open sources of the invention of the airplane peter b. meyer, u.s. bureau of labor statistics * *...
TRANSCRIPT
Open sources of the inventionof the airplane
Peter B. Meyer, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics*
* Findings and views are those of the author, not the Bureau
2008 User and Open Innovation Workshop, August 4-6, 2008
Pre-history of the airplane1860s Aeronautical clubs and journals arise1894 Survey book by Chanute1903 Wright brothers’ powered-glider flight1909 An industry exists
Experiments and designs developed slowlyMany were documented and shared openly
Chanute’s 1894 book Progress in Flying Machines refers to many experimenters
and authorsExperimenter/ group
Pagesref’ing
Location(background)
Maxim 33Britain
(from US)
Lilienthal 31 Germany
Penaud 22 France
Mouillard 21Algeria, Egypt(from France)
Hargrave 19Australia
(from Britain)
Moy 19 Britain
Le Bris 17 France
Langley 16 US
Wenham 15 Britain
Phillips 14 Britain
These people wrote and published and were known to one another.
The activity/network was international
The Wrights read and referred to these people heavily.
Historical accounts refer to them heavily.
Before 1903, fixed-wing aircraft patents exist, but don’t matter.
Looks like open innovation?
Autonomous innovators (not hierarchy, not cult) Sharing technical info in public space, including failures
Intellectual property set aside Diverse objectives, including intrinsic, altruistic ones
Want to fly! Curious Hope for recognition Hope to help bring peace, or make own nation safer)
Internationally dispersed collaboration Role for moderator / evangelist / supporter
Micro-economic model Imagine self-motivated tinkerers with some project
“progress” is rewarding to them in future (in utility function) They’d use time, effort, money for experiments
Imagine their experiments have some value to one another Assume they cannot see how a marketable product would arise They’d share findings with other tinkerers They prefer not to bother with intellectual property Moderator/evangelist role arises naturally They’d be willing to specialize to avoid duplication They’d be willing to standardize design and tools
Market processes are not necessary for these effects
Implications
Invention of airplane looks like open innovation. Tinkerer model assumptions generate open
innovation. This process can generate new industries.