7/23/2019 One Year_ Storyteller-In-Chief - The New Yorker

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/one-year-storyteller-in-chief-the-new-yorker 1/2

Save paper and follow @newyorker on Twitter 

JANUARY 20, 2010

One Year: Storyteller-in-ChiefBY JUNOT DÍAZ

It has always seemed to me that one of a President’s primary responsibilities is to be astoryteller. We all know the importance of narratives, of stories; they are part of the

reasons our brains are so damn big. We need stories, we thrive on them, stories are

how we shape our universe. Tolkien could have been talking about the power of stories

 when he described his One Ring: stories rule us, they find us, they bring us together,

they bind us, and, yes, they can pull us apart as well. If a President is to have any 

success, if his policies are going to gain any kind of traction among the electorate, he

first has to tell us a story.

 All year I’ve been waiting for Obama to flex his narrative muscles, to tell the story of his presidency, of his Administration, to tell the story of where our country is going

and why we should help deliver it there. A coherent, accessible, compelling story—one

that is narrow enough to be held in our minds and hearts and that nevertheless is

roomy enough for us, the audience, to weave our own predilections, dreams, fears,

experiences into its fabric. It should necessarily be a story eight years in duration, a

story that no matter what our personal politics are will excite us enough to go out and

reëlect the teller just so we can be there for the story’s end. But from where I sit our

President has not even told a bad story; he, in my opinion, has told no story at all. Iheard him talk healthcare to death but while he was elaborating ideas his opponents

 were telling stories. Sure they were bad ones, full of distortions and outright lies, but at

least they were talking to the American people in the correct idiom: that of narrative.

 The President gave us a raft of information about why healthcare would be a swell

idea; the Republicans gave us death panels. Ideas are wonderful things, but unless

they’re couched in a good story they can do nothing.

 The man has tried, of course; we’ve gotten patches of narrative around all the

important issues—the economy, the war in Afghanistan, the war on terror (a.k.a. theUndiebomber)—but I’ve yet to hear anything that excites that part of my brain which

loves, which craves the symmetries the pleasures of well-told tale. Just this past

 Tuesday we saw the consequences for the President of not having a real story to draw 

upon. In Massachusetts, the President was faced with an insurgent Republican

candidate who was telling a story that should have been familiar to the Commander-

in-Chief: the story of an upstart outsider with energy and ideas, who was going to

shake things up, etc. The President tried to help Martha Coakely by campaigning, but

since his Administration doesn’t seem to do story he couldn’t lend her one. He couldonly show up as himself, and that clearly was not enough. A man cannot withstand a

story, even if the man is remarkable and the story is simple. The story always wins.

 

7/23/2019 One Year_ Storyteller-In-Chief - The New Yorker

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/one-year-storyteller-in-chief-the-new-yorker 2/2

(What I’ve been aware of is how much better storytellers the members of the

opposition are. Tea Parties and death panels—you might hate these bursts of craziness

but these are, above all else, stories, narratives. Obama has provided his supporters

 with what, exactly? Even the Bush administration, for all its criminal shortcomings,

knew the value of a good story. Which is why, when 9/11 befell us, they rode that

tragedy for all it was worth. Got a good six years out of it, too.)

It is ironic—no it ’s actually tragic—that the man who proved himself to be a fantasticstoryteller on the campaign trail, who vaulted into office by fashioning his life, his

promise into a great story (“Dreams from My Father,” anyone?) has been unable to

locate an equally engaging narrative for his presidency.

Sometimes I wonder if he’s even trying.

I’ve been an Obama man all the way. I voted for him in 2008 and I’ll vote for him

again in 2012, with far less enthusiasm. But it would help me out so much if he could

give me some kind of story to hang onto. At this stage, a scrap would suffice. APresident can have all the vision in the world, be an extraordinary orator and a superb

politician, have courage and foresight and a willingness to make painful choices, have a

bold progressive plan for his nation—but none of these things will matter a wit if the

President cannot couch his vision, his policies, his courage, his will, his plan in the

idiom of story. It is hard to feel invested in a terrible story or a confused story or, in

the case of the current Administration, no story at all. Obama needs to craft a strong

story, and fast, if he expects to be able to accomplish anything in the three years that

remain. His opponents are hard at work smithing their stories, and Obama soon

might find himself surrounded on all sides by crude powerful tales that no amount of 

ratiocination will be able to dispel. The President needs to remember his post’s true

 vocation: that of the Storyteller-in-Chief.

Losing the super majority won’t kill the Obama presidency. It’s his sudden inability to

tell a good tale that will be his death-knell. If I were him, I’d have hired fewer Ivy 

League policy wonks and brought in a couple of storytellers.

Read more on Obama’s first year.(http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2010/01/one-year.html)

 Junot Díaz was named one of The New Yorker ’s “20 Under 40” in1999 and has regularly contributed both fiction and nonfiction since1995.