fo

r pre

vent

ing

fires

and

soi

l ero

sion

.

Req

uire

d pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f a

dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r bu

ildin

g pe

rmit

City

of O

akla

nd,

Fire

Pre

vent

ion

Bur

eau,

City

of

Oak

land

, CE

DA

, B

uild

ing

Ser

vice

s D

ivis

ion

XVI. U

tiliti

es an

d Se

rvice

Sys

tem

s a)

E

xcee

d w

aste

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

requ

irem

ents

of t

he S

an F

ranc

isco

B

ay R

egio

nal W

ater

Qua

lity

Con

trol

Boa

rd?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

UTI

L-1:

(Sto

rmw

ater

and

Se

wer

) Pr

ior t

o co

mpl

etin

g th

e fin

al d

esig

n fo

r the

pro

ject

’s

sew

er s

ervi

ce

Con

firm

atio

n of

the

capa

city

of t

he C

ity’s

sur

roun

ding

st

orm

wat

er a

nd s

anita

ry s

ewer

sys

tem

and

sta

te o

f rep

air

shal

l be

com

plet

ed b

y a

qual

ified

civ

il en

gine

er w

ith fu

ndin

g fro

m th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t. Th

e pr

ojec

t app

lican

t sha

ll be

re

spon

sibl

e fo

r the

nec

essa

ry s

torm

wat

er a

nd s

anita

ry

sew

er in

frast

ruct

ure

impr

ovem

ents

to a

ccom

mod

ate

the

prop

osed

pro

ject

. In

addi

tion,

the

appl

ican

t sha

ll be

re

quire

d to

pay

add

ition

al fe

es to

impr

ove

sani

tary

sew

er

infra

stru

ctur

e if

requ

ired

by th

e S

ewer

and

Sto

rmw

ater

D

ivis

ion.

Impr

ovem

ents

to th

e ex

istin

g sa

nita

ry s

ewer

co

llect

ion

syst

em s

hall

spec

ifica

lly in

clud

e, b

ut a

re n

ot

limite

d to

, mec

hani

sms

to c

ontro

l or m

inim

ize

incr

ease

s in

in

filtra

tion/

inflo

w to

offs

et s

anita

ry s

ewer

incr

ease

s as

soci

ated

with

the

prop

osed

pro

ject

. To

the

max

imum

ex

tent

pra

ctic

able

, the

app

lican

t will

be

requ

ired

to

impl

emen

t Bes

t Man

agem

ent P

ract

ices

to re

duce

the

peak

Prio

r to

com

plet

ing

the

final

des

ign

for t

he

proj

ect’s

sto

rm

drai

nage

and

sew

er

serv

ice

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y, S

ewer

an

d S

torm

wat

er

Div

isio

n

Page

-70-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) st

orm

wat

er ru

noff

from

the

proj

ect s

ite. A

dditi

onal

ly, t

he

proj

ect a

pplic

ant s

hall

be re

spon

sibl

e fo

r pay

men

t of t

he

requ

ired

inst

alla

tion

or h

ook-

up fe

es to

the

affe

cted

ser

vice

pr

ovid

ers.

b)

R

equi

re o

r res

ult i

n co

nstru

ctio

n of

ne

w s

torm

wat

er d

rain

age

faci

litie

s or

exp

ansi

on o

f exi

stin

g fa

cilit

ies,

co

nstru

ctio

n of

whi

ch c

ould

cau

se

sign

ifica

nt e

nviro

nmen

tal e

ffect

s?

Stan

dard

Con

ditio

n H

YD-4

: (St

orm

wat

er a

nd S

ewer

) S

ee a

bove

. P

rior t

o co

mpl

etin

g th

e fin

al d

esig

n fo

r the

pr

ojec

t’s s

torm

dr

aina

ge a

nd s

ewer

se

rvic

e

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y, S

ewer

an

d S

torm

wat

er

Div

isio

n

d)

Res

ult i

n a

dete

rmin

atio

n by

the

was

tew

ater

trea

tmen

t pro

vide

r whi

ch

serv

es o

r may

ser

ve th

e pr

ojec

t tha

t it

does

not

hav

e ad

equa

te c

apac

ity

to s

erve

the

proj

ect's

pro

ject

ed

dem

and

in a

dditi

on to

the

prov

ider

s'

exis

ting

com

mitm

ents

and

requ

ire o

r re

sult

in c

onst

ruct

ion

of n

ew

was

tew

ater

trea

tmen

t fac

ilitie

s or

ex

pans

ion

of e

xist

ing

faci

litie

s,

cons

truct

ion

of w

hich

cou

ld c

ause

si

gnifi

cant

env

ironm

enta

l effe

cts?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

UTI

L-1:

(Sto

rmw

ater

and

Se

wer

) S

ee a

bove

.

Prio

r to

com

plet

ing

the

final

des

ign

for t

he

proj

ect’s

sto

rm

drai

nage

and

sew

er

serv

ice

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y, S

ewer

an

d S

torm

wat

er

Div

isio

n

e)

Be

serv

ed b

y a

land

fill w

ith

insu

ffici

ent p

erm

itted

cap

acity

to

acco

mm

odat

e th

e pr

ojec

t’s s

olid

w

aste

dis

posa

l nee

ds a

nd re

quire

or

resu

lt in

con

stru

ctio

n of

land

fill

faci

litie

s or

exp

ansi

on o

f exi

stin

g fa

cilit

ies,

con

stru

ctio

n of

whi

ch c

ould

ca

use

sign

ifica

nt e

nviro

nmen

tal

effe

cts?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

UTI

L-2:

(Was

te R

educ

tion

and

Rec

yclin

g)

The

proj

ect a

pplic

ant w

ill s

ubm

it a

Con

stru

ctio

n &

D

emol

ition

Was

te R

educ

tion

and

Rec

yclin

g P

lan

(WR

RP

) an

d an

Ope

ratio

nal D

iver

sion

Pla

n (O

DP

) for

revi

ew a

nd

appr

oval

by

the

Pub

lic W

orks

Age

ncy.

Pr

ior t

o is

suan

ce o

f dem

oliti

on, g

radi

ng, o

r bui

ldin

g pe

rmit

Cha

pter

15.

34 o

f the

Oak

land

Mun

icip

al C

ode

outli

nes

requ

irem

ents

for r

educ

ing

was

te a

nd o

ptim

izin

g co

nstru

ctio

n an

d de

mol

ition

(C&

D) r

ecyc

ling.

Affe

cted

pr

ojec

ts in

clud

e al

l new

con

stru

ctio

n,

reno

vatio

ns/a

ltera

tions

/mod

ifica

tions

with

con

stru

ctio

n va

lues

of $

50,0

00 o

r mor

e (e

xcep

t R-3

), an

d al

l dem

oliti

on

(incl

udin

g so

ft de

mo)

.The

WR

RP

mus

t spe

cify

the

met

hods

by

whi

ch th

e de

velo

pmen

t will

div

ert C

&D

deb

ris w

aste

ge

nera

ted

by th

e pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct fr

om la

ndfil

l dis

posa

l in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith c

urre

nt C

ity re

quire

men

ts. C

urre

nt

stan

dard

s, F

AQ

s, a

nd fo

rms

are

avai

labl

e at

w

ww

.oak

land

pw.c

om/P

age3

9.as

px o

r in

the

Gre

en B

uild

ing

Res

ourc

e C

ente

r. A

fter a

ppro

val o

f the

pla

n, th

e pr

ojec

t

Prio

r to

issu

ance

of a

de

mol

ition

, gra

ding

, or

build

ing

perm

it an

d on

goin

g du

ring

cons

truct

ion

City

of O

akla

nd,

Pub

lic W

orks

A

genc

y,

Env

ironm

enta

l S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n

Page

-71-

MIT

IGA

TIO

N A

ND

MO

NIT

OR

ING

REP

OR

TIN

G P

RO

GR

AM

FO

R F

RU

ITVA

LE T

RA

NSI

T VI

LLA

GE

PHA

SE 2

PR

OJE

CT

Envi

ronm

enta

l Im

pact

M

itiga

tion

Mea

sure

s or

Sta

ndar

d C

ondi

tions

Im

plem

enta

tion

and

Mon

itorin

g Sc

hedu

le

Mon

itorin

g R

espo

nsib

ility

M

onito

ring

Proc

edur

e R

epor

ting

Com

men

ts

Rep

ortin

g D

ate

/ M

onito

r’s

Initi

als

Initi

al St

udy T

opics

(In

Orde

r of P

rese

ntat

ion

in th

e Ini

tial S

tudy

) ap

plic

ant s

hall

impl

emen

t the

pla

n.

Ong

oing

Th

e O

DP

will

iden

tify

how

the

proj

ect c

ompl

ies

with

the

Rec

yclin

g S

pace

Allo

catio

n O

rdin

ance

, (C

hapt

er 1

7.11

8 of

th

e O

akla

nd M

unic

ipal

Cod

e), i

nclu

ding

cap

acity

ca

lcul

atio

ns, a

nd s

peci

fy th

e m

etho

ds b

y w

hich

the

deve

lopm

ent w

ill m

eet t

he c

urre

nt d

iver

sion

of s

olid

was

te

gene

rate

d by

ope

ratio

n of

the

prop

osed

pro

ject

from

land

fill

disp

osal

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith c

urre

nt C

ity re

quire

men

ts. T

he

prop

osed

pro

gram

sha

ll be

in im

plem

ente

d an

d m

aint

aine

d fo

r the

dur

atio

n of

the

prop

osed

act

ivity

or f

acili

ty. C

hang

es

to th

e pl

an m

ay b

e re

-sub

mitt

ed to

the

Env

ironm

enta

l S

ervi

ces

Div

isio

n of

the

Pub

lic W

orks

Age

ncy

for r

evie

w

and

appr

oval

. Any

ince

ntiv

e pr

ogra

ms

shal

l rem

ain

fully

op

erat

iona

l as

long

as

resi

dent

s an

d bu

sine

sses

exi

st a

t th

e pr

ojec

t site

. f)

Vio

late

app

licab

le fe

dera

l, st

ate,

and

lo

cal s

tatu

tes

and

regu

latio

ns re

late

d to

sol

id w

aste

?

STAN

DAR

D C

ON

DIT

ION

UTI

L-2:

(Was

te R

educ

tion

and

Rec

yclin

g)

See

abo

ve.

Page -72-

APPROVED BY: City Planning Commission: (date) (vote) Applicant and/or Developer Statement I have read and accept responsibility for the Conditions of Approval, as approved by Planning Commission action on May 19, 2010. I agree to abide by and conform to these conditions, as well as to all provisions of the Oakland Zoning Code and Municipal Code pertaining to the project. Signature of Owner/Applicant: (date) Signature of Developer/Contractor (date)

oakland city planning commission · 2011-10-27 · page -1- findings final . project findings,...

Documents