October 15, 2010

Mr. William BurrusPresidentAmerican Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Bill:

Certified Mail Tracking Number:70993400000908354847

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Flint, Michiganarea mail processing study initiative.

If you have any questions, please contact Barry Carpenter at (202) 268-6892.

Sincerely,

Enclosure

(CA201 0-701)

Oct-Q1-2009: Mar-31-2010

Type of Distribution Consolidated: OriginatingFacility Name & Type: Flint P&DC

Street Address: 250 E. Boulevard Dr.City: Flint

State: MI50 Facility ZIP Code: 48502

District: Southeast MichiganArea: Great Lakes

Finance Number: 253292Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 484, 485

Miles to Gaining Facility: 38.5EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Richard PurdySenior Plant Manager: Michael Kotula

District Manager: Charles J. Miller

Facility Name & Type: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCStreet Address: 711 N. Glenwood

City: PontiacState: MI

50 Facility ZIP Code: 48340District: Southeast Michigan

Area: Great LakesFinance Number: 258231

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 480,483EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: (Left Blank Intentionally)Senior Plant Manager: Michael Kotula

District Manager: Charles J. Miller

Approval Date: July 22, 2009Implementation Date: Oct-Q1-2009

PIR Type: 1st PIRDate Range of Data:

Processing Days per Year: 310Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750

EAS Hours per Year: 1,825Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost ofBorrowing/

November 28, 2008New Facility Start-up Costs Update ~--------------l

Date & TIme this workbook was last saved: 10/13/2010 13:56

Area Vice President: JoAnn FeindtSenior Vice President, Operations: Steven J. Forte

Area AMP Coordinator: Nancy SchoenbeckNAI Contact: Jug S. Bedi

PI R Data Entry Page

Approval Signatures

10/01/09 PIRType:

to Mar-31-2010

MetroPlex P&OC

Oct~1~2009

Originating

Losing Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:

Current SCF ZIP Code{s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:

Current SCF ZIP COde{s):

Implementation Date:

Date Range of Data:

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ACCQUNTA81L!TY • facknowledge ll'1allamaccoulllablefQrrespeetll')ganosupportinglhe Illtegrily 01alt offi(:ial postal reporting$y~ems. Including flfl1ilnclal reports and those relating to compliance with conli7iletlml.compleroent. or. simnareffOrls invoiVing the inveslment and expenditure offunds, as well as all systems to service to our C\Jslome~,

LOSINGFACIU7'Y:

Plant Manager:

Richard PurdyPrinted Name

District Manager:

Charles J. MillerPnnted Name

Prtnted Name

DatePrinted Nama

Senior Plant Manager:'

Michael Kotula

Senior Vice President Operations:

GAINING.FACILlT¥:

Plant Manager:

(Left Blanklntentionally)

HEAOqUARTER§:

AREA OFFICE:

Area Vice President:

District Manager:

____-..:::C.;.,;.; ..:;M;.;.i..:;ll,e"",f..:;. ---'=

PIR Approval SignattJreS

Executive Summary PIR Type: 1st PIRLast Saved: October 13. 2010 Date Range of Data: 1011109 - 3131110

Losing Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:Current SCF ZIP Cadets):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:Current SCF ZIP Cadets):

Flint P&DC

250 E. Boulevard Dr.

FlintMI484,485

Originating

Savings/Costs

Actual Change PIRvs Pre-AMP

Proposed ChangePIR vs Proposed

Function 1 Wor1<hour savings $6,615,303 $5,736,784Non-Processing Craft Wor1<hOlJr S.";ngo (loss MalnVTrans) ($394,974} ($403,881)

PCESIEAS Wor1<hour Savings $1,167,143 $1,016,525Transportation saVings $1,708,271 $1,772,793

Maintenance Savings ($5,533,347) ($5,958,445)Space Savings $0 $0

Total Annual Savings $3,562,395 $2,163,775

Total One-Time Costs ($105,845) $7,990

Total First Year Savings $3,456,550 $2,171,765Craft Position Loss

from Stafflng-PCESIEAS

96.46%

Gaining Current Qtr

92.85%

Losing Current Qtr

____9:..;2;;;.. 7_5 from Stafflng-Craft

3 1PCESIEAS Position Loss

ServicePeliormance (EXFC O/N)

PiPIln * t f

ServiceFirst-Class Mail

First-Class MailService Peliormance (EXFC 2 Day) 92.89% ___.;:.9.;:.0.:..:.6:...;7..;%:.;.0 from ServiCe Performance & CSM

First-Class MailService Peliormance (EXFC 3 Day) 75.75% ___.::8.::9..:..:.2=.;0:..O;,.;Yo from ServiCe Performance & CSM

Customer Satisfaction Measurement Residential atPFC level _________9:..1.:..0;",:Yo from ServiCe Performance & CSM

Customer satisfaction MeasurementBusiness/Preferred at PFC level 86%

PIR Executive Summary

Calculation References

Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:

Function 1 Annual Workhour Costs

Non-Processing Craft Worl<hour Costs (less Malntfrrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs

Transportation Costs

Maintenance Costs

Space Costs

Total Annual Costs

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Costs

StaffingCraft Position Total

PCES/EAS Position Total

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (lass Malntfrrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

StaffingCraft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

Pre -AMP

$71,431,091$2,713,882$9,390,450

$23,379,021$19,998,468

$0$126,912,912

$0

$126,912,912

1,355

89

1st PIR vs PreAMP

$6,615,303($394,974)

$1,167,143$1,708,271

($5,533,347)$0

$3,562,395

($105,845)

$3,456,550

92

3

Proposed - AMP

$70,552,573$2,704,974$9,239,832

$23,443,543$19,573,370

$0$125,514,292

($113,835)

$125,400,457

1,338

87

1st PIR vs Proposed(Approved)

$5,736,784($403,881)

$1,016,525$1,772,793

($5,958,445)$0

$2,163,775

$7,990

$2,171,765

75

1

PIR

$64,815,788.47$3,108,856$8,223,307

$21,670,750$25,531,815

$0$123,350,517

($105,845)

$123,244,672

1,263

86

ApprovedAMP

$878,518$8,908

$150,618($64,522)$425,098

$0$1,398,620

($113,835)

$1,284,785

17

2

PIR Executive Summary

Summary NarrativeLast Saved: October 13, 2010

Losing Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Flint P&DC484,485Originating

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCCurrent SCF ZIP Code s: 480,483

Background:

The Great Lakes Area, with the assistance from the Southeast Michigan Performance Cluster, has completed the first (6 month)Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Flint, MI Area Mail Processing (AMP). This first PIR projects a full year savings anddetermines whether the Postal Service Increased efficiency by consolidating originating mail processing operations from the Flint,MI P&DC to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. The AMP moved originating letters and flats for the ZIP codes 484-485 to theMichigan Metroplex P&DC without modifications to the operating plan. The transfer of volumes to the Michigan Metroplex P&DCwas completed on September 22,2009.

The Flint P&DC is an owned facility located approximately 38 miles from the Michigan Metroplex P&DC.

Financial Summary:

1st PIR vs. Proposed 1st PIR VS. Pre AMP

Total Annual Savings:Total First Year:

$2,163,755$2,171,765

$3,562,395$3,456,550

The vast majority of the savings was due to the unprecedented reduction in mail volume over the last two years.

The consolidation shifted an approximate average daily volume of 294,892 originating first handling mail pieces (base period) fromthe Flint P&DC to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. There were service upgrades and downgrades for First Class, Periodicals, andStandard Mail. The Southeast Michigan Performance Cluster and Great Lakes Area realigned transportation, improvedoperational efficiencies, and made personnel scheduling adjustments to protect service and ensure cost reduction commitmentswere met.

Customer Service Considerations:

The Michigan Metroplex P&DC EXFC First Class Mail Service Performance is maintained at the Pre-AMP levels:

QTR 4 2008QTR 1 2009

QTR 2 2009

QTR 1 2010

QTR 2 2010QTR 3 2010QTR 4 2010

OvernightPercenta e

95.24%93.97%

96.31%96.82%

96.11%

96.46%

2 DayPercenta e

88.85%

89.49%92.02%94.86%

92.25%

90.67%

3 DayPercenta e

90.91%89.17%

92.04%94.14%

91.04%

89.22%

The Flint P&DC EXFC First Class Mail Service Performance is below the Pre-AMP levels:

After AMP

QTR 1 2010QTR 2 2010QTR 3 2010QTR 4 2010

OvernightPercenta e

97.24%

97.55%97.27%98.14%

95.62%92.85%

2 DayPercenta e

89.67%

92.56%94.72%96.12%

92.85%92.89%

3 DayPercenta e

72.28%

78.70%85.70%89.43%

82.71%75.75%

PIR Summary Narrative

Transportation Changes:

The approved Flint AMP projected an annual transportation cost of $64,522. The local initiatives put In place since theimplementation of the AMP resulted in a first PIR savings of $1,708,271. The vast majority of the savings was due to theunprecedented reduction in mail volume over the last two years.

Staffing Impacts:

The approved Flint AMP proposed identified a net reduction of 17 craft and 2 EAS employee positions due to the consolidation ofsome originating operations to the Michigan Metroplex P&DC. Complement data at the end of QTR 2 FY2010 shows thecomplement has been reduced by 92 craft and 3 EAS employess through attrition and transfers. Mail volume reduction and localinitiatives involving staffing/scheduling study impacts and early retirement incentives in the fall of 2009 contributed to the largerthan expected complement reduction.

The staffing impacts and management-to-craft ratios are summarized below.

SDOs to Craft 1

(1 :25 target)

1: 30

1: 25

MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1

(1 :22 target)

1: 26

1: 22

SDOs to Craft 1

(1 :25 target)

1: 57

1: 25

MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1

(1 :22 target)

1: 43

1: 22

1 Craft =FTR+PTR+PTF+Casualsl Craft =F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

While Flint employees were excessed out of the craft and out of the installation, all found landing spots within Southeast MichiganPerformance Cluster.

Maintenance Impacts:

The AMP projected a net annual savings of $425,098 in Maintenance. This savings was attributed to the Flint P&DC labor andnon-personnel costs associated with no longer maintaining 2 AFCSs, 1 ClOSS PARS operation and 1 NEC.

The dual pass rough cull (DPRC) and 2 DBCS-OSS heads were moved from the Flint facility to the Michigan Metroplex. In returnthe site received two regular DBCS heads.

The first PIR is projecting a net cost of $5,533,347. This is primarily because of two factors - the increased number of custodians(LDC 38) needed in the larger Metroplex and the increased preventative maintenance (LDC 36) due to extra equipment for theDetroit AMP. It is hard to differentiate the LDC 36 and LDC 38 hours from Detroit, MI and the Michigan Metroplex as both AMPswere being implemented simultaneously. The Detroit, MI originating AMP finalized implementation into the Michigan Metroplex onJanuary 26th

, 2010.

PIR Summary Narrative

Therefore. it has been determined that the Area will complete new staffing packages for each facility. Current staffing packagesfor custodians (LDC 38) have been performed and the packages significantly reduce the current staffing. The Michigan Metroplexis in the process of reducing LDC 38 costs.

Space Impacts and One Time Facility Costs:

The AMP projected $113.835 of one time costs. The first PIR identifies a one time cost of $105.845 to upgrade and relocate oneDual Pass Rough Cull from Flint to the Michigan Metroplex.

Other Concurrent Initiatives:

During the last six months both the Flint P&DC and Michigan Metroplex P&DC were engaged in other concurrent initiativesincluding:

• Distribution compressionTransfer of 484-485 Priority Mail to Detroit Pi

• Transfer of PARS operations to Detroit P&DC• Transfer of outgoing First Class SPRs to Detroit P&DC• Conversion of Detroit BMC into Detroit NDC with associated mail prep changes• Implementation of Detroit AMP

Conclusion:

Volume loss at Flint, MI P&DC and Michigan Metroplex, MI P&DC drove complement reductions through various efforts such asearly retirement incentives. The savings associated with this AMP needs to focus on reduction at Flint, MI P&DC. Comparison ofdata used during the feasibility study and the PIR indicate a 16.6% reduction in annual TPH volume at the Flint. MI P&DC. Basedon the approved AMP, Flint, MI P&DC was expected to reduce staffing by 40 craft positions. The difference between the PIR andthe proposed for Flint. MI P&DC was 5 craft positions, attributable to volume loss and other local initiatives such as distributioncompression.

PIR Summary Narrative

Service Perfonnance and Customer Satisfaction MeasurementLast Saved: OCtober 13, 2010

PIR Type: 1st PIRImplementation Date: "","'010""",1"'090::---

Losing Fscilily: -;,F1::in'::t>i:p::&;::DC'i7.==:- _District: Southeast Mid1igan

Q4a .,..QOa t1~

Q12a ...Q1&a ~

Q19 8ft

............9'"Q1

O"<omIghl 2Doy 3P«ormtao- Per_ PerClCf'ltage

02",",'012010 Q6..11% 9225" Q1.04%

"''''''' 96,81% 94.M;% ~.67"--Q32!Xi 96.83% "'.86% Q4,14%

Gaining Facility: Mid1igan MetroPlex P&DC

District: SOUliieast M.et\ijjan

('3>_:=====================·~~~~~~~~k'l2010.DMll~rnoItr-*Y~qIaItllr

01 o-..I~<O-IIIl~)

Qq ~wth~~"""~

os. ~wthlMdlnQ~wil\~

01~ ~wt;hfl'104.~~PO~"""'mMl~~PO)

Q1a. ~WJth'"""lll..-ll~~USPS~wiltIlI'lO$t~«ItlCItelwltlvsPS)

Q19 Uktllylcr~IheUSPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

Combined FacilitiesWortdlour cGSt$ .. Combined facilitk,s

\..IIIIts..w:~t3.201O

PlR~~•• CombIntdF~

,.... --

PIA: lNorkhour eo... Combin6dF.~

- ...... -- ......

L_FadU"".cf'1lnt=P'-'&"'OC"'- _

1YPt' of OlstJ1bUtlon ContOfldated: ..':()lg!n""""dn"",Q _

(,,,002

Worldlour Costa· Losing FaeAIty1..Mla.-t.~13,:ZOlO

OdllRange ofDIItI::~

""u·,.

$0$0,.so

1

PIR~com·Losirig

PiR WMhour Costs· Losing

,...... ,.....

PIR WoOhouf CostI . loting

PIA: World'lour Costs· losing

P1R WoO:hout Coct$ • LO$Ing

Workhour Costs ~ Gaining Facility~~C!I:laboIr13,2010

..$12'97....

• 104010

"..$23041$2..

I.

01'01'01'020021022028...............""""OM

"'......,....,

--..,.m716,,,'",.,

,...'"'"",

123","""",.",..,..,71>178119

"",,..200230232233

"15''''""m321322".".......",,,,",.,."'"'"...,,,'"...SO<...,,,'"s>o

'"""""'"""""'''''117m'31,,.

'"-- ,...... ......--..,......

'"--T.....

Other Workhour Move AnalysisLooIng Fdty. FlInt P&OC

$0 $0$0

0 $00 $00 $000 $0 $0 $00 $00

Totals ..,.... ;3lJ.201 23,700 .$044,1«) $1,.585"'" ,..,= If"1,;QO 123.1liIe $1,S48,310 $1.es.e.zea

PIR Workhour Costs· Combined Facilities

29881<0069

IOT~Sllb.

B9

eo81..eo91 .....

'"'"l<>

,.• SO

• SO

• ,.• to

To<>I

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

PIR Workhour Costs· Combined Facilities

Staffing· CraftLast Saved: Odober 13, 2010

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Losing Facility: Flint P&DC

Craft Positions

Function 1 • ClerkFunction 4 • ClerkFunction 1 • Mail HandlerFunction 4 • Mail HandlerFundion 3A· Vehide ServiceFunction 38· MaintenanceFunctions 67-69 - LrntdIRehablWCOther Functions

Total

Data Extraction Date: 04/08/10

ChangeAnalysis

PositionsPercent

(10)1st PlR \1$

PreAMP45

-17%

(11)1st PlR \1$

Pro osed5

-2.2%

Craft Positions

Function 1 • ClerkFunction 1 • Mail HandlerFunction 3A· Vehide ServiceFunction 38· MaintenanceFunctions 67-69· LrntdlRehablWCOther Functions

Total

Data Extraction Date: 04108110

r-#_#-(2J)-#_#-T~----(i4)--~-~l

I 1st PIR va Pre AMP I 1st PIR va Proposed ITotal Craft Position Loss:l 92 i 75 i

"~~~~"'a";~,rt;1~~~-;E;~s=l}')

Finance #: 258231

527231

26242

55

1,036

Variances Total On·RoUs

(21) (22)Change 1st PlR \1$ 1st PlR vs

Analysis Pre AMP Proposed

Positions 47 70Percent 4.3% -6.3%

PIR Staffing· Craft

staffing. PCESIEASL.atkYtill;/)ClQIlot'fI).2010

~T)'p«~

PlR StIttang . PCESIEAS

Transportation· HeRLast Saved: October 13, 2010

Losing Facility: Flint P&DC--------------------------Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Data Extraction Date:

(1)

Route #

48410

48431

48437

48438

48439

48460

48464

484A1

484AQ

484BK

484M5

484L5

484L1

484L4

484L7

484M2

484M3

484M4

485BA

485CA

48192

486LO

48612

487L1

oo

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock: 19:15

(10)

1st PIRAnnual

Cost/Mile

$1,14

$1,79

$1,84

$1,57

$064

$1,39

$0,71

$3,80

$2,25

$1,57

$1,65

$2,52

$1,27

$1,44

$1,23

$1,93

$1,70

$364

$3,34

$1,65

$1,64

$203

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Totals

HCRDATA 7.08.09

Change Analysis

Dolla",

Percent

PIR Transportation HeR· Losing

Transportation- HeRLast Saved: 0ctqber 13, 2010

$3.08

$2.09

$2.25

$1.85

$0.00

$0.00

$1.99$0:00

$1.32

$1.40

$0.00

$4.07

$2.52

$1.97

$2:66

$2.86

$0.00

$1.78

$2.87

$1.54

$4.76$3.96

$1.75

$2.05

$1.89

$2.17

$2.36

$4.10

$2.31

(10)

PIRAnnual

CostlMlle

$2:32

PIR Type: Originating

CET for OGP: 20:00

CT for Outbound Dock: 2:45

19:45

20:30

CET:forInbpund'Dock:-----CEl' fOr 6tncellatlons:.;:::=::::;;::==;

Gaining Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating

Data Extraction Date: 03/01/10

") W

48067

4806548065

480A548072

48071

48037

480A8

480LO

4803648036

480L1

48039

4803548033

480A6

48014

48030

48072

48018

48066

4801048012

480L5

480L7480L6

480L7

480BK

480AG

480M5

480AQ

Route #

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

480L9

480MO

480M1

480M3

480M4

480MR

ooo

46028

48119

60811

010KE

150YO(A)

150YO(B)

303SE38120

607NO

ooooooooooooooooooooooooo

$1.85

$0.00

$3.09

$1.46

$3.26

$1.80

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$1.67

$1.45

$13.50

$1.49

$1.73

$2.37

$1.45

$1.34

$1.79

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

$1.95

-4.5%

(12)lstPIR v.Proposed

$922,745-4.2%

$858,222

.Varlances Total Annual Costs(11)

1st PlR v.PreAMP

Dollars

Percent

Change An.atyol.

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

ooo

o

oo

oo

Totals

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gainlngfacllitles)

($1,766,524)

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilities)

($1,831,145)

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportatlon (PVS & HCR): ($2,616,672)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon (PVS & HCR): ($2,681,194)(This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Transportation HCR • Gaining

Transportii~()n ·PysLastSaved: .Oeto~c13, 2010

PIR Type: 1.;..:$;.:.t,-P:..:.IR,-__

$0 $0

$0 $0

$137,726 $8,597 $8,597

$1,828,386 ($852,949) ($352,949)

$1,966,112 ($844,352 ($844,352

Qat1l83Bge of Data: Od..Q1-2009 - to - _M_a_r-_3_1-_2_0_10 _

GlIlrjlng Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DCFinance Number: .:;2;:::58:::;2::;3::;:1:.:... _

Eleven Ton Trucks

Sin Ie Axle TractorsTandem Axle Tractors

Total Mileage Costs

Total Vehid"s Laased

Number. of ScI1edulesTotal Annual Mileage

PVS Owned E ul

PVS"Trans rtatlon

PVS Leases

PVS Workhour Costs

w ~ "~VariancePIR va

Pr osed

___..;$:::0+_~($;;,5,.::.6B6:::::i1}f_-l:($:::5,.::.6a6::.:.q) LDC 31 (617,679 764$0 LDC 34 (785, 766)

___..;$:';0+__(j;$.5,.69;;;6;,q__j;(S.5,.69;;;6;.lf Total Workhour Costs

""""""'"'4 ..;$O=-l ..$;:;.;O~·","" $;:;.;O~ Total Lease Costs

Total Workhour C

seven TonTrucks

Tandell\ Axle TractorsSin Ie Axle TractorsEleven TonTru~

S otters

LDC 34 (785; 766)

LDC 31 (817,679, 764)

PVS OwnedE ul

PVS Workhour Costs

(11) Total PIR vs Pre AMP Transportatlon-PVS SaVings: ($850,048)(ThIs number edded to the Executive SummaI)'

(12) Total PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon-PVS Savings: ($850,048)(ThIs number added to the Executive SummaI}')

(13) NoteS: '-- ...._.------------------------------- _

PIR Transportation - PVS

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

(9)

($6,825)

($34,125)

Variance InCosts

$750 ($5,075)

$750 ($47,025)

Carried toSpace Evaluation and

Other Costs

TABBER

UPS

FSS

#N1A

AFSM 100AFSM..AJ

AFSMATHS

APPS" ClOSS

sPes

o

UFSM

'CSBCS

DlOSS

MlOCR~SS

LCTS/LCUS

MPBCS-OSS

POV\EREDINDUSTRIALEQUIPMENT

AFSM-ATHSIAi

E ui ment

FCiZMICRO MARROBOTGANTR

HSTS/HSUS

MPE InventoryLast Saved: October 13, 2010

PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: __Oct;;.;...-Q...;..;.1-...;:2:.:.0.;.0.;,.9__- to ..__...;M...;:a::;.(...;-3...;1...;:-2:.:.0..;..10,,--_..

o

oo

o

o

°oo

o

o

o

o2

o

(3)

o

o

oo

6

11

1st PIR

TABBER

ClOSS

AFSMATHS

DBCS

APPS

CSBCS

AFSM-A1

UFSM

MLOCR~SS

AFSM 100

FSSSPBS

DlOSSDBCS-OSS

UPSLCTS I LCUS

MPBCS-OSS

POV\EREDINDUSTRIALEQUIPMENT

AFSM-ATHS/AI

E ui ment

FC I MICRO MARKROBOT GANTRY

HSTS/HSUS

Data Extraction Date: 1..04....10

Losing Facility: .;.F.;;.lin.;.t;.:.P...;&"'D;;.;C"- _

(10) Notes:

PI R relocation costs are lower than proposed relocation costs because equipment moves were handled in-houseby postal Maintenance instead of out sourced to contractor.

PIR MPE Inventory

Maintenancelast SllVed: october 13, 2010

Losing Facility: _F1_I_nt_P_&_DC__~ _

Workhour Activity

EE,...... _ELOC 38 Building Services $_ {Cut/ltDdllCSfMingJ

ELOC 39 Maintenance OperatlO~:$_ Support

E.

LOC t3 Malntanance $. Training_$

Parts and Supplies

Date Range of Data:

Gaining Facility:

Workhour ActiVity

PIR Type':-:'7st:-:P:"IR,,-~ __~:-:

Oct-Q1-2009 __-:;M::::;a::-r-::.31:-.;-2:::0:.:1::.0__

Michigan MetroPlex P&DC

(8) (9)Variance 1st

PlR to PI'AMP

8,nO,.(8.( 1,S!S,m t,MSP9

1,826,853 291.631 291,631

S~P02.249 3,0493.464 3~93,4«

9U,7.1 Isr,IH 187,174-

[732.912) $ [7:\3.,78)

4..04.&30 $ 4,602,570

(11) 1st PIR va Pre AMP- Malntanance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

$5,533,341$5,~58,445

(These number! carried fOfWard to the Executive Summary)

(T1leM numbers carri~·forward to the: Executive Summ4ty)

(13) Notes: ----------------------__------ _

UHf f 1m!

PIR Maintenance

Distribution ChangesLast Saved: October 13, 2010

Identify the date ofthe Postal Bulletin that contained DMMlabelinglist revisions.

(2) 22269 10-08"09

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) Partially

Losing Facility: .,;.F.;;.lin;,;.t;.;.P....;&....:D;;..C'--____________ PIR Type: __1.:.;:5:.:,.t;,..P:.:,.IR:..-_

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Originating Date Range of Data: Oct-01-2009 - to - Mar-31-2010

Place a ..x.. next to the DMM labeling Iist(s)revised as result of the approved AMP

DMMLOO1 ---DMM L011

DMM LOO2 X DMM L201

DMM LOO3 DMM L601---DMM LOO4 ---DMM L602

DMM LOO5 DMM L603---DMM LOO6 ---DMM L604

DMM LOO7 ---DMM L605

DMM LOOS ---DMM L60S

DMM LOO9 DMM L607---DMM L010 ---DMM L801

(1)

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary ReportNA5S Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival Open Closed Unschd

Month Losina I Gainina Facilitv Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count % Count

Nov. LosinQ Facilitv 484 Flint P&DC 381 61 16.01% 97 25.46%

:~320 83.99% 4

Dec. Losing Facility 484 FlintP&DC 363 82 22.59% 108 29.75% 281 77.41% 2

Nov. Gaining Facility 480 Michigan Metroplex P&DC 408 64 15.69% 177 43.38% 0 0.00% 344 84.31% 10

Dec. Gaining Facility 480 Michigan Metroplex P&DC 377 79 20.95% 176 46.68% 0 0.00% 298 79.05% 15

(5) Notes: -----------------------------------------

PIR Distribution Changes

Customer Service IssuesLast 8a'Ied: October 13, 2010

Losing Facility: .:.F.::;lin.::;t.:.P..:&:::D:.::C'-- _

DI..5~l:nCDO:~;.;;~~50;;;o~~i:<O;;-------

1. Collectlon PolntlNumber pk;:k:ed up before 1 p.m.

NumbM pkl<ed up betwHn 1-5 p,m.

Number picked up after 5 p.m,

Total Number of Couection Points

2. How many collection boxes are CUrTentty designated for "local dellvery"?

3. How many "local delivery" box.. were removed .. I reault 01 AMP7

4. Delivery Performlnce Report

% Cafl1er$ retumlng before 5 p.m.

Mon.. ~Frl.

90

179

49

318

PlR

PIR

23365

298

Percent

92.6%94.4%

Code: 485

PlR

Mon.AFrt.7374

38

185

69

60

137

Mon. A Fr!.

PIRsat

5. Retail Unltlnllde LOllng Flcility (WIndow Service TImII)

7:45

7:457:45

7:45

7:45

CLOSED

PIREnd

19:00

19:00

19:00

19:0019:00

CLOSED

6. BUlin... (Bulk) Mall Acceptance Houre

11:00

11:00

11:00

11:0011:00

CLOSED

PIREnd

18:00

18:00

18:00

18:00

18:00

CLOSED

7. Con cuatomare obtain I local postmark In Iccordance with Ippllceble policies In_, O~nrtIonaManua/? Vea

8. Notes: Anawer to gueatlon 19: METROPLEX MI-I8O

Gaining Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DC

9. What postmark is printed on colkld:lon mall?

PIR Cuttomer Servic:e Issues

Space Evaluation and Other CostsLast Saved: October 13, 2010

Losing Facility:~F.:;;lin",t,_,P...::&;:.:D::..:C,,__ _

1. Affected Facility

Date: __--:.1.::;:o�~3.::;:0/~0.::.9 _

Facility Name: Flint P&OCStreet Address:-:2~570~E"':.'=Bo::.::::.,ul-ev-a-rd-O-::O,-r.--------------------City, State ZIP:.:.F.::.lin:,::t:-. _

2. One-Time Costs '.·W.Enter anyone-time costs: $0 .

3. Savings Information

Space SaVings ($): _......;;.;....__

4. Oid you utilize the acqUired space as planned? Explain.

$113,835 $105,845(These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs sectlon.)

$0 $0(These numbers carried f0fW8rd to the Executive Summary)

5. Notes: Facility Costs include removal of OPRCS and 010 sytem

. . ., RIR:vs PreAMP •

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs(fnom MPE Inventory)

FaGility Costs(from above)

Total One-Time Costs

$0 $0 $0

$0 $47,775 $750

$66.060 $105,095

$113,835 $105,845(Variance cerriad forward to

Executive Summary)

Losing Facility:~F.:.:.lin"'t'_'P...:&::.:D::..;C"__ _ Gaining Facility: Michigan MetroPlex P&DC

YTD Range of Report: Oct-D1-2009: Mar-31-2010

(4) (5) (6) (9) (10)

P1R AssociatedPIR

PIR AssociatedPIR

RECCost per 1.000 Product

RECCost per 1,000

Images Images

Salt Lake Cit Lette,. Saft Lake Cit $29.34San Lake cn $28.22 Flats Satt lake Cit $28.22Salt Lake Cit $158.97 PARS COA Saft Lake Cd $158.97SaftLakeC $36.25 PARS Redirects san Lake C· $36.25San Lake Cay nla APPS Salt Lake C' nl.

B

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs