of the economy, planning & environment committee meeting · 2019-06-23 · adoption by council...

755

Adopted Report of the

Economy, Planning & Environment Committee Meeting

held

Wednesday 23 May 2018

at

9am

City of Gold Coast Council Chambers 135 Bundall Road, Surfers Paradise

Index

Adopted Report for 755

Economy, Planning & Environment Committee Meeting

Wednesday 23 May 2018 at 9am

Item Direct Div:

File Page Subject

City Development Branch

1# Div 9 PN171259/01/DA1(P1) 4 Report on Development Application for a material change of use (impact assessment) for a function facility - at 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley.

MCU201701262

City Planning Branch

2 EPE PD113/1306(P1) 73 Draft Local Government Infrastructure Plan Amendment 1 – Approval to Proceed to Adoption.

Closed Session

City Planning Branch / City Development Branch

3 Div 12 PN92201/01/DA1 178 Report on Development Permit for a material change of use (Impact Assessment) for an indoor recreation facility (Pilates) at 31 Hillcrest Parade, Miami.

MCU201501836

4# EPE PD113/1275/17(P1) 205 The Spit Master Plan Memorandum of Understanding Update.

5 EPE PD98/1132/04/39 274 Building Height Refinements for City Plan Major Update 2 and 3.

6 EPE PD98/1132/04/46 301 Submission of Proposed City Plan Major Update 2 & 3 for State interest review.

7 Div 14 PD113/1275/02 1351 Boyd Street, Bilinga Special Purpose Zone investigation.

Open Session General Business

#Officer’s Recommendation changed by Committee KEY: OCEO - Office of the Chief Executive Officer OCOO - Office of the Chief Operation Officer EPE - Economy, Planning and Environment OS - Organisational Services LC - Lifestyle and Community TI - Transport and Infrastructure WW - Water and Waste

755th Council Meeting 29 May 2018 Economy, Planning & Environment Committee Meeting 23 May 2018

2 ADOPTED REPORT

ADOPTION BY COUNCIL 29 MAY 2018 RESOLUTION G18.0529.022 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr O’Neill That the Report of the Economy, Planning and Environment Committee’s Recommendations of Wednesday, 23 May 2018, numbered EPE18.0523.001 to EPE18.0523.007, be adopted with the exception of:- Recommendation Numbers EPE18.0523.004

EPE18.0523.005 and EPE18.0523.007 which were specifically resolved.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ATTENDANCE Cr C M Caldwell Chairperson Cr W M A Owen-Jones Cr P J Young Cr G Baildon AM Cr P A Taylor Cr G O'Neill Cr PC Young visitor Cr G Tozer visitor Ms A Swain Director Economy, Planning & Environment Mr M Moran Manager City Development Ms A Tzannes Manager City Planning Ms Z Meha Manager Business Support Mr L Chean Special Coordinator Strategic Infrastructure Mr S Weterings Town Planner Ms L Dykes Coordinator Strategic City Planning APOLOGY/LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr PJ Young seconded Cr O’Neill That the apology of Cr Vorster and Cr Gates be noted.

CARRIED PRESENTATIONS Nil


3 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 CITY DEVELOPMENT CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Refer 21 page attachment 1 APPLICATION SUMMARY

Application information

Address 94 Pocket Road Numinbah Valley

Lot and plan Lot 11 on RP842006

Site area 20 hectares

Zone / Precinct Rural zone - Rural landscape and environmental precinct

Overlays / Development codes

Bushfire hazard overlay;

Environmental significance overlay – biodiversity areas;

Environmental significance overlay – priority species;

Environmental significance overlay – vegetation management;

Environmental significance overlay - wetlands and watercourses;

Landslide hazard overlay;

Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay;

Commercial design code;

Driveways and vehicular crossovers code;

General development provisions code;

On-site sewerage facilities code;

Solid waste management code; and

Transport code.

Proposed use Function facility

Level of assessment Impact assessment

Applicant and Applicant’s consultancy team

Zone Planning Group

Shane Denman Architects

CRG Acoustics

Land owner Jeffrey and Marcia Pilkington

Submissions Objections Support

10 Nil

Key matters raised by submitters

Fireworks;

Noise impacts;

Traffic impacts upon the rural amenity;

Land use and frequency;

Enforcing compliance with the Operational Management Plan;


4 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1

No benefit to rural area; and

Impact upon the water catchment.

Decision due date 10 May 2018

Referral agencies Third Party Advice – Seqwater

Officer’s recommendation Approval

2 PROPOSAL

Council is in receipt of an application for a development permit for making a material change of use for a Function facility at 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley.

The proposal seeks retrospective approval to formalise the Function facility land use that has been operating on site for approximately 5 years. The functions are proposed to be operated by third parties within an existing 350m2 cleared area adjacent to the western manmade lake. The third party operators will provide all lightweight portable structures, catering facilities and amenities, which will be erected and dismantled before and after each function.

The proposal intends to operate up to three (3) times per week between 7.00am and 10.00pm with a maximum of 200 guests (excluding staff) being present on site, although the applicant has stated that most functions traditionally involve between 60 to 80 guests.

A combined total of 68 car parking spaces are proposed within main and overflow car parking areas accessed via an existing gravel driveway from Pocket Road. The proposed main car parking area is located adjacent to the informal car parking area central to the site as illustrated in Figure 1. It accommodates 36 car parking spaces and is finished with compacted gravel. The proposed overflow car parking area is located adjacent to the formal car parking area to the north within a cleared grassed area and provides 32 car parking spaces.

All waste generated by the facility will be stored adjacent to the Dwelling house and removed off site within 24 hours of a function.

Portable toilet facilities will be provided on site during events with their associated waste transported off site by the service provider in accordance with the submitted operational management plan.

The key development parameters of the proposal are outlined in the table:

Key development parameters

Total use area 350m2

Built form Temporary marquees and other similar structures provided by third party operators. No permanent buildings are proposed.

Car parking 66 car spaces o 36 provided within main car park (compacted gravel) o 32 spaces within grassed overflow car park

Hours of operation 7.00am – 10.00pm

Up to three (3) times per week

Maximum persons on site

200 visitors

Unlimited staff Most functions previously occurring on site have attracted between 60 to 80


5 ADOPTED REPORT


Key development parameters visitors

Operational management plan

Will be provided to all third party operators and contains provisions relating to:

Hours of operation;

Staff and visitor numbers;

Car parking and bus set down area;

Noise requirements;

Toilet amenity;

Structure typology;

Set up / set down arrangements;

Bushfire procedures; and

Waste management.

Figure 1 and 2 below illustrate the proposed development:

Figure 1 Site Plan (Source: Shane Denman Architects)


6 ADOPTED REPORT


Figure 2 Example of temporary structures used for previous function (Source: Shane Denman Architects)

The proposal is subject to Impact Assessment and has been assessed against the City Plan as a whole, including the Strategic framework and applicable codes.

Under the Planning Act 2016, to meet a code, a development proposal can meet either the Acceptable outcomes or the Performance outcomes or the Overall outcomes. Acceptable outcomes are generally quantifiable provisions, with the Performance and Overall outcomes generally being qualitative and performance based.

Officers have undertaken an assessment of all relevant provisions. The ‘planning assessment’ section of this report provides a discussion of the performance based outcomes, including where the Acceptable outcome has not been achieved, relating to the following:

AO5.4 – Wetlands and watercourses (Environmental significance overlay code);

AO5.5 – Wetlands and watercourses (Environmental significance overlay code);

AO1 - All development (Separation distances) (Water resource catchment overlay code);

AO1 – Amenity protection (General development provisions code);

AO2 – Amenity protection (General development provisions code);

AO5 – Non-serviced areas (Solid waste management code); and

AO25 – Design of off-street parking facilities (Transport code).

Despite the proposal not meeting the identified Acceptable outcomes, this report will demonstrate compliance with the Performance outcomes and Overall outcomes.

3 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING AREA 3.1 Characteristics of site

The site:

Is irregular in shape comprising two (2) parcels of land severed by an unformed road;

has an area of 20 hectares;

Is improved by a Dwelling house, a large shed / carport and a pontoon to the western lake. The smaller (eastern) parcel of land does not contain any buildings or structures;

Gains access via a single vehicular crossing from Pocket Road;


7 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Contains a mixture of paddocks, maintained grassed areas and large expanses of local and State

significant vegetation;

Is traversed by Tonys Creek which flows into the Nerang River and Hinze Dam;

Contains three (3) minor watercourses which flow into two (2) existing dams on site;

Is not connected to urban infrastructure. The site provides water tanks for water supply and has an on-site effluent disposal system for sewerage disposal.

Figure 3 Site entrance

Figure 4 Proposed function area

Figure 5 Pocket Road from entrance Figure 6 View to alternative driveway from entrance

3.2 Characteristics of surrounding area

The subject site is located in the Numinbah Valley approximately 900 metres from the City of Gold Coast / Scenic Rim Regional Council border.

The surrounding area is characterised by a mixture of heavily vegetated conservation areas and partly cleared rural properties. Nine (9) additional rural properties are located on Pocket Road.

North: The Springbrook National Park adjoins the northern boundary. Springbrook National Park covers an area of 6,725ha and forms part of the Gondwana Rainforest of Australia World Heritage Area.

East: Land adjoining the eastern boundary forms part of the Hinze Dam open space area. Beyond this is the Springbrook National Park.

South: The site located on the opposite side of Pocket Road is an undeveloped rural allotment. A vegetative buffer is evident along the Pocket Road frontage of the site. Submissions identified that a future Dwelling house will be located approximately 350 metres from the


8 ADOPTED REPORT


proposed function area.

Adjacent to the site in a south easterly direction is the Springbrook National Park. Beyond this, in a south-west direction includes the remaining eight (8) rural properties located on Pocket Road.

West: The adjoining site to the west is predominantly vegetated land within the Pocket Road Conservation Area. Further west includes the nearest constructed Dwelling house located approximately 830 metres from the proposed development area. Further to the west contains rural land until the Rosins Lookout Conservation Park which abuts the Scenic Rim Regional Council area.

Figure 7 Aerial photo of site and surrounds (Source: City Plan Mapping)

4 LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT

The site is located within the Rural zone with parts of the site located within the Rural landscape and environment precinct of the City Plan, as identified in Figure 8.

Table 5.5.20: Rural zone of the City Plan categorises the proposal as subject to impact assessment because a Function facility is listed as impact assessable development within the tourism and entertainment activities group.

Table 5.5.20(1): Rural zone (Rural landscape and environment precinct) of the City Plan categorises the proposal as subject to impact assessment because a Function facility is an unlisted land use. It is noted that only the part of the driveway and walking track associated with the development are located within the areas nominated within the Rural landscape and environment precinct.


9 ADOPTED REPORT


Figure 8 Zone map (Source: City Plan Mapping)

5 OTHER DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS/EXISTING LAWFUL USES 5.1 Subject site

There are no development approvals or lawful uses on site that would affect this application.

Neighbouring premises

There are no development approvals or lawful uses on neighbouring sites that would affect this application.

6 PLANNING ASSESSMENT 6.1 Assessment against the Strategic framework

The strategic framework requires careful and balanced reading of the provisions to best achieve the purpose and objectives of the City Plan. The strategic framework sets the policy direction for the City Plan and has a planning horizon of 2031.

This Policy direction is structured in the following way:

a The strategic intent describes the planning vision for the Gold Coast over the coming decades; in particular, what our city will look like and how it will function, potential for major development over the next 10 or 20 years and areas for growth and protection.

b The following six city shaping themes that play an important role in shaping future growth and managing change across the city, and collectively represent the policy intent of the City Plan:

(i) Creating liveable places;

(ii) Making modern centres;

(iii) Strengthening and diversifying the economy;

(iv) Improving transport outcomes;

(v) Living with nature; and

(vi) A safe, well designed city.


10 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 (c) Strategic outcomes for each theme

(d) Elements that refine and further describe the strategic outcomes

(e) Specific outcomes sought for each of the elements

Although each theme has its own section, the strategic framework is read in its entirety as the policy direction for the City Plan.

The following is an assessment of the application against the relevant sections of the strategic framework identified in the table below:

Theme/s Related element Maps

Strengthening and diversifying the economy

Tourist economy

Rural production areas and rural enterprises

Strategic framework map 1 – Designated urban area

Non-urban area

Strategic framework map 2 – Settlement pattern

Natural landscape area

Strategic framework map 4 – Greenspace network

Hinterland core habitat

Water supply catchment

Strategic framework map 7 – Strategic infrastructure sites and corridors

Water supply catchment

Major reserves

Living with nature Natural landscape areas;

Green space network

Nature conservation

Coastal, wetland and watercourse areas

A safe, well designed city Landscape character

Environmental health and amenity

Natural hazards


11 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Figure 9 Strategic framework map 1 Designated urban area (Non-urban area)

Figure 10 Strategic framework map 2 Settlement pattern (Natural landscape area)

Figure 11 Strategic framework map 4 Greenspace network (Hinterland core habitat, Water supply catchment)


12 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Figure 12 Strategic framework map 5 - Focus areas of economic activity

Figure 13 Strategic framework map 7 Strategic infrastructure sites and corridors (Water supply catchment, Major reserves)

6.1.1 Strategic intent

The strategic intent flows through to the Themes, Elements (Specific outcomes) and applicable codes. The strategic intent is achieved through assessment against these outcomes.

6.1.2 Theme/s and Elements

Assessment against the themes and elements identified above has been undertaken as follows:

6.1.2.1 Strengthening and diversifying the economy

Element – Tourist economy

The Tourist economy element identifies two (2) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:

Specific outcome 3.5.4.1 (11)

Specific outcome 3.5.4.1 (11) states:

“Non-urban areas support compatible tourism activities (such as sustainable nature-based tourism, farm stays, bed and breakfasts and camping grounds) if they do not adversely impact rural production, cultural heritage, amenity, nature conservation, water supply catchments or landscape character.”

Officer’s comment

Whilst Specific Outcome 3.5.4.1 (11) does not identify a Function facility as a compatible tourism activity within non-urban areas, the scale and temporary nature of the use is considered appropriate for the area as follows:

The proposal is not identified within a rural production area or place of cultural heritage and will have no impact upon these areas;

The application was referred to Council’s Health and Regulatory Services Section for assessment. This section confirmed that the proposal will meet the relevant noise criteria to ensure nearby amenity will not be adversely impacted upon, subject to compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment.

The proposal will not impact the rural amenity regarding traffic given access to the site does not


13 ADOPTED REPORT


require visitors to travel past other rural properties on Pocket Road to reach the subject site. Further a condition is recommended requiring the applicant to submit an application for Tourist Roadside Directional Signage to minimise occurrences where visitors drive past the site;

The proposal will utilise temporary marquees and portable toilets and gains access via existing trafficable trails on site to avoid adverse impacts upon the site’s ecological values and preserve the landscape character. Further, conditions are recommended requiring temporary marquees and structures to be removed within 24 hours after each function to further preserve the visual amenity of the natural landscape; and

The application was referred to Seqwater for third party advice. In a letter dated 5 October 2017, Seqwater advised that:

“it is considered that the designated function area is suitably located to ensure minimal risk to water quality.”

Conditions were advised to be included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring car parking and portable toilet facility areas to be setback a minimum of 30 and 50 metres from watercourses to preserve the quality of the water catchment area. These conditions have been included in the Officer’s recommendation.



“The design, location and operation of new tourism attractions:

(a) promotes a positive city image;

(b) maintains acceptable amenity for nearby residents;

(c) protects matters of environmental significance and significant natural features;

(d) supports the development of facilities for nature-based tourism, special events, and cultural tourism activities, including facilities for major international events and indigenous cultural tourism activities; and

(e) consolidates existing tourist precincts in an orderly and efficient manner through additional attractions that reinforce key tourist markets and add diversity to the Gold Coast visitor experience.”

Officer’s comment

The design, location and operation of the Function facility is considered to be consistent with Specific outcome 3.5.4.1 (12), as follows:

The proposed new tourism facility can promote a positive city image having regard to the significant environmental and scenic amenity values afforded to the site;

An acceptable level of amenity will be maintained for nearby residents’ subject to conditions requiring compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment; hours of operation; nuisance and operational management plan;

The development will provide facilities for special events, including weddings;

The proposal does not involve changes to the site’s ecological values and natural features and therefore the proposed development is considered to maintain the current levels of protection in the area; and

Diversity is added to the Gold Coast visitor experience by promoting the natural areas of the city rather than traditional tourism experiences involving theme parks and beaches in urban areas.

Element – Rural production areas and rural enterprises


14 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 The Rural production areas and rural enterprises element identifies one (1) specific outcome relevant to this proposal as follows:



“A range of rural support and small scale semi-rural commercial, tourism and recreation activities occur in rural production areas where they do not conflict with landscape character, rural amenity and the long-term use of the land, or adjoining land, for rural production pursuits. Compatible activities may include:

(a) agricultural supplies store;

(b) animal keeping;

(c) minor tourist facilities, cafés and tea rooms;

(d) medical and community facilities;

(e) nature-based tourism;

(f) nurseries and community gardens;

(g) farmers’ markets;

(h) outdoor sport and recreation;

(i) research and development where directly associated with rural activities; and

(j) roadside stalls.”

Officer’s comment

Whilst a function facility is not identified as a compatible activity above, the proposed land use is considered in the Rural zone, being listed as Impact assessment within the Tourism and entertainment activities section of Table 5.5.20: Rural zone (where not in a precinct).

However, the scale and intensity of the proposed function facility (involving up to 200 visitors (excluding staff)) is considered to exceed the scale and intensity contemplated by the land uses mentioned above, which typically involve significantly less visitors being on site at any given time. As such, Council officers consider that a reduction from a maximum of 200 visitors (excluding staff) to a maximum of 150 visitors (excluding staff) aligns closer to the scale and intensity of small scale semi-rural land uses contemplated by the City Plan. Accordingly, it is recommended that the approved land use references a Function facility (maximum of 150 visitors (excluding staff)).

Bearing this in mind, a Function facility (maximum 150 visitors (excluding staff) is considered appropriate for the site, as follows:

The Function facility does not involve permanent buildings and therefore the site’s landscape character will be retained;

An acceptable level of amenity will be maintained for nearby residents, subject to conditions recommending compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment; hours of operation; nuisance and operational management plan;

The proposal will not impact the rural amenity regarding traffic given vehicles do not travel past other rural properties on Pocket Road to reach the subject site;

Existing paddocks on site are retained which could be used for rural production pursuits. Additionally, the temporary nature of the use and facilities will not permanently change the land and therefor the land could be used primarily for rural production pursuits in the future; and

The site does not adjoin land located in the Rural zone requiring protection.


15 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 6.2.2.2 Living with nature

Element – Natural landscape areas

The Natural landscape areas element identifies three (3) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:

Specific outcome 3.7.2.1 (1) and 3.7.2.1 (2)


“Natural landscape areas are retained and enhanced to perform essential functions such as nature conservation, cultural heritage, scenic amenity and other green space values, which are vital to protecting the city’s matters of environmental significance, including biodiversity areas and landscape character.”


“Natural landscape areas, like rural production areas and rural residential areas continue to maintain a green frame to the city’s urban areas, particularly on the Hinterland ranges and foothills. This contributes to the city’s distinctive form, visual attractiveness and role as a major tourist destination.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal does not involve changes to the site’s ecological values and natural features. As such, the proposed development is considered to maintain the current levels of protection of the city’s matters of environmental significance and natural landscape character and will therefore continue to provide a green frame to the city’s urban areas.



“Development is of a scale and intensity that does not dominate the natural landscape within its context and locality.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal seeks to operate up to three (3) times per week within a 350m2 area. It will utilise temporary marquees and portable toilets and gains access via existing trafficable trails on site. Additionally, conditions are included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring temporary marquees and structures to be removed within 24 hours after each function.

Having regard to the above, it is considered that the scale and intensity is appropriate to preserve the natural landscape character afforded to the site.

Element – Green space network

The Green space network element identifies three (3) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:



“The diverse green space network provides for recreation, community wellbeing, biodiversity, scenic amenity, water catchment management, cultural heritage, tourism, education and research. It includes:

(a) hinterland areas including rural production areas, rural residential areas and natural landscape areas;

(b) water supply catchment areas;


16 ADOPTED REPORT


(c) biodiversity areas and other matters of environmental significance;

(d) the Merrimac/Carrara floodplain special management area;

(e) the inter-urban break; and

(f) open space and recreation areas, including sports grounds, bushland and paths.

The city’s green space network also contains smaller open spaces and corridors not shown on the strategic framework maps that provide important green space values within the city’s urban form and character.”

Officer’s comment

Strategic framework map 2 – Settlement pattern identifies the site as being within a Natural landscape area. The proposal is considered to maintain the site’s natural landscape given it does not involve the construction of permanent buildings.

Strategic framework map 4 – Greenspace network identifies the site as being within a Hinterland core habitat. The proposal is not considered to adversely impact upon the site’s ecological values, as confirmed by the Environmental Assessment section as discussed herein.

Strategic framework map 7 – Strategic infrastructure sites and corridors identifies the site as being within a Water supply catchment area. The proposal is not considered to adversely impact upon the water supply catchment area as confirmed by Seqwater and Council’s Hydraulics and Water Quality Section and discussed herein, subject to conditions.

Specific outcome 3.7.3.1 (6) and (9)


“The limited commercial uses in the city’s green space network do not compromise the nature conservation, scenic amenity, recreation or other values of the green space network.”


“Development does not erode, and, wherever practicable, contributes to, the expansion of the extent, function and values of the green space network.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal does not involve changes to the site’s ecological values and natural features and therefore the proposed development is not considered to compromise the values of the greenspace network.

Element – Nature conservation

The Nature conservation element identifies two (2) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:

Specific outcome 3.7.4.1 (1) and 3.7.4.1 (2)


“The Gold Coast’s biodiversity areas and other matters of environmental significance are conserved, protected, enhanced and managed to maintain a diversity of terrestrial, aquatic and marine species, ecosystems and ecological processes. Poorly protected regional ecosystems and habitat for threatened species, such as koalas, are enhanced.”


“Biodiversity areas are fundamental elements of the city’s green space network. These areas are conserved to maintain the diversity of terrestrial, aquatic and marine species, ecosystems and ecological processes. Mapped biodiversity areas include:


17 ADOPTED REPORT


(a) core habitats, that are extensive tracts of intact habitat within the hinterland and coastal wetlands areas; support a variety of vegetation associations; provide habitat for diverse fauna populations; and require the highest level of protection;

(b) hinterland to coast critical corridors that link core habitat systems and isolated areas of biodiversity value by retaining existing vegetation and restoring degraded areas to enhance fauna movement between different ecosystems and landscapes; and

(c) substantial remnants of intact areas of vegetation that retain and enhance the diversity, extent and condition of habitat by avoiding impacts that originate from their urban context.”

Officer’s comment

The Environmental significance overlay map designates the site as containing:

Biodiversity areas (Hinterland core habitat system);

Priority species (State significant species, Koala habitat systems, Local significant species); and

Vegetation management (Regulated vegetation, General priority vegetation).

The Environmental Assessment Section provided the following comments regarding the proposals impact upon biodiversity areas and matters of environmental significance:

“Given the development is considered to be of limited impact due to the absence of permanent physical structures and the infrequency of the activity, it is considered that the development will have limited impact on the significant environmental values.”

Therefore, the proposal is considered to be consistent with Specific outcome 3.7.4.1 (1) and (2).

Element – Coastal, wetland and watercourse areas

The Coastal, wetland and watercourse element identifies two (2) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:



“The integrity of catchment areas is maintained in natural landscape areas, rural production areas and rural residential areas. Disturbance to existing landforms, ecological features, surface drainage, watercourses and groundwater movement is avoided or minimised. Water is used and managed as part of a total water cycle in which:

(a) natural drainage regimes and hydrological processes are maintained as far as possible;

(b) ecosystem health and water quality is protected or enhanced;

(c) public health and safety are protected and damage to property is avoided;

(d) run off is controlled;

(e) water is used efficiently as a limited resource; and

(f) on-site sewerage facilities are appropriately designed and maintained.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal maintains the integrity of the catchment area and does not seek to change the site’s landform, ecological features, surface drainage systems and watercourses.

Water is used and managed in a total water cycle as follows:

The natural drainage regime is maintained and run-off is controlled as confirmed by Council’s Hydraulic and Water Quality Section for assessment. This section advised that:

“The proposed car parking area will be facilitated on the gravel surface which will still allow


18 ADOPTED REPORT


absorption of stormwater runoff. The total car park area is very small in comparison to the whole site, which is predominantly covered by grasses, shrubs and trees and has the potential to naturally treat stormwater runoff.”

Water quality is protected subject to conditions included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring amended drawing to be submitted demonstrating that car parking areas to be setback at least 30 metres from minor watercourses and 50 metres from Tony’s Creek; and

No additional load is placed on the site’s existing onsite effluent disposal system. The Function facility will manage sewerage by providing portable toilet facilities by a licenced portable toilet provider. Conditions are recommended requiring portable toilets to be removed from site within 24 hours after the conclusion of an event.



“The Hinze and Little Nerang Dam water supply catchment areas are managed to ensure the highest level of protection possible to the city’s potable water supply.”

Officer’s comment

Strategic overlay maps 4 – Greenspace network and Strategic framework map 7 - Strategic infrastructure sites and corridors nominate the site as being within a water supply catchment area.

Seqwater has provided third party advice confirming that the proposal is suitably located to ensure minimal risk to water quality, subject to conditions included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring car parking areas to be setback at least 30 metres from minor watercourses and portable toilet facilities to be setback at least 30 metres from minor watercourses and 50 metres from Tony’s Creek.

6.1.2.3 A safe, well designed city

Element – Landscape character

The Landscape character element identifies four (4) specific outcomes relevant to this proposal as follows:

Specific outcome 3.8.2.1 (1), (2), (6) and (9)


“The distinctive rural, semi-rural and natural character of the city’s river valleys, hinterland settlements, extensive natural landscape areas, rural production areas and rural residential areas provide a clear hard edge to, and natural backdrop setting for, the city’s urban area.”


“The city’s natural, non-urbanised appearance is protected for its contribution to the city’s outstanding scenic amenity, image and role as a major tourist destination.

The city’s significant natural features include:

…(f) rivers and creeks;

...(h) major and minor ridgelines, prominent foothills and face slopes;

(j) Hinze Dam water supply catchment area;

(l) prominent areas of native vegetation; and

…(p) rural production areas and rural residential areas.”


“Natural landscape areas are protected for their contribution to the city’s scenic amenity and nature conservation.”


19 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Specific outcome 3.8.2.1 (9) states:

“The Springbrook plateau, Beechmont and Tamborine ranges and Hinze Dam water supply catchment areas are protected as assets of outstanding landscape interest.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal does not involve changes to the site’s natural features. Therefore, the relevant natural features including watercourses, the Hinze Dam water supply catchment area and prominent areas of vegetation will retain their current levels of protection.

Further, the proposal is considered to promote the city’s scenic amenity values, image and role as a major tourist destination by attracting visitors to the site to appreciate the city’s significant natural landscape and conservation areas.

Element – Environmental health and amenity

The Environmental health and amenity element identifies one (1) specific outcome relevant to this proposal as follows:



“Noise mitigation occurs at the source. Where this is not practicable, measures at the receiving environment maintain acceptable standards of amenity for sensitive uses without detracting from streetscape quality.”

Officer’s comment

The application was referred to Council’s Health and Regulatory Services Section for assessment. This section considers the proposal involving up to 200 visitors will not impact upon the rural amenity, subject to conditions requiring compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment and limiting the use to operate no more than three (3) times per week between the hours of 7.00am to 10.00pm. These conditions are included in the Officer’s recommendation.

Element – Natural hazards

The Natural hazards element identifies one (1) specific outcome relevant to this proposal as follows:



“Development in natural hazard areas only occurs if it:

(a) is located, designed and managed to mitigate the risk to life and property;

(b) does not occur at the expense of other environmental values; and

(c) supports, and does not unduly burden, disaster management response or recovery capacity and capabilities.”

Officer’s comment

The Bushfire overlay map nominates the site as having a high to very high bushfire hazard risk in addition to being located within a potential bushfire impact buffer area. The Queensland Fire and Emergency Services Section advised during the development assessment review meeting that further assessment was not required given the proposed Function facility does not involve permanent buildings and is located within existing cleared areas of the site.

Further, conditions are included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring the proposed development to operate in accordance with the submitted operational management plan. The operational management plan provides bushfire management procedures requiring the maintenance of clearly


20 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 signed evacuation routes, the implementation of an evacuation plan and maintenance of low fuel zone buffers around usable areas of the site, including the fire hose connection into the dam. Implementation of the Operational Management Plan’s bushfire management procedures does not require the removal of vegetation and is considered sufficient to mitigate the risk of property and support disaster management responses.

The landslide hazard overlay nominates the site as having a moderate landslide hazard risk. The proposal is not considered to be impacted upon by potential landslide hazards given the proposed use does not involve the construction of permanent building.

Element – Sustainable infrastructure provision

The Sustainable infrastructure provision element identifies one (1) specific outcome relevant to this proposal as follows:



“Development infrastructure and service networks are provided in a coordinated, environmentally responsibly and cost effective sequence, including:

(a) water supply;

(b) wastewater;

(c) transport;

(d) stormwater;

(e) communications;

(f) recreation facilities; and

(g) land for community facilities.”

Officer’s comment

The subject site is provided with appropriate transport and communication infrastructure. However, given the site is located in a non-urban area, the site does not have access to urban infrastructure such as water supply, wastewater and stormwater.

The application material states that water supply will be provided via the existing on site water tanks with the option of water being purchased and transported on-site as needed.

Regarding wastewater, the application does not seek to place additional load on the site’s existing effluent disposal system. Instead, portable toilets will be provided on site during events with their associated waste transported off site by the service provider in accordance with the submitted operational management plan.

The proposal utilises temporary structures and does not increase the amount of hardstand areas on site. As such, stormwater run-off from the function area and gravel car parking area will be absorbed and treated naturally.

Summary of Strategic framework

On balance, the proposal is considered to support and promote the Strategic framework for the following reasons:

The proposal adequately mitigates and manages impacts upon the rural amenity;

The proposed development maintains the current levels of protection for the city’s matters of environmental significance and natural landscape character;

The proposed development will maintain the water quality of the Hinze Dam water catchment;

The proposal is compatible with an acceptable level of risk associated with natural hazards; and


21 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 The proposed development provides an attractive enterprise business environment that will

contribute to the diversification and robustness of the local economy.

6.2 Assessment against the codes

The following is an assessment of the application against the applicable codes of the City Plan identified in the table below:

Zone code Overlay codes Development codes

Rural zone code Bushfire hazard overlay code

Environmental significants overlay code

Landslide hazard overlay code

Water resource catchment overlay code

General development provisions code

Solid waste management code

Transport code

6.2.1 Assessment against the zone code

The proposal has been assessed against the Rural zone code.

Rural zone code

The purpose of the Rural zone code is to:

“provide for rural uses including Cropping, Intensive horticulture, Intensive animal ahusbandry, Animal keeping and other primary production activities;

provide opportunities for non-rural uses that are compatible with agriculture, matters of benvironmental significance, and landscape character of the rural area where the uses do not compromise the long-term use of the land for rural purposes; and

protect or manage significant natural resources, and processes to maintain the capacity cfor primary production.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal involves a non-rural land use which will maintain the existing protection of agricultural land, primary production areas, matters of environmental significance and landscape character in the rural area, as previously discussed.

The purpose of the Rural zone code will be achieved through the following overall outcomes:

“(a) Land uses –

…(v) that do not directly relate to rural production may be considered where they do not conflict with landscape character, rural amenity and the use of the land, or adjoining land for rural production pursuits. These include activities such as Markets, Veterinary services, Community care centres, Crematoriums, Places of worship, Renewable energy facilities, Research and technology industry, Nature-based tourism, Outdoor sports and recreation, Transport depots, Clubs, Function facilities, Tourist attractions, Tourist parks, Major electricity infrastructure, Telecommunications facilities and Utility installations.”

Officer’s comment

A function facility is identified as an appropriate activity unrelated to rural production in accordance with Overall outcome (2)(a)(v). The scale and temporary nature of the use is considered appropriate for the zone as follows:


22 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 The proposal does not involve permanent buildings and therefore the site’s landscape character

will be retained;

An acceptable level of amenity will be maintained for nearby residents, subject to conditions recommending compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment; hours of operation; nuisance and operational management plan;

The proposal will not impact upon the rural amenity regarding traffic given vehicles do not travel past other rural properties on Pocket Road to reach the subject site; and

The existing paddocks on site are retained and could be used for rural production pursuits. Additionally, the temporary nature of the use and facilities will not permanently change the land and therefor the land could be used primarily for rural production pursuits in the future.

…(e) Variations in the zone are – Rural Landscape and environment precinct

The purpose of the Rural zone – Rural landscape and environment precinct will be achieved through the following overall outcomes:

“Land uses do not impact on the matters of environmental significance, landscape and dscenic amenity values of the land.

Natural landscape and matters of environmental significance are protected and econserved to assist in maintaining a green frame to the city’s urban area, particularly on the Hinterland ranges and foothills, which contribute to the city’s distinct form, visual attractiveness and role as a major tourist destination.”

Officer’s comment

The proposal does not involve changes to the site’s matters of environmental significance, natural landscape and scenic amenity values. Therefore, the proposed development is considered to maintain the current levels of protection in the area.

Under the Planning Act 2016, to meet the City Plan, a development proposal can meet either the Acceptable outcomes or the Performance outcomes or the Overall outcomes. Acceptable outcomes are generally quantifiable provisions, with the Performance and Overall outcomes generally being qualitative and performance based.

Officers have undertaken an assessment of all relevant provisions and determined the proposal complies with the above mentioned overlay codes. For the purposes of reporting, compliance with Acceptable outcomes is not outlined. The following provides a discussion of the relevant performance based outcomes, including where the Acceptable outcome has not been achieved, relating to:

Land use (Rural landscape and environment precinct only).

Performance outcome Acceptable outcome

PO5

Rural activities occur, in the Rural landscape and environment precinct, where they do not result in: (a) the clearing of vegetated areas; (b) impacts on matters of environmental significance;

and (c) loss of the scenic amenity values of hinterland

ridgelines, prominent foothills and face slopes.

AO5

No acceptable outcome provided.

Officer’s comment

A small portion of the driveway and walking track associated with the development are located within the areas nominated within the Rural landscape and environment precinct. The proposed land use is


23 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 considered to comply with PO5 of the Rural zone code for the following reasons:

The proposal does not involve damage or removal of vegetation;

The proposal does not result in impacts upon matters of environmental significance, including vegetation, and natural waterways; and

The proposal does not involve the erection of permanent buildings or structures that could reduce the scenic amenity values nearby ridgelines.

6.2.2 Assessment against overlay codes

The proposal has been assessed against the following overlay codes:

Bushfire hazard overlay code;

Environmental significance overlay code;

Landslide hazard overlay code; and

Water resource catchment overlay code.

Officers have undertaken an assessment of all relevant provisions and determined the proposal complies with the above mentioned overlay codes. For the purposes of reporting, compliance with Acceptable outcomes is not outlined. The following provides a discussion of the relevant performance based outcomes, including where the Acceptable outcome has not been achieved, relating to:

Environmental significance overlay code; and


This is discussed in more detail below.

Environmental significance overlay code

Wetlands and watercourses

Wetlands and watercourses


PO5

Buffers are provided to wetlands and watercourses identified on the Environmental significance – wetlands and watercourse overlay map to ensure the: (a) protection of matters of environmental

significance mapped onsite or identified through an ecological site assessment;

(b) unimpeded movement of fauna along the watercourse;

(c) water quality is maintained; (d) bank stability; and (e) protection of property and infrastructure.

AO5.4

Buffers at least 60m wide are provided between the development and the outer bank of a Major Watercourse as identified on the Environmental significance – wetlands and watercourse overlay map.

AO5.5

Buffers at least 30m wide are provided between the development and the outer bank of a watercourse as identified on the Environmental significance – wetlands and watercourse overlay map.

Officer’s comment

AO5.4 of the Environmental significance overlay code requires a 60 metre buffer between the development and the outer bank of a Major Watercourse (Tonys Creek). The proposed function area


24 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 does not maintain this buffer, being located approximately 35 metres from the Major Watercourse.

AO5.5 of the Environmental significance overlay code requires a 30 metre buffer between the development and the outer bank of watercourse. The proposed function area and car parking areas do not maintain this buffer.

The Environmental Assessment Section provided the following comments in regards to Performance Outcome PO5 of the Environmental significance overlay code.

“The site is identified as having areas of mapped environmental significance (both local and State significance) relating to biodiversity areas, vegetation management, and wetland and watercourses. Two existing lakes (dams) currently occupy the site along with a mapped major watercourse being Tony’s Creek.

“The City Plan also identifies the site as being within the area designated by the Water resource overlay code. In accordance with the code appropriate distances must be maintained between the development activity and waterways, groundwater recharge areas, onsite supplies and urban water supply storages to ensure water quality is maintained and protected”

It is noted that Seqwater advised that conditions should be included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring amended drawings demonstrating the car parking areas are setback 50 metres to Tonys Creek and 30 metres to minor watercourses. As discussed herein, such conditions are included in the Officer’s recommendation.

Bearing this in mind, the Environmental Assessment Section further states:

“Given the development is considered to be of limited impact due to the absence of permanent physical structures and the infrequency of the activity, it is considered that the development will have limited impact on the significant environmental values.”

Therefore, the proposal is considered to comply with PO5 of the Environmental significance overlay code.


All development (Separation distances)

All development (excluding any use within the Industrial activities group (refer to SC1.1.1 Defined activity groups), Intensive animal industry, Intensive horticulture, Animal keeping, Wholesale nursery, Motor sport facility and Outdoor sport and recreation)


PO1

Appropriate separation distances are maintained between all development activity and waterways, groundwater recharge areas, on-site water supplies and urban water supply storages to ensure water quality is maintained and protected.

AO1

Development complies with the horizontal separation distances (setbacks) within Table 8.2.16-2: Minimum horizontal separation distances required in water resource catchment area.

Officer’s comment

AO1 of the Water resource catchment overlay code requires development involving tourism activities to be setback a minimum of 50 metres from a surveyed bank of an intermittent watercourse, 100 metres from the surveyed bank of a permanent watercourse and located above the one (1) in 50 year flood line as prescribed by Table 8.2.16-2: Minimum horizontal separation distances required in water resource catchment area.


25 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 The proposed function area, parking area and overflow parking areas do not maintain these setbacks. The function area is within four (4) metres to the dams on site and the car parking area being within 20 metres of a minor watercourse. Therefore an alternative outcome to AO1 is proposed, requiring the development to comply with PO1 of the Water resource overlay code.

The application was referred to Seqwater for third party advice regarding the proposed development’s impacts upon the water quality of the Hinze Dam catchment area. The following comments were received:

“Notwithstanding the proposed setbacks the following circumstances across the site, inherent to the operation of the use, reduce the risk to local water quality:

the temporary and low impact nature of the function structures;

he minimal frequency of functions, estimated at 2-3 events per week;

the two stream order 1 watercourses have been stemmed by dam embankments,

reducing the likelihood of flows from the function and parking areas reaching Tony's Creek;

the use of temporary and standalone portable toilet facilities, over a permanent onsite wastewater treatment facility. Functions will not contribute to any additional loads on the wastewater treatment plant servicing the existing house;

adequate setbacks to Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam), with the subject lot maintaining approximately 500m - 600m distance;

adequate setbacks to the Nerang River, a major watercourse directly supplying Advancetown Lake, with the subject lot maintaining approximately 400m distance;

the driveway appears to have a gravel surface;

maintenance of grass cover over all function and parking areas; and

no removal of existing vegetation is proposed to accommodate the new use.

Given the above, it is considered that the designated function area is suitably located to ensure minimal risk to water quality. However, the 35m setback (to Tony's Creek) for temporary toilet facilities in the function area, still presents an unacceptable risk to water quality. A higher setback is considered appropriate, given the public health risks of potential contaminants and proximity of this section of Tony's Creek to Advancetown Lake.

Additionally, the location of the main car parking area directly adjoining the smaller dam is not supported, with the 4m setback not deemed sufficient to offset potential water quality impacts from likely grass stripping, erosion and high inflow events. Relocation of the main parking area further away from the dams I watercourses is considered appropriate in order to mitigate the potential for impact on local water quality. Surfacing of the main parking area also needs to be further addressed, as the risk of erosion of a grassed area is high.

Further, no details are provided on the surface treatment of the existing driveway. It is considered appropriate to include a gravel surface along the extent of the driveway, in order to mitigate increased vehicular usage associated with function patronage as well as setup, removal and supply.

Finally, no details on flood mitigation for the proposed function area have been provided. The Seqwater Guidelines recommend that all activities (including parking, function, waste storage and function area) are located above the extent of a 1 in 50 year event.

The following recommendations are therefore made, which Council may integrate as conditions where deemed reasonable and relevant:


26 ADOPTED REPORT


The applicant must amend the Management Plan (prepared by Zone Planning Group, dated 28 July 2017) and Site and Environment Plans- Site Plan and Car Parking (prepared by Shane Denman, dated 11 July 2017) to show details as follows:

Outline a separate, designated location for portable toilet facilities that maintains a minimum 50m setback to Tony's Creek and 30m to the dams and minor watercourses on-site. The chosen location must be stable and free of ponding/surface water flows and large enough to accommodate the required number of toilets for the largest anticipated event. No portable or temporary toilets utilised for the use, are to be stored or otherwise located within these setbacks at any time.

The location of car parking areas (main and overflow) setback at least 30m to all minor watercourses I dams on the site. Details should be included surrounding the rotation schedule of parking across the two areas as needed, to ensure that grass cover is constant and does not deteriorate, and lead to erosion. Alternatively, the applicant may provide a gravel surface over the main designated parking area, with grass cover in any informal overflow area. Setbacks as outlined previously must still be maintained and appropriate stormwater quantity and quality measures installed.

The location of all activities, including the function area, portable toilet location, parking areas and waste storage above the Q50 flood line.

The provision of a gravel surface along the entirety of the existing main driveway.”

Council officers concur with the advice provided by Seqwater. Conditions have been included in the Officer’s recommendation requiring:

Amended drawings demonstrating the car parking areas and portable toilet facilities to be setback 50 metre setback to Tony’s Creek and 30 metres to the dams and minor watercourses;

Amended plans (operational management plan) requiring car parking and portable toilet facilities to be located in the approved areas;

Maintenance of grassed car parking area to avoid dust and environmental harm; and

The main car parking area to be finished with compacted gravel.

Further to the above, Councils Hydraulics and Water Quality Section provided the following comments: “Considering the above facts (raised by Seqwater) this section does not recommend the imposition of conditions for requirements for stormwater treatment for the site. However, as Seqwater raised concerns about water quality in relation to the dam catchment requirements, it is recommended that the following advisory note to be included in the decision notice.

Advancetown lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment

The subject site is located within the Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment. The development is required to maintain the water quality of the stormwater runoff discharging from the site in accordance with the Seqwater Development Guidelines: Development Guidelines for Water Quality Management in Drinking Water Catchments 2012. Since the runoff from the proposed development will direct runoff into the existing lake systems, the owner or the legal entity of the site is required to ensure that lake water quality is maintained in accordance with The ANZECC Water Quality Guidelines 2000 for the Protection of Aquatic Ecosystems and Recreational Secondary Contact standards, and is generally consistent with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, Environmental Protection Regulation 1998 and the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997.”

Subject to the implementation of the above conditions and advice note, water quality of the Hinze Dam catchment area is considered to be maintained and protected in accordance with PO1 of the Water catchments overlay code.

Therefore, the proposed development is considered to comply with PO1 of the Water catchments


27 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 overlay code.

6.2.3 Assessment against development codes

The proposal has been assessed against the following development codes:

General development provisions code;

Solid waste management code; and

Transport code.

Officers have undertaken an assessment of all relevant provisions and determined the proposal complies with the above mentioned development codes. For the purposes of reporting, compliance with Acceptable outcomes is not outlined. The following provides a discussion of the relevant performance based outcomes, including where the Acceptable outcome has not been achieved, relating to:

Amenity protection (General development provisions code);

Non-services areas (Solid waste management code); and

Design of off-street car parking facilities (Transport code).

These are discussed in more detail below.

General development provisions code

Amenity protection:

Amenity protection


PO1

Development mitigates any negative effects to amenity, health and safety from existing surrounding activities having regard to: (a) noise; (b) hours of operation; (c) traffic; (d) signage; (e) visual amenity; (f) wind effects; (g) privacy; (h) vibration; (i) contaminated substances; (j) hazardous chemicals; (k) odour and emissions; and (l) safety.

AO1


PO2

The proposed development prevents loss of amenity and threats to health and safety, having regard to:

AO2



28 ADOPTED REPORT


(a) noise; (b) hours of operation; (c) traffic; (d) signage; (e) visual amenity; (f) wind effects; (g) privacy; (h) vibration; (i) contaminating substances; (j) hazardous chemicals; (k) odour and emissions; and (l) safety.

Officer’s comment

As there is no acceptable outcome provided, the proposed development must demonstrate compliance with Performance outcome PO1 and PO2. The development is considered to comply with Performance outcome PO1 for the following reasons:

Noise: The applicant provided a Noise Impact Assessment which was supported by Council’s Environmental Health and Regulatory Services Section. Conditions are recommended requiring compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment;

Hours of operation: Conditions are recommended limiting the hours of operation to operate between the hours of 7:00 am to 10:00 pm for a maximum of three (3) times per week;

Traffic: Vehicles do not travel past other rural properties on Pocket Road to reach the subject site. Further, a condition is recommended requiring directional signage to minimise the occurrences of vehicles accidently driving past the site and impacting upon the rural amenity;

Signage: No advertising devices are proposed as part of this application. Should an advertising device be proposed, it will require a license to be issued in accordance with Council’s Local Law No.16 (Licensing) 2008. The local law requires advertising devices to not create, or increase, a risk to human health or safety or road safety.

Visual amenity and privacy: Land adjoining the site includes the Pocket Road Conservation Area, Springbrook National Park and Hinze Dam open space. Therefore, the proposal will not impact upon adjoining amenity. Additionally, the Function facility is well removed from the front boundary and will be substantially screened by existing vegetation to protect the visual amenity and privacy of the rural property located opposite the site;

Vibration: The proposed site is not considered to be subject to any vibrations;

Contaminated substances: The site is not a contaminated site and does not adjoin a contaminated site;

Hazardous substances: The site is not a hazardous substance site and does not adjoin a hazardous substance site;

Odour and emissions: Conditions are recommended requiring a waste storage facility to be provided on site and for waste to be removed within 24 hours after the completion of a function to mitigate potential odour. The site is not adjoining any development that would be likely to generate odour and emissions; and

Safety: The site and neighbouring sites are not considered to provide an environment that could impact upon adjoining safety.

Solid waste management code


29 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 Non-serviced areas


PO5

Developments in non-serviced areas have appropriate solid waste management measures to adequately service the development.

Note: For Commercial developments a Waste management plan, prepared in accordance with SC6.13 City Plan policy – Solid waste management, is Council’s preferred method of addressing the above outcome.

AO5


Officer’s comment

As there is no acceptable outcome provided, the proposed development must demonstrate compliance with Performance outcome PO5. The Environmental Health and Regulatory Services Section provided the following comments in regards to Performance Outcome PO5 of the Solid waste management code.

“The applicant states that event organisers or the person leasing the land will be fully responsible for waste storage and servicing arrangements over the site. Health do not support this approach without the development, at a minimum, providing a designated waste storage facility of a size that is capable of storing all waste generated by an event.

The site plan indicates a ‘refuse & wheelie bin location’ point to the east of the site. This location appears to be adjacent to a fixed dwelling. It is not clear from the submitted drawings or operational management plan, if it is intended to store all waste within this area.

In order to ensure that waste is stored in a manner that minimises the risk to environment and provides suitable waste management measures in the non-serviced area, a condition has been recommended by Health requiring the site to provide an enclosed waste storage facility of a size that can accommodate all waste generated at an event. By having a facility specific for storing waste, there will be minimal risk to the environment compared to storing waste outside.

In addition to recommending a waste storage facility, Health has recommended the Operational Management Plan be amended to specify that all waste will be stored within the waste storage facility.”

Conditions are recommended requiring an enclosed waste storage facility to be located on site and amendments to the operational management plan, as requested by the Environmental Health and Regulatory Service Section.

Therefore, the proposal is considered to comply with PO5 of the Solid waste management code.

Transport code

Car parking

Design of off-street parking facilities:


PO1

Development provides off-street car parking to AO1

Off- street car parking spaces are provided in


30 ADOPTED REPORT


accommodate the parking demand. OR Where located in the Centre zone or the Southport Priority Development Area at rates that: (a) reduce congestion and car dependency; (b) maximise the efficiency of car parking provided;

and (f) (c) encourage alternative transport options such

as walking, cycling and the use of public transport.

accordance with the identified relevant table as follows:

Location Off-street car parking rate

All zones except: (a) Centre zone; (b) High density

residential zone (where located in the Transport hub area in Figure 9.4.13-1); or

(c) Special purposes zone – Special development area precinct – Southport Priority Development Area

Table 9.4.13-3

Officer’s comment

To meet AO1 of the Transport Code, a minimum of 35 car parking spaces are required. The development proposal includes a total of 66 car spaces (36 sealed, 32 overflow grassed area).

Therefore, the proposal is considered to comply with AO1 of the Transport code.

Design of off-street parking facilities


PO25 Off street car parking areas are designed to: (a) provide a legible and efficient internal layout; (b) ensure the safety and security of users; (c) clearly distinguishable from pedestrian paths

and entry points; (d) be easily negotiated by vehicles and

pedestrians including persons with a disability;

(e) ensure that there is no disruptions to or queues onto the public road network;

(f) provide sight distances from driveways to ensure visibility between vehicles on the driveway and pedestrians on the verge; and

(g) be marked and maintained to the current relevant standard.

AO25.1 Off street car parking is designed, constructed, line marked and maintained in accordance with AS2890.1, AS2890.2. AS2890.6 and AS1428.1.

Officer’s comment

The Transport Impact Assessment Section provided the following comments in regards to Performance Outcome PO25 of the Transport code.

“To meet AO25.1 of the Transport Code, all parking facilities should be sealed and line marked in accordance with AS2890.1 requirements. The development proposal includes a


31 ADOPTED REPORT


grassed overflow car park area. Given the location and nature of the proposed development, it is considered that overflow informal (unsealed) parking facilities are appropriate in this instance, as proposed by the applicant.”

Therefore, the proposal is considered to comply with PO25 of the Transport code.

7 ASSESSMENT AGAINST TEMPORARY LOCAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS

The proposal does not trigger assessment against any temporary local planning instruments.

8 ASSESSMENT AGAINST SCHEDULE 10 OF THE REGULATION

The proposal does not trigger assessment against any assessment benchmarks in Schedule 10 (Development assessment) of the Planning Regulation 2017.

9 ASSESSMENT AGAINST SCHEDULE 12 OF THE REGULATION

The proposal does not trigger assessment against any assessment benchmarks in Schedule 12 (Particular reconfiguring a lot requiring code assessment) of the Planning Regulation 2017

10 ASSESSMENT AGAINST STATE PLANNING POLICY

The City Plan appropriately reflects all aspects of the State Planning Policy apart from aspects relating to natural hazards, risk and resilience (coastal hazards).

The proposal does not trigger assessment against any assessment benchmarks relating to natural hazards, risk and resilience (coastal hazards).

11 ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE REGIONAL PLAN

The proposal is consistent with the goals, elements and strategies; and the Southern Sub-regional directions of the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2017 (ShapingSEQ).

12 DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (TRUNK)

Not applicable

13 INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES

The final estimated infrastructure charge is $13,130.00.

For further information on this matter, refer to the draft notice attached to this report entitled as Attachment: Infrastructure charges notice for the approved development.

14 LOCAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS THAT MAY BE MATERIALLY AFFECTED BY THE

DEVELOPMENT

The proposal does not trigger assessment against any assessment benchmarks for another local government area materially affected by the development.

15 REFERRALS


32 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 15.1 Internal referrals

This application has been assessed by internal referral officers who have provided reasonable and relevant conditions. An overview of the recommended conditions is provided in the table below:

Internal city expert Comments and Conditions

City Assets Officer’s comments

It is recommended the application be approved with conditions imposed, as a result of assessment conducted by the City Assets Section.

The following conditions were provided:

Construction of vehicular crossing

Environmental Assessment Officer’s comments

It is recommended the application be approved with conditions imposed, as a result of assessment conducted by the Environmental Assessment Section.


Approved plans for operational management plan.

Health and Regulatory Services

Officer’s comments

It is recommended the application be approved with conditions being imposed, as a result of assessment conducted by the Environmental Health and Regulation Section.


Approved drawings for bin storage points and bin wash down areas;

Approved plans for Noise Impact Assessment;

Amended plans for operational management plan;

Hours of operation; and

Certification of works for waste storage room design and construction.

Hydraulics and Water Quality Officer’s comments

It is recommended the application be approved with conditions being imposed, as a result of assessment conducted by the Hydraulics and Water Quality Section.


Overland flow paths and hydraulic conditions.

Transport Impact Assessment Officer’s comments

It is recommended the application be approved with conditions being imposed, as a result of assessment conducted by the


33 ADOPTED REPORT


Transport Impact Assessment Section.


Off street vehicle and car parking facilities;

Access to off street parking facilities;

Loading and unloading; and

Installation and requirements for advanced signage.

15.2 External referrals

The application did not require referral to Concurrence Agencies or Advice Agencies under the provisions of the Planning Regulation 2016.

However, given the subject site is located within the Hinze Dam water catchment area, the application was referred to Seqwater for third party advice.

In a letter dated 5 October 2017, Seqwater provided third party advice requesting that conditions are included in the Officer’s recommendation to protect the water quality of the Hinze Dam water catchment area.

The requested conditions have been included in the Officer’s recommendation. Please refer to section 6.2.3 (Water resource catchments overlay code) for further discussion.

16 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION 16.1 Overview

In response to public notification:

10 properly made submission/s were received, consisting of 10 objections and nil in support.

16.2 Compliance with public notification requirements

The applicant has submitted a notice of compliance stating public notification has been completed in accordance with the requirements of the Development Assessment Rules under the Planning Act 2016.

Council has reviewed the public notification material and considers the applicant has complied with the requirements of the Development Assessment Rules.

16.3 Issues raised in submissions

The main issues raised by submitters who made a properly made submission or a submission that has been accepted by Council are discussed below.

Issue Officer’s comment

Fireworks Most submissions alerted Council of fireworks being detonated on site on 10 December 2017, during the public notification period.

The submissions raised concerns that the fireworks adversely impact upon the rural amenity, spook livestock and native fauna and pose a significant bushfire risk.


34 ADOPTED REPORT


Council officers concur with the submitters. The use of fireworks is considered to adversely impact upon the rural amenity and the use of nearby land for rural production pursuits and increases risk to natural hazards.

Therefore, conditions are recommended prohibiting the detonation of fireworks and other explosives.

Conditions are also recommended to amend the submitted Operational Management Plan to state that the use of fireworks and other explosives are prohibited on site.

Noise impacts The applicant provided a Noise Impact Assessment which was supported by Council’s Environmental Health and Regulatory Services Section. Conditions are recommended requiring compliance with the submitted Noise Impact Assessment.

Additionally, a condition is recommended requiring the owner of the site to maintain a Noise Complaint Register. The condition requires all rural properties on Pocket Road to be provided with an email address to lodge noise related complaints and will be managed by the owners of the site. It further requires the owners of the site to implement measures to ensure the use does not cause environmental nuisance following a complaint and the register must be made available to Council upon request.

Further, a condition is included in the Officer’s recommendation limiting the scale of the use to 150 guests (excluding staff) which will further mitigate negative effects from noise and traffic.

Increased traffic Submissions raised concerns that Pocket Road is unsafe to meet the increased traffic demand.

Pocket Road is a sealed single lane rural road accessed via a single lane bridge from Nerang Murwillumbah Road. The bridge is approximately 60 metres long and the stretch of road between the Nerang Murwillumbah Road intersection and the subject site is approximately 930 metres.

Pocket Road is provided with a small turning lane from Nerang Murwillumbah Road which allows up to two (2) cars entering Pocket Road to stand should vehicles already be on the bridge exiting Pocket Road. However, the bridge is signed for vehicles exiting Pocket Road to give way to vehicles entering Pocket Road which prevents the banking of vehicles on Nerang Murwillumbah Road.

Although being a single lane, the land adjoining the bitumen is relatively flat and free of obstacles, as illustrated in Figure 14. This allows sufficient width for vehicles to safely pass in opposite directions without risk of falling down embankments.


35 ADOPTED REPORT


Figure 14 Photo of Pocket Road surface and profile

The stretch of Pocket Road between Nerang Murwillumbah Road and the subject site requires vehicles to navigate only three (3) bends which are not sharp when considering the low speed limit. Additionally, this stretch of road is provided with clear sight lines of incoming traffic. Therefore, the road is considered to be provided with good visibility for the safe navigation of the road network servicing the site.

Traffic Impacts upon rural amenity

Although access to the site does not require vehicles to travel past other rural lots on Pocket Road, submissions raised concerns that visitors often miss the site entrance and enter other rural properties further along Pocket Road.

To minimise this occurrence and assist in the protection of the rural amenity, a condition is recommended requiring the applicant to apply to Council’s Traffic Management and Operations Branch for Tourist Roadside Directional Signage on Gold Coast City Council-Controlled Roads. This will provide ‘advance warning’ for visitors that they are nearing the subject site.

Land use compatibility, scale and frequency

The proposed land use is considered in the Rural zone, being listed as an impact assessable development. Please see section 6.2.1 Assessment against the zone code for appropriateness of the use within the Rural zone.

Regarding scale and frequency, Officer’s recommend limiting the scale of the use to 150 guests (excluding staff) and the frequency to up to three (3) times per week to ensure the use operates as a low scale tourism activity consistent with the Strategic framework.

The proposed use is not considered to detract or compromise the amenity of the rural area. Please see section 6.2.3 Assessment against development codes.

Enforcing compliance with Operational Management Plan

The submissions raised concerns that third party operators are unlikely to have regard to the Operational Management Plan.

Compliance with the Operational Management Plan is a condition of


36 ADOPTED REPORT


approval attached to the land. Therefore, the site owners are responsible to ensure third party operators conduct functions on site in accordance with the Operational Management Plan (and any other condition of approval), otherwise non-compliance may result in a development offence under the Planning Act 2016.

To further ensure that third party operators conduct functions in accordance with the Operational Management Plan, a specific condition is recommended requiring all third party function operators to be provided with a copy of the conditions of approval, approved drawings and approved plans and instructed as to the need to comply with them.

No benefit to the rural area The proposed tourist activity is considered to contribute to economic growth within the local economy. This is achieved by promoting the Gold Coast’s significant biodiversity areas and natural landscapes to visitors, in addition to providing additional customers to local caterers, accommodation facilities and tourism providers.

Impact upon water catchment

The application was referred to Seqwater for third party advice. Seqwater advised that the proposal is suitably located to ensure minimal risk to water quality, subject to conditions included in the Officer’s recommendation regarding car parking area and toilet facility setbacks from watercourses.

17 OTHER RELEVANT MATTERS

An assessment of the application has not been carried out against, nor had regard to, other relevant matters.

18 CONCLUSION

Council is in receipt of an application for a development permit for a Material Change of Use to establish a Function facility at 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley.

After a detailed assessment, it has been determined the proposal meets the applicable themes and elements of the Strategic framework, the Rural zone and applicable overlay and development codes.

It is therefore recommended the application be approved, subject to conditions.

19 NOTIFICATIONS

The following property notifications will be applied:

Noise/Acoustic 20 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:


37 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) CITY DEVELOPMENT BRANCH - REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY - AT 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 – PN171259/01/DA1 A The Council approves (with conditions) the issue of a development permit for material

change of use for a Function facility (maximum of 150 visitors (excluding staff)), subject to the following conditions:

General

1 Timing a All conditions of this development approval must be complied with at no cost to Council at

all times unless otherwise stated in another condition.

b Where the timing in a condition is prior to commencement of the use and a Building Format Plan is lodged for approval, the timing in the condition changes from being prior to commencement of the use to being prior to the earlier of the commencement of the use and approval of the plan of subdivision. This timing requirement prevails despite any inconsistency with the timing requirement in another condition.

2 Amended drawings

Prepare and submit amendments to the drawings for confirmation they constitute the approved drawings for the purposes of this development approval. All amended drawings must be submitted (and confirmed by Council) prior to commencement of any works on site.

Planning

Drawing Title Author Date Drawing No. Ver

Site Plan Shane Denman Architect

07/03/18 DA 1.02 E


07/03/18 DA 1.03 E

Detail B and C Shane Denman Architect

07/03/18 DA 1.04 E

The following amendments must be included:

a. Locate car parking areas (main and overflow) at least 50 metres from Tony’s Creek and 30 metres from all minor watercourses and dams

3 Approved Plans

Undertake and maintain the development generally in accordance with the following plans:

Environmental Health and Regulatory Services

Plan Title Author Date Plan Reference No. Ver

Proposed Function Centre 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

CRG Acoustics

17 August 2017

17099 -

4 Amended Plans

Prepare and submit amendments to the plans listed below for confirmation they constitute the approved plans for the purposes of this development approval. All amended plans must be submitted (and confirmed by Council) prior to commencement of the use and any works on


38 ADOPTED REPORT


site:

Planning


Management Plan Function Facility 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley

Zone Planning Group

28 July 2017 N/A Final

The following amendments must be included: a Amend Figure 1 to reflect the drawings referenced in the amended drawings condition.

b Amend Section 5.0 to specify that car parking must be located in the designated areas illustrated in the stamped approved drawings (once approved).

c Amend Section 7.0 to specify that activities involving the detonation of fireworks and other explosives are not permitted.

d Amend Section 8.0 to specify that portable toilet facilities must be located in the designated area illustrated in the stamped approved drawings (once approved).

e Amend Section 10.0 to specify that marquees and temporary structures are to be removed within 24 hours after the conclusion of a function.

f Amend section 12.0 Wastes Management to specify that all waste generated from events will be transported into the designated waste storage enclosure at the conclusion of events.

5 Marquees and other structures (specific condition)

a. Marquees and other similar structures must only be erected for temporary purposes.

b. All marquees and other similar structures must be removed within 24 hours after the conclusion of a function.

6 Grassed car parking area (specific condition) a. The grassed overflow car parking area must be maintained to avoid dust and

environmental harm. b. Implement and maintain sediment and erosion control measures to ensure the

development does not cause erosion or allow sediment to leave the site.

7 Availability of approved plans, drawings and reports (specific condition)

All third party function operators must be provided with a copy of these conditions of approval, approved drawings and approved plans and instructed as to the need to comply with them.

Amenity

8 Hours of operation

Undertake all activities associated with the operation of the use only between the hours of 7.00am to 10.00pm, on a maximum of three (3) times per week.

9 Nuisance

Undertake and operate the development in a manner that causes no detrimental effect upon surrounding premises by reason of noise nuisance, lighting nuisance or other such emissions.

10 Fireworks (specific condition)

Activities involving the detonation of fireworks and other explosives are not permitted.

11 Noise Complaint Register (specific condition) a. A Noise complaint register is to be maintained at all times by the site owner/manager to


39 ADOPTED REPORT


record all noise-related complaints; b. Land owners of all rural allotments on Pocket Road must be provided with an email

address managed by the site owner/manager to lodge noise related complaints; c. Confirmation that all land owners have been provided with an email address must be

provided to Council. d. In response to noise complaints, noise mitigation measures must be implemented to

ensure the use does not cause an ‘environmental nuisance’ (within the meaning of that term set out in the Environmental Protection Act 1994) at any sensitive receptor stated in schedule 1 of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008.

e. The noise complaints register shall be made available to Council upon request within 3 business days.

12 Screening of visually offensive components

Locate and screen the following components of the development so that they are not visible from any road to which the site has frontage, adjoining premises or otherwise on display from any public thoroughfare or vantage point:

a. Refuse storage areas

Transport

13 Directional signage (specific condition)

a. The applicant must apply to Council’s Traffic Management and Operations Branch for Tourist Roadside Directional Signage on Gold Coast City Council-Controlled Roads, as per the Tourist Roadside Directional Signage Guidelines for Gold Coast City Council-controlled Roads (or equivalent).

b. The application is to be accompanied by a signage plan identifying the proposed location(s) and wording of signage, as follows:

i. ‘Advance warning’ directional signage, located on the eastern approach to the Pocket Road / Unnamed Road intersection, identifying the proposed development (trading name or land use type) and including wayfinding information (eg. turn right in xxx m). Signage should be located a sufficient distance in advance of the intersection to allow vehicles time to decelerate on approach.

ii. Directional signage, located at the intersection of Pocket Road / Unnamed Road, to identify access to the development.

c. Signage is to be designed and installed in accordance with QLD Transport and Main Roads’ Traffic and Road Use Management Manual and Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 6 Service and Tourist Signs.

d. Signage, if approved, is to be installed and maintained at the applicant’s cost, at no cost to Council.

Advice Note: The relevant application form can be accessed from the City of Gold Coast website.

14 Off street vehicle and car parking facilities

a. Design and construct off street vehicle facilities at no cost to Council prior to the commencement of the use, generally in accordance with the Transport code of the City Plan and include in particular:

i. A minimum of 35 formal (sealed with compacted gravel) car parking spaces and 1 medium rigid vehicle (MRV) service bay.

ii. Formal car parking spaces and loading facilities are drained, sealed and line marked.

iii. Clearly identified signage and directional markings including: o Directional signage within the site to guide motorists to the main and overflow


40 ADOPTED REPORT


parking areas.

b. Construct and maintain a gravel surface along the entirety of the driveway that provides access to car parking areas.

c. Maintain the off street vehicle and parking facilities at no cost to Council at all times.

15 Access to off-street car parking facilities

Any security gates that restrict access to the car parking facilities on the site must be open when the development is open for functions to allow access for staff and visitors.

16 Loading and unloading

Loading and unloading of service vehicles must be undertaken generally in accordance with the Transport Code of the City Plan and include in particular: a. Loading and unloading of any vehicle servicing the development must be conducted wholly

within the site. b. A vehicle, or vehicle waiting to be loaded or unloaded, must stand entirely within the site. c. All vehicles must enter and exit the site in a forward gear.

Engineering

17 Construction of vehicular crossing

Construct the vehicular crossing generally in accordance with the Driveways and vehicular crossing code.

Stormwater Drainage

18 Overland flow paths and hydraulic alterations

a. Leave unaltered the overland flow paths on the site, such that the characteristics of existing overland flows on other properties remain uninhibited and unchanged.

b. The development must not: i. Increase peak flow rates downstream from the site ii. Increase flood levels external to the site iii. Increase duration of inundation external to the site that could cause loss or

damage

Construction Management

19 Certification of works

Provide Council with certificates prepared by qualified experts from the disciplines listed below, confirming as follows:

Environmental Health and regulatory Services

Certified document

Certification

date

Plan/ Drawing

Expert discipline

Requesting Council Section

Waste storage enclosure design and construction

Prior to commencement of the use

Site and Environmental Plans Site Plan prepared by Shane Denman

Suitably qualified person



41 ADOPTED REPORT


Architect (Drawing No. DA 1.02)

The certification is to confirm: The waste storage room has been located, designed and constructed in accordance with SC6.13 City Plan policy – Solid waste management, section 13.13 – Bin storage points and bin wash-down facility requirements.

Advice Notes

A Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment

The subject site is located within the Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment. The development is required to maintain the water quality of the stormwater runoff discharging from the site in accordance with the Seqwater Development Guidelines: Development Guidelines for Water Quality Management in Drinking Water Catchments 2012. Since the runoff from the proposed development will direct runoff into the existing lake systems, the owner or the legal entity of the site is required to ensure that lake water quality is maintained in accordance with The ANZECC Water Quality Guidelines 2000 for the Protection of Aquatic Ecosystems and Recreational Secondary Contact standards, and is generally consistent with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, Environmental Protection Regulation 1998 and the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997.

B Compliance with conditions

Once this development approval takes effect, the conditions attach to the land and are applicable in perpetuity. It is a development offence to contravene a development approval, including any of its conditions.

C Infrastructure charges

Infrastructure charges are now levied under a Charges Resolution by way of an Infrastructure Charges Notice, which accompanies this decision notice.

D Connections to, alteration or realignment of Council infrastructure Where development works require the connection to, alteration, removal or realignment of Council infrastructure or impact on other public utility infrastructure (e.g. telecommunications, electricity, gas), the applicant must obtain the necessary approvals from the relevant public utility authority prior to works commencing. Connection to, alteration, removal or realignment of Council infrastructure includes (but is not limited to) fire hydrants, water service metres, sewer man hole covers, stormwater drainage infrastructure, reinstatement of hole covers, stormwater drainage infrastructure, crossovers, footpaths, road pavement, kerb and channel, kerb ramps, medians, traffic islands, road furniture, signage and line-marking.

E Indigenous cultural heritage legislation and duty of care requirement

The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (‘ACHA’) is administered by the Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Multicultural Affairs (DATSIMA). The ACHA establishes a duty of care to take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure any activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage. This duty of care:


42 ADOPTED REPORT


a Is not negated by the issuing of this development approval; b Applies on all land and water, including freehold land; c Lies with the person or entity conducting an activity; and d If breached, is subject to criminal offence penalties. Those proposing an activity involving surface disturbance beyond that which has already occurred at the proposed site must observe this duty of care. Details of how to fulfil this duty of care are outlined in the duty of care guidelines gazetted with the ACHA. The applicant should contact DATSIMA’s Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit on (07) 3405 3050 for further information on the responsibilities of developers under the ACHA.

F Applicant responsibilities

The applicant is responsible for securing all necessary approvals and tenure, providing statutory notifications and complying with all relevant laws. Nothing in this decision notice alleviates the need for the applicant to comply with all relevant local, State and Commonwealth laws and to ensure appropriate tenure arrangements have been made where the use of/reliance upon land other than that owned by the applicant is involved. Without liming this obligation, the applicant is responsible for: a Obtaining all other/further necessary approvals, licences, permits, resource entitlements

etc by whatever name called required by law before the development the subject of this approval can be lawfully commended and to carry out the activity for its duration;

b Providing any notifications required by law (by way of example only, to notify the administering authority pursuant to the Environment Protection Act 1994 of environmental harm being caused/threatened by the activity, and upon becoming aware the premises is being used for a ‘notifiable activity’);

c Securing tenure/permission from the relevant owner to use private or public land not owned by the applicant (including for access required by conditions of approval);

d Ensuring the correct siting of structures on the land. An identification survey demonstrating correct siting and setbacks of structures may be requested of the applicant to ensure compliance with this decision notice and applicable codes;

e Providing Council with proof of payment of the Portable Long Service Leave building construction levy (or proof of appropriate exemption) where the value of the Operational Works exceed $150,000. Acceptable proof of payment is a Q.Leave –Notification and Payment Form approved by the Authority. Proof of payment must be provided before Council can issue a development permit for the Operational works. This is a requirement of section 77(1) of the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991; and

f Making payment of any outstanding Council rates and charges applicable to the development site prior to the lodgement of subdivision plans.

g Obtaining any necessary local government/state approvals where works require the installation of temporary ground anchoring into adjacent Road Reserves. Where ground anchoring is proposed into an adjacent private property, approval from the relevant property owners(s) is required

G Notice of works timetable

The applicant is responsible for providing a Notice of works timetable for Retrospective development approval to Council’s Development Compliance section. A copy of Council’s Notice of works timetable is available for viewing on Council’s website http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/documents/fa/fm579_notice-of-works.pdf

Property Notifications

A Noise/Acoustic


43 ADOPTED REPORT


There are development approval conditions applicable in relation to acoustic issues on this lot/subsequent lots. All property owner(s) must ensure compliance with these conditions. Refer to Council of the City of Gold Coast’s Decision Notice insert application number. A copy of Council’s Decision Notice is available for viewing on Council’s website www.goldcoastcity.com.au/pdonline

Author: Authorised by:

Shane Weterings Michael Moran

Planning Officer Manager City Development

May 2018


44 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 1 (Continued) DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR MAKING A MATERIAL CHANGE OF FOR A FUNCTION FACILITY AT 94 POCKET ROAD, NUMINBAH VALLEY – DIVISION 9 PN171259/01/DA1

Changed recommendation Wildlife signage included in condition 13 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.001 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr O’Neill

A The Council approves (with conditions) the issue of a development permit for material change of use for a Function facility (maximum of 150 visitors (excluding staff)), subject to the following conditions:

General

1 Timing

a All conditions of this development approval must be complied with at no cost to Council at all times unless otherwise stated in another condition.

b Where the timing in a condition is prior to commencement of the use and a Building Format Plan is lodged for approval, the timing in the condition changes from being prior to commencement of the use to being prior to the earlier of the commencement of the use and approval of the plan of subdivision. This timing requirement prevails despite any inconsistency with the timing requirement in another condition.

2 Amended drawings

Prepare and submit amendments to the drawings for confirmation they constitute the approved drawings for the purposes of this development approval. All amended drawings must be submitted (and confirmed by Council) prior to commencement of any works on site.

Planning

Drawing Title Author Date Drawing No. Ver


07/03/18 DA 1.02 E


07/03/18 DA 1.03 E

Detail B and C Shane Denman Architect

07/03/18 DA 1.04 E


a Locate car parking areas (main and overflow) at least 50 metres from Tony’s Creek and 30 metres from all minor watercourses and dams

3 Approved Plans

Undertake and maintain the development generally in accordance with the following plans:

Environmental Health and Regulatory Services


Proposed Function Centre 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

CRG Acoustics

17 August 2017

17099 -

4 Amended Plans

Prepare and submit amendments to the plans listed below for confirmation they constitute the


45 ADOPTED REPORT


approved plans for the purposes of this development approval. All amended plans must be submitted (and confirmed by Council) prior to commencement of the use and any works on site:

Planning


Management Plan Function Facility 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley

Zone Planning Group

28 July 2017 N/A Final


a Amend Figure 1 to reflect the drawings referenced in the amended drawings condition.

b Amend Section 5.0 to specify that car parking must be located in the designated areas illustrated in the stamped approved drawings (once approved).

c Amend Section 7.0 to specify that activities involving the detonation of fireworks and other explosives are not permitted.

d Amend Section 8.0 to specify that portable toilet facilities must be located in the designated area illustrated in the stamped approved drawings (once approved).

e Amend Section 10.0 to specify that marquees and temporary structures are to be removed within 24 hours after the conclusion of a function.

f Amend section 12.0 Wastes Management to specify that all waste generated from events will be transported into the designated waste storage enclosure at the conclusion of events.

5 Marquees and other structures (specific condition)

a Marquees and other similar structures must only be erected for temporary purposes.

b All marquees and other similar structures must be removed within 24 hours after the conclusion of a function.

6 Grassed car parking area (specific condition)

a The grassed overflow car parking area must be maintained to avoid dust and environmental harm.

b Implement and maintain sediment and erosion control measures to ensure the development does not cause erosion or allow sediment to leave the site.

7 Availability of approved plans, drawings and reports (specific condition)

All third party function operators must be provided with a copy of these conditions of approval, approved drawings and approved plans and instructed as to the need to comply with them.

Amenity

8 Hours of operation

Undertake all activities associated with the operation of the use only between the hours of 7.00am to 10.00pm, on a maximum of three (3) times per week.

9 Nuisance

Undertake and operate the development in a manner that causes no detrimental effect upon surrounding premises by reason of noise nuisance, lighting nuisance or other such emissions.

10 Fireworks (specific condition)

Activities involving the detonation of fireworks and other explosives are not permitted.


46 ADOPTED REPORT


11 Noise Complaint Register (specific condition)

a A Noise complaint register is to be maintained at all times by the site owner/manager to record all noise-related complaints;

b Land owners of all rural allotments on Pocket Road must be provided with an email address managed by the site owner/manager to lodge noise related complaints;

c Confirmation that all land owners have been provided with an email address must be provided to Council.

d In response to noise complaints, noise mitigation measures must be implemented to ensure the use does not cause an ‘environmental nuisance’ (within the meaning of that term set out in the Environmental Protection Act 1994) at any sensitive receptor stated in schedule 1 of the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008.

e The noise complaints register shall be made available to Council upon request within 3 business days.

12 Screening of visually offensive components

Locate and screen the following components of the development so that they are not visible from any road to which the site has frontage, adjoining premises or otherwise on display from any public thoroughfare or vantage point:

a Refuse storage areas

Transport

13 Directional and Wildlife Signage (specific condition)

a The applicant shall install roadside directional signage to be positioned at the intersection of Pocket Road / Unnamed Road, to identify access to the development.

i The applicant must liaise with Council’s Traffic Management and Operations Branch in writing and attach a signage plan and a copy of this decision notice, by sending an email to [email protected]

ii The signage plan must identify the proposed location(s) and wording of signage, as follows:

A ‘Advance warning’ directional signage, located on the eastern approach to the Pocket Road / Unnamed Road intersection, identifying the proposed development (trading name or land use type) and including wayfinding information (eg. turn right in xxx m). Signage should be located a sufficient distance in advance of the intersection to allow vehicles time to decelerate on approach.

iii Signage is to be designed and installed in accordance with the QLD Transport and Main Roads’ Traffic and Road Use Management Manual and Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Part 6 Service and Tourist Signs and Tourist Roadside Directional Signage Guidelines for Gold Coast City Council-controlled Roads (or equivalent).

b The applicant shall install wildlife warning signs to be positioned within 100 metres from the western side of the Pocket Road bridge (for vehicles entering Pocket Road), and within 100 metres to the eastern side of the site’s exit (for vehicles exiting the subject site).

i The applicant must liaise with Council’s Traffic Management and Operations Branch in writing and attach a copy of this decision notice, by sending an email to [email protected]

ii Signage is to be designed and installed in accordance with QLD Transport and Main Roads’ Technical Note 110 – Wildlife signage guidelines.

c Signage is to be installed and maintained at the applicant’s cost, at no cost to Council.

d Signage is to be installed within three (3) months after this decision notice takes effect.


47 ADOPTED REPORT


14 Off street vehicle and car parking facilities

a Design and construct off street vehicle facilities at no cost to Council prior to the commencement of the use, generally in accordance with the Transport code of the City Plan and include in particular:

i A minimum of 35 formal (sealed with compacted gravel) car parking spaces and 1 medium rigid vehicle (MRV) service bay.

ii Formal car parking spaces and loading facilities are drained, sealed and line marked.

iii Clearly identified signage and directional markings including:

o Directional signage within the site to guide motorists to the main and overflow parking areas.

b Construct and maintain a gravel surface along the entirety of the driveway that provides access to car parking areas.

c Maintain the off street vehicle and parking facilities at no cost to Council at all times.

15 Access to off-street car parking facilities

Any security gates that restrict access to the car parking facilities on the site must be open when the development is open for functions to allow access for staff and visitors.

16 Loading and unloading

Loading and unloading of service vehicles must be undertaken generally in accordance with the Transport Code of the City Plan and include in particular:

a Loading and unloading of any vehicle servicing the development must be conducted wholly within the site.

b A vehicle, or vehicle waiting to be loaded or unloaded, must stand entirely within the site.

c All vehicles must enter and exit the site in a forward gear.

Engineering

17 Construction of vehicular crossing

Construct the vehicular crossing generally in accordance with the Driveways and vehicular crossing code.

Stormwater Drainage

18 Overland flow paths and hydraulic alterations

a Leave unaltered the overland flow paths on the site, such that the characteristics of existing overland flows on other properties remain uninhibited and unchanged.

b The development must not:

i Increase peak flow rates downstream from the site

ii Increase flood levels external to the site

iii Increase duration of inundation external to the site that could cause loss or damage

Construction Management

19 Certification of works

Provide Council with certificates prepared by qualified experts from the disciplines listed below, confirming as follows:

Environmental Health and regulatory Services

Certified document

Certification Plan/ Drawing Expert discipline

Requesting Council


48 ADOPTED REPORT


date Section

Waste storage enclosure design and construction

Prior to commencement of the use

Site and Environmental Plans Site Plan prepared by Shane Denman Architect (Drawing No. DA 1.02)

Suitably qualified person


The certification is to confirm:

The waste storage room has been located, designed and constructed in accordance with SC6.13 City Plan policy – Solid waste management, section 13.13 – Bin storage points and bin wash-down facility requirements.

Advice Notes

A Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment

The subject site is located within the Advancetown Lake (Hinze Dam) drinking water catchment. The development is required to maintain the water quality of the stormwater runoff discharging from the site in accordance with the Seqwater Development Guidelines: Development Guidelines for Water Quality Management in Drinking Water Catchments 2012. Since the runoff from the proposed development will direct runoff into the existing lake systems, the owner or the legal entity of the site is required to ensure that lake water quality is maintained in accordance with The ANZECC Water Quality Guidelines 2000 for the Protection of Aquatic Ecosystems and Recreational Secondary Contact standards, and is generally consistent with the requirements of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, Environmental Protection Regulation 1998 and the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997.

B Compliance with conditions

Once this development approval takes effect, the conditions attach to the land and are applicable in perpetuity. It is a development offence to contravene a development approval, including any of its conditions.

C Infrastructure charges

Infrastructure charges are now levied under a Charges Resolution by way of an Infrastructure Charges Notice, which accompanies this decision notice.

D Connections to, alteration or realignment of Council infrastructure

Where development works require the connection to, alteration, removal or realignment of Council infrastructure or impact on other public utility infrastructure (e.g. telecommunications, electricity, gas), the applicant must obtain the necessary approvals from the relevant public utility authority prior to works commencing.

Connection to, alteration, removal or realignment of Council infrastructure includes (but is not limited to) fire hydrants, water service metres, sewer man hole covers, stormwater drainage infrastructure, reinstatement of hole covers, stormwater drainage infrastructure, crossovers, footpaths, road pavement, kerb and channel, kerb ramps, medians, traffic islands, road furniture, signage and line-marking.

E Indigenous cultural heritage legislation and duty of care requirement

The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (‘ACHA’) is administered by the Department of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Multicultural Affairs (DATSIMA). The ACHA establishes a duty of care to take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure any activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage. This duty of care:


49 ADOPTED REPORT


a Is not negated by the issuing of this development approval;

b Applies on all land and water, including freehold land;

c Lies with the person or entity conducting an activity; and

d If breached, is subject to criminal offence penalties.

Those proposing an activity involving surface disturbance beyond that which has already occurred at the proposed site must observe this duty of care.

Details of how to fulfil this duty of care are outlined in the duty of care guidelines gazetted with the ACHA.

The applicant should contact DATSIMA’s Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit on (07) 3405 3050 for further information on the responsibilities of developers under the ACHA.

F Applicant responsibilities

The applicant is responsible for securing all necessary approvals and tenure, providing statutory notifications and complying with all relevant laws.

Nothing in this decision notice alleviates the need for the applicant to comply with all relevant local, State and Commonwealth laws and to ensure appropriate tenure arrangements have been made where the use of/reliance upon land other than that owned by the applicant is involved. Without liming this obligation, the applicant is responsible for:

a Obtaining all other/further necessary approvals, licences, permits, resource entitlements etc by whatever name called required by law before the development the subject of this approval can be lawfully commended and to carry out the activity for its duration;

b Providing any notifications required by law (by way of example only, to notify the administering authority pursuant to the Environment Protection Act 1994 of environmental harm being caused/threatened by the activity, and upon becoming aware the premises is being used for a ‘notifiable activity’);

c Securing tenure/permission from the relevant owner to use private or public land not owned by the applicant (including for access required by conditions of approval);

d Ensuring the correct siting of structures on the land. An identification survey demonstrating correct siting and setbacks of structures may be requested of the applicant to ensure compliance with this decision notice and applicable codes;

e Providing Council with proof of payment of the Portable Long Service Leave building construction levy (or proof of appropriate exemption) where the value of the Operational Works exceed $150,000. Acceptable proof of payment is a Q.Leave –Notification and Payment Form approved by the Authority. Proof of payment must be provided before Council can issue a development permit for the Operational works. This is a requirement of section 77(1) of the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991; and

f Making payment of any outstanding Council rates and charges applicable to the development site prior to the lodgement of subdivision plans.

g Obtaining any necessary local government/state approvals where works require the installation of temporary ground anchoring into adjacent Road Reserves. Where ground anchoring is proposed into an adjacent private property, approval from the relevant property owners(s) is required

G Notice of works timetable

The applicant is responsible for providing a Notice of works timetable for Retrospective development approval to Council’s Development Compliance section. A copy of Council’s Notice of works timetable is available for viewing on Council’s website http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/documents/fa/fm579_notice-of-works.pdf

Property Notifications

A Noise/Acoustic


50 ADOPTED REPORT


There are development approval conditions applicable in relation to acoustic issues on this lot/subsequent lots. All property owner(s) must ensure compliance with these conditions. Refer to Council of the City of Gold Coast’s Decision Notice insert application number. A copy of Council’s Decision Notice is available for viewing on Council’s website www.goldcoastcity.com.au/pdonline

CARRIED


51 ADOPTED REPORT


52 ADOPTED REPORT

GSPublisherEngine 0.35.100.100

N

CLIENT

PROJECT

TITLE

DA 1.02DRWG/REVISION NO.

JOB NO.

REVISION E

1726

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE

0 25

11:14 AM

START DATE

SCALE

DRAWN BY CHECKED

SHEET SIZE

PLOT DATE 7/03/2018A3

SDSDA

AS SHOWNAPRIL 2017

AS BUILT DOCUMENTFOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR TENDERFOR BUILDING APPROVALFOR D.A. APPROVALFOR INFORMATIONFOR PRELIMINARYDRAWING STATUS REVIEWED BY SIGNATURE DATE

SITE AND ENVIRONMENTPLANSSITE PLAN

NUMINBAH DEVELOPMENT

JEFF PILKINGTON

NO. DATE REVISIONS-DESCRIPTION BY

A 10/04/17 PRELIMINARY ISSUE FOR DA MJLB 29/05/17 REVISED CARPARKING CONFIGURATION MJLC 11/07/17 WATER SUPPLY, PED ROUTE & CREEK DIST. MJLD 15/11/17 CARPARKING LAYOUT & WASTE REVISED MJLE 07/03/18 CARPARKING LOCATION & WASTE REVISED MJLFG

shane denman designs pty ltdabn: 68 081 800 777

po box 810, elanora. q. 4221studio 4, 33 palm beach avenue

palm beach. q. 4221p: 07 5534 1141f: 07 5534 5197

m: 0407 943 731e: [email protected]

w: www.denmandesigns.com

A R C H I T E C Tshane denman

HIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

© CopyrightThis drawing is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Unless permittedunder the Copyright Act 1988, no part of this drawing may in any form or by anymeans be reproduced, published, broadcast or transmitted without prior writtenconsent of the copyright owner.

Please Note:If the status of this drawing is not signed off For Construction it may be subject tochange, alteration or amendment at the discretion of SHANE DENMAN DESIGN.If so, SHANE DENMAN DESIGN is not liable for any loss, damage, harm or injurywhether special, consequential, direct or indirect, suffered by you or any otherperson as a result of your use of this drawing for construction purposes.DIMENSIONS: Use figured dimensions only. DO NOT SCALE.Check all dimensions on site prior to fabrication or setout.

LOCATION

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

94 POCKET ROADNUMINBAHQLD, 4211

LOCATION EXISTING ALTERNATIVEEXIT ROAD

MAIN ACCESS ROAD(ALL WEATHER)

SEQ WATER

POCKET ROAD

DRIVEWAY TOADJOINING PROPERTY

CAR PARKING(36 CARS + 32 UNMAKRED)

APPROX. LINE FOR TOP OFBANK - TONYS CREEK

DETAIL B

SOLID WASTE STORAGE & WASHDOWN FACILITY LOCATION

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL CITY PLAN(refer notes for detail)

DESIGNATED PORTABLETOILET LOCATION

(refer notes for detail)

EXISTING RESIDENCE

ENTRY

VACANT LAND

BOUN

DARY

BOUN

DARY

BOUNDARY

LOT 1RP 187413

108,600 m2

BOUNDARY

BOUNDARY

NATIONAL PARK(CONSERVATION)


GOLD COAST CITYCOUNCIL LAND



LOT 11RP 842006

200,000 m2

DETAIL A

BUFFER ZONE

PROPOSED SITE PLANScale - 1:3000 -


53 ADOPTED REPORT


N

CLIENT

PROJECT

TITLE


JOB NO.

REVISION E

1726

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE

0 25

11:14 AM

START DATE

SCALE

DRAWN BY CHECKED

SHEET SIZE


SDSDA

AS SHOWNAPRIL 2017


SITE AND ENVIRONMENTPLANSSITE PLAN


JEFF PILKINGTON





palm beach. q. 4221p: 07 5534 1141f: 07 5534 5197




HIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ



LOCATION



25000

14000

6193

0

30000

58000

37600

30000

LOCATION EXISTING ALTERNATIVEEXIT ROAD

MAIN ACCESS ROAD(ALL WEATHER)

EXISTING RESIDENCE

FARM SHED LOCATION

Approx. Line forTop of Bank

Existing 90,000LWater Tank

Existing 4,000LAuxiliary Tank

Existing Fire HoseConnection into Dam Pedestrian access route from

Carpark to Function Location

Designated waste storageenclosure, In acordancewith the City Plan Policy


DETAIL A(PEDESTRIAN SITE TRIANGLES)

DETAIL B(CAR PARKING & OVERFLOW)

Designated Portable Toilet Location(refer notes for detail)

Designated waste washdown facility


ENTRY

BOUN

DARY

BOUN

DARY

BOUNDARY

BOUNDARY

BOUNDARY

LAKE

LAKE

to L

OCAT

ION

(minimum)

2000

2500

3000

7000

Pedestrian Site Trianglesto be kept free ofobstructions to visibility.

3.0m wide graveltwo-way roadway.

BOUNDARY LINE

GATE

FENCE

POCKET ROAD

(to gate)

NOTES*Formal car parking areas to have gravelas a minimum surface treatment.*Pedestrian Site Triangles to comply andbe in accordance with AS2890.2.*Stormwater to be taken to the legal pointof discharge as determined by the relevantauthority.*All solid waste, recycling storage andservicing facilities are designed andconstructed in accordance with SC6.13City Plan Policy - Solid WasteManagement, section 13.13 - Bin Storagepoints and bin wash down facilityrequirements.*Designated portable toilet location to notencroach within 50m of Tony's Creek and30m to dams and minor watercourseslocated on site.*Portable toilet location to accomodate fora minimum of 200 guests.*All carparking facilities are not to encroachwithin 30m to all minor watercourses anddams on site.

LEGENDIndicates 5.5m wide gravel roadwayfor vehicle overtaking opportunitiesin accordance with AS 2890.1.

Pedestrian Site Triangles inaccordance with Fig. 3.4 of AS2890.2.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100SCALE 1:2000

PROPOSED SITE PLANScale - 1:2000 - DETAIL A

Scale - 1:200 -


54 ADOPTED REPORT


N

CLIENT

PROJECT

TITLE


JOB NO.

REVISION E

1726

ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE

0 25

11:14 AM

START DATE

SCALE

DRAWN BY CHECKED

SHEET SIZE


SDSDA

AS SHOWNAPRIL 2017


SITE AND ENVIRONMENTPLANSDETAIL B & C


JEFF PILKINGTON





palm beach. q. 4221p: 07 5534 1141f: 07 5534 5197




HIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ



LOCATION



NOTES*Car parking layouts and private roadways to comply with AO25.2and in accordance with AS/NZ 2890.1 of the Transport Code.*Service bays and on-site manoeuvring layouts for an MRV tocomply with AO5 and AO6.1 of the Transport Code.*Car parking bays for visitors must be designed for User Class 3,in accordance with Figure 2.2 of AS2890.1.*Loading Bays to be in accordance with Table 4.1 of AS2890.2.*Access driveways and circulation roadways for MRV vehicles tobe in accordance with Section 5.4 of AS2890.2.*Grades of internal roadways where the MRV will circulate tocomply with the requirements of Section 3.3.3. of AS2890.2.

0 5 10 15SCALE 1:300

3635

3433

19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6

32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

121110987654321

1314

1516

1718

54

32

1

8800

4000

30003000300030003000300030003000300030003000300030003000

5400

6000

5400

540060003120060005400

540060002600260026002600260026002600260026002600260026002600230030062004000

4000

54000

54006000390001500

51900

5400

6000

5400

2080

016

430

3760

0

Car parking entry sign

Car parking exit sign

3.5m x 8.8m MRV reverse swept path fromloading bay with 300mm clearance envelope

3.5m x 8.8m MRV forward swept path intoloading bay with 300mm clearance envelope

Signage for loading bay

Sealed Pavement inaccordance with AS2890.1

for Pedestrian access.

Pedestrian access toFunction Location

Overflow car parkingENTRY/EXIT sign

CAR PARK36 CARS

Gravel

ENTRY

ROADGravel

EXIT

BUFF

ER Z

ONE

(MRV)SERVICE

BAY

BUFFER ZONE

32 UNMARKED CARS

ENTRY TOOVERFLOWCAR PARK

GRASS

Signage - House guestcars only past this point

DETAIL BScale - 1:300 -


55 ADOPTED REPORT

Information Request Response MCU for a Function Facility

94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley

Attachment 3 AMENDED OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN


56 ADOPTED REPORT

Issue Date Prepared by Checked By Draft 28/07/2017 NW SM Final Version 28/07/2017 NW NW

Disclaimer Zone Planning Group Pty Ltd retains the ownership and copyright of the contents of this document including drawings, plans, figures and all work produced by Zone Planning Group Pty Ltd. This document is not to be reproduced in full or in part, unless separately approved by Zone Planning Group Pty Ltd. The client may use this document only for the purpose for which it was prepared. No third party is entitled to use or rely on this document whatsoever. Zone Planning Group Pty Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any possible subsequent loss or damage arising from the use of this data or any part thereof.

This report was prepared by:

Zone Planning Group Pty Ltd

ABN36 607 362 238

1638 Tweed Street BURLEIGH HEADS QLD 4220

PO Box 3805

BURLEIGH TOWN QLD 4220

Telephone: (07) 5562 2303

Email: [email protected] Web: www.zoneplanning.com.au


57 ADOPTED REPORT

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.zoneplanning.com.au/

Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 Use area and location ............................................................................................................................ 3

3.0 Hours of operation ................................................................................................................................ 4

4.0 Staff and visitor numbers ...................................................................................................................... 4

5.0 Car parking and bus set down area ....................................................................................................... 4

6.0 Service vehicle arrangements ................................................................................................................ 4

7.0 Noise requirements / restrictions ......................................................................................................... 4

8.0 Toilet amenity ........................................................................................................................................ 5

9.0 Structure typology ................................................................................................................................. 5

10.0 Set up / down arrangements ................................................................................................................. 5

11.0 Bushfire procedures .............................................................................................................................. 6

12.0 Waste management .............................................................................................................................. 6

Figures & Tables Figure 1: Proposed layout (Source: Shane Denman Architect)


58 ADOPTED REPORT

Management Plan Function Facility


1.0 Introduction This management plan has been prepared to assist in informing the operational arrangements for the Function Facility to occur at 94 Pocket Road, Numinbah Valley (Lot 11 on RP842006), referred to herein as ‘the site’. A copy of this management plan should be kept on site at all times and be adhered to in carrying out the operational processes associated with the Function Facility. In accordance with City of Gold Coast’s City Plan 2016 Version 4, a Function Facility is defined as:

Premises used for conducting receptions or functions that may include the preparation and provision of food and liquor for consumption on site.

This management plan will outline the operational details for the Function Facility in relation to:

1. Total Use Area and location 2. Hours of operation 3. Staff and visitor numbers 4. Car parking arrangements and access to function area (incl overflow) and bus set down area 5. Service vehicle arrangements including set up / down areas 6. Noise restrictions 7. Toilet amenity 8. Structure typology 9. Set up / down arrangements (ie timing for structures to be erected and dismantled incl temp

storage areas 10. Bushfire procedures (evacuation locations, routes, tracks, water supplies on site, how low fuel zone

to be managed 11. Waste management (incl expected weekly gen rates, type/size of waste containers for gen / recycle,

dev specific streams. Location, size and design of storage points, servicing points, service vehicle access (ie ute), waste removal process


59 ADOPTED REPORT



2.0 Use area and location The location of the Function Facility (referred to herein as ‘use area’), in the context of the overall site, is shown as the ‘location’ area in Figure 1. The use area is located on the northern side of the eastern lake. The use area is to be suitably positioned away from the northern bank of the lake so as to ensure safety of visitors attending the site. This area is rectangular in shape, comprises a dimension of 14m x 25m, and totals 350m2. This area is to include all structures / amenities associated with the facility including marquees, pavilions, portable toilets, etc. Sufficient lighting should be provided during night time events to ensure the use area and associated amenity is clearly visible to users, including the extent of the northern lake bank. Sufficient measures are to be put in place to ensure a clear and safe pathway connection between the car park and use area is achieved. This path may include signage along the route and other visual markers to highlight the path during both day and night. The path should be sufficiently illuminated during night time events to ensure visitors can safely navigate between the car park and use area whilst ensuring the banks of both the western and eastern lakes are clearly visible and easily navigable.

Figure 1 – Site Plan


60 ADOPTED REPORT



3.0 Hours of operation The Function Facility (refer to herein as ‘the use’) may operate between the hours of 7am to 10pm, Monday to Sunday. These hours of operation are stated in accordance with the conditions of the development approval over the site. Should it be desired that the use operate outside the above stated times prior approval from City of Gold Coast must be sought.

4.0 Staff and visitor numbers No more than 200 visitors (excluding staff) should be on the site at any time during an event. Staff numbers are not restricted; however, provision should be made for dedicated staff parking areas and staff access to amenities such as toilets.

5.0 Car parking and bus set down area Designated car parking areas are to be suitably signed posted during events. Clear signage should be provided to identify the main car park area and secondary overflow car park area for larger events. Signage and markers directing visitors from the car park areas to the use area should be provided. Sufficient lighting is to be made available along these routes during night events ensuring the safety of visitors. Lighting may be in the form of solar lights, battery controlled torches / batons, or similar. Buses may set down passengers at the main car park area at any time. However, during large events buses to remain on site are to park in the overflow car park.

6.0 Service vehicle arrangements Delivery and service vehicles may access the use area at any time prior to or after the event. Service vehicles may access the use area via the main driveway or the alternate driveway depending on the size and capabilities of the vehicle. All service vehicles must be removed from the use area during events. Should vehicles remain on site during an event, the vehicle/s are to park in the overflow car park.

7.0 Noise requirements / restrictions The use is to operate in accordance with the approved Environmental Noise Impact Assessment (Acoustic Report) prepared by CRG Acoustics, dated 17 August 2017. The following provisions are stated by the report:

• Hours of operation be limited to 7am to 10pm including setup and clean-up activity.

• Waste collection be limited to the daytime period between 7am to 6pm.

• Future staff should be diligent in maintaining acceptable activities and noise levels from the patrons particularly after 6pm.


61 ADOPTED REPORT



• Amplified entertainment levels are not to exceed 81 dB(A) L10 measured at 3m at the function space

area. A sound level meter should be purchased by the operator to ensure amplified entertainment levels do not exceed the set sound limit. Checks should be conducted prior to and during events.

• Management advise Clients that there are noise limits for amplified music, and compliance with the limits is a condition of hiring the venue.

• Live entertainment in the form of a soloist or duo be allowed.

• No lived percussion or bass guitars be used onsite.

• Speakers should be directed away from the nearest offsite noise sensitive receivers (i.e. speakers should be directed to the east).

• Temporary mechanical plant (i.e. electrical generators and refrigeration compressors) should not exceed a sound pressure level of 72 dB(A) at 1m (i.e. sound power SWL level of 80 dB(A)) to ensure compliance with the noise criterion presented in Section 4.2 [of the approved Environmental Noise Impact Assessment]. Mechanical plant noise source levels should be checked prior to events with the purchased sound level meter.

8.0 Toilet amenity No additional load is to be put on the site’s existing onsite effluence disposal system/s unless approved otherwise by City of Gold Coast. Portable toilet facilities are to be provided within the use area during events and removed post events by a licenced contractor/supplier. Sufficient portable toilet facilities are required based on the number of visitors attending an event at a rate as recommended by a licenced portable toilet provider. Portable toilets must be removed from site within 48 hours after the conclusion of an event.

9.0 Structure typology Structures associated with the use area to be lightweight temporary structures which can be easily assembled and dismantled prior to and at the conclusion of each event. Structure typology may include marquees, pavilions, tents, or similar.

10.0 Set up / down arrangements All structures associated with an event are to be removed from the site within 48 hours after the event’s conclusion. Should a new event occur within 48 hours of a prior event finishing and the same temporary structures are to be utilised, the structures may remain on site; however, must be dismantled and removed within 48 hours after the next event’s conclusion.

Should a new event occur within 48 hours of a prior event finishing and new temporary structures are to be utilised, all structures associated with the prior event must be removed from site prior to the new event commencing.


62 ADOPTED REPORT



11.0 Bushfire procedures Review of fire restrictions in place on the day of an event via Queensland Fire and Emergency Services website must occur by the event organiser and property owner. Where fire restrictions are in place all restrictions must be adhered to. This may include a total fire ban including no open fires or naked flames. A low fuel zone must be maintained throughout the use area at all times. Where grassed areas exist around the use area, lawn must be maintained to minimum 40m buffer around the use area. Low fuel areas are also to be maintained to all pathways leading to the use area and car park areas including the length of alternate exit road as shown on Figure 1: Proposed layout plan. Low fuel areas are to be maintained to the lake’s edge and around the fire hose connection into the dam (Figure 1). All evacuation routes are to be clearly signed posted, well maintained, and accessible to emergency vehicles. An evacuation plan must be established and kept in a safe location within the use area at all times during an event. In the event of a fire, the evacuation plan is to be implemented with all visitors to be escorted off the site in a safe and orderly manner.

12.0 Waste management Bins are to be provided throughout the use area during events and these bins will be stored at the designated ‘Refuse & Wheelie Bin Location’ shown on the site plan contained in Figure 1. The number of bins will be dependent upon the number of visitors attending the site and will be the responsibility of the event operator. Where possible, opportunities to recycle rubbish should be made. All rubbish is to be removed from site within 24 hours after each event and transported to a local refuse collection centre. Any vehicle being used to transport waste from the site shall be no larger than the standard dimensions for a Medium Rigid Vehicle (MRV).


63 ADOPTED REPORT


64 ADOPTED REPORT


65 ADOPTED REPORT


66 ADOPTED REPORT

Document: #65853310 Page 1 of 6

Infrastructure Charge Notice To: JEFF PILKINGTON

C/- ZONE PLANNING GROUP PO BOX 3805 BURLEIGH TOWN QLD 4220

Cc: MARCIA NGAIRE PILKINGTON

8 PLATYPUS AVENUE BUNDALL QLD 4217 JEFFREY PAUL PILKINGTON 8 PLATYPUS AVENUE BUNDALL QLD 4217

Land to which charges apply

The land to which the charges in this notice apply is.

Property description LOT11 RP842006 Property address 94 POCKET ROAD NUMINBAH VALLEY

Total levied charge payable $ 13,130.00

+ADJUSTMENTS

Due date for payment

Total payable prior to the earliest of the following events: when the change happens or final plumbing inspection being undertaken or issue of a certificate of classification or final inspection certificate for building work being issued.

Payment details

Payment of the charges must be made in accordance with the “How to pay methods” section of this notice.

Adjustments to charge

The levied charge will automatically increase by the lesser of the following:

(a) The difference between the levied charge and the maximum adopted charge the local government could have levied for the development when the charge is paid; and

(b) The increase worked out using the PPI, adjusted according to the 3-yearly PPI average, for the period starting on the day the levied charge is levied and ending on the day the charge is paid.

‘3-yearly PPI average’ and ‘PPI’ have the meanings given in the Planning Act 2016. As the charge amount stated above is current at the date the notice was generated, the total charges due at the date of payment may be greater.


67 ADOPTED REPORT


Offsets and/or Refunds

Offsets (if applicable) will be provided consistent with the provisions of the Planning Act 2016 and Council’s Charges Resolution. If applicable, details of the offset are provided on this Infrastructure Charge Notice.

Failure to pay charge

A levied charge is, for the purposes of recovery, taken to be rates of the local government that levied it.

Authority for charge

The charges in this notice are payable in accordance with the Planning Act 2016.

GST GST does not apply to payments or contributions made by developers to Government which relate to, or relates to, an application for the provision, retention, or amendment of a permission, exemption, authority or licence (however described) under the Planning Act 2016.

Enquiries Enquiries regarding this Infrastructure Charge Notice should be directed to the Developer Contribution Group on Ph: (07) 5582 8300, during office hours, 9.00am to 5.00pm, Monday to Friday or e-mail [email protected].


68 ADOPTED REPORT


Infrastructure Charge Notice

Thursday, 30 November 2017 Application PN171259/01/DA1 Site address 94 POCKET ROAD, NUMINBAH VALLEY Application number & code 201701262 MCU Application description FUNCTION FACILITY Officer name Rachael Sullivan

Charge calculation

Charges Resolution No.1 of 2017 Qty Rate Gross Charge AmountImpervious Area 1,300 Square Metres @ $ 10.10 $ 13,130.00 $ 13,130.00

Net Charge Summary Gross Charge Amount Applied Credit Amount Net Charge Amount

$ 13,130.00 $ 0.00 $ 13,130.00

Office Use Only $ 13,130.00 OTHINF

$ 13,130.00


69 ADOPTED REPORT


DECISION NOTICE DECISION TO GIVE AN INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES NOTICE

Pursuant to section 119 of the Planning Act 2016, on the insert date, the City decided to give this infrastructure charges notice. The date the development application was approved is set out on the first page of the decision notice approving the development application. Appeal rights

You have appeal rights in relation to this notice. An appeal may be made against an infrastructure charges notice on 1 or more of the following grounds:

(a) the notice involved an error relating to:

(i) the application of the relevant adopted charge; or

Examples of errors in applying an adopted charge:

• the incorrect application of gross floor area for a non-residential development

• applying an incorrect ‘use category’, under a regulation, to the development

(ii) the working out of extra demand, for section 120 of the Planning Act 2016; or

(iii) an offset or refund; or

(b) there was no decision about an offset or refund; or

(c) if the infrastructure charges notice states a refund will be given – the timing for giving the refund; or

(d) for an appeal to the Planning and Environment Court – the amount of the charge is so unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local government could have imposed the amount.

To remove any doubt, the Planning Act 2016 declares that an appeal against an infrastructure charges notice must not be about:

(a) the adopted charge itself; or

(b) for a decision about an offset or refund:

(i) the establishment cost of trunk infrastructure identified in a local government infrastructure plan; or

(ii) the cost of infrastructure decided using the method included in the local government’s charges resolution.

An appeal must be started within 20 business days after the infrastructure charges notice is given to you.

An appeal may be made to the Planning and Environment Court or to a development tribunal.

An appeal is started by lodging a notice of appeal with the registrar of the Planning and Environment Court or a development tribunal, as applicable. The notice of appeal must be in the approved form, succinctly state the grounds of the appeal and be accompanied by the required


70 ADOPTED REPORT


fee.

An appellant to the Planning and Environment Court must give a copy of the notice of appeal, within 10 business days after the appeal is started, to the persons identified in section 230(3) of the Planning Act 2016. A person who is appealing to the Planning and Environment Court must comply with the rules of the court that apply to the appeal.

Chapter 6, Part 1 and Schedule 1 of the Planning Act 2016 sets out further information about appeal rights.


71 ADOPTED REPORT


How to pay methods

Pay by mail Ordinary mail

Simply enclose this Notice and your cheque or money order made payable to Gold Coast City Council in an envelope and post it to this address: Council of the City of Gold Coast PO Box 5042 GCMC QLD 9729

Customer Service Centre in person Pay at any Customer Service Centre with cash, cheque, or debit card (no surcharge), MasterCard or Visa (maximum $50,000 using credit card) Payment by credit card will incur a surcharge.

Customer Service Centres Monday to Friday 8.15am to 4.30pm Broadbeach 61 Sunshine Boulevard, Mermaid Waters Bundall 8 Karp Court, Bundall Burleigh Heads Park Avenue, Burleigh Heads

Coolangatta The Strand, Marina Parade, Coolangatta

Helensvale Cnr Lindfield Road and Sir John Overall Drive, Helensvale Nerang 833 Southport Nerang Road, Nerang Palm Beach 26 11th Avenue, Palm Beach

Southport 47 Nerang Street, Southport Upper Coomera Cnr Abraham Road and Reserve Road, Upper Coomera

How to contact us

07 5582 8866 or 1300 69 4222 (7am to 6pm, Monday to Friday), or from outside of Australia call +61 7 5582 8866

Council of the City of Gold Coast PO Box 5042, GOLD COAST MC QLD 9729

Visit us at any Customer Service Centre Open hours; cityofgoldcoast.com.au

goldcoast.qld.gov.au


72 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 2 CITY PLANNING DRAFT LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 – APPROVAL TO PROCEED TO ADOPTION PD113/1306(P1) Attachment A: Letter from Hon Cameron Dick MP, Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning Attachment B: Local Government Infrastructure Plan Attachment C: Council resolution for detailed infrastructure planning 1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Not Applicable.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not Applicable. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT This report seeks Council’s endorsement to adopt the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan Major amendment 1 (draft LGIP) following the Minister’s final review and approval to adopt, in accordance with the Statutory Guideline 01/16: Making and amending local planning instruments (MALPI). 4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS At the 750th Council Meeting on 13 February 2018 (EPE18.0207.007) Council resolved, in part: 1 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed

by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 That in accordance with section 117 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Statutory

Guideline 01/16 'Making and amending local planning instruments' (MALPI), Council decides to write to the Minister seeking approval to adopt the proposed LGIP and proceed to step 8 of MALPI.

3 That Attachment A – Draft Local Government Infrastructure Plan Submissions Report be

endorsed and authorised to be displayed online and at administration centres for submitters and the community, with the submitter and/or location details redacted.

4 That the draft Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) amendment 1 be endorsed as

outlined in Attachment B. 5 That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to write to the Minister to satisfy the

requirements under step 6.10 of MALPI by providing a copy of: a draft LGIP amendment 1 b draft Local Government Infrastructure Plan Submissions Report c checklist and written statement prepared by the appointed reviewer d confirmation that the changes to the draft LGIP amendment 1 are not

substantially different to the public consultation version.

6 The Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to the Draft Local Government Infrastructure Plan Submissions Report (Attachment A) and draft LGIP amendment 1 proposed changes (Attachment B) prior to submitting to the Minister for consideration.

5 DISCUSSION Background Legislatively, the draft LGIP is required to be completed and included in the City Plan by 1 July 2018, to ensure the City can continue to levy infrastructure charges and impose conditions for trunk


73 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 2(Continued) DRAFT LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 – APPROVAL TO PROCEED TO ADOPTION PD113/1306(P1)

infrastructure. The draft LGIP includes proposed trunk infrastructure networks for water supply, sewerage, transport, and parks and land for community facilities. The draft LGIP has progressed through the third stage (Public consultation) of the statutory review process in accordance with MALPI (see Figure 1 in Section 10). At each stage of the process, the City’s planning assumptions and modelling, priority infrastructure area map, desired standards of service, schedules of works, plans for trunk infrastructure, and the affordability of the LGIP were reviewed. In the first stage of the review process, the City’s Appointed Reviewer was satisfied with all elements of the draft LGIP, which was then submitted to State on 27 June 2017. On 6 September 2017 the City received written advice from the Deputy Premier, the Minister for Transport and Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (the Minister), stating that the City may publicly consult on the draft LGIP. This approval was subject to compliance with one condition, which included minor revision of the schedule of works model, prior to commencement of public consultation. Public Consultation Public consultation was undertaken for the draft LGIP between 4 October to 15 November 2017, concurrently with the proposed Major Amendment 1 and 1B to the City Plan and in accordance with the endorsed Engagement and Communications Plan. As a result of public submissions, changes were proposed to the draft LGIP. These changes did not result in the proposed LGIP being significantly different from the version released for public consultation. Upon Council endorsement of the proposed changes, Council resolved to seek Ministerial review and requested approval to adopt the draft LGIP (in accordance with MALPI). Approval to Adopt On 13 April 2018, Council received written notice from the Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the Minister) advising that the Minister was satisfied that the draft LGIP complies with all statutory requirements and Council may proceed to adopt the proposed LGIP. Next Steps In accordance with MALPI, upon receiving advice from the Minister that it may adopt the proposed LGIP, the local government must decide whether to adopt the proposed LGIP. This report seeks Council resolution to adopt the draft LGIP, which is Attachment B to this report. If Council decides to adopt the draft LGIP, a notice must be placed in the gazette and a copy of relevant documents must be placed on the website. 6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN

Theme: Place 1.1 Our city provides a choice of liveable places. We can choose diverse lifestyle and housing

options from rural to city living. 1.2 We live in balance with nature. We manage quality rural and urban living while looking after

the future of the city’s rainforest, bushland, waterways and open space. 1.4 We have fast, frequent and reliable public transport. We can get around the city easily and

cheaply. 13.6 Our modern centres create vibrant communities. We can work and play in our local

neighbourhoods.

Theme: Prosperity 2.3 We have infrastructure that supports productivity and growth. We have connected and vibrant

economic precincts.


74 ADOPTED REPORT


Theme: People 3.6 We are an active and healthy community. We enjoy our city and its enviable climate. 7 GOLD COAST 2018 COMMONWEALTH GAMES™ IMPACT Not Applicable. 8 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Not Applicable. 9 RISK MANAGEMENT 9.1 CO000544 - A Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) is not prepared in accordance with

Statutory Guideline 03/14 resulting in City wide impacts on the infrastructure planning, funding and charging framework.

To mitigate this risk, CM001136 is to prepare a new LGIP in accordance with the statutory guideline by 1 July 2018. The draft LGIP is a review of all aspects of the plan and constitutes ‘a new LGIP’.

The draft LGIP is required to be implemented in City Plan by 1 July 2018 to ensure the City can continue to levy infrastructure charges and impose conditions about trunk infrastructure. There is a significant financial risk should the draft LGIP not progress as planned.

9.2 This activity supports the mitigation of Planning and Environment Directorate Risk number CO000510:

‘City Plan delivers inadequate and/or ineffective strategic/development policy (e.g. poor planning, built form, growth, social and environmental outcomes - including flood impacts).’

10 STATUTORY MATTERS The draft LGIP was prepared in accordance with the amendment process set out in MALPI which is the statutory guideline under Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) (SPA) and it is aligned to the terminology of the Planning Act 2016 and associated regulations and guidelines. Section 287 of the Planning Act 2016 (Qld) provides if a process for making an LGIP had begun under the SPA, but not ended before SPA’s repeal, the SPA continues to apply in relation to the LGIP amendment. Section 94A of Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) requires a local government to review its LGIP. Section 117 of SPA requires an amendment to LGIP to follow the process as set out in MALPI. The process to prepare the draft LGIP was initiated and is being processed in accordance with MALPI. Section 94A and Section 117 of SPA also require an amendment to LGIP to be prepared in accordance with the requirements set out in Statutory guideline 03/14: Local government infrastructure plans (LGIP statutory guideline). The proposed changes constitute a major amendment to Part 4 of City Plan as per the definitions within MALPI. Figure 1 below outlines the overall MALPI process to be followed for a major amendment to an LGIP. This report relates to the final stage of the process.


75 ADOPTED REPORT


Figure 1. 11 COUNCIL POLICIES Not Applicable. 12 DELEGATIONS Not Applicable. 13 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Consulted

Directorate or Organisation

Is the Stakeholder Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) (comment as appropriate)

Executive Coordinator City and Regional Planning - Kelli Adair

Economy, Planning and Environment Yes

Executive Coordinator Legal Services - Cherie Watt

Office of the Chief Operating Officer Yes

The preparation of the amendments to the draft LGIP has involved extensive consultation with internal stakeholders as follows:

Lifestyle and Community Water and Waste City Assets Transport and Traffic Corporate Finance Corporate Asset Management Legal Services Regional Planning Environment Planning Natural Hazards.

Information sessions were held with Councillors throughout the development of the draft LGIP. 14 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS The Council adopted Community Engagement, Marketing and Communication Plan was delivered during the public consultation of the draft LGIP. This plan identified key stakeholders and engaged them and the broader community in the process of public consultation. Submissions were received from the community and industry. All submitters were advised of the receipt of their submission and about how their submission was dealt with by electronic notification and publication of the submissions report on the City’s website following approval from Council.


76 ADOPTED REPORT


15 TIMING The City is required under SPA to finalise the draft LGIP by 1 July 2018. It is recommended that Council adopt the LGIP and commence it alongside City Plan version 5 on 27 June 2018. Section 287 of the Planning Act 2016 (Qld) (Planning Act) applies if a process for making or amending a statutory instrument had begun under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (Qld) (SPA), but not ended before SPA’s repeal. This section will apply to Council’s LGIP (Council’s City Plan is a “statutory instrument” – see SPA, section 80). In summary, the effect of section 287 is as follows:

SPA continues to apply in relation to the LGIP amendment (Planning Act, section 287(2)); and

the LGIP can include matters, or be in a form, that the Minister considers is consistent with the Planning Act, provided the Minister is also satisfied that those matters do not substantially change the LGIP’s effect (Planning Act, section 287(3)).

15 CONCLUSION Council has received written notification from the Minister advising that the Minister is satisfied the proposed LGIP complies with all statutory requirements and that Council may adopt the proposed LGIP. This report seeks Council endorsement to adopt the draft LGIP. 16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential.

2 That in accordance with section 117 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Statutory Guideline 01/16 'Making and amending local planning instruments' (MALPI), Council adopts the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan, which is Attachment B to this report.

3 That the Chief Executive Officer undertakes the remaining steps in Stage 4 of MALPI.

4 That the adopted Local Government Infrastructure Plan commence on 27 June 2018.

5 That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any minor, administrative and editorial changes to the Local Government Infrastructure Plan as required, prior to its commencement.

6 That detailed infrastructure planning be undertaken in accordance with Attachment C.

Author: Authorised by: Lau Chean Alisha Swain Special Coordinator Strategic Infrastructure Director Economy Planning & Environment May May 2018 May 2018


77 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 2 (Continued) DRAFT LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN AMENDMENT 1 APPROVAL TO PROCEED TO ADOPTION PD113/1306(P1)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.002 moved Cr Baildon seconded Cr Taylor 1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential.

2 That in accordance with section 117 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Statutory Guideline 01/16 'Making and amending local planning instruments' (MALPI), Council adopts the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan, which is Attachment B to this report.

3 That the Chief Executive Officer undertakes the remaining steps in Stage 4 of MALPI.

4 That the adopted Local Government Infrastructure Plan commence on 27 June 2018.

5 That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any minor, administrative and editorial changes to the Local Government Infrastructure Plan as required, prior to its commencement.

6 That detailed infrastructure planning be undertaken in accordance with Attachment C.

CARRIED


78 ADOPTED REPORT

The Hon Cameron Dick MP Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning Queensland

Government

Our ref: MC18/1111

iWilliam Street Brisbane QLD 4000 PO Box 15009 City East Queensland 4002 Australia Telephone +617 3719 7200

Email [email protected] www.dsdmip.qld.gov.au

12 PPP 7018

Councillor Tom Tate Mayor Gold Coast City Council PO Box 5042 GOLD COAST MC QLD 9729

Dear Coun r Tate 10 WI

Thank you for the letter of 15 February 2018 from the Gold Coast City Council (the council) providing the proposed Local Government Infrastructure Plan Amendment 1 (the proposed LGIP), for review and approval to adopt.

I would like to congratulate the council on achieving this significant milestone. Having an approved LGIP in place will ensure the council continues to have the ability to levy charges or impose trunk infrastructure conditions on further development approvals.

The proposed LGIP has been assessed against the requirements of the repealed Sustainable Planning Act 2009, and for compliance with Statutory guideline 01/16: Making and amending local planning instruments (MALPI) and Statutory guideline 03/14: Local Government Infrastructure Plans (LGIP guideline).

I am pleased to advise that I am satisfied the proposed LGIP complies with all statutory requirements, and that the council may now proceed to adopt the proposed LGIP.

If you require any further information, please contact Ms Rebecca de Vries, Acting Manager, Planning and Development Services — South, in the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning, on (07) 5644 3220 or [email protected], who will be pleased to assist.

Yours sincerely

CAMERON DICK MP Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning


79 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 2 ATTACHMENT B Page 1 of 96

Part 4 Local government infrastructure plan

4.1 Preliminary (1) This Local government infrastructure plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of

the Planning Act 2016.

(2) The purpose of the Local government infrastructure plan is to:

integrate infrastructure planning with the land use planning identified in the City Plan

provide transparency regarding a local government’s intentions for the provision of trunk infrastructure

enable a local government to estimate the cost of infrastructure provision to assist its long term financial planning

ensure that trunk infrastructure is planned for and provided in an efficient and orderly manner

provide a basis for the imposition of conditions about infrastructure on development approvals.

(3) The Local government infrastructure plan:

(a) states in Section 4.2 (planning assumptions) the assumptions about future growth and urban development including the assumptions of demand for each trunk infrastructure network

(b) identifies in Section 4.3 (priority infrastructure area) the prioritised area to accommodate urban growth up to 2031

(c) states in Section 4.4 (desired standards of service) for each trunk infrastructure network the desired standard of performance

(d) identifies in Section 4.5 (plans for trunk infrastructure) the existing and future trunk infrastructure for the following networks:

(i) water supply

(ii) sewerage

(iii) transport

(iv) public parks and land for community facilities

(e) provides a list of supporting documents that assist in the interpretation of the Local government infrastructure plan in the Editor’s note – Extrinsic material listed in Table 4.6-1 in the Editor’s note.

4.2 Planning assumptions (1) The planning assumptions state the assumptions about:

(a) population and employment growth

(b) the type, scale, location and timing of development including the demand for each trunk infrastructure network.

(2) The planning assumptions together with the desired standards of service form a basis for the planning of trunk infrastructure networks and the determination of the priority infrastructure area.

(3) The planning assumptions have been prepared for:


80 ADOPTED REPORT


(a) the base date of 2016 and the following projection years to accord with future Australian Bureau of Statistics census years:

(i) mid 2021

(ii) mid 2026

(iii) mid 2031

(iv) Ultimate development

(b) the LGIP development types in column 2 that include the uses in Column 3 of Table 4.2-1

(c) the projection areas identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan maps LGIP-PIA-0 to LGIP-PIA-17 in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables.

Table 4.2-1: Relationship between LGIP development categories, LGIP development types and uses

Column 1

LGIP development category

Column 2

LGIP development type

Column 3

Uses

Residential development Attached dwelling Caretaker’s accommodation, Dual occupancy, Dwelling unit, Multiple dwelling, Residential care facility, Retirement facility, Rooming accommodation

Detached dwelling Community residence, Dwelling house, Relocatable home park

Tourist residential Hotel (residential component only), Resort complex, Short-term accommodation, Tourist Park

Non-residential development

Commercial Air services, Bar, Brothel, Car wash, Child care centre, Function facility, Health care services, Home based business, Hotel (non-residential component), Nightclub entertainment facility, Office, Parking station, Port services, Sales office, Theatre, Tourist attraction, Veterinary services, Wholesale nursery

Community purpose Cemetery, Club, Community care centre, Community use, Crematorium, Educational establishment, Emergency services, Funeral parlour, Hospital, Indoor sport and recreation, Landing, Major sport, recreation and entertainment facility, Outdoor sport and recreation, Park, Place of worship

Industry High impact industry, Low impact industry, Major electricity infrastructure, Marine industry, Medium impact industry, Renewable energy facility, Research and technology industry, Substation, Telecommunications facility, Transport depot, Utility installation, Warehouse

Retail Adult store, Agricultural supplies store, Bulk landscape supplies, Food and drink outlet, Garden centre, Hardware and trade supplies, Market, Outdoor sales, Service industry, Service station, Shop, Showroom


81 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

LGIP development category

Column 2


Column 3

Uses

Other Animal husbandry, Animal keeping, Aquaculture, Cropping, Environment facility, Extractive industry, Intensive animal industry, Intensive horticulture, Motor sport facility, Nature-based tourism, Outstation, Permanent Plantation, Roadside stall, Rural industry, Winery

(4) Details of the methodology used to prepare the planning assumptions are stated in the extrinsic material.

4.2.1 Population and employment growth

(1) A summary of the assumptions about population and employment growth for the City Plan area is stated in Table 4.2-2: Population and employment assumptions summary.

Table 4.2-2: Population and employment assumptions summary

Column 1

Description

Column 2

Assumptions

Base date

2016 2021 2026 2031

Ultimate development

Population 608,286 680,182 746,554 794,954 1,036,669

Employment 253,307 304,252 344,038 366,902 479,698

(2) Detailed assumptions about growth for each projection area and LGIP development type category are identified in the following tables in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables:

(a) for population, Table SC3.1-1: Existing and projected population

(b) for employment, Table SC3.1-2: Existing and projected employees.

4.2.2 Development

(1) The developable area is identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Map LGIP-DEV-AREA in Schedule 3 - Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables.

(2) The planned density for future development is stated in Table SC3.1-3: Planned density and demand generation rate for a trunk infrastructure network in Schedule 3 – Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables.

(3) A summary of the assumptions about future residential and non-residential development for the City Plan area is stated in Table 4.2-3: Residential dwellings and non-residential floor space assumptions summary.


82 ADOPTED REPORT


Table 4.2-3: Residential dwellings and non-residential floor space assumptions summary

Column 1

Description

Column 2

Assumptions

Base

2016 2021 2026 2031


Residential dwellings

280,214 310,014 338,912 361,933 469,067

Non-residential floor space

(m2 GFA)

8,296,292 10,109,701 11,689,755 12,815,873 16,610,929

(4) Detailed assumptions about future development for each projection area and LGIP development type are identified in the following tables in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables:

(a) for residential development, Table SC3.1-4: Existing and projected residential dwellings

(b) for non-residential development, Table SC3.1-5: Existing and projected non-residential floor space.

4.2.3 Infrastructure demand

(1) The demand generation rate for a trunk infrastructure network is stated in Column 4 of Table SC3.1-3: Planned density and demand generation rate for a trunk infrastructure network in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables.

(2) A summary of the projected infrastructure demand for each service catchment is stated in:

(a) for the water supply network, Table SC3.1-6: Existing and projected demand for the water supply network

(b) for the sewerage network, Table SC3.1-7: Existing and projected demand for the sewerage network

(c) for the transport network, Table SC3.1-8: Existing and projected demand for the transport network

(d) for the public parks and land for community facilities network, Table SC3.1-9: Existing and projected demand for the public parks and land for community facilities network.

4.3 Priority infrastructure area (1) The priority infrastructure area identifies the area prioritised for the provision of trunk infrastructure to

service the existing and assumed future urban development up to 2031.

(2) The priority infrastructure area is identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Maps LGIP-PIA-0 to LGIP-PIA-17 in Schedule 3 - Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables.

4.4 Desired standards of service (1) This section states the key standards of performance for a trunk infrastructure network.

(2) Details of the standard of service for a trunk infrastructure network are identified in the extrinsic material.


83 ADOPTED REPORT


4.4.1 Water supply network

(1) The key desired standards of service for the water supply network are stated in Table 4.4-1.

Table 4.4-1: Key desired standards of service for the water supply network

Parameter Standard

Average day demand (ADD) 220L/EP/day

Non-revenue water (NRW) 20L/EP/day (peaking factors are not applied to NRW)

Peaking factors: Detached dwelling

Attached dwelling

Commercial/Retail/ Community purpose

Industry Tourist residential

Open space

Mean day maximum month (MDMM)/ ADD (MDMM/ADD)

1.75 1.27 1.06 1.06 1.76 1.15

Peak day/ ADD (PD/ADD) 2.12 1.45 1.12 1.12 2.51 1.37

Peak hour/ ADD (PH/ADD) 4.5 2.97 2.32 1.54 6.03 2.40

Desired standards of service for mains:

Minimum service pressure with reservoirs at min. operating level

22m in the main adjoining property boundary

Maximum service pressure 80m

Maximum allowable velocity in mains 2.5m/s

Desired standards of service for reservoirs:

Ground level reservoir storage capacity Operational storage capacity: 3 x (PD – MDMM) + Emergency storage

Emergency storage capacity: Greater of 4 hours at MDMM, or 0.5ML (and for less than 1000EP: 150kL) Note: PD and MDMM is in kL/d, and reservoir storage is in kL

Elevated reservoir storage capacity Minimum capacity: 6 x (PH – 1/12 MDMM) + 150kL fire flow storage Where 8 x PH is less than or equal to MDMM, then capacity: 2 x PH + 150kL fire flow storage Note: PH and MDMM is in kL/d and reservoir storage is in kL

Reservoir duty pump requirements Ground level reservoir, where pump included: MDMM for 20 hours Elevated reservoir: Pump capacity = PH in L/s

Fire fighting requirements

Urban area flows Residential: 15L/s for 2 hours


84 ADOPTED REPORT


Parameter Standard

Commercial/industrial: 30L/s for 4 hours

Rural and small community flows Rural residential only: 7.5L/s for 2 hours Rural commercial/industry: 15L/s for 2 hours

Minimum residual mains pressure during fire fighting conditions

12m in the main, at the hydrant 9m minimum for existing infrastructure in small isolated or high elevation areas

Background demand Residential: 2/3 Peak Hour (and not less than ADD) Non-residential: Peak Hour for localised Industrial/Commercial or 2/3 PH for whole water supply zone

4.4.2 Sewerage network

(1) The key desired standards of service for the sewerage network are stated in Table 4.4-2.

Table 4.4-2: Key desired standards of service for the sewerage network

Parameter Standard

Average dry weather flow (ADWF) per EP, for sewerage network

210L/EP/day

Peak wet weather flow (PWWF) 5 x ADWF

Maximum depth of flow at PWWF for existing gravity mains

Up to 1.0m below manhole level (used as a trigger for augmentation, not a planning/design criterion for new infrastructure)

Maximum depth of flow at PWWF for new/augmented gravity mains

Up to 75% of the pipe diameter

Minimum velocity for gravity sewers 0.7m/s

Pump station pumping capacity Minimum pumping capacity = PWWF

Pump station emergency storage 4 hours at ADWF

Maximum rising main velocity 3m/s

Minimum rising main velocity 0.75m/s

4.4.3 Transport network

(1) The key desired standards of service for the transport network are stated in Table 4.4-3.

Table 4.4-3: Key desired standards of service for transport network

Parameter Standard

Average speed threshold for trunk road links

40% of the posted speed (in accordance with Austroads Guide to Traffic Management Part 3: Traffic Studies and Analysis).

Posted Speed 100kph 80kph 70kph 60kph 50kph


85 ADOPTED REPORT


Parameter Standard

Minimum link speed

40kph 32kph 28kph 24kph 20kph

Volume-capacity ratio of intersections (where all roads in the intersection are defined trunk roads)

For roundabout intersections: a maximum degree of saturation (volume capacity ratio) of 0.8 for any hour. For signalised intersections: a maximum degree of saturation (volume capacity ratio) 1.0 for any hour.

(2) Design the trunk road network to comply with:

(a) City Plan Policy – Land Development Guidelines of City Plan, City of Gold Coast (b) Austroads Guidelines (c) Road Planning and Design Manual, Department of Transport and Main Roads (d) The design standards stated in the LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Transport Network document:

(i) Table 2.2-2 Speed Environment and Nominal Lane Widths for Trunk Roads (ii) Table 2.2-3 Edge Treatments and Minimum Intersection Spacing for Trunk Roads (iii) Table 2.2-4 Desirable Access Management and Preferred Intersections Controls for Trunk

Roads (iv) Table 2.2-5 Turning Traffic Provisions and Parking Provisions for Trunk Roads

4.4.4 Public parks and land for community facilities network

(1) The key desired standards of service for the public parks and land for community facilities network are stated in Table 4.4-4.

Table 4.4-4: Key desired standards of service for the public parks and community facilities network

Parameter Standard

Rate of provision See table 4.4-5

Accessibility See table 4.4-6

Minimum size See table 4.4-7

Flood immunity See table 4.4-8

Maximum grades See table 4.4-9

Level of embellishment See tables 4.4-10 and 4.4-11

Table 4.4-5: Rate of provision

Park type Parks provision rate (ha/ 1,000 people)

City Wide Northern Zone Southern Zone

Local Recreation Park 0.8 0.8

District Recreation Park 0.5 0.5

City Recreation Park 0.35


86 ADOPTED REPORT


Park type Parks provision rate (ha/ 1,000 people)

City Wide Northern Zone Southern Zone

District Sport Park 1 1

City Sport Park 0.5

Land for Community Facilities 0.068

Total 0.918 2.3 2.3

Overall parks provision rate 3.218

Table 4.4-6: Accessibility standards

Recreation facility category Metre (m) / Kilometre (km) (to residential catchment)

Local Recreation 500 m

District Recreation 5 km

City Recreation Citywide access

District Sport 5 km

City Sport Citywide access

Land for Community Facilities Citywide access to integrated, co-located facilities

Table 4.4-7: Minimum park size

Park type Size

Local Recreation Park 1 hectare round or square

District Recreation Park 5 hectares round or square

City Recreation Park 15 hectares round or square

District Sport Park 10 hectares round or square

City Sport Park 15 hectares round or square

Land for Community Facilities No minimum

Table 4.4-8: Minimum allowable proportion of site subject to post development flood immunity (flood free)

Park type Q5 to Q50 Q50 to Q100 Above Q100

Local Recreation Park 25% 75%

District Recreation Park 90% 10%


87 ADOPTED REPORT


Park type Q5 to Q50 Q50 to Q100 Above Q100

City Recreation Park 50% 40% 10%

District Sport Park 90% 10%

City Sport Park 50% 40% 10%

Land for Community Facilities 100%

Table 4.4-9: Maximum areas for maximum grades

Park type Maximum grade (vertical height : horizontal length) for a maximum % of the site

Local Recreation Park 1:10 for 20%

District Recreation Park 1:10 for 10%

City Recreation Park 1:10 for 20%

District Sport Park 1:10 for 20%

City Sport Park 1:10 for 20%

Land for Community Facilities 1:10 for 2%

Table 4.4-10: Recreation park embellishments (minimum standards)

Embellishment Local recreation park

District recreation park

City recreation park

Recreation linkage

Barbeques 0 2 2 0

Bike racks As required where connectivity exists or is desired

1 module 2 modules 0

Bins 1 per play node 2 4 0

Boardwalks 0 0 0 By exception

Bollards As required As required As required As required

Car parks 0 5 per ha 5 per ha 0

Community gardens By exception By exception By exception 0

Drinking fountains 0 2 4 By exception

Electricity box 0 1 2 0

Fencing and barriers By exception By exception By exception By exception


88 ADOPTED REPORT





Recreation linkage

Fishing pontoons, boat launches, etc. 0 0 By exception 0

Fitness equipment 0 As required – located on a circuit path

As required - located on a circuit path

2 items grouped per 200m as required

Garden beds As required As required As required As required

Gates As required 2 4 1

Horse step throughs 0 0 0 0

Park maintenance access and emergency vehicle access

Adjacent to all private allotments adjoining public open space and where identified on an approved Bushfire Management Plan. By exception under all other circumstances.

Irrigation systems 0 0 0 0

Lighting By exception By exception By exception By exception

Maintenance taps 0 2 4 By exception

Maintenance vehicle access driveways As required 2 3 As required

Ornamental water features 0 0 0 0

Paths As required As required As required As required

Pedestrian bridges 0 By exception By exception 0

Picnic nodes 1 1 2 0

Picnic shelter 1 4 4 0

Play nodes1 1 2 3 0

Playing fields 0 0 0 0

Primary access points As required 2 4 As required

Seats As required 5 10 1

Signage – park entrance 1 2 4 As required

Signage (other types) As required As required As required As required

Toilet blocks By exception 1 2 0

Trails 0 By exception By exception By exception

Trees Sufficient quantities to provide adequate shade canopy when trees are mature

1 Play nodes are points of activity focus within public open space; they may include elements such as natural play; community gardens; a market space or picnic area supplied with lots of natural shade. These nodes must be located at path intersections, with provision of seating for guardians.


89 ADOPTED REPORT





Recreation linkage

Turf As required As required As required As required

Water supply As required As required As required As required

Table 4.4-11: Sport park embellishments (minimum standards)

Embellishment District City

Barbeques 1 1

Bike racks 1 module 2 modules

Bins 2 4

Boardwalks 0 0

Bollards As required As required

Car parks 5 per ha 5 per ha

Community gardens 0 0

Drinking fountains 2 4

Electricity 1 2

Fencing and barriers 0 0

Fishing pontoons, platforms and boat launches

0 0

Gate 2 4

Garden beds 0 0

Horse step throughs 0 0

Park maintenance access and emergency vehicle access

Located for the most direct, unobstructed, all weather access to playing surface

Irrigation systems 1 1

Lighting As required As required

Maintenance taps 2 4

Maintenance vehicle access driveway gates

2 3

Ornamental water features 0 0

Paths 200m 400m

Pedestrian bridges 0 0

Picnic nodes 0 0

Picnic shelters 4 4

Play nodes 1 2


90 ADOPTED REPORT


Embellishment District City

Playing fields 0 0

Primary public access points – entry statements

0 0

Primary public access points – pedestrian

2 4

Seats 5 10

Sewer Minimum of 1 Minimum of 1

Signage – park entrance 2 4

Signage – (other types) 0 1

Toilet blocks 1 2

Trails 0 0

Trees 80 150

Turf 90,000m2 145,000m2

Water supply 0 0

4.5 Plans for trunk infrastructure (1) The plans for trunk infrastructure identify the trunk infrastructure networks intended to service the

existing and assumed future urban development at the desired standard of service up to the planning horizon for each trunk infrastructure network shown in Table 4.5-1: Planning horizon for a trunk infrastructure network.

Table 4.5-1: Planning horizon for a trunk infrastructure network

Column 1

Trunk infrastructure network

Column 2

Planning horizon

Water supply 2066

Sewerage 2066

Transport 2031

Public parks and land for community facilities 2031

4.5.1 Plans for trunk infrastructure maps

(1) The existing and future trunk infrastructure networks are shown on the following maps in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables:

(a) Local government infrastructure plan map LGIP- PFTI-WAT-0 to LGIP-PFTI-WAT-53 – Plan for trunk water supply infrastructure

(b) Local government infrastructure plan map LGIP- PFTI-SEW-SCT-0 to LGIP-PFTI-SEW-SCT-53 – Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (sewage collection and treatment)

(c) Local government infrastructure plan map LGIP- PFTI-SEW-RWR-0 to LGIP-PFTI-SEW-RWR-44 - Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (recycled water release).


91 ADOPTED REPORT


(d) Local government infrastructure plan map LGIP- PFTI-TRN-0 to LGIP-PFTI-TRN-17 – Plan for trunk transport infrastructure

(e) Local government infrastructure plan map LGIP- PFTI-REC-0 to LGIP-PFTI-REC-17 – Plan for trunk parks and land for community facilities infrastructure.

(2) The State infrastructure forming part of transport trunk infrastructure network has been identified using information provided by the relevant State infrastructure supplier.

4.5.2 Schedules of works

(1) Details of the existing and future trunk infrastructure networks are identified in the electronic Excel schedule of works model which can be viewed here: City Plan link.

(2) The future trunk infrastructure is identified in the following tables in Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables:

(a) for the water supply network, Table SC3.2-1: Water supply network schedule of works

(b) for the sewerage network, Table SC3.2-2: Sewerage network schedule of works

(c) for the transport network, Table SC3.2-3: Transport network schedule of works

(d) for the public parks and land for community facilities network, Table SC3.2-4: Public parks and land for community facilities schedule of works.

Editor’s note ─ Extrinsic material

The below table identifies the documents that assist in the interpretation of the Local government infrastructure plan and are extrinsic material under the Statutory Instruments Act 1992.

Table 4.6-1: List of extrinsic material

Column 1

Title of document

Column 2

Date

Column 3

Author

Link to document

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Planning Assumptions

June 2017 City of Gold Coast

To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Priority Infrastructure Area June 2017 City of Gold Coast

To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Water supply network


To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Sewerage network


To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Transport network


To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Public parks and land for community facilities network


To be uploaded

City of Gold Coast Council LGIP Extrinsic Material Report Financial Methodologies


To be uploaded


92 ADOPTED REPORT


Schedule 3 Local government infrastructure plan mapping and tables

SC3.1 Planning assumption tables

Table SC3.1-1: Existing and projected population

Column 1 Projection area

Column 2 LGIP development type

Column 3 Existing and projected population

2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Arundel

Detached dwellings 8,283 8,283 8,283 8,283 11,699

Attached dwellings 1,972 1,972 1,972 1,972 1,982

Tourist residential 0 0 0 0 0

Total 10,255 10,255 10,255 10,255 13,681

Ashmore




Total 12,393 12,731 13,755 14,544 17,405

Benowa




Total 8,394 9,424 9,763 10,344 12,698

Biggera Waters



Tourist residential 9 6 567 567 1,043

Total 6,686 7,236 9,038 10,048 18,171

Broadbeach Waters




Total 8,424 8,494 11,023 11,418 11,543

Bundall




Total 4,552 5,000 5,806 6,716 8,069

Burleigh Heads




Total 8,874 9,948 10,943 10,962 11,062

Burleigh Waters





93 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 14,143 14,143 14,143 15,025 18,849

Carrara




Total 15,248 16,213 16,959 17,756 21,162

Clear Island Waters




Total 4,490 4,668 4,810 4,846 8,716

Coolangatta

Detached dwellings 1,068 683 650 650 650


Tourist residential 2,444 2,685 2,703 2,703 3,062

Total 8,762 10,001 10,201 10,201 10,919

Coombabah




Total 10,668 10,668 10,730 11,234 14,743

Coomera




Total 16,630 28,547 42,938 42,938 70,561

Currumbin - Tugun



Tourist residential 376 1,302 2,250 3,139 3,142

Total 11,020 13,228 14,760 15,894 16,391

Currumbin Valley - Tallebudgera


Attached dwellings 409 419 419 419 419


Total 7,105 7,151 7,364 7,472 8,675

Currumbin Waters




Total 9,844 11,157 11,472 11,579 12,306

Elanora





94 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 12,348 12,404 12,404 12,406 12,936

Guanaba - Springbrook




Total 4,208 4,409 4,609 4,609 6,598

Helensvale




Total 19,091 20,588 24,098 29,979 36,695

Highland Park




Total 8,992 8,992 8,992 9,666 11,887

Hope Island




Total 10,208 13,395 17,307 19,283 19,283

Jacobs Well - Alberton


Attached dwellings 530 4,017 4,017 4,017 4,367


Total 3,893 7,668 7,668 7,668 8,710

Labrador



Tourist residential 38 108 533 1,049 1,377

Total 17,012 17,783 18,428 19,749 22,496

Main Beach

Detached dwellings 205 105 3 3 3

Attached dwellings 243 837 1,041 1,041 1,041


Total 3,805 4,236 4,345 4,345 4,345

Mermaid Beach - Broadbeach

Detached dwellings 1,680 20 109 109 107



Total 16,475 22,341 24,357 25,617 26,912

Mermaid Waters





95 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 12,752 12,837 13,561 13,995 18,127

Merrimac




Total 6,345 6,383 7,259 7,310 9,381

Miami




Total 6,831 7,089 7,526 7,873 8,901

Molendinar




Total 6,525 6,530 6,530 6,530 6,533

Mudgeeraba - Bonogin




Total 18,333 18,333 18,333 18,333 25,835

Nerang - Mount Nathan




Total 21,091 22,608 24,129 28,373 36,911

Ormeau - Yatala




Total 19,432 22,011 22,011 22,128 29,183

Oxenford - Maudsland




Total 15,276 15,276 15,276 15,612 20,553

Pacific Pines - Gaven




Total 19,098 19,951 19,951 20,057 33,596

Palm Beach



Tourist residential 48 821 827 2,161 3,394


96 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 15,317 18,478 21,107 22,383 25,485

Paradise Point - Hollywell




Total 9,786 10,489 11,448 12,009 15,082

Parkwood




Total 9,226 9,226 9,229 9,229 13,105

Pimpama




Total 13,738 22,585 23,207 23,207 35,360

Reedy Creek - Andrews




Total 7,099 7,099 7,099 7,508 9,888

Robina




Total 24,568 25,950 27,828 32,543 40,290

Runaway Bay




Total 9,476 9,508 9,767 10,331 14,002

Southport




Total 35,252 39,137 45,992 52,446 83,026

Surfers Paradise




Total 42,980 46,189 54,238 59,084 89,762

Upper Coomera - Willow Vale





97 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 35,919 36,350 36,480 36,487 47,459

Varsity Lakes




Total 17,740 22,064 23,866 27,497 31,913

Worongary - Tallai




Total 7,981 11,410 15,550 17,464 17,464

Inside Priority Infrastructure Area




Total 588,674 658,299 724,259 772,499 1,005,976

Outside Priority Infrastructure Area




Total 19,612 21,883 22,295 22,455 30,693

Total Local Government Area




Total 608,286 680,182 746,554 794,954 1,036,669


98 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-2: Existing and projected employees



Column 3 Existing and projected employees

2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Arundel

Commercial 500 900 1,219 1,414 1,886

Community purpose 736 807 916 1,049 1,400

Industry 1,317 1,459 1,550 1,501 2,002

Retail 596 742 929 1,079 1,439

Other 215 772 1,321 1,950 2,601

Total 3,364 4,680 5,936 6,993 9,329

Ashmore

Commercial 944 1,381 1,616 1,449 1,735

Community purpose 1,589 1,612 1,639 1,641 1,964

Industry 1,352 1,401 1,392 1,371 1,641

Retail 1,248 1,374 1,460 1,430 1,711

Other 67 182 146 112 134

Total 5,198 5,951 6,252 6,004 7,185

Benowa

Commercial 936 1,247 1,426 1,375 1,688


Industry 1,338 1,338 1,338 1,338 1,643

Retail 1,187 1,255 1,293 1,287 1,580

Other 0 1 1 1 1

Total 5,044 5,431 5,668 5,611 6,888

Biggera Waters

Commercial 836 1,022 1,160 1,253 2,266

Community purpose 679 711 759 802 1,450

Industry 1,310 1,322 1,322 1,312 2,372

Retail 2,572 3,021 3,591 4,053 7,329

Other 21 49 44 25 45

Total 5,418 6,124 6,875 7,444 13,462

Broadbeach Waters

Commercial 560 786 807 800 809

Community purpose 481 542 616 567 573

Industry 564 564 564 564 570

Retail 2,599 2,749 2,903 2,836 2,867

Other 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4,204 4,641 4,890 4,767 4,819

Bundall

Commercial 3,710 5,005 5,408 5,326 6,399



99 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Industry 2,023 2,063 2,090 2,082 2,502

Retail 2,458 2,844 3,239 3,350 4,025

Other 46 86 147 305 366

Total 9,550 11,466 12,486 12,709 15,269

Burleigh Heads

Commercial 1,924 3,028 3,444 3,521 3,553


Industry 6,595 6,749 6,831 6,844 6,907

Retail 2,609 2,905 3,109 3,162 3,191

Other 277 697 933 974 983

Total 12,977 14,986 16,071 16,289 16,438

Burleigh Waters

Commercial 791 1,035 1,096 999 1,253


Industry 1,002 1,030 1,032 1,007 1,264

Retail 1,733 1,832 1,936 1,881 2,359

Other 40 84 74 47 59

Total 4,382 4,800 4,975 4,775 5,990

Carrara

Commercial 494 647 660 601 716


Industry 1,457 1,536 1,610 1,544 1,840

Retail 693 807 878 905 1,078

Other 85 150 156 115 137

Total 3,666 4,087 4,273 4,133 4,925

Clear Island Waters

Commercial 228 334 354 316 568


Industry 230 230 230 230 413

Retail 377 377 377 377 678

Other 2 0 0 0 0

Total 1,119 1,235 1,273 1,232 2,216

Coolangatta

Commercial 1,053 1,659 2,017 2,211 2,367


Industry 405 407 406 404 432

Retail 1,537 1,646 1,798 1,845 1,974

Other 3 8 5 0 0

Total 3,697 4,418 4,924 5,157 5,520


100 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Coombabah

Commercial 229 306 365 373 490


Industry 334 342 345 342 449

Retail 116 128 131 132 174

Other 21 59 63 45 59

Total 1,103 1,249 1,333 1,332 1,748

Coomera

Commercial 524 1,096 1,755 2,478 4,073


Industry 1,628 1,893 2,020 2,022 3,323

Retail 1,010 2,064 3,253 5,159 8,478

Other 428 1,637 2,462 3,332 5,476

Total 4,909 8,076 11,097 14,685 24,131

Currumbin - Tugun

Commercial 1,068 1,834 2,271 2,472 2,550


Industry 1,870 1,918 1,976 2,025 2,089

Retail 1,104 1,244 1,387 1,462 1,507

Other 65 179 323 455 469

Total 6,216 7,543 8,689 9,425 9,720


Commercial 308 519 621 623 724


Industry 682 683 683 681 791

Retail 201 227 258 276 320

Other 9 13 12 7 9

Total 1,770 2,055 2,217 2,252 2,615

Currumbin Waters

Commercial 295 472 589 644 685


Industry 2,046 2,193 2,297 2,211 2,349

Retail 410 477 579 655 696

Other 171 537 768 1,066 1,133

Total 3,327 4,090 4,663 5,018 5,333

Elanora

Commercial 482 704 804 769 802

Community purpose 770 829 920 1,011 1,055

Industry 504 505 504 504 526


101 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Retail 1,006 1,077 1,148 1,135 1,183

Other 1 3 0 0 0

Total 2,764 3,118 3,375 3,419 3,565


Commercial 141 248 333 411 589


Industry 384 389 389 385 552

Retail 182 220 264 294 421

Other 4 18 17 8 12

Total 919 1,098 1,245 1,349 1,931

Helensvale

Commercial 1,226 2,374 3,359 4,890 5,986


Industry 1,618 1,682 1,680 1,665 2,038

Retail 2,478 2,802 3,192 3,410 4,174

Other 154 503 602 624 764

Total 6,748 8,859 10,967 12,793 15,659

Highland Park

Commercial 527 798 881 789 971


Industry 840 835 835 835 1,026

Retail 459 453 453 453 558

Other 25 12 0 2 2

Total 2,242 2,485 2,709 2,696 3,315

Hope Island

Commercial 847 1,225 1,288 1,204 1,204


Industry 1,217 1,229 1,229 1,220 1,220

Retail 1,157 1,279 1,411 1,449 1,449

Other 21 50 47 26 26

Total 3,807 4,372 4,586 4,502 4,502


Commercial 182 418 696 928 1,054


Industry 876 980 1,098 1,206 1,370

Retail 237 352 527 714 811

Other 26 70 113 168 191

Total 1,581 2,201 2,877 3,531 4,011

Labrador Commercial 421 885 858 642 731


102 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development


Industry 1,606 1,614 1,605 1,610 1,833

Retail 869 1,009 1,264 1,186 1,351

Other 18 40 18 28 32

Total 3,744 4,404 4,621 4,344 4,948

Main Beach

Commercial 396 523 564 513 513


Industry 341 344 344 342 342

Retail 1,884 2,066 2,294 2,358 2,358

Other 13 26 27 20 20

Total 3,656 3,980 4,250 4,254 4,254


Commercial 2,098 2,844 3,371 3,302 3,469


Industry 1,443 1,450 1,454 1,450 1,524

Retail 4,264 4,574 4,831 4,751 4,991

Other 7 26 35 26 27

Total 11,329 12,629 13,350 13,158 13,824

Mermaid Waters

Commercial 518 722 800 751 973


Industry 537 540 536 536 694

Retail 932 1,008 1,069 1,010 1,308

Other 6 12 1 1 2

Total 2,649 2,955 3,104 3,014 3,904

Merrimac

Commercial 341 439 526 534 685


Industry 957 958 958 958 1,229

Retail 432 447 456 453 581

Other 1 5 4 4 5

Total 2,384 2,592 2,790 2,878 3,694

Miami

Commercial 562 735 815 779 881


Industry 578 578 578 580 655

Retail 897 1,002 1,072 1,078 1,219


103 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Other 8 7 9 13 14

Total 2,658 2,978 3,168 3,147 3,558

Molendinar

Commercial 523 869 1,045 1,118 1,119

Community purpose 708 880 1,120 1,210 1,211

Industry 6,290 6,399 6,394 6,362 6,365

Retail 889 984 1,056 1,029 1,030

Other 161 486 520 399 400

Total 8,571 9,618 10,135 10,120 10,125


Commercial 623 912 1,192 1,217 1,715

Community purpose 883 1,007 1,101 1,108 1,561

Industry 952 973 950 946 1,333

Retail 609 691 744 771 1,086

Other 33 81 23 19 26

Total 3,100 3,663 4,011 4,061 5,723


Commercial 2,646 4,034 4,581 4,700 6,115


Industry 4,143 4,177 4,188 4,183 5,441

Retail 2,402 2,668 2,961 2,945 3,831

Other 84 172 201 187 244

Total 11,045 12,936 13,880 13,997 18,210

Ormeau - Yatala

Commercial 1,611 3,955 6,307 8,284 10,924

Community purpose 911 998 1,147 1,278 1,686

Industry 8,617 9,942 11,274 12,762 16,830

Retail 2,258 3,740 5,747 7,904 10,424

Other 461 1,334 1,906 2,364 3,117

Total 13,858 19,968 26,382 32,592 42,982


Commercial 526 731 790 757 996


Industry 994 998 998 997 1,313

Retail 797 934 883 878 1,156

Other 19 21 19 19 25

Total 4,527 5,003 5,287 5,221 6,874


Commercial 505 827 909 844 1,414

Community 572 584 604 619 1,036


104 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

purpose

Industry 1,395 1,395 1,391 1,391 2,330

Retail 425 554 733 842 1,410

Other 17 20 6 5 8

Total 2,914 3,380 3,644 3,700 6,198

Palm Beach

Commercial 1,032 1,519 1,731 1,776 2,022

Community purpose 989 1,004 1,040 1,051 1,197

Industry 547 550 553 553 630

Retail 875 971 1,094 1,155 1,315

Other 11 19 28 27 31

Total 3,454 4,063 4,446 4,563 5,195


Commercial 581 792 779 671 843


Industry 627 631 632 629 790

Retail 840 888 903 882 1,107

Other 17 44 44 28 35

Total 2,334 2,640 2,669 2,514 3,157

Parkwood

Commercial 276 361 370 342 486


Industry 850 857 859 855 1,214

Retail 366 384 406 404 574

Other 23 59 57 36 52

Total 1,994 2,152 2,211 2,168 3,079

Pimpama

Commercial 255 587 687 754 1,149


Industry 1,571 1,571 1,571 1,571 2,394

Retail 202 202 730 756 1,151

Other 0 0 200 219 333

Total 2,506 2,981 3,944 4,212 6,418


Commercial 207 301 332 317 417


Industry 315 314 314 314 413

Retail 193 193 195 195 256

Other 3 1 1 1 1


105 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Total 1,499 1,590 1,633 1,620 2,133

Robina

Commercial 3,780 6,093 7,925 9,063 11,221


Industry 1,940 1,945 1,945 1,942 2,405

Retail 4,011 4,904 5,676 6,222 7,703

Other 29 46 45 37 46

Total 13,554 16,957 19,709 21,441 26,545

Runaway Bay

Commercial 852 1,160 1,167 1,025 1,389


Industry 939 939 939 939 1,273

Retail 1,309 1,419 1,541 1,474 1,998

Other 1 0 0 0 0

Total 3,912 4,339 4,498 4,297 5,824

Southport

Commercial 8,597 14,586 19,769 23,838 37,737


Industry 5,713 5,790 5,793 5,758 9,115

Retail 6,494 7,290 8,278 8,692 13,760

Other 232 502 504 524 830

Total 32,889 40,843 48,120 53,448 84,612

Surfers Paradise

Commercial 5,273 6,941 7,085 6,558 9,963


Industry 3,205 3,207 3,206 3,201 4,864

Retail 6,530 7,079 7,921 8,171 12,414

Other 61 65 62 51 78

Total 16,899 19,156 20,154 19,842 30,144


Commercial 522 1,096 1,693 2,212 2,877


Industry 1,295 1,338 1,412 1,458 1,896

Retail 830 1,211 1,761 2,385 3,102

Other 216 793 1,090 1,290 1,678

Total 3,993 5,593 7,277 8,774 11,412

Varsity Lakes

Commercial 1,113 1,731 1,961 1,995 2,315



106 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Industry 1,580 1,609 1,621 1,610 1,868

Retail 608 756 951 1,045 1,213

Other 60 156 158 106 123

Total 4,106 5,022 5,499 5,563 6,456

Worongary - Tallai

Commercial 327 398 388 370 370


Industry 615 615 615 615 615

Retail 319 319 319 319 319

Other 0 0 0 0 0

Total 1,728 1,845 1,875 1,858 1,858


Commercial 47,415 74,283 90,927 99,709 132,705

Community purpose

50,816 53,529 58,098 59,959 78,623

Industry 66,437 70,114 72,537 74,002 93,501

Retail 61,844 71,332 82,675 89,565 117,519

Other 2,761 7,972 10,804 13,056 17,441

Total 229,272 277,231 315,041 336,291 439,790


Commercial 3,974 5,797 6,887 7,501 9,984

Community purpose

6,094 6,972 7,380 7,967 10,448

Industry 10,207 9,364 9,014 8,851 11,181

Retail 3,359 3,836 4,327 4,681 6,142

Other 401 1,052 1,388 1,612 2,154

Total 24,035 27,021 28,997 30,611 39,908


Commercial 51,389 80,080 97,814 107,210 142,689


Industry 76,643 79,479 81,551 82,853 104,682

Retail 65,203 75,168 87,002 94,246 123,661

Other 3,162 9,024 12,192 14,668 19,595

Total 253,307 304,252 344,038 366,902 479,698


107 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-3: Planned density and demand generation rate for a trunk infrastructure network

Column 1

Area classification

Column 2


Column 3

Planned density

Column 4

Demand generation rate for a trunk infrastructure network

Non-residential plot ratio

Residential density

(dwellings/ dev ha)

Water supply network

(EP/dev ha)

Sewerage network

(EP/dev ha)

Transport network

(VTPD/dev ha)

Public parks and land for community facilities network*

(EP/dev ha)

Residential development

Low density residential

Detached dwellings 0 20 54.6 54.6 180 54.6

Low density residential – large lot precinct


Medium density residential

Attached dwellings, Detached dwellings (Any ‘Code Assessable’ Non-residential development within this zone, will be accommodated utilising the Residential Planned density)

RD1 0 25 68.3 68.3 112.5 68.3

RD2 33 56.8 56.8 148.5 56.8

RD3 40 68.8 68.8 180 68.8

RD4 50 86.0 86.0 225 86.0

RD5 100 150.2 150.2 450 150.2

RD6 150 225.2 225.2 675 225.2

RD7 200 300.3 300.3 900 300.3

RD8 385 578.1 578.1 1,732.5 578.1

High density residential

Attached dwellings, Tourist residential (Any ‘Code Assessable’ Non-residential development within this zone, will be accommodated utilising the Residential Planned density)

RD2 0 33 56.8 56.8 148.5 56.8

RD3 40 68.8 68.8 180 68.8

RD4 50 86.0 86.0 225 86.0

RD5 100 163.8 163.8 450 163.8

RD6 150 245.7 245.7 675 245.7

RD7 200 327.6 327.6 900 327.6

RD8 385 630.6 630.6 1,732.5 630.6

RDX 694 1073.0 1073.0 3,123 1073.0

Emerging Communities


Rural Residential Detached dwellings 0 2.5 6.8 0 22.5 6.8

Township Detached dwellings 0 16 43.7 43.7 144 43.7

Mixed development


108 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Area classification

Column 2


Column 3

Planned density

Column 4



Residential density

(dwellings/ dev ha)


(EP/dev ha)

Sewerage network

(EP/dev ha)

Transport network

(VTPD/dev ha)


(EP/dev ha)

Centre Attached dwellings, Retail, Commercial

RD2 0.85 33 56.8 56.8 148.5 56.8

RD3 40 68.8 68.8 180 68.8

RD4 50 86.0 86.0 225 86.0

RD4A

66 113.5 113.5 297 113.5

RD5 100 150.2 150.2 450 163.8

RD6 150 225.2 225.2 675 245.7

RD7 200 300.3 300.3 900 327.6

RD8 385 578.1 578.1 1,732.5 630.6

RDX 694 1073.0 1073.0 3,123 1073.0

Neighbourhood Centre

Retail, Commercial 0.6 25 43.7 43.7 112.5 43.8

Mixed Use Attached dwellings, Retail, Commercial

RD2 0.55 33 56.8 56.8 148.5 56.8

RD3 40 68.8 68.8 180 68.8

RD4 50 86.0 86.0 225 86.0

RD5 100 150.2 150.2 450 163.8

RD6 150 225.2 225.2 675 245.7

RD7 200 300.3 300.3 900 327.6

RD8 385 578.1 578.1 1,732.5 630.6

RDX 694 1073.0 1073.0 3,123 1073.0

Non-residential development

Sport and Recreation

Community purpose, Retail, Commercial

0 0 54.6 54.6 0.4/m² TUA*

0

Open Space Community purpose 0 0 0.8 0.1 0

Conservation Community purpose 0 0 0 0 0

Rural Rural 0 0 0 0 0.05/m² TUA

0

Low Impact Industry

Industry 0.5 0 43.7 43.7 0.05/m² TUA

0

Medium Impact Industry

Industry 0.5

0 43.7 43.7 0.05/m² TUA

0


109 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Area classification

Column 2


Column 3

Planned density

Column 4



Residential density

(dwellings/ dev ha)


(EP/dev ha)

Sewerage network

(EP/dev ha)

Transport network

(VTPD/dev ha)


(EP/dev ha)

High Impact Industry

Industry 0.5 0 43.7 43.7 0.05/m² TUA

0

Extractive industry

Other 0 0 0 0 0.05/m² TUA

0

Waterfront and Marine Industry

Industry 0.4 0 27.3 27.3 0.05/m² TUA

0

Community Facilities

Community purpose 0.05 0 41.0 41.0 0.4/m² TUA

0

Special Purpose Community purpose, Retail, Commercial

Site specific

0 Site specific Site specific

0.4/m² TUA

0

Major Tourism Other Site specific

Site specific Site specific Site specific

0.05/m² TUA

0

Innovation Community purpose, Retail, Commercial

Site specific

0 54.6 54.6 0.4/m² TUA

0

Limited Development

Community purpose 0 0 0.8 0.1 0.4/m² TUA

0

* TUA – Total Use Area as defined in the City Plan SC1.2 Administrative definitions.


110 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-4: Existing and projected residential dwellings



Column 3 Existing and projected dwellings

2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Development

Arundel



Total 3,925 3,899 3,904 3,900 5,162

Ashmore



Total 5,276 5,347 5,743 6,137 7,273

Benowa



Total 3,322 3,670 3,796 4,022 4,895

Biggera Waters



Total 3,576 3,756 4,649 5,222 9,457

Broadbeach Waters



Total 3,769 3,786 4,911 5,079 5,115

Bundall


Attached dwellings 611 611 621 620 1,253

Total 1,987 2,154 2,488 2,861 3,488

Burleigh Heads



Total 5,070 5,567 6,046 6,047 6,036

Burleigh Waters



Total 6,098 6,020 6,003 6,427 8,029

Carrara



Total 6,717 6,986 7,210 7,503 8,739

Clear Island Waters



Total 2,116 2,154 2,201 2,215 4,018

Coolangatta



Total 5,974 6,612 6,584 6,573 6,951

Coombabah



Total 5,210 5,073 5,043 5,276 6,896


111 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Development

Coomera



Total 6,057 10,750 16,211 16,185 26,446

Currumbin - Tugun



Total 5,854 7,073 7,868 8,512 8,690




Total 2,638 2,656 2,748 2,785 3,209

Currumbin Waters



Total 4,103 4,720 4,828 4,864 5,117

Elanora



Total 4,906 4,906 4,920 4,915 5,129




Total 1,907 2,006 2,114 2,112 3,012

Helensvale



Total 7,410 7,885 9,232 11,386 14,037

Highland Park



Total 3,467 3,455 3,466 3,720 4,544

Hope Island



Total 5,721 7,274 9,234 10,256 10,149




Total 1,685 3,362 3,328 3,323 3,744

Labrador



Total 8,890 8,973 9,143 9,846 11,160

Main Beach



Total 2,719 2,908 2,917 2,912 2,873

Mermaid Beach - Detached dwellings 890 11 59 58 57


112 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Development

Broadbeach Attached dwellings 10,790 15,513 16,403 17,225 17,859

Total 11,680 15,524 16,462 17,284 17,916

Mermaid Waters



Total 5,767 5,718 6,047 6,283 7,935

Merrimac



Total 2,496 2,463 2,778 2,794 3,565

Miami

Detached dwellings 1,287 1,297 1,252 1,091 936


Total 3,463 3,506 3,698 3,906 4,424

Molendinar



Total 2,373 2,365 2,372 2,369 2,360




Total 6,648 6,619 6,637 6,630 9,272




Total 8,717 9,176 9,733 11,450 15,314

Ormeau - Yatala



Total 6,863 7,729 7,764 7,796 10,238




Total 5,725 5,671 5,668 5,777 7,598




Total 6,540 6,734 6,689 6,719 11,396

Palm Beach



Total 7,939 9,687 11,232 11,983 13,500




Total 5,022 5,353 5,798 6,136 7,769

Parkwood Detached dwellings 2,923 2,938 2,965 2,962 4,301



113 ADOPTED REPORT





2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Development

Total 3,208 3,209 3,228 3,225 4,559

Pimpama



Total 5,597 9,731 9,943 9,930 14,952




Total 2,544 2,513 2,506 2,639 3,474

Robina



Total 10,240 10,686 11,401 13,403 16,463

Runaway Bay



Total 4,803 4,721 4,805 5,111 7,040

Southport



Total 18,378 19,810 23,074 26,417 41,459

Surfers Paradise



Total 31,096 31,992 36,468 39,645 59,787




Total 12,185 12,354 12,475 12,465 16,255

Varsity Lakes



Total 7,730 9,444 10,035 11,709 13,460

Worongary - Tallai



Total 2,802 4,016 5,511 6,183 6,163




Total 272,461 301,078 329,767 352,747 456,696




Total 7,753 8,936 9,145 9,186 12,371




Total 280,214 310,014 338,912 361,933 469,067


114 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-5: Existing and projected non-residential floor space

Column 1 Projection Area

Column 2 LGIP Development Type

Column 3

Existing and projected non-residential floor space

2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Arundel

Commercial 18,148 34,827 49,877 58,992 78,700


Industry 105,433 129,621 150,126 145,509 194,121

Retail 14,464 18,821 24,373 28,837 38,470

Other 107,119 116,130 126,100 140,597 187,568

Total 252,550 309,289 364,181 392,295 523,353

Ashmore

Commercial 29,331 42,093 48,846 44,673 53,461


Industry 45,114 50,873 49,717 48,044 57,495

Retail 51,002 54,788 57,343 56,441 67,544

Other 49,012 53,377 51,408 53,260 63,737

Total 189,577 217,083 224,188 219,382 262,537

Benowa

Commercial 21,708 31,781 37,003 35,523 43,607


Industry 12 61 75 37 45

Retail 7,616 9,631 10,747 10,543 12,942

Other 14 67 82 40 50

Total 45,360 57,811 64,878 63,140 77,508

Biggera Waters

Commercial 10,369 15,781 19,896 22,432 40,566


Industry 42,559 43,766 43,766 42,736 77,285

Retail 40,175 53,542 70,534 84,298 152,446

Other 45,353 45,130 44,690 44,910 81,216

Total 147,610 168,491 190,838 207,831 375,845

Broadbeach Waters

Commercial 3,290 9,538 9,895 9,508 9,612


Industry 1,856 1,856 1,856 1,856 1,876

Retail 102,361 106,863 111,477 109,454 110,653

Other 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,975

Total 111,792 124,664 132,229 128,100 129,502

Bundall Commercial 44,255 79,028 91,036 89,294 107,283


115 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate


Industry 36,202 41,060 45,143 44,527 53,498

Retail 112,423 123,755 135,338 138,509 166,413

Other 44,331 45,437 49,566 83,603 100,446

Total 242,603 300,117 336,567 372,992 448,135

Burleigh Heads

Commercial 34,512 66,586 78,289 80,183 80,914


Industry 184,382 201,515 212,022 213,723 215,673

Retail 101,401 110,250 116,302 117,864 118,939

Other 192,268 197,560 203,364 204,657 206,524

Total 526,125 590,700 629,943 637,550 643,366

Burleigh Waters

Commercial 14,022 21,609 24,090 21,589 27,084


Industry 13,630 16,133 16,519 13,942 17,491

Retail 42,385 45,334 48,461 46,790 58,698

Other 15,683 15,000 13,823 14,369 18,026

Total 95,657 108,150 113,526 107,488 134,844

Carrara

Commercial 23,139 28,060 28,641 26,836 31,984


Industry 52,580 59,957 67,220 60,980 72,677

Retail 34,091 37,494 39,599 40,401 48,151

Other 54,879 54,996 55,637 56,699 67,575

Total 187,275 203,476 214,829 208,604 248,619

Clear Island Waters

Commercial 6,014 9,384 9,771 8,661 15,578


Industry 394 263 263 263 472

Retail 440 417 417 417 750

Other 421 276 276 276 497

Total 12,903 16,446 17,465 16,250 29,226

Coolangatta

Commercial 17,689 32,838 41,660 46,408 49,674


Industry 1,883 2,149 1,959 1,669 1,786

Retail 57,201 60,414 64,896 66,244 70,907


116 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Other 1,991 2,284 2,075 1,757 1,880

Total 90,479 109,421 122,307 127,787 136,782

Coombabah

Commercial 4,835 7,045 8,795 9,098 11,940


Industry 29,447 30,557 31,297 31,045 40,743

Retail 6,908 7,279 7,365 7,406 9,719

Other 30,637 31,880 32,877 33,048 43,370

Total 76,446 81,710 85,804 86,419 113,413

Coomera

Commercial 10,584 25,651 44,544 66,205 108,797


Industry 75,318 107,253 131,160 145,574 239,225

Retail 34,611 66,035 101,424 158,279 260,103

Other 73,864 80,201 91,895 108,621 178,499

Total 200,051 287,141 384,774 497,423 817,426

Currumbin - Tugun

Commercial 52,411 76,559 91,902 100,634 103,781


Industry 9,297 16,605 25,509 33,359 34,402

Retail 42,487 46,662 50,862 53,086 54,746

Other 9,903 17,560 27,253 36,115 37,244

Total 134,761 187,071 237,964 275,402 284,014


Commercial 19,323 25,559 28,543 28,565 33,163


Industry 48,553 48,752 48,713 48,431 56,227

Retail 4,396 5,165 6,095 6,625 7,691

Other 51,135 51,352 51,309 51,000 59,211

Total 145,571 154,516 159,407 160,110 185,885

Currumbin Waters

Commercial 16,159 23,166 28,463 30,891 32,831


Industry 79,740 95,213 110,878 107,686 114,448

Retail 17,613 19,608 22,673 24,948 26,514

Other 83,467 86,830 93,347 106,612 113,306

Total 207,850 235,915 267,113 282,298 300,024

Elanora Commercial 6,656 12,971 16,151 15,342 15,998


117 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate


Industry 2,143 2,248 2,073 2,073 2,161

Retail 14,349 16,474 18,585 18,194 18,971

Other 2,259 2,374 2,182 2,182 2,275

Total 31,154 41,849 49,954 51,968 54,188


Commercial 15,053 18,336 20,860 23,175 33,174


Industry 43,842 44,696 44,650 44,104 63,133

Retail 23,105 24,250 25,550 26,461 37,877

Other 46,160 47,097 47,046 46,448 66,488

Total 142,777 149,475 153,883 156,246 223,661

Helensvale

Commercial 27,300 59,698 86,360 125,331 153,408


Industry 40,762 51,933 52,269 51,125 62,578

Retail 64,630 74,275 85,847 92,276 112,948

Other 39,990 40,470 40,459 41,942 51,338

Total 186,342 247,957 308,772 356,950 436,915

Highland Park

Commercial 7,394 17,377 18,961 15,873 19,520


Industry 2,438 1,635 1,635 1,635 2,011

Retail 17,204 17,051 17,051 17,051 20,969

Other 5,297 4,268 1,721 2,124 2,612

Total 34,975 42,806 47,210 47,191 58,034

Hope Island

Commercial 26,852 37,618 39,662 37,129 37,129


Industry 19,411 21,274 21,185 19,844 19,844

Retail 54,513 58,112 62,015 63,132 63,132

Other 21,148 22,974 22,428 21,177 21,177

Total 141,620 160,493 166,607 162,300 162,300


Commercial 6,753 13,213 21,315 27,979 31,784


Industry 30,180 41,162 54,953 68,433 77,738

Retail 28,876 32,312 37,507 43,060 48,916


118 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Other 28,282 30,214 34,309 41,035 46,615

Total 98,880 125,915 159,300 194,230 220,640

Labrador

Commercial 21,060 34,063 33,099 27,453 31,272


Industry 7,259 8,585 7,221 7,873 8,969

Retail 49,864 54,040 61,664 59,297 67,545

Other 7,692 9,146 7,649 8,365 9,529

Total 99,447 120,317 124,816 118,270 134,721

Main Beach

Commercial 11,245 14,390 15,415 14,181 14,181


Industry 10,126 10,282 10,317 10,091 10,091

Retail 19,850 25,217 31,908 33,835 33,835

Other 5,552 5,733 5,749 6,003 6,003

Total 58,655 67,493 75,280 76,020 76,020


Commercial 25,035 44,441 58,113 56,229 59,072


Industry 3,489 4,663 5,278 4,673 4,909

Retail 147,659 156,832 164,408 161,986 170,174

Other 3,625 4,893 5,474 4,830 5,074

Total 197,057 235,718 255,442 248,874 261,455

Mermaid Waters

Commercial 10,386 16,200 18,835 17,964 23,267


Industry 4,690 5,106 4,464 4,470 5,790

Retail 22,390 24,656 26,467 24,692 31,983

Other 5,371 5,822 4,924 4,929 6,385

Total 50,640 60,185 63,976 61,957 80,250

Merrimac

Commercial 18,177 21,190 23,698 23,875 30,638


Industry 8,706 8,922 8,904 8,885 11,402

Retail 7,278 7,712 7,997 7,890 10,126

Other 9,167 9,405 9,384 9,364 12,017

Total 66,701 73,731 80,051 83,057 106,588

Miami Commercial 12,763 17,385 19,567 18,658 21,095


119 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate


Industry 12,025 12,005 12,056 12,250 13,849

Retail 28,378 31,502 33,557 33,743 38,149

Other 12,482 12,453 12,479 12,577 14,219

Total 68,786 77,982 83,651 83,334 94,215

Molendinar

Commercial 6,301 18,247 24,670 27,233 27,245


Industry 214,139 225,550 224,761 217,497 217,597

Retail 27,701 30,549 32,703 31,917 31,932

Other 213,914 215,615 212,817 212,416 212,514

Total 464,730 498,677 512,058 509,325 509,559


Commercial 25,341 34,500 41,035 41,683 58,739


Industry 36,078 39,128 35,651 35,134 49,510

Retail 42,211 44,659 46,265 47,066 66,325

Other 37,913 41,219 37,177 37,019 52,167

Total 159,929 182,212 186,126 187,159 263,740


Commercial 82,357 119,681 133,972 136,437 177,494


Industry 132,787 137,910 139,752 138,841 180,621

Retail 87,812 95,747 104,508 104,006 135,304

Other 140,035 146,279 147,853 147,195 191,488

Total 476,059 536,737 565,430 566,988 737,606

Ormeau - Yatala

Commercial 44,179 130,209 225,701 278,796 367,670


Industry 433,224 658,998 930,526 1,276,282 1,683,136

Retail 81,130 125,376 185,326 249,764 329,384

Other 402,907 467,254 539,818 632,257 833,809

Total 966,891 1,390,310 1,895,089 2,455,402 3,238,137


Commercial 10,516 16,144 18,257 17,794 23,426


Industry 138,064 138,470 138,360 138,322 182,103

Retail 54,863 58,880 57,453 57,319 75,461


120 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Other 145,216 145,439 145,318 145,276 191,259

Total 360,589 375,346 385,540 383,908 505,421


Commercial 11,875 20,789 22,134 20,683 34,644


Industry 12,253 12,184 11,634 11,540 19,329

Retail 12,426 16,274 21,631 24,854 41,631

Other 13,743 14,522 12,845 12,688 21,253

Total 57,173 71,091 76,258 78,289 131,136

Palm Beach

Commercial 17,648 30,565 36,416 37,546 42,750


Industry 1,467 1,939 2,518 2,449 2,788

Retail 33,379 36,251 39,922 41,751 47,537

Other 1,575 2,093 2,728 2,652 3,020

Total 59,702 77,023 88,997 92,228 105,010


Commercial 11,946 18,377 17,887 14,595 18,329


Industry 20,128 20,423 20,742 20,124 25,274

Retail 14,595 16,022 16,443 15,822 19,871

Other 21,164 21,162 20,911 21,214 26,643

Total 73,059 81,765 82,703 78,211 98,225

Parkwood

Commercial 8,611 11,593 12,351 12,006 17,048


Industry 1,822 2,440 2,811 2,209 3,137

Retail 16,886 17,413 18,080 18,012 25,577

Other 1,579 1,565 1,497 1,722 2,445

Total 32,079 36,645 39,337 38,983 55,355

Pimpama

Commercial 16,969 27,120 29,835 31,842 48,515


Industry 15,354 15,366 15,352 15,352 23,392

Retail 4,186 4,188 20,007 20,787 31,672

Other 16,162 16,175 16,160 16,160 24,623

Total 68,172 83,350 106,595 114,889 175,051

Reedy Creek - Commercial 8,987 11,393 12,289 11,921 15,700


121 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Andrews Community purpose 6,156 6,211 6,528 6,607 8,701

Industry 437 271 270 270 356

Retail 12,180 12,181 12,239 12,239 16,119

Other 454 284 284 284 374

Total 28,215 30,340 31,610 31,321 41,249

Robina

Commercial 54,999 115,562 163,193 192,782 238,675


Industry 19,803 20,432 20,353 20,067 24,844

Retail 82,515 109,203 132,203 148,461 183,803

Other 20,833 21,317 21,230 21,012 26,014

Total 204,583 299,075 374,760 422,125 522,613

Runaway Bay

Commercial 11,652 19,972 20,266 16,684 22,612


Industry 349 281 281 281 381

Retail 24,817 28,109 31,762 29,744 40,313

Other 374 300 301 300 407

Total 43,925 55,761 60,776 55,450 75,153

Southport

Commercial 185,064 358,614 515,451 625,414 990,078


Industry 82,898 92,805 93,103 89,811 142,178

Retail 233,276 256,930 286,235 298,253 472,157

Other 88,857 99,377 98,063 102,578 162,389

Total 674,602 920,964 1,144,673 1,298,001 2,054,833

Surfers Paradise

Commercial 53,311 95,482 99,222 85,567 129,996


Industry 6,702 7,000 6,809 6,118 9,294

Retail 346,542 362,853 387,768 395,263 600,493

Other 7,220 7,548 7,338 6,580 9,996

Total 423,808 484,054 512,878 504,583 766,576


Commercial 26,166 41,824 60,196 76,304 99,248


Industry 64,305 72,412 87,191 96,109 125,008

Retail 38,054 49,416 65,777 84,366 109,734


122 ADOPTED REPORT




Column 3


2016 2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

Other 66,063 70,738 79,801 93,798 122,002

Total 208,777 249,407 313,826 375,211 488,033

Varsity Lakes

Commercial 32,494 49,340 55,843 56,719 65,828


Industry 19,399 23,266 25,496 24,441 28,366

Retail 20,672 25,074 30,863 33,615 39,014

Other 20,173 21,176 21,548 21,664 25,143

Total 100,038 127,010 143,202 145,881 169,309

Worongary - Tallai

Commercial 8,461 10,519 10,093 9,538 9,538


Industry 7,970 7,970 7,970 7,970 7,970

Retail 18,095 18,095 18,095 18,095 18,095

Other 8,389 8,389 8,389 8,389 8,389

Total 50,319 54,011 54,942 54,456 54,456


Commercial 1,043,849 1,823,970 2,335,213 2,581,973 3,429,058

Community purpose 528,305 634,686 791,078 862,592 1,126,444

Industry 1,836,508 2,236,315 2,601,509 2,927,517 3,738,210

Retail 2,180,569 2,463,239 2,801,122 3,006,000 3,937,929

Other 1,882,067 2,027,776 2,138,857 2,333,574 2,954,032

Total 7,471,298 9,185,986 10,667,779 11,711,655 15,185,673


Commercial 87,494 142,349 176,886 194,250 257,989


Industry 282,144 298,674 323,297 350,136 447,013

Retail 118,440 132,470 146,618 157,093 205,805

Other 273,562 267,556 274680 288126 364759

Total 824,994 923,715 1,021,976 1,104,218 1,425,256


Commercial 1,131,343 1,966,319 2,512,099 2,776,223 3,687,047

Community purpose 591,659 717,351 891,572 977,203 1,276,133

Industry 2,118,652 2,534,989 2,924,806 3,277,653 4,185,223

Retail 2,299,009 2,595,709 2,947,740 3,163,093 4,143,734

Other 2,155,629 2,295332 2,413,537 2,621,700 3,318,791

Total 8,296,292 10,109,701 11,689,755 12,815,873 16,610,929


123 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-6: Existing and projected demand for the water supply network

Column 1

Service catchment2

Column 2

Existing and projected demand (EP)

2016

(base date) 2021 2026 2031

Ultimate development#

Coolangatta 70,231 80,011 85,605 88,362 103,125

Gaven 83,368 90,527 99,059 109,205 169,710

Molendinar 349,337 388,984 426,043 453,842 630,911

Mudgeeraba 121,959 131,206 137,827 148,388 206,090

Pimpama 58,424 85,187 102,731 104,170 170,670

Stapylton 36,100 41,935 45,134 48,078 95,089

TOTAL 719,419 817,851 896,399 952,045 1,375,594 # Nominally year 2066

Table SC3.1-7: Existing and projected demand for the sewerage network

Column 1

Service catchment3

Column 2

Existing and projected demand (EP)

2016

(base date) 2021 2026 2031

Ultimate development#

Coombabah 324,846 355,283 388,761 417,779 613,954

Elanora@ 83,702 93,545 84,633 88,145 95,245

Merrimac@ 187,191 209,551 243,739 261,837 356,024

Pimpama 55,226 83,426 100,889 102,302 167,649

Stapylton 32,013 37,762 40,824 43,719 90,069

TOTAL 682,979 779,567 858,845 913,781 1,322,941 # Nominally year 2066

@ Based on ultimate catchment boundary

2 The service catchments for the Water Supply network are identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Map LGIP- PFTI-WAT-0 to LGIP- PFTI-WAT-53 in Schedule 3 (Local government infrastructure mapping and tables). 3 The service catchments for the Sewerage network are identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Map LGIP- PFTI-SEW-0 to LGIP- PFTI-SEW-53 in Schedule 3 (Local government infrastructure mapping and tables).


124 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.1-8: Existing and projected demand for the transport network

Column 1

Service catchment4

Column 2

Existing and projected traffic demand (VTPD)

2016

(base date) 2021 2026 2031


Yatala 79,984 104,220 127,177 146,935 146,935

Jacobs Well 14,178 22,918 24,858 24,904 24,904

Coomera 99,040 200,010 215,922 250,538 250,538

Hinterland West 36,177 45,221 48,598 48,656 48,656

Pacific Pines - Hope Island 126,852 141,734 153,549 172,941 182,626

Coastal North 210,218 220,665 237,246 249,428 261,899

Central 182,854 191,609 201,851 206,764 224,752

Nerang 105,433 108,479 109,969 117,289 132,302

Coastal Core 213,163 224,659 250,465 264,160 291,104

Hinterland South 79,032 83,041 85,031 87,424 87,686

Carrara - Burleigh 276,545 302,109 315,981 336,362 365,962

South 109,323 122,004 127,771 130,717 133,593

TOTAL 1,532,799 1,766,669 1,898,418 2,036,118 2,150,957

Table SC3.1-9: Existing and projected demand for the public parks and land for community facilities network

Column 1

Service catchment5

Column 2

Existing and projected demand (persons)

Base date

2016

2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Arundel 10,255 10,255 10,255 10,255 13,681

Ashmore 12,393 12,731 13,755 14,544 17,405

Benowa 8,394 9,424 9,763 10,344 12,698

Biggera Waters 6,686 7,236 9,038 10,048 18,171

Broadbeach Waters 8,424 8,494 11,023 11,418 11,543

Bundall 4,552 5,000 5,806 6,716 8,069

Burleigh Heads 8,874 9,948 10,943 10,962 11,062

Burleigh Waters 14,143 14,143 14,143 15,025 18,849

4 The service catchments for the Transport network are identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Map LGIP- PFTI-TRN-0 to LGIP- PFTI-TRN-17 in Schedule 3 (Local government infrastructure mapping and tables). 5 The service catchments for the Public parks and land for community facilities network are identified on Local Government Infrastructure Plan Map LGIP- PFTI-REC-1 to LGIP- PFTI-REC-17 in Schedule 3 (Local government infrastructure mapping and tables).


125 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Service catchment5

Column 2


Base date

2016

2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Carrara 15,248 16,213 16,959 17,756 21,162

Clear Island Waters 4,490 4,668 4,810 4,846 8,716

Coolangatta 8,762 10,001 10,201 10,201 10,919

Coombabah 10,668 10,668 10,730 11,234 14,743

Coomera 16,630 28,547 42,938 42,938 70,561

Currumbin - Tugun 11,020 13,228 14,760 15,894 16,391


7,105 7,151 7,364 7,472 8,675

Currumbin Waters 9,844 11,157 11,472 11,579 12,306

Elanora 12,348 12,404 12,404 12,406 12,936

Guanaba - Springbrook 4,208 4,409 4,609 4,609 6,598

Helensvale 19,091 20,588 24,098 29,979 36,695

Highland Park 8,992 8,992 8,992 9,666 11,887

Hope Island 10,208 13,395 17,307 19,283 19,283

Jacobs Well - Alberton 3,893 7,668 7,668 7,668 8,710

Labrador 17,012 17,783 18,428 19,749 22,496

Main Beach 3,805 4,236 4,345 4,345 4,345


16,475 22,341 24,357 25,617 26,912

Mermaid Waters 12,752 12,837 13,561 13,995 18,127

Merrimac 6,345 6,383 7,259 7,310 9,381

Miami 6,831 7,089 7,526 7,873 8,901

Molendinar 6,525 6,530 6,530 6,530 6,533

Mudgeeraba - Bonogin 18,333 18,333 18,333 18,333 25,835

Nerang - Mount Nathan 21,091 22,608 24,129 28,373 36,911

Ormeau - Yatala 19,432 22,011 22,011 22,128 29,183

Oxenford - Maudsland 15,276 15,276 15,276 15,612 20,553

Pacific Pines - Gaven 19,098 19,951 19,951 20,057 33,596

Palm Beach 15,317 18,478 21,107 22,383 25,485

Paradise Point - Hollywell 9,786 10,489 11,448 12,009 15,082

Parkwood 9,226 9,226 9,229 9,229 13,105

Pimpama 13,738 22,585 23,207 23,207 35,360

Reedy Creek - Andrews 7,099 7,099 7,099 7,508 9,888


126 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Service catchment5

Column 2


Base date

2016

2021 2026 2031 Ultimate

development

Robina 24,568 25,950 27,828 32,543 40,290

Runaway Bay 9,476 9,508 9,767 10,331 14,002

Southport 35,252 39,137 45,992 52,446 83,026

Surfers Paradise 42,980 46,189 54,238 59,084 89,762

Upper Coomera - Willow Vale 35,919 36,350 36,480 36,487 47,459

Varsity Lakes 17,740 22,064 23,866 27,497 31,913

Worongary - Tallai 7,981 11,410 15,550 17,464 17,464

TOTAL 608,285 680,183 746,555 794,953 1,036,669


127 ADOPTED REPORT


SC3.2 Schedules of works

Table SC3.2-1: Water supply network schedule of works

Column 1

Map reference

Column 2

Trunk infrastructure

Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

FGC_20000_PRV_LGIP PRV on 250 mm Main - DISCOVERY DRIVE, HELENSVALE

2066 $50,854 Water valve

FMO_20000_PRV_LGIP PRV on 200 mm Main - ANCHUSIA STREET, ASHMORE


FMO_20003_PRV_LGIP PRV on 250 mm Main - WILSON STREET, LABRADOR


FPI_21000_FCV_LGIP FCV on 150 mm Main - HUTH ROAD, JACOBS WELL


FPI_21000_PRV_LGIP PRV on 600 mm Main - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, COOMERA


FPI_21002_FCV_LGIP FCV on 150 mm Main - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STEIGLITZ


FSW_20002_PRV_LGIP PRV on 150 mm Main - ALLIED DRIVE, ARUNDEL


FSY_20000_PRV_LGIP PRV on 300 mm Main - PASCOE ROAD, ORMEAU


FPI_20005_PUMP_LGIP 5 kW Pump Station - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, COOMERA

2021 $186,542 Water pump station

P1144 5.3 kW Pump Station - TALLAI ROAD, TALLAI


FMO_20000_PUMP_LGIP 5 kW Pump Station - PARASOL STREET, ASHMORE


FPI_20002_PUMP_LGIP 4 kW Pump Station - JONATHAN STREET, UPPER COOMERA


FGC_20000_PUMP_LGIP 3 kW Pump Station - MAUDSLAND ROAD, MAUDSLAND


FPI_20001_PUMP_LGIP 2 kW Pump Station - WENDY COURT, UPPER COOMERA


FPI_20003_PUMP_LGIP 5 kW Pump Station - RESERVE ROAD, UPPER COOMERA


FPI_20004_PUMP_LGIP 4 kW Pump Station - BLUETAIL CRESCENT, UPPER COOMERA


FPI_21001_PUMP_LGIP 34 kW Pump Station - HUTH ROAD, JACOBS WELL


FPI_21002_PUMP_LGIP 11 kW Pump Station - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STEIGLITZ


6 The establishment cost is expressed in current cost terms as at the base date.


128 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

FBU_20004_TANK_LGIP 0.08 ML Elevated Reservoir -GABRIELLE GROVE, BURLEIGH HEADS

2066 $421,682 Water reservoir

FCW_20001_TANK_LGIP 0.15 ML Elevated Reservoir -GOLINE COURT, TALLEBUDGERA


FCW_20002_TANK_LGIP 0.37 ML Ground Level Reservoir -CARAPOOK CRESCENT, TALLEBUDGERA


FCW_20003_TANK_LGIP 0.14 ML Elevated Reservoir -WATTLEBIRD COURT, CURRUMBIN VALLEY


FMU_20005_TANK_LGIP 0.4 ML Ground Level Reservoir -WALLABY DRIVE, MUDGEERABA


FMU_20006_TANK_LGIP 0.22 ML Ground Level Reservoir -DUKE COURT, TALLAI


FMU_20007_TANK_LGIP 0.28 ML Ground Level Reservoir -GRANDVIEW TERRACE, TALLAI


FMU_20008_TANK_LGIP 0.06 ML Ground Level Reservoir -RANGE ROAD, TALLAI


FMU_20009_TANK_LGIP 0.07 ML Ground Level Reservoir -PEBBLE CREEK ROAD, BONOGIN


FNE_20000_TANK_LGIP 0.02 ML Elevated Reservoir -BLUE HILL COURT, NERANG


FNE_20001_TANK_LGIP 0.07 ML Ground Level Reservoir -CHOPIN COURT, NERANG


FPI_21000_TANK_LGIP 1.75 ML Ground Level Reservoir -HUTH ROAD, JACOBS WELL

2066 $1,022,556 Water reservoir

FPI_21001_TANK_LGIP 0.85 ML Ground Level Reservoir -STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STEIGLITZ


FRC_20010_TANK_LGIP 0.06 ML Elevated Reservoir -THURSDAY DRIVE, TALLEBUDGERA VALLEY


C_CO_14122 138.5 m of 300mm - MILES STREET, COOLANGATTA

2021 $213,598 Water main

C_HE_18901 184 m of 200mm - LYSTERFIELD RISE, UPPER COOMERA

2021 $149,963 Water main

C_HE_18955 553.3 m of 250mm - TORRINGTON STREET, UPPER COOMERA

2021 $439,263 Water main

C_HE_18956 383.1 m of 250mm - FINKE LANE, UPPER COOMERA

2021 $330,555 Water main

C_NS_14100 101.2 m of 100mm - MICHELMORE ROAD, CARRARA

2021 $54,550 Water main


129 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

C_NS_14101 68.6 m of 100mm - MICHELMORE ROAD, CARRARA

2021 $47,958 Water main

C_PI_18985 969.1 m of 200mm - BAILEYS MOUNTAIN ROAD, UPPER COOMERA

2021 $597,165 Water main

C_PI_18991 1488.9 m of 600mm - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, COOMERA

2021 $1,721,746 Water main

C_PI_18997 504.8 m of 150mm - GEORGE ALEXANDER WAY, COOMERA

2021 $237,778 Water main

C_PI_19012 1004.7 m of 450mm - DIXON DRIVE, PIMPAMA

2021 $1,696,085 Water main


2021 $1,751,127 Water main

C_PI_19014 194 m of 200mm - GEORGE ALEXANDER WAY, COOMERA

2021 $135,133 Water main

C_SY_19002 840.5 m of 200mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STAPYLTON

2021 $468,396 Water main

C_SY_19003 680.6 m of 200mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, ALBERTON

2021 $337,801 Water main

C_SY_19007 365 m of 200mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, ALBERTON

2021 $221,090 Water main

C_WO_14102 6.2 m of 300mm - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, BROADBEACH

2021 $23,128 Water main

C_CU_14123 182.3 m of 250mm - CREST DRIVE, CURRUMBIN

2026 $165,006 Water main

C_GI_14124 297.5 m of 100mm - KOOKABURRA DRIVE, GILSTON

2026 $119,192 Water main

C_MO_18908* 11.3 m of 150mm - SCARBOROUGH STREET, SOUTHPORT

2026 $25,506 Water main

C_CU_14126 399.3 m of 250mm - CREST DRIVE, CURRUMBIN

2031 $348,194 Water main

C_HE_19019 904.7 m of 300mm - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, HELENSVALE

2031 $858,543 Water main

C_MO_18936 15.8 m of 100mm - STAGHORN AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE

2031 $25,633 Water main

C_MO_18938* 12.6 m of 150mm - DAVENPORT STREET, SOUTHPORT

2031 $28,421 Water main

C_NS_14103 17.8 m of 150mm - EXPLORERS WAY, WORONGARY

2031 $25,626 Water main

C_PI_18935 0.8 m of 200mm - JONATHAN 2031 $1,347 Water main


130 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

STREET, UPPER COOMERA

C_PI_19020 828.3 m of 375mm - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA

2031 $1,568,871 Water main


2031 $879,379 Water main

C_PI_19022 436.6 m of 300mm - SHIPPER DRIVE, COOMERA

2031 $332,846 Water main

C_BU_14127 670.7 m of 225mm - CHRISTINE AVENUE, BURLEIGH WATERS

2036 $592,468 Water main

C_CU_14128 25.8 m of 250mm - CARLYLE DRIVE, CURRUMBIN

2036 $62,941 Water main

C_GC_19023 67.9 m of 300mm - BLACKHEATH TERRACE, PACIFIC PINES

2036 $99,477 Water main

C_HE_18903 125.7 m of 300mm - DISCOVERY DRIVE, HELENSVALE

2036 $151,646 Water main

C_MO_18940 41.3 m of 150mm - FERNY AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE

2036 $91,947 Water main

C_MO_18941* 18.9 m of 150mm - HIGH STREET, SOUTHPORT

2036 $42,704 Water main

C_MU_14129 642.6 m of 300mm - BONOGIN ROAD, MUDGEERABA

2036 $531,432 Water main

C_NE_19024 2865.2 m of 200mm - BEAUDESERT NERANG ROAD, NERANG

2036 $2,115,579 Water main

C_PI_18898 13.2 m of 600mm - DREAMWORLD PARKWAY, COOMERA

2036 $74,792 Water main

C_PI_18939 21.5 m of 200mm - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA

2036 $31,859 Water main

C_RO_14130* 2471.5 m of 300mm - ROBINA PARKWAY, ROBINA

2036 $2,487,090 Water main

C_RO_14131 72.1 m of 150mm - RON PENHALIGON WAY, ROBINA

2036 $60,289 Water main

C_RO_14132 88.5 m of 150mm - BALLYLIFFEN COURT, ROBINA

2036 $73,983 Water main

C_SW_19026 317.7 m of 200mm - NAPPER ROAD, PARKWOOD

2036 $243,690 Water main

C_BU_14133 637.1 m of 225mm - DUNLIN DRIVE, BURLEIGH WATERS

2066 $558,341 Water main

C_CO_14134 311.2 m of 300mm - STAPYLTON STREET, COOLANGATTA

2066 $291,532 Water main

C_CU_14135 290 m of 250mm - CARLYLE DRIVE, CURRUMBIN

2066 $308,240 Water main


131 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

C_EL_14136 1402.4 m of 150mm - PHILIPPINE PARADE, PALM BEACH

2066 $624,661 Water main

C_MO_18904 107.7 m of 150mm - MAXWELL BROWN DRIVE, SOUTHPORT

2066 $74,158 Water main

C_MO_18947 7.9 m of 150mm - MAIN BEACH PARADE, MAIN BEACH

2066 $16,844 Water main


2066 $4,990 Water main

C_MO_18949* 2 m of 150mm - NERANG STREET, SOUTHPORT


C_MO_18950 4.6 m of 100mm - CAVILL AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE


C_MO_18951 35.8 m of 150mm - ASHMORE ROAD, ASHMORE

2066 $51,667 Water main

C_MO_18952 15.3 m of 200mm - CAVILL AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $37,550 Water main

C_MO_19028 4700.5 m of 600mm - CURRUMBURRA ROAD, ASHMORE

2066 $13,226,752 Water main

C_MO_19029 337.4 m of 150mm - DANDAR DRIVE, SOUTHPORT

2066 $203,293 Water main

C_MO_19030 285 m of 200mm - ANNE STREET, SOUTHPORT

2066 $183,224 Water main


2066 $199,989 Water main

C_MO_19032 105 m of 150mm - OCEAN AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $103,790 Water main

C_MO_19033 101.3 m of 200mm - COTLEW STREET, SOUTHPORT

2066 $78,246 Water main

C_MO_19034 23.4 m of 150mm - SURFERS PARADISE BOULEVARD, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $48,351 Water main

C_MO_19035 20.7 m of 300mm - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, MAIN BEACH

2066 $61,468 Water main

C_MU_14137 753.6 m of 225mm - TALLAI ROAD, TALLAI

2066 $493,165 Water main

C_MU_14138 328.7 m of 300mm - BONOGIN ROAD, MUDGEERABA

2066 $295,495 Water main

C_NS_14139 1276 m of 150mm - MUREV WAY, CARRARA

2066 $653,613 Water main

C_NS_14140 223.2 m of 150mm - SPENCER 2066 $114,249 Water main


132 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

ROAD, NERANG

C_PI_18899 38.7 m of 375mm - KRISTINS LANE, UPPER COOMERA

2066 $162,521 Water main

C_PI_18943 12.3 m of 300mm - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, PIMPAMA

2066 $44,468 Water main

C_PI_18945 1.6 m of 200mm - BLUETAIL CRESCENT, UPPER COOMERA


C_PI_18983 650.2 m of 250mm - CABBAGE TREE POINT ROAD, STEIGLITZ

2066 $530,588 Water main

C_PI_18983_2 4714.2 m of 250mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, NORWELL

2066 $3,630,159 Water main

C_PI_19036 772.8 m of 250mm - RESERVE ROAD, UPPER COOMERA

2066 $870,872 Water main


2066 $634,045 Water main


2066 $65,174 Water main

C_PI_19042 747 m of 375mm - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA

2066 $1,002,177 Water main

C_PI_19043 834.9 m of 300mm - DIXON DRIVE, PIMPAMA

2066 $583,969 Water main

C_PI_19044 54 m of 200mm - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, COOMERA

2066 $53,369 Water main

C_PI_19045 18.2 m of 300mm - HUTH ROAD, JACOBS WELL

2066 $56,010 Water main

C_RO_14141* 425.8 m of 300mm - ROBINA TOWN CENTRE DRIVE, ROBINA

2066 $887,624 Water main

C_RO_14142* 69.8 m of 300mm - CHRISTINE AVENUE, ROBINA

2066 $166,126 Water main

C_SW_19047 1591.2 m of 300mm - OXLEY DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS

2066 $1,909,786 Water main

C_SY_19048 230.6 m of 250mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STAPYLTON

2066 $200,660 Water main

C_WO_14104 16.1 m of 250mm - SURF PARADE, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $50,695 Water main

C_WO_14105 15.1 m of 200mm - OLD BURLEIGH ROAD, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $39,626 Water main

C_WO_14106 4.4 m of 100mm - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, MERMAID BEACH


C_WO_14107 20.5 m of 100mm - OLD BURLEIGH ROAD, BROADBEACH

2066 $34,181 Water main


133 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost6

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

C_WO_14108 1.9 m of 100mm - OLD BURLEIGH ROAD, BROADBEACH



2066 $173,882 Water main

C_WO_14144 147.6 m of 150mm - HOOKER BOULEVARD, BROADBEACH WATERS

2066 $112,029 Water main


2066 $576,045 Water main

C_WO_14146 204.8 m of 300mm - FIRST AVENUE, BROADBEACH

2066 $268,065 Water main

C_WO_14147 264.5 m of 150mm - OLD BURLEIGH ROAD, SURFERS PARADISE

2066 $210,441 Water main

C_WO_14148 25 m of 100mm - QUEENSLAND AVENUE, BROADBEACH

2066 $41,781 Water main

C_WO_14149 424.3 m of 250mm - FIRST AVENUE, BROADBEACH

2066 $546,907 Water main

Total $58,686,770

* Please note: This item is partially or wholly located within land affected by other development legislation as identified in Part 10 of the City Plan.


134 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.2-2: Sewerage network schedule of works

Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

CO_XGMA06 641m of 150mm - POHLMAN STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $426,112 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGMA01a 486m of 600mm - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, NERANG 2036 $2,837,329 Sewer gravity

main

PI_XGMA02 562m of 375mm - CHRISTINE DRIVE, COOMERA 2026 $852,991 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA01 477m of 225mm - BLANCK STREET, ORMEAU 2066 $6,619,882 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA11 1541m of 900mm - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON 2021 $6,280,400 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA12 501m of 750mm - ELDERSLIE ROAD, YATALA 2021 $1,474,321 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA13 19m of 600mm - ELDERSLIE ROAD, YATALA

2021 $277,667 Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA14 117m of 450mm - ELDERSLIE ROAD, YATALA


ST_XGMA16 328m of 300mm - PEARSON ROAD, YATALA


ST_XGMA16a 548m of 225mm - PEARSON ROAD, YATALA 2021 $291,340

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA20 472m of 100mm - NYHOLT DRIVE, YATALA 2021 $231,389

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA21 573m of 375mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STAPYLTON 2021 $902,538

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA22 294m of 300mm - YELLOWOOD ROAD, STAPYLTON 2021 $539,749 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA29 4m of 300mm - BURNSIDE ROAD, ORMEAU 2021 $13,395 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA08a* 497m of 400mm - HIGH STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $2,175,064 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGM7_1 22m of 225mm - HINTERLAND DRIVE, MUDGEERABA 2066 $62,477 Sewer gravity

main

PI_XGMA03 1010m of 450mm - GEORGE ALEXANDER WAY, COOMERA 2036 $1,435,977 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA09a* 333m of 400mm - RAWLINS STREET, SOUTHPORT 2066 $1,248,080 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA21 125m of 150mm - PETER THOMSON DRIVE, PARKWOOD 2031 $115,631 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA22* 238m of 225mm - NORTH STREET, 2066 $1,533,315 Sewer gravity



135 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

SOUTHPORT main

PI_XGMA01 318m of 375mm - OLD PACIFIC HIGHWAY, PIMPAMA


PI_XGMA58 826m of 320mm - SEAGREEN DRIVE, COOMERA

2021 $1,021,706 Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA01 577m of 300mm - BAYVIEW STREET, RUNAWAY BAY 2066 $1,109,547

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA06a 25m of 375mm - BARATTA STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $208,782

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA07 1185m of 278mm - BLAKE STREET, SOUTHPORT 2066 $1,812,590

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA09* 361m of 225mm - BAY STREET, SOUTHPORT 2031 $536,158

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA11* 315m of 200mm - SEABANK LANE, SOUTHPORT 2036 $422,562 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA12* 363m of 250mm - LENNEBERG STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $601,476 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA13* 220m of 225mm - SPENDELOVE AVENUE, SOUTHPORT 2036 $293,038 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA14 112m of 200mm - FRIGO COURT, BUNDALL 2066 $158,326 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA25* 116m of 150mm - LAWSON STREET, SOUTHPORT 2066 $221,446 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA04a 208m of 400mm - SCOTTSDALE DRIVE, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $1,115,009 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA07a 233m of 300mm - GERALDTON DRIVE, ROBINA 2036 $377,339 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA07b 829m of 200mm - RANIER CRESCENT, VARSITY LAKES 2036 $859,787 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA08 672m of 400mm - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $2,585,443 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA09b 655m of 400mm - SUNNINGDALE CIRCUIT, ROBINA 2036 $866,053 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA10* 279m of 150mm - ROBINA TOWN CENTRE DRIVE, ROBINA 2036 $411,074 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA11 222m of 150mm - MALVERN PLACE, ROBINA 2036 $222,579 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA12 401m of 300mm - REEDY CREEK ROAD, BURLEIGH WATERS


MW_XGM16 598m of 300mm - NIELSENS ROAD, CARRARA


MW_XGM22 539m of 300mm - GOLD COAST 2066 $1,591,836 Sewer gravity


136 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

SPRINGBROOK ROAD, MUDGEERABA main

MW_XGMA01b 246m of 300mm - NEW STREET, NERANG 2036 $582,530 Sewer gravity main

MW_XGMA25 40m of 150mm - ARISAIG COURT, MERRIMAC


PI_XGMA04 133m of 150mm - RIVERMEADOWS DRIVE, UPPER COOMERA 2066 $99,607

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA05 228m of 200mm - EVEREST DRIVE, SOUTHPORT 2021 $255,182

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA08* 656m of 300mm - SPENCER STREET, SOUTHPORT 2026 $961,778

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA10* 631m of 300mm - NERANG STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $1,715,959

Sewer gravity main

CO_XGMA15 215m of 300mm - STAGHORN AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE 2066 $413,283 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA16 208m of 225mm - LAYCOCK STREET, SURFERS PARADISE 2066 $380,730 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA17 136m of 300mm - CAVILL MALL, SURFERS PARADISE 2066 $290,717 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA18 610m of 500mm - LEWIS DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS 2066 $2,834,366 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA19 602m of 500mm - OXLEY DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS 2066 $3,362,410 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA20 123m of 150mm - PETWORTH COURT, ARUNDEL 2031 $121,896 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA23* 322m of 150mm - SHORT STREET, SOUTHPORT 2036 $666,904 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XGMA26 239m of 150mm - GURRAH AVENUE, SOUTHPORT 2066 $235,454 Sewer gravity

main

HV_XGM0002 301m of 450mm - TOWN CENTRE DRIVE, HELENSVALE 2066 $552,340 Sewer gravity

main

HV_XGM0003 402m of 225mm - KINGSTON DRIVE, ARUNDEL 2066 $454,725 Sewer gravity

main

HV_XGM0005 26m of 225mm - LINDFIELD ROAD, HELENSVALE 2066 $61,246 Sewer gravity

main

HV_XGM0012 176m of 225mm - CHAPLIN CRESCENT, OXENFORD 2066 $153,692 Sewer gravity

main

HV_XGM0017 115m of 150mm - BABIRRA STREET, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XGM0021 1240m of 1200mm - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HELENSVALE

2066 $9,592,417 Sewer gravity main

HV_XGM0025 207m of 237mm - AKOONAH STREET, 2066 $166,282 Sewer gravity


137 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

HOPE ISLAND main

HV_XGM0061 37m of 150mm - AKOONAH STREET, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XGM0062 5m of 150mm - IRAGANA STREET, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XGM0074 992m of 900mm - WESTPARK COURT, HELENSVALE 2066 $3,731,947

Sewer gravity main

ME_XGMA02 557m of 200mm - GLEN EAGLES DRIVE, ROBINA 2036 $679,000

Sewer gravity main

ME_XGMA04b 92m of 300mm - SCOTTSDALE DRIVE, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $447,080

Sewer gravity main

ME_XGMA04c 156m of 150mm - HIGH STREET, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $160,444

Sewer gravity main

ME_XGMA05a 1085m of 300mm - LANTAU CRESCENT, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $3,140,091 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA05b 386m of 225mm - IMPERIA CRESCENT, VARSITY LAKES 2066 $883,789 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA06 331m of 400mm - LAKE STREET, VARSITY LAKES 2036 $826,583 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA09a 157m of 450mm - UNIVERSITY DRIVE, ROBINA 2036 $517,825 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA13a 552m of 400mm - ROBINA PARKWAY, CLEAR ISLAND WATERS 2066 $4,046,306 Sewer gravity

main

ME_XGMA13b 338m of 300mm - MARKERI STREET, CLEAR ISLAND WATERS 2066 $2,151,081 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGM11 845m of 450mm - NERANG RIVER DRIVE, NERANG 2036 $1,457,946 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGM29 240m of 225mm - RIVERBEND AVENUE, CARRARA 2026 $238,545 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGM8 1573m of 750mm - EXPLORERS WAY, WORONGARY 2021 $5,296,481 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGMA26 20m of 150mm - NIELSENS ROAD, CARRARA 2066 $32,394 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGMA27a 367m of 150mm - SOUTHPORT NERANG ROAD, NERANG 2066 $454,612 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGMA27b 192m of 250mm - SHORT STREET, NERANG 2066 $230,504 Sewer gravity

main

MW_XGMA28 114m of 150mm - PRICE STREET, NERANG


MW_XGMA29 153m of 225mm - MORTENSEN ROAD, NERANG


MW_XGMA30 11m of 525mm - NIELSENS ROAD, 2031 $66,884 Sewer gravity


138 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

CARRARA main

PI_XGMA05 193m of 150mm - DAYS ROAD, UPPER COOMERA


PI_XGMA55 42m of 225mm - OAKEY CREEK ROAD, COOMERA


PI_XGMA56 19m of 225mm - CABBAGE TREE POINT ROAD, STEIGLITZ 2066 $55,696

Sewer gravity main

PI_XGMA57 41m of 225mm - BEATTIE ROAD, COOMERA 2031 $336,631

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA02 181m of 225mm - HEIDI COURT, ORMEAU2066 $2,038,516

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA03 154m of 167mm - PASCOE ROAD, ORMEAU 2066 $1,653,406

Sewer gravity main

ST_XGMA04 24m of 300mm - CUTHBERT DRIVE, YATALA 2066 $236,648 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA05 129m of 225mm - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON 2066 $1,678,968 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA06 329m of 150mm - STANMORE ROAD, YATALA 2066 $2,447,450 Sewer gravity

main

ST_XGMA10 32m of 300mm - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON 2021 $76,215 Sewer gravity

main

CO_XRMA09 307m of 100mm - AGNEW STREET, LABRADOR

2021 $129,668 Sewer rising main

CO_XRMA09a 352m of 144mm - STEVENS STREET, SOUTHPORT


EL_XRMA_EL_01 2867m of 525mm - TALLEBUDGERA DRIVE, PALM BEACH, 4221

2021 $7,760,885 Sewer rising main

MW_XRM9 1918m of 600mm - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, NERANG


ST_XRMA01 8894m of 500mm - KERKIN ROAD NORTH, JACOBS WELL


ST_XRMA01a 2449m of 355mm - MINKA LANE, ORMEAU


ST_XRMA03 61m of 200mm - BURNSIDE ROAD, STAPYLTON


ST_XRMA06 559m of 200mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, STAPYLTON


ST_XRMA13 766m of 100mm - NYHOLT DRIVE, YATALA


ST_XRMA15 122m of 450mm - STANMORE ROAD, YATALA


ST_XRMA16 40m of 400mm - ELDERSLIE ROAD, 2021 $140,426 Sewer rising


139 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

YATALA main

CO_XRMA07 664m of 200mm - STANHILL DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


HV_XRM0018* 2096m of 375mm - CASEYS ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XRM0030 676m of 100mm - SICKLE AVENUE, HOPE ISLAND

2026 $262,532

Sewer rising main

ME_XRMA04 2233m of 527mm - ACANTHUS AVENUE, BURLEIGH WATERS

2026 $4,293,361

Sewer rising main

ST_XRMA07 1052m of 200mm - STANMORE ROAD, YATALA

2026 $495,872

Sewer rising main

ST_XRMA11 15404m of 750mm - BURNSIDE ROAD, STAPYLTON

2026 $62,119,537

Sewer rising main

CO_XRMA10 414m of 100mm - NAPPER ROAD, ARUNDEL


HV_XRM0019* 1456m of 375mm - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XRM0020* 46m of 375mm - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO_XRMA01 147m of 300mm - FIESTA AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE


CO_XRMA19 698m of 900mm - MUSGRAVE AVENUE, SOUTHPORT


HV_XRM0027 3250m of 600mm - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, HELENSVALE


ME_XRMA03 201m of 150mm - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES


MW_XRM12 1105m of 375mm - NERANG RIVER DRIVE, NERANG


PI_XRMA02 1481m of 300mm - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA


CO_XRMA02 7m of 450mm - SALERNO STREET, SURFERS PARADISE


CO_XRMA03 17m of 300mm - REMEMBERANCE DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


CO_XRMA04 888m of 100mm - CHELSEA AVENUE, BROADBEACH


CO_XRMA05 523m of 100mm - DAIMLER DRIVE, BUNDALL


CO_XRMA06 359m of 100mm - FRIGO COURT, BUNDALL


CO_XRMA11 811m of 200mm - BRISBANE ROAD, 2066 $484,369 Sewer rising


140 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

ARUNDEL main

CO_XRMA12 105m of 250mm - OXLEY DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS


CO_XRMA13 325m of 100mm - RUNAWAY BAY AVENUE, RUNAWAY BAY


CO_XRMA15 2173m of 400mm - SEIDLER PLACE, COOMBABAH

2066 $3,036,269

Sewer rising main

CO_XRMA18* 1677m of 894mm - TERRIGAL CRESCENT, SOUTHPORT

2066 $7,602,665

Sewer rising main

CO_XRMA20 593m of 250mm - HOLLYWELL ROAD, BIGGERA WATERS

2066 $461,517

Sewer rising main

EL_XRMA_EL_02 2951m of 450mm - NARRANE STREET, TUGUN, 4224

2066 $5,360,057

Sewer rising main

HV_XRM0015 205m of 100mm - AKOONAH STREET, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XRM0017 347m of 100mm - IRAGANA STREET, HOPE ISLAND


HV_XRM0024 653m of 100mm - KOPPS ROAD, OXENFORD


ME_XRMA02 209m of 100mm - CLAREMONT DRIVE, ROBINA


MW_XRMA5 10m of 450mm - MADIGAN ROAD, CARRARA


PI_XRMA01 380m of 750mm - KERKIN ROAD NORTH, PIMPAMA


PI_XRMA55 797m of 160mm - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA


PI_XRMA56 4890m of 200mm - STAPYLTON JACOBS WELL ROAD, NORWELL


ST_XRMA14 944m of 219mm - ELDERSLIE ROAD, YATALA


A10_2021P Total power - AGNEW STREET, LABRADOR

2021 $309,737 Sewer pump station

A4_2021E Emergency capacity - OAK AVENUE, SURFERS PARADISE

2021 $1,857,075 Sewer pump station

A5_2021E Emergency capacity - REMEMBERANCE DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


A52_2021O Operational capacity - FREYBURG STREET, BUNDALL


A6_2021E Emergency capacity - PARADISE ISLAND, SURFERS PARADISE


A9_2021P Total power - STEVENS STREET, 2021 $161,812 Sewer pump


141 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

SOUTHPORT station

B9_2021O Operational capacity - ANGELICA STREET, ELANORA


BARRATA BOOSTER_2021P

Total power - BARATTA STREET, SOUTHPORT


BE45N_2021O Operational capacity - YELLOWOOD ROAD, STAPYLTON

2021 $480,946

Sewer pump station

BE45N_2021P Total power - YELLOWOOD ROAD, STAPYLTON

2021 $510,485

Sewer pump station

DA11A_2021O Operational capacity - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON

2021 $4,744,183

Sewer pump station

DA11A_2021P Total power - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON

2021 $184,492

Sewer pump station

OR01_2021E Emergency capacity - GAWAIN DRIVE, ORMEAU


OR05_2021P Total power - MINKA LANE, ORMEAU 2021 $535,013 Sewer pump station

OX07_2021E Emergency capacity - CADELL DRIVE, HELENSVALE


W38_2021P Total power - CRUSADER WAY, NERANG 2021 $432,600 Sewer pump station

W44_2021P Total power - COLERIDGE COURT, NERANG


W48_2021P Total power - RIVERGUM DRIVE, NERANG


A1_2026O Operational capacity - AKES AVENUE, SOUTHPORT


A1_2026P Total power - AKES AVENUE, SOUTHPORT


A14_2026P Total power - FERRY ROAD, SOUTHPORT 2026 $453,995 Sewer pump station

A19_2026P Total power - PARKER STREET, LABRADOR


A39_2026P Total power - WATERWAYS DRIVE, MAIN BEACH


A78_2026O Operational capacity - MAWARRA STREET, SURFERS PARADISE


A78_2026P Total power - MAWARRA STREET, SURFERS PARADISE


A89_2026E Emergency capacity - ASHMORE ROAD, MOLENDINAR


BE44A_2026O Operational capacity - ENKLEMAN ROAD, 2026 $102,905 Sewer pump


142 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

YATALA station

BE44A_2026P Total power - ENKLEMAN ROAD, YATALA 2026 $291,565 Sewer pump station

BENOWA RE-PUMP_2026P

Total power - RACECOURSE DRIVE, BUNDALL


C30_2026P Total power - STATION STREET, TUGUN 2026 $313,967

Sewer pump station

SP26_2026E Emergency capacity - HOOKER BOULEVARD, MERMAID WATERS

2026 $605,460

Sewer pump station

SS66_2026E Emergency capacity - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES

2026 $610,796

Sewer pump station

SS72_2026P Total power - SCOTTSDALE DRIVE, VARSITY LAKES

2026 $220,730

Sewer pump station

W17_2026P Total power - CITRUS DRIVE, NERANG 2026 $122,854 Sewer pump station

W35_2026E Emergency capacity - HINKLER DRIVE, WORONGARY


A100_2031P Total power - ASHMORE ROAD, BENOWA 2031 $120,652 Sewer pump station

A31_2031O Operational capacity - COMMODORE DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


A55_2031E Emergency capacity - COLLINS CRESCENT, BENOWA


CO02_2031O Operational capacity - SHEEHAN AVENUE, HOPE ISLAND


CO05_2031P Total power - CRESCENT AVENUE, HOPE ISLAND


CO21_2031P Total power - SICKLE AVENUE, HOPE ISLAND


CO23_2031P Total power - SHEEHAN AVENUE, HOPE ISLAND


D51_2031P Total power - PARKWOOD BOULEVARD, PARKWOOD


D56_2031P Total power - PETWORTH COURT, ARUNDEL


DA11A_2031P Total power - CHRISTENSEN ROAD SOUTH, STAPYLTON


N4_2031P Total power - SOUTHPORT NERANG ROAD, MOLENDINAR


OX07_2031O Operational capacity - CADELL DRIVE, HELENSVALE


OX07_2031P Total power - CADELL DRIVE, 2031 $344,178 Sewer pump


143 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

HELENSVALE station

OX15_2031E Emergency capacity - MILDURA DRIVE, HELENSVALE


OX20_2031P Total power - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


OX22_2031P Total power - HELENSVALE ROAD, HELENSVALE

2031 $323,309

Sewer pump station

SS27_2031E Emergency capacity - CHATSWOOD COURT, ROBINA

2031 $742,243

Sewer pump station

SS35_2031P Total power - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES

2031 $157,597

Sewer pump station

W28_2031E Emergency capacity - SPALL STREET, CARRARA

2031 $135,010

Sewer pump station

A106_2036P Total power - HOSPITAL BOULEVARD, SOUTHPORT


A13_2036E Emergency capacity - BENOWA ROAD, SOUTHPORT


A2_2036E* Emergency capacity - MARINE PARADE, SOUTHPORT


A2_2036O* Operational capacity - MARINE PARADE, SOUTHPORT


A2_2036P* Total power - MARINE PARADE, SOUTHPORT


A22_2036E Emergency capacity - BAILEY CRESCENT, SOUTHPORT


A3_2036E Emergency capacity - PENINSULAR DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


A3_2036P Total power - PENINSULAR DRIVE, SURFERS PARADISE


D2_2036O Operational capacity - RUNAWAY BAY AVENUE, RUNAWAY BAY


D40_2036P Total power - BOTANICAL DRIVE, LABRADOR


G2_2036P Total power - MERLOO DRIVE, NERANG 2036 $105,142 Sewer pump station

MA1_2036O Operational capacity - KOOLA DRIVE, NERANG


MA1_2036P Total power - KOOLA DRIVE, NERANG 2036 $109,012 Sewer pump station

MU7_2036E Emergency capacity - BURKE CRESCENT, MUDGEERABA


N7_2036P Total power - SEAMIST DRIVE, NERANG 2036 $119,009 Sewer pump


144 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

station

N8_2036E Emergency capacity - BALOO CRESCENT, NERANG


N8_2036P Total power - BALOO CRESCENT, NERANG


OX01_2036P Total power - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, HELENSVALE

2036 $712,742

Sewer pump station

OX45_2036E Emergency capacity - KOPPS ROAD, OXENFORD

2036 $1,713,963

Sewer pump station

PA9_2036O Operational capacity - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA

2036 $256,446

Sewer pump station

PA9_2036P Total power - FOXWELL ROAD, COOMERA

2036 $1,271,797

Sewer pump station

SP2_2036P Total power - WITT AVENUE, CARRARA 2036 $188,480 Sewer pump station

SP4_2036P Total power - WITT AVENUE, CARRARA 2036 $278,312 Sewer pump station

SP57_2036P Total power - MAREEBA PLACE, ROBINA 2036 $99,174 Sewer pump station

SS27_2036O Operational capacity - CHATSWOOD COURT, ROBINA


SS66_2036O Operational capacity - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES


SS66_2036P Total power - CHRISTINE AVENUE, VARSITY LAKES


W13_2036O Operational capacity - O'SHEA DRIVE, NERANG


W22_2036E Emergency capacity - BAYMILL COURT, MERRIMAC


W44_2036E Emergency capacity - COLERIDGE COURT, NERANG


A1_2066E Emergency capacity - AKES AVENUE, SOUTHPORT


A102_2066E Emergency capacity - RACECOURSE DRIVE, BUNDALL


A12_2066O Operational capacity - BARATTA STREET, SOUTHPORT


A28_2066P Total power - SLATYER AVENUE, SOUTHPORT


A42_2066P Total power - MUIR STREET, LABRADOR 2066 $313,145 Sewer pump station

A5_2066P Total power - REMEMBERANCE DRIVE, 2066 $1,231,072 Sewer pump


145 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

SURFERS PARADISE station

A67_2066P Total power - FRIGO COURT, BUNDALL 2066 $339,075 Sewer pump station

A68_2066P Total power - DAIMLER DRIVE, BUNDALL 2066 $386,441 Sewer pump station

A97_2066O Operational capacity - COTLEW STREET EAST, SOUTHPORT

2066 $187,828

Sewer pump station

B19_2066P Total power - DURINGAN STREET, CURRUMBIN

2066 $448,406

Sewer pump station

BARRATA BOOSTER_2066P

Total power - BARATTA STREET, SOUTHPORT

2066 $3,879,345

Sewer pump station

C1_2066P Total power - K P MCGRATH DRIVE, ELANORA

2066 $551,687

Sewer pump station

C27_2066P Total power - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, BILINGA 2066 $1,173,993 Sewer pump station

CO01_2066O* Operational capacity - CASEYS ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO01_2066P* Total power - CASEYS ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO03_2066E Emergency capacity - SANTA BARBARA ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO03_2066O Operational capacity - SANTA BARBARA ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO03_2066P Total power - SANTA BARBARA ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


CO06_2066O Operational capacity - AKOONAH STREET, HOPE ISLAND


CO08_2066P Total power - BABIRRA STREET, HOPE ISLAND


CO11_2066P Total power - CASEYS ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


D2_2066P Total power - RUNAWAY BAY AVENUE, RUNAWAY BAY


D29_2066P Total power - LAE DRIVE, RUNAWAY BAY 2066 $229,636 Sewer pump station

D45_2066O Operational capacity - EAST QUAY DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS


D45_2066P Total power - EAST QUAY DRIVE, BIGGERA WATERS


D57_2066E Emergency capacity - GOLD COAST HIGHWAY, ARUNDEL


D9_2066O Operational capacity - BRISBANE ROAD, 2066 $353,334 Sewer pump


146 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

ARUNDEL station

D9_2066P Total power - BRISBANE ROAD, ARUNDEL


DA01_2066O Operational capacity - CUTHBERT DRIVE, YATALA


DA01_2066P Total power - CUTHBERT DRIVE, YATALA 2066 $716,390

Sewer pump station

DA06_2066O Operational capacity - HALFWAY DRIVE, ORMEAU

2066 $134,700

Sewer pump station

DA11_2066P Total power - GREYHOUND ROAD, ORMEAU

2066 $569,541

Sewer pump station

GN01_2066E Emergency capacity - WOOLSHED ROAD, STAPYLTON

2066 $431,558

Sewer pump station

GN01_2066P Total power - WOOLSHED ROAD, STAPYLTON


MA02_2066P Total power - MATTHEWS DRIVE, MAUDSLAND


MU1_2066P Total power - GOLD COAST SPRINGBROOK ROAD, MUDGEERABA


MU12_2066O Operational capacity - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, MUDGEERABA


MU12_2066P Total power - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, MUDGEERABA


MU17_2066P Total power - GLADES DRIVE, ROBINA 2066 $117,663 Sewer pump station

MU19_2066E Emergency capacity - BOOGAERDT RISE, BONOGIN


MU2_2066E Emergency capacity - MUDGEERABA ROAD, MUDGEERABA


MU7_2066P Total power - BURKE CRESCENT, MUDGEERABA


MU8_2066O Operational capacity - HIGHFIELD DRIVE, ROBINA


MU8_2066P Total power - HIGHFIELD DRIVE, ROBINA 2066 $833,263 Sewer pump station

N1_2066P Total power - BIRRIBI AVENUE, NERANG 2066 $554,518 Sewer pump station

N11_2066E Emergency capacity - HARPER STREET, MOLENDINAR


N19_2066E Emergency capacity - MILLAROO DRIVE, HELENSVALE


N2_2066E Emergency capacity - NERANG STREET, 2066 $745,778 Sewer pump


147 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

NERANG station

N3_2066P Total power - SHORT STREET, NERANG 2066 $236,501 Sewer pump station

N4_2066E Emergency capacity - SOUTHPORT NERANG ROAD, MOLENDINAR


N9_2066E Emergency capacity - NERANG CONNECTION ROAD, NERANG

2066 $136,687

Sewer pump station

OR05_2066P Total power - MINKA LANE, ORMEAU 2066 $863,740

Sewer pump station

OR10_2066P Total power - PIMPAMA JACOBS WELL ROAD, PIMPAMA

2066 $310,828

Sewer pump station

OX09_2066O* Operational capacity - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HOPE ISLAND

2066 $362,820

Sewer pump station

OX09_2066P* Total power - OXENFORD SOUTHPORT ROAD, HOPE ISLAND


OX29_2066P Total power - OYSTER COVE PROMENADE, HELENSVALE


OX39_2066O Operational capacity - WHYALLA COURT, HELENSVALE


OX39_2066P Total power - WHYALLA COURT, HELENSVALE


PSB_2066O Operational capacity - OAKEY CREEK ROAD, COOMERA


PSB_2066P Total power - OAKEY CREEK ROAD, COOMERA


PSN_2066O Operational capacity - CABBAGE TREE POINT ROAD, STEIGLITZ


PSN_2066P Total power - CABBAGE TREE POINT ROAD, STEIGLITZ


PSP_2066P Total power - BEATTIE ROAD, COOMERA 2066 $277,542 Sewer pump station

PSZ_2066P Total power - CREEK STREET, PIMPAMA 2066 $200,856 Sewer pump station

SP35_2066P Total power - ARCADIA DRIVE, MERMAID WATERS


SP4_2066O Operational capacity - WITT AVENUE, CARRARA


SP52_2066P Total power - SANTA CRUZ BOULEVARD, CLEAR ISLAND WATERS


SP53_2066P Total power - MARTINIQUE WAY, CLEAR ISLAND WATERS


SS12_2066P Total power - MANAKIN AVENUE, 2066 $115,956 Sewer pump


148 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

BURLEIGH WATERS station

SS16_2066E Emergency capacity - UNIVERSITY DRIVE, ROBINA


SS21_2066O Operational capacity - COTTESLOE DRIVE, MERMAID WATERS


SS36_2066P Total power - REGENSBERG CLOSE, VARSITY LAKES

2066 $368,124

Sewer pump station

SS63_2066P* Total power - ROBINA TOWN CENTRE DRIVE, ROBINA

2066 $337,810

Sewer pump station

SS67_2066E Emergency capacity - VARSITY PARADE, VARSITY LAKES

2066 $260,394

Sewer pump station

SS69_2066E Emergency capacity - SNOWWOOD STREET, REEDY CREEK

2066 $44,518

Sewer pump station

UC03_2066E Emergency capacity - RIVER TERRACE, UPPER COOMERA


UC03_2066P Total power - RIVER TERRACE, UPPER COOMERA


UC08_2066P Total power - MICHIGAN DRIVE, OXENFORD


UC17_2066P Total power - HART STREET, UPPER COOMERA


W11_2066E Emergency capacity - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, NERANG


W11_2066P Total power - PACIFIC HIGHWAY, NERANG


W13_2066P Total power - O'SHEA DRIVE, NERANG 2066 $615,154 Sewer pump station

W2_2066P Total power - HICKEY WAY, CARRARA 2066 $210,471 Sewer pump station

W20_2066O Operational capacity - ARISAIG COURT, MERRIMAC


W22_2066P Total power - BAYMILL COURT, MERRIMAC


W32_2066P Total power - TARBERT CLOSE, MERRIMAC


W35_2066P Total power - HINKLER DRIVE, WORONGARY


W39_2066P Total power - MADIGAN ROAD, CARRARA 2066 $1,199,752 Sewer pump station

W45_2066P Total power - COUNTY LANE, MERRIMAC 2066 $141,575 Sewer pump station

W46_2066P Total power - KINGARRY CIRCUIT, 2066 $224,226 Sewer pump


149 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

MERRIMAC station

W49_2066P Total power - ANGELIA LANE, MERRIMAC 2066 $299,959 Sewer pump station

Pi_Co_ST1 Pi-Co Return main - pump capacity upgrade: 350kW total

2021 $1,346,255 Recycled water release

Pi_Co_ST2

Pi Co return main upgrade - 30 ML/day capacity- Pipeline between Saltwater Crk and Coombabah STP (7.7km of 600mm dia. main)


LTR_BTSP_01 to LTR_BTSP_03

Stage 1 Nerang River Crossing Augmentation DN900 Duplication Pipeline 2021 $9,935,700 Recycled water

release

LTR_STG1_01 LTR_STG1_04

Stage 1 Broadwater crossings A & B - 1100mm pipeline


LTR_STG1_02 LTR_STG1_03 LTR_STG1_ND01 to LTR_STG1_ND10

Stage 1 Seaway Release - Northern Diffusers & South Stradbroke Island pipeline augmentation


LTR_STG1_SD01 to LTR_STG1_SD05

Stage 1 Seaway Release - Southern Diffusers 2021 $464,300 Recycled water

release

LTR_Benowa_PC Benowa RW pump capacity upgrade - 3 pumps @ total 3900kW 2021 $6,685,700 Recycled water

release

LTR_Coom_PC Coombabah RW pump capacity upgrade - 3 pumps @ total 3900kW 2021 $6,685,700 Recycled water

release

LTR_Elanora_PC Elanora RW pump capacity upgrade – 2 pumps @ total 1600kW


LTR_STG2_01 LTR_STG2_02 LTR_STG2_ORD01

Offshore Stage 2 Ocean Release System - Nthn Recycled Water Release Diffusers & South Stradbroke Island pipeline

2021 $60,171,400 Recycled water

release

LTR_STG2_03 Southern Stage 2 Augmentation (Merrimac to Benowa) 2021 $42,621,400 Recycled water

release

Pi_Co_ST3 Pi Co return main upgrade - 41 ML/day capacity- Pipeline between Foxwell Rd & Saltwater Crk (2.95km of 600mm dia. main)



Offshore Stage 3 Ocean Release System - Nthn Recycled Water Release Diffusers & South Stradbroke Island pipeline


LTR_STG3_02 Stage 3 Seaway crossing 2026 $19,871,400 Recycled water

release

LTR_STG4_01 Stage 4 Coombabah to Broadwater Augmentation 2036 $71,314,300 Recycled water

release

LTR_Merrimac_PC Merrimac RW pump capacity upgrade - 1 pump @ total 1200kW 2036 $1,950,000 Recycled water

release

LTR_STG5_01 Offshore Stage 5 Ocean Release System - 2036 $59,057,200 Recycled water


150 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost7

Column 5

Infrastructure Type

LTR_STG5_02 LTR_STG5_ORD01

Nthn Recycled Water Release Diffusers & South Stradbroke Island pipeline

release

Pi_Co_ST4 Pi Co return main upgrade - 54 ML/day capacity- Pipeline between Celestial Way & Foxwell Rd (1.75km of 600mm dia. main)



Offshore Stage 6 Ocean Release System - Nthn Recycled Water Release System & South Stradbroke Island pipeline


LTR_STG6_02 Stage 6 Seaway crossing 2066 $19,592,900 Recycled water

release

CO_BIO Centralised Biosolids Facility Stage 1 2021 $50,743,446

Sewerage treatment plant

CO_ST6 Stage 6 (H) Capacity Upgrade: 70,000 EP plus odour control & new PTA

2021 $98,380,150 Sewerage treatment plant

ME_UPG Stages 1 & 2 Online Capacity Upgrade: 24,500EP


PI_ST2 Stage 2 Capacity Upgrade: 68,000EP 2021 $70,419,476 Sewerage treatment plant

ME_ST6 Stage 6 Capacity Upgrade: 70,000EP 2026 $72,490,637 Sewerage treatment plant

CO_ST7 Stage 7 (I) Capacity Upgrade: 70,000 EP 2031 $72,490,637 Sewerage treatment plant


CO_ST8 Stage 8 Capacity Upgrade: 70,000EP (eastern side)


EL_ST2 Biosolids Stage 2 (Thickener and digester ancillary upgrade)



CO_ST9_10 Stages 9 & 10 Capacity Upgrades: 140,000EP - western side


EL_ST3 Stage 3 Capacity Upgrade: 20,000EP plus increase in nutrient removal





Total $1,861,153,424



151 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.2-3: Transport network schedule of works

Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost8

INT_001 Robina Parkway-Cheltenham Drive, Robina 2021 $920,040

INT_002 Foxwell Road-George Alexander Way, Coomera 2021 $1,230,000

INT_003 Foxwell Road-Coomera Station Road, Coomera 2021 $1,230,000

INT_004 Robina Parkway-Markeri Street, Robina 2026 $356,700

INT_005 Depot Road-Creek Street, Pimpama 2031 $1,230,000

INT_006 Musgrave Avenue-Brooke Avenue-Turpin Road, Labrador 2031 $169,256

INT_007 Kumbari Avenue-Wardoo Street-Johnson Street, Southport

2031 $356,700

INT_008 Mirambeena Street-Creek Street, Pimpama 2031 $688,800

INT_009 Pascoe Road-Peachey Road, Ormeau 2031 $688,800

INT_010 Foxwell Road-Finnegan Way-Shipper Drive, Coomera 2026 $6,152,038

INT_011 Old Coach Road-Reserve Road, Upper Coomera 2026 $4,629,885

INT_012 Reserve Road-Rose Valley Drive, Upper Coomera 2031 $2,214,000

INT_013 Old Coach Road-Days Road, Upper Coomera 2021 $5,019,766

INT_014 Old Pacific Hwy-Michigan Drive-Service Road, Oxenford 2031 $2,214,000

INT_015 Binstead Way-Pitcairn Way, Pacific Pines 2031 $688,800

INT_016 Gilston Road-McLaren Drive-Alexander Drive, Nerang 2031 $6,152,038

INT_017 Pitcairn Way-Santa Isobel Boulevard, Pacific Pines 2031 $688,800

INT_018 Pacific Pines Boulevard-Pitcairn Way, Pacific Pines 2031 $688,800

INT_019 Pacific Pines Boulevard-Santa Isobel Boulevard, Pacific Pines

2031 $688,800

INT_020* Robina Parkway-Laver Drive, Robina 2021 $649,440

INT_021 Waterways Drive-SeaWorld Drive, Main Beach 2031 $4,629,885

INT_022 Wardoo Street-Cotlew Street, Southport 2026 $6,152,038

INT_023 Benowa Road-Cotlew Street, Southport 2021 $6,152,038

INT_024 TE Peters Drive-Rio Vista Boulevard, Broadbeach Waters 2031 $2,952,000

INT_025 Rio Vista Boulevard-Rudd Street, Broadbeach Waters 2031 $2,952,000

INT_026 Cottesloe Drive-Rio Vista Boulevard, Mermaid Waters 2031 $2,952,000

INT_027 Old Coach Road-Kingsmore Boulevard, Reedy Creek 2026 $688,800

INT_028 Helensvale Road-Discovery Drive, Helensvale 2031 $4,629,885

INT_029 Eggersdorf Road-Jacobs Ridge Road, Ormeau 2031 $2,214,000

Note––8 The establishment cost is expressed in current cost terms as at the base date.


152 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost8

INT_030 Abraham Road-Turnbull Drive, Upper Coomera 2031 $688,800

INT_031 Marine Parade-Burrows Street, Biggera Waters 2031 $2,952,000

INT_032 Bayview Street-Ocean Street, Runaway Bay 2031 $2,952,000

INT_033 Napper Road-Daintree Drive, Arundel 2031 $688,800

INT_034 Napper Road-Wardley Drive, Parkwood 2031 $688,800

INT_035 Napper Road-Arundel Drive, Arundel 2021 $3,455,726

INT_036 Ashmore Road-Upton Street, Bundall 2026 $2,743,838

INT_037 Monaco Street-Savoy Drive, Broadbeach Waters 2031 $688,800

INT_038* Cheltenham Drive-Laver Drive, Robina 2031 $688,800

INT_039 University Drive-Varsity Parade, Varsity Lakes 2026 $2,952,000

INT_040 University Drive-Lake Street, Robina 2026 $2,952,000

INT_041 Christine Avenue-Burleigh Street, Burleigh Waters 2026 $2,952,000

INT_042 Christine Avenue-Joan Street, Burleigh Waters 2026 $2,952,000

INT_043 Christine Avenue-Dunlin Drive, Burleigh Waters 2026 $1,532,433

INT_044 Palm Beach Avenue-Tahiti Avenue, Palm Beach 2026 $1,637,032

INT_045 Palm Beach Avenue-Philippine Avenue, Palm Beach 2031 $2,952,000

INT_046 Ashmore Road-Harper Street, Molendinar 2031 $688,800

INT_047 Ashmore Road-Heeb Street, Ashmore/Benowa 2031 $130,996

INT_048 Bayview Street-Lae Drive, Runaway Bay 2026 $1,770,708

INT_049 Bayview Street-Poinsettia Street, Runaway Bay 2021 $211,068

INT_050 Beach Road-Ferny Avenue, Surfers Paradise 2031 $356,700

INT_051 Coolangatta Road-Miles Street, Coolangatta 2031 $1,230,000

INT_052 Gold Coast Highway-Musgrave Street, Kirra 2031 $356,700

INT_053 Government Road-Central Street, Labrador 2031 $356,700

INT_054 Guineas Creek Road-KP McGrath Drive, Currumbin Waters/Elanora

2031 $1,230,000

INT_055 High Street-Scarborough Street, Southport 2021 $4,738,773

INT_056 Hinkler Drive-Mortenson Road, Nerang 2031 $191,741

INT_057 Hollywell Road-Parr Street, Biggera Waters 2021 $2,952,000

INT_058 K P McGrath Drive and Angelica Street, Elanora 2021 $2,367,985

INT_059 Main Beach Parade-Waterways Drive, Main Beach 2031 $795,299

INT_060 Mortensen Road-Cayuga Street, Nerang 2031 $1,308,315

INT_061 Musgrave Avenue-Turpin Road, Southport/Labrador 2031 $356,700

INT_062 Napper Road-Captain Cook Drive, Parkwood/Arundel 2031 $1,230,000


153 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost8

INT_063 Nielsens Road-Hickey Way, Carrara 2031 $104,421

INT_064 Nielsens Road-Pappas Way, Carrara 2031 $975,465

INT_065 Peachey Road-Ormeau Shopping Centre Access, Ormeau 2021 $1,572,727

INT_066 Peachey Road-Sandy Creek Road 2031 $6,152,038

INT_067 Reserve Road-Brygon Creek Drive, Upper Coomera 2031 $243,921

INT_068* Robina Town Centre Drive and Laver Drive, Robina 2021 $2,952,000

INT_069 Somerset Drive-Bonogin Road, Mudgeeraba 2031 $356,700

INT_070 Sunshine Blvd-Oceanic Drive, Mermaid Waters 2031 $1,230,000

INT_071 Thrower Drive-Sarawak Avenue, Palm Beach 2021 $2,952,000

INT_072 Waterways Drive-Gold Coast Highway, Main Beach 2021 $339,843

INT_073* Short Street extension, Southport 2031 $3,101,024

INT_074 Smith Street-Hammond Drive, Gaven 2026 $688,800

INT_075 Hinkler Drive-Explorer Way, Worongary 2031 $1,537,500

RD_001 Helensvale Road Upgrade Stage 2 2026 $26,878,329

RD_002 Old Coach Road Upgrade Tallebudgera Creek Rd to Kingsmore Blvd Stage 1

2021 $16,485,000

RD_003 Old Coach Road Upgrade Tallebudgera Creek Rd to Kingsmore Blvd Stage 2

2021 $36,710,000

RD_004 Bermuda Street Extension Stage 1 2021 $38,214,000

RD_005 Bermuda Street Extension Stage 2 2021 $5,612,476

RD_006 Stanmore Road Upgrade Stage 5 2021 $12,300,000

RD_007 Abraham Road Upgrade 2026 $4,200,000

RD_008 Ashmore Road Extension 2031 $22,485,000

RD_009 Highland Way 2031 $8,180,000

RD_010 Pimpama Western Service Road between Pacific Springs Drive and Mirambeena Drive

2026 $4,200,000

RD_011 Burnside Road Upgrade Stage 2 2021 $9,393,432

RD_012 Stanmore Road Upgrade Stage 4 2021 $8,386,993

RD_013 Gilston Road Upgrade Stage 1 2021 $11,110,000

RD_014 Old Coach Road Upgrade between Bridgeman Drive and Kingsmore Boulevard

2031 $13,200,000

RD_015 Goldmine Road Upgrade 2031 $8,827,949

RD_016 Pappas Way West 2031 $4,886,995

RD_017 Foxwell Road Upgrade between Pacific Motorway and the railway line

2021 $4,209,357

RD_018 Pimpama Jacobs Well Road Upgrade between Wharf 2026 $12,874,727


154 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost8

Road and Old Pacific Highway

RD_019 Benowa Road Upgrade 2026 $1,173,518

RD_020 Coomera Town Centre Road A (Celestial Way) 2031 $8,019,263

RD_021 Coomera Town Centre Road B 2026 $36,471,010

RD_022 Coomera Town Centre Road C 2021 $3,711,185

RD_023 Coomera Town Centre Road D 2021 $27,484,502

RD_024 Coomera Town Centre Road E 2021 $11,143,486

RD_025 Coomera Town Centre Road F 2021 $29,120,759

RD_026 Coomera Town Centre Road G 2026 $27,039,458

RD_027 Coomera Town Centre Road H 2026 $5,504,483

RD_028 Coomera Town Centre Road I (Sudbury Dr) 2026 $5,256,583

RD_029 Bonogin Road Upgrade Stage 2 2021 $1,200,000

RD_030 Currumbin Creek Road Upgrade 2021 $919,433

RD_031 Kopps Road Upgrade 2021 $747,040

RD_032 Upper Ormeau Road Upgrade 2021 $459,716

RD_033 Pimpama Jacobs Well Road Upgrade between railway line and Jacobs Well

2026 $1,436,614

RD_034 Old Coach Road Upgrade between Kingsmore Boulevard and Tallebudgera Creek Road

2021 $8,430,470

RD_035 Isle of Capri Traffic Scheme 2021 $35,500,000

RD_036 The Spit Traffic Scheme 2026 $17,000,000

RD_037 Hinkler Drive Upgrade 2031 $2,040,900

RD_038 Coomera Town Centre Road G overpass 2031 $68,102,384

RD_039 Yawalpah Road Stage 1 2026 $4,592,026

RD_040 Yawalpah Road Stage 2 2026 $12,755,627

RD_041 Yawalpah Road bridge duplication - bridge work 2031 $6,000,000

Total $708,197,977



155 ADOPTED REPORT


Table SC3.2-4: Public parks and land for community facilities schedule of works

Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

CF_001 Community Centre ( Ormeau East) - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2026 $867,465

CF_002 Ormeau Central Library - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2021 $4,176,169

CF_003 Northern Gold Coast Sports and Community Precinct - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2021 $218,085

CF_004 Dixon Reserve Expansion - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2031 $475,821

CF_005 Coomera Integrated Community Facility (Purchase of Land) - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2021 $3,186,169

CF_006* Hope Island Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2021 $475,821

CF_007 CBD Community Centre (Southport) - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2026 $655,324

CF_008 Mal Burke Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2026 $475,821

CF_009 Athol Paterson Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2031 $475,821

CF_010 Nerang Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2031 $475,821

CF_011 Surfers Paradise Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2021 $475,821

CF_012 Transit Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2031 $970,821

CF_013 Pacific View Estate Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2026 $758,675

CF_014 Broadbeach Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2031 $1,862,893

CF_015 Albert Waterways Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2021 $474,334

CF_016 Pizzey Park Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2031 $475,821

CF_017 Burleigh Waters Youth Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2026 $475,821

CF_018 Mudgeeraba Community & Youth Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2031 $780,433

CF_019 Robina Youth Community and Recreation Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Existing Land

2026 $475,821



156 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

CF_020 Palm Beach Community Centre - Community Facility - Site Establishment - Land Acquisition

2031 $1,672,511

CL_001 Tchoobey Reserve - Embellish For Recreation Linkage 2031 $174,509

CL_002 Hinterland Regional Park via Upper Mudgeeraba to Austinville Valley - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $394,710

CL_003 Shared trail from Hinterland Regional Park (Mudgeeraba) to Austinville Conservation Area (Austinville Valley) - Land for Recreation Linkage

2031 $822,452

CL_004 Bonogin Reedy Creek Tallebudgera Connection 1 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $799,353

CL_005 Elanora to Currumbin Valley Trail Linkage - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $137,911

CL_006 Elanora Conservation Area - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $146,135

CL_007 Currumbin Border Track - Embellish For Recreation Linkage

2026 $244,313

CL_008 Austinville Conservation Area - Embellish For Recreation Linkage

2026 $401,474

CR_001 Guanaba Reserve - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $97,725

CR_002 Southport Broadwater Parklands (Phase 2) Youth Event Plaza - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $1,174,842

CR_003 Southport Broadwater Parklands (Phase 1) - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $5,997,326

CR_004 Athol Paterson Park - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $4,460,821

CR_005 Gold Coast Regional Botanic Gardens - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $3,330,746

CR_006 Kurrawa Pratten Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $3,759,495

CR_007 Gold Coast Central Park (Recreation Park) - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $16,058,955

CR_008 Gold Coast Central Park (Entry Bridge/Boardwalk) - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $250,797

CR_009 Pizzey Park (Skate) - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $1,090,423

CR_010 John Laws Park - Burleigh combined public amenities and changing spaces - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $294,414

CR_011 Winders Park Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $822,390

CR_012 Queen Elizabeth Park Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation

2031 $587,421

CS_001 Zipfs extension - Land for sport 2031 $6,600,000

CS_002 Mirambeena - Land for sport 2031 $7,150,000


157 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

CS_003 Ormeau Sports Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $535,299

CS_004 Ormeau Sports Park (Lighting 2) - Embellish for Sport 2026 $535,299

CS_005 Ormeau Sports Park (Lighting 1) - Embellish for Sport 2021 $1,090,423

CS_006 Gambamora Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $1,189,552

CS_007 Runaway Bay Sports Precinct West - Embellish for Sport

2026 $797,000

CS_008 Runaway Bay Sports Precinct East - Embellish for Sport 2031 $2,379,104

CS_009 Ashmore Community Park - Embellish for Sport 2026 $380,657

CS_010 Pizzey Park (Soccer and Athletics) - Embellish for Sport 2031 $832,687

CS_011 Somerset Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $416,343

CS_012 Tugun Quarry Mountain Bike - Embellish for Sport 2026 $654,254

DL_001 Pimpama River Conservation Area - Embellish For Recreation Linkage

2031 $383,920

DL_002 Coomera Springs Wongawallan Drive Highland Reserve Link - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $288,607

DL_003 Beattie Road Canelands - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $3,061,611

DL_004 Coombabah Lakelands Conservation Area (Arundel Section) - Embellish For Recreation Linkage

2026 $139,607

DL_005 Tamborine Mountain to Nerang National Park - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $404,979

DL_006 Nerang River Walk Extension 1 - Land for Recreation Linkage

2026 $237,153

DL_007 Nerang River Walk Extension 2 - Land for Recreation Linkage

2026 $237,153

DL_008 Kirribilli Park Recreation Trail 1 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $1,239,539

DL_009 Kirribilli Park Recreation Trail 2 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $285,859

DL_010 South Bay Lake Edge Connection - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $894,777

DL_011 Bonogin Valley to Tallebudgera Valley Trail Connection - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $411,224

DR_001 Cabbage Tree Point - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $680,706

DR_002 Pagan Road Yatala - Land for Recreation 2026 $495,000

DR_003 Colman Road Reserve Day Use Area - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $349,018

DR_004 Northern Gold Coast Sports and Community Precinct - Re-categorise for Recreation

2021 $0


158 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

DR_005 Dixon Reserve Expansion 2 - Land for Recreation 2021 $1,320,000

DR_006 Dixon Reserve Park Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $5,590,895

DR_007 Dixon Reserve Expansion 3 - Land for Recreation 2021 $3,740,000

DR_008 Kerkin Road South Park Mountain Bike & Adventure Play - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $3,985,000

DR_009 Coomera Town Centre Skate Park - Embellish For Recreation

2031 $408,731

DR_010 Sickle Park - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $1,615,408

DR_011 Regatta Waters Park Development - Embellish For Recreation

2031 $3,678,580

DR_012 Tea Trees - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $1,226,193

DR_013 Doug Jennings - Land for Recreation 2031 $2

DR_014 Brockman Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $587,421

DR_015 Musgrave Park Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $368,601

DR_016 Woodroffe Park Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $2,643,395

DR_017 Country Paradise Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $1,236,412

DR_018 Nerang Wet Play (Bischof Pioneer Park) - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $1,155,848

DR_019 Appel Park (Surfers Riverfront) - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $832,687

DR_020 Tiki Reserve (Surfers Riverfront) - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $237,910

DR_021 Lionel Perry (Surfers Riverfront) - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $832,687

DR_022 Emerald Lake Parklands (Soccer) - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $1,724,851

DR_023* Avica Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $5,005,000

DR_024 Colonial Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $13,408,090

DR_025² Robina City Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $5,124,988

DR_026 Robina City Parklands (Masterplan) - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $501,595

DR_027 Hinterland Regional Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $26,170

DR_028 Hinterland Regional Park - Re-categorise for Recreation 2021 $0

DR_029 Hinterland Regional Park - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $1,546,418

DR_030 Tourmaline Reserve Mountain Bike Tracks - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $279,215

DR_031 Salk Oval Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $3,033,358


159 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

DR_032 Bochow Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $817,462

DS_001 Pagan Road Yatala - Land for sport 2026 $550,000

DS_002 Prairie reserve extension - Land for sport 2031 $2,420,000

DS_003 Norfolk Park (Soccer) - Embellish for Sport 2021 $1,853,719

DS_004 Norfolk Park - Embellish for Sport 2021 $59,973

DS_005¹ Albert River Park (formerly Stanmore) - Land for sport 2031 $27,500,000

DS_006 Ormeau Woods State School JV - Embellish for Sport 2031 $2,022,239

DS_007 Mirambeena - Land for sport 2031 $1,650,000

DS_008 Pimpama River Sports Park - Embellish for Sport 2021 $2,355,313

DS_009 Gainsborough Greens - Sports Park - Acquire and Embellish for Sport

2021 $10,890,353

DS_010 Pimpama West Sports Park - Land for sport 2026 $7,817,761

DS_011 Northern Gold Coast Sports and Community Precinct - Embellish for Sport

2021 $201,728

DS_012 Northern Gold Coast Sports and Community Precinct - Embellish for Sport

2021 $14,502,624

DS_013 Coomera Sports Park (Second AFL) - Embellish for Sport

2026 $1,249,030

DS_014 Viney Park Netball (Netball) - Embellish for Sport 2021 $1,308,507

DS_015 Coomera Sports Park (Touch/Rugby) - Embellish for Sport

2026 $475,821

DS_016 Viney Park Sport (Soccer) - Embellish for Sport and Skate

2031 $273,597

DS_017 Hope Island Sports Park - Embellish for Sport 2026 $1,546,418

DS_018 Robert Dalley Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $196,276

DS_019 Robert Dalley Park (Rugby League) - Embellish for Sport

2026 $416,343

DS_020 Regatta Waters Park Sport - Embellish for Sport 2026 $12,678,367

DS_021 Oxenford Park - Embellish for Sport 2021 $2,081,716

DS_022 Kleinschmidt Family Park formerly Riverstone Crossing Amenities - Embellish for Sport

2021 $255,159

DS_023 Flooded Gum Park - Embellish for Sport 2021 $490,690

DS_024 Cooke Murphy Oval (AFL) - Embellish for Sport 2026 $535,299

DS_025 Cos Zantiotis Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $594,776

DS_026 Alan Neilsen Park (Amenities) - Embellish for Sport 2026 $255,754

DS_027 Alan Neilson Park - Embellish for Sport 2031 $535,299

DS_028 Hickey Way Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $6,160,000


160 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

DS_029 Gold Coast Central Park (Sport) - Embellish for Sport 2026 $22,006,716

DS_030 Robina Station Reserve - Embellish for Sport 2031 $214,119

DS_031¹ Firth Park extension - Land for sport 2031 $2,750,000

DS_032¹ Varsity College School Oval - Embellish for Sport 2031 $237,910

DS_033 Kingsmore Park - Embellish for Sport 2026 $214,119

DS_034 Coplick Family Sports Park 1 - Embellish for Sport 2021 $1,553,853

DS_035 Southern School Site for Tennis - Embellish for Sport 2026 $2,022,239

DS_036 Merv Craig Sporting Complex - Embellish for Sport 2031 $214,119

DS_037 Betty Diamond Sports Complex (Rugby League) - Embellish for Sport

2021 $327,127

LL_001 Local Park 4 (Ormeau - Yatala) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2021 $1,176,446

LL_002 Local Park 8 ( Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $1,185,766

LL_003 Local Park 7 (Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,185,766

LL_004 Local Park 11 ( Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,185,766

LL_005 Local Park 14a (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2021 $437,322

LL_006* Local Park 4 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $1,457,741

LL_007* Local Park 27 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $1,457,741

LL_008 Local Park 29 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $726,672

LL_009 Local Park 19c (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $481,055


2021 $281,758

LL_011 Local Park 19b (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $481,055


2021 $281,758


2021 $281,758

LL_014 Local Park 11e (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2021 $281,758

LL_015 Local Park 11d (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2021 $281,758


161 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

LL_016 Local Park 16f (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $154,477


2026 $256,735


2026 $481,055

LL_019 Finnegan Environmental Reserve - Embellish For Recreation Linkage

2031 $59,478

LL_020 Local Park 16g (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $154,477


2026 $154,477

LL_022 Local Park 30 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $726,672


2026 $154,477


2026 $256,735


2026 $154,477


2026 $154,477


2026 $154,477


2026 $256,735

LL_029 Local Park 16i (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $154,477


2026 $256,735

LL_031 Local Park 16h (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $154,477


2031 $154,477


2031 $154,477

LL_034 Local Park 8f (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $154,477

LL_035 Local Park 8g (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $154,477

LL_036 Local Park 8h (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $154,477


162 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

LL_037 Local Park 8i (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $154,477


2031 $154,477


2031 $154,477


2031 $154,477

LL_041 Old Coach Linkage 8 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $129,299


2026 $437,385


2026 $532,750


2026 $378,886

LL_045 Kumuru-Kumuru Linkage 10 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $816,511


2026 $563,771


2021 $730,940


2021 $424,656

LL_049 Hope Island Boardwalk North Local Park 1 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $581,595


2031 $144,077


2031 $441,985


2031 $165,226


2026 $152,855


2031 $155,148


2026 $177,788


2026 $200,843


2021 $582,660


163 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9


2026 $277,024


2026 $133,899


2026 $79,573


2026 $66,487


2026 $66,222


2026 $67,016


2026 $66,117


2026 $71,986


2031 $218,098


2026 $212,484

LL_068 Hope Island Boardwalk Central Local Park 14 - Cantilevered - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2026 $730,998


2021 $415,857


2026 $2,296,959

LL_071 Paradise Point Periphery Park - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $861,603


2026 $256,662


2026 $1,026,646

LL_074 Hope Island Boardwalk South Local Park 34 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $81,482


2021 $88,395


2021 $209,575


164 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9


2026 $367,124


2026 $266,408


2021 $87,655


2021 $282,099


2026 $1,088,375


2026 $162,444


2026 $162,444


2026 $162,444


2026 $162,444


2026 $165,693


2026 $155,946


2026 $165,693


2021 $61,729


2021 $19,136


2021 $112,963


2021 $66,667

LL_093 Hope Island Boardwalk South Local Park 19 - Land & 2021 $203,704


165 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

Embellishment for Recreation


2021 $265,433


2021 $61,729


2021 $61,729


2021 $59,259


2021 $59,259


2021 $61,729


2021 $61,729


2021 $60,000


2021 $61,729

LL_103 Local Park 3 ( Helensvale) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,294,556

LL_104 Local Park 2 ( Helensvale) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,294,556

LL_105 Lake Orr Periphery Park - Land & Embellishment for Recreation Linkage

2031 $919,253

LR_001 Pagan Road Yatala - Land for Recreation 2026 $440,000

LR_002 Calypso Bay Park 2 (Jacobs Well - Alberton) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $859,396

LR_003 Local Park 2 (Ormeau - Yatala) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,176,446

LR_004 Calypso Bay Park 3 (Jacobs Well - Alberton) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $859,396

LR_005 Local Park (Jacobs Well - Alberton) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $859,396

LR_006 Local Park 1 (Ormeau - Yatala) - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $1,176,446

LR_007 Local Park 3 (Ormeau - Yatala) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,176,446

LR_008 Local Park 6 (Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,136,814

LR_009 Local Park 9 ( Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,185,766


166 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

LR_010 Northern Gold Coast Sports and Community Precinct - Embellish For Recreation

2031 $587,421


2021 $1,185,766

LR_012 Local Park ( Pimpama) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,185,766


2021 $1,185,766


2021 $1,185,766

LR_015 Local Park 15d (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $437,322

LR_016 Local Park 15b (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $437,322

LR_017 Local Park 15c (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $437,322


2021 $1,185,766


2021 $1,185,766


2021 $1,136,814

LR_021 Kerkin Road South Park Regional Skate Facility - Embellish For Recreation

2031 $3,985,000


2021 $1,664,442

LR_023 Local Recreation Park (Pimpama) IA - Embellish For Recreation

2021 $616,089

LR_024 Local Park 6 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,408,789


2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741

LR_027* Local Park 26 (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741


2021 $1,408,789


2021 $1,408,789


167 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9


2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741

LR_034 Local Park 12 (Coomera - Big Sky IA) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741


2021 $1,457,741


2026 $1,457,741

LR_039 Local Park 20b (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $629,009

LR_040 Local Park 20a (Coomera) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $629,009

LR_041 Coomera Sports Park Recreation Upgrade - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $1,174,842

LR_042 Local Park - Courtney drive - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $1,153,129

LR_043 Cova Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $752,392


2026 $1,457,741

LR_045 Oyster Cove Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2021 $1,008,641

LR_046 Local Park 1 (Helensvale) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $1,294,556

LR_047 Athol Paterson Park - Local Use - Embellish For Recreation

2026 $587,421

LR_048 Local Park 1 (Nerang - Mount Nathan) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $1,017,145

LR_049 Local Park 2 ( Nerang - Mount Nathan) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $1,066,097

LR_050 Local Park 3 (Nerang - Mount Nathan) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $1,066,097


2031 $1,066,097


2031 $1,066,097


168 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

LR_053 Local Park 6a ( Nerang - Mount Nathan) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $533,049

LR_054 Local Park 6b ( Nerang - Mount Nathan) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $533,049

LR_055 Local Park 1 (Approved DA's Worongary - Tallai) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $1,729,694


2026 $1,153,129


2026 $1,153,129


2026 $1,153,129


2026 $1,153,129

LR_060 Local Park 1 (Carrara) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2031 $3,589,958


2031 $1,153,129


2026 $1,153,129


2026 $1,153,129

LR_064 Hickey Way Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $1,540,000


2026 $1,153,129

LR_066 Avica Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $2,145,000

LR_067 Colonial Park - Land for Recreation 2031 $924,000

LR_068 Robina Local Park 1 - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2026 $919,253

LR_069 Firth Park Local Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $587,421

LR_070 Hinterland Regional Park - Re-categorise for Recreation 2021 $0

LR_071 Tallebudgera Creek Park - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $587,421

LR_072 19th Ave Park (Palm Beach) - Land & Embellishment for Recreation

2021 $894,240

LR_073 Bromley Park Extension - Land for Recreation 2031 $1,540,000

LR_074 Salk Oval Parklands - Embellish For Recreation 2031 $297,388

LR_075 Tugun Quarry Local Park - Embellish For Recreation 2026 $587,421

Total $408,628,274


169 ADOPTED REPORT


Column 1

Map reference

Column 2


Column 3

Estimated timing

Column 4

Establishment cost9

Please note: * This item is partially or wholly located within land affected by other development legislation as identified in Part 10 of

the City Plan. ¹ The project establishment value of $0 represents projects where Council owned land is redesignated/re-categorise from

non-trunk use (i.e. drainage reserve) to trunk use (i.e. local linkage park) without any further works being required for that infrastructure to be used as trunk.

² The project establishment value of $1 represents a nominal transfer fee (a peppercorn) whereby land that is owned and under the full control of the state is ‘gifted’ to Council for use as trunk infrastructure and where no further works are

required for that land to be used as trunk.


170 ADOPTED REPORT


SC3.3 Local government infrastructure plan maps

Map number Map title Gazettal date

Priority infrastructure area and projection areas maps

LGIP-PIA-0 Priority infrastructure area and projection areas map - index

LGIP-PIA-1 Priority infrastructure area and projection areas - map 1

















Developable area map

LGIP-DEV-AREA Developable area map

Plan for trunk water supply infrastructure maps

LGIP-PFTI-WAT-0 Plan for trunk water supply infrastructure map - index

LGIP-PFTI-WAT-1 Plan for trunk water supply infrastructure - map 1












171 ADOPTED REPORT






























Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (sewage collection and treatment) maps

LGIP-PFTI-SEW-SCT-0 Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (sewage collection and treatment) - index

LGIP-PFTI-SEW-SCT-1 Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (sewage collection and treatment) - map 1








172 ADOPTED REPORT































Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (recycled water release) maps

LGIP-PFTI-SEW-RWR-0 Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (recycled water release) map - index

LGIP-PFTI-SEW-RWR-15 Plan for trunk sewerage infrastructure (recycled water release) - map 15







173 ADOPTED REPORT









Plan for trunk parks and land for community facilities infrastructure maps

LGIP-PFTI-REC-0 Plan for trunk parks and land for community facilities infrastructure maps - index

LGIP-PFTI-REC-1 Plan for trunk parks and land for community facilities infrastructure - maps 1

















Plan for trunk transport infrastructure maps

LGIP-PFTI-TRN-0 Plan for trunk transport infrastructure map - index

LGIP-PFTI-TRN-1 Plan for trunk transport infrastructure - map 1










174 ADOPTED REPORT








175 ADOPTED REPORT

Attachment C: Council resolution for detailed infrastructure planning That detailed infrastructure planning be undertaken as a result of the recommended zoning, height and density changes endorsed in Council resolution G18.0323.021 relating to Priority Growth Areas of Labrador, Southport West and Biggera Waters.


176 ADOPTED REPORT

CLOSED SESSION LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2009 AND SUPPORTING REGULATIONS PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Owen-Jones That the Committee move into Closed Session pursuant to Section 275(1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the consideration of the following items for the reason shown:-

Item Subject Reason

3 Report on Development Permit for a material change of use (Impact Assessment) for an indoor recreation facility (Pilates) at 31 Hillcrest Parade Miami

Prejudicial Matter

4 The Spit Master Plan Memorandum of Understanding Update Prejudicial Matter

5 Building Height Refinements for City Plan Major Update 2 and 3 Prejudicial Matter

6 Submission of Proposed City Plan Major Update 2 & 3 for State interest review

Prejudicial Matter

7 Boyd Street, Bilinga Special Purpose Zone investigation Prejudicial Matter

CARRIED

PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr Owen-Jones seconded Cr Taylor That the Committee move into Open Session.

CARRIED


177 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 3 CITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR AN INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY (PILATES) AT 31 HILLCREST PARADE MIAMI – DIVISION 12 – PN92201/01/DA1 REPORT CONFIDENTIAL

REDATED – Confidential Report pages 178 - 194


178 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 3 CITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR AN INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY (PILATES) AT 31 HILLCREST PARADE MIAMI – DIVISION 12 – PN92201/01/DA1 REPORT CONFIDENTIAL

16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended Council of the City of Gold Coast (Council) resolves the following:

1 That the report be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That Council’s notification to the Planning & Environment Court in the matter of Positive Pilates Pty Ltd v City of Gold Coast Council (Appeal Number 4529 of 2017) be that the Court approve the development application the subject of the appeal, subject to the imposition of conditions in this confidential report, subject to limitation on the following operations:

No more than six (6) persons, inclusive of staff and patrons, are present on the site at any one time during the hours of 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday; and

No more than twelve (12) patrons and two (2) staff are present on the site at any one time, outside the hours of 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday.


Sam Monaghan Alisha Swain

A/Senior Planner Director Economy, Planning and Environment

May 2018


195 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 3 (Continued) REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR AN INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY (PILATES) AT 31 HILLCREST PARADE, MIAMI – DIVISION 12 PN92201/01/DA1 REPORT CONFIDENTIAL

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.003 moved Cr O’Neill seconded Cr Baildon 1 That the report be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in accordance with

sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That Council’s notification to the Planning & Environment Court in the matter of Positive Pilates Pty Ltd v City of Gold Coast Council (Appeal Number 4529 of 2017) be that the Court approve the development application the subject of the appeal, subject to the imposition of conditions in this confidential report, subject to limitation on the following operations:

No more than six (6) persons, inclusive of staff and patrons, are present on the site at any one time during the hours of 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday; and

No more than twelve (12) patrons and two (2) staff are present on the site at any one time, outside the hours of 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday.

CARRIED


196 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 3 (Continued) REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (IMPACT ASSESSMENT) FOR AN INDOOR RECREATION FACILITY (PILATES) AT 31 HILLCREST PARADE MIAMI – DIVISION 12 – PN92201/01/DA1 REPORT CONFIDENTIAL

REDATED – Attachments – pages 197-204


197 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 4 CITY PLANNING THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) Refer 55 page attachment 1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 I recommend that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section 275 (1) of

the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves

(h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

1.2 It is recommended that the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those

parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the correspondence received 13 April 2018 from the Minister of Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the Minister) in relation to The Spit Master Plan, including a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). City officers have the following outstanding concerns in relation to signing the MoU:

The list of stakeholders groups as identified in Figure 1: The Spit Master Plan Governance Framework is considered to be an adequate representation of all stakeholders. The Community Reference Group (CRG) is one of four stakeholder groups identified. DSDMIP invited known community groups with a specific interest in The Spit to be part of the CRG. Inherently, this includes both groups that both publicly support and oppose the CST. Broader stakeholder groups, including professional bodies in the development industry, are included in a separate Key Stakeholder Group. The State Government engaged Phillips Group to prepare a Communication and Engagement Strategy, aligned with the timing of key milestones (Attachment 3). The Communication and Engagement Strategy indicates that the broader community will be provided numerous opportunities to be involved throughout the master planning process. Notwithstanding, the list of Councillors who will be consulted throughout the process identified in the Community and stakeholder Engagement Strategy – March 2018 (Attachment 3) does not accurately reflect the Councillors whose divisions occur within The Spit Master Plan study area and requires correction (refer to Section 11 for further details). Considering the above outstanding issues it is recommended:

1. that the Mayor does not sign the MoU in its current form, and sends a reply letter to the Minister detailing outstanding concerns and requesting amendments to the MoU.

2. Council continues to support the master planning process until such time as the MoU is finalised.


205 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) The above approach provides an opportunity for the State to review Council’s recommendations in more detail;

This outcome would reinforce that Council is committed to being part of the decision making process and a member of the Project Control Group (PCG). 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT

On 13 March 2018, Council resolved that a report be provided to Council once the State Government responds to Council’s request that the Coordinator-General reconsider its determination of the coordinated project application for the Oceanside Cruise Ship Terminal (OCST) and confirmation that the CST options will be considered as an option in The Spit Master Plan process.

The purpose of this report is to present correspondence from the Minister, which includes a proposed MoU in relation to The Spit Master Plan and response to the Mayor’s request that the Coordinator-General reassess the OCST coordinated project application. This report also recommends a way forward in relation to the MoU.

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS At its meeting on 13 March 2018, Council resolved (refer G18.0313.024) as follows:

1. “That attachment 8 be deemed a confidential document and the remainder of the report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That Council note the Office of the Coordinator General decision of 1 February 2018. 3. That the Mayor writes to the Queensland Premier (copy to the Minister for the Department of

State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning and Coordinator General) requesting:

a. a confirmation that two potential locations be considered as options for a Gold Coast Cruise Ship Terminal during The Spit master plan process Option A: The Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal (S-CST) on Doug Jennings Park or Option B: The Ocean-Side Cruise Ship Terminal (O-CST) on Philip Park

b. re-assessment of the coordinated project application by the Office of the Coordinator General on the basis that Council and the State government will work together to avoid compromising the master plan process and to limit local community confusion and uncertainty

c. that the Memorandum of Understanding for The Spit master plan be finalised covering:

i. the composition of the Community Reference Group ii. all community and stakeholder engagement strategies the implementation

plans and processes to ensure that the broader community has comprehensive involvement and representation throughout the master planning process

iii. confirmation that the study area, where relating to Main Beach south of Waterways Drive, has been included for context only and its inclusion won’t affect the State’s consideration of any development applications lodged pursuant to the Planning Act 2016

iv. the identification and timing of key milestones of the master plan process. 4. That a further report be provided to Council once the State government provides its decision

on the coordinated project application and confirmation that the Cruise Ship Terminal options will be considered as an option in The Spit master plan process.”

Attachment 1 includes other relevant historic Council resolutions regarding The Spit Master Plan and CST.


206 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) 5 DISCUSSION

5.1 Background On 20 March 2018, the Mayor wrote to the Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk MP, Premier of Queensland in accordance with Council Resolution G18.0313.024. A copy of this correspondence is included in Attachment 2. The Mayor requested:

a. confirmation that two potential locations be considered as options for a Gold Coast Cruise Ship Terminal during The Spit master plan process Option A: The Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal (SCST) on Doug Jennings Park or Option B: The Ocean-Side Cruise Ship Terminal (OCST) on Philip Park



v. the composition of the Community Reference Group vi. all community and stakeholder engagement strategies the implementation

plans and processes to ensure that the broader community has comprehensive involvement and representation throughout the master planning process

vii. confirmation that the study area, where relating to Main Beach south of Waterways Drive, has been included for context only and its inclusion won’t affect the State’s consideration of any development applications lodged pursuant to the Planning Act 2016

viii. the identification and timing of key milestones of the master plan process.

On 13 April 2018, the Minister wrote to the Mayor responding to his letter of 20 March 2018 and addressing the above request. A copy of this correspondence is included in Attachment 3.

5.2 Consideration of the Minister’s response Table 1 presents an assessment of how the Minister’s letter dated 13 April 2018 addressed Council resolution G18.0313.024. Table 1. Assessment of Minister response to Mayoral correspondence Request as per Council

Response from the Minister

Assessment by City officers

Recommendation to Council


207 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) Request as per Council




Re-assessment of the coordinated project application by the Office of the Coordinator-General on the basis that Council and the State Government will work together to avoid compromising the master plan process and to limit local community confusion and uncertainty

The Coordinator–General made a decision based on the council’s application and will, therefore, not reconsider his decision. There is nothing to preclude the council from reapplying following completion of The Spit Master Plan.

Noted. The Minister advised the Coordinator-General will not reconsider his decision.

That the MoU for The Spit Master Plan be finalised covering: the composition

of the Community Reference Group

The Community Reference Group membership was provided (Attachment 3).

Community Reference Group is one of four stakeholder groups. Others are noted in The Spit Master Plan Governance Framework (Figure 1)

DSDMIP invited known community groups with a specific interest in The Spit to be part of the CRG. Inherently, this includes both groups that both publicly support and oppose the CST. Broader stakeholder groups, including professional bodies in the development industry, are included in a separate Key Stakeholder Group.


208 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED




Recommendation to Council Note Community Reference Group membership.

That the MoU for The Spit Master Plan be finalised covering: all community

and stakeholder engagement strategies the implementation plans and processes to ensure that the broader community has comprehensive involvement and representation throughout the master planning process

Community and stakeholder engagement strategies as at March 2018 were provided (Attachment 3).

The program includes pop-up engagement sessions throughout the city, email updates, online engagement, media releases, community information sessions, public displays of the master plan.

Program extends through until March 2019.

The list of Councillors who will be consulted throughout the process does not accurately reflect the Councillors whose divisions occur within The Spit Master Plan study area and requires correction (refer to Section 11 for further details).

Note community and stakeholder engagement strategies and request corrections to the list of Councillors on the stakeholder list.

That the MoU for The Spit Master Plan be finalised covering: confirmation that

the study area, where relating to Main Beach south of Waterways Drive, has been included for context only and its inclusion won’t affect the State’s consideration of any development applications lodged pursuant to the Planning Act 2016

In his letter to the Mayor dated 13 April 2018, the Minister stated “I confirm the area south of the intersection of Seaworld Drive and MacArthur Parade is included in the master plan area solely to provide context, and its inclusion will not affect the state's consideration of any development applications made for sites in that area” (Attachment 3).

This has been addressed.

Noted.

That the MoU for The Spit Master Plan be finalised covering: the identification and

Key milestones of the master plan process and approximate timing were identified in the MoU (Attachment 3).


209 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED





timing of key milestones of the master plan process.


210 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED





Figure 1: The Spit Master Plan governance framework In summary, City officers have the following outstanding concerns in relation to signing the MoU:

Additionally, the list of Councillors who will be consulted throughout the process identified in the Community and stakeholder Engagement Strategy – March 2018 (Attachment 3) does not accurately reflect the Councillors whose divisions occur within The Spit Master Plan study area and requires correction (refer to Section 11 for further details).

5.3 Consideration of options for resolution of outstanding matters


211 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) The Minister has requested that the Mayor sign the revised MoU and return a copy to their office. The Mayor could respond in three ways:

sign the MoU don’t sign the MoU don’t sign the MoU in its current form and request amendments.

Table 2 provides a description of the pros and cons of each option.

Table 2: Description of options to respond to the Ministerial correspondence dated 13 April 2018


212 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1)

Council officers recommend that Option 3, that the Mayor does not sign the MoU and that the Mayor

sends a reply letter to the Minister detailing outstanding concerns and requesting amendments to the MoU. This option genuinely provides an opportunity for the State to review Council’s terms in more

detail and agree to those terms –

This outcome would also reinforce that Council is committed to being part of the decision making process and part of the PCG. 6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN 6.1 Corporate Plan The most relevant Signature Action in the Corporate Plan to The Spit Master Plan relates to the OCST:

Maintain and expand strategic marine industry infrastructure including the delivery of a Cruise Ship Terminal.

6.2 Economic Development Strategy 2013-2023 The development of a CST is aligned with Section 6.3

Infrastructure: Infrastructure that supports productivity and growth and key actions of the Economic Development Strategy 2013-23.

Signature Project:

Tourism infrastructure Development – identify and deliver projects to maximise economic outcomes and the city’s reputation as a world class tourist destination.

Key activities:

Maintain and expand strategic marine industry infrastructure, including the

Broadwater Marine Project Create a purpose built world class dive attraction

6.3 Gold Coast City Plan The most relevant aspect of the Strategic framework features in Strategic intent – globally competitive economy:

Wave Break Island and The Spit are owned by the State Government. They are being investigated for opportunities to support further investment in marine, tourism and recreational activities for the benefit of the Gold Coast and broader Queensland economy. New tourism and marine-oriented activities that take advantage of the unique Broadwater location can enhance the city image and provide lasting economic benefits. We will monitor the outcomes and


213 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


recommendations of the proposed Integrated Resort Development, including a cruise ship terminal, at the Broadwater.

As part of City Plan update Major 1B, Council have resolved to amend this section to reflect the most recent State Government and Council intentions for The Spit and Wavebreak Island. The State is no longer proceeding at the site between Sea World and the Gold Coast Fisherman’s Cooperative, and the City is committed to progressing the OCST. The amended wording is currently with the Minister seeking approval to adopt. 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Budget/Funding Considerations Not applicable. Costs for Capital Works and Service Proposals Not applicable. In accordance with the budget review guidelines the following circumstances require referral to the Special Budget Committee Not applicable. People and Culture Not applicable. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT Specific risks (cons) associated with each potential response to the State Government’s MoU are detailed in Table 2.

9 STATUTORY MATTERS The Spit Master Plan will not have statutory effect. Future implementation work may result in statutory planning implications. This may include changes to City Plan. The extent of proposed changes will not be known until The Spit Master Plan is close to completion, early-mid 2019.

10 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION Table 4 identifies internal stakeholders who have been involved / participated in the report to-date. Table 4: Stakeholders consulted in the preparation of this report Name of Stakeholder Title of the Stakeholder

Consulted Directorate or Organisation

Coordinator Major Projects Transport and Infrastructure Manager Major Projects Transport and Infrastructure

City Solicitor Office of the CEO


214 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) 11 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS The Spit Master Plan governance framework identifies four different interest groups that will be directly engaged in the Enquiry By Design process (Figure 1). These groups will be asked to develop concepts and opportunities for the Spit in a series of workshops. The State Government engaged Phillips Group to prepare a Communication and Engagement Strategy, aligned with the timing of key milestones (Attachment 3). The Communication and Engagement Strategy indicates that the broader community will be provided numerous opportunities to be involved throughout the master planning process. Notwithstanding, the list of Councillors who will be consulted throughout the process identified in the Community and stakeholder Engagement Strategy – March 2018 (Attachment 3) does not accurately reflect the Councillors whose divisions occur within The Spit Master Plan study area and requires correction. The list of Government stakeholders needs to be amended as follows: include Cr Tom Tate (Mayor) include Cr Gary Baildon (Division 7) – as the majority of the master plan area falls within his

division. include Cr Dawn Crichlow (Division 6) – as part of the master plan area falls within her division.

The western boundary of the master plan area is within her division. include Cr Cameron Caldwell (Division 3) – as part of the master plan area falls within his

division. Specifically, the southern part of South Stradbroke Island lies within the master plan area.

include Cr Kristy Boulton (Division 4) - as part of the master plan area falls within her division. The western boundary of the master plan area is within her division.

remove Cr Peter Young (Division 5) – as his division does not fall within the boundaries of the master plan area.

12 TIMING On 1 August 2017, the Premier announced that preparation of The Spit Master Plan will take 18 months; . Advice from the State Government indicates that the master planning process is to be undertaken in three phases. The completion of Phase 3 will note the end of the master planning process.


215 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) 13 CONCLUSION

This report presents the correspondence received 13 April 2018 from the Minister of Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the Minister) in relation to The Spit Master Plan, including a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). City officers have the following outstanding concerns in relation to signing the MoU:

.

The list of stakeholders groups as identified in Figure 1: The Spit Master Plan Governance Framework is considered to be an adequate representation of all stakeholders. The Community Reference Group (CRG) is one of four stakeholder groups identified. DSDMIP invited known community groups with a specific interest in The Spit to be part of the CRG. Inherently, this includes both groups that both publicly support and oppose the CST. Broader stakeholder groups, including professional bodies in the development industry, are included in a separate Key Stakeholder Group. The State Government engaged Phillips Group to prepare a Communication and Engagement Strategy, aligned with the timing of key milestones (Attachment 3). The Communication and Engagement Strategy indicates that the broader community will be provided numerous opportunities to be involved throughout the master planning process. Notwithstanding, the list of Councillors who will be consulted throughout the process identified in the Community and stakeholder Engagement Strategy – March 2018 (Attachment 3) does not accurately reflect the Councillors whose divisions occur within The Spit Master Plan study area and requires correction (refer to Section 11 for further details). Considering the above outstanding issues it is recommended:

1. that the Mayor does not sign the MoU in its current form, and sends a reply letter to the Minister detailing outstanding concerns and requesting amendments to the MoU.

2. Council continues to support the master planning process until such time as the MoU is finalised.

The above approach provides an opportunity for the State to review Council’s recommendations in more detail;

This outcome would reinforce that Council is committed to being part of the decision making process and a member of the Project Control Group (PCG). 16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows:

1. that this report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. that Council note the Ministerial correspondence dated 13 April 2018, including: a. advice that the Coordinator-General has decided not to reassess the

coordinated project application for the Oceanside Cruise Ship Terminal


216 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


b. a Memorandum of Understanding for the preparation of the Master Plan for The Spit signed by the Minister of the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning

c. the composition of The Spit Master Plan Community Reference Group d. The Southport Spit Master Plan Communication and Engagement Strategy –

March 2018.

3. that the Mayor does not sign the MOU in its current form and writes to the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning identifying outstanding concerns, expressing an intent to continue to work

collaboratively and requesting amendments to the MoU.

4. that a further report be provided to Council once the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning provides a response.

Author: Authorised by: Adrien Frew Alisha Swain Senior Strategic Planner Director Economy, Planning & Environment 25 April 2018


217 ADOPTED REPORT


Committee Recommendation Adopted At Council 23 May 2018 Changed recommendation Change to Condition 3 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.004 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Owen-Jones 1 That this report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the

Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 That Council note the Ministerial correspondence dated 13 April 2018, including:

a advice that the Coordinator-General has decided not to reassess the coordinated project application for the Oceanside Cruise Ship Terminal

b a Memorandum of Understanding for the preparation of the Master Plan for The Spit signed by the Minister of the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning

c the composition of The Spit Master Plan Community Reference Group

d The Southport Spit Master Plan Communication and Engagement Strategy – March 2018.

3 That the Mayor writes to the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning identifying outstanding concerns, expressing an intent to continue to work collaboratively and requesting amendments to the MoU.

4 That a further report be provided to Council once the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning provides a response.

CARRIED

ADOPTED AT COUNCIL 23 MAY 2018 RESOLUTION G18.0529.020 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Gates

That Committee Recommendation EPE18.0523.004 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:- 1 That this report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts

deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171(3) and 200(5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 That Council note the Ministerial correspondence dated 13 April 2018, including:

a advice that the Coordinator-General has decided not to reassess the coordinated project application for the Oceanside Cruise Ship Terminal

b a Memorandum of Understanding for the preparation of the Master Plan for The Spit signed by the Minister of the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning

c the composition of The Spit Master Plan Community Reference Group

d The Southport Spit Master Plan Communication and Engagement Strategy – March 2018.

3 That the Mayor writes to the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning identifying outstanding concerns,


218 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) CONFIDENTIAL

expressing an intent to continue to work collaboratively and requesting amendments to the MoU.

4 That a further report be provided to Council once the Minister for the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning provides a response.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


219 ADOPTED REPORT

iSPOT:#69375964 Page 1 of 1

Attachment 1 Other Relevant Historic Council Resolutions regarding The Spit Master Plan and Cruise Ship Terminal


220 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

Attachment 1: Relevant historic Council resolutions regarding the Spit Masterplan and Oceanside cruise ship terminal At its meeting on 13 March 2018, Council resolved (refer G18.0313.024) as follows:

1. “That attachment 8 be deemed a confidential document and the remainder of the report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That Council note the Office of the Coordinator General decision of 1 February 2018. 3. That the Mayor writes to the Queensland Premier (copy to the Minister for the

Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning and Coordinator General) requesting:

a. a confirmation that two potential locations be considered as options for a Gold Coast Cruise Ship Terminal during The Spit master plan process Option A: The Seaway Cruise Ship Terminal (S-CST) on Doug Jennings Park or Option B: The Ocean-Side Cruise Ship Terminal (O-CST) on Philip Park



i. the composition of the Community Reference Group ii. all community and stakeholder engagement strategies the

implementation plans and processes to ensure that the broader community has comprehensive involvement and representation throughout the master planning process

iii. confirmation that the study area, where relating to Main Beach south of Waterways Drive, has been included for context only and its inclusion won’t affect the State’s consideration of any development applications lodged pursuant to the Planning Act 2016

iv. the identification and timing of key milestones of the master plan process.

4. That a further report be provided to Council once the State government provides its decision on the coordinated project application and confirmation that the Cruise Ship Terminal options will be considered as an option in The Spit master plan process.”

At its meeting on 8 December 2017, Council resolved (refer G17.1208.030) as follows:

1. “That submission of the next Oceanside Cruise Ship Terminal report be provided to Council upon receipt of the draft Terms of Reference from the Coordinator General (thus nominally by 28 February 2018).

2. That the Chief Executive Officer progress the marine ecology and user survey/social impact assessment (total estimated cost $75,000), on the basis that such works are required over the summer period, are relatively compact and precise in scope, and of public value beyond the OCST project.

3. That the above works are progressed through the existing contract LG314/621/16/200 with Price Waterhouse Coopers. An extension of the current engagement is required to maintain the continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process.”

At its meeting on 30 May 2017, Council resolved (refer G17.0530.024) as follows:


221 ADOPTED REPORT

“That Committee Recommendation ED17.0525.002 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:

2. That the report and presentation be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

3. That Council notes the business case for the Ocean-Side Cruise Ship Terminal feasibility study and acknowledges the positive benefit cost ratio range of 3.0 to 3.9 associated with a home port.

4. That based on the positive benefit cost ratio it is in the public interest to continue the investigation into the Ocean-Side Cruise Ship Terminal.

5. That Council endorses the procedural steps as outlined in section 5.7 of the report for works to commence June 2017. These steps include:

a. an Initial Advice Statement for submission to the State Government (Office of the Coordinator General)

b. seasonal (winter / spring) flora and fauna studies c. design and geotechnical information to support an Initial Advice Statement

submission d. continuing market sounding

Further, that funding for this work is considered as part of the 2017-18 budget process.

6. That contract LG314/621/16/200 with Price Waterhouse Coopers be varied to include the additional scope identified within this report, as extension of the current engagement is required to maintain the continuity of expert advice, making it disadvantageous or impractical to undertake a competitive process.

7. That the procedural steps beyond those outlined in recommendation 4 above be the subject of an update report to be provided to Council in October 2017.”

At its meeting on 18 October 2016, Council resolved (refer G16.1018.025) as follows: “That Committee Recommendation ED16.1013.005 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:

1. That Council note the update for the Ocean-side Cruise Ship Terminal feasibility study.

2. That Council, based on the reasons as outlined in Section 5.2 of this report, reduces the locations for investigation through the feasibility study from three to one, with the focus being a location ocean-side of Philip Park.

3. That to further inform The Spit master plan process, the Mayor writes to the Premier noting Council’s preference for further investigation of the ocean-side of Philip Park as the focus for the cruise ship terminal.

At its meeting on 15 September 2016, Council resolved (refer G16.0915.004): “Council defers consideration of the application for a development permit for a Material Change of Use for Apartments, Resort Hotel, Tourist Facility (Museum Art Gallery and Aquarium) Shop, Restaurant, Café, Takeaway Food Premise, Service Industry (Group A), Convenience Shop, Tourist Shop and Outdoor Sport and Recreation and Development Permit for operational works for prescribed tidal works, until such time as Council, in partnership with the State Government, proceeds to develop a plan for the Spit, so as to address land use, density, height and other planning matters for incorporation into a future amendment of the City Plan, within a timeframe of no longer than 12 months.” At its meeting on 7 June 2016, Council resolved (refer G16.0607.020) as follows: “That Committee Recommendation ED16.0602.006 be adopted, with a change to Part 2,


222 ADOPTED REPORT

such that it reads in its entirety as follows: 1. That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except Attachment 3

which be deemed confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That the City undertakes the feasibility investigations to assess Ocean-side Cruise Ship Terminal options as outlined in this report.”


223 ADOPTED REPORT


Attachment 2 Mail Correspondence from the Mayor to the Minister – Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDMIP) dated March 20, 2018


224 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


225 ADOPTED REPORT


226 ADOPTED REPORT


227 ADOPTED REPORT


228 ADOPTED REPORT


229 ADOPTED REPORT


230 ADOPTED REPORT


Attachment 3 Mail Correspondence from Minister – Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDMIP) to the Mayor dated April 13, 2018


231 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

The Hon. Cameron Dick MP Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning Queensland

Government

Our ref: MBN17/1557

13 APR 2018

1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000 PO Box 15009 City East Queensland 4002 Australia Telephone +61 7 3719 7200 Email [email protected] www.dsdmip.q1d.gov.au

Councillor Tom Tate Mayor Gold Coast City Council PO Box 5042 GOLD COAST MAIL CENTRE QLD 9729

Dear Cou.rpti rcr'''Tate h4/1

I refer to your letter of 20 March 2018 to the Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk, Premier and Minister for Trade, about the master plan for The Spit and the cruise ship terminal proposed by the Gold Coast City Council (the council). The Premier has asked me to respond on her behalf.

I reiterate that the Queensland Government has a strong appreciation of your views about the vital function the council performs in managing and enhancing The Spit. I also concur with your views about the importance of the master planning process currently underway.

Please find enclosed an updated version of the terms of reference for the Project Control Group, comprising representation at a senior officer level from the state government, the council and the Gold Coast Waterways Authority. The Project Control Group is supported by the role that you and I will perform to enable the collaborative preparation of the master plan.

As foreshadowed by the Deputy Premier in her letter of 9 October 2017, the conduct of this role will be the subject of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between you and me, on behalf of the council and the state government, respectively. I confirm that this MOU includes consideration of the planning impacts of the cruise ship terminal in its scope.

Two copies of the MOU, as amended following consultation with council officers, are enclosed. I invite you to execute these copies by inserting the date of your approval on page 3 and providing a witnessed and dated signature on page 9. Please retain a copy for your records and return one copy to the following address:

Office of the Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning PO Box 15009 CITY EAST QLD 4002


232 ADOPTED REPORT

In relation to your request that the Coordinator-General re-assess his decision on the council's application for the ocean-side cruise ship terminal to be declared a coordinated project, the Coordinator-General advised me that he made a statutory decision based on the council's application and will, therefore, not be reconsidering his decision. However, there is nothing to preclude the council from re-applying to the Coordinator-General following the completion of the master plan.

In relation to the issues about which the council seeks clarity, please find enclosed:

• the proposed membership of the Community Reference Group, noting that the governance arrangement provides for a key stakeholder group (comprising representative business organisations such as the Southport Chamber of Commerce and the Gold Coast branch of the Urban Development Institute of Australia) and a Landholder Advisory Group (comprising representatives of existing businesses on The Spit)

• the Communication and Engagement Strategy, noting that a more detailed description of engagement activities will be provided to the council when the sequencing of various master planning activities is determined by the master planning team

• the program, which sets down the milestones of the master planning process.

As I believe is evident from the consultation process to date (for example, the extensive number and widespread locations of the recently convened pop-up consultation sessions) and the intention to invite a significant number of self-nominated members of the community to the major consultation events, the aim is to enable the broader community to have every opportunity to be involved in the master planning process.

I confirm the area south of the intersection of Seaworld Drive and MacArthur Parade is included in the master plan area solely to provide context, and its inclusion will not affect the state's consideration of any development applications made for sites in that area.

The Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the department) has arranged for the initial consultation event for The Spit master plan to be convened on 28 and 29 April 2018. This event will focus on establishing a shared understanding among all stakeholders of the existing condition and cultural significance of The Spit, and producing a shared vision for the future of The Spit.

I invite you or your nominee to join me in extending a welcome to the participants at this event on 28 April 2018 and to describe the importance of The Spit for the council. A copy of the agenda for the event is enclosed for your information.

I look forward to working with you and the council to deliver a master plan for the future of The Spit that will strike the right balance between protecting environmental and community values, meeting existing government commitments and providing for future development.

If you require further information, please contact Mr James Coutts, Executive Director, Priority Planning Projects, in the department, on (07) 3452 7673 or [email protected], who will be pleased to assist.

Yours sincerely •

CAMERON DICK MP Minister for State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning

Enc (6)

Page 2 of 2


233 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 4 (Continued) THE SPIT MASTER PLAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING UPDATE PD113/1275/17(P1) REDACTED – Attachment pages 234-269


234 ADOPTED REPORT


Attachment 4 Terms of Reference – Spit Masterplan Workshop Series (March 2018)


270 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

Purpose

In August 2017, the state government committed to delivering a community-led master plan to revitalise The Spit and increase its benefit to the Gold Coast as a community asset. The Southport Spit master plan process will feature a series of workshops that will enable participants to put forward their ideas in an open forum, understand the views of others and contribute to the preparation and evaluation of master planning options and outcomes.

Participants

The invited participants in the workshop series will represent a range of community, business and environmental viewpoints. Representatives of the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDMIP), Gold Coast City Council and Gold Coast Waterways Authority will also be in attendance.

Commitment of participants to the workshop series

Participants commit to attending all four workshops in the series during the master planning process to ensure continuity and understanding of issues. Due to the nature of the workshop process, it is not possible to introduce a new participant part way through the process or substitute one participant for another once the process has commenced. A participant may resign by providing their resignation in writing to DSDMIP. Participation in the workshop series will be void when a participant fails to attend a workshop or breaches the meeting protocols.

Terms of reference Spit Masterplan workshop series

MA

RC

H 2

01

8


271 ADOPTED REPORT

Terms of reference - 2 -

Media

A participant in The Spit master plan workshop series is not authorised to speak to the media on behalf of the participants in the workshop series.

Payment

Participation in the workshop series is on a voluntary basis, and no payment will be made for participation.

Workshop facilitator

DSDMIP will nominate a workshop facilitator to manage the workshop process.

Participation

Each workshop participant agrees to: respect the views of other participants participate positively in meetings. It is the responsibility of DSDMIP to: organise and host the workshops create a constructive environment for all participants in the workshop series.

Workshops

Number and timing of workshops

Four workshops will be held between April 2018 and early 2019 on the following dates: Saturday 28 and Sunday 29 April 2018 Saturday 21 and Sunday 22 July 2018 Saturday 24 and Sunday 25 November 2018 A weekend in early 2019 (to be confirmed).

Record keeping

Workshop outputs will be collated and made available on the project website within a month of each workshop. Comments will not be attributed to an individual participant and a verbatim record of the workshops will not be compiled.


272 ADOPTED REPORT

Terms of reference - 3 -

Meeting protocols

A workshop participant is to respect the views of other participants and participate positively in meetings. A workshop participant should not repeatedly disrupt other participants or disrespect the right of other people to participate. Each participant acknowledges that a breach of these meeting protocols will void their participation in the remainder of the workshop series.

Dispute resolution

It is not a requirement that consensus be reached among participants on any matter discussed in the workshops. Differing views will be noted and taken into consideration.


273 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 5 CITY PLANNING BUILDING HEIGHT REFINEMENTS FOR CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 AND 3 PD98/1132/04/39

Attachment C: Correspondence from the Minister of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 I recommend that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section

275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves

(h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the

interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

1.2 I recommend that the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those


2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Building Height Study was undertaken to re-define the building height policy direction in City Plan based on city shape values and citywide principles that seek to balance the city’s natural landscape values with on-going infrastructure investments and built form. The study included a building height strategy which comprised a series of recommendations to assist with updates to the building height policy direction in City Plan. In response to the Building Height Study, in October 2017, Council endorsed a staged approach to the implementation of the building height strategy comprising of four phases to be delivered from November 2017 to early 2019.


274 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 5 (Continued) BUILDING HEIGHT REFINEMENTS FOR CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 AND 3 PD98/1132/04/39

It is proposed that these recommendations be endorsed to be included in the merged City Plan Major update 2 & 3 package, which forms part of this Agenda, to be sent for State interest review. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to seek endorsement to refine building height and residential density in specific instances, namely:


275 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS Building Height Study Council resolved on 25 July 2017 (G17.0725.016) as follows:

1. That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That the report be noted.

3. That the document titled ‘Building Height Study – An Approach to City Image – Volume 2 – Building Height Strategy and City Plan Recommendations – dated 5 July 2017’ inform amendments to the policy direction for building height in the City Plan as part of Major Update 2 and any other consequential amendments as required, with the exception of principle 5 which will be considered at a later time.

4. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee be engaged in relation to the URBIS Report and proposed amendments to the building height in the City Plan as part of Major Update 2 and any other consequential amendments as required.

5. That a further report detailing the City Plan amendments related to the recommendations set out in ‘Building Height Study – An Approach to City Image – Volume 2 – Building Height Strategy and City Plan Recommendations – dated 5 July 2017’ be brought back for further consideration by the City Planning Committee.

6. That a further report be brought back in relation to the Central Park Precinct to a future City Planning Committee Meeting.

Phased approach for the delivery of the building height policy in City Plan

Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) as follows:


2. That the staged approach to implement the building height strategy is endorsed.

3. That the funding and resource requirements, as outlined in the report, be considered as part of the next budget review.

Major update 2 Council resolved on 28 November 2017 (G17.1128.013) as follows:



276 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


2. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to (in accordance with section 20 of the Planning Act 2016, and Minister’s Guidelines and Rules Under the Planning Act 2016 July 2017):

a. write to the Minister requesting a State interest review of Major update 2 and the Minister's agreement to publicly consult on the proposed amendments;

b. provide the Minister with a consultation report which outlines the extent and outcomes of consultation undertaken with State agencies and the public in preparing the proposed amendments;

c. provide the Minister with a written statement about the communication strategy Council intends to implement at the public consultation phase of the proposed amendments;

d. provide the Minister with the written statement about how the proposed addresses the relevant state interests;

e. provide the Minister with the written statement about how the key elements of a planning scheme mentioned in s16(1) of the Planning Act 2016 have been addressed;

f. provide the Minister with any relevant background studies or reports that informed the preparation of the proposed amendments; and

g. provide the Minister with any other material required in accordance with Schedule 3 – Required material in the Minister’s rules.

3. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make minor editorial modifications where required to the proposed City Plan update package outlined in Attachment A.

4. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to prepare a letter and any supporting documents advising the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning of recommendation 2.

Merge of Major update 2 and 3 to City Plan

Council resolved on 30 April 2018 (G18.0430.019) as follows:


2. That the recommendations identified in Attachment A be endorsed.

5 DISCUSSION 5.1 Building height in City Plan The City Plan currently regulates building height in, either (as outlined in Figure 1 below):

(a) metres; or (b) metres, as well as number of storeys up to 4 storeys.


277 ADOPTED REPORT


Figure 1: How building height is currently expressed in City Plan.

Where a building height is specified in both storeys and metres, both height designations apply. It is important to note that appropriate building heights for City Plan were converted from the 2003 planning scheme, which regulated in storeys only.

5.2 Changes in height definitions The introduction of the Queensland Planning Provisions (QPP), which formed the basis of City Plan, created a set of standardised land use and administrative definitions. ‘Building height’ and ‘storey’ were part of those standardised administrative definitions, which significantly differed to the definitions provided in the 2003 planning scheme. The key differences are summarised in the table below: Table 1: Key differences between 2003 planning scheme and City Plan definitions for ‘building

height’ and ‘storey’

Definition 2003 planning scheme City Plan Key differences Building height

The distance measured vertically from ground level to the highest point of a building, including projections such as architectural features, advertising signs and vent pipes. On those sites where fill is required by Council or its delegate, building height must be measured vertically from the required fill level. Unless the Local Area Plan or domain controls state otherwise, the maximum building

If specified: a) in metres, the

vertical distance between the ground level and the highest point of the building roof (apex) or parapet at any point, but not including load-bearing antenna, aerial, chimney, flagpole or the like; or

b) in storeys, the number of storeys above ground level; or

The definition adopted by City Plan incorporated storeys as an additional way in defining building height.

3 storeys and 15m

15m

EXAMPLE:

An example of building height in storeys and

metres

32m

32m

An example of building height in metres only


278 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Definition 2003 planning scheme City Plan Key differences height control also applies to structures that are separate from any building on the site.

c) in both metres and storeys, both (a) and (b) apply.

Storey “….

i) a ground floor storey that does not exceed 4.5 metres constitutes one storey only;

ii) if the ground floor storey of a building does not exceed 3.0 metres (residential use) or 4.0 metres (non-residential use), a topmost habitable storey that does not exceed 4.5 metres constitutes one storey only….”

“… v) the number of

storeys in any building shall be calculated as the greatest number of storeys in any vertical plane from ground level.”

Note: The relevant components of the storey definition have been focused upon for the purposes of this report.

A space that is situated between one floor level and the floor level next above, or if there is no floor above, the ceiling or roof above, but not a space that contains only: a) a lift shaft, stairway

or meter room; b) a bathroom, shower

room laundry, water closet, or other sanitary compartment;

c) a combination of the above.

A mezzanine is a storey. A roofed structure on or part of a rooftop that does not solely accommodate building plant and equipment is a storey. A basement is not a storey.

2003 planning scheme specifies a numerical measurement for how high a storey could be depending on the land use (i.e. residential or non-residential). City Plan does not regulate a maximum height. Only the minimum floor to ceiling height is regulated through the Building Act 1975 and the Building Code of Australia. The 2003 planning scheme states that the number of storeys in any building should be calculated as the greatest number of storeys in any vertical plane from ground level. City Plan does not calculate in any vertical plane.

1 Major update 2 package was endorsed by Council on 28 November 2017 (G17.1128.013), which is now being merged with Major update 3 as endorsed by Council (G18.0430.019) on 30 April 2018


279 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



280 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



281 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



282 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



283 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



284 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



285 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



286 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



287 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


o

6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN The City Plan is identified as a key deliverable in ensuring the themes of the Corporate Plan are achieved. Accordingly, all the themes (the best place to live and visit, prosperity built on a strong diverse economy and people contribute to a strong community spirit) of the Corporate Plan are applicable. A robust City Plan is essential to achieve the desired outcomes detailed in the Corporate Plan. The City Plan is an initiative in the Operational Plan. 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Not applicable. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT This activity supports the mitigation of Planning and Environment Directorate Risk number CO000510:

‘City Plan delivers inadequate and/or ineffective strategic/development policy (e.g. poor planning, built form, growth, social and environmental outcomes - including flood impacts).’

9 STATUTORY MATTERS The proposed changes to City Plan constitute a major amendment under the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules, July 2017 (MGR). The proposed updates, if endorsed, will form part of Major update 2 and 3 to be sent for State interest review.


288 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 5 (Continued) BUILDING HEIGHT REFINEMENTS FOR CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 AND 3 PD98/1132/04/39 10 COUNCIL POLICIES Not applicable. 11 DELEGATIONS Not applicable. 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION The Building Height Study, and the phased approach to implementing the building height strategy, has previously been extensively consulted with City Development.

Internal stakeholders will continue to be consulted as the City Plan Major update 2 & 3 package is progressed through the statutory stages. 13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS The updates to City Plan recommended by this report will form part of the merged Major update 2 and 3 package to be sent for State interest review in May 2018. Under the statutory process, the merged Major update 2 & 3 package to be sent for State interest review will be required to undergo a public consultation period for a minimum of 20 business days (with all submissions considered) prior to its adoption. 14 TIMING This matter is proposed to be progressed as part of the City Plan Major update 2 & 3 package to be sent for State interest review in May 2018.

Planning and preparation State

interest review

Public consultation

Changing the

proposed amendment

Effect of changes on consultation

Minister’s consideration

Adoption

Prepare amendment

content

Progress to state interest review

Minister considers

and decides how to

proceed

Address ministerial

requirements Review

submissions Make

changes Consider changes

Progress to minister

Decision to adopt

Undertake public

consultation

Minister advises on adoption

15 CONCLUSION


289 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those


2 That the proposed updates to City Plan maps, as identified in Attachment A, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2 and 3.

3 That the proposed updates to City Plan drafted content, as identified in Attachment B, be endorsed to be included in City Plan Major update 2 and 3.

4 That educational material about building height is developed to inform and assist the community with understanding how the designated building height is determined and applied, upon commencement of Major update 2 and 3.


Chris Harris Senior Planner

Alisha Swain Director Economy, Planning & Environment

1 May 2018


290 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Committee Recommendation Adopted At Council 23 May 2018 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.005 moved Cr O’Neill seconded Cr Baildon 1 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by

the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.




CARRIED

ADOPTED AT COUNCIL 23 MAY 2018 RESOLUTION G18.0529.019 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr O’Neill

That Committee Recommendation EPE18.0523.005 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:- 5 That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts

deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.




CARRIED

Cr McDonald requested that her vote in the negative be recorded Cr Vorster was not present for the vote Cr Vorster returned to the room at 2.28pm


291 ADOPTED REPORT


Attachment A (Confidential)


292 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



293 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



294 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Attachment B (Confidential)


295 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Attachment B(i):


296 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Attachment B(ii):


297 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Attachment C Letter from the Minister of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning


298 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

Planning and Development Services (SEQ South) PO Box 3290 Australia Fair QLD 4215

Our reference: MC17/5174; MA-00006 Your reference: PD98/1132/04/45 #65813065 16 March 2018 Mr Dale Dickson Chief Executive Officer Gold Coast City Council PO Box 5042 GCMC QLD 9729 Dear Mr Dickson Notice of request for further information (Given under chapter 2, part 4, section 17.3 and chapter 2, part 5, section 25.1 of the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules) Thank you for submitting the proposed City Plan Major Update 2 (Major Update 2) to the then Minister for Planning, the Honourable Jackie Trad MP, on 8 December 2017 for state interest review and approval to proceed to public consultation under chapter 2 of the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules 2017 (MGR). On 12 January 2018, the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the department) sent the Gold Coast City Council (the council) a notice requesting additional information on Major Update 2 and pausing the timeframes until 18 May 2018. The department has carried out a further review of Major Update 2 and has determined that currently Major Update 2 does not appropriately address relevant state interests. In accordance with chapter 2, part 4, section 17.3 and chapter 2, part 5, section 25.1 of the MGR, the department requests further information and changes to Major Update 2 to address the state interests as identified in Attachment 1. As you would be aware, the Queensland Government has committed to maintaining a three-storey height limit on the Spit. We trust that this will be reflected in the planning scheme. We note the Southport Spit Master Plan exercise is being led by the department in collaboration with the council and the Gold Coast Waterways Authority. We appreciate your ongoing commitment to this project. If you require further information, I encourage you to contact Thomas Holmes, Senior Planning Officer, Planning and Development Services within the department, on 07 5644 3217 or by email at [email protected]. Yours sincerely

Rebecca de Vries A/Manager, Planning and Development Services (SEQ South) Attachment 1 – Request for further information


299ADOPTED REPORT


Attachment D (Confidential)


300 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 6 CITY PLANNING SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46

Attachment B – Previous resolutions

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 It is recommended that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to

section 275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves



1.2 It is recommended that the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for

those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report seeks Council endorsement of the proposed City Plan Major update 2 & 3 package (Attachment A) to progress to the Minister for State interest review in accordance with the Section 20 of the Planning Act 2016 (the Act) and the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules (MGR). On 30 April 2018 (G18.0430.019) Council resolved to:

1. withdraw City Plan Major update 2 from State interest review;

merge Major update 2 with Major update 3;

City Plan Major update 2 & 3 is now comprised of 31 items and addresses approximately 140 improvement suggestions received from internal and external stakeholders.

A brief summary of the package items is provided in the table in Section 5.1 of this report. Under the MGR, prior to submitting an amendment to the Minister, the local government must ‘decide to amend the planning scheme.’ This report also seeks endorsement to fulfil this statutory process.

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT This report seeks Council endorsement to ‘amend the planning scheme’ and progress the proposed City Plan Major update 2 & 3 (Attachment A) to the Minister for State interest review in accordance with Section 20 of the Act and the MGR.


301 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS A list of resolutions relating to the scope and content of Major update 2 & 3 is included in Attachment B. 5 DISCUSSION 5.1 Progression of City Plan Major update 2 & 3 to State interest review City Plan Major update 2 & 3 is now comprised of the following 31 items:

Topic (listed alphabetically) Summary

Major update 2 items (previously resolved by Council (28 November 2017) to send to State interest review):

1. Administrative definitions - building height terminology

2. Biodiversity areas

3. Building height overlay map

4. Category of development and assessment for Caretaker’s accommodation, Emergency services, Park, Permanent plantation and Substation in various zones

5. Category of assessment for Shop in the High density residential zone

6. Category of assessment for Transport depot in the Rural and Rural residential zones

7. Chevron Island zoning, height and density

8. Communal space and private open space provisions


302 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46


9. Driveways and vehicle crossings code

10. Employment lands planning investigation

11. Healthy waters code

12. Major building height and residential density anomalies – Phase 1

13. Mapping updates

14. Reconfiguring a lot code - access easements

15. Road widening overlay code and overlay map

16. Rural and Rural residential landscape and environment precinct mapping updates

17. Transport outcomes

18. Updates to interface areas of community facilities

19. Updates to the Dual reticulation overlay code and Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay map

20. Upper Coomera investigation area

21. Vegetation management


303 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Topic (listed alphabetically) Summary mapping

Major update 3 items:

22. 5 year growth allocation project

23. Building height updates

24. Built form and urban design outcomes

25. Industrial land uses

26. Introduction of the Low-medium density residential zone (Major building height and residential density anomalies – Phase 2)

27. Investigation of Neighbourhood centres

28. Major building height and residential density anomalies – Phase 3

29. Mapping updates

30. Retirement living and aged person’s accommodation


304 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



31. Tables of assessment format updates

The drafted City Plan Major update 2 & 3 amendment package, proposed for progression to State interest review is provided in Attachment A. Further explanation on the nature and details of the above items can be found in the proposed amendment package.

5.2 Package changes as required by the State government The structure of the drafted amendment package provided in Attachment A has changed from what was submitted to Council to progress Major update 2 for State interest review on 28 November 2017 (G17.1128.013). Previously, the proposed amendments were contained in each item of the update package and only showed the drafted ‘track changes’ as an extract of the relevant City Plan document. It has since been required by the Department of State Development, Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Planning (the Department) to provide a complete ‘track changes’ version of City Plan for the proposed amendments, as specified in the guidance document for the MGR. This is to assist in completing the State interest review in a timely and efficient manner whilst maintaining clarity and transparency of the changes made throughout the process. As such, the drafted content for Major update 2 & 3 is contained in Appendix 1 (word document format with track changes) and Appendix 2 (mapping changes) of Attachment A. It is important to note that the drafting of the proposed amendments has been carried out using City Plan version 4 which is the current endorsed version. This means the drafting does not reflect changes made in City Plan Major update 1 and 1B as these proposed updates are yet to be fully endorsed by Council.

5.3 Additional changes beyond the scope of administrative and consequential

updates Since progressing the various projects that have informed the development of the Major update 2 & 3 package to Council, a number of potential improvements have been found that vary from the drafting that has been endorsed by Council with each update item. This has been made particularly evident while the drafting of the package has been undertaken. The following table summarises the additional changes to City Plan content which has previously been endorsed by Council, that are beyond the scope of an administrative or consequential change to implement the endorsed policy direction.

Topic Additional changes

3. Building height overlay map


305 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



9. Driveways and vehicle crossings code


306 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



15. Road widening overlay code and overlay map

17. Transport outcomes

18. Updates to interface areas of community facilities


307 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



22. 5 year growth allocation project

24. Built form and urban design outcomes


308 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



5.4 Endorsement and package progression Upon Council endorsement of the attached City Plan Major update 2 & 3, the package will be forwarded to the Minister for State interest review to fulfil Part 4 of the MGR process. It is recommended that the draft amendment package not be made publically available at this stage of the process, as it will still be subject to change following review by the State Government. The confidentiality of this package at this stage will assist in establishing a clear message that the draft updates do not carry any weight in development assessment. Once the State has finalised its review, under the MGR, this package will undergo a minimum 20 business day public consultation period. 6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN The City Plan is identified as a key deliverable in ensuring the themes of the Corporate Plan are achieved. Accordingly, all the themes (the best place to live and visit, prosperity built on a strong diverse economy and people contribute to a strong community spirit) of the Corporate Plan are applicable. A robust City Plan is essential to achieve the desired outcomes detailed in the Corporate Plan. The City Plan is an initiative in the Operational Plan. 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Not applicable. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT Items within City Plan Major update 2 & 3 mitigate the Planning and Environment Directorate Risk number CO000510:

City Plan delivers inadequate and/or ineffective strategic/development policy (e.g. poor planning, built form, growth, social and environmental outcomes - including flood impacts).

9 STATUTORY MATTERS City Plan Major update 2 & 3 will progress in accordance with the Act and the MGR. The recommended changes to City Plan contained in this report and attachments will constitute a major amendment under the MGR. Under the MGR, prior to submitting an amendment to the Minister, the local government must ‘decide to amend the planning scheme.’


309 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 This report seeks Council endorsement to ‘amend the planning scheme’ and progress the amendment package to the Minister in accordance with the MGR. The diagram below outlines the relevant steps for a major amendment and the progress of Major update 2 & 3:

Planning and preparation State

interest review

Public consultation

Changing the

proposed amendment

Effect of changes on consultation

Minister’s consideration

Adoption

Prepare amendment

content

Progress to state interest review

Minister considers

and decides how to

proceed

Address ministerial

requirements Review

submissions Make

changes Consider changes

Progress to minister

Decision to adopt

Undertake public

consultation

Minister advises on adoption

The supporting documents required to be provided to the Minister for State interest review (in accordance with Schedule 3 of the MGR), include:

1. An electronic copy of the proposed amendment in the format identified by the department.

2. A statement addressing the state interests in the relevant regional plan and SPP which includes—

a) how the state interests are integrated in the amendment;

b) reasons why any state interests have not been not integrated in the amendment; and

c) any state interests that are not relevant.

3. A statement about how the key elements of a planning scheme mentioned in section 16(1) of the Act have been addressed and if the amendment is consistent with the regulated requirements.

4. A communications strategy.

5. An indicative timeframe for the completion of the amendment process.

6. Any background studies or reports that informed the preparation of the amendment, including any strategic study or report, or review required under section 25(1) of the Act.

7. Any natural hazards, risk and resilience evaluation report prepared having regard to the SPP.

8. Any relevant mapping (if available).

9. Any other information considered relevant by the local government. The proposed amendments will be provided as a complete ‘track changes’ version of City Plan as specified in the guidance document for the MGR.


310 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 10 COUNCIL POLICIES Not applicable. 11 DELEGATIONS Not applicable. 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION

Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Consulted


Is the stakeholder satisfied with the recommendations (Yes/No)

Cherie Watt Executive Coordinator, Legal Services

Office of the CEO Yes

Drafting of the City Plan Major update 2 & 3 has involved extensive consultation with internal stakeholders as follows:

City Development;

Office of the City Architect;

Legal Services;

Regional Planning;

Environment Planning;

Natural Hazards;

Gold Coast Water and Waste;

Economic Development and Major Projects (the former);

City Infrastructure (Transport and traffic branch); and

Strategic Infrastructure Team (LGIP). Internal stakeholders will continue to be consulted as the package is progressed through the statutory stages. External stakeholders have previously been informed of the ‘upcoming’ Major update 2 package through Council’s Planning and Development Alert (the Alert) and Council’s website. Additional communication will occur through the Alert and Council’s website, to identify the merge of Major update 2 & 3 and the progress/status of the amendment. The recommended content will not be made available until public consultation occurs. Council officers have liaised with State Government officers on the content, approach and timing of the update package. 12.1 Proposed Communications Strategy Once Council has addressed any Ministerial requirements identified through the State interest review, the update package will progress to public consultation.


311 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 As part of the submission to the Minister requesting State interest review, Council is required to provide a written statement about the Communications Strategy Council intends to implement for community consultation. A more detailed Communications Strategy will be presented to Council in late 2018 (subject to receiving approval from the Minister at this stage) on the specific consultation activities proposed as part of the formal public notification period for this update package. It is recommended that the following outline of activities form part of the proposed Communications Strategy that is required to be provided to the Minister:

targeted multi-channel advertising campaign to reach residents in the update area advising them of the update, where to view the update and how to make a submission;

publish notices in relevant local newspapers and on Council’s website;

update Council’s website with information on how to view the update, get further information and how to make a submission;

provide the update for viewing online, at Council customer service centres and at meet the planner sessions;

planners will be available for consultation at strategic city locations;

create a suite of fact sheets to inform the community of proposed changes;

ensure planning officers are available to answer telephone enquiries and speak individually with people about the proposed update and how to make a submission;

utilise communication tools such as Council’s Planning & Development Alert, City of Gold Coast Newsletter and social media channels to inform the community of the update, where to view the update and how to make a submission; and

creating an online portal to receive submissions.

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS This update package has no implications for development assessment until the public consultation phase (however, there will be training/learning opportunities provided for City Development prior to public consultation). There are no stakeholder impacts evident for this stage of the statutory process. 14 TIMING Upon Council endorsement, the Major update 2 & 3 package will be progressed to the Minister to commence the State interest review. The MGR outlines a non-mandatory timeframe of 60 business days for the State to complete the State interest review. Following the State interest review, City officers will seek Council endorsement to publicly consult City Plan Major update 2 & 3.


312 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 15 CONCLUSION This report seeks Council endorsement to ‘amend the planning scheme’ and progress the proposed City Plan Major update 2 & 3 (Attachment A) to the Minister for State interest review in accordance with the Act and MGR.

16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts


2 To amend the City Plan in accordance with section 20 of the Planning Act 2016, and Minister’s Guidelines and Rules Under the Planning Act 2016 - July 2017. The proposed amendment, referred to as ‘City Plan Major update 2 & 3’ is Attachment A to this report.

3 That the Chief Executive Officer notify the Minister of Council’s decision to amend City Plan, and provide all required material for the proposed major amendment as prescribed in Schedule 3 of Minister’s Guidelines and Rules Under the Planning Act 2016 - July 2017.

4 That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make minor editorial modifications where required to proposed amendment ‘City Plan Major update 2 & 3’


Kellie Parker / Lisa Kubler Alisha Swain Senior Planner / A/Supervising Planner Director Economy, Planning and

Environment 8 May 2018


313 ADOPTED REPORT


COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.006 moved Cr O’Neill seconded Cr Baildon 1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the

Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 To amend the City Plan in accordance with section 20 of the Planning Act 2016, and Minister’s Guidelines and Rules Under the Planning Act 2016 - July 2017. The proposed amendment, referred to as ‘City Plan Major update 2 & 3’ is Attachment A to this report.

3 That the Chief Executive Officer notify the Minister of Council’s decision to amend City Plan, and provide all required material for the proposed major amendment as prescribed in Schedule 3 of Minister’s Guidelines and Rules Under the Planning Act 2016 - July 2017.

4 That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make minor editorial modifications where required to proposed amendment ‘City Plan Major update 2 & 3’.

CARRIED


314 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 6 (Continued) SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CITY PLAN MAJOR UPDATE 2 & 3 FOR STATE INTEREST REVIEW PD98/1132/04/46 REDACTED – Attachment pages 315-1331


315 ADOPTED REPORT

Attachment B – Resolutions for City Plan Major Update 2 & 3

Overarching/scoping/process resolutions

Council resolved on 1 September 2015 (G15.0901.023) as follows:

1. That the following City Plan amendment program be adopted:

a Administrative and minor amendments will occur on an ‘as needs basis’

b Target submission of major amendments to the State Government every 6 months

Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) to endorse the staged approach to building height (and items with a nexus to building height) as follows:


2. That the staged approach to implement the building height strategy is endorsed.

3. That the funding and resource requirements, as outlined in the report, be considered as part of the next budget review.

Council resolved on 14 November 2017 (G17.1114.015) as follows:


2. That the items that are identified in this report as being ready will progress to State interest review as part of Major update 2 in November 2017.

3. That progression of Major update 2 is discontinued under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and the Statutory guideline 01/16 Making and amending local planning instruments.

4. That Council proposes to commence a major amendment (Major update 2) to the City Plan in accordance with section 20 of the Planning Act 2016 and the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules to facilitate the progression of the 19 items identified in this report to State interest review in November 2017.

5. That in accordance with section 22 of the Planning Act 2016 and Chapter 3 of the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules, Council resolves to prepare a major amendment to City Plan Policies to support the delivery of the Major update 2 amendment package.



2. To endorse the current proposed program of updates to the City Plan:

a. Major Updates – to be informed by the list of items identified in Attachments A and B.

b. Minor and Administrative Update 4 and 5:

i. minor and administrative amendments in accordance with the Minister’s Guidelines and Rules.

ii. to facilitate timely adoption of appropriate State’s natural hazard mapping (such as the bushfire hazard mapping), where possible, Council notify


1332 ADOPTED REPORT

affected landowners through rates notices.

c. Major Update to City Plan Policies (Schedule 6) 2 – to be informed by the working list of items identified in Attachments A and B.

3. A future work program of projects and general policy refinements be updated and presented at a City Planning Committee in 12 months.

Council resolved on 30 April 2018 (G18.0430.019) as follows:


2. That the recommendations identified in Attachment A be endorsed.

Major update 2 items resolutions:

Biodiversity areas and Vegetation management mapping

Council resolved on 3 March 2017 (G17.0303.016) as follows:

1. That the report be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act.

2. That Council notes the following updated natural asset scientific reports;

a Native Vegetation Cover Mapping and Community Representation Report 2016 (Attachment 1)

b Species of City-wide Significance for Conservation Report 2016 (Attachment 2)

c Critical Corridor and Substantial Remnant Mapping Report 2016 (Attachment 3)

3. That Council supports the use of these reports in updating corporate mapping layers, informing City Plan updates and to assist the delivery of City services and programs.

4. That Council note that any changes to policy via City Plan updates will be supported by additional reporting that will be brought back to Council for consideration.

5. That Council supports ongoing natural asset scientific report updates (including those relating to native vegetation, native species and the natural asset network) in response to legislative changes, improved methodologies and new information, and that such reports be presented to Council for consideration.


1333 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED



2. That Council endorse the draft Environmental significance – Biodiversity area overlay map (attachment 1) and draft Environmental significance – Vegetation management overlay map (attachment 2) for incorporation into City Plan as part of Major Update 2.

3. That Council note that consequential amendments will be required to the City Plan Strategic framework map 4 and City plan policy - Ecological site assessments, resulting from the updated overlay maps.

Administrative definition – building height terminology and Building height overlay map

Council resolved on 25 July 2017 (G17.0725.016) as follows:





5. That a further report detailing the City Plan amendments related to the recommendations set out in ‘Building Height Study – An Approach to City Image – Volume 2 – Building Height Strategy and City Plan Recommendations – dated 5 July 2017’ be brought back for further consideration by the City Planning Committee.


Chevron Island zoning, height and density

The Chevron Island planning investigation was first introduced and noted by Council on 28 March 2017 (G17.0328.025):


2. That the contents of this introductory paper be noted.


1. That the report/attachment be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2. That the recommended policy positions, as identified in Attachment A, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2.


1334 ADOPTED REPORT

3. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee be informed on the proposed City Plan updates as part of Major update 2.

4. That the proposed changes to the City Plan, including the strengthening of the provisions controlling densities, be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

5. That the other recommendations, as identified in Attachment A, be further investigated and considered as part of a future update package.

6. That the future reviews of Chevron Island be undertaken as transport infrastructure evolves in the City.

Category of development and assessment for Caretaker’s accommodation, Emergency services, Park, Permanent plantation and Substation in various zones




3. That the proposed changes to the City Plan be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

4. That City officers investigate the structure of the codes in City Plan as part of a future update.

Major building height and residential density designation anomalies



2. That the amendments to the Building height and Residential density overlay maps, as identified in Attachment A, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2.

3. That the proposed changes to the Building height and Residential density overlay maps be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

Communal space and private open space provisions




3. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee be informed on the proposed City Plan updates as part of Major update 2.



1335 ADOPTED REPORT

Designing for flood

Note: Council resolved (confidentially) to remove Designing for flood from Major update 2 and to progress it as a separate Major update.

Council resolved on 28 March 2017 (G17.0328.025), the following for the introductory paper “update on natural hazard project (providing Council with an outline of the proposed update to Council’s flood free access policy, set out in the Flood overlay code):


2. That the contents of this report be noted.

Council resolved on 13 June 2017 (G17.0613.012):

1. That the report be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with section 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act.

2. The City Plan be updated, as part of the ‘Designing for Flood’ scope item in Major Update 2, to include additional policy outcomes relating to a sheltering-inplace approach as an alternative to evacuation.

3. City officers will bring a report to a future City Planning Committee meeting, addressing additional proposed updates to the Flood overlay code as part of the ‘Designing for Flood’ scope item Major Update 2.

4. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee be consulted on proposed content prior to progressing to State interest review.

5. The details of these updates be further considered as part of a consolidated update package (upon completion of drafting) when ready for submission for State interest review.

Council resolved on 25 July 2017 (G17.0725.016):

1. That the report be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with section 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That the City Plan be amended in accordance with the shelter-in-place policy framework outlined in this report.

3. That the City Plan be amended, as part of the ‘Designing for Flood’ scope item in Major Update 2, to include a Flood Emergency Management Plan policy to support the shelter-in-place policy framework.

Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) (Shelter in place policy) as follows:


2. To endorse the proposed amendments to the Flood overlay code as identified in Attachment 2 to be included as part of the Major update 2 package.

3. To note that the City Plan Policy - Flood Emergency Management Plan presented in Attachment 1 is required to support the shelter-in-place policy position in the Flood overlay code and it will be incorporated into a future Major Schedule 6 City Plan Policy amendment and a future Minor amendment to City Plan.


1336 ADOPTED REPORT

4. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative and consequential amendments prior to progressing to State interest review.

Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) (Minimum flood free land policy) as follows:


2. To endorse the proposed minimum flood free land policy as identified to inform updates to the Flood overlay code as part of Major update 2 package.

3. To prepare a Temporary Local Planning Instrument to implement minimum flood free land and return a TLPI package for endorsement before making a submission to the Minister for Planning.

Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) (Various Flood overlay code updates) as follows:


2. That the proposed amendments identified in Attachment 1 inform the updates to the Flood overlay code as part of the Major update 2 package.

3. That the proposed changes to City Plan be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

Employment Lands Planning Investigation

Council resolved on 7 December 2017 (G16.1207.016) as follows:

1. That the report be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act.

2. That the Employment Lands Planning Investigation be received and noted.

3. That the regular monitoring of employment land supply be undertaken as part of the ongoing City Monitoring program to:

a Maintain the employment lands model; and

b Identify opportunities for Council to investigate new employment lands as opportunities arise.

4. That options to update City Plan be investigated and brought back to Council for consideration to address the recommendations identified in Attachment 3 of this report as amended, to include Low impact industry zoned land.”

Council resolved on 13 June 2017 (G17.0613.012) (for Employment lands planning investigation Part 1) as follows:


2. The recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment A) be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2, including any consequential updates and alignment to Planning Act 2016 terminology.

3. That the proposed changes to the City Plan be brought back to the Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.


1337 ADOPTED REPORT

Council resolved on 15 September 2017 (G17.0905.024) to not endorse the officer’s recommendation, but proceed as follows:


2. That High Impact Industry zoned land take up rates be monitored and an investigation be undertaken when required to identify new High impact industry zoned land, to expand the Yatala enterprise area to the east of the M1 and appropriately separated from sensitive land uses.

3. That a report be brought back to realign levels of assessment and code provisions for industrial land uses in industrial zones.



2. It is recommended that the City Plan be updated to remove the Future industry precinct designations from the 39 properties identified in Attachment 1 as part of the City Plan Minor Update 4 package.

3. It is recommended that City Plan be updated to replace the levels of assessment for land uses in the Future industry precincts with their respective industrial activity base zones, except where levels of assessment for business and industrial activities are ‘accepted subject to requirements’, these will be changed to code assessment.

4. It is recommended that the revised tables of assessment for the Future Industry Precincts, as outlined above, be updated as part of City Plan Major Update 2.

Healthy waters code



2. That the proposed amendments identified in Attachment 2 as amended inform the updates to the Healthy waters code as part of the Major update 2 package.

3. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee be consulted on the proposed content prior to progressing to State interest review.


Rural and Rural residential landscape and environment precinct mapping updates

The City Plan 2015 Special Committee, at its meeting of 18 February 2015 (endorsed by CP15.0325.008 and G15.0402.021) recommended:

…

2. That Council commences an holistic review of all Rural and Rural Residential ‘Landscape and Environment Precinct’ mapping contained within the draft City Plan 2015 for inclusion as part of Amendment 1.


1338 ADOPTED REPORT

3. That in regard to areas of policy change:

a Subject to State support, all identified GIS anomalies in the Rural and Rural Residential Landscape and Environment Precincts be resolved prior to commencement of the City Plan;

b For the Rural Landscape and Environment Precinct:

i. All identified new environmental or scenic amenity areas be retained to support hinterland, environment and landscape values, until the findings of an holistic review of the precinct mapping is considered, or otherwise separately resolved as part of consideration of submissions;

ii. Notwithstanding the above, the precinct mapping east of the Pacific Motorway in Division 1, be amended by removing the identified new and scenic amenity areas recognising that the scenic amenity values in this location are related to rural production activities.



2. That the Rural and Rural residential landscape and environment precinct mapping methodologies included in Attachment A be used to update the City Plan zone mapping as part of City Plan Major update 2.

3. That the updated Rural and Rural residential landscape and environment precinct mapping be presented to Council as part of City Plan Major update 2 in November 2017.

4. That Council note further investigations will be undertaken in relation to how City Plan addresses landscape and scenic amenity values.

Updates to interface areas of community facilities



2. The recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment A) be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2 including any consequential updates.

3. That further investigation of the interface areas of the Community infrastructure identified on the Industry, community infrastructure and agriculture land interface area overlay are undertaken and reported back as part of a future Major update.

4. The Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or editorial amendments related to recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment A).

5. That the City Plan Major update 2 package be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

Upper Coomera investigation area




1339 ADOPTED REPORT

2. That City Plan Major Update 2 (draft Courtney Drive, Upper Coomera Investigation Area) include:

a Changes to zones resulting in additional Rural zone and Emerging community zone (Attachment 5);

b Creation of an Emerging Community zone - Upper Coomera precinct with overall outcomes to be informed by the principles identified in Attachments 6 and 7.

3. That draft City Plan content to implement the Courtney Drive, Upper Coomera Investigation Area be reported in October 2017, for endorsement in City Plan Major Update 2.

4. That infrastructure identified to support urban development of the Courtney Drive, Upper Coomera Investigation Area is considered for inclusion within the scope for the next version of the Local Government Infrastructure Plan.

5. That the Director Planning & Environment write to property owners of the Courtney Drive, Upper Coomera Investigation Area and provide a copy of the submission report (Attachment 3).

6. That Council endorse draft concept sketches for the Baileys Mountain Road intersections with Jenkins Court and Reserve Road (Attachment 9) identifying land required to be protected for future road works.



2. That the recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment C) are endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2.

Updates to the Dual reticulation overlay code and Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay map



2. The City Plan be updated to include the following policy outcomes:

a Include new provisions in the Reconfiguring a lot code to manage access handles and easements.

b Update the Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay maps to include the Two Supply System area policy position.

c Update mapping to:

iii. change all landings to ‘unzoned’ property;

iv. change all Council owned access restriction strips to Special purpose zone; and

v. make consequential changes as required to ensure City Plan mapping is calibrated to the new zonings

d Update mapping of a previously owned Energex property located in Ridgeway Avenue, Southport to be consistent with the surrounding mapping designations.


1340 ADOPTED REPORT

3. The policy changes set out in item 2 be included as part of the scope for Major update 2 and the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to these items.

4. That the proposed changes and final drafting to the City Plan be brought back to the City Planning Committee for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.



2. That the Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay map, code and references throughout City Plan be updated to include the Dual Supply System Area policy position as identified within this report/ attachment.

3. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to these items.

Driveways and vehicle crossings code



2. The recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment A) be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2 including any consequential updates, including City Plan Policies.

3. That the City Plan Major update 2 package be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

Transport outcomes & Road widening overlay code and overlay map


That Committee Recommendation CP17.0830.006 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:-


2. That City Plan be updated in accordance with proposed drafting in Attachment A and Attachment B as well as recommendations outlined in the following tables herein as amended:

a Table 1: Drafting and workability updates within Transport code;

b Table 2: Access to visitor parking within Transport code;

c Table 3: Additional triggers for Traffic Impact Assessments (TIA) within Transport code;

d Table 4: Provisions relating to development adjoining roads on the Functional road hierarchy within Transport code;

e Table 5: Car parking rates in the Transport code;


1341 ADOPTED REPORT

f Table 6: Bicycle parking rate updates to the Transport code;

g Table 7: Transport hub area figure update within Transport code; and

h Table 8: Transport outcomes within the Reconfiguring a lot code.

3. The Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to these items.

4. That the Mayoral Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) be informed of the policy refinements proposed in Recommendation 2a-2h above.

General Policy Refinements


City Plan Major Update 2 to include an increase to the level of assessment for a Transport Depot in the rural zone to impact assessment.


1. That the report be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2. That the City Plan be updated to include the following policy outcomes:

a Amend Tables of assessment, Table 5.5.3: High density residential zone to ensure a Shop where establishing in an existing non residential premises, involving only minor building work and a neighbourhood store not exceeding 150m2 is self-assessable development.

b Amend Tables of assessment, Table 5.5.21 Rural residential zone (where not in a precinct) to ensure a Transport Depot is impact assessable development.

c Update mapping to include the unzoned portion of Lot 1 SP284733 in the Mixed use zone, in the ‘24m’ building height designation area on the Building height overlay map and in the ‘RD5’ density designation area on the Residential density overly map.

d Update mapping to include Lot 3 on RP94306 in the ‘LDR1’ designation area on the Residential density overlay map.

3. That the policy changes set out in recommendation 2 included as part of the scope for Major update 2 and the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to these items.



That Committee Recommendation CP17.0315.010 be adopted as printed which reads as follows:-


2. The City Plan be updated to include the following policy outcomes:


1342 ADOPTED REPORT

a Include new provisions in the Reconfiguring a lot code to manage access handles and easements.

b Update the Water catchments and dual reticulation overlay maps to include the Two Supply System area policy position.

c Update mapping to:

i change all landings to ‘unzoned’ property; ii change all Council owned access restriction strips to Special purpose zone;

and iii make consequential changes as required to ensure City Plan mapping is

calibrated to the new zonings

d Update mapping of a previously owned Energex property located in Ridgeway Avenue, Southport to be consistent with the surrounding mapping designations.

3. The policy changes set out in item 2 be included as part of the scope for Major update 2 and the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to make any administrative or consequential modifications to these items.

4. That the proposed changes and final drafting to the City Plan be brought back to the City Planning Committee for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

Major update 3 items resolutions:

5 year Growth Allocation Project


6. That Council endorse the Building our City – Light Rail Corridor 2015 Update Report.

7. That the Building our City – Light Rail Corridor 2015 Update Report publication be made available to the community through Council’s website.

8. That Council notes the Building our City – Light Rail Corridor 2015 Update Report will be presented to Council in mid-2018.

9. The Mayor writes to the relevant State and Federal Members providing a copy of the Building our City – Light Rail Corridor 2015 Update Report.

Council resolved on 25 July 2017 (G17.0725.016) as follows:

1. That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act.




5. That a future report detailing the City Plan amendments related to the recommendations set out in ‘Building Height Study – An Approach to City Image – Volume 2 – Building


1343 ADOPTED REPORT

Height Strategy and City Plan Recommendations – dated 5 July 2017’ be brought back for further consideration by the City Planning Committee.


Council resolved on 17 October 2017 (G17.1017.013) to implement a staged approach to the development of the policy direction for building height through the Building Height Study, with Phase 2 to:

1) Utilise the findings from the Infill Capacity Assessment to inform potential updates to relevant overlay maps.

2) Retain the 50% exceedance test in the Strategic Framework.

3) Investigate the introduction of the Low-medium Density Residential Zone.

4) Fix the remaining anomalies between zoning, height and density across the city (excluding the Light Rail Stage 3 corridor and the Spit).

5) Review available existing development data to improve the baseline for relevant overlay maps.

6) Remove the optional Community Benefits Bonus Policy and replace with improved built form provisions that can be applied more broadly.

7) Strengthen the scheme’s existing amenity controls to improve built form outcomes.

8) Consider the introduction of an impact assessment trigger when exceeding the provisions shown on the Residential density overlay map.





Council resolved on 13 March 2018 (G18.0313.017) as follows: (5 year growth project Part A)


2. That the recommended next steps of Part A of the 5 year Growth Allocation Project be endorsed as per Attachment A.

3. That the background report for the Part A of the 5 year Growth Allocation Project be noted (Attachment B).

4. That a future report be brought back to Council for consideration containing Part B of the 5 year Growth Allocation Project.


1. That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3)


1344 ADOPTED REPORT

and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That Attachment A be endorsed as the recommended policy changes to City Plan with the deletion of Part 6 pf Attachment ‘A’.

3. That Attachment B: Background paper be noted.

4. That Attachment C: Review of available existing development data be noted.

5. That a report be brought back to Council with the drafted changes to City Plan to implement the policy changes contained in Attachment A.

Building height updates


1. Utilise the findings from the Infill Capacity Assessment to inform potential updates to relevant overlay maps.

2. Retain the 50% exceedance test in the Strategic Framework.

3. Investigate the introduction of the Low-medium Density Residential Zone.

4. Fix the remaining anomalies between zoning, height and density across the city (excluding the Light Rail Stage 3 corridor and the Spit).

5. Review available existing development data to improve the baseline for relevant overlay maps.

6. Remove the optional Community Benefits Bonus Policy and replace with improved built form provisions that can be applied more broadly.

7. Strengthen the scheme’s existing amenity controls to improve built form outcomes.

8. Consider the introduction of an impact assessment trigger when exceeding the provisions shown on the Residential density overlay map.



2. That Attachment A be endorsed as the recommended policy changes to City Plan with the deletion of Part 6 pf Attachment ‘A’.

3. That Attachment B: Background paper be noted.

4. That Attachment C: Review of available existing development data be noted.

5. That a report be brought back to Council with the drafted changes to City Plan to implement the policy changes contained in Attachment A.

Note: on this agenda (23 May 2018) is additional recommendations relating to building height.

Built form and urban design outcomes

Council resolved on 15 November 2016 (G16.1115.016) that the Introductory Paper – Community Benefit Bonus Elements Policy Review be noted, as follows:


1345 ADOPTED REPORT


2. That the contents of this report be noted.

Council resolved on 30 May 2017 (G17.0530.018) as follows:


2. That Council proposes to commence a major amendment (Major update 2) to the City Plan in accordance with section 117(1) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Statutory Guideline 01/16 ‘Making and amending a local planning instruments’.

3. That the scope list for Major update 2 outlined in Attachment 1 be endorsed.

4. That Council advise the Minister of this decision, in accordance with section 117(1) of the Statutory Guideline 01/16 Making and amending local planning instruments, by providing:

a. A written statement advising of the decision to update City Plan;

b. A written statement about the nature and details of Major update 2 (Attachment 1); and

c. A written statement about how State and regional interests may be integrated within the proposed Major update 2.

5. That the Chief Executive Officer be authorized to prepare and update the written statements dealing with matters referred to in 4 (a) to (c) addressed to the Minister.

6. That further reports detailing the City Plan updates for each scope item be brought back for consideration by the City Planning Committee.

7. That upon receipt of the letter from the Minister confirming state interests, officers proceed to prepare Major update 2 to the City Plan.

Council resolved on 13 June 2017 (G17.0613.012) as follows:


2. That the following option be endorsed with City Plan changes to be investigated as part of Phase 2 of the project:

a. Remove the existing Policy from City Plan;

b. Incorporate additional design elements into the relevant City Plan Codes;

c. Include a level of assessment trigger in City Plan for development that exceeds density on the Residential density overlay map.

3. That the Design and Urban Context Policy be prepared and presented to Council at a future meeting.

4. That urban elements mapping be investigated and presented to Council at a future meeting to determine how it could be implemented to guide outcomes for higher density development.

5. That Phase 2 of the project commence and be presented to Council at a future meeting as part of Major update 2.


1346 ADOPTED REPORT












2. That the proposed updates to City Plan, as identified in Attachment A, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

3. That the proposed drafted content, as identified in Attachment B, be endorsed in principle to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

4. That the proposed Light Rail urban renewal area overlay map and Strategic framework map 3 – Light rail urban renewal area, as identified in Attachment C, be endorsed in principle to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.


6. That a City Plan policy – Design and Context, be prepared to be presented to Council at a future meeting for endorsement prior to being included in a Major Schedule 6 City Plan Policy amendment.

7. That a review of zoning around existing light rail stations be undertaken to allow for greater range of non-residential uses in and around transit stops.

8. That ‘The Urban Ground Guideline’, as identified in Attachment D, be endorsed.

9. That the report ‘Valuing Good Urban Design on the Gold Coast’, as identified in Attachment E, be noted.

Industrial Land uses

Council resolved on 13 June 2017 (G17.0613.012) as follows:


2. The recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment A) be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 2, including any consequential updates and alignment to Planning Act 2016 terminology.



1347 ADOPTED REPORT



2. That High Impact Industry zoned land take up rates be monitored and an investigation be undertaken when required to identify new High impact industry zoned land, to expand the Yatala enterprise area to the east of the M1 and appropriately separated from sensitive land uses.

3. That a report be brought back to realign levels of assessment and code provisions for industrial land uses in industrial zones.

Council resolved on 27 February 2018 (G18.0227.010) as follows:


2. The recommended drafting changes to City Plan (Attachment B) – City Plan drafting changes) resulting from the Councilor briefing are endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major Update 3, including any consequential updates.

3. Undertake further investigations into High impact industry zoned land as outlined in Attachment (C) – Further Investigations.

Introduction of the Low-medium density residential zone















1348 ADOPTED REPORT


1. That the report/attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That the proposed updates to City Plan, as identified in Attachment A, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

3. That the proposed drafted content, as identified in Attachment B, be endorsed in principle to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

4. That the proposed Low-medium density residential zone mapping, as identified in Attachment C, be endorsed in principle to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

5. That the proposed drafted updates to the City Plan be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review.

6. That a City Plan policy – Design and context, be prepared to include design guidelines for Low-medium density housing typologies, to be presented to Council at a future meeting for endorsement prior to being included in a Major Schedule 6 City Plan Policy amendment.

7. That the other recommendations, as identified in Attachment A, be further investigated and considered as part of a future update package.

Neighbourhood Centres Investigation



2. That the contents of this report and attachments be noted.

3. That the recommended changes to City Plan outlined in this report are endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major Update 3, including any consequential updates.

4. That the further investigations outlined in the report be progressed and reported back to Council.



2. That the recommended changes to City Plan (Attachment B) are endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.

Major building height and residential density designation anomalies

Council resolved on 30 April 2018 (G18.0430.017):

1. That the report and attachments be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2. That the proposed City Plan mapping changes as identified in Attachment A be endorsed to be included in City Plan Major update 3.

3. That the proposed City Plan updates as identified in Attachment B be endorsed to be included in City Plan Major update 3.

4. That the proposed drafted updates to the City Plan be brought back to Council for endorsement prior to submission for State interest review


1349 ADOPTED REPORT

Mapping updates

Council resolved on 23 August 2016 (G16.0823.018) as follows:


2. That as part of a future City Plan major update, the following Investigation Areas be removed from Strategic Framework Map 1 – designated urban areas with the zone reviewed (where relevant) to reflect the following recommendations:

Investigation Area Recommendation

a. Mudgeeraba (Bonogin Road) i. Review zoning of 20 Bonogin Road to consider community use on the site (Place of worship) …

d. Coomera (Amity Road) Include in best fit zones to reflect commenced uses and community infrastructure designation for a new school.

…

Retirement Living and Aged Person’s Accommodation

Council resolved on 31 January 2018 (G18.0131.014) as follows:


2. That the recommended policy positions, as identified in Attachment A as amended, be endorsed to be included as part of City Plan Major update 3.


Tables of assessment format updates



2. That land uses currently listed as impact assessment in City Plan – Part 5 – Categories of development and assessment – Material change of use tables be removed for all zones.

3. That the proposed drafted changes to the City Plan be brought back to Council for endorsement.


1350 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 7 CITY PLANNING BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 Attachment A: Council resolution in response to proposed expansion of the Gold Coast Desalination Plant

1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 I recommend that this report be considered in Closed Session pursuant to section

275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves



1.2 I recommend that the report and attachment be deemed a confidential document and

be treated as such in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the findings of an investigation into future employment opportunities for Council owned Special purpose zoned land between Boyd Street, Bilinga and the Pacific Motorway (with a focus on the Tugun depot site and landfill entry).

However, a change to the current zone is not recommended until the following have occurred:

a capping program is established (2018-19 Financial Year) for the Tugun landfill and capping is progressed (time frame to be determined)

future expansion plans for the Tugun desalination plant are completed in order to

confirm land requirements; and an ecological assessment of the subject site is undertaken to determine if Open

space zone is warranted for any areas which contain matters of environmental significance.

Until these matters are resolved, the Special purpose zone is recommended to be retained over the subject site

3 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the findings of an investigation into future employment opportunities for Council owned land between Boyd Street, Bilinga and the Pacific Motorway (with a focus on the Tugun depot site and landfill entry).


1351 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02

4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS On 5 December 2016 Council resolved (CP16.1205.008): 1 That a Council submission to the preliminary draft 2017 Gold Coast Airport Master

Plan, incorporating the issues raised in Attachment 2 (Submission Table), be delegated to the Director Planning & Environment.

2 That options to update City Plan be investigated and brought back to Council for consideration to provide new employment opportunities for Special purpose zoned land between Boyd Street, Bilinga and the Pacific Motorway including (but not limited to):

i. airport and transport services (e.g. flight catering, logistics and cargo services, aviation support services, industry); and

ii. where located at 130 & 132 Coolangatta Road (Mallaraba car park), university related activities (e.g. Education establishment and Research and technology Industry) and office based employment together with supporting retail and passenger services (e.g. Short term accommodation), with height and density to be determined as part of strategic planning for extension of the Gold Coast Light Rail Corridor.

3 That targeted consultation is carried out with Gold Coast Airport Limited, Tweed Shire Council, Southern Cross University and Department of Transport and Main Roads in development of options to update City Plan referred to in the above resolution.

On 11 May 2009 Council made resolutions (refer Attachment A) in response to a Queensland Water Commission letter relating to the proposed expansion of the Gold Coast Desalination Plant. 5 DISCUSSION 5.1 Background In preparing Council’s submission to the preliminary draft 2017 Gold Coast Airport Master Plan, an opportunity was identified to review the zoning of Council owned Special purpose zone land adjacent to the Gold Coast Airport. The subject site is located at the corner of Cobaki Parkway and Boyd Street (Lot 31 SP240300) and is presently used for the Tugun depot, Tugun landfill, sports facilities and sewerage infrastructure. The current zoning, strategic context and land uses are illustrated in Figure 1 and 2. Other land identified for review in Council resolution (CP16.1205.008) included 130 and 132 Coolangatta Road, which presently accommodates the Gold Coast Airport car park.

The proximity of the subject site to the Gold Coast Airport, Southern Cross University, John Flynn Private Hospital and Cobaki Lakes new community presents a strategic opportunity to provide additional employment lands should Council cease use of the subject site for a depot.


1352 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

34281

Typewritten Text

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Figure 1 – Subject site context

Sewerage pumping station C27 requires 250m separation to sensitive uses

Tugun Landfill requires 500m separation to sensitive uses

Sewerage pumping station TH1

Part of separate Light Rail Corridor Study


1353 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 Figure 2 – Aerial photo and City Plan zoning map

Scope limited to Council land at Boyd Street, Bilinga (focus on Tugun depot site and Landfill entry)

Boyd Street

Tugun Landfill

Desalination Plant

Depot


1354 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 Property Services Branch, Organisational Services Directorate, has advised that the infrastructure associated with the Tugun depot is aging and there could be a long-term opportunity to relocate the depot should the development potential for the land be identified. The Special purpose zone provides limited opportunities for alternative land uses on the subject site, should the depot cease operation. A key consideration for future planning of this site relates to limitations imposed from community infrastructure (Tugun landfill and the Gold Coast Desalination Plant). In 2009, part of the subject site was identified as potential land required for expansion of the Gold Coast Desalination Plant. 5.2 City Plan zone investigation A City Plan zone investigation – Boyd Street Bilinga (Lot 31 SP240300) (Attachment B) analysed options for future zoning of the subject site. The City Plan zone investigation considered site opportunities such as strategic proximity to Gold Coast Airport, Southern Cross University and John Flynn Hospital and constraints (e.g. City Plan overlays, Tugun landfill and the desalination plant). Consideration was also given to findings from the Employment Lands Planning Investigation (MacroPlan Dimasi, November 2015) and opportunities presented from an adjacent new urban area in Cobaki Lakes, New South Wales. The Tugun landfill occupies a large proportion of the subject site. Water and Waste Directorate are developing a project brief to investigate effective means and options to implement capping and rehabilitation of the site. This will also include consideration of the highest and best use for the Tugun landfill. A timeline for capping and rehabilitation of the Tugun landfill is pending the results of the investigation planned for 2018-19 financial year. The Tugun landfill capping and rehabilitation will likely require significant earthworks and installation of landfill gas management infrastructure.

This affects

planning opportunities for the adjacent Tugun depot land.

Protection of existing and future water security infrastructure is a State interest for infrastructure integration in the July 2017 State Planning Policy (SPP) which states: ‘The outcomes of significant infrastructure plans and initiatives by all levels of government are considered and reflected, where relevant.’


1355 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED


Due to the identified environmental and infrastructure planning issues, a change to the current zoning is not recommended until the following have occurred:

a capping program is established (2018-19 Financial Year) for the Tugun landfill and capping is progressed (time frame to be determined)

future expansion plans for the Tugun desalination plant are completed

and an ecological assessment of the subject site is undertaken to determine if the Open

space zone is warranted for any areas containing matters of environmental significance.

Subject to these issues being resolved, the City Plan zone investigation report concluded that would be the highest and best use for the area of land used for the Tugun depot and landfill entry. An alternative option for

was made after consideration of land use opportunities in both zones and their nexus with strategic land uses in the area. The future Cobaki Lakes development and upgrade of Boyd Street which will provide increased exposure to the subject site was also a consideration.


1356 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONAL PLAN City Plan is a key longer-term plan that supports delivery of the Corporate Plan, Gold Coast 2020. A review of land use planning opportunities for Special purpose zoned land at Boyd Street, Tugun seeks to identify future employment opportunities for the future of the City. 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Not applicable. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT Directorate Risk CO000510 ‘City Plan delivers inadequate and/or ineffective strategic/development policy (e.g. poor planning, built form, growth, social and environmental outcomes’. This project contributes to mitigating Directorate Risk CO000510 by investigating a review of City Plan to provide for more effective strategic outcomes for development on Special purpose zoned land at Boyd Street, Tugun. 9 STATUTORY MATTERS Not applicable. 10 COUNCIL POLICIES Not applicable. 11 DELEGATIONS Not applicable. 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Consulted


Is the Stakeholder Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations

Camille Kirwan, Coordinator City Plan Economy, Planning and Environment

Yes

Donald, Mackenzie, Executive Coordinator Environment

Economy, Planning and Environment

Yes

Lau Chean, Special Coordinator Strategic Infrastructure


Yes

Lauren Dykes, Coordinator Strategic City Planning


Yes

Ross McInnes, Project Manager, Property Services Branch

Organisational Services

Yes

Mark Hunting, Executive Coordinator Sewerage Catchment Planning

Water and Waste Yes

Kevin Quantick, Coordinator Waste Water and Waste Yes


1357 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Consulted


Is the Stakeholder Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations

Management Infrastructure Kim Evans, Coordinator Strategic Land Use Planning

Water and Waste Yes

Bruce Flick, Coordinator Recreational Services Lifestyle and Community

Yes

Matt Shrimpton, Executive Coordinator Transport Policy, Planning and Program

Transport and Infrastructure

Consulted on report and no issues raised

Gold Coast Airport Limited, Tweed Shire Council, Southern Cross University, Department of Transport and Main Roads and Seqwater are recommended to be provided with a copy of the Council’s City Plan zone investigation (Attachment B) for Boyd Street, Bilinga. 13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS There are no internal or external stakeholder impacts arising from this report. 14 TIMING This report does not propose immediate changes to City Plan. It will be several years before the full extent of Tugun desalination plant land requirements are identified and a decision can be made to rezone land for future employment activities. 15 CONCLUSION A City Plan zone investigation report (Attachment B) has identified future employment opportunities for Special purpose zoned land between Boyd Street, Bilinga and the Pacific Motorway (with a focus on the Tugun depot site and landfill entry).

Due to the identified environmental and infrastructure planning issues, a change to zone is not recommended until:

capping of the Tugun landfill is progressed

future expansion plans for the Tugun desalination plant are completed ; and

an ecological assessment of the subject site is undertaken to determine if the Open space zone is warranted for any areas containing matters of environmental significance.


1358 ADOPTED REPORT

34281

Typewritten Text

REDACTED

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 16 RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That the report and attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts


2 That the contents of the City Plan zone investigation report for Boyd Street, Bilinga (Attachment B) be noted.

3 That Gold Coast Airport Limited, Tweed Shire Council, Southern Cross University, Department of Transport and Main Roads and Seqwater are informed of Council’s City Plan zone investigation report for Boyd Street, Bilinga (Attachment B).


Justin Collofello Alisha Swain Principal Regional Planner Director Economy Planning & Environment 4 May 2018


1359 ADOPTED REPORT


Committee Recommendation Changed At Council 23 May 2018 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION EPE18.0523.007 moved Cr O’Neill seconded Cr Baildon 1 That the report and attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts deemed by

the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.



CARRIED ADOPTED AT COUNCIL 23 MAY 2018 RESOLUTION G18.0529.021 moved Cr Tate seconded Cr O’Neill

That Committee Recommendation EPE18.0523.007 be adopted with the addition of Parts 4 5 & 6 such that it reads as follows:- 1 That the report and attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those




4 That an ecological assessment of the subject land is undertaken to recommend open space zones contained for any areas which contain matters of critical environmental significance and a report be brought back to Council by 30 June 2019.

5 A capping program is established in 2018-19 financial year to remove the risk of commercial uses affecting the existing landfill Environmental Authority

6 That the Mayor writes to the state to settle future expansion plans and land use requirements for the Tugun Desalination Plant.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY There being no further business the meeting was declared closed at 10.07am


1360 ADOPTED REPORT

Attachment A – Council resolution in response to proposed expansion of the Gold Coast Desalination Plant


1361 ADOPTED REPORT

521st Council Meeting 11 May 2009 Draft Master Plan for Boyd Street Precinct and Proposed Desalination Plant Expansion RESOLUTION G09.0511.021 moved Cr Robbins seconded Cr Clarke 1 Council note the progress of the draft Boyd Street Precinct Master Plan. 2 Council endorses a revised planning document be drafted and called the Boyd

Street Community Precinct Plan. 3 Council note the revised document, revised communication plan and

associated communications material will be brought back to Council in a further report for approval to proceed to public consultation.

4 Council agrees in principle to a collaborative master planning process, as

proposed by QWC officers, ensuring timing, roles and responsibilities of the relevant parties etc are resolved to the GCCC CEOs satisfaction and provided the Premier has given the commitment of a whole of government involvement.

5 Council endorses a request for all future costs to Council associated with the

Queensland Government master plan process, including Council internal resources, community consultation and materials and further studies, be funded by the Queensland Government.

6 Council writes to the Queensland Government advising that Council does not

support the proposed desalination expansion at Tugun or establishment of another desalination plant at other sites within the south coast region as this region has significantly contributed to the SEQ water grid already.

7 QWC be advised that Council supports the unconditional exclusion of South

Stradbroke Island from the potential desalination site list as identified in the site evaluation studies undertaken as part of the draft SEQWS.

8 Council requests that the QLD Government immediately secure and transfer

ownership to Council suitable land for a southern Gold Coast regional sporting complex.

9 Council requests the QLD Government build the desalination access road to

remove through traffic from the BDSC. 10 Council advise the QLD Government that the landfill site will be utilised as an

active landfill for the southern area of the Gold Coast until such time as an alternative facility is operational.

11 Council advise the QLD Government if the expansion of the desalination site

occurs that Council can not be responsible for the relocation of infrastructure. 12 Council notes the affected infrastructure includes the C27 pump station/rising

mains, and establishment/relocation of the effected sporting fields to the previously QLD Government purchased land.

13 Council advise the QLD Government that in the event of any loss of potential

revenue to Council (eg. by the non-pursuit of projects such as the extension of the QR corridor to Coolangatta) that appropriate compensation is sought to offset the revenue foregone.


1362 ADOPTED REPORT

A division was called Voting For 15 Cr Gates, Cr Wayne, Cr Pforr, Cr Grummitt, Cr Young, Cr Crichlow,

Cr Douglas, Cr La Castra, Cr Shepherd, Cr Sarroff, Cr Grew, Cr Betts, Cr McDonald, Cr Robbins, Cr Clarke

Against 0 Abstained 0 Absent 0

CARRIED


1363 ADOPTED REPORT

ITEM 7 (Continued) BOYD STREET, BILINGA SPECIAL PURPOSE ZONE INVESTIGATION PD113/1275/02 REDACTED – Attachment pages 1364-1408


1364 ADOPTED REPORT

These Pages

Numbered 1 to 1409

Constitute The Adopted Report Of The Meeting

Of The Economy, Planning and Environment Committee

Held Wednesday, 23 May 2018


1409 ADOPTED REPORT

of the economy, planning & environment committee meeting · 2019-06-23 · adoption by council...

Documents