oecd’s gfd in arab countries initiative tunis 15-16 february 2007 oecd’s gfd in arab countries...
TRANSCRIPT
1
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007 The Greek program for Better
Regulation: The Action plan
Dr. P.KarkatsoulisPolicy Advisor to the Ministry of Interior,
Public Administration and Decentralization, Professor at the National School of Public
Administration
2
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
The Greek Action plan for Better
Regulation
3
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Implementing the Greek RIA
A model has been produced. It’s main characteristics are:
– A combination of ICT and IA in the form of an electronic “checklist”.
– Questions are based on the principles
– An easily handled, interactive tool for the “everyday bureaucrat”.
4
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
e- RIA: The electronic Regulatory Impact Assessment checklist
• e-RIA assists the Law maker to answer the questions– Offers support via links
relevant to each question
• e- RIA is an interactive tool which offers assistance and not one more burden
• e- RIA is a means to promote the regulatory reform culture
5
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
The e-RIA
6
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the necessity principle
• Is the proposed regulation necessary and adequate to resolve a conflict?
• Could the problems be solved otherwise?
• Should there be a parliamentary law?
What if we do nothing?
•Where does the pressure come from?
–international environment?
–pressure groups?
–scientific development?
•What about the “non-decision” option?
•Has there been a risk assessment?
7
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Necessity questions look like this
8
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the proportionality principle
• Have all the measures been taken for the law to be efficient in terms of resources, infrastructure, appropriately trained personnel?
• Does the implementation of this law require further administrative/legislative measures (e.g. ministerial decisions, circulars, etc.)?
• Are the means referred to the law in balance with the result?
• Are there any alternatives to regulation (codes of conduct, self-regulation,sunset legislation)?
• Has a cost-benefit analysis (who pays/profits,what he pays/profits, how he pays/profits) been conducted?
9
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Proportionality questions look like this
10
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007 The Standard Cost Model is used for the
– Identification of information obligations imposed by the regulation
– Identification of the cluster of companies affected by the regulation
– Identification of the costs needed to fulfill these obligations.
Qs addressing the proportionality principle:How to measure administrative burdens imposed?
11
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the subsidiarity principle
• Which is the adequate administrative level to implement the regulation?
• Have the institutions which will implement the regulation been properly consulted?
• Has the appropriate level of courts, where disputes will be judged, been clearly identified?
12
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the transparency principle
• Have the stakeholders directly affected by the regulation been consulted?
• Did they have the time and the means to express their views properly?
• Have all the appropriate means for their consultation been used?
• Has transparency during the implementation of the law been ensured?
13
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Transparency questions look like this
14
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the accountability principle
• Does the law promotes ethical and social integrity?
• Are the appropriate forms of reporting to the parliament stipulated?
• Have the responsible organs for the implementation of the regulation been identified in every government level?
• Has the possibility of a co-regulation been checked?
15
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Accountability questions look like this
16
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the simplicity principle (1)• Has it been ensured that the new regulation used all
relevant, older and newer legislative techniques in order to clearly express the goals of the regulator?
• Has the consistency among the parts of the regulation been checked? Articles, paragraphs and sentences should not contradict each other and should follow the same key/basic idea of the Law.
• Has attention been paid to the homogeneity of the form? Specifically, attention should be given to the following:
– The Law should be divided in paragraphs or articles. It is recommended to be divided in articles.
– The paragraphs or articles should be divided in sentences.– Numbers should be put in paragraphs, in articles and in
sentences.– Letters should be used as sub-division of the numbers.– Bigger Laws should be divided in Parts and Chapters.– Parts, Chapters should be marked with titles.
17
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the simplicity principle (2)
• Have all contradictions and unintended consequences/subsequent results of the regulation been removed?
• Was the content of the regulation formulated in a plain language?
• Have any appropriate ICT systems been developed for the support of the decision-making?
18
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Qs addressing the accessibility principle
• Has every necessary step been taken for an easy and transparent access of the stakeholders to the regulatory field?
• Has the moment/time of the implementation of the regulation been defined? Its validity should not be postponed, because of explicit or hidden required actions.
• Has every previous useless regulation been removed?
• Has special attention been paid to the existence of sunset and review clauses, so that the users will not be discouraged or confused?
19
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
The structure of the Greek Action Plan
• Horizontal approach– Development of Policy Implementation Tools
– Structural interventions• Broadening the appositeness of the Central Simplification
Committee
• Ensuring cooperation among Ministries
– Design training curricula
– Communicate the regulatory reform program• Internal communication
• External communication
– Time programming• Inception phase
• Implementation phase
20
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Strategic plan: An outline
Component 1: Policy tools – R.I.A.
• The component’s objective is to make RIA an easy to handle tool to achieve regulations of better quality.
• General approach: A practical and easy to use RIA model will be designed through public consultation.
• Six different activities will take place in order to achieve the component’s objective
21
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 1: Initial study and drafting of the Greek RIA model
Activity’s objective:
To assess the needs and evaluate the ability of the Greek regulatory system to implement a RIA
Method Identify the problems that usually occur during the law making procedure.Comparative study of the international best practicesIdentification of the pools from where information needed for RIA will be gathered (i.e. Statistics office)
Timing October 2006
Input The RIA model elaborated by the Ministry of the Interior
Output Draft RIA model
Responsibility of
Prime Minister’s office
22
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 2: Draft the electronic form of the RIA modelActivity’s objective:
Make RIA an easy task to maximize the benefits from its use
Method Create a RIA databaseCreate an interactive questionnaire to facilitate the user to answer itDesign the software to follow up the law making procedure at every phase
Timing October – November 2006
Input Output of activity 1IT consultancy
Output e – RIACreate the interconnection platform between the e-RIA, data bases and end users
Responsibility of
Information Society – Ministry of the Economy
23
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 3: Implementation of RIA on selected regulations
Activity’s objective:
To indicate difficulties met during the implementation of RIA and suggest ways to overpass them
Method Specify the criteria according to which the regulations to be put under RIA will be chosen.
Timing September 2006 – January 2007
Input Responses from the public consultation
Output A list of the regulations for which RIA will be carried out
Responsibility of
Central Simplification Committee
24
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 4: Evaluation of the model RIA and fine tuning of it
Activity’s objective:
To ensure that the RIA model can be put to practice
Method Public consultation. RIA users will be invited as well as academia and business representatives to discuss RIA’s contribution to cutting red tape.
Timing June 2007
Input Model RIAExpert’s opinions
Output An evaluation of the model RIAA new, updated version of RIAA report with certain proposals on how to formulate consultation structures, based on the experience gained during activity 4
Responsibility of
General Secretariat of the government
25
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 5: Development of a RIA guide
Activity’s objective:
Offer support to the Ministries and the Regions
Method Record all problems that occurred during the pilot phase of RIA implementationDesign the RIA guide to be short and easy to understand and use
Timing July 2007
Input 2 experts’ working months
Output The RIA guideElectronic on line help available for the e-RIA software
Responsibility of
Prime Minister’s Office
26
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 6: Ex – post assessment of RIA implementation
Activity’s objective:
Make RIA efficient
Method Conduct an end users satisfaction researchForm a template to be used by the Ministries and the Regions
Timing July – September 2007
Input 30 man-days
Output Report evaluating the implementation of RIATemplate to be used by the Ministries and the Regions when reportin to the General Secretariat of the Government
Responsibility of
Central Simplification Committee
27
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Component 2: Structural interventions
• The component’s objective is to build the capacity of the General Secretariat of the Government to carry out the better regulation project, in order to add values to all involved agencies.
• General approach: The structure will follow the functions to achieve flexibility and short communication lines.
• Five different activities will take place in order to achieve the component’s objective.
28
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Activity 1: Assign to General Secretariat of the Government the responsibility of the better regulation program
Activity’s objective:
To make clear who does what in order to achieve unity of command and avoid overlapping of activities
Method Experts’ report on the restructuring of the General Secretariat of the Government
Timing November 2006
Input Experts’ report
Output Amended organization chart and responsibilities chart of the General Secretariat of the Government
Responsibility of
Prime Minister’s office
29
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Component 3: Training
Component’s objective:– To establish a sustainable mechanism of training for
the officers who are assigned to run the RIA project.
Method– Participatory
Activities– Train the trainers– Create an on the job coaching mechanism– Create a knowledge management system– Interconnect all RIA users to an e-learning platform
30
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Component 4: Communication of the program
Component’s objective:– Make ideas and information accessible to all
persons that play a role in the proper implementation of RIA.
Method– Develop communication lines among all
stakeholders
Activities– Give publicity to the action plan for better regulation– Create and advertise the better regulation site
31
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
32
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
OE
CD
’s G
fD i
n A
rab
co
un
trie
s In
itia
tive
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Tu
nis
15-
16 F
ebru
ary
2007
Thank you for your attention
Dr. Panagiotis Karkatsoulis